[Reading-hall-of-fame] Re: RHF elections, 2019-2020

[Stephen Krashen]

 Part of the solution is for the profession to encourage shorter, clearer papers.  "When you ask someone the time, you don't want a history of the. wristwatch."  And articles that are more easily available. Attached are 3 very short articles on these topics. 
    On Tuesday, June 18, 2019, 10:46:33 AM PDT, P Pearson <ppearson at berkeley.edu> wrote:  
 
 Good point.  There is a real tension here, however.  On the one hand, we could use more and better information in making wiser decisions.ButWe don't want the nomination process to be so daunting that folks will avoid submitting nominations.What if VITAE were submitted for round 2? Would that help you with your concern, Tim?
pdp
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/private/reading-hall-of-fame/attachments/20190618/abe99d01/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: A Short Paper Proposing That We Need to Write Shorter Papers.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 135393 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/private/reading-hall-of-fame/attachments/20190618/abe99d01/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: academic jibberish krashen.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 77121 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/private/reading-hall-of-fame/attachments/20190618/abe99d01/attachment-0002.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2019 What I would like to see happen in 2019.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 59734 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/private/reading-hall-of-fame/attachments/20190618/abe99d01/attachment-0003.pdf>