In today's particularly enjoyable conversation thread titled "non coders", Julian
said: "I would love to see more discussion about design content, what
makes good interactivity and all that stuff ..."<br><br>I'm personally <i>fascinated</i> by instructional strategy. In line with Julian's comments, I once came across a research study which documented numerous trials and measurements of compared instruction using different mediums. The conclusion? The medium (instructor led, computer-assisted, or video instruction, etc.) didn't matter. The medium used didn't significantly influence the effectiveness of the instruction. What <i>did</i> matter, what <i>did</i> make a difference, was the strategy.<br>
<br>My suggestion is that we might begin an occasional game of sorts, for those of us with an interest in strategy (coders and non coders alike). It would be a game in which we would put forth, as they occur to us, different "instructional challenges" for consideration. We might then brainstorm or suggest how Xerte might be used to tackle these challenges. To keep the non coders readily in the conversation, I'd encourage discussion contributors to:<br>
<ol><li>First consider how XOT (or Page Templates) might be used to address the challenge, <u>without adding any script</u>. For those skilled at coding, this might feel like we've tied both hands behind your back. Then again, maybe that's useful.<br>
</li><li>Second, let the coders cut loose. If more could be done with a little script, tell us how you might start off with XOT, or Page Templates, <i>and then</i> enhance it with script.</li></ol>To illustrate how an "Instructional Challenge" might be presented, I'll start off. What follows is a true, current task of mine, that I've
considered using Xerte for. My thought is to outline it here. I'll try to provide enough detail to
convey the complexity, while keeping my description of it as simple as
I can.<br><br>The instructional challenge is this:<br><br><b><u>Instructional Objective</u></b><br>Learners will be able to screen (i.e. review) vehicle accident (crash) reports, and route them appropriately.<br><br><br>
<u><b>Relevant Details</b></u><br><ul><li>The
crash reports are pre-printed, 4-page forms that must be completed and
submitted anytime a significant motor vehicle accident occurs. Here's a URL link to the form: <cite><a href="http://www.mass.gov/rmv/forms/21278.pdf">www.mass.gov/rmv/forms/21278.pdf</a> </cite></li><li>The learners are the employees who must review these crash reports and determine whether to ...<br>
</li><ul><li>Return them to the sender</li><li>Route them to "Fatals"; if a death was involved</li><li>Send them for Data Entry</li><li>Discard them (e.g. if the report was not required to be filed)</li></ul></ul>
<br><b><u>Task Criteria</u></b><br><ol><li>Send Back (to the sender), if X, Y, or Z fields are empty</li><li>Route
to "Fatals"; if the number "1" is listed in a specific field; or if a
death is mentioned in the Narrative (written description of the crash)<br>
</li><li>Send to Data Entry, if all is OK</li><li>Discard, if damage was less than $1,000 US, and there were no injuries</li><li>The Narrative on Page 3 is a written description of the accident. Use it to backfill empty fields, and to provide more detail.</li>
<li>If Region A indicates "X", then look at Section 4, Column G. If that indicates 2, 3, 4, or 7, then Discard.<br></li></ol><br>*************************<br><br>So .... How would you tackle it with XOT or Page Templates? If you're a coder, is/are there things you might do with a little script? <br>
<br>Cheers,<br>Pete<br><br>Instructional Designer<br>Boston, MA, USA<br><br>P.S. I'm an American, so I really have no clue at all what "Cheers" means; or why folks use the expression to finish letters. I just used it here, to try to fit in. To me, it's just a bar where Ted Danson worked. For a long, long time. <br>
<br>P.P.S. I'm equally confused by "Kind Regards", "Warm Regards", and their seemingly competitive siblings "Kindest Regards" and "Warmest Regards", used I can only imagine by those trying to one-up those who used the former. ;)<br>