[Xerte-dev] Re: Alternative Apereo Branding
Smith, John
J.J.Smith at gcu.ac.uk
Tue Mar 10 11:06:52 GMT 2015
Hi,
I agree with Inge, I prefer the 3rd one... less fussy and apereo might be academic focussed but xerte has a mix of adopters...
Regards,
John Smith | Learning Technologist
Room A250, Govan Mbeki Building | School of Health & Life Sciences | Glasgow Caledonian University
Cowcaddens Road | Glasgow | G4 0BA
Please address ALL support requests to hlsblt at gcu.ac.uk where one of the School Learning Technologists will pick up the job. This will ensure that all jobs are completed as promptly as possible.
________________________________________
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Inge Donkervoort 12Change [i.donkervoort at 12change.eu]
Sent: 10 March 2015 07:58
To: xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Alternative Apereo Branding
Hi,
For me and Katrien me I think it will be a barrier because our target groups are very different from academic.My preference is that we choose the last two. I also like the last two visually more that the first one. If I have to choose one then my preference is the third one because it's more 'calmer'. Don't know if that's the right word :)
Bye,
Inge
1 2 Change bv
Chopinlaan 27
5242 HM Rosmalen
T 073-5226195
M 06-50267104
F 073-5226196
E i.donkervoort at 12change.eu<mailto:i.donkervoort at 12change.eu>
I www.12change.eu<http://www.12change.eu>
T twitter<http://twitter.com/12ChangeLearn>
L linkedIn<http://nl.linkedin.com/pub/inge-donkervoort/7/4b/18a>
Julian Tenney schreef op 10-3-2015 8:18:
I don’t have strong feelings either way really, but would the focus on academia be a barrier to other adopters? Or are we resigned to that anyway?
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
Sent: 09 March 2015 15:58
To: 'For Xerte technical developers'
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Alternative Apereo Branding
It might be their tag but I quite like the re-enforcement of a focus on academia. A lot of our users won't no the name Apereo.
I've played about with some variations in Inkscape. Will reply again with the inkscape file attached in case that doesn't get through but here's a screenshot…
[cid:part5.03070903.01080805 at 12change.eu]
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Tenney
Sent: 09 March 2015 13:56
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Alternative Apereo Branding
I think the ‘serving the academic mission is too much as well – and it’s Apereo’s tag, not ours.
Here’s another version, just plain text:
[cid:part8.06090501.00020700 at 12change.eu]
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
Sent: 09 March 2015 12:05
To: 'For Xerte technical developers'
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Alternative Apereo Branding
I like bothbut I think the 'Serving the academic mission' looks a bit cramped in the second version. What does that look like written under both versions? e.g.
Version one reads
Xerte
an apereo community project
Serving the academic mission
and version 2 reads
Apereo
Xerte
Serving the academic mission
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Tenney
Sent: 09 March 2015 11:51
To: For Xerte technical developers (xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>)
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Alternative Apereo Branding
This is an alternative approach: it’s a bit easier to cope with because we can use a font for the apereo text (Myriad), rather than work off the graphics files Ian sent through.
[cid:part14.03000001.05020408 at 12change.eu]
Thoughts?
We really need to develop a number of icons / logos for different sizes, and I don’t see why we shouldn’t be able to use both approaches really…
[cid:part15.06070701.03080607 at 12change.eu]
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.
_______________________________________________
Xerte-dev mailing list
Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>
http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the
author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
University of Nottingham.
This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
permitted by UK legislation.
Glasgow Caledonian University is a registered Scottish charity, number SC021474
More information about the Xerte-dev
mailing list