[Xerte] Re: Xerte Digest, Vol 43, Issue 33

[Pat Lockley]

the only change that isn't in the files would possibly be the addition
of the ldap table (which removes the requirement of $$$ in
sitedetails).

If you download the zip, look in the setup folder for the sql and copy
the create table instruction out of that (there will be a dollar
symbol that represents your database table prefix).

On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:53 AM,  <C.J.Fryer at lse.ac.uk> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley
>> Sent: 22 September 2011 17:32
>> To: Xerte discussion list
>> Subject: [Xerte] Re: Bug in XOT 1.7 ldap authentication
>>
>> ooops, if only it didn't say eureka_site i could have blamed
>> some one else.
>>
>> the ldap table should come in version 1.7?
>>
>> Is your install without an ldap table (as this removes the $$$
>> ugliness)? The installer should add one entry to the ldap table (if
>> entered in the installer).
>
> I am upgrading to 1.7 from an earlier version.  Sorry I didn't make that
> clear in my original message.
>
> I'm not sure which version I am upgrading from.  Do you know how I can
> determine that?  Perhaps it doesn't matter.
>
> Other than simply overwrite the old files, what should I do to complete
> the upgrade?
>
> Chris
>
> Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://lse.ac.uk/emailDisclaimer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte mailing list
> Xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
>