<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 12pt;
font-family:Calibri
}
--></style></head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div dir='ltr'>> As flash falls more by the wayside is it going to be acceptable to develop new page types that are defined only with a html5 model and an xwd file, and no flash based .rlm model?<br><br>I think it would be unacceptable to stay chained to Flash.<div><br></div><div>Dave<br><div><br><div><div id="SkyDrivePlaceholder"></div><hr id="stopSpelling">Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 16:40:06 +0100<br>From: johnathan.kemp@ntlworld.com<br>To: Xerte-dev@lists.nottingham.ac.uk<br>Subject: [Xerte-dev] The future for rlm files?<br><br><div>Looking at the discussions at present regarding the next version of XOT there is a fair amount of consideration given to allowing HTML 5 projects to fall back gracefully to Flash if HTML 5 is not supported, also to allow the optional publication of projects as HTML5 or Flash (unless I have misunderstood the discussions).<br>
</div><div><br></div><div>Is it intended that there will always be an .rlm flash based model and a .html html5 based model for every page?</div><div><br></div><div>As flash falls more by the wayside is it going to be acceptable to develop new page types that are defined only with a html5 model and an xwd file, and no flash based .rlm model?</div>
<div><br></div><div>If this is acceptable then does anything need to change in XOT to accommodate this? e.g. what happens if you try to publish your project as a flash project when it contains a page that has no .rlm file for that page?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Kind regards</div><div><br></div><div>Johnathan </div>
<br>_______________________________________________
Xerte-dev mailing list
Xerte-dev@lists.nottingham.ac.uk
http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev</div></div></div> </div></body>
</html>