[Reading-hall-of-fame] Re: $2.2 trillion gain if overcome adult illiteracy

Tue Oct 26 18:52:12 BST 2021

Colin and all:  I empathize with your skeptical response Colin to the
latest U.S. adult literacy assessment and the correlations to school grade
level achievement.

I, too, have long been skeptical about these psychometric approaches to
literacy assessments for adults. In an article for The Canadian Journal for
the Study of Adult Education (online at
https://cjsae.library.dal.ca/index.php/cjsae/article/view/1915/1676) I
noted the large differences between the test developer’s view of adults’
literacy abilities based on their scores on the standardized tests and the
adults’ self perceptions of how well they thought they could read. For
instance, of those adults scoring in the lowest level of reading in the
Canadian assessment, almost half (48 percent) thought they read “well” or
”very well”. Less than a fourth of the lowest scoring adults thought their
reading skills were poor.

I argued that, in future national assessments, it may be important to pay
more attention to determining adults' perceived levels of literacy and
numeracy and providing those who perceive themselves as poorly skilled with
information that can be useful in assisting them to overcome various
barriers to participation and may motivate them to seek out educational
provision. But the large scale, multi-million dollar psychometric testing
goes on declaring many millions of adults illiterate or functionally
illiterate while at the same time enrollments in the Adult Education and
Literacy System, the largest provider of adult literacy instruction,
including English as an additional language, have fallen dramatically.

I spent quite a bit of time in the UK working with Alan Wells of the Basic
Skills Agency, Lord Moser, Baronesses Blatch and  Blackstone, and others on
adult basic skills education and found that there were many questions about
just how to characterize the literacy skills of adults in the UK. In my
ebook on Mainstreaming Marginalized Adults I have an appendix that
summarizes my work in the UK and provides a list of 15 publications of mine
in UK journals and reports. If interested, you can read the full account in
the ebook online at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324604141_Mainstreaming_Marginalized_Adults_The_Transformation_of_Adult_Basic_Education_in_the_United_States

Good to hear from you, Colin. I hope all is going well with you and yours
in this trying time of the Covid pandemic. Stay well!

Tom Sticht

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 4:54 AM Colin Harrison <
Colin.Harrison at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:

> Hi Tom and everyone
>
>
>
> Thanks for this posting. Your campaign to support low-literacy adults
> continues, and as always, is laudable. However….
>
>
>
> I may be a little slow here, but isn’t it axiomatic that 50% of US sixth
> graders are reading at sixth grade level, and also that 50% of tenth
> graders are reading at tenth grade level, etc?  In which case isn’t it
> nonsense for Forbes to say that more than 50% of US adults are reading at
> below sixth grade level?
>
> Forgive me it you’ve heard this before, but in 1990, in the very week that
> I became president of the UK Reading Association, The Daily Telegraph (one
> of our most revered right-wing newspapers) ran a lead story over the
> headline “Tests reveal fall in standard of pupils’ reading.” But that
> wasn’t all; the subheading was even more worrying: “Number below average
> level doubles”.  This was certainly a shock because now every child in the
> land was officially below average! Well, I worked my socks off during my
> presidential year, and I’m proud to report that under my stewardship, we
> made excellent progress. By the time I handed over the presidential gavel,
> England was back on track, and only half the readers in the nation were
> below average—and we’ve maintained that proud record ever since.
>
> More seriously, let’s not forget that 15% of the US population is
> non-native born (compare that with Japan and Finland, high performing
> nations that against which the US is often measured). Another key question
> from where did the author get the indicator of ‘sixth-grade reading level’?
> It’s not at all straightforward to equate adult reading tests results to
> school grade levels.
>
> I seem to remember that in 2019, the National Center for Educational
> Statistics reported that the American adult literacy rate was 79 percent.
>
>
>
> As one retired senior researcher into adult literacy said to me, ‘Colin,
> don’t repeat this, but it’s in our interest for there to be moral panic
> about adult literacy levels; how otherwise would we ever get any funding?’
>
>
>
> As ever
>
>
>
> Colin
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *<reading-hall-of-fame-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> on behalf
> of Thomas Sticht <tgsticht at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday, 25 October 2021 at 22:06
> *To: *reading hall of fame <Reading-hall-of-fame at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>
> *Subject: *[Reading-hall-of-fame] $2.2 trillion gain if overcome adult
> illiteracy
>
>
>
> Colleagues:  While looking for information about November as National
> Family Literacy Month I came across some interesting statements about
> illiteracy and literacy in the United States. The first thing that caught
> my eye was from Forbes magazine online with the bold headline: “*Low
> Literacy Levels Among U.S. Adults Could Be Costing The Economy $2.2
> Trillion A Year”*! The article went on to say: “Sep 9, 2020 — According
> to the *U.S.* Department of Education, 54% of *U.S.* adults 16-74 years
> old - about *130 million* people - lack proficiency in literacy, ...( see
> online at:
> https://forbes.com/sites/michaeltnietzel/2020/09/09/low-literacy-levels-among-us-adults-could-be-costing-the-economy-22-trillion-a-year/?sh=2d7634974c90
> ).
>
>  The claim that some 130 million adults lack proficiency in literacy
> reminded me of an earlier news headline from the Washington Post in 1993
> stating about U.S. adults: LITERACY OF 90 MILLION IS DEFICIENT (Online at:
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1993/09/09/literacy-of-90-million-is-deficient/df715ccd-f90b-44e8-8235-f527dde32297/
>
> I then recalled that almost a decade later, in 2001, the Washington Post
> ran an article headlined     *Adult Illiteracy,  Rewritten*  in which it
> was reported that the 90 million deficient in literacy number was based on
> faulty use of a “response probability” and greatly exaggerated the numbers
> of adults called deficient in literacy, or, as this quickly got popularized
> as “illiterate”. (Archived online with a new headline at:
> https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2001/07/17/millions-of-adults-illiterate-no-more/ac1067cb-9fdd-499b-a4bc-8713fc5a9063/
>
> Now a new report conducted by the Gallup organization and sponsored by the
> Barbara Bush Foundation for Family Literacy has led to media reports, like
> that by Forbes cited above, claiming that millions of U.S. adults are
> “illiterate”.  The new report (Rothwell, 2020) is available on the web site
> for the Barbara Bush Foundation and is titled “*Assessing the Economic
> Gains of Eradicating Illiteracy Nationally and Regionally in the United
> States” *When I went to the web site I was somewhat surprised to find a
> banner statement on the front page of the site stating: *Literacy is the
> key to solving healthcare, poverty, crime rates, unemployment, everything!*
>
>  Using data from the levels of literacy developed for the Program for the
> International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) and the U.S.
> Department of Education’s combined individual PIAAC data from 2012 to 2017
> to create estimated literacy levels for every U.S. county, the report
> states:
>
>  “This report defines illiteracy as a lack of proficiency on the PIAAC, an
> internationally validated literacy exam. Adults who score below Level 3 for
> literacy are not considered proficient and are defined as at least
> partially illiterate in this study. Adults below or at Level-1 literacy may
> struggle to understand texts beyond filling out basic forms. Drawing
> inferences or combining multiple sources of texts is likely too difficult.
> Adults at Level 2 can read well enough to evaluate product reviews and
> perform other tasks that require comparisons and simple inferences, but
> they are unlikely to correctly evaluate the reliability of texts or draw
> sophisticated inferences. Adults at Level 3 and above are considered fully
> literate in this study. They can reliably evaluate sources, as well as
> infer sophisticated meaning and complex ideas from written sources.”
>
> Using these data the report states: “*Eradicating illiteracy would have
> enormous economic benefits. *This analysis finds that getting all U.S.
> adults to at least a [PIAAC] Level 3 of literacy proficiency would generate
> an additional $2.2 trillion in annual income for the country. That is 10%
> of the gross domestic product.”
>
> For those interested in this report on illiteracy, whether whole or
> partial, from the Barbara Bush Foundation for Family Literacy the reference
> is:
>
> Rothwell, J. (2020). Assessing the Economic Gains of Eradicating
> Illiteracy Nationally and Regionally in the United States. Available online
> at:
> https://www.barbarabush.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/BBFoundation_GainsFromEradicatingIlliteracy_9_8.pdf
>
> Following several years after the 1993 report that some 90 million adults
> were lacking in literacy, funding and enrollments in the Adult Education
> and Literacy System (AELS) made up with funding from the federal Workforce
> Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) and state sources, rose up to 1998
> when the National Reporting System was implemented and since then while
> funding has risen (but not enough to overcome inflation) enrollments have
> plummeted by over 2.5 million from around 4.0 million in 1998 to around 1.3
> million or fewer now.
>
> It will be interesting to see where this new initiative by the Barbara
> Bush Foundation for Family Literacy leads.
>
> Tom Sticht
>
>
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
> attachment.
>
> Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
> necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored
> where permitted by law.
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/reading-hall-of-fame/attachments/20211026/7c2ebe58/attachment-0001.html>