[Xerte-dev] Re: 1.9 properties

[Smith, John]

Hi,

I know I'm new here but personally I think that JSON export would at least be as useful if not more useful as XML, especially when working in a JavaScript environment like the HTML5 engine. (see next part)

Incidentally, not sure if I only have commit access to XOT since XERTE desktop is being treated as almost dead in the water but the Xenith code i'm working on is part of the XERTE trunk, not XOT. My interest is just now is getting the HTML5 engine mature enough to use in anger. Over the weekend i've done the following HTML5 engine models:

     delicious (95% ready) - had to use JSONP request because of same origin policy
     youtuberss (95% ready) - have use new JSONC request
     textDrawing (<50%) - don't have a sufficient test file for this model and the XOT Jisc site won't save the image or let me add pictures just now... need to get XOT installed locally or use usb version temporarily (anyone help out with a test XML stub for this model??) Oh and the screenshot shows the freehand done using pixel <divs> for non canvas compatibility
     youtube (~80% ready) - just a guess as only a few sizing issues

Attached some screenshots for those who want to see.

I'ml definitely interested in working on the connector pages soon though and tying this altogether as we want a "mobile" compatible (read iPad) RLO repository of some fashion by the end of the academic year.

Regards,

John Smith | Learning Technologist
Room A251, Govan Mbeki Building | School of Health & Life Sciences | Glasgow Caledonian University
Cowcaddens Road | Glasgow | G4 0BA
________________________________________
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley [patrick.lockley at googlemail.com]
Sent: 29 October 2012 13:25
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: 1.9 properties

Also, would JSON export be more useful / as useful as XML export?

On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Pat Lockley
<patrick.lockley at googlemail.com> wrote:
> WordPress has a theme supports function, so I am thinking of having a
> list to indicate the tabs per template, or something similar
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Ron Mitchell <ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk> wrote:
>> 1, 2 & 3
>> Personally I don't think it's a necessity that the same tabs exist for all
>> templates but I suspect it's easier to just display a message like 'This
>> property is not relevant to this template' than it is to change the code to
>> dynamically change tabs based on the template in use.
>>
>> 4
>> Increase the properties window size and display 'This property is not
>> relevant to this template' for Xerte templates?
>>
>> Just my quick thoughts...
>> Ron
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley
>> Sent: 29 October 2012 12:48
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] 1.9 properties
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On the properties panel there are several options which are sort of xerte
>> specific - XML and media and quota for example.
>>
>> Some of the new templates aren't XML, so XML makes no sense - and the media
>> and quota code is very xerte specific.
>>
>> Would people think
>>
>> 1) all off these options should exist for all templates?
>> 2) should tabs exist even if the functionality doesn't?
>> 3) what sort of message should it say
>> 4) what if I have scope for an extra tab?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
>> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
>> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not
>> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any
>> attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do
>> not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
>> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
>> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev

_______________________________________________
Xerte-dev mailing list
Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev

Glasgow Caledonian University is a registered Scottish charity, number SC021474

Winner: Times Higher Education’s Widening Participation Initiative of the Year 2009 and Herald Society’s Education Initiative of the Year 2009.
http://www.gcu.ac.uk/newsevents/news/bycategory/theuniversity/1/name,6219,en.html

Winner: Times Higher Education’s Outstanding Support for Early Career Researchers of the Year 2010, GCU as a lead with Universities Scotland partners.
http://www.gcu.ac.uk/newsevents/news/bycategory/theuniversity/1/name,15691,en.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: delicious.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 165504 bytes
Desc: delicious.PNG
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20121029/039333d6/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: textDrawing.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 514806 bytes
Desc: textDrawing.PNG
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20121029/039333d6/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: youtuberss.PNG
Type: image/png
Size: 221617 bytes
Desc: youtuberss.PNG
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20121029/039333d6/attachment-0005.png>