[Xerte-dev] Re: New Build

Julian Tenney Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk
Thu Mar 8 12:57:26 GMT 2012


Brilliant, thanks. If you need any help, let me know,

From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Inge Donkervoort 12Change
Sent: 08 March 2012 11:19
To: xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: New Build

Hi Julian,

The community website (www.xerte.org.uk<http://www.xerte.org.uk>)  is technically up and and running. I will try to work on it next week and hope to show you all the first version in a week or two (very basic version) If you agree then we can try to release it together with the new 1.8 version of XOT.

Bye,
Inge
1 2 Change
Chopinlaan 27
5242 HM Rosmalen
T 073-5226195
F 073-5226196
E i.donkervoort at 12change.eu<mailto:i.donkervoort at 12change.eu>
I www.12change.eu<http://www.12change.eu>

T twitter<http://twitter.com/IngeDonke12C>
L linkedIn<http://nl.linkedin.com/pub/inge-donkervoort/7/4b/18a>

Op 7-3-2012 18:12, Julian Tenney schreef:

Yes, I think this is just growing pains as well. I don't want the deadline to sound like we are imposing one: that's not really what I'm driving at, I'm just trying to coordinate several activities, and resources here are scarce. In time we will have people's capacity to look at stuff again. Maybe it's better to be much more incremental, rather than trying so much at once. There has been loads of activity in the last six months, and I'm really grateful for it. I'm hopeful that the PHP will eventually really stabilise - and we can't think of anything it doesn't do (!).



I think in the end I'm starting to think of the Xerte Project belonging to the community, rather than to Nottingham - at least that's the direction of travel, with us contributing in part along with everyone else. Our new site is very minimal, just the old one, re-focusing on toolkits as the main product and sorting out some nomenclature re: Xerte 3 which just confuses everyone, and I'm hopeful we get the new community-based site off the ground in the next six months as well.



1.9 will be the first html5 output. I hope, for October.





-----Original Message-----

From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk> [mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Pat Lockley

Sent: 07 March 2012 16:59

To: For Xerte technical developers

Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: New Build



I just have loads on of my own stuff to do (and I don't get anything

directly from XOT). The code has been out there for testing for four

months after all.



I think we sort of need a roadmap though - because now we've got a

deadline that is Nottingham's and it is defining everyone's work. But

the majority of the work here isn't being done by Nottingham (and is

for free). At some point a Nottingham person is going to have to start

coding on this again, and it'll be a bit weird (because we've got

different coders doing different things, that database queries are

sort of PDO in some parts, and not PDO in other parts).



I get the feeling this is just a growing pain, but we could do with

some thoughts on say



What will tag / branch 1.9 be?



What sort of coding standards are there (the only thing really I would

say is text strings for internationalisation are upper case - but some

of the commits are indent changes - so are we going drupal like? I

don't mind what we do - it just makes sense for people looking to

commit changes they know it'll work. Once we got a commit for the PHP

header change for the export code, but I never committed it because it

broke Nottingham's export function. This isn't a big deal, but the

idea of nightly build, or a test version before approval makes sense?

Some sort of PHP doc commenting per file (@file version 1.1 timestamp

(unix time at that point?). At the moment there aren't a lot of people

supporting the PHP side - and as David says bits are him and bits are

me - but I don't understand all of his as well - so there is a point

where support will get awkward.



If everyone uses bugfixes.txt as well that helps a lot, so all fixes

are explained simply and listed for people to use. That way everyone

can be on the most up to date version without worrying about anything.

I know the SVN does it, as does the RSS feed - but it's not obvious or

tied to the install in any place.



Pat





On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Julian Tenney

<Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk><mailto:Julian.Tenney at nottingham.ac.uk> wrote:

Don't worry about the flash stuff, I can do that. Pat's time is scarce, so

if we can help him to help us that will get things moving,







Cheers







From: xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>

[mailto:xerte-dev-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk] On Behalf Of David Goodwin

Sent: 07 March 2012 16:11





To: For Xerte technical developers

Subject: [Xerte-dev] Re: New Build











On 7 Mar 2012, at 16:08, Julian Tenney wrote:







OK, I'll start doing that.







Who shall we assign particular types of bugs to?







I'm up for anything to do with templates, and the xerte stuff.







Volunteers for other types? Pat and David for all the php?







I'll do whatever I can - but some bugs will require Pat's knowledge of how

everything fits together - I have minimal knowledge about how the flash

stuff works (for example)







David.











Pale Purple Ltd.  (Company No: 5580814)



'Business Web Application Development and Training in PHP'







http://www.palepurple.co.uk



Office: 0845 0046746     Mobile: 07792380669







Follow us on Twitter: @PalePurpleLtd









This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and

may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in

error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please do not

use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any

attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do

not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.



This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment

may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:

you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the

University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.





_______________________________________________

Xerte-dev mailing list

Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>

http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev



This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and

may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in

error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.   Please do not

use, copy or disclose the information contained in this message or in any

attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do

not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.



This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment

may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer system:

you are advised to perform your own checks. Email communications with the

University of Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.







_______________________________________________

Xerte-dev mailing list

Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>

http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev



_______________________________________________

Xerte-dev mailing list

Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Xerte-dev at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>

http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/xerte-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/xerte-dev/attachments/20120308/7ac38350/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Xerte-dev mailing list