[Xerte-dev] Re: 1.9 modularisation

[Pat Lockley]

Well from the look of it, only you and me have put anything in the roadmap
anyways


On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Julian Tenney <
Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:

> In my mind, v2 is at easter, when we have parity between the flah and
> html5  output,
> ________________________________________
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley [
> patrick.lockley at googlemail.com]
> Sent: 13 November 2012 12:15
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: 1.9 modularisation
>
> Don't know - I would argue it makes sense to wait for 2.0, but that is a
> bit like waiting for X as 2.0 doesn't have a date. This what the roadmap
> should do really, should be a community decision around dates.
>
> I think the next version should be Xenith, and putting other templates in
> would just confuse people. Also if Xenith works in 1.8 then adding in the
> 1.9 stuff would offer a complication that isn't a requirement. Xenith works
> without modularisation, so if this is the Xenith release then make it that
> and what is in 1.8.
>
> I'm half using XOT at work locally, and I'm not that fussed if no one else
> is using modularisation (I need it for what I do, if no one else wants it,
> not bothered by it)
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Julian Tenney <
> Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>>
> wrote:
> Ok, leave it then. But following your argumment, when would there be a
> point?
> ________________________________________
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley [
> patrick.lockley at googlemail.com<mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com>]
> Sent: 13 November 2012 10:57
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: 1.9 modularisation
>
> Is there much point if the changes suggested sound like v2?
>
> All it would do is make the xerte side of the code different for no
> benefit (unless someone wants another template type)
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Julian Tenney <
> Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
> ><mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:
> Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>>> wrote:
> Can you merge it into trunk please?
> ________________________________________
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>> [
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley [
> patrick.lockley at googlemail.com<mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com
> ><mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com<mailto:
> patrick.lockley at googlemail.com>>]
> Sent: 12 November 2012 16:17
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] 1.9 modularisation
>
> Ignoring this morning's chat about libraries
>
> All of the modularisation stuff is now committed to 1.9.
>
> If anyone wants a pointer on how to create a module let me know as you can
> make pretty much what you want now.
>
> Some more emails later on to discuss certain points.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> ><mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do
> not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in
> any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this
> email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20121113/900c9826/attachment-0001.html>