[Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
Tom Reijnders
reijnders at tor.nl
Fri May 11 11:50:05 BST 2012
Ehmmm, can we get to a consensus ...
This is what I have up and running now...
Op 11-5-2012 12:48, Ron Mitchell schreef:
> ok here goes - revision of what we have right now...
>
> There are several ways to export a project. An exported project is packaged,
> but not deleted, into a zip file for you to share with another user, to
> deploy on the web, or to import into a SCORM compliant LMS or VLE. You can
> choose whether to export all of the project's files, or just those files
> used by the project.
>
> Export:
>
> 1. Export for deployment. Contains only the files required for importing
> into a vle (without SCORM tracking), sharing via CD or USB etc or importing
> into another XOT installation.
>
> Checkbox (unchecked by default) Convert to local links where possible
> Tick here if you want references to files uploaded to this LO via the Media
> & Quota tab to be converted so that access to XOT is no longer required.
>
>
> 2. Archive export. Complete backup including all required files for offline
> editing with the Xerte developer application or for sharing with other Xerte
> developer application users.
>
>
> If you want to export a SCORM package, you can choose to export SCORM 1.2 or
> SCORM 2004 packages. If you don't know which version of SCORM you need, the
> SCORM 1.2 package will work in most LMS and VLE systems.
>
>
> SCORM Export:
>
> 4.SCORM 1.2 package
>
> 5.SCORM 2004 3rd Ed package
>
> HTH
> Ron
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Tenney
> Sent: 11 May 2012 11:27
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>
>> Explaining why you would or wouldn't use that checkbox option could be
> covered outside of the interface as it is with the Techdis tutorials and
> perhaps now the community site.
>
> No, I think we need to find the words to explain the scenario for this
> option on the tab.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
> Sent: 11 May 2012 11:25
> To: 'For Xerte technical developers'
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>
> Because that could lead to chaos! ;-)
>
> It seems to me we all agree we have 4 export types/links + a checkbox to
> convert to local if required.
>
> Explaining why you would or wouldn't use that checkbox option could be
> covered outside of the interface as it is with the Techdis tutorials and
> perhaps now the community site.
>
> Don't we have FWS with those 4 options + checkbox?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley
> Sent: 11 May 2012 11:11
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>
> i mean for sysadmins
>
> you've all got your own opinions on how you'd like it to look, so let people
> set it their way.
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Julian Tenney
> <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Flippin Well Simple.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Reijnders
>> Sent: 11 May 2012 11:04
>>
>>
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> FWS ???
>>
>> Op 11-5-2012 11:56, Pat Lockley schreef:
>>
>> Suggestion (to save inboxes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Why not have in the languages folders a policy where if you have
>>
>>
>>
>> export.inc as the default
>>
>>
>>
>> if
>>
>>
>>
>> export_modified.inc exists
>>
>>
>>
>> then this is loaded instead of export
>>
>>
>>
>> so you can have your own interface?
>>
>> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Ron Mitchell
>> <ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>> For me the real value of the local export is this:
>>
>>
>>
>> User are authoring in the sandpit (or another XOT install) and want to
>> link to Word or PowerPoint documents etc which aren't online so they
>> import them via media and quota and link to them. Whilst learners are
>> accessing from XOT all fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> Author the exports for use via vle and or locally via USB/CD. Author
>> then needs choice whether those word/ppt links should be converted to
>> local links or not. Sandpit users would have to choose convert to
>> local because there assets would be wiped anyway. In other cases LO's
>> may contain links to lot's of online resources and sites so
>> connectivity is required even when viewing locally and keeping the
>> media folder links pointing back to XOT can be very useful especially
> where assets are shared or updated regularly.
>>
>>
>> The checkbox option gives the author control which is great.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Reijnders
>> Sent: 11 May 2012 10:21
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> I would love to oblige, but what do you actually suggest? I mean point
>> 2 contains 2 different exports (Scorm 1.2 and Scorm 2004). Just make
>> those two links in that line?
>>
>> And what do we do with 'local'
>>
>> All the code is there (need to debug scorm2004, that's probably a typo
>> somewhere), the actual export done are parameters to export.php. So we
>> only need to figure out how to do the UI right now.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> Op 11-5-2012 11:15, Julian Tenney schreef:
>>
>> OK, lets do that.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron
>> Mitchell
>> Sent: 11 May 2012 10:15
>> To: 'For Xerte technical developers'
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Only listed that order because that's the order that's there now and
>> effectively has been previously but yes probably makes more sense to
>> swap 1 and 3
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. Export for deployment. Contains only the files required for
>> importing into a vle without SCORM tracking, sharing via CD or USB etc
>> or importing into another XOT install
>>
>> 2. Export for SCORM deployment: self contained, SCORM 1.2 or SCORM
>> 2004 enables tracking of Quiz scores e.g. into Moodle gradebook
>>
>> 3. Archive export. Complete backup including offline editing and
>> round-tripping back to toolkits or sharing with other Xerte users.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian
>> Tenney
>> Sent: 11 May 2012 10:01
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> I'd switch the order of 1 and 2 or maybe 1 and 3.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron
>> Mitchell
>> Sent: 11 May 2012 09:52
>> To: 'For Xerte technical developers'
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>>> AFAIK, very few people do the roundtrip thing to xerte on windows.<
>>
>>
>> I think there's more than you think and more than we know. They aren't
>> developers, they're teachers in all sorts of organisations who might
>> start off with the Techdis sandpit but then learn they can use the
>> same easy to use interface in the developer tool and that becomes the
>> way the create and edit whilst waiting for their own organisation's
>> installation. There were quite a few people at the event on Wednesday
>> who had been using Xerte not XOT but had started on the sandpit and
>> exported. The full export has always been useful in this respect and a
>> selling point. I can see things might need to change in the future but
>> please keep this for now unless there's really good reason not to?
>>
>>
>>
>>> Export for sharing with another XOT install (maybe the same output as
>>> self contained deployment - or is this different?<
>>
>>
>> In my experience most XOT users export as 'normal zip' rather than
>> scorm and then import into their vle (usually moodle) and link to
>> index.htm. I appreciate that they would be better just linking from
>> XOT but for various reasons many still go the export route and
>> obviously sandpit users do this because of the monthly wiping. Another
>> reason is that display of scorm imports in Moodle in particular are
>> often constrained by the frameset display and/or sitewide scorm module
>> settings so people prefer the non-scorm route where score tracking
>> isn't required. I guess this might change if more page types are
>> tracked with Tom's developments but for now I think there's still a
>> need
> for non-scorm deployment.
>>
>>
>> So tweaking your list...
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. Archive export. Complete backup including offline editing and
>> round-tripping back to toolkits or sharing with other Xerte users.
>>
>> 2. Export for deployment. Contains only the files required for
>> importing into a vle without scorm tracking, sharing via CD or USB etc
>> or importing into another XOT install
>>
>> 3. Export for Scorm deployment: self contained, SCORM 1.2 or SCORM
>> 2004 enables tracking of Quiz scores e.g. into Moodle gradebook
>>
>>
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Ron
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian
>> Tenney
>> Sent: 11 May 2012 09:17
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Maybe it's useful to list the scenarios:
>>
>>
>>
>> Export for deployment: self contained, SCORM 1.2 or SCORM 2004
>>
>> Export for sharing with another XOT install (maybe the same output as
>> self contained deployment - or is this different?)
>>
>> Export for offline editing and round-tripping back to toolkits - this
>> is what you get when you click a source code link in xpert as well?
>>
>>
>>
>> That's all of them?
>>
>>
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian
>> Tenney
>> Sent: 11 May 2012 09:12
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> This is starting to feel like a FWS failure.
>>
>>
>>
>> In options 1 and 2, the exported project loads media from the
>> originating server? Is that what 'full URL' means, i.e.
>> 'http://ltdev.nottingham.ac.uk/etc/'
>>
>>
>>
>> Supporting the roundtrip edit -> export -> edit in xerte for windows
>> -> import -> continue editing might be something we want to drop in
>> -> the
> future.
>> I don't know how this will work in an HTML5 world. Increasingly,
>> connectivity is everywhere, and there's less need to support this than
>> there was. By far the most useful export is the one for deployment,
>> with a minimal set of files, including only the media used /
>> referenced in
> the project.
>>
>>
>> AFAIK, very few people do the roundtrip thing to xerte on windows.
>>
>>
>>
>> It useful to have an export for sharing with other XOT users at
>> different locations. When these projects are imported, the project
>> folder gets all the models / thumbs etc - this doesn't really need to
>> happen, but I'm not sure why Pat made it work like this - maybe just
>> easy coding, or maybe because we cope with templates the receiving
>> install doesn't know about, or templates that are out of synch with
>> the
> receiving systems models / engine etc?).
>>
>>
>> The SCORM zips are for deployment, so I think that's straightforward.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron
>> Mitchell
>> Sent: 10 May 2012 21:44
>> To: 'For Xerte technical developers'
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> I guess I'm falling into the trap of 'how it used to be' e.g. whatever
>> zip export I had I could extract and edit in Xerte.
>>
>>
>>
>> However I can understand the advantage of not exporting unused media
>> in terms of file space saving etc but I'm not sure about the value of
>> not including the files required to edit unless including them causes
>> a
> problem?
>>
>>
>> Effectively this means If I want to have an offline copy for safe
>> keeping that I can edit as well as import into a vle and track I have
>> to export twice - a full archive and a scorm export whereas previously
>> the scorm export would enable both. Has this been discussed in this
>> context e.g. is there a problem including the .xwd and any other files
>> required to edit as part of all the exports?
>>
>>
>>
>> Personally no I don't think the links should always be converted to
>> local links in fact quite the opposite. I've been showing people how
>> to re-use assets by creating an lo just for that purpose e.g. if
>> there's media and files used with lots of different LO's then upload
>> to an asset only LO and then use those links in any number of LO's.
>> This also means that linked documents can be updated once in one place
>> so I think having choice of whether to keep the full url links or
>> localise them is useful even if the asset is in the same lo.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Ron
>>
>>
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Reijnders
>> Sent: 10 May 2012 21:19
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> The option 2, 3, 4 and 5 miss files you need to be able to edit them.
>> The zip archives just contain the bare minimum.
>>
>> I wonder if the behaviour with the links of 3 should always happen....
>> and then get rid of option 3.
>>
>> Op 10-5-2012 22:03, Ron Mitchell schreef:
>>
>> Have committed that small mod.
>>
>>
>>
>> As far as I can tell option 3 works like this...
>>
>>
>>
>> I upload a file via properties> media& quota and copy that full url
>> link
>>
>> I then add that link to a text area of the same LO somewhere
>>
>>
>>
>> export options 1. and 2. include the file in the exported media folder
>> but the link to the file added via media& quota remain full url links
>>
>>
>>
>> export option 3 changes the link to the file added via media and quota
>> to FileLocation + 'media/filename' rather than full url.
>>
>>
>>
>> I also wondered what happens if the linked file was added to a
>> different lo and in that case the export retains the full url so I
>> guess the code must check for the LO ID or something and only convert
>> the links to local links if the same lo.
>>
>>
>>
>> However I'm not sure whether it's just my install of Xerte but at the
>> moment there seems to be a problem when trying to edit an LO exported
>> with option 2 and 3. If I double click the .rlt xerte fires up but
>> then automatically minimises and can't be restored e.g. can't edit the
>> file. The same lo exported with option 1 edits just fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> In testing all this I also found another bug - when uploading via
>> properties
>>> media& quota the uploaded file doesn't appear even though it is
> uploaded.
>>
>>
>> I'll add these issues to the Google doc.
>>
>>
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Ron
>>
>>
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Reijnders
>> Sent: 10 May 2012 20:27
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Please do. We still need to figure out what option 3 is doing.... :-)
>>
>> Op 10-5-2012 21:24, Ron Mitchell schreef:
>>
>> Hi Tom
>>
>> on the test server I just replaced the export template with a copy
>> that has<br></br> in the relevant places e.g.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Does that seem ok? If so shall I commit that quick modification?
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Ron
>>
>>
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron
>> Mitchell
>> Sent: 10 May 2012 20:09
>> To: 'For Xerte technical developers'
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> That looks good to me but I'd be inclined to add a return between each
>> link just so it's less easy to click the wrong link by mistake.
>>
>>
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Ron
>>
>>
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Reijnders
>> Sent: 10 May 2012 19:59
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> How about this for now?
>>
>>
>>
>> Op 10-5-2012 18:49, Tom Reijnders schreef:
>>
>> I think this looks good, and I am happy to explain 3, if I knew what
>> it is doing.
>>
>> Op 10-5-2012 15:31, Julian Tenney schreef:
>>
>> Do we need to add some wording to make this easy to understand: I
>> might not know what 'with references to local files altered' means, so
>> it
> might read:
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------
>>
>> There are several ways to export a project. An exported project is
>> packaged, but not deleted, into a zip file for you to share with
>> another user, to deploy on the web, or to import into a SCORM
>> compliant LMS or VLE. You can choose whether to export all of the
>> project's files, or just those files used by the project. [Need some
> explanation around option 3 here].
>>
>>
>> Export Zip Archive with all media files from the project
>>
>> Zip Archive with just the media files used in the
>> project
>>
>> Zip archive suitable for yadda yadda yadda
>>
>>
>>
>> If you want to export a SCORM package, you can choose to export SCORM
>> 1.2 or SCORM 2004 packages. If you don't know which version of SCORM
>> you need, the SCORM 1.2 package will work in most LMS and VLE systems.
>>
>>
>>
>> Export Scorm 1.2 Package
>>
>> Scorm 2004 Package.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> Happy for any ideas / refinements? Also I can't remember what the
>> point of option 3 was..? I'll see if I can find anything in my mail...
>>
>>
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Reijnders
>> Sent: 10 May 2012 09:42
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Op 9-5-2012 12:33, Julian Tenney schreef:
>>
>> Yep.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Reijnders
>>
>> Sent: 09 May 2012 11:30
>>
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>>
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> Difference between zip and local? Ehmmm... That's what I asked you
>> guys
>>
>> last week... :-)
>>
>>
>>
>> I'll make a quick page first, then we can at least test the
>>
>> functionality. UI shouldn't be that big of a problems afterwards. Agree?
>>
>>
>>
>> Op 9-5-2012 11:53, Julian Tenney schreef:
>>
>> Sorry, whats the difference between local and zip?
>>
>>
>>
>> Otherwise, yes merge the two 1.2 exports.
>>
>>
>>
>> I like the idea of a drop down list to select which one.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Reijnders
>>
>> Sent: 09 May 2012 10:52
>>
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>>
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> No, didn't do anything since last time yet. Current state is that
>> there
>>
>> are 5 exports:
>>
>>
>>
>> Zip : will only export used media and will export jMolViewer and/or
>>
>> mapstraction when used. Will not export the viewer because I need to
>>
>> look at that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Local zip: Same but with some changes to the urls
>>
>>
>>
>> SCORM 1.2
>>
>>
>>
>> SCORM 1.2 with extra meta data
>>
>>
>>
>> SCORM 2004
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> As far as I can tell we can bundle the two SCORM exports. (Always use
>>
>> SCORM with extra MetaData)
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> Op 9-5-2012 11:36, Julian Tenney schreef:
>>
>> I don't want to see this splinter into a complicated page with loads
>> of options. Ideally there might be some code that loops over each
>> filename and sees if it exists anywhere in the xml and then exports
>> it: that would cover hyperlinks too, and the user only has one option.
>>
>>
>>
>> Otherwise we start ending up with a slightly baffling local? Scorm?
>> Scorm 2004? Full? Minimal? Deployment? When people just want to get
> something out.
>>
>>
>> Are these changes on the test server now?
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Reijnders
>>
>> Sent: 05 May 2012 19:23
>>
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>>
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> That's why I proposed a small(er) Deployment Export and a Full export,
>>
>> The Deployment export would be a new choice. That started the
>>
>> export/download discussion.
>>
>>
>>
>> Op 5-5-2012 20:13, Ron Mitchell schreef:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Only just catching up on discussions that I couldn't follow on Thurs&
>>
>> Friday...
>>
>>
>>
>> Personally I think export/download whatever it's called should include
>> all
>>
>> the media in the media folder not just used media. The reason being
>>
>> sometimes files are uploaded via media and quota to simply link to via
>> text
>>
>> hyperlink (and that hyperlink might even be in a linked document
>> rather than
>>
>> a xerte page) or when trying different content as part of a particular
>> page
>>
>> or project, so just because these show as not used doesn't mean they
>> might
>>
>> not be required or used in future. I know that links like this might
>> not
>>
>> work in the exported project but I think an author naturally assumes
>> that
>>
>> export includes all their media and if it's a matter of reducing size
>> they
>>
>> can delete unwanted media via media& quota before exporting. e.g.
>> owner
>>
>> should control what's exported and the reason for exporting might
>> simply be
>>
>> as a backup of the whole project.
>>
>>
>>
>> HTH
>>
>> Ron
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Reijnders
>>
>> Sent: 03 May 2012 16:25
>>
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>>
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>>
>>
>> I just committed an update to the export code:
>>
>>
>>
>> Fixes and additions for export
>>
>> - Should copy all the language .xml files from the top of the
>> /language
>>
>> folder
>>
>> - Should enable scorm2004 compliant export
>>
>> - Should copy JMolViewer and/or mapstraction folders if and only
>> if those
>>
>> models are used
>>
>> - Should ONLY export the used media, the rest is not copied
>>
>> - small fixes in htaccess.conf
>>
>> - small fixes in library/Xerte/Authentication/Db.php
>>
>> - get rid of superfuous scorm files
>>
>> - move MainPreloader.swf, rloObject.js and resources.swf out of
>> scorm in
>>
>> in their own folder (modules/xerte/export)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I wonder whether we should prevent exporting the thumbs folder as well...
>>
>>
>>
>> David (Goodwin), I used the Db method and had to fix two typos.
>> Comitted
>>
>> thos as well. BTW, with the current code it is NOT that easy to set a
>>
>> password in the database... ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>> Op 3-5-2012 14:25, Pat Lockley schreef:
>>
>> i couldn't see them failing, was just wondering if the scorm one might
>>
>> conflict.
>>
>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Tom Reijnders<reijnders at tor.nl> wrote:
>>
>> I will, but they are really simple.
>>
>>
>>
>> Op 3-5-2012 14:01, Pat Lockley schreef:
>>
>> Tom, could you check the rewrite rules work - worried the scorm ones
>>
>> might have hungry regexs?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:57 PM, David Goodwin<david at palepurple.co.uk>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> On 3 May 2012, at 12:48, Pat Lockley wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> i like to leave the odd bug in to encourage other developers
>>
>> Nice.... thanks for making me laugh :)
>>
>>
>>
>> David.
>>
>>
>>
>> Pale Purple Ltd. (Company No: 5580814) 'Business Web Application
>>
>> Development and Training in PHP'
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.palepurple.co.uk
>>
>> Office: 0845 0046746 Mobile: 07792380669
>>
>>
>>
>> Follow us on Twitter: @PalePurpleLtd
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the
>>
>> addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have
>>
>> received this message in
>>
>> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please
>>
>> do not
>>
>> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or
>>
>> in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author
>>
>> of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University
>> of
>>
>> Nottingham.
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>>
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage
>>
>> your computer
>>
>> system:
>>
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications
>>
>> with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by
>>
>> UK legislatio
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the
>>
>> addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have
>> received
>>
>> this message in
>>
>> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please
>> do
>>
>> not
>>
>> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or
>>
>> in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of
>>
>> this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of
>>
>> Nottingham.
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>>
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage
>>
>> your computer
>>
>> system:
>>
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications
>>
>> with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK
>>
>> legislation.
>>
>> --
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom Reijnders
>>
>> TOR Informatica
>>
>> Chopinlaan 27
>>
>> 5242HM Rosmalen
>>
>> Tel: 073 5226191
>>
>> Fax: 073 5226196
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and
>>
>> may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in
>>
>> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please
>> do not
>>
>> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in
>> any
>>
>> attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this
>> email do
>>
>> not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>>
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
>>
>> computer system:
>>
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with
>>
>> the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK
>>
>> legislation.
>>
>> --
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom Reijnders
>>
>> TOR Informatica
>>
>> Chopinlaan 27
>>
>> 5242HM Rosmalen
>>
>> Tel: 073 5226191
>>
>> Fax: 073 5226196
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom Reijnders
>>
>> TOR Informatica
>>
>> Chopinlaan 27
>>
>> 5242HM Rosmalen
>>
>> Tel: 073 5226191
>>
>> Fax: 073 5226196
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete
>> it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in
>> this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by
>> the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system:
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with
>> the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK
> legislation.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete
>> it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in
>> this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by
>> the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>>
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment
>>
>> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer
> system:
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with
>> the
>>
>> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom Reijnders
>>
>> TOR Informatica
>>
>> Chopinlaan 27
>>
>> 5242HM Rosmalen
>>
>> Tel: 073 5226191
>>
>> Fax: 073 5226196
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete
>> it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in
>> this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by
>> the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>>
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment
>>
>> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer
> system:
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with
>> the
>>
>> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom Reijnders
>>
>> TOR Informatica
>>
>> Chopinlaan 27
>>
>> 5242HM Rosmalen
>>
>> Tel: 073 5226191
>>
>> Fax: 073 5226196
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete
>> it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in
>> this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by
>> the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>>
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment
>>
>> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer
> system:
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with
>> the
>>
>> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom Reijnders
>>
>> TOR Informatica
>>
>> Chopinlaan 27
>>
>> 5242HM Rosmalen
>>
>> Tel: 073 5226191
>>
>> Fax: 073 5226196
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete
>> it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in
>> this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by
>> the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>>
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment
>>
>> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer
> system:
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with
>> the
>>
>> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom Reijnders
>>
>> TOR Informatica
>>
>> Chopinlaan 27
>>
>> 5242HM Rosmalen
>>
>> Tel: 073 5226191
>>
>> Fax: 073 5226196
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete
>> it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in
>> this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by
>> the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>>
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment
>>
>> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer
> system:
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with
>> the
>>
>> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom Reijnders
>>
>> TOR Informatica
>>
>> Chopinlaan 27
>>
>> 5242HM Rosmalen
>>
>> Tel: 073 5226191
>>
>> Fax: 073 5226196
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete
>> it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in
>> this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by
>> the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system:
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with
>> the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK
> legislation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete
>> it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in
>> this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by
>> the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>>
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment
>>
>> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer
> system:
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with
>> the
>>
>> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>> Tom Reijnders
>>
>> TOR Informatica
>>
>> Chopinlaan 27
>>
>> 5242HM Rosmalen
>>
>> Tel: 073 5226191
>>
>> Fax: 073 5226196
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete
>> it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in
>> this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by
>> the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system:
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with
>> the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK
> legislation.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
--
--
Tom Reijnders
TOR Informatica
Chopinlaan 27
5242HM Rosmalen
Tel: 073 5226191
Fax: 073 5226196
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20120511/c035acab/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cihgajfd.png
Type: image/png
Size: 85423 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20120511/c035acab/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the Xerte-dev
mailing list