[Xerte] Re: Bug fixes - problem with MainPreloader.swf

[Pat Lockley]

When I view code on play_560 and on localhost they look the same (the
JS anyways).

The date of the LTdev file might help you out re revisions.

template path would seem the logical one - i am guessing you split the
path to find the models folder?

Look at the code for the models folder would be my first bet.

On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Julian Tenney
<Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
> I ned the source code, because I don't have a version with those changes in it...
>
> When you pass stuff in, do the cars need to be declared in the swf? Is it that simple? I thought vars got initialised even if they dodn't exist?
>
> Maybe it's not setting some engine level property...  which would be _level0.engine.templatePath?
>
> That's different for local xerte (== FileLocation) and toolkits (==the parent_template folder). Let me see if I can get a clue from the engine.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley
> Sent: 16 May 2011 11:54
> To: Xerte discussion list
> Subject: [Xerte] Re: Bug fixes - problem with MainPreloader.swf
>
> Yeah I think so - thats what it feels like with me - the path is
> getting mangled and so the path passed in is correct.
>
> Check the version on ltdev (ltdev/nextversion or maybe it's newversion
> - that one worked)
>
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Julian Tenney
> <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
>> OK. What did we need to change to MainPreloader to make it work in toolkits?
>>
>> There are three versions in the .svn. One form April 2009, one from Sep2010 and one from April 2011.
>>
>> None of them work, so the changes were never checked in.
>>
>> Pat: is my templatePath hunch chiming with you? What else is getting passed into the preloader from the page?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Tenney
>> Sent: 16 May 2011 11:38
>> To: Xerte discussion list
>> Subject: [Xerte] Re: Bug fixes - problem with MainPreloader.swf
>>
>> I'll switch that back. Not sure what the issue is... I added some code to error if the file failed to load, but that shouldn't have effected anything else. It looks like templatePath is not getting through or something, as the file does load, and the interface appears, and the titles, just no content...
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
>> Sent: 15 May 2011 22:12
>> To: 'Xerte discussion list'
>> Subject: [Xerte] Re: Bug fixes - problem with MainPreloader.swf
>>
>> attached.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley
>> Sent: 15 May 2011 21:52
>> To: Xerte discussion list
>> Subject: [Xerte] Re: Bug fixes - problem with MainPreloader.swf
>>
>> On 15/05/2011 21:44, Ron Mitchell wrote:
>>> Well I'm not sure if it's the only change from an earlier beta but it
>>> is
>> the
>>> change that as far as I can tell stops the current zip and repository
>>> XOT versions from working. Replacing MainPreloader.swf with
>>> MainPreloader.swf from an earlier beta fixes the problem and yes
>>> that's the only change between it not working and working.
>> can you send me an old preloader
>>
>> ta
>>
>> Pat
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xerte mailing list
>> Xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
>> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not
>> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xerte mailing list
>> Xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xerte mailing list
>> Xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte mailing list
> Xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte mailing list
> Xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>