[Xerte-dev] Re: SCORM 1.2 export

Pat L (pgogy) xerte at pgogywebstuff.com
Tue Jul 15 11:43:25 BST 2014 

I could see a case for phasing it out in version 3, or writing a very
hungry htaccess rule and modifying the url structure


On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Smith, John <J.J.Smith at gcu.ac.uk> wrote:

> I'm just wondering if they over complicate things with little added
> benefit. I'm definitely not talking about the external ones which do have
> added value...
>
> Regards,
>
> John Smith | Learning Technologist
> Room A250, Govan Mbeki Building | School of Health & Life Sciences |
> Glasgow Caledonian University
> Cowcaddens Road | Glasgow | G4 0BA
>
> Please address ALL support requests to hlsblt at gcu.ac.uk where one of the
> School Learning Technologists will pick up the job. This will ensure that
> all jobs are completed as promptly as possible.
> ________________________________________
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Tenney [
> Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk]
> Sent: 15 July 2014 10:06
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: SCORM 1.2 export
>
> I suppose so. You think it's worth removing the internal ones? I see their
> use for public urls
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Smith, John
> Sent: 14 July 2014 22:37
> To: xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: SCORM 1.2 export
>
> Like Ron i'm not sure how many people use them as i've only seen a couple
> and from history i've found these rewrite rules to be most useful for
> public urls. Seems that we are making heavy use of them for internal urls
> though which seems unnecessary and gives more possibility that the rules
> will break...
>
> Regards
>
> John Smith
> Learning Technologist
> School of Health and Life Sciences
>
> Sent from Samsung Galaxy SII
>
>
> Julian Tenney <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
> Cheers. The rules pretty much have worked, so no need to review their
> usefulness, but when they do go wrong, it takes a bit of a lightbulb to get
> from problem to culprit (at least for me).
>
>
> ________________________________________
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell [
> ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk]
> Sent: 14 July 2014 19:54
> To: 'For Xerte technical developers'
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: SCORM 1.2 export
>
> Sorry haven't had much time but just quickly tested Niko's suggested
> change of order on my install and that does fix the 1.2 export so now all 4
> export options work and the order of my .htaccess export lines are similar
> to this order:
>
> rewriteRule ^export_local_([0-9]+)$
> /toolkits/website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&local=true&scorm=false
>
> rewriteRule ^export_local_([0-9]+)?(.*)$
> /toolkits/website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&local=true&scorm=false&$2
>
> rewriteRule ^export_full_([0-9]+)$
> /toolkits/website_code/php/scorm/export.php?full=true&template_id=$1&scorm=false
>
> rewriteRule ^export_full_([0-9]+)?(.*)$
> /toolkits/website_code/php/scorm/export.php?full=true&scorm=false&template_id=$1&$2
>
> rewriteRule ^export_([0-9]+)$
> /toolkits/website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&scorm=false
>
> rewriteRule ^export_([0-9]+)?(.*)$
> /toolkits/website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&scorm=false&$2
>
> rewriteRule ^scorm2004_([0-9]+)$
> /toolkits/website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&scorm=2004
>
> rewriteRule ^scorm2004_([0-9]+)?(.*)$
> /toolkits/website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&scorm=2004&$2
>
> rewriteRule ^scorm_rich_([0-9]+)$
> /toolkits/website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&data=rich&scorm=true
>
> rewriteRule ^scorm_rich_([0-9]+)?(.*)$
> /toolkits/website_code/php/scorm/export.php?data=rich&scorm=true&template_id=$1&$2
>
> rewriteRule ^scorm_([0-9]+)$
> /toolkits/website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&scorm=true
>
> rewriteRule ^scorm_([0-9]+)?(.*)$
> /toolkits/website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&scorm=true&$2
>
> I can't comment on the htaccess.conf but if it's now the same order as
> above then seems correct. To be honest I'm not sure how many installs out
> there even make use of the apache mode setting. You only have to look at
> the full url's of the examples that get shared.
>
> HTH
> Ron
>
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Tenney
> Sent: 14 July 2014 15:47
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: SCORM 1.2 export
>
> I've committed a change, but please could someone make sure this is
> correct / sensible etc,
>
> Thanks,
>
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Tenney
> Sent: 14 July 2014 15:45
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: SCORM 1.2 export
>
> Thanks Niko. We're not sure where this needs to go in setup, so it's
> probably a good idea if someone who does can put it straight,
>
> Thanks,
>
> Julian
>
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Nikodem Miranowicz
> Sent: 14 July 2014 15:33
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: SCORM 1.2 export
>
> It seems that the order of rewriteRules in htaccess is responsible for
> this (One can export scorm 2004 but not scorm 1.2).
>
> The order of rules is now:
> rewriteRule ^scorm2004_([0-9]+)?(.*)$
> */website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&scorm=2004&$2
> rewriteRule ^scorm_([0-9]+)?(.*)$
> */website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&scorm=true&$2
> rewriteRule ^scorm_rich_([0-9]+)?(.*)$
> */website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&data=rich&scorm=true&$2
> Where greedy "scorm_([0-9]" apparently spoils "scorm_rich_([0-9]".
>
> My suggestion -
>
> 1.      (tested): change this order (in \setup\htaccess.conf ) to:
> rewriteRule ^scorm2004_([0-9]+)?(.*)$
> */website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&scorm=2004&$2
> rewriteRule ^scorm_rich_([0-9]+)?(.*)$
> */website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&data=rich&scorm=true&$2
> rewriteRule ^scorm_([0-9]+)?(.*)$
> */website_code/php/scorm/export.php?template_id=$1&scorm=true&$2
>
> 2.      or (untested): use [L] flag.
>
> The same should be with lines:
> rewriteRule ^export_...
> rewriteRule ^export_full_...
> rewriteRule ^export_local_...
>
> Niko
>
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Tenney
> Sent: 11 July 2014 13:38
> To: For Xerte technical developers (xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>)
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] SCORM 1.2 export
>
> SCORM 1.2 export isn't working here: nothing happens, nothing exports.
>
> Any idea?
>
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do
> not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in
> any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this
> email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do
> not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in
> any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this
> email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>
>
>
> Glasgow Caledonian University is a registered Scottish charity, number
> SC021474
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do
> not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in
> any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this
> email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer
> system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications
> with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK
> legislation.
>
>
>
>
>
> Glasgow Caledonian University is a registered Scottish charity, number
> SC021474
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do
> not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in
> any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this
> email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer
> system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications
> with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK
> legislation.
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20140715/d792bbec/attachment.html>

More information about the Xerte-dev mailing list