[Xerte-dev] Re: 1.9 modularisation

[Julian Tenney]

That's ok, happy to concetrate on the xenith stuff anyway,
________________________________________
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley [patrick.lockley at googlemail.com]
Sent: 13 November 2012 12:38
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: 1.9 modularisation

Well from the look of it, only you and me have put anything in the roadmap anyways


On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Julian Tenney <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>> wrote:
In my mind, v2 is at easter, when we have parity between the flah and html5  output,
________________________________________
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley [patrick.lockley at googlemail.com<mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com>]
Sent: 13 November 2012 12:15
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: 1.9 modularisation

Don't know - I would argue it makes sense to wait for 2.0, but that is a bit like waiting for X as 2.0 doesn't have a date. This what the roadmap should do really, should be a community decision around dates.

I think the next version should be Xenith, and putting other templates in would just confuse people. Also if Xenith works in 1.8 then adding in the 1.9 stuff would offer a complication that isn't a requirement. Xenith works without modularisation, so if this is the Xenith release then make it that and what is in 1.8.

I'm half using XOT at work locally, and I'm not that fussed if no one else is using modularisation (I need it for what I do, if no one else wants it, not bothered by it)




On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Julian Tenney <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>>> wrote:
Ok, leave it then. But following your argumment, when would there be a point?
________________________________________
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>> [xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley [patrick.lockley at googlemail.com<mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com><mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com<mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com>>]
Sent: 13 November 2012 10:57
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: 1.9 modularisation

Is there much point if the changes suggested sound like v2?

All it would do is make the xerte side of the code different for no benefit (unless someone wants another template type)


On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Julian Tenney <Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>><mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk>>>> wrote:
Can you merge it into trunk please?
________________________________________
From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>> [xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>>] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley [patrick.lockley at googlemail.com<mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com><mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com<mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com>><mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com<mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com><mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com<mailto:patrick.lockley at googlemail.com>>>]
Sent: 12 November 2012 16:17
To: For Xerte technical developers
Subject: [Xerte-dev] 1.9 modularisation

Ignoring this morning's chat about libraries

All of the modularisation stuff is now committed to 1.9.

If anyone wants a pointer on how to create a module let me know as you can make pretty much what you want now.

Some more emails later on to discuss certain points.

_______________________________________________
Xerte-dev mailing list
Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>><mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>>
http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev

This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.

This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.



_______________________________________________
Xerte-dev mailing list
Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>>
http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev


_______________________________________________
Xerte-dev mailing list
Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>
http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev