[Xerte-dev] Re: Navigator Pages

[Julian Tenney]

I think Ron's plan is sensible. I can see issues with deprecating them. A generic 'navigator' page would help gete around them, but we don'  have to worry about it now,
________________________________________
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell [ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk]
Sent: 12 June 2015 15:09
To: 'For Xerte technical developers'
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Navigator Pages

I can see the benefits of this and we have a similar feature in the site template where most of the navigators are combined. But I can imagine it will be difficult to ensure backwards compatibility apart from deprecation for new projects. In this case that would seem like a bit of a departure e.g. the other deprecated page are no longer needed or supported whereas the navigators are very much still useful and an important feature. Also would the tabbed navigator plus be a separate case and still left on it's own?

I'd suggest the following:

Fix the essential issues in the current navigators but perhaps not those not essential if not easy.
Add a new combined navigator when time permits and we can test in a develop version first and then until people are familiar with that leave the existing navigators without deprecating them.
At some future point deprecate the older separate navigators.

HTH
Ron

BTW Would be good to add a carousel navigator to the mix at some point like we have in the site template.

From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom Reijnders
Sent: 12 June 2015 14:47
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Navigator Pages

The problem is, that we need to deprecate the old pages. That's no problem in it self. But that would mean that we probably should fix the problems anyway. I would do it anyway, because it will simplify future maintenance.

Tom
Fay Cross schreef op 12-6-2015 om 15:17:
I’ve got to make some changes to a lot of the navigator pages to fix some problems that Inge found and it’s got me thinking about something I think Ron has mentioned before.

Button, tabbed, slideshow and accordion navigators are all identical in the information that the author enters – the only difference is the way you move between sub-pages in the LO. Would it be useful to replace these pages with one new navigator page where you could select which of these appearances you wanted it to have? Or do you think this would be confusing?

It would be easy to do (and then I’d only have to do the changes to fix the bugs once!) What do you think?

Fay





This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee

and may contain confidential information. If you have received this

message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.



Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this

message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the

author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the

University of Nottingham.



This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an

attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your

computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email

communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as

permitted by UK legislation.




_______________________________________________

Xerte-dev mailing list

Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>

http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev



--

--



Tom Reijnders

TOR Informatica

Chopinlaan 27

5242HM Rosmalen

Tel: 073 5226191

Fax: 073 5226196









This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee

and may contain confidential information. If you have received this

message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.



Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this

message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the

author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the

University of Nottingham.



This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an

attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your

computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email

communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as

permitted by UK legislation.