[Xerte-dev] Re: 1.9 modularisation

[Pat Lockley]

Don't know - I would argue it makes sense to wait for 2.0, but that is a
bit like waiting for X as 2.0 doesn't have a date. This what the roadmap
should do really, should be a community decision around dates.

I think the next version should be Xenith, and putting other templates in
would just confuse people. Also if Xenith works in 1.8 then adding in the
1.9 stuff would offer a complication that isn't a requirement. Xenith works
without modularisation, so if this is the Xenith release then make it that
and what is in 1.8.

I'm half using XOT at work locally, and I'm not that fussed if no one else
is using modularisation (I need it for what I do, if no one else wants it,
not bothered by it)




On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Julian Tenney <
Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:

> Ok, leave it then. But following your argumment, when would there be a
> point?
> ________________________________________
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley [
> patrick.lockley at googlemail.com]
> Sent: 13 November 2012 10:57
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: 1.9 modularisation
>
> Is there much point if the changes suggested sound like v2?
>
> All it would do is make the xerte side of the code different for no
> benefit (unless someone wants another template type)
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Julian Tenney <
> Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>>
> wrote:
> Can you merge it into trunk please?
> ________________________________________
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley [
> patrick.lockley at googlemail.com<mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com>]
> Sent: 12 November 2012 16:17
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] 1.9 modularisation
>
> Ignoring this morning's chat about libraries
>
> All of the modularisation stuff is now committed to 1.9.
>
> If anyone wants a pointer on how to create a module let me know as you can
> make pretty much what you want now.
>
> Some more emails later on to discuss certain points.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do
> not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in
> any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this
> email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20121113/8a34671c/attachment.html>