[Xerte-dev] Re: Modular and the Wizard

[Pat @ Pgogy]

A common library is fine, but the modules at present don't have scope for it.

As discussed with the site plugin you can have a concept of parent plugins which would allow for one editor and so on. It isn't a big change if you want it.

Pgogy Webstuff - http://www.pgogywebstuff.com
Makers of web things of a fair to middling quality

On 24 Apr 2013, at 15:04, Julian Tenney <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:

> Put it on the list of things to look at after 2.0. I don't think it's too serious, but we definitely don't want more than one version of the wizard, or we'll go insane,
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom Reijnders
> Sent: 24 April 2013 15:01
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Modular and the Wizard
> 
> I tend to agree with you Julian.
> 
> I put much effort to get to the same resuilt for play/preview/export etc. They all use the same files now, and in the past they used copies in various places.
> 
> That was one of the major reason for lots of isues with export.
> 
> Tom
> 
> Citeren Julian Tenney <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>:
> 
>> We have a situation where each type of template has its own wizard 
>> file? I think we should look to use common files when possible (but 
>> for the next release) because having different wizards is going to 
>> mess someone up at some point: if it uses the wizard, it should use it 
>> from a common place, but let's leave it for now?
>> 
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee 
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this 
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and
>> immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the  
>> information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views 
>> or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily 
>> reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an 
>> attachment
>> 
>> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
>> 
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with 
>> the
>> 
>> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
> 
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.