[Xerte-dev] Re: google doc + page type order

[Tom Reijnders]

I thought I did that (or at least in the order of the newNodes, which 
strictly speaking is not alphabetical but close (the name of the xwd is 
not the name of the menu)

However, even doing that, the meu comes out in reverse order, and I like 
to understand why before fixing things.


Op 28-5-2012 14:25, Julian Tenney schreef:
>
> The insert menu is fine like that, can we sort the child menus to be A-Z?
>
> *From:*xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk 
> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] *On Behalf Of *Tom 
> Reijnders
> *Sent:* 28 May 2012 12:27
> *To:* For Xerte technical developers
> *Subject:* [Xerte-dev] Re: google doc + page type order
>
> The page order is determined by the order in which the newNodes appear 
> in the data.xwd (template.xwd). The builder (at the moment) does that 
> in the order it encounters the files on disk. I tried to order on the 
> xwds but somehow the menu is still not ordered the way I would expect.
>
> Not sure what to do about it.
>
> And yes the builder is ready, we use it all the time.
>
> Tom
>
> Op 28-5-2012 13:10, Ron Mitchell schreef:
>
> Hi all
>
> a quick update re the issues listed in the Google doc
>
> Jonathan - thanks for updating the Google doc. I've moved all the 
> issues that you've indicated as closed to the fixed sheet. I know 
> you've committed some updated files to the Xerte svn so I assume 
> you'll be updating the XOT svn with the same files at some point? I'll 
> watch the rss feed for any updates and update the test install when 
> those updates are notified by the feed.
>
> All -  at the moment there are 4 issues remaining in the tests and 
> issues sheet. I think most of these are minor but can't recall if 
> we've discussed the order of page types in each category and if 
> there's a change needed? e.g. at the moment the order of page types 
> within each category doesn't appear to be alphabetical or in the same 
> order as previous versions. I seem to recall the consensus was that 
> the category order is fine now e.g. Text then Media then Navigators 
> etc but for instance at the moment the media category looks like this:
>
> Which doesn't appear to be alphabetical but can it be?
>
> Also a related question for Tom I guess - is your xwd builder code 
> ready for this release? Would be great to test that and I think would 
> be especially useful if we can document how admins might add or remove 
> page types and then re-run the builder direct in XOT.
>
> Cheers
>
> Ron
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee 
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this 
> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete 
> it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in 
> this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by 
> the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the 
> University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an 
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your 
> computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email 
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as 
> permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk  <mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>   
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>   
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>   
>
>
>
> -- 
> --
>   
> Tom Reijnders
> TOR Informatica
> Chopinlaan 27
> 5242HM Rosmalen
> Tel: 073 5226191
> Fax: 073 5226196
>   
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>

-- 
--

Tom Reijnders
TOR Informatica
Chopinlaan 27
5242HM Rosmalen
Tel: 073 5226191
Fax: 073 5226196


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20120528/a8913c82/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 14692 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20120528/a8913c82/attachment-0001.jpe>