[Reading-hall-of-fame] Re: RHoF at LRA

[Brian Cambourne]

As a non-USA based member of RHF, I agree with Colin’s suggestion that we  "get a small team of RHoF Zoom-ologists to plan something, with just one person from that team tasked to liaise with HQ over the best slot for timing.”

Brian Cambourne

On 12 Nov 2020, at 2:25 am, P Pearson <ppearson at berkeley.edu<mailto:ppearson at berkeley.edu>> wrote:

Somrehow I didn’t process that message as extending to the business
meeting and induction activities. I did see how limiting the LRA
format might be for our interactive presentation sessions. Thanks for
clarifying, Roger.



P David Pearson 510 543 6508 ppearson at berkeley.edu<mailto:ppearson at berkeley.edu>

> On Nov 11, 2020, at 2:22 AM, Beard, Roger <r.beard at ucl.ac.uk<mailto:r.beard at ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone
>
> I had an email from Diane two days ago as follows:
>
> ‘ I have requested that all Hall of Fame sessions be suspended until the 2021 conference. Our format is just not conducive to the new parameters that LRA has had to adopt for the 2020 conference.
> I hope you understand and I look forward to planning with you for 2021.’
>
> With best wishes and stay safe,
>
> Roger
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 11 Nov 2020, at 09:31, Colin Harrison <Colin.Harrison at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Colin.Harrison at nottingham.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>
>> 
>> Hi Everyone
>>
>> Thanks, P David and Donna for raising this.
>>
>> Following Donna’s and P David’s comments, I’m wondering if we’ll hear anything at all about RHoF at LRA from headquarters/the Conference team. My concern is that we will not. As I understand it, those involved are already working flat out to get the main conference online. Is there a RHoF program slot with presenters??? If no one has been informed of their timing slot, the answer is perhaps negative.
>>
>> I’ve had plenty of communication from HQ already over the past weeks about the sessions I’m involved in: the Awards session, and the session I’m contributing to on computational thinking. I’m wondering if we’re on our own, and need to get a small team of RHoF Zoom-ologists to plan something, with just one person from that team tasked to liaise with HQ over the best slot for timing.
>>
>> Your neighbour in hyperspace,
>>
>> Colin
>>
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
>> attachment.
>>
>> Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
>> necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
>> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored
>> where permitted by law.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Reading-hall-of-fame mailing list
>> Reading-hall-of-fame at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Reading-hall-of-fame at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/reading-hall-of-fame<http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/reading-hall-of-fame>

_______________________________________________
Reading-hall-of-fame mailing list
Reading-hall-of-fame at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Reading-hall-of-fame at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>
http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/reading-hall-of-fame<http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/reading-hall-of-fame>



This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
attachment.

Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored
where permitted by law.





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/private/reading-hall-of-fame/attachments/20201111/110ea14d/attachment.html>