[Xerte-dev] Re: Site Module

[Tom Reijnders]

Hi Pat,

I agree with you. The module should not depend on xerte files. That way 
you don't have to worry about chnages in the xerte files and/or site 
files and check whther it still does what the other 'modules' expects it 
to do.

Tom

Op 16-4-2013 1:54, xerte at pgogywebstuff.com schreef:
> Hello,
>
> Not to sound annoying, but the Site module isn't "a module" to me, as 
> it uses some of the Xerte files (and so they are shared, where if each 
> had it's own copy, it'd make more sense).
>
> Thoughts - current approach works, but, to me isn't "a module"
>
> Also the delete and duplicate actions need adding (or copying from Xerte).
>
> I am happy to do it
>
> Pat
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev

-- 
--

Tom Reijnders
TOR Informatica
Chopinlaan 27
5242HM Rosmalen
Tel: 073 5226191
Fax: 073 5226196

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20130416/6684c2ea/attachment-0001.html>