[Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)

Julian Tenney Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
Wed May 9 10:53:39 BST 2012 

Sorry, whats the difference between local and zip?

Otherwise, yes merge the two 1.2 exports.

I like the idea of a drop down list to select which one.

-----Original Message-----
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom Reijnders
Sent: 09 May 2012 10:52
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)

No, didn't do anything since last time yet. Current state is that there 
are 5 exports:

Zip : will only export used media and will export jMolViewer and/or 
mapstraction when used. Will not export the viewer because I need to 
look at that.

Local zip: Same but with some changes to the urls

SCORM 1.2

SCORM 1.2 with extra meta data

SCORM 2004


As far as I can tell we can bundle the two SCORM exports. (Always use 
SCORM with extra MetaData)

Tom

Op 9-5-2012 11:36, Julian Tenney schreef:
> I don't want to see this splinter into a complicated page with loads of options. Ideally there might be some code that loops over each filename and sees if it exists anywhere in the xml and then exports it: that would cover hyperlinks too, and the user only has one option.
>
> Otherwise we start ending up with a  slightly baffling local? Scorm? Scorm 2004? Full? Minimal? Deployment? When people just want to get something out.
>
> Are these changes on the test server now?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom Reijnders
> Sent: 05 May 2012 19:23
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Export Code (commit of fixes)
>
> That's why I proposed a small(er) Deployment Export and a Full export,
> The Deployment export would be a new choice. That started the
> export/download discussion.
>
> Op 5-5-2012 20:13, Ron Mitchell schreef:
>> Hi
>> Only just catching up on discussions that I couldn't follow on Thurs&
>> Friday...
>>
>> Personally I think export/download whatever it's called should include all
>> the media in the media folder not just used media. The reason being
>> sometimes files are uploaded via media and quota to simply link to via text
>> hyperlink (and that hyperlink might even be in a linked document rather than
>> a xerte page) or when trying different content as part of a particular page
>> or project, so just because these show as not used doesn't mean they might
>> not be required or used in future. I know that links like this might not
>> work in the exported project but I think an author naturally assumes that
>> export includes all their media and if it's a matter of reducing size they
>> can delete unwanted media via media&   quota before exporting. e.g. owner
>> should control what's exported and the reason for exporting might simply be
>> as a backup of the whole project.
>>
>> HTH
>> Ron
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom Reijnders
>> Sent: 03 May 2012 16:25
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Export Code (commit of fixes)
>>
>> I just committed an update to the export code:
>>
>> Fixes and additions for export
>>     - Should copy all the language .xml files from the top of the /language
>> folder
>>     - Should enable scorm2004 compliant export
>>     - Should copy JMolViewer and/or mapstraction folders if and only if those
>> models are used
>>     - Should ONLY export the used media, the rest is not copied
>>     - small fixes in htaccess.conf
>>     - small fixes in library/Xerte/Authentication/Db.php
>>     - get rid of superfuous scorm files
>>     - move MainPreloader.swf, rloObject.js and resources.swf out of scorm in
>> in their own folder (modules/xerte/export)
>>
>>
>> I wonder whether we should prevent exporting the thumbs folder as well...
>>
>> David (Goodwin), I used the Db method and had to fix two typos. Comitted
>> thos as well. BTW, with the current code it is NOT that easy to set a
>> password in the database... ;-)
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> Op 3-5-2012 14:25, Pat Lockley schreef:
>>> i couldn't see them failing, was just wondering if the scorm one might
>> conflict.
>>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Tom Reijnders<reijnders at tor.nl>    wrote:
>>>> I will, but they are really simple.
>>>>
>>>> Op 3-5-2012 14:01, Pat Lockley schreef:
>>>>> Tom, could you check the rewrite rules work - worried the scorm ones
>>>>> might have hungry regexs?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:57 PM, David Goodwin<david at palepurple.co.uk>
>>>>>     wrote:
>>>>>> On 3 May 2012, at 12:48, Pat Lockley wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i like to leave the odd bug in to encourage other developers
>>>>>> Nice.... thanks for making me laugh :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pale Purple Ltd.  (Company No: 5580814) 'Business Web Application
>>>>>> Development and Training in PHP'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.palepurple.co.uk
>>>>>> Office: 0845 0046746     Mobile: 07792380669
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Follow us on Twitter: @PalePurpleLtd
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>>>>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the
>>>>>> addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have
>> received this message in
>>>>>> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please
>> do not
>>>>>> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or
>>>>>> in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author
>>>>>> of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of
>> Nottingham.
>>>>>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>>>>>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage
>>>>>> your computer
>>>>>> system:
>>>>>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications
>>>>>> with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by
>>>>>> UK legislatio
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>>>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>>>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>>>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the
>>>>> addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received
>> this message in
>>>>> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do
>> not
>>>>> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or
>>>>> in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of
>>>>> this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of
>> Nottingham.
>>>>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>>>>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage
>>>>> your computer
>>>>> system:
>>>>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications
>>>>> with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK
>> legislation.
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Tom Reijnders
>>>> TOR Informatica
>>>> Chopinlaan 27
>>>> 5242HM Rosmalen
>>>> Tel: 073 5226191
>>>> Fax: 073 5226196
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
>> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
>> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not
>> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any
>> attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do
>> not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
>> computer system:
>>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with
>>> the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK
>> legislation.
>> --
>> --
>>
>> Tom Reijnders
>> TOR Informatica
>> Chopinlaan 27
>> 5242HM Rosmalen
>> Tel: 073 5226191
>> Fax: 073 5226196
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev

-- 
--

Tom Reijnders
TOR Informatica
Chopinlaan 27
5242HM Rosmalen
Tel: 073 5226191
Fax: 073 5226196



_______________________________________________
Xerte-dev mailing list
Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev

More information about the Xerte-dev mailing list