[Xerte] Re: could you provide an updated XOT zip please?

Sun Jul 31 14:39:45 BST 2011

Thanks Pat, but even if I try logging into management without having logged into toolkits first I get the same result. I tried from another PC with the same result.

Franck

De : xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] De la part de Pat Lockley
Envoyé : dimanche 31 juillet 2011 11:22
À : Xerte discussion list
Objet : [Xerte] Re: could you provide an updated XOT zip please?

The svn is the most up to date code, I doubt much has changed in the management side since the last zip.

I would imagine the management problem is because the session of a user is still valid for your pc.

Try logging into management without having logged into toolkitts first.

The zip doesn't need updating that often as it's usually the models that change to add in new features, not fix bugs.

On 31 Jul 2011, at 05:03, Franck Petit <franck.petit at ac-reunion.fr> wrote:

Hi,

I have this problem as admin on a fresh install of XOT 1.6: after login a “the feature is for administrators only” is displayed. I have checked XOT on google code but found it too difficult to use SVN (I really tried) I noticed many changes were made since the last release. Could someone please send a link to an updated zip of XOT? It would be great if there was a weekly release as this is the case with moodle.

Cheers, Franck

<image001.jpg>

De : xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] De la part de Patrick Lockley
Envoyé : mercredi 15 septembre 2010 19:37
À : Xerte discussion list
Objet : RE: [Xerte] XOT Peer review

Stop it with the puppy dog eyes! I would do it if I had the time. 

I am sure Dave could do it in about 5 minutes!

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
Sent: 15 September 2010 16:23
To: 'Xerte discussion list'
Subject: RE: [Xerte] XOT Peer review

Cheers will add to todo list.

But just gives me more pages to remember and exclude from future updates. :-(

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Patrick Lockley
Sent: 15 September 2010 14:20
To: Xerte discussion list
Subject: RE: [Xerte] XOT Peer review

Ok here is what you need to do.

Find the php code for peer in website_code/php/properties/

Edit it to have a second textbox for text entry

Change the insert code to add the email then some delimiter, suggest - *** if both variables are sent

Then on the peer review submit page, peer.php in the root folder, add a php split on the delimiter if found.

Easy peasy

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
Sent: 15 September 2010 14:18
To: 'Xerte discussion list'
Subject: RE: [Xerte] XOT Peer review

Pat

I'm not sure this is used much but yes perhaps the author submits which email replies go to. I can think of advantages with that too e.g. author sends link but wants/needs feedback to go to a colleague. 

Ron

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Patrick Lockley
Sent: 15 September 2010 13:56
To: Xerte discussion list
Subject: RE: [Xerte] XOT Peer review

What’s twitter?

3) It won’t. But it works here. Well until we have to fix it.

So, you want Peer review to work across multiple email domains, or for people to submit an address to which to send peer review too?

Pat

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
Sent: 15 September 2010 13:52
To: 'Xerte discussion list'
Subject: [Xerte] XOT Peer review

 Hi Pat

I'm guessing it's you that has been replying to this on Twitter and the char limit obviously makes it difficult so thought it better to reply here...

Can you explain exactly how the peer review system identifies the email address? If I understand correctly this should work something like this...

1. Author enables peer review and sends the link by email to a colleague. Good to know this works without needing to make the LO public.

2. The colleague reviews the LO and types and submits feedback via the form on the review page.

3. I think you're saying details added to site details then appends the username to the sitedetails info to determine the email to send to. On the sandpit or other installations where users don't use the same email domain how would this work? Even with an installation used by staff within one organisation it will not always follow that their username and email format are always consistent.

The peer review system is still useful but with installations like the sandpit probably needs a message prompting to send feedback via email rather than the form - if my assumptions are correct?

Cheers

Ron

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. 

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. 

_______________________________________________
Xerte mailing list
Xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte/attachments/20110731/bf7da54d/attachment-0001.html>