[Xerte-dev] Re: Roadmap

[Pat Lockley]

this feels like the marking poetry scene in Dead poet's now. Ajar source anyone?

Agree re documentation

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Julian Tenney
<Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
> Well, you can be a bit open or a lot open, or in the case of 'non-commercial' try to appear to be open.
>
> It was common sense stuff like we should have information for developers that tells them how to get involved, how we do stuff like work with the svn all that good stuff,
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley
> Sent: 31 October 2012 09:51
> To: For Xerte technical developers
> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Roadmap
>
> doing stuff for it's own end though seems a bit spiritual?
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Julian Tenney <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
>> No, the point isn't about openness being 'good' or openness being 'successful', it's just openness.The two things that come out for our project are the knowledge stuff for developers (because it all just kinda exists in or heads) and governance (how we go about doing stuff).
>>
>> If people want to start adding ideas to the road map we can start to
>> figure out who's doing what,
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat
>> Lockley
>> Sent: 30 October 2012 22:12
>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Roadmap
>>
>> I find there stuff a bit specific and technical - does a project succeed more because its gpl?
>>
>> Surely some one other than me and you has some feedback for the road map? Or at least Dave must want to add a sarky comment?
>>
>> On 30 Oct 2012, at 15:38, Julian Tenney <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> OK. I'll add a load of the openness ones from OSS Watch then,
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat
>>> Lockley
>>> Sent: 30 October 2012 15:38
>>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: Roadmap
>>>
>>> I concur, but think that suggestions like this should be part of the
>>> road map itself at this stage I.e that abstract
>>>
>>> On 30 Oct 2012, at 15:31, Julian Tenney <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It would be good if we managed pieces of work through a series of steps, and that we agree as a group pieces of work to be taken from 'proposed' to 'development' status (i.e. moving from a wish list to actively being worked on, with real commitment to the delivery date), so the steps might be:
>>>>
>>>> Propose
>>>> Accept
>>>> Develop
>>>> Test
>>>> Integrate
>>>>
>>>> That would help us do the more incremental development stuff, maybe even each piece of work gets a new minor version number? What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>>> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat
>>>> Lockley
>>>> Sent: 29 October 2012 22:21
>>>> To: For Xerte technical developers
>>>> Subject: [Xerte-dev] Roadmap
>>>>
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xvIPXtLBLhegwI0mo-KH63LxAHvXUAKO
>>>> c
>>>> X
>>>> ZusfKNK38/edit
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>>>
>>>> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>>>>
>>>> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
>>>> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
>>>> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications
>>>> with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xerte-dev mailing list
>> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
>> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev