[Xerte-dev] Re: Design editor

Tue Nov 25 15:41:14 GMT 2014

Unfortunately I have a work deadline that is going to keep me from being able to contribute anything more than ideas and mockups until some time in December, most likely. :(

—Brad

From: Inge Donkervoort 12Change <i.donkervoort at 12change.eu<mailto:i.donkervoort at 12change.eu>>
Organization: 12Change
Reply-To: For Xerte technical developers <xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>
Date: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 at 10:26 AM
To: "xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>" <xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Design editor

No it doesn't, so your ideas for the insert page are stil very welcome.
Are you working on that?

1 2 Change

Chopinlaan 27
5242 HM Rosmalen
T 073-5226195
M 06-50267104
F 073-5226196
E i.donkervoort at 12change.eu<mailto:i.donkervoort at 12change.eu>
I www.12change.eu<http://www.12change.eu>

T twitter<http://twitter.com/12ChangeLearn>
L linkedIn<http://nl.linkedin.com/pub/inge-donkervoort/7/4b/18a>
Smith, Bradley schreef op 25-11-2014 16:23:
Yeah, the stylesheet is lovely. Nicely done.

Does this change anything functionally/structurally, though? Or would this be separate from things like fixing the way the Insert menu works?

—Brad

From: Julian Tenney <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>>
Reply-To: For Xerte technical developers <xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>
Date: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 at 8:59 AM
To: For Xerte technical developers <xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Design editor

I think so too, really nice.

From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
Sent: 25 November 2014 13:56
To: 'For Xerte technical developers'
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Design editor

That looks great to me!

From:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Inge Donkervoort 12Change
Sent: 25 November 2014 12:28
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Design editor

Hi all,

One of our Norwegian users Jens Magnus Jensen made an example for a new design of the editor. Is this something he can go on with? Any suggestions?

Bye,
Inge
1 2 Change

Chopinlaan 27
5242 HM Rosmalen
T 073-5226195
M 06-50267104
F 073-5226196
E i.donkervoort at 12change.eu<mailto:i.donkervoort at 12change.eu>
I www.12change.eu<http://www.12change.eu>

T twitter<http://twitter.com/12ChangeLearn>
L linkedIn<http://nl.linkedin.com/pub/inge-donkervoort/7/4b/18a>
Julian Tenney schreef op 25-11-2014 10:26:
A custom interface is a legacy from the old flash runtime, where you could use a swf as a custom interface: that swf could then call the navigation methods in the main engine.

I’m not so close to the html5 runtime, Fay will give you a better answer tomorrow: try overriding with !important in css?

Otherwise extend the code in the template to handle an optional property for layout?

J

From:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Smith, Bradley
Sent: 24 November 2014 23:15
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Custom layout for questions?

Hello all,

Not sure if this is better send to xerte or xerte-dev, but I’ll try the latter first.

Personally, I’m not a fan of the two-column sort of layout that Xerte seems to prefer for questions. Often, both my questions and answers may include unix commands, screen shots, and other things that take up a lot of horizontal space. What I would like to have is a “vertical” layout that just shows the instruction/prompt (when you only have one question, I’m unclear why you would distinguish between these  anyway), followed by the answer options, each taking up 100% of the page’s width.

The closest I’ve gotten to this is to set the Panel Width setting to “full”, and put the instruction and prompt text both in the Prompt box . However, the prompt is rendered as an H3 tag, so the whole question appears bolded. This causes problems with text-heavy questions where I need more variety in the formatting.

I noticed an option to include a custom stylesheet with a learning object, so I uploaded one with:

h3.question {
  font-weight: normal;
}

When I load the preview, my browser’s dev tools show that the stylesheet is loaded by something, but there is no change to the formatting of the question.

So my question is: what’s the best way to do what I want here? I see there’s also an option to upload a “custom interface”, but that only seems to be available at the the learning object level (as opposed to a specific component like a question), and I haven’t seen any docs that explain exactly how to make one anyway.

Suggestions?
—Brad

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.