[Syrphidae] Syrphidae Digest, Vol 235, Issue 3
lasiopa at bknet.dk
lasiopa at bknet.dk
Thu Sep 17 14:05:45 BST 2026
Thank you for your explanation, Libor. I will await his publication and use D. lenensis as a valid species until we know its status.
Where can I see the results of TaxoFly?
Best regards
Leif
----------------------------------------
Fra: syrphidae at centrum.cz
Sendt: 16/09/2026 22.17
Til: syrphidae at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
Emne: Re: [Syrphidae] Syrphidae Digest, Vol 235, Issue 3
Dear all,
I know only situation around D. lenensis. Dasysyrphus lenensis was synonymized with D. nigricornis by Anatolyi Barkalov in his paper:
Barkalov A.V. 2007 Hoverflies of the genus Dasysyrphus Enderlein, 1937 (Diptera, Syrphidae) from the Urals, Siberia and the Far East. Euroasian Entomological Journal 6: 273-298+ VIII
But I discussed this synonymy with him when prepared data for TaxoFly and we have to repair this synonymy to D. nigricornis and D. kegali. D. lenensis is surely separated species to D. nigricornis according to current opinion of Anatolyi, but not published yet. So I used D. lenensis in TaxoFly, even if I am not so sure if D. lenensis is conspecific with Centraleuropean populations named as D. lenensis.
With best wishes
Libor
> Od: syrphidae-request at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> Komu: syrphidae at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> Datum: 16.09.2026 17:00
> Předmět: Syrphidae Digest, Vol 235, Issue 3
>
Send Syrphidae mailing list submissions to
syrphidae at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/syrphidae
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
syrphidae-request at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
You can reach the person managing the list at
syrphidae-owner at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Syrphidae digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. FW: Scientific names changed (Francis Gilbert)
2. Re: FW: Scientific names changed (ximo mengual sanchis)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:45:14 +0000
From: Francis Gilbert <Francis.Gilbert at nottingham.ac.uk>
To: "syrphidae at nottingham.ac.uk" <syrphidae at nottingham.ac.uk>
Subject: [Syrphidae] FW: Scientific names changed
Message-ID:
<AMBPR06MB1095697722A29BFF7B59A60C6CCB92 at AMBPR06MB10956.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Dr Francis Gilbert
Emeritus Professor, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG72RD, UK
website: https://www-web.nottingham.ac.uk/~plzfg/
________________________________
Fra: lasiopa at bknet.dk<mailto:lasiopa at bknet.dk>
Sendt: 16/09/2026 10.44
Til: "Syrphidae" <syrphidae-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:syrphidae-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>
Emne: Scientific names changed
Dear all
Does anybody know why scientific names of hoverflies have been changed lately in the Catalogue of Life? Examples are Melanostoma mellinum, now M. mellina, and Dasysyrphus lenensis, now a synonym for D. nigricornis.
Where were changes published?
Best wishes
Leif
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/syrphidae/attachments/20260916/240414f8/attachment-0001.htm>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 16:59:32 +0200
From: ximo mengual sanchis <xmengual at gmail.com>
To: "syrphidae at nottingham.ac.uk" <syrphidae at nottingham.ac.uk>, Leif
Bloss Carstensen <lasiopa at bknet.dk>
Subject: Re: [Syrphidae] FW: Scientific names changed
Message-ID:
<CALZXNEtisVc0wa8htmFOPBpcpFUfieRrQ9+oa0DP4o=FNWXw9w at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi Leif,
I am not aware of a publication with such changes. Catalogue of Life
receives the taxonomic information from www.diptera.org
If you do a little search there, this is what I found for *D. lenensis*:
http://diptera.org/Nomenclator/Details/48073
Under Authority, they cite Barkalov and Mutin (2018). If you check that
publication, authors mention the following:
*Dasysyrphus nigricornis (Verrall, 1873)*
= *Dasysyrphus lenensis *Bagatshanova, 1980
Distribution. Sib, S Kh ? Eu, Mn.
Remarks. The records of this species from the Far East [Gritskevich, 1997,
1998] actually belong to a separate species that is not identical to *D.
lenensis* Bagatshanova, 1980.
The same for *M. mellinum*: http://diptera.org/Nomenclator/Details/44818
In this case it is an error. The species was originally described as Musca
mellina, and we do not know if mellina is a name or an adjective.
Stoma, stomatos is neuter in Greek, thus mellinum is correct if it refers
to an adjective. You can email Neal Evenhuis and Thomas Pape and ask them
if the correct spelling should be mellinum.
But Douglas Yanega knows better and can give you a better explanation.
Cheers,
Ximo
********************************************************
Dr. Ximo Mengual
Head of the Diptera Section
Museum Koenig Bonn - LIB
Adenauerallee 127 ? 53113 Bonn, Germany
Phone: 0049 (0)228 9122 292
ZFMK web
<https://leibniz-lib.de/en/ueber-das-lib/mitarbeitende/ximo-mengual.html>
<http://entomology.si.edu/StaffPages/MengualJ.html>
https://www.bolgermany.de/ | http://syrphidae.myspecies.info/
El mi?, 16 sept 2026 a las 16:45, Francis Gilbert (<
Francis.Gilbert at nottingham.ac.uk>) escribi?:
>
>
>
>
> Dr Francis Gilbert
>
> Emeritus Professor, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham,
> Nottingham NG72RD, UK
>
> website: https://www-web.nottingham.ac.uk/~plzfg/
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Fra*: lasiopa at bknet.dk
> *Sendt*: 16/09/2026 10.44
> *Til*: "Syrphidae" <syrphidae-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>
> *Emne*: Scientific names changed
>
>
>
> Dear all
>
>
>
> Does anybody know why scientific names of hoverflies have been changed
> lately in the Catalogue of Life? Examples are Melanostoma mellinum, now M.
> mellina, and Dasysyrphus lenensis, now a synonym for D. nigricornis.
>
>
>
> Where were changes published?
>
>
>
> Best wishes
>
> Leif
> _______________________________________________
> Syrphidae mailing list
> Syrphidae at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> https://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/syrphidae
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/syrphidae/attachments/20260916/47755aeb/attachment.htm>
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
Syrphidae mailing list
Syrphidae at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
https://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/syrphidae
------------------------------
End of Syrphidae Digest, Vol 235, Issue 3
*****************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/syrphidae/attachments/20260917/b4a1ace7/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Syrphidae
mailing list