[Xerte-dev] Re: 1.9 modularisation

[Pat Lockley]

Is there much point if the changes suggested sound like v2?

All it would do is make the xerte side of the code different for no benefit
(unless someone wants another template type)


On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Julian Tenney <
Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:

> Can you merge it into trunk please?
> ________________________________________
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley [
> patrick.lockley at googlemail.com]
> Sent: 12 November 2012 16:17
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] 1.9 modularisation
>
> Ignoring this morning's chat about libraries
>
> All of the modularisation stuff is now committed to 1.9.
>
> If anyone wants a pointer on how to create a module let me know as you can
> make pretty much what you want now.
>
> Some more emails later on to discuss certain points.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do
> not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in
> any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this
> email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20121113/0e401ab2/attachment-0001.html>