[Reading-hall-of-fame] Re: Possible Move of RHF annual meeting from ILA to LRA

Mon Nov 21 04:22:15 GMT 2016

I like Brian's idea.

Hilary Janks
Sent from my iPhone

> On 21 Nov 2016, at 4:27 AM, William Teale <wteale at uic.edu> wrote:
> 
> I am scheduled to be at the 2017 ALEA and would be happy to help out with this idea if it comes to be.
> 
> Also, it seems to me that LRA would be a good match for the research focus of the RHoF. I don’t see the need to submit a proposal as being a problem for  obtaining a slot on the conference. If we can’t do that…
> 
> The inauguration/business meeting is trickier, but perhaps Friday evening would work.
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------
> William H. Teale
> Professor & University Scholar
> Director, UIC Center for Literacy
> University of Illinois at Chicago
> College of Education (MC 147)
> 1040 West Harrison St.
> Chicago, IL 60607
> 312.413.1914
> http://education.uic.edu/faculty/128-william-teale 
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Nov 20, 2016, at 18:47, Barbara Comber <barbara.comber at qut.edu.au> wrote:
>> 
>> Great idea Brian cheers Barbara 
>> From: Brian Cambourne <bcambrn at uow.edu.au>
>> Date: Monday, 21 November 2016 9:54 am
>> To: Hilary Janks <hilary.janks at gmail.com>
>> Cc: "reading-hall-of-fame at nottingham.ac.uk" <reading-hall-of-fame at nottingham.ac.uk>
>> Subject: [Reading-hall-of-fame] Re: Possible Move of RHF annual meeting from ILA to LRA
>> 
>> Here’s a wild idea:- What about getting an occasional slot a the national conference  in RHF members’ countries? I’m pretty sure the Aussie and NZ RHF members would love for you all to meet up and present at our Annual conferences? 
>> Think of the spin-offs ( or is it ‘spins-off’) for both RHF and the cause of literacy in other countries.
>> Just a thought.
>> Brian C ?
>>> On 21 Nov 2016, at 4:50 AM, Hilary Janks <hilary.janks at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Members
>>> 
>>> I am keen for the RHF to move to LRA as I think the LRA conference is more inclusive of the different levels of education to which our literature research contributes than ILA. In addition it tends to be a gathering of researchers more than teachers which I think pushes the thinking of RHF members more than ILA does. There is no reason not to keep the slot at ILA so that teachers can hear board members and then new members can decide whether to present at ILA or LRA (once we get a slot there). I don’t think it would be too hard to persuade LRA that the RHF members will not disappoint in their presentations and to take responsibility for vetting the session. We are not asking for a keynote session - just one session out of many.
>>> 
>>> We would have to find an inauguration time that does not clash with LRA Board meetings though.
>>> 
>>> Looking forward to seeing many of you at LRA this year. Perhaps we should get together over breakfast to discuss this and to pay our dues.
>>> 
>>> Best wishes
>>> 
>>> Hilary Janks
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 20 Nov 2016, at 4:57 PM, Bean, Rita M <ritabean at pitt.edu> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Dear Members:  Recently, the Executive Board sent an informal survey to you, asking for your input about a possible move of the annual meeting from the ILA conference to the LRA conference.  Of the  51 members voting, 62% indicated an interest in moving from ILA to LRA  (reasons included time of year, time expense, research focus of LRA).   Ray Reutzel, Vice-President, RHF,  and I then sought information from LRA to get some idea of what it might mean for us if we made the move and wanted to schedule both our annual induction meeting and a session at which our recent inductees might make presentations. We identified the following as issues that would need to be resolved    
>>>>  All presentations for the LRA conference must be vetted--according to LRA Board policy Changing this policy would require LRA Board action; we would need to submit a proposal for our presentation session  (We are guaranteed a slot at ILA for the presentation session of recent inductees). 
>>>> Our annual induction meeting would need to be scheduled when it did not conflict with meeting times --so a 7:30 a.m. breakfast might not be feasible -- we might have to consider other options (e.g., evening meeting on Tuesday before the conference begins) 
>>>> We would need to work with LRA in terms of arranging for our annual induction meeting (food services, etc.).  To this date, ILA has worked closely with the RHF treasurer. They handled the arrangements, the menu, etc.  
>>>> All of these issues can be addressed, of course -- but before we make a decision, the RHF Executive Board is recommending the following:  
>>>> 
>>>> REC 1. Provide opportunities for conversation about this possible move on the RHF listserv.  We encourage you to make your views known, especially as related to the issues identified above.  It would also be helpful if you would think about some possible solutions to these issues (e.g.,  If we can't get a guaranteed slot for our presentations by recent inductees, do we eliminate that - and just have our annual meeting/induction meeting?  Should we identify a RHF member to handle the induction meeting arrangements, work with the hotel to arrange for breakfast, etc., Make a formal proposal to LRA Board with our request - and then make a decision based on their response)   
>>>>  
>>>> REC 2. Hold in-depth discussion of the possible move from ILA to LRA at our annual meeting in July, 2017.  There we can summarize the results of the listserv discussion, discuss pros and cons, and have a vote on this issue (if recommended, we can also hold the vote electronically, once a motion has been made at the annual meeting).  If there is a decision to move the annual meeting/presentations to LRA, we would also need to develop a timeline for the move.  
>>>> 
>>>> Thank you for your feedback as we move through this decision making process.  
>>>> Rita Bean
>>>> President, RHF     
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>>>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>>>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 
>>>> 
>>>> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
>>>> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
>>>> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
>>>> University of Nottingham.
>>>> 
>>>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>>>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
>>>> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
>>>> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
>>>> permitted by UK legislation.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Reading-hall-of-fame mailing list
>>>> Reading-hall-of-fame at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/reading-hall-of-fame
>>> 
>>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 
>>> 
>>> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
>>> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
>>> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
>>> University of Nottingham.
>>> 
>>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
>>> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
>>> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
>>> permitted by UK legislation.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Reading-hall-of-fame mailing list
>>> Reading-hall-of-fame at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/reading-hall-of-fame
>> 
>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 
>> 
>> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
>> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
>> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
>> University of Nottingham.
>> 
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
>> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
>> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
>> permitted by UK legislation.
>>  This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
>> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
>> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. 
>> 
>> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
>> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
>> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
>> University of Nottingham.
>> 
>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
>> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
>> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
>> permitted by UK legislation.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Reading-hall-of-fame mailing list
>> Reading-hall-of-fame at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/reading-hall-of-fame
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/private/reading-hall-of-fame/attachments/20161121/beacd8f6/attachment-0001.html>