[Xerte-dev] Re: gap fill question - version difference...

[Ron Mitchell]

Hi John
Not sure when this changed but no it applies whether flash or html5 in version 2. It's probably not something that is a problem for the majority but would seem like a good idea if it were optional 
Cheers
Ron

Sent from my iPhone

On 30 May 2013, at 21:23, "Smith, John" <J.J.Smith at gcu.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi Ron,
> 
> Does the "old version" mean in the flash player and "version 2" mean the html5 player? Or is this a change in the creation process in the wizard that has changed between v1.9 and v2.0?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> John Smith | Learning Technologist
> Room A251, Govan Mbeki Building | School of Health & Life Sciences | Glasgow Caledonian University
> Cowcaddens Road | Glasgow | G4 0BA
> ________________________________________
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell [ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk]
> Sent: 30 May 2013 18:32
> To: 'For Xerte technical developers'
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] gap fill question - version difference...
> 
> Hi all
> I had the following question posed regarding the gap fill page type…
> 
> "on the old version it allows me to add anything in the gaps if I put some dummy text and don’t give feedback (this is what I want)
> On version 2 as soon as I start putting alternative answer or text it shows a hint… This I don’t want.
> Why is there this difference?"
> 
> So obviously I explained that this is how the new version has been coded but I can see the point and wonder if the hints could/should be an optional property to enable/disable?
> 
> Ron
> 
> 
> 
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
> 
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
> 
> 
> Glasgow Caledonian University is a registered Scottish charity, number SC021474
> 
> Winner: Times Higher Education’s Widening Participation Initiative of the Year 2009 and Herald Society’s Education Initiative of the Year 2009.
> http://www.gcu.ac.uk/newsevents/news/bycategory/theuniversity/1/name,6219,en.html
> 
> Winner: Times Higher Education’s Outstanding Support for Early Career Researchers of the Year 2010, GCU as a lead with Universities Scotland partners.
> http://www.gcu.ac.uk/newsevents/news/bycategory/theuniversity/1/name,15691,en.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
> 
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
> 
> 
> 
>