<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 11/06/2011 14:57, Tom Reijnders wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4DF37440.8030907@tor.nl" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
Ok, some of this is history...<br>
<br>
1. The title of the learning object (title of the item
identifier) is
hardcoded. It says "My learning object title". This is what is
shown
in the Scorm player. <br>
2. The title of the package (the name of the package) is set to
the zip
file name, and some manipulation is done on _, i.e. _ is replaced
with
' ' (space).<br>
3. Also the title of the generated html file is hardcoded "SCO
Example"
in xot.<br>
<br>
I changed this in standalone Xerte to be replaced with Items the
user
had influence on. So, I chose the name and the title in the XML,
because for Xerte standalone that makes perfect good sense, and is
better than the project name (easier to change by the user).<br>
<br>
So when I got involved in XOT as well, I wanted the two to behave
the
same, and yes, the XML names are not the most obvious ones, but it
seems silly to do it differently.<br>
<br>
So, part of this is caused by my ignorence.<br>
<br>
Tom<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Tom, wasn't saying you are ignorant, just was a bit, isn't this a
user preference?<br>
<br>
Could you send me a screen dump of the Xerte scorm publish process
and I'll see what can be done to make toolkits do the same.<br>
<br>
Sorry if i sounded snappy - more, just, not sure this is a problem
:)<br>
<br>
Pat<br>
</body>
</html>