[Xerte-dev] Re: google doc + page type order

Mon May 28 13:42:18 BST 2012

The xwd's are right beside them (and 1 xwd for 1 model) in the en-GB 
folder. The template.xwd is generated from the individual .xwds and 
basix.xwd.

Tom

Op 28-5-2012 14:27, Julian Tenney schreef:
>
> If it's easy to run, change and fix the files in pageWizards/models 
> (by running Xerte.exe in the runtime folder, creating  a new project, 
> then adding the types you're interested in) then that would be fine. I 
> think that's the case. How easy is it to add a new model -- it was 
> really easy before in the templates/pageTemplates one because the xwd 
> was right there to change along with the models...
>
> *From:*xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk 
> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] *On Behalf Of *Tom 
> Reijnders
> *Sent:* 28 May 2012 13:25
> *To:* For Xerte technical developers
> *Subject:* [Xerte-dev] Re: google doc + page type order
>
> I think we should do this (only once) and than agree on where the 
> source is. As far as I am concerned, that can be pageWizards of the 
> standalone.  But we must agree on where the ONE source is.
>
>
>
> Op 28-5-2012 13:41, Kemp Johnathan schreef:
>
> I have just run a quick winmerge comparison between the model files in 
> the
>
> xerte svn pageWizards\models folder
>
> and the model files in the
>
> XOT svn modules\xerte\parent_templates\Nottingham\models\ folder
>
> It appears that some changes have been made to the following files in 
> the XOT svn (which in some cases appear to fix bugs in the pageWizards 
> version (typically a [0] reference that should be [projPI] but there 
> are also more substantial changes in some pages.
>
> The pages concerned are
>
> buttonNav.rlm
>
> columnPage.rlm
>
> title.rlm
>
> Whilst I can see the need to correct the [0] to [propPI] references I 
> don't know anything about the other changes and I don't know who made 
> them - it may have been whilst I was on holiday recently.
>
> Do I need to be copying the versions of these pages in the XOT svn 
> back into the Xerte svn pageWizards section? Do the changes need testing?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Johnathan
>
> On 28 May 2012 12:10, Ron Mitchell <ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk 
> <mailto:ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk>> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> a quick update re the issues listed in the Google doc
>
> Jonathan - thanks for updating the Google doc. I've moved all the 
> issues that you've indicated as closed to the fixed sheet. I know 
> you've committed some updated files to the Xerte svn so I assume 
> you'll be updating the XOT svn with the same files at some point? I'll 
> watch the rss feed for any updates and update the test install when 
> those updates are notified by the feed.
>
> All -  at the moment there are 4 issues remaining in the tests and 
> issues sheet. I think most of these are minor but can't recall if 
> we've discussed the order of page types in each category and if 
> there's a change needed? e.g. at the moment the order of page types 
> within each category doesn't appear to be alphabetical or in the same 
> order as previous versions. I seem to recall the consensus was that 
> the category order is fine now e.g. Text then Media then Navigators 
> etc but for instance at the moment the media category looks like this:
>
> Which doesn't appear to be alphabetical but can it be?
>
> Also a related question for Tom I guess - is your xwd builder code 
> ready for this release? Would be great to test that and I think would 
> be especially useful if we can document how admins might add or remove 
> page types and then re-run the builder direct in XOT.
>
> Cheers
>
> Ron
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee 
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this 
> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete 
> it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in 
> this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by 
> the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the 
> University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an 
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your 
> computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email 
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as 
> permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk <mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee 
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this 
> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete 
> it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in 
> this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by 
> the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the 
> University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an 
> attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer 
> system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk  <mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>   
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>   
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>   
>
>
>
> -- 
> --
>   
> Tom Reijnders
> TOR Informatica
> Chopinlaan 27
> 5242HM Rosmalen
> Tel: 073 5226191
> Fax: 073 5226196
>   
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>

-- 
--

Tom Reijnders
TOR Informatica
Chopinlaan 27
5242HM Rosmalen
Tel: 073 5226191
Fax: 073 5226196

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20120528/000bb737/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 14692 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20120528/000bb737/attachment-0001.jpe>