[Xerte] Re: FileLocation + in path de rigueur?

[Julian Tenney]

But the gotcha is its a different path at authoring time, when it will try and resolve it from xerte.exe
________________________________________
From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Dave Burnett [d_b_burnett at hotmail.com]
Sent: 26 March 2013 20:05
To: Xerte list
Subject: [Xerte] Re: FileLocation + in path de rigueur?

Sorry.
rollo

> From: Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
> To: xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:55:49 +0000
> Subject: [Xerte] Re: FileLocation + in path de rigueur?
>
> you talking rlo? Or toolkits?
> ________________________________________
> From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Dave Burnett [d_b_burnett at hotmail.com]
> Sent: 26 March 2013 19:07
> To: Xerte list
> Subject: [Xerte] FileLocation + in path de rigueur?
>
> Any way to use a relative path in the url parameter of a media asset?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte mailing list
> Xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.