[Xerte-dev] Re: IP Clearance

[Pat L (pgogy)]

Devin did license the code, it was BSD i think

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:48 PM, Julian Tenney <
Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:

> That’s what I meant, what I’m most worried about is third party stuff from
> elsewhere,
>
>
>
> Everyone who has contributed will need to sign an agreement, more on that
> in due course – though feel free to pipe up now if you’re not prepared to
> do that. Technically I think the copyright remains with you, you just agree
> to let Apereo redistribute the work. I have someone here from IP /
> Commercialisation who will  think will be in touch with you all re:
> agreements.
>
>
>
> J
>
>
>
> *From:* xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] *On Behalf Of *David Goodwin
> *Sent:* 24 September 2014 12:09
> *To:* For Xerte technical developers
> *Subject:* [Xerte-dev] Re: IP Clearance
>
>
>
> " Do you know if all the php / js in \website_code was written by us,
> mostly Pat I guess? Looking through, it all looks OK, just want to be sure
> here’s nothing lurking in there from 3rd parties. It would be a good folder
> to tick off."
>
> I would have written parts. Or rewritten them. I'm happy to assign
> copyright if necessary.
>
> Any external libraries I would have introduced (eg zend framework?) would
> be licensed under a free / floss licence.
>
> David.
> --
> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20140924/e2610b53/attachment.html>