[Xerte-dev] Re: Players and alternative formats
Tom Reijnders
reijnders at tor.nl
Thu Nov 22 10:00:26 GMT 2012
and trunk is newer than 1.8...
Op 22-11-2012 10:52, Julian Tenney schreef:
>
> Trunk is the zip
>
> *From:*xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] *On Behalf Of *Pat
> Lockley
> *Sent:* 22 November 2012 09:01
> *To:* For Xerte technical developers
> *Subject:* [Xerte-dev] Re: Players and alternative formats
>
> Maybe I crossed my own wires
>
> Is 1.8 the zip, or is trunk the zip?
>
> Last time trunk was the zip and 1.8 was the next version?
>
> On 22 Nov 2012, at 07:23, Tom Reijnders <reijnders at tor.nl
> <mailto:reijnders at tor.nl>> wrote:
>
> We are, aren't we? We do have a 1.8 branch.
> And we should make a branch for the december 7 release. And fixes
> should go in there as well as trunk.
>
> It is a bit unfortunate that your branch is called 1.9, that
> should have been pats_1.9. But, we can work around that, perhaps
> even renaming your branch.
>
> Tom
>
> Op 22-11-2012 0:06, Pat Lockley schreef:
>
> Also, should we move to a more formal trunk way of working
> where the branches are old releases?
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Pat Lockley
> <patrick.lockley at googlemail.com
> <mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>
> I don't get the process here though and there is a lot of core
> I can't test - no ldap, no multiuser and sharing and so on.
> Could the sandbox switch to 1.9?
>
> Alternatively, I could commit into 1.8 as I suspect I've
> changed maybe 10 files (if that)
>
>
> On 21 Nov 2012, at 22:32, Julian Tenney
> <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
> > well, I think it will be for you to attempt to merge, and
> when you have code in files that have changed since you
> branched, it's going to be down to you to make sure your new
> code doesn't break anything that has changed since you
> branched. I don't think too much has - you can also get a log
> of each file so you can step through changes that have been
> mde to that file. I'm guessing that to ull this off, you'll
> have changed some core stuff, but I don't know how much. From
> our point ofview the only thing that has changed is the html5
> stuff, and that is mostly client side. My own changes are
> client side, but might have fixed the odd PHP thing.
> >
> > Ron, Tom and David are the most likely to be able to comment
> on any PHP changes since 1.8 they have made.
> >
> > Probably worth trying at first into a dummy folder or
> something 'safe', just to see how things pan out?
> > ________________________________________
> > From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>
> [xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>] On Behalf
> Of Pat Lockley [patrick.lockley at googlemail.com
> <mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com>]
> > Sent: 21 November 2012 17:47
> > To: For Xerte technical developers
> > Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Players and alternative formats
> >
> > i've never merged before........
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Julian Tenney
> <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>>> wrote:
> > I don't think so. LTI just lets you open a door into the
> application.
> >
> > I'd rather deal with this now, than later when it's more
> complicated.
> >
> > Why not try merging, and see if it looks gribbly?
> >
> > From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>
> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>] On Behalf
> Of Pat Lockley
> > Sent: 21 November 2012 16:36
> >
> > To: For Xerte technical developers
> > Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Players and alternative formats
> >
> > Could do, and just leave out the new modules?
> >
> > The changes I discussed don't exist in 1.9 just yet - would
> later in week.
> >
> > I need to list what's changed for the purposes of testing,
> but am a bit worried that since the 1.9 branch was made a lot
> of new stuff has joined 1.8 (LTI for example) and I might undo
> some stuff? I can't see it clashing, but....
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Julian Tenney
> <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>>> wrote:
> > Why don't you merge in your mod stuff, it won't make a lot
> of odds to most people, but will allow some cool stuff
> later... most people won't see any difference, right?
> >
> >
> > From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>
> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>] On Behalf
> Of Pat Lockley
> > Sent: 21 November 2012 15:53
> >
> > To: For Xerte technical developers
> > Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Players and alternative formats
> >
> > i could, but is the php in 1.8 svn?
> >
> > It isn't a lot of php (an if statement or two)
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Julian Tenney
> <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>>> wrote:
> > Could you do the php side? In the wizard we can add a
> parameter to the LO playback="flash" which can be updated to
> playback="html" for people who want to experiment with the beta.
> >
> > Then in the wizard we can do
> >
> > If (set as flash or undefined) //do it flash style
> >
> > Else
> >
> > //do it html5 style
> >
> > Appreciate the flash side is probably easier than the PHP
> side...
> >
> > From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>
> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>] On Behalf
> Of Pat Lockley
> > Sent: 21 November 2012 14:45
> >
> > To: For Xerte technical developers
> > Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Players and alternative formats
> >
> > -- Flash side --
> >
> > put a radio button in the editor
> > add an extra parameter to the url generation code (event
> handler for the play button)
> >
> > -- php side --
> >
> > Edit preview and play .php to check for this new $_GET and
> then branch
> >
> > -- .htaccess side --
> >
> > Mod the reg exp
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Julian Tenney
> <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>>> wrote:
> > Time is of the essence for the 1.9 drop because we want to
> get that done by 30th November, so I like what you're saying,
> but wonder if it can be done in time...?
> >
> > From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>
> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>] On Behalf
> Of Pat Lockley
> > Sent: 21 November 2012 13:29
> >
> > To: For Xerte technical developers
> > Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Players and alternative formats
> >
> > Well it depends on what we call "now"
> >
> >
> > It's a bit roadmappy, but for 1.9 you'd not have
> html_play.php and play.php, but one play.php which would then
> switch on the variable set (within the module folder).
> >
> > You'd have an option somewhere of setting "HTML5" somehow
> (perhaps a radio box on the editor?) which would then send a
> request to set this session to be "HTML5" and all previews
> from then on would be HTML5 mode.
> >
> > Then you add an extension to the current play rule in
> htaccess to support a "third" variable, so play_560_html would
> play the template in HTML5 mode. In the future, play_560_scorm
> would do the scorm export. As long as play_560_[a-z]+ was
> handled in the php play code for that module you could do
> whatever you wanted to do.
> >
> > In theory you could also have preview_560_html as well
> >
> > It seems neater to me, but this is me speaking from my cave.
> >
> > Oooh a flint.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Julian Tenney
> <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>>> wrote:
> > I like to generalise solutions too. What would the
> implications be for what we have now?
> >
> > From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>
> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>] On Behalf
> Of Pat Lockley
> > Sent: 21 November 2012 12:43
> > To: For Xerte technical developers
> > Subject: [Xerte-dev] Players and alternative formats
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > This is a message from deep inside modularisation caves so
> it might not apply to all.
> >
> > I have a semi working google maps making template, and when
> it "plays" at present it draws a map using the google maps AP
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> <mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
--
--
Tom Reijnders
TOR Informatica
Chopinlaan 27
5242HM Rosmalen
Tel: 073 5226191
Fax: 073 5226196
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20121122/90523225/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Xerte-dev
mailing list