From ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk Tue Jan 17 17:23:42 2017 From: ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk (Ron Mitchell) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 17:23:42 -0000 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Future Chrome release and how it will treat non SSL sites Message-ID: <021801d270e6$74342890$5c9c79b0$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> Hi all Just reading this https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2017/01/chrome-56-ssl-https-wordpress/ and suspect we should put a similar advisory together re Xerte installations and SSL etc. What do you think? Ron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From robb at interlin.nl Tue Jan 17 20:37:14 2017 From: robb at interlin.nl (robb) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 21:37:14 +0100 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Future Chrome release and how it will treat non SSL sites In-Reply-To: <021801d270e6$74342890$5c9c79b0$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> References: <021801d270e6$74342890$5c9c79b0$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> Message-ID: <59151d10-fcbc-38df-d9f6-2d90e4f39e27@interlin.nl> I think XoT should be accessed through SSL only. A good option would be to support letsencrypt by default. regards, Rob Op 17-01-17 om 18:23 schreef Ron Mitchell: > > Hi all > > Just reading this > https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2017/01/chrome-56-ssl-https-wordpress/ > and suspect we should put a similar advisory together re Xerte > installations and SSL etc. > > What do you think? > > Ron > > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this > message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. > > Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this > message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the > author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the > University of Nottingham. > > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an > attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your > computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email > communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as > permitted by UK legislation. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by *MailScanner* , and is > believed to be clean. > > > _______________________________________________ > Xerte-dev mailing list > Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk > http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From info at pgogywebstuff.com Tue Jan 17 20:52:03 2017 From: info at pgogywebstuff.com (Pat Lockley (Pgogy)) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 15:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Future Chrome release and how it will treat non SSL sites In-Reply-To: <59151d10-fcbc-38df-d9f6-2d90e4f39e27@interlin.nl> References: <021801d270e6$74342890$5c9c79b0$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> <59151d10-fcbc-38df-d9f6-2d90e4f39e27@interlin.nl> Message-ID: SSL only would seem awkward on localhost? Also do Unis issue their own SSL? On 2017-01-17 15:37, robb wrote: > I think XoT should be accessed through SSL only. A good option would > be to support letsencrypt [2] by default. > > regards, > > Rob > Op 17-01-17 om 18:23 schreef Ron Mitchell: > >> Hi all >> >> Just reading this >> > https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2017/01/chrome-56-ssl-https-wordpress/ >> and suspect we should put a similar advisory together re Xerte >> installations and SSL etc. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Ron >> >> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the >> addressee >> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this >> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete >> it. >> >> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in >> this >> message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by >> the >> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the >> University of Nottingham. >> >> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an >> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage >> your >> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email >> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as >> permitted by UK legislation. >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by MAILSCANNER [1], and is >> believed to be clean. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xerte-dev mailing list >> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk >> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MAILSCANNER [1], and is > believed to be clean. > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this > message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete > it. > > Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this > message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the > author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the > University of Nottingham. > > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an > attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your > computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email > communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as > permitted by UK legislation. > > > > Links: > ------ > [1] http://www.mailscanner.info/ > [2] https://letsencrypt.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Xerte-dev mailing list > Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk > http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev -- Pgogy Webstuff pgogywebstuff.com From ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk Tue Jan 17 20:56:09 2017 From: ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk (Ron Mitchell) Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 20:56:09 +0000 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Future Chrome release and how it will treat non SSL sites In-Reply-To: <59151d10-fcbc-38df-d9f6-2d90e4f39e27@interlin.nl> References: <021801d270e6$74342890$5c9c79b0$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> <59151d10-fcbc-38df-d9f6-2d90e4f39e27@interlin.nl> Message-ID: <362695C0-ED7F-4703-93E6-3D6A48630764@mitchellmedia.co.uk> XOT already works if the server and installation is set to use https whether that be paid for certs or letsencrypt. But to date it's been up to whoever looks after the installation and there are disadvantages with using https too e.g embedding external non https content. My reason for mentioning this is that we probably need to put together some advice and guidance while it's still optional rather than essential, including how people switch their installations without breaking existing links and embeds etc. Cheers Ron > On 17 Jan 2017, at 20:37, robb wrote: > > I think XoT should be accessed through SSL only. A good option would be to support letsencrypt by default. > > regards, > > Rob > Op 17-01-17 om 18:23 schreef Ron Mitchell: >> Hi all >> Just reading this https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2017/01/chrome-56-ssl-https-wordpress/ and suspect we should put a similar advisory together re Xerte installations and SSL etc. >> What do you think? >> Ron >> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee >> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this >> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. >> >> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this >> message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the >> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the >> University of Nottingham. >> >> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an >> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your >> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email >> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as >> permitted by UK legislation. >> >> -- >> This message has been scanned for viruses and >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >> believed to be clean. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Xerte-dev mailing list >> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk >> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this > message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. > > Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this > message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the > author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the > University of Nottingham. > > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an > attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your > computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email > communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as > permitted by UK legislation. > _______________________________________________ > Xerte-dev mailing list > Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk > http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk Wed Jan 18 08:55:07 2017 From: Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk (Julian Tenney) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 08:55:07 +0000 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Future Chrome release and how it will treat non SSL sites In-Reply-To: <362695C0-ED7F-4703-93E6-3D6A48630764@mitchellmedia.co.uk> References: <021801d270e6$74342890$5c9c79b0$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> <59151d10-fcbc-38df-d9f6-2d90e4f39e27@interlin.nl> <362695C0-ED7F-4703-93E6-3D6A48630764@mitchellmedia.co.uk> Message-ID: Do we need to make changes and a release to make https the default for new installs? I don?t fully understand it, so sorry if that?s the wrong question. From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell Sent: 17 January 2017 20:56 To: robb at interlin.nl; For Xerte technical developers Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Future Chrome release and how it will treat non SSL sites XOT already works if the server and installation is set to use https whether that be paid for certs or letsencrypt. But to date it's been up to whoever looks after the installation and there are disadvantages with using https too e.g embedding external non https content. My reason for mentioning this is that we probably need to put together some advice and guidance while it's still optional rather than essential, including how people switch their installations without breaking existing links and embeds etc. Cheers Ron On 17 Jan 2017, at 20:37, robb > wrote: I think XoT should be accessed through SSL only. A good option would be to support letsencrypt by default. regards, Rob Op 17-01-17 om 18:23 schreef Ron Mitchell: Hi all Just reading this https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2017/01/chrome-56-ssl-https-wordpress/ and suspect we should put a similar advisory together re Xerte installations and SSL etc. What do you think? Ron This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Xerte-dev mailing list Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. _______________________________________________ Xerte-dev mailing list Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk Wed Jan 18 11:14:28 2017 From: ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk (Ron Mitchell) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 11:14:28 -0000 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Future Chrome release and how it will treat non SSL sites In-Reply-To: References: <021801d270e6$74342890$5c9c79b0$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> <59151d10-fcbc-38df-d9f6-2d90e4f39e27@interlin.nl> <362695C0-ED7F-4703-93E6-3D6A48630764@mitchellmedia.co.uk> Message-ID: <009b01d2717c$0a25f9b0$1e71ed10$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> No nothing essential to do with the current codebase unless I?m missing something. Although Tom and I have previously discussed the need for changes re https etc for different reasons. More important at the moment to plan and develop some in advance guidance that this is the way it?s going and what to do short term and longer term in preparation for this e.g. changing configuration and ensuring existing links and embeds still work and login works etc. For instance at the moment if you view your page types example via https rather than http you?ll probably find it still works fine. However if you login via https it will login but not display the workspace correctly. That?s easy to fix if you know how but in some cases at least the user community will need guidance. Perhaps a topic for our planned developer days. From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Tenney Sent: 18 January 2017 08:55 To: For Xerte technical developers ; robb at interlin.nl Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Future Chrome release and how it will treat non SSL sites Do we need to make changes and a release to make https the default for new installs? I don?t fully understand it, so sorry if that?s the wrong question. From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell Sent: 17 January 2017 20:56 To: robb at interlin.nl ; For Xerte technical developers > Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Future Chrome release and how it will treat non SSL sites XOT already works if the server and installation is set to use https whether that be paid for certs or letsencrypt. But to date it's been up to whoever looks after the installation and there are disadvantages with using https too e.g embedding external non https content. My reason for mentioning this is that we probably need to put together some advice and guidance while it's still optional rather than essential, including how people switch their installations without breaking existing links and embeds etc. Cheers Ron On 17 Jan 2017, at 20:37, robb > wrote: I think XoT should be accessed through SSL only. A good option would be to support letsencrypt by default. regards, Rob Op 17-01-17 om 18:23 schreef Ron Mitchell: Hi all Just reading this https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2017/01/chrome-56-ssl-https-wordpress/ and suspect we should put a similar advisory together re Xerte installations and SSL etc. What do you think? Ron This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Xerte-dev mailing list Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. _______________________________________________ Xerte-dev mailing list Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk Wed Jan 18 13:24:21 2017 From: Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk (Julian Tenney) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 13:24:21 +0000 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Future Chrome release and how it will treat non SSL sites In-Reply-To: <009b01d2717c$0a25f9b0$1e71ed10$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> References: <021801d270e6$74342890$5c9c79b0$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> <59151d10-fcbc-38df-d9f6-2d90e4f39e27@interlin.nl> <362695C0-ED7F-4703-93E6-3D6A48630764@mitchellmedia.co.uk> <009b01d2717c$0a25f9b0$1e71ed10$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> Message-ID: Sounds like putting some guidance together would be worthwhile, yes From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell Sent: 18 January 2017 11:14 To: 'For Xerte technical developers' Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Future Chrome release and how it will treat non SSL sites No nothing essential to do with the current codebase unless I?m missing something. Although Tom and I have previously discussed the need for changes re https etc for different reasons. More important at the moment to plan and develop some in advance guidance that this is the way it?s going and what to do short term and longer term in preparation for this e.g. changing configuration and ensuring existing links and embeds still work and login works etc. For instance at the moment if you view your page types example via https rather than http you?ll probably find it still works fine. However if you login via https it will login but not display the workspace correctly. That?s easy to fix if you know how but in some cases at least the user community will need guidance. Perhaps a topic for our planned developer days. From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Julian Tenney Sent: 18 January 2017 08:55 To: For Xerte technical developers >; robb at interlin.nl Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Future Chrome release and how it will treat non SSL sites Do we need to make changes and a release to make https the default for new installs? I don?t fully understand it, so sorry if that?s the wrong question. From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Ron Mitchell Sent: 17 January 2017 20:56 To: robb at interlin.nl; For Xerte technical developers > Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Future Chrome release and how it will treat non SSL sites XOT already works if the server and installation is set to use https whether that be paid for certs or letsencrypt. But to date it's been up to whoever looks after the installation and there are disadvantages with using https too e.g embedding external non https content. My reason for mentioning this is that we probably need to put together some advice and guidance while it's still optional rather than essential, including how people switch their installations without breaking existing links and embeds etc. Cheers Ron On 17 Jan 2017, at 20:37, robb > wrote: I think XoT should be accessed through SSL only. A good option would be to support letsencrypt by default. regards, Rob Op 17-01-17 om 18:23 schreef Ron Mitchell: Hi all Just reading this https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2017/01/chrome-56-ssl-https-wordpress/ and suspect we should put a similar advisory together re Xerte installations and SSL etc. What do you think? Ron This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Xerte-dev mailing list Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. _______________________________________________ Xerte-dev mailing list Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk Wed Jan 25 08:52:38 2017 From: Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk (Julian Tenney) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:52:38 +0000 Subject: [Xerte-dev] FW: ATLAS meeting today at 10AM Eastern Time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It would be worth promoting the Atlas awards again this year: let?s see if we can make it two years in a row for a winner from our community! https://www.apereo.org/communities/atlas From: Luisa Li [mailto:luisa.li at apereo.org] Hello, folks, We had a quick meeting today and discussed a few things to promote ATLAS this year. First of all, the ATLAS 2017 page is open. Please use your best judgement and spread the word locally, globally, and in your personal circle. You may also join our social media campaign on Twitter. Remember to use relevant hastags to increase traction. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From i.donkervoort at 12change.eu Wed Jan 25 14:02:16 2017 From: i.donkervoort at 12change.eu (Inge Donkervoort 12Change) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:02:16 +0100 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: FW: ATLAS meeting today at 10AM Eastern Time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5888AFE8.7000409@12change.eu> Hi all, I added this also to the Xerte community website :) http://www.xerte.org.uk/index.php?lang=en&Itemid=478 Bye, Inge 12Changebv Chopinlaan 27 5242 HM Rosmalen T 073-5226195 M 06-50267104 F 073-5226196 E i.donkervoort at 12change.eu I www.12change.eu F facebook T twitter L linkedIn Julian Tenney schreef op 25-1-2017 9:52: > > It would be worth promoting the Atlas awards again this year: let's > see if we can make it two years in a row for a winner from our community! > > https://www.apereo.org/communities/atlas > > *From:*Luisa Li [mailto:luisa.li at apereo.org] > > Hello, folks, > > We had a quick meeting today and discussed a few things to promote > ATLAS this year. > > First of all, the ATLAS 2017 page is open. Please use your best > judgement and spread the word locally, globally, and in your personal > circle. You may also join our social media campaign on Twitter. > Remember to use relevant hastags to increase traction. > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this > message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. > > Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this > message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the > author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the > University of Nottingham. > > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an > attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your > computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email > communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as > permitted by UK legislation. > > > _______________________________________________ > Xerte-dev mailing list > Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk > http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk Wed Jan 25 14:26:37 2017 From: Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk (Julian Tenney) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 14:26:37 +0000 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: FW: ATLAS meeting today at 10AM Eastern Time In-Reply-To: <5888AFE8.7000409@12change.eu> References: <5888AFE8.7000409@12change.eu> Message-ID: I'll try and tweet it a few more times as well and big up the 'trip to the USA prize' aspect of it. I'd love it if a Xerte project won again, so please encourage anyone doing anything interesting to consider putting an application forward, From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Inge Donkervoort 12Change Sent: 25 January 2017 14:02 To: xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: FW: ATLAS meeting today at 10AM Eastern Time Hi all, I added this also to the Xerte community website :) http://www.xerte.org.uk/index.php?lang=en&Itemid=478 Bye, Inge 1 2 Change bv Chopinlaan 27 5242 HM Rosmalen T 073-5226195 M 06-50267104 F 073-5226196 E i.donkervoort at 12change.eu I www.12change.eu F facebook T twitter L linkedIn Julian Tenney schreef op 25-1-2017 9:52: It would be worth promoting the Atlas awards again this year: let's see if we can make it two years in a row for a winner from our community! https://www.apereo.org/communities/atlas From: Luisa Li [mailto:luisa.li at apereo.org] Hello, folks, We had a quick meeting today and discussed a few things to promote ATLAS this year. First of all, the ATLAS 2017 page is open. Please use your best judgement and spread the word locally, globally, and in your personal circle. You may also join our social media campaign on Twitter. Remember to use relevant hastags to increase traction. This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. _______________________________________________ Xerte-dev mailing list Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From reijnders at tor.nl Sun Jan 29 12:19:26 2017 From: reijnders at tor.nl (Tom Reijnders) Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 13:19:26 +0100 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Fixed textMatch (finally) Message-ID: Guys and girls, I finally was able to fix textMatch. Still have no clue why the previous code had such a strange side effect, but it seems to work fine now. Release 3.3.5?? With happy regards, Tom From reijnders at tor.nl Sun Jan 29 15:44:57 2017 From: reijnders at tor.nl (Tom Reijnders) Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 16:44:57 +0100 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Splitting up model files to get more control over css in themes Message-ID: <03f43f26-1179-1fad-be9d-e6758e22ad88@tor.nl> Hi all, I created a new branch to experiment with splitting out the css contained in the model files, so you can overrule them in the themes. Please see branch split_css 1. All model files are split in a css and html file (probably js would be better....) 2. xenith.js is changed, specifically changePage - It deletes any previously added page specific css files - It adds the model css file to the header - It adds the theme css file for a specific page to the header (if present) Please also find enclosed a sample css file for dragAndDrop. You can place it in a css folder in one of the themes and it will change the shape of the draggable labels and the shape of the hotspot areas (if displaying them is enabled). Let me know what you think. Regards, Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dragDropLabel.css Type: text/css Size: 401 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk Mon Jan 30 09:04:09 2017 From: ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk (Ron Mitchell) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:04:09 -0000 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Fixed textMatch (finally) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <008201d27ad7$d202ec90$7608c5b0$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> Tom Well done in finding the fix! I'd say yes let's formally release but why call it 3.3.5 rather than 3.4? Cheers Ron -----Original Message----- From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom Reijnders Sent: 29 January 2017 12:19 To: For Xerte technical developers Subject: [Xerte-dev] Fixed textMatch (finally) Guys and girls, I finally was able to fix textMatch. Still have no clue why the previous code had such a strange side effect, but it seems to work fine now. Release 3.3.5?? With happy regards, Tom _______________________________________________ Xerte-dev mailing list Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. From ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk Mon Jan 30 09:07:42 2017 From: ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk (Ron Mitchell) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:07:42 -0000 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Splitting up model files to get more control over css in themes In-Reply-To: <03f43f26-1179-1fad-be9d-e6758e22ad88@tor.nl> References: <03f43f26-1179-1fad-be9d-e6758e22ad88@tor.nl> Message-ID: <008301d27ad8$50e81f80$f2b85e80$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> Tom I tested this but getting errors with new or existing projects whenever changing theme to anything but default. Will detail on github and maybe discuss online later. Cheers Ron -----Original Message----- From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom Reijnders Sent: 29 January 2017 15:45 To: For Xerte technical developers Subject: [Xerte-dev] Splitting up model files to get more control over css in themes Hi all, I created a new branch to experiment with splitting out the css contained in the model files, so you can overrule them in the themes. Please see branch split_css 1. All model files are split in a css and html file (probably js would be better....) 2. xenith.js is changed, specifically changePage - It deletes any previously added page specific css files - It adds the model css file to the header - It adds the theme css file for a specific page to the header (if present) Please also find enclosed a sample css file for dragAndDrop. You can place it in a css folder in one of the themes and it will change the shape of the draggable labels and the shape of the hotspot areas (if displaying them is enabled). Let me know what you think. Regards, Tom This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. From reijnders at tor.nl Mon Jan 30 09:12:06 2017 From: reijnders at tor.nl (Tom Reijnders) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:12:06 +0100 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Fixed textMatch (finally) In-Reply-To: <008201d27ad7$d202ec90$7608c5b0$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> References: <008201d27ad7$d202ec90$7608c5b0$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> Message-ID: <25f3910b-dd73-5f90-4ca4-f74ac3dce3c0@tor.nl> Ok, sorry. I meant 3.4. 3.3.5 was released yesterday.... Op 30-1-2017 om 10:04 schreef Ron Mitchell: > Tom > Well done in finding the fix! > I'd say yes let's formally release but why call it 3.3.5 rather than 3.4? > Cheers > Ron > > -----Original Message----- > From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk > [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom Reijnders > Sent: 29 January 2017 12:19 > To: For Xerte technical developers > Subject: [Xerte-dev] Fixed textMatch (finally) > > Guys and girls, > > I finally was able to fix textMatch. Still have no clue why the previous > code had such a strange side effect, but it seems to work fine now. > > Release 3.3.5?? > > With happy regards, > > Tom > > > _______________________________________________ > Xerte-dev mailing list > Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk > http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev > > > > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and > may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in > error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. > > Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this > message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author > of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of > Nottingham. > > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment > may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, > you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the > University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xerte-dev mailing list > Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk > http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev > > > > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this > message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. > > Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this > message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the > author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the > University of Nottingham. > > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an > attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your > computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email > communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as > permitted by UK legislation. > From reijnders at tor.nl Mon Jan 30 09:15:27 2017 From: reijnders at tor.nl (Tom Reijnders) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:15:27 +0100 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Splitting up model files to get more control over css in themes In-Reply-To: <008301d27ad8$50e81f80$f2b85e80$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> References: <03f43f26-1179-1fad-be9d-e6758e22ad88@tor.nl> <008301d27ad8$50e81f80$f2b85e80$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> Message-ID: <5c7774c0-65bd-f7d6-d951-6fe8fff1972e@tor.nl> Fixed and committed.... Lesson learned. Do not make last minute changes without a thorough test before committing.... Op 30-1-2017 om 10:07 schreef Ron Mitchell: > Tom > I tested this but getting errors with new or existing projects whenever changing theme to anything but default. > Will detail on github and maybe discuss online later. > Cheers > Ron > > -----Original Message----- > From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom Reijnders > Sent: 29 January 2017 15:45 > To: For Xerte technical developers > Subject: [Xerte-dev] Splitting up model files to get more control over css in themes > > Hi all, > > I created a new branch to experiment with splitting out the css contained in the model files, so you can overrule them in the themes. > > Please see branch split_css > 1. All model files are split in a css and html file (probably js would be better....) 2. xenith.js is changed, specifically changePage > - It deletes any previously added page specific css files > - It adds the model css file to the header > - It adds the theme css file for a specific page to the header (if > present) > > Please also find enclosed a sample css file for dragAndDrop. You can place it in a css folder in one of the themes and it will change the shape of the draggable labels and the shape of the hotspot areas (if displaying them is enabled). > > Let me know what you think. > > Regards, > > Tom > > > > > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. > > Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. > > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xerte-dev mailing list > Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk > http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev > > > > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this > message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. > > Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this > message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the > author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the > University of Nottingham. > > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an > attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your > computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email > communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as > permitted by UK legislation. > From Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk Mon Jan 30 09:18:38 2017 From: Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk (Julian Tenney) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:18:38 +0000 Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Splitting up model files to get more control over css in themes In-Reply-To: <5c7774c0-65bd-f7d6-d951-6fe8fff1972e@tor.nl> References: <03f43f26-1179-1fad-be9d-e6758e22ad88@tor.nl> <008301d27ad8$50e81f80$f2b85e80$@mitchellmedia.co.uk> <5c7774c0-65bd-f7d6-d951-6fe8fff1972e@tor.nl> Message-ID: Some lessons you learn more than once! Thanks for this Tom, -----Original Message----- From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom Reijnders Sent: 30 January 2017 09:15 To: For Xerte technical developers Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Splitting up model files to get more control over css in themes Fixed and committed.... Lesson learned. Do not make last minute changes without a thorough test before committing.... Op 30-1-2017 om 10:07 schreef Ron Mitchell: > Tom > I tested this but getting errors with new or existing projects whenever changing theme to anything but default. > Will detail on github and maybe discuss online later. > Cheers > Ron > > -----Original Message----- > From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk > [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Tom > Reijnders > Sent: 29 January 2017 15:45 > To: For Xerte technical developers > Subject: [Xerte-dev] Splitting up model files to get more control over > css in themes > > Hi all, > > I created a new branch to experiment with splitting out the css contained in the model files, so you can overrule them in the themes. > > Please see branch split_css > 1. All model files are split in a css and html file (probably js would be better....) 2. xenith.js is changed, specifically changePage > - It deletes any previously added page specific css files > - It adds the model css file to the header > - It adds the theme css file for a specific page to the header > (if > present) > > Please also find enclosed a sample css file for dragAndDrop. You can place it in a css folder in one of the themes and it will change the shape of the draggable labels and the shape of the hotspot areas (if displaying them is enabled). > > Let me know what you think. > > Regards, > > Tom > > > > > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. > > Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. > > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xerte-dev mailing list > Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk > http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev > > > > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this > message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. > > Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this > message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the > author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the > University of Nottingham. > > This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an > attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your > computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email > communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as > permitted by UK legislation. > _______________________________________________ Xerte-dev mailing list Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev