[Xerte-dev] Re: Connector Pages

[Kemp Johnathan]

 Can everyone play around with the connectors and can we have some debate
about this please?

I will be out this morning, but this afternoon I will put together a brief
introduction to Connector pages. You can learn all you need to know about
the use of Connector pages by becoming familiar with the Menu, Plain Text,
MCQ and Redirector Connector pages. All the Connector pages essentially
work the same way.

The other three pages introduce nothing new with respect to their being
Connector pages. What they add are features specific to themselves e.g. the
different things the hotspots can be used for in the Hotspot Image
Connector; how you can manage the variety of things that you can add to a
tab in the Tab Navigator Connector; and with respect to the Scenario
Connector the whole concept of what a Scenario is and how you can use
scenes, props, conditions, actions and outcomes to develop sophisticated
interactions with the learner.

These latter three pages deserve separate coverage in their own right, once
you have an understanding of Connector pages in general. It will take me a
little longer to produce something to cover the items specific to these
pages.

Kind regards

Johnathan




On 24 April 2012 13:02, Julian Tenney <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>wrote:

> Why have the author set ‘mode’? What’s the point of this, and if we need
> it can we not detect it? What happens if I forget to set it back? Couldn’t
> this be a global setting?
>
>
>
> With the connector pages, do we need to have the options for back / next
> buttons stuff on each page, or are there global / automatic settings we
> could make?
>
>
>
> It is a pain when buttons are turned off to quickly get to the page I want
> to get to – so If I add a new page, I can’t navigate to it to check it’s
> how I want it, because the buttons suddenly disappear.
>
>
>
> I can see the value in the connectors, but we need to make this easy.
>
>
>
> Seriously, when we built toolkits the mantra in the office was (honestly)
> ‘f*ckwit simple’. It meant that we created tools that create relatively
> simple content. But it means people can use it. That guiding principle has
> got us a long way, and means that people can easily create content – that
> is what people like about toolkits. We need to sanity check all the new
> features against that mantra. If it isn’t ‘f*ckwit simple’ it may belong in
> another tool.
>
>
>
> Even if people don’t use the more advanced features, seeing them, and
> realising they don’t know what to do with them undermines the simplicity
> and usability elsewhere – I think people should very quickly feel at home
> with all the functionality, and not feel that only a subset of it is
> appropriate for them: by implication those users feel, well, a bit like
> f*ckwits, and that’s not what we want to say. We want to say ‘this is easy’
> and we want people to think ’this is brilliant, I can do this’. There are
> other tools for more advanced users.
>
>
>
> What is display text? This is another one that we need to have a think
> about: I’m not sure what it does having just played around with it for a
> few minutes. If I don’t know what something does after playing around with
> it for a few minutes, neither will a great many other people. Remember the
> mantra.
>
>
>
> Can everyone play around with the connectors and can we have some debate
> about this please?
>
>
>
>  This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not
> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any
> attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do
> not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> permitted by UK legislation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do
> not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in
> any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this
> email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20120425/ef25790f/attachment.html>