[Xerte] Re: could you provide an updated XOT zip please?

[Pat Lockley]

Could you send the files to the list?

Merci :)

On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Franck Petit <franck-petit at live.fr> wrote:
> I reinstalled without the patch, compared the management.php files in xot1.6
> and moodle patch and noticed there was some differences. I copied the
> beginning of the moodle patch management.php file to add it to what seems to
> be a new version of the management.php files. I uploaded the patch on the
> server and everything seems to be running ok so far
>
>
>
> De : xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] De la part de Ron Mitchell
> Envoyé : lundi 1 août 2011 12:51
>
> À : 'Xerte discussion list'
> Objet : [Xerte] Re: could you provide an updated XOT zip please?
>
>
>
> Can you or Pat explain? I'm not aware of any problem with the moodlepatch
> and management.php
>
>
>
> From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Franck Petit
> Sent: 01 August 2011 09:41
> To: 'Xerte discussion list'
> Subject: [Xerte] Re: could you provide an updated XOT zip please?
>
>
>
> Problem solved. It was due to moodlepatch.
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
>
>
> De : xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] De la part de Pat Lockley
> Envoyé : dimanche 31 juillet 2011 21:30
> À : Xerte discussion list
> Objet : [Xerte] Re: could you provide an updated XOT zip please?
>
>
>
> Are you using the Moodlepatch?
>
> On 31 Jul 2011, at 16:55, Dave Burnett <d_b_burnett at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Good.
>
> It's the last refuge of scoundrels...
>
>
>
>
> From: franck-petit at live.fr
>
> To: xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 19:32:08 +0400
> Subject: [Xerte] Re: could you provide an updated XOT zip please?
>
> No, I don’t do php at all.
>
>
>
> De : xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] De la part de Pat Lockley
> Envoyé : dimanche 31 juillet 2011 18:00
> À : Xerte discussion list
> Objet : [Xerte] Re: could you provide an updated XOT zip please?
>
>
>
> Ok. Sounds like the session isn't being set. Do you do any php?
>
> On 31 Jul 2011, at 14:39, Franck Petit <franck-petit at live.fr> wrote:
>
> Thanks Pat, but even if I try logging into management without having logged
> into toolkits first I get the same result. I tried from another PC with the
> same result.
>
> Franck
>
>
>
> De : xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] De la part de Pat Lockley
> Envoyé : dimanche 31 juillet 2011 11:22
> À : Xerte discussion list
> Objet : [Xerte] Re: could you provide an updated XOT zip please?
>
>
>
> The svn is the most up to date code, I doubt much has changed in the
> management side since the last zip.
>
>
>
> I would imagine the management problem is because the session of a user is
> still valid for your pc.
>
>
>
> Try logging into management without having logged into toolkitts first.
>
>
>
> The zip doesn't need updating that often as it's usually the models that
> change to add in new features, not fix bugs.
>
> On 31 Jul 2011, at 05:03, Franck Petit <franck.petit at ac-reunion.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have this problem as admin on a fresh install of XOT 1.6: after login a
> “the feature is for administrators only” is displayed. I have checked XOT on
> google code but found it too difficult to use SVN (I really tried) I noticed
> many changes were made since the last release. Could someone please send a
> link to an updated zip of XOT? It would be great if there was a weekly
> release as this is the case with moodle.
>
> Cheers, Franck
>
> <image001.jpg>
>
>
>
>
>
> De : xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] De la part de Patrick Lockley
> Envoyé : mercredi 15 septembre 2010 19:37
> À : Xerte discussion list
> Objet : RE: [Xerte] XOT Peer review
>
>
>
> Stop it with the puppy dog eyes! I would do it if I had the time.
>
>
>
> I am sure Dave could do it in about 5 minutes!
>
>
>
> From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
> Sent: 15 September 2010 16:23
> To: 'Xerte discussion list'
> Subject: RE: [Xerte] XOT Peer review
>
>
>
> Cheers will add to todo list.
>
> But just gives me more pages to remember and exclude from future updates.
> :-(
>
>
>
> From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Patrick Lockley
> Sent: 15 September 2010 14:20
> To: Xerte discussion list
> Subject: RE: [Xerte] XOT Peer review
>
>
>
> Ok here is what you need to do.
>
>
>
> Find the php code for peer in website_code/php/properties/
>
>
>
> Edit it to have a second textbox for text entry
>
>
>
> Change the insert code to add the email then some delimiter, suggest - ***
> if both variables are sent
>
>
>
> Then on the peer review submit page, peer.php in the root folder, add a php
> split on the delimiter if found.
>
>
>
> Easy peasy
>
>
>
> From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
> Sent: 15 September 2010 14:18
> To: 'Xerte discussion list'
> Subject: RE: [Xerte] XOT Peer review
>
>
>
> Pat
>
> I'm not sure this is used much but yes perhaps the author submits which
> email replies go to. I can think of advantages with that too e.g. author
> sends link but wants/needs feedback to go to a colleague.
>
>
>
> Ron
>
>
>
> From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Patrick Lockley
> Sent: 15 September 2010 13:56
> To: Xerte discussion list
> Subject: RE: [Xerte] XOT Peer review
>
>
>
> What’s twitter?
>
>
>
> 3) It won’t. But it works here. Well until we have to fix it.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte mailing list
> Xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not
> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any
> attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do
> not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not
> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any
> attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do
> not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte mailing list
> Xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not
> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any
> attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do
> not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>