[Xerte-dev] Re: google doc + page type order

[Kemp Johnathan]

I have just run a quick winmerge comparison between the model files in the
xerte svn pageWizards\models folder

and the model files in the

XOT svn modules\xerte\parent_templates\Nottingham\models\ folder

It appears that some changes have been made to the following files in the
XOT svn (which in some cases appear to fix bugs in the pageWizards version
(typically a [0] reference that should be [projPI] but there are also more
substantial changes in some pages.

The pages concerned are

buttonNav.rlm
columnPage.rlm
title.rlm

Whilst I can see the need to correct the [0] to [propPI] references I don't
know anything about the other changes and I don't know who made them - it
may have been whilst I was on holiday recently.

Do I need to be copying the versions of these pages in the XOT svn back
into the Xerte svn pageWizards section? Do the changes need testing?

Kind regards

Johnathan

On 28 May 2012 12:10, Ron Mitchell <ronm at mitchellmedia.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> a quick update re the issues listed in the Google doc
>
>
>
> Jonathan - thanks for updating the Google doc. I've moved all the issues
> that you've indicated as closed to the fixed sheet. I know you've committed
> some updated files to the Xerte svn so I assume you'll be updating the XOT
> svn with the same files at some point? I'll watch the rss feed for any
> updates and update the test install when those updates are notified by the
> feed.
>
>
>
> All -  at the moment there are 4 issues remaining in the tests and issues
> sheet. I think most of these are minor but can't recall if we've discussed
> the order of page types in each category and if there's a change needed?
> e.g. at the moment the order of page types within each category doesn't
> appear to be alphabetical or in the same order as previous versions. I seem
> to recall the consensus was that the category order is fine now e.g. Text
> then Media then Navigators etc but for instance at the moment the media
> category looks like this:
>
> Which doesn't appear to be alphabetical but can it be?
>
>
>
> Also a related question for Tom I guess - is your xwd builder code ready
> for this release? Would be great to test that and I think would be
> especially useful if we can document how admins might add or remove page
> types and then re-run the builder direct in XOT.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Ron
>
>  This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not
> use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any
> attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do
> not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system: you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> permitted by UK legislation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xerte-dev mailing list
> Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and
> may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do
> not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in
> any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this
> email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:
> you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the
> University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20120528/8fb56dca/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 14692 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20120528/8fb56dca/attachment-0001.jpg>