[Xerte] Re: pagewizards

[Kemp Johnathan]

Thanks for the info regarding version numbering. I had not come across that
method of version checking before.

I have just checked the details for my installations of Xerte, both on my
main PC and my laptop on which I did the re-installation of the version of
Xerte that I down-loaded yesterday and they both provide the same version
and dates as you describe in your email.

So for anyone having problems getting the Page Wizards to work I recommend
that they down-load the current version of Xerte from the link on the home
page of the Xerte web site and install that. Then download the Page Wizards
from the Xerte Wiki Page Wizards Page. This should provide a desktop Xerte
installation in which Page Wizards will work correctly.

Kind regards

Johnathan

On 19 April 2011 18:01, Paul Swanson <Paul.Swanson at harlandfs.com> wrote:

> The confusion on the version is probably due to the method of checking. If
> I right-click Xerte.exe, select Properties and then the Version tab, it
> tells me the version is 2.5.0.33. I’m pretty sure I’m using Xerte v2.15. The
> file date on Xerte.exe is April 8th, 2009, but XMLEngine.swf is dated
> January 25th, 2011. Some updates involve changing XMLEngine.swf without
> touching Xerte.exe.
>
>
>
> *From:* xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:
> xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] *On Behalf Of *Kemp Johnathan
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 19, 2011 9:46 AM
> *To:* Xerte discussion list
> *Subject:* [Xerte] Re: pagewizards
>
>
>
> Following on from your last email I have downloaded the version of desktop
> Xerte currently available from the main Xerte web site, which is described
> as version 2.15.
>
>
>
> I have deleted my current installation of Xerte, installed this version,
> created a project based on the Page Templates project wide template and
> compared all the files this generated with the files generated by performing
> the same task with the previous version.
>
>
>
> This is my standard process for identifying changes in versions and the
> comparison reveals no changes in the two sets of project files.
>
>
>
> I have also installed page wizards in this new version and tested a couple
> of them (title page and model answer) both worked correctly.
>
>
>
> I am not sure what has happened in your installation. Page Wizards only
> work with Xerte 2.n (that is they don't work with Xerte On-line toolkits),
> but I can confirm they work with the current version of Xerte.
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Johnathan
>
>
>
> On 19 April 2011 15:13, Goñi Corral, Leire <lgoni at grupogureak.com> wrote:
>
> sorry the other version was Xerte 2.5.7.1, no 1.5
>
>
>
>  This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not
> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any
> attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do
> not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte mailing list
> Xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not
> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any
> attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do
> not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte/attachments/20110420/1d199103/attachment-0001.html>