[Xerte-dev] Re: Selection of appropriate models on which to base the new international ready model files

[Kemp Johnathan]

So if I have understood you correctly I should use the model files in

Xerte svn\templates\pageTemplates\models

and ignore any work done in the XOT svn?

Kind regards

Johnathan

PS what is happening with the Interactive Diagram page? It appears to be a
work in progress, with code in the rlm file to support a multiple choice
question, but nothing in the xwd to provide data for this?

On 31 January 2012 14:04, Julian Tenney <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>wrote:

> Most up to date models are in xerte svn.
>
>
>
> I always develop in there, and when done, and all other dependences are in
> place for toolkits, I move them in there. Xerte is the source for all xerte
> rlated stuff; toolkits for the php and web app for toolkits.
>
>
>
> Does that help?
>
>
>
> *From:* xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:
> xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] *On Behalf Of *Kemp Johnathan
> *Sent:* 31 January 2012 13:54
> *To:* Xerte Developers Discussion List
> *Subject:* [Xerte-dev] Selection of appropriate models on which to base
> the new international ready model files
>
>
>
> Following my recent testing of the embed content page I have had occasion
> to update my copy of the XOT svn.
>
>
>
> I also updated my Xerte svn copy and then compared the models in the
> following folders using winmerge
>
> xerte svn\templates\pageTemplates\models
>
> and
>
> XOT svn\modules\xerte\parent_templates\Nottingham\models
>
> There are differences between the two versions of the following files with
> the most recent being indicated against each file
>
>
> dragDropLabel.rlm         x
> embedDiv.rlm                xot
> hotspotImage.rlm           xot
> jmol.rlm                          xot
> memory.rlm                     xot
> textGraphics.rlm             xot
> textSWF.rlm                  xot
> textVideo.rlm                xot
> thumbnailViewer.rlm     x
> youtuberss.rlm               x
>
> I have been using the pageTemplates models as my source for developing the
> languaged versions of the files and monitoring changes to the pageTemplates
> models against a baseline snapshot taken before I started the work.
>
> As I develop the new model files I am including support for projects with
> multiple page definitions. Whilst this will be neutral in impact to XOT
> based pages in terms of their performance it will, until the changeover is
> completed, make comparison between the previous files and the new versions
> a little more complicated as every reference to the data structure is
> modified e.g.
>
> templatedata.quiz[0] becomes templatedata.quiz[projPI]
>
> in XOT projects projPI gets set to 0 at the start of the page.
>
>
>
> You can view completed examples in the xerte svn in pageWizards/models/
>
>
>
> So where should I be looking for the most appropriate version of the files
> to use and how do we manage the current situation in which changes are
> taking place, in two different places?
>
>
>
> How am I to know which version to use and when a change should be
> implemented in the languaged version of the files?
>
>
>
> I don't want to produce a set of files that omits important changes that
> have been made, but at present I don't know which version of the files I
> should use or when a change should be incorporated in the files I am
> developing.
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Johnathan
>
>
>
>
>
>  This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not
> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any
> attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do
> not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> permitted by UK legislation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do
> not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in
> any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this
> email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20120131/cc6791f8/attachment-0001.html>