[Xerte] XOT Peer review

[Patrick Lockley]

Ok here is what you need to do.

 

Find the php code for peer in website_code/php/properties/

 

Edit it to have a second textbox for text entry

 

Change the insert code to add the email then some delimiter, suggest -
*** if both variables are sent

 

Then on the peer review submit page, peer.php in the root folder, add a
php split on the delimiter if found.

 

Easy peasy

 

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
Sent: 15 September 2010 14:18
To: 'Xerte discussion list'
Subject: RE: [Xerte] XOT Peer review

 

Pat

I'm not sure this is used much but yes perhaps the author submits which
email replies go to. I can think of advantages with that too e.g. author
sends link but wants/needs feedback to go to a colleague. 

 

Ron

 

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Patrick
Lockley
Sent: 15 September 2010 13:56
To: Xerte discussion list
Subject: RE: [Xerte] XOT Peer review

 

What's twitter?

 

3) It won't. But it works here. Well until we have to fix it.

 

So, you want Peer review to work across multiple email domains, or for
people to submit an address to which to send peer review too?

 

Pat

 

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
Sent: 15 September 2010 13:52
To: 'Xerte discussion list'
Subject: [Xerte] XOT Peer review

 

 Hi Pat

I'm guessing it's you that has been replying to this on Twitter and the
char limit obviously makes it difficult so thought it better to reply
here...

 

Can you explain exactly how the peer review system identifies the email
address? If I understand correctly this should work something like
this...

 

1. Author enables peer review and sends the link by email to a
colleague. Good to know this works without needing to make the LO
public.

2. The colleague reviews the LO and types and submits feedback via the
form on the review page.

3. I think you're saying details added to site details then appends the
username to the sitedetails info to determine the email to send to. On
the sandpit or other installations where users don't use the same email
domain how would this work? Even with an installation used by staff
within one organisation it will not always follow that their username
and email format are always consistent.

 

The peer review system is still useful but with installations like the
sandpit probably needs a message prompting to send feedback via email
rather than the form - if my assumptions are correct?

 

Cheers

Ron

 

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham. 

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte/attachments/20100915/6d54e3f0/attachment.html