[Xerte-dev] Re: 1.9 modularisation

[Julian Tenney]

Ok, leave it then. But following your argumment, when would there be a point?
________________________________________
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley [patrick.lockley at googlemail.com]
Sent: 13 November 2012 10:57
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: 1.9 modularisation

Is there much point if the changes suggested sound like v2?

All it would do is make the xerte side of the code different for no benefit (unless someone wants another template type)


On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Julian Tenney <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>> wrote:
Can you merge it into trunk please?
________________________________________
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley [patrick.lockley at googlemail.com<mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com>]
Sent: 12 November 2012 16:17
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] 1.9 modularisation

Ignoring this morning's chat about libraries

All of the modularisation stuff is now committed to 1.9.

If anyone wants a pointer on how to create a module let me know as you can make pretty much what you want now.

Some more emails later on to discuss certain points.

_______________________________________________
Xerte-dev mailing list
Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>
http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.