[Reading-hall-of-fame] Re: Upcoming RHF Nomination Process

Tue Apr 5 17:34:01 BST 2022

Greetings

I agree with David also.  Accomplishment should be what is considered for a membership and will extend the impact of the work.

Warm regards,
Judith

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 5, 2022, at 5:05 AM, Henrietta Dombey <H.Dombey at brighton.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> Dear Fellow H of Fers,
> 
> I am in complete agreement with David Pearson on this.  "We ought to be eligible when our record of accomplishment merits it. "
> 
> Best to all,
> 
> Henrietta
> 
> Henrietta Dombey
> Professor Emerita of Literacy in Primary Education
> University of Brighton UK
> ________________________________________
> From: reading-hall-of-fame-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [reading-hall-of-fame-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] on behalf of P David Pearson, Emeritus [ppearson at berkeley.edu]
> Sent: 05 April 2022 00:20
> To: Kathy Hinchman; reading hall of fame
> Subject: [Reading-hall-of-fame] Re: Upcoming RHF Nomination Process
> 
> CAUTION: This email may have originated from outside of the university. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.
> ________________________________
> I am thrilled to know that we have the opportunity, once again, to nominate so many deserving candidates for the RHF.
> 
> However, I continue to oppose the current standard of 25 years out from one's terminal degree.  I think the standard is ageist, arbitrary, and anti-meritorious.
> Ageist:  The distribution of ages among those who meet the 25 years beyond the terminal degree could be very wide.
> 
>  *   Scholar A got a BA and Teacher Credential at age 22, taught elementary school for 5 years, went back to school to earn a Phd in 5 years.  She is eligible for RHF at age 57.
>  *   Scholar B got a BA in History and went directly into an MA+credential program, finishing at age 23.  She taught for 3 years as a classroom teacher, wrote some articles for the Reading Teacher, collaborated on a teacher book for a publisher, started a free lance consulting company, and became well known. She is eligible at age 48.
>  *   Scholar C got a BA and credential, after starting a family, at age 29. She taught for 5 years, during which time she completed an MA as a reading specialist, joined a local reading council, served as president, published 5 articles and a book, ran for and was elected to the ILA Board at age 48, at which time, she started a doctoral program.  She finished at age 55.  She'll be eligible to stand for RHF at age 80.
> 
> Not fair
> 
> Arbitrary:  What's magical about 25 years. Some of us hit our stride early in our careers (I won't name any RHF members out of fear of missing someone), while others hit it later (we all know who we are).  We ought to be eligible when our record of accomplishment merits it.  Why does it matter if some have achieved enough to stand in 15 years, while others take 30 years?  Most other prestigious elections that I know of (e.g., AERA fellow or National Academy of Education) have NO time in grade requirements. Why should we?
> 
> Anti-merit:  I think we should reward merit (accomplishment in scholarship and leadership), pure and simple.  To put a time in grade standard in place assumes that if you just hang around long enough, your turn might come.  I think your turn should come when the record says it is your time.  That is what we should be judging: Does the record meet the standard?
> 
> I am not suggesting that we should change the process and criteria this year. We need to stick with what we have.
> 
> But at some point, I think we should go to a strictly merit-based standard and let the "age" chips fall where they may.
> 
> My 2 cents forth.
> 
> David
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 3:37 PM Kathy Hinchman <kahinchm at syr.edu<mailto:kahinchm at syr.edu>> wrote:
> Hello Reading Hall of Fame Members,
> 
> I hope this email finds you well. The email comes as a reminder to begin thinking about who you would like to nominate for induction into the Reading Hall of Fame. This induction will take place at the 2022 annual meeting of the Literacy Research Association (LRA). The nomination process will begin when I send you a call for nominations in early June, 2022.
> 
> As you are considering nominees, I want to remind you of the Voting Procedures for the years 2020-2025.
> 
> 1. An inductee must have made significant contributions to the field for over 25 years after the terminal degree is granted.
> 2. The description of the nominee’s biographical statement can be up to 250 words.
> 3. RHF members can nominate living and deceased individuals and national and non-national individuals for induction.
> 
> According to these procedures, there will be two ballots. The first one will be sent out during the week of June 6, 2022.The second and final ballot will be sent out approximately two weeks later.
> 
> Many thanks and take care,
> 
> Kathy Hinchman
> Secretary
> Reading Hall of Fame
> 
> ---
> Kathleen A. Hinchman
> Professor Emerita
> Reading & Language Arts Department
> Syracuse University
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> “And in the end, it’s not the years in your life that count. It’s the life in your years."‑—Abraham Lincoln
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> P. David Pearson
> Evelyn Lois Corey Emeritus Professor of Instructional Science
> Graduate School of Education
> University of California, Berkeley
> 
> email:  ppearson at berkeley.edu<mailto:ppearson at berkeley.edu>
> other e-mail:  pdavidpearsondean at gmail.com<mailto:pdavidpearsondean at gmail.com>
> website for publications:  www.pdavidpearson.org<http://www.pdavidpearson.org>
> *******************
> Please use HOME ADDRESS for responses
> 110 41st Street, Apt 401
> Oakland CA 94611-5237
> iPhone:  510 543 6508
> ****************************************
> 
> 
> 
> 
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
> attachment.
> 
> Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
> necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored
> where permitted by law.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Reading-hall-of-fame mailing list
> Reading-hall-of-fame at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/reading-hall-of-fame
> 
> 
> 
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
> attachment. 
> 
> Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
> necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored 
> where permitted by law.
> 
> 
> 
> 