[Xerte] XOT Peer review

[Ron Mitchell]

Pat

I'm not sure this is used much but yes perhaps the author submits which
email replies go to. I can think of advantages with that too e.g. author
sends link but wants/needs feedback to go to a colleague. 

 

Ron

 

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Patrick Lockley
Sent: 15 September 2010 13:56
To: Xerte discussion list
Subject: RE: [Xerte] XOT Peer review

 

What's twitter?

 

3) It won't. But it works here. Well until we have to fix it.

 

So, you want Peer review to work across multiple email domains, or for
people to submit an address to which to send peer review too?

 

Pat

 

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
Sent: 15 September 2010 13:52
To: 'Xerte discussion list'
Subject: [Xerte] XOT Peer review

 

 Hi Pat

I'm guessing it's you that has been replying to this on Twitter and the char
limit obviously makes it difficult so thought it better to reply here...

 

Can you explain exactly how the peer review system identifies the email
address? If I understand correctly this should work something like this...

 

1. Author enables peer review and sends the link by email to a colleague.
Good to know this works without needing to make the LO public.

2. The colleague reviews the LO and types and submits feedback via the form
on the review page.

3. I think you're saying details added to site details then appends the
username to the sitedetails info to determine the email to send to. On the
sandpit or other installations where users don't use the same email domain
how would this work? Even with an installation used by staff within one
organisation it will not always follow that their username and email format
are always consistent.

 

The peer review system is still useful but with installations like the
sandpit probably needs a message prompting to send feedback via email rather
than the form - if my assumptions are correct?

 

Cheers

Ron

 

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not
use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any
attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do
not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. 

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte/attachments/20100915/81e90d58/attachment.html