[Xerte-dev] Re: FW: Further Xerte Data Loss
Julian Tenney
Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
Wed May 21 09:24:03 BST 2014
In Bootstrap, all text is CDATA (I think), so it's not duff chars.
-----Original Message-----
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
Sent: 20 May 2014 17:29
To: 'For Xerte technical developers'
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: FW: Further Xerte Data Loss
Oh dear maybe this isn't adding to the uncertainty or maybe it's a clue - just had the following reply from Alistair...
"I have still experienced some loss since my Broadband was stabilised. I was working on the Bootstrap template using Chrome browser and lost a set of pages about 2 weeks ago."
That's the first time I'm aware of this happening with Bootstrap too but I guess that's also writing xml so perhaps not really any different?
Ron
-----Original Message-----
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Tenney
Sent: 20 May 2014 16:01
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: FW: Further Xerte Data Loss
> One of the changes I've committed to github / a pull request is that there's better validation on the XML. i.e. if it doesn't validate then XOT won't overwrite what ever is in the USER-FILES/$whatever/(data|preview).xml file(s).
Cheers.
It does seem the data loss issue has the remote user as the common factor.
-----Original Message-----
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of David Goodwin
Sent: 20 May 2014 15:47
To: xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: FW: Further Xerte Data Loss
<snip/>
>
> A student on one of the HEA projects reported this recently and
> responded as follows:
>
> “No text was copied and pasted, so I doubt there would be HTML, plus
> no hyper linking was included....however pages were lost, but only
> when working or accessing the project at my house anywhere else it
> 'seemed' to be fine... But I can't be too sure”
>
> This mirrors the only consistent cause Alistair and I were able to
> identify e.g. he was having connectivity problems and regularly
> getting corrupt LO's or lost pages. Since his connectivity was fixed I
> don't think this has happened but I'll check. All that said I've never
> once had this happen to me even when on trains or using mobile
> connections including the same codebase or even installations as
> Alistair.
>
> Even if a new solution is put in place to validate before saving etc
> it seems to me that there will still be high risk for all those users
> and installations unlikely to be able to upgrade immediately and would
> still be good to try to nail down the cause of this.
>
I've certainly seen corruption due to invalid characters being embedded into the LO. I can't replicate this, regardless of what sort of formatting I embed in, which is a pain.
One of the changes I've committed to github / a pull request is that there's better validation on the XML. i.e. if it doesn't validate then XOT won't overwrite what ever is in the USER-FILES/$whatever/(data|preview).xml file(s).
(via plugins/xml_parsing_check.php when/if merged).
David.
--
Pale Purple Ltd
PHP Web application development and support
http://www.palepurple.co.uk
@PalePurpleLtd
07792 380669 / 0845 0046746
_______________________________________________
Xerte-dev mailing list
Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
_______________________________________________
Xerte-dev mailing list
Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
_______________________________________________
Xerte-dev mailing list
Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
More information about the Xerte-dev
mailing list