[Xerte-dev] Re: SCORM tracking

Tue Apr 9 10:54:42 BST 2013

Hi Ron,

Thanks for testing! The Scorm 2004 should say 'completed' if all pages  
were visited.

In Scorm2004 the copmpletion status is separated from the Success  
status. So in 2004 you can have completed as Completion Status and  
'failed' as success status. The moodle score book doesn't handle that  
situation very good.

And I want the commenst in Scorm 1.2 separated with new lines, but  
haven't found a working linebreak character yet.

Tom

Citeren Ron Mitchell <ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk>:

> Hi Tom
> just a quick note to say I tested the 1.2 and 2004 export options  
> earlier today and imported as scorm into a Moodle 2.2.1
>
> Both seemed to work well! This was a simple 5 page test LO with a  
> quiz added at the end just to test that functionality.
>
> In Moodle viewing the results of a student viewing the LO and  
> completing the quiz the  view of interactions (pages) works best via  
> Scorm 2004 as each page result is showed in a separate row whereas  
> with 1.2 it's all shown under 1 row of cmi.comments but as you say  
> still more info than tracked previously.
>
> The only odd thing I noticed from my tests so far is that under  
> general data 1.2 Status showed as passed whereas 2004 showed status  
> as incomplete. Not sure if that's an error or not but why would that  
> differ between 1.2 and 2004?
>
> HTH
> Ron
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk  
> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom  
> Reijnders
> Sent: 08 April 2013 10:08
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: SCORM tracking
>
> It makes sense for quizzes, but not for some of the other page types.
>
> Also, you can make this as complicated as you want, but in the end,  
> it has to be intuitive to the teacher/lerarning speciaist who  
> creates the LO.
>
> I can imagine that we add an optional weight parameter to all  
> interactions, then you could even create 'exercise quizzes' inside  
> an LO.
>
> So, summarizing, for the first release, I am not too keen to add all  
> kinds of bells and whistles. In my opinion it is a lot simpler to  
> use, than it was before, and it tracks a lot more data (not even  
> sure at he moment if that's a blessing).
>
> The way I implemented though gives you MUCH opportunities to play  
> with the plugin structure you created.  The html5 and the flash  
> rlm's use a javascript API to do the tracking, which at the moment  
> is pretty straightforward.  The actual tracking is done in separate  
> javascript classes. With the plug-ins, you can imagine building  
> tracking classes targeted at a very specific LMS.
>
> I will write op some documentation on this hopefully, before R2-Day...
>
>
> Tom
>
> Op 8-4-2013 10:14, Smith, John schreef:
>> Could we have the total result being a running total also as an  
>> option? Im hoping to be able to do an LO where they user does  
>> several sections and then end of section quizzes so need overall  
>> score rather than average score...
>>
>> Anyone tested the score in Blackboard? I can do that at this end  
>> when back to work tomorrow.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> John Smith
>> Learning Technologist
>> School of Health and Life Sciences
>>
>> Sent from Samsung Galaxy SII
>>
>>
>>
>> Julian Tenney <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>> OK, good stuff,
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom
>> Reijnders
>> Sent: 05 April 2013 14:40
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] SCORM tracking
>>
>> I just committed the second stage of SCORM tracking work
>>
>> - quiz tracking is enabled again, but it doesn't look at/ need the  
>> optional parameters at all. At the moment the tracking is enabled  
>> when a scorm package is exported. Also, you now can have two quizes  
>> (quizzes?) in a LO. The total result will be the weighted average.
>>
>> I want to get rid of the quiz parameters dealing with scorm and  
>> replace the quiz specific optional scorm tracking parameters with  
>> optional LO scorm parameters:
>>    - Do not track at all
>>    - Do minimal tracking, ie. only final score
>>    - Do full tracking with times spent in all pages, scores on  
>> individual questions, etc.
>>
>> Mind you, this is still work in progress, and I am testing in all  
>> kinds of scorm environments at the moment.
>>
>> Primary goall: robustness.
>>
>> Another goal is to be able to use a LO from XOT as a SCORM LO, i.e.
>>
>> When you have xot and moodle installed next to each other (with  
>> moodle integration), create a scorm manifest that uses the LO from  
>> XOT, without export. Much easier to maintain, but there are some  
>> gotchas there.  To be continued.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> --
>> --
>>
>> Tom Reijnders
>> TOR Informatica
>> Chopinlaan 27
>> 5242HM Rosmalen
>> Tel: 073 5226191
>> Fax: 073 5226196
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the  
>> addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have  
>> received this message in error, please send it back to me, and  
>> immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the  
>> information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any  
>> views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not  
>> necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>>
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage  
>> your computer system:
>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with
>> the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK  
>> legislation.
>>
>> Glasgow Caledonian University is a registered Scottish charity, number
>> SC021474
>>
>> Winner: Times Higher Education’s Widening Participation Initiative  
>> of the Year 2009 and Herald Society’s Education Initiative of the  
>> Year 2009.
>> http://www.gcu.ac.uk/newsevents/news/bycategory/theuniversity/1/name,6
>> 219,en.html
>>
>> Winner: Times Higher Education’s Outstanding Support for Early  
>> Career Researchers of the Year 2010, GCU as a lead with  
>> Universities Scotland partners.
>> http://www.gcu.ac.uk/newsevents/news/bycategory/theuniversity/1/name,1
>> 5691,en.html _______________________________________________
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>
> --
> --
>
> Tom Reijnders
> TOR Informatica
> Chopinlaan 27
> 5242HM Rosmalen
> Tel: 073 5226191
> Fax: 073 5226196
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.