[Xerte] Wiki

Thu Apr 30 14:25:32 BST 2009

Please keep the list going as I am much better at push technology than pull!
Here I HAVE to read the messages and keep up as well as save those I may
need in the future even if I am not working on a project at the moment!
Also you have been so amazingly helpful to those of us who are not so
technologically able! 

Best wishes E.A. 

Mrs E.A. Draffan
Learning Societies Lab,
ECS, University of Southampton,
Tel +44 (0)23 8059 7246
http://www.lexdis.ecs.soton.ac.uk
http://www.emptech.info

-----Original Message-----
From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Tenney
Sent: 30 April 2009 10:45
To: Xerte discussion list
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

I don't expect the mailing list to dissapear. I see the wiki as being the
plae for docs / examples / info / etc, whilst this list does what it always
has done,

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Alistair McNaught
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:33 AM
To: Xerte discussion list
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

Replying to these out of sequence as I catch up fro a couple of days on the
road.

I like the idea of the parallel routes - the discussion list v wiki. I think
I had probably been worrying that the wiki would replace all as the centre
of the Xerte universe but if it is the distillation of the best bits of the
lists it would work for all levels of contributor.

I agree that editing an existing entry is easy but creating brand new ones
and doing slightly more sophisticated stuff like inserting images is more
daunting to Wiki newbies. In some respects though it might act as a bit of a
quality control filter. 

A

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Mark Tomlinson
Sent: 29 April 2009 09:48
To: 'Xerte discussion list'
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

Trusted contributors is possible to implement if the general consensus is
that is what is required.  If someone 'edits / defaces' the content there,
it is not lost as each page change is archived.  It is merely an annoyance.

I think this discussion list covers your needs under your point 2 and I
don't see a Wiki replacing this.  I see the Wiki as supplementary and
holding such things as documentation and 'best practice examples' using
certain techniques etc.

When you edit a page in the wiki, there are buttons at the top of the editor
that insert the correct syntax for you, so you don't have to remember the
'obscure code convention'

Regards

Mark

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Alistair McNaught
Sent: 29 April 2009 09:30
To: Xerte discussion list
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

Useful info Mark - many thanks.

I can look into this but not able to for a couple of days..

That still leaves the issues about audience and trusted contributors to be
considered..

A

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Mark Tomlinson
Sent: 29 April 2009 09:05
To: 'Xerte discussion list'
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

Apparently Mediawiki is :  "almost accessible for blind users"

http://blind.wikia.com/wiki/Mediawiki_and_Accessibility

The main issue I believe centres around the use of Captcha.  The one I
integrated does not use the visual verification method, but asks the user to
solve a simple maths problem.  I would assume that a screen reader could
read this, but I have not tested it.

Mark

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Alistair McNaught
Sent: 28 April 2009 21:09
To: Julian Tenney; ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk; Xerte discussion list
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

Hi all

Just catching up with this thread. 

I agree that a collaborative area for creating support materials is a great
idea but I think we ought to exercise some caution before making any single
place the centre of the universe J

My main concerns are

1)      Vandalism /spamming etc. We love Xerte but if I was a commercial
developer making a tidy income from selling overpriced underfeatured
software I might not love the threat Xerte provided to my income. I suggest
that some sort of 'trusted status' should be applied for access to the main
support materials.

2)      Horses for courses - MediaWiki is fine and dandy for coders but
if we wanted to set up an area where teaching practitioners could share
ideas, applications, examples, simple questions etc we'd need a much simpler
system. I'm an experienced Tiddlywiki user but looking at the help pages on
formatting and conventions made me think. I can't be bothered. I haven't got
time to remember some obscure code convention for placing an image on the
page or italicising text.

3)      Accessibility - it would be embarrassing if the much vaunted (by
us at any rate) accessibility features of Xerte were documented on an
inaccessible wiki page. I've not yet had a chance to get a screenreader user
to test the page but I certainly wouldn't want to push this out before
having done so. There are 14 tests for assessing the accessibility of web2
services (see www.web2access.org.uk) and I'd want to be sure we could meet
most of them before putting my name to a Xerte centre of the universe.

Certainly the wiki could be invaluable at putting together the
specifications for training and support materials - and it may well be
appropriate for hosting the materials themselves but I think there needs to
be rather more debate on the matter and this might be the sort of thing that
is thrashed out in relation to the XPERT project meeting in May.

Alistair

From: Julian Tenney [mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk]
Sent: 28 April 2009 12:22
To: ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk; Alistair McNaught
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

I think we should concentrate on making wiki.xerte.net the centre of the
known universe. We need all the documentation - from us, from the xpert
project, from other contributers to live in one place where it can easily be
updated and maintained. 

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of RonM
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 12:11 PM
To: 'Xerte discussion list'
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

Apologies if this comes through twice but I sent this at 10.40 this morning
and it hasn't appeared on the list yet. L

Hi Julian

Apologies for not responding sooner - was delivering Toolkits training all
day yesterday.

When we were discussing the use of a wiki off-list recently I was thinking
that would be for developing the spec for the support material rather than
the actual support material. But as has been suggested subsequently an
installation of MediaWiki might do both
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki as an example a lot of the moodle
documentation is provided via MediaWiki http://docs.moodle.org/en/Main_Page 

Ron

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Patrick Lockley
Sent: 28 April 2009 10:49
To: Xerte discussion list
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

I did quite a bit on www.installationwiki.org re toolkits guidance, and then
some spammer wrecked it and all my work got deleted.

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Mark Tomlinson
Sent: 28 April 2009 10:49
To: 'Xerte discussion list'
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

I'll see what I can do..

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Patrick Lockley
Sent: 28 April 2009 10:38
To: Xerte discussion list
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

I made an account as well, but my inner pedant says Captcha?

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Mark Tomlinson
Sent: 28 April 2009 09:44
To: 'Xerte discussion list'
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

Jules

I think people can simply create their own accounts??

Anyone an expert on media wiki on the list??

Mark

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
[mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Tenney
Sent: 27 April 2009 21:25
To: Xerte discussion list
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

I think there needs to be documentation for people developing the software,
and documentation for people using the software. It could be in the same
place, or in different places as the two groups will have quite different
requirements. Googlecode happened to have a convenient wiki which is what
Pat has started to use today. Sourceforge have also just approved my project
request, so now is a good time for us to decide google code or sourceforge
once and for all. I might set up a project on soirceforge anyway adn then we
can vote or something. You can see the google code pages already. I like the
simplicity a lot - it fits well with our FWS design principles for the
software itself.

Mark - how would we add users to the wiki you set up? That (or something
similar) should probably host the bulk of the user docs, and be the one
place for info on using Xerte in its various forms. I would love it if
someone were to step forward and take on managing that space.

We have several people primed to start creating documentation and I'm keen
it doesn't become fragmented. 

Alistair and Ron: would a wiki meet your needs? wiki.xerte.net in
particular. 

J

________________________________

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk on behalf of Patrick Lockley
Sent: Mon 27/04/2009 19:10
To: Xerte discussion list
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

10 repositories.

1 for those that speak binary, 1 for those that don't - or grom my take so
far on the installs of XOT, we have the sysadmin types who would want the
scope to do whatever they wanted, and the dabblers who want something a
little more light.

________________________________

From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk on behalf of Dave Burnett
Sent: Mon 27/04/2009 17:22
To: Xerte list
Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki

Totally your call, but I'm not sure about the facility of splitting
locations...

> Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki
> Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:09:40 +0100
> From: Patrick.Lockley at nottingham.ac.uk
> To: xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> 
> Can do both - I see the google one as the trouble shooter
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Mark 
> Tomlinson
> Sent: 27 April 2009 17:06
> To: 'Xerte discussion list'
> Subject: RE: [Xerte] Wiki
> 
> I spoke to Julian about this a while back and I did set one up then
on:
> 
> http://wiki.xerte.net
> 
> I never got round to publicising it though :-(
> 
> Mark
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Patrick 
> Lockley
> Sent: 27 April 2009 17:01
> To: Xerte discussion list
> Subject: [Xerte] Wiki
> 
> http://code.google.com/p/xerte/w/list
> 
> Your wish is our command, if your wishes are based primarily on wikis 
> that is :)
> 
> Patrick Lockley
> IS Learning Team
> King's Meadow Campus
> Tel: 0115 84 68882
> 
> My Page on Community - http://webapps.nottingham.ac.uk/elgg/cczpl
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte mailing list
> Xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte mailing list
> Xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte mailing list
> Xerte at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte

________________________________

Windows LiveT SkyDriveT: Get 25 GB of free online storage. Check it out.
<http://windowslive.com/online/skydrive?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_skydrive_04200
9>  

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses, which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. 

____________________
This email is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient please accept our apologies. Please do not disclose,
copy, or distribute information in this email nor take any action in
reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting
it

Please note that views expressed in this email are those of the author and
do not necessarily represent those of the Higher Education Academy

Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet
e-mail is not a secure communications medium. We advise that you understand
and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us

Although we have taken steps to ensure this e-mail and attachments are free
from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the
recipient should ensure they are actually virus free

The Higher Education Academy Registered No 4930131

____________________
This email is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient please accept our apologies. Please do not disclose,
copy, or distribute information in this email nor take any action in
reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting
it

Please note that views expressed in this email are those of the author and
do not necessarily represent those of the Higher Education Academy

Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet
e-mail is not a secure communications medium. We advise that you understand
and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us

Although we have taken steps to ensure this e-mail and attachments are free
from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the
recipient should ensure they are actually virus free

The Higher Education Academy Registered No 4930131

____________________
This email is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient please accept our apologies. Please do not disclose,
copy, or distribute information in this email nor take any action in
reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. Please inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting
it

Please note that views expressed in this email are those of the author and
do not necessarily represent those of the Higher Education Academy

Please note that this e-mail has been created in the knowledge that Internet
e-mail is not a secure communications medium. We advise that you understand
and observe this lack of security when e-mailing us

Although we have taken steps to ensure this e-mail and attachments are free
from any virus, we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the
recipient should ensure they are actually virus free

The Higher Education Academy Registered No 4930131

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.287 / Virus Database: 270.12.9/2087 - Release Date: 04/29/09
18:03:00