[Xerte-dev] Re: Location of xwd and rlm files in the svn(s) plus any other shared files

Mon Apr 23 12:30:30 BST 2012

I'm not even sure where they are now!

Previously I had them in the xerte repo, so that I could run Xerte standalone from there and have the latest .rlms in a page templates project: that made it easy to fire up a project, open up the rlm and make changes / fix things. It also means you can work on the engine with the latest set of files easily, and debug stuff if you need to. Those files were then made into a .xtp file for standalone, or moved into the toolkits repo after testing on the Nottingham toolkits server. I'd like to stick with that arrangement as I think it worked well.

From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
Sent: 23 April 2012 12:23
To: 'For Xerte technical developers'
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Location of xwd and rlm files in the svn(s) plus any other shared files

and the key question as Jonathan asked too - where's the primary source of the xwd's and rlms etc to be? e.g. if today at 1pm one of us wanted to make a change, addition, fix to one of the rlm's where should that be committed?

From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Tenney
Sent: 23 April 2012 12:11
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Location of xwd and rlm files in the svn(s) plus any other shared files

If you generate a xwd from lots of small xwds for each model, how do you add in the LO stuff? There's no model for that.

From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom Reijnders
Sent: 23 April 2012 12:10
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Location of xwd and rlm files in the svn(s) plus any other shared files

Op 23-4-2012 12:54, Julian Tenney schreef:
>I guess Julian is king...
...Canute maybe. Seems like I can't stem the tide...

I imagine the stylesheet option has gone because there isn't an LO model, so Tom built in the LO properties from an old file to his generator.
Ehmmm, come again? Can I fix that?

The order of things: I like the order suggested: Text, Media, Navigators, Connectors, Interactivity, etc. I thought this was determined by the LO node in the xwd as well?

The order has been fixed. Not committed yet though...
The order is determined from the xwd, but what is in there is dynamic (sort of) from the individual xwd's. But Like I said, I found a soltution that for all purposes will work out just fine.

From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell
Sent: 20 April 2012 11:13
To: 'For Xerte technical developers'
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Location of xwd and rlm files in the svn(s) plus any other shared files

That's a good point Jonathan but I guess the answer isn't straightforward :-(

e.g. I notice Fay has just updated /trunk/modules/xerte/parent_templates/Nottingham/data.xwd but I'm not sure what changes that contains or whether that brings it in sync or out of sync with the Xerte version or rather versions.

As we've listed and discussed the custom stylesheet option has gone missing in the XOT 1.8 beta to which I guess means it's gone missing from the xwd but I'm not sure how or why. Likewise there's the discussion about the order in which the categories and page types appear in the Nottingham template and I guess this applies to Xerte as well as XOT although I haven't checked if this has changed in Xerte too?

I guess Julian is king and needs to guide us? ;-)

Cheers
Ron

From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Kemp Johnathan
Sent: 20 April 2012 10:47
To: Xerte Developers Discussion List
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Location of xwd and rlm files in the svn(s) plus any other shared files

Currently we have separate svns for Xerte and Toolkits.

Whilst developing the new model and xwd files I set up a pageWizards folder in the root of the Xerte svn so that they could be developed parallel to the existing models which were still in use.

Now we have come to a point where we are testing a beta release of Toolkits that is based on these new models and xwds. Also a beta release of desktop Xerte is imminent, which will also be using the same model and xwd files. They will also share many other files e.g. thumbs, the "common" folder and I also (?) the core files such as editor.swf, XMLengine.swf etc.

Would it not make sense for all the shared files to be kept in one location so that we avoid a situation in which the various copies of the files that currently exist get out of synch with each other? If the Toolkits release is using earlier versions of swf files that have been modified in the desktop Xerte then this is going to create anomalies during testing, since the models were developed in the desktop environment.

Where then are we to keep them?

The testing of the XOT beta is raising the need to make some changes to xwd files and possibly also some model files. I don't want to start making these changes whilst there is ambiguity as to which set of files to work from.

Personally I have no preference as to where they are kept. I think Tom may have a view on this.

Currently there are copies of the new xwd and rlm files in

xerte svn / runtime/pages /
xerte svn / pageWizards/models (rlms) and pageWizards/en-gb (xwds)
XOT svn/ modules/xerte/parent_templates/Nottingham/models (rlms) and wizards (xwds)

Kind regards

Johnathan

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.

_______________________________________________

Xerte-dev mailing list

Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>

http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment

may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:

you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the

University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.

--

--

Tom Reijnders

TOR Informatica

Chopinlaan 27

5242HM Rosmalen

Tel: 073 5226191

Fax: 073 5226196

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20120423/d087e54a/attachment-0001.html>