assessmentId,internalTaxonId,scientificName,redlistCategory,redlistCriteria,yearPublished,assessmentDate,criteriaVersion,language,rationale,habitat,threats,population,populationTrend,range,useTrade,systems,conservationActions,realm,yearLastSeen,possiblyExtinct,possiblyExtinctInTheWild,scopes 65544726,65544723,Sphaerophoria beattiei,Least Concern,,2020,2019-03-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Sphaerophoria beattiei is endemic to the small and remote island of St Helena, in the South Atlantic Ocean. It was first discovered in 1976. This species is common over much of the island; adults are usually seen on open-structured flowers and the larvae are predatory, possibly on aphids. The increase in invasive non-native predatory species may threaten this species by reducing the overall population. Species of concern include various species of introduced orb-web spinning spiders, Common House Geckoes (Hemidactylus frenatus) and Springbok Mantis (Miomantis caffra). Introduced insect eating birds may also have an impact. However, overall this species appears not to currently be undergoing a continuing decline. It is a generalist which can be found in gardens and other non-native areas of vegetation. S. beattiei has an extent of occurrence (EOO) of 58 km² and area of occupancy (AOO) of 48 km² and is known from 19 locations with no known continuing decline, therefore is assessed as Least Concern. 

","

Sphaerophoria beattiei is widespread on the island and inhabits a range of habitats across different altitudes. This species is found to be abundant at locations where Scrubwood (Commidendrum rugosum) and other native Asteraceae species such as Black Cabbage Tree (Melanodendron integrifolium) are found. It is likely that this species is important in pollinating some of the endemic plants, however this species is seen on open-structured flowers of many plant species. The larvae are predatory, possibly on aphids.

","

The increase in invasive non-native predatory species may threaten this species by reducing the overall population. Species of concern include various species of introduced orb-web spinning spiders, Common House Geckos (Hemidactylus frenatus) and Springbok Mantis (Miomantis caffra). Introduced insect-eating birds may also have an impact.

",

During two zoological expeditions (1966/67) over 100 specimens were collected from varied habitats across the island from Rupert’s Valley to the High Central Ridge. This species was collected during an invertebrate survey of the Central Peaks and Peak Dale’ (Mendel et al. 2008). 478 specimens were collected across 16 sites during the 2017 Darwin Plus funded invertebrate project. Peak Dale and the High Central Ridge appear to have the highest populations.

,Unknown,"

Sphaerophoria beattiei is endemic to the island of St Helena, in the South Atlantic Ocean, and it is found widespread in a variety of habitats. It has an extent of occurrence (EOO) of 58 km² and area of occupancy (AOO) of 48 km².

",There is no known use or trade of this species.,Terrestrial,"

At the moment there is no need for specific conservation measures for this species, however, further research into its life history and ecology would help to inform conservation actions. Conservation restoration work implemented by the Government, Environment Management Division (EMD), and St Helena National Trust (SHNT) is ongoing across a range of areas of St Helena, predominantly in dryland areas and upland areas, particularly cloud forest. This includes propagating and planting of a wide range of endemic plant species suited to the appropriated areas, maintenance and invasive weed species clearance. This is helping to secure and improve habitat quantity and ecological function benefiting the whole system including the invertebrate contingent. The species is protected under the island's 2016 Environmental Protection Ordinance.

",Afrotropical,,FALSE,FALSE,Global 149115145,149115143,Merodon aberrans,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species prefers unimproved, calcareous montane grassland and patchily-vegetated, herb-rich open areas within the fir (Abies) forest zone, in the Alps and Pyrenees. At lower altitudes, this species also occurs in warm and dry (thermophilous) Balkan Oak (Quercus) forest, in southeastern Europe. The adults visit the flowers of Apiaceae.

The area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are above the thresholds for threatened species in Europe and the EU27. It has been found in many localities. The continuous decline of the quality of its habitats, and the conversion of forest areas could be possible threats to this species. Although, it is widely distributed through Central and Southern Europe, further research on this species is needed, especially regarding its biology and ecology. 

","This species prefers unimproved, calcareous montane grassland and patchily-vegetated, herb-rich open areas within the fir (Abies) forest zone, in the Alps and Pyrenees. At lower altitudes, it also occurs in warm dry (thermophilous) Balkan oak (Quercus) forest in southeast Europe. The adults visit the flowers of Apiaceae. The flight period is from May to July and in August at higher altitudes. The host plant and immature stages are unknown (Speight 2020).","The possible threats to this species are related to human activities, such as deforestation, logging, agriculture, and urbanisation.","

In Europe, there are numerous subpopulations of this species. There is no information about population size and trend for this species, but it seems to be stable.

",Unknown,"In Europe and the EU27, this species is widely distributed in the mountains of Central and southern Europe. It is present throughout Central Europe, from Germany, the Czech Republic and the Alps (France, Switzerland, Austria) to Hungary and Romania and to Ukraine. In southern Europe it exists from the mountainous parts of Italy, Albania, the Balkans and Greece, including some Mediterranean islands, such as Crete. The data for Portugal and Spain have not been checked (Mengual et al. 2020, Speight 2020, A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are above the thresholds in Europe and the EU27 to be considered as a threatened species.

This species also occurs in southern Russia and Georgia and its range reaches Turkey and the southeastern Mediterranean (Lebanon, Israel). The data for Morocco have not been checked (Mengual et al. 2020, Speight 2020, A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

Some point localities of this species are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network, for example, in the Nature Park Velebit in Croatia, Pindus and Olympus National Parks in Greece, National Park Durmitor in Montenegro, National Park Mavrovo in North Macedonia, in Serbia National Parks Fruška gora and Đerdap, and in Natural Park Vršačke planine.

The growing levels of urbanisation, logging and agriculture constantly escalate the degradation of forest and grassland and the disturbance of the habitats of this species, and so a continuous management of sites in protected areas is needed.

It is very important to increase awareness about this species. Further research is needed on its biology and ecology, and further monitoring of its population and habitat trends are required. 

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149115155,149115153,Merodon albifasciatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic species is known from scattered records in Greece, coastal parts of Croatia, and northern peninsula Italy. It prefers Mediterranean maquis and forests (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020), and the adults visit flowers of Carlina, Dittrichia viscosa, and Drimia species (Vujić et al. 2018, 2020).

This species is assessed as Least Concern because while it has a relatively restricted (56 km2) area of occupancy (AOO), its extent of occurrence (EOO) is large (368,678 km2), and the number of locations (based on fire as the major threat) are above the threshold (12). Fires, overgrazing by livestock and to some extent, infrastructure development are causing habitat destruction and threaten this species.","

This species prefers Mediterranean maquis and forests (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The flight period is in April and May, and in September and October. The adults visit flowers of Carlina, Dittrichia viscosa, and Drimia species (Vujić et al. 2018, 2020). The larva is unknown, but it is most probably associated with Drimia as host plant, possibly either Drimia numidica, or Drimia aphylla on East Aegean islands (Vujić et al. 2020).

","The habitat of this species is threatened by fires, which are becoming more frequent and intense. Overgrazing by livestock is an additional threat, especially on Andros, Samos and Crete (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Infrastructure development (mostly due to tourism) can also harm the habitat of this species to some extent.","There is no information about the population trend. A total of 36 specimens have been collected so far. Two specimens were collected in Croatia (one in 1983, one in 2014), one was collected in Italy (in 1986). The rest of the specimens are from Greece (between 1925 and 2018) (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"

This European endemic species is known from Greece, on the Peloponnese peninsula, Crete, and on some Aegean islands such as the Cyclades, as well as in the coastal zone of southeastern Greece (Vujić et al. 2020, Speight 2020). It also exists in Croatia and Italy.

In Europe and the EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 368,678 km2, and its currently known area of occupancy (AOO) is 56 km2.

",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. Five point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network, and their protection should be implemented consistently. Research on its ecology, and population size and trend, as well as on the threats is needed. Areas where it occurs should be protected. Monitoring its population and habitat trends is also required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149115165,149115163,Merodon adriaticus,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The Adriatic coast in Croatia and Montenegro is the only known area of Merodon adriaticus. It is a Mediterranean species and its habitats are increasingly destructed by tourism. Only five specimens in three localities have been recorded, although in Montenegro the species is considered Possibly Extinct since it has not been recorded there since 1997). It is considered to be likely that this species is endemic to this area. Based on the small geographic range of the species (the area of occupancy is 8-12 km2, the extent of occurrence is 45-1,127 km2) with only two (possibly three) locations based on the continuing decline of the habitat quality because of the intensive tourism, it is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU27.

We propose the monitoring of its population, as well as the monitoring of the habitat trend. Further research on life history and ecology of this species is needed.

","This species prefers Mediterranean scrub and evergreen Adriatic thermophilous oak (Quercus) forest. The adults are active during August. It occurs in coastal areas. The developmental stages are unknown (Veselić et al. 2017, Speight 2020). The host plant is also unknown.","The increasing tourism (and the expansion of tourism infrastructure), residential urbanisation and wine industry (expanding of vineyards), as well as the frequent threats from fires during hot and dry summers constantly increase the disturbance of the habitat and can have a negative impact on the population.","The population size and trend of this species is unknown. The locality in Montenegro may not be extant, and in Croatia it has been found in low numbers.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, with records from the Adriatic coast of Croatia and Montenegro (Veselić et al. 2017). Until now, it has been recorded only from three point localities (Veselić et al. 2017, Speight 2020). In Montenegro, the species has not been recorded since 1997, although surveys have been carried out systematically. Therefore, it can be considered as possibly extinct there. In Croatia, it was last recorded in 2017.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 45-1,127 km2, which is estimated based on a rough calculation (the distance between points and a rough width - 1 km) because only two point localities are confirmed and in the third it is possibly extinct; the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 8-12 km2 based on this rationale.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"The range of this endemic Adriatic species belongs to a Mediterranean hot spot. The locality in Montenegro is situated in Boka-Kotorska Bay, which is included in the World Heritage UNESCO list.

In Croatia, both known localities are within protected areas of the Natura 2000 network (the Pelješac peninsula belongs to a Special Protection Area under the EU Birds Directive).

The increasing tourism and wine industry, as well as the frequent threats from fires during hot and dry summers constantly increases the disturbance of the habitats. Introducing this endemic species to the National Lists of protected species is very important, as well as increasing awareness about it. Further research on the biology of this phytophagous species is also needed, especially to reveal the host plant(s) necessary for its larval development. More monitoring of its population and habitat (Mediterranean scrubs and evergreen Adriatic forests) trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149115176,149115173,Merodon abruzzensis,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"The Abruzzi region in central Italy is the only known area where this European endemic species is known to occur, where it is found in the high mountains. The species habitats suffer from destruction by overgrazing (by livestock) (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). This species has not been recorded since 1960. We propose the monitoring of its population, as well as its habitat trend. Further research on its life history and ecology is also needed.

The area of occupancy (AOO) is 24 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 200 km2, both of them are below the thresholds for threatened categories. Based on the small geographic range of the species with only three locations based on the continuing decline of its habitat quality because of the intensive overgrazing by livestock, the species is assessed as Endangered.

","This species prefers open ground. It occurs on grazed, unimproved, alpine and dry grasslands. The adults fly among stands of tall figwort (Scrophularia), which is unpalatable for cattle. The flight period is between July and early August. The developmental stages of this species have not been described (Speight 2020).","The main threat to the overall population is the habitat loss due to land conversion and poor management of habitats (overgrazing by livestock) (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). In some areas, the presence of millions of sheep grazing the grass during the summer is the most plausible threat.

Fires and tourism (i.e. the expansion of tourism infrastructure) can also have a negative impact on the population.

In other areas, land abandonment and land conversion are the main threats.

From 2012 to 2017, the Abruzzi Region (Gran Sasso National Park) implemented the LIFE+ PRATERIE project, which aimed to introduce grazing levels that allow the recovery of grasslands (D. Sommagio pers. comm. 2020). The impact of this project on hoverflies has not been assessed.","The population trend is unknown. This species has been observed in several point localities in National Park Gran Sasso and in one locality in Monte Sirente in the 1960s. The last records are from the 1960s, and no further sampling has been conducted since then.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is restricted to the Abruzzo Mountains in central Italy (Vujić et al. 2012, Speight 2020). Despite intensive sampling, it does not seem to occur in northern Italy. However, it is possible that it is not restricted to the centre of Italy (D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2020).",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

This species has been found in one national park (Gran Sasso and Monti della Laga National Park) and a regional park (Sirente-Velino). These belong to the Natura 2000 network. Although these areas are protected, grazing by livestock is still intensive (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). This activity should be controlled and maintained at sustainable levels in order to protect this species.

It has only been recorded in 1960. Additional monitoring of its population and habitat trends is needed. Additional research on its biology and ecology, as well as its population size and trend is required. It is essential to establish the exact host plant for the development of the larvae.

Introducing this endemic species to the National List of protected species, as well as increasing awareness about it, are also very important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149115188,149115186,Merodon aerarius,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This European endemic species is assessed as Least Concern both globally and for the EU27 Member States. While it has a relatively restricted area of occupancy (the regional area of occupancy (AOO) is 360 km2, in the EU27 it is 200 km2), it has a very large extent of occurrence (EOO): the regional EOO is 801,363 km2 and in the EU27 it is 801,363 km2. In addition, the number of locations, calculated based on the threat of logging, are above the threshold for threatened categories (45-55 in European levels and 20-25 in the EU27). Logging, infrastructure development and, to some extent, overgrazing by livestock and agricultural intensification are causing habitat destruction and threaten this species.","This species prefers temperate broadleaved forests (mostly Quercus and Fagus forests). According to the available data, the flight period is from July to September. The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown.","Logging can be considered as the major threat to the habitat of this species. Other threats include overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020), infrastructure development for tourism and agricultural intensification.","There is no information on the population trend. In total, 792 specimens have been collected over the entire range of the species. The records from Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Slovakia and Romania are old (end of 19th and beginning of 20th century). The records from Croatia, France, Italy, Montenegro, Serbia and Slovenia are more up-to-date (second half of 20th century), distributed almost equally among these countries (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"This European endemic species is known from records in Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, France (on the mainland and in Corsica), Italy (on the mainland and in Sardinia), Montenegro, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia and Slovenia (Šašić Zorić 2018).

In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be 801,363 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 360 km2. In the EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 801,363 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 200 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions targeting this species. Parts of its range occur within the Natura 2000 network. In Serbia and Montenegro, some point localities are within protected areas. Attempts should be made to collect new material from countries where only old records exist. Additional research on the possible threats, and on the ecology and population trend of this species is needed. Monitoring of the population and habitat is also required. Awareness should be raised about its importance.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149115198,149115196,Merodon alagoezicus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN).

In Europe and the EU27, the species is only known in Greece, in areas that are increasingly destroyed by tourism. Fire and overgrazing by livestock can also negatively influence the population (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Based on the small area of occupancy (AOO) (32 km2) with only four locations based on tourism as the main threat, and because of the the continuing decline of the habitat quality, this species is assessed as Endangered in Europe. It is unlikely that populations from outside Europe would provide a rescue effect.

We propose the monitoring of the population, as well as the habitat trend. Further research on the life history and ecology of this species is also needed.

","This species prefers open ground, and wet, unimproved montane grasslands, mostly above 1500 metres. The adults visit and fly around flowers of Euphorbia species. (Vujić et al. 2011) and around stands of Apiaceae. They also settle on low-growing vegetation, often in partial shade. The flight period is from June to August. The developmental stages have not yet been described, and the host plant is unknown (Hurkmans and Hayat 1997, Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020).","In Greece, this species is under continuous threat, mainly from intensive tourism and its supporting infrastructure (transportation) both in the mountains (for example around ski centres) and on the islands (in the summer resorts); it is also threatened by overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). In addition, fires are very frequent every summer on the Peloponnese Peninsula.",The population trend of this species is unknown. The specimens have been collected from eight point localities from 1982 to 2014 in Greece.,Unknown,"In Europe and the EU27, this species is known from eight localities in Greece (on the mainland, on Samos Island and the Peloponnese Peninsula). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is moderate, at 40,853 km2, however, the area of occupancy (AOO), based on available records, is 32 km2.

Outside of Europe, the range extends through Anatolia (Turkey) to the Caucuses (Armenia) (Vujić et al. 2011, 2020; Speight 2020).",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"All subpopulations of this species live in protected areas designated by Natura 2000. The increasing tourism (around ski centres and summer resorts), frequent threats from fires during hot and dry summers, and overgrazing by livestock constantly increase disturbance of the habitats (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). This species would benefit from balanced levels of grazing. Introducing this species into the National Lists of protected species is very important, as well as increasing awareness about it. Further research on the population, threats and the biology of this phytophagous species is needed, especially to reveal the host plant species necessary for larval development. Monitoring the population size and trend is also required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149115208,149115206,Merodon albifrons,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widely distributed in Central and Southern Europe. This species prefers open grounds, stony, unimproved, non-calcareous dry grasslands and open, tall-herb areas in deciduous and evergreen Quercus forests (Vujić et al. 2020). It also occurs on calcareous substrates in sweet chestnut forest, herb-rich meadows, and bushes below road and pine forests (Ricarte et al. 2012).

The area of occurrence (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are above thresholds for threatened category in Europe and EU27. A continuous decline in the quality of the habitat due to anthropogenic interference (for example deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanization, tourism - especially on the Mediterranean coast) is possible. A lot of further research is needed about this species, especially on its biology and ecology, population size and trend.

","

This species prefers open ground, stony, unimproved, non-calcareous dry grasslands and open, tall-herb areas in deciduous Quercus (Quercus fraineto, Quercus cerris, Q. pubescens) and evergreen Quercus (Q. coccifera, Q.ilex) forests (Vujić et al. 2020). It also occurs on calcareous substrates in sweet chestnut forests, herb-rich meadows, and bushes below road and pine forests (Ricarte et al. 2012).

The adults visit flowers of Urginea maritima (Standfuss and Claussen 2007), Chrysanthemum, Euphorbia, Helianthemum, Ranunculus, Scabiosa, Senecio, white-flowered Umbelliferae (Vujić et al. 2011), Leucanthemum, Ferula (Vujić et al. 2020) and Thymus (Speight 2020). The flight period is from the end of April until October (Vujić et al. 2020). The host plant and immature stages are not known (Speight 2020).

",Possible threats include habitat degradation due to intense tourism on the Mediterranean coast and conversion of forest areas (logging) because of  infrastructure development (urbanization).,"

There are numerous subpopulations of this species in central and southern Europe. There is no information about the population size and trend.

",Unknown,"This species is widely distributed in central and southern Europe. Its range extends to the east to Ukraine (Crimea), from central France south to the Mediterranean and  from western Spain eastwards through central (Switzerland, Austria, Hungary) and southern Europe (Sardinia, Sicily, Italy, the Balkans, Greece, Bulgaria, Romania) to Turkey (Speight 2020, A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The area of occurrence (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are above the thresholds for threatened categories in Europe and EU27.

Out of the European region, the range extends to Anatolia (Turkey) and east Georgia and Azerbaijan, and to North Africa.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

Some point localities of this species are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and Natura 2000 network, such as the Natural Park Grazalema in Spain, Olympus National Park in Greece, National Park Durmitor in Montenegro, and the National Park Đerdap in Serbia.

The increasing tourism, urbanization, logging and agriculture can disturb the habitats of the species, so continuous management of sites in protected areas is needed. Raising awareness about this species is very important. Further research on its threats, biology and ecology is needed. More monitoring on population and habitat trends is also required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149115218,149115216,Merodon ambiguus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-14 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Within the European region, this species is distributed in southeastern Europe, in Serbia, Romania, Bulgaria, Greece. The species prefers mesophilous and thermophilous deciduous forests and unimproved grasslands with scrub. It occurs in track-sides and tall-herb open areas in Eastern thermophilous oak (Quercus) forests. The adults are extremely fast-flying and wary species, who are very difficult to catch with a hand net. They often appear at open areas and track-sides, where they fly mostly within one meter of the ground surface, around and through tall-herb vegetation and the foliage of the lowest branches of trees.

The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is 52 km2, and it is 36 km2 in the EU27. Since it has a small area of occupancy (AOO), with only five locations based on the continuing decline of the habitat quality because of tourism, fire, and other threats, it is assessed as Endangered in Europe. There is no rescue effect of subpopulations from outside of the assessment region. Although its known localities occur within protected areas, they are largely under threat by tourism. We propose the monitoring of population, as well as the monitoring of the habitat trends. Further research on life history and ecology of this species is needed.

","The species prefers mesophilous and thermophilous deciduous forests and unimproved grasslands with scrub. It occurs on the sides of tracks and tall-herb open areas in Eastern thermophilous oak (Quercus) forests.

The adults are extremely fast-flying and wary, very difficult to catch with a hand net. They often appear in open areas and at the sides of tracks, where they fly mostly within one meter of the ground surface, around and through tall-herb vegetation and the foliage of the lowest branches of trees.  It rests in the sun on the foliage of low branches or large-leaved herbs within one meter of the ground, or on the ground. It appears soon after the sun reaches the sides of the tracks in the morning, and disappears before midday.

In Greece, it has been recorded on the flowers of Polygonum. The flight period is from August or September to October. The developmental stages are not described and the host plant is unknown (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020).","Tourism is the most plausible threat, but unsustainable commercial forestry and forest management also threaten the species. Wildfires are acknowledged as the major threats in the National Park Dadia in Greece (Catsadorakis et al. 2010), as well as in National Park Djerdap in Serbia.",The population trend and size are unknown. The species has been recorded from 11 point localities in four countries from 1977 to 2014.,Unknown,"This species is distributed in southeastern Europe, with records from eastern Serbia, southwestern Romania, the Black Sea coast of Bulgaria and northeastern Greece (Vujić et al. 2018, 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 127,811 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 52 km2. Presence in the European part of Turkey is possible.

The range extends out of Europe to the Anatolia region of Turkey (Vujić et al. 2018, 2020).",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"All point localities where this species has been recorded in Greece, Bulgaria (Zlatni Pyasatsi Nature Park) and Romania belong to the Natura 2000 network. Additionally, the species is also found in National Park Djerdap in Serbia, as well in National Park Dadia in Greece. Although these areas are protected, tourism (namely the expansion of tourism infrastructure) presents a major threat and restricting these activities would benefit the species.

Additional research on possible threats, its biology and ecology, as well as on the habitat trend and population size and trend is required. Establishing the exact host plant for the development of the larvae of the species is crucial. In addition, its introduction to the National list of protected species, as well as increasing the awareness about this endemic species is very important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149115228,149115226,Merodon alexandri,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Ukraine and southeast Russia are the only known areas of Merodon alexandri. Based on the small (80 km2) area of occupancy (AOO), which is below the threshold for threatened species, and because this species has about ten locations (based on forest fires as the main threat, caused by the war in eastern Ukraine), with a continuing decline of the habitat quality, this species is assessed as Vulnerable (VU B2ab(iii)). The species is not present in the EU 27, and therefore it is Not Applicable in the EU 27 regional assessment.

The habitat of this oak forest species is threatened by war, fires and logging. We propose the monitoring of population, as well as the habitat trend. Further research on the life history and ecology of this species is needed. Increasing the percentage of protected areas and the awareness about this species is very important too.","This species prefers forests and open ground, small open areas in humid Quercus robur forests and alluvial hardwood forests with Quercus robur. The adults fly low over ground vegetation. The males exhibit territorial behaviour. They can visit flowers of Crataegus, Euphorbia, Fragaria, Ornithogalum fischeranum, and Stellaria holostea. The host plant is still unknown because larvae have not yet been found in natural conditions. The flight period is between May and June. The developmental stages are not described, but the larvae feed on bulbs of Hyacinthaceae in laboratory conditions (Popov 2009, Speight 2020).","The war in eastern Ukraine, which started in 2014, is the most plausible threat. The extent to which the war has had an impact on the subpopulations (possible degradation and fragmentation of habitats due to explosions that cause forest fires) is not known. Logging has a negative effect on the subpopulations in the European part of Russia.",The species has been recorded from several point localities (about ten in Ukraine and six in south-eastern Russia). It is a common species in Ukraine without annual fluctuations and with a stable subpopulation. The subpopulation trend in Russia is unknown.,Unknown,"This European endemic species is known from eastern Ukraine and southeastern parts of European Russia (Popov 2009, Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 164,030 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 80 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"Two point localities in Ukraine are in the Homilshanski Lisy NP and the Stanychno-Luhansky Nature Reserve, and two point localities in southeast Russia in the Les na Vorskle and Galichya Gora Nature Reserves.

Taking into consideration that the majority of recorded subpopulations have been found outside of protected areas, and that the quality of habitats are largely decreasing because of fires, war and logging, the species would benefit from restricting these activities. Additional research on its biology and ecology, as well as on the threats, habitat trend and population size and trend is required. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is also needed. Establishing the exact host plant for the development of the larvae is also necessary. Increasing the percentage of protected areas and the awareness about this species is very important too.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163217,149163215,Merodon aureus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This endemic species is distributed on high European mountains. It occurs in the Alps in France, Austria, Germany, Switzerland, Italy and Slovenia, on the Apennine Peninsula and the Dinaric mountain range in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia and Bulgaria (Vujić et al. 2020). This species prefers open grounds and unimproved, calcareous montane grasslands.

The area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are above thresholds for threatened categories. A possible decline in the quality of the habitat due to urbanization, tourism, logging and agriculture can threaten this montane species. This species is distributed in the high mountains of Central Europe, and on the Balkan and Apennine peninsulas. However, a lot of further research on this species is needed, especially on its biology and ecology, population size and trend.

","Speight (2020) listed the biological data of this species under the name Merodon aeneus. It prefers open grounds and unimproved, calcareous montane grasslands. The adults are known to visit the flowers of Apiaceae and Anthericum ramosum, Leucanthemum vulgare, Mentha, Ranunculus, Solidago, and Taraxacum. The flight period is from the end of May until August. At higher elevations, the peak is in July to August. The immature stages and the host plant are unknown.","The major threats are habitat loss and fragmentation. Traffic (road networks), tourism and logging on mountains can negatively influence the habitat of this species.",The population trend is unknown.,Unknown,"This European endemic species is known from the high European mountains. It occurs in the Alps in France, Austria, Germany, Switzerland, Italy and Slovenia, in the Apennines on the Italian Peninsula, and in the Dinaric mountain range in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia and Bulgaria (Vujić et al. 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are above the thresholds for threatened categories.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions targeting this species so far. Some point localities are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network: the National Parks Mercantour, Vanoise and Écrins, Regional Parks Préalpes d'Azur and Haut-Jura in France, the National Park Abruzzo and Gran Sasso e Monti della Laga, Natural Park Adamello Brenta, Parc Ela, in Italy, National Park Triglav in Slovenia, National Park Kopaonik, Natural Park Golija and Stara Planina in Serbia, and National Park Rila in Bulgaria.

Further research is needed on the biology and ecology of this species, as well as on possible threats. More monitoring of the population and habitat trend is  required. Increasing tourism, logging and road networks can disturb its habitats, so continuous management of sites in protected areas is needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163229,149163227,Eumerus gibbosus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic species is assessed as Endangered since it has a very restricted geographic range with an area of occupancy (AOO) of only 12 km2, is found in only two locations, and has a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat. The species is threatened due to the drying of its natural habitat with an increased risk of forest fires caused by climate change and human activities. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be around 365,586 km2. If research and surveys locate further localities, the species may require reassessment and potentially down listed to a lower threat category. For now, a precautionary attitude was used to list this species as Endangered. Further research into the population size, distribution and trends and threats is needed. Monitoring of the population trends is also required. Raising awareness of rare and important species and communication and protection of species at the national level are recommended as a conservation measure.","In Spain, this species can be found in low mountainous areas with open Pinus halepensis and Pinus nigra forest landscape that have an undergrowth of Mediterranean maquis shrubland and diverse yellow-and-white flowering Apiaceae (van Steenis et al. 2017). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records of the larval stages of this species.","A decrease in precipitation due to climate change combined with the increased demand for water from tourism, agricultural practices and a growing population, is leading to the rapid loss of natural water sources and drought in the habitat of this species. Increasing risk of forest fires due to climate change (van Steenis et al. 2017) impact it. The larval stage is assumed to be dependent on bulb plants, which makes it particularly sensitive to these threats.","This species is presumably extremely rare, since fewer than 20 specimen have been recorded and the area where the species is found is quite well explored (van Steenis et al. 2017). The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is known from only two locations, one in southern Spain and one in southern Portugal (van Steenis et al. 2017, Speight 2020)Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 365,586 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) about 12 km2.
",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"Both known localities are within the Natura 2000 network. The species occurs at the Vale do Guadiana National Park (Birds Directive and Habitats Directive) in Portugal, and Sierra de Alcaraz y Segura y cañones del Segura y del Mundo Habitat Directive Site in Spain (European Environment Agency 2020).

There are no specific conservation measures in place for this species. Further research into its population size, distribution, trends and threats is needed. Monitoring of the population trends is also required. Raising awareness of rare and important species, and communication and protection of species at the national level, are recommended as conservation measures.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149163239,149163237,Eumerus funeralis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is distributed across Europe, and the Palearctic realm in general. It is found in open ground, dry grassland and clearings in dry woodland. It also occurs in suburban gardens and land used for horticultural purposes. This species is assessed as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution, because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category, and the species has a presumed large and stable population. Nonetheless, the species may be Endangered in some parts of its range such as in southeast Europe, thus, population trends need to be monitored.

","This species prefers open ground, dry grassland, and clearings in dry woodland. It also occurs in suburban gardens and land used for horticultural purposes. It flies close to the ground, in sparsely vegetated grassland and woodland clearings, and over flowerbeds in gardens. It is fast-flying, settling often on bare ground or stones. Adults visit many flowers, including Bindweed (Convolvulus), Surge (Euphorbia), Strawberries (Fragaria), Ox-eye Daisy (Leucanthemum) and Buttercups (Ranunculus) (Speight 2018). The larva has been described by various authors, including Hodson (1927, 1932) and illustrated in colour by Rotheray (1994): it feeds on damaged bulbs of Amaryllis (Amaryllis), Hyacinths (Hyacinthus) and Daffodil (Narcissus). It is classified as a minor pest of horticulture, but larvae are unable to complete their development in the absence of fungi infesting the bulbs (Creager and Spruijt 1935). It has not been established whether the larva carries the fungus it requires, enabling it to infect the bulb so as to provide itself with a food supply. This species overwinters as a larva (Brunel and Cadou 1994).","There are no major threats known for the species, but it may be Endangered in some parts of its range such as in Southeast Europe since it is quite rare there. Giving that it could develop in suburban ecosystems, it is not clear what poses a potential threat to this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data about the population trend for this species, but given that it is distributed in much of the Palearctic realm, its population is presumed to be stable. However, in southeast Europe it is quite rare and potentially at a risk of disappearing (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Stable,"This species probably originated in the Mediterranean Basin but is becoming increasingly cosmopolitan. It is now known from much of the Palaearctic region. It can be found in all European countries, including the islands. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, the species is found in North (except cold-climate zones) and South America. It has also been introduced into Australia and New Zealand (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions in place for this species, and no conservations actions are needed at the moment. Since it is rare in southeast Europe, research about threats and the monitoring of its population trends are needed to obtain more information. The species occurs in several Natura 2000 sites in Europe, such as at Karavanke in Slovenia, Ostoja Kozubowska in Poland, and Cheile Dobrogei in Romania (European Environment Agency 2020). It is also found in the Fruška Gora National Park in Serbia and Durmitor and Skadarsko jezero National Parks in Montenegro.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163249,149163247,Eumerus etnensis,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This European endemic species lives in forest and open ground of the Mediterranean area. It is assessed as Vulnerable since it has an area of occupancy (AOO) of 32 km2 and is found at seven locations. The most prominent threats are forest fires, overgrazing, and coastal tourism development in the Mediterranean area. There is also a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to human pressure on Mediterranean ecosystems. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be around 648,698 km2. The species is also considered VU for the EU Member States, with an AOO of 28 km2 and six locations.

Area and habitat protection is needed. Research into its taxonomy, population size, distribution, and trends, and threats is required. Monitoring of the species' population and habitat trends is also recommended.","This species prefers open forest ground, in open Castanea forests, Olea europaea maquis shrubland with Opuntia ficus indica thickets, and sparsely vegetated ground with Opuntia cactus. The egg, larva, and puparium of this species were described by Pérez-Bañón and Marcos-Garcia (1998) under the name Eumerus purpurariae. The larvae were found in the decaying stems of the introduced cactus Opuntia. The puparial phase lasts from two and a half to nearly four weeks. In southern Europe, larvae apparently occur throughout the year, as do the puparia. Adults visits Euphorbia flowers (Speight 2018).","This species is sensitive to the more frequent and devastating fires due to climate change, and also to overgrazing and coastal tourism development in the Mediterranean area (CEPF 2020).",There is no information about the population trend of this species. There are very few records from all its known localities (Smit et al. 2004).,Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is known from mainland Portugal and Spain, Gibraltar, southern France, from the slopes of Mount Etna in Sicily, and from Malta (Speight 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 648,698 km2 and the currently known area of occupancy (AOO) about 32 km2. The species is found at seven locations.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation measures in place for this species. It is found in numerous Natura 2000 sites, such as at Ria Formosa / Castro Marim in Portugal, Rock of Gibraltar in Gibraltar, Sierras de Gádor y Enix and Illa de Tabarca in Spain and Fascia altomontana dell'Etna and Pineta di Adrano e Biancavilla on Sicily (European Environment Agency 2020). Area and habitat protection is needed. Research into its taxonomy, population size, distribution, trends and threats is required. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is also needed.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149163259,149163257,Eumerus crassus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-14 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

Within the European region, this Mediterranean species is found in Greece (the northeastern mainland and the eastern Mediterranean islands. It is assessed as Vulnerable since it has a very restricted geographic range in Europe and EU 27 with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 88 km². The number of locations are ten to fourteen. There is also a continuing decline in quality of its habitat due to human pressure on Mediterranean ecosystems. The species is threatened by forest fires as a result of climate change, overgrazing, and the development of the tourism industry, which has exposed areas of the coastline to intense pressure from land-use change. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from subpopulations outside the assessment area. In Europe and the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be around 26,761 km2Using a precautionary approach, the assessors list this species as Vulnerable at present, but with a need for further investigation into population and habitat trends and threats.","The species prefers sparsely-vegetated, open areas in Mediterranean scrub and garrigue (Vujić et al. 2020). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records of the larval stages of this species.","The Mediterranean Basin is one of the most fire-prone regions in the world and due to climate change, forest fires are expected to become more frequent and have a higher impact. Other main threats are overgrazing and the development of the tourism industry, which has exposed areas of the coastline to intense pressure from land-use change (CEPF 2010).","There is no information about the population trend for this species, but up to five individuals are usually recorded in one locality (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is found in north-eastern mainland Greece and the eastern Aegean islands (Samos, Chios, Lesvos; Chroni et al. 2018). In Europe and the EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 26,761 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) about 88 km2.

Outside of the European region, the species occurs in Bozdağ and the Dilek Peninsula, in Anatolia (Turkey). It is found up to 900 m above sea level.",The species is not traded or utilized.,Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation measures in place for this species. It occurs at a few Natura 2000 sites in Greece, such as at Voreia Lesvos, Notiodytiki Chersonisos, Apolithomeno Dasos Lesvou, Lesvos Paraktioi Ygrotopoi Kai Kolpos Kallonis, Lesvos Kolpos Geras, Elos Ntipi Kai Oros Olympos – Potamos Evergetoulas, Voreia Chios and Samos: Oros Ampelos (Karvounis) (European Environment Agency 2020). Habitat and area protection are important conservation actions that are needed. Research into its taxonomy, population size, distribution and trend, life history, ecology and threats is required. Further monitoring of its population and habitat trends is also needed.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163269,149163267,Eumerus consimilis,Least Concern,,2021,2019-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This European endemic species is assessed as Least Concern globally and for the ERU Member States because of its relatively large range across the Mediterranean region in Europe; however being quite rare in western and eastern European countries. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The species prefers open forest ground. It is affected by deforestation, habitat conversion into farmland, and urbanization. Resource and habitat protection are needed for this species. The population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats should be investigated.

","

The species prefers open forest ground. It lives in open, scrub-invaded areas and tracksides in well-drained, sandy hardwood forest, and warm-dry Oak (Quercus) forest. It also occurs beside rivers in karstic Downy Oak (Quercus pubescens) savanna. Adults visit Rock Rose (Helianthemum) flowers (Speight 2020). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies can be found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records of the larval stages of this species.

","This species is affected by deforestation, habitat conversion into farmland, and urbanization (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). No immediate conservation actions are required.","There is no information about the population trend for this species. Overall, it is considered to be widespread, but rare in some parts of its range (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, known from scattered records in mainland Portugal and Spain, then more widespread records through France and Italy to Greece in southeastern Europe (Speight 2020). The species is apparently absent from parts of the western Balkans, however this may be a result of a lack of survey. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions in place for this species. The species likely occurs in protected areas across its range, and it is found in Sotos y Mejanas del Ebro in Spain (Ricarte et al. 2013) and Stura di Lanzo in Italy, which are part of the Natura 2000 network (D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2020). It is found in the Đerdap National Park in Serbia and in Durmitor National Park in Montenegro, and also occurs in the area of the Natural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor Unesco World Heritage Site (whc.unesco.org). Resource and habitat protection are needed for this species. The population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats should be investigated.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163279,149163277,Eumerus clavatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and for the EU27 Member States because of its relatively large range across Europe; however, it is quite rare in eastern European countries. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The species prefers the temperate forest of European beech. It is threatened mainly by changes in the precipitation pattern due to climate change and ozone air pollution. Monitoring of the population trends is required as well as further research into the species' life history and ecology and threats is needed.

","The species prefers Fagus sylvatica forest. Adults fly low in and around the edges of thickets of Rubus in the sun, in clearings and open areas, settling on bare ground or low-growing plants (Speight 2018). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies can be found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records of the larval stages of this species.","The habitat of this species is Beech forests, which are affected by an increase of periods of drought in summer and periods of heavy rain in spring and fall, with oxygen depletion in the soil caused by climate change, especially in the south (Rennenberg et al. 2004). Other main threats are pollution, particularly air pollution by tropospheric ozone which primarily damages the leaves (Cailleret et al. 2018). Currently, no conservation measures are required to preserve this species.","There are no data on population trends of this species, but it is assumed to be stable. It is observed to be rare, but could be locally common (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Stable,"

Within the European region, this species is found from north-western Spain, southern and northeast France to the south of Spain, as well as in Germany, Greece, the Danube floodplain in Romania, the Balkan countries, and Ukraine (Speight 2020).

The range of the species extends out of the European region to Anatolia in Turkey (R. Hayat pers. comm. 2019), the Caucasus region, and North Africa (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"This species is protected under the Serbian legislation (Code on declaration and protection of strictly protected and protected wild species of plants, animals and fungi, “Official Gazette of RS”, no. 5/2010). In Germany, it is assessed as Critically Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011). Monitoring of the population trends is required as well as further research into its life history, ecology and threats. Currently, no conservation measures are recommended to preserve this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163289,149163287,Eumerus claripennis,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is endemic to the eastern Mediterranean island of Lesvos and Lake Ohrid in North Macedonia. It is assessed as Endangered because it has a very restricted geographic range with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 28 km2 and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of 2,065 km2, the number of locations is three to five with two to four being on Lesvos and one near the Lake Ohrid, where no specimens have been recorded since 1955, and a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat. There are less than 20 findings of the species so far. Targeted investigations are necessary to estimate population size and gather more information about this species' ecology and possible threats to it. There are no known conservation actions for the species so far. Further area and habitat protection is needed. Research on taxonomy, population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, and threats is needed for this species. Further monitoring of the population trends is also required.

","The species prefers open scrub areas along rivers and beside lakes (Speight 2018). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies can be found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records of the larval stages of this species.","The Mediterranean Basin is one of the most fire-prone regions in the world, and due to climate change, forest fires are expected to become more frequent and have a higher impact (CEPF 2010). Other main threats are overgrazing and the development of the tourist industry, which has exposed areas of coastline to intense pressure from land-use change and pollution (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There is no information about population size and very few records exist for this species (Ricarte et al. 2012). There is a single record outside Lesvos, from 1955.",Unknown,"

The species is endemic to Europe, where it is known from two collections; from Lake Ohrid in North Macedonia (record from 1955; Coe 1957) and further research is required to see if it still occurs there), and from several areas on Lesvos Island in Greece (Ricarte et al. 2012). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is 2,065 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) 28 km2. The number of locations are three to five with two to four on Lesvos, and one near Lake Ohrid . It is found up to 1,200 m above sea level.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species so far, but area and habitat protection is needed. It occurs at a few Natura 2000 sites on Lesvos, such as at Kolpos Geras, Eli Ntipi Kai Charamida, Notiodythiki Chersonisos, and Apolithomendo Dasos Lesvou (natura2000.eea.europa.eu). The records from Lake Ohrid are within the Galichica National Park and Ohrid region World Heritage Site.

Further intensive surveys are needed to find new records between between Lake Ohrid and Lesvos, and to find possible subpopulations. Research on taxonomy, population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, and threats is needed for this species. Further monitoring of the population trends is also required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149163299,149163297,Eumerus canariensis,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-10-21 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

The species is assessed as Endangered since it is endemic to the Canary Islands and is found on only two islands, with old records from more than 30 years ago. Its area of occupancy (AOO) is 24 km2 and its extent of occurrence (EOO) is 382 km2. There is a continuing decline in the extent of and quality of its habitat due to goat overgrazing, agriculture, and tourism, resulting in two to four locations for the species. No details are known about the habitat or ecology of the species. Further research into the ecological preferences of the species as well as into its population, distribution, and trends might help preserve it. Monitoring of the species habitat trends is also required.

","The larva of this species presumably feeds on plants, developing in bulbs or other infested underground organs, like other species of this genus. No details are known about its habitat or ecology. The flight period of the adults is in February (Speight 2018).","So far, the species has only been found on two Canary Islands, both inhabited. There is a documented problem with overgrazing of feral and domestic invasive goats on Fuerteventura (Arevalo et al. 2012). Besides this, widespread subsistence agriculture and tourism due to the high tourist numbers on the island present additional pressure for this rare species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).","The population size and trend for this species remain unknown, due to a lack of information. All the records are from 1977, a total 17 specimens (Báez 1982) from two Canary islands. No targeted surveys have been conducted in order to find this species after its discovery.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to the Canary Islands in Spain (Speight 2018), where it is found on the islands of Fuerteventura and Lanzarote. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 382 km2 and its area of occupancy (AOO) is 24 km2. It is found between 200 and 453 metres above sea level.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. It occurs in protected areas within the Natura 2000 network. Conservation of damaged and fragmented habitat is needed, as well as the control of grazing of invasive goats that is causing further habitat destruction. Raising awareness about its rarity, as well as its listing in national legislation, are also needed. Further research into its ecological preferences as well as into its population, distribution and trends might help preserve it. Monitoring of habitat use is also required (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163319,149163317,Eumerus basalis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and for the EU27 Member States because of its relatively large range across the Mediterranean region, the Balkan Peninsula, European Turkey and Ukraine, where it may be common and because its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The species prefers broad-leaved, evergreen forest, and Mediterranean shrub formations. The species usually occurs in natural unimproved ecosystems and is affected by fires and water shortages due to climate change and habitat loss due to land degradation caused by urban development, commercial and industrial areas and coastal tourism development. Research into the threats of the species and monitoring of the population trends are needed. The species population trend is presumed to be stable.

","The species prefers broad-leaved, evergreen forest and high maquis scrubland of Quercus ilex. It is found in Mediterranean shrub formations, evergreen Mediterranean forest with Laurus nobilis, and dry forests of warm environments in general (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). Adults visit Smyrnium perfoliatum (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies can be found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems, and roots of various plants, but there are no records of the larval stages of this species.","Wildfires and water shortages due to climate change pose a major threat to the Mediterranean forests where the species occurs. Land degradation caused by urban development, commercial and industrial areas and coastal tourism development are also significant threats (CEPF 2010).","There are no data on population size and trends of this species, but it is assumed to be stable. It is observed to be locally common (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Stable,"This species is found in Mediterranean parts of Europe, from north-eastern mainland Spain, southern France and Corsica, to Greece (including Crete and Rhodes), and east to Romania, Ukraine, and European Turkey. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of the species in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

The range of the species extends out of the Europe region to Iran (Sarıbıyık 2014, Speight 2018, Vujić et al. 2020).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"The species is protected under the Serbian legislation (Code on declaration and protection of strictly protected and protected wild species of plants, animals and fungi, “Official Gazette of RS”, no. 5/2010). No further conservation actions are required for this species at the moment. Research into the threats of the species and monitoring of the population trends are needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163329,149163327,Eumerus amoenus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Eumerus amoenus is assessed as Least Concern since its range is relatively large and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species in Europe are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The species usually occurs in natural unimproved ecosystems, but it can also be found as a secondary pest in onion bulbs, which is why it is quite common in some parts of the area. The species is listed as Critically Endangered in Germany, where it is situated on the northern border of the species' distribution (Ssymank et al. 2011). Further research into threats and the monitoring of population trends is required for this species.

","The species prefers warm-dry Quercus forest and unimproved, permanent grassland with an overgrowth of taller vegetation such as Pteridium. It is found in hedges and edges of crop fields and vegetable gardens in southern Europe. It flies among low-growing vegetation at up to one meter from the ground, often in partially-shaded conditions, for example hedges, bramble patches, and bracken stands. In the sun, it settles on leaves and on pathside vegetation, for example the main stem of a Pteridium frond or on the ground. On the ground, the species uses short vegetation rather than bare soil or stones to settle on (Speight 2018). Adults visit Smyrnium olusatrum (Ssymank 2012). Efflatoun (1922) records that the species has been reared from potato tubers, water melon, grapes, rotten paw-paw, and damaged rhizomes of Iris germanica. It has also been reared from Allium in the vicinity of Bordeaux (Speight 2018). The larvae commonly damages onion crops in Egypt (Assem and Nasr 1967).","Natural habitat loss as a consequence of urbanization and agriculture affects this species (EEA 2016), but due to the fact that it can also be found as a secondary pest in onion bulbs (Efflatoun 1922, Assem and Nasr 1967), it is assumed that the population is not under threat.","There is no information about the population size of this species, but the species is believed to be stable in the EU 27 and in Europe. Due to the fact that the species larvae develop in onion bulbs (Efflatoun 1922, Assem and Nasr 1967), the species is quite common in some parts of its range.",Stable,"The species is widely distributed in Europe, from the Iberian Peninsula (mainland Portugal and Spain), through central and southern France, and through the Mediterranean Basin to European Turkey, including the Mediterranean islands (e.g., Cyprus, Rhodes, and Crete). Its range extends in the European region around the northern parts of the Black Sea and to southern European Russia. It is present in the Canary Islands, in the Azores, as well as in southern Germany, Austria, Switzerland and central Europe.

Outside of Europe, the species is also known from Morocco, the Caucasus region in Kazakhstan, Turkestan, Tajikistan, Mongolia, and Asia (Speight 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of the species in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There has been no known conservation actions for this species and no conservation actions are needed to preserve this species. The species is listed as Critically Endangered in Germany, where it is situated on the northern border of its distribution (Ssymank et al. 2011). Research on threats and the monitoring of population trends is required. Currently, no conservation actions are needed to preserve this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163339,149163337,Eumerus alpinus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This European endemic species is assessed as Least Concern both globally and for the EU 27 Member States since it has a relatively large distribution throughout Europe and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species in Europe are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Frequent fires caused by human negligence and climate change as well as overgrazing in montane grasslands pose a threat to this species. Further research about taxonomy, population size, distribution and trends, threats, and life history and ecology are needed for this species. Monitoring of the population trends of this species is also needed and no immediate conservation actions are required.

","The species prefers well-drained, unimproved, permanent pasture, from montane pasture to sea level and open areas within deciduous Fagus and Quercus forest. The species is found in open areas with sparse ground vegetation and in more or less complete ground cover of grasses and Pteridium. The species flies fast and low, settling in the sun on bare soil, stones, and low vegetation. Adults also visit flowers of Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus and white umbellifers (Speight 2020). Developmental stages of the species are not described, but Speight and Garrigue (2014) reared the species (as Eumerus olivaceus) from larvae found in tubers of Asphodelus albus and Asphodelus ramosus, and they provided a coloured photo of the puparium. The apparently mature larvae overwinter in decaying Asphodel tubers and the puparial phase lasts between two and four weeks (Speight and Garrigue 2014).",Frequent fires caused by human negligence and climate change as well as overgrazing in montane grasslands pose a threat to this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). No immediate conservation actions are required.,"The population trend and size in the EU 27 and in Europe is unknown for this species. The species could be common locally, but its population is most likely very fragmented since the species lives in open terrain from the coast to mountain pastures (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"This is a largely Mediterranean species, endemic to Europe. It occurs over much of Spain, at up to 1,000 m in the Pyrenees, in southern France from Dordogne and the Atlantic coast, to Italy and Tessin in southern Switzerland, and east to parts of former Yugoslavia (Speight 2018). It has also been recorded in Sicily, where the extremely similar and endemic species Eumerus olivaceus occurs, as well as in the north of Greece and on Lesvos. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of the species in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions in place currently. There are no conservation actions required for the species currently. Further research about taxonomy, population size, distribution and trends, threats, and life history and ecology are needed for the species (Grković et al. 2015). Monitoring of the population trends of the species is also needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163351,149163348,Pipiza quadrimaculata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27 because it is widespread, known from many localities and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. A continuing declining in the quality of its habitat and conversion of forest area is inferred. It is distributed throughout the whole of Europe except the Iberian Peninsula. However, further research is needed, especially into its biology and ecology.

","

This species prefers conifer forest from the Fagus/Picea zone up into Picea forest, and on occasion it can also be found in humid Fagus forest. Adults are active from the end of May to July with occasional later specimens, especially at higher altitudes. Adults are active along tracksides, in clearings and in open, mature forest and visit the following flowers: yellow composites, umbellifers, Alliaria, Allium ursinum, Caltha, Cardamine, Cornus, Euphorbia, Fragaria, Malus, Meum, Potentilla, Ranunculus, Rubus, Salix, Sambucus and Sorbus aucuparia (Speight 2018). The developmental stages are undescribed, but Kula (1982) records larvae as overwintering among leaf litter on the floor of spruce (Picea) forest. The morphology of the chorion of the egg is figured by Kuznetzov (1988).

","

The most plausible threat is destruction of the forest habitat of this species due to urbanization, agriculture, tourism etc. Climate change may also influence its distribution. A loss of 10 to 30% of its distribution, mainly in central and eastern Europe, was predicted under BCC_CSM1.1, HADGEM2-ES and CCSM4 climate models using species distribution modelling (Milić et al. 2019).

","

The population trend of this species is unknown. It has been recorded from throughout Europe. In the places where it occurs, there seem to be relatively well-established subpopulations.

",Unknown,"This species is distributed from Finland south to the Pyrenees, Bulgaria and the former Yugoslavia, and through northern and central Europe into European Russia.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.

The global range extends eastwards through Russia as far as the Pacific (Sakhalin), and is also reported to occur in North America (Speight 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

More than 50% of its known localities are within protected areas. In Serbia some subpopulations are found in Kopaonik National Park and in Montenegro in Durmitor National Park. Continuous management of sites is recommended. Further studies of its population size, threats and ecology is needed. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163362,149163359,Pipiza noctiluca,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27 because it is widespread and known from many localities, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. A continuing decline in the quality of the habitat, and conversion of forest area may be locally impacting this species. Although distributed throughout Europe, further research is needed, especially into its biology and ecology.

","This species can be found in forest/water-edge ecotones - edges of open areas and tracksides in Atlantic scrub, conifer forest, conifer plantations, Salix forest and Quercus forest, tall-herb formations along streams in deciduous forest, around fens and at pool or lake edges in open country, and suburban gardens and along hedges in farmland. Adults fly among tall ground vegetation and within edges of thickets of Rubus etc., along hedges, tracks within woodland and in open areas in deciduous woodland and scrub and among tall-herb vegetation of humid grassland. They are know to visit umbellifers, Crataegus, Filipendula, Ranunculus, Rosa, Stellaria and Taraxacum. Adults are active from May/beginning of June to the end of July/beginning September, with peaks in June and August. The larva is aphid-feeding on tall herbs, bushes and shrubs up to 3 m from the ground (Speight 2018). Dussaix (2013) notes that, in what is probably this species, the mature larva undergoes a diapause of some weeks before formation of the puparium, and that duration of the puparial phase is approximately 2 weeks. Rojo and Marcos-Garcia (1997) found larvae on Populus, fruit trees (Prunus spp., Pyrus) and shrubs (Pistachio spp.). From oviposition to emergence of adults, development takes approximately 1.5 months, but may be interrupted by larval diapause. Overwintering occurs in larval diapause.","

Urbanization and tourism as well as expansion of their infrastructure are the most plausible threats to this species. Species distribution models have predicted range declines of up to 15% under BCC_CSM1.1, HadGEM2-ES and CCSM4 climate models by 2070 (Milić et al. 2019).

","There is no information about population size and trend for this species. In the places where it occurs, there seem to be relatively well-established subpopulations. The species has been collected from 1914 until the present.",Unknown,"This European endemic is distributed throughout the whole of Europe, including Russia and Turkey (Vujić et al. 2013). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

More than 50% of point localities are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network. In Montenegro some point localities within Durmitor National Park and one subpopulation is situated in Boka-Kotorska Bay World Heritage Site. In Serbia some subpopulation are within national parks and natural parks. Continuous management of sites is recommended. Further investigation on its population size, threats and ecology is needed. More monitoring of its population and habitat trends is required. 

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163372,149163370,Pipiza luteitarsis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Despite having a small area of occupancy in both Europe and the EU 27, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27. It is widespread and known from many localities and is not considered severely fragmented. A continuing decline in the quality of the habitat is ongoing as a result of forest conversion. Further research is needed, especially into its biology and ecology.

","

This species prefers deciduous forest; mature humid Fagus and acidophilous Quercus forest and woodland and thermophilous Quercus forest. It can also be found in mature suburban gardens. Adults are to a significant extent arboreal, flying at up to 5 m from the ground around the foliage of mature trees and shrubs. They settle on foliage of the lower branches of oak and beech at the edge of clearings and paths etc., and on bushes, e.g. Rubus fruticosus. Adults are active from the middle of April to the end of May (with occasional later records) and are known to visit the flowers of Acer platanoides, Crataegus, Euphorbia, Malus, Prunus spp., Ranunculus and Tussilago. The larva was described and illustrated by Rotheray (1987), who found larvae on a number of occasions in June in colonies of the leaf-curl aphid Schizoneura ulmi (L.) in leaf-curl galls on Ulmus glabra. Rotheray et al. (2014) records finding P. luteitarsis larvae with the same leaf-curl aphid on Ulmus glabra in 2010, remarking that the larva appears to develop exclusively on Schizoneura ulmi, on its primary host, the foliage of Ulmus species. Rotheray (1987) observed that the larvae went into diapause in July, overwintered as larvae, pupated in the following April and May and hatched as adults in May-June (Speight 2018).

","

Urbanization and tourism as well as the expansion of associated infrastructure are the most plausible threats to this species. The loss of up to 20% of its distributional area was predicted for Pluteitarsis according to BCC_CSM1.1, HadGEM2-ES and CCSM4 climate models by 2070 using species distribution modelling (Milić et al., 2019).

","

There is no information about population size and trend for this species. In the places where it occurs, there seem to be relatively well-established subpopulations. There are records from 1909 to the present.

",Unknown,"This European endemic is distributed from Fennoscandia south to Belgium and France, and from Ireland eastwards through central Europe (Speight 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in Europe and the EU 27, but the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 380 km2 in Europe and in the EU 27 it is 194 km2.
",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

Approximately 40% of subpopulations are within protected areas categorised by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network. In Montenegro one point locality lies within Durmitor National Park . In Serbia some subpopulation are within Fruška gora National Park and Obedska bara Special Nature Reserve. Anthropogenic disturbance can affect its habitats, so continuous management of sites is recommended. Further investigation of its population size, threats and ecology is needed. More monitoring of its population and habitat trend is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163382,149163380,Pipiza luteibarba,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

This species is assessed as Endangered in Europe on the basis that it has a calculated area of occupancy of 28 km2, it is considered to occur as a severely fragmented population (and in only five locations), and there is an inferred decline in the extent and quality of its habitat as a result of forest conversion.

This species is assessed as Critically Endangered in the EU27 on the basis that it has a calculated area of occupancy of 8 km2, it is considered to occur as a severely fragmented population (and may survive in only one location if it is extinct in Austria and Czechia), and there is an inferred decline in the extent and quality of its habitat as a result of forest conversion.

","

This species prefers deciduous forest and tall-herb open areas along rivers in the Balkan thermophilous Quercus forest of Q. pubescens/Q. cerris/ Q. frainetto and in alluvial hardwood forest. Adults are active during April. There are no data about adult habits, flowers visited or developmental stages (Vujić et al. 2008, 2013; Speight 2020), but the larva must be aphidophagous.

","

Urbanization and expansion of tourism infrastructure are the most plausible threat. Wildfire can also negatively affect the subpopulation in Greece during hot dry summers, and this threat may increase in the future as a result of climate change. 

","The population trend of this species is unknown. The records from Czechia and Austria are old. Detailed surveys of the syrphid fauna in Austria (H. Helge pers. comm. 2020) and Czechia (Jirka pers. com. 2020) not resulted in confirmation of its recent presence in these countries. The most recent record is from Greece (2011). Only one or two specimens have been found at each locality, despite surveys particularly in Greece and Serbia. It may be extinct at one locality in eastern Serbia, since it has not been reconfirmed since the first record in 1989 (Vujić et al. 2008) despite monitoring during the last five years.",Unknown,"The species is endemic to Europe, known only from seven point localities in Czechia, Austria, Serbia, and Greece (Samos island) (Vujić et al. 2013). The exact locality of the Austrian record is unknown.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

The locality in Czechia lies within a protected area in the Natura 2000 network. Two point localities in Serbia are within the Obedska bara Special Nature Reserve. Considering it for inclusion in national lists of protected species is very important, as well as increasing awareness about this European endemic. Continuous management of sites is recommended. Further investigation of its population size, threats and ecology is needed, as is more monitoring of the population and habitat trends.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163392,149163390,Pipiza lugubris,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Despite its small area of occupancy (AOO) this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27 because it is widespread, known from many localities and not currently considered to be severely fragmented. A continuing decline in the quality of its habitat, and conversion of forest area, are considered the main threats. Further research is needed, especially into its biology and ecology.

","

This species prefers tall-herb tracksides and open areas in acidophilous Quercus and Quercus/Ulmus/Carpinus forest. Adult males hover in small groups at 2-3 m above the ground, in small open areas in oak forest, settling on foliage of trees in the sun. Adults visit white umbellifers, Crataegus, Euphorbia, Filipendula, Leontodon, Mentha, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus, Rosa rugosa, Rubus and Stellaria. Adults are active from June and August/September, rarely seen in July; at the northern edge of its range it is in flight only in July/August. The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2020), but the larval stage must be aphidophagous.

","

The most plausible threat is conversion of forests to other land-uses (urbanization, infrastructure, and agricultural development). Milić et al. (2019) predicted the loss of distributional area of 8-28% for P. lugubris by 2050 and 2070 according to BCC_CSM1.1, HadGEM2-ES and CCSM4 climate models, using species distribution modelling. However there was no strong evidence that climate change would significantly affect the species in Europe, particularly in Scandinavia.

","

There is no information about population size for this species. In the places where it occurs there seem to be relatively well-established subpopulations. It has been recorded from 1883 until the present. It is still found regularly and is quite common in Finland, Sweden, Denmark, and southern Norway, the main centre of its distribution. In Fennoscandia, the population trend is stable, but the overall population trend is unknown.

",Unknown,"

The known distributional range of this European endemic is in northwestern Europe: Fennoscandia, Poland, and from England and Wales through France and across central Europe (Vujić et al. 2013, Speight 2020) to Ukraine. Records published from European Russia in fact belong to Cryptopipiza notabila (A. Polevoi pers. comm. 2021). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category, but the area of occupancy (AOO) is 1436 km2 for Europe and 908 km2 and for the EU 27.

",There is no use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,

More than 50% of point localities are within protected areas. Continuous management of sites is recommended. Further investigation of its natural history is needed. More monitoring of population and habitat trends is required.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163402,149163400,Pipiza laurusi,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered in both Europe and the EU27 on the basis that it has a small area of occupancy (32 kmin Europe, and 24 km2 in the EU 27), occurs as a severely fragmented population in only 8 locations (4-5 in the EU 27), and there is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat. It may have been lost from the locality in Montenegro, in which case it will have been subject to a decline in the extent of occurrence and area of occupancy. Further research is needed, especially into its natural history and ecology.

","

This species prefers Laurus nobilis forest. Adults are active from April/May to July. There is no information about visited flowers. The developmental stages have not been described (Vujić et al. 2013, Speight 2018), but the larva must be aphidophagous.

","

Expansion of tourism infrastructure and urbanization are the most plausible threats. Wildfire can also negatively affect its population, and also exposure to fires during hot dry conditions may be increasing as a result of climate change.

","The population trend of this species is unknown. It has been recorded from several point localities in three countries. The population is severely fragmented. In Montenegro, where the species was first recognized, surveys over the last seven years have not resulted in any new records. Forest with Laurus is the type locality, and these are fragmented and destroyed in most of areas because of logging and conversion to urban areas, and hence this species might have disappeared from the locality, but this requires confirmation.",Unknown,"This European endemic species is distributed only in Montenegro, North Macedonia and Greece (Vujić et al. 2013). It is considered to occur at eight locations, based on the threat of habitat destruction from land-use change. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 32 kmin Europe, and 24 km2 in the EU 27, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in both regions.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

Most point localities in Greece lie within the Natura 2000 network. The locality in Montenegro is situated in the Boka Kotorska Bay World Heritage site. It is very important to consider this species for listing into national lists of protected species, as well as increasing awareness about it. Further investigation into its natural history and ecology is needed. More monitoring is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163412,149163410,Pipiza fasciata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern on the basis that it is widespread and has been recorded from many localities. There is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat, and conversion of forest area, but the majority of known localities are in protected areas. Further research on this species is needed, especially into its biology and ecology.

","

This species prefers margins of and track sides in acidophilous Quercus forest, Quercus/Ulmus/Carpinus forest, humid Fagus forest and Picea forest. The adult flies through tall-herb vegetation and around shrubs, where it is active from April to August and visits umbellifers, Stellaria, and Ranunculus (Vujić et al. 2013). The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018), but the larva must be aphidophagous.

","

The most plausible threat to this species is conversion of forest area in order to develop urbanization and infrastructure, tourism, agriculture etc. It is projected to lose up to 35% of its distributional area by 2050 and 2070 according to BCC_CSM1.1, HadGEM2-ES and CCSM4 climate models using species distribution modelling (Milić et al. 2019).

","There is no information about the population size and trends for this species. In the places where it occurs, there seem to be relatively well-established subpopulations.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is distributed from Fennoscandia south to France, and from Germany eastwards through central Europe to the Balkan peninsula (Vujić et al. 2013).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

More than 50% of point localities are within protected areas. Continuous management of sites is recommended. Further investigation on its population size, threats and ecology is needed. More monitoring of population and habitat trend are required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163437,149163435,Pipiza carbonaria,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered in both Europe and the EU27 on the basis that it has an area of occupancy calculated at 100 km2 in Europe and around 12 km2 in the EU 27, a severely fragmented population (and is considered to occur in only three locations in the EU 27), and there is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to conversion and degradation of forest. However, further research is needed, especially on its ecology.

","

This species prefers forest margins and tracksides in Quercus forest. Adults are active during May and the beginning of June, where they fly through ground vegetation and visit flowers of Smyrnium and Stellaria. The developmental stages are undescribed (Vujić et al. 2013, Speight 2018), but the larvae must be aphidophagous.

",The most plausible threat is a continuing decline of habitat quality due to land-use change for urbanization/industrial development and tourism in protected areas.,"

The population trend is unknown. It has been recorded from a single locality in Czechia, one in Austria and several in the Balkan peninsula, from 1957 to 2011 (most recently in Serbia). Most records are from Serbia. The population is considered severely fragmented. At the locality near Novi Sad in Serbia, it has not been seen in the last seven years, despite regular surveys.

",Unknown,"This European endemic is distributed in Czechia, Austria and on the Balkan Peninsula (Vujić et al. 2013, Speight 2018) at low elevations. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in Europe and the EU 27 whilst the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 100 km2 and in the EU 27, is estimated to be around 12 km2.
",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

Most localities in the Balkan peninsula are within protected areas, in Serbia in the Fruška gora National Park and Vršačke planine Natural Park, and in Montenegro in the Durmitor National Park. The important actions needed are its listing in the national lists of protected species, as well as increasing awareness about it. Continuous management of sites is recommended, especially in protected areas. Further investigation into its natural history and ecology is needed. More monitoring of its population and habitat trends is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163450,149163445,Pipiza austriaca,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern on the basis that this has a large area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) and is known from numerous locations. A continuing decline in the quality of the habitat, and conversion of forest, is considered the main threat. It is distributed throughout the whole of Europe except the Iberian Peninsula. However, further research is needed, especially into its biology and ecology.

","

This species prefers forest habitat, tall herbs and shrubs (e.g. thickets of Rubus fruticosus) at edges of open areas and tracks in deciduous (acidophilous Quercus) forest, conifer plantations and Atlantic scrub (including Corylus scrub on limestone pavement); tall herb vegetation edging fen and reed beds, pools and lakes; along hedges with an associated tall-herb, field-margin zone, in farmland; and crops of Solanum tuberosum. Adults are active from middle of June to the end of August and they fly through tall-herb ground vegetation and around shrubs; they visits mostly umbellifers, Euphorbia and Ranunculus. Larvae have been found on Rumex. At maturation they go into a diapause for some weeks, before puparial formation. The duration of the puparial phase is 8-9 days (Speight 2018).

","

Degradation of habitat (temperate forest) due to the long history of land-use change is the most plausible threat, and is ongoing driven largely by urbanization and tourism. A loss in distributional area of up to 6%, mainly on the Balkan and Apennine Peninsulas, was predicted for this species by 2070 under BCC_CSM1.1 and CCSM4 climate models using species distribution modelling (Milić et al. 2019).

","There is no information about the population size and trend for this species. In the places where it occurs, there seem to be relatively well-established populations.",Unknown,This species is distributed throughout the whole of Europe except the Iberian Peninsula and eastern Europe (Speight 2018). It is endemic to Europe.,There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

Most localities are within protected areas. Anthropogenic disturbance can disturb its habitats, so a continuous management of sites is recommended. Further investigations on its population size, threats and ecology are needed. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163467,149163465,Katara connexa,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is endemic to the EU 27, within which it is known only from a small area between the Katara Pass and Kampos Despoti, in the Pindos Mountains in Greece. Based on the small geographic range (AOO = 8 km2), its occurrence in only one location and a continuing loss of habitat quality due to unsustainable grazing as the main threat, this species is assessed as Critically Endangered. Grazing management and research on its ecology, population size and trend is needed, as well as the identification of the host plant.",Katara connexa prefers montane conifer forests of Pinus heldreichii/P. nigra pallasiana. The flight period is in May (Vujić et al. 2019). The developmental stages are undescribed and the scientific name of the host plant has not been determined.,"The main threat to this species is unsustainable grazing. A lot of sheep and cattle graze in the meadows of the Pindos Mountains during late spring and summer. Tourism can also negatively affect the population (WWF, 2020), and fire is a potential future threat.","There are only 23 records, the latest from 2016, with surveys every 2-4 years. The population trend is considered stable, but in very low numbers, and due to decline in the quality of its habitat, it is likely to decline in the future. It is a very localized species.",Stable,"This EU 27 endemic species is known only from a single area between the Katara Pass and Kampos Despoti, in the Pindos Mountains in central Greece (Vujić et al. 2019). It is considered to occur in one location based on the threat of grazing.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"This species has been found in Periochi Metsovou (Anilio - Katara) protected area, part of the Natura 2000 network. Another endemic species, Cheilosia katara, described by Claussen and Vujić (1993), was also found at the same locality. These two species have been recorded only in these relict Pinus heldereichii and P. nigra forests, demonstrating the importance of the Pindos Mountain Range in the preservation of relict European hoverflies (Vujić et al. 2020). Although this area is protected, grazing is intense and should be controlled, and the natural forest maintained. Additional research on its ecology, population size and trend is needed, as well as the identification of the host plant.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149163479,149163476,Heringia adpropinquans,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered due to its very small area of occupancy (16 km2) and extent of occurrence (155 km2), number of locations (2), and continuing loss of habitat quality due to fire as the main threat, with contributory threats from a range of other human activities. Research is needed to provide further information about it, and to confirm that all current protection plans for the forest are sufficient.","The preferred environment for this species is laurisilva (subtropical laurel forest) (Baez 1977). The flight period is in May and in July/August. The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018), but the larva will be aphidophagous.","Wildfires represent the main threat on the Canary Islands. Due to the subtropical climate these islands are very susceptible to fire, which can result in the loss of large areas of laurel forests. In addition, land-use change could affect its habitat. Although much of the laurel forest is located within protected areas, tourist resorts and illegal construction inside the protected areas have a negative impact on the habitat and represent a major threat. Unsustainable livestock grazing, crop planting, and timber harvesting (WWF 2020) are also the causes of habitat destruction. Finally, invasive plant species may affect the host-plants of the aphids on which the larvae of this species feed, but this needs confirmation.","There is no information on the population size or trend for this species. Fewer than 100 specimens are known, most of them dating from the beginning of the 1990s. There have been a couple of surveys done in the Canary Islands, but apparently no recent records.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to the Canary Islands (Speight 2018), with records from La Gomera and disjunctly from northern Tenerife. It is considered to occur in two locations based on the threat of fire. It has an extent of occurrence of 155 km2 and a known area of occupancy of 15 km2.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"This species is found within the boundaries of some protected areas categorized within the Natura 2000 network, and very close to national parks. However, its habitat has been and still is under various detrimental influences. The laurel forest has been extensively exploited since the fifteenth century (Parsons 1981), and only 11% of the original forest remains (del Arco et al. 2010). Approximately 85% of the laurel forest is included in the Canarian Network of Protected Areas and up to 92% within the Natura 2000 Network (Guimaraes and Olmeda 2008). Additionally, the first long-term monitoring (12 years) of the laurel forest seedling bank in the Canary Islands (Fernandez-Lugo et al. 2015) revealed the high regeneration potential of the forest in well-preserved stands, indicating that probably no management interventions are required to ensure the regeneration of the forest. Further research on the ecology, population and habitat trends of this syrphid is needed. Prohibition of illegal house construction within the protected areas and regulation of other human activities is needed. Research is needed to provide further information about the species, and confirm that all current protection plans for the forest are sufficient.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163491,149163488,Cheilosia vicina,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States on the basis that it is widespread and there are a large number of locations. However, there is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to anthropogenic interference (deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanization, tourism). Further research is needed, especially into its biology, ecology, population size and trend.

","

This species occurs in both coniferous and deciduous forest, clearings and open areas in forest and unimproved grassland from the Fagus/Picea zone up to the Larix zone and beyond, into subalpine grassland, to above 2.000 m in the Alps. Adults usually fly within 2 m of the ground and settle on foliage of ferns and bushes etc. They are known to visit flowers of Caltha, Convolvulus, Galium, Potentilla erecta, Prunus spinosa, Ranunculus and Taraxacum. The flight period is from May till July and August at higher elevation/more northerly latitudes (Speight 2020). The larva has not been described but Kuznetsov (1992) reported oviposition on Alchemilla (Rosaceae). The morphology of the chorion of the egg is figured by Kuznetzov (1988).

","

Possible threats exist from anthropogenic interference (deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanization). In the Balkans it is projected to lose up to 68% of its range by 2080 under the B2a climate warming scenarios using the CSIRO climate model using species distribution modelling (Radenković et al. 2017).

","

There is no information on the population size or trend of this species. In the places where it occurs, there seem to be relatively well-established subpopulations and the population is considered stable.

",Unknown,"

This is a widely distributed species in the European region, with a range stretching from Fennoscandia south to the Pyrenees and northern Spain, and from Ireland eastwards through northern, central and southern Europe (northern Italy and the former Yugoslavia) into European parts of Russia and Turkey (Speight 2020).

Its global range extends eastwards through Siberia to Tuva (Speight 2020).

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

Some localities of this species are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network, and it occurs also in National parks in Croatia, Czech republic, Greece, Montenegro, Serbia and Slovenia. Anthropogenic disturbance can affect its habitats, so continuous management of sites is recommended. Further research into its population size, threats and ecology is needed. More monitoring of the population and habitat trend is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163502,149163499,Cheilosia vernalis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern in both the EU and Europe due to its wide distribution. There is a continuing declining in the quality of its habitat due to anthropogenic interference (deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanization, tourism). Further research is needed, especially on its biology, ecology, population size and trend.

","

This species occurs in dune systems, and humid oligotrophic and eutrophic unimproved pasture, Molinia grassland or acidic fen subject to seasonal flooding, grassy clearings in deciduous forest and upwards through montane grassland into alpine grassland. Adults are low-flying over ground vegetation; males hover at 1-3 m, in small clearings and sheltered spots. They visit flowers of white umbellifers, Caltha, Cirsium arvense, Leontodon, Leucanthemum, Menyanthes, Prunus spinosa, Ranunculus, Salix, Senecio and Taraxacum. The flight period is from April till October, with peaks in May/June and August (Speight 2020). The larva has not been described, but is known to be an internal feeder in the stems of Achillea, Matricaria and Sonchus oleraceus (Bankowska 1980).

","

The most plausible threat is decline in quality of the habitat due to anthropogenic interference (deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanization, tourism). In high montane areas on the Balkan peninsula, this species is projected to experience severe impacts under climate change scenarios. Species distribution modelling suggests that its range and abundance in the Balkans would be greatly reduced (range up to 78% and abundance up to 67% by 2080) and that it would mostly remain in the Dinaric mountains but be less numerous, while its abundance would increase in the Alps, the Balkan mountain range and the Rhodopes (Radenković et al. 2017).

","

In Europe, there are numerous subpopulations of this species. There is no information about its population size and trend.

",Unknown,"This is a widely distributed species in the European region, with a range stretching from Fennoscandia south to Iberia, and from Ireland eastwards through central and southern Europe (Italy and the Balkans) to Turkey and European parts of Russia (Speight 2020).

Its global range extends through Siberia to the Russian Far East and the Pacific coast (Speight 2020).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species. Some localities are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network. Continuous management of sites is recommended. Further studies into its population size, threats and ecology is needed.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163512,149163510,Cheilosia venosa,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is assessed as Endangered because of its severely fragmented population, relatively small area of occupancy and the low number of locations (7, based on grazing/tourism). Although climate change will probably be the main threat in the future, grazing and tourism are more immediate threats. There is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to climate change, overgrazing, and the development of infrastructure for ski resorts in the Alps. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is needed, as well as further research into its ecology.","This species is known from sparsely vegetated, rocky, calcareous, subalpine grassland from the upper edges of the Larix zone and in karstic Pinus uncinata forest and upwards, to above 2,400 m. The flight period is from the end of May to mid-August. The developmental stages have not been described (Speight 2018).","In the Alps, unsustainable grazing and skiing are the main threats to the habitat of this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). Considering that C. venosa is a high-mountain species, climate change is likely to be the main future threat, but whether it is currently impacted by climate change is unknown.","The population size and trend of this species are unknown. There have been fewer than 15 specimens found, with the latest record from 1996. The population is considered severely fragmented because the species is only found at high altitudes and in small numbers, without the possibility of communication between subpopulations. The lack of recent records may indicate a decline in the population, but this is unknown and further research is needed to confirm this.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is distributed in the Alps (Germany, France, Switzerland, Austria, and Italy) (Speight 2018) at high elevations.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"This species was found in Parco Nazionale dello Stelvio, a protected area within the Natura 2000 network. Further monitoring of its population and habitat trends, as well as further research into its ecology and the impacts of threats is required. Grazing management is needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163530,149163520,Cheilosia velutina,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread and occurs in many locations, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. Thus it is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27. There is continuing decline in quality of its habitat caused by human activities. Additional research on its population, threats and habitat trends is required, as well as monitoring of the population and habitats.","This species prefers forest/open ground; mesophilous deciduous forest/scrub and unimproved grassland. Males hover up to 5 m in the vicinity of trees and shrubs, beside streams and tracks; both sexes settle on foliage up to 5 m. The flight is low, very fast and very direct. Adults visit flowers of white umbellifers, yellow composites, Achillea, Anemone nemorosa, Anthemis, Bellis, Caltha, Chrysanthemum, Galium, Potentilla erecta, Prunus spinosa, Ranunculus and Rorippa. The flight period is mid-July to late August (Speight 2018). The larva remains undescribed. The morphology of the chorion of the egg is figured by Kuznetzov (1988).","The main threats to this species are those associated with human activities that lead to forest destruction (deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanization, tourism, infrastructure development). Overgrazing might be an additional threat as it is found in grasslands (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There is no information on population size or trends for this species. More than 1,000 specimens have been recorded.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is distributed from Fennoscandia south to Spain, and from Ireland eastwards throughout much of Europe into European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered for any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27.

The distribution extends eastwards out of the European region through Siberia to the Russian Far East and the Pacific coast (Speight 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"This species occurs in some protected areas within the Natura 2000 network. Additional research on its population, threats and habitat trends is required, as well as monitoring of the population and habitats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163540,149163538,Cheilosia varnensis,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic is assessed as Critically Endangered because of its very restricted area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) of 4 km2, its single known location and the continuing decline in the quality of habitats in the Black Sea region due to human activities. Further research is needed, especially on its natural history, ecology and habitats, and on its population size and trend. Surveys and monitoring are required in the place where the species was found.",The male was collected from temperate broadleaf and mixed forest along the western coast of the Black Sea (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020) in June (Speight 2018). The developmental stages are undescribed.,"Inadequate planning, uncontrolled urban and industrial development, inappropriate erosion control, and a lack of strong legislation and sustainable management have all led to degradation of the Black Sea landscape. Many habitats have been lost (Kotlyakov 1998).","There is no information on the population size or trend of this species. Only a single male specimen is known, from the Black Sea coast south of Varna (Bulgaria); the female remains unknown (Claussen 2000). This species was last recorded in 1973 and it is not known whether surveys have recently been conducted in this area. It is unlikely that it is significantly more widespread, as there are many records of other species from the Balkan peninsula collected in recent surveys, but there have been no new records of this species.",Unknown,"Cheilosia varnensis is a species endemic to Europe, found only in Bulgaria (Claussen 2000, Speight 2018) in 1973 (eastern Bulgaria, coast of Black Sea). It may be a relict species. As it is known only from a single locality, its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are only 4 km2.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"This species was collected from the ""Galata"" Special Protection Area within the Natura 2000 network. Further research is needed, especially on its natural history, ecology and habitats, and its population size and trend. Surveys and monitoring are required in the place where it was found.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163550,149163548,Cheilosia vangaveri,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-21 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This European endemic is found in high-montane grassland and forest habitats. The population is considered to be severely fragmented because it exists in small isolated subpopulations at high altitudes, which are unlikely to interact with one another. There is also continuing decline in the quality of the habitat due to tourism and overgrazing. Additionally, climate change could pose a threat for this high-mountain species. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is large for Europe and the EU 27, but the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 104 km2 for Europe and is 92 km2 in the EU 27. This species is therefore assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27. Further research is needed on its ecology and the monitoring of its population and habitat trends.","This species prefers unimproved montane grassland and open grassy areas in the upper parts of the Abies/Picea zone, and from there through the Larix zone into unimproved calcareous and non-calcareous subalpine grassland to above 2,500 m asl. Adults fly very low. They visits flowers of white umbellifers, Ranunculaceae, Potentilla and Thlaspi. The flight period is from the beginning of June to the end of July, plus August at higher elevations. The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018).",The habitat of this species is threatened by winter tourism and overgrazing on mountain grasslands. Climate change could also pose a threat for this high-mountain species.,"There is very little information on the population size or trend of this species. It is found in low numbers and there are fewer than 100 records. The population is considered to be severely fragmented because it exists in small isolated subpopulations at quite high altitudes, which are unlikely to interact with one another.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is distributed in the Jura (France, Switzerland), the Alps (France, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, and Italy), parts of central Europe (Montenegro, Slovenia) (Speight 2018) and Bulgaria. As there are no specific localities for Switzerland, the area mapped is approximate, and is based on reports from the Alps in the Graubunden and Wallis regions, all at 2,000 m asl or higher. There are a couple of records a little lower (1,200 m asl.) from the Vaud region (L. Fisler pers. comm. 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large for Europe and the EU 27, but the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 104 km2 in Europe and is 92 km2 in the EU 27.",There is no use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"This species is found in some protected areas within the Natura 2000 network and in Durmitor National Park in Montenegro. Habitat protection is desirable. Additional research is needed on its ecology, and its population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163561,149163558,Cheilosia urbana,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and for the EU27 Member States because it is widespread. A large number of locations and many individuals and subpopulations have been recorded. A continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to industrial human impacts is likely. More research on its ecology, population status and habitat trends is needed.","This species prefers open areas in both coniferous and deciduous forest and scrub, unimproved grassland including semi-arid grassland, dry calcareous grassland and montane/subalpine grassland, and clearings and tracksides. Adults fly low, usually within 1 m of the ground, and settle on low-growing plants. Males hover at 1-2 m close to shrubs in flower, or close to rocks. Adults are known to visit flowers of white umbellifers, Acer pseudoplatanus, Anemone nemorosa, Buxus, Caltha, Euphorbia, Potentilla, Prunus spinosa, male Salix and Taraxacum. The flight period is in April and June and July at higher elevations/more northerly latitudes (Speight 2018). Stuke (2000) found larvae in Hieracium pilosella that he identified as ""cf.urbana"" and scored in his study. Claussen (1980) and Doczkal (1996) found the species egg-laying in the basal leaf rosettes of Hieracium pilosella. Grosskopf et al. (2001) report that C.urbana can develop in both H. pilosella and H. caespitosum. The young larvae move down from the leaf axils in which the eggs are laid, to feed externally on the roots of the plant, in which they make small holes. It evidently overwinters as a puparium in the soil close to the ground surface. Kassebeer (1993) indicates finding females egg-laying on Filipendula ulmaria.","As this species favours habitats within forests, it may be subject to localized threats associated with human activities - principally deforestation, logging, agriculture, infrastructure development and urbanization.",There is no information on the population size or trends of this species. There are a lot of specimens (about 2000) and many known subpopulations.,Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is distributed from Fennoscandia south to Iberia and the Mediterranean (including the island of Crete), and from Britain eastwards through central and southern Europe to the Balkans, Ukraine (G. Popov pers. comm. 2020) and Turkey (not mapped). In Belarus, Denmark, Luxembourg and Romania, its presence is uncertain due to the fact these occurrences have not yet been taxonomically verified. 

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.

Outside Europe it occurs in North Africa (Speight 2018) and Iran (Barkalov and Mutin 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"Some localities of this species are within protected areas categorized by the Natura 2000 network. Further research on its ecology is needed, as well as monitoring of population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163571,149163569,Cheilosia tonsa,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered because of its small area of occupancy (28 km2 in Europe), severely fragmented population, and a continuing loss of habitat quality due to tourism as the main threat, with an additional projected threat from climate change affecting high-mountain species. Further research on its ecology, population size and trend is required.",This species prefers sparsely vegetated rocky ground in the alpine zone. The flight period is the end of July and August. The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018).,"The main threat to this species is tourism and unsustainable grazing. Skiing destroys its habitat. Considering that this is a high-mountain species, there is also a current and future threat from climate change especially if they impact the host plant.","There is no information on the population size or trends of this species. Only a few specimens (<10) have been found, with no information on recent collection dates. The population is considered to be severely fragmented because it is only found at very high elevations in low densities, in areas subject to impacts. It is always found in very low numbers - one or two specimens - and is therefore recognized as rare.",Unknown,"This species is distributed in the Alps (Switzerland, Austria, and Italy) (Speight 2018) at high elevations. It is endemic to Europe.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"This species has been found in two protected areas in Italy that lie within the Natura 2000 network. Although these areas are protected, winter ski tourism and unsustainable grazing in the Alps are the major threats, which require management. There are only a few records, and additional research on its population size and trends is needed. Further research on its ecology is also required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163581,149163579,Cheilosia marginata,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This species is listed as Near Threatened (NT) in Europe and Vulnerable (VU) in EU 27 because the area of occupancy has been calculated as 64 km2 in Europe and 52 km2 in the EU27, and a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat as a result of changes in land-use, intensification of grassland management, grazing pressure, and deforestation throughout the whole distribution range. It is considered to occur in around 12 locations in Europe defined by a threat from grazing, and thus is close to but does not qualify for a threatened listing applying Criterion B2. It is considered to occur in approximately 10 locations in the EU 27, and so is listed as Vulnerable. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements and to improve knowledge about the existing threats.

","

The preferred habitat of this species is open ground in humid Fagus forests upwards through the Picea and Larix zones into humid subalpine grassland to above 2,000 m. Adults fly from April to June, and in July at higher altitudes. The larva is undescribed (Speight 2020).

","The main threat to this species is habitat loss due to changes in land-use and deforestation in the Alps and in the whole of Europe (Bebi et al, 2017, Strandberg and Kjellström 2019), as well as intensification of grassland management and grazing pressure in Europe’s grasslands.","Based on all known reports, only a few specimens have been collected from the period between 1973 and 2008, despite a lot of general collecting in the Alps, so it is probably a rare species. The most recent record is from Switzerland in 2017. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species is a European high-mountain endemic distributed in the Alps (France, Italy, Austria, Switzerland, and Germany) and the Carpathians (Romania and Slovakia). There are doubts about the Romanian records and these need to be verified.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large for Europe and the EU 27. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 64 km2 in Europe and 52 km2 in the EU 27.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not subject to any targeted conservation action. Its distributional range is partly within the boundaries of some Natura 2000 sites, Natural Park Bucegi (Romania) and Ecrins National Park (France). Since the species is recorded mainly in forests of the Alps and the Carpathian Mountains, conservation actions should be focused on preserving its habitat due to high deforestation rates of European forests. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements and to improve knowledge about the existing threats. Management of grazing is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163591,149163589,Cheilosia pini,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-05-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27 because of its severely fragmented population and relatively small area of occupancy (36 km2). At the EU 27 level it is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) due to the severely fragmented population, small area of occupancy (20 km²) and occurrence in only five locations. At both levels, there is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat. Potential threats are degradation of its habitat quality, mostly due to logging, agricultural intensification and infrastructure development. Further research into its ecology, threats, distribution and population trend is needed.

","

This species has been recorded from humid Fagus/Picea forest (Vujić and Claussen 2000), and humid, montane grassland at 1,100 m asl (Treiber and Doczkal 2016). Males visit flowers of Salix and Caltha (Vujić and Claussen 2000). The flight period is from April to July (Speight 2018). The developmental stages and host plant are unknown.

","

The major threats to this species are habitat destruction due to logging (commercial forestry), agricultural intensification and infrastructure development.

","

There is no information about the population size or trends of this species. Around 30 specimens have been collected so far, the most recent from 2012. It has an early flight period, which means there may be a lack of data due to the surveying season. The population is considered to be severely fragmented, because this species is restricted to mountainous regions and associated with forests and montane grasslands which are under immense pressure, reducing connectivity between subpopulations.

",Unknown,"

This species is endemic to Europe. It is distributed in France, Germany, Slovakia, Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro (Speight 2018), and Romania (Stanescu and Parvu 2005).

Speight (2018) also list Poland and the Czech Republic, but these records are historical and the continuing presence of C. pini in these countries is uncertain. In Europe, the extent of occurrence is estimated to be 381,286 km2 and the area of occupancy to be 36 km2. In EU 27, the extent of occurrence is estimated to be 210,450 km2 and area of occupancy to be 20 km2.

",There is no use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no conservation actions known for this species. Some point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. Additional research and monitoring on its population, habitat size and trend, and its ecology is needed, as well as clarifying the impacts of threats. Efforts to confirm its presence in Poland and the Czech Republic should be made. More sustainable forest practices are recommended.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163776,149163774,Cheilosia rodgersi,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27 because it has very small area of occupancy and is found in just two locations. Potential threats include degradation of habitat quality, mostly due to fires and to some extent overgrazing. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trend is needed.

",

This species prefers Mediterranean forest and garrigue (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). Data on its ecology is lacking. The flight period is in April. The developmental stages are unknown.

,"

The habitat of this species is potentially threatened by fires, which are getting more frequent and intense throughout the Mediterranean as a result of climate change. Overgrazing could also contribute to habitat degradation. Near the coast, there is increased infrastructure development.

","

There is no information about the population trend of this species. Only a few specimens have been collected so far. The specimen from Portugal is from 1972, the Spanish record is even older. During the most recent surveys in Spain conducted in the last 3-4 years, specimens of many other species were collected, but not of this one. It is possible it may not be present in Spain any more. However, it is most often found after rainfall, and there is a possibility that the weather conditions were not favourable during these surveys. Therefore, more research is required before it can be determined that the species is no longer present in Spain.

",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from a single record in central Portugal and a single record in southern Spain. In Europe and the EU 27, extent of occurrence (EOO) cannot be calculated as it only exists in two localities; the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 8 km2.

Outside Europe it is found in Morocco (Speight 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. Both point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. Research on its habitat, ecology, population size and trend is much needed, as well as monitoring of the habitat trend. Grazing management and more sustainable development activities are required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163786,149163784,Cheilosia rhynchops,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern because it is widespread in both Europe and the EU 27. The continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to tourism, overgrazing and urbanization is considered to be the main threat. It is distributed on the high mountains in central Europe and the Balkan Peninsula. However, lots of further research is needed, especially on its biology, ecology, population size and trend.

","

This species prefers Fagus/Picea and Fagus/Abies forest, from the upper elevational limit of the Fagus into the Abies/Picea zone and upwards into the Larix/P. mugo/P. uncinata zone to 2,000 m. Adults inhabit clearings, tracksides, beside streams etc., flying quickly through vegetation up to 2 m, and settling on the foliage of bushes, Petasites etc. Males hover at up to 5 m in open areas within forest. Adults visit flowers of Caltha, Euphorbia, Ranunculus and Sorbus aucuparia. The flight period is from the end of May to July. The developmental stages have been scored by Stuke (2000), and the female has been observed ovipositing on Adenostyles alliariae (Doczkal 1996), strongly suggesting that this is a larval host plant (Speight 2020).

","

Expansion of tourist infrastructure (ski resorts) is the most plausible threat. Overgrazing and residential urbanization also negatively affect the population. In the Balkans a loss of up to 69% in its distribution by 2080 has been predicted under the B2a climate warming scenarios of the CSIRO climate model using species distribution modelling (Radenković et al. 2017).

","

There is no information about population size and trends for this species. It inhabits high mountains in several countries in Europe.

",Unknown,"

This endemic European species is distributed from Poland south to the Alps, and from northeastern France (Vosges) eastwards through central Europe to Austria and northern Italy, the former Yugoslavia, Romania and Bulgaria (Speight 2020). On the Balkan peninsula C. rhynchops is known from high elevations in the Alps, Dinaric mountains, Stara Planina and Rilo-Rhodopes (Vujić 1996).

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

Some point localities of this species are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network. Continuous management of sites is recommended. Further studies of its population size, threats and ecology are needed. More monitoring on the population and habitat trends are required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163813,149163811,Cheilosia rhodiolae,Data Deficient,,2021,2021-06-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
Europe 27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

This species is assessed as Data Deficient due to taxonomic uncertainty and therefore uncertainty about its true distribution. The taxonomic uncertainty arises from it being particularly difficult to separate from Cheilosia semifasciata, evident for subpopulations in central Europe where both species occur. More research is needed on its distribution, taxonomy, ecology and population trends. The available data are inadequate to determine the degree of threat, and therefore it is assessed as Data Deficient.","This species was described from a high-altitude locality in Austria, and the larvae are leaf miners of roseroot, Rhodiola rosea. Recent studies have shown that Finnish subpopulations of Cheilosia rhodoliae utilize both Hylotelephium telephium and Rhodiola rosea as host plants. Schmid (2000) reported that both sexes feed persistently on flowers of Rhodiola rosea, which grows in rocky areas at high elevations, and suggests (U. Schmid pers. comm. 2020) that this species may be an important pollinator of this plant. Males hover at 3-5 m over plants of Rhodiola, and settle almost exclusively on their inflorescences. Females lay their eggs on the undersides and bases of Rhodiola leaves, particularly basal leaves of the plant (U. Schmid pers. comm. 2020). The flight period is mid June and July. The larva was described and figured by Schmid (2000), who also provided details of the larval biology. He showed that the larva mines the leaves and overwinters as a puparium.","Habitat loss and fragmentation are the major threats to alpine biodiversity. Tourism, infrastructure development and unsustainable farming are the main drivers. Any impacts on this species are unknown, and its host plant is widely cultivated.",There is no information on population trends of this species.,Unknown,"This European endemic is a high-elevation alpine species recorded from Austria, France and Switzerland (Schmid 2000, 2007; Speight et al. 2017).",This species is not commercially utilized nor traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. Research is needed to clarify whether it is a valid species and to determine its population trend and potential threats. The type locality of Cheilosia rhodiolae is in the National Park Hohe Tauern (Austria) (Schmid 2000), and is reported from Mercantour NP (France) (Speight et al. 2017).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163823,149163821,Cheilosia reniformis,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

Cheilosia reniformis is assessed as Vulnerable (VU B2ab(iii)) for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States because of its relatively small area of occupancy and number of locations, just within the threshold for this category. The main potential threat is degradation of habitat quality, mostly due to clearing of areas for arable land and infrastructure development. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trend is needed.

It is suspected that this species is much more widespread in Europe, but without further research and verification of existing records, it is not possible to draw a final conclusion. More genetic data are needed, because it is difficult to distinguish related species solely on the basis of morphology. Therefore, the species is assessed as Vulnerable, but it could be more widespread. It is also severely fragmented, but the extent of this is not fully known. More research is needed.

","

This species prefers humid, unimproved grassland along streams and grassy open areas in forests. Males hover at 2-3 m above ground (G. Ståhls pers. comm. 2020). Adults visit Caltha (G. Ståhls pers. comm. 2020), Trollius riederanus (Gritskevich 1998), Tussilago and Salix caprea (Bartsch et al. 2009). The flight period is from April to June. The developmental stages are unknown (Speight 2018).

","This species is potentially threatened by habitat destruction mostly due to clearing of areas for arable land and construction (infrastructure development), but any impacts of these or other threats are mostly unknown.","

There is no information about the population size or trend of this species. Approximately 40 specimens have been collected so far, the majority of them recent (from 2009 to 2017) because the species has only recently been recognized as valid. In Finland there are good numbers and stable subpopulations, but numbers in other countries are unknown.

",Unknown,"

This species is distributed in Norway (Nielsen and Ødegaard 2013), Finland and Ukraine (Speight 2018). Mutin and Barkalov (1999) characterized its range in the non-European Palaearctic as Siberia, south of the Khabarovsk Region, the Amur Region, the Sakha Republic (Yakutia), and the Irkutsk Region (Prokhorov et al. 2018). It is likely to be more widespread (for instance occurring in Sweden), so the true distribution is unknown and the area of occupancy based on existing records highly inaccurate.

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,There are no conservation actions known for this species. Only one point locality occurs within the Natura 2000 network. Additional research on its population trend and ecology is needed. Monitoring of the habitat trend is required.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163833,149163831,Cheilosia redi,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Cheilosia redi is assessed as Least Concern because of its large extent of occurrence and number of locations. Potential threats to this species are degradation of habitat quality, mostly due to logging and wood harvesting, agricultural intensification and infrastructure development. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trend is needed.

","Cheilosia redi can be found near streams in Balkanic thermophilous Quercus forest, Quercus/Carpinus forest and mesophilous Fagus forest (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). Males hover at 2-3 m (Vujić 1996). Adults visit flowers of Caltha, Salix and Stellaria (Vujić 1996). The flight period is from March to May, and July at the northern edge of its range (Vujić 1996). The developmental stages are unknown (Speight 2018).","The habitat of this species is threatened by logging operations, agricultural intensification, overgrazing and infrastructure development (tourism and road networks).","There is no information on the population trends of this species. Around 200 specimens have been collected so far from its entire range, the oldest in 1911 (from Bosnia and Herzegovina) and the most recent from 2017 (Montenegro and Serbia). Within its range there are three countries with only a single recorded specimen: the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia. The majority of specimens have been collected in Serbia (135).",Unknown,"This species is distributed in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Bulgaria, Greece, Romania (Speight 2018) and Montenegro (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). It is endemic to Europe.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. Three point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. Some of the point localities are within Protected Areas in Serbia (Fruška gora National Park, Đerdap National Park) and Montenegro (Durmitor National Park). Additional research on its ecology, and population size and trend is needed. Monitoring of the habitat trend is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163843,149163841,Cheilosia ranunculi,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in both Europe and the EU 27, and is listed as Least Concern. There is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to urbanization, tourism and agriculture. Lots of further research is needed, especially into its biology, ecology, population size and trend.

","

This species prefers open ground; unimproved dry grassland and open grassy areas within forest, from thermophilous Quercus forest up to 1,500 m in the Abies zone in the Jura and Alps. Adults fly at up to 1 m through grassland vegetation, settling on flowers or on leaves of low-growing plants and visiting flowers of Caltha, Ranunculus and Senecio (Speight, 2020). Adults are active from the end of April to the beginning of June. The larva of C.ranunculi is undescribed, but is probably associated with Ranunculus bulbosus since oviposition has been seen (Doczkal 2000, 2002), though Gibbs and Plant (2001) report the occurrence of C. ranunculi from localities where R. bulbosus did not seem to be present.

","The most plausible threat is destruction of habitat due to conversion of forest and grassland areas into agricultural land, urbanization, tourism and supporting infrastructure. In the Balkans, a loss of up to 37% by 2080 of its distribution has been predicted under the A2a climate warming scenarios of the CSIRO climate model using species distribution modelling (Radenković et al. 2017).","

There are numerous subpopulations of this species. There is no information about its population size and trend.

",Unknown,"

This species is distributed in Denmark, Britain (southern England), France (Paris basin southwards), Germany, Switzerland, Hungary, Italy (including Sicily), Spain, parts of the former Yugoslavia, Bulgaria, Romania (Speight 2020). It is endemic to Europe.

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

Some point localities of this species are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network: in Italy the Apuan Alps regional park, in Slovenia in Triglav National Park, in Croatia in Gorski kotar National Park, in Montenegro in Durmitor National Park, and in five national parks in Serbia as well as special reserves and natural parks. One subpopulation is situated in Boka-Kotorska Bay World Heritage Site; in Serbia in all five National parks (Fruška gora, Tara, Šar planina, Đerdap and Kopaonik), in Natural park Vršačke planine, special reserve of nature Deliblatska peščara and Obedska bara etc. Anthropogenic disturbances affect its habitats, so continuous management of sites is recommended. Further investigations of its population size, threats and ecology are needed. More monitoring of the population and habitat trend are required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163854,149163851,Cheilosia pubera,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least-concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least-concern (LC)

This species is widespread in both Europe and the EU 27, and is listed as Least Concern. There is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to tourism, overgrazing and other anthropogenic interference (deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanization). Lots of further research is needed, especially into its biology, ecology, population size and trend.

","

This species prefers unimproved montane pasture and fen carr and beside streams in Fagus/Picea forest. Adults fly low over ground vegetation in grassland and in open areas along streams within forest, settling on the foliage of large-leaved plants and visiting flowers such as Acer platanoides, Caltha, Cardamine, Prunus padus, Pulsatilla alpina, Ranunculus and Taraxacum. Adults are active from the end April to June at lower elevations, and June/July at higher elevations and more northerly latitudes. Exceptionally, there appears to be a second generation in Ireland, with a flight period in July and August. The larva is described by Stuke and Carstensen (2002), found in the leaf-bases and root-stock of Geum rivale between June and September, and overwintering as a puparium. C. pubera can be found in at least two rather different types of situation. This may be due to the larvae having plant hosts with rather distinctly different ecological requirements (Speight 2020).

","

This species may be exposed to threats due to anthropogenic disturbance (deforestation, logging, agriculture, and urbanization). Overgrazing may also negatively affect its population. In the Balkans, a reduction of its distributional area by up to 50% has been projected by 2080 under the B2a climate warming scenarios of the CSIRO climate model using species distribution modelling (Radenković et al. 2017).

",The population trend is unknown. Based on all known data there are numerous subpopulations across Europe.,Unknown,"

This species is distributed in Fennoscandia, the Ardennes, northern Spain (Cordillera Cantabrica) and the Alps; from Ireland eastwards through northern and central Europe (plus mountainous parts of northern Italy and the former Yugoslavia) into European parts of Russia (Speight 2020). It is endemic to Europe.

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. Some point localities are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network. Continuous management of sites is recommended. Further research into its population size, threats and ecology is needed. More monitoring of population and habitat trends is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163864,149163862,Cheilosia psilophthalma,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Cheilosia psilophthalma is assessed as Least Concern because of its large range. It is considered that the entire European subpopulation is still stable, and although not yet confirmed outside Europe it may be more widespread than presently understood. Potential threats are degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to poor management practices of European forests, and infrastructure development. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trend is needed.

","This species prefers open ground within forest: open, grassy areas within sparse woodland and unimproved, montane/subalpine grassland from above 1,500 m, down to grassy, open areas within karstic Quercus pubescens forest. Adults settle on low-growing vegetation, e.g. clumps of dead Molinia and visit flowers of shrubs. They visit flowers of Acer platanoides, Anemone nemorosa, Euphorbia, Primula veris, Prunus padus, P. spinosa, and Salix spp. including S. repens. The flight period is from April to May and on to July at higher altitudes. The larval morphology is undescribed, but according to Grosskopf et al. (2001) it develops in the aerial parts of Hieracium pilosella and H. caespitosum, overwintering as a puparium among ground-surface litter (Speight 2018).","Threats to the habitat of this species include unsustainable forest management and logging operations, and infrastructure development.","There is no information about the population size or trends of this species, but the population is considered stable throughout most of the range. The closely-related C. urbana often occurs in great numbers, but only single individuals of C. psilophthalma are usually found.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe. Its full range is uncertain, due to confusion until recently with C. latigenis and C. urbana, but it is confirmed from southern Norway, Sweden, southern Finland, Ireland, Britain, France (Vosges, Alps, Cevennes), Poland, Switzerland, Greece, Montenegro, Serbia and European Russia (Speight 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. Additional research in order to determine the borders of its range is needed, and so is research on its ecology, population size and trend. Monitoring of the habitat trend is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163874,149163872,Cheilosia personata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has a large range and a large number of locations was estimated. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27 and so it is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27. There is a continuing decline in the quality of the habitat due to anthropogenic interference (deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanization, and tourism), but the current population trend is considered to be stable. Further research on this species is needed, especially on its biology, ecology, population size and trend.

","

This species prefers forest/open ground; open areas in humid Fagus forest and upwards through the Picea zone into the Larix/Pinus mugo or P. sylvestris/P. uncinata zone; plus unimproved, calcareous and non-calcareous montane grassland. Adults inhabit clearings and tracksides within forest and more open grassland. They fly fast and low and settle on low growing vegetation and visit flowers of white umbellifers and Adenostyles, Knautia, Saxifraga and Scabiosa. The flight period is in June and July, and in August at higher elevations. The developmental stages are undescribed, and the host plant is unknown (Speight 2020).

","

Possible threats are general impacts due to anthropogenic interference (deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanization). Both over- and undergrazing negatively affect the population. In the Balkans, species distribution modelling has predicted a 79% decline in its distribution by 2080 (Radenković et al. 2017), which could lead to the loss of the subpopulation from the Balkan peninsula, but the species would survive in the Alps in this scenario and so is not considered a range-wide threat.

","

There is no information on the population size or trend, but it is considered stable. The oldest record dates from 1912 from Bosnia and Herzegovina, although there are recent records also (from 2020 in Slovenia). Where present it is found in good numbers.

",Stable,"

This European endemic is distributed in northern Spain, the Pyrenees, the Alps and northern parts of the former Yugoslavia (Croatia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Slovenia) (Speight 2020). Its occurrence in the Apennines is based on an old record (1938) from Abruzzo National Park. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

Some point localities of this species are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and Natura 2000 networks. These include Gorski kotar and Plitvice Lakes National Parks as well as Velebit Nature Park in Croatia, Durmitor National Park in Montenegro, and in Serbia the Tara and Kopaonik National Parks, as well as Stara planina Nature Park. Further research into its population size, threats and ecology is needed. More monitoring of population and habitat trends is required. Management of grazing and sustainable agriculture practices is recommended.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163884,149163882,Cheilosia pedemontana,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered because it has relatively small area of occupancy (92 km2 in Europe and 84 km2 in EU 27), and the population is considered severely fragmented. The potential current and projected threats are degradation of habitat quality, mostly due infrastructure development and unsustainable livestock grazing, causing a decline in the quality and extent of habitat. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trend is needed.

","

This species prefers open areas within montane zone Abies/Picea forest and upwards into unimproved, calcareous and non-calcareous subalpine grassland to 2,000 m, in the Alps. Males hover at 2-4 m in open areas within forest and rest on foliage of shrubs such as Alnus viridis. Both sexes rest on rocks or patches of bare ground in the sun to bask. They visit flowers of umbellifers, Caltha and Ranunculus. The flight period is from June to September. The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018) but Doczkal (1996) suggested that one host-plant was probably Peucedanum ostruthium (Apiaceae).

","This species is threatened by habitat degradation due to infrastructure development (tourism, road networks, and urbanization) and unsustainable grazing.","

There is no information about population size or trends in Europe and the EU 27. Around 300 specimens have been collected so far throughout the entire range, including some recent records in France (2018) and Switzerland (2019). This is a small species but easy to see and it occurs in fairly large subpopulations, but not in many places. This is thought likely to reflect reliance on a specialized but presently unknown larval host plant. The population is considered severely fragmented because it is found at high altitudes in isolated subpopulations.

",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe. It is distributed in Spain, France, Switzerland, Austria, northern Italy, Romania (Speight 2018), Bulgaria, Slovenia and Germany. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in Europe and the EU 27 and the area of occupancy (AOO) based on known records is estimated to be 92 km2. In the EU 27, the AOO is 84 km2.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. Some of the point localities occur within Natura 2000 sites and other protected areas. Its conservation needs should be taken into account when creating and implementing management plans for those protected areas. Research on its population size and trends, life history and ecology, as well as possible threats is needed. Monitoring of habitat trends is required. Management of grazing is recommended as the main conservation action.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163894,149163892,Cheilosia pascuorum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern because of its large area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27. Although threatened in some parts of the range (A. Vujić, pers. comm. 2020), it is considered that the entire European population is still stable. Potential threats are degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to poor management practices of European forests, infrastructure development and agricultural intensification. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trend is needed.

","This species prefers humid deciduous forests of Quercus and Fagus (Vujic 1996), upwards into unimproved, non-calcareous subalpine grassland to above 2000 m (Goeldlin and Speight 1997), and tall-herb open areas in Quercus frainetto/Q. pubescens forest and Quercus cerris/Q. pubescens forest. Males hover at 2-5 m and settle on the ground, or on flowers (Vujic 1996). Adults visit flowers of Alyssum, Ficaria (Vujić 1996) and Euphorbia. The flight period is from April to beginning of June and July at higher altitudes (Vujić 1996). The developmental stages are not described, but the larva is known to be an internal feeder in Cynoglossum officinale (Vujić 1996).","This species is threatened by habitat degradation at least in some parts of its range, as a result of infrastructure development, unsustainable forest management and agricultural intensification.",There is no information about population size or trends in Europe or the EU 27. In some parts of its range it is considered threatened.,Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe. It is distributed in France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Romania, parts of European Russia and the Balkans (Speight 2018). It has a relatively large range, and the area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU27 are estimated to be well above the threshold for any threatened category.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. In some parts of the range it is considered threatened, so additional research on threats would be beneficial. Research on its population size and trends, and life history and ecology is needed. Monitoring of habitat trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163904,149163902,Cheilosia paralobi,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) for Europe and the EU27 Member States because of its relatively small areas of occupancy (84 km2), continuing decline in quality of habitat and its occurrence as severely fragmented subpopulations. A continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat is inferred from the existing threats of degradation of habitat quality, mostly due to logging and wood harvesting. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trends is needed.

","This species prefers broad-leaved evergreen forest. It can be found by streams in Quercus ilex forest and, at higher altitudes, in mixed Q.ilex/Q.pyrenaica/Castanea forest (M. Marcos-Garcia, pers. comm. 2020), in open Castanea forest (C. Kehlmaier, pers. comm. 2020) and montane grassland with Castanea (Ricarte et al. 2014). Males hover over ground vegetation in open areas within forest (C. Kehlmaier, pers. comm. 2020). Adults visit umbellifers; Hedera, Leucanthemopsis, Mentha, Oenanthe, Ranunculus, Stellaria, Thapsia (Marcos-Garcia 1986, as C. latifacies - M. Marcos-Garcia, pers. comm. 2020) and Salix (Van Eck 2011).The flight period is April to November in Spain (Marcos-Garcia (1986, 1987, 1990), but in North Africa virtually throughout the year, with peaks in March/April and September/ October (Kassebeer 1998). The developmental stages are unknown (Speight 2018).","Habitat loss, fragmentation and degradation are the most significant threats to this species, mostly due to logging and wood harvesting. Infrastructure development and agricultural intensification are to a certain extent impacting its habitat as well. Too much grazing will also have a negative impact.","There is no information about population trends. Around 100 specimens have been collected so far, the majority of which are recent. The population is considered to be severely fragmented, particularly in Spain.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from small numbers of mostly scattered records in Portugal and Spain. In Europe and the EU 27, its extent of occurrence is estimated to be 285,733 km2, and area of occupancy 84 km2.

Outside of Europe it is present in North Africa (Morocco, Algeria) (Speight 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions for this species. The majority of point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network, and some are within two Nature Parks. Additional research on its population size, trends and ecology, as well as on possible threats is needed. Monitoring of habitat trends is required. The limiting of logging operations is recommended as the main conservation action. Localities where this species is found should be placed under some form of protection to ensure its survival.",Nearctic|Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163915,149163912,Cheilosia pagana,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern because of its large range across Europe and the EU 27. It is considered unthreatened across Europe (Speight et al. 2020). Potential threats exist from degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to human activities such as unsustainable forestry and agriculture. Further research into its threats and population trend is needed.

,"This species favours open areas in coniferous and deciduous forest and humid, unimproved grassland; somewhat synanthropic, occurring also along hedgerows in farmland and along roadsides. Adults prefer clearings and tracksides in woodland, scrub and carr; fen meadows, and along hedgerows and beside streams. Adults fly up to 2 m, with hovering males up to 4 or 5 m; they settle on foliage of bushes and low-growing plants. They visit flowers of yellow composites, Ranunculaceae, white umbellifers, Allium ursinum, Anemone nemorosa, Fragaria, Potentilla erecta, Primula, Prunus spinosa and Salix. The flight period is May to June and July to September. In southern Europe, adults are on the wing from mid March. The larva has been reared from rotting roots of Anthriscus sylvestris (Stubbs 1980) and Angelica sylvestris (Doczkal 1996), and was described by Rotheray (1990). Adults have repeatedly been collected by emergence traps installed over clumps of Heracleum and also of Angelica, suggesting that both of these large umbellifers can support larval development. The morphology of the chorion of the egg is figured by Kuznetzov (1988) (Speight 2020).","

This species may be affected by the loss of habitat quality in some parts of its range due to unsustainable forestry and agriculture, but these threats do not influence the population across Europe as a whole, which remains stable.

","

There is no known information about population sizes, but presumably the population is stable in Europe and EU 27. No decreasing trends for this species are reported by Speight et al. (2020).

",Stable,"This species is widespread from Fennoscandia south to Iberia, and from Ireland eastwards through central and southern Europe into Turkey and Russia and on to Eastern Siberia (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation activities for this species. It is considered unthreatened across Europe (Speight et al. 2020). Future monitoring is needed, as well as research on its ecology and potential threats.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163925,149163923,Cheilosia orthotricha,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern on the basis that it has an extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both above the thresholds for any threatened category, and it occurs in a large number of locations defined by existing threats in both Europe and the EU 27. There is, nonetheless, a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to varied forms of anthropogenic disturbance. Further research on this species is needed, especially in its biology, ecology, population size and trend.

","This species prefers forest, along stream margins and trackside with tall-herb communities in humid deciduous forest of Fagus and Quercus. Adults inhabit open areas along streams and settle on the ground or on the foliage of large-leaved herb-layer plants, e.g. Petasites. Males hover at 1-3 m (Vujic 1996) and visit flowers of Petasites, Salix and Taraxacum. Adults are active from February to May, and at higher elevations until June and July. The developmental stages are undescribed, but the larva morphology have been scored (Stuke 2000). Stuke and Claussen (2000) record finding the larvae in Petasites hybridus, where they occur in the lower half of the flowering stalks. It is uncertain whether the species overwinters as a larva or puparium (Speight 2020).","Possible threats exist due to anthropogenic disturbance (deforestation, logging, urbanization). In the Balkans, species distribution modelling predicts a loss of 90% of its range by 2080 under climate change under the A2a climate warming scenarios of the CSIRO climate model (Radenković et al. 2017).

",The population trend is unknown. There are many recorded subpopulations.,Unknown,"

This European endemic is distributed from Belgium and France eastwards through central Europe (Germany, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary) to Serbia, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina (Vujić 1996, Speight 2020).

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

Some point localities of this species are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network. Anthropogenic disturbance can disturb its habitats, and so continuous management of sites is recommended. Further investigation of its population size, threats and ecology is needed. More monitoring on population size and trends are required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163936,149163933,Cheilosia nigripes,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 

This species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and EU 27 because of its large extent of occurrence and number of locations. Habitat loss (both in quality and quantity) is expected due to changes in land-use and deforestation throughout Europe. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better the existing threats.

,"

This is a very numerous species in southern Europe, predominantly in deciduous forests (Vujić 1992, 1996). Its preferred habitat is open grassy area in Fagus forest, usually on well-drained soils, and upwards through (well-drained) Abies/Picea forest to the lowest levels of subalpine grassland, both calcareous and non-calcareous (Speight 2020). In the Balkans, it is most abundant in Quercus and Fagus forests (Vujić 1996). Adults fly low, settling on the foliage of low-growing plants and bushes, and visit flowers such as Caltha palustris, Myosotis, Prunus padus, Ranunculus, Rubus idaeus, Stellaria holostea, Taraxacum or white umbellifers (Vujić 1992, Speight 2020). The flight period is from May to June and into July and beginning of August at higher altitudes. The larva is undescribed (Speight 2020).

","The main threat to this species is habitat loss due to changes in land-use and deforestation throughout the whole of Europe (Bebi et al. 2017, Strandberg and Kjellström 2019), as well as intensification of grassland management and grazing pressure in Europe’s grasslands.",Based on all known reports there are numerous subpopulations across the whole of Europe. It has been collected from 1886 (Croatia) to the present day. The population trend is unknown for Europe and EU27.,Unknown,"This species has a Euro-Siberian distribution (Vujić 1996), and is widely distributed through all of Europe into Turkey and the European part of Russia, through Siberia to the Russian Far East (Speight, 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Cheilosia nigripes is on the Red List of the hoverflies of Baden-Württembergs, Denmark (LC), Germany (moderately common), Flanders (regionally CR) and Sachsen-Anhalt (very rare). Its distributional range is partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network and in the North York Moors National Park (UK), South Downs National Park (UK), Ormø-Færder National Park (Norway), Podyji National Park (Czech Republik), Foreste Casentinesi National Park (Italy), Triglav National Park (Slovenia), Fruška Gora National Park (Serbia), Kopaonik National Park (Serbia), Stara planina Natural Park (Serbia), Durmitor National Park (Montenegro), Dassia National Park (Greece), Pindos National Park (Greece) and Olympus National Park (Greece). Since it has been recorded mainly in deciduous and evergreen forests of most of Europe and Russia right to the Pacific coast, conservation actions should be focused on preserving its habitat due to high percentage of deforestation of European forests. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements, and to understand better the existing threats.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163946,149163944,Cheilosia nebulosa,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 

This species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and EU 27 because of its large distribution and number of locations. Habitat loss (in both quality and quantity) is expected due to changes in land-use and deforestation throughout Europe. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better the existing threats.

,"The preferred habitats of this species are wetland in Alnus/Salix forest and drained scrub in woodland with Prunus spinosa. Adults appears in clearings and tracksides, where males hover up to 7 m beside Salix or Crataegus in flower, descending to settle on low-growing plants whenever the sun disappears behind a cloud. Females fly low over ground vegetation, settling to rest in the sun on dead grasses (e.g. Molinia tussocks). Both sexes visit flowers of trees as Crataegus, Prunus, male Salix, Taraxacum, Tussilago (Speight 2020) and Ficaria verna (Vujić 1996). The flight period is from the end of April to the beginning of June, or at higher elevations to early July. The larva is undescribed, but Doczkal (2002) reports egg-laying by this species on leaves of Centaurea nigra (Speight 2020).","The main threat to this species is habitat loss due to change in land-use and deforestation throughout Europe (Bebi et al. 2017, Strandberg and Kjellström 2019).","Based on all known records, this species has been collected between 1886 (in Croatia) to the present day. According to Vujić (1992), its subpopulations are small and it is very rare. The population trend is unknown for Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,This European endemic is distributed in most European countries (Vujić 1992) from Ireland in the west to the European part of Russia in the east (Speight 2020). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are significantly greater then the thresholds for any threatened category.,This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is on the Red List of hoverflies of Baden-Württemberg (EN), Red List of hoverflies of Bayern (EN), Red List of hoverflies of Germany (rare), Flanders Red List (regionally NT), Red List of plants and animals of Sachsen-Anhalt (very rare) and listed as Vulnerable in the database of Irish Syrphidae. The distributional range is partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network, and in the Podyji National Park (Czech Republik), Durmitor National Park (Montenegro), Triglav National Park (Slovenia), Stara Planina Natural Park (Serbia) and Kopaonik National Park (Serbia). Since it is reported mainly from deciduous forests, conservation actions should be focused on preserving its habitat due to the high percentage of deforestation of European forests. Monitoring and further research are required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better the existing threats.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163956,149163954,Cheilosia naruska,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT) 
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT) 

This species is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) in Europe and EU 27 based on its known area of occupancy (160 km2 for Europe and 148 km2 for the EU 27), and its 13 locations in northern Scandinavia and the immediately adjacent European part of Russia, and a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat as a result of pressure on boreal forests from commercial forestry. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better its existing threats.

","

This species is known from open ground in humid meadows (Haarto et al. 2007) and the edge of humid meadow bordering Betula/Salix/Populus forests (Nielsen 2008). Adults are active from mid-June to the beginning of July, and visit Anthriscus sylvestris. Males sit on leaves in the sun and close to the ground. The larva is undescribed but this developmental stage is possibly associated with Anthriscus sylvestris, with which the adult flies are apparently always found (Haarto et al. 2007).

","The main threat to this species is habitat loss due to change in land-use. In the Boreal region the area covered by natural habitats is much reduced and under increasing pressure. In terms of impact, commercial forestry (based mainly on spruce, pine, birch and oak) has had the greatest influence (Sundseth 2009). Additionally, some of the wet meadows in northern Europe and Russia have experiences a declining in the grazing needed to maintain this habitat and some have experienced complete abandonment of grazing leading to habitat loss for large number of wild animals (https://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/life/publications/lifepublications/lifefocus/documents/wetlands.pdf).",Most known data are from the period 2003-2015. The population trend is unknown for Europe and the EU 27.,Unknown,"This is endemic to northern Europe, distributed in northern Scandinavia and in European parts of Russia. Its area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe, based on known records, is 160 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 157,983 km2. In the EU 27, the AOO is 148 km2 and the EOO is 122,477 km2.
",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not subject to any targeted conservation action and there are no conservation measures in place. It is listed as Least Concern in Finland (Haarto and Kerppola 2007). Its distributional range is partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network, and in Varangerhalvøya National Park (Norway), Muotkatunturi Wilderness Area (Finland) and Paanajärvi National Park (Russia). Since it is recorded mainly in the Boreal forests of Europe, conservation actions should be focused on preserving its habitat from the increasing pressure of commercial forestry (based mainly on spruce, pine, birch and oak). Additionally, there is a need to enact management measures in wet meadows in northern Europe and Russia in order to preserve suitable habitats. Monitoring and further research is required to establish the habitat and ecological requirements, and to understand better the existing threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163967,149163964,Cheilosia mutabilis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 

This species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and the EU 27 because of its large distribution and number of locations. Habitat loss (in both quality and quantity) is expected due to change in land-use and deforestation throughout Europe. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better the existing threats.

,"

The preferred habitat of this species is open ground in both coniferous and deciduous forests, open woodland and scrub on well-drained sites often susceptible to short-duration winter flooding, and also in garrigue and heathland (Speight 2020) and Mediterranean maquis, shrubs and montane pastures (Vujić 1996). In Sweden, Denmark and along the northern seaboard of Germany, C. mutabilis is primarily a coastal species, occurring in coastal heathland and dune grassland, but it may also occur in inland, grassland situations that are not obviously well drained (H. Bartsch pers. comm. 2020) (Speight 2020). Adults inhabit clearings and tracksides, flying up to 2 m from the ground, and settle on foliage of bushes or flowers including white umbellifers, Alisma plantago-aquatica, Cistus, Hieracium, Jasione montana, Potentilla fruticosa, Sedum acre (Speight 2020), Ranunculus, Cotinus and Apiaceae (Vujić 1996). The flight period is from May to mid August, with a peak in July. The larva is undescribed, but reported by Grosskopf et al. (2001) as developing in the above-ground parts of Hieracium pilosella. According to Ball et al. (2011), the larva of C. mutabilis has been found in the roots of Carduus crispus.

","The main threat to this species is habitat loss due to change in land use and deforestation throughout Europe (Bebi et al. 2017, Strandberg and Kjellström 2019), as well as intensification of grassland management and grazing pressure in Europe’s grasslands.","Based on all known reports of this species, it is frequent and numerous across its European range. The population trend is unknown for both Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,"This species is Euro-Siberian (Vujić 1992), distributed in most of Europe and in western Siberia, as well as in North Africa and Turkey (Speight 2020). Its extent of occurrence and area of occupancy in both Europe and the EU27 are significantly greater then the thresholds for threatened categories.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is on the Red List of hoverflies of Baden-Württembergs, the Red List of hoverflies of Denmark (LC), the Red List of hoverflies of Bayern (warning list), the Red List of hoverflies of Germany (moderately common), Flanders Red Lists (regionally EN), the Red List of hoverflies of Berlin (very rare), the Red List of plants and animals of Sachsen-Anhalt (moderately common) and the Red List of hoverflies of Saxony (potentially EN). Its distribution range is partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network and the Podyji National Park (Czech Republic), Foreste Casentinesi National Park (Italy), Triglav National Park (Slovenia), Učka Nature Park (Croatia), Durmitor National Park (Montenegro), Fruška Gora National Park (Serbia), Djerdap National Park (Serbia), Kopaonik National Park (Serbia), Stara Planina Natural Park (Serbia), Pirin National Park (Bulgaria), Mavrovo National Park (North Macedonia), Galičica National Park (North Macedonia) and Olympus National Park (Greece). Since it has been recorded mainly from both deciduous and evergreen forests in most of Europe and western Siberia, conservation actions should be focused on preserving its habitat due to the high rate of deforestation of European forests. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements, and to understand better the existing threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163977,149163975,Cheilosia montana,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered (EN) in Europe and EU 27 based on the small area of occupancy (AOO) and severely fragmented population in both regions. Furthermore, habitat loss (quality and quantity) is expected due to intensification of grassland management and grazing pressure in Europe’s grasslands. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements and to understand the existing threats better.

","

This species has been recorded from unimproved, calcareous and non-calcareous subalpine grasslands. Adults rest on rocks and stones in the sun, and are active from the beginning of July to the end of August. The larva has not been described (Speight 2020).

",The main threat to this species is habitat loss from the intensification of grassland management and grazing pressure in Europe’s grasslands.,"Based on all known records, about 30 specimens have been collected. The population trend is unknown for Europe and the EU 27. The population is considered severely fragmented in Europe and the EU 27 because of the fragmentation of suitable habitat.",Unknown,"This European endemic is distributed in the mountainous regions of Europe; from northern Spain in the west, through the high central European mountains (Alps) to Romania and Bulgaria in the east (Carpathian and Rodopi mountains). The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe based on known records is 112 km2, while in EU 27 it is 96 km2. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in both Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is on the Red List of the hoverflies of Bayern (Germany) as Data Deficient and on that for Germany as very rare. Its distributional range is partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network, and in Rila National Park (Bulgaria). Since it has been reported mainly in mountains of central and eastern Europe, conservation actions should be focused on preserving its habitat from intensification of grassland management and grazing pressure. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements and to understand the existing threats better.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149163987,149163985,Cheilosia melanura,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Both the area of occupancy (AOO) and the extent of occurrence (EOO) are above the thresholds for a threatened category. Continuing declines in the quality of its habitat due to tourism, overgrazing and urbanization are considered the main threats. This species is distributed on the high mountains in Switzerland and the Balkans. However, it is projected to experience declines under climate change, and this should be carefully monitored as this may push the species into a threatened category in the future. Further research is needed, especially on its biology and ecology.

","

This species prefers open ground: unimproved, calcareous and non-calcareous montane and subalpine grassland, from within the Picea zone upwards. Adults are fast flying at 2-4 m, frequently along streams and active from the middle of the May (beginning of July at higher altitudes) to August. They visit white umbellifers, Caltha palustris, Ranunculus spp. and Euphorbia spp.. Its developmental stages and host plant are undescribed (Vujić 1996, Speight 2018), although Doczkal (1996) observed oviposition on Cirsium spinossimum and Stuke (2000) scored aspects of the larval morphology.

","

The tourism industry (i.e. expansion of tourism infrastructure) is the most plausible threat. Overgrazing and residential urbanization can also negatively affect the population. Furthermore, this high-mountain species can experience severe effects under climate change scenarios using species distribution modelling. Their ranges and abundances would be greatly reduced (range up to 60% and abundance up to 68% by 2080), vanishing almost entirely from the Balkan peninsula, except for alpine regions where suitable climatic conditions could persist (Radenković et al. 2017).

","

The population trend of this species is unknown for Europe and the EU 27. There have been many subpopulations registered across its range. It was first recorded in Europe in 1896, within Croatia, although recent records are also present.

",Unknown,"

This species is distributed in the Carpathians, Schwarzwald, Alps and Balkan mountains. Outside of Europe, it can be found in the Caucasus mountains and in western Siberia to Cis-Baikal (Vujić 1996, Speight 2018).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"

Most point localities of this species are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura-2000 network. In Montenegro some point localities belong to National park Durmitor. In Serbia some subpopulations are within national parks Kopaonik and Šar planina, while others in Natural parks Stara planina, Golija and Zlatibor. Unfortunately, increasing of tourism (ski resorts), overgrazing and urbanization constantly increase disturbance of its habitats. Increasing awareness about this species is very important. Further investigation of its biology and ecology is needed. More monitoring on population and habitat trend are required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149163997,149163995,Cheilosia lucense,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Cheilosia lucense is considered to be endemic to the Cantabrian mountains in northwest Spain. Due to its small area of occupancy 8 km2, the fact that it is found in only two locations and a continuing decline in quality of habitat due to agriculture, overgrazing and wood harvesting, this species is assessed as Endangered. It would benefit from area and habitat protection, as well as legal protection. Further monitoring of the species is needed.


","

The known specimens were collected in calcareous montane unimproved grasslands (Ricarte et al. 2014). It is known to visit flowers of Chaerophyllum hirsutum (Ricarte et al. 2014). The flight period is during May. The larva must be phytophagous, but the developmental stages have not been described (Speight 2020).

","

So far as is known this species is endemic to the Cantabrian Mountains, and so activities in this region are considered to affect the entire population of Cheilosia lucense directly. The landscape of this area is strongly influenced by human activities. Flatter areas have traditionally been cultivated, while wood from forests has been used as a source of fuel. Extensive areas of scrublands have been burnt or grazed by domestic animals (Ricarte et al. 2014)

","

There is no known information about the population trend or size of this species, but it is presumed that the population is small because only six specimens are known so far, all of them collected in 2012 (Ricarte et al. 2014). These were quite easy to collect and identify, and therefore the low number of specimens suggests that the species is rare.

",Unknown,"

This species is considered to be endemic to Europe, found only in northwest Spain (the Cantabrian mountains) (Speight 2020). It was relatively recently described (in 2014). The extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is around 90 km2 and its area of occupancy (AOO) is around 8 km2. It is found between 710 m and 1,280 m above sea level.

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions conducted for this species. It would benefit from area and habitat protection, as well as legal protection and management of grazing and tourism. Future research on its ecology, threats and population trends, and continued monitoring of the habitat and population is needed. 

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149164008,149164005,Cheilosia longula,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27 because of its large range, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. It is considered unthreatened across Europe (Speight et al. 2020). Potential threats are degradation of its habitat quality in part of its range due to human activities such as unsustainable forestry. Further research into its threats and population trend is needed.

","The preferred habitat for this species is forest (deciduous and coniferous) and conifer plantations. Adults are found in glades, clearings, tracksides etc., flying at up to 3 m, often settling on low-growing vegetation in dappled sunlight: they are more frequent in conifer than deciduous forest. They visit flowers of white umbellifers, yellow composites, Achillea, Calluna, Cirsium, Euphorbia, Galium and Potentilla erecta. The flight period is from end June to October, with a peak in September. The larva was described and figured by Rotheray (1990), and illustrated in colour by Rotheray (1994). It is an internal feeder on the tissues of various large, woodland basidiomycete mushrooms, especially Boletus, Leccinum and Suillus (Buxton, 1955, Hackman and Meinander 1979). It overwinters as a puparium (Speight 2020).","

This species is affected by the loss of habitat quality in some parts of its range due to unsustainable forestry but this threat do not influence the overall population trend, which remains stable (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

","

There is no known information about the population size of this species. Although a decreasing trend has been reported in Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands and Switzerland (Speight et al. 2020), presumably the overall population is stable in Europe and the EU 27.

",Stable,"This species ranges from Fennoscandia south to the Pyrenees; and from Ireland eastwards through Eurasia, with southern range limits in Europe in Italy and the Balkans (Speight 2020). Outside of Europe, the species is found across the Eurasian continent to eastern Siberia and in North America. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

This species is protected under Serbian legislation. It is considered unthreatened across Europe (Speight et al. 2020). Future monitoring of its population and habitat is needed, as well as research on its population, habitat and potential threats.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164035,149164033,Cheilosia limbicornis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-05-14 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Cheilosia limbicornis is endemic to Spain, and listed as Endangered since it has severely fragmented population and restricted area of occupancy (52 km2), found in 6-7 locations, and there is a continuing decline in the quality of the habitat throughout its range due to destruction of forests from forestry. Future monitoring is needed, as well as research on its population, ecology and threats.

","The preferred habitat for this species is forest, where it occurs in open areas within matorral of both Pinus and Quercus species; and Q. ilex maquis (M. Marcos-Garcia pers. comm. 2019), up to 1,600m. It visits flowers of  Prunus spinosus (Pérez-Bañón et al. 1996), and Ranunculus ollissiponensis (Marcos-García 1990). The flight period is from the middle of March until June. The larva will be phytophagous, but developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2020).","

This species is threatened by the degradation of habitat quality due to destruction of forests, poor forestry management and overgrazing, impacting the diversity of plants and probably the currently-unknown host plant (A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2019).

","

There is no known information on population trends. All specimens are more than 20 years old. Pérez-Bañón et al. (1996) stated that taking into account the dispersion of its distribution within the peninsular area, it can be assumed that although low in numbers, Cheilosia limbicornis is present in a large part of the Iberian territory. It occurs in 6-7 localities, and is considered severely fragmented due to it being a forest species and forests are limited in Spain.

",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Spain (Speight 2020). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is around 159,967 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) about 52 km2.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation activities for this species. Protection of its habitats is needed along with grazing control, as well as future monitoring of its population and habitat, and research on its population, ecology and potential threats. It is found in a protected area, the Sierra Nevada National Park.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149164045,149164043,Cheilosia lenta,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-05-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered since it has restricted area of occupancy (188 km2 in pan-Europe and 76 km2 in the EU27), the population is severely fragmented because it is connected with humid forests which are disappearing and becoming fragmented across Europe, isolating subpopulations, and there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of the habitat throughout Europe due to unsustainable forestry. Future monitoring is needed, as well as research its ecology.

","This species is found in forests, beside brooks and rivers in humid deciduous forest, from Quercus/Carpinus up into the Fagus zone to above 1,500 m in the Balkans (Vujić 1996 and pers. comm. 2019). The adult flies low over waterside vegetation, settling on leaves (Vujić 1996). It visits flowers of Caltha, Myosotis and Ranunculus (Vujić 1996). The flight period is during April to June and July at higher elevations (Vujić 1996). The larva will be phytophagous, but the developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2020).","This species is mainly threatened by the loss of habitat due to the destruction of humid forests across Europe, mainly caused by unsustainable forestry practices: this is a problem even in the protected areas where this species lives (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","

The population of this species is considered to be severely fragmented because it is typically connected with humid deciduous forests which are disappearing in most places in Europe, reducing or preventing dispersal between subpopulations.

",Decreasing,"

This species is endemic to Europe, known from North Macedonia, Greece, Hungary, Romania, Serbia and Slovenia. Records from Switzerland are considered to be erroneous (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in both Europe and the EU 27, but the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 188 km2 in Europe and in the EU 27 it is 76 km2.

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation activities for this species.  Future monitoring is needed, as well as research on its ecology and potential threats.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164055,149164053,Cheilosia latigenis,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-05-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Cheilosia latigenis is endemic to the Pyrenees in France and is assessed as Endangered since it has a restricted AOO (16 km2) and EOO (192 km2) in Europe and in the EU 27, it is found only at 3 locations both in Europe and in the EU 27, and there is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to development of winter tourism and overgrazing on mountain grasslands. Additionally, climate change is a threat, as high-alpine species are considered to be especially threatened. Future monitoring is needed, as well as research on its ecology and population trends.

","The preferred environment for this species is open ground beside pools and streams in unimproved, non-calcareous, subalpine grassland. Adults visit flowers of Caltha palustris and Senecio. The flight period is during June. The larva will be phytophagous, but the developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2020).","

As this species is restricted to mountainous areas, mainly in high alpine habitats, development of winter tourism as well as overgrazing on mountain grasslands present the most severe threats for this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). Additionally, climate change is a threat, as high-alpine species are considered to be especially threatened.

","

There is no known information about the population trend or population size for this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). It is so far known mainly from type material collected in 1991, a total of 12 specimens. Some recent material comes from the Pyrenees, i.e. two specimens from 2014 and one from 2017 (material of X. Lair, unpubl. data).

",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, found only in the Pyrenees in France (Speight 2020). In Europe and in the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is around 192 km2 and its area of occupancy (AOO) is around 16 km2. The species is found between 1,600 m and 2,100 m above sea level.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation activities for this species. It would benefit from area and habitat protection, as well as protection through national legislation, as it is endemic to France. Management of grazing and tourism is required. Future monitoring is needed, as well as research on its ecology and population trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164065,149164063,Cheilosia laticornis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Cheilosia laticornus is assessed as Least Concern because of its relatively large range, whose extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. Although considered threatened in some European countries, it is considered that the European population as a whole is still stable. Potential threats for this species are degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to poor management practices of European forests and overgrazing. Further research into its distribution, ecology, threats and population trend is needed.

","This species occurs in tall-herb open areas and tracksides within montane, southern European deciduous forest (mesophilous Fagus, Castanea) and unimproved, montane grassland. At the northern edge of its range in southern Sweden, it appears to be confined to coastal grassland. The adults fly among tall-herb vegetation of scrub-invaded grassland, forest tracksides and clearings, settling on foliage. Flower visitation records are known from umbellifers and yellow composites. The flight period is from the end of April to June and the end July to the beginning of September. The larva is not described, but Sörensson (2003) suggests Peucedanum oreoselinum may act as one larval host-plant (Speight 2018).","A decline in the quality of habitat due to poor management across forests in Europe affects this species in a part of its range. As the species is found in grasslands as well, overgrazing might posse an additional threat.","There is no information on population size but due to the large range and the fact that it can be locally abundant, it is presumed that the population is stable.",Stable,"This species is found in southern Sweden, central Europe, the Balkans, southern Russia, Ukraine and Turkey and Israel eastwards to Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan (Vujić et al. 2020). In Europe, there are isolated records from the northern edge of its range that suggest it is currently expanding northwards (Speight 2018).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"This species is considered to be threatened in France, Netherlands and Switzerland (Speight et al. 2015), but its overall European trend is considered to be stable. There are no known conservation measures in place. Research on its population, distribution, ecology and threats is needed. Monitoring of population trends is needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164075,149164073,Cheilosia lasiopa,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Cheilosia lasiopa is assessed as Least Concern because of its relatively large range, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. Although a decreasing population trend has been recorded in some European countries, it is considered that the European population as a whole is stable. Potential threats are degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to poor management practices of European forests, and climate change because this is an alpine species. Further research into its distribution, ecology, threats and population trend is needed.

","The preferred habitat of this species is forest, both deciduous and coniferous, particularly scrub woodland. Adults are found in clearings, tracksides etc., where they fly low and fast and settle on the foliage of bushes etc. favouring those with large leaves such as Arctium. Flower visitation records are known from white umbellifers, Cochlearia, Crataegus, Euphorbia, Fragaria, Menyanthes, Ranunculus, Salix, Stellaria, Taraxacum and Vaccinium. The flight period is during May and June (with occasional specimens into July), and April in southern Europe. The larva was described and figured by Stuke and Carstensen (2000), from larvae which lived initially in the leaf and stem bases of Plantago lanceolata, and later in the rootstock. They also established that it overwinters as a puparium (Speight 2018).","Decline in the quality of habitat due to poor management across forests in Europe affects this species in a part of its range. Considering that this is an alpine species, it is possible that raising temperatures due to climate change might also poses a threat.","There is no known information about the population size of this species. It is assumed that the overall population trend is stable, although there is a recorded declining trend in several European countries (Speight et al. 2015).",Stable,"This species is widely distributed. It ranges from Fennoscandia south to the Vosges Mountains (north-east France); and from Britain eastwards through mountainous parts of central Europe into the former Yugoslavia and European parts of Russia (Speight 2018), although the range in European Russia is not well known. Outside of Europe, this species occurs across parts of Asia.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",There is no use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. It requires further monitoring of habitat trends, as well as further research into its ecology, population size and possible threats. It is considered threatened in the Netherlands.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164085,149164083,Cheilosia laeviventris,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-05-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as endangered since it has restricted area of occupancy (24 km2 in Europe and 20 km2 in EU27), the population is severely fragmented as this is high-mountain species connected with alpine habitats, where the mountain peaks act as continental islands, disabling communication between subpopulations, and there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of the habitat throughout Europe due to development of winter tourism and overgrazing on mountain grasslands. Additionally, climate change is a threat, because high-alpine species are considered to be especially threatened. Future monitoring is needed, as well as research on its ecology.","The preferred habitats for this species are sparsely vegetated, rocky, unimproved, non-calcareous, subalpine grassland to elevations above 2,000 m. The adults have a very rapid, darting flight; the males hover at 1-3 m in the vicinity of large boulders and both sexes settle on rocks in the sun. The flight period is during July. The larva must be phytophagous, but the developmental stages are undescribed. According to Stuke and Carstensen (as cited in Speight 2018), the larval host plant is Primula auricula.","

As this species lives in high-alpine habitats, the development of winter tourism as well as overgrazing of montane grasslands present its most severe threats (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). Additionally climate change is a threat, because high-alpine species are considered to be especially threatened.

","

Although found in several distinct countries, this species is considered rare. Not many specimens have been found, despite many general surveys done recently in the Alps (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). Most records are quite old, 25 years or older. The population is considered to be severely fragmented because this is high-mountain species connected with alpine habitats, whose mountain peaks act as continental islands, disabling communication between subpopulations.

",Unknown,"

The species is endemic to Europe, distributed in Austria, France, Germany, Italy, and Switzerland (Ståhls and Barkalov 2017). Its presence in Romania is uncertain, as the records are very old. The specimen reported as C. laeviventris in Montenegro was later reclassified as C. caerulescens (Vujić 1996). In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 24 km2 and in the EU 27 about 20 km2. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 46,645 km2 both in Europe and in EU27.

",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation activities for this species. It would benefit from area and habitat protection, as well as management of grazing and tourism.. Future monitoring is needed, as well as research on its ecology, population size and further threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164095,149164093,Cheilosia laeviseta,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered since it has restricted area of occupancy (112 km2 in Europe and 68 km2 in EU27), its population is severely fragmented and as a high-mountain species it is connected with alpine habitats whose mountain peaks act as continental islands, disabling communication between subpopulations. There is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of the habitat throughout Europe due to development of winter tourism and overgrazing on mountain grasslands. Additionally, climate change is also a threat, as high-alpine species are considered to be especially threatened. Future monitoring is needed, as well as research on its ecology.

","

The preferred environment for this species is open ground; open, grassy areas in the Larix zone upwards into unimproved calcareous and non-calcareous subalpine grassland to above 2,000 m into the alpine zone, including sparsely vegetated, stony ground and close to snow patches. Adults fly at up to 1 m over alpine grassland vegetation, and settle on rocks and stones in the sun. Flower visitation records are known from white umbellifers and Ranunculus. The flight period is from beginning of June to mid-August. It almost certainly has phytophagous larvae, like congeneric species, but the host plant is unknown and the developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018).

","

As this species inhibits high alpine habitats, development of winter tourism and overgrazing of mountain grasslands present its most severe threats. Climate change is also a threat, because high-alpine species are considered to be especially threatened (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

","

There is no information about population size. There are both older (30 years) and newer (2013-2020) records. Considering that this is a high-altitude mountain species connected with alpine habitats, its population is considered to be severely fragmented because the mountain peaks act as continental islands, limiting or preventing dispersal between subpopulations (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, distributed in northern Spain, France, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, northern Italy, Montenegro and Greece. In addition, it was found in Slovenia in July 2020 on a mountain path near an alpine meadow (S. Bot pers. comm. 2020). In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 112 km2 and in the EU 27 about 68 km2. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 886,592 km2 in Europe and 872,625 km² in the EU27. It is found at high elevations. Although found quite recently in a new locality, given its rarity it is currently considered unlikely that it exists in a significant number of new localities so as to impact significantly the AOO and threat status.

",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation activities for this species. It would benefit from area and habitat protection, as well as management of grazing and tourism. Future monitoring is needed, as well as research on its ecology, population size and further threats.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164105,149164103,Cheilosia gorodkovi,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

Due to its small area of occupancy (AOO) (16 km2) in Europe, the fact that it is found in four locations and the continuing decline in quality of habitat caused by livestock farming where one subpopulation (with the largest number of records) is found, this species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)). At all other locations, only three specimens in total were recorded.

For the EU 27 regional assessment, the species is assessed as Critically Endangered (CR B2ab(iii)) because the known AOO is 4 kmin the EU27 and the species occurs only in one location.

The species would benefit from protection of the area and the habitat, as well as by legal protection. Further research on its ecology and distribution as well as monitoring is urgently needed.

","

This species prefers open ground: humid, lowland unimproved grassland (Skufjin 1977) and steppe grassland (Mielczarek 2013). It visits flowers of Campanula, Fritillaria, Salix, and Schivereckia (Skufjin 1977). The flight period is April and May. The developmental stages are undescribed. The locality where it was found in Poland is a large flat forest glade surrounded by old oak trees. In the second half of the 19th century, the area was an overgrown forest, probably of a forest-pasture character. It is very likely that after cutting down the trees there was an arable field, followed by pasture and mowing meadow (Mielczarek 2013, Speight 2020).

","

The main threat for this species is the loss of habitat due to livestock farming, especially in the locality in the European part of Russia (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2019). The locality in Poland was found within a protected area and so it is less exposed to intensive grazing, but is still threatened by this activity.

","

There is no information about population size or trends. The subpopulation in Russia was recorded in 1974 (in total, 33 specimens were collected), but was mentioned in Barkalov (2002) as being quite common: however, no precise distribution data were given. Only one specimen was collected in Poland in 2009. In Ukraine, two specimens were recorded (G. Popov pers. comm. 2019), but these records are still unpublished. No other data are available.

",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from a single locality in southern Poland, north-eastern Ukraine (known from two still-unpublished locality records - G. Popov pers. comm. 2019), and from a single mapped locality in South European Russia. In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 16 km2 and in the EU 27 it is estimated to be around 4 km2. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 79,301 km2 in Europe and around 1,000 km2 in the EU27. It is found between 162 m and 242 m asl.

Outside Europe, it is found in the Magadan region of the Russian Far East and in western and eastern Siberia (Speight 2018).",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species. It would benefit from protection of the area and the habitat, as well as legal protection. Future research needs to be focused on determining whether it is still present in the locality in Russia. In addition, its population trend, possible threats and ecology should be further investigated.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164115,149164113,Cheilosia kerteszi,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

Due to its small area of occupancy (28 km2) in Europe, the fact that it is found in four locations, and an inferred continuing decline in quality of habitat due to the destruction of deciduous forests across Europe and developing tourism in the area where one of the subpopulations is found, this species is listed as Endangered. 

In the EU27 regional assessment the species is assessed as Critically Endangered because the area of occupancy and extent of occurrence in the European Union have been calculated at 4 km2, and it occurs only in one location. Although officially protected by national law in Serbia, it would benefit from protection in other countries of occurrence as well. Protection of the habitat and further monitoring is needed, considering that its most recent record was more than 20 years ago.


",This species occurs in open areas along streams in deciduous forest (Vujić 1996). Adult males hover at 2-5 m (Vujić 1996). Known flowers visited are Ranunculus and Salix (Vujić 1996). The flight period is in April and May. The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2020).,"

The main threat to this species is the destruction of its habitat, because it is associated with deciduous forests which are in general decline across Europe due to inappropriate forestry management. Developing mountain tourism in Montenegro, where one subpopulation occurs, represents an additional threat (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

","

There is no information about the population size or trends of this species. The number of caught specimens is low (fewer than 30), the latest from the 1990s despite at least five surveys in Serbia and Montenegro in the last ten years. The current population trend is considered to be decreasing (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

",Decreasing,"This species is endemic to Europe, recorded from Romania, Serbia and Montenegro (Vujić 1996, A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 28 km2 and in the EU27 estimated at 4 km2. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 20,479 km² in Europe and only 4 km2 in EU27. In Europe, it occurs in four locations, while occurring in just a single location in the EU 27. It is found between 380 m and 1,680 m above sea level.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species. It is protected by national law in Serbia. It also occurs in Durmitor National Park in Montenegro. It requires habitat protection and would benefit from being listed as protected in all the countries of its occurrence. Further research is needed in order to obtain information about its population trends, ecology and threats.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164125,149164123,Cheilosia katara,Critically Endangered,"B1ab(iii,v)",2021,2020-03-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

The Katara Pass, on the Greek mountain Pindos is the sole locality of this species. Due to its very small area of occupancy and extent of occurrence (both 12 km2), one location (due to the threat of grazing in the area) and the continuing decline in the quality of its habitat (and apparently in the number of mature individuals, inferred from evidence of recent decline) due to grazing, encroachment, development of winter tourism and developing infrastructure, this species is assessed as Critically Endangered 

","

This species prefers open areas with seepages/flushes in relict montane forest of Pinus heidreichii/P.nigra ssp.pallasiana (Vujić 1996). The adults are stocky with short wings, which results in their clumsy and short flight (Vujić 1996). They visit flowers of Ranunculus (Vujić 1996). It seems that it appears only over a short period during spring, from the end of April until mid-May (Speight 2018). The larvae are undescribed, but are presumably phytophagous.

","

Although found only at the borders of the Pindos National Park, this species is facing threats. It is impacted by grazing of goats and sheep in the area, and this is probably its main threat (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019) since it is a strict endemic found only in a very small area. Additional threatening factors besides overgrazing are forest encroachment (construction sites, intense machinery use, large number of logging operations), development of winter tourism and the developing infrastructure in this area. The dense forest road network (that serves mostly for forest exploitation) influences the level of disturbance. Landslides and erosion following the loss or degradation of forest cover have already been observed in many parts of the forest (Calisto 2020). 

","

There is no information on population size. All specimens were found in only one subpopulation in a very restricted geographic area. Fewer than 30 specimens were found in the period 1990-2012. Most specimens date from 1990 and 2011. There are no more recent records, despite surveying at least three times in the last five years. Therefore the current population trend is considered to be decreasing (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019), however it is not yet considered to be extinct in wild.

",Decreasing,"

This species is endemic to Europe, specifically to Pindos Mountain in the Peloponnese (Greece: Vujić et al. 2020). Its range is restricted to an extremely small geographic area above 1,000 m altitude near Metsovo, called the Katara Pass. It can be considered a strict local endemic of this area and a relict species. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is 12 km2 and its area of occupancy (AOO) is also 12 km2. It is found between 1,350 m and 1,680 m above sea level.

",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species. Limiting the habitat destruction and further research on its population, life history and threats is needed, as well as monitoring and management of grazing. It is found within the Pindos National Park, formally a protected area but in reality the part where this species is found is strongly impacted by human activities. Increasing awareness is needed of the local people regarding the fact that this is the only place where Cheilosia katara occurs, as well as its inclusion in national legislation documents.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149164135,149164133,Cheilosia insignis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-07-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is strictly protected in Serbia, and in the German Red List it is classified as rare. It is widespread in mountainous areas in Europe at low to medium-high altitudes, but not commonly encountered because it is an early spring flying species. However, there is no evidence of decreasing populations so far. Additional research on its population size and trend, and ecology is needed. The area of occupancy (AOO) is small (212 km2) in Europe and the EU 27 (124 km2), the distribution is considered severely fragmented and a decline in quality of habitat can be observed, and therefore the present status of this species is considered to be Endangered. Monitoring of the population is required.

","The preferred habitats of this species include humid, montane Fagus forest and from the upper limit of Larix into unimproved calcareous and non-calcareous subalpine grassland, and upwards into the rock and scree zone (Vujic 1996; Verlinden 2000). Flowers visited include Muscaria and Salix (Speight 2018). The flight period is from beginning of April to May, extending to June at higher elevations. The immature stages are undescribed, but Verlinden (2000) provides evidence suggesting the larvae may be associated with the rhizomes of Anemone species.","

This species can be subject to locally occurring anthropogenic activities in Europe such as intensified land-use due to increased urbanization, overgrazing in mountainous habitats and intensive forest management including clearings, which can lead to habitat degradation. Habitat loss and fragmentation are the major general threats to alpine and montane biodiversity.

",There is no information about population trends in Europe and the EU 27 but the species is considered severely fragmented as a high mountain species with isolated subpopulations.,Unknown,"This conspicuous species is endemic to Europe. It is distributed throughout mountainous parts from the Pyrenees to central Europe including Austria, Germany, France and Switzerland and Poland to the Balkan peninsula (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia), and on to Bulgaria and Romania (Speight 2018).

Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is large but area of occupancy (AOO) is only 212 km2 in Europe and 124 km2 in the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. In Serbia, this species is listed as a ""strictly protected species"" and protected by the national law Code of Regulations on the Declaration and Protection of Strictly Protected and Protected Wild Species of Plants, Animals and Fungi (Official Gazette of RS, No. 5/2010, 47/2011, 32/2016 and 98/2016). Additional research on its population status and ecology is needed, and into the impacts of any threats. Monitoring is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164145,149164143,Cheilosia ingerae,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2021-05-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This Scandinavian endemic species is rarely encountered in all of its distributional area. It is mainly distributed in the northernmost parts of Fennoscandia. Its population trend is unknown. The extent of occurrence is above the thresholds for the threatened categories, but the known area of occupancy is 88 km2 in Europe and for the EU27 36 km2, the population is considered severely fragmented and a decline in quality of habitat can be projected as a result of unsustainable forestry practices, increased tourism and climate change. Therefore this species is assessed as Endangered in both Europe and the EU27. More research is needed on its ecology and biology, population trends and microhabitat requirements. Monitoring of the population and habitats are needed.","This species is a subarctic, early summer species. It is found in open areas in taiga forest and field margins (Nielsen and Claussen 2001). Flower visitation records are known from Anthriscus sylvestris (Nielsen and Claussen 2001) and Ranunculus (Bartsch et al. 2009). The host plant and developmental stages are unknown. The flight period is from mid-June to early August (Speight 2020).","This species may be negatively affected by habitat degradation in some parts of its range due to unsustainable forestry practices, or increased tourism and development. Climate change has potentially profound implications for hoverfly habitats especially in the northern parts of Europe, and it can be expected to lead to significant changes in the coming century. In northern Fennoscandia the predictions are for much wetter environments, which could be unfavourable for many of the hoverflies that occur there today. This species occurs in the northernmost parts of the continent will be unable to migrate further north. However it remains unclear how serious this potential threat is or the timescale over which it may operate.",This species is rarely encountered and there is no information on its population trends for Europe or the EU 27. The population is considered severely fragmented as its subpopulations are widely distributed and are unlikely to interact.,Unknown,"This species is restricted to northern Fennoscandia and is distributed in Norway, Sweden and Finland (Nielsen and Claussen 2001, Bartsch 2009, Haarto and Kerppola 2007). There are records the border of Norway and Russia but there are no confirmed records from Northwest European Russia (A. Polevoi pers. comm. 2020). Whilst the extent of occurrence (EOO) is large, the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 88 km2 in Europe and 36 km2 in the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. More sustainable forestry practices could benefit this species as well as protection of its habitat. More research is needed on its ecology and biology, population trends and microhabitat requirements. Monitoring of the population and habitats are needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164155,149164153,Cheilosia impudens,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-05-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is distributed in central Europe and the Balkan mountainous regions. Its population trend is unknown but it is not a common species. The major threat for this species is intensive forest management across Europe, as well as the expansion of winter tourism in mountains which can impact extent and quality of habitats. It is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) in Europe and the EU 27 due to its small area of occupancy (AOO), severely fragmented population and current and projected continuing decline in the quality of habitat. Better grazing management is required, and management of expanding tourism in the area as well as additional research on its biology and ecology is needed and monitoring of population and habitat trends.","This species is known from Fagus/Picea and Fagus/Abies forest up into the Picea or Abies zone and on to its upper edge and the Larix zone; clearings and tracksides. It also occurs in high-mountain grasslands. Adults fly low and settle on the foliage of low-growing plants in the sun; males hover at 2-3 m. The species visits flowers of Caltha and Ranunculus. The flight period is from April to June. The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018), and the host plant is unknown but may be rare.","The major threat for this species is intensive forest management across Europe, as well as the expansion of winter tourism in mountains leading to natural habitat destruction and habitat fragmentation. It also occurs in high mountain grasslands and so may also be impacted if there is intensive grazing.","There is no information on population size or trends of this species. It is not a common species. In 2020, 15 individuals were recorded at one sample site in France (S. Bot pers. comm. 2020). The population is considered severely fragmented because it is restricted to high mountains, which limit or prevent dispersal between subpopulations and would prevent recolonization should these be lost.",Unknown,"The range of this species includes Czechia (Vujić and Bartak, 2001), Germany (Schwarzwald), France (Massif Central, the Alps, the Jura), Switzerland (the Alps, the Jura), Italy (the Alps), Austria (the Alps), Spain (the Pyrenees), Slovenia, Croatia, Romania (Barkalov and Stahls 1997, Speight 2018), Bosnia and Herzegovina (Vujić 1996), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014) and the Caucasus (Speight, 2018). It has been reported to occur in Poland (Bankowska 1963), but this record is very old and cannot be checked, so it is not considered to occur in this country here.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large for Europe and the EU 27 but the area of occupancy is 144 km2 in Europe and 116 km2 in the EU 27.",This species is not traded or commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"In Germany this species is listed as Vulnerable (Ssymank et al. 2011). Some point localities of the species are within the boundaries of protected areas within the Natura 2000 network. Additional research on its biology and ecology is needed, as well as monitoring of population and habitat trends. Better grazing management is required, and management of expanding tourism in the area.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164165,149164163,Cheilosia impressa,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is a widespread and relatively frequently occurring species throughout its distributional range. The population trend is unknown, and although it may locally be impacted due to unsustainable forest management or other human activities, there are no major direct threats. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are above the thresholds for the threatened categories. Therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and EU27. More research is needed on its population trends and microhabitat requirements.

","This species favours open areas in deciduous forest, montane unimproved grassland and unimproved grassland up to above 2,000 m in the alpine zone. It is also known from fens. It is active in clearings, tracksides etc.; males hover at 2-5 metres. Flower visitation records are known from a wide range of white Apiaceae, Compositae, Cirsium, Eupatorium, Euphorbia, Filipendula, Geranium, Mentha, Prunus, Ranunculus and Rubus. The flight period is from May to July and August/September (with a peak in July), but the second generation may be limited or missing. The larva was described and figured by Schmid (1999), from larvae found feeding externally on the rootstock and underground stem-bases of Arctium. It very probably has alternative food plants since it may be abundant where no Arctium is present, for instance in alpine grassland. Stuke (2000) and Doczkal (2002) report egg-laying by this species on Eupatorium cannabinum and numbers of teneral specimens have been found drying their wings on large Rumex, in grazed alpine grassland where no other large herbs were present (Speight 2020).","

This species could potentially be subject to locally occurring anthropogenic activities in Europe, such as intensified land-use and intensive forest management including clearing, which could lead to habitat degradation.

",There is no information on population trends for this species in Europe and the EU 27.,Unknown,"This species is distributed in southern parts of Fennoscandia (Bartsch et al. 2009, Haarto and Kerppola 2007), south to the Pyrenees and north Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-Garcia 2017); and from Ireland east through all countries of central Europe (Speight 2020) to European parts of Russia, and across Siberia and the Russian Far East to the Pacific (Barkalov and Mutin 2018). It has also been recorded from Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,There are no known conservation actions for this species. Increased research and monitoring of its population as well as research on the microhabitats is needed.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164176,149164173,Cheilosia illustrata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread and abundant species, and its host plants occur abundantly in most of Europe. The population trend of this species is unknown, and although it may be locally impacted by unsustainable forest management or other human activities, there are no major direct threats. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. Therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and EU27.

","This species occurs in a wide range of habitats: deciduous forest and hedgerows, pasture and meadows, including montane pasture within sheltering woodland. Flower visits include a wide range of white Apiaceae, but very frequently on the flowers of Heracleum; it also visits Matricaria, Prunus, Rubus and Sambucus. The flight period ranges from May to September (Speight 2020). The larva and puparium were described and figured by Rotheray (1999), bred from Pastinaca sativa roots and also from the expanded rootstock of Heracleum (Rotheray 1999).","

Although this species has most probably suffered from general anthropogenic activities in Europe related to land use change (such as increased urbanization, forest management clearings, intensive agriculture), it has an overall stable distribution and has adapted to some modified habitats so it is currently considered unthreatened.

",This is a widely distributed common species in Europe. Its population trend is considered to be stable in Europe and the EU 27.,Stable,This species is widely distributed across the whole of Europe and outside of Europe is known to exist into western parts of Siberia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.,This species is not traded not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,There are no known conservation actions for this species. Continued monitoring of the population is recommended.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164186,149164184,Cheilosia iberica,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2021-02-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,

This species is endemic to the Iberian peninsula and exists in open Quercus forest. The population trend of this species is unknown but it has a known area of occupancy of 56 km2 and exists in up to five locations. There is inferred to be a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to a variety of anthropogenic pressures. It is consequently assessed as Endangered. Protection of sites and habitats as well as more sustainable management of habitat is needed. Research on its ecology and population status is urgently needed as well as monitoring of the population and habitat.

,"The preferred environment is open Quercus forest, from 600-1,200 m asl. Flowers visited include white umbellifers, Chaerophyllum, Doronicum, Halymium, Stellaria (Marcos-Garcia and Claussen 1989), Rosa canina, Ranunculus, Spiraea and Taraxacum (van Eck 2011, 2016). The flight period is April to May. The host plant and immature stages are unknown (Speight 2018).","This species occurs in habitats that have undergone anthropogenic pressure from intensified land-use as a result of tourism, land conversion and overgrazing and the risk of uncontrolled forest fires.","There is no information on population trends for this species. The type specimens from Spain were collected in the 1980s, while the records from Portugal are from 2010s. Only a few specimens have been collected so far.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to the Iberian peninsula, where it is distributed in both Spain and Portugal. It is known from the Cantabrian mountain chain and the western mountain ranges of the Spanish central mountains. All Portuguese records are from Serra de Gerês and Serra da Estrela (Marcos-Garcia and Claussen 1989, van Eck 2016). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large and the known area of occupancy is 56 km2. Based on the threats of land-use conversion, forest fires and overgrazing pressure, this species is considered to exist in up to five locations.",This species is not traded not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,There are no ongoing conservation actions for this species. Protection of sites and habitats as well as more sustainable management of habitat is needed. Research on its ecology and population status is urgently needed as well as monitoring of the population and habitat.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149164196,149164194,Cheilosia hypena,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is distributed in Portugal, Spain, France, Switzerland, Austria, Italy, Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia and can be found close to streams and pools in unimproved, montane and subalpine grassland. This species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27 despite a relatively restricted known area of occupancy (AOO) (European - 232 km2; EU 27 - 160 km2), because it is widespread, regularly recorded and known from numerous localities, and the threats are presently thought to be localized because most known localities lie within protected areas. While there is presumed to be a continuing decline in the quality and quantity of some of its habitats, due to unsustainable forestry and urban infrastructure development, it is found in a range of different habitat types (forest and grasslands), and across a range of elevations (400 m to 2,000 m asl).

","This species can be found close to streams and pools in unimproved, montane and subalpine grassland, from 400 m upward to above 2,000 m; at lower elevations in the vicinity of marshy seepages and streams in open areas or in forest e.g. Betula, Quercus, Pinus uncinata. Adults fly along stream edges and among taller ground vegetation and settle on the foliage of taller herb layer plants, particularly white umbellifers (Speight, 2020). Males hover at 1-2 m (Vujić 1996). They visit flowers of umbellifers, Mentha, Parnassia, Saxifraga and Sisymbrium (Speight 2020). The flight period is from the beginning of June to the end of August, plus March to May in the Balkans (Vujic 1996). The developmental stages and host plant are unknown.","The habitat of this species is threatened by unsustainable forestry practices (lack of tree diversity, clearance of forest) and infrastructure development, mostly due to tourism in the mountainous areas, and building of forestry roads.","There is no information about the population size or trends of this species in Europe or the EU 27. More than 250 specimens have been collected so far. The oldest record is from 1921 (from Croatia), and the most recent one is from 2019 (from Switzerland). In Serbia and the Pyrenees, it appears quite regularly in large subpopulations, hence locally it is not a rare species. It may be more widespread than currently known.",Unknown,"This species is distributed in Portugal, Spain, France, Switzerland, Austria, Italy, Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia (Speight 2020). The only record from Sicily is dubious. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in Europe and the EU 27 but the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 232 km2 in Europe and in the EU 27, 160 km2.",This species is not traded not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. Most of the point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. It is protected by law in Serbia. Additional research on its ecology and population status is needed. Monitoring of its population and habitat is required.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164207,149164204,Cheilosia himantopa,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is distributed in southern Sweden, Germany, France, the Alps and Apennines. This species occurs along streams and in open areas in humid Fagus forest and upwards through the Abies/Picea zone into unimproved, subalpine grassland. This species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and the EU 27, since the extent of occurrence (EOO), area of occupancy (AOO) and number of locations are above the thresholds for the threatened categories, but forest decline related to wet or flooded sites may cause noticeable declines in the quality of its habitat and this, along with the population trend should be closely monitored.

","This species occurs along streams and in open areas in humid Fagus forest and upwards through the Abies/Picea zone into unimproved, subalpine grassland (Speight 2018). The adults can be found from early April to June (to mid July at higher altitudes) (Smit et al. 2001). The larvae are phytophagous as most of its congeners, and was described by Dusek (1962) from Petasites under the name Cheilosia canicularis (Speight 2018). Stuke and Claussen (2000) reported Petasites albus, P. hybridus and P. kablikianus as host plants for C. himantopa. Females were observed ovipositing on the leaf bud of Petasites hybridus in late spring. Eggs were laid on structures such as dead leaves, twigs and non-host plants near Petasites hybridus with undeveloped leaf buds. Larvae move to the rhizome, which provides living plant tissue and an ideal place for the larvae to overwinter (Vujić and Šikoparija 2001).","Forest decline in wet or flooded sites has a negative impact on this species, causing noticeable decline in the quality of its habitat. Destruction of habitats with the host plant Petasites hybridus along rivers and streams as result of river bank management is the main threat in many countries.",There is no precise information on population trends for this species exist in Europe or the EU 27.,Stable,"This species is distributed in southern Sweden, Germany, France, the Alps (France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Italy) and Apennines (Italy) (Speight 2018) and in countries of the Balkan peninsula (Vujić and Šikoparija 2001). It has also been recorded in Poland (Klasa and Soszynski 2010), Slovakia (Mazánek and Bičík 2001), Czech Republic, the Netherlands, Belgium (Smit et al. 2001), Hungary and Bulgaria (Tóth 2011, 2014).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. Research is needed into its distribution, population status and threats is recommended, and site and habitat protection may be warranted due to its relatively specialized habitat requirements. Monitoring of the population and habitat is also needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164217,149164215,Cheilosia hercyniae,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-07-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This European endemic montane species has a wide distribution in central Europe and is not commonly encountered being mostly recorded in low numbers. It has a small area of occupancy (AOO) of only 120 km2 in Europe and of 96 km2 in the EU 27. It also has a decline in habitat quality and a severely fragmented population. This species is therefore assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) in Europe and the EU 27. Further research is needed into its biology, ecology and distribution.

","This species occurs in herb-rich open areas within Abies/Picea forest and upwards into calcareous, unimproved subalpine grassland to well above the tree line. Flowers visited include white umbellifers, Anemone ranunculoides, Caltha, Helianthemum, Ranunculus, Salix, Senecio and Tanacetum. Bartsch (2009) collected the species on Laserpitium latifolium. The flight period extends from the end of May to July, and on into August at higher altitudes. The host plant and immature stages are unknown (Speight 2018).","This species is experiencing habitat loss due to overgrazing by livestock in montane habitats, and habitat fragmentation due to land conversion and increased land-use (urbanization) are potential local threats to this species.","

The population of this species is considered to be severely fragmented because of its mountain-top subalpine habitats, which act as continental islands disabling communication between subpopulations, exacerbated by destruction of suitable habitat which remains in small patches. The species is not commonly encountered, and is mostly recorded in low numbers. Its population trend is unknown in Europe and the EU 27.

",Unknown,"This species has a wide distribution in central Europe. It has been recorded from Czechia (Mazánek 2009), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), France (Speight et al. 2018), Switzerland (L. Fisler pers. comm. 2020), Germany (A. Ssymank, pers. comm. 2020), Austria (Heimburg 2018), northern Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-Garcia 2017) and from the Balkan Peninsula from Montenegro (Vujic 1996) and Romania (Bradescu 1991). The northernmost record is from Uppland (Sweden), a report of two specimens in 2005, but there have been no subsequent records from Sweden, and its presence in the country is considered uncertain (SLU Artdatabanken 2020; https://artdatabanken.se). It has a large extent of occurrence (EOO) but a known area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe of only 120 km2 and of 96 km2 in the EU 27.",This species is not traded or commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. Population and habitat monitoring is needed, as well as further research on its population, ecology and threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164227,149164225,Cheilosia herculana,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-07-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This European endemic species is only known from the Carpathian mountains (Romania) and the Balkan peninsula. Its population trend is currently unknown. It is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27 due to its small area of occupancy (48 km2 in Europe and 8 km2 in the EU 27), severely fragmented population, and projected habitat degradation caused by increased urbanization and intensive forest management. Further research is needed into its ecology, including microhabitat preferences, and population trends.","This species occurs in open, rocky areas in humid Fagus forest, upwards to 2,000 m in the Balkans (Vujić 1996). Adults fly in open, rocky areas, settling on stones in the sun; males hover at 2-4 m (Vujić 1996). Flower visitation records are known from Alyssum and Ranunculus (Vujić 1996). The flight period is from the beginning June to end August. The host plant and immature stages are unknown (Speight 2020).","

The habitat of this species may be impacted intensified land use due to increased urbanization and intensive forest management including clearings. It is believed this is leading to loss in the quality of the habitat. Even in the protected areas that this species exists, inappropriate forest management and human activities constantly increase disturbance of the habitat.

","There is no information on population trends for this species for Europe or the EU 27. The population is considered to be severely fragmented as a result of a very fragmented habitat, leaving the subpopulations isolated.",Unknown,"This European endemic species is only known from the Carpathian Mountains (Romania) and the Balkan peninsula (Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia) (Bradescu 1982, Ståhls and Barkalov 2017; Vujić 1996, 2020). It has a large extent of occurrence in Europe but has an estimated area of occupancy of 48 km2 in Europe and only 8km2 in the EU 27. The EOO cannot be calculated for the EU 27 as it only exists in two localities.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"Some localities of this species are within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network in Romania, Durmitor National Park in Montenegro and Mavrovo National Park in Macedonia. Although these areas are protected, inappropriate forest management and human activities constantly increase disturbance of the habitat. Therefore, improved protection of key sites and habitats is recommended as well as increasing public awareness of this species. Further research into its ecology, including microhabitat preferences, and larval biology is needed, as well as monitoring of population and habitat trends. Further research on threats is also recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164237,149164235,Cheilosia grisella,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is fairly widely distributed in Europe and its population is considered stable. Whilst the area of occupancy (AOO) is within the threshold for the Endangered category, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and number of locations are above the thresholds for the threatened categories. However, unsustainable livestock grazing practices may locally impact this species. Currently, this species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27. Monitoring and research of its distribution, population status, habitat trends and ecology is recommended.

","This species prefers open ground, unimproved montane/subalpine grassland on calcareous and non-calcareous sites sometimes at lower altitudes. The adults can be found from June to July, August at higher altitudes. The developmental stages are unstudied (Speight 2018), but the larvae must be phytophagous like related species.","Montane and subalpine pastures tolerate moderate grazing, but inappropriate grazing practices cause declines in the quality of the habitat of this species. Climate change may impact in the future, but at the moment it does not seem to be a major threat because its elevational range is wide.","No precise information on population trends for this species exists in Europe or the EU 27. The population trend is considered stable, with individuals found in high numbers.",Stable,"This species is distributed in the Carpathians (""Silesia""), in the Alps (France, Germany, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Austria, northern Italy) (Speight 2018) and countries of the Balkan peninsula (Bosnia, Croatia, Montenegro, Serbia, North Macedonia, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Romania) (Vujić 1996). It has been recorded in Georgia (Mengual et al. 2020), but is unlikely to occur here in reality, and has not been found there recently. Its presence in Russia is doubtful (Barkalov and Mutin 2018). Therefore, this species is considered to be a European endemic.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in Europe and the EU 27 but the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 620 km2 in Europe and 364 km2 in the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation measures in place for this species. In Germany this species is assessed as Vulnerable (VU). Site protection and management of grazing in areas where it occurs is recommended. Monitoring and research of its distribution, population status, habitat trends and ecology is recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164247,149164245,Cheilosia griseifacies,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This typically low mountain species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) due to small area of occupancy (AOO), which is around 108 km2 in Europe and 20 km2 in EU 27, and a severely fragmented population. The main threats are deforestation and transformation of the native lowland forests into monoculture tree plantations (Populus spp.), causing a decline in the extent and quality of the habitat. It requires further monitoring and protection of areas and the habitat.

","

This is a typical species of the Pannonian Plain, some outcrops in the Balkans (Javor Mountain in Bosnia and Herzegovina) and some parts of the European low mountain ranges (in Germany). It is dependent on rivers, and is found at low elevations (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). It prefers deciduous forest and  Quercus/Fraxinus forest, including alluvial hardwood forest (Vujić 1994, 1996). Adults appear during the spring (April - May), flying among Salix branches and settling on large-leaved plants. Specimens were found on flowers of Euphorbia and leaves of Smyrnium perfoliatum (Šimić et al. 1994). The largest population density is recorded in the period April 20-May 10 (Vujić 1994, Speight 2018).

",

The main threats to this species are deforestation and transformation of the native lowland forests into monocultures of tree plantations (Populus sp.). The areas where it occurs in the Pannonian Plain are especially affected by this activity (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

,"

There is no information on population size or trends. There are more than 100 records for this species. Due to the geographic distribution of mountains in the regions between Hungary and Germany the German subpopulations are very isolated, with no possible exchange of individuals, and so the population is considered severely fragmented.

",Unknown,"

This species is endemic to Europe. Until recently its range has been uncertain due to confusion with Cheilosia canicularis, but so far it has been confirmed at low elevations in Germany, Hungary, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Serbia (Speight 2018). The latest specimen was found in 2019 in Serbia. In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 108 km2 and in the EU 27 around 20 km2. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 359,525 km2 in Europe and 165,033 km2 in the EU27. It is found between 75 m and 619 m above sea level.

",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

This species is strictly protected under Serbian legislation. Both site and habitat protection are needed, as well as further research on its taxonomy, ecology, population trends and threats. Some monitoring in Serbia has occurred, but more activities across its range are recommended.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164257,149164255,Cheilosia gagatea,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-07-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species occurs at low to high altitudes in the European Alps and on the Balkan peninsula, but in geographically restricted areas mostly in mountains, and thus the distributional area is severely fragmented. The species is not very common, but there is no evidence of decreasing populations. A decline in quality of habitat and area of occupancy (AOO) can be projected and the AOO is <500 km2 in both Europe and the EU 27. This species is therefore assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27.  Research is needed to determine whether the population is declining and to better understand the threats. Monitoring of the population and habitat is needed.

","This species is found on unimproved, calcareous montane and subalpine grassland to above 2,000 m in the Alps, and open areas within Fagus/Picea forest. Adults are found on tracksides, in clearings and in pastureland up to 2 m from the ground. Flower visitation records are known from white umbellifers and Ranunculus. The flight period is from May to July. The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2020).","The habitat of this species can be affected by localized anthropogenic impacts in Europe, such as intensified land-use due to increased urbanization and intensive forest management including clearing, which could lead to habitat degradation.","There is no information on population trends for this species for Europe and the EU 27. It is not very common, but there is no evidence of a decreasing population currently. The species is considered severely fragmented in Europe.",Unknown,"This species is distributed in central Europe, in Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Slovakia (Maznáek 2009), France (Speight et al. 2020), Switzerland (CSCF 2019), Austria (Heimburg 2018), northern Italy (Sommaggio 2010), the Balkan countries  of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia and Slovenia (Vujić 1996), Bulgaria (Toth 2014) and Romania (Stanescu and Parvu 2005); it has also been recorded from northern Spain (Cordillera Cantabrica) (Ricarte and Marcos-Garcia 2017).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large for Europe and the EU 27 but the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 316 km2 in Europe and 160 km2 in the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,There are no known conservation actions for this species but the species would benefit from habitat and site protection. Research is needed to determine whether the population is declining and to better understand the threats. Monitoring of the population and habitat is needed.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164268,149164265,Cheilosia fraterna,Least Concern,,2021,2020-07-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in most parts of Europe. This species is found along streams and rivers with marginal tall-herb communities, in open forest. The population trend is currently unknown but the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and in the EU27. Research on the population and monitoring of the population and habitat is recommended.","This species is found along streams and rivers with marginal tall-herb communities, in open forest (acidiphilous Quercus, humid Fagus). Adults are observed in clearings and tracksides, usually along streams or rivers. Flower visitation records are known from Caltha, Ranunculus, Stellaria and Taraxacum. The flight period extends from April to June and at higher elevations July to August/September. The larva was described and figured by Rotheray (1988): it mines stems and basal rosettes of Cirsium palustre; other species of Carduus and Cirsium are also cited as larval foodplants by Reemer et al. (2009). It overwinters as a puparium (Speight 2020).","The habitat of this species can be impacted by anthropogenic activities such as intensified land-use due to increased urbanization, forest management and clearing, wetland drainage, and intensive agriculture, the species has an overall stable population throughout its range.",There is no information on population trends for this species for Europe or the EU 27.,Unknown,"This species is distributed from Fennoscandia south to the Pyrenees (where it is montane in southern parts of its range), and from Britain eastwards through central and eastern Europe into European parts of Russia and on into Siberia (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species. In light of the current distribution and population size, such actions are presently not required. Research on the population and monitoring of the population and habitat is recommended.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164278,149164276,Cheilosia flavissima,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

In Europe this species is mainly confined to boreal forests in Fennoscandia (the taiga belt) and northwest European Russia, with a few records in the Moscow region and in Poland. Its immature stages are highly likely to develop in fungi (Boletaceae) as in the other members of the subgenus, but host fungus and immature stages remain unknown. The population trend is unknown, and although it may locally be threatened due to unsustainable forest management or other human activities, there are no major direct threats. The extent of occurrence and area of occupancy are above the thresholds for the threatened categories. Therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and EU27. More research is needed to clarify its ecology, population trends and microhabitat requirements.

","This species is known from conifer forest and mixed boreal forest, where the flies are commonly encountered along roadsides and in open areas in forests. The larvae of the other members of the Cheilosia longula species group to which C. flavissima belongs are fungus-feeders in Leccinum spp. and Boletus spp. (and other Boletaceae), therefore fungus-feeding is the most likely larval feeding mode also for this species, The host fungus and immature stages are not known, but the host is presumably a species of Boletaceae. Flower visitation records are known from Solidago virgaurea (Bartsch et al. 2009) and Sorbaria sorbifolia. The flight period is from June to August (Claussen and Ståhls 2007, Speight 2020).","This species is subject to anthropogenic activities in Europe, which include intensified land use due to increased urbanization and intensive forest management, including forest clearing, which could result in habitat degradation. Climate change has potentially profound implications for this high-latitude species' habitats as it can be expected to lead to significant changes in the coming century. In northern Fennoscandia the predictions are for increased precipitation and higher temperatures in the boreal zone which could be favourable for the abundance of terrestrial fungi (including the potential host fungi, Boletaceae). Additional research on its biology and ecology is needed.",There is no information on population trends for this species in Europe and the EU 27.,Unknown,"This species is distributed in the northern Palaearctic, and in Europe is known from Norway (Nielsen and Svendsen 2014), Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009), Finland (Haarto and Kerppola 2007), and one locality in Poland (Mielzcarek 2009). The distribution includes European Russia, and extends to Siberia and further to the Pacific (including Sakhalin and Kuril Island) and Japan (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Georgia (Mengual et al. 2020) and Mongolia (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. Research is needed into its population status, ecology and the impacts of threats. Monitoring of the population and habitat is also needed. This species is classified as Near Threatened in the Norwegian Red List (Henriksen and Hilmo 2015), but is assessed as Least Concern in the Finnish Red List (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) and the Swedish Red List (SLU Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164288,149164286,Cheilosia faucis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-07-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This montane species exists in Picea forest and upwards into open areas within Alnus viridis thickets and unimproved, subalpine grassland species. It is not commonly encountered, but no information exist on population trends. It is considered to have a severely fragmented population, an area of occupancy (AOO) of less than 500 km2 in Europe and the EU 27. Furthermore, there is continuing destruction of this species' habitats by human activities such as urbanization and intensive forest management. This species is therefore assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27. Further research on its ecology, potential threats and population and habitat trends is needed.","This species is known from open areas in montane Picea forest (Vujic 1996) and upwards into open areas within Alnus viridis thickets and unimproved, subalpine grassland to 2,000 m in the Alps. Adults are found within forest in the montane zone beside streams in open areas, flying up to several metres from the ground around willow and other trees; males hover in small open areas and settle on foliage of large-leaved shrubs, such as Alnus viridis. Flower visitation records are known from Ranunculus and male Salix. The flight period is in May and June. The host plant and immature stages are unknown (Speight 2020).","The habitat of this species can be affected by locally occurring anthropogenic activities in Europe, such as intensive land-use caused by increased urbanization and intensive forest management including clearings, which could lead to habitat degradation.","It is not commonly encountered, but no information exist on population trends in Europe or the EU 27. This high mountain species is considered severely fragmented as the small subpopulations are unlikely to be able to interact between montane localities.",Unknown,"The distributional range of this species is still somewhat unclear due to confusion with the closely related species Cheilosia nivalis however this is not expected to significantly affect its area of occupancy (AOO). It is confirmed from the Pyrenees (France, Spain) (Ricarte and Marcos-Garcia 2017, Speight 2018), Massif Central and Jura (France, Switzerland) (Speight 2018), Alps (France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Italy) (Barkalov and Ståhls 1997), the Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Dinaric mountains (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Slovenia) (Barkalov and Ståhls 1997, Steenis et al. 2013, Vujic 1996), Carpathians (Romania) and Bulgaria (Ståhls and van der Ent unpubl. data).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large for both Europe and the EU 27. The AOO is 120 km2 in Europe and 96 km2 in the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions for this species. Sustainable forest management which preserves and promotes the habitat of this species would be beneficial as well as protection of important sites. Its distributional range is partly within the boundaries of protected areas categorized by the Natura 2000 network and Durmitor National Park in Montenegro. Further research on its ecology and potential threats is needed, as well as monitoring of population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164298,149164296,Cheilosia derasa,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species may be locally threatened due to habitat degradation caused by grazing livestock. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trends is needed. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27, therefore, the present status of this species is considered to be Least Concern. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trends is needed as well as population monitoring.","The preferred habitat of this species is stream margins with Petasites, toward the upper limit of Abies/Picea forest and montane/subalpine, unimproved, calcareous and non-calcareous grassland and grassy clearings with Adenostyles or Petasites. Adults visit flowers of Ranunculus and white umbellifers, and commonly rests on leaves of Petasites. The immature stages are unknown but are suspected to be in Petasites (Doczkal 1996). The flight period from end of May to July.","Habitat loss due to overgrazing by livestock in montane habitats, and habitat fragmentation due to land conversion and increased land use (urbanization), are potential local threats to this species.",There is no information on population trends for this species in Europe or the EU 27.
,Unknown,"This species is widespread in central and southern Europe, to which it is endemic, but the distribution within this area is highly fragmented. It occurs in mountain regions at mid to high altitude in the Alps, Pyrenees and mountain ranges in the Apennine and Balkan peninsulas.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation measures known for this species. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trends is needed as well as population monitoring.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164311,149164309,Cheilosia cynocephala,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a very widespread species in Europe. The preferred habitat type is commonly available, and the larval host plants are common, but the species is seldom encountered in large numbers. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27, therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern.","The preferred environment is open ground near rivers, streams or flushes in unimproved grassland, usually on calcareous soils, including unimproved montane pasture. Flower visitation records are known from white umbellifers, Calluna vulgaris, Cirsium arvense, Parnassia palustris, Pulicaria, Ranunculus, Salix repens, Saxifraga azoides, Scabiosa, Senecio and Sonchus. The flight period is from July to October, with peaks in July and September. The larva was described by Dušek and Láska (1962), mining the stems of Carduus nutans. The larva also develops in stems of Carduus crispus, Cirsium palustre and C. vulgare (Bartsch et al. 2009).","The preferred habitat types are widespread, but potential local threats could exist from anthropogenic activities in Europe such as intensified land-use from increased urbanization, intensive forest management, or wetland drainage leading to habitat destruction.","There is no information on population trends for Europe and the EU 27, but the species is rarely found in large numbers.",Unknown,This European species ranges from Fennoscandia south to central France; central and southern Britain eastwards through central Europe and on into central Russia; and southwards into mountainous parts of northern Italy and the Balkan peninsula.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.,This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. Research on the threats, population and monitoring of the population and habitat is needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164321,149164319,Cheilosia cumanica,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 assessment: Endangered (EN)

Cheilosia cumanica is assessed as Least Concern at the European regional level despite its relatively restricted known area of occupancy (148 km2) and the continuing decline in the quality and quantity of its habitat from unsustainable forestry and agricultural intensification, because of its large extent of occurrence (192,214 km2) and number of locations above the threshold (17).

At the EU 27 level it is assessed as Endangered due to the very restricted known area of occupancy (16 km2), extent of occurrence (4,696 km2) and number of locations within the threshold (3) in the only EU 27 range state, Romania. The above-mentioned threats to the habitat of the species are also present on the EU27 level.

","The preferred habitat of this species is deciduous forest, occurring in herb-rich open areas in thermophilous Quercus forest (Q. cerris/Q. pubescens) (Speight 2020). Adults fly low and settle on foliage of bushes and Smyrnium perfoliatum (Vujić 1996) and on foliage of trees such as Tilia, up to 2 m from the ground (A. Vujic pers. comm. 2020). Males hover at up to 3 m (A. Vujic pers. comm. 2020). Flower visitation records are known from Smyrnium perfoliatum and white Apiaceae (Vujić 1996). The flight period is from March to August (Vujić 1996). Developmental stages and host plant are unknown.","Threats to the habitat of this species include unsustainable forestry practices, which include disturbance of forest herb diversity from a high density of trees or forest clearing, resulting in too dry or otherwise disturbed habitats; and also land-use change such as conversion of forest to agricultural land or urbanization. Habitat decline can be projected in the very localized areas where this species occurs, as pressure from forestry is increasing.","There is no information about population sizes or trends. More than 200 specimens have been collected so far. Most of the records date from the 1980s and 1990s, with the most recent from Montenegro and Serbia, taken in 2017. Records over the last ten years have decreased in Serbia, suggesting a decline, but the reasons behind this are unknown. Although the overall current population trend is unknown it is suspected that there is a decline, at least in parts of the distribution (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). It is declining in Serbia, where the majority of occurrences derive (but still less than 50%). Its occurrences in this country are in lowland areas which are not connected, with large areas of agriculture and urbanization between them, thus Serbian subpopulations are considered severely fragmented.",Unknown,"This species is distributed in Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Romania (Speight 2020), and Russian Transcaucasia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018). Outside Europe it is found in Iran (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in Europe and the EU 27 but the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 148 km2 in Europe and 16 km2.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. Some of the point localities occur within National Parks; two point localities are within Natura 2000 network in Romania. Additional research on its ecology and population trend is needed. Monitoring is required to clarify whether declines have genuinely taken place, and if so, their extent, scale and causes.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164331,149164329,Cheilosia crassiseta,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-06-21 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is encountered at low to high elevations in most of the European Alps. Its occurrence is restricted to geographically small areas in several countries in Europe, and the distributional area is considered severely fragmented. It is not very common, but no evidence of population decline currently exists. Its habitat is projected to be in decline (both in quality and extent) as a result of grazing livestock. The area of occupancy (AOO) is less than 500 km² in both Europe and the EU 27, therefore this species is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27. This species requires further research on its habitat and ecology, threats, population and monitoring of its population and habitat.

","The habitat of this species is open ground: unimproved, non-calcareous grassland, from within the upper part of the Abies/Picea zone upwards into alpine grassland to 2,500 m. There are no data on flower visits by adult flies. The flight period is June, and July at higher altitudes. The host-plant and immature stages are unknown (Speight 2018).",This species may be threatened due to habitat degradation caused by grazing livestock.,There is no information on population trends of this species in Europe or the EU 27. This high mountain species is considered to have a severely fragmented population.,Unknown,"This species is endemic to central and south-east European mountain regions. It has a severely fragmented distribution in low to high mountain areas in Poland (Mielczarek 2009), the Alps (France, Switzerland, Austria, Italy) (Speight 2018; Heimburg 2018), Slovakia (Mazanek 2009), Slovenia and the Balkans (Montenegro) (Vujic 1996, van Steenis et al. 2015). It has a large extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 but the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 200 km2 in Europe and is 148 km2 in the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species but more sustainable grazing practices may benefit this species. This species requires research on its habitat and ecology, threats, population and monitoring of its population and habitat.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164341,149164339,Cheilosia clausseni,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Cheilosia clausseni is assessed as Endangered because of its small area of occupancy (20 km2) and low number of locations (5). Additionally, the population is considered to be severely fragmented. Potential threats exist from degradation of the quality and extent of habitat, and habitat fragmentation due to unsustainable farming (grazing livestock) and possibly negative impacts of increased tourism at high elevation areas. Although information is insufficient to infer the likely extent of these impacts, a precautionary approach is warranted due to its scarcity and evidence of increased pressure on alpine meadows from grazing of sheep. This is a high-montane species only occurring in central Europe, perhaps specialized on a high-elevation host plant which could be at particular risk as a result of climate change. Additional research into its ecology, distribution and population trends is extremely urgently needed.","This species is known from sparsely vegetated, rocky, open ground in the subalpine zone, at high altitudes from 1,900 - 2,400 m. There are no data on the flowers visited by adults. The flight period is from the end of June to the end of August. The host plant and developmental stages are unknown (Barkalov and Ståhls 1997, Speight 2018), but the host plant may well be a high-elevation species.","Potential threats include habitat destruction due to intensive grazing of alpine meadows by cows or sheep, which seems to have become more common also in high-elevation alpine meadows (IUCN Hoverfly Specialist Group pers. comm. 2020). Habitat destruction due to increased tourism is a potential threat. The impact of climate change at high elevations may lead to unfavourable conditions for the host plant, or unsuitable habitat for the adult flies, and so could constitute a high risk because the species is known from very few localities.","Only six specimens of this species are known in total. It was described in 1997 (Barkalov and Ståhls 1997), and is still only known from very few localities at high-alpine elevations (1,900 – 2,500 m asl.). A specimen from France collected in 2009 is the most recent record; all five previous specimens are from the 1990s. No population information is available. There have been no targeted surveys to find it, but there are a lot of collections from the Alps and yet this species has not often been found in general surveys. It seems therefore to be genuinely rare, and although perhaps more widespread, current data suggest that it is localized to certain parts of the Alps. The current population trend is unknown.

This species is considered to occur as a severely fragmented population because the subpopulations appear to be small and isolated, and should they go extinct there will be a reduced probability of recolonization. It may however be more widespread than currently known.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to the Alps, where it has been recorded from Italy, Austria and France (Barkalov and Ståhls 1997). It has a known area of occupancy (AOO) of 20 km2.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation measures in place for this species. The species has been found in the Reserve naturelle de Sixt-Passy (France). Additional research on its ecology, habitat, distribution and population size, and into threats is urgently needed. Monitoring of the habitat is also recommended. Further information on the host plant of this species would be beneficial, but is likely to be very difficult to identify directly in the field.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164351,149164349,Cheilosia clama,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-05-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) because of its relatively small area of occupancy (European - 68 km2; EU 27 - 40 km2), due to unsustainable forestry practices and its severely fragmented population. Potential threats include degradation of habitat quality, mostly due to unsustainable forestry and infrastructure development. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trends is needed.

","This species can be easy to overlook due to its early flight period. It prefers humid, open grassy areas in Fagus/Picea forest upwards through the Picea zone and on into Pinus cembra forest and the Larix zone (Speight 2020). It can be found in grassy clearings and tracksides, usually close to streams (Vujić 1996); females fly low and fast, with a rapid, zigzag flight, settling on leaves of low-growing plants (e.g., Caltha) in the sun (Speight 2020). Adults visit flowers of Caltha, Salix, Taraxacum and Tussilago. It is an early spring species, with a flight period from the beginning of May to June. The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown (Speight 2020).","The habitat of this species is threatened by unsustainable forestry practices (clearing of forests, low diversity of planted forest, lack of unmanaged areas) and infrastructure development, including roads built for forestry.","There are no data on the population size or trends of this species and its trend is considered unknown for Europe and the EU 27. So far about 30 specimens have been collected, most from the 1980s and 1990s. Its population is considered severely fragmented as it is found in small numbers and its localities are isolated with large distances between them. In the northern parts of its range it does not occur in high mountains.",Unknown,"The range of this species is uncertain due to confusion with other species until recently, but it has been confirmed from mainland France, Germany, Switzerland, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina (Speight 2020), Belgium (one record, male), and the Czech Republic.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) are large for Europe and the EU 27 but the area of occupancy (AOO) for Europe is only 68 km2 and 40 km2 in the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions in place for this species. Some of the point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. Additional research on its ecology, the impacts of threats, and population trends is needed, and clarification of its range. Habitat monitoring is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164362,149164359,Cheilosia chrysocoma,Least Concern,,2021,2020-08-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in most parts of Europe. It is not commonly collected as it is an early spring species, but there is no evidence of decreasing populations so far. Its preferred habitat is widespread, but may be threatened locally from forest management or other human activities. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. Therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27.","This species is known from Alnus-Salix woodland, fen carr and alluvial softwood forest. Adults are found along tracks and glades, on low-growing vegetation in the sun. Flower visitation records are known from Caltha, Crataegus, Narcissus, Prunus, Ranunculus and Salix, including S. viminalis. The flight period is from April to June. The larva is undescribed, but the adult female has repeatedly been observed (Doczkal 1996) egg-laying on Angelica sylvestris, providing strong evidence that this is a larval host plant (Speight 2020). The larva was reared from the root of Cnidium spp. (Apiaceae) by Bagachanova (1990).","The preferred habitat types are widespread, but potential local threats could exist from anthropogenic activities in Europe, such as intensified land-use due to increased urbanization, intensive forest management, or wetland drainage leading to habitat destruction.",There is no population information for this species in Europe or the EU 27.,Unknown,"The distributional range of this species extends from Scandinavia south to northern Spain, Portugal, Italy, Bulgaria and the Balkan peninsula; Ireland eastwards through central Europe to European parts of Russia and on into Siberia and Georgia (Speight 2020, Mengual et al. 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,There are no known conservation actions for this species. Research and monitoring on the population of this species is needed.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164372,149164370,Cheilosia carbonaria,Least Concern,,2021,2020-07-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread throughout Europe, except in some parts of western Europe and the Mediterranean region. In Scandinavia the species is rather rare, but is more frequently recorded in Denmark. In northern Europe it occurs in lowland areas, while in central Europe and the Balkans it also occurs in mountain regions (Alps, Dinaric and Rhodope mountains). Typically it is not abundant, but so far there is no evidence of decreasing populations. It is assessed as Least Concern because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.","This species occurs near flushes, springs and seasonal streams in pasture and herb-rich meadows, and scrub woodland on well-drained and usually calcareous soils, from alluvial hardwood forests up to within the Fagus/Picea forest zone. Adults are found along the edges of woodland clearings, tracks and field hedges usually close to a river or stream; they fly low and rather fast. Flower visitation records are known from white umbellifers, yellow composites, Allium ursinum, Caltha, Cirsium, Myosotis, Leontodon, Pulicaria, Ranunculus and Tripleurospermum. The flight period is from May to June and July to September. the larval host plant and developmental stages remain unknown (Speight 2018).","

The preferred habitat types are widespread, but potential local threats could exist from anthropogenic activities in Europe, including intensified land-use due to increased urbanization, intensive forest management, or wetland drainage leading to habitat destruction.

","There is no information on population trends for this species. In Scandinavia it is rather rare, but is more frequently recorded in Denmark.",Unknown,"This species is widespread throughout Europe, except in some parts of western Europe and the Mediterranean region. It is distributed in all Scandinavia, extending south to the Pyrenees; and from southern England eastwards including most of central Europe and all of the Balkan peninsula into European parts of Russia and further into Siberia and Kazakstan (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Muitn 2018).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,There are no known conservation actions for this species. Monitoring and research of the population and trends is needed.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164383,149164380,Cheilosia canicularis,Least Concern,,2021,2021-07-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a very widespread European species with a stable population trend. The host plant typically grows in large communities and is distributed throughout Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. Therefore the present status of this species is considered to be Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27.

,"Its preferred environments are humid deciduous and coniferous forests and along streams in open areas, where the adults settle on Petasites spp. and other streamside vegetation. The flight period is from the end of June to September, and it has two generations per year in most of its distributional area. Flowers visited include umbellifers, yellow composites, Petasites hybridus, Cirsium arvense, C. palustre, Hieracium spp., Senecio, Taraxacum and Ranunculus (Speight 2018, Vujic 1996). The larva is scored in Stuke (2000) and has been reared from Petasites hybridus (Stuke and Claussen 2000).",There are no known threats to this species.,"This species is widespread and abundant in most parts of Europe and the EU 27, except in the northern parts and some western parts of its distribution. No precise information on population trends exists but it is considered stable.",Stable,"This species ranges from the southernmost regions of Denmark and Sweden, most of central and southern Europe, most parts of the Balkan Peninsula, Ukraine, Turkey, and European parts of Russia. Outside of Europe it can be found across Russia to western Siberia, the Russian Far East and the Caucasus (Georgia) (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Mengual et al. 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"No known conservation actions are in place for this species. In light of its current wide distribution and apparently large population size, such actions are not presently required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164394,149164391,Cheilosia caerulescens,Least Concern,,2021,2020-07-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in Europe, and during last 10-15 years has spread northwards in Europe. Reemer et al. (2009) reported a strong increase in its relative abundance in the Netherlands between 1988 and 2000. The host plants, Houseleeks (Sempervivum spp.), are common garden plants. In light of the current horticultural trade, this species is expected to spread further in the future. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. Based on the known information on its wide distribution, often high abundance and host-plant association with a common species, the species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27.","

The natural habitat of this species is rocky unimproved calcareous and non-calcareous subalpine grassland and heath to above 2,000 m (Speight 2018). The larva is a leaf-miner of Houseleeks (Sempervivum spp.) (d'Aguilar and Coutin 1988). It is bivoltine and has spread rapidly north and west across Europe in recent decades, mainly utilizing Sempervivum tectorum growing in gardens. The host plants are alpine in their natural habitat, but have been cultivated for a very long time, growing on roofs and walls and often planted in rock gardens and, more recently, as patio plants. The hoverfly has spread north and west across Europe and its arrival in Britain has been expected. It was first found in the Netherlands in 1986, but by 2005 it was reported to be widespread and common in urban gardens in Leiden (Reemer et al. 2009). The recent British records are definitely from suburban gardens, including specimens bred from Sempervivum imported to Britain from horticultural suppliers in the Netherlands (Collins and Halstead 2008, Speight 2018). Judging by the experience in Belgium and the Netherlands, it can be expected to spread rapidly and become widespread in urban gardens in the UK (Ball and Morris 2014).

","Potential threats to the high-mountain areas in the Alps and mountain regions in the Balkans, the original native range of this species, include intensive livestock grazing of alpine meadows. There may potentially be negative impacts of climate change at high elevations, but this species has naturally expanded its range outside this region following the wide cultivation of its host plants.",Reemer et al. (2009) reported a strong increase in the relative abundance of C. caerulescens in the Netherlands between 1988 and 2000. There is no other population information for this species in Europe or the EU 27.,Unknown,"This species is distributed from Britain (Ball et al. 2014) and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) south to the Pyrenees, occurring in France (Speight 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Italy (CSCF 2020) and Austria (Heimburg 2018) eastwards through central Europe as far as but not reaching European parts of Russia (Mutin and Barkalov 2018) and southeast to the Balkans (Montenegro, Bulgaria) and Romania (Bradescu 1991). It was added to the British list in 2006 (Iliff 2020) and recent records from this island are definitely from suburban gardens, including specimens bred from Sempervivum imported to Britain from horticultural suppliers in the Netherlands (Collins and Halstead 2008). Iliff (2020) stated that the species is now well established in southeastern England, and is gradually expanding its range northwards and westwards. It is included in The Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species - Britain and Northern Ireland (GRIIS; http://www.griis.org).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,There are no ongoing conservation actions for this species. Research and monitoring is needed on population trends.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164404,149164402,Cheilosia brunnipennis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in central and southern parts of Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. The preferred habitat types are widespread, but it may locally be threatened due to forest management or other human land-use activities. The present status of this species is considered to be Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27.","This species occurs along streams in thermophilous Quercus forest (Vujic 1996) and in Mediterranean shrub communities (garrigue and maquis). The flight period is from February to mid May. Males hover over Prunus shrubs in flower, at 2-3 m; both sexes have a rapid, darting flight more reminiscent of Syritta than a Cheilosia species. Flowers visited include Petasites, Salix (Vujic 1996), Euphorbia spp., Prunus mahaleb, P.spinosa, Pyrus spinosa and Viburnum tinus (Speight 2018).","

This species could potentially be subject to localized anthropogenic activities in Europe, such as intensified land-use due to increased urbanization, and intensive forest management including clearing which could lead to habitat degradation.

",There is no information on population trends for Europe or the EU 27.,Unknown,"This species is widely distributed in the Mediterranean and adjacent regions, where it is known from southern France, northern Italy, the Balkans (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia), Romania, southern Russia. Outside of Europe, this species exists in northern Caucasus (Georgia), Ukraine, Israel and North Africa (Morocco) (Speight 2018).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27 but cannot be accurately calculated as the distribution of this species is based on country checklists rather than exact locality data.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species, and none are presently required. Research and monitoring is needed on population trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164414,149164412,Cheilosia bracusi,Least Concern,,2021,2020-07-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern because of its relatively large extent of occurrence and area of occupancy in Europe and the EU 27. It is considered unthreatened across Europe (Speight et al. 2020), although classified as Critically Endangered in the Red Lists of Baden-Württemberg (Germany) and in the German Red List. Potential threats are degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to human activities such as unsustainable forestry and agriculture, because it can be found in forests and in grasslands. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trend is needed.

","This species is known from open areas along streams, in humid Fagus forest upwards into unimproved, subalpine grassland, both calcareous and non-calcareous. The flight period is from the end of April to July. Flower visitation records are known from Apiaceae, Asteraceae, Brassicaceae, Doronicum austriacum, Ranunculus and Trollius. The immature stages are unknown (Speight 2018). In the Balkan peninsula the species occurs in mountain regions above 500 m altitude (Vujić 1996).","The preferred habitats are widespread within its range, but this species may locally be threatened due to forest management or other human activities such as agriculture.","This species is not commonly encountered, but there is no information on population trends.",Unknown,"Cheilosia bracusi is confined to mountain ranges in central and southern Europe: the Pyrenees, Jura, Alps and Apennines, and mountain regions on the Balkan peninsula. Its distributional range includes Portugal (van Eck 2016), France (Speight et al. 2018), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-Garcia 2017), Switzerland (L. Fisler pers. comm. 2020), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Austria (Heimburg 2018), Italy (Sommaggio 2010), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Bosnia, Croatia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Greece and Slovenia (Vujić 1996). Outside of Europe, this species is found in at least Georgia (Mengual et al. 2020).",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. It is considered unthreatened across Europe (Speight et al. 2020), although it is classified as Critically Endangered in the Red List of Baden-Württemberg (Germany), and as Critically Endangered in the German Red List. Future monitoring is needed, as well as research on its ecology and potential threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164424,149164422,Cheilosia bergenstammi,Least Concern,,2021,2020-08-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is assessed as Least Concern because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. It has been recorded throughout Europe except in some parts in Fennoscandia. The population trend is unknown in Europe and the EU 27. Future monitoring is needed, as well as research on its ecology and potential threats.","This species is found in open, grassy areas in coniferous and deciduous forest, up to the upper altitudinal limit of Picea, eutrophic dune grassland, unimproved alpine pasture and also sheep pasture in parts of Europe with a moist climate (Speight 2018). The larva is an internal feeder in stems of Senecio, especially S. jacobaea, but probably also in other species, e.g. S. palustris, S. erucifolia. The larva is described and figured by Smith (1979). It has two generations per year in central Europe. The flight periods are from April to June and from the middle of July to September (Speight 2018).","This species is not subject to major threats but is likely to be impacted to some degree by the loss of habitat due to destruction of humid forests across Europe, mainly caused by unsustainable forestry.","This species is rarely collected in Fennoscandia, but is regarded as fairly common in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). No information on population trends exist for Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,"Cheilosia bergenstammi is widespread in most parts of Europe, and occurs in southern Scandinavia (Norway, Sweden) (Bartsch 2009), France (Speight et al. 2018), northern Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Ireland (Speight et al. 2018), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Czech Republic and Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Balkans (Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia) (Vujic, 1996), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Hungary (Tóth 2001), Italy (Stoch 2003), Switzerland (CSCF 2019) and Ukraine (Prokhorov et al. 2020), and outside Europe in southern European parts of Russia and Transcaucasia (Georgia) (Barkalov and Mutin 2018; Mengual et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. Future monitoring is needed, as well as research on its ecology and potential threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164434,149164432,Cheilosia beckeri,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-08-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This EU 27 endemic species is assessed as Endangered because of its small area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) and low number of locations (3). Fewer than 20 specimens are known from three localities, two of which within protected areas. Potential threats are a projected degradation of habitat quality, mostly due to tourism and unsustainable livestock farming in alpine environments, and (as this is a high-mountain species) including negative impacts of climate change on host-plant viability. Further research into its ecology, distribution threats and population trend is extremely urgently needed.","This species is known from open ground in the high-alpine zone. In 2018, D. Doczkal found 2 males and 8 females in two malaise traps on the highest mountain in the German part of the Alps, the Zugspitze. All specimens were found solely in the highest traps, at 2,455 m and 2,500 m asl, in traps placed in a high alpine landscape with extremely sparse vegetation (e.g. Thlaspi rotundifolium). No specimens were found in the malaise traps placed lower down.","

Habitat loss and degradation of habitat quality are the major ongoing threats to high-elevation alpine biodiversity, due to increased tourism and associated activities, and unsustainable livestock farming in alpine environments. The impacts of climate change at high elevations may result in unfavourable conditions for this species or its host plant.

","There is no information on population trends, and fewer than 20 specimens known in total. No new specimens have been recorded in Austria where the type was collected in 1910 but there has not been any recent surveys in this locality. It has been collected in Germany as recently as 2018/9, one female was caught in 2019 in the Berchtesgaden National park (altitude 1,984 m) in Germany. These are the only verified records known since the species was described.",Unknown,This species is only known from high alpine localities (Hochalpen) in the southernmost German Alps and from the type locality Admont (Austria). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 947 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 12 km2.,This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. The localities where the newly collected specimens from Germany occur are within National Parks or protected areas. Further research and monitoring is recommended into its distribution, population size, ecology and threats.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164444,149164442,Cheilosia barbafacies,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-08-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

In Europe, this endemic species is assessed as Endangered because of its very small area of occupancy (24 km2), and extent of occurrence (136 km2). The known subpopulations occur within National Parks, but recent activities such as road development and avalanches have increased its extinction risk. The main threat is habitat loss due to changes in land-use and deforestation on high Balkan mountains in two locations, leading to both an ongoing and projected decline in the extent and quality of its habitat. As this species is not known to exist in the EU 27, it is assessed as Not Applicable for this region.","This species occurs in deciduous forest. It was found only in primary forest near deep gorges of high mountains, a very localized habitat. The flight period is May to July (Vujić et al. 2013). The immature stages and host plant are unknown, but it is assumed to be phytophagous like its congeners.","Vujic et al. (2013) state that this species occurs in an area within the Dinaric mountains rich in endemic insects and a plant diversity hotspot. Most known records are in the Durmitor National Park in Montenegro, in a relatively small area. The main threat is habitat loss due to changes in land-use and deforestation on high Balkan mountains in two locations. Recently stochastic events, such as avalanches, have increased in frequency as a result of climate change, which may impact springtime occurrence and development. This has destroyed parts of the forest, and although the species was still found to be present, this threat might impact it again in the future. There is a road being built close to this area, and there may be future forestry plans.","There is no information about population trends. Cheilosia barbafacies is only known from the type material (15 specimens) collected in the 1990s and one additional specimen from 2009 (Steenis et al. 2015). No additional records of C. barbafacies from either the field or private/public collections have been published, but it was seen in 2018 (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). Most specimens have been collected in the Durmitor National Park, but the area is not regularly surveyed.",Unknown,"This is a Balkan endemic, only known from two Dinaric mountains in the central part of the Balkan peninsula: the Durmitor (Montenegro) and Jahorina (Bosnia-Herzegovina) mountains (Vujić et al. 2013). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 136 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 24 km2.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

This species can be difficult to distinguish from several closely related species, so collected material should be checked because this species was only recently described and is not well known. Further investigation on its biology and ecology is needed. More monitoring of population and habitat trends is required. The species would benefit from education and awareness raising activities.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164454,149164452,Cheilosia balkana,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-01-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Cheilosia balkana has a small AOO (76 km2) in Europe and 24 km2 in EU27, an EOO of around 72,029 km2 in Europe and 4,607 km2 in the EU27, and is found at nine locations in Europe and 4-5 in EU27 considering tourism and overgrazing as the main threats. Its population is severely fragmented, with tourism affecting all localities where this species occurs, and there is a projected continued loss of habitat quality. Taking into account this threat, as well as the threats of climate change and overgrazing, this mid-altitude mountain species is assessed as Endangered (EN).

","

This species is known from open areas within humid Fagus forest and, at higher elevations, into subalpine grassland to 2,000 m. It is found in open grassy and rocky ground, where males hover at 5-7 m. It is known to visit flowers of Alyssum. The flight period is from mid-June to mid-July (Vujić 1996). The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018).

","

The most severe threat to this species is tourism. In Slovenia and the Dolomites in Italy the presence of skiing areas results in habitat destruction at the mid-elevations where this species occurs. On Durmitor Mountain in Montenegro and on the Šar Mountains in Serbia, increasing tourism and the infrastructure development related to this activity represent the most serious threats (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). Additional potential threats exist to mid-elevation habitats from climate change and overgrazing. Miličić et al. (2018) projected a potential loss of the area of suitable habitats in the future as a consequence of climate change.

","

There is no information on population size or trends. There are many specimens known (>400), but most of them date from the beginning of the 1990s, in spite of regular collecting trips in the areas known to be suitable. Some specimens have no records of collection date. The most recent record is from 2018 in Italy: very few specimens are recorded from Italy, and it is more difficult to find the species now than it was historically (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). The population trend is unknown, but the results of recent surveys may suggest a decline in the population, which is considered to be severely fragmented, with many subpopulations small and isolated with no possible exchange of individuals.

",Unknown,"

This species is endemic to Europe, mainly distributed in the Balkan Peninsula (in Montenegro, Serbia, and Slovenia) (Vujić et al. 2013). It is also found in northeastern Italy. It does not occur in high-altitude mountain areas, and is not considered an alpine species. In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 76 km2 and in the EU 27 about 24 km2The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 72,029 km2 in Europe and 4,607 km2 in the EU27. In Europe, it occurs in nine locations, 4-5 of which are in the EU 27. It is found between 354 m and 2,233 m above sea level.

",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

Cheilosia balkana is listed as a strictly protected species in Serbia. There are no known conservation actions. Further research on its ecology, distribution and population trends is needed, as well as the control of the level of grazing. In Italy, it is found near the Dolomiti Bellunesi National Park, but not inside, while it is present in the National Parks of Durmitor in Montenegro and Šar Mountain in Serbia. Habitat preservation is recommended.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164464,149164462,Cheilosia aristata,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-08-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This European endemic species is assessed as Endangered because of its small area of occupancy, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1507 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 20 km2 in Europe and 12 km2 in the EU 27. Furthermore, the population is considered severely fragmented and there is degradation of habitat quality, due to tourism and unsustainable farming (grazing livestock), and (as this is a high-mountain species) the negative impacts of climate change on host-plant viability. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trend is extremely urgently needed.","This species has been found over open ground, including almost bare, hot and sunny siliceous rocky slopes and steep alpine meadows at 1,900 - 2,650 m, some with Androsacion alpinae communities. It may be restricted to areas with calcareous rocks (Speight 2020). Flower visitation records exist from Silene rupestris (P. Goeldlin pers. comm. 2020) and Helianthemum sp. (L.-J. van der Ent pers. comm. 2020). The flight time is from the end of June to August at higher elevations. The host plant and immature stages are unknown.","Potential threats to this species include habitat destruction due to intensive grazing of alpine meadows by cows or sheep, which seems to have become more common in high alpine meadows. Habitat destruction due to increased tourism is a potential threat, including development of ski resorts. The impact of climate change at high altitudes could result in unfavourable conditions for the host plant, or unsuitable habitat for the adult flies, and hence could constitute a high risk because the species is known from very few localities.","This species was described in 1997 (Barkalov and Ståhls 1997), and is still only known from very few localities at high alpine elevations (1,900 – 2,650 m asl) mainly in Switzerland. It has apparently been repeatedly sampled from the same localities in Saas-Fee (Valais, Switzerland) in the 1990s and in 2010, and the subpopulation here may be stable. In the other localities, the population trend is unknown. The total number of collected specimens is probably below 100 and the species is clearly rare.",Unknown,"

This species is endemic to Europe, with the only known occurrences in the central European Alps. It was described from Valais (Switzerland) (Barkalov and Ståhls 1997), and subsequently but fairly recently has been recorded from northern Italy (L. van der Ent pers. comm. 2020) and the French Alps (Lair 2018). It occurs at high elevations. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1507 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 20 km2 in Europe and 12 km2 in the EU 27.

",This species is not commercially utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. It was described in 1997, and is still only known from very few localities at higher altitudes (1,900 – 2,650 m asl) mainly in Switzerland. All collecting sites are within National Parks or similar areas. Additional research on its ecology including population size is urgently needed. Research is needed to confirm the distribution, population status and the impacts of threats. Protection of habitat, including grazing and tourism management, is recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164475,149164472,Cheilosia antiqua,Least Concern,,2021,2020-07-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This European endemic species has been recorded throughout Europe except northern Europe and the Mediterranean region. Its population trend is unknown, and although it may be locally be threatened due to unsustainable forest management or other human activities, there are no major direct threats. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are above the thresholds for the threatened categories. Therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and EU27. More research is needed on its population trends and microhabitat requirements.","This species occurs in deciduous forest and unimproved pasture, including montane/subalpine pasture. The preferred habitats include forest clearings and beside tracks in woodland, along old hedgerows and in open areas in montane pasture. The flight period is from April to June, with occasional specimens in March and July. Known flowers visited are Caltha, Cardamine, Fragaria, Iris, Ranunculus and Taraxacum (Speight 2018). The host plant is Primula: the larva feeds in the rootstocks of several Primula species, where it hollows out cavities in thickened stem bases. The immature stages are described and illustrated by Rotheray (1991, 1994).","This species is likely to be locally affected by various human activities (habitat loss due to land conversion and poor management, deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanization, overgrazing, and possibly climate change) which potentially degrade the habitat quality and lead to habitat fragmentation.",There is no information about population trends for this species.,Unknown,"This species is a West Palaearctic species endemic to Europe and is to date, not known to exist outside of Europe despite existing close to the border of the region. The distribution ranges from Ireland and the UK (Ball et al. 2011) through to central and southern Europe, and the Balkans (de Groot and Govedić 2008, Krpač et al. 2001, Tóth 2011, Tóth 2014, Vujic 1996), and on into European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018). It has apparently not been recorded further north than Denmark (Torp 1994), but is known from the French Pyrenees, and has been recorded in Spain (Ricarte and Marcos Garcia 2017, Speight 2018, Lair et al. 2021).",This species is not traded or commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164485,149164483,Cheilosia andalusiaca,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-07-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This species is endemic to mainland Spain, where it is known from a small number of specimens in mountainous areas of Castile and León. It is assessed as Endangered because of its small area of occupancy (< 500 km) and low number of locations (between one and five). The potential threat is degradation of habitat quality. It was described in 1987, and is still only known from very few specimens and localities.

Further research into the ecology, threats and population trend of this rare species is needed.

","This species is known from sparsely-vegetated, open rocky ground from 900 m to above 2,300 m (Marcos García 1987). The flight period is from April to June. The immature stages unknown (Speight 2018).","

This species can be impacted by degradation of habitat quality, mostly due to occasional fires and to some extent overgrazing.

","There is no information about population trends. Only 10 specimens have been collected so far (Torp Pedersen 1971, Marcos Garcia 1987).",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Spain, where it has been recorded in mountain ranges in the southern part of the provinces of Castile and León (Torp Pedersen 1971, Marcos Garcia 1987).",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. Site and habitat protection would benefit this species. Further research into the ecology, threats and population trend of this rare species is needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164496,149164493,Cheilosia alpina,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-07-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Due to the small AOO (96 km2 in Europe and 84 km2 in EU27), severely fragmented population caused by destruction of habitat, where small patches do not have the capacity to sustain viable subpopulations and a continuing decline in the quality of habitat, Cheilosia alpina is assessed as Endangered. It is not commonly encountered. Possible confusion with the morphologically very close central European species Cheilosia montana complicates the picture, including the recently evidenced identical or near identical DNA barcode sequences of these two species.

The preferred habitat in the northern populations of this species, subarctic birch forests near the treeline and arctic tundra, could be negatively impacted by unsustainable reindeer herding, as well as climate change. In the Finnish Red List C. alpina is classified as Near Threatened. The taxonomy and biology remain understudied and urgently need additional study.

","The preferred habitat is open areas in subarctic birch forests near the treeline, and arctic tundra (Nielsen and Svendsen 2014). Flower visitation records exist from umbellifers, Alchemilla, Caltha palustris (Bartsch et al. 2009), Ranunculus spp. (Bartsch et al. 2009) and Salix spp. (T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2020). The flight period is June to July. The immature stages are undescribed, but Bartsch et al. (2009) discussed a possible host-plant association with Angelica archangelica archangelica.",Habitat loss and habitat fragmentation are major biodiversity threats to organisms in the Arctic and Subarctic regions. Grazing by reindeer could impact the species negatively if the host plant is Angelica archangelica archangelica. Ongoing climate change is expected to result in a continuing decline in the extent and suitability of its habitat.,"There is no information about population trends, but the population is considered to be severely fragmented as a consequence of habitat destruction and fragmentation. The species is not commonly recorded and may be genuinely rare.",Unknown,"Cheilosia alpina is a species with a boreo-alpine distribution pattern in Europe. In Fennoscandia, it only occurs in the extreme northern parts, with about 20 records in total from northern Finland, Sweden and Norway (one record from Russian Karelia, also recorded from northwestern Russia) (Bartsch 2009; Haarto and Kerppola 2007; species.fi (Schulman et al. 2021); artsdatabanken.no). In Central Europe it has been recorded from alpine regions of Austria and France (Claussen 1998), and from the High Tatra Mountains in Slovakia (Čepelák and Čepelák 1986, Čepelák 1992). A doubtful record from Lithuania is included in StN2015 Excel (Speight et al. 2015), but not considered in this assessment. Taxonomic confusion with the closely-related C. montana calls for re-appraisal of its distribution in central Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in Europe and the EU 27. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 96 km2 in Europe and 84 km2 in EU27

The distribution extends out of the European region to southern Siberia (Altay) (Barkalov and Mutin 2018) and Mongolia (G. Pennards pers. comm. 2020). Mengual et al. (2020) list the species from Georgia, but state that the record requires confirmation.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. The species occurs in Malla Strict Nature and Saana Nature reserves (Enontekiö, Finland), Further research into the ecology, threats and population trend of this rare species is needed and its taxonomy is in need of resolution.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164509,149164504,Cheilosia alpestris,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-07-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This European endemic species is rare, never found in high numbers, with a distribution restricted to the Alps. It may be locally threatened due to human activities (increased tourism) and/or increased grazing by livestock on alpine meadows at medium-high to high elevations. More data on its occurrence, especially from areas from which only old data are available, and information on habitat quality (including host plant information) are necessary to assess the extinction risk, which could be high at some localities. The highest number of specimens are from France.

The present status of this species is considered to be endangered: although the EOO and number of locations are above the threshold, the area of occupancy is restricted (100 km2 in Europe and 68 km2 in the EU 27), is considered severely fragmented as many subpopulations are small and isolated, and there is a projected continuing decline in the quality of the habitat.

","The preferred habitat of this species includes humid grassy areas within the upper levels of the Picea zone and on through the Larix zone into humid unimproved calcareous subalpine grassland (near tree line) up to 2,100 m, and open herb-rich areas within Alnus viridis thickets (Speight 2018). In central Europe it has been collected at localities at medium-high to high altitudes. Flower visitation records exist from Peucedanum cervaria (Apiaceae) (Ssymank and Lair 2014). The larval host plant and immature stages unknown.","This species can be affected intensive grazing of alpine meadows, especially on high alpine meadows. Increased tourism in alpine environments with negative impact on the natural habitat is a potential threat. The impact of climate change at high altitudes leading to unfavourable conditions for the host plant, or unsuitable habitat for the adult flies and resulting in habitat fragmentation could constitute a high risk because the species is known from medium to high elevations in Alpine regions in rather few countries.","The number of sampled individuals at any locality is very low, despite there having been recent surveys in the Alps. There is no information on population trends. The newest record is from Italy in 2020.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to the central European Alps. It has been recorded from France (Speight et al. 1998, Ssymank and Lair 2014, Speight et al. 2018), Switzerland (CSCF 2020) and Austria (Barkalov and Ståhls 1997, Heimburg 2018). It is known from two records in Italy, one from a checklist (Belcari et al. 1995) and the other from a locality near the French border found in 2000 (D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large for Europe and the EU 27. The area of occupancy (AOO) is only 100 km2 in Europe and is 68 km2 in the EU 27.",

This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.

,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. The French specimens were collected in Mercantour National Park. Recommended conservation actions include protection of the habitat through controlling the intensity of grazing (which occurs within National Parks), management of tourism, and maintenance of plant diversity. Management is particularly important within National Parks. Research and monitoring of population trends, habitat management and study of its ecology are recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164532,149164530,Cheilosia albipila,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This widely distributed species has been recorded throughout northern, western, central and eastern Europe, some parts of southern Europe, Great Britain, and the European parts of Russia and Turkey. It has not been recorded in the far north of Europe, south of the Pyrenees and southern Greece. It is commonly encountered and its host plants (several species of thistles) occur abundantly throughout the Palaearctic region. It can be found in wetlands and forests, Alnus/Salix carr, clearings, tracksides and other open areas in humid forest, both coniferous and deciduous, up to the altitude of Larix forest. It could potentially be subject to locally occurring man-made activities in Europe, such as intensified land-use due to increased urbanization and intensive forest management including clearings, which could lead to habitat degradation. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are above the thresholds for the application of a threatened category. This species is thus assessed as Least Concern.","This species can be found in wetlands and forests, Alnus/Salix carr, clearings, tracksides and other open areas in humid forest, both coniferous and deciduous, up to the altitude of Larix forest. The larva is a stem miner in thistles (Carduus spp. and Cirsium palustre) common in agricultural environments, pastures and roadsides. The larva was described and figured by Rotheray (1988) using specimens collected from Cirsium palustre in pastures. This species overwinters as a puparium. Flowers visited include: Betula, Caltha, Cardamine, Corylus, Prunus spinosa, Ribes uva-crispa, Salix, Taraxacum, Tussilago and Vaccinium. The flight period is between the end of March to the end of May (Speight 2018). ","

The species could potentially be subject to localized impacts from intensified land use due to increased urbanization and intensive forest management, including clearing, which could lead to habitat degradation.

","Despite being an abundant species in most of its range, no information on population trends is available except that it seems to have a stable population throughout its range in both Europe and the EU27.",Stable,"This is a widely distributed Palaearctic species. In Fennoscandia, it is recorded from the southern coastal region of Norway along the coast up to Hardangerfjorden, in southern and central Sweden (Bartsch 2009), and in southern parts of Finland (with the northernmost record at the Arctic Circle) (Haarto and Kerppola 2007). In other parts of Europe it occurs from Ireland eastwards through all of northern, central and southern Europe (not known further south of the Pyrenees), the Balkans (Vujic 1996), the European part of Russia and the European part of Turkey. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are above the thresholds for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is known from central and eastern Siberia in the Baikal region, Kazakhstan and Georgia (Bartsch 2009, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Speight 2018, Mengual et al. 2020).",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known ongoing conservation actions for this species, and no conservation actions are needed. However, research into the population size, distribution and trends as well as the monitoring of population trends is recommended. 

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164543,149164541,Platycheirus ciliatus,Critically Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

This montane species was previously thought to be exclusively Nearctic, but was first found in Europe only very recently (Ssymank and Lair 2015). It is considered very rare because it has only been found in two localities, both in southern France; one in Mercantour National Park in southeastern France close to the border with Italy, and a second in the eastern Pyrenees, close to or within a second protected area. The population trend is unknown, however the population in Europe is considered severely fragmented because the two subpopulations are very small and highly unlikely to interact with one another, the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 8 km2 and the habitat is projected to decline in extent and quality due to the impacts of livestock grazing, commercial forestry and climate change. Based on this, the species has been assessed as Critically Endangered (CR) in Europe and the EU27.

This species is missing in all available European determination keys, which must be updated as soon as possible because it can be challenging to differentiate this from related species. Based on this, it is possible that this species has been overlooked in existing collections, and therefore further research is essential, in particular, into its threats, population sizes, distribution and trends, as well as its habitats and biology, particularly of the larvae. Monitoring is required on the population and habitat trends.","This is a montane species found in Pinus uncinata forest with Rhododendron thickets, in open areas of subalpine Pinus/Abies/Larix forest, but also in Mediterranean Quercus coccifera mattoral. Adults fly around bushes and were recorded visiting the flowers of Quercus coccifera (Speight 2018, 2020). The larvae are unknown but presumed to be aphidophagous.","Both of the mountain habitats listed for this species in Speight (2018) are threatened to some degree, with Quercus coccifera mattoral being more abundant. The threats are not yet well understood, but the species may be threatened by the impacts of climate change in the upper altitudinal zones, by industrial forestry and by intense pasturing in semi-open forests and garrigue vegetation.","This is a predominantly Nearctic species first reported from Europe by Ssymank and Lair (2015). Only single individuals have been found so far in only two localities, both in France. The European population is believed to be small because a Malaise trap was used to survey for it. It is difficult to distinguish from closely related species and therefore the data are possibly incomplete, but it is understood to be very rare.

Based on the very small number of records, it is not possible to establish its population trend. It is considered severely fragmented because the two subpopulations are understood to be very small and highly unlikely to interact with one another due to the great distance between them. There has been some surveying in Mercantour National Park since this species was first found, but it was not found again there or anywhere else.",Unknown,"In Europe, this species is only known form southern France, where it has been found in the French Alps within the Mercantour National Park (Ssymank and Lair 2015) and in the eastern Pyrenees (Speight et al. 2018). Due to difficulties of identification and its absence in European identification keys, the range might be incompletely known, but it is not expected to occur in many more localities than currently known. However, this assessment uses the currently available data, and the species may be reassessed if ongoing monitoring suggests it occurs in more localities. Potentially it has a highly restricted extent of occurrence (EOO), but with only two georeferenced locality records, the EOO cannot be estimated. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 8 km2.

Outside Europe, it occurs in Canada, the western coast of the United States of America (from Alaska to California (Young et al. 2016) and in the Russian Far East (Mutin 2020).",This species is not utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"The eastern record is within a protected area (Le Mercantour Site of Community Importance/Special Protection Area/National Park), whilst the western record from the Pyrenees is either within or adjacent to a protected area (Parc naturel régional des Pyrénées catalanes, the Canigou-conques de La Preste (Special Protection Area), the Massif du Canigou Site of Community Importance).

There are no specific conservation actions currently known for this species. It is not listed in any of the national Red Lists of Europe because it was only discovered here in 2015. Maintaining alpine forest and shrub vegetation, and preventing overgrazing by livestock, are recommended. Research is needed on its threats, population sizes, distribution and trends, as well as on its habitats and biology particularly of the larvae. Monitoring is required on its population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164553,149164551,Cheilosia alba,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-07-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is assessed as Endangered due to its small area of occupancy (AOO) of 64 km2 in Europe and 44 km2 in the EU27, its severely fragmented population, and a projected decline in the quality of its habitat as a result of intensified land-use due to increased urbanization and forest management including clearings, which could lead to habitat degradation. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU27 is 1,819,890 km2. It is found in humid FagusAbies and Picea forest, alluvial softwood forest with Salix alba and humid, mesophilous/calciphilous Picea forest. It is a very rarely encountered species in all countries where it occurs (France, Germany, Italy, Finland, Montenegro and Norway). In all countries within the distributional range, its occurrence can be regarded as highly unpredictable because it is rarely found despite being repeatedly searched for at known localities in different years.

","This species is found in humid Fagus, Abies and Picea forest, alluvial softwood forest with Salix alba (Vujic and Claussen 2000), and humid, mesophilous/calciphilous Picea forest. Adults occur along streams in forests or at lakes or rivers. The early flight period is between the end of March to beginning of June. The host plant and the developmental stages remain undescribed, but the species is assumed to be phytophagous like its congeners (Speight 2018).","This species could be subjected to locally occurring man-made activities in Europe that consist of intensified land-use due to increased urbanization and forest management including clearings, which could lead to habitat degradation. Fagus forest has been reduced across Europe, which may impact the species to some extent, and it may be sensitive to the destruction of natural habitats near streams or other small water bodies. In the Balkans, the construction of hydropower dams could potentially constitute a threat.

In Serbia, the species is known from only one locality and thus it is possibly extinct because the habitat of the locality has been destroyed by deforestation (A. Vujic pers. comm. 2020). It was not found at the locality in question during the past seven years despite targeted surveys. Whether deforestation could lead to habitat loss or degradation of habitat remains unclear because the host plant remains unknown.","Only a few individuals have been observed in surveys throughout the known distributional range of this species. The current population trend for both Europe and the EU27 is unknown. From Italy, there are only one or two specimen known, so it is considered to be rare here. Most records from southern Finland are from habitats near a waterbody such as a lake or stream. It is potentially under-recorded due to its early flight period. The population is severely fragmented and the total number of recorded individuals can be estimated to be less than 100 based on the accumulated knowledge of observations. In all countries within the distributional area its occurrence can be regarded as highly unpredictable because it is rarely found despite being repeatedly searched for at known localities in different years.",Unknown,"This species was described by Vujić and Claussen (2000) based on specimens from Baden-Württemberg in southern Germany, Montenegro and Serbia. It has additionally been recorded in southwest and southeast Finland (Haarto and Kerppola 2004), in central Europe from Italy, France (Tissot et al. 2019), to Poland (Zoralski and Kowalczyk 2015), Switzerland and Montenegro. It is possibly extinct in Serbia (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2021). A recent finding from Norway exists (T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2020). It is potentially under-collected due to its early spring flight period, and so the true distribution remains unclear. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is 1,819,890 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is 64 kmand the EU27 is 44 km2. It is found between 1 and 1,409 m asl.",This species is not traded and is not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"In the Finnish National Red List, the species is assessed in the Least Concern category (Kahanpää, 2010). In the German National Red List, the species is classified as Data Deficient (Doczkal et al. 2001). There are no current conservation actions known for this species. In Serbia, the species is listed as a ""strictly protected species"" and protected by national law Code of Regulations on the Declaration and Protection of Strictly Protected and Protected Wild Species of Plants, Animals and Fungi (Official Gazette of RS, No. 5/2010, 47/2011, 32/2016 and 98/2016). Conservation actions recommended are site/area protection, site/are management, and awareness and communications. The species has been found in Parc naturel régional du Haut-Jura (France), and some of the point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. Additional research on population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats is needed. Surveys should be conducted early in the season to ensure that this species is found, given its early flight period.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164563,149164561,Platycheirus caesius,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

This species is only known from three localities isolated in the Swiss Alps and in the Spanish Pyrenees. It has not been found on any of the other high central or south European high mountains, where other closely related species of the Platycheirus ambiguus-group have been recorded. Furthermore there have been no records of this species since 1995, which could mean a population or even an area of occupancy (AOO) decline. However, there have been no intensive surveys on the historic sites so far. Its habitat is fairly widespread, but this is not reflected in the occurrence of this species, suggesting more habitat and ecology research is needed. The habitat could be threatened by intensification of human activities such as grazing by livestock and tourism. In the future it may also be threatened by climate change.

In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 41,850 km2 and the AOO is 12 km2, the population could be considered severely fragmented because it is only known from three small isolated subpopulations. It is therefore assessed as Endangered (EN).

In the EU 27, the EOO and AOO are only 4 km2, and it is only known to occur in one locality and therefore one location. It is therefore assessed as Critically Endangered (CR).

Improved grazing management in alpine grasslands with mosaics of extensively managed and abandoned grassland may enhance its habitat quality. Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends and threats as well as on its life history and ecology. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is necessary.","This species occurs in alpine calcareous and acidic grasslands. The males are known to hover ""round outstanding groups of rocks ...at heights of 2-5 metres"" (Speight 2018). Currently there are no records of visiting flowers. The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous. As a high-mountain species, the flight period is short, in June and July.","This is a high-mountain species, and its habitat (mainly alpine grasslands) is threatened by the intensification of human activities such as tourism and agricultural grazing (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2021). Since it is limited to high altitudes, climate change is a potential threat in the future. The habitats of temperate acidophilous alpine grassland, arctic-alpine calcareous grassland and scree vegetation have been assessed as Least Concern according to Janssen et al. (2017).","This species is known from only three localities, all presumably with small population sizes. The largest number of specimens (28) was collected from the type locality in the Pyrenees in 1995 by Nielsen (2004). There has been no specific search for new records since 1995, but it has not been found during other general hoverfly surveys on any of the other high central or southern European high mountains, where other closely related species of the Platycheirus ambiguus group have been recorded. In Europe it could be considered severely fragmented as it is only known to exists in three small isolated subpopulations, while in the EU 27 it is known to occur in only one locality, and therefore also has only one location. Overall the population trend is unknown for Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,"This is a very rare European endemic found only in the high mountains of the Alps and Pyrenees in Spain and Switzerland (Speight 2018). It has only ever been found above 2,000 m above sea level. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 41,850 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) 12 km2 for Europe. In the EU 27, the EOO and AOO are both 4 km2 because it is only known from one locality.",This species is not yet known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions currently being taken for this species. Improved grazing management in alpine grasslands with mosaics of extensively managed and abandoned grassland may enhance its habitat quality, as is indicated for other species by Walcher et al. (2020). Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends and threats as well as on its life history and ecology. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is necessary.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164573,149164571,Cheilosia aerea,Least Concern,,2021,2021-04-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is a widely distributed temperate and south European species, especially common in the Mediterranean region. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU27 are above the thresholds for the threatened categories. It can be found in open forest ground, open areas in mesophilous/thermophilous deciduous forest of Fagus and Quercus, dry scrub, and unimproved dry/very dry grassland. This common and abundant species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU27.

There are no known conservation actions for this species and no conservation actions are presently required. Research into its taxonomy and ecology is required, and research into population trends is recommended. It could potentially be subject to localized impacts resulting from man-made activities in Europe. 

","This species can be found in open forest ground, open areas in mesophilous/thermophilous deciduous forest of Fagus and Quercus, dry scrub, and unimproved dry/very dry grassland. Adults can be found in clearings and glades, fields adjacent to woodland, and open areas in scrubby dry grassland. Adults are fast flying and males can hover up to 4 m in sunlit glades. Both sexes settle on foliage of trees and shrubs and on ground vegetation. The flight period is between April and October, with peaks in May and July/August. Flowers visited include white umbellifers, Crataegus, and Euphorbia (Speight 2018). Doczkal (1996) reported specimens reared from Verbascum nigrum and females observed ovipositing on Verbascum densiflorum. The larvae have been scored by Stuke (2000).","This species could potentially be subject to localized impacts from intensified land use due to increased urbanization and intensive forest management, including clearing, which could lead to habitat degradation.","

The species has an overall stable population throughout its range in Europe and the EU27, but is scarce in the northern areas of its distributional range.

",Stable,"

This is a widespread species in the Palaearctic region, occurring in northwestern, central and southern Europe including the Balkans and the European part of Turkey and extending into southeast Russia (Speight 2018). Outside of Europe, the species is found in the Transcaucasia region in Georgia (Speight 2018, Mengual et al. 2020), and recorded from Tajikistan and Kazakhstan to Kyrgyzstan and Iran (Barkalov and Mutin 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species in Europe and the EU27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species. In light of the current wide distribution and considerable population size, no conservation actions are presently required. Research into its ecology is required, and research and monitoring of population trends is recommended.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164584,149164581,Platycheirus ambiguus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-12-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The range of this species is uncertain due to its confusion with Platycheirus lundbecki and Platycheirus hirtipes, and its population trend is currently unknown in Europe and the EU 27. Despite this, it is known to be widely distributed, occurring in a variety of woodland and shrubland habitats not currently considered vulnerable. In some European countries (Germany and the Netherlands) it is considered to be a rare species. Its area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are far beyond the threshold to be considered for the threatened categories, and so this species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and also in the EU 27.

Monitoring and research are needed in order to understand better its distributional range and population and habitat trends. More taxonomic research is also required because of its confusion with other species.","This species can be found in scrub-invaded clearings and scrub-edged tracks within deciduous woodlands. It can also be found in garrigue, hedgerows and gardens (Speight 2020). Reemer et al. (2009) state that adults can be found on sunny forest edges, shrubs and flowering solitary fruit trees. The adults can be found flying from the beginning of April until the end of May in the immediate vicinity of scrub, the males hovering beside Crataegus, Prunus spinosa or Salix in flower, often actually among the branches. The females visit the flowers of these trees, and both sexes are known to visit Acer pseudoplatanus, Crataegus, Prunus mahaleb, P. spinosa, Pyrus communis, male flowers of Salix (including Salix repens), Sorbus aucuparia and Viburnum (Speight 2020). The larvae are aphidophagous and were described by Dusek and Laska (1959).

In Ireland, it is typical of deciduous Prunus/Crataegus scrub habitat and mature hedgerows. It can be expected to occur also where Ribes is grown as a fruit crop. It is not known to occur in mature forest, wetlands or open ground and there are no records of it from Corylus scrub (Speight 2008).","The main threats to this species are intensive agricultural practices which result in the loss of transition habitat and the removal of habitat as a result of commercial forestry activities. This is well documented in Ireland, where intensive agriculture is resulting in tighter control over scrub-invasion of grasslands and grubbing-up of hedges, which removes the only available habitat for this species in much of the Irish landscape. Current trends in farming can only be expected to result in a further reduction in the frequency of its occurrence. Conversion of deciduous scrub to conifer plantation has a similar effect.

Currently it is not considered threatened in Ireland, and with the current policy of providing financial incentives to farmers to maintain hedges in the farmed landscape, there is little reason to be concerned that it will become threatened in the immediate future (Speight 2008).","This is a widespread species in northern Europe and in the UK and Ireland, but knowledge of its population is uncertain due to confusion with other species. Literature from Germany and the Netherlands argue that this species is rare (Reemer et al. 2009, Saure 2018). In western Europe there are scattered records, with sometimes only a few occurrences. Overall its population trend is considered to be unknown in Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,"The range of this species is uncertain, due to its confusion with Platycheirus lundbecki and Platycheirus hirtipes, but it is known to occur from Fennoscandia (Nielsen 1999) south to central Spain, and from Ireland (Speight 2008, Bartsch et al. 2009) eastwards through most of Europe, including Austria (Heimburg 2018), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Verlinden 2020), the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Latvia and Lithuanian (Pakalniškis et al. 2000, Karpa 2008) into European Russia.

Outside Europe, its range extends to Russia, Siberia and on through the Russian Far East to the Pacific coast, including Japan (Mutin and Barkalov 1999, Speight 2020).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"Monitoring and research are needed in order to understand better the distributional range and population and habitat trends of this species. More taxonomic research is also required because of its confusion with other species. Sustainable land use and management could help ensure its future by preserving its habitat. Furthermore, hedgerows and/or flower strips in gardens and urban area could provide appropriate habitat. In the Red List of Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020) and Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), the species is Least Concern.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164595,149164592,Merodon velox,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered  (EN)

The species prefers open grounds in forests, semi-arid, stony, thinly-vegetated, unimproved grasslands, and open areas in Abies forest (Vujić et al. 2011) and Castanea forests (Ricarte et al. 2012). The adults apparently resemble a small Xylocopa in the field, and continues to fly at temperatures above 35 °C.

It is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU27 countries. Although the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 380,221 km2, the area of occupancy (AOO) is 200 km2, and the number of locations is 13 (based on overgrazing by livestock as the main threat), this species has a severely fragmented distribution due to the fact that it is recorded on islands (on a number of Greek islands and Sicily in Italy). Furthermore, ongoing threats to the habitat of this species should not be neglected (primarily overgrazing by livestock as a result of a poor land management, but also fires, urbanization and tourism) as they are causing an ongoing decline in the habitat quality. Additional research is needed on the population and habitat trends, species ecology and biology. Monitoring is also required. 


","

This species prefers open ground in forests, semi-arid, stony, thinly-vegetated, unimproved grasslands, and open areas in Abies forest (Vujić et al. 2011) and Castanea forests (Ricarte et al. 2012). The adults apparently resemble a small Xylocopa in the field, and even fly at temperatures above 35 °C. The males are strongly territorial, and both sexes fly low and fast through ground vegetation (Hurkmans and Hayat 1997). It has been found drinking at the edge of a small stream in the evening of a hot day (Reemer and Smit 2007). Adults are known to visit Apiaceae and Euphorbia (Speight 2020). The flight period is from April to September (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages have not been described.

","

Extensive grazing by livestock is considered to be the main threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). In addition, fires in Mediterranean region, either of natural or anthropogenic origin, can cause considerable impacts on a landscape level with the destruction of large areas of vegetation. Tourism development and urbanization on islands cause declines in habitat quality, leading to fragmentation and loss.

","There is not enough data to establish the population trend, and so monitoring as well as research on this are needed. Existing specimens were collected from 1868 to 2016.",Unknown,"In Europe, this species occurs in Greece (on Greek islands) and in Italy (in Sicily). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 380,221 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 200 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is present in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey and Syria.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. It is recommended to protect its primary habitats. Additional research is needed on its threats, population and habitat trends, ecology and biology. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is also needed. Raising awareness about this species is very important. A number of point localities are within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164605,149164603,Microdon miki,Vulnerable,A2c,2021,2020-03-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This species has very rare and isolated populations in western Europe and mountain areas of central Europe (possibly relict populations), with a wider distribution in parts of Scandinavia and eastern Europe. Therefore there are big differences across the European region. It needs small clearings, wind throws or open canopy (all of which are getting rarer in modern forestry) as a suitable habitat for its host ants.

As it has a declining population based on a declining area of occupancy (AOO), and risks losing part of its extent of occurrence (EOO), this species is assessed as Vulnerable (VU A2c). Based on declines mainly in the quality of its habitats where it occurs, we suspect that it has undergone a population decline of around 30% over the last 10 years, and this is projected to continue, with possible losses of central European isolated relict subpopulations and additional pressure by climate change.","This species exists in boreal, subarctic and temperate coniferous forests of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies and in particular in forest clearings or open patches within the forest (Speight 2018). Currently there are no records of flowers that the adults visit. The larvae need Formica ant nests in which to develop, and the adults are known to stay in the vicinity of these ant nests. The larvae live in nests of the Formica rufa group in particular, most likely Formica lugubris (Speight 2018).","As this species is dependent on host-ant nests in coniferous forest, intensive forest management with more closed forest structures and quick reafforestation of wind-throws is possibly threatening suitable habitats. The habitats in which it occurs, such as temperate mountain Picea woodland, Abies woodland and temperate and continental Pinus sylvestris woodland, are considered to be Least Concern and Near Threatened (Janssen et al. 2017). Climate change is likely to reduce the available habitat when mountain coniferous forest becomes rarer.","This species has very small, very localized subpopulations in western Europe; for example, it is known from just one locality in Germany, in the National Park Bayerischer Wald (Merkel-Wallner 2010). To the east of Europe, there are many more subpopulations known, but their exact size is unknown. The population trend is suspected to be decreasing, based on habitat decreases in area and quality. We suspect that it has undergone a population decline of around 30% over the last 10 years, and this is projected to continue",Decreasing,"This species can be found from Scandinavia southward to northern Italy and eastwards to European Russia. It is not present in the far west of Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are greater than the thresholds to be considered in a threatened category for Europe and the EU 27.

Outside of Europe, the global range of this species extends from European Russia on through Siberia to the Pacific coast (Speight 2018).

For the distribution map in Scandinavia (NO, SE, FI), GBIF point data (GBIF.org, 15 February 2020) were used; for Germany and the Czech Republic, point data; for France, department-based distributions (Speight et al. 2018); and for all other countries, modelling using a map of the natural vegetation of Europe (Bohn et al. 2000). The latter map was made based on a selection of group D (complete, with mapping units D1-D64), and modelled distribution data are shown with the status ""possibly extant"" in cases where no record on a country checklist is given.",This species is not known to be utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are currently no known specific conservation actions for this species. Restoration of more natural and diverse forests, as well as protection of ant nests in coniferous forests could help it. Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends, ecology and threats. Monitoring of population and habitat trends is also necessary. Speight (2016, 2018) considers it threatened in Europe, and it is assessed as Critically Endangered on the German Red List (Ssymank et al. 2011) and Endangered on the Czech Red List (Farkac et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164616,149164613,Merodon unicolor,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is 462,608 km2, and the number of locations is 16 (based on land conversion as the main threat). Because of the 16 locations and small area of occupancy (AOO) (184 km), but also the continuous decline in the habitat caused by the impact of ongoing threats (primarily land conversion due to overgrazing by livestock, fires and tourism) the species is assessed as Near Threatened in Europe and the EU27 countries. This species is primarily distributed across the Iberian Peninsula (Spain and Portugal), but it also occurs in France and Andorra. Because of the ongoing threats (primarily land conversion due to overgrazing by livestock, fires and tourism), the habitat quality of this species is declining, and is getting fragmented.

Furthermore, even tough a number of point localities are within the boundaries of protected areas, grazing is still intensive, and it should be controlled and managed adequately. Monitoring is highly recommended. Additional research is needed primarily on the population and habitat trends, species ecology and biology. 


","This species prefers open ground in forests, as well as well-drained, non-calcareous, montane and subalpine unimproved grasslands. It also occurs in hedgehog heath, open and grassy areas in montane Betula and Pinus forests, including Pinus uncinata forest in the Pyrenees (Speight 2020). In addition, it is present in small, managed woodlands (‘soutos’) of mature sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) in northern Spain (Ricarte et al. 2014). The adults fly fast, at up to 1.5 metres from the ground, through and around tall ground vegetation. They have been recorded visiting Anthemis mixta. The flight period is from April to September (Speight 2020, Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007).","

Land conversion (mainly due to overgrazing by livestock, fires and urbanisation) is considered to be the main threat, causing decline in habitat quality, causing its fragmentation and loss. The habitats have been increasingly fragmented on the Iberian Peninsula, and processes of intensification and extensification have caused changes. Overgrazing by livestock is one of the biggest threats to habitats, even in protected areas (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Fires also represent a potential threat to habitat quality. Furthermore, ongoing urbanisation and tourism development (especially in point localities near ski resorts) cause habitat fragmentation and declines in habitat quality.

","According to all known data, specimens have been collected from 1908 to 2018. A considerable number have been recorded from Spain (more than 200, in the largest numbers from localities in the Sierra de Gredos and Puerto de Pajares), 10 from Andorra, more than 30 from France, and more than 20 from Portugal. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species occurs in southwestern Europe right across the Iberian Peninsula, from southern France (Col de Font-Froide) and the Pyrenees, Andorra, Spain including mountainous areas (Vujić et al. 2020) and Portugal (van Eck 2011, 2016). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated at 462,608 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) at 184 km2.

Outside Europe, it is also present in the mountain ranges of northwestern Africa (Speight 2020).",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. However, considering the fact that it is distributed across the Iberian Peninsula and the Pyrenees in France, incorporating it into the National lists of protected species is recommended. A number of point localities are within the boundaries of protected areas, National and Natural Parks, as well as Natura 2000 networks (such as the National Park Sierra Nevada, Natural Park Sierras de Cazorla, Segura y Las Villas, National Park de Los Picos de Europa, National Park des Pyrenees, Regional Natural Park des Pyrenees Ariegeoises, Regional Natural Park des Pyrenees  Catalanes, Regional Park de la Sierra de Gredos, and the Regional Natural Park du Haut Languedoc). However, even though a number of point localities are within the boundaries of protected areas, grazing is still intensive, and it should be controlled and managed adequately.

Further research is needed on the population and habitat trends, ecology and biology, as well as other potential threats to the habitat. Raising awareness about this species and monitoring its population and habitat trends are also important. 

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164628,149164626,Xanthogramma pilosum,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This European endemic species is regarded as Endangered due to the restricted area of occupancy (8 km2) based on on currently known records, occurrence in two locations, and a projected reduction in habitat extent and quality. Despite the fact that the Greek hoverflies have been rather well studied (Vujić et al. 2020), X. pilosum has only been found in Lesvos island and the Rhodope region (mainland Greece). Especially in Lesvos, tourism-related activities may provoke changes in some of the habitats of this species, for example, X. pilosum appears to find refuge in organic olive orchards (Speight 2018) that might be abandoned by owners due to changes in economic activity. In the Rhodope region, fires may threat this species.

It is assumed that the species has a wider distribution than currently known, and it should be reassessed if further data on its distribution become available.

","This species has been found close to temporary streams in evergreen oak (Q. coccinea), matorral and organic olive orchards. Adults fly through tall-herb vegetation, in April, and visit Euphorbia flowers (Speight 2018). The larva is totally unknown but expected to be predatory.","

There are no specific threats documented for this species. At least in the island of Lesvos, habitat destruction and tourist pressure could be two significant threats. Tourist development may encourage the abandonment of traditional olive orchards, which appear to represent a potential refugia for this species. Fires may also threaten this species both in their insular and mainland populations (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020; https://rewilding-rhodopes.com/life-vultures/areas). In Rhodopes, the modification of vegetation due to abandonment of livestock breeding can be a future threat for this species in the future (https://rewilding-rhodopes.com/life-vultures/areas).

","Only three specimens are reported so far, but the two known locations are far from each other, so the species is expected to be present in intervening areas. There are not enough data to estimate the population size or trend of this species. However, the hoverfly fauna of Lesvos has been well-studied in the last decade and this species has been found just in one location within the island, so the Lesvos subpopulation is apparently very small, or that hoverfly sampling on this island has not been focused on the main activity period of this species, which seems to be early in the year (April) (Nedeljković et al. 2018).
",Unknown,"This species is recorded only from Greece, both from the northeastern mainland (the Rhodope region) and on the Aegean island of Lesvos (Nedeljković et al. 2018). It has an area of occupancy based on known records of 8 km2. The species is for sure present in other localities, but additional surveys are necessary to better understand the range of this species.","This species is not subject to trade or use. Even though it has a potential use in pest control of the presumed insect prey and in crop pollination, the rarity of this species makes commercial exploitation difficult.",Terrestrial,"

There are no conservation actions for this species, and as its ecological requirements and larval biology are unknown further research is needed in order to identify appropriate conservation measures. Monitoring is needed to understand population trends and impacts of threats. There is also need for research on the distribution of this recently described species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149164638,149164636,Merodon unguicornis,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic species is assessed as Near Threatened, primarily due to its small area of occupancy (AOO) (92 km2), only 14 locations (based on overgrazing by livestock and fires) and decline in habitats quality provoked by ongoing threats (primarily overgrazing, but also fires and cork extraction on few point localities). Moreover, the presence of this species is uncertain for France and there is a reasonable possibility that nowadays this species is extinct from this locality. Although a number of point locations are within the boundaries of protected areas, grazing is intensive in these areas, and it should be controlled and managed adequately. Monitoring the population and habitats, as well as their protection is of crucial importance for the survival of this species.","The preferred environments of this species are forests and scrub. It occurs in open Quercus ilex forest and maquis, Quercus rotundifolia woodland and hedgehog heath (Speight 2018). The adults fly at up to one metre from the ground, through low shrub vegetation. They are known to visit Brachypodium, Cistus, Erinacia anthyllis, Euphorbia, Helianthemum, Sedum and Thymus (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007). The flight period is from April to August. The developmental stages have not been described.","Overgrazing by livestock is the main threat to the habitat of this species, causing decline in its quality and leading to fragmentation and loss (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). The habitats have been increasingly fragmented on the Iberian Peninsula, and processes of intensification and extensification have caused habitat changes (Pulido-Fernández et al. 2018). Fires also pose a threat to habitat quality, contributing to its fragmentation and loss. A few point localities are within the boundaries of the Grazalema Natural Park, where there is ongoing cork extraction from the cork oak, which could also be considered as a potential threat to the habitat of this species.",The population trend is unknown due to the lack of data. Specimens have been collected from 1896 (the single uncertain record from France) to 2019.,Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, with records from central Portugal, Spain (from northern parts to the Mediterranean), and perhaps France (only one point locality collected in 1896) (Speight 2020), but its presence in France remains uncertain (Whithers 2017, Lair 2018) and it is considered possibly extinct there. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 414,790 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 92 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. The record from France is very old (1896) and there is a reasonable possibility that the species is now extinct at this locality. Monitoring the population trend is highly recommended. Although a number of point localities are within the boundaries of protected areas (National Park Sierra Nevada, Natural Park Los Alcornocales, Natural Park de la Sierra de Andujar  Regional Natural Park Pyrenees Catalanes, Natural Park Sierras de Cazorla, Segura y Las Villas, Natural Park das Serras de Aire e Candeeiros and Natura2000 networks), grazing by livestock, the main threat to its habitat, is still intense, and should be controlled and managed adequately. Monitoring and research on its population and habitat trends is needed, together with research on its biology, ecology and other possible threats. It is crucially importance to discover the host plant for larval development. Raising awareness about this species is very important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164649,149164646,Xanthogramma pedissequum,Least Concern,,2021,2021-07-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in Europe/EU27. In spite of the confusion in the identification of this species, which probably results in an overestimate of its range in the Mediterranean parts of its distribution (Speight 2020), it is still widespread in Europe/EU27. There are no specific threats identified for this species. Therefore, the species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.","Xanthogramma pedissequum occurs in open ground; unimproved montane grassland and unimproved, lowland humid grassland and open areas along streams in thermophilous Quercus forest and mesophilous Fagus forest; in suburban parks and gardens (Speight 2018). Adults visit the flowers of the following plants: umbellifers, yellow composites; Berberis, Caltha, Crataegus, Euphorbia, Lamium, Ligustrum, Potentilla erecta, Pulicaria, Ranunculus, Rosa, Rubus, Sambucus nigra, Stellaria, Ulmus. The flight period is from May to September. The larva is described and figured by Rotheray and Gilbert (1989). The larvae are predators of the ""herds"" of root aphids tended by ants of the genus Lasius.",

There are no threats identified for this species and conservation actions are unnecessary at this point.

,"There is no information about population size and trends for this species. However, it appears to be local and usually scarce in Great Britain (Ball et al. 2011). In Serbia, another country with well known hoverfly diversity, about 47 specimens of X. pedissequum have been collected from 1979 to 2017 (Z. Nedeljković et al. unpublished data).",Unknown,"The distribution of this species is uncertain, due to confusion with both X. dives and X. stackelbergi. It is known in Europe from Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, European Part of Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, and Great Britain (Speight et al. 2020), as well as Serbia (Z. Nedeljković et al. unpublished data). It is presumably widespread in intervening areas, and is considered Extant throughout Europe on the accompanying map, although Speight et al. (2020) suggests that its distribution may be overestimated in the Mediterranean.

There are also records of this species from Morocco, Israel, Syria (Dirickx 1994) and the Russian Far East (Peck 1988), but these plus the Mediterranean records are mostly to be confirmed (Speight 2020).","This species is not used or traded commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphids (Rojo et al. 2003).",Terrestrial,

There are no conservation actions known for this species. Research on population trend is needed.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164662,149164659,Xanthogramma aeginae,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is regarded as Endangered due to its low extent of occurrence (1,434 km2) and area of occupancy (32 km2) and a projected reduction in the area and quality of habitat as a result of the increased frequency of fire. Based on the fact that a fire could impact large parts of the islands where this species is recorded, the eight known localities are thought to occur in four locations.","This species inhabits Mediterranean forests and shrubs. Adults fly from the end of March to the beginning of May. The larva is unknown, but suspected to be an aphid predator like other congeneric species (Nedeljković et al. 2018).","There are no specific threats documented for this species. However, at least on Lesvos, habitat destruction and tourist pressure could be two main threats. Fire could be a threat, at least for adults of this species, on both Lesvos and Chios (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020), since these islands are so small that a single major fire could destroy all suitable habitats.","There are no estimates of the population size and trend for this species. Given that 17 specimens were collected on Chios island and just one on Lesvos, the Chios subpopulation appears to be larger than that on Lesvos (Nedeljković et al. 2018).",Unknown,"Xanthogramma aeginae was recently described from specimens collected on the Aegean islands of Chios and Lesvos in Greece (Nedeljković et al. 2018). These are the only localities where the species has been recorded so far. The species has an extent of occurrence of 1,134 km2, and an area of occupancy based on known records of 32 km2.","This species is not subject to any trade or use. Even though it has a potential use in pest control of their prey and in crop pollination, the rarity of this species makes commercial exploitation difficult.",Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions in place for this species. Three of the collection sites are within the Voreia Chios Kai Nisoi Oinousses Kai Paraktia Thalassia Zoni Natura 2000 site. Since its larval biology is completely unknown and its requirements consequently unclear, life history research is needed in order to determine appropriate conservation measures. Monitoring is required to establish population trends and impacts of threats. There is also need for research on the distribution of this recently-described species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149164671,149164660,Merodon trochantericus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27 because it is widespread in Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Habitat loss (both quality and quantity) is the main threat due to change in land use, overgrazing by livestock and fires throughout the distribution range (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Further research is needed on the population trend, and ecology and biology of the species.

","

This species prefers open areas in thermophilous and evergreen Quercus (Quercus suber) forests, maquis, and unimproved, calcareous, coastal grasslands. The adults fly fast and low through tall ground vegetation in the period of May to June and July to September. They are known to visit flowers such as Cistus, Euphorbia, Quercus coccifera and Prospero autumnale. The larva has not been described. It has been postulated that one of its larval host plants is Prospero autumnale (Speight 2020).

","Since the species is distributed mostly in southern and southwestern Europe, the probable threats are habitat loss due to change in land use in eastern and central Europe, and overgrazing by livestock and fires in the Mediterranean areas (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","Based on all known data, there are numerous subpopulations on Sardinia and on the mainland of France. The first record from Europe was from 1905 from France. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This European endemic species is mainly distributed in the southern and southwestern parts of Europe, with an additional locality on the island of Jersey. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of a threatened category.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation actions. Its conservation needs are mainly related to conservation of suitable habitat. Its range is partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network, and in the Pyrenees National Park (Spain). Additional research is needed on its population trend, ecology and biology. The impact of overgrazing by livestock in the Mediterranean part of its range also needs further investigation. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required, and raising awareness about this species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164682,149164679,Xanthandrus comtus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in Europe or the EU27. It is a widespread species, present in many habitats, and with large subpopulations in most countries where recorded. There are no specific threats identified for this species. Therefore, the species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","Xanthandrus comtus occurs in forest, deciduous, broad-leaved evergreen and coniferous (Fagus, Quercus, and Pinus) forests and scrub. Adults visit flowers of umbellifers, Arbutus unedo, Filipendula, Hedera, Juncus, Leontodon, Lonicera, Mentha aquatica, Rosa, Rubus, Succisa, Viburnum tinus. The larva is described by Dušek and Láska (1967). The larva is predator of aphids and the caterpillars of small moths (from the families Noctiuidae, Torticidae) (Speight 2018).",

This is very common hoverfly species in Europe and seems to have no threats.

,

There is not information about population size and trends for this species in Europe.

,Unknown,Xanthandrus comtus is widely distributed in Europe. It occurs from the Faroes and southern Norway to the Iberian peninsula. It is also present from Ireland eastwards through central and southern Europe to Russia and the Caucasus and on to the Pacific coast.

Besides Europe and North Asia this species also occurs in Japan and Taiwan (Speight 2018).,"

This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are aphids and caterpillars (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,

There are no specific conservation actions needed for this species.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164704,149164701,Parasyrphus malinellus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

It is a widespread arboreal species with probably numerous subpopulations in both natural forest and conifer plantations, although it becomes rarer toward to east in temperate Europe. The decline in this species in some areas of western Europe is probably due to a combination of deforestation and changes in forest management in these countries, where there has been a shift away from coniferous plantations. No conservation action is required at present, except research on larval biology that is known inadequately to estimate possible impacts of invasive ladybirds.

","It is an arboreal species that occurs along rides and in clearings in or close coniferous forests (Abies, Picea, humid Pinus, including conifer plantations) (Speight 2018), in mixed forests near the coast in Sweden up to 300-400 m above sea level (Bartsch et al. 2009) and in forest from 800 to 2,000 m asl. in the Alps (Maibach et al. 1992). Adults often fly 2 m or more from the ground, also high up in the treetops, and visit various flowering trees (Sorbus aucuparia, Salix spp. Prunus spp, Malus domestica). They descend to visit flowers of various bushes and herbs (Anthriscus sylvestris, Crataegus laevigata, Rubus spp., Anemone nemorosa, Barbarea, Cardamine flexuosa, Meum, Petasites albus, Ranunculus, Stellaria, Taraxacum, Vaccinium myrtillus, Caltha palustris, Bunias orientalis, Allium ursinum, Heracleum spp., Filipendula ulmaria (Speight 2018, Barstch et al. 2009, Barkemeyer 1994, van Steenis et al. 2001). It is univoltine species with an adult flight period from mid April to beginning July (Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkemeyer 1994, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight et al. 2016), from mid-June to mid-July in the Alps (Maibach et al. 1992). The larva is unknown but probably feeds on aphids that live on conifers (Bartsch et al. 2009, Ball et al. 2011).","

Apart from the general threats for biodiversity and deforestation, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe. This species is widespread in conifer plantations (Speight 2018, Ball et al. 2011). The decline of this species in some areas could be partly explained by high deforestation and changes in forest management in these countries, where there has been a shift away from coniferous plantations. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axiridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids, but probably not on Picea (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

This species is widespread but quite uncommon or rare, especially southeast to Fennoscandia and Denmark (Bartsch et al. 2009, Maibach et al. 1992, Nedeljković 2011, Röder 1990). An analysis of population trends in Great Britain suggested that this species´ occurrence was declining, possibly with some evidence of recovery (Ball et al. 2011). According to Speight et al. (2016) this species is decreasing in the Netherlands and Belgium. Reemer et al. (2009) listed this species as scarce and susceptible in the Netherlands.

",Decreasing,"

This species is widespread in most of the forested boreal to temperate Palearctic. It is known from Fennoscandia south to Ardenes and north Pyrenees (southern France), Alps (Italy) and Kopaonik, Rila and Pirin (Serbia and Bulgaria) on the Balkan Peninsula; and from Ireland eastwards through northern and mountainous Europe into European parts of Russia (Speight 2018, Barkalov pers. comm. 2020, Bartsch et al. 2009, Nedeljković 2011, Burgio et al. 2015).

Outside Europe it ranges through Siberia to the Russia Far East (Sakhalin, Kuril Islands) and to Japan (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009).

","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation actions for this species in Europe at present. Parasyrphus malinellus is considered a Near Threatened species in the Netherlands (Speight et al. 2016, Reemer et al. 2009). The biology of this species, especially larval biology, is known inadequately to estimate possible impacts of the invasive ladybird Harmonia axiridis on this species and also impacts of non-specific chemical treatments against aphid pest.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164715,149164712,Merodon trebevicensis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27 because while it has a relatively restricted area of occupancy (AOO) (176 km2 in Europe, and 96 km2 in the EU27), it has a large extent of occurrence (EOO) (1,337,582 km2 in Europe and 1,015,460 km2 in the EU27), and its number of locations is above the threshold (30-35 on European level, and 20-21 in the EU27). In some parts of the range, there is a continuing decline in the quality of habitat due to fires, overgrazing by livestock, infrastructure development, and agricultural intensification (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). These are also the threats on which the number of locations is based.","This species prefers open grassy and tall-herb areas in montane, mesophilous Fagus and Castanea forests of southern Europe. The adults fly fast through and at the tops of tall herb and long grass vegetation, and also at greater heights above the ground, around the foliage of shrubs. The flight period is from May to the end of June. They are known to visit yellow Apiaceae and yellow Asteraceae, Aegopodium and Ranunculus. The developmental stages and host plant are unknown (Speight 2020).","There is no major threat to this species. In some parts of the range, fires (Greece), overgrazing by livestock (Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina), infrastructural development (most of the range), and agricultural intensification (most of the range) are considered to be a threat to its habitat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data on the population trend. A total of 94 specimens have been collected across the range. Records from Austria and Germany are old (19th and the beginning of the 20th century), and records from Bulgaria and North Macedonia are from the 1960s and 1970s: the rest of the records are fairly recent.",Unknown,"In Europe, this species is distributed in Slovakia, Austria, Italy, Bulgaria (Speight 2020), Germany, Greece, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, North Macedonia and Ukraine. In Europe, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 1,337,582 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 176 km2. In the EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 1,015,460 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 96 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is found in Turkey (Speight 2020).",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. More than half of the point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. Threats such as fires, overgrazing, agricultural intensification and infrastructure development can disturb its habitat, so continuous management and protection of sites in protected areas are needed. It is protected by law in Serbia. Fieldwork should check if it still exists in Austria and Germany. Additional research on threats, ecology and population size and trend is needed. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is also required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164726,149164723,Eupeodes tirolensis,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

Eupeodes tirolensis
is a very rare European species that occurs mostly on isolated restricted montane/alpine and Arctic habitats, that are usually only in protected national montane parks. The population trend of this species is uncertain but is suspected to be declining. The population thought to be severely fragmented as many of the subpopulations are very small and likely not viable by themselves, since it is projected loss of habitats due global changes (Barredo et al. 2020). The Alps might be the last stronghold for this species. The species has a large extent of occurrence but apparently low and fragmented area of occupancy (Pan European = 200 km2, EU 27= 140 km2). The species is therefore close to qualifying as Endangered in both Europe and the European Union applying Criterion B2, however most known localities are within protected areas and subpopulations in the Alps presently appear to be stable.","

Adults of E. tirolensis are known from unimproved montane and alpine grassland (with Alnus viridis and Salix scrub) and alpine lake shores, and heath near seepages and streams from 1,200 m up to 2,500 m in the highest mountains of Central and south Europe (Speight 2018) and in open, damp pine forest near the forest border in northern Scandinavia (Bartsch et al. 2009). The flight period is from the end of May to July and August at higher altitudes. The males often rest in the sun on large stones or scree, returning repeatedly to the same place, they hover at heights from 1 - 5 m, in open situations and often many of hilltopping males could be collected in close proximity on one place (van Steenis 2015, Speight 2018). Adults have been recorded visiting flowers of a Sedum sp.  Developmental stages are unknown, but larvae are apparently predacious as larvae of other Eupeodes species (Bartsch et al. 2009).

","

Any current threats to this species are unknown. Nevertheless, it is presumed that a continuing decline of extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species is ongoing, due to human activities and settlements in Europe (Janssen et al. 2016), although most known subpopulations occur in protected areas. The quality of suitable habitat for this species is likely to be strongly influenced by climate change (D. Doczkal pers comm. 2020, T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2021, Barredo et al. 2020).

","This is an apparently rare subalpine to alpine species with fragmented populations in several restricted mountainous areas in Europe (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018). It seems that this species was more frequently collected in past than recently, but the rate of any population decline has not been calculated. There is great variability in numbers of collected specimens (sometimes several hill-topping specimens are collected in one place; van Steenis 2015, Speight 2018). In the southern part of the Alps there seems to be a stable population because the species is regularly collected in this area at present (even if at low density) (Lebard and Speight 2019). The population thought to be severely fragmented as many of the subpopulations are very small and likely not viable by themselves.",Decreasing,"

This European endemic species has a boreoalpine distribution. It is known from northern and mountainous Fennoscandia (Norway, Sweden, Finland), from most parts of the Alps (France, Switzerland, Austria, Italy), Pyrenees (France, Spain), the Dinaric Alps (Durmitor and Prokletije in Montenegro), and the northern Apennines in Italy (Dušek and Láska 1973, Maibach et al. 1992, Speight 1993, Nielsen 1999, Bartsch et al. 2009, Nedeljković 2011, Nielsen and Svendsen 2014, Burgio et al. 2015, van Steenis et al. 2015, Schlüsslmayr 2018, Speight 2018, Speight et al. 2018, Lembart and Speight 2019, GBIF 2020). Vujić et al. (2018) listed this species also as occurring in Serbia, citing Nedeljković (2011), but Nedelković reported a new record from Prokletije National Park in Montenegro rather than Serbia. The species has a large extent of occurrence, but an apparently low and fragmented area of occupancy (Pan European = 200 km2, EU 27= 140 km2).

","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,"Conservation actions regarding to this species are unknown, however this species has been recorded mostly only in the protected mountainous national parks. Haarto and Kerppola (2007) listed this species as Vulnerable to Finland. It is listed as Data Deficient in the recent Red List to Finland species (Haarto et al. 2019). In the recent Norwegian and Swedish Red Lists it is listed as Least Concern (Gammelmo et al. 2015, ArtsDatabanken 2020).  Further monitoring is needed to determine recent distribution and population status of this species as well as its biology.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164738,149164735,Eupeodes abiskoensis,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT°)

This species is distributed in most mountainous arctic region in the Holarctic, but it is a rare localised species with a restricted area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe, with a known AOO of just 140 km2. There are 28 known locations in Europe and within them only six in the EU27. The population of this rare species seems to be stable at present, but there is a continuing decline in the quality and extent of the suitable habitats for this species. The species is assessed as Near Threatened for Europe under Criterion B (B2ab(iii)), with a number of locations (28) that is close to the threshold for a threatened category. If population decline of this species is detected it should be reassessed and may warrant listing in a higher category in Europe.

This species meets the Criteria to be assessed as Vulnerable for the EU 27 (area of occupancy 28 km2, six locations, and a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat) but there is an expectation of continuous immigration from Norway, because most localities in the EU lie close to the border with Norway, so it is necessary to downgrade the category for EU27. Hence, the species is assessed as Near Threatened (NT°) for the EU27 Member States.

","

This species is present in unimproved subalpine, subarctic grassland and heathland with dwarf Betula scrub and herb-rich patches (Speight 2018). Bartsch et al. (2009) mention its occurrence in open coniferous or mixed forests and visiting of flowers of Bartsia alpina and Pinguicula alpina (both species which are restricted to mountain fens and wetlands). Tore Nielsen observed males of this species on flowering Salix and Cerastium in Norway (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Barkalov and Mutin (2015) observed this species around flowering Rhododendron and on flowers of Sorbus near banks of the river Anadyr in Far East Russia, and on flowers of Arctanthemum, Taraxacum and Potentila anserina edegi. Some females were trapped by yellow traps installed in floodplain underbrush of Pinus pumila. The species does not occur at low elevations (Bartsch et al. 2009). No information on the larvae of this species is known, but larvae are likely aphidophagous like other Eupeodes larvae (Skevington et al. 2019, Bartsch et al. 2009).

","Any current threats to this species are unknown. Nevertheless, there is presumed to be a continuing decline in the quality and extent of the suitable habitats for this species, due to human activities and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016). The quality and extent of suitable habitat for this alpine arctic species may be declining due to global warming, limiting the potential range of the species (Barredo et al. 2020, T. Nielsen pers comm. 2021). Members of this genus tend to be ecological generalists whose distribution is influenced by the presence or absence of commoner, superior competitors (A. Vujic and D. Doczal pers. comm. to L. Mazanek 2021). Should climate change favour range expansion of commoner species into this species' range, it is likely to be highly sensitive to competitive displacement (L. Mazanek pers. comm. 2021).","Eupeodes abiskoensis is a rare species in Europe with only scattered records from Fennoscandia (Bartsch et al. 2009) and no known records from European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018). However, this species is still regularly observed in Fennoscandia and represented by recent records (GBIF 2020) as well as in Asian Russia (Chukotka) (Barkalov and Mutin 2015) so the population of this species could be stable, but the species is too rare (and there were no records of this species accessioned on GBIF between 1997 and 2007 (GBIF 2020), but the reason behind this is not known.",Unknown,"In the European region, this species is known from northern and alpine Fennoscandia (Norway, Sweden, Finland) (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Skevington and Locke 2019, Mazánek et al. 1999). The occurrence in North European Russia has not been documented (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), and although it seems possible, this species does not occur in lowlands and there are limited suitable alpine tundra habitats in European Russia.

Eupeodes abiskoensis is distributed in northern Holarctic. Its range extends through Siberia to the north of Far East Russia, USA (Alaska) and Canada (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Skevington and Locke 2019, Mazánek et al. 1999).",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"E. abiskoensis is listed as Least Concern in the Norwegian Red List for Species (Gammelmo et al. 2015) and in Sweden (Arts databanken 2015, 2020) and as Data Deficient in the Red List of Finnish Species (Hyvärinen 2019). Previously, Haarto and Kerppola (2007) listed this species as Vulnerable for Finland. Since the Norwegian and Swedish Red List assessments were prepared, there has been a reevaluation of this species' likely sensitivity to climate change impacts in particular, and national reassessments for these countries may be warranted (L. Mazanek pers. comm. 2021). Conservation actions relating to this species are unknown. Research is needed into the biology, population and threats to this species, and also monitoring on population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164747,149164734,Merodon testaceus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)


This species is distributed in the Southeastern Mediterranean, in Greece (on the East Aegean islands of Lesvos and Chios) (Vujić et al. 2020), and in North Macedonia. Further research is needed into the population trend and ecology and biology of the species.

This species is assessed as Endangered in Europe because the area of occupancy (AOO) is 120 km2, and the species is severely fragmented. The number of locations is 10-15, defined primarily by the ongoing habitat loss (both quality and quantity) caused by change in land use and overgrazing by livestock, and also by the fires throughout the distribution range.

In the EU 27, it is assessed as Endangered, because the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 3674 km2, the area of occupancy (AOO) is 108 km2 and the species is severely fragmented. The number of locations is about 10, which is defined primarily by the ongoing habitat loss. 

","

This species prefers thermophilous deciduous forests (Castanea) (Ricarte et al. 2012, Ståhls et al. 2009). The adults are active from April to October, and have been recorded visiting the flowers Ferula and Foeniculum. The larva has not been described (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020).

","Habitat loss (both in quality and quantity) because of overgrazing by livestock and forest fires across the range is the main threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). A recent increase in the intensity of dairy sheep farming has happened in Chios (Gelesakis et al. 2012), leading to expected overgrazing and consequent loss of habitat quality.","Based on all known findings, there are about 100 collected specimens dating from 1937 to 2017. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species occurs in the southeastern Mediterranean, in Greece (on the East Aegean islands of Lesvos and Chios) (Vujić et al. 2020), and in North Macedonia. In Europe, its area of occupancy (AOO) is 120 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 39,051 km2. In the EU27, its area of occupancy (AOO) is 108 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 3674 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is present in southern Turkey.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation actions. Its conservation needs are mainly related to conservation of suitable habitat. The range lies partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network. Additional research is needed on its population trend, ecology and biology. The impact of overgrazing by livestock in the Mediterranean part of its range also needs further investigation. Monitoring population and habitat trends is required. In addition, raising awareness about the species would be beneficial.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164759,149164756,Doros destillatorius,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Doros destillatorius
is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) in both Europe and the EU27 (which includes all known range states except Turkey) due to its known area of occupancy (68 km2), severely fragmented population and an expected reduction in the habitat quality due to the loss and degradation of old-growth forests. There are big gaps between the known distribution points of this species in Europe. Inappropriate forest management and wildfire may also reduce the abundance of mature trees providing breeding sites.","The preferred environment of this species seem to be deciduous forest of mesophilous Fagus and thermophilous oak with mature or over-mature trees. Adults are apparently largely arboreal, but descend from the canopy to visit the margins of forest streams. The larva of this species is unknown but appears to be related to ant-maintained colonies of Stomaphis aphids living under the bark of mature Acer and Quercus trees (Speight 2018).","This species seems to be closely-associated with Acer, Fagus and Quercus forests with mature or over-mature trees where its presumed larval prey occurs. The main threats for this species are the reduction and loss of this habitat type, as well as inappropriate forest management techniques and wildfire which do not favour over-mature trees.","There is no estimate of the population size of this species. Doros destillatorius has never been observed in numbers in nature, and most records consist of solitary specimens (e.g. Mazánek et al. 2005; Birtele 2011). Density consequently appears to be low. The species might be genuinely related to old-growth forest and further monitoring in this forest type may clarify the actual population size and trend of D. destillatorius.  The size and colour pattern of this species make it difficult for this species to go unnoticed by collectors. This species' population appears to be genuinely severely fragmented and individual subpopulations appear to be small, a fact that might relate to the fragmented distribution of forests with mature and over-mature trees providing potential breeding sites for this species.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from a small number of records across the Mediterranean basin from southern and eastern France, Italy (Sardinia), northeastern Greece, Bulgaria (no mapped locality) and European Turkey (no mapped locality) to the east, and is also found in Romania (no mapped locality), southern Crimea (Speight 2018), and the southern Czech Republic (Mazánek et al. 2005) close to the border with Austria.

Out of the European region, the distribution of this species extends to the Caucuses (Georgia; Georgian Biodiversity Database 2020).",This species is not subject to any use or trade.,Terrestrial,"Doros destillatorius is in need of a specific conservation plan based on a better knowledge of its range, population size and larval biology. For the moment, strict protection of forests where this species is found is  required to preserve this species habitat. According to Speight et al. (2016) this species' population is decreasing in Europe, and might be regarded as 'endangered'. Doros destillatorius appears to be Critically Endangered (CR) in the Czech Republic, where it is known from a single specimen collected in Podyjí National Park (Mazánek et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164769,149164758,Merodon teruelensis,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic species is distributed in northern and central Spain and in southeast France (Speight 2020). The species prefers small, marshy, open areas in evergreen oak maquis, garrigue and scrub-invaded grasslands (V.S. van der Goot pers. comm. in Speight 2020), and also wet meadows (M.Á. Marcos-Garcia pers. comm. in Speight 2020). In France, it occurs around the margins of poor fen (Speight 2020).

It is assessed as Vulnerable because while it has a relatively large extent of occurrence (EOO) (213,332 km2), its area of occupancy (AOO) based on the available records is small (24 km2), it has six locations and there is a continuous decline in the quality of its habitats. The number of locations is calculated considering the planting of monocultures as a major threat. We propose additional research concerning population trends, as well as monitoring and conservation of the habitat.","This species prefers small, marshy, open areas in evergreen oak maquis, garrigue and scrub-invaded grasslands (V.S. van der Goot pers. comm. in Speight 2020), and also wet meadows (M.Á Marcos-Garcia, pers. comm. in Speight 2020). In France, it occurs around the margins of poor fen (Speight 2020). The adults fly fast and low through ground vegetation. They are known to visit flowers of Senecio. The flight period is in May, and between July and beginning of August (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Speight 2020). The developmental stages and host plant are unknown.","The main threat is habitat loss due to monoculture plantations that cause serious decline in the quality of habitat. Infrastructure development for tourism (ski centres, motorways), and overgrazing by livestock also represent a certain threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data about population size, trend or dynamics. In Spain, the records date from 1965 to 1987, while in France, only one specimen is known from 1927.",Unknown,"This European endemic species is restricted to northern and central Spain and southeast France (Speight 2020). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 213,332 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 24 km2.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions targeting this species. Five point localities occur within Natura 2000 sites, in Sierra de los Ancares, Picos de Europa en Castilla y León, Alto Tajo, Sierra de Guadarrama and Sierra de Gredos. Conservation and monitoring of the habitat are important for its preservation. Research on its population trend and ecology, as well as threats would be beneficial. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required, and raising awareness about this endemic species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164782,149164780,Chrysotoxum triarcuatum,Vulnerable,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This species is assessed as Vulnerable on the regional level due to its relatively restricted area of occupancy (136 km2) and extent of occurrence (11,053 km2), the species is considered to occur in 10 locations, and there is an inferred continuing decline of habitat quality and threats from tourism development and wildfires. The assessment is the same on the EU27 level because this species' range is restricted to the European Union.

","Chrysotoxum triarcuatum has been collected in roadside vegetation and in a gorge in La Palma island, visiting flowers of Foeniculum vulgare (Burt and Mengual 2019). Larval biology is unknown.","

Reduction of habitat quality may threaten this species. Infrastructure development (mostly due to tourism) can be regarded as the major threat to the habitat of the species. Although the natural habitat is unclear, it has mainly been found in remnant vegetation along verges. Additional threats in some parts of the species range include overgrazing by feral goats and wildfires.

","There is limited information about the population size and trend of this species. Leclercq (1975) reported this species from Tenerife, and Báez (1977) from this and other islands. Burt and Mengual (2019) reported 23 specimens collected in different localities of La Palma in 2017. According to these data, the status of the population, at least in La Palma, appears to be stable.",Stable,"Chrysotoxum triarcuatum is endemic to the Canary Islands in the Macaronesian region of Spain. It has been recorded from Gran Canaria, La Gomera, La Palma and Tenerife (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Burt and Mengual 2019). It has an estimated extent of occurrence of 11,795 km2 and area of occupancy of 136 km2.","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. Even though it has a potential use in pest control of the larval prey (presumed to be insects, particularly aphids) and in crop pollination, the rarity of this species makes commercial exploitation difficult.",Terrestrial,There are no specific conservation actions known for this species. Further research into this species' life history - including studies of larval biology - is needed to propose effective conservation actions. Additional monitoring is needed to better understand the population trends and impacts of threats.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164783,149164778,Merodon serrulatus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species prefers open areas in thermophilous deciduous and evergreen Quercus, dry Pinus, and Castanea forests, lentisc scrub. It also occurs in dry, well-vegetated, calcareous and non-calcar­eous unimproved grasslands and tracksides, in hedgehog heath (Speight 2020), as well as in Pinus, Pi­cea and Larix forests in Siberia (Vujić et al. 2020a), and mesophilous Fagus forests (Vujić et al. 2020b).

The species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and EU 27 because it is a widespread species. Based on all known data, there are numerous subpopulations across the continent, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Habitat loss (both quality and quantity) is the main threat due to overgrazing by livestock and fires through all the Mediterranean (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Further research is needed on the population trend, and ecology and biology of the species.

","

This species prefers open areas in thermophilous deciduous and evergreen Quercus, dry Pinus, Castanea forests, and lentisc scrub. It also occurs in dry, well-vegetated, calcareous and non-calcar­eous unimproved grasslands and tracksides, in hedgehog heath (Speight 2020), as well as in Pinus, Pi­cea and Larix forests in Siberia (Vujić et al. 2020a), and mesophilous Fagus forests (Vujić et al. 2020b).

The adults are recorded visiting flowers such as Apiaceae, Cirsium, Helianthemum, Potentilla, Rosa, Thapsia, Thymus and Ranunculus (Krpač et al. 2001 as Merodon alexeji) in the period from April to September (Vujić et al. 2020a). They fly low and very fast, zig-zagging through grasses and tall, herb-rich ground vegetation, settling on low-growing ground vegetation, often on dead shoots. The larva has not been described (Speight 2020).

","Since the species is distributed mostly in southern Europe, the main threats are probably overgrazing by livestock and the ever-present fires in the Mediterranean region (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","Based on all known data, there are numerous subpopulations across Europe. Specimens have been collected from 1837 (Italy) to 2019. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species occurs from the Iberian Peninsula in the southwest, right through to Greece and eastern Turkey in the south, and eastward towards Siberia and Mongolia (Doczkal pers. comm. in Vujić et al. 2020a). In Europe, it is distributed mostly in the Mediterranean region, on the Black Sea coast and in the European part of Russia. Previous records of this species from North Africa and Middle East belong to other species of the Merodon serrulatus species group. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of a threatened category.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

So far this species has not yet been the subject of any targeted conservation action. Its range lies partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network in various protected areas such as Chelmos National Park (Greece), Olympus National Park (Greece), Pindos National Park (Greece), Vanoise National Park (France), Pyrenees National Park (Spain) and Sierra Nevada National Park (Spain). Its conservation needs are mainly related to the conservation of suitable habitats. Additional research is needed about its population trend, ecology and biology. The impacts of overgrazing in the Mediterranean parts of its range also need further investigation. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required, and raising awareness about the species is important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164801,149164799,Merodon sapphous,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii),2021,2019-11-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

In Europe, the species is known from the island of Lesvos (Greece) (Vujić et al. 2007, 2020; Speight 2020). It is found at only three point localities in one chestnut forest (Vujić et al. 2007).

It is assessed as Critically Endangered in Europe and the EU 27 countries based on its small extent of occurrence (EOO), which 12 km2, number of locations (one), and decline in the quality of habitats. The number of locations is based on the fire as the major threat. The area of occupancy (AOO) is also 12 km2, which is also very close to the Critically Endangered threshold. We propose additional research concerning the species ecology and population trends, as well as monitoring and conservation of the habitat. The rescue effect from subpopulations outside of Europe is unlikely to happen.",This species inhabits dry deciduous forests of Castanea. The adults have been recorded visiting the flowers of Foeniculum (Vujić et al. 2020)There is no information about its ecology. The flight period is September and October. The developmental stages and host plant are unknown (Speight 2020).,Fires represent the main threat to the habitat of this species. Overgrazing by livestock and infrastructural development also cause habitat disturbance to a certain extent (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020),"There is no information about the population size. Only around 20 specimens have been found on Lesvos until now, dating from 2004, 2005 and 2019.",Unknown,"

In Europe this species is known from the island of Lesvos (Greece) (Vujić et al. 2007, 2020; Speight 2020) from just three point localities in one chestnut forest (Vujić et al. 2007). In Europe and EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are estimated to be 12 km2.

Outside of Europe, it occurs in the Isparta region in Turkey.

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions targeting this species. All three point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network (Kolpos Geras, Elos ntipi Kai Oros Olympos). The conservation of the forest habitat is vital for its survival, and measures include the prevention of forest fires and controlling grazing by livestock. Considering that there is no information about its ecology, research is needed. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required. Raising awareness about this species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164812,149164809,Xylota suecica,Vulnerable,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2019-09-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

Xylota suecica is a species with a restricted range in Europe, found only in Sweden, Finland, Norway and European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 1.6 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is estimated to be between 500 and 2,000 km2. The distribution map is an estimation of the range in which the species can occur. There is a projected continuing decline in habitat and EOO and AOO with human activities and climate change for both Europe and EU 27 countries. In Norway, the species is very rare and records are old, but it has a wide range in Russia to the east. Therefore, in Europe it is assessed as Vulnerable under Criterion B.

However, for the EU 27 it is different as this species is found in approximately 14 locations in the EU 27 countries (Sweden and Finland) with an AOO of around 56 km2, based on the threat of human activities such as logging and other activities. It is severely fragmented in its distribution in both Europe and the EU 27, and the assumption is there is in a continuous decline in EOO and AOO which will continue in the future. Therefore, this species is assessed as Endangered for the EU 27.
","

This species is found in conifer forest, Pinus sylvestris taiga and mosaic boreal Picea/Pinus/Betula forest and aapa mire (Finnish term for a large, complex, cold-climate wetland) with overmature trees (H. Bartsch and T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2019; Speight 2017, 2020). The hoverfly has been recorded visiting the flowers of Ranunculus sp., Rubus chamaemorusRosa acicularis, Anemone sylvestris, Ptarmica cartilaginea, Ranunculus repens, Ledum decumbens (Bagatshanova 1990) and Heracleum sibiricum (Pestov 2007). The flight period is from mid June to mid July. The developmental stages are not described.

There is a projected continuing decline in the habitat as a result of climate change for both Europe and EU 27.

","In the EU 27, this species is restricted to certain habitat types in the high north so any changes in climate will likely destroy its habitats, and it is susceptible to slight climatic changes that affect its habitats. Furthermore the species is susceptible for the human activities in the region like logging, deforestation, work and other activities.","It is estimated there is a constant decline in the number of localities in northern Europe, and the overall current population trend is considered to be strongly decreasing (Speight 2020). There are 14 known localities across northern Scandinavia (eight from Finland and six localities in Sweden) and a undefined number of locations in European Russia. The species has a wide range to the east and is probably more stable in parts of European Russia due to connection to the more eastern subpopulations. However, the species is considered to be severely fragmented in both Europe and the EU 27, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"

This species is known from arctic Norway, northern Sweden and Finland, eastwards through northern European Russia and on to eastern Siberia (Speight 2020). It is an Arctic species occurring high north in the Arctic circle.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 1.6 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be between 500 and 2,000 km2.

In the EU 27 countries this species is found in approximately 14 locations, so is estimated to have an AOO of around 56 km2, based on the threat of human activities in the region like logging, deforestation, work and other activities.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"It is not known if there are any conservation actions ongoing for this species, but it is known to occur in some protected areas in Russia. This species has been assessed as Near Threatened in Finland in 2010 and 2019 (FinBif 2020), and in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020) and Norway (Artsobservasjoner 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164823,149164820,Merodon sacki,Critically Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is endemic to southwestern Spain, where it is known from only four specimens, three of which are dated from 2015 (all from one point locality), and from one further specimen from the beginning of the 20th century; this latter specimen requires confirmation.

This European endemic species is assessed as Critically Endangered (CR) based on the small area of occupancy (AOO) (4 or 8 km2, as one of the localities might no longer exist), the extent of occurrence (EOO) (4 or 250 km2), and number of locations (one or two, as one of the localities might no longer exist), as well as due to the decline in quality of habitats. We propose additional research concerning the population trends, as well as monitoring and conservation of the habitat.",

This species prefers open areas in evergreen oak forests (Quercus ilex and Quercus suber) and Mediterranean scrub. The flight period is from April to July (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages and host plant are unknown.

,"Overgrazing by livestock represents a major threat to this species, followed by the intensification of agricultural practice and infrastructural development (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).",There is no information about the population size or trends.,Unknown,"This European endemic species is known from two point localities in southwestern Spain. The species is known from only four specimens, three of which date from 2015 (all from one point locality northwest of Seville), and the other from the beginning of the 20th century south of Cadiz, from where the species was described in 1936, in a locality where the species might not be present anymore. Since the specimen was collected at the beginning of the 20th century, further investigation is needed in order to confirm if the species still occurs in the locality. Its area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 4 km2 based on extant the locality near Seville. Both AOO and EOO could be larger, depending on whether the species still occurs at the second locality.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. One point locality occurs within the Natura 2000 network (Sierra de Aracena y Picos de Aroche). The protection of habitat by preventing overgrazing by livestock, and restricting urban development (one point locality is very close to a village), are necessary measures for this species. Additional research concerning population size and trends, ecology and threats is needed. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required. Raising awareness about this endemic species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149164835,149164832,Syritta pipiens,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The Common Compost Fly (Syritta pipiens) is a widespread species, found across the whole of Europe. It is very common, and has a very large extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO). The EOO of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 21.3 million km2 and the AOO is estimated to be around 9 million km2. For the EU 27 countries the estimated EOO is around 14.5 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 3.6 million km2. There are no current threats to this species, and the current population trend is considered to be increasing. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. No conservation measures are required at present.","

This species is found in a very wide range of habitats: wetland; fen, edges of bogs and along the margin of almost any freshwater body, including lakes, ponds, ditches, canals, brooks and rivers; anthropophilic, occurring in most sorts of farmland, suburban gardens and urban parks.

Adults are low-flying, rarely more than 1 m from the ground, settling on vegetation. Males patrol stands of low-growing plants in bloom (see Parmenter 1956). 

Flowers visited include white umbellifers; Achillea, Allium, Aster, Calluna, Cardamine, Cirsium palustre, Convolvulus, Crataegus, Epilobium, Euphorbia, Galium, Jasione montana, Leontodon, Polygonum cuspidatum, Potentilla erecta, Prunus laurocerasus, Ranunculus, Rosa canina, Senecia jacobaea, Sorbus aucuparia, Tussilago. See also the extended list in de Buck (1990). 

The flight period of this species is from March to November, and in southern Europe probably all the year round, but most records are from May to October.

The larvae described and figured by Heiss (1938) and Hartley (1961) and illustrated in colour by Rotheray (1994), Bartsch et al. (2009) and Dussaix (2013); a inhabitant of various types of moist, decaying, vegetable matter, including cow dung and garden compost heaps. Under some conditions, the larva can apparently also develop successfully in mammalian corpses (Magni et al. 2013). Dussaix (2013) confirms the larva overwinters, shows a puparium in colour and reports the puparial phase as lasting for 3 weeks.

",There are no major threats to this species.,This species is very widespread and common across all of Europe. The current population trend is considered to be increasing.,Increasing,"

This species is widespread and becoming cosmopolitan, and occurs across most parts of the European region.

Globally, it is known from most of the Palaearctic, including North Africa, most of North America, South America and the Oriental region. Records from the Afrotropical region are apparently erroneous (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 21.3 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 9 million km2. For the EU 27 countries the estimated EOO is around 14.5 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 3.6 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),No conservation measures are necessary; this species occurs in Protected Areas across its range.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164845,149164843,Merodon rufus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is distributed in most of Continental Europe (from France on the west, to Ukraine on the east) and in the Mediterranean region (on the Iberian, Apennines and Balkan Peninsulas). The data for Slovakia, and the European part of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Speight, 2020) are not checked and data from Poland (Radenković et al. 2020) doesn't give a precise locality.

The species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and EU 27, because it is widespread in Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Habitat loss (both quality and quantity) due to change of land use, and overgrazing by livestock and fires through all the Mediterranean is the main threat to the species. Further research is needed into the population trend and ecology and biology of the species.

","This species prefers open areas within dry forests, both deciduous (mesophilous Fagus, thermophilous Quercus and evergreen Quercus ilex forests) and coniferous (dry Pinus) forests. It also occurs up to 1400 metres in unimproved montane grasslands in the Alps. The adults fly very fast and low over thinly vegetated ground, and settle on bare ground in the sun (Speight 2018). They are active from May to August, and have been recorded visiting the flowers of Asteraceae, Apiaceae (Krpač 2001), Anthericum, Paradisia, Geranium and Helianthemum. According to Peterson et al. (2008), Merodon rufus is a specialist pollinator of Anthericum liliago (Anthericaceae). It has also been observed feeding on flowers of Pinus sylvestris (G. Pétremand, pers. comm. in Speight 2020). The larva has not been described (Speight 2020).","Since this species is distributed in most of Europe, the main threat is probably habitat loss due to change in land use across the Europe, and overgrazing by livestock and fires in the Mediterranean areas (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","Based on all known data, there are numerous subpopulations across Europe. It has been collected from 1832 (Czech Republic) to 2019. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species occurs in most of Continental Europe (from France in the west, to Ukraine in the east) and in the Mediterranean region (on the Iberian, Apennine and Balkan peninsulas). The data for Slovakia, and the European part of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Speight, 2020) have not been checked. The data from Poland (Radenković et al. 2020) does not give a precise locality. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, the species is present in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and in North Africa.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Merodon rufus is on the Red List of Germany, Red List of Baden-Württemberg and Red List of Czech Republik (Vulnerable). The range of the species is partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network, and also within various protected areas, such as the Natural Reserve Combe Lavaux (France), Ecrins National Park (France), Mercantour National Park (France), Pyrinees National Park (Spain), Gesause National Park (Austria), Fruška Gora National Park (Serbia), Triglav National Park (Slovenia), Risnjak National Park (Croatia), Durmitor National Park (Montenegro) and Rodopi National Park (Greece). Its  conservation needs are mainly related to the conservation of suitable habitat. Additional research is needed into its population trend, ecology and biology. The impacts of overgrazing by livestock in the Mediterranean part of its range also needs further investigation. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required, and raising awareness about the species is also important. 

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164857,149164854,Pseudopelecocera latifrons,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

Pseudopelecocera latifrons is associated with steppe habitat in Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 2.7 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.2 million km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 455,000 km2, but the AOO for EU 27 is estimated to be around 500 km2. The species is relatively common in the southeastern steppe of the Ukraine, and there are also records from the Czech Republic and Hungary. However, some records from EU 27 countries are very old, and there are very little recent records from any of the EU 27 countries. The species seems to be extremely rare outside the Ukraine. The steppe habitat is considered threatened in the EU, the population trend in the EU 27 is considered to be strongly declining and the species is considered to occur at less than five locations. The estimated AOO will decline fast as the steppe habitat disappears. Therefore, in the EU 27, the species is assessed as Endangered. However, in Europe the species is assessed as Least Concern, because in the Ukraine and southern European Russia the habitat is still there and the population there seems to be reasonably stable.

Further research is needed on the threats, taxonomy, habitats, ecology and population of this species, particularly on the larvae.","This species is found in dry and steppic grasslands, although it can sometimes also occur in cities and in botanical gardens. It is probably a phytophagous species, although there is not much information about the larvae. There is lots of speculation around the larvae behaviour/ecology (may be below the ground in the grass root zone), and the species might be associated with fungi. The flight period of this species is April.","There are no known clear threats to this species, but the steppe habitat it lives in is considered to be a threatened habitat in the EU. This kind of habitat has probably disappeared in the western part of Europe due to (historical) anthropogenic activities like agriculture, logging and other human intrusions.

See for that the attached files to this assessment of the remaining steppe, the occurrence of the species is probably strongly connected with this, although there might be some populations outside this range which occur in cities and in botanical gardens. But it is unclear whether this will have a positive effect on the occurrence of the species. Frank van de Meutter (pers. comm. 2020) suggests that the species might have benefited from climate change where steppe habitat evolved.","There are four specimens known from Czech Republic but they are old records from a National Park in the southeast of the country. The species is common in southeastern Ukraine, and was last collected in 2014. The specimen from Germany is more than 50 years old, and was probably found in the south, but a recent survey of steppe habitat in Germany failed to find the species again (A. Hochkirch pers. comm. 2019). 

Overall, the species seems to still be present in the countries were the habitat still occurs, like Ukraine, Hungary and the southern part of European Russia. In the western parts of Europe, particularly in EU countries, the species has strongly declined and probably has disappeared from France (although it is unclear if it was ever found there), Germany, Slovakia and maybe the Czech Republic. Therefore, the overall current population trend of this species is considered to be decreasing in the EU 27, but probably stable in European Russia.",Decreasing,"

This species was described from specimens collected in the Lebanon. In their redescription of the species (as Pelecocera latifrons), Mengual et al. (2015) cite specimens examined from southern European Russia and Hungary. According to Peck (1988), this species has also been recorded from Germany (but possibly extinct), the Czech Republic, France, Roumania (Lasi, Jijia) and the former Yugoslavia. It is not currently included on the species lists for France or Germany (but probably as Pelecocera latifrons) - as far as we know there are no records in France, but it is suspected that it might occur there (Speight 2020).

The species is also known from Ukraine, in the steppe region, and is found in a few places in south European Russia (Lipetsk Region, Voronezh Region) (Barkalov and Mutin 2018). Its European occurrence is on the western border of the range.

Literature on this and related species is not comprehensive, but a lot of literature refers to the species as Pelecocera latifrons. Most recent record from the Czech Republic was from 2003, in the steppe region, with several records from one locality. One locality was found in 1992 to 1996 but has been searched for more recently and the species was not found there. Old records from Slovakia (1950s).

In 2005, the species was recorded from Hungary. There is no information on the record of Romania, it is listed on the checklist but no detailed information. Records from Germany exist but they are old (Ssymank pers. comm. 2019). It may be found in Turkey but there are two similar species that may cause confusion, one is P. persiana and another is a new species. According to Andre van Eck (pers. comm. 2019) the species doesn't occur in Turkey (in press).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 2.7 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.2 million km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 455,000 km2, but the AOO for EU 27 is estimated to be around 500 km2, although it might be smaller when the species is restricted to the small part of steppe that remains in Europe. Due to the threats on the rare and declining steppe habitat, this species is considered to occur at less than five locations within the EU 27.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Further research is needed on the threats, taxonomy, habitats, ecology and population of this species, particularly on the larvae. It has been found in a National Park in the Czech Republic which was well protected during WW2 until 1989, but now there is increasing tourism (Mazanek pers. comm. 2019). In 2009, this species was listed in the Ukraine Red Data Book (Akimov 2009).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164867,149164865,Merodon rufipes,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

The species is assessed as Endangered on European level due to the restricted area of occupancy (AOO) (12 km2), small number of locations (three) which are based on the urbanisation as the major threat and a continuing decline in the quality of habitat.

On the EU 27 level, it is assessed as Critically Endangered due to the even more restricted area of occupancy (4 km2), equally small extent of occurrence (EOO) (4 km2), a single location (only one point locality in Bulgaria), and the continuing decline in quality of habitat. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from subpopulations in the assessment region.","This species prefers Eastern thermophilous Quercus forest, mesophilous Fagus forest (Veselić et al. 2017) and Quercus robur forest in Ukraine (G. Popov pers. comm. 2019). The flight period is in August and September (Speight 2020). The developmental stages and host plant are unknown.","All of the specimens collected so far have been found in close proximity to urban areas, and therefore urbanisation is considered a major threat to this species. In addition, unsustainable agriculture can threaten its habitat.",There is no information about the population trend. Only five specimens have been recorded so far. The records from Ukraine are from 1881 and from 1883. One male from the Kharkiv region dates from 1981 (the most recent record).,Unknown,"

The European range of this species includes Bulgaria and Ukraine (Speight 2020). In Europe, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 25,500 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 12 km2. In the EU27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are estimated to be 4 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is also distributed in the Caucasus region of Russia and Georgia (Mengual et al. 2020).

",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions targeting this species. One point locality occurs within the Natura2000 network: Sinite kamani - Grebenets.

The prevention of rapid and uncontrolled urbanization would be beneficial for the preservation of this species. Additional research on its population trends, ecology, and possible threats is needed. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required, and raising awareness about the species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164878,149164876,Pelecocera tricincta,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Pelecocera tricincta
 is found across Europe, and is particularly widespread in Scandinavia. In other parts of its range, it may be declining due to human activity, fire and droughts. However, overall the population is large and stable. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.

Although conservation action is not urgently required, if it is implemented, it should focus on the preservation of the habitat where this species is found, particularly forest habitats with open areas.","

The preferred environment of this species is conifer forest and open ground, dry Pinus forest and heathland. It is also found in open areas within Castanea forest. 

Adults fly low among ground vegetation of tracksides and clearings, and in ericaceous heathland, easily detected by use of the sweep net as by direct observation. 

Flowers visited by this species include Calluna vulgaris, Cirsium palustre, Hieracium sp., Hypochoeris sp., Leontodon sp., Narthecium sp., Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus sp., Sedum acre and Teucrium sp.

The flight period is from June to September, plus April and May in southern Europe. The morphology of the chorion of the egg is figured by Kuznetzov (1988).

","Forest habitats with open areas have disappeared, not only due to human activities like deforestation, logging and industrial areas but also because of climate change. In the south, there might be an additional threat by fire and droughts.","There is no well documented population information on this species in Europe, but the association between this species and heathland in conifer, Pinus and Castanea forest means that it has decreased considerably in abundance, with its habitat. However, the current population trend is considered to be fairly stable for this species in both Europe and the EU 27. With continuing intensification of use of farmland, the species may decrease in frequency (M. Speight pers. comm. 2019). However, it still has a wide range in Europe, if fragmented.",Stable,"

This species is known from Fennoscandia south to Iberia, from Britain (southern England) eastwards through much of Europe (including Italy, northern parts of the Balkans) into European parts of Russia (Karelia, Lipetsk Region, Voronezh Region) and the Caucasus. It is also found through Siberia to Cis-Baikal (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 7.8 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2.7 million km2. The EOO for EU 27 is around 5.9 million km2, and the AOO is around 1.8 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions currently in place for this species. Although not urgently needed, if implemented, they should focus on the protection of the habitat, particularly areas most vulnerable to human activities, pollution and climate change. Furthermore research should be done on the taxonomy, biology and ecology of the species.

This species has been assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Sweden and Finland (Artdatabanken 2020, FinBif 2020), and as Near Threatened (NT) in Norway (Artsobservasjoner 2020). The species is protected in Serbia (Republic of Serbia Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning 2010). In the Czech Republic the species was assessed as Vulnerable (Farkac et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164888,149164886,Merodon rubidiventris,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is endemic Europe, where it is known from the islands of Sardinia and Corsica (Vujić et al. 2020). It prefers small, open areas in deciduous Quercus and Mediterranean forests close to seasonal rivers and streams.

It is assessed as Vulnerable because it has a restricted area of occupancy (AOO) of 48 km2, and is considered to occur in eight locations, based on fire as the major threat, and there is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitats. The prevention of forest fires is important for the protection of its habitats.","

This species prefers small, open areas in deciduous Quercus and Mediterranean forests close to seasonal rivers and streams. Based on the available data, the flight period is from May to October. The developmental stages and host plant are unknown. All species from the Merodon constans species group whose developmental stages are known, develop in bulbs of Galanthus spp. It is possible that this is the same for this species as well (Vujić et al. 2020).

","Forest fires are the main threat to this species, followed by overgrazing by livestock and infrastructural development, mostly along the coastline (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). In Corsica, fires are an especially severe threat, as they are often set to protest about particular social or political measures, such as the creation of new protected areas.","There is no information about the population size and trend. On Corsica, the records date from 1938 to 2017, a total of 25 specimens. On Sardinia, records date from 1957 to 2016, with 10 specimens collected until now.",Unknown,"

This species is endemic to the islands of Sardinia (Italy), where it is known from a small number of scattered record across the island, and from Corsica (France), where it is known from central parts of the island (Vujić et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 23,472 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 48 km2.

",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions targeting this species. Seven point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. The prevention of forest fires is important for the protection of the habitat. Additional research on population size and trends, as well as ecology and threats is needed. Monitoring the population and habitat trends, and raising awareness about this species is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149164901,149164897,Syrphocheilosia claviventris,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

In Europe, this species lives in (sub)alpine meadows between 1000 and 2600 metres altitudes, and it is widespread in the Alps and locally in the Bulgarian mountains. The species can be locally common in its preferred habitat types. There is no information about declines in its populations, and it seems to profit from grazing by livestock on alpine meadows. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Because there are no immediate threats to the species or its preferred habitat, and it can locally be abundant, the current European Red List status is considered to be Least Concern.","Syrphocheilosia claviventris lives close to flushes and streamlets in unimproved, calcareous and non-calcareous montane and alpine grasslands from the top of the Picea zone to above 2500 metres (Speight, 2020). In Tirol during mid-summer, it is regularly found to be the dominant hoverfly in high alpine non-calcerous grazed meadows. It has mostly been found on flowers of Potentilla grandiflora or Ranunculus sp., and in wetter habitat types as well (L.J. van der Ent pers. comm. 2020). It also visits Anemone ranunculoidesCaltha palustrisCardamine spp. and Helianthus sp. In spring, it has been observed at lower altitudes in subalpine meadows above 1000 metres, and in mid-summer, it appears in alpine meadows up to 2600 metres altitude. The adults resemble a Cheilosia in habits and appearance, and are usually found on yellow flowers, sometimes with more than one specimen per flower. The larval developmental stages are not described, and the flight period is from end of May until end of August.","No threats to this species are found in the literature. Grazing by livestock, sheep and cows can lead to low availability of the flowers necessary for feeding and mating. However, on high alpine meadows grazed by livestock, Syrphocheilosia claviventris can be the most numerous hoverfly species, especially on small patches of yellow flowers. The isolated and fragmented populations in south-west Bulgaria are likely to be threatened by winter tourism, even within the National Parks.","In the preferred habitat patches in mid-summer, this species can be found as dozens of specimens at one site, where it is often the most abundant hoverfly (L.J. van der Ent pers. comm. 2020). In Germany, its populations are stable over the short and undefined long term (Ssymank et al. 2011). The overall population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"

This is a Palaearctic species, in Europe restricted to the high mountains of the Alps and to the Balkan peninsula. It is widespread in the Alps, including France, Switzerland, Germany, Liechtenstein, Austria, and Italy. On the Balkan Peninsula, it occurs in southwest Bulgaria in the mountains south of Sofia and the north-west Rhodope mountains (Claussen 1987, Goeldlin de Tiefenau 1974, Heimburg 2018, Schmid 1989, Speight 1988, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, Tóth 2014; D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, L. Fisler pers. comm. 2020). 

Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is recorded from Turkey (where it is widespread and abundant in mountain areas), Transcaucasus (Armenia and Georgia) and north Caucasus (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Mengual et al. 202, Saribiyik 2014, Speight 2020).

",There is no information on use or trade.,Terrestrial,"There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. Habitat protection and, where possible, restoration are recommended, together with research and monitoring of the threats, ecology and population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164910,149164900,Merodon robustus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

In Europe, the species is distributed on the island of Samos (Greece) (Veselić et al. 2017, Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020) and Cyprus. It prefers open areas in evergreen Mediterranean oak forests and maquis (Veselić et al. 2017).

This species is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27 countries due to its very restricted area of occupancy (AOO) (28 km2), and small number of locations (3-5) which are based on overgrazing by livestock as the major threat. The habitat of this species is continuously threatened by overgrazing by livestock, tourism and fires. The rescue effect from subpopulations outside of Europe is unlikely to happen.",This species prefers open areas in evergreen Mediterranean oak forests and maquis (Veselić et al. 2017). The flight period is April and May. The developmental stages and host plant are unknown (Speight 2020).,Overgrazing by livestock represents a major threat to the quality of the habitat of this species (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Tourism and fires also represent considerable threats.,"There is no information about the population size and trend. In Cyprus, the records range from 1982 to 1999, and in Greece from 1988 to 2011.",Unknown,"

This species occurs on the island of Samos (Greece) (Veselić et al. 2017, Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020) and Cyprus. In Europe and EU27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 20,053 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 28 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is found in Turkey and Israel.

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions targeting this species. One point locality occurs within the Natura 2000 network, in Dasos Stavrovouniou. Controlling grazing would be beneficial for conservation of its habitat. Considering that there is no population or ecological information, researching these is necessary. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required. Raising awareness about this species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164924,149164919,Sphegina clunipes,Least Concern,,2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species occurs in almost all European countries and is also known throughout the Palaearctic region. Many records are known all over the range of occurrence. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. No trends are known, and because its habitat is not fully understood, there could be a decline or even an increase. In Germany, it is listed as Least Concern (Ssymank et al. 2011). The intensification of agriculture and especially the use of pesticides could pose a great threat. As these effects are not studied, and the species is widespread and occurs in many forested habitats, the species is regarded as Least Concern for both the EU and Europe.

","

This species is found in broadleaved and mixed humid forests with tree trunks in wet condition and decaying trees with wet accumulations of sap. It is also found in city parks with old scenescent trees. Adults visit flowers of a wide range of herbs, such as Apiaceae, Ranunculaceae and also tall shrubs like Crataegus and Prunus, often in shady conditions close to water (but it has also been found in humid places without open water). The larval habitat is sap-runs on deciduous trees and sappy accumulations in tree trunks of deciduous and coniferous trees in wet conditions (Verlinden 1991, Torp 1994, Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Krivosheina 2018, Speight 2020).

","

Ongoing forest decline of mainly humid, broadleaved forests pose a threat to this species. Furthermore, the use of pesticides will have a negative impact on this species as its larvae are dependent on clean water in which tree trunks are lying. It is not well known if its main habitat is directly affected by these threats and so it is not possible to conclude the threat status of this species.

","

This species is often seen in great numbers (van Steenis et al. 2013). However, in many instances, there are only very few individuals found at one locality. It seems that it has a preferred habitat in which population densities are high. In less favourable habitats, the number of specimens can be very low indicating a large dispersal range (Speight and Lucas 1992, Popov 1997, Pestov et al. 2010; Tóth 2011, 2014; Borodin and Borodina 2014. The population trend is unknown.

",Unknown,"

This is a widespread species in the Palaearctic region and in Europe. It is distributed from Scandinavia in the north, south to Spain and southern Italy, and from Ireland eastwards into the European part of Russia (van der Goot 1981, Thompson and Torp 1986, Vujić 1990, Brădescu 1991, Maibach et al. 1992, Kuznetsov 1993, Dirickx 1994, Nielsen 1999, Stănescu and Pârvu 2005, de Groot and Govedić 2008, Ball et al. 2011, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Heimburg 2018, Speight et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

The records from Japan and Korea could refer to other species (J. van Steenis pers. comm.2020), and they need to be clarified.

",The species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place for this species. It has several common names (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Röder 1990, Torp 1994, Tóth 2017) which could help to engage with the public and taking conservation actions on a national level. Monitoring the population trends would be also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164932,149164920,Merodon rasicus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27 countries due to its very restricted area of occupancy (20 km2 on regional level, and 16 km2 in the EU27) and small number of locations (three on regional level, and two in the EU 27). The number of locations is based on overgrazing by livestock as the major threat. In addition, the species can be considered severely fragmented. There is a continuing decline in the quality of habitat of this species due to overgrazing by livestock, fires and infrastructural development due to tourism. The rescue effect from subpopulations outside of Europe is unlikely to happen.","

This species prefers grassy open areas in Eastern thermophilous oak forests (Quercus frainetto) and unimproved, subalpine grasslands (Speight 2020). The preferred habitats also include open areas in mesophilous Fagus and Quercus forests. It has been recorded visiting the flowers of Achillea (Vujić et al. 2020).  The adults fly low, and settle on low-growing vegetation (M. de Courcy Williams, pers.comm. in Speight 2020). The flight period is between April and July. The developmental stages and host plant are unknown (Speight 2020).

",Overgrazing by livestock has a major impact on the habitat of this species and represents the biggest threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Fires and infrastructural development due to tourism also have a negative impact.,"There is no information about the population of this species. Only 37 specimens have been collected until now. Out of the total number, 14 were collected in Europe.",Unknown,"

The range of this species includes Greece and Serbia (5 point localities). In Europe, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 23,716 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 20 km2. In the EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 336 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 16 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is also found in Turkey, Azerbaijan and Iran (Speight 2020).


",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions aiming to protect this species. One point locality is located within the National Park Kopaonik. Three point localities are within Natura 2000 sites, in Koilada Filiouri and Treis Vryses in Greece. Controlling the grazing, and monitoring the habitat are very important for the conservation of this species. Additional research on its population trends and ecology is needed. In addition, monitoring the population trend, as well as raising awareness about this species is very important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164943,149164940,Sphegina clavata,Least Concern,,2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread European endemic with scattered records throughout its range. It occurs in alluvial forest habitats. Some of this habitat is threatened at European level, but the specific requirements of the species are not known. It is therefore not possible to conclude that the specific habitat (and with that also the species) is threatened. On the national Red List of Germany, it is listed as Least Concern (Ssymank et al. 2011). The area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are also considered to be large, meaning this species is listed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27.","

This species is found in alluvial deciduous forests such as humid Fagus forests and Alnus-Populus forests. It is found close to rivers and streams in the semi-shade, often visiting flowers of white Apiaceae such as Chaerophyllum temulum, and also Viburnum opulus (van Steenis et al. 2015, Speight 2020). Sometimes the species is hard to find among more numerous co-occuring other Sphegina species (Verlinden 1991, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

","

The alluvial forests of Europe are threatened by human activity and thus the habitat of this species could be threatened. However, the exact habitat preferences are not known for this species, and since not all alluvial forest types are threatened, it is not sure whether this species will be threatened.

","

This species is mostly found in low numbers together with other species of the genus (Vujić 1990, van Steenis et al. 2013, van Steenis et al. 2015). It is possible that it is overlooked in the field, but it seems likely that it has low population densities throughout its range (Vujić 1990, Krpač et al. 2011, van Steenis et al. 2015). The population trend is unknown.

",Unknown,"

This is a widespread European species, extending from the Netherlands and Germany in the north-west, to the Spanish Pyrenees in the south, and to Moldova in the east (Thompson and Torp 1986, Brădescu 1991, Maibach et al. 1992, Dirickx 1994, Vujić et al. 1997, Stănescu and Pârvu 2005, de Groot and Govedić 2008, Heimburg 2018, Speight et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020). Exact locality data are not always available for this species, so calculating the extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) was difficult. But the AOO and EOO were considered to be large enough for this species not to be threatened.

",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place for this species. It has several common names (Bot and van de Meutter 2019, Röder 1990, Tóth 2017), which could help to engage with the public and taking conservation actions on a national level. Monitoring the population trends is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164953,149164951,Merodon quercetorum,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic species is known from a small number of scattered records in Spain (Speight 2020). The main threat is habitat loss due to plantations of monocultures that are threatening the ancient broadleaf forest in the Cantabrian range. In addition, the expansion of energy and tourism infrastructures (wind parks, ski resorts and motorways) is also endangering the habitat of this species.

It is assessed as Endangered because it has a very restricted area of occupancy (AOO) (24 km2) and only occurs at 4-5 locations. The number of locations is based on the infrastructural development as the major threat. In addition, the habitat of this species is continuously threatened by infrastructure development due to mountain tourism, fires, logging and grazing by livestock.","This species prefers open mountainous areas. It can be found in open areas in thermophilous Quercus (Quercus faginea, and Quercus pyrenaica), evergreen oak (Quercus rotundifolia) forests and open grounds at higher altitudes, up to 2,200 metres (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007). It has been recorded visiting the flowers of Crocus salzmannii (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007). The flight period is between August and September. The developmental stages and host plant are unknown.","Habitat loss is the main threat due to plantations of monocultures that are threatening the ancient broadleaf forest in the Cantabrian range. In addition, the expansion of energy and tourism infrastructures (wind parks, ski resorts and motorways) is also endangering the habitat of this species. Other threats include fires, overly intense and inadequately managed logging operations and overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).",There is no information about the population trends. The records range from 1980 to 2016.,Unknown,"This European endemic species is found in northern Spain (Cantabria) and in a few montane localities in central, southern and southeastern Spain (Speight 2020). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 134,135 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 24 km2.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are known for this species. It occurs in two Natural Parks, La Font Roja and Mariola (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007). Habitat conservation and monitoring  are needed in order to conserve the species. Considering that some point localities are within protected areas, this species should be taken into account when creating and implementing management strategies for those areas. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required. Raising awareness about this endemic species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149164963,149164961,Sphegina verecunda,Least Concern,,2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread species found in many localities. It can be found in various kinds of deciduous forests with streams and brooks, and has no obvious significant threats to its habitat. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, as in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), it is classified as Least Concern in Europe.","

This species can be found in various kinds of deciduous forests with streams and brooks. The adults fly in shady conditions along streams, forest edges and brooks, feeding predominantly on white Apiaceae (Torp 1994, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020). The larvae are found in submerged logs with sappy decay, or in sap-runs on old senescent trees (van Eck 2016).

","The main threats are intensification of agriculture and forestry leading to logging, drainage of streams and pollution by pesticides and eutrophication.","This species is often found as several specimens from the same locality and over several years in a row (Verlinden 1991, Torp 1994, Vujić et al. 1997, Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009; Tóth, 2011, 2014; van Steenis et al. 2015). The population trend is stable.",Stable,"This species is distributed in western and central Europe, from Denmark in the north to France in the south, and from Great Britain in the west to European Russia in the east (Thompson and Torp 1986, Vujić 1990, Maibach et al. 1992, Speight and Lucas 1992, Popov 1994, Stănescu and Pârvu, 2005, de Groot and Govedić 2008, Pestov et al. 2010, Ball et al. 2011, Borodin and Borodina 2014, Speight et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

It is also known from the Caucasus (Mengual et al. 2020).",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"No conservation actions are in place for this species. It has several common names (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Röder 1990, Torp 1994, Tóth 2017), which could help in engaging with the public and taking conservation actions on a national level. Monitoring its population and habitat trends would be also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164973,149164971,Merodon pulveris,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

EU 27 assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This species is distributed in Greece (on Lesvos, Samos and Rhodes) (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020), Cyprus (Van Steenis et al. 2019) and Montenegro.

It is assessed as Vulnerable in Europe and the EU 27 countries since it has a restricted range (on European level the area of occupancy is 88 km2 and the extent of occurrence is 166,119 km2, while in the EU 27 the area of occupancy is 84 km2 and the extent of occurrence is 85,888 km), and the number of locations, which is based on fire as the major threat, is just under the thresholds for a threatened category (the regional number of locations is 10, and 9 in the EU 27). It is observed that the quality of the habitat preferred by this species is declining continuously due to fires and overgrazing by livestock. Tourism, and associated infrastructural development also pose a certain threat, particularly in the coastal areas. Additional research on species ecology and population trends is needed. There is no rescue effect of subpopulations from outside of the assessment region.","This species prefers Mediterranean maquis (Radenković et al. 2011), herb-rich open areas in thermophilous Quercus forests and phrygana with Cistus scrub. The known visited flowers are Drimia, Foeniculum and Prospero autumnale (Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is in April and from late September to mid-October (Speight 2020). The developmental stages and host plant are unknown, but the larva is probably associated with Prospero autumnale, or one or more of its closely related micro-species (Vujić et al. 2020).

","Fires can be considered as the major threat to the habitat of this species, as it seems that they are becoming more severe and more frequent each year. Overgrazing by livestock is also a serious threat, especially on the Greek islands (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Infrastructure development (mostly due to tourism) is destroying the habitat too, especially along the coastlines.","There is no information about the population trend. A total of 413 specimens has been collected so far. The majority of specimens are from the European part of the range (83 from Lesbos, 21 from Samos, 196 from Rhodes, 44 from Cyprus, and one from Montenegro). The rest (68 specimens) were collected in Turkey. Records from Europe range from the 1970s to 2018, mostly recent (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"This species is distributed in Greece (on Lesvos, Samos and Rhodes) (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020), Cyprus (Van Steenis et al. 2019) and Montenegro. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be 166,119 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) of the species is 88 km2. In the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be 85,888 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 84 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is found in Turkey (Speight, 2020).",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. 12 point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. Threats such as fires, overgrazing and infrastructure development can disturb its habitats (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020), so continuous management and protection of sites in protected areas are needed. Additional research on its ecology, population trend and threats is needed. Monitoring population and habitat trends is required. Awareness should be raised about the importance of this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164983,149164981,Sphegina sibirica,Least Concern,,2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has increased its range during the last few decades, and is still expanding without any indication of any decrease in its former areas. It is widespread throughout Europe, and is still common in its original area of occurrence in Siberia, meaning that the species is possibly not vulnerable to any existing threat as of now. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Thus just as in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), the species classified as Least Concern in both the EU and Europe as a whole.","

This species is predominantly dependent on Pinus forests, but is also found far away from its main habitat. The larvae have not been described, but females have been seen near pine logs in different conditions, from water-submerged logs to heaps of timber in full sunlight. The adults can be found in humid forests in semi-shade, or even in full sunlight, visiting flowers, most notably white Apiaceae (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, van Steenis et al. 2013, Speight 2020).

","Due to its recent expansion, it is unknown or even unlikely that there are major threats to this species. The only possible threats are the ceasing of maintaining pine plantations or the intensification of pesticide use.","

This species can be found in huge numbers in suitable habitats, but also far away from seemingly suitable habitats. In the latter case, the number of individuals is always low. It seems that it has great dispersal capacities and can have large flourishing populations (Reemer et al. 2009, Tóth 2011, Speight 2020).

",Stable,"

This is a widespread species, known from northern Fennoscandinavia to central France, and from Ireland eastwards to European Russia and further to Japan (van der Goot 1981, Thompson and Torp 1986, Vujić 1990, Brădescu 1991, Verlinden 1991, Speight and Lucas 1992, Kuznetsov 1993, Dirickx 1994, Nielsen 1999, Stănescu and Pârvu 2005, Pestov and Dolgin 2006, de Groot and Govedić 2008, Pestov et al. 2010, Ball et al. 2011, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Heimburg 2018, Speight et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020). It is probably a species that has extended its range enormously from Siberia into Europe, and is still spreading. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

",This species is not used.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place for this species. It has several common names (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Röder 1990, Tóth 2017) which could help to engage with the public and taking conservation actions on a national level. Monitoring the population trends would be also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149164994,149164991,Merodon pruni,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is distributed in Croatia, Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Romania and Ukraine. It is assessed as Least Concern in Europe because while it has a relatively restricted area of occupancy (AOO) (428 km2 on regional level and 420 km2 in the EU27), its extent of occurrence (EOO) is large (1,858,563 km2 on regional level and 1,567,358 km2 in the EU27), and the number of locations are above the threshold (55 to 62 on regional level and 55 to 60 in the EU27). The number of locations is based on fire as the major threat. Fires, overgrazing by livestock, agricultural intensification and infrastructure development are causing habitat destruction and threatening this species.

Outside of Europe, it is found in Turkey, North Africa and Arabia (Speight 2020).","This species prefers sparsely vegetated, dry and semi-arid grasslands with scattered tall herbs, open areas in low-altitude Abies cephalonica forests on limestone, and Castanea forest (Speight 2020). Hurkmans (1985) provides some information on the territorial behaviour by the males. The females fly fast and very close to the ground, and are much less noticeable than the males. It has been found visiting flowers of Ferula, Cachrys crassiloba, Crithmum maritimum and Foeniculum vul­gare (Van Steenis et al. 2019, Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is from May to September. The developmental stages and host plant are unknown (Speight 2020).","There are several threats to the habitat of this species. Fires are a serious threat in the Mediterranean region, negatively affecting its habitat. Other threats include overgrazing by livestock, agricultural intensification and infrastructure development (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","There is no information about the population trend. Out of the total number of specimens (760), 483 were collected in the European part of the range. The records from Arabia and North Africa are mostly from the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries. Most of the European records are recent.",Unknown,"This species is distributed in Croatia, Cyprus, Greece, Italy, Romania and Ukraine. In Europe, its extent of occurrance (EOO) is estimated to be 1,858,563 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 428 km2. In the EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 1,567,358 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 420 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is found in Turkey, North Africa and Arabia (Speight 2020).",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. Some point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. Threats such as fires, overgrazing, agricultural intensification and infrastructure development can disturb its habitats, so continuous management and protection of sites in protected areas are needed. Additional research on its ecology, population trend and threats is needed. Monitoring of population and habitat trends is required. Awareness should be raised about the importance of this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165004,149165002,Sphegina obscurifacies,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

This is a very rarely collected boreal species. The European sightings are possibly at the western edge of its distributional range. Based on the few records, low area of occupancy (AOO) (between 20 and 200 km2), few locations (five based on logging as the main threat), and the ongoing decline in quality of the habitat, it can be categorised as Endangered. It is more likely this species has a much larger AOO and number of locations than currently known, but we consider that it would still fall within the Endangered category for Europe. It is unknown if the European population is in contact with the rest of the world population, but migration from outside of Europe seems unlikely, and therefore the threat category is not downgraded. This means that the species should be listed as Endangered in Europe.

In the EU27, it is categorised as Critically Endangered because it is severely fragmented, the area of occupancy (AOO) is 8 km2 and there is a continuous decline in its habitat quality and extent.

","

This is a species of the coniferous taiga forest in Russia, and its larvae are found in decayed cambium of trunks and branches of Alnobetula hirsuta and Betula platyphylla that have fallen in the water of forest streams. Several larvae are found close together (Sivova and Mutin 2000). Very little is known about its European habitat (Speight 2020).

","No direct threats to this species are known. However, its habitat is under possible threat due to deforestation and climate change, causing a decline in the area of occupancy (AOO) and a shift of the habitats northwards.","

The three Russian records are all based on single individuals, indicating very low population densities (Thompson and Torp 1986, Pestov and Dolgin 2006, Pestov et al. 2010). In the Russian Far East, it can be found in greater numbers at the same locality and over periods of several years (Mutin 2001, Mutin et al. 2016). It is possible that the European population is at the western boundary of its distributional range, and therefore exists in low numbers in widely scattered sites. In the Baltic states, the population is potentially declining (Kuznetsov 1993). The overall population trend is unknown.

",Unknown,"This species is recorded from Latvia and Lithuania and has some widely scattered records from European Russia. It was recorded as Sphegina claviventris in Europe, but Mutin (2001) pointed out that the real S. claviventris is an east Palaearctic species and that the European specimens belong to Sphegina obscurifacies. In Europe, the extent of occurrence is estimated to be 906,358 km2, and the area of occupancy ranges between 20 and 200 km2. In the EU27, the EOO could not be calculated because there are only two known locations; the AOO is 8 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is known from Siberia and Korea.",The species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology, population and habitat trends better. Protecting its habitats as well as increasing awareness about this species are very important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165014,149165012,Merodon planiceps,Critically Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-21 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

EU 27 regional assessment:  Critically Endangered (CR)

The species prefers open grounds, and unimproved, humid, montane grasslands (Hurkmans 1988). Only two specimens were collected in Europe, one in Italy and one in Rhodes (Greece). The record from Rhodes is dated from 1830 and the species was not found again on the island despite targeted attempts.

The species is assessed as Critically Endangered  in Europe and the EU 27 countries because it has a restricted area of occupancy (AOO) (8 km2), the number of its location is only one or two in Europe, and due to the continuing decline in the quality of its habitat. It is unknown if the species still occurs in Rhodes, in which case the number of locations is one. The rescue effects from outside of Europe are unlikely because the subpopulations occurring in Turkey are far from the European range and are very localized.","This species prefers open ground, and unimproved, humid, montane grasslands (Hurkmans 1988). The adults fly fast and very low through and over short ground vegetation (Hurkmans 1988). It has been recorded visiting Euphorbia (Hurkmans and Hayat 1997, Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is between April and July (Speight 2020). The developmental stages and host plant are unknown.","Overgrazing by livestock represents the major threat to the species at both of the two localities (in Italy and Greece) (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). The Greek subpopulation might be extinct, as it has not been recorded since 1830. Tourism represents an additional pressure to the quality of habitat in Rhodes.","There are no data about the population trend. Only two specimens have been collected in Europe, one in Italy and one in Rhodes. The record from Rhodes dates from 1830 and it has not been found again on the island, despite targeted attempts.

A total of about 30 specimens have been collected up to now, mostly from Turkey.",Unknown,"This species is found in Italy and Greece (on Rhodes) (Speight 2020), at one point locality in each country.

Outside of Europe it is also distributed in Turkey (Speight 2020). In Europe and EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 1,159,356 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 8 km2.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. Controlling grazing by livestock is of utmost importance for preserving its habitat. Research on population size, trends, status and threats is strongly recommended. Monitoring of population and habitat trends is required, especially to check its status in Rhodes. Raising awareness about this rare species is also very important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165024,149165022,Sphegina limbipennis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This is an EU27 endemic. Although the number of locations is 19 (based on the decline of the habitat quality as the main threat), which is above the threshold for threatened categories, it has a severely fragmented occurrence around the Pyrenees and in Armorica (France). The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be at most 194 km2 and the habitat quality is declining due to the ongoing pressures of climate change, extension and intensification of agriculture and water abstraction. Therefore, the species is assessed as Endangered.

","

The species is collected in humid broadleaved forests with small streams and with senescent trees and logs in humid conditions. It is also known from a garden pool. The adults are encountered in shady conditions close to the streams, flying low among the vegetation or visiting flowers such as Anthriscus sylvestris, Euphorbia, Ficaria and Sambucus (Thompson and Torp 1986, Cavailles et al. 2019, Speight 2020). The larval habitat is unknown but, as for the other species of Sphegina, they probably live in sappy decay in partly submerged logs or sap-flows on live trees.

","

Climate change will give rise to warmer and drier summers, and thus will lead to the degradation of the humid streamside forests on the Iberian Peninsula. Furthermore, extension and intensification of agriculture will have a negative impact on the quality and also on the area of suitable habitats. Water abstraction, pollution and human recreational activities can also negatively impact this species during its larval phase.

","

Nothing is known about population sizes or trends, but it seems to be a very rare species, occurring in very low densities. No records are known from the same locality in different years, so it seems that the population density fluctuates over the years. In Armorica, it is widespread and sometimes collected with several individuals at the same time, and so seemingly has a flourishing subpopulation (Cavailles et al. 2019). This species is considered to be severely fragmented as it is collected in very low numbers in small habitats at the other locations, so it is unlikely that these subpopulations are viable.

",Unknown,"

This species is known from widely separated localities in southern France, throughout Spain and in the northern part of Portugal (Dirickx 1994, van Eck 2011, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Speight et al. 2018). Recently it was found throughout Armorica (France), expanding its range tremendously (Cavailles et al. 2019). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is larger than the threshold for the threatened categories, and the area of occupancy (AOO) ranges between 16 and 196 km2.

",This species is not utilised by humans.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better. Conservation should be focused on reversing the intensification of agriculture, reducing pollution, and on enhancing habitat protection and restoration measurements. Raising awareness about this species would be also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165034,149165032,Merodon peloponnesius,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"The species is endemic to the southern part of the Peloponnese Peninsula, where it is found in open areas within Mediterranean pine forests and Mediterranean maquis. It is assessed as Endangered due to its very restricted area of occupancy (AOO) (12 km2) and extent of occurrence (EOO) (423 km2), and because it is considered to occur in three locations, based on urbanisation as the major threat. There is a continuous decline of  the habitat quality and extent due to commercial and residential development, as well as fires.","

This species prefers open areas in Mediterranean pine forests and Mediterranean maquis (Vujić et al. 2020). The adults fly in October (Radenković et al. 2018). The developmental stages and host plant are not known.

","Habitat loss is the main threat due to increasing rates of urbanisation and the extension of transport networks mostly due to tourism. In addition, fires present a great threat to the habitats throughout the Mediterranean and the habitat of this species is no exception.","There is no information about the population trend. Only 21 specimens from 3 point localities have been collected so far, all from 2014.",Unknown,"

The species is endemic to the southern part of the Peloponnese Peninsula in Greece (Speight 2020), where it has been recorded at three localities (Radenković et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be 423 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 12 km2.

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. One point locality occurs within the Natura 2000 network (Oros Mainalo). The conservation of habitat and fire prevention is crucial for its survival. Additional research on its ecological preferences, population size and trends, and threats, is needed. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required. Awareness should be raised about its importance.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149165046,149165043,Spazigaster ambulans,Near Threatened,"B2b(ii,iii)",2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This is a Palaearctic species. In Europe, it occurs mainly in mountain areas (Alps, Carpathians, Balkans) and is restricted to special habitat types along mountain streams. It is rare in most of its range in Europe, but it is more common locally on the Balkan Peninsula. Patches of suitable habitat are often small and fragmented, and the number of observed adults is usually very low, which makes this species sensitive to local extinction. In addition, the preferred habitats are vulnerable to human activities and are suffering from a continuous decline in both their extent and their quality. So far, the species has been collected at approximately 100 different sites in Europe, but is likely to be encountered at more localities, making an area of occupancy (AOO) of around 1,600 km2 for Europe and 1,000 km2 for the EU27 countries more likely. The habitat is threatened, but there are no indications that it is either severely fragmented or showing extreme fluctuations. Thus it is considered to be Near Threatened in Europe and the EU27.

","

This species is most often encountered along undisturbed mountain streams, particularly around Alnus viridis thickets. It can be also seen near alpine and montane grasslands, as well as in alpine glacier floodplains (Speight 2020). It usually occurs at high altitudes close to the timberline, but can also be found at much lower altitudes along rivers and streamside vegetations.

Adult males are often encountered on leaves, while females behave more elusively, flying through dense vegetation (Speight 2020). The larval stage is not known, but are expected to live in thickets of low water-side shrubs (Speight 2020). The adults visit umbellifers, Galium spp., Parnassia palustris, Salvia spp., Sambucus ebulus and Saxifraga aizoides. The flight period is from the end of June to mid-August.

","

There is no information about the potential threats to this species, but the preferred habitat types along streams may be vulnerable to human activities such as drainage, canalisation, human settlements, recreational activities, water pollution and intensive grazing by livestock. As a result of these activities, the alluvial thickets probably necessary for larval development may disappear or become severely damaged.

","

In Europe, this species is usually encountered by single specimens, and it is rarely collected twice at the same site. In Germany, it showed an undefined negative population trend (Ssymank et al. 2011). The overall population trend is unknown. In Turkey, it can be abundant in the mountain ranges (J.A.W. Lucas pers. comm. 2000).

",Unknown,"

This is a Palaearctic species. In Europe, it is predominantly present in central and south-east Europe, especially in mountain areas (Alps, Carpathians, Balkans), but sometimes also in hilly landscapes. It occurs in eastern France (Alps), southern Germany (mainly the Alps), Czechia, Slovakia, southern Poland, south-west Ukraine, north and central Romania, Hungary, Austria, Liechtenstein, Switzerland (Alps), Italy (Alps and Apennines - possibly extinct) and Slovenia (Alps). On the Balkan peninsula, it is found in the mountains south to the northern mountainous parts of Greece and southwestern Bulgaria (De Groot et al. 2010, Dirickx 1994, Mazánek and Barták 2005, Peck 1988, Röder 1990, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, Stănescu and Pârvu 2005, Tóth 2011, Tóth 2014, Vujić et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020; L. Mazánek pers. comm. 2019, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020, A. Ssymank, pers. comm. 2020, L.J. van der Ent pers. comm. 2019). 

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is larger than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category, in both Europe and the EU27 countries. The calculated area of occupancy (AOO) was 532,623 km2 because areas such as provinces were used to indicate occurrence, but the current number of known locations is 100, and expected to be closer to 200-300. Thus in Europe, the AOO ranges between 800 and 1,200 km2, but it is probably closer to 1,600 km2, because many localities are suspected to be larger than 4 km2. Based on the records, the AOO in the EU27 countries is about two-thirds of the European AOO, making about 1,000 km2 to be likely here.

Outside Europe, it is widely distributed in the mountain areas of Turkey, and has been recorded from the Transcaucasus (Azerbeidzjan, Armenia and Georgia), northern Caucasus, the Middle East and Iran (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Gharali and Reemer 2010, Mengual et al. 2020, Saribiyik 2014, Speight 2020).

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. It is listed as threatened in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) and Vulnerable in Czechia (Mazánek and Barták, 2005). Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better. The specific habitat needs protection and where possible, restoration is also recommended. Raising awareness would be also beneficial.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165056,149165054,Merodon parietum,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is endemic to Western Europe. It is listed as Near Threatened based on the small currently known AOO (92 km2) and a continuing decline of the habitat, due to overgrazing by livestock, and also desertification and fires. It has 16-17 locations based on these threats. In addition, the Mediterranean basin is expected to be one of the areas more seriously affected by climate change (Schröter et al. 2005). That is why the populations of this species can be further threatened. Based on scientific assessments in Sierra de Cazorla Natural Park, an extreme variability of climate has been proved (Mendoza-Fernandez et al. 2010), which is manifested in thunderstorms, rainfalls, extreme summer temperatures and series of fires. A continuous decline in habitat extent and quality is expected. This is likely to cause a decline in the amount of suitable habitats available. Further research is needed into the population size and trend, habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better the threats affecting the species.","The preferred environment of this species is forests and open ground, open areas in thermophilous Quercus forests and well-drained, unimproved, non-calcareous grasslands (Marcos-García et al. 2007). The adults fly low through tall ground vegetation, settling on patches of bare ground, and visit flowers such as Chrysanthemum leucanthemum, Myosotis, Ranunculus, Scilla monophyllos, Stellaria (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Van Eck 2016, Speight 2020) and Cistus salviifolius (Kehlmaier 2002). The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown.","This species is widely distributed in Western Europe, where the main threat is habitat loss due to overgrazing by livestock, fires and desertification (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). It has a relatively restricted range, potentially further constricted by climate change (for instance by increasing temperatures or increased fire frequency). Evidence shows that the Mediterranean basin is expected to be one of the areas more seriously affected by climate change, associated primarily with increasing temperatures and decreasing precipitation, both of which are some of the most serious threats to biodiversity (Schröter et al. 2005). Based on scientific assessments in Sierra de Cazorla Natural Park, extreme variability of climate occurs (Mendoza-Fernandez et al. 2010), manifested in thunderstorms, rainfall, extreme summer temperatures and series of fires.","There is a lack of data, but based on all known findings, the species is widely distributed in western Europe, represented with at least 11 subpopulations throughout the range. In France, four specimens were collected from two point localities (Périgord and Sainte-Baume) in 1951 (Speight et al. 1998) and in 1997. In Portugal five specimens were collected in the period 1966-1969 from four point localities, and a further 10 specimens in 2011-2013 from three point localities (Van Eck 2011, 2016). In Spain, more than 150 specimens were collected between 1933 (Marcos-García and Louis 1998) and 2018 from 12 point localities. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to western Europe, where it is is known from Spain, France and Portugal. The known area of occupancy (AOO) is 92 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 641,128 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action, but it occurs in the protected areas of Los Picos de Europa National Park (Spain) and Sierra de Cazorla Natural Park (Spain), and partly in the Natura 2000 network. Its habitats within protected areas should be conserved, as well as in the rest of its range. Monitoring of habitat and population trends is required, and raising awareness about the species is also important. Further research is needed about its population size and trend, habitat and ecological requirements, and to understand better the threats that affect it.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165067,149165065,Riponnensia morini,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)


This species is threatened and has a restricted range in the Balkans. It has become extinct at the type locality (van Steenis et al. 2015, Vujić et al. 2001), but has recently been recorded from North Macedonia (Krpač et al. 2011), Greece (Claussen and Standfuss 2017, Vujić et al. 2020) and Cyprus (van Steenis et al. 2019).


Based on the small (60 km2 in Europe and 28 km2 in the EU27 countries) area of occupancy (AOO), continuous decline both in the quality and extent of habitats, and severely fragmented population, the species is classified as Endangered at global, Pan-European and EU27 level.

","

This species prefers small streams or small marshy areas in humid forests of Castanea sativa with Laurus nobilis. It also occurs in evergreen oak (Quercus ilex), or broadleaved forests with Alnus orientalis, Platanus orientalis and flowering Hedera pastuchovii subspecies cypria (van Steenis et al. 2019, Speight 2020).


The adults settle in the sun on foliage and on flowers of large-leaved emergent vegetation or Hedera, and flowers of Smyrnium perfoliatum. The species visits Hedera, Smyrnium perfoliatum and Tamarix (van Steenis et al. 2019, Speight 2020).


The larvae are not known, but they probably live in small streams or marshy areas with emergent plants such as Polygonum equisetiforme or Smyrnium, where they probably feed on bacteria in nutrient-rich decaying plant material or on roots of submerged plants.

","The type locality of this species in Montenegro (Boka Kotorska, Morinj) was proposed to be protected as a Nature Reserve due to the highly diverse syrphid fauna (approx. 130 species in 4 km2) and because two species were described from this small patch of remaining natural habitat. It was one of the richest areas within the Mediterranean. The Institute for Nature Conservation prepared a protection proposal. This was never considered in any legal procedure (A. Vujić, pers. comm. 2020). The population at the type locality (Morinj, Montenegro) is now lost to urban development (van Steenis et al. 2015, 2019).

It is unclear what threats the other subpopulations suffer from. It is presumed that developments for housing and recreational purposes pose a threat. In addition, climate change will have a negative impact on the small rivers in which the larvae live. Water abstraction can also impact this species during its larval stage. Additionally, agricultural pollution can disrupt its aquatic habitat and pesticides will be harmful for the whole lifecycle of the species.","The population trend is unknown for this species. Although the number of subpopulations might be small, it could be numerous in some of them. For example, at least 90 males and 5 females have been counted in Cyprus on 5th and 9th October 2017 (van Steenis et al. 2019). The species is considered to be severely fragmented as the few subpopulations are very far from each other and any interactions between them seems unlikely.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe. It has been recorded in Greece (both on the mainland and on the islands as well), in the Balkans (Montenegro, Kosovo, North Macedonia) (Vujić 1999, Krpač et al. 2011, Vujić et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020) and on Cyprus (van Steenis et al. 2019). The type locality of this species in Montenegro has been lost to urban development and thus, the species is considered to be Possibly Extinct here. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is above the threshold for threatened categories in both Europe and the EU27 countries. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 60 km2 in Europe and 28 km2 in the EU27 countries.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),

No conservation actions are in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better. Protection of important sites and reducing the impact of habitat destruction would benefit its conservation fortunes.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165080,149165075,Merodon ottomanus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This species is assessed as Vulnerable in Europe, because the area of occupancy (AOO) is 48 km2 and the number of locations is 7-8, based on the main threats, which are overgrazing by livestock and fires throughout the whole distributional range, leading also to expected decline of habitat quality. In addition, the distribution range of this species is expected to be one of the areas that are more seriously affected by climate change in the near future (Schröter et al. 2005). Based on all known findings, the species is recorded in small numbers: 17 specimens from Spain and 11 specimens from Greece.

In Turkey, the species has not been found after 1999 (Vujić et al. 2011). Subpopulations occurring in Turkey are registered on high mountains of the eastern and southeastern Anatolian, separated from the Greek subpopulations by geographical barriers in the form of mountains and seas, and are far from the European range, making the rescue effect more difficult. Consequently, further research is required to establish the current status of the species throughout its range, the habitat and ecological requirements and to better understand the existing threats.","This species prefers open ground in forests. It occurs in open areas in Quercus ilex and Pinus halepensis forests and lentisk scrubs (Marcos-García et al. 2007), as well as in Quercus rotundifolia woodlands (Marcos-García, pers. comm. in Speight, 2020), and unimproved, montane grasslands (Hurkmans and  Hayat 1997). Adults fly along the margin of stands of taller herbs (Hurkmans and Hayat 1997). They are known to visit Apiaceae and flowers of Ornithogalum (Vujić et al. 2011, 2020; Speight 2020). The flight period is from April to July (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2011, 2020). The developmental stages and host plant are unknown.","

The main threat is habitat loss (both quality and extent) due to overgrazing by livestock and fires throughout its whole range (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). This species has a relatively restricted range with disjunct areas, which could be further constricted by climate change (for example by increasing temperatures, or increased frequency of fires) and by the loss of suitable habitats.

","There are insufficient data, but based on all known findings, this species has been recorded in small numbers. 34 specimens have been recorded in Spain, where the records date from 1966 to 2015 (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Database of Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Serbia), and 11 specimens in Greece (from 2 point localities in the Peloponnese) collected in 1970, 2014 and 2016 (Vujić et al. 2020). The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species is distributed in south and southeastern Europe (Spain and Greece). Outside of Europe, it is present in Turkey (Hurkmans, 1993, Marcos-García et al. 2007, Vujić et al. 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 is 48 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 401,785 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species occurs in the protected area of Sierra de Grazalema Natural Park in Spain and partially in the Natura 2000 network in Greece and Spain. It is recommended to conserve suitable habitats, since it is not yet the subject of any targeted conservation action. Further research is required to establish its current status throughout the range, its habitat and ecological requirements, and to understand better the existing threats. Monitoring population and habitat trends is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165091,149165088,Riponnensia splendens,Least Concern,,2021,2020-08-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is listed as vulnerable on the national Red List of Czechia, as decreasing/declining in the Netherlands and Great Britain, and as endangered in Germany (Mazánek and Barták 2004, Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011, Ball and Morris 2014). In France, the species is not threatened (Speight et al. 2020). The habitat is under pressure of forest management, decreasing water levels, nutrient enrichment and climate change.

The area of occupancy (AOO) is still above 2000 km2 in both Europe and the EU27 countries, and the populations are not severely fragmented yet. Therefore, the species classifies as Least Concern both at the European and EU27 level.","

This species mostly occurs in humid forests close to running water. It is also found in grasslands and meadows close to streams and ditches, and very often is seen in areas under influence of base-rich seepage (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020)

The adults fly in a zig-zag fashion in dappled sunlight, settling on fallen branches and twigs in the sun. In general, the adults fly usually within one metre from the ground, settling on foliage of bushes or shrubs, and frequently visit flowers of yellow composites, white umbellifers, Matricaria and Ranunculus (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The larvae are filter-feeders, and were found on plants in standing and slow-moving water with lots of organic material or wooden debris, such as ditches and cattle ponds (Ball et al. 2011, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).","The habitat is threatened by water extraction, intensive forest management, nutrient input from agricultural lands and climate change (as the habitat shifts into drier habitats). The species could suffer from pesticide residues from agricultural lands in the vicinity of the habitat.","Not much is known about the population size or trends. In most areas, this species is seen in low numbers, up to 10 or so. The populations are scattered, without large areas with continuous subpopulations.",Unknown,"

This species is distributed from the Netherlands south to North Africa, including the Mediterranean islands such as Corsica and Crete, and from Ireland eastwards through most of central and southern Europe into Greece. It also occurs in Turkey, Crimea, European Russia and the Caucasus Mountains. It is localised in central and south Europe (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Dirickx 1994, Speight 2020, Speight et al. 2018).

Vujić et al. (2020) stated that the species is not recorded from Greece or Crete. The record from Crete (Claussen and Lucas 1988) could belong to Riponnensia morini, as Vujić et al. (2020) mention R. morini from Crete and the two species are very similar.

Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better. Protection of important sites and reducing the impact of habitat destruction would benefit its conservation fortunes.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165102,149165099,Merodon nisi,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This species is listed as Endangered because the area of occupancy (AOO) is very low (24 km2), and the number of locations is five-six. Additionally, the species is restricted only to two Greek islands in Europe (Crete and Rhodes), where it is registered with only a few specimen (27 in total) over the years of sampling based on all known findings. The number of locations is defined mainly by overgrazing, and also by fire. Because Rhodes is exposed to strong winds, the probability for fires to spread across larger areas is higher. A continuing decline in habitat quality and extent is expected. However, further research is needed into the population size and trend, habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better the threats affecting the species.

","

The species prefers open areas in dry Pinus forest, Mediterranean scrub (Veselić et al. 2017) and maquis (Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is in October (Veselić et al. 2017, Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020). The adults are known to visit flowers of Drimia (Vujić et al. 2020). The species may tolerate low levels of grazing by livestock that are enough to maintain open areas. The developmental stages and host plant are unknown. 

","Habitat loss is the main threat mainly due to overgrazing by goats and sheep in Greece (Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki 1985, Papanastasis 2004, Gkoltsiou 2011), particularly in Crete. On Rhodes, the expansion of tourism infrastructure is also an important threat. Additionally, fires can pose a threat. Because Rhodes is exposed to strong winds, the probability of fires spreading across larger areas is higher. Because of its limited distribution, the species is presumably threatened to some degree by climate change in the Mediterranean Basin (Tapoglou et al. 2019).","The population trend is unknown due to lack of data. However, based on all known findings, the area of this species in Europe is restricted to just two Greek islands (Crete and Rhodes), where it was recorded with only 27 specimens (3 from Rhodes and 24 from Crete) across 6 point localities from 1986 to 2016.",Unknown,"

This species is endemic to Greece, where it has been recorded from a small number of records across Crete and two records on the East Aegean island of Rhodes. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 24 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 12,913 km2.

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

So far this species has not been the subject of any targeted conservation action. It partially occurs within the Natura 2000 network. Considering that in Europe, the area of this species is restricted to just two Greek islands (Crete and Rhodes), it is recommended that the areas where it occurs receive some kind of protection. Additional research is needed on its population size and trend, habitat and ecological requirements, and to understand its threats better. Monitoring the habitat and population trends is required. Introducing this endemic species into the National list of protected species, as well as increasing awareness is very important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149165112,149165101,Riponnensia daccordii,Critically Endangered,"B1ab(i,ii,iii)+2ab(i,ii,iii)",2021,2020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This EU27 endemic species is only known from the type locality and the type series from Corsica, where it was collected in August 1988. The habitat probably includes forests with running water. Both forests and running water are threatened in Corsica by forest management, by abstraction of ground or surface water and by recreational development. For instance, today there is a ski resort close to or even at the type locality. Despite several syrphidologists having visited Corsica since the initial collection it has not been found again. If it is still extant, its area of occupancy (AOO) would be 4 km2, and it has only been found at one location. Therefore, the species is Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct). However, more thorough surveys might reveal a small remaining population in the mountains of Corsica. There is an unconfirmed record of one male from Sardinia, and this requires further investigation.","The only thing known about the species is that it was collected in Corsica near Bastelica, Val d'Ese, at 1,700 metres asl. in August 1988. Like other species of Riponnensia, the adults probably visit flowers near freshwater. The larvae probably live in the water, close to, or attached to water plants or plant roots, or they might live in decaying plant material.",Commercial forestry and climate change are the main threats to this species. Recreational development can also negatively impact it.,"The species is only known from the type series of two males and one female. The population is very small. Probably the population is decreasing because no recent findings are known. In 1910, there was a record that might have referred to Riponnensia daccordii as well (Becker et al. 1910), but this is not confirmed. There have been several recent general hoverfly surveys in Corsica and this species has not been found.",Decreasing,"Riponnensia daccordii is only known from the type series, one male and two females from Corsica (France). They were caught in Val d'Ese, ca. 5 km southeast from Bastelica, at 1,700 metres asl. in 1988 by M. Daccordi (Claussen 1991). Since the only record dates back to 1988, and several syrphidologists have visited Corsica since, it is possible the species is extinct.

Kehlmaier (2009) gives a record of one male from Sardinia (Province Oristano, Il Montiferru, close to Cúglieri, on typical mountain slope). However, he does not give any confirming characters, so it is not certain that the identification is correct. Therefore, Burgio et al. (2015) is followed, who do not mention the species to be present in Italy or Sardinia. The identities of some Riponnensia records from Corsica in Becker et al. (1910) are not clear and should be also checked.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"No specific conservation actiona are known for this species. Research is needed and surveys should be conducted specifically for this species to understand its ecology, and to find where this species lives.",Palearctic,5-Aug-88,TRUE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149165123,149165120,Merodon nigritarsis,Least Concern,,2021,2019-12-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is distributed across Central and Southern Europe, from France on the west, to Ukraine on the east. It is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and EU 27 because it is widespread in Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Habitat loss (both in quality and quantity) is the main threat due to change of land use and overgrazing by livestock and fires through all the Mediterranean. Further research is needed about the population trend, and ecology and biology of the species.

","This species prefers open ground in thermophilous oak forest and evergreen Quercus ilex and Quercus suber forests and maquis, as well as herb-rich, dry, semi-arid, unimproved grasslands, vineyards, Pinus matorral and Mediterranean scrub. The adults are active from May to August, and they fly fast and low through sparse ground vegetation, settling in the open on bare ground (Speight 2018). They are known to visit Rosmarinus officinalis (Speight 2020), Euphorbia, Tordylium apulum, Mentha and Ferula (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020). The larva has not been described, but has been reared from the steppe hyacinth Hyacinthella pallasiana by Stepanenko and Popov (1997). There is circumstantial evidence to suggest that Muscari racemosum can also act as a larval host for this species (Speight 2020).","Since this species is distributed in most of Europe, the main threat is probably habitat loss due to change in land use across the continent, and overgrazing by livestock and fires in the Mediterranean areas (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","Based on all known data, there are numerous subpopulations across Europe. Specimens have been collected between 1838 (Greece) and 2019. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species is distributed across central and southern Europe, from France in the west, to Ukraine in the east. The data for Poland (Speight 2020) and Switzerland have not been checked.

Outside of Europe, it is present in Turkey, Armenia, Turkmenistan and Iran. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of a threatened category.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Merodon nigritarsis is on the Red List of Germany, and also in the Red Book of Ukraine as a protected species in Crimea and endangered/rare species of Ukraine. Its distribution is partially within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network and also in the Natural Reserve Combe Lavaux (France), Biosphere Reserve Fontainebleau et du Gâtinais (France), Grands Causses Regional Natural Park (France), Ecrins National Park (France), Mercantour National Park (France), Pyrenees National Park (Spain), Sierra Nevada National Park (Spain), Sierra de Cazorla National Park (Spain), Gran Sasso National Park (Italy), Fertő-Hanság National Park (Hungary), Djerdap National Park (Serbia), Mavrovo National Park (North Macedonia), Dadia National Park (Greece), Olympus National Park (Greece), Pindos National Park (Greece) and Karadag Nature Reserve (Ukraine). Its conservation needs are mainly related to the conservation of suitable habitats. Additional research is needed into its population trend, ecology and biology. The impact of overgrazing by livestock in the Mediterranean part of its range also needs further investigation. Monitoring population and habitat trends, as well as raising awareness about this species are also important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165134,149165131,Rhingia rostrata,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widely distributed in Europe, where it occurs mostly in nutrient-rich deciduous forests. In the past 100 years, it has disappeared from several lowland areas in north-west Europe, and also from Spain and Italy. However, it has reappeared in some parts such as the Netherlands and Belgium, and became recently more common and widespread in England. In other parts of Europe, especially in the low mountain regions, the subpopulations seem to be more stable over the long–term, but can fluctuate a lot over short time periods. There are no immediate threats to its main habitat, but there is a lack of understanding about why the populations fluctuate so much, sometimes disappearing and then reappearing after some time, and more research is suggested to understand the reasons behind this. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Based on this, the current European Red List status of this species is considered to be Least Concern, but should be evaluated regularly as it could soon become threatened.

","

This species is found in deciduous forests (Quercus, Fagus or Fraxinus) or forest patches on nutrient-rich soils that have a rich herb layer (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020). The adults are often encountered in shaded areas, but they also visit flowers or leaves in sunny patches inside forests and along forest edges (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The larvae are expected to live in dung of large animals such as horses, but also badgers, and they have been reared from human faeces where females were observed laying eggs on the underside of Fagus leaves above the dung after inspecting it (Speight 2020).

Adults visit Ballota nigra, Centaurea spp., Cirsium spp. Geum rivale, Geranium robertianum, Hypericum spp., Succisa pratensis, and Veronica spp. (Bartsch. et al. 2009), and also Campanula trachelium, Phyteuma spicatum, Silene dioica and Senecio ovatus (Waarneming.nl).

There are two generations. The flight period of the spring generation is from late April to early June and the summer generation from mid-July until early September (Bot and Van de Meutter, 2019), or somewhat later until October in Great Britain (Stubbs and Falk 2002).

","

The reasons behind the disappearance of this species in Sweden, Denmark, northern lowland parts of Germany, and its recolonization in Belgium and the Netherlands as well as the cause(s) of the observed huge population fluctuations in Great Britain are still unknown. There are no immediate threats known to the preferred habitat, and therefore it is hypothesized that the availability of dung or manure for larval development may be the key factor in the unexplained population fluctuations. One hypothesis is the absence of horses and mules around the preferred habitats, because these were replaced by machinery for agricultural uses and harvesting of trees. In addition, veterinary medicines found in the dung of livestock and other domestic animals may have a toxic effect on the species. The first hypothesis may be enhanced by the reappearance of the species in Belgium and the Netherlands, where horses have become more popular for grazing on semi-natural grasslands or for horse riding. Stubbs and Falk (2002) suggested that the availability of badger latrines may play a role. However, none of these hypotheses can satisfactorily explain why the species shows such extreme variation in its pattern of occurrence. Ball and Morris (2021) explained the recent increase of this species partly as a result of climate change, but further investigations are needed. 

","

This species is usually encountered in small numbers. The subpopulations are erratic in some woodlands, present in some years and then disappearing for many years (Stubbs and Falk 2002). In Germany, it had a strong population decline over the long-term and an undefined population decline over the short-term (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Great Britain, a strong significant increase was observed over the past four decades, especially after 2000 (S.G. Ball pers. comm. 2021). The overall population trend is unknown.

",Unknown,"

This is a Palaearctic species widely distributed in Europe. Currently, it occurs from England (including Wales) and France, east to European Russia (north, northwest, central and east), Belarus, Ukraine (western parts and Crimea) and Romania, and from the Baltic States, Poland and Germany south to Spain (the Pyrenees) and central Italy. It is also present on the Balkan peninsula south to Serbia (Kosovo), Montenegro and southwestern Bulgaria (Dirickx 1994, Drensky 1934, Kuznetzov 1993, Langhoffer 1918, Nedeljkovic et al. 2009, Peck 1988, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Tóth 2014, Vujić et al. 2020; A.V. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, M. de Groot pers. comm. 2021, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020, A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019, R. Zoralski pers. comm. 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside Europe, Rhingia rostrata is known to occur in Transcaucasia (Georgia) and western Siberia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Mengual et al. 2020).

In the past, it has become extinct in the Netherlands (before 1900), Belgium (1944), Sweden (in southern part in 1880), Denmark (1902), northern lowland states of Germany (1934), central Italy (1908), and central (before 1930) and possibly also northwest Spain (1978). However, from 2009 it has started to recolonise the central and eastern parts of Belgium and the extreme southeastern tip of the Netherlands (Bartsch et al. 2009, de Bree et al. 2013, Reemer et al. 2009, Torp 1994, A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2020, A. Ssymank, pers. comm. 2020). In England, it has dramatically increased in range northwards over the past three decades (Ball and Morris 2021).

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,"There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. It is listed as endangered on the Red List of Germany (Ssymanck et al. 2011). Habitat protection, raising awareness, research and monitoring (of the population and habitat trends) are proposed to keep this species out of the threatened categories. More research to understand the reasons behind the population fluctuations would be also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165152,149165142,Merodon neonanus,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed Endangered in Europe, because the area of occupancy (AOO) is 40 km2, the extent of occurrence is relatively low (1,210 km2) and the number of locations is five. The number of locations is defined by overgrazing by livestock and fires. Additionally, the species is restricted only to two islands in Europe (Chios and Samos). The subpopulations occurring in Turkey are registered on high mountains of northeastern and southwestern Anatolian, separated from the Greek subpopulations by geographical barriers in the form of mountains and seas, making the rescue effect difficult. Habitat loss is the main threat due to overgrazing by goats and sheep in Greece (Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki 1985, Papanastasis 2004, Gkoltsiou 2011) and fires. In 2012 and 2016, fires occurred in the central-southern part of Chios and could have eliminated the subpopulations occurring in that region. There is a continuous decline of habitat quality and extent due to these threats. Furthermore, the majority of the coastal areas in the Aegean Sea are exposed to strong impact of sea level rise (Klaoudatos et al. 2015). Consequently, further research is needed into the population size and trend, habitat and ecological requirements, and to understand better the threats affecting the species.","This species inhabits herb-rich open areas in thermophilous Quercus forest, olive groves, and unimproved, humid, montane grasslands. The known visited flowers are LeontodonOrnithogalum (Vujić et al. 2020) and Trifolium (Speight, 2020). The flight period in Europe is March to July, and October (Vujić et al. 2015, Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages and the host plant unknown.","This species is present only on the two Greek islands of Chios and Samos in Europe, where overgrazing by goats and sheep together with fires cause ongoing habitat loss (Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki 1985, Papanastasis 2004, Gkoltsiou 2011). In 2012 and 2016, fires occurred in Chios, and these are likely to increase in frequency with climate change. There is also a high probability of threat caused by climate change. The Aegean Sea is considered to be the area of the Mediterranean Sea most exposed to sea level rise, with particularly strong impacts on the majority of its coastal areas (Klaoudatos et al. 2015).","The population trend is unknown because of lack of data, but based on all known findings Merodon neonanus has been recorded in Europe only on two Greek Island, Chios and Samos, between 1995 and 2012. Only one point locality (one specimen from 2012)  is on Samos.",Unknown,"

This species is present in Greece (on Chios and Samos) and Turkey. Vujić et al. (2015) and Speight (2020) also mention North Macedonia, but according to the additional morphological and molecular analysis of Kočiš Tubić et al. (2018), the record from North Macedonia listed under Merodon neonanus in Vujić et al. (2015) is a different species, Merodon vladimiri Vujić et Kočiš Tubić 2018. The area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 is 40 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1210 km2.

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"So far, the species has not been the subject of any targeted conservation action, and there are no conservation measures in place. It partially occurs in the Natura 2000 network. Since the species has been recorded only at a few localities on the islands of Chios and Samos, conservation actions should be focused on preservation of the habitat. Further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements, and to understand the existing threats better. Monitoring population and habitat trends is required, including checking its current status in the central-southern part of Chios, after the fires of 2012 and 2016.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165160,149165144,Rhingia borealis,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a Palaearctic species widely distributed in Europe. It occurs in forest areas, especially in northern Fennoscandinavia and in the low and middle mountain ranges of central Europe. There is no immediate threat to its main habitat, and the species does not appear as vulnerable or threatened on national Red Lists of the countries where it is mainly distributed. In addition, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, the current European Red List status of Rhingia borealis is considered to be Least Concern.

","

This is a typical forest species, found in open moist deciduous or mixed forests, such as Quercus/Carpinus, Fagus/Quercus, or Fagus/Picea forests, and at higher altitudes or latitudes also in Betula or Picea/Pinus forests. It is also found on floodplains of major rivers and on heather and ruderal vegetation besides forest areas (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020). Bot and Van de Meutter (2019) stated that Rhingia borealis typically occurs in forested stream valleys, in shady and semi-shady conditions.

The adults fly around or sit on vegetation and bushes in shady forest edges, along forest trails and clearings which are rich in vegetation (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The larval stages are not described, but Bartsch et al. (2009) expected the larvae to live in the droppings of animals such as reindeer and moose.

Adults visit flowers such as Geranium robertianum, Geranium sylvaticum, Linnaea borealis, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus acris, Lonicera xylosteum, Lychnis flos-cuculi, Saxifraga spp., and white umbellifers such as Angelica archangelica (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The flight period is from May until August, and in Scandinavia from early June until early September. In central Europe, it probably has separate spring (May/June) and summer (July/August) generations (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020).

","

There are no immediate threats known to this species or to its preferred habitat, except for forest reclamation for human use and replacing suitable forest patches by other types of forests.

","

This species is usually encountered in low numbers. In Germany, it shows a stable short-term population trend (Ssymank et al. 2011). The overall population trend is stable and might even be increasing, but this would need confirmation.

",Stable,"

This is a Palearctic species, mostly found in northern Europe and in the mountainous areas of central Europe. It occurs from Belgium (Ardennes), the Netherlands (South Limburg – but there are no recent records), France (northern and northwestern regions), eastwards to Latvia, Lithuania, Belarus, and Romania (Moldava and Transylvania), and from northern Scandinavia and adjacent European Russia (north European Russia, Karelia), south to the Pyrenees (France and Spain) and northern Italy (Alps). It is also present on the Balkan peninsula, where it is known from Croatia and Serbia (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and van de Meutter 2019, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Kuznetzov 1993, Langhoffer 1918, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, van Steenis et al. 2015, Tóth 2011; A.V. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, L. Mazanek pers comm. 2019, R. Zoralski pers. comm. 2020). 

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside Europe, it has been recorded from western and central Siberia and Mongolia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Speight 2020).

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,"There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. Site and habitat protection, raising awareness and monitoring the population trends would be of benefit.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165174,149165171,Merodon neolydicus,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii),2021,2019-12-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

This species is assessed as Critically Endangered in Europe and the EU27 countries because the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 55 km2 and the number of locations is one. The number of locations is defined by fires. The distribution range include Eastern Mediterranean (Greece, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel) and Iran. The species is also severely fragmented due to altered habitats within the distributional range, especially in the eastern part of the distribution range. In Europe Merodon neolydicus is restricted only to one island (Chios), and the number of registered specimens is very low (12 specimens). Furthermore, because of fires that occurred in the island in 2012 and 2016 it is unclear if the species is still present.

Habitat loss is the main threat due to overgrazing by goats and sheep in Greece (Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki 1985, Papanastasis 2004, Gkoltsiou 2011) and fires. A continuing decline in habitat quality is expected due to these factors. Outside of Europe, the species is widespread but locally distributed, and the loss of suitable habitat is expected because the species is mainly distributed in war zones in the Middle East. Therefore, rescue effects from subpopulations outside Europe are unlikely. Further research is needed into the population size and trend, habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better the threats affecting the species in total of distribution area. 

","This species prefers Mediterranean maquis. The flight period is from January to June, with a peak in March (Speight 2020). It is an early-spring species (the adults can survive very low temperatures). The developmental stages and host plant are unknown.","The main threat is habitat loss due to overgrazing by goats and sheep in Greece (Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki 1985, Papanastasis 2004, Gkoltsiou 2011), as well as because of fires. In 2012 and 2016, fires occurred in Chios and their frequency could increase due to climate change. The species has a restricted range in Europe (recorded only from the East Aegean island of Chios), which make this species extremely vulnerable to the established effects of climate change in the Mediterranean Basin (Miličić et al. 2018). The Aegean Sea is considered to be the area of the Mediterranean Sea most exposed to sea level rise, with particularly strong impacts on the majority of its coastal areas (Klaoudatos et al. 2015).","The population trend is unknown due to lack of data. However, based on all known findings, in Europe, the species has only been recorded a few times (12 specimens across four point localities in Chios, collected between 1998 and 2012). 

In 2012 and 2016, fires occurred in Chios, and it is not known if this species still occurs in these localities. Outside of its European range (Eastern Mediterranean and Iran), it is relatively widespread, although locally distributed.",Unknown,"This species is present in several countries of the eastern Mediterranean (Greece, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel) and in Iran. In Greece, it is known only from the East Aegean island of Chios from four point localities (Vujić et al. 2018, 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 is 12 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 55 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action so far, nor does it occur within protected areas. Conservation actions should be focused on the preservation of habitats and research on its populations, ecology and threats. Monitoring population and habitat trends is required, including checking if the species is still present on Chios.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165184,149165173,Portevinia maculata,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a European endemic which mainly occurs in western and central Europe, in deciduous forests in the patches of its larval hostplant Allium ursinum. In these habitat patches, it often has large and stable subpopulations. Threats on a local scale are deforestation and disturbance by forestry management, and in the long term, climate change. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the threshold for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, the current European Red List status of Portevinia maculata is considered to be Least Concern, similar to its host plant Allium ursinum, but it should be monitored regularly.

","

This species occurs on nutrient-rich and often calcareous soils, and deciduous forests where its larval host plant Alliuim ursinum occurs, often near streams, trails or open patches in forests (Stubbs and Falk 2002, Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019). There are also records from unimproved alpine grasslands, probably on Allium victoralis, and in parkland areas, and it is supposed that Allium triquetum may be an alternative larval host plant (Speight 2020). These latter records need verification regarding the true identity of the species and the very different habitat, and therefore this habitat has not been taken into account in this assessment (J. van Steenis pers.comm. 2021).


The adults are usually found flying around or sitting on sunlit leaves of the host plant Allium ursinum or nearby vegetation, and are seldom found away from these patches of the host plant (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020). The larvae are phytophagous, and the first larval stages mine the stem-base and later on move to mine the bulbs, where they overwinter (Stubbs and Falk 2002, Bartsch et al. 2009). Bulbs affected by its larvae usually start showing discolouration (Stubbs and Falk 2002). Adults are often found feeding on the host plant, but also on nearby plants, such as Geranium sanguineum, Ranunculus acris and Rubus idaeus (Bartsch et al. 2009). The flight period is synchronous with the flowering of the host plant, from late March until early June (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), and in Scandinavia also until July (Bartsch et al. 2009).

","

It has been predicted that climate change will shift the range of the larval host plant, Allium ursinum, towards the north or higher altitudes (CWRnl.nl). This will have a negative impact on the population of this species, especially in the southern parts of its range. Allium ursinum has a broader distribution than the hoverfly, indicating that it is not always capable of tracking hostplant availability. It is expected that Portevinia maculata would only be able partially to follow the hostplant during any northward migration. Besides climate change, subpopulations of the hostplant can be locally threatened by deforestation or the thinning of forests, which makes the habitat unsuitable because shady conditions disappear, and also by large-scale hand-picking of leaves by humans for consumption (salads).

","

This species is usually present in large subpopulations near to the host plant, Alluim ursinum. In the Netherlands and Germany, it has a stable population trend in the long and short term (Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011). In Great Britain, the population trend was found to be stable or a slight increase over the past four decades (S.G. Ball pers. comm. 2021). The overall population trend is also considered to be stable.

",Stable,"

This is a European endemic, found mainly in western and central Europe. It occurs from Ireland and Great Britain, France (northern and western parts) east to Poland (Lower Silesia, Greater Poland and Subcarpathia), Ukraine (Carpathians and Rivne Region) and Romania (Moldavia), and from southwestern Norway, the extreme southern part of Sweden (Skane) and Denmark south to northern Spain (the Cantabrian Mountains) and north Italy (Alps). It also occurs on the Balkan peninsula, where it has only been recorded from Montenegro so far (Röder 1990, Torp 1994, Vujić 1996, Delmastro and Sommaggio 2003, Stănescu and Pârvu 2005, Speight 2008, Bartsch et al. 2009, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Tóth 2017, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, SLU Artdatabanken 2020, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020, R. Żóralski pers. comm. 2020).

Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.




",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,"There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. It is considered to be Threatened on the Balkan Peninsula (Vujić et al. 2001) and Vulnerable in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre 2021) and Czechia (Mazánek and Barták 2005). It is also Near Threatened in Denmark, but not found to be threatened in the centre of its geographical distribution. Protection of the sites and habitats where this species occurs, and research and monitoring on its population and habitat trends are needed to keep it as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27 countries.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165195,149165192,Merodon neofasciatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least concern (LC)

In Europe, this species is distributed in Greece and Cyprus. It prefers maquis, a scrubland vegetation characteristic for Mediterranean region (A.Vujić, pers. comm. 2020). The adults visit flowers of Senecio iopensis, Crithmum maritimum, Dittrichia viscosa, Drimia, Inula (van Steenis et al. 2019, Vujić et al. 2020).

This species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27 countries because while it has a relatively restricted area of occupancy (AOO) (220 km2), the extent of occurrence (EOO) is larger (268,968 km2), and the number of locations are above the threshold (25-30). The number of locations is based on fire as the major threat. Fires, infrastructure development and, to some extent, overgrazing by livestock are causing habitat destruction and threatening this species.","This species prefers maquis, a scrubland vegetation characteristic for Mediterranean region (A.Vujić, pers. comm. 2020). The adults are known to visit the flowers of Senecio iopensis, Crithmum maritimum, Dittrichia viscosa, Drimia and Inula (van Steenis et al. 2019, Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is between February and June and  from August to October (Speight 2020). The larva is unknown but is most probably associated with Drimia as a host plant, either Drimia numidica or (on the eastern Aegean Islands) Drimia aphylla (Vujić et al. 2020).","Fires are a major threat to the habitats of this species. The increasing rate of urbanization and the extension of transport networks mostly due to tourism are also serious threats, followed by overgrazing by livestock in some parts of the range (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).",There is no information about the population size or trends. Between 120-130 specimens have been collected between 1925 and 2017 across Greece and Cyprus. The majority of records are recent.,Unknown,"In Europe, this species is distributed in Greece and Cyprus.

Outside of Europe it is present in Turkey, Palestine and Israel (Speight 2020).

In Europe and EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be 2,68,968 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 220 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. Many point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. The increasing infrastructure development and the extension of transport networks can disturb its habitats, so continuous management and protection of sites in protected areas are needed. Additional research on its ecology, population trends and possible threats is needed. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is also required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165205,149165203,Orthonevra montana,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Across its distribution, this European endemic is rare in Germany, Greece, Romania and Czechia (Bradescu 1991, Ssymank et al. 2011, Barták and Vujić 2004 as cited in Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020). Although it lives in mountainous areas in the Balkans, it does not seem to be threatened by climate change in Serbia, where the estimated area of occupancy (AOO) shows a little increase under expected climate change scenarios (Miličić et al. 2018).

Within the European Union, it is only known from eight localities (Germany, Czechia, Romania and four localities in Greece) with an estimated AOO of 32 km2. The distribution is severely fragmented and the extent and the quality of the habitat are inferred to be declining. Thus this species is assessed as Endangered in the EU27.

In Europe as a whole, it is also Endangered due to the few severely fragmented populations, continuous threats to the habitat, and the small AOO (minimum of 56 km2).","

This species lives near streams with small Sphagnum bogs, or calcareous spring fens in open Picea/Pinus forests well above 1,000 metres. The habitat is a mixture of wet and dry habitats with upwelling groundwater (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020).


It visits white umbellifers, Ranunculus and Trollius (van Steenis et al. 2015, Vujić 1999). The adults are found on large dry rocks in riverbeds. It is associated with Sphagnum bogs in the southeastern part of Europe, but in the Isar Valley with calcareous fens (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020).


The habitat in Greece (at Thassos) is not known.


The larvae are not yet known, but they probably live in the small bogs, springs or flushes close to the adult habitats.


","This alpine species is threatened by winter tourism (development of ski resorts and ski runs), unsustainable grazing of grasslands by livestock, nutrient-enriching pollution from agriculture and climate change. Water abstraction can also impact it during its larval stage.","The type locality has been destroyed and there have been no recent records there. There is no information about the population trend, but the species can be very abundant in healthy habitats.",Unknown,"

This European endemic occurs in the mountainous parts of the Balkans (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Greece, North Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia), but there is also one record from Thassos island, Greece, at 80 metres asl. (Vujić 1999, Vujić et al. 2020). There are also records from Germany (Bavaria, the Isar River Valley) (Ssymank et al. 2011) and Czechia (Speight 2020, locality derived from title of the referred article: Šumava Mountain). The type locality in Serbia is destroyed (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2021).


The closely related Orthonevra tristis is also listed from Hungary, Romania and southern Italy. The records from Romania are included in this assessment as they are very likely to belong to this species (W. van Steenis pers. comm. 2021). The other records could refer either to O. montana or to O. tristis, so they are included in the O. tristis assessment as uncertain records.


The extent of occurrence (EOO) is above the threshold for threatened categories in both Europe and the EU27 countries. The area of occupancy (AOO) is less than 500 km2 with a minimum known AOO of 56 km2 in Europe, and is 36 km2 in the EU27 countries.

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

No conservation actions are in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better. In Serbia, this is a strictly protected species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165216,149165213,Merodon naxius,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This species is endemic to the islands of Naxos and Iraklia in Greece. It is listed as Endangered because the area of occupancy (AOO) (20 km2) and extent of occurrence (EOO) (124 km2) are small, and the range of this species is restricted only to two Aegean islands (in two-three locations), which prevents its expansion and the exchange of genetic material. The number of locations is defined based on the overgrazing by livestock and high erosion risk on Naxos. Due to intensifying overgrazing by goats and sheep in Greece (Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki 1985, Papanastasis 2004, Gkoltsiou 2011), the quality of the suitable habitats for this species is expected to decline. Additionally, results of Nastos et al. (2010) indicate a high erosion risk on Naxos, as well as amplified erosion processes, together with a change in land cover and land use, which are the main drivers for the desertification of the island. Further research is needed about the habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better the threats affecting the species.

",This species prefers Mediterranean maquis. It is known to visit Dittrichia viscosa (Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is during October (Speight 2020). The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown.,"Habitat loss is the main threat due to overgrazing by livestock that can additionally cause desertification through erosion processes (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Its range is restricted to just two of the Cycladic islands (Naxos and Iraklia), and hence range expansion is restricted as well as the exchange of genetic material.

Loss of habitat quality is expected because of intensifying overgrazing by goats and sheep on the Greek Islands (Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki 1985, Papanastasis 2004, Gkoltsiou 2011). Additionally, Nastos et al. (2010) indicated a high erosion risk on Naxos, as well as amplified erosion processes and change in land cover and land use, the main drivers of desertification on the island. This species has a relatively restricted range, making it more vulnerable to climate change. The Aegean Sea is considered to be the area of the Mediterranean Sea most exposed to sea level rise, with particularly strong impacts on the majority of its coastal areas (Klaoudatos et al. 2015).","The population trend is unknown due to the lack of data, but based on all known findings, it is endemic to Greece and occurs only on two Greek islands: on Naxos 3 specimens were collected in 2012 (one female) and two males in 2014; 16 specimens were collected on Iraklia in 2018.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Greece, where it is known from just two of the Cyclades islands, Naxos (two localities in the north of the island) and Iraklia (four localities on the eastern side of the island) (Vujić et al. 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) is 20 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 124 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. Iraklia is protected within the Greek Natura 2000 framework as part of the site of Community Importance site GR4220013 (EUNIS 2017). However, the subpopulations on Naxos do not occur in protected areas. Since the species is narrowly distributed and endemic to Greece, conservation actions have to be focused on conservation of suitable habitat and adequate levels of grazing (i.e. adequate management of habitats). Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is required. Introducing this endemic species into the National list of protected species, as well as increasing awareness is very important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149165225,149165215,Orthonevra gemmula,Critically Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)
EU27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

This is a very rare species n the European region, occurring at the border of the vast Euro-Siberian steppe system. The two European records and the Siberian type locality are all situated at this border. It is unclear how threatened this habitat is, but climate change and human use of water will certainly have a strong impact on it. Due to the very few known and severely fragmented subpopulations, the small (8 km2) area of occupancy (AOO), and the presumed decline in the habitat, the species is assessed as Critically Endangered (CR CR B2ab(iii)) both in the EU27 and in Europe.

While it is possible that the record of Orthonevra auritarsis in Romania might belong to this species, even if it were considered in this assessment, the category would not change. However, at the time of this assessment, Orthonevra auritarsis considered to be a separate species.","This species occurs in Juncus marsh in thermophilous Quercus (Q.cerris, Q.pubescens) forests (A.Vujić, pers.comm. in Speight 2020) and in the wet, moderately eutrophic parts of the steppe. It is known to visit flowers of Euphorbia (Reemer and Turnhout 2014).","Human water use in the steppe biome lowers water tables, posing a threat to the habitat of this species. In addition, climate change will negatively affect the wet areas in the steppe.","This species has a very few records, and these are are widely separated. In Hungary, several specimens were recorded together. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"

This species occurs in Hungary, Serbia and western Siberia (Brădescu 1992, Reemer and Turnhout 2014, Vujić 1999). A Romanian record of O. auritarsis might also refer to this species (W. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020). All European records are from the Pannonian Steppe, mostly from wet areas within the steppe habitat. The type locality in Russia (close to Novosibirsk) is in the Kazakh Steppe (Violovitsh 1983). In Europe, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 8 km2. The species potentially has a highly restricted extent of occurrence (EOO), but with only two georeferenced locality records, it cannot be estimated. In the EU27, both the AOO and the EOO are 4 km2.

",This species is not used.,Terrestrial,"

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. It is mainly threatened by changes in the water system. Thus the most important conservation action is to minimize the negative effect of human actions on the water tables in its habitat. The lowering of water tables, and using of ground or surface waters should be stopped, and efforts made to minimise and compensate for the effects of climate change. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand its ecology and population trends better.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165236,149165233,Merodon natans,Least Concern,,2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is mainly distributed in Southern Europe (in the Mediterranean region) and in Northern France. The data for Slovenia is not checked. It prefers herb-rich open areas in thermophilous Quercus forest and phrygana with Cistus scrub.

This species is listed as Least Concern in Europe and EU 27, because it is widespread on the continent. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Habitat loss (both quality and quantity) is the main threat due to change in land use, overgrazing by livestock and fires throughout the distribution range. Further research is needed about the population trend and ecology and biology of the species.

","

This species prefers herb-rich open areas in thermophilous Quercus forest and phrygana with Cistus scrub. It also occurs in orchards in southern Europe. The adults fly in open areas with tall herbs and scrub within dry woodland. They are known to visit Apiaceae, Mentha (Birtele 2011)Scilla autumnalis, Foeniculum, Solidago and Drimia. The flight period is between April and July, and August and November. The larva has not been described (Speight 2020), but is probably associated with Prospero autumnale or one or more of its closely related micro-species (Vujić et al. 2020).

","Since this species is distributed mostly in southern and southwestern Europe, the main threat is habitat loss due to overgrazing by livestock and fires in the Mediterranean areas, as well as change in land use across the whole of its distribution (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","Based on all known data, there are numerous subpopulations across southern Europe. Specimens have been collected between 1862 (Croatia) and 2018. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species is mainly distributed in southern Europe (in the Mediterranean region) and in northern France. The data for Slovenia has not been checked. Records of Merodon natans from Iberia are potentially confused with other species from the Merodon natans group (e.g. M. calcaratus). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of a threatened category.

Outside Europe, it is present in Turkey.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. Vujić et al. (2001) listed it under “Species threatened in Europe generally, and on the Balkans; degree of threat: decreasing”, following the classification of Speight and Castella (2001). Its conservation needs are mainly related to the conservation of suitable habitats. Its range falls partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network, and it is also present in the Reserve Naturelle de la Combe Lavaux (France), Skadar Lake National Park (Montenegro), Olympus National Park (Greece), Pindos National Park (Greece), Evros Delta National Park (Greece) and Dadia National Park (Greece).

Additional research on its population trend, ecology and biology is needed. The impacts of overgrazing by livestock in the Mediterranean parts of the range also need further investigation. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends, as well as raising awareness are also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165248,149165245,Neoascia unifasciata,Endangered,"B2ab(iii,v)",2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This is a European endemic which occurs in many countries in central Europe, but often only at a few sites and in low numbers. It usually occurs in undisturbed fragile wetland habitats which are sensitive to disturbance, including pollution from agriculture which is causing a decline in the habitat quality. So far, it has been collected from roughly 70 localities, but may be under-recorded as it often flies in low numbers among numerous specimens of other Neoascia species. However, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be between 280 and 1,120 km2 based on known occurrences and habitat potential. It is generally found in very low numbers at each location, and lives in small and fragile habitat patches with a fragmented distribution, making it sensitive to local extinction. Thus, its distribution may be severely fragmented. Taking a precautionary approach, and using the lower AOO value, the species is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU27 countries.

","

This species is usually found in wetlands along streams in unimproved humid pastures, and in open areas in brook-alluvial gallery (Alnus/Salix or Picea) forests, as well as in montane calcareous fens (Speight 2020). These habitat patches often also contain stands of Petasites hybridus.

The adults are observed to fly through the tall herb vegetation in the vicinity of streams and/or Petasites hybridus (Speight 2020). They are found flying together with Neaoscia annexa and/or Neoascia obliqua (Reemer et al. 2009). The larval stages are unknown, but they may also develop inside Petasites hybridus like both co-existing Neoascia species.

They visit Euphorbia cyparissias, Caltha palustris and Stellaris spp. (Speight 2020), and the flight period is from mid-May until July (Bot and van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020)

","

Alluvial gallery forests where this species occurs can be impacted by overgrazing by livestock, leaving only willows (Salix) to grow, which can threaten the habitat of this species. Pollution, nitrification and upwelling can also impact the larval stages by disrupting their aquatic habitat.

","

This species is usually found in very small numbers, and it is often much less common than co-occurring Neoascia species. In Germany, it is thought to have shown a moderate population decline over the past 150 years (Ssymank et al. 2011). The overall population trend is also considered to be declining.

",Decreasing,"

This is a European endemic, mainly found on hillsides and in the mountain regions of central Europe and on the Balkan peninsula. It occurs in the Netherlands (South Limburg), Belgium (East Ardennes), northwest France (Moselle, Doubs, Jura, Savoie, and Haute Savoie), Switzerland (Vaud), Austria (Voralberg, Styria, Lower Austria), Germany (except the lowland areas), Latvia, Poland (Lesser Poland), Czechia (Moravian-Silezian, Moravia), Slovakia (Bansky Bystrica), Hungary (northern parts and Transdanubia), Romania (Transylvania), Slovenia (central Slovenia and Littoria – Inner Carniola), Serbia (seven districts), North Macedonia (southwestern parts), Bulgaria (Pirin mountains) and Greece (Mt. Pindos) (Vujić 1990, Kuznetsov 1993, Krpač et al. 2001, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Klasa and Soszyński 2011, Tóth 2011, 2014, Heimburg 2018, Speight et al. 2018 ,Bot and van de Meutter 2019, Speight et al. 2020, Vujić et al. 2020, M. de Groot pers. comm. 2021, L. Fisler pers. comm. 2020, L. Mazánek pers. comm. 2020, A, Ssymank pers. comm. 2020, A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).


Its exact distribution is not precisely known, and so the map indicates the regions where the species is known to exist rather than the exact distribution. In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) would be 440,260 km2 based on the map, but so far, within this range it has been recorded from approximately 70 localities. Based on the low number of localities and the restricted habitat preference (most often the habitat is a stretch of Petasites along small rivers), an AOO of 280-1,120 km2 is more realistic for Europe. Only a few records are from outside the EU27, so the estimation of the AOO for EU27 is regarded to be in the same range.



",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,"Currently, no conservation actions are known for this species. It is listed as Near Threatened on the German national Red List (Ssymank et al. 2011). Besides site protection and restoration, more research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165259,149165256,Merodon nanus,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is listed as Endangered in Europe, because the area of occupancy (AOO) is 28 km2, the extent of occurrence is low (556 km2) and the number of locations is five (based on overgrazing and fires). In Europe (Lesbos), the number of sampled adult were 26 in total between 2004 and 2016. Ongoing habitat loss is the main threat in the EU27, due to overgrazing by goats and sheep in Greece (Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki 1985, Papanastasis 2004, Gkoltsiou 2011), as well as fires. Additionally, the species is restricted only to one island in Europe (Lesbos). The subpopulations occurring outside of Europe are registered on  the mountains of Eastern, Southern and Central Anatolian and in the Middle East, separated from the Greek subpopulations by geographical barriers in the form of mountains and seas, and are far from the European range, making the rescue effect more difficult.

In addition, outside of Europe, there is potential for loss of suitable habitat for the species because it is distributed in a war zone in the Middle East. Further research is needed on the population size and trend, habitat and ecological requirements and threats affecting the species.

","This species prefers open ground and unimproved, humid, montane grasslands (Vujić et al. 2020), as well as olive groves (Ricarte et al. 2012). The adults fly very low through the ground vegetation (Speight 2020). The flight period of adults in Europe is from April to June (Ricarte et al. 2012, Vujić et al. 2015, 2020). They are known to visit flowers of Apiaceae, Asteraceae, Euphorbia and Ornithogalum (Vujić et al. 2015, 2020). The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown.","The main threat is habitat loss (both quantity and quality) due to overgrazing by goats and sheep in Greece (Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki 1985, Papanastasis 2004, Gkoltsiou 2011) as well as fires (which are likely to increase with climate change). A fire occurred in the southeastern tip of the island, eliminating this species in 2016 (A. Vujić, pers. comm. 2020). In Europe, the species has a restricted range. In Greece, it has been recorded only from the East Aegean island of Lesbos (Vujić et al. 2020), which prevents its spread and the exchange of genetic material, and makes this species extremely exposed to the established effects of climate change in the Mediterranean Basin (Kaloveloni et al. 2015). The Aegean Sea is considered to be the area of the Mediterranean Sea most exposed to sea level rise, with particularly strong impacts on the majority of its coastal areas (Klaoudatos et al. 2015).","The population trend is unknown due to the lack of data. However, based on all known findings, in Europe (Lesbos) between 2004 and 2016 the number of sampled adults was 26 in total, across eight point localities. All the subpopulations are concentrated in the south, east and southeast parts of Lesbos. A fire occurred in the southeastern tip of the island, eliminating the species in 2016 (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). Therefore, it is possible that the species no longer occurs in Charamida.",Unknown,"This species is distributed in Greece and Turkey and in the mountainous regions of the Middle East (Armenia, Iran, Israel, Lebanon and Syria). In Greece, it has been recorded only from the East Aegean island of Lesbos (Vujić et al. 2020).

The area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 is 28 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 556 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action so far. For the most part it does not occur in protected areas (only and is partially within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network), and so it is recommended to conserve suitable habitats. Further research is needed on its population size and trend, habitat, ecological requirements and threats. Monitoring of population and habitat trends is required, and its presence in Charamida needs to be checked after the fires that occurred there.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165271,149165268,Melanogaster nigricans,Vulnerable,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessments: Vulnerable (VU)
EU27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR) 

This European endemic is very rare in the European Union, with only one record from Romania. Wetlands are threatened in Romania, and there is a decline in the quality of its habitat. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) are 4 km2. Thus, the species is listed as Critically Endangered within the EU27 countries.

In Europe, the species is a bit more widespread in Ukraine and European Russia, where it has around 150 localities. However, it is still quite rare, with an estimated area of occupancy (AOO) of 600 km2. It also has severely fragmented subpopulations. In addition, the habitat of the species is threatened by changes in the surface water levels that alter wet meadows into dry ones, and in the decrease or even disappearance of the breeding sites. Overgrazing by livestock and use of fertilisers in the nutrient-poor, species-rich meadows where adults feed, leads to these habitats becoming unsuitable. Therefore, this species is classified as Vulnerable in Europe.","The species prefer wetlands and freshwater. It occurs close to both standing and running water bodies (pools, lakes, streams, rivers), in humid grassland, marsh and fen (G. Popov pers. comm. 2021, Speight 2020).","The habitat of the species is threatened by changes in the surface water levels that result in wet meadows becoming dry ones, and in the decrease or even disappearance of the breeding sites. Overgrazing by livestock and use of fertilisers in the nutrient-poor species-rich meadows where adults feed, leads to these habitats becoming unsuitable.","There is no information on the population size or trend, but it seems to be decreasing because in most countries there are only old records of this species. In Ukraine, it is a common species in some areas (G. Popov pers. comm. 2021).",Decreasing,"According to Speight (2020), this species is recorded from Albania, Romania, parts of European Russia (Ryazan region) and Ukraine (both mainland and Crimea) (Peck 1988, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, G. Popov pers. comm. 2021). There is also a record from Greece, but this requires confirmation (Vujić et al. 2020). A Lithuanian record (Pakalniskis et al. 2006) is far from the known distribution, and until this specimen is checked, its presence in Lithuania is considered to be uncertain (W. van Steenis pers. comm. 2021). Although recorded from North Macedonia (Glumac 1968) and Albania (Dirickx 1994), these records are considered to be unreliable (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020): according to Vujic, the species is not found in Albania and North Macedonia. Therefore, these countries are excluded from this assessment. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 825,579 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 600 km2. In the EU27, the species has only one locality in Romania, so both the EOO and the AOO are 4 km2 here.

Outside the range of this assessment, but within Europe, the species is also recorded from Karbardino-Balkari in the Russian part of the Caucasus Mountains (Goguzokov 2003).",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. The most important conservation action would be to protect the areas, sites, and habitats where it occurs. This includes the maintenance of both the wet, nutrient-poor, species-rich meadows and the natural waters used for reproduction. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand better its ecology and population trends.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165281,149165279,Merodon moenium,Least Concern,,2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is predominantly distributed in the continental parts of Europe, but it also occurs in the southern and southeastern parts of the Mediterranean Basin. It is also present in Great Britain, and the Black Sea coast. The data for Belgium is not checked (Speight et al. 2016).

This species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27, because it is widespread on the continent. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Habitat loss (both in quality and quantity) is the main threat due to change in land use across Europe, and because of overgrazing by livestock and fires throughout all the Mediterranean Basin. Further research of the population trend and ecology and biology of the species is needed.

","

This species prefers open ground in humid Fagus or Picea, mesophilous Fagus and thermophilous Quercus forests, as well as dry, unimproved, lowland grassland, old almond and cherry orchards, and vineyards with ground vegetation. The adults fly very fast and low through the vegetation and settle most often on the ground, on bare patches of soil on woodland paths, or at the edge of tracks. The males are very territorial. They are known to visit Apiaceae, Achillea and Euphorbia. The adults fly from May to August. The larva has not been described (Speight 2020).

","Since the species is distributed across almost the whole of Europe, the main threat probably is habitat loss due to changes in land use, as well as forest fires and overgrazing by livestock in the Mediterranean areas (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","Based on all known data, a large number of specimens have been collected from all of Europe between 1816 (Austria) and 2019 (Montenegro, Serbia and France). The biggest subpopulations are recorded in Serbia, France, Montenegro, Italy and Austria. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species is predominantly distributed in the continental parts of Europe, but it also occurs in the southern and southeastern parts of the Mediterranean Basin. It is also present in Great Britain, and the Black Sea coast. The data for Belgium has not been checked (Speight et al. 2016).

Outside of Europe, it occurs in Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Iran, Turkey and North Africa. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of a threatened category.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"Merodon moenium is on the Red List of Berlin. Its conservation needs are mainly related to the conservation of suitable habitats. Its distribution is partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network, and also partially in various protected areas: the National Nature Reserve Combe Lavaux - Jean Roland (France), Central Balkan National Park (Bulgaria), Stara Planina Natural Park (Serbia), Rodopi Mountains National Park (Greece), Olympus National Park (Greece), Tzoumerka, Peristeri, Arachthos Gorge and Acheloos Valley National Park (Greece), Mavrovo National Park (North Macedonia), Tara National Park (Serbia), Djerdap National Park (Serbia), Fruška Gora National Park (Serbia) and Durmitor National Park (Montenegro). Additional research needed on its population trend, ecology and biology. The impacts of overgrazing by livestock in the Mediterranean part of the range also needs further investigation. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is also needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165293,149165290,Melanogaster aerosa,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is rare in parts of its distribution. It is classified as Endangered in Czechia, Germany and as threatened in the Balkan peninsula (Vujić et al. 2001, Mazanek and Barták 2004, Ssymank et al. 2011). Its habitats are under pressure in large parts of Europe. Still, in parts of its distribution (United Kingdom, Ireland, southern Scandinavia and probably Eastern Europe) it is widespread and still doing well, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, the species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27 countries.

","

This species is present in wetlands: in acid fen and valley bogs and flushes, pools and small streams in moorland (Speight 2020). In the Netherlands and Belgium the two generations show a remarkably different distribution and habitat. The spring generation occurs in grasslands and shrubland with clay soil along rivers, and the late summer generation occurs in peat bogs in heathlands with some seepage (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019).

The adults fly among dense fen vegetation, usually close to larger water bodies (lakes, rivers, large fens) and visits white umbels, Bunias, Cirsium, Hieracium and Leontodon (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020). In Belgium and the Netherlands, the spring generation visits Crataegus and Ranunculus, and the summer generation most often visits Calluna (Reemer et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019).

The larvae live just beneath the surface of semi-liquid mud enriched by peat, in the vicinity of plant roots, in almost-standing water (Ball et al. 2011, Maibach et al. 1994, Speight 2020).

","In most parts of Europe, the wet habitats of this species are negatively impacted by decreases in groundwater tables and surface waters, and nitrogen deposition. They are also threatened by habitat alteration and drought caused by climate change, and possibly by pesticides filtrating from agricultural lands.",Populations are mostly small and separated. The population trend is unknown.,Unknown,"This is a widespread species in the lower parts of Finland and Scandinavia, Great Britain, Ireland and northern Russia into Siberia, and south to central France, Switzerland, Austria and Hungary. In southern Europe, it is a rare species with some records from Spain, Montenegro, Romania and Bulgaria (Speight 2020).

Exact locality data are not always available, so calculating the extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) was difficult. However, the AOO and EOO are considered to be large enough for this species not to be threatened in Europe.

Outside Europe, it is also recorded from western Siberia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018).",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. The most urgent conservation actions are protection and restoration of nutrient-poor species-rich wet to dry meadows and small natural water-bodies with good water quality and natural watersides in the vicinity. Research and monitoring are also needed to better understand its ecology and population trends.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165303,149165301,Merodon minutus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27, mainly because it is widely distributed in Southern Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Habitat loss (both in quality and quantity) is the main threat, caused by changes in land use, and overgrazing by livestock and fires throughout all the Mediterranean. Further research is needed about the population trend and ecology and biology of the species.

","

The  species prefers open areas in evergreen Quercus maquis and even more open, almost bare ground in semi-arid conditions. The adults fly extremely low and fast over thinly vegetated ground, settling on the ground and visiting the flowers of low-growing herbs (Prospero autumnale and Anthemis have been recorded) (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period of adults is from April to May and from September to November. The larva has not been described (Speight 2020).

","The main threat is habitat loss due to fire and overgrazing by livestock throughout the Mediterranean region (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). This species is potentially further constricted by climate change (for instance by increasing temperatures and increased fire frequency) across its entire distribution. This is likely to cause a decline in the amount of suitable habitat available. Additionally, various biotic and abiotic risks threat the Evros Delta National Park, such as human activities or management problems (Arabatzis et al. 2010).","Based on all known findings, 188 specimens have been collected between 1858 (Sicily, Italy) and 2017 (Corsica, France). Most of the subpopulations are in Greece and Italy. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species is distributed in southern Europe, mainly in the southern and eastern Mediterranean (on the Balkan Peninsula and some Mediterranean islands).

Outside of Europe it is also present in Turkey and Morocco. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of a threatened category.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. Its conservation needs are mainly related to the conservation of suitable habitats. Its range is partly located within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network, and partially in the Park Naturel Regional de Corse (France) and Evros Delta National Park (Greece). Additional research is needed on its population trend, ecology and biology. The impact of overgrazing by livestock in the Mediterranean part of its distribution also needs further investigation. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165314,149165312,Criorhina pachymera,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)


Criorhina pachymera is a widespread European endemic that lives in ancient forests on nutrient-rich soils, mostly in Fagus forests with over-mature and senescent trees, and also in cultivated areas, in stands and lines of Populus. Currently, it is known from approximately 200 localities but is expected to be more widespread and the habitat type is not fragmented. It is expected to be affected negatively by forest management, for example by removing old stands of beech forest, but at the same time, it can also benefit from human landscaping such as planting lines and stands of Populus trees along roads and waterways. In many countries the number of records for this species is low and subpopulations may be fragmented. However, while it is listed as threatened in a number of countries (such as Czechia and Poland), it is not rare in the Netherlands and Belgium, and has recently shown an increase in numbers and distribution (Waarneming.nl).

Although this species is declining in some parts of this range, overall the area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are thought to exceed the thresholds for considering this species threatened in either Europe or the EU 27. It is therefore assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27. However, regular monitoring of the population and habitats is needed to determine whether it should be assessed as threatened in the near future.


","

This species lives in ancient forests on nutrient-rich soils, mostly in Fagus forests with over-mature and senescent trees, and also in Populus or Fraxinus riparian forests, as well as in lines or stands of Populus spp. in more open and cultivated countrysides (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020). In Sweden, it has been found in a mixed forest near old Populus tremula trees (Johansson 2015).


The adults are primarily arboreal but they descend to flowers in the understory to feed, and sometimes are found at localities several kilometres away from any habitat suitable for egg-deposition (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020). Males can be found sitting at the base of old Fagus sylvatica and Populus spp. trees defending a territory (Reemer et al. 2009) or patrolling by flying very fast through the canopy of Fagus sylvatica or around flowering shrubs of Crateagus monogyna (L.J. van der Ent, pers. comm. 2020). Females may be found investigating insect-bored and rotten parts of the trunks of old standing live trees (Speight 2020).


Egg deposition has been observed between leaves near stems of Fagus sylvatica, but the larvae, which are likely to live in rotten wood, have not been found so far (Reemer et al. 2009).


The visited flowers are mostly shrubs such as Cornus sanguinea, Crataegus spp., Photinia spp., Prunus avium, Prunus cerasus, Prunus spinosa, Prunus serotina, Rubus spp., Salix spp. and Sorbus aucuparia, but also herbs such as Myrrhis odorata.


The flight period is from April until June (Bot and van de Meutter 2019).

","

Threats may include deforestation and harvesting trees for commercial use resulting in removal of old tree stands. In addition, a potential threat is the removal of old Populus stands and individual trees along roads or waterways for safety reasons. This species is also dependent on forest edges with flowering shrubs such as Crateagus, which are less and less present in the transition zones of commercial or recreational plantations and forests.



","

In general, this species is recorded in low numbers, one or two specimens at a time, but sometimes it is found in larger numbers on flowering shrubs such as Crateagus spp. In the Netherlands, there are no data on the population trend after 1950, but it has become more widespread after the 1980s (Reemer et al. 2009). In Germany, a strong and long-term population decline was found, as well as a moderate short-term population decline (Ssymank et al. 2011). The overall population trend is unknown.

",Unknown,"

This is a European endemic, occurring from the Netherlands (central and southern parts), Belgium (except the Ardennes) and central France, east to central Poland, Ukraine (Rivne Region) and Romania (Muntenia), and from southwest Sweden (with a few recent records as reported in Johansson 2015), and most German states south to central Spain and central Italy. It is also present on the Balkan peninsula south to the mountain regions of Greece (Langhoffer 1918, Vujić and Milankov 1990, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Speight et al. 2018, Bot and van de Meutter 2019, Speight et al. 2020, Vujić et al. 2020, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020, R. Żóralski pers. comm. 2020). So far Criorhina pachymera has been collected within its range from approximately 200 locations.

",It is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There is no information available about the conservation measures specific for Criorhina pachymera. Protection and better management of the habitats where this species occurs would be important, and research about its ecology and population trends is recommended.

The species is considered to be threatened throughout Europe. It is listed as threatened on the Balkan peninsula (Vujić et al. 2001), endangered in Czechia and Poland (Mazánek  and Barták 2005, Palaczyk et al. 2002), and severely threatened in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165324,149165322,Merodon megavidus,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This European endemic species is assessed as Endangered because the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 32 km2 and extent of occurrence (EOO) is 2,962 km2, and the number of locations is only five. The number of locations is based on habitat loss (quality and quantity), which is the main threat due to overgrazing by goats and sheep on Greek Islands (Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki 1985, Papanastasis 2004, Gkoltsiou 2011). In Europe, the species is present only on the two Greek islands of Lesbos and Samos presumably with no or little genetic exchange between them. Additionally, there is a high probability of threat posed by climate change in the Mediterranean Basin (Kaloveloni et al. 2015), which can increase the risk of fires. For this reason, there is a high probability of threat of a more intense impact of climate change in the Mediterranean Basin (Kaloveloni et al. 2015, Miličić et al. 2018, Tapoglou et al. 2019). Further research is needed on the population trend and ecology and biology of the species.

","

The preferred environments of this species are open ground in forests, open areas in thermophilous Quercus and Castanea forests (Vujić et al. 2020), and maquis (Ačanski et al. 2016, Speight 2020). The adults can feed in ruderal sites close to natural areas. The flight period is from April to July. The adults have been recorded visiting the flowers of Convolvulus (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown.

","In Europe, the species is only present on two Greek islands (Lesbos and Samos), presumably with no or little genetic exchange between them. The main threat is habitat loss due to overgrazing by goats and sheep in Greece (Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki 1985, Papanastasis 2004, Gkoltsiou 2011), which may lead to loss of habitat quality and quantity. However, the impacts of overgrazing by livestock on the species are not fully known and require investigation. Additionally, there is a high probability of climate change impacts in the Mediterranean Basin (Kaloveloni et al. 2015), which can increase the risk of fires. The Aegean Sea is considered the area of the Mediterranean Sea most at risk of sea level rise, with particularly strong impacts on the majority of its coastal areas (Klaoudatos et al. 2015).","The population trend is unknown due to the lack of data. In total, the species has five subpopulations. In Samos, there are two known point localities (with only eight specimens recorded between 2010 and 2012), and in Lesbos, there are eight point localities (records range from 1999 to 2015).",Unknown,"This European endemic species is restricted to Greece, where it has been recorded from the two East Aegean islands of Lesvos and Samos (Ačanski et al. 2016, Speight 2018, Vujić et al. 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) is 32 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 2,962 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"The conservation needs of this species relate mainly to conservation of its habitats, given that it is restricted to just two Greek islands in Europe, preventing its range increase and the exchange of genetic material. The range is partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network. Additional research is needed on its population trend, ecology and biology. The impacts of overgrazing by livestock also need further investigation. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required. Introducing this endemic species into the National list of protected species, as well as increasing awareness about it is very important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149165335,149165332,Criorhina floccosa,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has its main distribution in Europe where it is widespread in old deciduous, usually humid Fagus and Quercus forest with over-mature and senescent trees and a well-developed understory. Possible threats to the preferred habitat involve forest management where old trees are removed and suitable native deciduous stands of trees replaced by tree species unsuitable for larval development. In the southern and eastern part of its range, it is rare and has a fragmented distribution. On the other hand, it has increased in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) and was recently downgraded from threatened to vulnerable on the national Red List of Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, despite the occurrence on several regional Red Lists, the current European Red List status of this species is Least Concern, which is also true for the EU27 countries.

","

This species lives in old deciduous, usually humid Fagus and Quercus forest with over-mature and senescent trees and a well-developed understory on sandy or more nutrient-rich soils (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020). It can be also found outside of woodland in hedgerows, and on parkland trees (Stubbs and Falk 2002), as well as in stands of Populus canadensis. (L.J. van der Ent, pers. comm. 2020).

The adults are arboreal but they descend to visit flowers of small trees and shrubs. Males patrol and fly very fast through flowering small trees and shrubs. Females are also observed at the trunk base of large, old deciduous trees, apparently investigating sites for egg deposition (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

Larvae are found in rotten trunks or roots in living and dead deciduous trees including Acer pseudoplatanus, Fagus sylvestris, Fraxinus excelsior, Quercus faginea, Quercus pyrenaica, and Ulmus spp. (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Ricarte et al. 2013, Speight 2020, Stubbs and Falk 2002).

The visited flowers are mostly shrubs and small trees including Acer campestris, Cornus sanguinea, Crataegus spp., Photinia spp., Prunus spinosa, Ribes alpina, Rubus idaeus, Sorbus aucuparia, Sorbus aria, Sorbus torminalis; it is also recorded from white-flowering Apiaceae.

The flight period is from late March to early July (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meuter 2019, Speight 2020), but also until August (Stubbs and Falk 2002).

","

Forestry activities where old trees are removed, as well as a removal of old trees in parks and estates for safety reasons, may have a negative impact on the subpopulations of this species. In addition, afforestation via replacement of native deciduous tree stands by conifer trees or by other fast-growing tree species could pose a threat to larval development. This species is also dependent on forest edges with flowering shrubs such as Crateagus spp., which are less and less present at transition zones of commercial or recreational plantations.

","

In general, this species is encountered in low numbers, but sometimes on a flowering shrub such as Crataegus monogyna, dozens of specimens have been observed. In the Netherlands, it has increased in distribution, especially from the 1980s (Reemer et al. 2009). In Germany, it has shown an undefined long-term decline in populations (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Great Britain, population trend was found to be stable over the past four decades (S.G. Ball pers. comm. 2021). In general, the population trend seems to be stable.

",Stable,"

This is a Palaearctic species with its main distribution in Europe. It occurs from Ireland, Great Britain including Scotland and France, east to European Russia (no additional distribution data available), Ukraine (Transcarpatia) and Romania (Banat); and from Norway (one recent record in the southeastern tip) and the southern tip of Sweden south to central Spain, central Portugal (unconfirmed record from Sierra da Estrela, L.J. van der Ent pers. comm. 2019) and central Italy. It is also present on the Balkan peninsula, south to the mountainious regions of Greece (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Falck 2011, Glumac 1968, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Speight et al. 2020, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Vujić et al. 2020, Vujić and Milankov 1990, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020, Hoverfly Recording Scheeme).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside Europe, the species has been recorded in Turkey and in Georgia (Transcaucasia) (Saribiyik 2014, Mengual et al. 2020).

",No information about the use and trade of this species. It is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There is no information about the conservation of this species. Better management of the habitats where it occurs would be important, and research about its ecology and population trends is recommended. On the regional Red Lists of some German states, it has been listed as threatened to severely threatened (Doczkal et al. 2001, Freund et al. 2005, Dziock et al. 2004, Saure 2018, Von der Dunk et al. 2003), in Poland as Endangered (Palaczyk et al. 2002), and in Ireland, Denmark and Sweden as Vulnerable (Speight 2008).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165347,149165345,Merodon luteomaculatus,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

This European endemic species is assessed as Endangered because its area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are small (40 km2 and 1,196 km2) and it has a relatively restricted range (it is considered to occur in five locations). The number of the locations are determined based on main threat, namely habitat loss due to road expansion and of tourism infrastructure, as well as the excessive deforestation. Merodon luteomaculatus occurs on top of few mountains in Western Balkans, where the increasing pressure from urbanization, tourism and deforestation are affecting the subpopulations. Additionally, climate change can pose a threat in the future (Alfthan et al. 2015, Kaloveloni et al. 2015), due to the highly restricted range of the species, and because it is a high mountainous species. Further research is required to establish the current status of the species throughout its range, the habitat and ecological requirements and to better understand the existing threats. The species is not present in the EU27.

","

This species prefers sub-Mediterranean mixed oak forests, and beech or mixed beech forests. The adults fly from August to September (Radenković et al. 2018). The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown.

","Habitat loss from road expansion and tourism infrastructure is the main threat, as well as the excessive deforestation. Because it is a high-mountain species, an increase in temperature exacerbated by climate change can potentially have a high impact on the future distribution of hoverflies on the Balkan Peninsula (Kaloveloni et al. 2015). This species occurs on the top of the mountains in the western Balkans, a proven hotspot of climate change (Alfthan et al. 2015). It is likely that global warming will further restrict the distribution of this species, and competition may cause it to move into rather unfavourable areas.","There are insufficient data about the population trend, but based on all known findings, the number of recorded specimens is relatively low. In Bosnia and Herzegovina only one male has been collected (in 1911), while in Montenegro two specimens were collected in 1984, and during recent field investigations there were a further 18 in 2011, two males in 2012 and one male in 2018. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This is a continental species distributed on mountains of the western part of the Balkan Peninsula; Mt. Orjen and Mt. Durmitor in Montenegro, and Krupac (near Konjic) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Radenković et al. 2018). The latter record is considered uncertain as it dates from 1911. The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is 40 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1,196 km2. The species is endemic to Europe.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"Specimens of Merodon luteomaculatus were collected from 13 point localities. Since it is not the subject of any targeted conservation action, and it is not known if it is present in any protected area, conservation actions should focus on preservation of its habitats and on research on its populations to determine the real distribution and extinction risk, as well its ecology, life history and possible future threats. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, efforts should be made to check its presence since the only record is from 1911. Conservation actions should include better planning and mitigation of tourism infrastructure. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165359,149165356,Chrysosyrphus nigra,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-14 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Although Chrysosyrphus nigra does not have a very large distribution in Europe due to its habitat preferences, it does not seem to be directly threatened in its range. In Europe, this hoverfly is only found in the high northern parts of Scandinavia, and in European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 2 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 550,000 km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is about 566,000 km2 and the AOO is around 201,000 km2. The species is seemingly rare, and may be impacted by human activity and climate change, but it does not seem to be in any eminent danger. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. Further research on the species and potential threats is recommended to establish if there are any conservation measures needed.","

The preferred environment of this species is wetland/forest, particularly aapamire within Pinus sylvestris forest and in taiga wetlands (Nielsen 1998). The flight period is from mid June to mid July.

This species occurs in mountain and marsh areas, both above the forest boundary and in the birch and coniferous forest belt. In Sweden, it visits flowers of cobwebs Caltha palustris, squamous Rhododendron tomentosum and cloudberry Rubus chamaemorus. In northern Norway it has also been seen visiting flowering Salix spp.

","The threats to this species are unknown, but it is likely to be affected by the usual anthropogenic activities going on in Europe, such as deforestation, logging, drainage, agriculture and urbanisation. The environment where it lives (high north) will probably provide some protection from anthropogenic activities, but climate change will be a serious factor in the future.","Not much is known about the size of the subpopulations of this species, and the current population trend in both Europe and the EU 27 is unknown. It is not commonly encountered because it is difficult to find and lives in areas that are not well investigated. It may be more widespread than currently known.",Unknown,"

This species found across northern Europe, from northern Norway (old records from Finnmark), Sweden and Finland, northern parts of European Russia (Narjan-Mar) (Barkalov and Mutin 2018) and across Asia through northern Siberia to Kamchatka (Speight 2020).

In Sweden, it is known from the mountains south to Lycksele, but its distribution probably extends further south along the mountain chain and reaches the coast at least in Norrbotten. The species is likely to be more common than the few findings indicate, and the distribution may be greater (in particular along the mountain chain) than shown in the map (see bibliography). In Norway and Finland, it is known from a number of localities north of the Arctic Circle. It is also known from the area around Inare swamp at just over 100 m Asl. It also was sighted in other parts of northern Finland. 

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 2 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 550,000 km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is about 566,000 km2 and the AOO is around 201,000 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"More research is needed on the biology, life cycle, threats and distribution of this species in order to make a more detailed assumption about necessary conservation actions. In Finland and Sweden, this species has been assessed as Least Concern (LC) (FinBif 2020, Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165371,149165369,Merodon luteofasciatus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-01-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This species is assessed as Vulnerablein Europe and the EU27 countries due to its very restricted area of occupancy (AOO) (40 km2), and eight locations. The number of locations is based on fire as the main threat. It is found only on four Greek islands in Europe. In addition, a continuous decline in habitat quality and extent is observed, which is due to fires, tourism and overgrazing by livestock. Additional research on species ecology and population trends is needed. There is no rescue effect from subpopulations outside of the assessment region.","This species prefers maquis, a scrubland vegetation characteristic for the Mediterranean region (Vujić et al. 2020). The adults are known to visit flowers of Drimia (Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is from June to September and October. The larva is unknown but is most probably associated with Drimia as a host plant, either Drimia numidica or (on the Eastern Aegean islands) Drimia aphylla (Vujić et al. 2020).",Fire represents a major threat to the habitat of this species. Tourism and overgrazing by livestock are considered to be additional threats (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).,"There are no data about the population trend. From 2008 to 2014, a total of 27 specimens have been collected from the four islands.",Unknown,"This species is distributed on four Greek islands (Lesbos, Samos, Crete, and Rhodes). It is also found in Turkey (Speight 2020). In Europe and EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be 50,498 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 40 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. Two point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. Research about the threats, habitat and ecology, as well as about population trends is needed. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is also important. Awareness should be raised about the importance of this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165383,149165380,Chalcosyrphus valgus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Chalcosyrphus valgus
 is widely distributed, although its abundance differs across its range. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be around 7.3 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 4,032 km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is around 3.8 million km2 and the AOO is estimated to be around 3,344 km2. The species is dependent on a habitat that is rare in economically exploited woodlands making it relatively rare by definition over large parts of its range. Although it also has a relatively fragmented distribution as seen on the map, and taken in account the expected decline in suitable habitat in the future the species is listed for the moment as Least Concern for Europe and EU27. This status might change in the future as it has the characteristics of a continuous decline in suitable habitat and a growing fragmentation in its distribution.

The main threats to this species are the usual anthropogenic influences on the mature forests, as is the case for all of the saproxylic species. Some conservation measures should be taken in central and southern Europe where there are likely declines happening, particular to protect old trees in forests, as this is a preferred habitat of the species.","

The preferred environment of this species is coniferous forest; old Fagus/Picea forest with overmature trees, toward the upper altitudinal limit of the Fagus and in old Pinus forest, including western taiga; deciduous forest; old Quercus/Carpinus forest. It is also found in alluvial softwood forest of Salix alba/Populus alba with old trees.

Adults have been found on tree stumps and freshly cut logs of conifers; both in flight and when settled, the species closely resembles large ophionid ichneumons (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) in appearance and movements. From the observations of L. Mielczarek (pers. comm. 2020): “the male of C. valgus flies fast just over ground vegetation, close to poplars. When it reaches a tree, it flies spirally round the trunk, upwards to approximately 2.5 m - presumably to find a female. The male then returns to the base of another trunk and repeats this behaviour three to four times, systematically moving forward in the forest. Searching flight behaviour also occurs above fallen logs. Females searching for oviposition sites fly close to trees with wounds, sap runs or with activity of ants”.

Flowers known to have been visited by this species include Campanula sp., Chaerophyllum sp., Hypericum sp., Rubus idaeus and Sorbus aucupariae. The flight period is from May to July. The larva has been described and figured by Schmid and Moertelmaier (2007), from larvae reared to last instar in a mixture of damp rotten wood of Acer, Alnus and Picea, to which eggs laid by a captive female were added. There is strong circumstantial evidence to indicate that the larvae of C. valgus can develop in damaged trunks of Populus alba (L. Mielczarek pers. comm. 2020).

","

The main threats to this species are the usual anthropogenic influences on the mature forests, as is the case for all of the saproxylic species. This includes logging and deforestation, human intrusions like housing, industrial areas and tourism. Furthermore the climate change might be an issue with the degradation and alteration of suitable habitat.

","This species is widely distributed, although its abundance differs across its range. There are very few records in southeast Europe, but it is regularly caught in suitable habitats, good forest, elsewhere. It is probably the most common species of the red-legged species in this genus. This species is today very localised within many parts of its European range, but not so evidently under threat as the closely similar C. femoratus (Speight 2020). Despite this, the current population trend of this species is considered to be decreasing across Europe and the EU 27.",Decreasing,"This species is found in Scandinavia, south to the Pyrenees, and in northern France eastwards through central and southern Europe into Asiatic parts of Russia. The distribution reaches almost as far as the Pacific coast, to China (Speight 2020).
In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be around 7.3 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 4,032 km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is around 3.8 million km2 and the AOO is estimated to be around 3,344 km2.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"In parts where the species is rare, some measures should be taken. It has a threatened status in other countries too, particularly in western parts of the range. Some measures should be taken in central and southern Europe where there are likely declines happening. This should be a recommendation for all saproxylic species. It is important to protect old trees in forests, as not just the size of forest matters, but the species also needs presence of old trees. Old trees outside of forests may also be in need of protection.

This species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Finland (FinBif 2010, 2019), Sweden (Artdatabanken 2019), and Norway (Artsdatabanken 2016). This species is strictly protected in Serbia (Republic of Serbia Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning 2010) and listed on the Polish Red List as Critically Endangered (CR) (Palaczyk et al. 2002). In Germany and Denmark, it is Vulnerable (VU) (Ssymank et al. 2011; Bygebjerg 2004, 2019). In the Czech Republic the species was assessed as VU (Farkac et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165393,149165391,Merodon luteihumerus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is relatively large (233,532 km2), which is above the thresholds for threatened categories, but the number of locations is 9-10 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 44 km2. The number of locations the number of locations are determined by frequent fires and the collection of the host plant for medicinal purposes. Most of the subpopulations of this species can be threatened by the high risk of fires throughout the whole distributional range (exacerbated by climate change), as estimated by several studies (Jimenez et al. 2017, de Castro et al. 2005). This is likely to cause a decline in the amount of suitable habitats available. Because of this, the species is listed as Vulnerable in Europe.

Further research is needed into the population size and trend, habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better all the threats affecting the species.","This species inhabits open areas in evergreen oak forests (Quercus ilex and Quercus suber) with thickets of Mediterranean scrub on stony ground. Adults have been recorded feeding on flowers of Drimia maritima (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Ebejer and Bensusan 2010). The adults fly from August (Van Eck 2016) to October (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Ebejer and Bensusan 2010, Van Eck 2011, Speight 2020). All developmental stages are connected to the host plant Drimia maritima (Ricarte et al. 2008; Van Eck 2011, 2016).","Fire is the main threat across the range, exacerbated by climate change, which is expected to increase the frequency and magnitude of extreme events such as fires. This is likely to cause a decline in the amount of suitable habitat (de Castro et al. 2005, Jimenez et al. 2017). Bulbs of Drimia maritima can be collected for medicinal purposes, posing a direct threat to its host plant (Bozorgi et al. 2017).","The population trend is unknown due to insufficient data. Based on all known findings (Marcos-García et al. 2007; Ebejer and Bensusan 2010; Van Eck 2011, 2016), about 50 specimens have been collected in Europe during more than 50 years. The subpopulations generally seem to be isolated in the European part of its range. When detected, the species can be locally abundant (20-50 specimens).",Unknown,"This species is distributed in Europe on the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands. In Europe and the EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 233,532 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 44 km2.

Outside of Europe it also occurs in northwestern Africa, including Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. Some point localities are located inside the Serra De São Mamede Natural Park (Portugal), Grazalema National Park (Spain) and Cabañeros National Park (Spain). Additionally, part of its range is within the Natura 2000 network. However, the remaining point localities are found outside protected areas, which is why it is recommended to conserve additional suitable habitats. Further research is required to establish its current status throughout its range, and to identify existing threats and trends. Additional research is needed about its habitat and ecological requirements. Monitoring of population and habitat trends is also required. Raising awareness about this species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165404,149165401,Chalcosyrphus rufipes,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2019-09-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

Chalcosyrphus rufipes
 is less common in the west of Europe, as the main distribution is more central and eastern. The main distribution is the central and eastern Palearctic. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be around 2.2 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 116 km2. In the EU27 countries the EOO of this species is estimated to be around 532,000 km2, and the AOO is estimated to be around 32 km2. Although the current estimates of EOO for Europe and the EU 27 are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a very fragmented distribution. The species is dependent on a habitat that is rare in economically exploited woodlands making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. The current population trend is considered to be declining, so the species is listed as Endangered under Criterion B for Europe and EU27.

This species is linked to the presence of good healthy forests, and so forest management can impact it.","

The preferred environment of this species is forest; humid deciduous forest of Fagus and sometimes Quercus (A.Vujic pers. comm. 2020), alluvial hardwood forest and riparian gallery forest (M. Krivosheina pers. comm. 2020). Flowers known to be visited by this species include Aruncus asiaticus (Gritskevich 1998), Rosa acicularis, Spiraea media, and Anemone sylvestris (Bagatshanova 1990). The flight period is from May to July. The larva are described and figured by Krivosheina (2001), from larvae found in workings of other insects, in rotten wood under the bark of old trunks and in moist tree-holes of Populus and Tilia.

","There have been some declines of this species in central and southern Europe, caused by forestry management as the species is linked to presence of good healthy forests. Central Europe lies at the westernmost marginal range of the species, as the main range is more central and eastern Asia.","This species is rare in parts of its distribution, and is less common in the west as the main distribution is central and eastern Europe. It can be relatively common in other places, linked to preservation of coniferous or pine forest, such as in Slovakia. Overall, the current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is decreasing (Speight pers. comm. 2019). In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"This species is found in Sweden (in museum collections, no recent records (ArtDatabanken 2020), Finland, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, parts of the former Yugoslavia, Romania, Ukraine, Transcaucasus, from western to eastern Siberia, Mongolia, and probably from eastern Germany (Speight 2020). But some of these records are old. This species is not found in the Mediterranean. The main distribution is the central and eastern Palearctic.

In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be around 2.2 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 116 km2. In the EU27 countries the EOO of this species is estimated to be around 531,000 km2, and the AOO is estimated to be around 32 km2. Not all exact localities are shown on the current map, especially when they are very old or obscure.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Some conservation measures should be taken in central and southern Europe where there are likely to be declines happening due to forest management. The species is more secure in the central European subpopulations. This species is strictly protected in Serbia (Republic of Serbia Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning 2010).

In Finland, this species has been assessed as Data Deficient (DD) (FinBif 2019). In Sweden, this species is Not Evaluated (Artdatabanken 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165414,149165412,Merodon longispinus,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This species is endemic to southeastern Spain, with only a single known recent record. The current area of occupancy based on recent records is estimated at 4 km2, while the known extent of occurrence of the species is highly restricted (below 1 km2). Since the species is registered only at one point locality, the location number is one. This species has a restricted range, within which it is presumably threatened to some degree by climatic factors, due to an extreme variability of climate that has been proved in Sierra de Cazorla Natural Park, which leads to expected loss of habitat quality and quantity. Considering all known information, the species is assessed as Critically Endangered.

","This species was collected from open sparsely vegetated ground close to a river on a mountain in the south of Spain (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Speight 2020). The adult was visiting flowers of Lavandula latifolia (Marcos-García et al. 2007). The flight period is in September. The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown.","This species has a restricted range in the Sierra de Cazorla Natural Park, where the climate is extremely variable (Mendoza-Fernandez et al. 2010), with heavy rain and thunderstorms, extreme summer temperatures and a series of fires. Additional likely threats are anthropogenic habitat destruction due to tourism and change of land use (due to the expansion of agricultural land for olive trees, to the detriment of natural forests).","There are insufficient data on the population trend. Based on all known findings, only a single specimen has been recorded (in 1988). Therefore, the population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"

This European endemic species is known from a single locality in southeastern Spain, recorded only in the Sierra de Cazorla Natural Park, Jaén province. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 4 km2. The known extent of occurrence of the species is highly restricted (below 1 km2), but has been increased to 4 km2 in order to equal the area of occupancy.

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action, but it occurs in a protected area (in the Sierra de Cazorla Natural Park, a site in the Natura 2000 network). As the climate is extremely changeable in this protected area, additional conservation of suitable habitats is recommended. Further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements, and to understand better the existing threats. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required. Introducing this endemic species into the National list of protected species, as well as increasing awareness is very important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149165426,149165423,Chrysogaster solstitialis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is widespread both in Europe and in the European Union. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category, and it is not listed on any European Red List. Although its habitat quality will be in decline and there are some indications that populations are also declining in some parts of Europe, the species still is very widespread.","

This species is present in wetlands and deciduous forest, woodland streams and ponds (Speight 2020). The adult habitats are forests, forest edges or meadows beside streams and ponds in woodlands and scrubs (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The adults can be active under cloudy conditions or even in light rain (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020). They visit many flowers, such as white umbellifers, Cornus, Filipendula, Galium, Sambucus and Senecio jacobaea (Speight 2020).

The larva is described and figured by Hartley (1961). They were found in mud containing a large amount of decaying wood and other vegetation at the edge of ponds and streams in woodland areas (Hartley 1961), and can also be found on the surface of organically enriched mud beneath the fallen leaves of trees, in very shallow (1 cm) water of seepages and spring-fed pools within deciduous woodland (Speight 2020).

","

The ongoing decline of humid deciduous forests poses a threat to this species. Furthermore, the use of pesticides and nitrogen deposition might have a negative impact on this species as its larvae are dependent on nutrient-rich but not poisonous water, and the adults need flower-rich forest edges.

","The species is widespread and often quite abundant, but the overall population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species occurs in most of Europe from southern Scandinavia and Ireland to Portugal and Greece, and eastwards to the Urals and the Caucasus mountains. Outside of Europe, it is also recorded in North Africa and the Asian part of Turkey (Speight 2020, Speight et al. 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

There are no conservation actions in place. The most urgent conservation actions are protection and restoration of flower-rich grasslands and forest edges along small natural waters with good water quality and watersides with natural vegetation of helophytes and macrophytes.

The species has several common names (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Röder 1990, Torp 1994, Tóth 2017), which could also help to engage with the public and taking conservation actions to a national level.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165437,149165434,Merodon legionensis,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-10-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic species occurs in Portugal and Spain. The known area of occupancy (AOO) is 72 km2, and the number of locations is 11-14 (based on overgrazing by livestock as the main threat). Because of continuous decline in the habitat quality and extent, it is likely that some of the threatened level thresholds are met in the near future, and so the species is classified as Near Threatened. Furthermore, because of the negative effects of threats (causing fragmentation and loss of habitat, loss of host plants, mainly due to overgrazing by livestock in the Iberian Peninsula, but also fires, urbanization and cork extraction in the Grazalema point locality), more efforts should be directed towards habitat conservation, as well as to the research on population trend, ecology and other potential threats.","This species inhabits open ground, unimproved montane grasslands, including open grassy areas in pine forest or Mediterranean scrub, as well as hedgehog heath and Quercus rotundifolia woodland (Speight 2020 ). Usually the species has been recorded on flowers of white Apiaceae, yellow Asteraceae and Merendera montana. The developmental stages have not been described (Speight 2020). The host plant is unknown. The flight period is in August, September and October.","Overgrazing by livestock is the main threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Habitats have been increasingly fragmented on the Iberian Peninsula, and processes of intensification and expansion have provoked changes (such as shrub encroachment and nitrophilous plants) (Pulido-Fernández et al. 2018). Fires in these point localities also represent a potential threat to habitat quality, contributing to its fragmentation and loss. Ongoing urbanisation and tourism development in certain localities, especially in those near to the coast, cause habitat fragmentation and loss. Since one point locality is within the boundaries of Grazalema Natural Park, cork extraction from the cork oak could also be a potential threat to the habitat.","There are not enough data on population trends. However, based on known findings, four specimens were caught in 1987, three in 1993, one in 1994, 2002, 2012 and 2014, two in 1995, 2008 and 2009, and five in 2004 (Veselić et al. 2017; A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2020). More research and monitoring is needed in order to obtain more complete information on population size.",Unknown,"This European endemic species is distributed in central and northern Portugal and in Spain. In Spain, there are scattered records from northern (Cantabria and the Pyrenees), central, southern and eastern Spain (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Van Eck 2016, Veselić et al. 2017). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 338,897 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 72 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. The majority of point localities are within the Natura 2000 network. Some point localities are also within protected areas: in the Transboundary Biosphere Reserve Gerês-Xurés, Natural Park de Fuentes Carriones y Fuente, Natural Park da Serra da Estrela, Natural Park da Serra de S. Mamede, and Natural Park da Serra de Grazalema.

Additional research is needed into the abundance, habitat, ecological requirements, threats and trends. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is also required. Because of the negative effects of threats, more efforts should be directed towards habitat conservation. Raising awareness about this endemic species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165446,149165436,Chrysogaster rondanii,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European Assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 Assessment: Endangered (EN)

This European species has a limited and severely fragmented distribution. There are only a few records within the distribution area. In Germany, it is judged ""threatened, but with unknown magnitude"" (Ssymank et al. 2011). In the national Red List of the Netherlands, the species is ""Critically Endangered"" (Reemer et al. 2009), and in Switzerland, it is threatened (Speight et al. 2020). Mazanek et al. (2009) reported it to the Czech national Red List, classifying it as Endangered, and suggested it be added to the National Red List of Invertebrates as an endangered species due to its rarity and connection to Endangered wetland habitats. Only in France and Belgium is the species not considered to be threatened (Speight et al. 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) is 200 km2 in Europe, and 188 km2 in the EU27 countries. The habitat is under pressure from forest management, groundwater abstraction, nitrogen and pesticide deposition and climate change, causing a decline in habitat quality. Therefore the species is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU27.","This species has been found in base-rich deciduous forests visiting flowers of Sorbus aucuparia and Prunus padus (Reemer et al. 2009). It also occurs in open areas along small brooks and in groundwater streams in forests, and along streams fringed by riparian Fraxinus gallery in Quercus / Carpinus / Ulmus forests, and humid Fagus/Picea and Fraxinus / Fagus forests. The adults visit flowering trees and shrubs, mainly Prunus spinosa, but also Salix, Sarothamnus scoparius, Crataegus, Sorbus aucuparia and Prunus padus (Bot and van de Meutter 2019), and also Ilex as well (Speight 2020). The ecology of the larva is unknown, but it is believed to live in freshwater in the above-mentioned habitats.",The species is under threat by habitat alteration due to climate change and drainage of forests. The species might also be threatened by pesticides (deposited in nature areas after application in agricultural lands) and nitrogen deposition.,The species is generally found in small numbers. The population trend is unknown.,Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe. It has a very limited distribution, being only present in the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, France, Czechia and Switzerland (Maibach and Goeldlin de Tiefenau 1995, Stuke and Wolff 1998, Mazánek et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight et al. 2018, Bot and van de Meutter 2019, Speight et al. 2019, Speight et al. 2020, database of University of Novi Sad, personal collection of Bartak M., identified by Tóth, T.). Exact locality data are not always available for this species, so calculating the extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) was difficult. However, it is estimated that there are only 50 localities, making the AOO 200 km2 in Europe. In the EU27, the AOO is estimated to be 188 km2.

Khaghaninia et al. (2012) list the species for Iran, but based on the known distribution and habitats in Europe, it is considered to be unlikely that the record is indeed Chrysogaster rondanii. However, since there is no chance of immigration from Iran to Europe due to the distance, this record would not affect its regional status.",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),There is no active conservation action plan in place. The most urgent conservation actions for the species are protection and restoration of nutrient-poor species-rich wet to dry meadows and small natural waters with good water quality and natural watersides in the vicinity. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand better its ecology and population trends.


,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165458,149165454,Chrysogaster basalis,Vulnerable,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This species is dependent on meadows and forest edges rich in flowers. It appears close to forests with good quality running or standing water nearby. Both extensive grasslands and small waters are facing declines in extent and quality due to infrastructure development, climate change and changing agricultural use.

In Germany, its population is in moderate decline in the long term and is probably in decline in the short term (Ssymank et al. 2011). In France, it is assumed to be declining in numbers (Speight et al. 2020). Its distribution is severely fragmented, and the estimated area of occupancy (AOO) is below 2,000 km2 but above 500 km2 in both Europe and in the EU27 countries. Therefore, the species is assessed as Vulnerable in both Europe and the EU27.","This species is found in deciduous forests (acidophilous and thermophilous Quercus, including mesophilous Fagus forests). Adults are found visiting flowers of white and yellow umbels (in particular Thapsia villosa) and other species with easily accessible nectar in dry grasslands or forest edges.

Since the larvae presumably live in water (just like other species of the genus Chrysogaster), there is a need of (running) water in the vicinity of the species (Speight 2020).","The habitat of this species is poorly understood, but it is suspected to be threatened. The larval habitats (which are likely to be streams and other small waters, probably in or close to forests) may be threatened by urban or recreational development, droughts, agricultural irrigation, human alteration of forests, waters or both. The adult habitats, probably thermophilic grasslands rich in flowers, are threatened by intensification of grassland use in Europe (eutrophication due to over-fertilisation and lowering water tables for easier mowing and grazing at the forest edges) or abandoning extensive dry grasslands so they change into forests. Climate change will cause more severe drought and less water in small rivers. In addition, in the mountain areas, the habitat is threatened by recreational developments.","There is little information known about the population size. This species occurs in low densities, except in Spain, where it is more abundant at certain localities. In Germany and France, the species probably is in decline (Speight et al. 2020, Ssymank et al. 2011). Most populations are widely separated, at least within the EU27.",Unknown,"This is a species with a southern distribution in Europe. It occurs from central France and central Germany south to Portugal, Spain, southern Italy, and further east to the Balkans and Greece (Burgio et al. 2015, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Vujić 1999, Vujić et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020, Van Eck et al. 2016, Tóth 2014). There are stray records from the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) and Lower Saxony (Germany) (Stuke and Wolff 1998). The occurrence in Poland needs confirmation (Ł. Mielczarek pers. comm. 2020).

In the eastern and southeastern parts of the distribution, its presence is unclear due to confusion with Chrysogaster musatovi. The latter species, known from the northern Caucasus (European Russia), southern Caucasus (Georgia) and Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan) might be a synonym (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Mengual et al. 2020, Speight 2020). The records of C. basalis or C. musatovi from Ukraine are doubtful (G. Popov pers. comm. 2020) and would need confirmation. The locations of the species are widely separated.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is above the thresholds for threatened categories both in Europe and in the EU27 countries. Exact locality data are not always available for this species so calculating the area of occupancy (AOO) was difficult. Although the calculated area of occupancy (AOO) is 1,379,141 km2, due to the lack of information about the exact locations, the real AOO is much smaller. The total number of known localities will be less than 500, with an AOO of less than 2000 km2 in Europe, and this will be also the case for the EU27, where the AOO is also less than 2000 km2 but above 500 km2.

The species is also recorded from Iran (Khaghaninia et al. 2012, Samin et al. 2016), but it is unclear whether this is indeed C. basalis or C. musatovi. It is also present in North Africa.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"There are no conservation plans in place. Research and monitoring are needed to understand the ecology of this species and its population trends better. The most urgent conservation actions for the species are protection and restoration of nutrient-poor species-rich meadows, and small natural waters with good water quality and natural watersides.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165466,149165455,Merodon latifemoris,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-01-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This species is assessed as Vulnerable in Europe and the EU27 due to its restricted area of occupancy (AOO) (72 km2), relatively large extent of occurrence (EOO) (42,397 km2) and nine locations. The number of locations is based on fire as the major threat. It is found in Greece (on Lesbos, Chios, Euboea and Mountain Pindos). Furthermore, a continuous decline of habitat quality and extent due to fires, tourism and overgrazing by livestock is noted. Additional research on species ecology and population trends is needed. There is no rescue effect from subpopulations outside of the assessment region.","This species prefers olive groves (Ricarte et al. 2012) in Mediterranean maquis, and Castanea forest (Speight 2020). The adults are known to visit yellow Apiaceae (Ricarte et al. 2012), and Trifolium (Speight 2018). The flight period is in June and July. The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown (Speight 2020).","Habitat loss is the main threat due to fires, which present a great threat to the habitats throughout the Mediterranean, and the habitat of this species is no exception. Additionally, increasing rates of urbanisation and an extension of transport networks mostly due to tourism, as well as overgrazing by livestock are threatening this species (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","There is no information about the population size or trend. Just over 60 specimens have been collected from 1998 to 2017 from Lesbos, Chios, Euboea and Mt Pindos.",Unknown,"This species is distributed in Greece (Speight 2018), on Lesbos, Chios, Euboea and on Mt Pindos.

Outside of Europe it found in Turkey and Iran.

In Europe and EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be 42,397 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 72 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. Twelve point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. Additional research about its threats, ecology and population size is needed. Monitoring of the habitat and population trends is required. Awareness should be raised about the importance of this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165481,149165478,Brachyopa silviae,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This is a very rare and seemingly severely fragmented species with a few locations (nine, based on the threat of forestry) and a small area of occupancy (AOO) of 36 km2 (32 km2 in the EU27). The threat to the habitat consists of modern forestry logging old-growth trees and the risk of turning oak (Quercus) forests into more productive species such as beech and poplar. Due to the small  AOO, the severe fragmentation and the decline in its habitat quality, this species is assessed as Endangered in Europe and in the EU27.","This species has been found in old-growth oak-beech (Quercus-Fagus) and alluvial forests, as well as in thermophilous oak (Quercus) and mesophilous beech (Fagus) forests. It visits flowers of high shrubs and trees such as Acer, Crataegus and Pyrus. One adult was found flying close to a sap-run on Carpinus betulus, indicating a potential larval habitat (van Steenis et al. 2020).","Logging of old-growth trees is the main threat to this species (van Steenis et al. 2020). In addition, intensified forestry, and the risk of turning oak (Quercus) forests into more productive species such as beech and poplar is also a risk.","

This species has only been observed regularly in Germany: the records from Austria, France and Serbia were mostly single specimens on single occasions. The population trend is unknown and the species is considered to be severely fragmented (van Steenis et al. 2020), as the subpopulations are far apart and are relatively isolated.

",Unknown,"This is a rare central European endemic, recorded from Austria, France, Germany and Serbia (van Steenis et al. 2020). In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 719,249 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 36 km2. In the EU27, the EOO is estimated to be 517,496 km2 and the AOO to be 32 km2.",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place. More research is needed to establish the habitat preferences, and thus the need for conservation action; increased monitoring is required to understand the population trends better. Raising awareness about this rare species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165490,149165480,Eumerus flavitarsis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Within the European region, this species has a very wide distribution. The species is assessed as Least Concern because of its large range across the forest of Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and in EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The species is common in central Europe but rare in southeast of the range. The species is under the threat of habitat loss due to urbanization, inadequate forest management and droughts. Additional research on life history and ecology as well as potential threats is needed. Furthermore, monitoring of its habitat trends is required.

","This species prefers areas close to tiny brooks in deciduous forest, thermophilous Quercus forest and the lower levels of humid Fagus sylvatica forest, including alluvial hardwood Quercus forest sands and gravels (Speight 2018). Adults have been recorded visiting Potentilla erecta and Veronica chamaedrys (Bartsch et al. 2009). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records of the larval stages of this species.","This species is under threat of habitat loss due to urbanization, inadequate forest management, and frequent droughts as a consequence of climate change (EEA 2016).","There are no data about the population trends of this species. It is common in central Europe, but much rarer in the southeastern part of its range (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"This species is found from southern Norway, southern Sweden and southern Finland, southwards to the Pyrenees Mountains and Spain, and from the Netherlands and Belgium eastwards through central and southern Europe in Corsica, Italy, the Balkan states, Romania, and to European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of the species in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is found in Asia, continuing to the Pacific coast (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions for this species have been implemented so far, and no conservation actions are required at present. Given that it is rare in some parts of its range, such as in southeastern Europe, additional research is needed on its life history and ecology, as well as potential threats. Monitoring of its habitat trends is required. The species can be found in several Natura 2000 sites in Europe, such as at Údolí Otavy a Vltavy and Beskydy in the Czech Republic, Capçaleres del Ter i del Freser in Spain, Kočevsko in Slovenia, and Ori Athamanon (Neraida) in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165500,149165498,Brachyopa scutellaris,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)


This is a widespread species in western Europe and thus does not seem to be globally threatened. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. However, the species' habitat is threatened due to several factors. Thus this species might be threatened based on the reduction of the population size, but as nothing is known about the rate of a possible decline over the past or future 10 years and more research is needed to estimate it. Therefore, this species is classified as Least Concern in both Europe and in the EU27, but with more information, it is possible that it could be classified as threatened in the near future.

","

This species is found in humid deciduous forests, most notably in alluvial and swamp forests. Larvae are found in the sap-runs of a wide variety of deciduous trees. The species visits flowers of Apiaceae and others such as Cardamine, Cornus, Crataegus, Prunus, Rubus, Sorbus and Viburnum. The adults are more often found on tree trunks and trees with sap-runs on Acer, Betula, Castanea, Fagus and Quercus (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","

The main threat to this species is forestry and the cutting of over-aged trees. The habitats of this species are Alnus woodlands on riparian and upland soils, temperate and boreal hardwood riparian woodlands, and broadleaved swamp woodland on non-acid peat (G1.2a, G1.2b and G1.4 in the European Red List of Habitats) (Janssen et al. 2016), categorised respectively as Least Concern, Endangered and Vulnerable. On several regional Red Lists, this species is categorised from Near Threatened to Endangered (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","This species can be found in the same locality several years in a row, and sometimes in great numbers at the same locality. The larvae are found in external sap-runs, a habitat that shows localised fluctuations over time (van Steenis et al. 2020). However, the species' habitat is threatened due to several factors. Thus this species might be threatened based on the reduction of the population size, but as nothing is known about the rate of a possible decline over the past or future 10 years and more research is needed to estimate it.",Unknown,"This is a widespread western European species, found from southern Sweden to Portugal and Italy in the south, and from Ireland to Poland and Austria in the east (van Steenis et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place. More research is needed to establish the habitat preferences, and thus the need for conservation action. Raising awareness about this species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165510,149165508,Eumerus dubius,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is found on Gran Canaria in the Canary Islands. The species is assessed as Endangered since its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be less than 12 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 8 km2, and the species occurs at only two locations. Furthermore, there are only a few records of the species, and all the records belong to the material where it was originally described. The species' habitat is also experiencing a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat as a consequence of agricultural, urban, and industrial expansion in its area. There is a possibility that the species has already disappeared from the only island where it was found, since the succulent shrub lands where it lives largely retreated in the Canaries. Further research on taxonomy, life history, ecology, and population size, distribution, and trends are required, but more importantly - monitoring to find new specimens of the species. Raising awareness of rare and important species on the island and communication and protection of species at the national level are recommended as a conservation measure.","The type locality of this species is in the area of Spurge (Euphorbia) shrubland on rocky and scarcely developed soil (Aguilar et al. 2010). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records of the larval stages of this species.","This species occurs in succulent communities where Spurge (Euphorbia) scrub occurs. This habitat has retreated greatly, sometimes with little possibility of recovery (Aguilar et al. 2010), as a consequence of agricultural, urban, and industrial expansion over its area.","The species is only known from Báez's material (1982), which consists of a few specimens. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species is a European endemic, found on Gran Canaria in the Canary Islands, Spain (Speight 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 8 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be less than 12 km2. The species only occurs at two locations.",This is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions for this species so far. It was found within the Amurga Habitat Directive Site on Gran Canaria (natura2000.eea.europa.eu). Research on its taxonomy, population size, distribution, trends, life history and ecology is needed to determine if the species still exists on the island. Monitoring of population trends is also required. Raising awareness of this rare and important species on the island, and communication and protection of the species at the national level, are recommended as conservation measures.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165520,149165518,Brachyopa quadrimaculosa,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Within the European region, this species has a low number of locations (six, based on the threats of overgrazing, forest fires and other cases of deforestation), its range is severely fragmented and the quality of the habitat is declining. In addition, the area of occupancy (AOO) is less than 200 km2. Therefore, the species qualifies as Endangered. Possible influx from outside Europe could come from Israel, but the chance of this is regarded as very low. The threat category therefore is not downgraded. The threat category for Europe and EU27 is the same, and the final assessment is Endangered.","Adults were found in alluvial and Platanus orientalis forest within Mediterranean Quercus frainetto and Q. pubescens forests, and in alluvial Populus forest within Pinus brutia forest and Mediterranean maquis. They were visiting flowers of Pyrus spinosa and Smyrnium olusatrum. Some were also collected in alluvial Alnus orientalis forest within mixed Platanus orientalis and Pinus brutia forest (van Steenis et al. 2020).","On the Aegean islands and Cyprus, repeated forest fires and overgrazing by livestock are serious threats to the survival of this species, and commercial forestry will also have a negative impact (van Steenis et al. 2020).","This species is only found in very low numbers, and it is not known whether it can be found on the same locality in several consecutive years (van Steenis et al. 2020), even though general hoverfly surveys are carried out in its European distributional range. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species was described from Israel. In Europe, it is known from Cyprus and several localities in Greece (Thrace province, and the islands of Lesvos and Samos) (van Steenis et al. 2020).The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 102,055 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) ranges between 24 and 200 km2. The species is found on several east Mediterranean islands, which explains the large extent of occurrence (EOO), despite the small area of occupancy (AOO).",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place. More research is needed to establish the habitat preferences, and thus the need for conservation actions such as area protection, management and restoration. Increased monitoring and raising awareness of the species are also recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165530,149165528,Pipiza accola,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN) 

This species is assessed as Endangered in both Europe and the EU27 on the basis that it has an area of occupancy calculated at 100 km2, occurs as a severely fragmented population, and there is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to conversion of forest. However, further research is needed, especially on its ecology.

","

This species prefers deciduous forest along streams with Alnus and Fraxinus in Quercus/Carpinus/Ulmus forest, in association with Prunus padus close to water (T. Järveläinen pers. comm. 2020), and alluvial hardwood forest. Adults are active from the end of April to June and visit Prunus padus, Salix, Prunus spinosa and Salix caprea. The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018), but the larva must be aphidophagous. It seems to be associated with aphid colonies on Prunus padus (Speight 2020). Prunus padus is commonly found at forest margins, near small streams, etc.

","The most plausible threat is forest conversion, driven by an increase in urbanization, tourism and forest degradation.","The population trend of this species is unknown. Its population is considered to be severely fragmented. There are no regular surveys specifically for it, but it has been found during more general hoverfly surveys. It is found regularly at one locality in Finland, but elsewhere it is not found regularly. Some species of this genus seem to fluctuate naturally in numbers from year to year at the same site, with no known cause but possibly linked to aphid numbers. It is not known if the numbers of this species fluctuate, but all species of the genus are considered to show similar changes. The most recent record is from Finland in May 2020.",Unknown,"This species is distributed in southern Fennoscandia, Germany, the Netherlands, France, Ukraine and Asiatic Russia (Siberia) (Speight 2018, Vujić et al. 2013).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

The localities of this species in Germany and two localities in Finland fall within protected areas in the Natura 2000 network. Including this species into national lists of protected species is strongly recommended, as well as increasing the awareness about it. Further investigations into its life history, ecology, population size and threats are needed. More monitoring of population and habitat trends is required. Habitat protection is recommended through forest management plans to increase forest structural diversity (e.g. appropriate management of Natura 2000 sites).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165540,149165538,Brachyopa plena,Near Threatened,"B2b(iii,v)",2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This is a rare East European endemic with rather few and scattered records. In Bulgaria, Croatia and Germany, only old records are known, and the species could be extinct in these countries. The area of occupancy (AOO) is rather small (ranging between 296 and 1,480 km2, but likely to be over 500 km2 in both Europe and the EU27 countries), and the possible extinction in parts of its distribution shows the decline of its populations. Its distribution outside the EU27 is very small, and many of the records are from Austria and Hungary. The quality of the habitat is declining, and it could be possible this species shows extreme fluctuations in its AOO and number of subpopulations, but this needs confirmation, and for now it is not considered to show extreme fluctuations. As such, this species is assessed as Near Threatened in Europe and the EU27 countries.","This species is found in Mediterranean oak forests and alluvial forests. The visited flowers include Acer, Crataegus, Pyrus, Salix and Sorbus trees. The adults are also seen flying around the base of oaks (Quercus). The larvae are thought to live in sap-runs, because adults have been seen flying around them (van Steenis et al. 2020).","As it is the case with other species of Brachyopa, forestry will most likely have a negative impact on the larval habitat. In addition, the alluvial forests are especially threatened at European level due to increased industrialization and tourism (van Steenis et al. 2020). The modification of streams and rivers for transport could also have a negative impact on the habitat.","In Serbia, this species has been collected with several individuals around Salix trees with external sap-runs. It seems that it is rarely found at the same localities several years in a row. In Bulgaria (1983), Croatia (1969) and Germany (1989), only older records are known, and the species could be extinct in these countries (van Steenis et al. 2020). Thus the population trend is considered to be decreasing.",Decreasing,"This is a rare East European endemic, recorded in Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Romania, Serbia and Ukraine (van Steenis et al. 2020). The species is possibly extinct in Bulgaria, Croatia and Germany (J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2021). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 714,272 km2. The species has a seemingly large area of occupancy (AOO), but due to lack of exact habitat data, it is difficult to estimate the true AOO. The Mediterranean and alluvial forests are threatened, and thus it seems likely that the AOO will be smaller. Only 74 records are known, making a minimum AOO of 296 km2 and a possible maximum of 1,480 km2. In the EU27, the minimum AOO is estimated to be 276 km2.",The species is not traded or used.,Terrestrial,There are no conservation actions in place. More research is needed to establish the habitat preferences and thus the need for conservation actions such as area protection and restoration. Raising awareness about this species is also important.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165557,149165554,Chalcosyrphus eumerus,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-01-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Chalcosyphus eumerus is only known within Europe from European Russia. However, there is no recent data on this species, and further research is required into the taxonomy, population trend, life history and threats to this species. Therefore, it is assessed as Data Deficient for Europe.

This species does not occur in the EU 27 and therefore is Not Applicable.","

There is little known information on the habitat of this species. It has been recorded on the flower of Rosa canina (Zimina 1957), and the flight period is from June to July.

",The threats to this species are unknown.,"No information about the European population is known, but the species is rare and not easily collected.",Unknown,"

This species is known to occur in European Russia (Karelia, Moscow region, Leningrad, Orenburg) and throughout Siberia to the Pacific coast (Speight 2020, Barkalov pers. comm. 2019). It is not present in the EU 27. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 2.1 million km2 and the area of occupancy is around 655,697 km2, but due to the uncertainty surrounding this species, this may be inaccurate.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions known for this species. Further research on the taxonomy, population trends, life history and threats is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165565,149165551,Heringia heringi,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Due to its large extent of occurrence and number of locations, this species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States. Possible threats exist from declines in the quality of its habitat due to poor management across forests in Europe, and excessive use of pesticides in orchards. Further research on possible threats, and population and habitat trends is needed.","This species occurs in deciduous forest (Fagus, Quercus), including alluvial hardwood forest, plus broad-leaved evergreen forest (Q. ilex/Q. suber), orchards and sometimes suburban gardens (where fruit trees are present). Adults fly low among the foliage of bushes and within low-growing vegetation, at the edge of clearings or along paths, usually in partial shade. They visit flowers in partially shaded situations, and emerge into the open to sun-bathe on the foliage of low-growing shrubs in the evening. They are know to visit the flowers of Alliaria, Allium ursinum, Anthriscus, Caltha, Eruca sativa, Hypericum and Prunus spinosa. The flight period is from the end of April to July, with occasional specimens in August (Speight 2018). The larva was described and figured by Dusek and Laska (1959), and the larval biology described by Dusek and Kristek (1967), Kurir (1963) and Rojo et al. (1999): they are predators of gall-making or leaf-curling aphids or psyllids on various trees (e.g. Populus and Ulmus), fruit trees (e.g. Malus, Prunus spp., Pyrus) and shrubs (e.g. Laurus, Pistachio). They live within the aphid galls, one larva per gall being normal. Ball and Morris (2013) provide a coloured illustration of the larva of H. heringi with its aphid prey, within a gall on Populus. In the case of Laurus nobilis, Rojo et al. (1999) observed that it was characteristically the young plants, less than 1 m tall, on which H. heringi larvae were found. Rojo and Marcos-Garcia (1997) established that from oviposition to production of a puparium takes three weeks and that the adult hatches from the puparium after two weeks, during the summer. The larvae overwinter in diapause, which ends in April/May (Speight 2018).","Considering that Heringia heringi occurs in a wide range of forest types, possible local threats exist from a decline in the quality of habitat due to poor management across the forests of Europe. Excessive use of pesticides represent an additional threat, because the species can also be found in orchards.",Population size and trends are unknown. There are numerous specimens and subpopulations.,Unknown,"This is a widely distributed species in Europe, ranging from southern Norway south to southern Spain and the Mediterranean (including Crete), and from Ireland eastwards to European Russia, through central and southern Eurasia to Greece, Romania, Turkey and European parts of Russia.

Its range extends out of the European region to Mongolia (Speight 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. It requires further monitoring of its population and habitat trends, as well as additional research into possible threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165575,149165573,Brachyopa pilosa,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread species in the temperate zone of the Palaearctic region which seems to have stable populations and good dispersal capacity. Its habitats are somewhat threatened but due to its wide habitat range, this does not seem to pose a great threat to its survival. In addition, its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. It is therefore categorised as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27.

","The species is found in many different forests and forested areas, mainly in Fagus but also humid Picea spp. forests, or even in city parks. Larvae are found under the bark and/or trunk of a wide variety of deciduous and also coniferous trees. The species is often accompanied by larvae of other Diptera, but never in connection with xylophagous larvae. The larvae are known to be parasitized by Tetrastichus spp. (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). The visited flowers include herbs, shrubs and trees, such as Apiaceae, Acer, Anemone nemorosa, Cardamine pratensis, Crataegus, Prunus and Viburnum. The adults are found on tree trunks and logs, and are seldom seen around trees with sap-runs (van Steenis et al. 2020).",Forestry and especially the clearing of logs is the main threat to this species. Agriculture could also pose a threat to larval and adult survival due to use of pesticides and fertilisers (van Steenis et al. 2020).,"This species has stable populations and has been found over many years in the same localities. The larval habitat occurs naturally and rather abundantly in European forests, and does not seem to show large fluctuations. This is a species with seemingly good dispersal capacities (van Steenis et al. 2020).",Stable,"This is a widespread European species occurring from northern Scandinavia to Spain and Italy, and from Ireland to European Russia and the Caucasus and further eastwards into the Russian Far East (van Steenis et al. 2020). It is also known from Georgia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.",The species is not traded or used.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place. More research is needed to establish the habitat preferences of this species, and thus the need for conservation action. Raising awareness about this species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165587,149165584,Cryptopipiza notabila,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) in both Europe and the EU27, because it has an area of occupancy estimated at 144 km2, it occurs as a severely fragmented population, and there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat, potentially the result of human-mediated disturbance. Further research on its ecology, population size and trends as well as habitat trends is needed.",This species prefers herb-rich open areas within Picea (T. Järveläinen pers. comm. 2020) and Pinus (Van Steenis 2011) forest. Adults are known to visit the flowers of Anthriscus sylvestris (T. Järveläinen pers. comm. 2020). The flight period is in June/July (Ståhls and Vujić 2009). The developmental stages are undescribed.,"The main threat to this species is habitat loss due to industrial development (land-use change, building roads, urbanization). Poor forest management also contributes. Due to increased human activities in boreal forests during recent years, there has been extensive loss of forest in some regions, while others face heavy forest fragmentation or the threat of exploitation (Bradshaw et al. 2009). There is also the threat of climate change, because the boreal region is warming twice as fast as other parts of the world and it is already experiencing severe impacts from climate change (Burton et al. 2010, Park et al. 2014). As this species is found close to forests, logging may also affect its habitat.","There is no information on the population size or trend of this species. There have been about 50 individuals found, the latest from 2016. The population is considered severely fragmented, because it is small-bodied and probably cannot fly long distances. Subpopulations are scattered across northern Europe and European Russia. It occurs at low densities, being known mostly from one specimen per locality.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is distributed in Norway (Nielsen and Ødegaard 2013), Sweden, Finland, the western edge of European Russia (Karelia and Moscow Region) (Speight 2018). It has an area of occupancy in Europe of 144 km2.

The global range extends out of the European region to the Russian Far East (Sakhalin) (Speight 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"This species occurs in some protected areas within the Natura 2000 network. Additional research on its ecology, population and habitat trends is needed. More sustainable land management and forestry practices are recommended, as well as protection of the habitat.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165597,149165595,Brachyopa panzeri,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread species with about 500 records throughout its distributional range. The main habitat does not seem to be threatened, although there is evidence that the old-growth beech (Fagus) forests and especially alluvial forests are declining. The larval habitat consists of accumulations of sap in tree trunks and stumps. Modern forestry induces an increase in such stumps and the net effect on the population due to logging, drainage and the increase in larval habitat is not fully understood. On the Red Lists of several countries this species is listed as Vulnerable, while in others it is Least Concern. The final category for both Europe and the EU27 is Least Concern, very close to Near Threatened. This is based on the rather low number of records as well as due to the lack of research on the net effects of forest management. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Regular monitoring is needed because with more data the species could become threatened in the near future.

","

This species prefers humid Fagus forests and also alluvial and mixed forests. The records from coniferous forests could apply to Brachyopa dorsata, with which this species is often confused. The larva has been found in a sap-run on Fagus sylvatica, while the record from Picea spp. could refer to B. dorsata as explained above. The adults are seen visiting flowers of herbs, shrubs and trees such as Acer, CrataegusSambucus and Prunus, but are more often found hovering around stumps or at sap-runs on several different trees (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","

Forestry is the main threat to this species. Drainage of forest grounds will cause a change in ground flora, and possibly also lead to an accelerated dessication of the stumps and logs in which the larvae develop. The harvest of old trees can decrease the number of logs, but at the same time it can increase the number of stumps. Its net effect (especially on the larval habitat) has not been investigated and is hard to predict (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","The species is found in singletons or up to 10-15 individuals at the larval habitat. It is sometimes found in the same locality during consecutive years (van Steenis et al. 2020). The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"The species is widespread in northern Europe and in temperate climates of the continent, from southern Sweden to Spain and from central France eastwards to Siberia (van Steenis et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,There are no conservation actions in place. More research is needed to establish the habitat preferences and thus the need to have conservation actions. Raising awareness about this species would be also important.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165611,149165606,Claussenia hispanica,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-21 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic is assessed as Endangered since it has very restricted area of occupancy (48 km2), and its population is severely fragmented because it occurs on some islands and in distant parts of the Mediterranean with no possibility of dispersal between distant subpopulations. There is also a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to fires, common in the Mediterranean, and unsustainable grazing. More research on its ecology and monitoring of its population and habitat trends are needed.","This species prefers forest, the open scrub/maquis of evergreen oak forest of Quercus ilex and Q. suber, open areas in Pinus nigra var. salzmanni forest and phrygana. Adults fly through taller ground vegetation with a rapid, zig-zag flight, and visit stream edges in the shade to drink water. Adults are known to visit flowers of Nasturtium officinale (feeding having been observed in the evening at the margin of a large spring emerging at the edge of Q. ilex forest). The flight period is from the beginning of April to mid-May. The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018).","The main threat to the habitat of this species is fire, common in the Mediterranean, and unsustainable grazing. Fires increasing due to climate change. Conversion of habitat due to overgrazing is also a threat (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There is no information on the population size or trend of this species, but it is rare and its population likely to be small. There have been about 50 specimens recorded, the latest from 2012. It is known from sporadic records, and is thought to occur as a severely fragmented population, because very few specimens have been found at each locality, and its range appears to be highly disjunct. It is often found with similar species, but is dependent on Mediterranean forest.",Unknown,"This European endemic is primarily a Mediterranean species, occurring in Spain, the Mediterranean zone of southern France (plus Corsica), northern Italy (and Sardinia), Croatia, and Greece (including Crete) (Speight 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large, while the area of occupancy (AOO) is 48 km2.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"Some localities are within protected areas categorized by the Natura 2000 network. Additional research on its ecology, and population and habitat trends is needed. Grazing management is recommended, along with the protection of its habitats (Mediterranean forests).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149165619,149165607,Brachyopa obscura,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

In Scandinavia, this is a widespread species, occurring in many localities. Overall, it does not seem to be threatened in Scandinavia, even though it is listed as Endangered in Norway, because the species is abundant in Sweden and Finland, and influx from these subpopulations will ensure its survival in Norway as well.

In central and southeastern Europe it is rare and its distribution is fragmented. The habitats are possibly relict glacial habitats and thus threatened. Any influx from Scandinavian subpopulations seems to be unlikely, and it is not known if there could be any influx from Russian subpopulations. The central and south-eastern subpopulations are at a higher risk level as they have a minimum area of occupancy (AOO) of 100 km2 and the habitat quality is considered to be declining. Therefore, the species is much more threatened in central and south-eastern Europe than in Scandinavia.

Using knowledge on the habitat and frequency of this species in Scandinavia, the range values are far greater than the threshold to consider this species threatened in either Europe or the EU 27 at this time. The species is therefore assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27. Monitoring of the population and habitat are needed to determine whether it should be assessed as threatened in the near future.

","

This species is associated with mixed boreal forests with overmature trees, and other rich deciduous forests. The collection of a recently hatched adult from Pyrus spp. indicates that the larva live in accumulations of sap under bark or in internal sap-runs. This species has been collected on a wide variety of flowering herbs and bushes such as Apiaceae, Acer, Crataegus and Prunus (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","The adult habitat is not fully understood, but since it is not recorded often in central Europe, the species seems to have high demands on its habitat. In Scandinavia, it is found in mixed forests with old deciduous trees as possible larval habitat, most notably Populus and Pyrus. The Populus tremula forests of the sub-boreal region are very rare in central Europe, and are threatened by forestry, pollution from agriculture and climate change (van Steenis et al. 2020).","

Based on observations in Sweden where the population strongly increased some years after a destructive storm, this species shows strong fluctuations in population size. It can be found in great numbers in suitable localities and also over several consecutive years (van Steenis et al. 2020).

",Stable,"This is a northern species with scattered records in central and southeastern Europe. It is recorded from northern Fennoscandinavia south to France and Montenegro, and from Belgium to European Russia in the east (van Steenis et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.
 
",The species is not traded or utilised.,Terrestrial,No conservation actions are in place. More research is needed to establish habitat preferences and thus the need for conservation actions.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165632,149165628,Brachyopa minima,Critically Endangered,"B1ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v)+2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v)",2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is endemic to Greece. It has a very small extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) (4-8 km2), and is only known from one or two widely scattered localities, so it is severely fragmented. Its habitat is declining in extent, area and quality. The number of subpopulations has also declined, as the only large subpopulation was known from Lesvos island, where it has not been found since 2015. The species is dependent on external sap-runs and thus shows extreme fluctuations in AOO, number of subpopulations and number of mature individuals. There is no indication of the exact number of mature individuals. The EOO (4-1,270 km2) and AOO (4-8 km2) together with the decline in the extent of occurrence, area of occupancy, area, extent and quality of habitat, number of locations and subpopulations mean that this species is precautionarily assessed as Critically Endangered.","Larvae have been found in an external sap-run on a single Populus nigra tree several years in a row. Around this tree, several adults have been collected too. The sap-run dried out due to the closure of the fissure during the recovery of the tree. In the surroundings of this single tree, no other external sap-runs were found, and it is possible the subpopulation here is now extinct. The population in Thrace is not well investigated, and only one record is known. The forest habitat in Greece and especially on the Aegean islands is heavily threatened due to overgrazing by livestock and forest fires (van Steenis et al. 2020).","The natural extreme fluctuations in the occurrence of external sap-runs makes this species very vulnerable to the loss of the extent or quality of its habitat. On the Aegean islands, repeated forest fires, logging and overgrazing by livestock are serious threats to the survival of this species (van Steenis et al. 2020).","This species is only known from a small number of localities. The main Lesvos locality was at a single Populus tree with an external sap run. This sap run ceased to exist over a short period of time, and after 2014 no Brachyopa specimens have been seen on Lesvos despite vigorous surveying efforts (van Steenis et al. 2020). Therefore, the population trend is decreasing.",Decreasing,"This species is only known from Greece, where it is found in Thrace province and on the island of Lesvos (van Steenis et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1,270 km2 and the current area of occupancy (AOO) is 8 km2.",The species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are currently in place. Research and monitoring are needed to understand the ecology of this species and its population trends better. Some conservation suggestions have been made, such as reducting the damage that sheep grazing causes to old trees (Pérez–Bañón et al. 2016).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149165640,149165627,Cheilosia vulpina,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is has an extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, and is therefore assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27. There is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat anticipated due to anthropogenic disturbances such as deforestation, urbanization, agriculture and tourism-related infrastructure development. Further research on its population and habitat trends is needed.","The preferred habitats of this species are open woodland (coniferous and deciduous) where there is herbaceous ground cover and unimproved pasture to above the altitude of Picea forest, usually on well-drained sites. The males hover up to 15 m. Adults are known to visit the flowers of white umbellifers especially Heracleum, Chaerophyllum, Bellis, Galium and Ranunculus. The flight period is from April to June and July to September (Speight 2018). The larva was described and figured together with the puparium by Brunel and Cadou (1990a), who reared it from the roots of cultivated artichoke (Cynara scolymus). These authors (1990b) also demonstrated the occurrence of a pupal diapause, triggered by temperatures experienced during the last larval instar. Stuke and Carstensen (2002) reared it from the root-stock of Arctium lappa and Arctium minus, and redescribed the larva. Doczkal (2002) reports egg-laying behaviour on Cirsium eriophorum, and Stuke and Carstensen (2002) also refer to various Cirsium species as probable larval host plants. It overwinters as a puparium.","Possible threats to the habitat of this species exist from human disturbances such as deforestation, urbanization, agriculture, and tourism-related infrastructure development (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There is no information on the population size or trend of this species. There are many subpopulations recorded to date, and more than 500 individuals collected, the latest from 2019.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is distributed in southern Norway and Finland, Estonia and Denmark south to the Pyrenees and northern Spain, and from Britain (England and Wales) eastwards through central and south Europe to central and southern parts of European Russia (Speight 2018). It is found in Ukraine (G. Popov pers. comm. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.

Its global range extends as far as western Siberia in Russia (Speight 2018) and to Iran and Kazakhstan (Barkalov and Mutin 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"Cheilosia vulpina is listed as a vulnerable species in Denmark. It is found within some protected areas in the Natura 2000 network, and also in the Durmitor National Park (Montenegro), Fruška gora National Park (Serbia), Sutjeska National Park (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Galičica National Park (North Macedonia) and Mavrovo National Park (North Macedonia). Additional research and monitoring on its population and habitat trends are needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165652,149165648,Brachyopa maculipennis,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is dependent on alluvial forests. In several EU countries, it has not been found for many decades and is assumed to be critically endangered or even extinct in these countries. The extent and quality of its habitat has declined strongly, and it is still severely threatened throughout Europe. There is a continuing decline in the area of occupancy (AOO) and habitat quality. Based on the recorded localities, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be between 192 and 384 km2, assessing it as Endangered in Europe.

In the EU27, there are clear declines in the habitat extent and quality. The AOO is between 124 and a maximum of 248 km2. Based on the possible extinction and habitat decrease in several EU27 countries, the true AOO is inferred as a maximum to be 124 km2, classifying the species as Endangered in the EU27 countries.

","

This is a species of alluvial and humid broad-leaved forests. The adults fly near external sap-runs on deciduous trees such as Populus and Salix, or can be found visiting flowering trees such as Crataegus, Frangula alnus, Prunus padus and Malus. Egg laying was observed close to an external sap-run and this surely forms the larval habitat of the species (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","The habitats where the species occurs - namely riparian floodplains, gallery woodlands, meso- and eutrophic oak and Hornbeam forests and woodlands - are categorized from Near Threatened to Endangered. The area and the quality of the alluvial forests in Europe are rapidly declining and thus the habitat and Brachyopa maculipennis are also threatened (van Steenis et al. 2020). Some of the threats are tourism, logging, agriculture and the use of fertilizers and pesticides.","

This is a species with many scattered records and with only old records throughout its western range. For example, in Germany, the records are from 1900 and 1971; in Italy, the records are from 1890 and 1900; while in Austria, Czechia and Serbia, several recent records are known. It has been found in rather low numbers at each collecting site, and it is not well known if the population is stable over the years (van Steenis et al. 2020). The population trend is unknown.

",Unknown,"This is a European endemic, known from German to Italy and eastwards to Poland, Hungary and into the eastern parts of Ukraine (van Steenis et al. 2020). In several countries only old records are known (in Germany, the records are from 1900 and 1971; in Italy, from 1890 and 1900). Possible stable subpopulations have been found in Austria, Czechia, Poland and Serbia. In Europe and in the EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is above the thresholds for threatened categories. The area of occupancy (AOO) is between 192 and 384 km2 in Europe, and between 124 and 248 km2 in the EU27.
",The species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place. More research is needed to establish the habitat preferences, and thus the need to establish and plan conservation actions. Protection of important sites and reducing the impact of habitat destruction would also benefit the conservation fortunes of this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165660,149165649,Cheilosia vujici,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Because of its severely fragmented population, small area of occupancy (68 km2 in Europe and 24 km2 in the EU 27), and the low number of locations (only eight in Europe, and just three in the EU 27), and continuing decline in quality of its habitat due to tourism and unsustainable grazing as the main threats, Cheilosia vujici is assessed as Endangered. Further research on its ecology is required, as well as research on threats, and population and habitat trends.","This species prefers open ground, occurring in calcareous and non-calcareous montane/subalpine and alpine grassland up to 2,500 m in the Alps. The flight period is from the end of May to the end of June and into July at higher elevations. The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018).","Tourism represents the main threat to this species. In the Alps, unsustainable grazing and tourism are destroying its habitat, while on Kopaonik and Golija Mountains in Serbia and on Durmitor Mountain in Montenegro unsustainable grazing, tourism, and infrastructure development are the main threats (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). Climate change is also a potential threat in the future.","The population size and trend of this species are unknown. There are fewer than 100 specimens known, the latest from 2018. The population is considered severely fragmented because it is only found on the tops of mountains, and hence without the possibility of communication among subpopulations. In Serbia, the subpopulation has been stable over the last five years, but the overall trend in Europe and the EU 27 is unknown.",Unknown,"This European endemic is distributed in the Alps (France, Switzerland, and Italy), Serbia and Montenegro (Speight 2018). It is a mid- to high-mountain species, found at higher elevations in the Alps and mid-elevations in the Balkans.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in Europe and the EU 27, while the area of occupancy (AOO) is 68 km2 in Europe and 24 km2 for the EU 27.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"This species has been found in some protected areas within the Natura 2000 network. It was also found within the boundaries of Kopaonik National Park and Golija Nature Park in Serbia, and Durmitor National Park in Montenegro. In Serbia, it has been declared a protected species. Although these areas are protected, human activities such as tourism and infrastructure development related to tourism increase disturbance of the habitat. Management of grazing is required. Further research on its ecology, threats and monitoring of the population and habitat trends are needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165670,149165668,Brachyopa insensilis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread species in most parts of Europe and thus does not seem to be threatened. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. However, the habitat is threatened due to several factors, such as agricultural intensification, use of pesticides and fertilizers, and forestry. It is suspected that there will be a population reduction over a period of 10 years based on a decline of the habitat quality. The possible reduction is not easy to estimate, and more monitoring is needed to establish a better idea of the magnitude of the trend. The final assessment for this species and its category is Least Concern, but further work could find that it may warrant uplisting in the future.","This species is found in a wide variety of wooded habitats from broadleaved to coniferous forests, and often in cities with old senescent trees. Larvae are found in external sap runs on a wide variety of deciduous (e.g. AlnusAesculus, Ulmus) as well as coniferous (Abies alba and Pinus nigra) trees. Larvae are often very numerous and occur at the same time of the year at the sap run as the adults. Adults, and especially the males, are found near trees with sap runs or feeding on flowers such as Apiaceae, Malus, Prunus, Pyrus and Sorbus (van Steenis et al. 2020).","The main threat to this species is agricultural intensification, the use of pesticides and fertilizers and tourism. Forestry is another possible threat to this species together with the intensification of pest control, which could harm or even decrease the amount and quality of the larval habitat (van Steenis et al. 2020).","This species is often found in large numbers at the larval habitat or while visiting flowers. It is also found in sap-runs several years in a row, but also seemingly disappears for many years. It has not been seen in Russia and Ukraine since 1958 and 1986 respectively, and so is thought to be extinct in these countries (van Steenis et al. 2020). It is suspected that there will be a population reduction over a period of 10 years based on a decline of the habitat quality. The possible reduction is not easy to estimate, and more monitoring is needed to establish a better idea of the magnitude of the trend.",Decreasing,"This is a widespread lowland species occurring in western, central and eastern Europe. It reaches its northern limit in the southern part of Sweden, and its southern limit in northern Spain and central Italy. Its latitudinal distribution ranges from Ireland in the west, to Greece and European Russia in the east (van Steenis et al. 2020). It is extinct in Ukraine and in European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.",The species is not utilised nor traded.,Terrestrial,There are no conservation actions in place. More research is needed for estimating possible population reductions based on a decline of the habitat quality or fluctuations in the availability of suitable larval habitat.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165681,149165678,Cheilosia variabilis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Listed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27 on the basis that this species is widespread and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. However, a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to unsustainable forest management, agricultural intensification, unsustainable farming and infrastructure development is likely to be taking place. Further research is needed, especially on its biology, ecology, population size and trends.

","

This species prefers humid/mesophilous deciduous forest, from the Fagus/Picea zone to alluvial hardwood forest. Adults inhabit tracksides, edges of clearings etc. and settle frequently on the foliage of bushes (e.g. Rubus fruticosus), shrubs and taller ground vegetation such as Pteridium. Adults visit the flowers of white umbellifers, Caltha, Cirsium, Euphorbia, Galium, Ranunculus, Rubus, Scrophularia nodosa, and Sorbus aucuparia. They are active from April to September, with apparently one generation in June and August towards the northern edge of the range, but with two periods of emergence (April to June and July to September) further south (Speight 2020). The larvae tunnel in the rhizomes of Scrophularia spp. (Scrophulariaceae), and pupate before overwintering; the larval morphology was described by Dusek (1962) and Rotheray (1990).

","

The habitat of this species is threatened due to unsustainable forest management, agricultural intensification, unsustainable farming and infrastructure development. In the Balkans, a decline in its distributional area of 12% and abundance of up to 58% by 2080 has been projected under the A2a climate warming scenario of the CSIRO climate model using species distribution modelling (Radenković et al. 2017).

","There is no information on the population size or trend of this species. In the places where it occurs, there seem to be relatively well-established subpopulations. It is one of the most abundant species on the Balkan peninsula (Vujić 1996).",Unknown,"

Within the European region, this species is widely distributed, from southern Fennoscandia south to Iberia, and from Ireland eastwards through central and southern Europe (Italy and the Balkans) into Bulgaria, and Turkey (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.

The range of the species extends out of the European region to Turkey and Russia as far as western Siberia. It is also found in North Africa (Morocco) (Speight 2020).

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

Some point localities of this species are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network, and it occurs also in the Somiedo Nature Park in Spain, Gorski kotar National Park and Papuk and Velebit Nature Parks in Croatia, Rila National Park in Bulgaria, Pindus National Park in Greece, Durmitor National Park in Montenegro, Mavrovo National Park in North Macedonia, Fruška gora, Šar planina, Đerdap and Kopaonik National Parks in Serbia, and Vršačke planine, Deliblatska peščara, Obedska bara and Triglav in Slovenia, amongst others. Continuous management of sites is recommended. Further investigation of its population size, threats and ecology is needed. More monitoring of the population and habitat trend is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165691,149165689,Brachyopa dorsata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread species with many records from all over its range. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of a threatened category. Its habitat seems to be threatened by forestry and agriculture, but it is not placed in any threat category. However, some forestry actions could increase the availability of larval habitat. The net effect of the possible decline in adult habitat and the possible increase in larval habitat is not clear. No trends could be detected in the database, except for a possible extension of its distributional range and strong fluctuation populations in other parts of its range. This species is therefore considered to be Least Concern in Europe and the EU27 countries.

","

The species is found in lowland to subalpine mixed forest and on a variety of boreal bogs. Larvae are found in accumulation of sap under trunks and stumps of several deciduous tree species, often together with larvae of several other species of Diptera and beetles. Adults are often found near stumps and trunks of deciduous and coniferous trees, and to a lesser extent also around sap-runs or visiting flowers of various species of herbs, shrubs and trees, such as Anthriscus sylvestris, Caltha palustris, Crataegus, Prunus and Salix. It is often found together with several other Brachyopa species (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","Intensification of forestry is the main threat to this species. Tree harvest can decrease the availability of logs, but at the same time it can increase the number of stumps. Its effect (especially) on the larval habitat has not been investigated and is hard to predict. Based on the range extension in some countries and the seemingly fluctuating populations in others, the net effect can depend on many factors, and can lead to an increase, or to a decrease of the number of sub-populations (van Steenis et al. 2020).","

This species is found in various numbers, with often only one to five individuals found at one site. In some instances, several specimens were collected at the same site on a single day. Specimens have also been collected in the same place several consecutive years in a row. In some countries the species seems to show population fluctuations, and in other countries it seems to have extended it distributional range over the last decades (van Steenis et al. 2020). The population trend is unknown.

",Unknown,"This is primarily a boreo-montane species with scattered records from temperate Europe. It is known from northern Sweden south to the French Pyrenees, and from Belgium to Romania and east to European Russia (van Steenis et al. 2020). Further to the east, it is also known from Siberia, the Russian Far East and Japan. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of a threatened category.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,No conservation actions are in place. Research and monitoring are needed to better understand the ecology of this species and its population trends. Raising awareness about it is also important.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165706,149165699,Cheilosia uviformis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern both globally and for the EU27 Member States because its area of occupancy and extent of occurrence are above the thresholds for any threatened category, and it is known from many localities. Nevertheless it has somewhat specialized habitat requirements, and considering that its habitats are threatened and in decline, monitoring of its population is required so that any changes in population status can be detected. Protection of its habitat and further research is needed, especially on its biology, ecology, population size and trend.","This species is known from deciduous forest and woodland subject to winter flooding. It occurs in both alluvial hardwood forest and lake-edge swamp woodland of Alnus/Salix. Females spend much of their time sunning themselves on low-growing plants in sheltered spots; males hover up to 10 metres from the ground in small glades and along paths in woodland, descending immediately when the sun disappears behind a cloud and settling low down on pathside vegetation etc. Both sexes visit male flowers of Salix, but leave whenever the sun is obscured. They also visit flowers of white umbellifers, Anemone nemorosa, Caltha, Crataegus, Listera ovata, Potentilla tabernaemontani, Prunus padus, Ranunculus, Vaccinium myrtillus (Speight 2018) and Acer platanoides (Prokhorov et al. 2020). The flight period is in May. The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018).","The main threat for this species is loss of habitat due to human activities, resulting in forest destruction (logging, agriculture, urbanization). Its habitats are threatened and in decline, so it is necessary to monitor the population to detect changes in the trend.","There is no information on the population size or trends of this species. About 100 records exist, with the most recent from 2018 (Ukraine) (Prokhorov et al. 2020).",Unknown,"This European endemic species is distributed from Fennoscandia (Norway, Sweden, Finland) south to the Pyrenees, and from western Europe (Ireland, Great Britain, France, Belgium and Netherlands) eastwards through Denmark and central Europe (Germany, Poland, Switzerland and Slovenia) to Serbia and Montenegro (Speight 2018). It is also found in Ukraine (Prokhorov et al. 2020) and in the European part of Russia (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020). This species is extant in Denmark and Great Britain but its exact localities are unknown. In the European part of Russia the species is possibly extant.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"Cheilosia uviformis is listed as Least Concern in Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), and as Data Deficient in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) and Great Britain (Ball and Morris 2014). It is found in some protected areas within the Natura 2000 network, and also in Kopaonik National Park (Serbia), Fruska Gora National Park (Serbia) and Durmitor National Park (Montenegro). Habitat protection is desirable. Further research on its biology and ecology is needed, as well as more monitoring on the population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165716,149165714,Brachyopa cinerea,Vulnerable,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU°)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

In the European region, this species has a minimum area of occupancy (AOO) of 80 and a supposed maximum of 1,560 km2. It is found in 20 localities making many locations, and its habitat is threatened and is classified as Vulnerable. The population density is very low, and the species occurrence is considered to be severely fragmented. Furthermore, there is a continuing decline in the area of occupancy and in the habitat quality. Therefore, the species is assessed as Endangered. However, it is much more common in the eastern part of its Palaearctic distribution, and it is assumed there will be some influx from this part into the European part of Russia. Therefore, the category is downgraded to Vulnerable (VU° B2ab(ii,iii)) in Europe.

In the EU27 countries, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 32 km2. The species is also severely fragmented here, and the habitats are threatened. Furthermore, the populations in the northern parts of Sweden are supposed to be extinct. Moreover, there is a continuing decline of the area of occupancy and the habitat quality in the EU27 countries as well. This will classify the species as Endangered, and as the species is already rare in the rest of Europe, no immigration from outside the EU27 is expected. Therefore, the final category in the EU27 is Endangered (EN B2ab(ii,iii)).","

This is a subarctic species found in boreal Betula forests, visiting flowers of low herbs and shrubs such as Anthriscus sylvestris, Ribes rubrum and Salix glauca. Specifically, it lives in European Habitat G1.5. - broadleaved bog woodland on acid peat (Janssen et al. 2016). The larval stage is not well understood, but it is likely to be similar to other species of Brachyopa, occurring in old trees with sap runs or dead trees with sappy decay (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","The habitat of this species (European Habitat G1.5 - broadleaved bog woodland on acid peat) is classified as Vulnerable, and it is known that this species has very low population densities. A small decline in habitat could have great effects, causing a rapid decline. The main threats are intensified and increasing forestry causing a loss of suitable habitat and old growth trees, and also climate change (van Steenis et al. 2020).","In Europe, the species is found only as single individuals at each site and in some years it has not been found at all. Seemingly it has very low population densities and the localities are very far apart. Moreover, some of these subpopulations are possibly extinct. In the Nordic countries, this species has been assessed as Near Threatened to Vulnerable (van Steenis et al. 2020). The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"The species is known from the boreal parts of Norway, Sweden and Finland and eastwards from European Russia to the Siberian Far East of Russia and Japan (van Steenis et al. 2020). In some parts of Norway, Sweden and Finland the species is considered possibly extinct, as there have been general investigations in these areas and it has not been found in recent years. A record in Belarus is uncertain as it is far outside of the range and was recorded a long time ago (van Steenis et al. 2020).

In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is above the thresholds for threatened categories, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is between 80 and 1560 km2. In the EU27 countries, the EOO is 336,481 km2 and the AOO is 32 km2.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,No conservation actions are currently in place. Research and monitoring are needed to understand the ecology and population trends. Protection of important sites and reducing the impact of habitat destruction would also benefit the conservation fortunes of this species.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165726,149165724,Merodon hoplitis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is assessed as Endangered for Europe, based on the number of locations (4-5) and an area of occupancy of 28 km2. The number of locations is based on overgrazing (mainly by sheep and goats) as the main threat. In addition, a continuing decline in habitat quality is observed due to other ongoing threats, such as urbanisation in this area because of intensive tourism development, as well as due to fires (mainly of anthropogenic origin).

The species is also assessed as Endangered (EN) for the EU27 Member States, where it is restricted to Croatia, based on number of locations (two) and because its area of occupancy (AOO) is only 8 km2. A continuing decline in the habitat quality is observed due to ongoing threats, primarily overgrazing by livestock, urbanisation and intensive tourism development in this area, as well as because of fires.

","This species prefers Mediterranean-type shrubland and forest and open habitats connected to forested areas. The developmental stages have not been described, and the host plant is unknown. The flight period is from April to June. Open habitats in mountainous areas do not usually require management, but at lower altitudes some grazing can help maintain them.","In all point localities, overgrazing by livestock represents a major threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Tourism development and urbanisation are threats of significant importance in some localities (Montenegro) as they can lead to habitat fragmentation and loss. Fires (mainly of anthropogenic origin in recent years) can cause declines in habitat quality.","

The population trend is unknown. Based on the known records, specimens were collected across the range in 1969 (128 specimens), 2008 (10), 2011 (62) and 2019 (12). In addition, one specimen was collected in 1930, and two in 2003. However, more research and monitoring needs to be conducted in order to obtain more complete information on any population trend. When detected, the species can be found in high numbers (hundreds).

",Unknown,"Merodon hoplitis is endemic to the Balkan Peninsula in Europe, where it is known from the Dinaric Mountains along the Adriatic coast on the (Vujić et al. 2012). Its known distribution is restricted to Montenegro and Croatia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 5,004 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 28 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"Until now, Merodon hoplitis has not been the subject of any targeted conservation action. However, since its habitat is under ongoing threats, conservation actions should be undertaken. They should be directed towards the protection of the species habitat and host plants through  application and enforcement of environmental regulations, rules and other policies. Public awareness and education are essential. Two point localities are within Lovćen National Park (Montenegro), and point localities in Croatia are within the Natura 2000 network. More research and monitoring need to be conducted in order to obtain more complete information on its population and habitat trends, threats and ecology.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165736,149165734,Brachyopa bimaculosa,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This is an EU27 endemic. It is known from Germany, Slovenia and Greece with only two records in Germany, and one from Slovenia. It has a severely fragmented distribution. Its area of occupancy (AOO) is small (between 48 and 128 km2), qualifying for the Endangered category. Furthermore, there is an inferred decline in extent and the quality of the habitat. Therefore, the final category for this species is Endangered.","

Two forest habitats are known for this species. It is found near sub-alpine mixed forests with streams, where it is recorded in singletons, and in Mediterranean calcareous pine forests, where large populations are known. However, there is not much information about its habitat requirements. Adults have been found visiting flowers of low herbs as well as trees, e.g. several Apiceae, Acer spp., and Salix aurita L. (van Steenis et al. 2020). No larval information is available, but it is assumed they live in sappy decay of living or dead wood, like other species in this genus (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","Grazing by sheep, unsustainable forestry and forest fires on the Peloponnesus pose large threats to the species habitat. Agriculture, forestry and industrial activities such as drainage, increased use of pesticides and fertilizer, clearing of old trees and dam building are other factors may have a negative impact on the habitat  (van Steenis et al. 2020).","The species is normally found as single individuals, except on the Peloponnesus, where it has been found in great numbers at different localities. The localities outside the Peloponnesus are very far away from each other (van Steenis et al. 2020). The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This is a species endemic to the EU27. It is known from Germany, Slovenia and Greece, but with only two records in Germany, one in Slovenia and two on mainland Greece. On the Peloponnesus there are several flourishing subpopulations in the mountain forests (van Steenis et al. 2020). Based on the suitable habitats in the Peloponnesus, the species is expected to have a wider distribution in this locality, and the area of occupancy (AOO) has been calculated to reflect this. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is above the threatened categories and the area of occupancy is between 48 and 128 km2.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,No conservation actions are in place. More research is needed to establish the habitat preferences and thus the need to establish conservation actions. Protection of important sites and reducing the impact of habitat destruction would benefit the conservation fortunes of this species.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165758,149165747,Brachyopa bicolor,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has a large area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO), and it is found in many localities across the European region.

Although there is an extensive database covering an estimated 80% of all records for this species, no quantitative analysis has been found to estimate the extinction risk. It could be argued that its population size has declined with almost 25% based on the many old records available in the database. Combined with the decreasing habitat quality and the known extreme fluctuations, it is prone to be threatened. It is however unknown if this decline has occurred over the last 10 years or more, but it is suspected to be happening over the next 10 years. This is based on the continuing decline of the habitat and the degradation and destruction of the larval habitat, caused by numerous threats, such as the intensification of agriculture and forestry, and cutting out old trees. As it is not possible to estimate the rate of population decline in the next 10 years, the species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27 countries. However, research and monitoring is strongly recommended as it can easily become threatened in the very near future.","

The species is found in different deciduous wood and parkland forest types, from alluvial to thermophilous forests. The larvae are known from a wide variety of deciduous as well as coniferous forests in sap-runs or accumulations of sap under bark of live trees or tree trunks associated with larvae of other insects. Sap-runs on Quercus spp. is supposed to be the preferred larval habitat. The larvae are known to be parasitised, possibly causing many losses. Adults have been found visiting flowers of high shrubs such as Acer, Crataegus and Prunus, but they are more often found flying around trees with supposed sap-runs where they can fly high into the trees (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","The main threat is the degradation and destruction of its larval habitat by intensification of agriculture and forestry, and increased use of pesticides and fertilizers. The clearance of old trees from forests and ""maintenance"" of old urban trees has a negative impact on the number of sap-runs. Furthermore, the expansion of urban and industrial areas will lead to a decrease of forest surface (van Steenis et al. 2020).","The species is often found in low numbers on flowers or around trees with sap-runs, but sometimes it is more abundant and can be found in the same locality several years in a row, probably due to its larval habitat showing extreme fluctuations. It has been listed in several country Red Lists, ranging from Least Concern to Endangered. The population trend is possibly declining, based on the many old, but rare newer records from Central and Eastern Europe over the last 50 years (van Steenis et al. 2020). It is suspected this decline could continue over the next 10 years (J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2021).",Decreasing,"This species occurs in Europe from southern Norway and southern Sweden to northeastern Spain and Portugal, and from Wales to Greece and eastwards to European Russia(van Steenis et al. 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Out of the European region, the range extends to the Siberian Far East of Russia and Japan (van Steenis et al. 2020).
",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place. More research and monitoring is needed to improve knowledge of habitat preferences, fluctuations and population trends. Raising awareness about this species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165770,149165766,Brachyopa atlantea,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

As only one Spanish record is known of this otherwise African species, nothing can be concluded concerning its threat status in Europe. Due to the lack of information on habitat preferences and the few observations of this species, it is categorised as Data Deficient in Europe.","

In Spain, the specimen was collected in an area with Mediterranean evergreen oak forest at an altitude of 550 m in April.

In Morocco, it has been found at an altitude of 1,000 m near an external sap-run on Populus spp. in the Atlas Mountains. The records are based on one adult, several larvae and pupae, of which many were empty, collected between March and April (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","The saproxylic larvae of the genus Brachyopa have been found in sap-runs externally and internally in living deciduous and coniferous trees as well as in accumulations of sap in recently fallen and decaying logs or stumps. This habitat shows large fluctuations, with the quantity and quality varying over a period of five to ten years.

Larvae of Brachyopa atlantea have been found in external sap-runs which are known to have large fluctuations. The quality of the evergreen oak forest habitat is threatened by intensified agriculture causing dehydration, increased risk of pollution due to fertilizers and pesticide use. Unsustainable forestry leads to fewer overmature and senescent trees, decreasing the number of trees with sap-runs. Moreover, climate change will lead to dryer and hotter summers, giving rise to dehydration of sap-runs and increasing the risk of forest fires (van Steenis et al. 2020).","Only one specimen has been collected in Europe, in 1974.

In Morocco, several specimens and larvae were collected at one site through several consecutive years (van Steenis et al. 2020).",Unknown,"Only one record is known from Spain, where it was collected in 1974 from Lanjaron, Grenada, southern Spain, at 550 m a.s.l. (van Steenis and van Steenis 2014). It is not known if this specimen was from a resident population or a vagrant individual.

The species is described from several specimens collected in different years from one locality in Morocco (van Steenis et al. 2020).",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,No conservations actions are in place. More research is needed to establish habitat preferences and conservation actions.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165789,149165786,Sphaerophoria virgata,Near Threatened,A2c,2021,2020-02-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This species is a moderately frequent species, but its habitats such as wet heathland have undergone significant losses and this implies a population decline in Europe and the EU 27. Taking the large differences in the regional situation into account, with clear reductions in area of occupancy (AOO) in northwestern Europe, and a reduction of the quality of a considerable part of its habitats, this species is assessed as Near Threatened in Europe and the EU 27. A reduction in its population of 15-20% is suspected to have occurred over the last ten years due to reduction both in quantity and quality of a major part of its habitats, especially in the lowlands.","This species occurs in Molinia grassland and heath, with a preference for wet heathland, from lowlands to montane heath, and also in woodland clearings of humid forest (Fagus, Picea and Pinus). Adults have been recorded visiting the flowers of Calluna vulgaris, Potentilla erecta, yellow Asteraceae (Tussilago, Taraxacum), Apiaceae (Meum) and a wide range of various other herbaceous plants and shrubs (e.g. Prunus padus, Salix repens) (Speight 2018). The larvae are undescribed but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","The major threats to this species are intensification of humid grassland and heathland management (fertilizers and earlier mowing, or changes in pasturing systems), partially coupled with airborne nitrogen deposition above the critical loads. An important extra threat is changes in hydrology with water abstraction of surface and ground water for various purposes. Pesticides may also play an important role. Heathland habitats (F4.1) are listed as Vulnerable, and moist to wet oligotrophic grasslands (E3.5) are listed as Endangered in the European Red List of Habitats. However, the species also inhabits clearings in mountain Fagus, Picea and Abies woodland (G1.6b, G31a and G3.1b) which are assessed as Near Threatened or Least Concern (Janssen et. al. 2017).","From the loss of habitats both in extent and quality, a decreasing population trend of this species can be inferred. In the Netherlands, it has lost about 60% of its original distribution since 1990 (Reemer et al. 2009).",Decreasing,"Within the European region, this species is distributed from Fennoscandia south to Spain, and from central to eastern Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27, but these cannot be calculated accurately because the distribution is partially based on country checklists rather than exact locality data.

Outside Europe it can be found in the Russian Far East (Speight 2018).",This species is not utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures known for this species. It is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), and has been assessed as Least Concern for most of northern Europe, in Denmark (2019), Sweden (2020) and Finland (2019), but Endangered for Flanders (Belgium) (Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998). In Germany at national level it was assessed as Least Concern (Ssymank et al. 2011), but within Germany as Near Threatened for Baden-Württemberg (Doczkal et al. 2001), Vulnerable for Saxony (Pellmann and Scholz 1996) and threatened to an unknown degree in Berlin (Saure 2018). In the United Kingdom it is classified as nationally scarce (Ball and Morris 2015). Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially larvae), ecology, preferred habitats and threats. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165808,149165806,Sphaerophoria bengalensis,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-05-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

This species is recorded only from eastern Europe (sometimes under the synonym Sphaerophoria turkmenica) with very little information other than collection sites, and thus its habitat may be incompletely known, making it difficult to infer possible habitat losses and quality changes. With increasing knowledge, it may be assessed as Near Threatened, but with an aphidophagous larva obviously not directly linked to agricultural land, it could also be assessed as Least Concern. Currently it is considered also by Speight (2020) as Data Deficient for Europe, and is not listed on any of the published national Red Lists. Given the lack of certainty about its entire distribution (currently largely based on country checklists), habitat and population trends, this species is assessed as Data Deficient in Europe and the EU 27.","This species is found in vegetated inland dune systems (Speight 2018) and herb-rich vegetation of seasonally dry river beds (Ebejer in Spheight et al. 2018, Van Steenis et al. 2019). Adults fly low in the vegetation, and have only been recorded visiting the flowers of Foeniculum (Speight 2020). The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","The potential threats to this species are unknown. While inland dune systems as a known habitat (E1.9b) are listed as Endangered in Janssen et al. (2017), dry temporary Mediterranean river beds are not rare.","There is no detailed information available on the population size or trends of this species at a European or EU 27 level. Van Steenis et al. (2019) reported eight males from three different localities during a single excursion in October 2017 to Cyprus, where it does not seem to be rare. Population data from the European part of Russia are unknown.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known to occur in Cyprus (Van Steenis et al. 2019), Belarus, Crimea and European Russia, based on checklists. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) cannot be accurately calculated at this time, because the distribution information is based largely on country checklists. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be 2400 km2 and the AOO is estimated as below 1000 km2 but further investigation is needed to confirm this.

Outside Europe, it can be found in the Caucasus, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Iran, Arabian Peninsula (Oman), Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Pakistan and northern India (Speight 2018, 2020).",This species is not utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"No specific conservation measures are currently known for this species. It is considered Data Deficient for Europe by Speight (2020, category N3), and it is not documented in the Red List of any European country. Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially the larvae), ecology, preferred habitats and threats. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165830,149165827,Sphaerophoria taeniata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is one of the most common and abundant species throughout Europe. Despite some local population declines due to intensive agriculture, the subpopulations are still very large and there are no gaps in the distribution. It is currently not Red-Listed in any European national Red List, and only in Flanders (Belgium) is it considered Near Threatened. It can occur in large numbers in suitable habitats, and has a very large extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO), well above the thresholds for any threatened category. This species is therefore assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27.","This species exists in open areas (clearings and tracksides) in humid deciduous forest (Fagus, Quercus), scrub, forest margins and unimproved humid grassland, especially in river flood plains (Speight 2018). Adults have been recorded visiting a wide spectrum of flowers, mainly from the families Asteraceae (Eupatorium cannabinum, Sonchus arvensis, Senecio) and Apiaceae (Berula erecta, Pimpinella major, Pastinaca sativa), but also a range of low herbs with small flowers such as Galium, CircaeaPotentilla erecta, Ranunculus, Polygonum, Myosotis, Lycopus europaeus or Sedum (Speight 2018, A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). So far, flower visits are known on more than 70 plant species (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). Larvae were described by Kuznetsov (1988) from material reared on Rhopalosiphum padi from eggs laid by gravid females, and have also been found in aphid colonies on Phragmites (Hartmann and Duelli 1988), Cirsium (Gavrilyuk et al 2008), Picea (Kula 1980) and Spiraea (Stary 1995).","The major threats to this species are grassland intensification, nutrient loads and pesticides in agriculture, and for wet grasslands changes in hydrology with various kinds of water abstraction. Other threats are losses of habitat due to urbanization, commercial and industrial developments and (of less importance) forestry management aiming at very closed canopy and minimal open habitats inside forests. The habitat spectrum used is mostly assessed as Least Concern or Near Threatened, according to Janssen et al. (2017).","There is no detailed information available on the population size of this species at a European level. In most European countries it is one of the most abundant or moderately frequent to frequent species, with high local fluctuations and occurring in a relatively wide range of habitats. The population trend overall in Europe is still more or less stable, but regionally it can be decreasing: for example, local declines of up to 60% of the local population have been observed in Germany over the past 27 years (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020), but this cannot be extrapolated to the whole of Germany and beyond. In the Netherlands, it has lost approximately half of its original distribution since 1990 (map in Reemer et al. 2009). Overall the population is stable in Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"Within the European region, this is a widespread species, occurring from Fennoscandia south to central Europe, and eastwards into European Russia. It can occur in large numbers in suitable habitats, and has a very large extent of occurrence (EOO and area of occupancy (AOO), well above the thresholds for any threatened category. Despite some local declines, there are no gaps in the distribution.

Outside Europe it occurs from Siberia to the Russian Far East and the Pacific coast (Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions needed for this species. Local population declines can be diminished by using less pesticides, minimizing nutrient (especially nitrogen) inputs both direct via fertilizers and indirect via airborne nitrogen deposition, and maintaining extensive herb-rich grasslands without changes in hydrology. It is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), and is assessed as Least Concern for the majority of available country Red Lists including Denmark (2019), Finland (2019), Norway (2015), Sweden (2020), Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) and the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2015). For Belgium (Flanders) (Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998) it has been assessed as Near Threatened. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165843,149165839,Sphaerophoria shirchan,Near Threatened,A2c,2021,2020-05-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This species is considered to be decreasing in Europe by Speight (2020). It is rare with highly fragmented subpopulations in high-mountain ranges in montane to subalpine forests. Its estimated extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) maxima are above the thresholds for any threatened category, but it is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) in Europe and the EU 27 because recent records are scarce and a population reduction of more than 20% over the last ten years is suspected. This is projected to continue as result of the impact of climate change on the habitat.","This species is found in open areas (clearings, tracksides) in montane Fagus/Picea forest up to subalpine Picea forest (Speight 2020, Reemer and Branquart 2004). Flower visits have not been recorded in Europe, but are known from the Russian Far East (Tumnin region) on Potentilla fragarioides, Salix bebbiana and Taraxacum (Mutin et al. 2016). The larvae are undescribed but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","Forest management in high-mountain forests may be the major threat to this species, and a possible future threat is habitat deterioration due to climate change, especially in subalpine forests. Increased research is needed to understand the threats better. According to the European Red List of terrestrial habitats (Janssen et al. 2017), its major habitats of temperate mountain Picea and Abies woodland (G1.3a, G1.3b) are assessed as Least Concern, or in the case of Fagus woodlands (G1.6a) as Near Threatened, but the habitat is much more widespread than the species: the detailed habitat requirements of this species are not well known.","This species is clearly decreasing in Europe by Speight (2020). It is very rare with a severely fragmented distribution, and there are only scattered records of few specimens in central European mountain ranges such as Vosges, Ardennes, the mountains in central and southern Germany, the Alps and Czech Republic at higher altitudes in the montane and subalpine zone. The population trend is uncertain, but is possibly decreasing as recent data are scarce (Speight 2020), and a population reduction of more than 20% is suspected.",Decreasing,"This is a relatively rare central European species, distributed eastwards to Ukraine and into European Russia. Whilst the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are estimated to be large in Europe and the EU 27, they may be estimated as much smaller in the future based on increased research and understanding. Although mapped to entire countries for most of its range, it is restricted to high-mountain ranges.

Outside Europe, it occurs in Siberia and the Russian Far East, including Sakhalin and Kunashir Islands (Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation action taking place currently for this species, but it would benefit from site protection and management. It has been assessed as Vulnerable in the Czech Republic (Farkac et al. 2005), and in Germany it is very rare and assessed as Data Deficient (Ssymank et al. 2011). Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially larvae), ecology (flower visiting) and threats. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165865,149165860,Sphaerophoria scripta,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is one of the most common and abundant species throughout Europe. It is a widespread migratory species, and despite some local population declines due to intensive agriculture, the subpopulations are still very large and there are no gaps in distribution. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27. This species is therefore assessed as Least Concern in both regions.","This species occurs in all kinds of open terrestrial habitats, including arable fields, humid to dry grassland from the plains to the alpine zone, clearings and margins of forests (only avoiding dense closed forest), shrub, hedgerows, heathland, garrigue vegetation, saltmarshes, but also parkland, gardens and other anthropogenic or ruderal habitats such as roadsides. Predominantly coastal at the northern edge of its range, further south it is distinctly synanthropic (Speight 2018). Adults fly in the vegetation and visit a large spectrum of flowers, in Belgium at least 139 plant species have been recorded (De Buck 1990), and for Germany over 300 species (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). Among the flowers visited are many herbs, such as white Apiaceae (Achillea millefolium, Anthriscus sylvestris, Daucus carota etc.), many Asteraceae (e.g. Cirsium arvense, Tussilago farfara, Tripleurospermum inodorum, Leontodon, Taraxacum, Erigeron), Euphorbiaceae, Ranunculaeae, etc. Some shrubs are regularly visited, such as Crataegus and Prunus spinosa. The larvae were described by Dixon (1960) and Goeldlin de Tiefenau (1974); they are aphidophagous, feeding mainly on aphids in the herb layer and using a wide spectrum of aphid species. Several generations per year are possible, depending on the climate.","Possible threats are related mainly to reduction of available larval food (aphids) due to pesticides, weed removal and loss of field margins, or direct toxicity of biocides such as neonicotinoids.","Throughout most European countries, this is one of the most abundant and frequent species, with high local fluctuations and a very wide range of habitats used. Nevertheless, some local declines have been observed in Germany over the past 27 years, but this cannot be extrapolated to the whole of Germany and beyond. It is a highly migratory species (Gatter and Schmid 1990).",Stable,"This is a widespread, migratory species throughout Europe, including Iceland and Fennoscandia south to the Mediterranean. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, but these cannot be calculated accurately because its distribution is based on country checklists rather than exact locality data.

Outside Europe it occurs in Greenland, North Africa, eastwards throughout Russia, Kashmir, Nepal and to the Pacific Coast (Speight 2018).",This species is not utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions needed for this species. Local population decline can be diminished by using less pesticides, and maintaining flowering field margins and landscape elements. It is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), and has been assessed as Least Concern for all available Red Lists of European countries such as Belgium (Flanders) (Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998), Denmark (2019), Finland (2019), Norway (2015), Sweden (2020), Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2015). As an important species both for pollination and biocontrol, at least monitoring of population trends is recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165883,149165881,Sphaerophoria potentillae,Vulnerable,A4c,2021,2020-05-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This European endemic species is very rare, with only scattered records of a small number of individuals in the northern part of central Europe, extending eastwards to the Baltic States. Its habitats are threatened, and its population trend is decreasing in Europe and the EU 27. There has been a partly observed, partly suspected population reduction of distinctly more than 30% over a period of ten years in most of central and western Europe, and this is expected to continue as a result of the threats facing its habitats. The species is therefore assessed as Vulnerable (A4c) in Europe and the EU 27. Monitoring is urgent, as it is possible that it may be upgraded to a higher threatened status in the near future.","This species can be found on the edges of low-altitude raised bogs (Lagg) and seasonally flooded humid grassland (Speight 2018). Adults have been recorded visiting flowers of Apicaeae (Achillea), Potentilla erecta and Ranunculus (Speight 2018). The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","The major threats to this species are changes in hydrology, and direct or indirect airborne nutrient (nitrogen) and pollution inputs. There is nitrogen deposition in large parts of its range, well above the critical loads for its sensitive bog habitats. Often areas adjacent to its habitat are under intensive agriculture, which results in fertilizer run-off, herbicide impact and water abstraction. An additional threat is climate change, both via direct summer drought and habitat alteration due to water shortage or lowered water tables, which can result in mineralisation of the bog and increasingly eutrophic tall-herb vegetation and reed beds. According to the European Red List of terrestrial habitats (Janssen et al. 2017), its major habitats are either Endangered (temperate and boreal moist or wet oligotrophic grasslands [E3.5]) or Vulnerable (Raised bog [D1.1]).","This is a very rare species, with only scattered records of a small number of individuals in the northern part of central Europe extending eastwards to the Baltic States. Its population trend is decreasing in Europe and the EU 27, with Germany having large historical losses and still a negative short-term trend. It is known from only one single locality in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) and one for Norway. Recent records are overall scarce.",Decreasing,"This European endemic is distributed from Scandinavia to northern Germany, and from France to north-eastern Europe (Speight 2018, 2020). There was an erroneous record from Italy (Delmastro and Sommagio 2003) which was a misidentification of Sphaerophoria infuscata (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, but these cannot be calculated accurately because the distribution is partially based on country checklists rather than exact locality data.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures known for this species, but it would benefit from the protection and appropriate management of its key sites and habitat. It would also benefit from restoration of deteriorated habitats. It is considered clearly threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), is assessed as Critically Endangered in Germany (category ""1"") (Ssymank et al. 2011) and Vulnerable in Denmark (2019) and the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2015). It was assessed as Least Concern in 2015 in Norway, but there are no recent records. Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially larvae), ecology (there are only limited data on flower visiting) and threats. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149165925,149165922,Sphaerophoria philanthus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-08-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), and in northern European countries is assessed as Least Concern, although in western and central Europe it is more threatened. There are clear historical declines, and it still has a moderately decreasing population and habitat trend, with a decline in area of occupancy (AOO) in some countries. However, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27. The species is therefore assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27. It may be reassessed as threatened if the negative trends continue in western and central Europe. Monitoring is required of its population and habitat trends.","This species can be found in Calluna heath, including dry to wet heath and oligotrophic Molinia grasslands. It can also be found in blanket bogs, degraded bogs, dune grassland (Speight 2018) and western taiga (Nielsen 1998). Adults have been recorded visiting a range of flowers, including Calluna-heathland plants such as Calluna vulgaris, Galium, Hypochoeris and Potentilla erecta (Speight 2018). The larvae are undescribed from Europe, but Fluke (1929) described them from North America as aphid predators in crops. Bagatshanova (1990) reports larvae from Potentilla fruticosa, Ribes and Artemisia. Ecological information from North America and Europe is inconsistent and there is some variation in the genitalia.","The major threats to this species are modifications in the management regime of heathlands, both by the intensification of grazing and the complete abandonment of grazing which results in subsequent succession to forest. Nutrient input from adjacent crops as well as airborne nitrogen input can negatively affect wet heath and bog habitats. Changes in the hydrology of the habitat as a result of water abstraction of surface and ground water, and pesticide input from agriculture and forestry, can both also affect the habitat. More locally, habitat loss can result from infrastructure development, urbanization and commercial developments. According to the European Red List of terrestrial habitats (Janssen et al. 2017), heathlands (F4.1, F4.2) and quaking mires (D2.3a) are assessed as Vulnerable, but the habitat spectrum it uses is larger and includes less-threatened habitats also, especially in northern Europe.","There is no detailed information available on the population size of this species at the European and EU 27 levels. It has a scattered distribution throughout most of northern and central Europe, and is moderately frequent. Based on the known distribution, there has been an estimated 50% decline in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), and in Germany the population has also experienced some declines. Locally and regionally, some subpopulations seem to be stable, but the population trend is considered to be decreasing overall in Europe and the EU 27, as its habitat area is shrinking and deteriorating.",Decreasing,"Within the European region, the range of this species is only incompletely known due to confusion with other closely related species, but despite this, it is considered to be widespread. It is currently known to occur from Norway to Germany and from Ireland to Austria (Speight 2018), with presence assumed in most western European countries except the Iberian Peninsula and parts of the Balkan Peninsula, and across European Russia.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, but these cannot be calculated accurately because parts of its distribution is based on country checklists rather than exact locality data. The AOO is considered to be declining, but overall the range is not considered to be decreasing.

Outside Europe, it is present throughout Russia to the Far East and on into North America.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"This species would benefit from site protection and management as well as the restoration of its habitat where it has been lost. It is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020). It is assessed as Least Concern in the northern European countries of Denmark (2019), Finland (2019), Norway (2015) and Sweden (2020). The most critical situation is reported for Flanders (Belgium), where it was assessed as Critically Endangered (Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998). In Germany it is rare with a population decline and is assessed as Vulnerable (category ""3"") (Ssymank et al. 2011). Within Germany it is assessed as Critically Endangered in Berlin (Saure 2018), Endangered in Baden-Württemberg (Doczkal et al. 2001) and Vulnerable in Saxony (Dziock at al. 1996). Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially larvae), ecology and threats. Taxonomic and population genetic studies could be important to clarify the observed variation in genitalia morphology (possible a species complex). Monitoring is required of its population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165946,149165944,Sphaerophoria pallidula,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Within the European region, this species only occurs in northern parts of Scandinavia (Norway, southern and northern Finland) and further east into European Russia where the majority of records are. It occurs in wetland habitats such as bog woodland. In European Russia there are limited data available but a potentially wider distribution according to available habitat information, making the EOO and AOO beyond the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe, and hence it is assessed as Least Concern. Within the EU27 Member States, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is large at 320,700 km2, however the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated, based on available locality data, to be below 100 km2, with only 12 documented localities and eight locations (based on the threats of commercial forestry management water abstraction). With a projected population reduction due to habitat decline as a result of the future threat of climate change, and severely fragmented subpopulations, the species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) in the EU 27, with no rescue effect applied as significant immigration from European Russia is uncertain. Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially larvae), ecology and threats. Monitoring is required of its population and habitat trends.","This species occurs in northern European mire systems and swamp forest with Picea and Betula or Pinus and Betula trees (Speight 2018). Adults have been recorded visiting flowers such as Ledum palustre and Cicuta virosa (Speight 2018). The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous. One of its major habitats, bog woodland, is partially declining in northern Europe.","The threats to this species are not well known, and further research needed. Modifications in hydrology by water abstraction and as a result of forestry management may threaten bog woodland habitats. Climate change could affect the water balance and thus lead to habitat alteration in the future.","There is no detailed information available on the population size and trends of this species at European or EU 27 levels. There are only single records from Scandinavia.

The population is not severely fragmented in Europe, but in the EU27 Member States the population is considered to be severely fragmented, with only isolated records mostly far from each other in northern Scandinavia.",Unknown,"This species occurs in northern Europe (Sweden, Finland) and European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are beyond the thresholds to be considered threatened in Europe, but in the EU 27, the AOO based on available records is between 44 and 100 km2.

Outside Europe it is found in Siberia to the Russian Far East (Speight 2018, 2020).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions yet known for this species, but it would benefit from the protection of its key sites. It is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020). It has been assessed as Least Concern in Finland (2019), but has not yet been evaluated in Sweden. Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially larvae), ecology and threats. Monitoring is required of its population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165966,149165964,Sphaerophoria loewi,Near Threatened,A2c,2021,2020-05-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

Within the European region the species is found from the British Isles and Fennoscandia south to the Mediterranean and eastwards into European Russia in slightly salty or brackish water habitats, such as coastal lagoons. There have been large historical losses and there is continuing population decline of the population and continuing decline in the number of mature individuals. There is also a continuing decline in the area of occupancy (AOO) and also in the extent of occurrence (EOO). There has been a large decline in the subpopulations of several countries of western and central Europe. However, the EOO, AOO and number of locations remain well above the thresholds for a threatened category.

There is a suspected and partially observed population reduction of around 20% over the last ten years due to loss of suitable habitat and habitat degradation. The species is therefore assessed as Near Threatened in Europe and the EU27. No regional adjustment is made as there is not thought to be any significant immigration from outside the region. Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially larvae, details on habitat requirements), ecology and threats. Monitoring is required of population and habitat trends.","This species is usually found in slightly salty or brackish-water habitats, such as coastal lagoons with Bolboschoenus maritimus, freshwater lakes with Scirpus-reedbeds, and occasionally in Phragmites reedbeds (for example steppic lakes). Adults fly in the morning over the water of reedbeds, where they visit flowers of Scirpus, Schoenoplectus and Triglochin palustre. They have also been recorded visiting other nearby herbs on the waterfront such as Eupatorium cannabinum, Filipendula ulmaria, Lythrum salicaria and Ranunculus (Speight 2018, A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). The larvae are undescribed but are presumed to be aphidophagous: Bartsch et al. (2009) reported larvae on Phragmites.","The major threats to this species are reductions in the extent and quality of the habitat, such as the brackish to saline water-bodies with aquatic seedbeds of mainly Schoenoplectus or Scirpus. These can be impacted by pollution and nutrient input, changes in hydrology, any mechanical removal or destruction of reedbeds and by waves of ships in shipping lanes or water sports. Potentially in the future, climate change could alter the habitat, but no specific research has been carried out yet. Especially in estuaries but also along lake shores, industrial and commercial development as well as housing and urbanization can also play a role in local habitat loss. According to the European Red List of terrestrial habitats (Janssen et al. 2017), permanent inland saline and brackish waterbodies (C1.5) are only assessed as Near Threatened, but only a small fraction of these are actually used as habitat by this species, possibly because it is more sensitive to threats than the habitat itself.","Within its range this species is extremely localized, with scattered and often small subpopulations. It is considered to have a severely fragmented distribution with isolated populations in slightly saline or brackish environments, for example, on the Baltic coast and in inland brackish water bodies and steppic lakes. In Europe, it is a rare species with a clear decline and loss of local subpopulations in several countries, for example in the Netherlands, Germany, Denmark and Belgium. It is extinct in Flanders (Belgium) (Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998) and in parts of the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). In Ireland, it is now only known from two sites in coastal lagoons (Speight 2008). Overall the population is considered to be declining in Europe and the EU 27. A population reduction of around 20% due to loss of suitable habitat and habitat degradation is suspected and partially observed.",Decreasing,"Within the European region this species occurs from Fennoscandia south to the Mediterranean and eastwards into European Russia. Detailed distribution data are available only for Scandinavia, France and the UK, with all other parts of its distribution mapped to entire countries/sub-county units. It is, however, considered to have a severely fragmented distribution as it is mainly linked to brackish and saline habitats.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, but these cannot be calculated accurately because the distribution is partially based on country checklists rather than exact locality data.

Outside Europe it is found across to Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, up to Mongolia and Siberia (Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"There are no specific conservation measures known for this species, but its habitats are partially covered by the EU Habitats Directive. These sites and its habitat should be protected and managed appropriately. It is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), but there have been major declines, especially in western and central Europe. It is listed as Endangered in Denmark (2019) and Norway, and Critically Endangered in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) where extra surveys are needed to confirm its presence. In Sweden it was assessed as Near Threatened (2010), and also in the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2015). Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially larvae, details on habitat requirements), ecology and threats. Monitoring is required on its population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149165989,149165987,Sphaerophoria kaa,Near Threatened,A3c,2021,2020-05-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This Nordic species is distributed in Europe in northern Sweden, Finland and marginally in Norway. The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2,000 km2. Although the population trend is stable at present, there is a projected continuing decline in the number of mature individuals and in the area of occupancy (AOO) based on the impact that climate change may have on its habitat in the next ten years, but the degree of decline is largely unknown. It is therefore assessed as Near Threatened in Europe and the EU 27. Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially larvae), ecology (habitats and flower visiting behaviour) and threats. Monitoring is required on both its population and habitat trends.",This species occurs in taiga and open subalpine birch forest (Bartsch et al. 2019a). Adults have been recorded visiting flowers such as Potentilla (Bartsch et al. 2009a). The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous.,"Because of limited available data, the threats to this species are largely unknown. Potential threats could be large-scale commercial forest exploitation in taiga forests. The main habitats, Picea taiga woodland (G3.A) and boreal mountain Betula and Populus tremula woodland on mineral soils (G1.9a), are assessed as Near Threatened and Least Concern respectively in the European Red List of Terrestrial Habitats (Janssen et al. 2017).","There is no detailed information available on the population size and trends of this species at the European and EU 27 levels. The population is assumed to be stable in Europe and the EU 27, because its main habitats (taiga and subalpine birch forest) are stable in the northern part of Scandinavia. However more research is needed to confirm this. There is a projected population decline in the future, based on the impact of climate change on its habitat.",Stable,"This Nordic species is distributed in northern Sweden, Finland and marginally in Norway. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large, but the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be only 2,000 km2.

 Outside of Europe, it can be found in the Russian Far East and possibly Mongolia (Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures known for this species. In the northern part of Scandinavia it is assessed as Least Concern in Finland (2019) and Sweden (2010). It is not assessed on the Red List of Norway. Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially larvae), ecology (habitats and flower visiting behaviour) and threats. Monitoring is required on both the population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166002,149165998,Sphaerophoria infuscata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), but has a highly fragmented distribution in the high-mountain ranges of central Europe (it is a European endemic). Based on the situation of its major habitats, the overall population is suspected to be stable, and therefore the species is assessed as Least Concern. However, at regional level some of its fragmented high-mountain subpopulations may be threatened, and more research and monitoring is needed.","This is a high-mountain grassland species, occurring in grassy openings of montane to subalpine Picea/Abies forest and in alpine acidophilous grassland (for example Nardion) (modified from Speight 2018). Adults have been recorded visiting flowers of Rubiaceae (Asperula, Galium), Apiaceae (Meum athamanticum, Heracleum sphondylium), Rosaceae (Potentilla erecta) and Caryophyllaceae (Stellaria). The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","At the moment there are no major threats known for this species. As a high mountain relict, potentially in the future it will be affected by habitat alterations induced by climate change. In high-mountain conifer forests, bark-beetle attack due to weakened trees may play a role in some of the mountain ranges (e.g. Harz mountains), but more research is needed to assess how much this affects its populations. Other minor threats could be modifications in high-mountain forest management, and intensification or abandonment of alpine grasslands. The majority of its habitats, such as acidophilous alpine grasslands (E4.3b) and coniferous mountain Picea, Abies, or subalpine Larix and Pinus uncinata woodland, have been assessed as Least Concern or only partially Near Threatened, according to the European Red List of habitats (Janssen et al. 2017).","There is no detailed information available on the population size and trends of this species at the European level. The population is assumed to be stable, at least in the largest part of its range in the Alps, based on the more or less stable high-mountain forest habitats in this area. Populations in other high-mountain ranges of central Europe are highly fragmented and possibly partially declining due to climate change and a decline in forest quality. However, more research is needed on the situation of its regional populations. Overall the population is considered stable in Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"This European endemic exists in the higher mountain ranges of central Europe (Harz, Vosges, Alps, Pyrenees) (Speight 2018) with a severely fragmented distribution. It is probably a relict species from a from a wider distribution in historical times.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"No specific conservation measures are known for this species, but it is present in several high-mountain protected sites. It is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), but in Germany it is listed as Vulnerable (category ""3""; Ssymank et al. 2011) because it is a rare species with a negative population trend.

Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (larvae), ecology and threats. These need to be done independently in all parts of its fragmented high-mountain subpopulations, because its threats and status might differ regionally. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166020,149166018,Sphaerophoria fatarum,Near Threatened,A4c,2021,2020-05-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This species is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), and is not threatened in northern Europe. Decline and regional threats are documented in western and partially in central Europe, closely linked to losses of habitat in both extent and quality. A population decline is present in western and partly central Europe, with a decline also in the area of occupancy (AOO) but with still enough smaller intact subpopulations left so that the extent of occurrence (EOO) has not been reduced yet. With a population decline regionally documented and suspected from a decline of major parts of its habitats, especially in western and central Europe, the species is assessed as Near Threatened under Criterion A4 in Europe and the EU 27, with a suspected population decline of 15-20% based on habitat decline.","This species occurs in Calluna heath, wet heath, transition and blanket bogs, oligotrophic Molinia grassland and unimproved extensive montane to alpine grassland, and in northern Europe in western taiga. (Speight 2018). Adults have been recorded visiting the flowers of Euphorbia hibernica, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus, male catkins of Salix, Sorbus aucuparia and Taraxacum (Speight 2018). The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","This species inhabits a number of quite different but highly sensitive habitats. Heathland habitats are threatened by changes in grazing, either an intensification or a complete abandonment with subsequent succession to acidic beech oak and pine forests and therefore habitat loss. Airborne nitrogen input well beyond the critical loads, urban development and conversion to farmland all accelerate habitat degradation and loss. The whole range of its wetland habitats are threatened by anthropogenic changes in hydrology (mostly water abstractions for agriculture and land-use changes with drainage or changes in mowing regime of wet Molinia grasslands), and in future also by climate change. In addition, input of pesticides from agriculture, rarely also from forestry is a threat mainly to its wetland habitats. Most of the wetland habitats (such as raised bog D1.1, quaking mires D2.3a, D4.1c and wet heath F4.1) are assessed as Vulnerable in the European Red List of habitats (Janssen et al. 2017). Its other habitats in northern Europe are less threatened, such as Picea taiga woodland (G3.A), or are assessed as Least Concern, such as Pinus sylvestris taiga woodland. The situation is better also at higher altitudes with acidophilous alpine and boreal grasslands.","There is no detailed information available on the population size and trends of this species at the European or EU 27 level. The population is declining in parts of its range, especially in central and western Europe, with documented losses of local subpopulations due to loss of suitable wetland and bog habitats.",Decreasing,"This European endemic can be found from Iceland and Scandinavia south to the Alps and northern Italy (Speight 2018). It is rare to moderately frequent, with a scattered distribution over a wide European range. The range is not fully understood because it was confused with other species in the older literature, and therefore the area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are preliminary estimates; however, both values are well above the thresholds for any threatened category in Europe and the EU 27. The AOO is in decline due to losses of local subpopulations in several countries caused by ongoing habitat losses in both extent and quality.",This species is not yet utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures known for this species. It is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), and this is also the case in most countries of northern Europe, where it is listed as Least Concern in Denmark (Bygebjerg 2004), Finland (2019), Norway (2015) and Sweden (2010). However in central and western Europe, it is threatened to different degrees: assessed as Endangered in Flanders (Belgium: Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998), with a distinct decline of about 80% of its distribution in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) and Near Threatened (category ""V"") in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) with a negative long-term trend but a stable short-term trend at a lower number of sites. Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (larvae), ecology and threats. Monitoring is required of the population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166032,149166028,Merodon hirtus,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is assessed as Endangered in Europe based on number of locations (three), area of occupancy (24 km2) and extent of occurrence (1,328 km2), which are all below thresholds. In Europe, this species is only registered at six localities in Cyprus. The number of locations is three based on the main threats (fires and intense urbanization). Furthermore, due to other ongoing threats, such as mismanagement of pastures and grazing by livestock, tourism development, a continuing decline in habitat quality is observed (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).

Outside of Europe, this species is recorded in Asia (Turkey, Israel, Iran, Syria, Palestine and Jordan), but considering the fact that the range of this species in Europe is restricted to one island (making it isolated), conserving the habitat is of crucial importance as these island subpopulations are more vulnerable to extinctions resulting from ongoing threats.


","This species prefers Mediterranean-type forest and shrubland (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The developmental stages have not been described, and the host plant is unknown. The flight period is from March to September.","Habitat loss due to fires and urbanisation are the main threats. Mismanagement of pastures, grazing by livestock, as well as tourism development (mainly urban development in the coastal zone) also cause habitat fragmentation and loss (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Ski facilities in higher altitudes and road construction represent a growing threat to important forest habitats and endangered species (Regato 2021, Ministry of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment, Cyprus 2014, A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","

There are not enough data about the population trend. Based on all known findings, on Cyprus five specimens were collected in 2000, 71 in 2003, four in 2011, and one in 2012. More research and monitoring is needed in order to obtain more complete information on population size.

",Unknown,"This species is distributed in Cyprus (six localities). In Europe and the EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1328 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 24 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is present in Turkey, Israel, Iran, Syria, Palestine and Jordan.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"Until now, the species has not been the subject of targeted conservation action. However, since its habitat is under ongoing threats, conservation actions should be undertaken. Taking into account the possible threats, it is recommended to conserve the habitat (host plants) of this species by enforcement of environmental regulations, rules and other policies. Public awareness and education are essential. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required. Research about its threats, ecology, abundance and population trend is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166041,149166031,Sphaerophoria estebani,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-08-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This is a relatively rare European endemic of high-mountain ranges in central and southern Europe. It exists in sparsely vegetated subalpine to alpine screes, and sparsely vegetated gravel beds of alpine river valleys. It is very rare with a severely fragmented distribution, mainly in the Alps and the Pyrenees. However, it is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), and it is not listed as threatened in the Red List of any country. The population is suspected to be stable at very low population densities, but may be at risk in the future due to climate change (no populations in low-altitude screes are known). While the maximum values of both extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are beyond the thresholds to be assessed as threatened, within the EU 27 the AOO is approximately 5,600 km2 at most, based on available habitat, and the real value could be distinctly lower, but sampling the habitat is difficult and perhaps unreliable. Subpopulations of different high-mountain ranges are severely fragmented, and fluctuations can occur probably depending on the availability of their larval prey. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe, but as Near Threatened (NT close to qualifying under Criterion B with a restricted AOO) in the EU 27.","This species occurs in sparsely vegetated subalpine to alpine screes, usually with Rumex scutatus, and sparsely vegetated gravel beds of alpine river valleys (Speight 2018). Adults fly close to or within stands of Rumex scutatus, and visit their flowers (Speight 2020). Scree vegetation with Rumex scutatus is more widespread than the distribution of this species, but the reasons for this and the detailed habitat requirements of this species are unknown. The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","No major threats are known to affect this species at the moment, as long as the screes remain in place without constructions to stabilize them. In future, a potential threat to this high-mountain species could be climate change with alteration of alpine habitats. It is sometimes recorded at lower altitudes in alpine river gravel beds. Glacial melt as a result of climate change will also severely modify the hydrology of these alpine rivers. Avalanches and landslides may also affect its habitat. Its major habitats have been assessed as Least Concern (high-mountain siliceous and base-rich screes) in the European Red List of habitats (Janssen et al. 2017).","There is not a lot of detailed information available on the population size and trends of this species. It is rarely recorded and only in low numbers, closely linked to subalpine/alpine screes with Rumex scutatus, a habitat which is more or less stable in its extent. Therefore the population is suspected to be more or less stable in Europe and the EU 27, but fluctuations are likely to occur probably depending on the availability of the larval prey. It is considered to have a severely fragmented distribution consisting of small isolated subpopulations, where exchange between them is not regularly possible.",Stable,"This is a relatively rare European endemic of high-mountain ranges in central and southern Europe. It has a fragmented distribution linked to specific scree habitats. It is mainly found in the Pyrenees and Alps (Speight 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe. Within the EU 27, the AOO is approximately 5600 km2 at most, based on available habitat; the real value could be distinctly lower, but sampling in these difficult habitats is hard, making the distribution unreliable.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"No specific conservation measures are currently known for this species. It is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), and it is not listed as threatened in the Red List of any country. In the German Red List it is assessed as ""R"" (extremely rare), but with a stable trend (Ssymank et al. 2011). Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (larvae), ecology and threats. Monitoring is required on its population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166053,149166050,Sphaerophoria chongjini,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This species can be found from northern to central Europe, and it is also present in some parts of the Mediterranean region. It inhabits mainly different types of dry grassland, often along woodland edges. The population is declining, based on the decline of suitable habitats both in area and quality throughout most of its range, with a suspected population reduction of about 20%. Both the maximum estimated area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are beyond the thresholds for any threatened category, but in the southern part of its range (Italy) for the EU 27 as well as in European Russia, almost no data exist on its distribution and the real values might be lower. Therefore this species is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) for EU27 based on Criterion A4c.

As the range extends well into European Russia with suitable dry grassland habitats, for the whole of Europe it is assessed as Least Concern, but precise data on its distribution in European Russia are missing and further research is recommended.","This species occurs in a variety of open or semi-open habitats, for example in unimproved dry grassland with shrubs, ruderal areas, and edges of deciduous forests (Speight 2018). Adults are reported to visit flowers of Apiaceae and Rosaceae (Potentilla and Prunus spinosa) (Speight 2018), Pastinaca sativa (Van Steenis 2016), and also shrubs and small trees such as Cornus alba and Acer ginnala, or Caltha palustris in wet forest openings (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). The larvae are undescribed but have been found feeding on Macrosiphum euphorbiae aphids on Rosa (Gavrilyuk et al 2008).","The main threats result from loss of suitable extensive dry and mesic grassland, either by intensification of agriculture, or on the other hand by abandonment and subsequent shrub invasion and succession into forests. While some scrub can be positive, a closed tree canopy in later stages will not allow this species to survive. Airborne nitrogen input accelerates habitat change with loss in quality and a quicker succession. Over the whole range, less important threats are direct losses of habitat by infrastructure developments and locally also quarrying activities. An additional threat is input of pesticides, both as influx from arable crops as well as airborne pollution. The majority of its grassland habitats are declining, and assessed as Vulnerable (E1.1i, E1.2a) or even Endangered (E1.9a), and even associated woodland fringes and forests (for example E5.2a, G1,6a, G1.6b and G3.4a) are assessed at least as Near Threatened in the European Red List of terrestrial habitats (Janssen et al. 2017).","Usually only small numbers of specimens are found, scattered in extensive dry and non-intensively managed dry to mesic grasslands, but there are no precise population data at the European or EU 27 level. A decline in the population has been observed in several countries of central and northern Europe. Due to a decline of suitable habitats in Europe and the EU 27, a general population decline for the whole of Europe is suspected.",Decreasing,"This species can be found from northern to central Europe, and it is also present in some European parts of the Mediterranean region. Country checklists have sometimes been used to indicate its distribution, which means the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) cannot be calculated accurately, but they are both greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. The AOO is in decline due to local losses of subpopulations and losses in both extent and quality of its habitat.

Outside Europe, it occurs in Siberia, the Russian Far East and Japan (Speight 2018).",This species is not utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"No specific conservation measures are known for this species. It is not considered as threatened for Europe by Speight (2020), and is assessed in northern Europe as Least Concern in Sweden (2010) and Finland (2019), Vulnerable in Norway (2015), equivalent to Vulnerable (category 3) in Germany with a negative long-term trend (Ssymank et al. 2011), and regionally within Germany in Baden-Württemberg as Endangered (""2"") (Doczkal et al. 2001). In Belgium for Flanders it is assessed as Near Threatened (Meerharghe and Grootaert 1998). Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (larvae), ecology and threats. Monitoring is required of the population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166073,149166071,Sphaerophoria batava,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This European endemic can be found throughout much of Europe, from the United Kingdom and Fennoscandia to the Pyrenees and Alps. It inhabits a relatively wide spectrum of forest habitats with clearings, canopy openings and track sides. The population is considered stable but with some early indications of local declines. Further monitoring is needed to observe these declines closely. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, and therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27. Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially the larvae), ecology and threats. Monitoring is recommended on its population and habitat trends.","This species exists in open areas (clearings, track-sides and forest margins) in humid Pinus slyvestris forest and Pinus uncinata forests in the Pyrenees, and mesophilous Fagus forest and Myricaria germanica scrub in alpine river beds (Speight 2018). Adults have been recorded visiting a wide range of flowers such as Calluna vulgaris, Euphorbia, Euphrasia, various Apiaceae (Pimpinella saxifraga, Peucedanum oreoselinum, Bupleurum), Cirsium palustrePotentilla erecta, Ranunculus and Veronica (Speight 2018; A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). The larvae are unknown but are presumably aphidophagous.","There are no major threats known to affect this species, but more research is needed. Threats such as urbanization, pesticide use in agriculture and forestry and forestry management practices might affect its habitats. Its main habitats in deciduous and coniferous forests are all assessed as Near Threatened in the European Red List of habitats (Janssen et al. 2017).","This species is relatively frequent and widespread in suitable habitats, even if large subpopulations do not occur regularly. More research is need on subpopulation sizes. Locally and regionally, there are some indications of declines which need to be monitored but overall the population is considered stable in Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"This European endemic species can be found throughout much of Europe from the United Kingdom and Fennoscandia to the Pyrenees and Alps (Speight 2018). Due to confusion with related species, part of the older distribution records may be erroneous. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, but these cannot be accurately calculated because the distribution is partially based on country checklists rather than exact locality data.",This species is not utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"No specific conservation measures are known or needed for this species. It is not considered as threatened for Europe by Speight (2020), and has been assessed in northern Europe as Least Concern in Sweden (2010), Finland (2019), Norway (2015) and Denmark (2019). For Belgium it was assessed as Near Threatened (Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998), and within Germany at regional level it was assessed as Vulnerable (""3"") for Saxony-Anhalt (Dziock et al. 2004) and Near Threatened (""V"") for Baden-Württemberg (Doczkal et al. 2001). While the overall European population is considered stable, regional or locally some declines may be present. Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially the larvae), ecology and threats. Monitoring is recommended on the population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166095,149166092,Sphaerophoria bankowskae,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment : Least Concern (LC)

This species can be found from northern Europe (Fennoscandia) to central and southern Europe (Italy). It occurs in Fagus/Picea forest and subalpine Picea forest, usually in small openings, clear-cut areas or at forest margins, but also in treeless calcareous alpine grassland at high altitudes (up to 2000 m) and in northern taiga. Its population is considered stable. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are considered to be far greater than the thresholds to be assessed in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27. This species is therefore assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27. Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially the larvae) and ecology. Monitoring is recommended on its population trends.","This species exists in Fagus/Picea forest and subalpine Picea forest, usually in small openings, clear-cut areas or at forest margins, but also in treeless calcareous alpine grassland at high altitudes (up to 2000 m) and in northern taiga (Speight 2018). Adults have been recorded visiting a wide range of flowers of the Apiaceae, Ranuculaceae (Ranunculus), Rosaceae (Potentilla), Asteraceae (Lactuca), Hypericaceae (Hypericum) and Prunella (Speight 2018). The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","High-mountain forestry practices, changes in grassland management (fertilization and early mowing regimes) (Treiber 2011) and climate change could reduce the number of subpopulations in the future, but more research is needed on threats to this species. Within the European Red List of habitats, its habitat in northern Europe, Picea taiga woodland (G3.A), is assessed as Near Threatened, and Pinus sylvestris taiga woodland (G3.B) is assessed as Least Concern, while in central and southern Europe it is a mountain species of mostly unthreatened mixed relatively widespread forests or conifer forests (G1.6a, G1.31, G1.3b, G3.2) (Janssen et al. 2017).","The northern Europe subpopulations occur at low altitudes, while in central and southern Europe they only occur in mountain ranges and are therefore more isolated. There is no indication of any decline, and overall the population of Europe and the EU 27 is assumed to be more or less stable.",Stable,"This species can be found from northern Europe (Fennoscandia) south to central and southern Europe (Italy). In some cases, only country checklists were available and so it is not possible to calculate an accurate extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO). Despite this, the EOO and AOO are considered far greater than the thresholds to be assessed in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27.

Outside Europe, it can be found eastwards to Asiatic Russia and the Pacific coast (Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures known or currently needed for this species. It is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), and has been listed in northern Europe as Least Concern in Sweden (2010), Finland (2019) and Norway (2015). For Denmark (Red List 2019) and the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2015) it has been listed as Data Deficient, and for Germany as not threatened (Ssymank et al. 2011). Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially the larvae) and ecology. Monitoring is recommended on the population trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166115,149166113,Sphaerophoria abbreviata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a northern European species: its major habitats are relatively widespread in northern Europe and are mostly unthreatened at the moment, although climate change is expected to have an impact in the future. Both the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category, and the population is currently considered stable. It is therefore assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27. Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially larvae) and ecology. Monitoring is recommended on its population trends.","This species is found in grassy open areas in western taiga forest and dwarf shrub tundra (Speight 2018). The adults have been recorded visiting the flowers of Rubus chamaemorus (Nielsen 1998), Caltha, Ranunculus and Taraxacum (Bartsch et al. (2009a), Potentilla and Ledum (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020), Tanacetum bipinnatum and Tripleurospermum hookeri (Barkalov 2012). The larvae are undescribed but are certainly aphidophagous.","There are no serious threats known to affect this species at the moment, but climate change may affect it in the future. Its major habitats are relatively widespread in northern Europe, and mostly assessed as Least Concern (F1.1 shrub tundra, F2.1 Subarctic and alpine dwarf Salix scrúb and G3.B Pinus sylvestris taiga woodland) or at most Near Threatened (G3.A Picea taiga woodland), according to the European Red List of terrestrial habitats (Janssen et al. 2017).","Although parts of the population are scattered in northern Europe, there are no indications of a declining population trend, and therefore it is presumed to be stable in Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"This species is found across northern Europe including Fennoscandia and European Russia. The map for this nordic species is based on Bartsch et al. (2009) for Scandinavia, while for Lithuania and Russia only the country checklists were available. With its northern distribution, for Russia the map was limited to the part north of 54°N (the southernmost edge of its distribution known for Europe). Because of this, it is not possible to calculate an accurate extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO). Despite this, the EOO and AOO are considered to be far greater than the thresholds to be assessed in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27.

Outside Europe, it occurs in Siberia and the Russian Far East, and Greenland (Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures known for this species. It is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), and is listed as Least Concern in Sweden (2010), Finland (2019) and Norway (2015). Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution as well as on its life history (especially larvae) and ecology. Monitoring is recommended on its population trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166139,149166136,Pyrophaena rosarum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widely distributed wetland species, found from Fennoscandia to the Mediterranean and eastwards to Russia. It is widespread, common and its population is considered to be stable. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered for any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, and as long as there are no huge changes in its population and no larger geographic gaps in its distribution, the species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and EU 27. Research is needed on its population size and trends, as well as on its larval biology and ecology. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is recommended.","This species is found in pond, stream and river margins with tall-herb vegetation, in fens, on the border of bogs, in Salix swamps and humid, seasonally-flooded, unimproved grassland (Speight 2018). Adults fly among tall waterside and fen vegetation, and in ditches. The adults have been recorded visiting flowers of waterside plants such as Caltha, Lythrum salicaria, Veronica scutellata, Mentha longifolia, Polygonum hydropiper and Lycopus europaeus but also many herbs in adjacent grasslands, such as Knautia, Lythrum salicariaPotentilla erecta and Ranunculus, and some grasses such as Brachypodium sylvaticum and Phalaris arundinacea (Speight 2018, 2020; A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). The larvae were very briefly described by Lundbeck (1916), but not since; they are presumed to be aphidophagous.","Overall this species is not considered to be at risk (Speight 2016). The potential threats are changes in the hydrology of its habitats, modifications of river systems for agricultural and other purposes, including water abstraction, agricultural intensification of wet grassland habitats and pesticide application in wetlands or close to the water edge. Its habitats have been assessed in the European Red List of Habitats, and some bog systems (such as non-calcareous quaking mire and calcareous quaking mire: D2.3a, D4.1c) were assessed as Vulnerable, and small-sedge base-rich fen and calcareous spring mire (D4.1a) was assessed as Endangered. A large part of its habitats have been assessed as Near Threatened, including blanket bog, oceanic valley bog, mesotrophic to eutrophic waterbodies with vascular plants and base-poor springs and spring brooks (D1.2, D2.1, C1.2b, C2.1a), with some as Least Concern, such as permanent non-tidal, smooth-flowing watercourses (C2.3) (Janssen et al. 2017). The list of habitats that have been assessed is not comprehensive, and some of the smaller ""microhabitats"" are not covered by the Red List of terrestrial habitats.","This species uses a wide range of wet habitats, some of which have declined in the past. However, it is still widespread and common, and can be found regularly in suitable habitats. Currently in these habitats the local subpopulations are more or less stable for Europe and EU 27, with some fluctuation presumably depending on the availability of aphid prey. There has been no change in the distribution of the subpopulation in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), and unpublished population studies in North Rhine-Westphalia show no population decline either (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020).",Stable,"This is a widely distributed species, found from Fennoscandia to the Mediterranean, and east to Russia.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, but these cannot be calculated accurately because the mapped distribution is partially based on country checklists rather than exact locality data. The distribution map has been adapted for Scandinavia according to Bartsch et al. (2009). For France the departmental distribution map of Speight et al. (2018) was used, and for Greece the Atlas of Vujić et al. (2020). Single locality data are scattered, depending on available habitats within the range.

Outside Europe it can be found across Russia including Siberia (Urals and Altai) and the Russian Far East, and on into the Nearctic, from Alaska to Nova Scotia and south to New Jersey (Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be traded or utilised.,Terrestrial,"No specific conservation actions are known for this species, but it would benefit from sustainable wetland management and restoration, as well as water management. Research is needed on its population size and trends, as well as on its larval biology and ecology. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is recommended.

It has been listed as Least Concern in most country Red Lists, including Belgium (Flanders) (Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998), Denmark (Bygebjerg 2004), Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Norway (Henriksen & Hilmo 2015), Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) and Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020). Some local German studies point to differences from the national assessment: for example within three regions it was listed as Near Threatened (Berlin [Saure 2018), Saxony (Pellmann et al. 1996), Saxony-Anhalt (Dziock et al. 2004)].",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166163,149166160,Pyrophaena granditarsa,Near Threatened,A2c+4c,2021,2020-03-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This species is widespread across Europe, found from Iceland south to the Alps and eastwards to European Russia in a variety of wetland and wet grassland habitats. However, its range started to decline regionally 10-20 years ago. Despite its large extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27, its population trend is considered to be decreasing, with recorded declines of up to 33% in multiple European countries. This decline has occurred in the past, is continuing, and it is projected to continue in the future, both in the extent and quality of its habitats. The causes of this decline, mainly agricultural threats such as water abstraction and pesticides, are understood and could be reversed, but they have not ceased, nor are they expected to cease in the near future. This species is therefore assessed as Near Threatened under Criterion A in Europe and the EU 27; it is not expected to experience a rescue effect from subpopulations outside Europe. Site protection and habitat protection is required. Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends and threats as well as on its life history (especially larvae) and ecology. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is necessary.","This species occupies a wide range of intact humid grassland habitats, including alluvial grassland, acidic Molinia-grassland, marsh, calcareous and acidophilous fen, edges of transition bog and raised bog. In humid grasslands it is often associated with springs or upwelling groundwater. Males hover above open spots. Adults have been recorded visiting the flowers of a wide range of waterside herbs, such as white Apiacaeae, Alisma plantago-aquatica, Bidens cernua, Lycopus europaeus, Eleocharis palustris, Polygonum hydropiper and Polygonum cuspidatum (Speight 2018), but also grassland species like Ranunculus and Senecio jacobaea. The larvae were briefly described by Lundbeck (1916), but not recorded since: adult flies have been caught with emergence traps in humid grasslands with cow dung (Speight 2018). The differences in habitat quality requirements of this species compared to the more widespread and less sensitive sister species Pyrophaena rosarum are not understood.","The major threats to this species are changes in hydrology, both on rivers, sources and lakeshores, as well as drainage or groundwater abstraction in wetlands for agricultural purposes. It is closely linked to very wet habitats, often with small places of upwelling groundwater or groundwater close to the surface. Water soluble pesticides and seed coatings (neonicotinoids) seem to play an important role in affecting this species, derived from intensive agriculture adjacent or close to its habitat. Overgrazing can destroy its specific habitat of upwelling groundwater in wet grasslands. Most of its habitats are assessed as Endangered in the European Red List of Habitats, including moist or wet mesotrophic to eutrophic hay meadow, moist or wet mesotrophic to eutrophic pasture and temperate and boreal moist or wet oligotrophic grassland (E3.4a, E3.4b and E3.5); raised bog (D1.1) is assessed as Vulnerable and small-helophyte beds are assessed as Near Threatened (Janssen et al. 2017). Some of the microhabitats are partially threatened and not covered by the European Red List of terrestrial habitats.","The subpopulations of this species are very localised, and its distribution is reducing, causing a decline in the area of occupancy (AOO): there have been complete losses of some local subpopulations while the overall extent of occurrence (EOO) is still untouched. The population trend is clearly decreasing, with about a third of the known sites having been lost in the Netherlands alone (Reemer et al. 2009). In wet river valleys in Germany (Wahnbachtal) it used to be possible to find large subpopulations with numerous individuals (370 individuals in 1989), but this dropped to zero individuals in 2014, and so the size of this subpopulation has dropped to below the detection threshold or is now locally extinct (Hallmann et al. 2021, A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). Additionally the remaining subpopulations seem now to have a general tendency to concentrate in very wet and unimproved habitats. In Ireland there have been ""clear losses, confined to wetter unused habitats"" (Speight 2008). The species is easy to identify in the field, which means it is usually well recorded in surveys. A decline of between 20-30% is suspected in parts of its range.",Decreasing,"This species is widespread across Europe, found from Iceland south to the Alps and eastwards to European Russia. Outside Europe it can be found across Russia to Siberia and the Russian Far East, and on into the Nearctic Region from Alaska to Quebec and south to Colorado (Speight 2018).

Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds required for the application of any threatened category for both Europe and the EU27, but these cannot be accurately calculated because the distribution in places is based on country checklists rather than exact locality data.",This species is not known to be traded or utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions being taken for this species, but it benefits from wetland restoration. Site protection and habitat protection is required. Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends and threats as well as on its life history (especially larvae) and ecology. Monitoring of population and habitat trends is necessary. In Germany it has been listed as Near Threatened in the national Red List, with both negative long-term and short-term population trends (Ssymank et al. 2011); in the regional Länder lists, it has been assessed as Endangered in Saxony-Anhalt (Dziock et al. 2004).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166186,149166184,Callicera scintilla,Critically Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-01-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

Callicera scintilla
 is only known in Europe from Cyprus, where only six specimens have been found at one locality. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) of this species are both 4 km2. The current population trend is unknown, but the hoverfly is very likely to be affected by the usual anthropogenic activities in Cyprus. Based on the threat of deforestation, this species is considered to occur at one location. Although close to a protected area, the area where the records come from is used extensively, and there is considered to be a decline in the quality and the extent of the habitat.

Therefore, this species is assessed as Critically Endangered for both Europe and the EU 27.","

In Jordan, the habitat of this species is unknown but given the saproxylic biology of the immature stages it is most likely found near trees, thus restricting the possibilities greatly in this predominantly desert country (Smit 2014). Moreover, it is uncertain if the larvae can develop in palm trees, reducing the possibilities even further. This is only the second saproxylic species recorded from Jordan (Waitzbauer and Katbeh-Bader 2002). Additional fieldwork is needed in order to ascertain the exact localities where this species might occur.

From the locality in Cyprus we know that they were collected and photographed in the Kypros region of the Troodos mountains, on the edge of a protected NATURA 2000 area called Periochi Platy. However, the area where the species was found is used extensively, and there is considered to be a decline in the quality and the extent of the habitat.

From Jordan’s neighbouring country, Israel, no species have been recorded but several specimens belonging to different species are present in the collection of TAUI (A. Freidberg and E. Morgulis pers. comm. 2019), none of which resemble this species.

","The threats to this species are not known in detail, but it is very likely to be affected by the usual anthropogenic activities going on in Cyprus like deforestation, logging, agriculture and urbanisation. The area of the Troodos mountains is extensively used, also for resorts and tourism.","There is only one known subpopulation of this species known in Europe, with very few specimens. The population trend is therefore unknown for both Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,"The species was originally described from Jordan, and has only recently been found on Cyprus, in one locality in the Troodos Mountains (around six specimens) (Smit 2014). The species might also occur in Greece, but this needs to be confirmed.
Due to being only known from locality in Europe (and therefore also the EU 27), the extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) of this species are both 4 km2. Based on the threat of deforestation, this species is considered to occur at one location.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are known for the species. In Cyprus the specimens were collected and photographed in the Troodos mountains, at the edge of a protected area called Periochi platy (Makris pers. comm. 2020). This is a NATURA 2000 area (Limassol tourism 2016) in the Kypros region but the exact locality of the specimens is not known. Research should be done on population size, threats, distribution and trends, as well as ecology and biology of the species. If the species occurs outside one of the protected areas, then additional measures should be taken to protect the area.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166196,149166194,Platycheirus varipes,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is found in Norway, Sweden and Finland within boreal/sub-arctic Betula forests, tundra and palsa mire. It is known to be rare but there are very few data about its population trend. However, a decline can be inferred because it is a habitat specialist, and its habitat is known to be in decline. Its habitat is likely to be impacted by climate change in the future. Its specific habitat needs in Betula forests can be impacted by unsustainable forestry management, and palsa mire habitats have been assessed as Critically Endangered (CR) on the European Red List of Habitat. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large for both Europe and the EU 27, but the area of occupancy is only 172 km2 in Europe and 104 km2 in the EU 27. This species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) in Europe and the EU 27, based on the small AOO, habitat decline and a severely fragmented population.

Monitoring of its population trend and habitat is needed. Sustainable forest management that promotes the conditions it needs is recommended.","This species occurs in boreal/sub-arctic Betula forest (T. Nielsen pers.comm. in Speight 2020), tundra (Barkalov and Nielsen 2008), and palsa mire (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). The adults are in flight in June/July and have been recorded visiting small white Brassicaceae (H. Bartsch pers. comm. in Speight 2020) and Ranunculus (Nielsen 1999). The developmental stages are unknown but the larvae are presumably aphidophagous.","The habitat of this species is likely to be impacted by climate change in the future. Its specific habitat needs in Betula forests can be impacted by unsustainable forestry management. Palsa mire habitats have been assessed as Critically Endangered (CR) on the European Red List of Habitats because of the impacts of climate change, but its main habitats are Betula forests and tundra, which have been assessed as Least Concern (LC) (Janssen et al. 2017).","This is known to be a rare species, but there are very few data about its population trend. However, a decline can be inferred because it is a habitat specialist, and its habitat is known to be in decline. It was last recorded in Sweden in 2019 (GBIF 2019). Whilst neighbouring subpopulations may experience some interaction, the population is considered severely fragmented overall.",Decreasing,"This species is found in Norway, Sweden and Finland (Nielsen 1999, Bartsch et al. 2009). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is large for both Europe and the EU 27, but its area of occupancy is only 172 km2 in Europe and 104 km2 in the EU 27.

Outside Europe it is found in Greenland, central Asiatic Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), and in North America throughout Alaska, western and northern Canada south to Colorado and Maine (Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"Monitoring of the population trend and habitat of this species is needed. Sustainable forest management that promotes the conditions it requires is recommended. Further research on its distribution and ecology is required. In Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020) and Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) it has been listed as Least Concern in the national Red Lists.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166208,149166205,Pipizella zeneggenensis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is a European endemic, found in the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Spain, Portugal, Andorra, Italy, Switzerland, Germany, and Hungary. Its presence is uncertain in Austria. It is assessed as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution and presumed stable population and the fact that the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The species prefers open forest ground, open areas in dry scrub, Mediterranean scrub, Quercus ilex forest, maquis, and Fagus forest. It can also be found in dry, stony, unimproved grasslands. It is threatened by the introduction of irrigation to its dry grassland habitat. Research on the species' population size, distribution, and trends as well as the monitoring of the population trends are recommended. Resource and habitat protection is also recommended.

","This species prefers open forest ground, open areas in dry scrub, Mediterranean scrub, Quercus ilex forest, maquis, and Fagus forest. It can also be found in dry, stony, unimproved grasslands (both calcareous and non-calcareous) and heath up into the alpine zone in the Pyrenees mountains and southern parts of the Alps, as well as in the grey dunes of coastal dune systems in northern France (X. Lair pers. comm. in Speight 2020). Adults are known to visit Euphorbia, Myrrhis, Potentilla erecta, and Viburnum lantana (Speight 2020). The undescribed larva probably feeds on aphids on trees, in galls or on the roots of plants.
",This species is threatened by the introduction of irrigation to its dry grassland habitat (Speight 2020).,"There are no data about the population trend of this species. It is not common, but is quite widespread in Europe (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"This species is an European endemic, where it is known from the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Spain, Portugal, Andorra, Italy, Switzerland, Germany and Hungary (Steenis and Lucas 2011, Speight 2020). Its presence is uncertain in Austria. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions in place for this species. It is found in Mercantour National Park in France (Ssymank and Lair 2014), and the mapped range of the species overlaps that of numerous protected areas (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2021). Research is recommended on the population size, distribution and distributional trends, as well as the monitoring of population trends. Resource and habitat protection is recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166219,149166216,Platycheirus urakawensis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessments: Endangered (EN)

This Holarctic species is known to occur only in Scandinavia in Europe. It is rare and the population is very small and considered severely fragmented. More research is needed on its microhabitats and ecological requirements to understand its rarity better. Climate change is projected to cause a decline in the extent and quality of its general habitat. Its area of occupancy (AOO) is only 100 km2 in Europe and 80 km2 in the EU 27. It is therefore assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27.

Further research into its population size, biology, ecology (larval development) and threats is required. Monitoring of its population trend and habitat is also needed.","According to Speight (2020), the preferred environments of this species are open areas that have tall herbaceous plants within Picea forests in northern Europe (Sörensson 2001) and tundra with dwarf Betula scrub (T. Nielsen pers. comm. according to Speight 2020, no exact date). The precise habitat requirements are not fully understood, because the habitat has a large extent in northern Europe and Russia, but the species is still rare here.

The adults are in flight in June and July in northern Europe (Sörensson 2001, Nielsen and Svendsen 2014). They are recorded visiting flowers of Aruncus asiaticus, Chamaenerion angustifolium (Gritskevich 1998), Geranium sylvaticum, Ranunculus and Rubus idaeus (Sörensson 2001).

The developmental stages are undescribed but the larvae have been reported feeding on Myzus persicae in Japan (Minamikawa and Fukuhara 1964) and associated with aphids of herbaceous plants (Vockeroth 1990).","Habitat loss and degradation can threaten this species, but its threats are not fully understood. Climate change is projected to impact its northern habitats and cause declines in extent and quality.","There are insufficient data on the population of this species to determine the trend for Europe and the EU 27, but it is considered rare and is likely to be a relict population. The last record from Norway was in 2018, and from Finland and Sweden in 2017. The population is considered severely fragmented because it occurs in small isolated subpopulations that are unlikely to interact.",Unknown,"This Holarctic species is known to occur in northern Sweden, Norway and Finland (Bartsch et al. 2009, Haarto and Kerppola 2014). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in both Europe and the EU 27. In Europe, the area of occupancy is 100 km2 and in the EU 27 it is 80 km2.

Outside Europe, it occurs in the Himalayas (northern India, Bhutan), the Russian Far East and Japan (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Speight 2020) and in the Nearctic in Greenland, Alaska (USA) (Young et al. 2016) and scattered localities in Canada (British Columbia: Young et al. 2016). It also can be found in Korea (Choi et al. 2018).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known to be under way for this species. Further research into its population size, biology, ecology (larval development) and threats is required. Monitoring of its population trend and habitat is also needed.

In the Swedish Red List (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), this species has not been evaluated, but in Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) it is Least Concern.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166233,149166230,Platycheirus transfugus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This forest species has a fragmented population in Europe and the EU 27, but with a wide distribution from Arctic Norway to southern France. In the northern part of its distribution, it is considered more stable but the overall population trend is unclear for both regions. It is considered very rare across its range, with just one or two individuals found in each locality.

Recently, there has been a decline in the extent and quality of natural and semi-natural forests, its main habitat. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 45,908 km2 for Europe, but 43,252 km2 in the EU 27. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is very large in Europe and the EU 27. This species is therefore assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27.

Monitoring of its population and habitat is needed. Further research on its biology, ecology, threats, and population is required.","This species occurs within open areas of Picea/Pinus forests and deciduous forests (Nielsen 2004). In the southern parts of its range it is restricted to mountains, but this is not so true in the northern part of its range (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020).

The adults are in flight from mid May to the beginning of August, with a peak in June. They have been recorded visiting the flowers of Chrysanthemum fruticosa, Potentilla fragiformis (Nielsen 2004), Allium schoenoprasum, Potentilla crantzii, Ribes alpinum and Saxifraga granulata (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020). The developmental stages are undescribed, but the larvae are likely to feed on aphids.","The main threats to this species are habitat loss and alteration of habitats as a result of wood harvesting/logging, acidification and climate change (Nellemann and Thomsen 2001).","This species occurs in severely fragmented small subpopulations. It is considered very rare across its range, with just one or two individuals found in each locality. It is more stable in the northern part of its range, but overall its population trend and size is unknown in both Europe and the EU 27.

The European population is very geographically separate from the non-European population.",Unknown,"This species occurs throughout Norway (from the southern tip to the far northern Arctic regions), in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009), southern Finland (Haarto and Kerppola 2007), Denmark (Torp 1994, Nielsen 1999), southern Germany (Baden-Württemberg - without coordinates) (Doczkal et al. 2001), France (Vosges, Alps: Lair 2018, Speight et al. 2018) and Serbia (van Steenis et al. 2015).

The area of occupancy (AOO) is 45,908 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 3,920,129 km2 in Europe. For the EU 27 the AOO is 43,252 km2, and the EOO is 2,852,044 km2. The AOOs and EOOs are greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27.

Outside Europe, it occurs in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia and south-eastern Siberia (Altai mountains) (Mutin and Barkalov 1999).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions being taken for this species currently. Monitoring of its population and habitat is needed. Further research on its biology, ecology, threats, and population is required.

In Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020) and Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020) it has been listed as Least Concern on the national Red Lists, but Near Threatened for Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019). In Denmark (Danish Biodiversity Information Facility (DanBIF) 2020) it is listed as Vulnerable, while in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) it is considered to be the equivalent of Critically Endangered.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166241,149166227,Pipizella virens,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is found from southern Sweden south to northern Spain, from southern England eastwards through central and southern France, Italy, and the Balkan states, and then into the European parts of Russia. The species prefers dry deciduous forest such as Fagus, Quercus, and Atlantic scrub. The species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States in view of its wide distribution and presumed stable population and the fact that the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.  Research on the species' population size, distribution, and trends as well as the monitoring of the population trends is required.

","This species prefers dry deciduous forest such as Fagus, Quercus, and Atlantic scrub. Adults are known to visit umbellifers, Euphorbia and Rubus idaeus (Speight 2020). The larvae feed on wax-secreting aphids on the roots of white umbellifers - probably mainly on Anthriscus (Ball and Morris 2000).","There are no major threats to this species, but in some parts of its range it could be affected by habitat loss and fragmentation (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data about the population size or trends, but the species is presumed to be stable based on many findings (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). It is presumed to be common in appropriate habitats in Europe and the EU 27, given its stable population trend.",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is found from southern Sweden south to northern Spain, and from southern England eastwards through central and southern France, Italy, and the Balkan states, and on into the European parts of Russia and Turkey. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside Europe, it is found in Iran, Siberia and Mongolia, and on to the Pacific coast (Speight 2020).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"In Sweden, this species is assessed as Near Threatened (Artdatabanken 2020). Research is required on the population size, distribution and distributional trends, as well as the monitoring of population trends. No conservation actions are needed at the moment. It is present in some Natura 2000 sites in Europe, such as at Javorniki - Snežnik in Slovenia; Južni Dilj in Croatia and Koryfes Orous Smolikas and Oros Titaros in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020). It also occurs in the Fruška Gora and Kopaonik National Parks in Serbia and Durmitor National Park in Montenegro.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166254,149166249,Platycheirus tatricus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This montane species can be found across the Alps and parts of central Europe in grassland and forest habitats. It is considered very rare, and is suspected to be declining due to declining habitat. Because restricted to high altitudes in declining habitats, and therefore unlikely to have mobility between isolated subpopulations, the population is considered fragmented. However, the area of occupancy (AOO) is large for Europe and the EU 27, and so the species does not meet the criteria for any threatened category at this time. Monitoring of its population trends and habitat is needed. Further research on its biology, ecology, population size and threats is required.","This species is found in open ground of the Larix zone upwards, in thinly-vegetated unimproved calcareous and non-calcareous alpine grasslands. It is found in these habitats up to 2,000 m asl, particularly along the edges of torrents (L.Verlinden pers. comm. in Speight 2020), and in open heathy areas in Pinus uncinata forests. It is not found in low-altitude areas (Speight 2020).

The adults are in flight at the end of May until July, and have been recorded visiting flowers of Potentilla, Ranunculus and Salix. The developmental stages are unknown but the larvae are presumed to be aphidophagous (Speight 2020).","The threats to this species are habitat loss and degradation as a result of land-use changes. Open habitats in high mountain areas are threatened by land-use management and grazing. In addition, climate change also might have a negative impact.","The population size is unknown but it is very rare across its range, and because it is restricted to high altitudes with little mobility between subpopulations, it is considered severely fragmented. Using knowledge about the decline of its preferred habitat, a decline in population size is suspected in both Europe and the EU 27. Increased data on the population size and trends of this species are needed. It was last recorded in Austria in 2016.",Decreasing,"This European endemic species occurs in the Tatra Mountains (Slovakia), Czech Republic, the Alps (France, Liechtenstein, Switzerland, Austria) (Heimburg 2018, Speight et al. 2018, Verlinden 2020), northern Italy (the Dolomites) (Speight 2020), Germany (with several records in high-mountain areas: A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020) and in Serbia and Montenegero (van Steenis et al. 2015).

The extent of occurrence (EOO= 650,269 km2) and area of occupancy (AOO=25,555 km2) are greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27. The AOO for the EU27 is 24,851 km2, and the EOO is 295,518 km2.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. Improved conservation efforts and protection of the declining habitat is needed. Monitoring of population trends and habitat is needed. Further research on its biology, ecology, population size and threats is required.

In the Czech Republic, it is listed as Vulnerable (Farkač et al. 2005). It has not yet been included on any other national Red Lists.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166262,149166250,Pipizella viduata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species occurs throughout most of the European region, absent from Iceland and some northern parts of Scandinavia, and form the Mediterranean islands. The species prefers open forest ground, dune grasslands, heathland which can be partly-drained bog dominated by ericaceous scrub, unimproved pasture, and grassy clearings in woodlands, especially scrub woodlands. This species is assessed as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution and presumably stable population and the fact that the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Research on the species' population size, distribution, and trends and the monitoring of its population trends is recommended. Currently, no conservation actions are required.

","This species prefers open forest ground, dune grasslands, heathland which can be partly-drained bog dominated by ericaceous scrub, unimproved pasture, and grassy clearings in woodlands, especially scrub woodlands. In Southern Europe, it is apparently mostly found in woodlands, such as alluvial hardwood forests. Adults are known to visit umbellifers, Euphorbia, Galium, and Potentilla erecta (Speight 2020). Eggs are laid on the stems of umbellifers and other plants infested with root aphids upon which the larvae feed: the aphids are usually tended by Lasuis niger (e.g. Dixon 1959).
",There are no major threats to this species.,"There are no data about the population trend, but the species is presumed to be stable based on numerous findings (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). It is presumed to be common within appropriate habitat in Europe and the EU 27, given its stable population trend.",Stable,"Within the European region, this species occurs from Fennoscandia south to the Iberian Peninsula and the Mediterranean, and from Ireland eastwards through most of Europe into the European parts of Russia and Turkey. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside Europe, it is found in western Siberia (Speight 2020).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions in place for this species. Research is recommended on the population size, distribution and distributional trends, and the monitoring of its population trends. Currently, no conservation actions are required. The species occurs in several Natura 2000 sites in Europe, such as at Grintovci, Menina, Bohinjska Bistrica in Jereka, Dolina Vipave, Notranjski trikotnik, Javorniki - Snežnik, Krimsko hribovje - Menišija, and Slovenska Istra in Slovenia; Jelas polje in Croatia; Oros Tymfi (Gkamila), Periochi Metsovou (Anilio - Katara), and Kentriki Rodopi Kai Koilada Nestou in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020). It also occurs in the Fruška Gora, Đerdap and Kopaonik National Parks in Serbia and the Durmitor and Skadarsko jezero National Parks in Montenegro.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166275,149166270,Platycheirus tarsalis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is fairly widespread across Europe, occurring in humid Fagus, Carpinus/Quercus and acidophilous Quercus forests. Overall it has a stable population, although declining and rare in some parts of its range, such as the Netherlands, but its threats are not currently well understood. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27. Therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU 27. It would benefit from research on its ecology, larval biology, population and threats. Monitoring of the population and habitat is also recommended.","This species can be found in small open areas within humid Fagus, Carpinus/Quercus and acidophilous Quercus forests, with tall-herb communities (Speight 2020).

The adult flight period is from the beginning of May to July, with the peak at the end of May or beginning June (Röder 1990, Speight 2018). Adults are rcorded visiting flowers such as Euphorbia, Geranium, Myosotis, Frangula alnus, Potentilla, Primula, Ranunculus, Senecio, Stellaria, Verbascum, Viola (Speight 2018) and Geranium (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020).

The larvae described by Kuznetsov (1988) were reared from eggs and fed Aphis fabae in the laboratory.","There are no threats currently observed to be affecting this species. However, in the Netherlands it is rare and the population is decreasing, perhaps caused by habitat loss and habitat changes.","In Scandinavian, the subpopulations are scattered, and in the Netherlands numbers are decreasing and it is considered threatened (Reemer et al. 2009). In the UK the subpopulation is considered stable according to the consistency of records. Overall the population is considered stable in Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"This species is present in the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2013), Sweden, Finland, Norway (Nielsen 1999, Bartsch et al. 2009, GBIF 2019), eastwards through central and southern Europe. It is confirmed from the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Belgium (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001, GBIF 2019), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Serbia (Steenis et al. 2015, Vujić et al. 2018), Romania (Stanescu and Parvu 2005), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Latvia (Karpa 2008), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2000), the Alps (Verlinden 2020) and European Russia (Speight 2020). Outside Europe it is found across Asia to the Russian Far East (Mutin and Barkalov 1999). The distribution map is based on GBIF datasets (2019, checked again in 2021) and available records in the literature.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are currently known for this species. It has been listed as Least Concern in the Red Lists of Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020). It would benefit from research on its ecology, larval biology, population and threats. Monitoring of its population and habitat is also recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166283,149166273,Pipizella thapsiana,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-05-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species, found in Portugal and prefers closed, unimproved, lightly-grazed, calcareous, Mediterranean tall-grass grassland at 200-300 m with thickets of Hawthorn, Blackthorn, and Bramble. The species is assessed as Endangered for Europe and the EU27 Member States due to its small area of occupancy (AOO), which is between 24 and 40 km2 in Europe and the EU 27, the fact that the species occurs in only three to five locations, and because it has a continuing decline of the quality of its habitat due to overgrazing, frequent fires, and soil nitrogen enrichment. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is about 18,000 km2. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from subpopulations outside of the assessment region. Further research on the species' population size, distribution, and trends and the monitoring of the population trends are required. Resource and habitat protection is recommended to conserve the species.

","This species prefers closed, unimproved, lightly-grazed, calcareous, Mediterranean tall-grass grassland at 200-300 metres with thickets of Crataegus, Prunus spinosa, and Rubus (A. van Eck pers. comm. 2020 in Speight 2020) and humid grassland at 1,000 metres in the Atlas Mountains (Kassebeer 1995). It also occurs in very dry, unimproved, calcareous, sheep-grazed grassland with thickets of Juniperus, Prunus spinosa and Rosa (Speight 2020). The undescribed larva is assumed to feed on aphids occurring on trees, in galls, or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants.","The main threats to grassland ecosystems in Portugal are overgrazing, frequent fires with short reoccurrence cycles due to climate change and human activities, and soil nitrogen enrichment due to intensive grazing  (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data about the population trend of this species. It is not common, usually to be found in small numbers, typically fewer than 10 specimens per locality (van Steenis and Lucas 2011).",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is restricted to central and southern Portugal (van Eck 2011), with four mapped localities. In Europe and the EU 27, it occurs at three to five locations, with an area of occupancy (AOO) estimated to be between 24 and 40 km2, and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 18,000 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is found in Morocco (Kassebeer 1995).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation measures in place for this species. It occurs in two Natura 2000 sites in Portugal - Serra de São Mamede and Serras d'Aire e Candeeiros (European Environment Agency 2020). Further research is required on its population size, distribution and distributional trends, and the monitoring of population trends. Resource and habitat protection is recommended for its conservation.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166295,149166291,Pipizella siciliana,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This European endemic species is found in Sicily in Italy, southern France, and northwestern Spain. The species prefers open habitat, thinly vegetated grasslands and orchards and montane, and unimproved grasslands with Chestnut woodlands. The species is assessed as Vulnerable since it has a restricted geographic range, with an area of occupancy (AOO) less than 32 km2, it is found in six to eight locations, and has a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due the abandonment of montane grasslands. In Europe and the EU 27, the extent of occurrence is estimated to be about 650,000 km2. Resource and habitat protection is recommended. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends and the monitoring of the population trends is required.

","This species prefers open habitat, thinly vegetated grasslands and orchards (Nielsen and Torp 1973), and montane and unimproved grasslands with Castanea woodlands (Ricarte et al. 2014). It also occurs in montane, sheep-grazed, unimproved and calcareous grassland with thickets of Rosa, Prunus spinosa and Juniperus (Speight 2020). The undescribed larva is assumed to feed on aphids on trees, in galls, or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants.
",The abandonment of grazing in mountain pastures resulting in overgrowth and afforestation is the main threat to the species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).,"There is no information about the population trend for this species. Based on a small number of records, it is presumably rare (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"This European endemic species is known from Sicily (Italy), southern France, and northwestern Spain. According to Vujić (1997), the citation of the species from Romania by Bradescu (1991) should be referred to Pipizella zloti. According to van Eck (2011), Portuguese records of Pipizella siciliana all refer to Pipizella thapsiana (Speight 2020). In Europe and the EU 27, the species occurs at six to eight locations, with an area of occupancy (AOO) considered to be less than 32 km2 and an extent of occurrence estimated to be about 650,000 km2.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions in place for this species; however, resource and habitat protection is recommended. Research is needed on the population size, distribution and distributional trends, as well as monitoring of population trends. It is found in some Natura 2000 sites in Europe, such as Tratto Montano del Bacino della Fiumara di Agrò in Sicily in Italy; Serra do Xistral, Ancares - Courel in Spain and Est et sud de Béziers, Plaine de Fabrègues-Poussan, Gorges du Tarn et de la Jonte, and Plateau de Valensole in France (European Environment Agency 2020). Whilst Portuguese records of Pipizella siciliana refer to Pipizella thapsiana, the identity of records of Pipizella siciliana in northwestern Spain require investigation.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166303,149166292,Platycheirus subambiguus,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is found in southern central Europe in rocky calcareous open ground, probably beside rivers and brooks in stony calcareous grassland, although more research is needed on its habitat. Its population trend is unknown. Its habitats are considered vulnerable, and it is suspected that there is a decline in the habitat quality and extent across its range. The population is considered to be severely fragmented, and there is a continuing decline projected in the area, extent and quality of its habitat. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 5,439 km2 . The species is assessed as Near Threatened, close to qualifying under Criterion B2. Further research on its biology, ecology, habitat, population trends and threats is required. In addition, monitoring of the habitat and population is also recommended.","This species occurs in rocky calcareous open ground, probably beside rivers and brooks in stony calcareous grassland (Descaves and Speight 2017).

The adults have been recorded visiting Salvia pratensis (Nielsen 2004) and Laserpitium siler (Descaves and Speight 2017) when they are in flight in May (Nielsen 2004) and June (Descaves and Speight 2017). The developmental stages are unknown but the larvae should feed on aphids.","Habitat loss is the major threat to this species; calcareous grasslands are in decline and so it is suspected that there is a decline in the quality and extent of its specific habitat across its range. Climate change may contribute to habitat decline, but more immediate threats include unsustainable land-use management, including intensive grazing.","The population size and trend is unknown for this species in Europe and the EU27, but it is considered very rare. It was last recorded in 2017 in France. The population is considered severely fragmented because of its small and isolated subpopulations.",Unknown,"This European endemic occurs in northern Italy, Croatia and Hungary (Nielsen 2004, Tóth 2011) and France (Descaves and Speight 2017, Speight et al. 2018), although only the sampling sites are known in France rather than the specific coordinates, in France.

The area of occupancy (AOO) is 5,439 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 142,720 km2 in Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions known for this species. It would benefit from more sustainable grazing practices. Further research on its biology, ecology, habitat, population trends and threats is required. In addition, monitoring of the habitat and population is also recommended. It does not seem to have been included on any National Red Lists.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166317,149166311,Pipizella nigriana,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is European endemic, found in France, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, Liechtenstein and Austria. It prefers open areas within Larix and Pinus mugo forest and scrubland, unimproved, non-calcareous alpine grassland and heath up to 2,500 metres. The species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) since it has a restricted geographic range in Europe and the EU 27, with an area of occupancy (AOO) between 50 and 80 km2, has severely fragmented subpopulations, and has a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to human-caused wildfires and the abandonment of alpine grasslands. In Europe and the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is about 150,000 km2Further research on the population size, distribution, and trends and threats as well as the monitoring of the population trends are recommended. Resource and habitat protection are required to preserve this species. 

","The species prefers open areas within Larix and Pinus mugo forest and scrubland, unimproved non-calcareous alpine grassland and heath up to 2,500 m. Adults are known to visit Potentilla, Ranunculus, Saxifraga and Sedum (Speight 2020). The unknown larva presumably feeds on aphids on trees, in galls, or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants.
","Pine scrublands are often cut and burnt in order to enlarge pastures, causing wildfires, one of the main threats to alpine ecosystems. However, the abandonment of alpine grasslands also causes afforestation, leading to losses in the biodiversity of open areas (WWF 2001, A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data on the population trends of this species. It is considered to be very rare in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), although only a small proportion of its range occurs there, and in France, fewer than 10 specimens are found per locality (Ssymank and Lair 2014). It is considered to be severely fragmented.",Unknown,"This species is a European endemic, where it is known from southwestern France, Switzerland, northwestern Italy (Verlinden 1999; D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2021), southern Germany, Liechtenstein and Austria (Ssymank et al. 2011, van Steenis and Lucas 2011, Ssymank and Lair 2014, Speight 2020). In Europe and the EU 27, it occurs at 10 to 15 locations, with an area of occupancy (AOO) estimated to be between 50 and 80 km2, and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 150,000 km2. It is found at altitudes between 850 and 2,500 m above sea level.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no targeted conservation actions concerning this species; however, resource and habitat protection is needed. Further research is recommended on its population size, distribution and threats, as well as the monitoring of population trends. The species is found in the Le Mercantour Bird Directive Site in France and Karwendel, Niedere Tauern, Hohe Tauern and Tirol Habitats Directive Sites in Austria (European Environment Agency 2020), and a large number of protected areas occur within its known range (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2021).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166325,149166312,Platycheirus sticticus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in Europe although its distribution is somewhat fragmented. It is considered under-recorded because it is elusive and difficult to find. The population trend is unknown in both Europe and the EU 27. It is very rare in some countries such as the Netherlands, where it was once considered extinct, and is suspected to be declining in Germany. More research is needed to understand the population trends, habitat needs and threats better. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, and so this species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27.","This species can be found in conifer Picea/Pinus plantations and acidophilous Quercus woodlands, relatively consistently across its range. The adults can be found in forest clearings and tracksides, and according to Speight (2020) are largely arboreal but descend to visit flowers of low-growing plants. It has been recorded visiting flowers such as Cardamine, Euphorbia, Ranunculus, Stellaria and Chaerophyllum hirsutum (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). The adults are in flight from mid-May until August, and on into September at higher altitudes. The larvae are undescribed but should be aphidophagous (there are doubtful records from Italy of larvae associated with Psylla pyri on Pyrus malus) (Ball and Morris 2014).","Given the wide range of habitats from which this species has been recorded, and its wide but scattered distribution, there are broad indications that intensive woodland ride management, hedgerow removal, scrub invasion and intensification of grassland management may pose threats, because these result in habitat loss and degradation. More research is needed on these threats.","This is a rare species but found in a wide range of habitats (Ball and Morris 2014), not restricted just to mountain areas. It is very widely distributed in Germany with 130-140 records across almost all of the states, but some are quite old and these sites need to be revisited (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). It is assumed to be threatened in Germany but it is not known to what extent. It is suspected to have declined in the past, as it has not been recently recorded in some places where it was previously found. It is difficult to identify without collection, and difficult to collect with standard insect nets, and therefore it might be under-recorded since it is somewhat elusive. In Serbia, it has been recorded in only one locality and not since. It was last recorded in 2019 in France.

Overall the European and EU 27 population trends are considered unknown.",Unknown,"The range of this species extends from southern Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009), Denmark (Torp 1994) and Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) south to the Pyrenees and northern Spain, and from Ireland (Ball and Morris 2014) eastwards through Belgium (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), central Europe including Hungary (Tóth 2011), Germany (Röder 1990), northern Italy and Latvia (Karpa 2008), and into Russia. Outside Europe, it can be found throughout Russia to the Far East (Sakhalin) and Mongolia (Mutin and Barkalov 1999). In the Netherlands it was considered extinct (Reemer et al. 2009) but was rediscovered in 2011 (https://waarneming.nl/observation/55095239/). In Hungary and Austria the records are uncertain because either the identification at species level was not possible (in Austria) or the records too old (most of the records from Hungary).

The map was created according to GBIF (2019) records, and available data in the literature. From European Russia and Latvia there are no exact records available, but occurrence is confirmed.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"The existing mosaic of habitats should be retained and even restored where it has been lost. Rotational ride management should aim to maintain open swards grading into scrub. Similarly, field margins and woodland edges would benefit from maintenance of such gradations. Monitoring of habitat and population trends is required. Further research on its population, threats and biology are also recommended to clarify its habitat further.

This species is listed as Vulnerable in Czechia (Farkač et al. 2005), Near Threatened in Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), Nationally Scarce in the UK (Ball and Morris 2014), Near Threatened in Denmark (DanBIF 2020), but Least Concern in Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166337,149166333,Platycheirus splendidus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The entire distribution of this species is incomplete due to taxonomic confusion with other members of the scutatus group until recently. Nevertheless, it has a large distribution, being found in a variety of woodland and shrubland habitats. The population is considered stable, although somewhat fragmented. In Europe and the EU 27, the area of occupancy (AOO) and the extent of occurrence (EOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. It is therefore assessed as Least Concern (LC) in both Europe and the EU 27.","This species is know to occur in forests and hedgerows, specifically in deciduous forest of Quercus/Ulmus that have a diverse forest structure, including clearings and other open areas upwards to the upper limit of the Picea/Abies forest zones and on to 2000 m in the Alps, where it may be found in association with Alnus viridis thickets. It can be found in hedges containing Ulmus glabra, and has also been observed in suburban gardens (Speight 2008, Bartsch et al. 2009).

The adult flight period is between April and the beginning of June and the end of June into August. There may only be one generation (mid-April to the beginning of July) in the United Kingdom, Ireland and Scandinavia (Ball and Morris 2013, Speight 2018). The adults have been recorded visiting flowers of Anthriscus, Heracleum, Silene dioica and yellow Crassula (Speight 2020).

The larvae were described by Rotheray (1998) from leaf-curl galls of the aphid Schizoneura ulmi (L.) on Ulmus glabra, and from aphid colonies on Silene dioica.","No specific threats to this species are known. However, intensive wood harvesting and logging, as well as lack of forest structural diversity might threaten its habitat. Drought exacerbated by climate change can cause deterioration in the extent and quality of its habitat in Picea forests (Avitabile et al. 2020).","This species is widely distributed within suitable habitat. The population is somewhat fragmented in Europe and the EU 27, but in its local subpopulations it is considered stable.",Stable,"The full distribution of this species is incomplete due to taxonomic confusion with other members of the scutatus group until recently. It is confirmed to exist in Ireland (Speight 2008, 2018), the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2013), Scandinavia (Norway, Sweden, Finland) (Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), through Belgium, the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) and Germany to the Alps (Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland) (Doczkal et al. 2002).

In Europe and the EU 27, its area of occupancy (AOO) and the extent of occurrence (EOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. Specifically in the EU 27, the AOO is 31,289 km2 and EOO is 4,348,043 km2.

Outside Europe, it is known to occur in the Nearctic (Young et al. 2016).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions known for this species. Increased research is needed to establish an understanding of its full distribution, and its population and habitats trends, as well as the threats. In Denmark (Danish Biodiversity Information Facility (DanBIF) 2020) this species is listed as Data Deficient in the national Red List, while it is listed as Least Concern in Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) and Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166345,149166334,Pipizella nataliae,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not applicable (NA)

The species is found in the southern region of European Russia. The species was at first assessed as Critically Endangered since it has a restricted extent of occurrence (EOO) of 25 km2, is only found between one and three locations, and has a declining quality in its habitat due to the development of ski tourism and disturbance of weather patterns caused by climate change. However, considering the potential influence from Georgian subpopulations, the category was downgraded to Endangered. The area of occupancy of the species (AOO) is about 12 km2. Further research on the population size, distribution, and trends and threats as well as the monitoring of the population trends are recommended. Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection is required to preserve this species. The species is assessed as Not Applicable in the EU 27 since the species is not found in the EU 27.

","This species was found on a high mountain ridge (van Steenis and Lucas 2011) among mountain pastures and grasslands. The undescribed larva is assumed to feed on aphids occurring on trees, in galls, or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants.","This species is found on mountain peaks, where its habitat is significantly threatened by ski tourism and disturbance of weather patterns caused by climate change (Tashilova et al. 2019).","There are no data about the population trends for this species, but it is considered to be rare in Europe (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"This species is found in the southern European part of Russia in North Ossetia (van Steenis and Lucas 2011, Speight 2020). In Europe, it is found in one to three locations with an area of occupancy (AOO) of about 12 km2 and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 25 km2. It has been found at an altitude of 1,850 metres above sea level (van Steenis and Lucas 2011).

Outside of Europe, it is also found in Turkey and Georgia.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no targeted conservation actions concerning this species; however, site, resource and habitat protection are required for its preservation. It is found in the Alaniya National Park on the northern slope of the central Caucasus Mountains in European Russia (van Steenis and Lucas 2011). Further research is recommmended on its population size, distribution and threats, as well as the monitoring of population trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166356,149166353,Platycheirus speighti,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-02-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

This species has previously been recorded across the Alps, but some of these records are probably misidentifications. The population is suspected to be decreasing, based on habitat decline, but there are insufficient data to know this for certain, and it is generally considered to be very rare. The quality and extent of its habitat is projected to continue to decline. It is restricted and localised, and we can assume that the number of mature individuals in each subpopulation is very small - only individual specimens have been caught. It is quite likely that the subpopulations are isolated, and therefore its distribution might be severely fragmented. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are uncertain because its true distribution is uncertain, and therefore this species is assessed as Data Deficient in Europe and the EU 27.

Further research is needed on its taxonomy (to establish if it is a European endemic), biology, ecology, threats, appropriate conservation actions and distribution. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is also required.","This species occurs in unimproved non-calcareous montane/alpine grasslands from 1,500 to above 2,000 metres above sea level in the Alps (Doczkal et al. 2002). The adults are in flight from the end of May until mid-July, and have been observed visiting the flowers of Myosotis alpestris (Doczkal et al. 2002). The larvae are unknown, but they should be aphidophagous.","This species is most affected by habitat loss and fragmentation caused by climate change in alpine environments. Unsustainable grassland management and land-use change are also potential threats, given that it is associated with these types of habitats.","The population is suspected to be decreasing, based on habitat decline, but there are not enough data to know this for certain, but generally it is considered very rare. It has very localised subpopulations, and it can be assumed that the number of mature individuals in each subpopulation is very small, based on the number observed during surveys (Doczkal et al. 2002). It is also quite likely that all the known subpopulations are isolated, and therefore its distribution might be severely fragmented. It was last recorded in 2010, in France (J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020).",Decreasing,"This species has previously been recorded across the Alps including Austria (Heimburg 2018), France (Speight 2020), Italy, and Switzerland (Doczkal et al. 2002), but some of these records are thought to be misidentifications (A. Vujic pers. comm. 2020). There is also an uncertain record from Austria from 1991. There are no records from the German part of the Alps, and only one record from Russia - although no locality was given for this and it has not been reported in the recent Russian checklist (Barkalov and Mutin 2018). There are very few records known and it may be under-recorded. It is only certain to occur in France based on a specimen from 2010 (J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020), and similarly one certain record from Italy (Doczkal et al. 2002).

Outside Europe, it is known from Canada (Alberta, British Columbia) and the USA (Alaska: A.D. Young pers. comm. 2020). According to Young et al. (2016), Nearctic specimens are identical to the European ones, but research is needed to confirm this at a genetic level before it is possible to establish whether this species is endemic to Europe or not. Currently, it is not considered endemic.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are uncertain because its true distribution is uncertain. The AOO was calculated from two points in Europe.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions currently known to support this species. Further research is needed on its taxonomy (to establish if it is a European endemic), biology, ecology, threats, appropriate conservation actions and distribution. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is also required. It does not occur on any national Red Lists.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166365,149166355,Pipizella mongolorum,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Within the European region, the species is found in Jura in France, southern Germany, and the eastern Czech Republic. The species prefers wetlands, calcareous fern, transition mire, and edges of raised bog up to 1,300 metres in the Alps. The species is assessed as Endangered since it has a restricted area of occupancy (AOO) between 16 and 24 km2, is only found from four to six locations, and has a continuing decline of habitat quality due to atmospheric pollution and droughts caused by climate change. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from subpopulations outside the assessment region. In Europe and the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is about about 35,500 km2. Resource and habitat protection is needed. Further research on the population size, distribution, and trends and threats as well as the monitoring of the population trends are recommended to obtain more knowledge about the species.","This species prefers wetlands, calcareous fern, transition mire and the edges of raised bog up to 1,300 metres in the Alps (C. Claussen pers. comm. 2020 in Speight 2020). Adults visit flowers such as Potentilla erecta (B. Tissot pers. comm. 2020 in Speight 2020), yellow composites and Caltha. The undescribed larva presumably feeds on aphids on trees, in galls, or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants.
","Atmospheric pollution and climate change are considered the main threats to the habitat of this species. Its wetland montane habitats are sensitive to even the slightest environmental changes. Warmer temperatures, for example, begin to dry them out, resulting in their degradation and, ultimately, complete destruction (Silva et al. 2007). These habitats are sensitive to a wide range of external and internal pressures, including changes in topography due to peat growth, climate change, atmospheric pollution, grazing, burning, artificial drainage, afforestation and infrastructure development (Grzybowski and Glińska-Lewczuk 2020).","There are no data about the population trends, but this species is presumably rare. Only a few specimens have been found in Europe, first discovered only at the end of the last century (Verlinden 1999).",Unknown,"This species is found in Jura in France (Tissot et al. 2013), southern Germany, and the Czech Republic (Verlinden 1999). In Europe and the EU 27, it occurs at four to six locations, with an area of occupancy (AOO) of less than 24 km2, and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 35,500 km2. It can be found in the Alps up to 1,300 metres.

Outside of Europe, it is found in central and eastern Siberia and Mongolia.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no targeted conservation actions in place for this species; however, resource and habitat protection is needed. Further research is recommended on the population size, distribution and distributional trends, and threats, as well as the monitoring of population trends. It occurs in Vallons de la Drésine et de la Bonavette Habitats Directive Site in France; Karwendel, Isar Birds Directive Site, Moore, and Wälder der Endmoräne close to the Starnberg Habitats Directive Site in Germany, and Šumava Habitats Directive Site in the Czech Republic (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166376,149166373,Platycheirus scutatus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread across Europe, and is considered to have a stable population in Europe and the EU 27. It exists in a variety of deciduous woodlands and many artificial habitats too. There are no threats currently known to affect it, but it would benefit from further research on potential threats and also its full distribution, considering recent taxonomic changes. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27, and therefore it is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in both regions.","This species occurs in most types of deciduous forest, especially scrub woodlands. It also occurs in hedgerows, fruit and olive orchards, suburban gardens and parks and in young conifer plantations (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020, Skevington et al. 2019). The adults are in flight between April and October, with peaks in June and August and occasionally into November (Tóth 2011, Ball and Morris 2013). They have been recorded visiting the flowers of plants such as Achillea millefolium, Aster, Berberis, Campanula rapunculoides, Euphorbia, Geranium robertianum, Leontodon, Ranunculus, Rosa, Salix repens, Silene dioica, Stellaria, Taraxacum and Tripleurospermum inodorum (Speight 2020).

The larvae were described by Bhatia (1939), Dixon (1960) and Rotheray (1988), and feed on aphids on herbaceous plants, bushes, shrubs and small trees (Dussaix 2013).",There are no threats currently known to affect the extinction risk of this species.,"This species is considered widely distributed in Europe, despite recent taxonomic changes. It is generally found in high numbers, and the current population trend is considered stable in Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"The full distribution of this species requires review due to potential confusion with other species in the recently described scutatus group. Despite this, it is seemingly widespread and known to occur in Iceland, the Faroes (Jensen 2001), Fennoscandia (Bartsch et al. 2009, GBIF 2019) south to Iberia and the Mediterranean, and from Ireland eastwards through northern, central and southern Europe (including Italy, Greece and parts of eastern Europe) (Ball and Morris 2013, Röder 1990, Tóth 2011, Speight 2020) and into Turkey and European parts of Russia. Outside Europe, it occurs in Afghanistan and eastwards through Siberia to the Russian Far East including Sakhalin and Japan (Mutin and Barkalov 1999). It is also found in North America from Alaska south to Colorado (Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27, but cannot be accurately calculated as the distribution is sometimes based on country checklists rather than exact locality data.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions currently needed for this species. The ecology of the adults and larvae are well-studied, but it can be confused with other species in the scutatus-group, and therefore confirmation of its identity in some records, and further research into its distribution is recommended, as well as research on its threats. Monitoring of the population is also recommended. In Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Denmark (Danish Biodiversity Information Facility (DanBIF) 2020) and Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020), it is assessed as Least Concern.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166387,149166384,Pipizella maculipennis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-21 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is known from southern England, Belgium, France, Switzerland, Italy, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Greece, Slovenia, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, and Romania. The species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States in view of its wide distribution and because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The species exists in open forest ground and dry, unimproved, grassy areas within dry scrub and in Fagus and Pinus forest. Further research on the population size, distribution, and trends and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends are recommended. No conservation actions are required at the moment.

","The species prefers open forest ground and dry, unimproved, grassy areas within dry scrub or Fagus and Pinus forest. Adults are known to visit Cirsium flowers (Speight 2020). The undescribed larva has been recorded feeding on root aphids and on aphids on Plantago.
",This species is affected by the loss of habitat quality in some parts of its range due to human activities such as agriculture and urbanization (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).,"There are no data about the population trends for this species. It is not common in Europe and the EU 27, because fewer than 20 specimens per locality are typically found (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"Within the European region, the range of this species was uncertain until recently, due to confusion with Pipizella zennegenensis. It is known from southern England, Belgium, France, Switzerland, Italy, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Greece, Slovenia, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Romania. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside Europe, it is recorded from Turkey (Speight 2020), in Altai in Russia, and Afghanistan (van Steenis and Lucas 2011).
",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions in place for this species currently. No conservation actions are currently required. Further research is recommended on the population size, distribution, trends in distribution, and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends. It occurs at several Natura 2000 Sites in Europe, such as in Massif de la Sainte-Baume in France; Slovenska Istra in Slovenia, and Šire Rovinjsko područje in Croatia (European Environment Agency 2020). It also occurs in Fruška Gora, Đerdap and Kopaonik National Parks in Serbia and National Park Durmitor in Montenegro.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166398,149166395,Platycheirus scambus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in northern and far western Europe. It can be found in a variety of wetlands, a habitat declining as a result of intensive agriculture causing water abstraction, and it will be threatened in the future by increasing drought as a result of climate change. Its population is considered to be decreasing in Europe and the EU 27, but the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. It is therefore assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and the EU 27.

More sustainable agricultural practices would benefit this species. Research on its ecology, phenology and habitat is needed, and monitoring of its population and habitat would be beneficial.","This species is found in wetland habitats including fens, coastal fens, river margins and also salt-marshes (Speight 2020).

The adult flight period is from the end of May to mid-July and from August to September (Röder 1990, Bartsch et al. 2009). The adults have been recorded visiting the flowers of Carex, Ranunculus, Schoenoplectus, Scirpus lacustris, Spartina, Urtica dioica (Speight 2020) and Rorippa amphibia (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). The larvae were described by Rotheray (1988) and are aphidophagous.","The drainage of fens and moors can threaten the habitat of this species, and increasing drought as a result of climate change may threaten the wetlands habitats too. In western Europe, habitat loss as a result of agricultural intensification can result in a decline of its population (Speight 2008).","According to Speight (2008), this species is widely distributed and not threatened in Ireland. It is frequent in northern Europe, but further south, it becomes confined to lakeside reed beds and alluvial wetlands on the floodplains of major rivers (Speight 2008). It ranges widely beyond Europe, through Asiatic parts of the Palaearctic and in the Nearctic. In the Netherlands, the population has been decreasing since 1950 (Reemer et al. 2009). In Germany, the species is abundant but shows a declining tendency (Ssymank et al. 2011, Saure 2018).

In summary, in some countries the population of the species shows a decreasing tendency, while in other countries (especially in northern Europe and in the UK) the population seems stable.",Decreasing,"This species is present in Fennoscandia (Torp 1994, Nielsen 1999, Bartsch et al. 2009) south to central France (Sarthou 1996, Speight et al. 2018), and from Ireland (Speight 2008, 2020) eastwards through northern and central Europe (such as Germany (Röder 1990), Austria (Heimburg 2018), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Romania (Stanescu and Parvu 2005), Belgium (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019) and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009)), Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania (Kuznetzov 1993, Karpa 2008) to European parts of Russia. Outside Europe, it occurs across Russia to the Pacific coast of the Russian Far East (Sakhalin) (Mutin and Barkalov 1999) and in North America from Alaska to Quebec and south to California (Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific actions known to be taking place for this species. More sustainable agricultural practices would benefit it. Research on its ecology, phenology and habitat is needed, and monitoring of its population and habitat would be beneficial. In national Red Lists it is listed as Near Threatened in Denmark (Danish Biodiversity Information Facility (DanBIF) 2020), and Least Concern in Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), and Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166408,149166406,Pipizella elegantissima,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Considering that this European endemic species is known from only three locations, with tree logging and overgrazing having caused severe destruction and a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat, and as a result of a restricted geographic range with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 20 km2, it is assessed as Endangered. The species prefers deciduous forest and open areas within forests.

Conservation actions such as site/area as well as resource and habitat protection are recommended to preserve the species. Further research on the population size, distribution, and trends and life history and ecology is required. Monitoring of the population trends is recommended and the area of Castiglione dei Pepoli in Italy should be considered for protection.

","This species prefers deciduous forest and open areas within forests (Speight 2018). The larvae are assumed to feed on aphids occurring on trees, in galls, or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants (van Steenis and Lucas 2011). The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018).","

Due to tree logging and extensive grazing, a noticeable decline in the quality of the habitat has resulted (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

","

There is no information about the population trends of this species. There are only a few records so far, so it is considered rare (van Steenis and Lucas 2011). Despite sampling in the Apennine Mountains north of Castiglione dei Pepoli, it has not been found there (D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2020).

",Unknown,"This species is an European endemic, where it is known from the montane zone of Sila (Calabria) and the northern Apennines (Emilia-Romagna) in Italy, and from south-eastern France (Speight 2018). It is considered to occur at three locations, with an area of occupancy (AOO) of about 20 km2, and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 96,000 km2. It is found at altitudes between 600 and 1,500 metres above sea level.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation measures in place for this species so far. It is known to occur within one Natura 2000 Site, Sila Grande in Italy (European Environment Agency 2020), however its mapped range overlaps that of 33 protected areas (UNEP-WCMC 2021). Conservation actions such as site/area as well as resource and habitat protection are recommended to help its preservation. Further research is required on the population size, distribution, trends, life history and ecology. Monitoring of population trends is recommended, and the area of Castiglione dei Pepoli should be considered for protection.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166418,149166416,Platycheirus ramsarensis,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species can be found in the Faroe Islands, United Kingdom, Ireland and Scandinavia. It has a somewhat fragmented population in northern Europe. It is threatened by the deterioration of habitat due to agricultural water abstraction activities and increasing drought as a result of climate change. The population is not considered severely fragmented in Europe, but is considered fragmented in the EU 27. The population is stable in the United Kingdom. The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is 11,317 km2 and 2,397 km2 in the EU 27. As the AOO and EOO do not meet the criteria of any threatened category, this species is considered to be Least Concern (LC). It may occur that in the EU 27, due to the decline of its habitat, its status should be re-assessed in the future and categorised into a threatened category.

Protection of wetland habitats, and the regulation of water use from these habitats is needed. Research on its ecology, phenology, taxonomy and distribution range is required, as well as the monitoring of its population and habitats.","This species occurs in wetlands and open ground such as tundra, transition mires, flushes in blanket bog, lakeside vegetation round oligotrophic lakes and in tall marginal vegetation along brooks in moorlands. It can also be found in oligotrophic unimproved montane grasslands on non-calcareous soils (Bartsch et al. 2009, Ball and Morris 2013, Speight 2020) .

The adults are in flight between the end of June and mid-August, with a peak in mid-July. They have been recorded visiting the flowers of species such as Caltha palustris and probably also Poaceae and Cyperaceae (Speight 2020). Males have so far only been collected in June and the beginning of July (Speight and Goeldlin de Tiefenau 1990, Speight 2018). The developmental stages are unknown.","The drainage of fens, moors and other wetland habitats for agricultural purposes can cause the habitat of this species to deteriorate. Agricultural pollution through the use of pesticides may negatively affect its wetland habitats, and increasing droughts as a result of climate change are projected to continue to reduce the extent and quality of its habitats.","The population of this species is fragmented, with scattered subpopulations in northern Europe. In the United Kingdom, the population is considered to be stable. Overall, it is considered stable in Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"This European endemic species is present in the Faroes (Jensen 2001), Scandinavia (Nielsen 1999, Bartsch et al. 2009), Ireland and the United Kingdom (from Outer Hebrides and Scottish Highlands south to Yorkshire) (Speight and Goeldlin de Tiefenau 1990, Stubbs and Falk 2002, Ball and Morris 2013). The map is based on data from GBIF (2019) and the literature listed in the references. Scandinavian records are identical with the map presented in Bartsch et al. (2009).

The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is 11,317 km2, while in the EU 27 it is 2397 km2 . The EOO is large in both Europe and the EU27. Based on the AOO and EOO, this species does not meet the criteria for any threatened category.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions currently known to be being taken for this species. Protection of wetland habitats, and the regulation of water use from these habitats is needed. Research on its ecology, phenology, taxonomy and distributional range is required, as well as the monitoring of its population and habitats. It has been listed as Least Concern in the national Red Lists of Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) and Norway (NBIC 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166430,149166426,Pipizella calabra,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"The species is found in the French Alps and in the Apennines Mountains in central Italy. The species prefers open ground scrublands and dry, open grassy areas with scattered deciduous scrub in the Spruce and Larch zone. The species is assessed as Vulnerable due to its small area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and in the EU 27 which is between 68 and 80 km2, because the species only occurs between seven and 10 locations, and because there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due land conversion and the improper management of grasslands and forests. The extent of occurrence is estimated to be less than 50,000 km2. Research on the species' population size, distribution, and trends and the monitoring of its population trends are needed. Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection are recommended.","This species prefers open ground scrublands and dry, open grassy areas with scattered deciduous scrub in the Spruce (Picea) and Larch (Larixzone. Adults are known to visit Spring Cinquefoil (Potentilla tabernaemontana). It also occurs in unimproved and calcareous alpine grasslands up to 2,000 m, while also often being found near streamlets or alongside the seasonally dry channels of torrents (L. Verlinden pers. comm. 2020 in Speight 2020). The undescribed larva is assumed to feed on aphids occurring on trees, in galls, or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants.
",Land conversion and the poor management of mountainous grasslands and forests are the main threats facing this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).,"There are no data about the population trends of this species. It is usually found in low numbers, and is considered a rare species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"This species is an European endemic, found in the French and Maritime Alps (Speight et al. 2018) and in the Apennine Mountains in central Italy (Birtele et al. 2003). It is considered to occur in 7-10 locations, with an area of occupancy (AOO) estimated to be between 68 and 80 km2, and an extent of occurrence (EOO) between 46,000 and 50,000 km2. It is found at altitudes between 700 and 2,200 metres above sea level.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions in place for this species so far; however, site/area as well as resource and habitat protection are recommended. It occurs in a few Natura 2000 sites, such as at Bardonecchia - Val Fredda and Crinale dell'Appennino parmense in Italy and Le Mercantour and Marguareis - La Brigue - Fontan - Saorge in France (European Environment Agency 2020), as well as the Alpi Marittime and Alte Valli Pesio e Tanaro SPAs.

Research is needed on population size, distribution, distributional trends and the monitoring of population trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166440,149166429,Platycheirus podagratus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread across Europe, living in wetland habitats such as acidic fens, margins of oligotrophic lakes, rivers and brooks in unimproved grasslands, taiga, moors, unimproved montane and alpine grasslands and palsa mire. The majority of its habitats are threatened, and the population is therefore considered to be decreasing and this is projected to continue. However there is no monitoring of the population trend. Despite these data, the AOO and EOO are very large and therefore this species does not meet the criteria for a threatened category.

Monitoring of the habitat and population trends is required. Further research is needed on its population size, trend and threats. It would benefit from wetland and bog land restoration efforts.","This species exists in a variety of wetland and open habitats. More specifically, it can be found in acidic fens, margins of oligotrophic lakes, rivers and brooks in unimproved grasslands, taiga, moors, unimproved montane and alpine grasslands and palsa mire (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). The adults are in flight from the end of May to mid-July and on to mid-August at higher altitudes (Speight 2020). They are known to visit the flowers of Cyperaceae. The larval and pupal stages are undescribed, but the larvae are aphidophagous.","Changes in the hydrology of freshwater habitats due to agricultural water abstraction, and changes in land-use and other agricultural practices such as the use of pesticides, can impact this species. Taiga, moors, unimproved montane and alpine grasslands and palsa mire habitats are threatened by climate change (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005). The majority of the habitats where this species is found are endangered or vulnerable (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013).","The population trend is considered to be decreasing in Europe and the EU 27 due to ongoing threats to the habitat, but monitoring of the population is needed to confirm this. It is very rare in Germany. It was most recently recorded in Sweden in 2019 (Global Biodiversity Information Facility 2019).",Decreasing,"This is a widespread species in Europe that can be found from the Faroes (Jensen 2001) and Fennoscandia (Nielsen 1999, Bartsch et al. 2009, Hyvärinen et al. 2019) south to the Pyrenees, and from Ireland (Ball and Morris 2014) eastwards through northern Europe and the mountainous parts of central Europe, France (Ssymank and Lair 2015, Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Röder 1990), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Slovenia (De Groot and Godevic 2008), Romania (Stanescu and Parvu 2005), Lithuanian, Estonia and Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993, Pakalniškis et al. 2006, Karpa 2008), and into Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014) and Russia. There is only one georeferenced record in Germany. It is likely to be under-recorded in the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27.

Outside Europe, it occurs in Mongolia, Kyrghizstan, Siberia and the Russian Far East to Sakhalin and the Kurils (Mutin and Barkalov 1999, Barkalov and Mutin 2018). It has a wide distribution in North America including Canad (Alberta and Ontario: Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019).
",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known to be currently being taken for this species. Monitoring of its habitat and population trends is required. Further research is needed on its population size, trend and threats. It would benefit from ongoing wetland and bog land restoration efforts. It is listed as Least Concern in Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020) and Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), Vulnerable in Denmark (Danish Biodiversity Information Facility (DanBIF) 2020) and Endangered in Germany (Saure 2018).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166450,149166448,Pipizella brevis,Vulnerable,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

The species is European endemic, known from the Pyrenees Mountains, with a single record from Austria. The species prefers open ground forest, open areas in the Pyrenees Mountains within the upper levels of Beech and Spruce forest. The species is assessed as Vulnerable since it has a restricted geographic range in Europe and the EU 27 with an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 19,200 km2, an area of occupancy (AOO) of 32 km2, the fact that it occurs at nine to 10 locations, and because it has a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to development of tourism, logging, and overgrazing in its range. The population is considered to be very fragmented since the subpopulations are small and isolated. Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection are conservations actions that are needed to preserve this species. Further research into the species' population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology and threats are required. Monitoring of the population trends is also recommended.

","This species prefers open ground in forests, open areas in the Pyrenees Mountains within the upper levels of Fagus and Picea forest upwards to the tree line in Pinus uncinata and Rhododendron forest and into the alpine zone in thinly-vegetated heath and acid grasslands up to above 2,000 m (Speight 2018). The larvae is assumed to feed on aphids occurring on trees, in galls, or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants (van Steenis and Lucas 2011). The developmental stages have not been described yet (Speight 2018).","

The main threats to this species are the destruction of its habitat due to logging and overgrazing, and the development of tourism within its range, such as a ski-centre (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). 

",

There is no information about the population trend of this species. It is assumed to be very rare since there are very few records (around 10) so far (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The population is considered to be severely fragmented since the subpopulations are small and isolated.

,Unknown,"This species is a European endemic, known from Spain, France (Speight 2018), Austria (Ivenz  2014, Ivenz and Krenn 2017), Andorra (van Steenis and Lucas 2011), the autonomous community of Cantabria, and the Pyrenees Mountains. Records from northern Europe, such as from Finland and Siberia (e.g. Verlinden 1999), are now considered to be of Pipizella certa (Speight 2020). In Europe and the EU 27, it occurs at 9-10 locations with an area of occupancy (AOO) assessed to be 32 km2, and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 19,200 km2. It is found between 800 and 2,500 metres above sea level.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. It occurs at three point localities in Spain within the Natura 2000 network: Valgrande, Posets - Maladeta, and Capçaleres del Ter i del Freser (European Environment Agency 2020), and its known localities overlap the extent of some other protected areas such as the Pyrénées Catalanes and Pyrénées Ariégeoises National Parks.

Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection are conservation actions needed for its preservation. Further research is required into the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats. Monitoring of population trends is also recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166460,149166458,Platycheirus perpallidus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has a fairly widespread but scattered distribution across northern and central Europe. Its population is declining in some areas and stable in others, but overall the trend is not known in Europe or the EU 27. The wetland habitats are threatened by water abstraction, agricultural pollution and the alteration of natural river flows. However, the the extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) are large in both the EU and EU27.

Conservation actions should concentrate on maintaining fringes of sedge-rich marginal vegetation around and along water bodies, with a sustainable level of grazing to deter scrub invasion. Further research on the threats, conservation actions and distribution is needed as well as monitoring of the population and habitat.","This species exists in freshwater wetlands such as in the tall sedges of water-margins, reed beds in fens, transition mire, palsa mire and along rivers or the edge of lakes (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff, 2013, Speight 2020). The adults are known to vis Rubus chamaemorus (Nielsen 1998), Cyperaceae, Juncus spp. and Salix repens. The larvae were described by Maibach & Goeldlin (1991), collected feeding on the aphid Subsaltusaphis rossneri on the sedge Carex rostrata. There are also records from Austria of the larvae feeding on the aphid Hyalopterus pruni on Bulrush (Typha angustifolia). The larvae overwinter underwater on the lower parts of the host plant and may even be found beneath the ice when the surface water freezes (Speight 2020).","Drainage of wetlands, inappropriate engineering of river channels and over-grazing of riparian vegetation by livestock are the most likely threats to the habitat of this species (Ball and Morris 2014). Diffuse pollution from the application of nitrates in agriculture may also be a threaten. Pesticides from agriculture can spill over into freshwater habitats as well.","Across Europe, this species is fairly widespread in the lowlands where there are suitable wetlands. However, wetlands across Europe are declining and fragmented. The subpopulations are quite fragmented and probably do not interact with one another. In Switzerland Maibach and Goeldlin (1991) recorded it from just five localities.

In Germany, there is a declining trend (Saure 2018), but it is considered stable in northern Europe, where it was most recently recorded (Sweden in 2019). Whilst an overall decline is assumed in the population size, the number of sampling surveys from suitable localities has also decreased (Ball and Morris 2014) and so the overall trends are considered unknown in Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,"This species occurs in Norway and Finland (Torp 1994, Nielsen 1999, Bartsch et al. 2009) south to northern France (Speight et al. 2018), and from Ireland and the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014) eastwards through northern and central Europe, including northern Germany (Röder 1990), Czechia (Čepelák et al. 1986, Mazánek 2006), the Netherlands, Belgium (Reemer et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), Hungary (Tóth 2011) and into European parts of Russia.

There is some taxonomic confusion about the identification between this species and Platycheirus neoperpallidus (newly described and a recent taxonomic split). This means there is a possibility that some records of this species may be incorrect, and thus the distribution might not be completely correct, although it is likely that the majority of records are in fact this species.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category in either Europe or the EU 27.

Outside Europe, it occurs across Siberia and the Russian Far East to the Pacific coast (Mutin and Barkalov 1999, Barkalov and Mutin 2018); and in North America from Alaska to New Brunswick and south to Utah (Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"Conservation actions should concentrate on maintaining fringes of sedge-rich marginal vegetation around and along water bodies, with a sustainable level of grazing to deter scrub invasion.

In Germany, this species is listed as Vulnerable/Category 3, it is Nationally Scarce in the UK (Ball and Morris 2014), endangered in the Czech Republic (Farkac et al. 2015) and is listed as Least Concern in Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) and Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020). In Denmark it is assessed as Near Threatened (Danish Biodiversity Information Facility (DanBIF) 2020).

Further research on the threats, conservation actions and distribution is needed as well as monitoring of the population and habitat.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166474,149166468,Pipizella annulata,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-14 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Nearly Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Nearly Threatened (NT)

The European endemic species, which typically occurs at higher altitudes, has a wide distribution in Europe and the large number of subpopulations. The species prefers deciduous forest of Quercus, Carpinus, Ulmus, Fagus, and Castanea. Furthermore, the species can also occur in unimproved and alpine grassland up to 2,000 m and in unimproved grassland at lower altitudes. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be about 3,500,000 km2 and in the EU 27 it is estimated to be about 3,100,000 km2. Its area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be between 536-600 km2 in Europe and about 500 km2 in the EU 27. The species is threatened by a continuing decline and fragmentation of the quality of the its habitat due to land conversion, agriculture and urbanization. Further research is needed to determine if there is a need to include this species in any of the threatened categories based on a fragmented population. It is therefore assessed as Near Threatened in both Europe and the EU27. Research on population size, distribution and trends and the monitoring of the population trends are recommended. Resource and habitat protection is also recommended.

","This species prefers deciduous forest such as Quercus, Carpinus, Ulmus, Fagus, and Castanea forest. Furthermore, it can also occur in unimproved and alpine grassland up to 2,000 metres, and in unimproved grassland at lower altitudes (D. Doczkal pers. comm. 2020 in Speight 2020). Adults are known to visit umbellifers, Chaerophyllum and Galium. The larval stages are undescribed, but a larva was found by Dussaix (1997) at the root collar level of Heracleum stems, with black aphids tended by ants. Dussaix (2013) provides more detail on the rearing of this species, and colour photos of both larva and puparium. Dussaix (1997) notes that all the larvae he found were on leaves or at the stem-base of Heracleum plants, where both aphids and ants were present. Formation of the puparium occurs at the stem-base (Speight 2020).","Usually occurring at higher altitudes, this species is threatened by habitat loss and fragmentation due to land conversion, agriculture and urbanization (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data on the population trends of this species. Despite the many records throughout Europe, this is not a common species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"This species is a European endemic, found from the Netherlands and Germany, south to southern Portugal, and east through central Europe to Hungary, and from the Mediterranean region to the Balkan countries (Speight 2020). Records of Pipizella annulata from Finland, especially female specimens, could refer to Pipizella certa (van Steenis and Lucas 2011).

Outside Europe, there are records of Pipizella annulata in Turkey but they probably refer to the species Pipizella orientalis (van Steenis and Lucas 2011), and the species is considered to be endemic to Europe here. In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be between 536 and 600 km2, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) about 3,500,000 km2. In the EU 27, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be about 500 km2, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) about 3,100,000 km2. It is found in alpine grassland up to 2,000 metres, down to unimproved grassland at lower altitudes (D. Doczkal pers. comm. 2020 in Speight 2020).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation measures in place for this species so far. Research is recommended on the population size, distribution (for example, the identity of records of this species in Anatolia is required), and trends in distribution, and the monitoring of population trends. Resource and habitat protection is also recommended.

The species occurs in several Natura 2000 sites, such as at Sierra de Grazalema, Riu Montnegre, Serres de Mariola i el Carrascar de la Font Roja, Llanos de Cáceres y Sierra de Fuentes, Monte de El Pardo, Parga - Ladra - Támoga, and Riberas del Río Duero y afluentes in Spain; Réseau hydrographique de la Haute Dronne, Plateau de Millevaches, Petite Beauce, Vallée du Rutin, coteau de Chaumiton, étang de Saosnes et forêt de Perseigne, Cuesta du Bray, Forêts picardes: Compiègne, Laigue, Ourscamps, Réseau de coteaux crayeux du bassin de l'Oise aval (Beauvaisis), Vallées de la Loue et du Lison, Montagne de Seymuit - Crête de la Scie and Le Mercantour in France; Bunder- en Elsloërbos, Savelsbos, Geuldal, and Brunssummerheide in the Netherlands; Ohrdrufer Muschelkalkplatte, Apfelstädtaue, and Ampertal in Germany; Julijci, Snežnik - Pivka and Krimsko hribovje - Menišija in Slovenia; Fertőmelléki dombsor, Kab-hegy, Papod és Miklád, Budai-hegység, Börzsöny, Mátra, Tisza-tó, Bodrogzug és Bodrog hullámtere, Zempléni-hegység a Szerencsi-dombsággal és a Hernád-völggyel, Szekszárdi-dombvidék, and Gemenc in Hungary; Domogled - Valea Cernei in Romania; Melnishki piramidi and Zapadni Rodopi in Bulgaria and Oros Tymfi (Gkamila), Aspropotamos, and Oros Olympos in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166482,149166471,Platycheirus peltatus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widely distributed in Europe and the EU 27, with a stable population trend in both assessment regions. It occurs in a wide range of habitats, such as wetlands, humid forests and grasslands. There are no current threats impacting its risk of extinction, but the effects of climate change on wetland habitats should be monitored. Additionally, monitoring of its population, as well as research on its threats, larval biology and full distribution is needed, as our understanding of its distribution is incomplete due to previous taxonomic confusion with other species.

Despite the uncertainty of the entire distribution, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for either Europe or the EU 27, and this species is therefore assessed as Least Concern (LC) in both assessment regions.","This species occurs in fens and humid unimproved grasslands. It can also be found along rivers and streams in grasslands and heathlands, and in association with tall-herb vegetation of flushes in grasslands (Speight 2018). In the Alps, it is also known to occur in open areas within humid Fagus/Abies forests (Röder 1990, Bartsch et al. 2009).

The adult flight period is between May and August, with a peak in June/July. Some individuals have also occasionally been observed to fly in September (Speight 2020). The adults have been recorded visiting flowers such as white umbellifers, Allium ursinum, Berteroa incana, Epilobium, Eupatorium, Euphorbia, Galium, Papaver and Ranunculus (Speight 2020).

Larval descriptions in the literature (Dušek and Láska 1960, Goeldlin de Tiefenau 1974, Rotheray 1993) were considered unreliable by Speight (2020) because of doubt about the identity of the species involved, although peltatus is by far the commonest species. The larvae feed on aphids.","No threats have been observed that might affect the extinction risk of this species currently. However, climate change is likely to have a negative impact on some of its habitats, especially on the humid and wetland habitats which are at greater risk of depletion from increasing drought.","This is a widespread species across much of Europe, with a stable population in Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"The full distribution of this species is uncertain due to confusion with other species (such as P. parmatus, P. amplus and P. nielseni) until recently, but its presence is confirmed in Norway (Nielsen 1999), Sweden, Finland, Denmark (Torp 1994, Bartsch et al. 2009), Ireland, United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2013), Germany (Röder 1990), the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), France (the Ardennes [Bot and Van de Meutter 2019] and Vosges mountains, the Loire floodplain, the Rhine valley, the Pyrenees), the Alps (Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Austria), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Slovenia (De Groot and Govedić 2008) Serbia (Nedeljković 2011, Vujić et al. 2018), Romania (Stanescu and Parvu 2005), and Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania (Kuznetzov 1993, Karpa 2008). Outside Europe, it occurs in the Altai mountains (south-east Siberia), the Russian Far East (Mutin and Barkalov 1999), and Japan.

Despite the uncertainty of the entire distribution, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category in either Europe or the EU 27.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions known to be taking place for this species. Monitoring of its habitat and population, as well as research on its threats, larval biology and full distribution is needed.

In the Red Lists of Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020) and Denmark (Danish Biodiversity Information Facility (DanBIF) 2020), this species is Least Concern (LC). In the German Red List it is listed as ""häufig"", which means ""frequent"" (Saure 2018).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166493,149166490,Platycheirus occultus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread species in Europe and the EU 27, with a stable population trend. It exists in a variety of wetland habitats that are at risk from agricultural water abstraction and, in the future, climate change. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27. It is therefore assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and the EU 27.","This species exists in a variety of wetland habitats, including fens and the periphery of raised bogs, coastal marshes and dune slacks, moorlands and humid seasonally-flooded unimproved grasslands (Speight 2020). In the Alps, it is apparently only in wetlands with Phragmites below 1,000 metres above sea level, but in Scandinavia it occurs as far north as the taiga wetlands (Nielsen 1998).

The adults are in flight from April to September with peaks in May/mid-June and mid-July/August, and have been recorded visiting flowers such as white umbellifers, Carex and Salix repens (Ssymank 2002).

The larvae are unknown but presumed to be aphidophagous.","Abstraction of water and other hydrological changes, and changes in land-use management as a result of agriculture, are likely to be the major threats to the habitats of this species. It is also likely to be threatened by the impact of climate change, but this is not likely to be an immediate threat across its range.","This is a widespread species which is scattered but not rare. Its population trend is stable in the Pan-European and EU 27 regions. In the Netherlands, it is considered to be increasing.",Stable,"This species occurs in Norway, Sweden, Finland (Nielsen 1999, Bartsch et al. 2009), the Faroes (Jensen 2001), Denmark (Torp 1994), Ireland, United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014), northern Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), France (Ssymank and Lair 2015, Speight et al. 2018) (including the Alps, Pyrenees, Massif Central and the Vosges), lowland parts of Switzerland, Liechtenstein (the Rhine valley), Spain, northern Italy (Apennines), the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Belgium (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), Austria (Heimburg 2018), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Serbia and Montenegro (Steenis et al. 2015) and Ukraine. The map is based on the GBIF (2019) dataset and the literature listed in the references.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for both Europe (AOO= 320,841 km2) and the EU 27 (AOO= 96,670 km2).

Outside Europe, the species is known from Turkey, Iran and Azerbaijan.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known to be taking place for this species, but wetland habitat restoration is recommended. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends, and further research on its population size, life history, and threats are needed.

This species is listed as Least Concern in the national Red Lists of Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Denmark (Danish Biodiversity Information Facility (DanBIF) 2020), Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) and Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020). It is listed as Near Threatened in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166503,149166501,Paragus vandergooti,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

The species is extant in mainland areas of France, Portugal, and Spain. Due to its area of occupancy (AOO) of about 72 km2 in Europe and the EU 27, the fact that the species is known from 12-15 locations, and because of a continuing decline in the quality of habitat, the species is assessed as Near Threatened. The species is threatened by tourism and unsustainable forestry, which cause the encroachment of the herb layer. This herb layer is significant for the larvae of the species. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from the subpopulations outside of Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 of the species is estimated to be around 432,400 km2Resource and habitat protection as well as raising awareness about the presence of the species and its significance is recommended. Further research into its population size, distributions, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends is needed.

","The preferred environments of this species are forests, scrublands, tall-herb open areas in Quercus ilex forest, Quercus rotundifolia woodland, and Genista florida/Quercus pyrenaica maquis (Mª-A. Marcos-Garcia and A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2019). It also prefers Mediterranean riparian ash forest. It is known to  visit flowers such as umbellifers and Thapsia villosa (Carles-Tolrá 2006). The flight period is from May to September. The larva is zoophagous, but this stage of its life cycle is not yet fully understood (Speight 2018).","The main threats affecting this species are tourism and unsustainable forestry, which also causes the encroachment of the herb layer. The herb layer of forests is particularly important for this predatory species because the larval food is there. This threat mostly affects species found in inter-continental localities, while due to the touristic activities, there is a continuing decline in the quality of habitat in areas near the coast and near big cities (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).","There is no known information about the population size or trends for this species, which seems to be genuinely rare (T. Tot pers. comm. 2019). There are records from Portugal near Algarve from 1996 (Lucas 1996) and one near Porto from 2010 (van Eck 2011). The Spanish records are from 1980-1990, and again from 2000 and afterwards (Marcos-Garcia 1986, Ricarte et al. 2018). Records from France are from 1991 (Speight 1993).",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is distributed in southern France, Portugal, and central and southern Spain. It is found up to 2000 metres above sea level, in 12 to 15 locations in Europe and the EU 27. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is estimated to be around 432,400 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) about 72 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is found in North Africa, such as in Morocco (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species, but resource and habitat protection is recommended, as well as raising awareness about its presence and significance. It occurs within the Cabaneros National Park in Spain. Some localities are part of the Natura 2000 network. Research is required on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166513,149166511,Platycheirus nigrofemoratus,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This species can be found in the tundra habitat of northern Europe, and is considered rare in Europe and the EU 27. Its habitat is considered to be in decline due to the impacts of climate change, and therefore its population is also suspected to be in decline. In Europe its area of occupancy (AOO) is only 124 km2, while in the EU 27 this is only 112 km2. There is a projected decline in AOO and EOO, but the population is not deemed not to be severely fragmented and so the species is assessed as Near Threatened in Europe and the EU 27.

Research is needed on its population size, habitat, threats, potential conservation actions and ecology/biology (particularly the developmental stages). Monitoring of the population and habitat is also required.
","This species occurs in open ground alongside river banks in tundra (Nielsen 1999). The adults have been recorded visiting flowers of Caltha palustris and Ranunculus spp (Nielsen 1999). The larval and pupal stages are unknown, but the larvae should be aphidophagous.",The main threat to this species is habitat degradation/loss as a result of the impacts of climate change on tundra habitats.,"There are no data on population size for this species because of the limited number of records, but it is probably very rare; it is only found in tundra, making it very specialised and restricted. The most recent records are from Finland (2017), Sweden (2014) and Norway (1982). The record from Karelia in European Russia has no year of record. The population is fragmented but is not considered severely fragmented.

Based on habitat degradation, there is a suspected decline in its population in Europe and the EU27, but there are no direct data to confirm this.

",Decreasing,"This species occurs in northern Europe, including northern Norway, northern Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009), northern Finland (Nielsen 1999, Haarto and Kerppola 2014) and northern European Russia (Karelia). Outside Europe it can be found in the Altai mountains (south-east Siberia) (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Alaska and northern Canada (Vockeroth 1992, Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in Europe and the EU 27, but the area of occupancy (AOO) is calculated to be only 124 km2 in Europe and 112 km2 in the EU27.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions known to be taking place for this species. Research is needed on its population size, habitat, threats, potential conservation actions and ecology/biology (particularly the developmental stages). Monitoring of the population and habitat is also required.

It appears as Least Concern in the national Red Lists of Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020) and Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166533,149166531,Platycheirus nielseni,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species can be found from the United Kingdom, across Scandinavia and into European Russia. The population trend is unknown overall in Europe and the EU 27. It exists in a variety of open woodland habitats and alongside streams and creeks. Its exact distribution in all countries is not yet completely known, but its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are thought to be far greater than the thresholds to be considered for any threatened category. It is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27. Monitoring of its population and habitat is needed, and further research on its biology, ecology, and threats is needed.","This species occurs in open ground of forests and along brooks in open conifer forests (humid Pinus, Abies, Picea) and Betula woodland (Speight et al. 2018). It can also be found beside scrub-fringed streams in montane and alpine pastures up to 2000 metres above sea level in the Alps. In Ireland, it is essentially an upland species, found where Betula/Salix scrub is present in oligotrophic Molinia grassland and moorland or partially-reclaimed blanket bog, especially alongside streams.

The adults are known to visit flowers of Aegopodium, Anthriscus, Barbarea vulgaris, Caltha palustris, Cirsium arvense, Geranium sylvaticum, Ranunculus and Senecio (Falk and Stubbs 1991). The larval and pupal stages are unknown, but the larvae should be aphidophagous.","Climate change can result in habitat loss in mountain alpine pastures where this species resides. Additionally, modification of brooks and small rivers can result in changes of the natural hydrological structures and systems, which could affect it. Unsustainable grazing and intensification of grazing by livestock can also impact its habitat.","This species appears to be absent from many lowland areas, and although not frequent, it is also not considered threatened (Speight 2018, 2020). It has a somewhat fragmented distribution in most of Europe, except the northern part of its range.

The subpopulations in Ireland and the United Kingdom are considered to be stable. Overall, it is considered a low-density species likely to have a stable population, based on its habitat, but the population trend is currently unknown for Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,"This species can be found from Fennoscandia (Nielsen 1999, Bartsch et al. 2009, Hyvärinen et al. 2019) south to northern France (Speight et al. 2018), and from Ireland (Ball and Morris 2014) and the UK (Stubbs and Falk 2002) eastwards through northern and central Europe (including northern Italy, the central Alps, Germany [Röder 1990]) and into European parts of Russia (Karelia) (Mutin and Barkalov 1999, Barkalov and Mutin 2018) and Ukraine: there is one record from Austria (Heimburg 2018). Outside Europe, it is found in Siberia and the Russian Far East, Alaska, throughout much of Canada and south through the Rocky mountains to Colorado (Vockeroth 1992, Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019).

Its exact distribution in all countries is not yet completely known, but its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are considered far greater than the thresholds to be considered for any threatened category.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation action for this species, but reduction of intensive grazing and restoration of natural stream hydrology would benefit it. Monitoring of its population and habitat is needed, and further research on its biology, ecology, and threats is needed.

It has been assessed as Least Concern in the national Red Lists of Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) and Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166544,149166541,Paragus tibialis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is found from southern Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, Belgium south to the Mediterranean and from Britain eastwards through central and southern Europe. The species presence is uncertain in Austria and Sicily and it is considered extinct in the Netherlands. However, the species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States since it has a relatively wide distribution across its range in Europe and because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Intense grazing and clearance of heathland for agriculture, urbanization, and coastal areas development can cause a decline in quality of its habitat. The species prefers open ground, unimproved dry pasture, dry heathland, garrigue, glades in dry Pinus sylvestris forest, and dune grasslands. Resource and habitat protection as well as research on the population size, distribution, trends, life history and ecology is recommended.

","This species prefers open ground, unimproved dry pasture, dry heathland, garrigue, glades in dry Pinus sylvestris forest, and dune grasslands. The adults are known to visit flowers of plants such as Jasione montana, Potentilla, and Salix repens. The flight period is from early May to August, and from April to September in southern Europe. The developmental stages are unknown (Speight 2018), but the larvae must be predators of soft-bodied Homoptera.","Intense grazing and clearance of heathland for agriculture, urbanization and coastal area development has caused a decline in the quality of the habitat of this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There is no information about the population size and trends of this species. Records and literature data indicate it to be common in Europe, but there are a higher number of records in southern Europe than in the northern part (T. Tot pers. comm. 2020). It has not yet been recorded in the Czech Republic or Slovakia. In Germany there are very few records from the northern part of the country. In Belgium, two recent metapopulations have been noted, one in the very south and one in the middle of the country (F. Van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is found from southern Norway, Sweden, Belgium and Denmark south to the Mediterranean, and from southern Britain eastwards through central and southern Europe. Records from Austria are questionable and its presence here is uncertain; Franz (1989) considered that the species occurs in Upper Austria (Salzburg and Styria), but also indicated that he had not examined the male terminalia of the specimens, thus making its identification uncertain. Identification of the species belonging to the subgenus Pandasyopthalmus is dependent primarily on features of the male terminalia, and some females cannot be satisfactorily separated. The presence of this species is also uncertain on Sicily, because it is based on literature data. It has disappeared from the Netherlands and is considered extinct there because the last record was from 1973 (Reemer et al. 2009). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, the species is recorded from Turkey and Israel (Speight 2018). Records from North America are questionable and they are most likely refer to Paragus haemorrhous.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. In Germany it is listed as Endangered (EN) (Symank et al. 2011), and in the United Kingdom as Near Threatened (NT) (Ball and Morris 2014). It has disappeared in the Netherlands, where it is considered to be Regionally Extinct. Its presence is uncertain in Austria. Resource and habitat protection as well as research on the population size, distribution, trends, life history and ecology is recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166554,149166552,Platycheirus neoperpallidus,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-01-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

This species has been recently described and taxonomically split from its sister species Platycheirus perpallidus. It is currently only confirmed to occur in Ireland, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, and its presence in Germany requires verification. There is no knowledge about its population trend, habitat needs or threats, although it is considered rarer than Platycheirus perpallidus. Urgent research and monitoring is needed on its distribution, population trends, habitat, ecology and threats to establish its situation. This species is therefore assessed as Data Deficient (DD) in Europe and the EU 27.
","The exact habitat of this species is unknown due to its recent taxonomic split from Platycheirus perpallidus, but it is assumed to occur in wetland habitats.",The threats to this species are unknown due to lack of knowledge.,"The population trend of this species is unknown, but it seems to be rarer in Europe than its sister species Platycheirus perpallidus.",Unknown,"The European range of this species is largely unknown because it was only recently split from Platycheirus perpallidus (Young et al. 2016). At present, its is confirmed to occur in Ireland, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands (Young et al. 2016), and its presence in Germany needs confirmation. Re-identification of all material formerly identified as Platycheirus perpallidus in European collections is needed, but it is clearly rarer than Platycheirus perpallidus.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) cannot be accurately calculated at this time due to lack of specific locality data, and due to the uncertainty of its true distribution.

Outside Europe, it is known to occur in Canada (Alberta, British Columbia, Northwest Territories, Ontario, Quebec, Saskatchewan, Yukon Territory) and the USA (Alaska, Colorado, Utah) (Young et al. 2016).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions being taken for this species, but urgent research is needed to understand its distribution, population trends, habitat, ecology and threats. The population should also be monitored once the true distribution has been established.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166564,149166562,Paragus strigatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is recorded in France, Italy, Malta, Portugal, Spain, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria and the European part of Russia. The species is assessed as Least Concern because of its relatively large range and because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The preferred environment for the species is open ground scrub cultures, hedgehog heath, and small open areas in maquis and along the edges of fields and olive orchards. The species is generally considered unthreatened across Europe, although certain threats influence some of the subpopulations of this species. Potential threats for the species are the degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to human activities such as tourism and agriculture, but the population remains stable. Research on life history and ecology and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required.

","The preferred environment for this species is open ground scrub cultures, hedgehog heath, and small open areas in maquis and along the edges of fields and olive orchards. Adults fly among and through tall ground vegetation. They are known to visit flowers of Chamaemelum, Leucanthemopsis, Rubus, umbellifers (Carles-Tolrá 2006) and Euphorbia. The flight period is from April to September. The larva is zoophagous, hunting other invertebrates. The developmental stages have not been described yet (Speight 2018).","

This species is affected by the loss of habitat quality in some parts of its range due to tourism and agriculture (mainly wood plantations), but these threats do not influence the entire population, which remains stable. As the species is found in artificial areas, such as olive orchards, it seems that it is tolerant to human interventions in its habitat (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

","

There is no known information about the population size of this species, but the population is presumed to be stable, based on observations from the field (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). It is very abundant in the Mediterranean zone, but is widely distributed and recorded in many surveys from across Europe (T. Tot pers. comm. 2019).

",Stable,"

Within the European region, this species is recorded from Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Malta, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Bulgaria and European Russia (Speight et al. 2015, Speight 2018). In some publications it has also been reported to occur in Ukraine, but these specimens have proven to be of Paragus oltenicus (G. Popov pers. comm. 2019). Records from the Balkan Peninsula (Speight 2018) are also not valid. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside Europe, the species occurs in Morocco, and there are unconfirmed records from Kirghizia, Tajikistan and Mongolia known only from the literature (Sorokina 2009).

",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation activities for this species, and no conservation actions are required at the moment. It is considered unthreatened across Europe (Speight et al. 2015), although certain threats influence some of the subpopulations of this species. It has been recorded in some Natura 2000 areas, such as in the Danube Delta in Romania (European Environment Agency 2020). Research is required on the life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends. Taxonomic research to solve confusion with Paragus oltenicus is also required.


",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166577,149166574,Platycheirus naso,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a northern European species that occurs in a variety of forest, scrubland and wetland habitats. Most of its habitats are not currently threatened but could experience decline in the future as a result of climate change, which should be monitored. The population is considered stable, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27. This species is therefore assessed as Least Concern (LC) in both Europe and the EU27. Research on its population trends and threats are recommended.","This species occurs in taiga, sub-alpine Betula forest and dwarf-scrub tundra (Bartsch and Nielsen in Speight 2018) and palsa mires (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). The adults visit flowers of Geranium sylvaticum, Rubus chamaemorus, Ranunculus acris, Epilobium angustifolium, Apiaceae and Asteraceae (Taraxacum and Tanacetum) (Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkalov 2012, Nielsen 1998). The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","There are no major threats to this species known. In the future, climate change could threaten its habitat and result in partial loss of bog systems. In the European Red List of Habitats, its habitats of shrub tundra (F1.1), boreal mountain Betula and Populus tremula woodland on mineral soils (G1.9a) and Pinus sylvestris taiga woodland (G3.B) have been assessed as Least Concern. Picea taiga woodland (G3.A) has been assessed as Near Threatened, while the declining palsa mire (D3.1) is assessed as Critically Endangered (Janssen et al. 2017) - but this represents only a small proportion of its habitats.","The population of this species seems to be largely stable, based on fairly regularly survey efforts, and its habitats are widespread in northern Europe.",Stable,"This is a northern European species found in Fennoscandia (Speight 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27.

Outside Europe, it is found in the high-mountain ranges of the Altai in Russia (Speight 2018) and the Nearctic Region, from Alaska to Colorado (Young et al. 2016).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,There are no conservation actions known to be under way for this species. Research on its population trends and threats is recommended. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is also recommended. It is not currently listed in any Red Lists of European countries.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166587,149166585,Paragus sexarcuatus,Vulnerable,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

The presence of the species has been confirmed only on two Mediterranean islands: Corsica and Sardinia. The species prefers sparsely-vegetated, semi-arid areas. This European endemic species is assessed as Vulnerable since it has a restricted geographic range with an extent of occurrence (EOO) of 15,422 km2, an area of occupancy (AOO) estimated to be 32 km2, is found at six locations, and has a continuing decline in the extent and quality of the its habitat due to unintentional fires, overgrazing, and the development of ski resorts. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of the population trends are required. Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection is recommended.

","This species prefers open ground, sparsely-vegetated, and semi-arid ground vegetated mostly by low-growing ruderals (Speight 2018). The larvae are predators, mostly of soft-bodied Homoptera, but the developmental stages have not been described yet (Speight 2018).","

Due to unintentional fires and overgrazing, there has been an observed decline in the quality of the habitat of this species. Permanent damage to the habitat is caused by commercial and industrial areas, as well as the development of ski resorts on Corsica (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

","

There is no information about the population trend of this species. It is rare, with only a very low number of records. Most records are from the last century, but there is one male specimen found in Corsica in 2017, the most recent data (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is known with certainty only from France (Corsica) and Italy (Sardinia). There is a very old record for Sicily, referable to Bezzi's (1926) records (D. Sommaggio pers.comm. 2020). It occurs in six locations with an area of occupancy (AOO) estimated to be 32 km2, and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of 15,422 km2.  It is found between 16 and 1,215 m above sea level.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far; however, site/area as well as resource and habitat protection is recommended, and confirmation of the record from Sicily is required. Research is required on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population trends. The species occurs in a few Natura 2000 sites, such as at Capu Rossu, Scandola, Revellata, Calvi and Massif montagneux du Cinto, Monte d'Oro/Vizzavona on Corsica and Monti del Gennargentu and Monte Linas - Marganai on Sardinia (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149166597,149166595,Platycheirus muelleri,Endangered,B2ab(ii),2021,2020-03-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This EU 27 endemic has a severely fragmented distribution in the mountains of the Mediterranean region. It occurs in mesophilous Fagus forest, and (in the Pyrenees) upwards to the Pinus uncinata zone. Most recent records are from the Pyrenees in the western Mediterranean, while new data in the eastern Rhodopes are scarce. Speight et al. (2016) suggest a decline in Europe, but so far the extent of occurrence (EOO) has not changed significantly. There is however a risk that some of its isolated populations may vanish in the future (e.g. the island subpopulations of Corsica or Sardinia, or in the Eastern Rhodopes), and therefore it could quickly become highly threatened and needs careful attention and additional research. The habitats are considered to be in decline (assessed as Near Threatened in the European Red List of Habitats) and the area of occupancy (AOO) is between 24 and 28 km2. Therefore, this species is assessed as Endangered (ENB2ab(ii)) in Europe and the EU 27.

Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends and threats as well as on its life history (especially larvae) and ecology. Monitoring of its population trends and habitat is required.","This species exists in mesophilous Fagus forest, and (in the Pyrenees) upwards to the Pinus uncinata zone (Speight 2018). Males hover over tracks or in open areas in woodland, or settle on low-growing track-side plants. The adults have been observed visiting flowers of Hypericum spp. and Sorbus spp. (Speight 2018). The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","The threats to this species are largely unknown, and may differ in the widely separated parts of its distribution. Its habitats such as Fagus woodlands on non-acid and acid soils (G1.6a, G1.6b) and Pinus unicinata woodland (G3.2b) are assessed as Near Threatened in the European Red List of Habitats (Janssen et al. 2017), with some decline in the past.","This species has small isolated populations in Mediterranean mountain ranges, with a low number of records and usually only single individuals found. Therefore the population can be considered severely fragmented. There are no precise data available on its population trends, but from the slight decline in the extent of suitable habitat it can be inferred that there has been a population decline. Most recent records are from the Pyrenees in the western part of the Mediterranean, while new data in the Eastern Rhodopes are scarce. Speight et al. (2016) suggest a decline of this species in Europe, but so far the extent of occurrence (EOO) has not changed significantly. There is a risk that some of the isolated populations may vanish in future, such as the island subpopulations in Corsica and Sardinia, or in the Eastern Rhodopes.",Decreasing,"This European endemic species is known to occur in France (the eastern Pyrenees, southeastern mainland and Corsica), Italy (Sardnina and the north-eastern peninsula (Kehlmaier 2010, Speight et al. 2018), and Greece in the eastern Rhodope mountains (Vujić et al. 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is very large, but the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 24 - 28 km2.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"No specific conservation measures for the species exist. Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends and threats as well as on its life history (especially larvae) and ecology. Monitoring of its population trends and habitat is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149166609,149166605,Paragus quadrifasciatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is a widespread Mediterranean species, extending its range to Latvia, European part of Russia, European Turkey, and reaching the Netherlands in Europe. The species prefers open, dry, warm biotopes, such as grasslands, and ruderal areas. In southern Europe it is often found in agricultural areas. The species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) for Europe and the EU27 Member States since it has a large range and because of the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Intensive logging and agriculture as well as coastal tourism development in the Mediterranean area may cause a decline in the quality of the species' habitat. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends as well as the monitoring of the population trends are required. Resource and habitat protection is recommended.

","This species prefers open ground in forests, dry, unimproved, sparsely-vegetated grassland with or without dry scrub, and open Quercus ilex and Quercus suber forest. The adults are known to visit Asteraceae and umbellifer flowers. The flight period is from May to September (Speight 2018). The larva was described by Goeldlin (1974). Dussaix (2013) recorded the duration of the puparial phase as 8-20 days. The larvae are predators, mostly of soft-bodied Homoptera.",Intensive logging and agriculture as well as coastal tourism development in the Mediterranean area may cause a decline in the quality of the habitat of this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).,"There is no information about the population size of this species, but its population trend is presumably stable, based on collected and published records (T. Tot pers. obs. 2020).",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is found from northern France south to the Mediterranean, and from Portugal eastwards through southern and central Europe to Romania, Greece, European Turkey and European parts of Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside Europe, it is found in North Africa, Iran and the Caucasus Mountains, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and further east to northern China, Korea and Japan (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions for this species so far; however, resource and habitat protection is needed. In the Czech Republic the species is listed as Vulnerable (VU) (Farkač et al. 2005), and in Germany it is listed as Least Concern (LC) (Ssymank et al. 2011). Research is required on the population size, distribution and trends in distribution, as well as monitoring of population trends. Some of its localities occur within Natura 2000 sites, for instance at Karla – Mavrovouni – Kefalovryso Velestinou – Neochori, Dikti – Oropedio Lasithiou, Katharo, Selena, Selakano, Chalasmeni Koryfi, Notio Dasiko Symplegma Evrou, and Kolpos Kallonis Kai Chersaia Paraktia Zoni in Greece; Srednjedalmatinski otoci i Pelješac and Zaleđe Trogira in Croati, and Mlaștina Satchinez in Romania (European Environment Agency 2020). It also occurs in the Pindus National Park in Greece; National Parks Skadarsko jezero and Lovćen in Montenegro; and Special Nature Reserve Pašnjaci velike droplje and National Park Fruška Gora in Serbia.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166617,149166607,Platycheirus modestus,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

Within Europe, this species has been recorded just once in northern Finland, despite ongoing Platycheirus surveys in northern Finland and other parts of Scandinavia. It is suspected to be a relict in Europe, with a very small area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) of 4 km2. It occurs in just one location, and as a wetland specialist there is a continuing decline in the quality and quantity of its habitat, the case across Europe for wetland habitats. Increased research is clearly needed into its European ecology and population trend, and to understand its threats better. Despite this, based on current knowledge it is appropriate to assess this species as Critically Endangered in Europe and the EU 27.","This is a wetland species, known to occur in “marshes, fens, and other low, wet areas” (Young et al. 2016) in the Nearctic, although there is no information on its specific habitat needs in Europe (Speight 2018). There are no records of flower visits, and the larval biology is unknown but is presumed to be aphidophagous.","Knowledge on the ecology of this species relies on data from outside Europe, making it difficult to assess the threats. However, based on knowledge that this is a wetland species, it is possible that it is threatened by changes in the hydrology of wetland habitats, and pollution that affects marshes and fens. From its northern distribution, climate change is assumed also to be a threat. The situation in Europe needs more research.","There is only one subpopulation of this species known to exist in Europe, in Finland, with a single record from 2008 (Haarto 2014b). It is considered to be very rare, and despite surveys for other Platycheirus in northern Finland, it has not been found in any other localities. There are no other data available about this species, and so the population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"In Europe, this species is only present in northern Finland. The European population in Finland could possibly be a relict subpopulation from a previously connected population across the Holarctic.

Because the species is found in only one locality, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are only 4 km2. The known EOO is actually highly restricted (<1 km²) but is increased to 4 km2 here in order to equal the AOO.

Outside Europe, it is found in Alaska, Maine and New Hampshire in the United States, and also in Canada (Young et al. 2016). It is regularly collected in North America within its range.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"No specific conservation measures for this species are known. Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends and threats as well as on its life history and ecology. Monitoring of its population trends is necessary. In the Finnish Red List (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) it is listed as Data Deficient.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166629,149166625,Platycheirus meridimontanus,Critically Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Only two single males have been recorded in Europe, both in North Macedonia in 1959 and 1960, and it does not seem likely to occur in many other localities. Since that time, it has not been observed again, although no specific surveys have taken place to look for it in recent years. It is currently unclear whether the subpopulations still remain in the mountains of North Macedonia, and research is urgently needed to clarify whether this species is still extant in Europe. Due to the very restricted number of subpopulations, extremely low number of specimens known, an area of occupancy (AOO) of only 4 km2, only one location where the species is likely to still exist, and the observed decline in habitat quality, this species is assessed as Critically Endangered (Possibly Regionally Extinct) in Europe. In the EU 27, it is assessed as Not Applicable because it is not known ever to have occurred in the region. Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends and threats as well as on its life history and ecology. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is necessary.","Although in the montane zone, the habitat of this species is insufficiently understood (Speight 2018) and is suspected to be associated with water bodies (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). No visits to flowers have been recorded. The adult flight period is from the end of May until the end of June. The larvae are undescribed, but are presumably aphidophagous. The records from North Macedonia were collected between 900 and 1,400 m asl. It is a high-mountain species with a short flight period.","The threats to this species are largely unknown due to lack of knowledge of its habitat and biology. As with other closely related aphidophagous species of this group, it can be assumed to be sensitive to herbicides and pesticides, and as a Mediterranean montane species it is also potentially affected by climate change. Infrastructure development (ski and mountain resorts) is suspected to have impacted its subpopulation in the southern locality, where is is now possibly extinct.",There is no information on population size and trend.,Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is only known from two records in northwestern (Mavrovo Lake) and southwestern (Lake Prespa) North Macedonia. Both localities are considered possibly extinct. The European area of occupancy (AOO) is 4 km2, considering the southern locality to be extirpated.

Only two male specimens of this species are known from two different localities in North Macedonia, and since 1960 there has not been a single observation, although no extensive search has been carried out recently in these localities. It is likely that the Lake Prespa subpopulation is extinct due to severe land-use changes and infrastructure development in the last 50 years (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020) but further research is needed to confirm the absence of the species at both known localities and in suitable habitat between these two areas.

Outside Europe, it is known from Lebanon (Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be traded or utilised.,Terrestrial,"No specific conservation measures exist for this species, and due to a lack of habitat and biological data, it is not possible to say which conservation measures are needed. Research is urgently needed to fill these gaps, and also on its population size, current presence and distribution in Europe, trends and threats as well as its life history and ecology. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is necessary.",Palearctic,1960,TRUE,FALSE,Europe 149166637,149166626,Paragus pecchiolii,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is considered common and is widely distributed across Europe. The species prefers different habitat types such as wet forests, open, dry herbaceous vegetation, calcareous grassland, roadsides, and vegetable gardens. The species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) because of its relatively large range and because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of the species in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. However, clearance of heathland for agriculture and intensive logging may cause habitat loss of this species. Resource and habitat protection is recommended and research on the population size, distribution and trends and the monitoring of the population trends are required.

","This species occurs in a wide range of biotopes, such as in deciduous woodland and overgrown dune slacks, on low grassy vegetation at the edges of marshes and, further south, in garrigue, Evergreen Oak (Quercus ilex) forest and dry grassland. It may also occur in vegetable gardens. The adults are known to visit flowers such as umbellifers, spurge (Euphorbia), bedstraw (Galium), mayweed (Matricaria), Common Tormentil (Potentilla erecta), chickweeds (Stellaria), thyme (Thymus), starflower (Trientalis) and speedwells (Veronica). The flight period is from May to September, and in southern Europe from the end of March to October (Speight 2018). The larva was described by Goeldlin (1974), who found larvae on Fabaceae, Common Ivy (Hedera) and Prunus. The larvae are predators mostly of soft-bodied Homoptera.",Clearing of heathland for agriculture and intensive logging may cause a decline in the quality of the habitat of this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).,"The population trend of this species is presumed to be stable; it is common (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). Although widely distributed in Europe, it is scarce in in the Netherlands with no apparent long-term trends (Reemer et al. 2009).",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is found from southern Norway and Denmark, south to Spain and most of the Mediterranean islands, and from northern France eastwards through central Europe to the Balkan Peninsula and into European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside Europe, it is also found in North Africa and Turkey (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far, but resource and habitat protection is recommended. In Germany and Sweden the species is listed as Least Concern (LC) (Ssymank et al. 2011), while in the Czech Republic it is listed as Vulnerable (VU) (Farkač et al. 2005). Some localities occur within Natura 2000 sites such as at Otok Cres in Croatia and Oros Ossa, Samos Oros Ampelos, Lesvos Kolpos Geras, Elos Ntipi Kai Oros Olympos – Potamos Evergetoulas, and Ethnikos Drymos Vikou - Aoou in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020). It is also found in the Fruška Gora and Đerdap National Parks, Special Nature Reserves Obedska bara and Pašnjaci velike droplje in Serbia, and the Skadarsko jezero and Durmitor National Parks in Montenegro. Research is required on the population size, distribution and trends in distribution, and the monitoring of population trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166648,149166645,Platycheirus melanopsis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species can be found in the mountainous regions of the United Kingdom and the Alps, but it is believed to have a wider distribution than is currently understood. In Serbia and Bulgaria, it is suspected to be declining because of habitat deterioration resulting from skiing tourism in the region, but in the Alps the subpopulation is considered stable. Overall the population trend is unknown in Europe and the EU 27. It occurs in unimproved montane grasslands on calcareous rock, usually within open forests or scrubs of Picea, Betula, Juniperus and Pinus mugo. It can also be found in open unimproved alpine grasslands up to 2700 metres in the Alps. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27. This species is therefore assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and the EU 27.

Research on its biology and population size as well as further monitoring of its population and habitat are required.","This species occurs in unimproved montane grasslands on calcareous rock, usually within open forests or scrubs of Picea, Betula, Juniperus and Pinus mugo. It can also be found in open unimproved alpine grasslands up to 2700 metres in the Alps (Speight 2018, 2020). In the United Kingdom, it is a montane species that occurs at altitudes in excess of 250 to 300 metres above sea level (Ball and Morris 2014).

The adults are in flight in June/July and July/August in higher altitudes. They have been recorded visiting flowers of Androsace, Bellidiastrum, Calamintha, Cerastium, Cirsium, Convolvulus, Crepis, Gypsophila, Helianthemum, Hornungia, Minuartia, Pinguicula, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus and Rhododendron ferrugineum.

The larvae were described by Rotheray (1997) from puparia and a larva found on Vaccinium and Blechnum; larvae have also been found among aphid colonies on Cirsium in alpine grassland (Goeldlin pers. comm. 2020).","This montane species is possibly affected by the impacts of climate change on its habitat. Commercial afforestation and drainage are further and more immediate threats in the United Kingdom (Scotland) (Ball and Morris 2014), resulting in shrub development that might not be suitable. Loss of vegetation cover and soil erosion can also result in declines in the population in the UK (Ball and Morris 2014), but also in the Alps.

Outside the UK, this species is usually found above the forestry zone. In Serbia and Bulgaria, infrastructure development for skiing tourism is likely to be the main threat. Overgrazing of grasslands could be problematic in the Alps if there is an intensification of grazing.","The population is restricted to high-altitude areas, but it is likely to be more widely distributed than current records suggest (Ball and Morris 2014). As a result of infrastructure development in the high mountains of Serbia and Bulgaria (e.g. for skiing tourism), it is now very rare and declining in these areas. In the Alps, it is probably relatively frequent, and there is no major habitat loss. As there are differences between the areas where it occurs, its population trend for Europe and the EU 27 is unknown.",Unknown,"This species can be found from the United Kingdom (northern Scotland and northern England: Stubbs and Falk 2002, Ball and Morris 2014) to the Alps and the Pyrenees, Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), Austria (Heimburg 2018), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Bulgaria and into European parts of Russia. Outside Europe, it can be found across Russia into the Russian Far East (Mutin and Barkalov 1999). This species is generally found at elevations above 1500 metres above sea level, but it is found at much lower altitudes in the UK (Stubbs and Falk 2002).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, but cannot be calculated accurately because part of its distribution is based on country checklists rather than exact locality data.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"Maintaining sustainable grazing management and limiting tourism pressure to popular mountains is key in order to avoid soil erosion. Further research on its biology and population size as well as monitoring of its population and habitat are required.

In the United Kingdom, this species has been assessed as Near Threatened.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166657,149166647,Paragus medeae,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

The species, which is endemic to the EU 27, is found in Hungary and Romania. The species is a typical inhabitant of sand dunes. It is assessed as Endangered because of its restricted extent of occurrence (EOO) of 4,567 km2 and an area of occupancy (AOO) of 16 km2, the fact that it is found in only two locations, and because it has a continuing decline of habitat quality due to deforestation which causes sand erosion. The species would benefit from conservation actions such as site/area as well as resource and habitat protection and education and awareness. Further research on the species' population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of its population and habitat trends is necessary. 

","This species prefers inland estuarine sand dunes (Stanescu 1992). It is found flying from June to September (Speight 2018). The larva is presumably aphidophagous, just like other congeneric species.","Deforestation, which intensifies the process of sand erosion, is considered to be the main threat to this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).",There is no information about the population size and trends of this species. It is known only from a small number of specimens (T. Tot pers. comm. 2019).,Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is known from two point localities in eastern Romania (Stanescu 1992) and two 10x10 km grid cells in central Hungary (Ócsa, close to Budapest; Tóth 2011). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 4,567 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) around 16 km2. It has been found between one and 101 m above sea level, at two locations.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. It would benefit from conservation actions, such as site/area as well as resource and habitat protection, and education and awareness. Further research is necessary on its population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of its population and habitat trends. It is found in the Danube Delta Biosphere reserve in Romania.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166668,149166665,Platycheirus manicatus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread species with many records across Europe, where it occurs in a variety of wetlands. The population trend seems to be stable in Europe and the EU 27, but the decline of its habitat may affect it in the future. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. It is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and the EU 27. Monitoring of its population and habitat is necessary, as well as further research on its distribution and threats.","This species occurs in open wetlands such as fens, unimproved montane and alpine grasslands and humid unimproved grasslands (to above 2000 m in the Alps). It can also be found beside streams and rivers in open country (including moorland) and taiga (Tóth 2011, Ball and Morris 2013, Speight 2018).

The adults are in flight between May and September, with peaks in June and August (Tóth 2011). They visit white umbellifers and other flowers such as Allium schoenoprasum, Caltha, Campanula rapunculoides, Cardamine, Chrysanthemum, Cirsium, Filipendula, Glechoma hederacea, Leontodon, Origanum, Ranunculus, Rosa rugosa, Senecio, Stellaria, Succisa, Taraxacum and Veronica (Speight 2018). This species has been observed on more than 25 plant species (A. Ssymank pers. comms. 2020).

The larvae were described and figured by Dixon (1960), Goeldlin (1974) and Rotheray (1986), and are aphidophagous on the aphids of low-growing plants and bushes.","There have been no direct threats to this species noted, but its habitats (such as montane alpine grasslands and wetlands) of this species are vulnerable, and might be threatened due to climate change (drought) and agricultural activities such as water abstraction from wetlands, peat harvesting and soil acidification.","In central Europe the subpopulation of this species is somewhat fragmented, and it seems to be rarer with only a small number of records. There are very limited data on the subpopulations in Mediterranean countries. Overall the population in Europe and the EU 27 is considered stable.",Stable,"This is a very widespread species. It occurs in Iceland, the Faroes (Jensen 2001) and Fennoscandia (Bartsch et al. 2009) south to Iberia and the Mediterranean, and from Ireland eastwards through most of Europe (Aldridge 1984, Ball and Morris 2013, de Buck 1990, Röder 1990, Torp 1994, Vujic and Simic 1994, Tóth 2011, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019) and into European parts of Russia.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, but these cannot be calculated accurately because some of the distribution is based on country checklists rather than exact locality data.

Outside Europe, it occurs in Turkey, North Africa, Kirghizstan, the Caucasus, Siberia and the Russian Far East (from the Urals to Yakutia) (Mutin and Barkalov 1999), Mongolia (Mutin and Barkalov 1999), Alaska in North America (Young et al. 2016) and Greenland (Speight 2018, 2020).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no current specific conservation actions known for this species. However, reducing damaging activities such as abstraction of water would benefit its habitat. Additionally, monitoring of its population and habitat is necessary, as well as further research on its distribution and threats. It has been assessed as Least Concern in the national Red Lists of Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Norway.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166678,149166676,Paragus majoranae,Endangered,"B2ab(iii,v)",2021,2020-04-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is endemic to Europe, with scattered records from northern Spain, east to southern Romana and northern Greece. It is assessed as Endangered because of its small area of occupancy (AOO) of 196 km2 in Europe and 156 km2 in the EU 27, its severely fragmented population as a result of habitat destruction and the existence of only small isolated patches of suitable habitat, and a continuing decline in the quality of habitat due to improper forestry management practices. It is assumed that there is no possibility of interaction between subpopulations found in different patches. In Europe and the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is around 1,668,899 km2. Further research on the species' population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of its population and habitat trends is required.

","The preferred environment for this species is open forest ground, open grassy areas, both humid and semi-arid, along brooks and rivers in warm-dry Oak (Quercus) forest, and upwards through Beech (Fagus) forest into the Spruce (Picea) zone up to 1,500 metres in the Balkan countries. It is largely confined to relict areas of unmodified forest (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). Adults fly among low-growing plants (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). The flight period is from April and May until July and August. The larva is zoophagous, hunting other invertebrates. The developmental stages have not been described yet (Speight 2018).","The main threat to this species is the destruction of deciduous and relict forests, which are in a general decline due to improper management practices in forestry, such as clear cutting (mainly the Balkan Peninsula) and elimination of old trees (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).","There is no information about the population size of this species. All records are older than 20 years, with most dating back to around 30 years ago, and those from Italy, Romania and Spain being more than 40 years old. Thus it is reasonable to assume that it is experiencing a declining population trend. The population is also considered to be severely fragmented as a result of habitat destruction and the existence of only small isolated patches of suitable habitat, with no possibility of interaction between subpopulations found in different patches (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).",Decreasing,"

This species is endemic to Europe, with scattered records from northern Spain, southern and eastern France, Germany, northern Italy, northern Greece, Montenegro, Serbia, North Macedonia, Austria (not mapped), Croatia, and Romania (Vujić et al. 2020, T. Tot pers. comm. 2019). Its area of occupancy (AOO) is 196 km2 in Europe and 156 km2 for the EU 27; in both Europe and the EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is around 1,668,899 km2. It is found from five to 2,124 m above sea level.

",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions in place for this species. Resource and habitat protection are required for its preservation. Further research is required on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends. It is present in some Natura 2000 areas.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166688,149166686,Platycheirus kittilaensis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species occurs in Norway, Sweden, Finland and into northern parts of European Russia (Kola peninsula). It can be found in subarctic Betula forests, dwarf scrub (Salix) tundra, western taiga forests and palsa mires. Its population trend is not known in Europe and the EU 27 due to lack of data, but it is suspected that population is stable. It is assessed as Least Concern in the national Red Lists of Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020) and Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is very large. The area of occupancy (AOO) has been estimated to be 134,997 km2 in Europe and in the EU 27 it is 5,204 km2. This is currently just an estimation because of the lack of precise data, particularly in central Europe, but the values are considered to be greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category, therefore the status of this species is considered to be Least Concern (LC).","This species can be found in subarctic Betula forests, dwarf scrub (Salix) tundra, western taiga forests (Nielsen 1998) and palsa mires (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). The adult flight period is in June and July (Nielsen 1998, Speight 2018) when they have been recorded visiting flowers such as Geranium silvaticum, Caltha, Potentilla erecta (Bartsch et al. 2009), Ranunculus spp., Rubus chamaemorus and Viola biflora (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). The larval stages are unknown.","This species can be affected by loss of quality and extent of habitat due to climate change, especially the palsa mire habitat which is particularly at risk from the melting of permafrost.","The population trend is not known in Europe and the EU 27 due to lack of data, but it is suspected that population is stable.",Unknown,"This species occurs in Norway, Sweden, Finland and into northern parts of European Russia (Kola peninsula). The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is very large. The area of occupancy (AOO) has been estimated to be 134,997 km2 in Europe and in the EU 27 it is 5,204 km2. This is currently just an estimation because of the lack of precise data, particularly in central Europe, but the values are considered to be greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category.

Outside Europe it can be found in Siberia (Altai) (Nielsen 1999, Van Veen 2004, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are currently known to be taking place for this species. Research on its biology (larvae in particular) and ecology, and monitoring of its population trend are required. It has been assessed as Least Concern in the national Red Lists of Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166698,149166696,Paragus glumaci,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species has been recorded in Montenegro, North Macedonia and Greece. The species is found in certain wetlands and in Oak woodlands and it has a very small distribution within Europe. The species is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27 because it has a restricted area of occupancy (AOO) of 24 km2 in Europe and 16 km2 in the EU 27 and is only found at six locations in Europe and at four locations in the EU 27. Furthermore, due to the intensive loss of Oak forests across Europe, a typical habitat for this species, there has been a continuing decline in the extent and quality of the species' habitat. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is around 158,660 km2 in Europe and 55,142 km2 in the EU 27. The species would benefit from site/area as well as resource and habitat protection. This could be aided by increased education and awareness about the species. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends is recommended. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from subpopulations outside the assessment region.

","This species prefers open ground and wetlands, seasonally-flooded coastal grassland and sub-Mediterranean lake shores near thermophilous oak forests and maquis (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). As a larva it is thought that this species hunts and feeds on aphids, like others in this genus.","The main threat to this species is the disappearance of its habitat, due to the destruction of oak forests across Europe (Thomas 2008). Furthermore, most of the remaining habitat is in small and scattered patches, limiting the ability of the species to make the movements important for sustaining populations. Oak forests have been exposed to intense human pressure over the last 2000 years with constant felling (Mansourian et al. 2013). This has resulted in overt destruction, size reductions and fragmentation of these forests, as well as promoting edge effects (Robinson et al. 1995). Residential and tourism development and recreational activities are additional disturbance factors for this species.",The population size and trend for this species is unknown. Very few individuals (not more than 20) have been found on the European continent (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).,Unknown,"Within the European region, this species has been recorded from a small number of localities in Montenegro, North Macedonia (Speight 2020) and Greece (Lesvos (Vujić et al. 2020), Zakynthos and Thasos (unpublished data). The area of occupancy (AOO) is 24 km2 in Europe and 16 km2 for the EU 27. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is around 158,660 km2 in Europe and 55,142 km2 in the EU 27. It exists at only six locations in Europe and four locations in EU 27, between three and 229 metres above sea level.

Outside of Europe, it is known from only the Anatolian region of Turkey.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions in place for this species. However, it would benefit from site/area as well as resource and habitat protection. This could be aided by increased education and awareness about the species. Research is recommended on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends. It is found at Dojran lake in Macedonia (a Ramsar Site), as well at Skadar Lake National Park in Montenegro and Skala Kallonis in Lesvos, all part of the Natura 2000 network. Some of the other point localities where the species is found are also part of the Natura 2000 network.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166708,149166706,Platycheirus jaerensis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species can be found in northern and central Europe, where it occurs in a variety of wetland and forest habitats. Its population trend is unknown in Europe and the EU 27. No specific threats are known, but its habitat may be threatened by drought caused by climate change, deforestation and habitat deterioration due pests. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are very large, and the AOO may be even larger due to the lack of precise data, particularly in central Europe. This species is therefore assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and the EU 27.

Research on its biology (particularly of the larvae and pupae), habitat and distribution (especially in central Europe) is recommended. Monitoring of its population trend is also needed.","This species inhabits raised bogs with Vaccinium (especially V. uliginosus or V. myrtillus) and sometimes with Betula/Salix scrub, boreal Pinus forests, Picea/Pinus/Betula mixed forests and in humid grassy areas within Picea forests (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Skevington et al. 2019). The adults are in flight from the end of May till mid June and in July/August in Finland (Haarto and Kerppola 2007). Its temperate forest habitats are not well understood, and its occupation of this habitat type requires confirmation although it is suspected in Germany. Adults are recorded visiting flowers of Geranium sylvaticum, Ranunculus spp., Taraxacum spp. and Vaccinium uliginosum (Speight 2018).

The larval stages are undescribed, but females have been observed ovipositing on the underside of leaves of Vaccinium uliginosus (T.R. Nielsen, Pers. Comm. 2020) and the larvae have been reared through the early stages using aphids as food (Speight 2018).","No specific threats to this species are known, but its habitat may be threatened by drought caused by climate change and deforestation. Another threat to the habitat is bark beetles (Ips typographus), one of the most destructive of the forest pests causing damage to spruce forest (Picea) ecosystems in Europe (de Rigo et al. 2016). Climate change can compound the impacts of bark beetles and therefore pose a threat to the habitat overall.","Records of this species show, that in southern Scandinavia it is widespread, but the Swedish subpopulation is fragmented. It is present in northern Scandinavia but is scarcer here. It seems to occur only in the mountains within central Europe. Its population trend is unknown in Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,"This species can be found in Norway, Sweden, Finland (Nielsen 1999, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Bartsch et al. 2009), Estonia, Latvia, Germany, France (Jura Mountains) (Speight et al. 2018) and Switzerland (Jura Mountains).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27. However due to the lack of precise data, particularly in central Europe, the EOO and AOO can only be estimated, and in fact the AOO may be larger than is currently understood. Countries where there is a lack of precise data have been shown on the map as the whole country.

Outside Europe, it occurs in Alaska and Canada (Vockeroth 1992, Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are currently no conservation actions known for this species. Research on its biology (particularly of the larvae and pupae), habitat and distribution (especially in central Europe) are recommended. Monitoring of its population trend is also needed.  In Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) and Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020), it has been assessed as Least Concern in the national Red Lists.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166718,149166716,Paragus flammeus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is distributed from Belgium southwards through France to central Spain and eastwards through central Europe from Germany, Switzerland, Austria to Ukraine and through southern Europe. This oak woodland species is assessed as Least Concern because of its relatively large range and because its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Despite a decreasing trend in some European countries, the species is considered to be overall unthreatened across Europe (Speight et al. 2015). Threats to this species are degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to overgrazing and unsustainable forestry. Resource and habitat protection is required. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends is needed.

","The preferred environment of the species is at the edge of thermophilous oak forests, and dry/semi-arid unimproved grasslands. The adults fly low among sparse ground vegetation in the grassland habitat, in open areas, and within the oak forests. They are known to visit flowers of Scabiosa (Baugnée 1998). The adult flight period is from the end of May to the end of August. The developmental stages of the species are poorly known, but the larvae are predatory and hunt other invertebrates.","

Although there is a decreasing trend of this species in some parts of its European range, overall it is considered not threatened (Speight et al. 2015). It is affected by loss of habitat quality in some parts of its range due to overgrazing by livestock and unsustainable forestry practices, but these threats do not influence the entire population, which overall remains stable.

","

There is no known information about the population size of this species, but the overall population trend is considered to be stable. However, a decreasing trend is noted in some parts of its European range (Speight et al. 2015).

",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is distributed from Belgium southwards through France to central Spain, and eastwards through central Europe from Germany, Switzerland, Austria to Ukraine and through southern Europe. Its presence in Greece is uncertain (Vujić et al. 2020), as well as in European Russia, based on Barkalov and Mutin (2018), who argue it is doubtful the species is still extant there. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside Europe, it can be found in the Caucasus Mountains, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Iran, China and Morocco (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no current conservation actions in place for this species; however, resource and habitat protection is required. Research is needed on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends. The species is present in some Natura 2000 sites, such as at Fuentes del Narcea, Degaña e Ibias in Spain and Corbières occidentales in France.


",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166728,149166726,Platycheirus immaculatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional experience: Least Concern (LC)

This species lives in the humid forests of southern and central Europe, and its population is considered stable in Europe and the EU 27. It is considered difficult to detect and survey, and so its distribution may be greater than is currently understood. Nevertheless, its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category in Europe and the EU 27, and it is therefore assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and the EU 27.

Research on its biology (particularly larvae), ecology, habitat, distribution range and population trend is required. Monitoring of its population and habitat is also recommended.","This species exists in humid Fagus/Picea forests upwards into the Abies/Picea zone (Nielsen 2014, Speight 2018). The adults are known to visit understory trees that are in flower, but they can also be found flying amongst the herb layer vegetation in the shade (Nielsen 2004): therefore the species is considered difficult to detect (Speight 2018). The adults are known to visit white umbellifers and flowers such as Crataegus, Euphorbia, Salix spp. and Sorbus aucuparia (Speight 2018).

The larval and pupal stages of this species are unknown.","There are no threats currently known to affect this species directly, but deforestation and logging can reduce the size of its habitat. Habitat quality may also deteriorate due to the impacts of climate change, such as droughts, forest fires and increased extreme weather. The other threat to the habitat is bark beetles (Ips typographus), one of the most destructive of the forest pests causing damage to spruce forest (Picea) ecosystems in Europe (de Rigo et al. 2016). This is compounded by the other threats facing this habitat, such as climate change.","This is not a widespread species in Europe compared to some other species, but the population is considered to be stable in Europe and the EU 27. In Germany, it is considered to be rare but not vulnerable.",Stable,"This species is found in central and southern Europe (Nielsen 2014). It is known to occur in central France (Massif Central) (Speight et al. 2018; X. Lair pers. comm. 2020) and eastwards through central Germany (Ssymank 2011) to the Alps (Switzerland, France and northern Italy), Montenegro, Greece (mainland and Crete) and southwestern Bulgaria (Tóth 2014). Occurrence in the European part of Turkey is likely. The map was created according to GBIF (2019) and records and/or data in the literature, which are listed in the references. The AOO for the EU 27 is 85,433 km2, and the EOO is 1,505,831 km2. For the European region, these metrics are 113,742 km2 and 1,817,503 km2, respectively.

It is considered difficult to detect and survey, and so its distribution maybe greater than is currently understood. Nevertheless, its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category.

Outside Europe, it is found in Turkey, the Caucasus, Nepal, the Russian Far East and Japan (Ohara 1980, Mutin and Barkalov 1999).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions currently known for this species. Research on its biology (particularly larvae), ecology, habitat, distribution range and population trend is required. Monitoring of the population and habitat is also recommended. It has not yet been assessed in any European national red lists.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166740,149166736,Paragus constrictus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is considered to be rare and can be found in coastal, limestone and calcium-rich habitats from alpine regions to calcium deposits that can be found near rivers. The species has been assessed as Endangered (EN) in Europe with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 236 km2 and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 5,700,000 km2. In the EU 27 it has an area of occupancy (AOO) assessed to be 144 km2 and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of 5,022,155 km2. The species' population is considered to be severely fragmented in Europe and the EU 27 and due to intensive grazing and coastal development there is a continuing decline in the quality of suitable habitat. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat of this species is required. Resource and habitat protection are conservation actions required for the species. In Germany the species is listed as Data Deficient (DD) and in Sweden it is listed as Vulnerable (VU).

","The species prefers open ground, areas of thinly vegetated rocky limestone, river margins and other aquatic areas that have calcareous deposits present, unimproved alpine pastures, and coastal dune systems. The adults can be found visiting white umbellifers such as Crithmum maritimum, Potentilla erecta, Potentilla fruticosa and Ranunculus. The flight period is between May and July/August. The developmental stages have not been described yet (Speight 2018), but the larvae are predators feeding mostly on aphids and other Homoptera. ","This species is threatened by intensive grazing of its habitat by livestock, and by tourism and recreational activities (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). Additionally, in Ireland and part of its northern European range, coastal development and sea level rise resulting from climate change is causing destruction in the quality of its habitat.","The population size and trend of this species are unknown, but it is a very rare species in both Europe and the EU 27.  There are more records in the northern part of Europe than in the southern part. Records from the Balkan Peninsula are very scarce and old (T. Tot pers. comm. 2020). The population is considered to be severely fragmented because many subpopulations are small and isolated.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from the southern parts of the Scandinavia countries, Ireland, Spain, France and across Central and Eastern Europe to the Crimean Peninsula in Ukraine. In Europe and the EU 27, its range is considered to be severely fragmented. In some countries the records are relatively old, such as in Serbia and Montenegro where the species was last observed in 1997 (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020), in Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1983 (Šimić 1986) and in North Macedonia in 1996 (Krpač et al. 2011). In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 236 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) about 5,700,000 km2. In the EU 27 the area of occupancy (AOO) is assessed to be 144 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) about 5,022,155 km2. The species can be found between one and 2,000 m above sea level.

Outside Europe, it has also been recorded in Turkey and Russia (Speight 2018).",This species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions in place for this species. In Germany it is listed as Data Deficient (DD) (Ssymank et al. 2011) and in Sweden as Vulnerable (VU) (Artsdatabanken 2010). Research is required on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends. Resource and habitat protection are required conservation actions. Some localities occur within Natura 2000 sites, such as at Black Head-Poulsallagh Complex SAC and East Burren Complex SAC in Ireland; Holtemmen, Højsande og Nordmarken, and Rømø in Denmark; Verkeåns dalgång in Sweden; Haut Giffre and Plateau d'Emparis - Goleon in France and Rodopi - Sredni in Bulgaria (European Environment Agency 2020). It is also found in the Durmitor National Park in Montenegro.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166748,149166738,Platycheirus groenlandicus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species can be found across the most northern parts of Europe, including much of central and northern Scandinavia and into European Russia. It is restricted to arctic and boreal habitats such as subalpine Betula forest and dwarf Betula/Salix scrub tundra, which are currently unthreatened but may experience decline as a result of climate change in the future. There is no evidence of a significant decline, nor is it listed as threatened in any national Red List in Europe. Its population is considered stable, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category in both Europe and the EU 27. This species is therefore assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and the EU 27.

Research is needed on its population size, distribution and trends as well as on its life history (especially the larvae) and ecology. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required.","This species is found in subalpine Betula forest and dwarf Betula/Salix scrub tundra (Nielsen 1972). It is also found open areas in taiga (Speight 2018) and palsa mire (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). The adults have been recorded visiting the flowers of Dryas, Sanguisorba (Barkalov 2012), Ranunculus, Salix, Sedum (Nielsen 1972), Rhodiola rosea (Bartsch et al. 2009) and Rubus chamaemorus (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","There are no known immediate threats to this species. It may be potentially threatened by climate change in the future, because it exclusively inhabits northern European terrestrial habitats, mainly taiga and tundra. A small proportion of its habitats are currently in decline (palsa mire), but this has little influence on its overall range and distribution. The large majority of its habitats such as shrub tundra (F1.1), subarctic and alpine dwarf Salix scrub (F2.1) and boreal mountain Betula and Populus tremula woodland on mineral soils (G1.9a), are assessed as Least Concern in the European Red List of Habitats (Janssen et al. 2017). Only palsa mire habitats have been assessed as Critically Endangered.","This species is considered to have a fairly stable population in Europe and the EU 27, because its habitats in northern Europe are abundant and not currently threatened.",Stable,"This species can be found across the most northern parts of Europe, including much of central and northern Scandinavia and into European Russia.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are greater than the thresholds to be considered in amy threatened category in both Europe and the EU 27.

Outside Europe, it can be found across Russia into Asia and the Russian Far East, Greenland, Canada and Alaska (Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"Currently there are no conservation actions needed or in place. In the Red Lists of Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), Norway (Gammelmo et al. 2015) and Sweden (SLU ArtaDatenbanken 2020) it has been assessed as Least Concern. Research is needed on its population size, distribution and trends as well as on its life history (especially the larvae) and ecology. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166761,149166756,Platycheirus fulviventris,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread species both in and outside Europe, occurring in mostly wetland habitat types. It has many records in Europe and the EU 27, and the population trend seems generally to be stable in both assessment regions. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27.

More sustainable land-use practices such as the reduction of water abstraction and pollution from agriculture can preserve its habitats. Increased research is needed on its distribution and threats is needed, as well as monitoring of the population and habitat.","This species occurs in wetlands, marshes, fens, margins of rivers and irrigation ditches in farmlands (Speight 2018). The adults fly among fen and waterside vegetation and along the water side (rather than the bank side) of reed beds. They are frequently found where Phragmites and Cyperaceae predominate, and they settle on stems of Cyperaceae and Juncaceae (Speight 2018). They visit flowers of Cyperaceae, Poaceae and Plantago (Speight 2018). The flight period is in May/August with adults occasionally being found in September, and March/October in southern Europe (Speight 2018). The larvae were first described by Rotheray and Dobson (1987), and are aphidophagous on aphids on Carex, Phragmites and Typha.","The wetland habitats of this species can be threatened by climate change, unsustainable land use and water management, which can can lead to alteration of their vital hydrological conditions. Water pollution caused by agriculture (fertilization) can be also a threat to the population.","The population trend of this species is considered to be generally stable in Europe and the EU 27, but it seems to be declining in the UK according to Ball and Morris (2014). In central and western Europe the population is somewhat fragmented, but this could be due to a lack of sampling.",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is found from Fennoscandia (Bartsch et al. 2009) south to Iberia and the Mediterranean, through lowland areas of central and southern Europe into Turkey and European parts of Russia (Mutin and Barkalov 1999, Barkalov and Nielsen 2009).

More specifically, it can be found in Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), Austria (Heimburg 2018), Ireland (Speight 2008), Ukraine (Popov 2010), Germany (Röder 1990, Saure 2018), France (Speight et al. 2018), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Greece and Montenegro (Global Biodiversity Information Facility), Serbia and Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015) and Spain (GBIF Data Portal 2013).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) cannot be accurately calculated because part of its distribution is based on country checklists rather than exact locality data, but the EOO and AOO are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27.

Outside Europe it can be found in Mongolia and on to the Pacific coast (Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are currently known for this species. More sustainable land-use practices such as the reduction of water abstraction and pollution from agriculture can preserve its habitat. Increased research is needed on its distribution and threats is needed, as well as monitoring of the population and habitat. In Denmark (Danish Biodiversity Information Facility (DanBIF) 2020), Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), and Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) it is considered to be Least Concern.
",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166769,149166757,Paragus coadunatus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable  (VU)

The species is found on the Canary Islands, Azores Islands Sicily, Malta, Madeira, Porto Santo, and in Greece. The species is assessed as Vulnerable since it has a restricted geographic range with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 188 km2 both for Europe and the EU 27, is found between 10-12 locations, and has a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to resort-oriented tourism development and urbanization. The species prefers open ground, thinly vegetated dry grassland and field margins, and gardens. It has an extent of occurrence in Europe and EU27 (EOO) of 4,404,884 km2. There is no potential rescue effect from subpopulations outside of the region. Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection are recommended. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats is required.

","The species prefers open ground, thinly vegetated dry grassland and field margins, and gardens (Speight 2018). Adults are known to visit Crithmum maritimum (Gomez and Baez 1990), Euphorbia, Foeniculum, Ferula, Frankenia, Malva, Solidago (Speight 2018) and Chrysanthemum coronarium (Pita and Gomes 2003). It has also been recorded on grassy vegetation along streams in Pinus brutia forest in the north-eastern part of Greece. The flight period is from April to October. The larva is aphidophagous and is frequently found in aphid colonies of creeping plant communities (Pita and Gomes 2003).", Resort-oriented tourism development and urbanization are causing habitat destruction for the species (CEPF 2010).,"There is no information about the population size and trend for this species. It is unknown if the population is severely fragmented. The species is rare in both in Europe and the EU 27. The most recent records are outside Europe, from Morocco (Sahib et al. 2020). The last records from Europe were from Malta and Sicily (Ssymank and Ebejer 2009).",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from scattered localities, from the Macaronesian islands (Canary Islands, Azores Islands, Madeiran archipelago) in the west, to Italy (Sicily), Malta, and Greece (northeastern mainland) in the east. Kassebeer (2002) critically reviewed the literature on Balearic hoverflies, but he did not mention this species. The species was registered in checklists for the Balearic Islands, especially on Mallorca (Riddiford and Ebejer 2006), but without information about the localities where the species was found, and presence on the Balearic Islands requires confirmation. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in both Europe and in the EU 27 is 4,404,88 km2. The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 188 kmin both Europe and the EU 27. It is found in 10-12 locations, between one and 1,800 m above sea level.

Outside of Europe, it is known from Turkey and Morocco (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far; however, site/area as well as resource and habitat protection is needed. Research is required on on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166781,149166777,Platycheirus fasciculatus,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-01-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This species can be found across the Alps and in the Italian Dolomites. It has a  severely fragmented population due to its localised subpopulations in high mountains at altitudes above 1,800 m. It inhabits montane grasslands, which are threatened by tourism infrastructure for recreational skiing, climate change and unsustainable grazing practices. The population is suspected to be in decline based on these habitat pressures. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are above the thresholds to be considered for the threatened categories, but considering the fragmentation of the habitat and habitat decline across its range, it is considered to be Near Threatened (NT) in Europe and the EU 27.

Sustainably managing damaging grazing practices can help to conserve its habitat. Additionally, new ski resorts should not be built in areas where the alpine vegetation has high conservation value. Monitoring and research of its population and habitat trends, size, biology and distributional range is required.","This species relies on the sparsely-vegetated open grounds and unimproved non-calcareous subalpine grasslands and moraines, from 1800 metres to above 2000 metres in altitude (Speight 2018).

The adults fly close to the ground, with a rapid darting flight when disturbed, settling on stones in the sun (C. Claussen pers. comm. 2020, Speight 2018). They have been recorded visiting flowers of Silene rupestris (C. Claussen pers.comm. 2020; Speight 2018) and Saxifraga aizoides (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). The larval and pupal stages are unknown.","The subalpine grassland communities in which this species occurs are very sensitive to disturbance (García-González 2008). When the vegetative cover is altered or there is significant loss of soil, it is almost impossible to restore the original habitat. The main threats to these grassland communities are inappropriate grazing practices, the construction of infrastructure for tourism (mainly ski resorts), perturbations caused by changes in land-use, and climate change. They tolerate moderate grazing, but overgrazing and overstocking can destroy the vegetation and lead to soil erosion (García-González 2008).","The subpopulations are restricted to high-mountain habitats, which are in decline, and so its population is considered somewhat fragmented. There are very few data to show the population trend definitively, but it is suspected to be in decline in both Europe and the EU 27 due to the threats and pressures that its habitats are experiencing. The latest record is from 2016 (Austria): this species is not regularly collected or found.",Decreasing,"This European endemic species can be found in the Alps of Austria (Heimburg 2018), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) and Switzerland (Maibach 1993), and in the Dolomites of Italy (Nielsen and Barkalov 2017, Speight 2018).

The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is 13,625 km2, and 10,082 km2 in the EU27. The extent of occurrence (EOO) both in Europe and the EU 27 is 194,827 km2.
",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are currently being undertaken for this species. Sustainably managing damaging grazing practices can help to conserve its habitat. Additionally, new ski resorts should not be built in areas where the alpine vegetation has high conservation value (García-González 2008). Monitoring and research of its population and habitat trends, size, biology and distributional range is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166789,149166779,Paragus cinctus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is distributed across Europe. The species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27 because of its relatively large range and because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly above the threshold for the application of a threatened category. The species is considered to be unthreatened across Europe (Speight et al. 2015). Potential threats for this species are the degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to human activities such as tourism and agriculture. The species is found in on grassland and shrubland areas. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends is needed.

","The preferred environment of this species is Quercus ilex and Quercus suber forest with a scrub layer of Cistus and Sarrothamnus and more open patches with sparse vegetation that contain grass and Sedum. The adults fly slowly through sparse, tall ground vegetation of grass and scattered bushes, at around one metre from the ground during the earlier part of the morning (it disappears by 10.00 a.m.). The adults are known to visit flowers of Scabiosa plants. The adults are active in May and August (Speight 2020). The larvae are known to be predators, but the developmental stages generally remain poorly understood.","The species is considered to be unthreatened across Europe (Speight et al. 2015). However, it may be affected by the loss of habitat quality in some parts of its range due to tourism and agriculture activities, but these threats do not influence the entire population, which remains stable.","The population size and population trend of this species are unknown, but assumed to be stable. Both in Europe and the EU 27, the species is not considered to be rare (T. Tot pers. comm. 2019).",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is distributed across Europe in Spain, France (mainland and Corsica), Italy (all parts), Austria, Hungary, Croatia, mainland Greece, Romania, Serbia, and Ukraine. Its presence is uncertain in European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly above the threshold for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is also found in Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Morocco (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation activities in place for this species. It is present in Natura 2000 Sites in Spain, France, Italy, Austria, Croatia, Hungary, Romania and Greece. Research is needed on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as monitoring of population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166799,149166797,Platycheirus europaeus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widely distributed species in Europe, found in a variety of habitats including various wetland, grassland and forest habitats. The population is considered stable in Europe and the EU27, and it is most common in Scandinavia where it has been assessed as Least Concern in all of the national Red Lists. There are no threats currently known to be affecting it, although this requires further research. The extent of occurrence and area of occupancy are far greater than the thresholds for any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27. Therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in both regional assessments.

Monitoring and research on its ecology, threats, distribution, habitat in different latitudes and larval development is required.","The preferred habitats of this species are wetlands and wet open ground in forests, in particular, brook floodplains and wet flushes in montane grasslands, grassy glades beside streams and flushes in the Carpinus/Quercus forest zone. It can also be found up into the Fagus/Picea zone (including humid Pinus) and in humid unimproved grasslands (Speight 2018). In Scotland, it has been found in Pinus sylvestris woods and in the Fagus/Picea zone. The low-altitude records in the Scottish Highlands are probably equivalent to records in the upper limit of its altitudinal range on the continent, according to Ball and Morris (2013). The adults are known to visit flowers of Poaceae, Cyperaceae, Plantago, Cardamine, Ranunculus and Taraxacum (Speight 2018). The larva was described by Goeldlin (1974) under the name immarginatus, and feeds on aphids.",The threats to this species are currently unknown.,"Whilst the population of this species is widely distributed, in some countries (mainly in central Europe) it seems to be more fragmented. It is likely to be most common in Scandinavia. The population is considered stable in Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"This is a widely distributed species in Europe, although its range is inadequately known. It has been recorded in Scandinavia (Torp 1994, Bartsch et al. 2009), United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2013), Germany (Ssymank 2002), Netherlands, Belgium (van der Linden 1991, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), France (the Cote d'Or, Vosges, Alps and Pyrenees), Czech Republic, Hungary (Tóth 2011), the Swiss Plateau (Jura and the Alps) (Maibach 1993), Austria, Spain, Italy (Speight and Goeldlin de Tiefenau 1990), Serbia and Belarus (Reemer 2000) but without georeferenced records in the literature.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are considered to be far greater than the threshold required to be assessed in a threatened category.

Outside Europe, it is found in the Far East of Russia and in Japan (Mutin and Barkalov 1999).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"No current conservation actions for this species. Monitoring and research on its ecology, threats, distribution, habitat in different latitudes and larval development are required.

It has been assessed as Least Concern in the national Red Lists of Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020), Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) and Denmark (Danish Biodiversity Information Facility (DanBIF) 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166810,149166801,Paragus bicolor,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is found across southern Europe and into the European parts of Turkey and Russia. It typically exists in warm and dry Oak and Beech forests. The species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) for Europe and the EU27 Member States because it is considered to be relatively widespread and because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The population trend of the species is considered to be stable currently but increased monitoring is needed for this species and its habitat - which is facing a number of threats. Resource and habitat protection is recommended. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends is recommended.

","The species prefers open ground and forest. It exists in herb-rich temporary clearings, forest fringes and dry open clearings in warm and dry oak and beech forest. It can be found in open areas within Quercus ilex forest and maquis shrubland (Speight 2018). The adult flight period is from April to October. The developmental stages are not yet understood, but the larvae are predators of soft-bodied true bugs of the suborder Homoptera.","Intensive logging practices, overgrazing by livestock and tourism infrastructure development (in Mediterranean countries) may cause a decline in the extent and quality of habitat for this species (CEPF 2010).","There is very little information about the population size of this species, but based on records of collected specimens, the population trend is considered to be stable. Both in Europe and in the EU 27, the species is not considered to be rare.",Stable,"This species is distributed across southern Europe (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020) including European Turkey and some Mediterranean islands, and the range extends to the northeast to European Russia. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is also found in Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Kirghizstan, Tajikistan, and Iran (Sorokina 2009) and North Africa (Morocco and Algeria).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions for this species. Resource and habitat protection is recommended. Research is recommended on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as monitoring of population and habitat trends. Some localities occur within Natura 2000 sites, such as at all sites in Portugal, Spain, Italy, Greece and Bulgaria and Les Cévennes, Garrigues de Lussan, Forêt de Grésigne et environs and Les Ecrins in France (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166821,149166818,Platycheirus complicatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The full distribution of this forest and grassland species is not yet known due to a lack of precise locality data. Its population trend is not yet fully understood, and its threats not completely known. Further research is needed to establish the ecological requirements of its larval stages. Despite the lack of available information, based on the currently understood distribution, its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are greater than the thresholds for threatened status, and so it is currently categorised as Least Concern (LC) in both Europe and the EU 27. If further research and monitoring show it to be in decline, or with a smaller EOO and AOO, then it may reach the threshold for Near Threatened or threatened in the future.","The preferred habitats of this species are forests and wet unimproved montane meadows. It can be found in humid open areas of Fagus/Picea forest upwards into calcareous and non-calcareous unimproved subalpine grasslands. It also occurs in subalpine Betula and Larix forests (Speight 2018). The adult males hover at 1-2 metres and settle on both bare rocky ground and low-growing vegetation (Barkalov and Nielsen 2007). The adults have been recorded visiting the flowers of Allium ursinum, Caltha, Geranium sylvaticum, Lamium album, Meum athamanticum, Ranunculus, Rhododendron aureum, Salix, Sorbus aucuparia, Tussilago (Speight 2020) and Salix appendiculata (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). The larval and puparial stages are unknown.","There are no specific threats currently known for this species, but its habitat may experience over-grazing by livestock, logging and impacts as a result of climate change such as habitat shifting and alteration.","The population seems to be quite scattered across Europe with a localised distribution, suggesting that this species is quite rare.",Stable,"This species can be found in Belgium (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), Germany in Niedersachsen and Baden-Württemberg (Röder 1990, Ssymank et al. 2011), the Czech Republic (Dusek and Laska 1982), Hungary (Tóth 2011), France (Alps) (Speight et al. 2018), Switzerland (Maibach 1993) and northern Italy (Dolomites). Outside Europe, it occurs in western Siberia (Nielsen 1981, Nielsen and Barkalov 2017) and Japan (Mutin and Barkalov 1999). However, there are only few records of this species in GBIF (2019) and currently its exact localities are not well documented. Where exact localities are available, these have been used to show the distribution; where exact locality information is not available, the habitat types based on its preferences have been indicated.

Due to lack of exact locality data, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) cannot be calculated accurately at this time, but they are currently understood to be greater than the threshold required to be considered for threatened categories.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are currently no conservation actions taking place for this species. Due to the lack of precise knowledge about its distribution, population trends, larval ecology and threats, urgent monitoring and research are needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166831,149166829,Paragus ascoensis,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

The species is endemic to Europe, being only found on Corsica and Sardinia, and potentially in southern peninsula Italy, with records from there requiring confirmation. Considering it has a small area of occupancy (AOO) of 120 km2, a continuing decline in habitat quality, and that the species is found in only 10-14 locations based on the threat of tourism activities and infrastructure, this species is assessed as Vulnerable (VU B2ab(iii)), taking a precautionary approach and considering there to be ten locations. Protection of key sites and habitat for this species is recommended. Further monitoring of the population and habitat trends is needed. Research into the species' taxonomic identity, population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology and threats is also recommended.

","The habitat of this species is not understood. The majority of specimens have been found in the vicinity of the commune Asco on Corsica. Asco offers an extremely rich and varied landscape of bare rocky mountains in the Gorges of Asco, with almost impenetrable scrub above the gorges. There is dry and arid forest of prickly juniper in the vicinity of the village, and thick forests of black pine above the village. Below the ridge lines, thick and aromatic alder bushes grow - an endemic shrub without a trunk. The remarkable Asco communal forest that covers the upper valley includes the Forest of Vecchietto and the Forest of Carrozzica, which are larger and higher, but both on the Asco slopes. These landscapes are similar to high alpine valleys. The species is known to visit the flowers of Euphorbia. Some specimens were caught by entomological nets while flying above the flowers of Euphorbia pithyusa cupanii (Birtele 2011). The adult flight period is from the end of March to the beginning of October. The developmental stages have not been described (Speight 2018).","The main threat to the species is activities and infrastructure associated with tourism (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019), as well as intensive land use, mainly connected with overgrazing (Falcucci et al. 2007). Both islands Corsica and Sardinia are well-known tourist attractions. Specifically, the commune Asco, where many of the specimens have been found, once had a ski-resort, and now there are tourist activities such as adrenaline parks, hotels and camping sites Additionally, there are several historical and heritage sights. Overgrazing is particularly present in Corsica due to an extremely high number of pigs in the forests (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). Because the species is found on Mediterranean islands that lie in one of the areas most susceptible to climate change in the world (Vogiatzakis et al. 2016), this might pose additional threatening factors.","There is no known information about the population size or trends of this species. However, the last specimen was found more than 20 years ago in Corsica and around 15 years ago in Sardinia. During the recent general hoverfly surveys in these areas, the species was not recorded, but no targeted surveys were organized, so it is not reasonable to assume that the species might be possibly extinct, especially as it is found in several locations. The species is however considered to be rare in Europe and in the EU 27 (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Corsica and Sardinia (Speight 2018), but is also possibly present in southern Italy (Burgio et al. 2015). The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is estimated to be around 25,529 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) about 120 km2. It is found in between 10 and 14 locations.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions currently in place for this species. Some of the localities where the species is found are a part of the Natura 2000 network. Protection of key sites and habitat for this species is recommended. Further monitoring of the population and habitat trends is needed, especially as the last specimen was found more than 20 years ago. Research is needed into the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149166841,149166839,Platycheirus cintoensis,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-01-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic is found only on Corsica in Abies forests, but very little is known about its habitat needs as an adult or larvae. It has only been observed in 1982; additional surveys and research are needed to understand its distribution, habitat and ecology, and its population trend and threats. Due to lack of knowledge, this species is assessed as Data Deficient in Europe and the EU 27. Without recent monitoring on Corsica, we cannot establish whether the species is still extant.","This species was found in open Abies forests with scrub in July, at around 1,600 metres above sea level, according to van der Goot (1961). The developmental stages are unknown.","The habitat (Abies forests) of this species is not considered to be threatened, but its deterioration has increased substantially in recent years through droughts and climate change. Overall, the threats to this species are unknown.","There are no recent records known from Corsica: it is only known to occur there based on its original discovery in 1982 (Speight 2018, 2020). The distribution map in Speight et al. (2018) is probably based on Dušek and Láska (1982). There are no available data on its population size or trends.",Unknown,"This European endemic is only known from Corsica (France: Dušek and Láska 1982). It has a maximum extent of occurrence (EOO) of 10,604 km2 and a maximum estimated area of occupancy (AOO) of 8,752 km2, because its exact distribution is unknown.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions currently taking place for this species. Because of the lack of information, extensive research and monitoring needs to take place, including research on its population size, biology, ecology and threats, as well as its distribution within Corsica. Monitoring of its habitat and population trend is also required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149166854,149166849,Paragus albipes,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-03-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

The European endemic species is present in Estonia and Latvia. The species is assessed as Data Deficient (DD), because there is no sufficient information for a proper assessment of conservation status to be made. There are no known conservation actions for the species so far. Research on taxonomy, population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats is needed for this species. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is also recommended for the species in Estonia and Latvia. It is unknown if the species is located in Protected Areas or National Parks. 

","There is no information about the preferred habitat and flight period for this species. The developmental stages of this species are also unknown. In the original description (Gimmerthal 1842), as well as in publications, experts state that information about habitat of this species is lacking (Kuznetzov 1993, Speight 2018).",The threats to the species are unknown.,"There is no information about the population size and trend of this species. There is no reliable evidence when this species was last observed, neither when it was last found nor in which number.",Unknown,"This species was described from either Estonia and Latvia (Speight 2018). Gimmerthal (1842) published a catalogue of Lifland Diptera. Unfortunately, it is not possible to establish from the catalogue which of the species were found in Latvia and which in Estonia, because Lifland included the northern part of Latvia and southern part of Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993). The species is endemic to Europe, described from Estonia or Latvia and not subsequently cited from elsewhere (though see Speight (2011) for a discussion of Peck's (1988) recording of the species from Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are impossible to include due to insufficient information about the range of this species.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"Research is needed on its taxonomic identity, population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is also recommended in Estonia and Latvia. It is unknown if the species is located in Protected Areas or National Parks.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166863,149166851,Platycheirus chilosia,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This is a Nordic species that exists on the tundra in the far north of Scandinavia and Russia. It is considered unthreatened by Speight (2016), and is currently listed as Least Concern and Near Threatened in the national Red Lists it has appeared in. It has a large extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe, and its population trend is considered to be stable, and so it is assessed here as Least Concern (LC).

Within the EU 27, the species has a small AOO of  < 20 km2 and is only known from four isolated localities, making the population severely fragmented. The habitat is projected to decline as a result of climate change, and therefore the species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) in the EU 27.

Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends and threats as well as on its life history (especially the larvae) and ecology. Monitoring of the population and habitat trend is required.","This species exists in arctic-alpine tundra (Speight 2018) on ""high barren mountain slopes"" (Vockeroth 1990). The adults are known to visit flowers of Dryas octopetala (Speight 2018). The larvae are unknown, but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","Currently this species does not seem to be experiencing any threats, but as an arctic species it will be potentially threatened by climate change in the future. Its habitats, shrub tundra and moss-and-lichen tundra, have both been assessed as Least Concern in the Red List of European Habitats (Janssen et al. 2017).","There are very few data available on the size of subpopulations. However, there is no fragmentation of the population because the tundra habitat is continuous, and there are no signs of any decline, so the population is inferred as stable in Europe and the EU 27. The main EU 27 subpopulation is in Finland.",Stable,"This species has a naturally northern arctic distribution, from northern Fennoscandia eastwards to European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are greater than the thresholds for any threatened category for Europe. In the EU 27, the AOO is estimated to be less than 20 km2.

Outside Europe, it occurs across Russia to the Russian Far East and Greenland (Speight 2018), Canada and the Northern Yukon (Young et al. 2016).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"No specific conservation actions are known to exist for this species. Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends and threats as well as on its life history (especially the larvae) and ecology. Monitoring of the population and habitat trend is required. It has been assessed as Least Concern in the national Red List of Norway (Gammelmo et al. 2015), Near Threatened in Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) and assessed as Not Applicable in Sweden because of its marginal occurrence there at the western border of its range.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166875,149166872,Platycheirus angustipes,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Whilst this species has a large area of occupancy and extent of occurrence, its population is declining as a result of habitat decline, it has very scattered and fragmented population, and the range is also uncertain but is probably restricted to mountains. There are only few georeferenced records in the databases, but nevertheless the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. With increased understanding of its distribution, this species may be reassessed as Vulnerable, but for now it is assessed as Least Concern (LC).","This species is known to occur in wetlands, fens, rich fens and marshes and humid, unimproved grasslands subject to seasonal flooding (Speight 2018). The adults occur beside streams and lakes in montane grassland or open forest, from 1,000 m upwards into the wet alpine grassland zone e.g. on glacier floodplains. The adults have been recorded visiting Caltha palustris (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020).

The flight period is in June/August, with peak in July. The aphidophagous larva was described and figured by Goeldlin (1974), from larvae collected from emergent Carex and Phragmites around the edge of a small lake (P. Goeldlin pers. comm. 2020, Speight 2020).",The wetland habitat of this species may be at risk due to climate change and drainage. The glacier habitats are threatened in particular and the mountain habitats are known to be decreasing.,"The population of this species is somewhat fragmented because it is restricted to mountains. It is known from a limited amount of data, suggesting it is quite rare and found in fairly low numbers. The population is suspected to be in decline because its habitat is fragmented, very restricted and declining. However, there is no research on its population size. The last record is from 2014 in France.",Decreasing,"This species is known to occur in the Alps of France, Switzerland, Liechtenstein and Austria (Heimburg 2018), the Swiss Jura, the Apennines in Italy and the Pyrenees in France (Speight and Goeldlin de Tiefenau 1990). Its full distribution is thought to be incompletely known, but the currently known data have been used for this assessment. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.

Outside Europe it is known to occur in the Caucasus within Georgia (Mengual et al. 2020).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are currently no conservation actions known for this species. Conservation of its wetland habitats may be a priority in the future. There is no data on any national red lists on this species. Research on its ecology, habitat range, larval development, threats and taxonomy is needed, as well as monitoring of the population and habitat.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166883,149166871,Paragus absidatus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is known from a small number of scattered records in Europe from the Pyrenees to European Russia. The species is found living in alpine, subalpine and montane grasslands, and the main threats to the species are intensive grazing of its habitat by livestock and ski resorts. It is assessed as Endangered in both Europe and the EU 27, since it has a small area of occupancy (AOO) which is 72 km2 for Europe and 56 km2 for the EU 27 countries, a severely fragmented population, and a continuing decline in the quality of the species' habitat. The subpopulations are small and isolated and are found in 13 locations. There is no potential rescue effect from subpopulations outside of the region. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is 1,948,562 km2 and in the EU 27 it is estimated to be around 528,796 km2.

Sustainable management of livestock grazing would benefit this species. The protection of key sites and habitats are needed conservation actions for this species. Further research on the species' population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the increased monitoring of its population and habitat trends are needed.

","The species prefers open ground, unimproved, calcareous and non-calcareous alpine/subalpine grassland and moraine up to 2,500 m. It also lives in unimproved montane grassland within the Picea zone down to 1,300 m. It has also been recorded in Larix forest near a river on ungrazed lawns (Lebard and Speight 2019). Adults fly low to the ground over vegetation, and are active in either mid-June or at the end of July (Speight 2018). The developmental stages for the species are known because the larva and puparium were described by Rotheray and Sarthou (2007). The larvae were found on Gentiana punctata, Epilobium and Cirsium in subalpine grassland; they are predators, mostly feeding on soft-bodied true bugs of the suborder Homoptera.",The main threat to this species is the intensive grazing of its habitat by livestock. Ski resorts are also one of the main threats to alpine calcareous grasslands (García-González 2008).,"There is no information about the population size for this species, and the current population trend is unknown. It is very rare in both Europe and the EU 27 countries, and very few records have been made. The population is considered to be severely fragmented because it is found in small and isolated subpopulations.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from the Pyrenees in southern France (apparently not recorded from adjacent parts of northern Spain) and southeastern France, Switzerland, northern Italy, Austria, and from single locality records from each of Serbia, Bulgaria, western Ukraine and European Russia. Röder (1998) recorded the species in Germany, but this was a misidentification - the record actually referred to Paragus pecchiolli, identified by Dieter Doczkal; based on this information, Paragus absidatus was deleted from the German list of hoverflies (Doczkal et al. 2002). The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is 1,948,562 km2 and in the EU 27 it is estimated to be around 528,796 km2. The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 72 kmin Europe and around 56 km2 in the EU 27. The species is found in 13 locations, up to 2,500 metres above sea level.

Outside of Europe, it has been recorded from the Anatolia region of Turkey, in the Siberian Mountains, and in the Amur and Primorye regions of Russia.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. It was designated as a strictly protected species under the Serbian legislation (Code on declaration and protection of strictly protected and protected wild species of plants, animals and fungi, (“Official Gazette of RS”, no. 5/2010). Sustainable management of livestock grazing would benefit this species. The protection of key sites and habitats are the conservation actions needed. Further research on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats are needed, as well as increased monitoring of its population and habitat trends. Some point localities occur within protected areas and at Natura 2000 sites such as at Hautes vallées d'Aspe et d'Ossau and Combeynot - Lautaret - Ecrins in France; Osttiroler Gletscherflüsse Isel, Schwarzach and Kalserbach in Austria; Rodopi - Zapadni in Bulgaria (European Environment Agency 2020) and at the Kopaonik National Park in Serbia.


",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166895,149166891,Platycheirus amplus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The European range of this wetland species is not yet fully understood due to taxonomic confusion with another species. While its population is considered stable in northern Europe, in the UK it has been assessed as Near Threatened. The area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and also in the EU27 are too large to be considered in a threatened category in Europe, and so the species is assessed as Least Concern.

Research on its biology, ecology and habitat range is needed. More taxonomic research is also required because of possible confusion with other species.
","The preferred habitat of this species is wetlands, fens and poor fens, flushes and brooks in moors and bogs. The adults can be found among sedges and similar tall ground vegetation, especially in the vicinity of standing water or brooks and they visit flowers of umbellifers, Polygonum bistorta, Ranunculus and Taraxacum (Speight 2018). The adult flight period is between June and July with records into August. The larva is unknown but is likely to feed on aphids.","This species can be threatened by drainage of its habitat, overgrazing of habitat and the conversion of land to conifer plantations.","The population is considered to be stable in northern Europe, but it seems to be somewhat fragmented.",Unknown,"The distribution of this species is not yet fully understood due to its taxonomic confusion with Platycheirus peltatus. Nevertheless, it is known to occur in Iceland, Norway (Nielsen 1999), northern Sweden, Finland (Bartsch et al. 2009), Ireland, the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000), Belgium (Ardennes: Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), Germany (Pompé and Cölln 1993), the French and Swiss Jura (Maibach 1993) and the central Alps (Austria). The exact localities are not known for some countries, in which case the whole country has been mapped.

The area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) cannot be accurately calculated, because part of its known distribution is based on country checklists rather than exact locality data. Nevertheless, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are considered to be too large to be considered in the threatened categories in Europe and the EU 27.

Outside Europe, it occurs in the Altai mountains, the Russian Far East (Mutin and Barkalov 1999, Speight 2018, 2020) and in North America (Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions known for this species. Research on its biology, ecology and habitat range is needed. More taxonomic research is also required because of possible confusion with other species. The protection of its wetland habitat is needed. In the UK it has been assessed as Near Threatened on the National Red List (Ball and Morris 2014). In Sweden, Finland and Norway it has been assessed as Least Concern.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166913,149166911,Platycheirus altomontis,Critically Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

This European endemic is only known from two localities in the high Alps of northern Italy and Switzerland, where it is found in sparsely-vegetated, rocky habitat. The population seems to be very small but further research is needed to confirm its population trend and potential localities. As a montane species, it is likely that climate change threatens or will threaten it in the future. Its area of occupancy is only 8 km2 because it is only known from two localities and it is considered severely fragmented, as an isolated mountain species, in Europe, and it has only one location in the EU 27. It is therefore assessed as Critically Endangered (CR B2ab(iii)) in Europe and in the EU 27. Research is needed on its biology, ecology, population trends, threats and distribution range is also required. Monitoring of the population and habitat is also needed.
","This species exists in the open ground of sparsely-vegetated, rocky talus slopes above 3,000 m asl in the Alps. Adult males rest in the sun, in sheltered spots between rocks, but there are no records yet of flower visits. The adult flight period is currently known to be in July (Nielsen 2004). The larva is unknown but should feed on aphids.","As this species occurs in mountainous habitats in the Alps, the main possible threats are habitat loss and/or deterioration due to climate change.","Very few surveys have taken place to find this species, but it seems to be severely fragmented and to have a very small population. There are only two records from high (>3,000 m asl) in the Italian Alps, both from the same locality in 1998 (Nielsen 2004), and only one record from Switzerland (J. Van der Ent pers. comm. 2020). The population trend is unknown for Europe and the EU 27, but is projected that it may decline as a result of climate change impacts on its habitat in the future.",Unknown,"This European endemic species is only known from two localities in the high Alps of northern Italy and Switzerland (Nielsen 2004, 2014; Speight 2018). It likely has a highly restricted extent of occurrence (EOO), but with only two georeferenced locality records, it cannot be estimated; the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 8 km2.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"Limiting the impact of climate change on the alpine habitat of this species is needed. Research on its biology, ecology, population trends, threats and distribution range is also required. Monitoring of the population and habitat is also needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166923,149166921,Eumerus vestitus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is assessed as Endangered for Europe and the EU27 Member States because of its small area of occupancy (AOO) of 20 km2 in Europe and the EU 27, the fact that it is only found in four to five locations, and because there is a continuing decline in the quality of the species' habitat. There is continuing pressure causing degradation of the species' habitat. The threats causing this pressure are tourism, agriculture, fires, and droughts. The species prefers semi-arid, sparsely-vegetated, herb-rich, open ground communities beside seasonal water bodies. However, the species range exceeds Europe, and a global assessment might be different. There might be a rescue effect from outside subpopulations since the species in Europe occurs at the edge of its range. Protection of habitats is the main required conservation action. Future research on the population size, ecology and threats to the species are also needed.

","The species prefers semi-arid, sparsely-vegetated, herb-rich, open ground communities beside seasonal water bodies (Speight 2020). This is a typical Mediterranean species. It has been seen visiting flowers of Foeniculum vulgare (van Steenis et al. 2019). The flight period of the species is only known on the Arabian Peninsula, where the species flies in February, May, and November. The species feeds on plants, presumably developing in bulbs or other infested underground organs, like other congeneric species.","The main threat to this species is the degradation of its habitat caused by intensive tourism activities (increased tourist arrival numbers) and frequent fires and droughts, as a consequence of climate change. Furthermore, there is a strong negative pressure on its habitat caused by overgrazing (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).","There is no information about the population size and trend. The species is rare in Europe since the locations where it is found correspond to the edge of its range but it is common in the Afrotropical region. The last finding from Europe and the EU 27 is from Cyprus in 2017. During surveys in Greece in the last 4-5 years, the species was not recorded (last finding is from 2008), although the surveys were not specifically targeting this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).",Unknown,"Within Europe, this species is known from Greece (single localities on the mainland near Athens, on Rhodes in the Eastern Aegean, and on Thira in the Cyclades) and from two localities on Cyprus (Speight 2018). In Europe and the EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 59,345 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) about 20 km2. It is found in 4-5 locations in Europe and the EU 27.
Outside of Europe, it is found in Egypt, Sudan, Syria, the Arabian Peninsula and the Afrotropical region. Anooj et al. (2020) report the species from New Delhi, India.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. It is present in areas included in the Habitats Directive (Alykos Potamos - Agios Sozomenos) and the IBA (Important Bird Area) Alykes Larnakas on Cyprus. The main conservations actions needed for this species should focus on the protection of the areas where it occurs, as well as its habitats, which are sometimes severely degraded. Future research on the population size, distribution, trends, life history,  ecology and threats are a required step for its conservation. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166934,149166931,Platycheirus abruzzensis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This is a high mountain species with a severely fragmented distribution, and it seems to have a very low population size, with never more than five individuals being observed at a time in any locality. It is considered to be declining in Europe and the EU27 because most of the known records come from before 1990, despite survey efforts. In Europe, it has an area of occupancy (AOO) of between 52 and 790 km2, and in the EU27 16 km2, and its habitat is declining in quality and extent due to the impacts of climate change and forestry practices. Based on this, the species is assessed as Endangered (B2ab(iii)) in Europe and the EU 27. Protection of its habitat and key sites is recommended. Research is needed on threats, population size, distribution and trends. Monitoring of population and habitat trends is also necessary.","This species is found in open habitat within montane to subalpine Abies/Picea and Larix forests and up to alpine acidic to calcareous grasslands (Speight 2018). It is usually at altitudes above 1,700 m up to 2,800 m. The larval and pupal stages of this species are not known, but the larvae are presumed to be aphidophagous (feeding on aphids).","Climate change may considerably reduce the range of this species and localised high mountain subpopulations are threatened. As this is a high mountain species with records between 1,700 and almost 2,800 m asl, it is often in the vicinity of glaciers or cold screes, the specific habitat likely to be getting rarer as a result of climate change. Whilst Mediterranean Abies forests are assessed as Least Concern in the European Red List of Habitats, this habitat has slightly declined in the past as a result of forestry and possibly also climate change. Another of its habitats (temperate subalpine Larix, Pinus cembra and Pinus uncinata woodland) has been assessed as Near Threatened (Janssen et al. 2017), but P.abruzzensis only occurs in a small proportion of this habitat.","Currently, there are very few data available on the population and subpopulation sizes for this species, but in most of the localities, between one and five individuals have been found. Speight (2016) and Speight (2020) report a declining trend for Europe (and EU 27), because most of the records come from before 1990, with only a very few records that are more recent (from the southern Alps). In Italy despite survey efforts, it was last recorded in Gran Sasso in 1960, and in Stilfser Joch in 1871, so it is considered possibly extinct in these localities. In Switzerland it was last recorded in 1990, while it was recorded most recently in France in 2010. Its population is considered to be severely fragmented due to the fact it exists in small isolated subpopulations between which it is unlikely to be able to disperse.",Decreasing,"This is a localised species found in the high mountains of central and southern Europe (the Alps, Jura in Switzerland and the Apennines in Italy) (Nielsen 2004) and Mercantour in France (X. Lair pers. comm. 2020). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is quite large at 168,860 km2, but the area of occupancy (AOO) is considered to be only between 52 and 790 km2. In the EU 27, the AOO is estimated to be around 16 km2. Outside Europe, it is found in the central to East Asian parts of Russia (Barkalov and Nielsen 2009), Kazakhstan and Armenia (Nielsen 2014).

The map was created from known point data published in Nielsen (2004), with additions from X. Lair (pers. comm. 2020).",This species  is not known to be utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are currently no specific conservation actions known to be taking place for this species, but protection of its habitat and key sites is recommended. Research is needed on threats, population size, distribution and trends. Monitoring of population and habitat trends is also necessary.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166944,149166942,Eumerus vandenberghei,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This European endemic species is assessed as Endangered (EN) because the species is found in only three locations, on the islands of Corsica in France and Sardinia in Italy, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is 4,163 km2 and its area of occupancy (AOO) is 20 km2. The habitat of the species represents a typical Mediterranean shrubland with pine forest. Urban and tourist development in the coastal zone have a significant impact on the species' habitat. Due to climate change, the risk of fires and droughts also significantly threats the habitat of the species. As a result, there is also a continuing decline in the quality of the species' habitat. Monitoring of the population trends in suitable habitats of Corsica in France and Sardinia in Italy is required. Protection of locations in Corsica in France is needed to preserve the species.

","The type locality of the species is the coastal zone of Corsica, which is covered in Mediterranean shrubby vegetation mixed with pine forest in Porto-Vecchio (Doczkal 1996). In Sardinia, it was found in an area of forest consisting mainly of Quercus ilex, Quercus suber and Olea europaea var. sylvestris and slopes covered with Mediterranean shrubs and a secondary garrigue vegetation (Birtele 2011). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.","Urban and tourist development in the coastal zone have a significant impact on the habitat. Due to climate change, the risk of fires and drought is also significantly increased (CEPF 2010).","This species is considered to be very rare, but the population trend in is unknown. Fewer than 70 specimens have been found in two locations in Corsica (Doczkal 1996), and there is only one specimen from Sardinia, from 2006 (Birtele 2011).",Unknown,"This species is found on the French island of Corsica (Doczkal 1996) and on the Italian island of Sardinia (Birtele 2011): these are the only known locations. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 4,163 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) at 20 km2, based on the available localities. The species is endemic to the EU 27 and Europe, and found at three locations.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,The species occurs at the Monti del Gennargentu Natura 2000/Parco Nazionale Del Golfo Di Orosei E Del Gennargentu site in Sardinia in Italy (European Environment Agency 2020). Monitoring of the population trends in suitable habitats of Corsica in France and Sardinia in Italy is required. Protection of locations in Corsica in France is needed to preserve this species. Site and area protection is also needed.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149166955,149166952,Microdon mutabilis,Vulnerable,A2c+4c,2021,2020-03-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This grassland specialist has been assessed as threatened on many European national Red Lists. Its full distribution is currently uncertain as a result of taxonomic confusion with Microdon myrmicae. Despite this, it is understood that the population is declining in Europe as a result of loss in the quality and extent of its habitat. The majority of the habitats on which this species relies are threatened, and their quality and extent have reduced and are continuing to decline. The decline of this species seems to be more pronounced in central and northern Europe. Based on the decline both in extent and quality of its habitats where it occurs, we suspect that the species has undergone a population decline of around 30% over the last 10 years in both Europe and the EU 27, and this is projected to continue. The species is therefore assessed as Vulnerable (A2c) in both Europe and in the EU 27 Member States. This species can also be assessed as Vulnerable (A4c) based on the past and projected decline over a time period of 2020 to 2030.","This species is found in mesic to dry grassland on calcareous rocky substrates and sandy soil. It is also found in heathland, unimproved montane pasture and grassy forest clearings (Speight 2018). The larvae live in ant nests of Formica lemani (Schönrogge et al. 2002a), Formica cunicularia (Van de Meutter 2016, Scarparo et al. 2017) and Formica cinerea. The adults are known to make occasional flower visits to the orchid Ophrys fuciflora, presumably by males attempting copulation (Delforge 1994, Speight 2018).","The majority of the grassland habitats on which this species relies are threatened at European level, according to the European Red List of Habitats (Janssen et al. 2017). The major threat is loss of habitat due to unsustainable grassland management practices, that can lead either to intensification of grassland use by grazing livestock or, in contrast, the abandonment of grassland management which leads to succession to scrub and then subsequently to closed forest. Additional threats include pollution and nitrogen enrichment, accelerating succession and resulting in the loss of the sunny open ground suitable for the host ants and as resting places for adults (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2021, Article 17 Habitats Directive).","This species is declining in Europe (Speight 2016). There are no direct data on its population trend, but surveys of its main habitat show a clear decline. It occurs on dry grassland and partially dry heathland, usually with very localized subpopulations with small subpopulation sizes. Considering the major losses of the quality and extent of its habitat, and the expectation that this trend will continue in the short and long term, it is clear that the population of this species is still declining. We suspect that the species has undergone a population decline of around 30% over the last 10 years in both Europe and the EU 27, and this is projected to continue.",Decreasing,"The range of this species is uncertain due to taxonomic confusion with Microdon myrmicae (a cryptic species). It is likely to occur from Scandinavia to Spain, eastwards to Russia.  It has been confirmed to occur in Britain and Ireland (Schönrogge et al. 2002a,b), Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009b), Belgium (Van de Meutter 2016), Italy (Scarparo et al. 2017) and Switzerland (Beuker 2004), based on identification using larvae and pupae .

Outside Europe, the global range extends across Russia to the Russian Far East (Speight 2018).",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"Grassland management which keeps open bare ground suitable for ant nests and partially removes scrub invasion is recommended for this species. Low intensity pasturing (<1-2 livestock units per ha) or mowing regimes (usually only once per year after the main herb flowering period) is recommended. Reseeding of agricultural land with grass seeds with toxic coatings can drift into crucial habitat, and it is important to protect habitat from this.

Research is needed on its population size, distribution and trends as well as on its life history and ecology. Monitoring of population and habitat trends is necessary.

This species is classified as Vulnerable in Czechia (Farkac et al. 2005), Endangered in Flanders (Belgium) (Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998) and Data Deficient in Germany but with a negative short-term and long-term trend at a national level (Ssymank et al. 2011). Within Germany it is considered extinct in Saxony-Anhalt (Dziock et al. 2004) and Vulnerable in Baden-Wuerttemberg (Doczkal et al. 2001). In Ireland it is still considered to be Least Concern (Speight 2008).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166966,149166963,Eumerus tarsalis,Endangered,"B2ab(i,iii,iv)",2021,2020-04-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is assessed as Endangered for Europe and the EU27 Member States since it has a restricted area of occupancy (AOO) of 24 to 40 km2 in Europe, the population is severely fragmented, and there is a continuing decline in the species' extent of occurrence (EOO) and extent and quality of its habitat throughout Europe. The area of occupancy (AOO) in the EU 27 is estimated to be less than 20 km2. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species in Europe is about 520,000 km2. In the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is about 220,000 km2. The number of locations is also considered to be declining in Europe.

The species can be found in humid European forests as well as in unimproved, alpine pastures up to above 2,000 metres in the Alps, and in montane pine forests in southern Europe. Land conversion of alpine and subalpine habitats, abandonment of traditional livestock grazing, and replacement of meadows with dense cover of shrubs and forests are the main threats to the species' habitat. Habitat fragmentation is also a major threat to the species. Protection of its habitat and further research into the population size, distribution, and trends as well as threats might help preserve the species. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from populations outside the assessment region.

","The species prefers forests and open grounds. It is found in both coniferous and deciduous forest, including humid Fagus/Picea forests and Fagus/Fraxinus forests in central Europe. The species also lives in unimproved, alpine pasture up to above 2,000 m in the Alps, and in montane Pinus forests in southern Europe. Adults are known to visit Apiaceae (Speight 2018).","It is difficult to determine the reason why populations of this species have declined, but since their development is dependent on specific plants, the assessors have inferred that the decline is related to the degradation of its habitat. Land conversion of alpine and subalpine habitats, abandonment of traditional livestock grazing, and replacement of meadows with dense cover of shrubs and forests undoubtedly adversely affect the biodiversity of open habitats (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). Habitat fragmentation due to agriculture and urbanization is also one of the major threats to this species.","There are no data on population size. Despite being once widely distributed, the species is now considered rare all over its range. It is found in low numbers in most sites, with approximately two individuals encountered per site. Its range is considered to be severely fragmented, because many subpopulations are small and isolated with no possibility of exchange of individuals among them (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The population trend is decreasing, because the species has not been recorded recently in most of its historical localities.",Decreasing,"Within the European region, this species was formerly widespread in Europe, but there are very few recent records - from France (Ssymank and Lair 2014), Austria (Aistleitner et al. 2008), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013) and Montenegro (S. Brajović pers. comm. 2020). In Europe, the area of occurrence (AOO) is estimated to be between 24 and 40 km2 and in the EU 27 less than 20 km2. It is considered to occur at six to 10 locations in Europe, and fewer than six in the EU 27. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is about 520,000 km2, and in the EU 27, about 220,000 km2. It is Extinct in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005) and in Belgium (Speight 2020). Despite being assessed as Endangered in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), there are no recent records of this species and it is Possibly Extinct in this country (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). Records from Romania (Bradescu 1991) are from the last century, and records from Hungary are over 40 years old (Tóth 2011) so we consider the species in these countries to be Possibly Extinct. It is considered to be Possibly Extinct in Spain as well. It has not been recorded recently in most of its historical locations, so the number of locations is considered to be declining in Europe. Records from Ukraine are probably misidentified specimens of Eumerus sabulonum (Popov 2003); a record from the Netherlands from the last century was certainly a misidentified specimen, and thus the species is considered to be Possibly Extinct in the Netherlands (J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020).

Outside of Europe, the species is found in North Africa, in Russia including eastern Siberia, and in Mongolia (Speight 2018).
",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. It is listed as Extinct in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005) as well as in Belgium and is considered Possibly Extinct in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), Spain, the Netherlands, Slovakia, Hungary, and Romania. Conservation should be based on the protection of its habitat. Further research on the population size, distribution and trends, as well as threats, might also help preserve this species. It is found in the Gîtes et habitats à chauves-souris en Bourgogne Habitat Directive Site (FR2601012) in France, Darányi borókás Habitat Directive Site in Hungary, Durmitor National Park, and Boka Bay UNESCO World Heritage Site in Montenegro (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149166975,149166965,Microdon major,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2020-03-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic has been confused with Microdon analis in the past and can only be identified based on larval and puparial characters (Schmid 2004). However, the few known records clearly indicate that the species is much rarer than Microdon analis. The species is a European endemic confirmed only from three countries (Germany, France and Belgium), with a total of three known locations, based on the threat of land-use conversion for agriculture and forestry. In the Kottenforst area near Bonn in Germany it has not been rediscovered since 1912 despite specific search for it, and it is now considered extinct here. The larvae are considered to be dependent on Formica ant nests. Formica species have declined in the past and are continuing to decline. Increased density of forest stands and changes in forestry management, leading to a reduction in diversity of forest structure and availability of habitats may be the cause of declining habitat quality. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 12-16 km2 and although there are one or two subpopulations yet to be discovered, this is not expected to be enough to change the assessment of this species. Because of the small AOO, the loss of historical subpopulations, the small number of known locations and the still-declining larval habitat, the species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(ii,iii)) in Europe and the EU27.","The habitat requirements for this species are only partially understood. It can be found in forest clearings of mesic to humid deciduous and coniferous forests, thermophilous forest margins, scrub-invaded grasslands and garrigue (Speight 2018). Adults do visit flowers, although the only knowledge of this is from Delforge (1994) where ""Microdon latifrons"" is described as feeding on Ophrys fuciflora, believed to be Microdon major (according to Speight 2018). The larval habitat is within ant nests of Formica species (Formica rufa, F. exsecta, F. sanguinea) (Schmid 2004) that occur in tree stumps (Dussaix 2007) or tree bases, for example on Picea abies (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020).","The main threat to this species is land-use conversion due to agriculture and forestry. Speight (2018) states that because ants of the Formica rufa-group ""have become much less frequent during the 20th century, because of intensification of farming, it would be expected that Microdon major is itself becoming a threatened species"". The larvae have so far been collected in forest clearings, and forestry management which does not promote a diverse forest structure could be a threat.","There is only partial and very localised information on the population of this species. There was a relatively large subpopulation reported by Andries (1912) from the Kottenforst in Germany that is now likely to be extinct as no recent records are known, despite extensive searches and trapping (Ssymank 2019). Overall it is considered to be decreasing in both Europe and the EU 27. In the few localities where it is still present, the recorded numbers are very low and it can be assumed that even when a few localities might be still be found it will be nowhere abundant and have only small remnant populations.",Decreasing,"The range of this species is uncertain due to taxonomic confusion with Microdon analis: based on larval/pupal specimens (where identification can be certain), it is confirmed only from France, Germany (Speight 2018) and Belgium (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). In some of the localities (Germany and Belgium), several larvae were collected. All records are relatively recent (2004 onwards), with the exception of records close to Bonn. It is currently considered a European endemic, although in Turkey one uncertain record has been published (but it is possible that this is a confusion with Microdon analis). It has a large extent of occurrence (EOO) of 116,404km2, but a small area of occupancy (AOO) of around 12 - 16 km2.

The distribution map is based on known confirmed localities. Due to confusion with M. analis, it is possible that a few more localities exist, although it is not expected to increase the AOO significantly. As there was no precise locality information available for France, here the map of Speight et al. (2018) was used.",This species is not known to be utilised.,Terrestrial,"The protection and management of forest margins and grassy clearings is recommended, as well as keeping a certain amount of grassland succession stages with scrub encroachment. Ant nests should also be protected. Research is needed on the population size, distribution and trends of this species, as well as on its habitat, ecology and threats. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is necessary.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166988,149166983,Merodon gallicus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-10-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU) 

This species is known from the Ticino region in southern Switzerland and from eastern and southwest France (from Lorraine south to the Alpes-Maritimes, and in Haut-Languedoc). Based on its area of occupancy (AOO) (40 km2) and number of locations (nine) calculated based on overgrazing by livestock as the main threat, the species is assessed as Vulnerable both globally and for the EU27 Member States. Furthermore, because of the ongoing threats (primarily poorly managed grazing) on this species habitat, a continuous decline in its quality is inferred.

Considering the fact that there are only few recent records of this species (from 2011 and 2018), while the other records are from 1919, 1924, 1932 and 1968, more efforts should be directed towards monitoring of this species, and towards research on its population, ecology, and other potential threats.","This species inhabits open ground in deciduous forests, open grassy and tall-herb areas in Quercus/Fraxinus and Quercus/Carpinus forest. The adults fly fast through and at the tops of tall herb and long grass vegetation, and also at greater heights above the ground, around the foliage of shrubs.

The developmental stages have not been described. The flight period is between May and the end of June (Speight 2018). In Switzerland, it was found in a fairly dry and sunny Quercus/Castanea grove (L. Pollini pers. comm. 2020). The host plant is unknown.","Overgrazing by livestock is considered to be the main threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Increasing tourism, road construction and urbanisation can also cause habitat fragmentation and loss.","There are not enough data about the population trend. Based on all known findings, in France only two specimens were caught in 1916, six in 1924, one in 1932 and one in 1968 (Vujić et al. 2012). Recent records are from 2011 near Grenoble, and in 2016 from the Côte-d’Or region (in the Natural Reserve de la Combe Lavaux) (Francois et al. 2019).

In Switzerland, five specimens were caught in 2018 in the Ticino region (P. Lucia pers. comm. 2020). More research and monitoring is needed in order to obtain more information on the population size.",Unknown,"This European endemic species is known from France and Switzerland. In France, it is distributed in the eastern part, from Lorraine south to the Alpes-Maritimes, and in the south-west in Haut-Languedoc, with localities in Bourgogne, Hérault, Isère, Meurthe, Meurthe-et-Moselle and Côte-d’Or regions (Vujić et al. 2012, Speight 2018, Francois et al. 2019). In southern Switzerland, it has been recorded in the Ticino region (L. Pollini pers. comm. 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this endemic species is estimated to be 216,453 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 40 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

The species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. However, it is recommended to conserve its habitat and restrict overgrazing by livestock. Additional research and monitoring is needed on general abundance, habitat trends, ecological requirements, threats (especially to investigate the impact of grazing) and trends. In addition, raising awareness about this species would be beneficial. 

One point locality is within the boundaries of de la Combe Lavaux Natural Reserve (France). Lebard and Speight (2019) include this species in their list of Syrphidae of the Mercantour National Park (in France; IUCN Management Category II). In addition, a few point localities are within the Natura 2000 network.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149166996,149166985,Xanthogramma marginale,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Although endemic to the south-west of Europe and North Africa, this species does not qualify for any threatened category in Europe or the EU27 (to which its European range is restricted). There are no important specific threats influencing this species in the near future, its population is not severely fragmented and it is known from many localities. Thus, it is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27.","The preferred habitats of X. marginale are forests and open areas such as open maquis of Q. ilex and Q. pyrenaica, as well as dry, unimproved grassland (Speight 2018). The species can also be found in Mediterranean riparian ash woods (Ricarte et al. 2008) and in anthropized halophilous Mediterranean scrub (A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2020). Adults fly from April to early June visiting flowers of yellow composites and umbellifers. Larva of this species is unknown but suspected to be entomophagous, like other congeneric species.",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,"There is no information about population sizes and trends in Europe. However, this species can be locally common even in anthropized habitats (A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2020). There are about 50 specimens known from Spain in literature (see bibliography in Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), while in Portugal only two specimens are recorded.",Unknown,"Xanthogramma marginale occurs in Portugal, central and southern Spain, southern France, and Italy in Europe (Speight 2018).

Outside Europe it is known from North Africa (Morocco, Algeria) (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids (Rojo et al. 2003).",Terrestrial,"

There are not specific conservation actions for X. marginale. Research and monitoring are required to better understand population size and trend of this species in Europe.

The larval biology of this species is unknown, and further research on this species biology is required to inform effective conservation actions, should any be required in future.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167009,149167004,Xanthogramma laetum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment:  Least Concern (LC)

Xanthogramma laetum does not qualify for any threatened category in a European regional assessment. Its known area of occupancy is below 500 km2, but no specific threats have been identified.

","The preferred habitats of Xanthogramma laetum are forests of Abies/Picea and Pinus, including dry Pinus, and also Alnus incana alluvial forest. Adults fly from May to September visiting the flowers of Allium ursinum, Crataegus, Glecoma, Phyteuma spicatum, and Ranunculus. The larva is unknown but suspected to be entomophagous, like congeneric species (Speight 2018).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe. 


,"There is no information about population size and trends in Europe. However, the species appears to be locally scarce. For example, Nedeljković et al. (2018) reports three specimens from Serbia collected in 1957-1986, one specimen from Spain collected in 2016, and another from Montenegro in 2001.",Unknown,"Xanthogramma laetum occurs from northern Germany south to southwest France (Pyrenées-Atlantiques), from Belgium eastwards through central and southern Europe to Romania and European parts of Russia (Speight 2018).

Besides Europe this species also occurs in Siberia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids (Rojo et al. 2003).",Terrestrial,"

There are no conservation actions in place or needed for this species. Nonetheless, some subpopulations are indirectly protected in national parks, for example, in Fruška gora (Serbia), Durmitor (Montenegro) and Sovinecko (Czech Republic). Research and monitoring are required to better understand actual population size and trends for this species in Europe.

Larval biology of this species is unknown, and further research on this species' biology is required to inform any conservation measures.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167017,149167005,Eumerus strigatus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-11-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is known from Fennoscandia south to the Iberian and the Mediterranean Basin. The species is found in the major and central parts of Europe. The species is assessed as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution across Europe and its presumed large and stable overall population. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The species occurs in unimproved, humid, seasonally-flooded grassland, in broad-leaf forests and in open and dry unimproved pasture. It can also be found in horticultural land and suburban gardens. There are no major threats to species, but urbanization and land conversion due to agriculture and other human activities pose a minor threat to the species. Currently no conservation actions are required, but the monitoring of the population trends is recommended.

","The species is found in wetlands, forests and open ground in unimproved, humid, seasonally-flooded grassland, in broad-leaf forests and in open, dry unimproved pasture including dune grassland. It was transported to some areas by human activities, and it sometimes occurs in horticultural land and suburban gardens. It prefers visiting umbellifers, Allium ursinum, Convolvulus, Eschscholzia californica, Euphorbia, Fragaria, Leontodon, Papaver, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus, Sonchus arvensis and Taraxacum. The puparium is described and figured by Ricarte et al. (2017), and the larva is described by Heiss (1938). The species is a bulb feeder, and it has been recorded from lilies, parsnip, carrot, potato, asparagus, artichoke roots, and from rotting grapefruit. It is regarded as a minor pest of horticulture as it apparently only attacks bulbs when they are rotting (Speight 2018).","There are no major threats to the species, but urbanization and land conversion due to agriculture and other human activities pose a minor threat (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","

There is no information about population size, but the large number of findings indicate that population trend is stable (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is known from Fennoscandia south to the Iberian and the Mediterranean Basin, and in the major and central parts of Europe. There have been some problems with its identification in old records, where it may have been confused with Eumerus sogdianus or other similar species from the strigatus group. For example, in northern Italy, many identified specimens were actually sogdianus (D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2019). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, the species is known from Turkey, Russia (east from the Ural Mountains to the Pacific coast in Sakhalin), and to Japan. The species has been introduced in North America, and it has been recorded in both Canada and the United States. It has also been introduced to Australia and New Zealand (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are required to protect this species at the moment, but the monitoring of population trends is recommended. It occurs in many protected areas, among others in the Kopaonik National Park in Serbia, Durmitor National Park in Montenegro, Danube Delta National Park in Romania and Podyjí National Park in the Czech Republic. It also occurs in several Natura 2000 sites such as at Slovenska Istra in Slovenia, Otok Cres in Croatia, Recifii Jurasici Cheia in Romania, Kaňon Vltavy u Sedlce in Czech, Forêts picardes: massif des trois forêts et bois du Roi in France, Ostoja Kozubowska in Poland, and Ethnikos Drymos Vikou - Aoou in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167028,149167025,Xanthogramma dives,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread species, without evident signs of severe fragmentation in its European population and without actual threats identified. Therefore, this species is regarded as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27.

","Xanthogramma dives occurs in forest, both deciduous and coniferous and in broad-leaved evergreen forest, including mesophilous Fagus and thermophilous Quercus, especially in the vicinity of temporary streams; also in Mediterranean riparian Fraxinus forest, and in the vicinity of temporary streams in evergreen oak forest of Q. ilex and Q. suber. The species also inhabits garrigue, Abies forest, dry Pinus sylvestris forest, near temporary streams in Mediterranean pine forest and in olive orchards. Adults fly from May to June visiting flowers of Chaerophyllum hirsutum (Ricarte et al. 2014, Speight 2018). The larva is unknown, but suspected to be aphidophagous like other congeneric species.",

There are not specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,"

There is no information about population size and trend for this species in Europe. However, there seem to be a good number of subpopulations in central and southern Europe and it can be locally abundant in southern Spain (A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2020).

",Unknown,"The geographic range of Xanthogramma dives is uncertain due to confusion with other similar Xanthogramma species such as X. pedissequum and X. stackelbergi. Xanthogramma dives is confirmed from Spain, France, Netherlands, central Germany, northern Italy, Norway, Serbia, Montenegro and Greece (Nedeljković et al. 2018); it appears to be a central and southern European species, rare (Norway) or absent (UK) from the north.

The species has also been recorded from North Africa (Speight 2020).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids (Rojo et al. 2003).",Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation actions for this species. Research and monitoring are required to better understand the actual distribution of this species, as well as its population size and trend in Europe.

The larval biology of this species is unknown, and further research on this species biology is required to inform effective conservation actions, should any be required in future.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167038,149167035,Eumerus sinuatus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is assessed as Endangered for Europe and the EU27 Member States since it has a restricted area of occupancy (AOO) of about 100 km2 in Europe, the population is severely fragmented, and there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat throughout Europe. In the EU 27, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 76 km2. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is estimated to be about 1,500,000 km2. Habitat loss and habitat quality decline, even if slow, are continuous. This species is only present in natural forests and scrubby European habitats, which are in continuing decline due to logging, increasing urbanization, and intensive forest management, as well as expanding agricultural activity. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from populations outside the assessment region. Site and habitat protection of remaining Fagus forests and xeric calcareous and non-calcareous grasslands are needed. Monitoring of the population trends at all historical sites and research on life history and ecology and threats is required.

","The species prefers broad-leaf forests, open ground and scrubby habitats. It is found in forest fringes of warm and dry sites, in Fagus forests and in xeric, open, unimproved, dry, calcareous and non-calcareous grassland (Speight 2018). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species. Adults are known to visit Asparagus officinalis flowers (Speight 2018).","Logging and increasing urbanization are major threats to European Broadleaf and mixed forests. Intensive forest management, particularly large clear cuts reforested with coniferous monocultures, is another major threat to this type of habitat. Remaining forest habitats are often fragmented by divided highways and multi-track railroads, creating barriers to wildlife movement (EEA 2016). These threats directly affect species related to forests in any aspect of their lives. One locality in Serbia is particularly threatened by a construction project. In Italy, the main problem is expansion of vineyards on calcareous soils where the species occurs (D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2019).","There are no data on the population trend of this species. Despite being widely distributed, the species is very rare all over its range. It is usually found in very small patches, so big subpopulations are unlikely to exist (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The population is considered to be severely fragmented.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is found in central and southern France, in Bavaria and Baden-Wuerttemberg in southern Germany, Austria, Hungary, Slovakia, Serbia, and Romania (Speight 2020). It is also extant in Bolzano in northern Italy (D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2019), and further recent records were made from northeastern Italy, Serbia and from France in June 2005. Records from Hungary and Croatia are relatively old (Tóth 2011). Its presence in the Czech Republic is uncertain, regardless of the fact that it is included in the Czech Red List (J. Hadrava pers. comm. 2020). In Europe, its area of occupancy (AOO) is about 100 km2. In the EU 27, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 76 km2. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is estimated to be about 1,500,000 km2. It is found between 80 and 1,700 metres above sea level.

Outside of Europe, it is found in western Siberia and northern Kazakhstan (Stackelberg 1961).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"This species is on the list of strictly-protected species under the Serbian legislation (Code on declaration and protection of strictly protected wild species of plants, animals and fungi, “Official Gazette of RS”, no. 5/2010). It is listed as Endangered in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005) and Critically Endangered in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). Site and habitat protection of remaining Fagus forests and xeric calcareous and non-calcareous grasslands in Europe are needed. Monitoring of the population trends at all historical sites is required, as well as research on its life history, ecology and threats. It occurs in several Natura 2000 sites in Europe, such as at the Monte Musiné Habitats Directive Site in Italy; Le Mercantour and Bas-Rhin Habitat Directive Sites in France; Trockengebiete an den Werntalhängen zwischen Karsbach und Stetten Habitat Directive Site in Germany; Őrség, Papod és Miklád, Budai-hegység Habitats Directive Sites and Mátra and Alsó-Tisza-völgy Birds Directive Sites in Hungary; and Slovensky kras Birds Directive Site in Slovakia (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167051,149167047,Syrphus vitripennis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in Europe or the EU27. It is a widespread species, present in many habitats. including anthropogenic ones There are no specific threats identified for this species. Therefore, S. vitripennis is here regarded as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27.

","The preferred habitat of this species are forests (most types of deciduous and coniferous forest and conifer plantations). This species is significantly anthropophilic, occurring along field hedges, in suburban gardens and parks. Adults fly from April to October visiting flowers of white umbellifers, Achillea millefolium, Brassica rapa,Campanula rapunculoides, Cirsium, Convolvulus, Crataegus, Euphorbia, Leontodon, Origanum vulgare, Ranunculus, Rosa, and Rubus fruticosus (Speight 2020). The larva is described by Dušek and Laska (1964).",

This is one of the commonest hoverfly species in Europe and seems not to be subject to any threats.

,There is not information about population size and trends for this species in Europe. There are many specimens collected from different European countries.,Unknown,"This species is widely distributed in the whole Palaearctic. It occurs in almost every European country.

Besides Europe this species occurs in North Africa and North America (from Alaska to California), and Asia (Taiwan) (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded and used commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphid crop pests (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,

There are no specific conservation actions for this species.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167059,149167049,Eumerus rubrum,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This European endemic species is assessed as Endangered because it is found at only two to three locations on the Peloponnese Mountain range in Greece, with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 12 km2 and an extent of occurrence (EOO) estimated to be around 605 km2. The species is likely to be found in shrubby Mediterranean vegetation at high altitudes. Overgrazing and tourism activities are destructing and causing a continuous decline in the quality of its habitat. The last specimen of this species was found more than 10 years ago, and therefore further targeted surveys are needed to establish if the species is still extant in the areas where it was found. For further conservation of the species area and resource protection are needed as well as legislation on a national level. Future research should focus on population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats to this species. Monitoring of both the population and habitat trends is required.

","The larvae feed on plants, presumably developing in bulbs or other infested underground organs, like other congeneric species. It was last recorded flying during May and June (Speight et al. 2018). It is likely to be found in shrubby Mediterranean vegetation at high altitude (Vujić et al. 2019). Its preferred habitats are herb-rich open areas and dry pine forests (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). There is no further information on its habitats and ecology.","The main threats to this species are overgrazing, as well as the development of the tourism industry, such as the building of a ski-centre at Mount Chelmos (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).","

There is no information about the population size of this species, and the population trend is unknown. So far only three specimens have been found, all on the Peloponnese Mountains in Greece. The last specimen was found more than 10 years ago (in 2007) on Chelmos Mountain, although surveys in the area where it was found have been conducted several times since then (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

",Unknown,"This species is endemic to mainland Greece (Grković et al. 2017), where so far it has only been found on the Mediterranean mountains of the Peloponnese. It is found between 836 and 1,695 m above sea level. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be about 605 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) at 12 km2, based on the known localities.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions in place for the species. Although all known localities are within protected areas (for example, Chelmos-Vouraikos National Park and IBA (Important Bird Area) Taygetos Mountain) which are part of the Natura 2000 network, overgrazing and pressure from the tourism industry threaten it (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). It is crucial to change the management of these protected areas and hence limit the threats to the species. For its further conservation, area and resource protection are needed as well as legislation on a national level. It is also important to continue systematic monitoring, because the last specimen was found more than 10 years ago. Future research should focus on population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats to this species. Monitoring of both the population and habitat trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149167071,149167067,Syrphus sexmaculatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern on the regional level in both Europe and the EU27 due its wide range and the absence of identified threats.

,"Syrphus sexmaculatus occurs in forest and open ground, taiga (Nielsen 1998), dwarf scrub tundra and subalpine Betula forest (H. Bartsch pers. comm. 2020); and subalpine heath (Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults fly from June to August visiting the flowers of Matricaria, Ranunculus (Nielsen 1998), Bistorta vivipara, Geranium sylvaticum, Leucanthemum vulgare, Taraxacum (Bartsch et al. 2009). The larva is undescribed (Speight 2018).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,

There is no information about population size or trends for this species in Europe.

,Unknown,"Syrphus sexmaculatus occurs only in northern parts of Europe: Scandinavia (Norway, Finland, Sweden) and St. Petersburg and Karelia Regions in European parts of Russia (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018).

Besides Europe this species occurs also in North America in Alaska and Canada (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"

There are no conservation actions known for this species. This species is considered Least Concern in Sweden (https://artfakta.se) and Norway (https://artsdatabanken.no). Research on population trends is needed.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167080,149167070,Eumerus pusillus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is found in Portugal, Spain, around the Mediterranean basin to Greece, and on the Mediterranean islands. The species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States since it has a wide distribution in the Mediterranean, because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category, and because of a presumed common and stable overall population. It can be found in a variety of Mediterranean habitats, from wooded areas to open habitats, even bare areas. There are no known major threats to this species. Considering that the species is very common in eastern parts of its range, no protection measures are needed currently, but the monitoring of its population is recommended.

","The species prefers open forest ground, Cistus florida and Quercus pyrenaica maquis (Marcos-Garcia pers. comm. 2018 in Speight 2018), and more open, semi-arid, almost bare ground. It can also be found in hedgehog heath and Mediterranean dune systems (Speight 2018). On Cyprus, van Steenis et al. (2019) noted that it can be found in flower-rich abandoned vineyards, large open areas and meadows in montane forest dominated by Pinus brutia, Quercus alnifolia and Cistus spp., uncultivated fields with Foeniculum vulgare and Polygonum equisetiforme, in dry stream beds, along streams, and in broadleaved riverine forest. Adults visit umbellifers, Euphorbia, Hedera, Mentha, Solidago, Vinca (Marcos-García 1985; Speight 2018), Foeniculum vulgareΤουμπαρίνα (Greek) or Çarşambaotu (Turkish) (Cachrys crassiloba), and Cyprian 'Ann Ala' Ivy (Hedera pastuchovii cypria) (van Steenis et al. 2019). The larva was described by Ricarte et al. (2008) from larvae in decaying parts of bulbs of Drimia maritima. Van Eck (2016) reports further rearing of the species from Drimia maritima bulbs.",There are no known major threats to this species.,"There are no exact data about the population size of this species, but it is considered common in the eastern part of its range and its population is presumed to be stable (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is found from mainland Portugal, Gibraltar, Spain (mainland and the Balearic Islands), and around the Mediterranean basin to Greece, and on the Mediterranean islands (Speight 2018). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is also known from Turkey, Tunisia, and Algeria.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation measures in place for this species. Considering that the species is common in eastern parts of its range, no protection measures are needed at this time. Monitoring of the population trends is recommended.
The species occurs at several Natura 2000 sites in Europe such as at Sintra / Cascais, Paul do Taipal and Serra de Montejunto in Portugal, Llanos de Cáceres y Sierra de Fuentes, Sierra de Aracena y Picos de Aroche, Sierra de Grazalema, Estrecho, Ramblas de Gérgal and Tabernas y Sur de Sierra Alhamilla in Spain, Rdumijiet ta' Malta: Ir-Ramla taċ-Ċirkewwa sal-Ponta ta' Bengħisa in Malta; Monte Coccovello - Monte Crivo - Monte Crive in Italy, and Oros Erymanthos, Oros Parnassos, Oros Taygetos - Lagkada Trypis, Sifnos: Profitis Ilias Mechri Dytikes Aktes Kai Thalassia Periochi, Anafi: Chersonisos Kalamos - Roukounas, Antikythira - Prasonisi Kai Lagouvardos, Lefka Ori Kai Paraktia Zoni, Kourtaliotiko Farangi, Farangi Preveli, Prassano Farangi, Dikti: Oropedio Lasithou, Katharo, Selena, Selakano, Chalasmeni Koryfi, Voreia Karpathos Kai Saria Kai Paraktia Thalassia Zoni, Anatoliki Rodos, Samos: Oros Kerkis, Voreia Chios Kai Nisoi Oinousses Kai Paraktia Thalassia Zoni, Lesvos Kolpos Geras, Elos Ntipi Kai Oros Olympos – Potamos Evergetoulas, Vouna Evrou - Potamos Lyras - Spilaia Didymoteichou Kai Kefalovounou and Stena Nestou in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167091,149167088,Syrphus rectus,Data Deficient,,2021,2021-07-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

Syrphus rectus is assessed as Data Deficient because of its unclear taxonomic status; the European population might be referable to S. vitripennis (Ssymank et al. 1999). Even if referable to the North American S. rectus it is unclear whether European records represent established native populations as the species appears to be migratory. Further taxonomic and faunistic research is needed to clarify this species status in Europe.,"Syrphus rectus occurs in different types of deciduous forests and open ground, scrub and grasslands. There are no data about the plant species which adults visit. The flight period is from July to May. The larva is undescribed (Speight 2018). Short and Bergh (2005) illustrate the eggs of Syrphus rectus from North America, where the larva of this species is apparently a significant predator of the aphids on fruit trees, including the woolly apple aphid (Eriosoma lanigerum).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,

There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe.

,Unknown,"The geographic range of this species is uncertain due to confusion with other European species such as Syrphus vitripennis. Its presence is reported from Denmark, Finland, France, Luxembourg, Germany, Ireland and Switzerland.

Besides Europe, Syrphus rectus occurs in North America (USA and Canada) and it may be to a significant extent migratory (Speight 2018).

There are still doubts about the assignment of European subpopulations to this species (Ssymank et al. 1999), and most records in Europe should be treated with caution. If European records are genuinely conspecific with North American S. rectus, it is likely that they represent migratory specimens or introductions rather than an established European population.","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphids (Speight 2018).",Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions in place for this species. Research is needed to clarify the taxonomic identity of this species across its range, and the distribution as well as the identity of European specimens referred to by this name.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167102,149167099,Merodon funestus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is listed as Least Concern both in Europe and the EU 27, primarily due to its wide distribution (throughout in Central and Southern Europe).  Both the area of occupancy (AOO) and the extent of occurrence (EOO) are above thresholds for the threatened categories. Due to ongoing threats (primarily unsustainable forest management, but also urbanization), continuing decline in habitat quality, as well as habitat fragmentation and loss is expected. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is recommended. Further research is needed on population and habitat trends, species ecology and biology, as well as other potential threats to the habitat of this species. 


","The preferred habitat of this species is open ground in forests. It occurs in open areas in evergreen oak forests of Quercus coccifera or Quercus ilex, and by seasonal streams in Balkan thermophilus deciduous Quercus forests. It is also present in tall-herb ruderal communities on sparsely vegetated open ground close to seasonal rivers and streams, or in drainage ditches. It is known to visit the white and yellow flowers of AdonisAnacyclus and Ranunculus (Vujić et al. 2020).

The flight period is from April to October. The developmental stages have not been described. The adults closely resemble honeybees (Apis) and spend much time sitting on flowers. They fly low through and over ground vegetation, and settle on stones (Speight 2020).","

The main threat is habitat degradation, primarily due to conversion of forest areas, urbanization and infrastructure development, intensive tourism especially in Mediterranean coastal areas.


","The population trend is unknown. According to available data, there are numerous subpopulations of this species in the Mediterranean basin.

.",Unknown,"The species is distributed in central and southern Europe. In Greece, it has been recorded at low altitudes in the north-eastern and central parts of the mainland, as well as in the Peloponnese Peninsula, the Ionian Islands, the Cycladic island of Ios and the East Aegean island of Samos.

Outside of Europe, it is also present in Turkey, Israel and Libya (Vujić et al. 2020).

In Europe and EU27, both the area of occupancy (AOO) and the extent of occurrence (EOO) are above the thresholds for threatened categories.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

The species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. A number of point localities are within the boundaries of protected areas and the Natura 2000 network. For example, there are point localities in the Natural Park Los Alcornocales, Natural Park Sierras de Cazorla, Segura y Las Villas; Regional Natural Park des Pyrenees Catalanes, Natural Park Grazalema in Sapin, and in the Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli Forest National Park, National Park of Tzoumerka, Peristeri and Arachthos Gorge in Greece.

Monitoring of population and habitat trends is recommended. Further research is needed on these and on the ecology, biology and other potential threats to the habitat of this species. In addition, raising awareness would be beneficial. Especially in non-protected areas, it is recommended to conserve its habitat by enforcement of environmental regulations, rules and other policies.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167112,149167110,Syrphus nitidifrons,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This European endemic species is assessed as Least Concern both globally and in the EU27 due to its wide range and the lack of identified threats.,"The preferred habitat of Syrphus nitidifrons is conifer forest (Abies, Picea, humid Pinus). Adults fly from April to June visiting flowers of Amelanchier, Lychnis, Prunus serotina, Ranunculus repens, Salix, and Sorbus aucupariae. The larva is undescribed (Speight 2018).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species.

,"There is not information about population size and trends for this species in Europe. Only two specimens have been collected in Serbia (Kopaonik National Park), four specimens in Greece, and only one specimen in England.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is known from Denmark in the north to northern Spain in the south, and from the southern coast of England to northern Romania and the Greek East Aegean islands in the east. It is also present in Belgium and the Netherlands through central Europe (Switzerland) to the Balkan Peninsula. Syrphus nitidifrons appears to be spreading rapidly through Atlantic parts of Europe at present (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,

There are not specific conservation actions in place for this species. Syrphus nitidifrons is listed as Vulnerable in Denmark (https://www.allearter-databasen.dk) and as Data Deficient in the German province Bayern (von der Dunk et al. 2003)

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167122,149167120,Eumerus narcissi,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-03-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This species is considered to be native to France (with known records from southern Corsica and southern mainland France), with a record from Madeira (Portugal) excluded here as considered to be the result of introduction, and with records from Turkey requiring confirmation. Records from North America result from introductions. There is insufficient distribution information in order to estimate the extent of occurrence or area of occupancy for this species, and the number of locations cannot be estimated. The species appears to be rare at its confirmed known native localities in France, however, there is no information on its population size or trend. The species is considered Data Deficient (DD), with research in order to understand the native range, population size and population trend.

","In France, it has been found in Quercus ilex maquis with herb-rich ground flora (Speight et al. 2013).

In its introduced range in North America, the species prefers forest, small open areas in Quercus ilex shrubland and around bulb farms (Skevington et al. 2019). Larvae are frequently found in Narcissus bulbs but have also been reared from Allium and Hippeastrum (Speight et al. 2013). The species is considered as a pest for bulb plants, particularly in California where it has become naturalized.","The main threats to the region where the species is found are intensive urbanization, increased water consumption, agricultural intensification and fires caused mainly by human negligence and climate change (WWF 2013).","There are no data about population size for this species, and the population trend is unknown. In its natural range in Europe, the species has recently been recorded in southern France with fewer than 10 records (Speight et al. 2013), and there is one record from Madeira in Portugal (Speight 2018), which is excluded from this assessment.",Unknown,"This species is a native endemic to Europe, where it is known from two records in France (Biot Municipality, Alpes Maritimes, Côte d’Azur, southern mainland France; Speight et al. 2013) and from a small number of specimens collected from Bonifacio, southern Corsica; Lebard et al. 2019). The species has also been recorded from Porto Santo in the Portuguese Madeiran Archipelago, however, the origin of this latter record is of uncertain origin, and it is considered likely to occur there as a result of introduction. The area of occupancy (AOO) is a minimum of 8 km2, however, given the lack of detailed distribution data for the species in Côte d’Azur, it is not considered appropriate to estimate figures AOO or extent of occurrence.

Outside of the Europe region, the species has been reported from Anatolia in Turkey (Lebard et al. 2019), but this record is unconfirmed; the species is present in the list of the Agricultural Ministry of Turkey as a pest of ornamental plants, but it was not confirmed, R. Hayat (pers. comm. 2021) has no specimens in his collection. Further, it is not present in the recent checklist for Turkey (Saribiyik 2014); the species is here considered to be endemic to the European region.

The species has been introduced to North America, where it has become naturalized in California. There is a single record from Ontario in Canada (Speight 2018), also considered to be the result of introduction.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures in place for this species. Known records of this species do not occur in any protected areas.

Confirmation of the origin of the record from Madeira and of its occurrence in Turley is required. Research on population size, population trend, distribution, trends and threats are required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149167132,149167130,Syrphus auberti,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This European endemic species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) globally due to its relatively restricted known area of occupancy (<100 km2), suspected severe fragmentation of subpopulations, and an inferred continuing decline in the of quality of its habitat due to various pressures.

This species is also assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) for the EU 27 Member States due to its relatively restricted known area of occupancy (<100 km2), suspected severe fragmentation of subpopulations, and an inferred continuing decline in the of quality of its habitat due to various pressures.

","Syrphus auberti occurs in open ground; unimproved, humid, calcareous and non-calcareous, montane and subalpine grassland (Speight 2018). There are no data about the plant species which flowers adults of this species visit. The larva is not described. The flight period is from July to August (Speight 2018).",

This species is threatened by habitat destruction and climate change. Overgrazing in alpine grasslands and snow-related tourist activities may threaten this high montane species.

,"There is no information about population trends. There are 11 specimens collected so far from Switzerland. At the type locality 7 specimens were collected in 1995, and four additional specimens from the Swiss Alps were collected in 2014. In France only 4 specimens were collected in 2016 and 2018 (X. Lair in litt.). Its apparent occurrence in low densities in high montane areas suggest that the population may be severely fragmented.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it occurs in the Alps , with records from Germany, Switzerland and France (Goeldlin de Tiefenau 1996, Goeldlin de Tiefenau and Speight 1997, Speight 2018). It has also been recorded from the Jura in eastern France (Réserve naturelle nationale du lac de Remoray (Claude and Tissot 2013) and FrancheComté (Gharet et al. 2011)) and southern France, from l’Ariège department (Lair and Maurette 2020) and the Pyrenees, from Porté-Puymorens and Dorres, at the junction of France, Spain and Andorra, by Lair et al. (2018). It has also been recorded from Vorarlberg (Pruner 2016) and the Allgäu Alps in Austria (Heimburg 2018). It has been found to an elevation of c.2,400 m asl.","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. Even though it has a potential use in pest control of their prey insects and crop pollination, the rarity of this species makes commercial exploitation difficult.",Terrestrial,Syrphus auberti is considered  Data Deficient (DD) in the Red List of  Bayern province of Germany (von der Dunk et al. 2003). Additional monitoring is needed to better understand the population trends and impacts of threats. Research required to better understand larval biology.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167142,149167140,Eumerus minotaurus,Vulnerable,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

The species is endemic to the Crete and Karpathos islands in Greece. It is assessed as Vulnerable due to its limited extent of occurrence (EOO) of 7,631 kmand its area of occupancy (AOO) of 72 km2. Today, it is only known from nine locations because of the threats such as coastal development for tourism and overgrazing. Furthermore, the species' habitat is in continuing decline due to human pressure on the islands' ecosystems. The species prefers forest and open ground and more particularly Evergreen Oak. Habitat and area protection is needed. It is necessary to research the life history and ecology as well as monitor the population trends of the species.

","This species prefers forest and open ground, and more particularly Quercus coccifera and garrigue habitats (Claussen and Lucas 1988). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for larval stages of this species.","

The natural landscapes of Crete are highly affected by pastures and grazing in mountain areas, the growing tourism development in the northern coastal zone (mainly tourism accommodation construction), and intensive agriculture in the southern coastal zone (pesticides and land clearance). Concrete production and road construction are devastating large areas of land with significant native habitats. Today, at least 50% of the land surface is considered to be used for grazing by sheep and goats. Overgrazing and fire caused by climate change and human activities, leading to soil erosion, are other important threats on Karpathos island. There is an increase of tourism in specific sites, especially at the coastal areas (FILOTIS - Database for the Natural Environment of Greece).

",There is no information on the population size or trends of this species.,Unknown,"This species is endemic to Crete and Karpathos in Greece (Chroni et al. 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 7,631 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 72 km2The species is known from nine locations.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"Most of the known localities occur within protected areas, such as Lefka Ori Kai Paraktia Zoni and near the Dikti Mountains such as at Oropedio Lasithiou, Katharo, Selena, Selakano, and Chalasmeni Koryfi Natura 2000 sites on Crete in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020). It is necessary to research the life history and ecology as well as to monitor the population trends of this species. There are no known conservation actions for the species so far; however, area and habitat protection is needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149167154,149167151,Scaeva selenitica,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in Europe and the EU 27, where it has a wide distribution and it is abundant with large subpopulations. There are no major threats to this species, and no conservation action is required at present, only studies of larval biology to estimate potential impacts of invasive ladybirds on this species. The species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.","

This species inhabits various types of forests, scrub woodland and orchards, including evergreen Quercus ilex forest in southern Europe (Speight 2018). The flight period of adults is from March to September over much of Europe, but is restricted in montane regions and cooler climatic zones (Speight 2018). Adults visit a wide range of flowers, e.g. white Apiaceae; Buxus, Erica, Hamamelis, Leontodon, Ligustrum, Origanum, Polygonum, Ranunculus spp, Salix, Sarrothamnus, Taraxacum, Tussilago, Viburnum opulus, Anemone nemorosa, Rubus, Caltha palustris, Cichorium, Senecio spp., Lathyrus japonica, Crataegus spp., Succisa pratensis, Verbascusm, Geranium, Crepis spp. Cirsium vulgare, Bunias orientalis, Tripleurospermum perforatum, Calluna vulgaris and some others have been referred by Speight (2018), Bartsch et al. (2009) and Röder (1990). In central Europe and recently also in Great Britain, females can hibernate during winter (Mazánek and Láska 2007, Ball et al. 2011) and moreover Kula (1982) reports larvae of this species as overwintering among leaf litter of the floor of spruce (Picea) forest. The annual occurrence of this species in northern Europe (e.g. in the Faroes) is probably highly dependent upon annual immigration from southern parts and records of the adults are restricted to late May to September there (Dušek and Láska 1974, Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Jensen 2001). Diagnostic features of the last instar larva and puparium of this species have most recently been given and figured by Láska et al. (2006). Larvae feed on various aphids, usually on trees and shrubs (see Rojo et al. 2003).

","

There are no major threats to this species. This species inhabits conifer plantations and orchards as well as natural forest. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axy ridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This ladybird is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brow 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly as it was observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

",

This species is common and often the dominant hoverfly species in most forested parts of Europe.

,Stable,"

Scaeva selenitica is widely distributed in almost the whole of Europe. This species is absent only from the extreme north of Europe, Iceland and from several areas and islands of Mediterranean area, where migratory specimens of this species could be also occasionally recorded (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Dušek and Láska 1985, Vujić et al. 2020).

According to Speight (2018), Saribiyik (2014) and Dousti and Hayat (2006) this species is present also in North Africa, Turkey and Iran and it is known from the Urals through Siberia to Cis-Baikal and on to Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands. However Barkalov and Mutin (2018) mentioned that this species is present only in Eurasia, including the European part of Russia and Altai. According to Dušek and Láska (1985) records from southern parts of the Palaearctic region require confirmation, since they may reflect confusion with S. dignota and S. lunata.

","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential be use in biocontrol of aphids in forestry and agriculture.

",Terrestrial,

Scaeva selenitica is not considered threatened in any area in Europe and its biology is relatively well-known. However larval biology is known inadequately to estimate potential impacts of invasive ladybirds on this species.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167165,149167162,Cheilosia proxima,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Cheilosia proxima is assessed as Least Concern because of its relatively large range. Although a decreasing population trend is recorded in some European countries, it is considered that the entire European subpopulation is still stable. Potential threats are degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to poor management practices of European forests, agricultural intensification, unsustainable farming and infrastructure development. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trend is needed.

","This species prefers forest, both coniferous and deciduous, acidophilous Quercus and humid Fagus/Picea, and also occurs in scrub and unimproved grassland. It can be seen near clearings or tracksides, and may occur in small patches of woodland, among scrub in old pasture and in more open grassland situations. The males hover at up to 6 m beside trees. Both sexes rest on the foliage of bushes and trees, not infrequently at more than 3 m from the ground. Adults visit flowers of white umbellifers, Crataegus, Euphorbia, Prunus spinosa, Ranunculus and Valeriana dioica. The larva has been described and figured by Rotheray (1988), collected from rosettes of Cirsium palustre, where it is an external feeder on the root collar and the lateral roots. The species has also been reared from other Cirsium spp and Centaurea maculosum. It overwinters as a puparium. The morphology of the chorion of the egg is figured by Kuznetzov (1988) (Speight 2018).","The habitat of this species is threatened due to unsustainable forest management, agricultural intensification, unsustainable farming and infrastructure development.","There is no information on population size or trends, but the population is considered stable.",Stable,"This is a widely distributed species, with a range stretching from Fenno-Scandinavia south to Pyrenees and mountainous parts of Spain, and from Britain eastwards throughout much of Europe into Turkey and European parts of Russia, and though Siberia from the Urals to Kamchatka in the Russian Far East (Speight 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. Additional research on its population size and trend, as well as its ecology is needed. Monitoring of habitat trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167176,149167173,Scaeva mecogramma,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species inhabit primarily threatened natural habitats eg. Mediterranean Quercus ilex/suber forest, but it also inhabits anthropogenic habitats (olive and citrus orchards) so is probably not threatened across Europe or the EU as a whole, even though it is seemingly not as abundant in olive-growing regions today as in the past. The distribution however seems to be restricted and relictual and most records of this species except these from Spain are too old (older than 30 years) to be used for calculating extent of occurrence or area of occupancy with any confidence. It is a strongly migratory species.

The species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","

S. mecogramma primarily inhabits Mediterranean Quercus ilex/Q. suber forest and Q. rotundifolia woodland. Secondary habitats are western Mediterranean high maquis and also olive (Olea europea) and citrus orchards. Males hover 3-6 m above ground among open woodland, close to the canopy of an adjacent tree. Females fly in dappled sunlight along the edge of evergreen oak forest/maquis, at 2–3 metres from the ground. Adults visit yellow Asteraceae (Speight 2018). Rojo et al. (1999) dissected the guts of S. mecogramma specimens (from the Natural Park of the Columbretes Archipelago, 39°54´N, 0°41´E) and found pollen grains that mostly belonged to the Lobudaria maritima. These authors also found on the body of specimens of S. mecogramma the pollen from at least 8 plant species, among which Daucus gingidium was the most frequent.

The adults flight period is from May to June and August to September (Speight 2018). It is a migratory species (Speight et al. 2016) that could migrate far outside the suitable breeding sites (Maibach et al. 1992). Larvae were collected repeatedly as preying on psyllids Euphyllura oliviana on olive trees in spring (May and June) and in autumn (September and December) by Rojo et al. (1999), who also described in detail larval biology.


","This species mainly inhabits Quercus forests as its primary habitats, which are threatened by forestry, human activities and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016), causing a decline of extent and quality of natural suitable habitats for this species. This species also inhabits anthropogenic habitats (olive orchards), but it appears to be less abundant in these than in the past (Speight 2018). This author attributed this to the heavy and repeated use of non-specific insecticidal treatments in commercial olive orchards, in attempts to prevent infestation of olives by the olive fly (Bactrocera oleae (Rossi)).","

The range of this species is rather restricted but this species is also associated with anthropogenic habitats (olive orchards) (Rojo et. al. 1999). The population of the species is decreasing in France (Speight et al. 2016). Sceava mecogramma is not as abundant in olive-growing regions as in the past (Speight 2018). It seems that this species is very rare except for specific places in Spain (Santos Rojo pers. comm. 2020). While there has been no monitoring across Europe as a whole it is suspected that the population trend is declining, based on the known threats to the main natural habitats of this species and the status of subpopulations in areas where sufficient data exist to infer a trend, such as France.

",Decreasing,"

This is a Mediterranean species that is known in Europe from several areas in Spain, Portugal, southern France, Corsica, Italy (northern mainland, Sicily, Sardinia) and Lesbos (Greece) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Speight 2018, Vujić et al. 2020). It is occasionally recorded far outside the suitable breeding sites, for example in Switzerland, 1,900-2,000 m in Bretolet in the Alps (Maibach et al. 1992). The sole record from Scotland (1905) is exceptional according to Dušek and Láska (1985); it is discussed by Ball et al. (2011) as probably an accidental import.

It is known also from North Africa (Morocco, Algeria) (Kassebeer 1998, Haffaressas et al. 2017).

","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, this species has the potential to be used in biocontrol of psyllids in olive orchards.

",Terrestrial,"

This species is regarded as declining in France and as threatened in Switzerland (Speight et al. 2016) since there are only two records of this species in Switzerland (1962 and 1967), although these were probably migrant females (Aubert et al. 1976, Maibach et al. 1992). No conservation measures are currently ongoing. Further research on population and threats is necessary. It is necessary to control the non-selective pesticide use in secondary habitats and olive orchards, and to preserve natural and semi-natural Quercus forest. Monitoring of population and habitat trends are necessary.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167186,149167184,Cheilosia pilifer,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered because of its severely fragmented population, the relatively small area of occupancy (AOO for Europe is 64 kmand for the EU27 60 km2), and an inferred continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat, mostly due to tourism, infrastructure development and unsustainable grazing. The population is considered to be severely fragmented, as this species is restricted to the Alpine region in Europe and associated with alpine habitats which are under immense pressure. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trends is needed.

","

This species apparently prefers unimproved calcareous and non-calcareous grassland, from the Larix/Pinus mugo zone upwards to above 2,500 m. Adults fly at up to 1 m, in open grassland, settling on vegetation. They visit flowers of Ranunculus. The flight period is from the beginning of June to end of July, plus in August at higher altitudes. The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018).

","Habitat loss and fragmentation are the major threats to alpine biodiversity. Tourism, infrastructure development and unsustainable grazing are the main causes. Climate change is suspected to be having both ongoing and future impacts on this species.","

There is no information about the population size and trends of this species. Around 20 specimens have been collected across its entire range. Although the population trend is unknown, there have been very few records over the last 20 years and very few recent ones, so a decline in the population is suspected. The population is considered to be severely fragmented, because it is restricted to the Alpine region in Europe, and associated with alpine habitats which are under immense pressure. The mountain-top habitat is naturally severely fragmented, restricting communication between subpopulations.

",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe. It is distributed in France, Germany, Switzerland, Austria and Italy (Speight 2018). In Europe, its extent of occurrence is estimated to be 66,768 km2 and the area of occupancy to be 64 km2. In the EU 27, the extent of occurrence is estimated to be 667,68 km2, and area of occupancy to be 60 km2.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. Some point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network or National Parks. Additional research on its population size and trends, as well as its ecology is needed. Monitoring of habitat trends is required. Better management of grazing and tourism is recommended.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167207,149167205,Cheilosia pictipennis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) for both Europe and the EU27 Member States because of its relatively small area of occupancy (180 km2 in Europe; 72 km2 in EU 27), a decline in the quality of its habitat (mostly due to tourism, infrastructure development and unsustainable grazing) and the severe fragmentation of its subpopulations. Further research into its distribution, ecology, threats and population trend is needed.

","

This species prefers mature Abies/Picea forest and unimproved calcareous montane grassland. Adults fly low in open areas within Picea forest or in unimproved grassland at higher altitude, and may settle on the ground. They visit flowers of Ranunculus and Sorbus aucuparia. The flight period is from May to June and on to July at higher elevations. The developmental stages are unknown (Speight 2018).

","

Habitat loss and fragmentation are the major threats to Alpine biodiversity, and are considered to affect this species. Infrastructure development, tourism and unsustainable grazing are major causes of habitat degradation. There are no data on modelling of climate change effects, but climate change is predicted to have a future impact especially in the Balkans.

","

There is no information about the population size and trends of this species. Around 100 specimens have been collected so far across the entire range. Most of the records are more than 20 years old; the most recent specimen was found in 2015 in Switzerland. It is not a difficult species to see in the field, but there are only a few new records. This suggests that the species is rare and potentially in decline, but further research is required to confirm the population trend. The population is considered to be severely fragmented because it is restricted to the highest mountains in Europe, and connected with alpine habitats which are under immense pressure.

",Unknown,"

This species is distributed in Germany, France, Switzerland, Austria, Romania, Italy, Greece, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Serbia. Speight (2020) lists European Russia as well, but this cannot be confirmed with certainty.

Outside of Europe, it is found in Siberia and the Caucasus (Speight 2018, 2020, Mengual et al. 2020). In Europe, it is restricted to the highest mountains – the Alps, Pyrenees, Carpathians, and Balkan mountains. In Europe, its extent of occurrence is estimated to be 776,717 km2 and area of occupancy 180 km2. In the EU 27, the extent of occurrence is estimated to be 769,716 km2 and area of occupancy 72 km2.

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no conservation actions known for this species. Some of the point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network and protected areas. Additional research on its ecology, population size and trends is needed. Monitoring of population and habitat trends is very important. Sustainable grazing and tourism management are required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167218,149167215,Parasyrphus relictus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-09-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread arboreal species with numerous subpopulations. Declines in Western Europe have been observed but are probably linked to local changes in forestry management in these areas and there are no documented threats to this species elsewhere. The species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

No conservation action is required at present, except research on larval biology that is known inadequately to estimate possible impacts of invasive ladybirds.","This species occurs usually in conifer forest (Abies, Picea, humid Pinus), including plantations but preferably where these are semi-natural or well-preserved, but also occasionally in deciduous forest (humid Fagus) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Kula 2001). It appears to be a largely arboreal species, but will descend to visit flowers in rides and clearings (Ball et al. 2011). The adults visit flowers of most herbaceous plants (white Apiaceae, yellow Ranunculaceae) and many other herbs, shrubs and trees (Speight 2018, Barstch et al. 2009, Röder 1990). According to Aubert et al. (1976) adults also migrate. The flight period of adults is from April to September, with two generations at lower altitudes (Speight 2018, Kula 2001). At higher altitudes or latitudes the flight period is more restricted and there is one peak in July/August (Speight 2018). The aphid-feeding larva has been found mainly on conifers (Abies, Picea and Pinus), but also on beech Fagus sylvatica and on blackcurrant Ribes nigrum (Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018). Larvae have been recorded overwintering among leaf litter on the floor of spruce (Picea) forest (Kula 1980).","Apart from the general threats for biodiversity (e.g. using of non selective pesticides against homopteran pest in conifer plantations), including deforestation, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe. This species seems to be widespread also in conifer plantations, although generally only where these have a similar structure to natural forest. Declines of this species in Western Europe could be partly explained by changes in forest management in these countries, where there has been a shift away from coniferous plantations. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). The invasive species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).","Parasyrphus relictus has numerous subpopulations in almost all humid and forested areas in Europe. It is abundant in Fennoscandia and Central Europe (Bartsch et al. 2009, Kula 2001), but it is regarded as rare and decreasing in Denmark (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight et al. 2016) and as declining in Ireland, Belgium and the Netherlands (Speight et al. 2016). The number of occurrence records of this species in Great Britain has been steeply declining according to Ball et al. (2011).",Stable,"This species is widespread in subarctic and boreal Holarctic and forested submountainous and mountainous temperate areas south to the Pyrenees (Spain), Northern Apennines (Italy), Pindos (Greece) and the northern Caucasus in Europe (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Vujić et al. 2020, Sommaggio 2010, Burgio et al. 2015, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017; Barkalov pers. comm. 2020).

Outside Europe it ranges from the Urals to central Siberia (Cis-Baikal, Yakutia), Mongolia to northeastern Siberia and in North America south to California and Colorado (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Vockeroth 1992).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially.",Terrestrial,"Parasyrphus relictus is considered threatened in Ireland by Speight et al. (2006) and as Vulnerable in the Netherlands by Reemer et al. (2009). The biology of this species is relatively well-known, however larval biology is known inadequately to estimate possible impacts of invasive ladybirds on this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167229,149167226,Cheilosia pedestris,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered because it has a severely fragmented population, a relatively small area of occupancy (32 km2 in Europe and 24 km2 in the EU 27) and is found in only seven locations. There is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat, inferred from logging, unsustainable grazing and infrastructure development. Further research into the ecology, threats and population trend of this rare alpine species is needed.



","

This species has been recorded from unimproved montane/subalpine, calcareous grassland within the Fagus/Abies zone, up to 1,800 m. It can also be found in subalpine Pinus uncinata forest on karst. Adults fly fast and low over short ground vegetation. They settle on foliage of shrubs along the woodland edge. The flight period is from mid-May to June. The developmental stages are unknown (Speight 2018).

","

The habitat of this species is threatened by logging (commercial forestry), but the most significant threats are unsustainable grazing and infrastructure development (ski centres, road networks, etc.), which can threaten it even in protected areas.

","

There is no information on the population trends of this species. About 10 individuals have been found so far, most of them from Italy. The most recent record is from 2003, collected in Italy. The population trend is unknown; the lack of recent records may indicate a decline, but further research is needed to confirm this. The population is considered to be severely fragmented. The largest subpopulation occurs near and within Parco Nazionale del Gran Paradiso, while in other parts of Europe it is scattered and restricted to small subpopulations with little or no communication among them.

",Unknown,"

This species is endemic to Europe. It is distributed in Italy and Switzerland (the Alps and the Jura mountains) (Speight 2018). In Europe, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 37,851 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 32 km2. In the EU 27, the AOO is 24 km2 and the EOO is 8507 km2.

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. Two point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network, and three point localities are within Parco Nazionale Gran Paradiso in Italy; it also occurs in Monte Baldo Regional Park in Italy. Its conservation needs should be taken into account when creating and implementing management plans within those protected areas. Further research on its ecology, population trends and possible threats is needed. Monitoring of habitat trends is required, particularly close to Lake Garda in Italy. Controlling the level of grazing is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167238,149167228,Parasyrphus proximus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC°)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC°)

The full distribution as well as population status of P. proximus in Europe is uncertain, and there is a high probability that either it is a migrant visitor to at least part of its European range or that it could be overlooked up to now due to great similarity with P. malinellus. As such, it is highly likely that it will be more widely distributed.

The calculated area of occupancy in Europe is only 164 km2, and it is listed as Vulnerable in the Norwegian Red List, but this uncertainty makes it unclear how reliable this estimate is. It is possible that it may be genuinely restricted in Europe and so close to qualifying for a threatened category, as it is presumed there is a continuing decline in the quality and extent of its habitat but it does not occur at fewer than 10 locations, however there is high probability of immigration of specimens from Russia since it is migratory species, so it is necessary to downgrade the category to Least Concern both in Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","

P. proximus is known from humid mixed boreal forest and Alnus glutinosa forest (Speight 2018). Adults were observed along forest tracks and edges, and in adjacent fields, often several metres above ground (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults fly from mid-May (peak) to June and visit flowering Caltha palustris, Prunus padus, Prunus spinosa, Ribes alpinum, Rosa canina (Bartsch et al. 2009) and Salix (van Steenis 2011) in north Europe. In Germany, two males were collected during April from comparatively cool and damp habitats within the otherwise warm study area (Ssymank and Doczkal 2017). The larva is undescribed, but it is likely to feed on (among other things conifers) aphids (Bartsch et al. 2009).

","

Any current threats to this species are unknown, since there is no adequate information on the distribution and biology of this species. Nevertheless, it is presumed that there is a continuing decline of extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species, due to human activities (such as commercial forestry activities) and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016). Climate change may also threaten this species.

","

Recent distribution data and population data of P. proximus in Europe is incomplete. There are only scattered records from Europe, but this species is probably a widely distributed and a resident in Fennoscandia. This species may be migratory (Bartsch et al. 2009, Ssymank and Doczkal 2017), and may periodically immigrate into Sweden from the east (Bartsch et al. 2009), or it could be overlooked due to confusion with the similar species P. malinellus (Ssymank and Doczkal 2017). Ssymank and Doczkal (2017) noted that their record of this species from Baden-Württemberg is very surprising since the species had not been found in Central Europe, and that it cannot be determined whether the collected specimens belong to an autochthonous population or are migratory specimens.

",Unknown,"

Parasyrphus proximus was described by Mutin (1990) on the basis of specimens morphologically very similar to Parasyrphus malinellus from the Far East (Khabarovsk region) and from the Moscow region. It has been reported also from Sweden, Norway, Finland (Bartsch et al. 2009, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Nielsen 1999), Russian Karelia (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020) and recently from the southwestern corner of Germany (Baden-Württemberg) (Ssymank and Doczkal 2017). According to Speight (2018) this species is distributed from central and northern parts of Fennoscandia eastwards into European parts of Russia and on through Siberia to the Pacific coast.

","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,"Further survey work is needed to determine the distribution and to estimate recent population trend of this species especially in temperate Europe as well as its biology. P. proximus is listed in the 2015 Norwegian Red List as Vulnerable applying criterion B1a((i))b(iii)+2a((i))b(iii) (Gammelmo et al. 2015). Haarto and Kerppola (2007) listed this species as DD for Finland. In the Swedish National Red List from 2020, the species is listed as Least Concern (ArtDatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167248,149167246,Cheilosia nivalis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This European endemic is assessed as Endangered in Europe and EU 27 based on its known area of occupancy (116 km2 in Europe and 88 km2 in EU 27) and severely fragmented population, and because there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat inferred from changes in land-use throughout Europe. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better the existing threats.

","

The preferred habits of this species appear to be stony, open areas along rivers, torrents or roads, unimproved grasslands within the upper levels of Abies/Picea forests upwards, through the Pinus cembra/mugo zone and into unimproved, sparsely vegetated, calcareous and non-calcareous subalpine grassland. Adults sit on low-growing, or large-leaved herbs in the sun, and visit flowers such as Ranunculus and Sisymbrium. The flight period is from mid May to July, and in August at higher elevations. The larva is undescribed (Speight 2020).

","The main threats to this species are habitat loss due to changes in land-use and intensification of grassland management and grazing pressure in Europe’s grasslands. Climate change is likely to impact it also, because although records exist from low elevations it is mostly known from mountains.","Based on all known reports there have been only a few specimens recorded in the period from 1906 to 2019. Most recently, in 2019, three specimens were collected in the Pyrenees in France. The population trend is unknown in Europe and the EU 27, but is presumed to be severely fragmented because it is only found at high altitudes and so subpopulations are isolated. The population is thus considered severely fragmented in Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,"This European endemic is distributed in the mountainous areas of western and central Europe, from Spain to western Romania. The data from Poland (Speight 2020) are omitted since they are old and unverified. The area of occupancy (AOO), based on known records in Europe, is 116 km2, while in the EU27 it is 88 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Cheilosia nivalis is on the Red List of hoverflies of Bavaria (rare) and of Germany (very rare). Its distributional range is partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network, and in the Pyrenees National Park (France) and La Sainte-Baume Nature Park (France). Since it has been reported mainly in the mountains of central and western Europe, conservation actions should be focused on preserving its habitat due to the high percentage of deforestation in Europe. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better the existing threats. Management of grazing is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167259,149167256,Parasyrphus lineola,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
 EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

It is a widespread arboreal species with numerous subpopulations in both natural forest and conifer plantations. The decline of this species in some areas of western Europe is probably the result of a combination of high deforestation rates and changes in forest management in these countries, where there has been a shift away from coniferous plantations. No conservation action is required at present, except research on larval biology that is known inadequately to estimate possible impacts of invasive ladybird Harmonia axiridis to this species.

","It is an arboreal species that occurs along forest edges and in clearings in or close coniferous forests (Abies, Picea, humid Pinus) including conifer plantations and near conifers in mixed forests, parks, gardens, etc. (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults fly often within a few metres of the ground but also high up in the treetops and visit various flowering trees (Acer platanoides, Sorbus aucuparia, Salix spp. Prunus spp.) and often descend to visit flowers of various bushes and herbs around of conifers (Speight 2018, Barstch et al. 2009, Barkemeyer 1994). In total there are more than 50 plant species from which flower visits have been documented (Bartsch et al. 2009). According to Aubert et al. (1976) adults also migrate. The flight period of adults lasts from end of April to the end of September with probably in two generation with facultative diapause in larva (Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkemeyer 1994, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Goeldlin de Tiefenau 1974). It is known that its larvae live in the crowns of Picea trees where they feed on aphids (eg. genus Cinara) and they can overwinter as a larva on the forest floor, among leaf litter (Kula 1980, 1982, Speight 2018, Barstch et al. 2009).","

Apart from the general threats for biodiversity (e.g. chemical treatments with non selective pesticides to control aphid pest in pine plantations) and deforestation, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe. This species is widespread and common also in conifer plantations (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). The decline of this species in some areas could be partly explained by high deforestation and changes in forest management in these countries, where there is a shift away from coniferous plantations. The invasion of the ladybird Harmonia axiridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids, but probably not on Picea (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

This species has numerous and stable subpopulations in almost all humid areas with coniferous forests, including conifer plantations (Bartsch et al. 2009, Röder 1990, Speight et al. 2016). However, this species is scarce and has been declining in the Netherlands (Speight et al. 2016, Reemer et al. 2009) and it also has undergone a very significant decline in Great Britain (Ball et al. 2011).

",Stable,"

Parasyrphus lineola is widespread in the whole of the forested boreal and temperate Palearctic, from northern Fennoscandia south to the Maritime Alps and North Pyrenees (southern France), northern Apennines (Italy) and Pindos and Rhodopi (Greece); and from Ireland eastwards through northern and mountainous Europe into European parts of Russia (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Vujič et al. 2020, Sommaggio 2010, Burgio et al. 2015).

Outside Europe it ranges through Siberia to the Pacific coast (Kamchatka, Sakhalin Is, Kuril Islands, Japan) south to Mongolia and North China (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Speight (2018) and Bartsch et al. (2009) referred P. lineola as a species with Holarctic distribution that is present also in North America from Alaska to Quebec and south to Colorado and New Mexico (to Rocky Mountains). The basis for this is not clear, as it is hard to find primary records of this species from North America. Vockeroth (1992) noted this species only as a Eurasian species, that is not present in North America, and was familiar with this species from his prior work (Vockeroth 1969).

","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation actions for this species in Europe at present. Parasyrphus lineola is considered Vulnerable in the Netherlands by Reemer et al. (2009). The biology of this species seems to be relatively well known, however larval biology is known inadequately to estimate possible impacts of the invasive ladybird Harmonia axiridis on this species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167270,149167267,Merodon flavicornis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic species is known from only three point localities in southern France, one of which is considered to be possibly extinct. It is assessed as Endangered, based on the maximum two locations based on overgrazing as a primary threat and because the area of occupancy (AOO) is 8 km2. Furthermore, due to the ongoing threats (overgrazing by livestock, fires, urbanisation and tourism), a continuing decline in the habitat quality is inferred.
",This species inhabits thermophilous oak (Quercus) forests. The developmental stages have not been described. The flight period is in September and October (Veselić et al. 2017). The host plant is unknown.,"Overgrazing by livestock is the main threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Fires also pose a potential threat to the habitat quality, as they contribute to its fragmentation and loss. Ongoing urbanisation and tourism are major threats at one locality near to the coast, also causing habitat fragmentation and loss.","

There are insufficient data about the population trend of this species. Only two specimens were caught in 1918, one in 1961, and one designated as the holotype in 1969 (Veselić et al. 2017). Regular monitoring is needed in order to obtain more information on population size and distribution. Due to the high pressure from urbanization and tourism, the species is likely to have become extinct in the locality close to Marseille from where the oldest records come.

",Unknown,"The distribution of this European endemic species is restricted to southern France where it is known from only three point localities (around Nîmes, Marseille and Frejús, with the locality east of Marseille considered to be possibly extinct). The species was described from an unknown type locality. The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 8 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. One point locality is within boundaries of the National Park des Cevennes. It is recommended to conserve the habitat by enforcement of environmental regulations, rules and other policies. Additional research is needed about general abundance, habitat, ecological requirements, threats and trends. Regular monitoring is necessary in order to obtain more information on habitat trends, as well as on population size and distribution, because due to the high pressure of urbanisation and tourism, it is likely that the species may have become extinct in the locality close to Marseille. Raising awareness of this species is also important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149167281,149167278,Meliscaeva cinctella,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in Europe/EU27. It is a widespread species, present in many habitats, and with large subpopulations in most countries where recorded. There are no specific threats identified for this species. Therefore, the species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","Meliscaeva cinctella occurs in forest and scrub, both deciduous and coniferous and conifer plantations. This species is to a significant extent anthropophilic, occurring also in hedgerows and suburban gardens and parks. Adults fly from April to September visiting flowers of white umbellifers, Acer pseudoplatanus, Crataegus, Euphorbia, Ilex, Juncus, Ligustrum, Lonicera periclymenum Origanum vulgare, Polygonum cuspidatum, Potentilla erecta, Prunus spinosa, Ranunculus, Rhododendron, Rubus fruticosus, R. idaeus, Salix, Sambucus, Senecio jacobaea, Solidago virgaurea, Sorbus aucupareia, and Taraxacum. The larva is aphidophagous (Speight 2018).",

This is one of the most common hoverfly species in Europe and seems to be subject to no threats.

,"

There is no estimate of population size for this species because it is very abundant and widespread in Europe and other continents. Nonetheless, studies on population trends in nature should be conducted to monitor possible changes in population sizes due to climate change.

",Unknown,"Meliscaeva cintella is widespread through Europe. It occurs from Scandinavia to Iberian peninsula, the Mediterranean and from Ireland eastwards through most of Europe into European parts of Russia.

This species also occurs in Siberia from the Urals to the Pacific coast (Kuril Isles). Besides Europe and Asia, Meliscaeva cinctella also occurs in North Africa, North America from Alaska south to California and Colorado (Speight 2018).","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphid crop pests (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,

There are no specific conservation actions in place or needed for this species.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167292,149167289,Cheilosia morio,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-06-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Taking the currently understood area of occupancy (AOO) of this species (116 km2 in Europe and 108 km2 in the EU 27) and using the precautionary approach, this species is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27since it is a notably rare species, with a population that is considered severely fragmented due to its subpopulations are small and isolated. Furthermore, there is a continuing decline in the quality of the habitat due to unsustainable forest management. Key sites and habitat for this species should be protected as part of a more sustainable forestry management. Its taxonomy, distribution and ecology are in need of further research, and monitoring of the population and habitat is needed.

","

This species can be found together with the species Cheilosia luteicornis, but prefers more open habitats than Cheilosia luteicornis and seems more restricted. It was collected in small open places such as humid meadows, dry meadows, and fens within large pine forests. Flower visitation records exist for Anemone hepatica and Tussilago farfara (van Steenis 2011). The flight period is April and May. The developmental stages are unknown but the larvae are phytophagous like most of its congeners.

Existing data about Cheilosia morio are now attributed to C. luteicornis due to the taxonomic situation with these two species. It is likely that the larval lifestyle of C. morio are also in resin-filled bark wounds but these needs confirmation.

",Logging and inappropriate forest management that results in a lack of structural diversity of the forest causes a noticeable decline in the quality of habitat for this species.,"There is no precise information on population trends for this species. Cheilosia morio is a rare species, with a small number of records. Based on all known data, the biggest subpopulations are recorded from Sweden. The trend is unknown for Europe and the EU 27. The population is considered severely fragmented as over half of the subpopulations are presumed to small and isolated.",Unknown,"The full range of this European endemic is uncertain at present, due to confusion with Cheilosia luteicornis until recently. Confirmed records of Cheilosia morio are known from Germany (Kassebeer 1993, Dziock 1997), Greece (Ssymank 2012), Italy, Montenegro, Poland (Bankowska 1963, 1981), Sweden (van Steenis 2011, 2016; Nilsson et al. 2007, 2012), France (Treiber 2011), Czech Republic (Mazanek et al. 2009) and Slovakia. The presence of this species in Austria (Burgenland - Metz 2012) is uncertain. Metz reported “Günser Gebirge, Geschrittensteinstrasse, 4.5.1995” as the locality. The specimen cannot be found, so a review of its identity is not possible (Heimburg 2018). It is believed that this species occurs also in Norway (Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017). The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is 116 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1,808,234 km2. In the EU 27, the AOO is 108km2 and the EOO is 1,749,885 km. The AOO has been calculated using only the confirmed records of this species and so taking the precautionary approach at this time.
",This species is not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. Key sites and habitats should be protected as part of a more sustainable forestry management. Its taxonomy, distribution and ecology are in need of further research, and monitoring of the population and habitat is needed.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167303,149167300,Meliscaeva auricollis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in Europe or in the EU27 Member States. It is a widespread species, present in many habitats, and with large populations in most countries where it has been recorded. There are no specific threats identified for this species. Therefore, the species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","Meliscaeva auricollis occurs in different types of forests (both deciduous, broad-leaved evergreen and coniferous) and conifer plantations. Adults fly from March to October visiting flowers of white umbellifers, Arbutus unedo, Chaerophyllum, Euonymus, Euphorbia, Filipendula, Hedera, Rubus, Salix, Sarrothamnus, Sorbus, Viburnum opulus (Speight 2018). The larva and puparium are described and figured in colour by Dussaix (2013).",This is very common hoverfly species in Europe and seems to be subject to no threats.,"

There is no estimate of the population size for this species because it is very abundant and widespread in Europe and other continents. Nonetheless, studies on population trends in nature should be conducted to monitor possible changes in population size due to changes in forest management.

",Unknown,"Meliscaeva auricollis occurs in Europe from Fennoscandia and the Faroes to Iberia. It is also present in the Mediterranean (including Cyprus, Malta and Crete) and the Canary Islands, and from Ireland eastwards through most of Europe into European parts of Russia (Speight 2018).

Outside Europe it is known from North Africa, Turkey and Israel (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphid crop pests (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,

There are no specific conservation actions in place or needed for this species.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167320,149167311,Cheilosia melanopa,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 

This species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and EU 27 because of its large extent of occurrence and number of locations. Habitat loss (both in quality and quantity) is expected due to change in land-use and deforestation throughout Europe. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements and to understand the existing threats better.

,"

The preferred habitats are open areas in high montane Pinus and Fagus forests, along streams in the Picea forest zone upward into montane and submountain grasslands, and pastures and rocks. Adults fly from the end of May to the end of July, and in August in the northern part of distribution range. Adults visit flowers of Myosotis, Ranunculus and Salix. The larva is undescribed (Vujić 1996, Speight 2020).

","The main threat is habitat loss due to change in land-use and deforestation throughout Europe (Bebi et al. 2017, Strandberg and Kjellström 2019), as well as intensification of grassland management and grazing pressure in Europe’s grasslands.","Based on all known records, there are numerous subpopulations. The biggest subpopulations were recorded in Montenegro and in Scandinavia. The population trend is unknown for Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,"This European endemic is distributed mainly in northern Europe (Scandinavia), mountainous regions of western and central Europe (Alps, Carpathians and Pyrenees) and on northern mountains of the Balkan Peninsula. The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is 528 km2, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 3,942,141 km2, while the AOO in EU27 is 480 km2, and the EOO is 3,903,978km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is on the Red List of hoverflies of Bayern (Data Deficient) and of Germany (very rare). Its distributional range is partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network and in Triglav National Park (Slovenia), Durmitor National Park (Montenegro), Kevo Nature Reserve (Finland), Ovre Dividal National Park (Norway), Saltfjellet-Svartisen National Park (Norway), Hardangervidda National Park (Norway) and Jotunheimen National Park (Norway). Since it is recorded mainly in forests of northern Europe and Alps, as well as high mountains of northern Balkan peninsula, the conservation actions should be focused on preserving its habitat due to high percentage of deforestation of European forests. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements, and to understand the existing threats better.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167328,149167317,Melangyna labiatarum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

For both the European and EU27 regional assessments, this Holarctic species is considered as Least Concern (LC) based on the widespread distribution and presence in many European countries, as well as the absence of any threats.

","The habitat, preferences and ecology of this species are poorly understood. The larvae are known exist on Evonymus europaeus and Heracleum sphondylium, feeding on aphids (Aphis fabae) in the UK (Rojo et al. 2003). In the Nearctic, the species is known to exist on the tundra, species-rich grassland and forests.",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,"Existing data suggest that the knowledge on the population size and trend of this species is uneven amongst European regions. For example, 19 specimens have been collected in Serbia so far, while only one specimen has been found in each of Italy and Greece (Drama Province). The Italian specimen was collected in 1967.",Unknown,"This species has been recorded from the UK (Great Britain), the Netherlands, Austria, Germany, Serbia, Montenegro, Italy, Hungary and Romania (Heimburg 2018, Doczkal et al. 2001, Toth 2011, Reemer et al. 2009, Bradescu and Parvu 2005, Ball et al. 2011). It is also known to occur in Norway, Denmark, Finland and Sweden (Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Barsch et al. 2009).

Outside Europe it occurs in the Nearctic (Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Barsch et al. 2009).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphids (Rojo et al. 2003).",Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions for this species. In the German Province of Baden-Württembergs, M. labiatarum is regarded as Data Deficient (Doczkal et al. 2001). Additional monitoring is needed to better understand the population trends and impacts of threats. Research is required to validate taxonomy of the species and better understand the ecology and biology of the species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167341,149167336,Melangyna ericarum,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This species is assessed as Near Threatened in Europe due to a relatively small area of occupancy (76 km2), a continuing decline in its habitat quality and the low number of locations (13-14) were it is found. It is regarded as Vulnerable in the UK and very rare or near threatened in other countries.

In the EU27 regional assessment, this species has been considered as Vulnerable (VU) due to its small number of locations (<8), small area of occupancy (36 km2) and continuing decline in habitat quality.

","Melangyna ericarum occurs in forest (conifer forest; humid Pinus forest) and along the tree line from 1,700 m upwards in the Alps, found with Pinus mugo and Larix. Adults fly from July to August, visiting flowers of white umbellifers, yellow composites and Ranunculus. The larva is undescribed (Speight 2018).",

Reduction of habitat quality in alpine locations as a result of forest management and commercial forestry activities may threaten subpopulations of this species. Extreme temperature changes as a result of climate change might have a great influence on this species due to reduction or disappearance of its high-altitude habitat

,

There is no information about the population size and trend for this species.

,Unknown,"This European endemic species is known from Great Britain (with records from the Scottish Highlands, and northern and southern England), Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Germany, Czech Republic, Slovakia, France, Switzerland, and northern Italy (Aosta) (Speight et al. 2016, Speight 2018). Speight et al. (1975) suggests that the species occurs in Ireland, but this requires confirmation.","This species is not used or traded commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions for this species. However, it has been assessed as Vulnerable (D2) in the UK (Ball and Morris 2014) and regarded as 'extremely rare' in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Sweden it is listed Not Applicable (https://artfakta.se) and in Norway as Near Threatened (https://www.biodiversity.no). The larval biology of this species is unknown, and further research on this species' biology is required in order to propose conservation actions. Additional monitoring is needed to better understand the population trends and impacts of threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167349,149167337,Cheilosia loewi,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-05-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Cheilosia loewi is assessed as Endangered since it has restricted area of occupancy (188 km2 in Europe and 172 km2 in the EU27), the population is severely fragmented because it is a high-montane species with no connectivity between subpopulations, and there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of the habitat throughout Europe due to development of winter tourism and overgrazing on mountain grasslands. Additionally, climate change is a threat, as high-alpine species are considered to be especially threatened. Future monitoring is needed, as well as research on its ecology.

","

The preferred environment of this species is unimproved montane grassland within the Picea zone and upwards into unimproved subalpine grassland to above 2,000 m, usually near seepages or streamlets. Adults fly among grasses in open areas towards the upper altitudinal limit of Picea and upwards. They visit flowers of Euphorbia, Myosotis, Potentilla verna and Ranunculus. The flight period is from May until July. The developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018).

","As this species is montane and mainly associated with high alpine habitats, development of winter tourism as well as overgrazing on mountain grasslands present the most severe threats for this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). Additionally, climate change is a threat as high-alpine species are considered to be especially threatened.","

There is no information about the population size of this species. There are both older (more than 100 years) and some newer (around 2011, and 2017 to 2020) records. This is a high-montane species and therefore there is unlikely to be any connectivity between subpopulations. It is a very enigmatic species: all data are based on very few specimens found in seemingly low-density subpopulations (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

",Unknown,"This species is distributed in southern Poland, France, Spain, Germany, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Austria, Italy, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Montenegro, Slovenia and Romania. Its presence in Croatia is uncertain, and it is not known to be present in Serbia, although this information appears in the literature - identifications of specimens from low elevations may be incorrect (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 188 km2 and in the EU 27, AOO is estimated to be around 172 km2. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 1,515,637 km2 in Europe and 1,413,093 km2 in EU27.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation activities for this species. It would benefit from area and habitat protection. Future monitoring of its habitat and population is needed, as well as research on its population, ecology and possible threats. Management of grazing and tourism is recommended.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167362,149167357,Melangyna compositarum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This Holarctic species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States as it is widespread and abundant.

,"The preferred habitat of Melangyna compositarum are conifer forest (Abies, Larix, Pinus) and conifer plantations, up to (and including) the Larix zone. Adults fly from May to September, visiting flowers of white Umbelliferae, Galium, and Sorbus aucuparia. The larva is unknown (Speight 2018).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,

There is not information about population size and trends for this species in Europe.

,Unknown,"In the European region, Melangyna compositarum occurs from Scandinavia to the Pyrenees and northern Spain. It is also present from Ireland eastwards through northern and central Europe into European parts of Russia.

Outside Europe, this species occurs in Siberia, from the Urals to the Pacific coast, and also in North America, from Alaska to New Mexico (Speight 2018).","This species is not used or traded commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,

There are no conservation actions for this species.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167370,149167360,Cheilosia lenis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This European endemic is assessed as Least Concern because of its relatively large range, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. It is considered unthreatened across Europe, with the exception of the Netherlands. Potential threats exist from degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to human activities such as unsustainable forestry, because it is found in woodlands. Further research into its threats and population trend is needed, as well as continued monitoring.

","The preferred habitat for this species is deciduous woodland towards its upper elevational limits, or otherwise experiencing a somewhat harsh climate e.g., humid Fagus/Picea forest, and upwards into the subalpine zone. Adult prefer clearings etc., often resting on low-growing vegetation; males hover at 1-3 metres. It visits flowers such as Acer platanoides, Alliaria petiolata, Allium ursinum, Anemone nemorosa, Caltha, Cardamine pratensis, Galium, Petasites albus, Prunus, Ranunculus, Salix, Taraxacum and Tussilago. The flight period is during April/May and June at higher altitudes (Speight 2020). The larva is phytophagous, and the developmental stages were described and figured by Dusek (1962) from larvae collected from Senecio fuchsi. The female has also been observed egg-laying on this ragwort species (Doczkal 1996). Reemer et al. (2009) also cite Senecio nemorensis as a larval foodplant of this fly.","

This species is affected by the loss of habitat quality in some parts of its range due to unsustainable forestry but these threats do not influence the overall population trend, which remains stable (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

","

There is no known information about the population size of this species, but presumably most subpopulations are stable. There is a decreasing trend in some continental areas, but in general it is considered unthreatened across Europe and the population generally stable (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

",Stable,"This species is distributed from Germany south to the Pyrenees; and from the Netherlands eastwards through central Europe to European parts of Russia, with southern range limits in Italy and the Balkans (Speight 2018).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation activities for this species. It is considered unthreatened across Europe, except in the Netherlands (Speight et al. 2015). Future monitoring of its population is needed, as well as research on potential threats.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167380,149167378,Melangyna coei,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This Holarctic species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe due to the large extent of occurrence and the absence of identified threats. In the EU27 Member States, its status is the same as at the European regional level.

","Melangyna coei occurs in taiga (Nielsen 1998) and subalpine Betula forest (Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults fly from June to July visiting flowers of Trollius riederanus, umbellifers, Dasiphora fruticosa, Potentilla erecta, Saxifraga aizoides, Taraxacum (Speight 2018). The larva has been found on umbellifers (Bartsch et al. 2009).","

Climate change is the main threat for this species, since it is mainly a taiga species.

",

There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe. The majority of the specimens were collected in Norway. 

,Unknown,"In the European region, this species is restricted to Scandinavia (Norway, Sweden and Finland) and European parts of Russia (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018).

It has a wide global range, also present in North America (USA and Canada) (Vockeroth 1992), the Russian Far East, Japan and Korea (Barkalov and Mutin 2018).","This species is not traded or used commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,

There are no specific conservation actions in place for this species.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167390,149167388,Merodon femoratus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27 primarily due to its wide distribution (the extent of occurrence is 1,587,121 km2), and number of locations (more than 30 based on overgrazing and fires as main threats). However, because of the ongoing threats (primarily overgrazing by livestock and fires), the quality of habitat of this species is declining. According to data, this species existed on one point locality in Croatia (Dalmatia) more than 100 years ago, but now it is considered to be extinct here (A. Vujic pers. comm. 2020). Moreover, most of the registered specimens date back from many years ago. Therefore, continuous monitoring is highly recommended, as well as further research on population and habitat trends, the ecology of the species, and on possible threats as well. 

","The preferred environment of this species is garrigue (phrygana). It has been found on low-lying, sandy, herb-rich grasslands containing abundant wild onion flowers (Allium sp.), scattered clumps of sedge and occasional stems of Arundo. It also occurs at the edge of Mediterranean salt-marsh, where during winter the fluctuating ground-water levels bring the water level very close to the ground surface. It has also been found in open, dry Pinus forest (P. halepensis) on largely bare, stony grounds and in open areas within Quercus ilex forest and Castanea forest, garrigue, matorral, and hedgehog heath (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Speight 2020). Van Eck (2016) also mentions a zone of mixed deciduous forest on humid soils in the lower parts, with nearby higher, drier, rocky and more open places.

The adults fly extremely rapidly and very low over and through ground vegetation. The males return repeatedly to particular resting sites, settling on patches of reclining grass stems or other low-growing vegetation, or on small patches of bare ground. They are known to visit flowers such as Calystegia, Cistus and Eryngium (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Speight 2020). The flight period is from April to September (Speight 2020), with peaks in June and at the end of August - beginning of September (Speight 2020). The developmental stages have not been described.","The main threat to the habitat of this species is overgrazing by livestock, and to some extent fires as well (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). These threats can cause decline in habitat quality leading to its fragmentation and loss.","There are not enough data on its population trend. The collected specimens range in date from the early 1900s (France) to recent years (it was collected in 2017, also in France, in Corsica). In general, most of the oldest specimens are those from France. There is one location in Croatia (Dalmacia) where this species was recorded more than 100 years ago (Strobl 1900), but today it is considered extinct from this locality (A. Vujic pers. comm. 2020). Since a lot of records of this species date back to the 1950s, 1960s, and 1980s, monitoring is highly recommended.",Unknown,"This species is distributed in south and southwestern Europe (France, Portugal, Spain, and Italy).

Outside of Europe, it is also present in North Africa (Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia).

In Europe and EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be  1,587,121 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 236 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. However, a lot of point localities in France and Spain are within the boundaries of National and Natural Parks (National Park des Pyrenees, Natural Parks Regional de Corse, la Serrania de Cuenca, des Baronnies provencales, du Luberon, des Ballons des Vosges, de la Sierra de Gredos, and do Vale do Guadiana). A relatively high number of point localities are within the Natura 2000 network. Nevertheless, additional research is needed on population and habitat trends, ecology, biology and potential threats. Taking into account the possible threats, it is recommended to conserve the habitat of this species by enforcement of environmental regulations, rules and other policies. Since a lot of records of this species date back from 1950s, 1960s, and 1980s, monitoring is highly recommended. Furthermore, raising awareness about this species is very important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167401,149167398,Melangyna barbifrons,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Pan-European Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

In Europe, this species is Least Concern due to having a wide range across north and central Europe although it is rarer than some other widespread species and there appear to have been some local extinctions in parts of the Central European range. In Belgium is ""Regionally Extinct"", in Germany ""Rare"", and in UK ""Near Threatened"".

On the EU27, this species is also Least Concern due to having a wide range across north and central Europe although it is rarer than some other widespread species and there appear to have been some local extinctions in parts of the Central European range.

","The preferred habitat of Melangyna barbifrons in PiceaPinus and mixed forest. Adults fly from February to April visiting flowers of Alnus, Anemone nemorosa, Corylus, Hamamelis mollis, Prunus, male Salix, Tussilago. The larva is undescribed (Speight 2018).","

Reduction of habitat quality due to changes in traditional forest management and reduction of forest cover because of land use changes may threaten this species' population. Competition with Melangyna pavlovski, a hoverfly that has recently colonized Europe and is expanding its range (Van de Meutter et al. 2015), for feeding resources during the larval and adult stage may impact this species.

","There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe, although it is rarer than some other widespread species. The majority of specimens have been collected in Scandinavian countries (Finland, Norway and Sweden). Only 21 specimens have been collected in Serbia (Kopaonik National Park). Only one specimen has been recorded in Estonia, and one in Poland (Krakow). In Czechia it is a widespread species. There have been some local extinctions in parts of the Central European range, and it is listed as Regionally Extinct in Flanders.",Unknown,Melangyna barbifrons occurs from Scandinavia to Belgium. It is also present from Britain eastwards through central Europe into European parts of Russia (Speight 2018).

Outside Europe it ranges through Siberia to the Pacific (Speight 2018).,"This species is not used or traded commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation actions in place for this species.

Melangyna barbifrons is regarded as ""Regionally Extinct"" in the Belgian Region Flanders (https://www.inbo.be/en/search-flanders-red-lists; Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998), as ""Data Deficient"" in German province Bayern (von der Dunk et al. 2008), ""Rare"" (selten) in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), and ""Near Threatened"" in UK (Ball and Morris 2014). In the Swedish (https://artfakta.se) and Finnish (Hyvarinen et al. 2019) national Red Lists it is considered Least Concern (LC).

Additional research is needed to better understand the population trends and impacts of threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167415,149167409,Cheilosia gigantea,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in Europe. Its preferred habitat is widespread but may locally be negatively impacted by anthropogenic activities, and the host plants are abundant and widespread in Europe. The potential threats are degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to human activities such as unsustainable forestry and agriculture, because it is found in grasslands. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27, therefore, the species is assessed as Least Concern. Further research into its threats and population trend is needed.","This species occurs in unimproved grassland, usually montane and subalpine (calcareous to neutral) in the Alps, but at low elevation in Scandinavia. Adult males hover at 2-5 m and settle on grass and rocks; both sexes are fast flying, flying low over ground vegetation. Flower visitation records are known from white umbellifers, Caltha, Euphorbia, Meum, Ranunculus, Sorbus aucuparia and Taraxacum. The flight period is May to June (July/beginning August at higher altitudes) (Speight 2020). Stuke and Carstensen (2002) reared and described the larvae found in the tap root of Rumex longifolius and Rumex aquaticus. They observed that it overwinters as a puparium. The larva was also reported by Bagatshanova (1990) from Rumex sp. She found that the larvae overwinter and pupate in the spring.","

This species could potentially be subject to localized anthropogenic activities in Europe, such as intensified land-use due to increased urbanization and agriculture, which could lead to habitat degradation.

",There is no information on population trends of this species for Europe and the EU 27.,Unknown,"This species is widely distributed in the Palaearctic region, where it ranges from the whole of Fennoscandia (Bartsch 2009), the Baltic countries (Kuznetzov 1993; Karpa 2008), Austria (Heimburg 2018), France (Speight 2018), northern Italy (Stoch 2003), Switzerland (CSCF 2019), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Czech Republic and Slovakia (Mazánek, 2009), Hungary (Tóth 2001), Belarus, Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), the Balkan peninsula (Bosnia-Herzegovina, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Slovenia) (Vujic 1996), Greece (Vujic et al. 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), and into European parts of Russia and Siberia from the Urals to the Pacific coast of the Russian Far East, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan (Barkalov and Mutin 2018); Iran (Dousti and Hayat 2016) and the Caucasus (Georgia) (Mengual et al. 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,There are no known conservation actions for this species but more research is needed on the population and potential threats. Monitoring of the population and habitat is also needed.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167423,149167412,Melangyna arctica,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in Europe/EU27. It is a widespread species (mainly in north and central Europe), present in many habitats and large number of locations. There are no specific threats identified for this species. The species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","The preferred habitats of Melangyna arctica are coniferous forest (Abies/Picea, Pinus) and plantations and wet deciduous woodland (Alnus/Betula/Salix) up to the altitude of Larix forest, and Alnus viridis scrub (Speight 2018). Adults fly from April to June (July to August at higher elevations) visiting flowers of Pseudoplatanus, Galium, Ilex, Prunus spinosa, Ranunculus, Salix, Stellaria, Taraxacum. The larva is aphidophagous, described and figured by Rotheray (1988) from larvae collected on Alnus (Speight 2018).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,

There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe. The majority of specimens were collected in Scandinavian countries (Norway and Sweden) and the United Kingdom.

,Unknown,"Melangyna arctica occurs in Scandinavia, Great Britain, Ireland, Germany, Czech Republic, France (Pyrenees and Alps), Switzerland and Liechtenstein (Speight 2018).

Outside Europe, the species is present in Asia in Russian Federation (northern and central Siberia) and in North America (from Alaska and Canada to Colorado).","This species is not traded or used commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include pest aphids in cultivated plants (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,

There are no specific conservation actions in place or required for this species.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167436,149167431,Cheilosia frontalis,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in most parts of Europe but its population trend is unknown. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27, therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern. However, additional research into the threats and population trends is needed. Additional research on its biology and life cycle is needed, and research is recommended into its population status and threats.

","Cheilosia frontalis occurs in the vicinity of streams, flushes and areas of poorly drained ground in unimproved montane grassland (including relatively small areas within forest) from the Picea zone upwards to 2,000 m. Adults fly at up to 2 m from the ground, in relatively sheltered situations, often following the edge of streams. They settle on vegetation of low-growing plants or shrubs. Flowers visited include white umbellifers, Acer pseudoplatanus, Anemone nemorosa, Cardamine and Salix. The flight period is in April/May and June/July at higher elevations. The host plant(s) and immature stages are unknown (Speight 2020).","Although certainly subject to general anthropogenic activities in Europe - including intensified land use due to increased urbanization, forest management and clearing, wetland drainage, and intensive agriculture - this species overall has a stable population throughout its range.",There is no information on population trends for this species in Europe and the EU 27.,Unknown,This species is endemic to Europe and is distributed from Fennoscandia and mountainous parts of Europe south to the Pyrenees and northern Spain; and from the Ardennes east to the Alps and on into European parts of Russia (Speight 2020).,This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species, and none appear to be required. Additional research on its biology and life cycle is needed, and research is recommended into its population status and threats. Monitoring of the population and habitat is needed.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167457,149167452,Eupeodes punctifer,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread species of Arctic tundra in the whole northern Holarctic. This species does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in Europe or the EU27. It has large subpopulations in Arctic regions. There are no specific threats identified for this species. Therefore, it is regarded as Least Concern in Europe and in the EU27 Member States.

","

This species is present in circumpolar Arctic and alpine dwarf-shrub tundra and taiga (Nielsen and Swendsen 2014, Bartsch et al. 2009). The flight period of adults is from the end of June to beginning of August (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Published flower visitation records exist for Ranunculus propinquus (Ranunculaceae), Trolius sibiricus (Ranunculaceae), Sanquisorba officinalis (Rosaceae), Polemonium acutifolium (Polemoniaceae), Tanacetum bipinnatum (Asteraceae), Silene acaulis (Caryophyllaceae), Dryas integrifolia, Dryas octopetala (Rosaceae) (Barkalov 2012, Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Böcher et al. 2015). Developmental stages have not been described, but adults of this species were reared from predacious larvae found on Spiraea (Rosaceae) in Yakutia (Speight 2018).

","

Any current threats to this species are unknown. Nevertheless, a continuing decline of extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species is inferred due to human activities and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016).

The quality of suitable habitat for this high-latitude species could be also decline due to global warming (Barredo et al. 2020).

","

It is one of the most frequent Eupeodes species in circumpolar arctic tundra and taiga (Nielsen and Swendsen 2014, Bartsch et al. 2009, Bocher et al. 2015). Its population is apparently stable, and no decline has been documented.

",Stable,"

Eupeodes punctifer is a widely distributed northern Holarctic species with a circumpolar Arctic distribution to almost the boreoalpine zone (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Böcher et al. 2015, Barkalov and Mutin 2015).

In Europe it occurs in Scandinavia, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania and northern European Russia.

","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,"

Eupeodes punctifer is not considered a threatened species in northern Europe (Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Gammelmo et al. 2015). Nevertheless larval biology of this species is not adequately known.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167465,149167453,Merodon femoratoides,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU) 

This species is assessed as Vulnerable in Europe and the EU 27 primarily based on the number of locations (10) (calculated based on overgrazing as the main threat), and the small (64 km2) area of occupancy (AOO). Also, fires and changes in land use pose direct threats to this species habitat, causing its continuous fragmentation and loss. Furthermore, from some point localities (such as those in Crimea, Ukraine) this species is considered to be extinct (and records are quite dated). Continuous monitoring is required, as well as additional research on population trend, species ecology.

","The species prefers sparsely-vegetated dry grasslands, Mediterranean prickly thickets of shrubs and trees, and dry deciduous forests (Speight 2020, Popov pers. comm. 2020). The flight period is from May to July. The visited flowers are Ornithogalum ponticum, Seseli tortuosum, Bupleurum sp. (Popov pers. comm. 2020). The developmental stages have not yet been described.","The main threats for this species are overgrazing by livestock, fires and ploughing, which could provoke habitat fragmentation and loss (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","

Most collected specimens from Ukraine (Crimea) date from 1919, 1925, 1981-1984, 1997 and 1998, and are from the Karadag Nature Reserve (174 specimens out of 183). It is possible that this species is now extinct in its localities in Crimea, where only a few specimens were collected in 1923, 1929 and 1980 (G. Popov pers. comm. 2020). The recent records are from Greece (from 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2010, but also from 1956 and 1985), but only a few specimens were collected (Vujić et al. 2020; X. Mengual pers. comm. 2020). The population trend is unknown.

",Unknown,"This species is distributed in Greece and Ukraine (in Crimea).

Outside of Europe, it also occurs in Turkey, North Africa (Algeria) (Speight 2020), and in Armenia.

In Europe and the EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 296,033 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 64 km2.",

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

,Terrestrial,"

Merodon femoratoides has been listed in the Red Book of Ukraine as a Vulnerable species (Akimova 2009, https://redbook-ua.org/). One point locality in Crimea (Ukraine) is within the boundaries of Karadag Nature Reserve, and a few point localities in Greece are within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network. Monitoring, as well as additional research about population and habitat trends, ecology and potential threats are needed. Raising awareness about this species is very important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167478,149167473,Eupeodes nuba,Least Concern,,2021,2020-09-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Eupeodes
nuba is widespread species in southern Europe, particularly in the Mediterranean basin. Although it is usually recorded only occasionally, it has been recorded also in rather anthropogenic suburban habitats. It is not considered a threatened species in Europe according to Speight (2016).","

E. nuba inhabits various open ground and sparsely vegetated habitats usually beside dry seasonal rivers and streams in Mediterranean, it is present also in suburban maquis, in Mediterranean dune scrub and in coastal dune systems (Speight 2018). Adults fly round and over low-growing vegetation, often settle on low-growing vegetations and visit flowers of yellow Apiaceae, Euphorbia, Viburnum tinus (Speight 2018). Flight period of adults is mostly from April to June and from August to September (Speight 2018), but it may persist all the winter in the warmest part of Europe, eg. Canary Islands (Báez, 1977). Developmental stages are undescribed (Speight 2018) but Kesten (1975) reported larvae as predacious on Aphis craccivora on Medicago sativa (Rojo et al. 2003).

","

Apart from the general threats for biodiversity, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe. This species is able to inhabit also rather anthropogenic suburban habitats in the Mediterranean, where non-specific chemical treatments to control of aphid pests can negatively affect local populations of this predatory species.

","

Although this species is widely distributed in Mediterranean area, it is recorded only occasionally in Europe, most frequently in Spain (Ricarte and Marcos 2017, Sommagio pers. comm. 2020, Vujić et al. 2020, Speight et al. 2018). Dirickx (1998) mentioned that it had not been recorded from tropical Africa since its description from Sudan 1830.

",Stable,"

Eupeodes nuba is widespread in southern parts of Palaearctic region.

In Europe and adjacent areas it is present particularly in the Mediterranean basin. It is known from Canary Islands and Madeira, through the Mediterranean basin (Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, Croatia, Greece, Malta, Crete, Cyprus, Turkey (Muğla), Lebanon, Palestine, Syria, Israel) including North Africa (Morocco, Egypt, Suez). Elsewhere it occurs through West and Central Asia (Transcausasus, Iran, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kirghizstan, Central Tian-Shan, Altai) to Mongolia and Nepal (Speight 2018, Peck 1988, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Dušek and Láska 1976, Vujić et al. 2020, Ricarte and Marcos 2017, Ssymank and Ebejer 2009, Smit et al. 2004, Dousti and Hayat 2006, Saribiyik 2011). There are also occasional records out of Mediterranean area in Europe (Roumania, Ukraine, Switzerland) (Maibach 1992, Prokhorov et al. 2017, Bradescu 1991), at least some of these records, e. g. in Switzerland, are based apparently on migratory specimens. This species is known also from northern parts of the Afrotropical region, from the area of Nubia, that is region stretching from the south of Egypt to Sudan (Dirricks 1998).

","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has the potential to be used in biocontrol of aphids in agriculture.",Terrestrial,"

Eupeodes nuba is not considered a threatened species in Europe according to Speight (2016) and there are not specific conservation actions for this species in Europe. Nevertheless, the larval biology of this species is known inadequately to estimate habitat requirements of this rather rare species and impact of non-specific chemical treatments on its populations.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167500,149167494,Eupeodes luniger,Least Concern,,2021,2020-09-21 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is a widespread and sometimes abundant species in almost whole Europe and in the EU 27, it has a wide distribution and it is also widespread in agricultural and suburban landscapes. There are no major threats to this species, and no conservation action is required at present. It is therefore assessed as Least Concern for both regions.

","Adults of this species are very mobile and they can occur in any fairly open situations. It seems to be anthropophilic often occurring in many types of farmland and orchards, suburban gardens and parks and along the firebreaks and tracks of conifer plantations (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults fly fast over ground vegetation and hover up to 4 m above the ground, usually around bushes and trees. Adults visit a wide range flowering herbs, bushes and trees, the flying period is usually from April to November with peaks in May/June and in August (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). According to Speight (2018) the species is known to hibernate as an adult in central Europe, but apparently this species overwinters as a puparium in Central Europe (Dušek and Láska 1986, Speight 2018). Immigrants from further south augment populations in many parts of Europe during the summer (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). The larva of this species has been frequently reported as predacious on aphids on various herbs, bushes and trees, often fruit bushes and trees and various arable crops (Rojo et al. 2003, Speight 2018, Barkemeyer 1994). A number of these reports (particularly older ones) are not reliable due to difficulties in the identification of Eupeodes species, especially as this species exhibits variable colouration influenced by temperature during pupal development (Dušek and Láska 1974, Ball et al. 2011).","

There are no known major threats to this species in Europe. This species is also widespread in agricultural and suburban landscapes. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016), but E. luniger is widespread also in East Palearctic, where the invasive ladybird is native. Another possible threat are the chemical treatments in crops against aphid pests.

","

This is one of the most abundant species of the genus in forested and agricultural landscapes of most areas of Europe. This species is highly migratory, and in connection with migration it can occur locally in large numbers (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Aubert et al. 1976).

 

",Stable,"

Eupeodes luniger is one of the most widespread species of the genus Eupeodes in Europe as well as in the Palaearctic region. It is present also in North Africa, Madeira and Canary Islands and North India. It has not been recorded only in some areas of the extreme north, in Iceland and in several islands in the Mediterranean (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Smit et al. 2004, Vujić 2020).

","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has potential to be used in biocontrol of aphids in forestry.",Terrestrial,

Eupeodes luniger is not considered threatened in any area in Europe (Speight et al. 2016) and its biology is relatively well known.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167508,149167497,Cheilosia chloris,Least Concern,,2021,2020-07-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in most parts of Europe. It is not commonly encountered, especially not in northern Europe, but there is no evidence of decreasing populations so far. Its preferred habitat type is widespread and is considered unthreatened across Europe. The species could potentially be subject to locally occurring anthropogenic activities in Europe, such as intensified land-use due to increased urbanization, agriculture and intensive forest management, which could lead to habitat degradation. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27 and this species is therefore assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trends is needed.","This species is known from grassy areas within Fagus/Picea forest and scrub, and old unimproved pasture, apparently not extending above the upper altitudinal limit of Fagus. Adults are encountered around clearings, tracksides etc. where they fly low over ground vegetation. Flower visitation records are known from yellow composites, umbellifers, Allium ursinum, Caltha, Euphorbia, Frangula alnus, Prunus spinosa, Ranunculus, Salix and Sorbus aucuparia. The flight period is from April to June (Speight 2018). The larvae have been scored by Stuke (2000), and the female has been observed egg-laying on Cirsium oleraceum (Doczkal 1996), and the larval association with that plant was confirmed by Stuke and Carstensen (2000).","

This species is affected by the loss of habitat quality in some parts of its range due to unsustainable forestry and agriculture, but these threats are localized and the overall population remains stable.

","There is no information on population size for this species, but it is presumed to be stable for Europe and the EU 27. It is not commonly encountered, especially not in northern Europe, but there is no evidence of decreasing populations.",Stable,"In Scandinavia this species is known from southernmost parts of Norway and Sweden. The distribution elsewhere includes most of central Europe extending east into European parts of Russia and on into Siberia; it is also recorded from the Transcaucasia (Georgia) (Speight 2018, Mengual et al. 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. Future monitoring is needed, as well as research into its population and ecology, and the impacts of potential threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167519,149167516,Eupeodes lucasi,Least Concern,,2021,2020-09-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in the Mediterranean area. This species is frequent in Iberian Peninsula and Corsica (Marcos-García et al. 2000) and south-east France (Speight et al. 2018). It is a migratory species (Speight et al. 2016), so in non-breeding areas it is recorded only occasionally. It is not considered as threatened species in Europe according to Speight et al. (2016), and is listed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27.

","

It is present on paths and other small, open areas in mesophilous Fagus forest, Quercus pyrenaica forest and Castanea forest, upwards into Abies forest (Speight 2018) and in mountain ranges or areas with cold winter in Spain (Marcos-García et al. 2000).  This species is able to inhabit also rather anthropogenic suburban habitats in the Mediterranean. Flower visitation records are known from Hedera, Linaria, Thapsia, Sorbus, Quercus coccifera (Speight 2018, Ssymank 2012). The flight period of adults is from April to October, peaking in June/July (Marcos-García et al. 2000). Larvae are aphidophagous and they are present from May to September in colonies of various genera of aphids, which are often pests on Mediterranean fruit trees (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2000, Rojo et al. 2003).

","

Apart from the general threats for biodiversity, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe. Non-specific chemical treatments to control the aphids, can negatively affect the local populations of this species.

","

This species is frequent in Iberian Peninsula and Corsica (Marcos-García et al. 2000) and also south-east France (Speight et al. 2018), in other parts of Europe is rather rare, but it had been often misidentified as E. luniger (Marcos-García et al. 2000). It is also a migratory species (Speight et al. 2016) and the seeming rarity of this species in some areas is probably based on vagrant specimens. This species is referred as decreasing in Switzerland by Speight et al. (2016).

",Stable,"

Eupeodes lucasi is endemic to Europe and is apparently a Mediterranean species known from mainland Portugal, Spain (mainland and the Baleares), Italy, (mainland and Sicily) France (mainland and Corsica), Greece (mainland and the East Aegean Islands), and the Balkan Peninsula (Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina), but there are also some exceptional records - probably of vagrant specimens - far outside the Mediterranean area (Hungary, Switzerland, Czech Republic) (Nedeljković 2011, van Eck 2011, Burgio et al. 2015, Ricarte and Marcos 2017, Speight 2018, Marcos-García et al. 2000, Vujić et al. 2020).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,

Eupeodes lucasi is not considered threatened species in Europe according to Speight (2016) and there are no specific conservation actions for this species in Europe.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167529,149167527,Cheilosia brachysoma,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-05-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

This species is assessed as Data Deficient (DD) in Europe and EU 27. It is often taxonomically confused with closely related species. More data need to be obtained for a better understanding of its distribution. At a general level, habitat loss (in quality and quantity) is expected due to the intensification of grassland management and livestock grazing pressure in Europe’s grasslands. Monitoring and further research is required to establish its distribution and precise habitat and ecological requirements so as to understand the existing threats better.

The German Red List classified this species as Critically Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011), and based on this Speight (2018) noted that the species appears to be extremely scarce and should be regarded as threatened. With more information, this species may well meet one of the thresholds for a threatened category, and so urgent action should be taken to carry out further research within the next five years.","This species appears to prefer unimproved/almost unimproved (subject at most to addition of occasional organic fertiliser), humid, oligotrophic/mesotrophic montane grassland (at 800-1,000 m asl) with streams and flushes, subject to light/moderate grazing by cows (C. Claussen, D. Doczkal and A. Maibach pers. comm. 2020). There are no data on flowers visited, and the immature stages are unknown (Speight 2020).",This species appears to be extremely scarce (Speight 2020). The main threats are habitat loss due to change in land use and intensification of grassland management and grazing pressure in Europe’s grasslands.,"There is no information on population trends. Due to confusion with other species, it may be more widespread than currently known but this is not possible to confirm without checking more records. It is considered extremely rare in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Unknown,"Cheilosia brachysoma is a species endemic to Europe, distributed mainly in central Europe. It has been recorded from Austria (Heimburg 2018), Czech Republic and Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Hungary (Tóth 2001), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005) and Switzerland (CSCF 2019).

Its full distribution is unknown due to widespread difficulty with identification, and so it is not possible to calculate the area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) accurately. The distribution map is created based on potentially suitable habitat at higher altitudes within the countries of occurrence.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions for this species. It is noted in the Red List of the hoverflies of Baden-Württemberg and in that for Germany as Critically Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011). Its distributional range is partly within the boundaries of Natura 2000 in the Šumava National Park (Czech Republic). Since it is recorded mainly in grasslands of central and eastern Europe, the conservation actions should be focused on preserving its habitat due to intensification of grassland management and grazing pressure in Europe’s grasslands. Monitoring and further research is required to establish the habitat and ecological requirements and to understand the existing threats better.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167540,149167537,Eupeodes latifasciatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread and sometimes abundant in almost the whole of Europe and in the EU 27 Member States. It has a wide distribution and it is also widespread in agricultural landscapes. There are no major threats to this species, and no conservation action is required at present, and it is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","

This species of hoverfly prefers humid open ground habitats such as fens, seasonally-flooded/poorly-drained grasslands, usually along streams in open country (including seaside) and unsown fallow land in agricultural landscapes (Speight 2018). Adults are migratory (Aubert et al. 1976) and fly usually among low growing vegetation preferably in the vicinity of water. They visit flowers of various herbaceous plant and shrubs such as white Apiaceae, Caltha palustris, Convolvulus, Euphorbia, Potentilla erecta, Prunus padus, Ranunculus spp., Salix repens, Taraxacum, Tussilago, Calluna vulgaris, Frangula anus, Lobularia marítima , Crataegus spp., Cirsium arvense, Leucanthemum vulgare (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkemeyer 1994).  Flight period of adults is from May to September in most of Europe and from April to October in southern Europe (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). The predacious larva was described by Dušek end Láska (1960) and it feeds on various species of aphids that are found usually on roots or at the base of herbs, shrubs including various crops (Bartsch et al. 2009, Rojo et al. 2003).

","

There are no major threats to this species. This species is also widespread in agricultural landscapes.

The invasion of ladybird Harmonia axiridis in Europe could be important threat for the native aphidophagous predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016) but probably not for this aphidophagous species, since E. latifasciatus occurs also in Asia, where is H. axiridis native.

","Although this species is widely distributed, it is abundant only locally or occasionally (Bartsch et al. 2009); that probably depends on the abundance of suitable prey aphids. This species might be abundant also in agricultural landscapes and suburban habitats (Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkemeyer 1994).",Stable,"

Eupeodes latifasciatus is one of the most widespread species of the genus Eupeodes in Europe as well as in almost the whole Holarctic region. It is present in all regions of Europe except the extreme North (Swalbard, Faroes) (Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Bartsch et al. 2009, Jensen 2001). It is not known from several parts and islands in the Mediterranean (Corsica, South Greece, Crete and Malta) (Speight et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020, Ssymank and Ebejer 2009) or from Macaronesia (Smit 2008, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017).

Outside Europe it is present in most parts of Palaearctic region (from North Africa to Far East), in most parts of the Nearctic and partly in the Oriental region (India) (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Dousti and Hayat 2006, Saribiyik 2014, Vockeroth 1992).

","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential to be used in control of aphids on various crops.",Terrestrial,Eupeodes latifasciatus is not considered as threatened in any area in Europe and its biology is relatively well known.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167551,149167548,Cheilosia barbata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-08-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy are greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27 and this species is not expected to be subject to major threats, and so it is assessed as Least Concern in both regions. It is often abundant, and has been recorded throughout central and southern Europe. Although widely distributed through large parts of Europe, additional research is needed, especially on its biology and ecology.","This species is known from young deciduous woodland and scrub on well-drained soils and dry, unimproved grassland at elevations up to and including montane pasture; it is more closely associated with open areas within forest towards the southern edge of its range (Speight 2018). The flight period is from May to August, with a peak in July/beginning of August. Flower visitation records are known from Caltha, Chaerophyllum, Crataegus, Euphorbia, Ranunculus, Sambucus, Taraxacum and most white umbellifers (Speight 2018).","

This species is unlikely to be subject to widespread threats due to its wide range, but a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to conversion of forest areas may constitute localized threats.

","There is no information about population trends, but this species is widely distributed. In the Netherlands, at the edge of its distribution, it is regarded as rare (Reemer et al. 2009). In the Finnish Red List (Haarto et al. 2019) it is classified as Regionally Extinct, but this classification is based on a single specimen with potentially erroneous locality data, and should not be considered.",Unknown,"This species is widely distributed in Europe. Its distributional range extends from Britain east through most of central Europe to parts of European Russia and western Siberia, and south to southwest Spain; through upland areas of southern Europe to the Balkans, Turkey (Speight 2018) and Kazakhstan (Barkalov and Mutin 2018). One old specimen is known from the Helsinki region in Finland, but it seems highly likely that this specimen has an erroneous locality label, since no other specimens are known and in Fennoscandia the species is only known from Denmark, not from other parts of Scandinavia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy are greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. Although widely distributed through large parts of Europe, additional research is needed, especially on its biology and ecology.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167564,149167561,Eupeodes lapponicus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-09-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has numerous subpopulations in almost all humid regions of Europe with conifer forests and in conifer plantations. But this species is apparently rare and disappearing from some parts of western Europe. There are no documented specific threats to this species, but subpopulations of this species are apparently influenced by forestry management. No conservation action is required at present, except research on larval biology and the impact of possible threats from invasive ladybirds.

","

This hoverfly occurs primarily in clearings and forest edges in both deciduous (mesophilous and humid Fagus) and coniferous (Picea/Abies) forests, including conifer plantations, also in montane birch (Betula) forest of northern Europe. Adults were observed on various flowering herbs, bushes and trees and their flying period is from March to November, but are most numerous during summer months. They are highly migratory (Aubert et al. 1976, Speight et al. 2016). Fertilized females are known as overwinter in Central Europe (Dušek and Láska, 1986, Goeldlin 1974), but this species can overwinter also as larva or pupa (Kula 1980). Larvae of this species are almost exclusively predacious on aphids on trees (Abies, Picea, Pinus, Fagus and Malus) (Rojo et al. 2003), including on balsam twig aphids (Mindarus abietinus) on balsam fir (Abies balsamea) on Christmas trees plantations in eastern North America (Berthiaume et al. 2016).

","

There are no documented threats to this species in Europe. This species is present in conifer plantations. Subopulations of this species are apparently influenced by forestry management in Europe, especially outside of boreal Europe. The is also invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axiridis in Europe, that could be important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is also preferably predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly as it was observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015), although E. lapponicus is present also in East Palearctic, where the invasive ladybird is native. Chemical treatments to control aphid pest in pine plantations, can also damage the populations of this predator species.

","

This species has numerous and stable subpopulations in coniferous forests in Scandinavia (particularly in Finland) and Central Europe (Bartsch et al. 2009, Čepelák et al. 1986). It is reported to be rare, decreasing or threatened in Ireland, Great Britain, Belgium and Denmark (Speight et al. 2016, Ball et al. 2011). In general E. lapponicus is a vagrant species (Speight et al. 2016, Ball and Morris 2014), so it is often recorded as a rare species in areas without coniferous forest (Bartsch et al. 2009) far from permanent breeding sites.

",Stable,"

Eupeodes lapponicus is a Holarctic species widely distributed across the whole Europe except the extreme North, Iceland, and dry forestless regions in southern Europe. The species is also widely distributed in all forested zones of Asia and in North America from Alaska south to California (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Vockeroth 1992). It is not present in Greenland (Böcher et al. 2015).

","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential to be used in biocontrol of aphids on coniferous trees.",Terrestrial,"

Eupeodes lapponicus is not threatened in Fennoscandia and Germany (Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Gammelmo et al. 2015, Ssymank et al. 2011). Speight et al. (2016) listed this species as threatened in Ireland and Great Britain and decreasing in Denmark and Belgium. Ball and Morris (2014) believe this to be a vagrant species in the Great Britain. The biology of this species is relatively well known, however larval biology is known inadequately to estimate possible impact of the invasive ladybird Harmonia axiridis on this species and to estimate impact of chemical treatments to control aphid pests in pine tree plantations.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167577,149167572,Merodon euri,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This European endemic is assessed as Vulnerable both globally and for the EU 27 Member States, primarily based on its number of locations (eight), and the area of occupancy (AOO) (68 km2). Moreover, due to ongoing threats (primarily habitat loss due to agricultural activities), a continuing decline in quality of habitat is observed. The number of locations is calculated based on the habitat loss due to agricultural activities. In the EU 27, the species is assessed as Vulnerable, based on its number of locations (seven) and the area of occupancy (AOO) (64 km2). Moreover, due to the ongoing threats, a continuing decline in quality of habitat is observed.

","

The preferred environment of this species is maquis and open areas in Mediterranean evergreen forests (Radenković et al. 2018), open ground and brushwood forests, open thermophilous Quercus (Quercus frainetto, Quercus cerris, Quercus pubescens) forests, garrigues and parklands. The flight period is from April to June and from August to October (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages and host plant are unknown.

","The loss of habitat and host plants represent direct threats (Rotheray 1993). The main causes of loss of maquis in the Mediterranean region is the destruction of the natural vegetation to make way for pasture, grazing by livestock (which hinders or slows down the progressive development of the vegetation), fires (large-scale fires particularly in Dadia National Park), replacement of the natural vegetation by crops, reforestation with species which do not give rise to maquis, and human settlements in varying density in places formerly covered by vegetation (Tomaselli 1977). A main threat is habitat loss due to agricultural activities. Additionally, urbanisation and tourism can also lead to habitat fragmentation and loss.","

In order to obtain more information about the population, continuing monitoring is needed. However, based on the available data, only one specimen was recorded in 1962 and 1985, two in 1998, three in 2007, and four in 1984. In 2012, the population was considered to be stable (61 specimens were caught, from Dadia National Park, Mount Olympus, Thessaly and central Greece, and from the Pčinja region in Serbia). It was also considered to be stable in 2014 as well (22 specimens collected, all from the Peloponnese, Greece).

",Stable,"This European endemic species is known from southwestern Bulgaria, Greece and southern Serbia, from the eastern to the southern parts of the Balkan Peninsula, with one population even occurring in the northern Peloponnesus. Further research is required to confirm its distribution, with no records from North Macedonia at present, for example.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Until now, this species has not been the subject of any targeted conservation actions. However, since its habitat is being threatened, conservation actions should be undertaken to protect it, directed towards the protection of the habitat, including host plants. Some point localities occur in National Parks. Raising awareness and educating about the importance of this species are important. Research is needed about its threats, ecology, biology, population size and trends. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is also required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167585,149167574,Eupeodes flaviceps,Least Concern,,2021,2020-09-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Eupeodes
flaviceps is widespread, but probably relatively frequent only on the Balkan Peninsula into Hungary and south Slovakia. It seems that this species was more frequently collected in the past than recently, but records referred to this species (especially older ones) are often not reliable. It is not considered a threatened species in Europe except in Switzerland, and is consequently listed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27.","E. flaviceps prefers open areas in Quercus ilex and Q. pubescens forests and dry scrub and on dry/semi-arid, unimproved grasslands (Speight 2018, Nedeljković 2011). Males hover low (about 1 m) in dappled sunlight, beneath trees like Q. ilex (Speight 2018) and numerous males are often observed in hilltop situations (Dušek and Láska 1976). The flight period of the adults is from June to September. There is no data about flower visiting. The larva is not described, but specimens referred to this species were obtained from aphid colonies collected on Thalictrum flavum and other plant (Marcos-García 1985, Speight 2018).","Apart from general threats to biodiversity, any specific threats to this species cannot be identified due to the lack of clarity surrounding the biology and microhabitat requirements of this species.","This species is relatively frequent on the Balkan Peninsula including Hungary and south Slovakia (Nedeljković 2011, Tóth 2011, Čepelák et al. 1986), e.g. Dušek and Láska (1976) mentioned 63 males collected on one hilltop situation in Slovakia, and rather rare and local in Southwest Europe (Speight et al. 2018, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Burgio et al. 2015). Speight et al. (2016) report that this species is declining in Switzerland. It seems that this species was more frequently collected in the past than recently, but the rate of any genuine population decline cannot be calculated. Records of this species based on females are not reliable due to similarity with related species, and there is a great variability in numbers of collected males.",Unknown,"

Eupeodes flaviceps is widespread in southern parts of West Palaearctic, occurring in Europe south from central France, Switzerland, Austria, Slovakia, Romania and Crimea (Speight 2018, Speight et al. 2018, Dušek and Láska 1976, Vujić et al. 2020, Burgio et al. 2015, Ricarte and Marcos 2017, Nedeljković 2011, S. Popov pers. comm.). Peck (1988) and some others authors reported the occurrence of this species also in Germany, Poland or Czech Republic, but this species is absent from current comprehensive regional lists for these countries (e.g. Mielczarek 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011) or data is based on very old single record that it is necessary to critically review (Mazánek et al. 2006).

Outside Europe it is known also from Turkey, Transcaucasia (Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia) and Altai (Speight 2018, Peck 1988, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Mengual et al. 2020, Saribiyik 2014).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Eupeodes flaviceps is not considered threatened generally in Europe, but is threatened and declining in Switzerland (Speight et al. 2016). There are no specific conservation actions for this species in Europe. Research is needed as the larval biology of this species is unknown and there are still problems with distinguishing females of this species, and older records are in need of review.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167598,149167594,Eupeodes curtus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a relatively rare species with limited distribution in arctic tundra and taiga habitats of the northern Holarctic. The population seems to be stable and there are much more that 10 locations in Europe and the EU 27 alike, and the population is not severely fragmented. This species is listed as Least Concern in all recent national Red Lists of all European countries within its distribution, and is listed here as Least Concern in both the EU27 and Europe.

","

This species is present in arctic tundra and taiga environments. The flight period of adults is during June and July. Published flower visitation records in Europe exist for Caltha sp. (Ranunculaceae), Chrysanthemum leucanthemum (Asteraceae) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Barkalov and Mutin (2015) observed this species on flowering Spirea sp., Tanacetum and Potentila anserina ssp. edegi in Anadyr river floodplain in the Far East of Russia. The larval stage is unknown, but apparently predacious as larvae of other Eupeodes species (Bartsch et al. 2009).

","

Any current threats to this species are unknown, although it is presumed to be subject to a general continuing decline in the extent and quality of suitable habitat due to human activities and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016). The quality of suitable habitat for this high-latitude species could be decline due to global warming (Barredo et al. 2020, T. Nielsen pers comm. 2021).

","

It is a rare but still regularly observed Eupeodes species in western taiga and tundra as well as in the Russian Far East and northern Nearctic region (Barstch et al. 2009, GBIF 2020; T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2021). Its subpopulations are apparently stable, with no documented decline (Speight et al. 20016).

",Stable,"

Eupeodes curtus has a northern Holarctic distribution including Iceland, but it is not present on Greenland (Böchet et al. 2015). It is known from northern and alpine Fennoscandia (Norway, Sweden, Finland) and in the north Far East of Russia (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018) and the northern Nearctic. Its occurrence in Northern European Russia has not been documented (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), but it seems to be possible.

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation measures in place or needed. Eupeodes curtus is not listed as threatened in any recent national Red Lists (Norway, Finland, Sweden) (Artdatabanken 2020, Haarto et al. 2019, Gammelmo et al. 2015), although an earlier Red List for Finland (Haarto and Kerppola 2007) listed this species as Near Threatened.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167606,149167593,Cheilosia angustigenis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-07-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Cheilosia angustigenis is a rather rarely encountered species. The preferred habitat type seems to be available, but it may have high requirements for habitat quality, as the occurrence is mainly in undisturbed (unimproved) habitats such as humid, unimproved meadows adjacent to temperate (old) forests rich in naturally occurring herbs, and in open areas in old coniferous forests.

The population trend is unknown, and although it may be locally threatened due to unsustainable forest management or other human activities there are no major direct threats. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are above the thresholds for the threatened categories. More research is needed on its ecology, population trends and microhabitat requirements. The available data are insufficient to determine the degree of threat to the species, but with the currently understood EOO and AOO, the species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27.

","This species is known from open areas in boreal Betula forest (Nielsen 1980), western taiga (Nielsen 1998), and humid meadows adjacent to forests (Bartsch et al. 2009); van Steenis (2016) mentions wet meadows in old coniferous forests as habitat in a nature reserve in the Uppsala area (Sweden). It is known primarily from undisturbed habitats. Flower visitation records are known from Acer platanoides, Anemone nemorosa (Nielsen 1980, van Steenis 2016), Caltha palustris, Crataegus spp., Prunus spinosa, Viburnum opulus (Bartsch et al. 2009) and Prunus padus (van Steenis 1998). The flight period is from May to the end of June. The host plant and immature stages are unknown.","This species is subject to general anthropogenic activities in Europe, including intensified land-use due to increased urbanization, wetland drainage, and intensive agriculture, all of which could result in degradation of habitat and habitat fragmentation.",There is no information about population trends. The occurrence of this species seems to be highly localized. It is a rare but possibly also an overlooked species.,Unknown,"This species is distributed in most of Sweden (van Steenis 1998, van Steenis 2016, Bartsch et al. 2009) and Finland (Haarto and Kerppola 2007), southern and northern Norway (Pasvik valley) (Nielsen 1980, 1998, Nielsen and Svendsen 2014), northern European Russia, Siberia and the Russian Far East (Barkalov and Mutin 2018 as C. lugubris), Kazakhstan and northern Caucasus (Speight 2018). A record from Ukraine remains doubtful (Lezhenina 1993, as C. lugubris). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened category.",This species is not traded or commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. Research is needed to clarify its distribution, population status, ecology and the impacts of threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167620,149167614,Eupeodes corollae,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread and abundant in almost whole of Europe and in the EU 27, it has a wide distribution and it is also abundant in agricultural landscapes. There are no major threats to this species, and no conservation action is required at present. It is consequently listed Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27.

","

This species of hoverfly prefers rather open habitats (grasslands, dune systems, dry river beds, garrigue, agricultural landscapes, gardens, orchards and parks). It is present up to altitude of alpine grasslands in the Alps. Adults are frequent in hedgerows, grassy clearings in woodland, crops, gardens, tracksides, road verges etc. They are highly migratory (Speight 2018, Aubert et al. 1976). They visit flowers of various mainly herbaceous plant such as Apiaceae and a lot of other herbs and also shrubs (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bakemayear 1964, Röder 1990). The flight period of adults is from May to September in most of Europe, but it may persist all the year round in the Mediterranean zone (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Larvae feed on aphids and exceptionally on other soft bodied pests on various low-growing plants including various crop plants (see Rojo et al. 2003). Larva was described by Dušek end Láska (1961) and larval biology has been studied by many other authors, because E. corollae has an important role in the bio-control of aphid pests on various arable crops. Larvae are efficient searchers and quickly captured, and eat aphids even at the lowest aphid densities (Scott and Barlow 1986). Growth potential of this aphidophagous species is relatively high, and its population is able multiply 2.55 times every week (Sharma and Balla 1995). Bartsch et al. (2009) noted that development from eggs to newly hatched flies can be as short as eleven days, but this seems unreliable in natural condition. Benestad (1970) observed that duration of development is dependent highly on temperature and that shortest time of development from laid egg to adults was 14.1 days at constant 28 °C. A comprehensive review of the biology of this species is provided by Barkemeyer (1994).

","

There are no major threats to this species. This species is rather more abundant in anthropogenic habitats (Bartsch et al. 2009) and it seems to be partly antrophophilic.

The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be important threat for the native aphidophagous predators in Europe (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016), but probably not for this aphidophagous species, since E. corollae occurs also in Asia where H. axiridis is native.


","

This species is one of the most common species of hoverfly in most parts of Europe. It is largely anthropophilic, and is often the dominant hoverfly also in agroecosystems and suburban habitats (Vujić et al. 2020, Speight 2018, Bartsch et. al. 2009)).

",Stable,"Eupeodes corollae is one of the most widespread and abundant species of hoverfly in Europe as well as in the rest of the Palearctic region. It is present in all regions of Europe except the extreme North (Swalbard) (Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Bartsch et al. 2009). According to Speight (2018) this highly migratory species is frequently observed using the coastal land/water interface as a migration route. Records from northern Europe, Faroes and Iceland, are almost certainly derived from annual immigration (Jensen 2001, Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009).

It is also widespread in almost all other parts of the Palaearctic region, it is found along the coasts of Africa south to South Africa in the Afrotropical region, and it is recorded to be present in Mauritius, in Oriental region and Tasmania (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Dousti and Hayat 2006, Saribiyik 2014, Vujić et al. 2020).","This species is probably not traded or exploited commercially at present. However, a lot of authors have studied the role and use of this species for biological control of aphids on various arable crops, because this species is one of the most important natural enemies that can control aphids (Pu 2019 and others).",Terrestrial,There are no known conservation measures in place and none are needed. Eupeodes corollae is not considered as threatened in any area in Europe and its biology is relatively well known.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167628,149167615,Cheilosia albitarsis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a Holarctic species with a wide distribution throughout the Palaearctic region, occurring in almost all European countries and further extending to Siberia. It is one of the most widespread species in the Palaearctic region, but its distribution could require revision due to confusion with Cheilosia ranunculi (Doczkal in Speight, 2020). Its population trend is stable. It can be found on open ground and forests, agricultural land, and forest clearings, montane and subalpine pasture. It is assessed as Least Concern because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category, the population appears to be stable, and it is unlikely to be subject to major widespread threats.

","This species can be found in open ground and forests, agricultural land, and forest clearings, montane and subalpine pasture. Adults can be found on the edges of forest clearings and tracks, along hedges and in pastures in farmland. The males hover up to 5 m above the ground and settle on foliage of shrubs or low growing plants. Flowers visited include: white umbellifers, yellow composites, Ajuga, Allium ursinum, Caltha, Crataegus, Matricaria, Potentilla, Ranunculus, Sorbus and Stellaria. The flight period is between April/June and July at higher altitudes. Being an synanthropic species, it is favoured by present-day farming practices (Speight 2018). The larvae have been collected from the rootstock of Ranunculus (probably Ranunculus repens) and reared to adult (Rotheray 1994).","

This species could potentially be subject to localized man-made activities in Europe, such as intensified land-use due to increased urbanization and intensive farming, which could lead to habitat degradation in agricultural areas.

","This species is one of the most widespread and abundant species of the genus Cheilosia in the Palaearctic region, and the population trend is considered stable in both Europe and the EU27. It is common in its entire distributional range across Europe.",Stable,"This is a Holarctic species with a wide distribution throughout the Palaearctic region, occurring in almost all European countries and further extending to Siberia (Speight 2018). Outside of Europe, it is also recorded from North Africa, North America, Kazakhstan and Georgia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Speight 2018, Mengual et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species in Europe and the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for a threatened category.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,There are no known ongoing conservation actions and none are needed for this species. Research on its distribution and trends as well as the monitoring of the population is recommended.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167639,149167636,Eupeodes bucculatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-09-21 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Eupeodes bucculatus
is occasionally but regularly recorded from almost the whole of Europe except warmer Mediterranean areas and the extreme north. Its Pan-European population seems to be numerous and stable, but this species is apparently threatened or disappearing from some areas of urbanized Western Europe (Speight et al. 2016, Bartsch et al. 2009). There are no documented threats to this species, and no specific conservation action is required at present, except research on taxonomy, population trends and possible threats, and it is therefore, assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.","Eupeodes bucculatus seems to be a principally arboreal species that descends to visit flowers in riverine gallery forest, alluvial softwood forest of Populus/Salix and mature fen carr of Salix/Betula (Speight 2018). In Sweden adults occur in open ground with elements of Alnus, Betula and Salix, among others, on meadows, among dunes, by beaches, in agricultural landscapes and in younger conifer plantations (Bartch et al. 2009). The adults can probably travel long distances over land and also sea (Bartsch et al. 2009, Aubert et al. 1976)) and they visit flowers of various herbs (eg. Cirsium arvense, Geranium sylvaticum, Heracleum sphondylium, Leontodon autumnalis, Caltha palustris, Euphorbia, Narthecium, Potentilla erecta, Stellaria.) and bushes (eg. Rubus chamaemorus, Salix spp., Sorbus aucuparia). Flight period of adults is from the end of April to September with two generation possible (Speight 2018, Speight et al. 2016, Bartsch et al. 2009, Ball et al. 2011). Aphidophagous larvae were found on plants by Dixon (1960), Láska and Starý (1980) and also by Dušek and Láska (1960, according to Mazánek et al. 1998).","

There are no known major threats to this species in Europe. It seems that this species is present in agricultural and suburban landscapes. However, it is probably preferentially a woodland edge species that is likely to be affected by over-intensive management and loss of open patches and ecotones with tall herbs and shrubs structure in connection with high woodlands. 

The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015). E. bucculatus is however present also in the East Palearctic, where the invasive ladybird is native.

","

This species is broadly widespread in Europe, but usually recorded only sporadically with no obvious trend (Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Vujić et al. 2020, S. Popov pers. comm. 2020). The species is however considered to be declining in Belgium, France and Switzerland and is referred to as threatened in Denmark (Speight et al. 2016, Bartsch et al. 2009). There is a possibility that this could be a rare migrant/vagrant in some areas (Ball et al. 2011). There is also problems with confusion with similar Eupeodes species (Speight 2018, Ball et al. 2011, Mazánek et al. 1999) since the present species concept of this species has been established relatively recently and there is great variability within the species (Mazánek et al. 1998).

",Stable,"

Eupeodes bucculatus is occasionally but regularly recorded from almost the whole of Europe except warmer Mediterranean areas and the extreme north.

The species is known also from most parts of the Palearctic region out of Europe (Georgia, Afghanistan, Mongolia, Nepal, Pakistan, Siberia, Russian Far East, Japan and Korea - Speight 2018, Mengual et al. 2020, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Mazánek et al. 1998).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Eupeodes bucculatus is not threatened in Fennoscandia (Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Gammelmo et al. 2015). Speight et al. (2016) listed this species as threatened in Denmark. It is necessary to critically review the knowledge about this species, since it is not certain whether all published information refers to the same species. The impacts of invasive ladybirds are unknown.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167649,149167647,Merodon vladimiri,Vulnerable,D2,2021,2019-11-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

This species is endemic to Europe, where it is currently known from a single male specimen collected in North Macedonia. It has a restricted area of occupancy (AOO) of 4 km2, with a plausible future threat (urban development) that could drive the taxon to become Critically Endangered or Extinct in a very short time. Based on this, the species is assessed as Vulnerable (D2). Significant further research is needed on this species, especially on its distribution, population size and trend, biology and ecology. We propose population monitoring, as well as of the habitat trend and potential threats. Once this research is ongoing, there is potential that the species is found to be classified in a higher threat category.

","The male was collected in May. There are no data about the habitats (Kočiš Tubić et al. 2018), but it is likely to prefer open habitats and grassland. Other closely related species have been found in open grassland habitats, in relatively restricted subpopulations, so it is likely that this species occurs in the same type of habitats and is also very restricted.",There are high pressures from urban development in the area where the species was recorded.,Only one male of this species has been recorded to date. The population trend is unknown.,Unknown,"This European endemic species has only been recorded from one point locality in North Macedonia (Kočiš Tubić et al. 2018). The record is from 2003, and it is a relatively recently described species. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 4 km2.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"Raising awareness about this species is very important. Further research on its biology, ecology and population is needed. More monitoring on its population and habitat trend is also required, as well as site protection.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167661,149167658,Eriozona erratica,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is Least Concern due to being fairly widespread across Central and northern Europe, although in southern Europe it is rare. In the EU27 Member States, the assessment for E. erratica is similar as it has a relatively wide range and is not considered to be at significant risk. However, there is likely decline in Central parts of Europe and it is listed as Near Threatened in Belgium and as extinct in the German region of Berlin.

","The preferred habitats of Eriozona erratica are coniferous forests: Abies, Picea, and humid Pinus forests. Adults fly from July to September visiting flowers of Bellis, Calluna vulgaris, Cardamine pratense, Cirsium vulgare, Crataegus, Epilobium angustifolium, Euphorbia hyberna, Geranium, Lonicera periclymenum, Prunus spinosa, Ranunculus, Rubus idaeus, R. fruticosus agg., Salix, Sorbus aucuparia, Stellaria, Veronica, Viburnum and yellow Asteraceae. The larva was described and figured by Dušek and Láska (1967) and Goeldlin (1974).",Reduction of habitat quality due to changes in traditional forest management and reduction of forest cover because of land use changes may particularly threaten this species' population.,"

There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe. However, there is likely decline in Central parts of Europe and it is listed as Near Threatened in Belgium and as extinct in the German region of Berlin.

",Unknown,"In Europe, this species occurs mainly in northern and Central Europe, from Fennoscandia to the Pyrenees and from Ireland eastwards through central Europe and the Alps into European Russia.

Out of the European region, this species occurs in Siberia and the Pacific coast (Sakhalin and Kunashir islands) and in the Himalayas (Nepal) and North America from Alaska to Mexico (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphids causing pests in cultivated plants (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,

There are not specific conservation actions in place for this species.

Eriozona erratica is regarded as Near Threatened (NT) in the Belgian region of Flanders (https://www.inbo.be/en/search-flanders-red-lists) and as extinct in Berlin (Germany) (Saure 2018). It is considered as Least Concern in Sweden (2015).

Additional monitoring is needed to better understand the population trends and the impacts of potential threats.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167671,149167669,Merodon escorialensis,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European species is endemic to the Iberian Peninsula. It is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) as it is close to meeting the threshold for Vulnerable under Criterion B, with a restricted area of occupancy (AOO), continuing decline in habitat area and quality, but with a number of locations that exceeds ten (though to be c. 10). The number of locations is based on overgrazing by livestock as the main threat. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 369,791 km2 and AOO is 104 km2. In addition, due to the ongoing threats (of which overgrazing represents the main one), a continuing decline in quality of habitat and its fragmentation is observed. Furthermore, only a small number of specimens have been registered. Monitoring and research of its population and habitat trend are required.","

The preferred environment for this species is open ground, unimproved, non-calcareous, montane grassland and heath, from the level of Castanea forest up to 1,800 metres, as well as open Quercus rotundifolia woodland all over Spain (Marcos-García 1989, Marcos-García et al. 2007, Speight 2018). It is known to visit yellow Asteraceae, Calluna, Lavandula, Mentha and Succisa. The developmental stages have not been described. The flight period is from March to September (Marcos-García et al. 2007). The host plant is unknown.

","Overgrazing by livestock represents the main threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). The vegetation habitats have been increasingly fragmented in the Iberian Peninsula, and processes of intensification and expansion have provoked changes (such as shrub encroachment and nitrophilous plants) (Fernández et al. 2018). Fires in these point localities also represent a potential threat to the habitat quality, contributing to its fragmentation and loss. Ongoing urbanisation and tourism development in certain localities, especially in those near to the coast, can result in habitat fragmentation and loss.","There are no data on the population trend, and therefore, continuous monitoring is needed. Based on all known findings, specimens in Portugal were collected from 1981 to 2015 (two in 1981 and one each in 2009, 2010, 2013 and 2015). Specimens from Spain were collected in 1969, 1986 (two), 1977, 1981, 1982, 1985 (three), 1980 (five), 1988 (six), 1987 (14) (Marcos-García 1989, Marcos-García et al. 2007).",Unknown,"This European endemic species is restricted to the Iberian Peninsula. In Spain, it is known from the Cantabrian mountains southwards to the mountains of the Sistema Central of central Spain, and in the Parque Natural de Cazorla in the south, and from locality in Barcelona (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007). In Portugal, it is recorded from a few point localities in northwestern and central parts of the country (Van Eck 2011, 2016). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 369,791 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) is 104 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

The species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. Some of its point localities are within the boundaries of the Natural Park de Cazorla in Spain. In Portugal, a few point localities are within the boundaries of two Natural Parks: da Serra da Estrela and das Serras de Aire e Candeeiros. A number of point localities are within the Natura 2000 network. 

Additional research and monitoring are needed on its general abundance, habitat, ecological requirements, threats and trends. As overgrazing by livestock is the main threat, this should be restricted. Raising awareness and education about the importance of this species is also important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167683,149167680,Episyrphus balteatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is listed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27 Member States because it is widespread and abundant in many habitat types and it has a high migrant ability. The biology of E. balteatus is well-studied and this species is commercialized as a biocontrol agent. There are no threats identified for this species and conservation actions are unnecessary at this point.,"This species is highly anthropophilic and almost ubiquitous. Thus, it can be found in a wide range of habitats visiting flowers of various plant species. The early stages of this hoverfly are well known. The larva preys on numerous insect species, mainly aphids (Speight 2018).",This is one of the commonest hoverfly species in Europe and seems not to be subject to any threats. Experiments in laboratory conditions (in petri dishes and on potted plants) examining competitive interactions between this species and the widely-introduced harlequin ladybird (Harmonia axyridis) found that the beetle larvae preyed on early instars of the hoverfly more frequently than vice versa; the significance of this interaction in the wild is unclear but warrants further research (Ingels et al. 2015).,"There is no estimate of the population size for this species, but it very abundant and widespread in Europe and elsewhere. Nonetheless, studies on population trends in nature should be conducted to monitor possible changes in population dynamics, changes in its migratory behaviour and consequent changes in population densities.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species occurs from Fennoscandia south to the Mediterranean, the Canary Islands, Azores east from Ireland through Eurasia. Whether this species has been introduced in regions such as Australia is not clear because it is naturally widespread and it is greatly migratory.

This species is widespread throughout the Palaearctic Region; its range extends to North Africa, and extends eastwards in Asia to the Pacific coast, and south through the Oriental region to Sri Lanka and Australia (Speight 2018).","This is one of the two hoverfly species used for biocontrol purposes in Europe. There are companies rearing this species from breeding colonies at a large scale, developed with live specimens collected in the field. This species is commercialized and distributed in farms all across Europe to control mainly aphids. The commercial use of this species is not regarded as an important reason for this species to be widespread, since its use as pest control agent is not as extensive and generalised as other pest control methods are. In addition, the E. balteatus is usually used as pest control agent is closed agrosystems such as greenhouses.",Terrestrial,"This is one of the commonest hoverfly species with a large population in Europe and, for the moment, conservation actions are unnecessary. Research is recommended into the impacts of introduced ladybirds on wild subpopulations (Ingels et al. 2015).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167693,149167691,Merodon pumilus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

In Europe, this species is distributed in Spain and Portugal. It prefers open areas in thermophilous Quercus forests and evergreen oak forests. It is also found in maquis and mattoral  and xeric grasslands (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007).

The species has a relatively restricted area of occupancy (AOO) (56 km2) and a continuing decline in the quality of habitat is noted. The number of locations, which is based on overgrazing by livestock as the major threat, is just above the thresholds for threatened categories (11-12), but the population is considered to be severely fragmented. Due to all of the above, the species is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU27. The rescue effect from subpopulations outside of Europe is unlikely to happen.","This species prefers open areas in thermophilous Quercus forests and evergreen oak forests. It is also found in maquis, mattoral and xeric grasslands (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007). It is known to visit flowers of the Apiacae, Anthericum ramosum, Chrysanthemum leucanthemum, Mentha, Ranunculus, Solidago, Taraxacum (Speight 2020) and Oenanthe crocata (Marcos-García et al. 2007). The flight period is from April to June. The developmental stages and host plant are unknown (Speight 2020).","The main threat to the habitat of this species is overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Tourism, ski centres, infrastructural development, logging and fires also affect negatively the quality of its habitat in mountainous areas.","There is no information about the population trend. Many of the specimens from Spain (and Algeria) were collected in the 1920s. More recent records from Spain (2004, 2011 and 2015) are from at least 10 point localities. In Portugal, most of the records date from 2004 from two point localities. The subpopulation in Bolonia is the largest, while other subpopulations are small (typically 1-2 specimens per point locality) and isolated, with little possible exchange of genetic material. The population is considered severely fragmented because it is quite localized, does not fly large distances, and only a low numbers are collected in each locality.",Unknown,"In Europe, this species is distributed in Spain and Portugal, but it is also found in North Africa (in Algeria and Tunisia) (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Van Eck 2011, Speight 2020). In Europe and the EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 166,086 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 56 km2.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. Controlling grazing activities would benefit preservation of the habitat. Logging and infrastructural development should be closely monitored and controlled as well. Since there is no information about the population size, this needs attention together with its ecology. Monitoring population and habitat trends is required, and raising awareness about the species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167705,149167702,Epistrophella euchroma,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in Europe. It is a widespread species, present in many habitats, and there are no specific identified threats. Therefore, E. euchroma is regarded as Least Concern in Europe and in the EU27 Member States.

","The preferred habitat of Epistrophella euchroma are forests: taiga (Nielsen 1998), mature deciduous forest (Fagus/Quercus), and apple (Malus) orchards (Speight 2018). Adults fly from April to June visiting the flowers of white umbellifers, Acer pseudoplatanus, Euphorbia, Prunus, Salix. The larva is aphidophagous, described and figured by Dušek and Láska (1959) and Goeldlin de Tiefenau (1974).","

Apart from general threats to biodiversity, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

","

There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe. However, in countries such as the Czech Republic E. euchroma appears to be a common species (Jiří Hadrava in litt.).

",Unknown,"Epistrophella euchroma is widely distributed and present in almost all European countries. It occurs from northern Scandinavia to the Pyrenees and central Spain, and from Britain (southern England) eastwards through central Europe into European Russia.

Its range extends to the Caucasus in the south, and to eastern Siberia (Yakut) in Asia in the east (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphids causing pests in cultivated plants (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,

There are no specific conservation actions in place or recommended for this species. Taxonomic and nomenclatural work is required.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167715,149167713,Merodon erivanicus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

In Europe, this species is distributed in Serbia, Croatia, North Macedonia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Greece. It is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and EU 27 primarily due to its wide distribution. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 508,575 km2, and the number of locations is over 30 based on the overgrazing as the main threat. However, other possible threats to the habitat of this species should not be neglected (urbanisation and fires, especially in the Mediterranean hotspot). Additional research and monitoring is needed on population trend, species ecology and biology, as well as about potential threats.





","This species prefers open ground beside seasonal water-courses with a riparian forest strip of Populus and Salix scrub within otherwise open steppes, and alongside rivers in various habitats, including olive orchards, Castanea forest and phrygana. The known visited flowers are Euphorbia, yellow Apiaceae, and Ferula (Vujić et al. 2011, 2020; Ricarte et al. 2012; Speight 2020). The flight period is from the end of April until October (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages have not been described.","

The main potential threat is habitat loss due to change in land use. In addition, especially in the Mediterranean region, overgrazing by livestock, urbanisation and fires represent potential threats (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).

","There are insufficient data on the population trend, and thus monitoring is required. Specimens have been collected between 1887 and 2019, with more than 20 collected specimens in 2009, 2010 and 2012.",Unknown,"This species is distributed in Serbia, Croatia, North Macedonia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Greece. In Europe and the EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 508575 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 304 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is also present in the Caucasus (in Armenia and Azerbaijan), Turkey and Israel.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action so far. However, some point localities are within the boundaries of  Galičica National Park (Northern Macedonia) and Dadia Forest Nature Reserve (Greece). Furthermore, a considerable number of point localities are within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network. Monitoring of population and habitat trends is recommended, as well as research about potential threats, ecology and population size. Increasing awareness about this species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167727,149167724,Epistrophe ochrostoma,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The real distribution as well as population of Epistrophe ochrostoma in Europe is uncertain, due to confusion with related species until the revision of the genus Epistrophe by Doczkal and Schmid (1994). It seems that this rare species is declining in temperate Europe, even if it was probably rare historically but there is problem with the reliabily of old records. E. ochrostoma is listed as Data Deficient species in the Red List to Syrphidae of Germany and Great Britain (Ssymank et al. 2011, Ball and Morris 2014) as Vulnerable in the Red List of  Threatened Animals in Poland (Palaczyk et al. 2002). Haarto and Kerppola (2007) listed this species as Endangered (EN) for Finland, but in the recent Red Lists for Finland, Sweden and Norway it is listed as Least Concern (Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Gammelmo et al. 2015).

","E. ochrostoma is reported to occur in conifer and deciduous forest in temperate Europe and western taiga with Betula/Fraxinus/Salix (T. Nielsen, H. Bartsch and M. Reemer, pers.comm. in Speight 2018) and as occurring mainly in mixed or deciduous forest near lakes or streams (Bartsch et al. 2009) and suburban parks (Trzciński et al. 2014). Reemer et al. (2009) recorded subpopulations of E. ochrostoma in deciduous forests on various soils. It is rather arboreal species, but males were observed to hover low over ground vegetation. Adults visit flowering Salix repens, Salix sp. (Reemer 1999); Prunus padus and Ranunculus ficaria (Bartsch et al. 2009). The flight period of adults is from early May to mid June (to July in the north) in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009), and from mid April/mid May in temperate Europe (Speight 2018, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019). The larva is undescribed, but probably feed on aphids on trees and shrubs, like the larvae of other Epistrophe species. The larva described under this name by Goeldlin (1974) is now known to be that of E. flava (Mazánek et al. 2001).","

Apart from the general threats to biodiversity, including deforestation, there are no specific threats identified for this species, since there is no adequate information on the distribution and biology of this species. Nevertheless, it is presumed that a continuing decline in the extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species is underway, due to human activities (intensive forestry in temperate Europe) and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016).  This species probably has arboreal larvae associated with trees and shrubs with low economic value. The loss of unimproved open habitats in forests and ecotones along them and streams with tall herbs, bushes and deciduous trees with low economical value is possibly the main threat for this species, because it is probably associated with these species-rich habitats. The quality of suitable habitat for this species in temperate Europe could be also influenced by climatic changes due to global warming. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

The true distribution as well as the population status of E. ochrostoma in Europe is practically unknown due to confusion with related species (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). It seems that this species is extremely rare but probably widely distributed in northern Europe (Bartsch et al. 2009). The occurrence of this species in most parts of temperate Europe is based only on scattered and usually older records (Bartsch et al. 2009, Séguy 1961, Dirickx 1994, Doczkal and Schmid 1994). It is hard to determine whether the population of this species is declining, because there are a lot of older records that are unreliable due to confusion with similar common species (Doczkal and Schmid 1994). Nevertheless, the population of E. ochrostoma has decreased in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) and probably across the whole of temperate Europe.

",Unknown,"

The true range of this species in Europe is uncertain due to confusion with related species until the revision of the genus Epistrophe by Doczkal and Schmid (1994). Records of this species published prior to this revision mostly belong to other species of Epistrophe

The species has been confirmed as a rare species that occurs in Norway, Sweden, Germany, the Netherlands, Finland, the Czech Republic, Poland and Belgium (Speight 2018, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Bartsch et al. 2009, Mazánek 2009, Palaczyk et al. 2002, Doczkal and Schmidt 1994, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019). At present, this species is also regarded as occurring in Hungary and Bulgaria (this is likely partly incorrect despite Tóth 2011 referring to it as being relatively widespread; Rila Mt. Rila valley - Tóth 2014). It has been reported from most parts of European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, A. Barkalov pers comm. 2020), Slovenia (de Groot and Govedič 2008), Slovakia (Čepelák et al. 1986, Mazánek 2009), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Latvia (Karpa 2008) and Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), but most of these references are based on data published prior to revision of the genus by Doczkal and Schmid and it is not clear if these data were critically revised by authors. There are also records from Gibraltar by Ebejer and Bensusan (2010) that are apparently based on misidentified speciimens of E. elegans (A. Van Eck, pers.comm. in Speight 2018). This could also be the case with E. ochrostoma records from Mallorca (discussed by Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017) and also from Santander province in northern Spain (Peris 1958, Diricx 1994, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017). The occurrence of E. ochrostoma in Great Britain is discussed by Ball et. al. (2011), who conclude that E. ochrostoma is not resident in Great Britain.

The species is also reported to occur in Siberia, Far East and Japan (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, V. Mutin pers. comm. 2020).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"Further survey work is needed to determine the distribution and to estimate recent population trend of this species especially in temperate Europe, as well as its biology. E. ochrostoma is listed as Data Deficient species in the Red List to Syrphidae of Germany and Great Britain (Ssymank et al. 2011, Ball and Morris 2014) as Vulnerable in the Red List of  Threatened Animals in Poland (Palaczyk et al. 2002). Haarto and Kerppola (2007) listed this species as Endangered (EN) for Finland, but in the recent Red Lists for Finland, Sweden and Norway it is listed as Least Concern species (Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Gammelmo et al. 2015).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167737,149167735,Merodon papillus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This species is assessed as Vulnerable in Europe, because the area of occupancy (AOO) is 52 km2, and the number of locations is 8-9 based on overgrazing by goats and sheep, and fires, which can also reduce the quality of suitable habitat. A continuous decline of the habitat quality is expected.

The subpopulations occurring in Turkey are registered on high mountains of the Central and Southern Anatolian are separated from Greek subpopulations by geographical barriers in the form of mountains and seas, and are far from the European range making the rescue effect more difficult. Further research is needed into the population size and trend, habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better the threats affecting the species.

","The preferred environment of this species is forest, thermophilous oak forest of Quercus pubescens and Quercus cerris, evergreen oak forest of Quercus ilex and maquis of Q. coccifera, Pistacia, Olea, phrygana of Cistus and Thymus capitatus, and olive (Olea) groves (Vujić et al. 2007, 2020; Speight 2020). The flight period is from April to May (Vujić et al. 2007, 2020; Speight 2020). The adults are known to visit the flowers of Ornithogalum (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages and host plant are unknown.","The main threat is habitat loss due to fires and overgrazing by goats and sheep in Greece (Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki 1985, Papanastasis 2004, Gkoltsiou 2011). This species has a relatively restricted range in Europe, which will potentially be further constricted by climate change (for instance because of increasing temperatures and increased fire frequency). This is likely to cause a decline in the amount of suitable habitat available.","There are insufficient data, but based on all known findings, there are at least nine subpopulations on mainland Greece and on the islands of Lesbos and Samos. Two specimens were collected from the mainland in 2007, one from Samos in 2010, and more than 100 from Lesbos between 2001 and 2014. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"

This is a local species distributed in Greece (two point localities in eastern mainland Greece, 12 point localities in Lesbos and one point locality in Samos): outside Europe, it also occurs in Turkey (Vujić et al. 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 is 52 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 22,722 km2.

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. It occurs in the protected area of Nestos Delta Natural Park in mainland Greece and partly within the Natura 2000 network on the islands. It is recommended to conserve additional suitable habitats in other parts of its distribution range. Additional research about its population trend, ecology and biology, as well as potential threats, is needed. Monitoring population and habitat trends, as well as raising awareness about this species is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167748,149167745,Epistrophe nitidicollis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread arboreal species with numerous and probably stable subpopulations in most part of Europe and in the EU 27, and is also widespread in suburban habitats. It is consequently listed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States. There are no major threats to this species, and no conservation action is required at present, except research into potential impacts from invasive ladybirds.","

Epistrophe nitidicollis inhabits most types of deciduous forests and scrub including suburban parks and gardens (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults reside in clearings and open habitats with tall herbs, shrubs and trees with low economic value in the foliage of trees and they visit various flowering trees (Acer pseudoplatanus, Malus spp., Salix spp., Sorbus aucuparia), shrubs (Crataegus laevigata, Rosa canina, Prunus spinosa, Euonymus europaeus, Ilex aquifolium, Viburnum opulus) and herbs (white Apiaceae, Anemone nemorosa, Barbarea vulgaris, Bunias orientalis, Caltha palustris, Ranunculus sp., Cistus, Stellaria, Myrrhis odorata, Taraxacum spp., Euphorbia spp.) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults fly from April (March in southern Europe) to June (Speight 2018, Reemer et al. 2009) and from the beginning of May to the end of July in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009). It is a univoltine species with diapausing and overwintering larvae that are flattened and greenly camouflaged to resting on leaves (Mazánek et al. 2001). They feed aphids on deciduous trees often on fruit trees (Malus domestica, Prunus spp., Cerasus, Acer pseudoplatanus), on shrubs (Euonymus europaea, Sambucus nigra, Rubus spp., Ribes spp., Lonicera, Spirea, Prunus padus) but they were observed also on herbaceous plants (Crepis, Rumex, Cirsium arvense, Carduus crispus) including some crops (Beta vulgaris, Vicia faba, Triticum) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Rojo et al. 2003, Mazánek et al. 2001).

","Apart from the general threats for biodiversity, including deforestation, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe. This species inhabits suburban habitats, parks and gardens (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009), so tolerates a degree of disturbance. The loss of unimproved ecotones and open habitats with tall herbs, shrubs and trees with low economic value is nevertheless possibly the main threat for this species. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).","This species is broadly widespread in Europe and locally it has numerous subpopulations across most of its range (e.g. Reemer et al. 2009, Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009). According to Speight et al. (2016) this species is declining only in Ireland and the Netherlands. Ball et al. (2011) noted that there had been some decline in occurrence over the past 25 years in England, although this was not significant.",Stable,"Epistrophe nitidicollis is widespread in all parts of Europe south from Fennoscandia (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018). It is probably not present only in some warmer and dry parts of the Mediterranean, Cyprus, Malta, Sardinia and Sicily (Ssymank and Ebejer 2009, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Burgio et al. 2015, Vujić et al. 2020) and in Macaronesia (Smit 2008, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017). Its occurrence on Corse and Balearic islands seems to be unconfirmed (Kassebeer 2002, Speight et al. 2018). It is widespread also through European Russia. This species has not been recorded from several poorly-surveyed European countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Moldova), but its presence is probable there.

Outside the European region, the species ranges in Siberia to the Russian Far East (including Kamchatka, Sakhalin), Korea and Japan (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018) and also in Alaska and Canada, south to California and South Carolina in North America (Speight 2018, Vockeroth 1992).",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,There are no specific conservation actions for this species. Epistrophe nitidicollis is not considered threatened in any area in Europe except Ireland (Speight et al. 2016) and its biology is relatively well known. However there is insufficient data to evaluate the possible impacts of invasive ladybirds on this species.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167758,149167756,Merodon erymanthius,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species inhabits high elevations (between 1,250 and 1,900 .) on Erymanthos and Chelmos mountains in the northern Peloponnese, Greece. Its preferred habitat is Mediterranean evergreen forest (Radenković et al. 2018), and tracksides and streams in Pinus forest. The adults visit flowers of Mentha L. (Vujić et al. 2020).

The species is assessed as Endangered based on the area of occupancy (AOO), which is 8 km2, extent of occurrence (EOO), which 38 km2 and because it has only two locations (based on overgrazing by livestock). This species is found at only two point localities in Mount Erymanthos and Mountain Chelmos (Peloponnesos, Greece), and due to major threats for the habitat of this species (primarily overgrazing by livestock and tourism), a continuing decline in quality of habitat is observed. ","This species inhabits high elevations (between 1,250 and 1,900 m) on Mts. Erymanthos and Chelmos in the northern Peloponnese. Its preferred habitat is Mediterranean evergreen forest (Radenković et al. 2018), and tracksides and streams in Pinus forest. The adults are known to visit flowers of Mentha (Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is in August and September (Radenković et al. 2018).","The main threats to the maintenance of the special ecological characteristics of the mountain ecosystems of Erymanthos originate from overgrazing by goats and sheep, logging, road expansion, poaching and hunting. Overgrazing by goats and sheep is one of the major threats to the survival of many unique plant associations in the open steppe grasslands, characterized by high diversity and a high number of endemic species (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). From 1961 to 1972 there was a decrease in the number of goats grazing on the mountains, but an increase in the number of sheep, and the total number of grazing animals increased. However, during the 10-year period between 1980 and 1990, the numbers appeared to stabilize (Natura, 2000 Data Form). Due to the fact that the popular ski resort of Kalavryta (on Mt. Chelmos) is quite near to one point location, tourism development also poses a threat to the habitat of this species. Fires of natural or anthropogenic origin can also cause the habitat fragmentation and loss.","There no data on the population trend. Currently, only one specimen was collected in 1987 and 23 in 2012. In order to obtain more information on population, continued monitoring is needed.",Unknown,This European endemic species is restricted to Mt. Erymanthos and Mt. Chelmos in the Peloponnese Peninsula of Greece. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 38 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 8 km2.,This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

The species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. However, education and raising awareness about the importance of this species is needed. All point localities are within the Natura 2000 network. One point locality is within the Mt Chelmos National Park and the other is in the Mt Erymanthos Natural Park. However, it is recommended to conserve the habitats of this species. Additional research is needed on general abundance, habitat, ecological requirements, threats (for example, which levels of grazing could be tolerated) and trends. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is also important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149167769,149167766,Epistrophe leiophthalma,Endangered,"B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv)",2021,2020-04-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The current distribution of this species in Europe is not adequately known due to the scarcity of recent records in much of its historical range. This species has probably disappeared from large parts of its previous range (Belgium, Germany, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland, possibly Romania, and the Pyrenees in South France) where all known records are old (more than 30 years) or historical, and are considered to be possibly extinct. Recent, extant, records of this species are restricted to several restricted areas in the Alps and to some broadly isolated small mountainous protected areas on the Balkan Peninsula (Durmitor, Pirin), and it is considered to occur as a severely fragmented population. It is a generally rare conspicuous species with perhaps more or less stable subpopulations in the Alps and Dinaric Alps (Durmitor) (Speight et al. 2016, Vujić et al. 2001), but across Europe and the EU as a whole it is considered to be undergoing a continuing decline in all of its extent of occurrence, area of occupancy (estimated as 104 km for Europe and 92 km2 for the EU), and number of locations as well as habitat extent and quality. The species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv)) both in Europe and in the EU27 Member States.

","

Epistrophe leiophthalma resides in open areas and along tracksides with tall herbs, within the upper levels of the Fagus forest zone up to the upper limit of Picea and unimproved montane and subalpine grasslands. Adults have been observed near streams in open areas within forest (Speight 2018). Van Steenis et al. (2013) observed male and female as visiting flowers of white Apiaceae in the vicinity of shrubs in Slovenia. Ssymank and Lair (2014), C. Lauriaut pers. comm. (2020) and T. Lebard pers. comm. (2020) reported adults visiting flowering Laserpitium latifolium in species-rich mountain hay meadow along a ridge in the Alps. The flight period of adults is from June to August (Speight 2018). The larva is aphid-feeding and was described by Goeldlin (1974) from larvae collected on Cirsium at 1,500 m.

","

There is an inferred estimated continuing decline in the extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species, due to human activities and settlements in Europe (Janssen et al. 2016). A likely threat is overgrazing of pastures (larvae live on herbs and feed on aphids which feed on herbs, so overgrazing could impact this). The loss of unimproved ecotones and open habitats along forests and streams with tall herbs, bushes and deciduous trees with low economical value is possibly the main threat for this species, because this species is probably associated with these species-rich habitats.

The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

There are only historical or too old (more than 30 years old) records from most areas of the species' known range in Europe, particularly in the Alps and Balkan Peninsula (Aubert et al. 1976, Bankowska 1963, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Bradescu 1991, Čepelák et al. 1986, Czižek 1909, Dirickx and Steffen 1992, Glumac, 1972, Goeldlin 1974,  Heimburg 2018, Leclercq 1955, Maibach et al. 1992, Malski 1959, Mielczarek 2009, Peck 1988, Ringdahl 1957, Rondani 1857, Sack 1932, Sarthou and Speight 1997, Schiner and Egger 1853, Speight 1993, Ssymank et al. 2011, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Štys and Moucha 1962, Şuster 1959, Vimmer 1913). Recent occurrences are confirmed only from the Alps (GBIF 2020, Sommagio pers. comm. 2020, Speight et al. 2018, Ssymank and Lair 2014, C. Lauriaut pers. comm. 2020, T. Lebard pers. comm. 2020), Dinaric Alps (van Steenis et al. 2013, Vujić et al. 2001) and Pirin in Bulgaria (Outen 2013). According to Vujič et al. (2001) this species is threatened on Balkan Peninsula, but with a stable population on Durmitor Mountains. The population in the Alps is stable according to Speight et al. (2016), but recently this species has been recorded only occasionally there (Ssymank and Lair 2014). According to Speight et al. (2006) this species is decreasing in Belgium and Germany, and in Europe more generally. The extant population is regarded as being severely fragmented.

",Decreasing,"

This is a rare European near-endemic species that has been reported from the Alps (France, Switzerland, Austria, Italy), the Massif Central and the Pyrenees in France, the Dinaric Alps (Slovenia, Montenegro, Bosnia Herzegovina), Pirin (Bulgaria), Ardennes (Belgium), southern Germany, the Czech Republic and the High Tatras (Slovakia and Poland) (Speight 2018, Peck 1988, Speight et al. 2018, Maibach et al. 1992, Heimburg 2018, Burgio et al. 2015, van Steenis et al. 2013, Šimić 1987, Glumac 1972, Outen 2013, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Ssymank et al. 2011, Mazánek 2009, Čepelák et al. 1986, Bankowska 1963, Mielczarek 2009). It has also been reported from Carpathians in Romania (Stanescu and Parvu 2005).

Only the records from southern France, the Alps, Montenegro and Bulgaria are recent, with all others considered possibly extinct. Based on the extant records, the calculated extent of occurrence is 508,800 km2 for Europe and 508,053 kmfor the EU, and the corresponding values for area of occupancy based on known records are 104 km2 and 92 km2.

The species' range extends out of the European region in the North Caucasus in South European Russia and Transcaucasia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Mengual et al. 2020).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

E. leiophthalma has been listed as extremely rare (Data Deficient) in the Red List to Syrphidae of Germany 2011 and as Vulnerable in the List of Threatened Species in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005). It could however be regionally extinct in the Czech Republic because there have been no records from the last 100 years. In Poland and Slovakia there have been no records for more than 50 years from the High Tatras. Speight et al. (2016) listed this species as threatened in the Belgium, from which there have been no records for more than 30 years (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019). It is considered threatened species in the Balkan Peninsula (Vujić et al. 2001). Further survey work is needed to determine the extant distribution and population trend of this species. Research on the biology, life history and threats of this species is also necessary. 

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167779,149167777,Merodon italicus,Near Threatened,B2b(iii),2021,2020-03-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

In Europe and the EU27, this species is distributed in Spain, Portugal, Greece, Italy, Ukraine, Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia and North Macedonia. The species prefers open ground near freshwater; open ground near cultures (such as olive trees plantations); stony river banks, dry grasslands and orchards as well as garrigues (Speight, 2020). It also inhabits Mediterranean oak dehesa, with Quercus rotundifolia and Quercus pyrenaica as dominant tree species (Ricarte et al. 2018).

This species is assessed as Near Threatened in Europe and the EU27 primarily due to its area of occupancy (AOO) which is 272 km2. Moreover, because of the ongoing threats (primarily overgrazing by livestock, but also fires, changes in land use), the quality of habitat of this species is declining. This is the reason why this species is possibly extinct from two point localities in Crimea (out of the three in total where it was previously registered).


 

 

","

This species prefers open ground near freshwater, open ground near cultures (such as olive-tree plantations), stony river banks, dry grasslands and orchards as well as garrigues (Speight, 2020). It also inhabits Mediterranean oak dehesa, with Quercus rotundifolia and Quercus pyrenaica as the dominant tree species (Ricarte et al. 2018). Adults usually settle low down on the foliage of large-leaved shrubs. In particular, males rest on the bare ground of paths and tracks, in the sun and in the evening (Speight 2020). In Crimea, it is present in dry deciduous forests, and in shyblyak (G. Popov, pers. comm. 2020). It is known to visit flowers such as Foeniculum vulgare, Euphorbia, Daucus, Paliurus spina-christi and Ferula (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is from May to September (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages have not been described.


","Due to the fact that this species prefers open ground near freshwater, open ground near cultures (olive plantations for example), dry grassland, orchards and garrigue, shyblyak, and dry deciduous forests, possible threats are overgrazing by livestock, fires and ploughing, which could induce habitat fragmentation and loss (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","There are insufficient data on the population trend. However, more than 50 specimens were collected in Italy in 1959, more than 20 in Greece in 2012, and in 2014 more than 50 in Spain, with two more from Portugal (Van Eck 2011). Only a few specimens have been collected in Ukraine (Crimea), where the species might be extinct in the two point localities (Alushka and Karasivka) (G. Popov, pers comm. 2020).",Unknown,"In Europe and the EU27, this species is distributed in Spain, Portugal, Greece, Italy, Ukraine, Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia and North Macedonia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 2,850,258 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 272 km2.

Outside of Europe, it also occurs in Turkey, Lebanon and North Africa.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action so far. However, some point localities are within the boundaries of Natura 2000 (in Spain, Greece and Slovenia) and protected areas (in Spain: Los Alcornocales and Sierra de Grazalema Natural Parks, de Sierra Nevada National Park, Biological Reserve of Campanarios de Azaba; in Serbia: Đerdap National Park; in North Macedonia: Galičica National Park; in Ukraine: Karadag Nature Reserve). Taking into account the possible threats, it is recommended to conserve its habitat, especially in non-protected areas by enforcement of environmental regulations, rules and other policies. Monitoring is needed, and additional research on its population trend, ecology and potential threats is important. Raising awareness about this species is also very important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167790,149167787,Epistrophe grossulariae,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

It is a broadly widespread species with numerous subpopulations in several areas of Europe but often variable in numbers. This species is probably affected by deforestation and by intensive landscape management, but is not currently regarded as threatened in most European range state that has included it on national Red Lists. It is listed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27, but further research is required to better understand to the real distribution and habitat requirements as well as the impacts of suspected threats.","It occurs in deciduous and mixed forests near coasts, lakes, watercourses, rivers and streams, including willow swamp woodland; also in drier meadows, in the edges and next to roads and in alpine grassland (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018). The adults are highly mobile and probably vagrant and they can be observed almost everywhere even far from permanent breeding places, sometimes also in more numbers (see Aubert et al. 1976, Reemer et al. 2009). The adults reside in clearings, open places in and just above the herbaceous vegetation up to 3 m and visit various flowering plant (white Apiaceae, Bunias orientalis, Centaurea, Cirsium, Filipendula, Geranium, Knautia, Rhododendron, Rubus, Sambucus nigra, Succisa, Valeriana) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009). The flight period of adults is from June to September (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009). Its larva is flattened and green; it is camouflaged resting on leaves and overwinters on fallen leaves (Rotheray 1994). They feed on the aphid Drepanosiphum platanoidis on the German maple Acer pseudoplatanus (Rotheray 1986) but given the species' widespread distribution, it is presumed hat it feeds on aphids also on other deciduous trees and shrubs (Bartsch et al. 2009).","

Apart from the general threats to biodiversity, including deforestation, there are no known specific threats identified for this species in Europe. The loss of unimproved ecotones and open habitats with tall herbs, shrubs and trees with low economic value is possibly the main threat for this species. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","This species is widespread and has numerous subpopulations in several areas of Europe (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Ball et al. 2011). Its occurrence is variable and it is much more numerous in certain years (Reemer et al. 2009). There has been a substantial decline in occurrence over the past 30 years in Great Britain (Ball et al. 2011). This species has been declining in Denmark, Ireland and the Netherlands (Speight et al. 2016).",Stable,"

Epistrophe grossulariae is broadly widespread in Europe and it is present in almost all of Europe except the Mediterranean and beyond the Polar Circle (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018). It occurs further east through Siberia to the Russian Far East (including Kamchatka Peninsula, Sakhalin), Korea and Japan, and further south in Turkey, the Caucasus and Mongolia. It is also found in North America from Alaska and Quebec south to California (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Vockeroth 1992).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Epistrophe grossulariae is not threatened in Norway, Sweden, Finland, Great Britain and in Central Europe (Gammelmo et al. 2015, Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Ssymank et al. 2011, Farkač et al. 2006, Ball and Morris 2014). This species is listed as Near Threatened in Denmark (Bygebjerg 2019). Further research is required to better understand to the habitat requirements and the impacts of possible threats from habitat loss and invasive species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167800,149167798,Merodon dzhalitae,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

The species is endemic to Crimea (Ukraine) (Vujić et al. 2020). Based on the small area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) (20 km2 and 854 km2), with only five locations (based on tourism as the main threat) and a continuing decline of the habitat quality due to the intensive tourism, this endemic species is assessed as Endangered. However, a lot of further research on this species is needed, especially about its biology and ecology.

",The species prefers grasslands and steppe-like areas among ravine woods. The adults are known to visit flowers of Mentha longifolia and Limonium platyphyllum. The flight period is from May to August. The host plant and the immature stages are unknown (Vujić et al. 2020).,"Anthropogenic actions such as urbanisation and tourism and their effects have threatened many of Crimea’s ecosystems. Primary habitats comprise only 2-3% of the territory of Crimea, including remnant forests and mountain meadows.","The population trend is unknown. It has been recorded from five point localities in the Crimea in 1925, 1988, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2017 and in 2018 (Vujić et al. 2020).",Unknown,This European species is endemic to Crimea (Ukraine). Vujić et al. (2020) found five point localities in southern Crimea. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 854 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 20 km2.,This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions targeting this species so far. Three point localities are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network, in the Karadag nature reserve in Crimea. Further research about the population size, threats and ecology of this species is needed. More monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required. Introducing it into the National lists of protected species, as well as increasing the awareness about this endemic species is very important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167810,149167808,Epistrophe flava,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread species in the European region, with numerous and probably stable subpopulations in some areas in Scandinavia and Central Europe. This species is probably affected by deforestation and by intensive landscape management, but it has a wide extent of occurrence and is not considered to be at risk in most range states that have included it on national Red Lists. Monitoring of subpopulations is necessary in some areas and further research is required to better understand to the habitat requirements and threats. It is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU27 Member States.

","It occurs in connection with deciduous and mixed forests near coasts, lakes and streams (Bartsch et al. 2009), from riverine gallery forest of Populus/Salix alba to dry Quercus/Castanea forest and on to humid Fagus/Picea forest (Speight 2018). The species resides in lush clearings, open habitats with tall herbs, shrubs and trees with low economic value, and gardens but also along roads and on ruderal land (Bartsch et al. 2009). The fly visits flowering trees and bushes (Berberis vulgaris, Crataegus, Sorbus aucuparia, Tilia cordata) and various flowering plants (white Apiaceae, Argentina anserine, Bunias orientalis, Caltha, Ranunculus, Lathyrus japonica, Euphorbia, Leucanthemum vulgare) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). The flight period of adults is in May and June, further north in June and July (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019). It is a univoltine species with diapausing and overwintering larvae (Mazánek et al. 2001). The predacious larva is flattened and green, and rests camouflaged against leaves. Larvae have been collected from aphid galls on leaves of Malus domestica in an orchard (Goeldlin 1974), and from aphid colonies on Cirsium arvense and Cichorium intibus (Mazánek et al. 2001). Bartsch et al. (2009) report observations of females that lay eggs in colonies of the aphid Aphis sambuci on Sambucus nigra.","

Apart from the general threats to biodiversity, including deforestation, there are no known specific threats identified for this species in Europe. The loss of unimproved ecotones and of open habitats with tall herbs, shrubs and trees with low economic value is possibly the main threat for this species. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","This species is widespread but there are often only scattered records across most of its range e.g. in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). This species is numerous only locally in some types of forested landscapes (Mazánek et al. 2006). It is quite common in the Mälardalen and Stockholm archipelagos in Sweden and it is, next to the similar species Epistrophe nitidicollis, the most common early summer species there (Bartsch et al. 2009). This species is common also in Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020). This species has been declining and/or is threatened in Belgium, Denmark and the Netherlands (Speight et. al. 2016, Reemer et al. 2009).",Stable,"

Epistrophe flava is widespread from southern Scandinavia south to the Pyrenees and Cordillera Cantabria (southern Spain), Northern Apennines (Italy) and to Serbia and Bulgaria on Balkan Peninsula (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Burgio et al. 2015, Sommaggio 2010, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Tóth 2014, Nedeljković 2011). From Belgium and France it ranges eastwards through submontane Central Europe, Ukraine into European parts of Russia and Caucasus (Georgia) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Mengual et al. 2020, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, G. Popov pers comm. 2020). It has not been recorded in European Russia east from Moscow region (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2019, V. Mutin pers. comm. 2020). Its presence in southern Spain and in Corsica is uncertain (Kassebeer 2002, van Eck 2011).

Outside Europe it ranges through Siberia to the South Russian Far East including Sakhalin, Korea and Japan (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). There is still uncertainty about its range, because this species was recognized relatively recently and it had been confused with several species before that (Doczkal and Schmid 1994, Bartsch et al. 2009).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Epistrophe flava is not threatened in Norway, Sweden, Finland and Central Europe (Gammelmo et al. 2015, Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Ssymank et al. 2011, Farkač et al. 2006). Speight et al. (2016) listed this species as threatened in the Netherlands and Belgium. Reemer et al. (2009) list this species as Vunerable in The Netherlands and it is listed as Near Threatened species in Denmark (Bygebjerg 2019). Monitoring of subpopulations in some areas is necessary and further research is required to better-understand to the habitat requirements and threats from invasive beetles.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167822,149167818,Merodon crypticus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii); D2,2021,2019-11-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is is known from the Cantabrian mountain range and western Pyrenees in northern Spain and from the Serra da Estrela mountain range in Portugal. This European endemic species is assessed as Vulnerable, primarily based on the number of locations (seven), based on overgrazing by livestock, and because the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 52 km2. Additional threats to the preferred environment of this species (Spanish Eurosiberian region) are fires and tourism development. Therefore, a continuing decline in quality of habitat, as well as its fragmentation is expected in the future.","This species prefers non-calcareous, unimproved montane and subalpine grassland in high mountains of the Spanish Eurosiberian region.

The Portuguese specimens were collected in a former glacier valley with little streams, grazed by sheep. The vegetation is rich in grasses and the herbaceous perennial plants stay relatively short. In Portugal, adults are known to visit flowers of Merendera montana (Ricarte et al. 2009). The developmental stages have not been described. The flight period is from July to September (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007, Speight 2018).","

The loss of habitat and host plants represent direct threats. In the Mediterranean Basin around 80% of the land area is marginal, frequently mixed with various land uses (Pardini 2004). Drought and temperature extremes also pose threats, because an increase in temperature could disrupt the temporal synchrony of plant–pollinator interactions.

The main threats of grazing pressure and recurrent fire events in northwestern Spain could also increase soil erosion, depleting soil nutrients and altering the competitive environment (Peñuelas et al. 2007).

","

There are insufficient data on the population trend for this species. Based on all known findings, the number of specimens recorded from Spain are as follows: one specimen in 1981, 14 in 1987, four in 1995, and one in 2017 (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007). In Portugal, only a few specimens have been recorded: one in 1981 and three in 2009 (Ricarte et al. 2009; Van Eck 2011, 2016).

",Unknown,"This European endemic species is restricted to the north of Spain (Cantabrian mountain range and the western Pyrenees; Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007) and northern Portugal, where it is known from a single record in the Serra da Estrela mountain range (Ricarte et al. 2009; Van Eck 2011, 2016). The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this endemic species is estimated to be 75,991 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) to be 52 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

The species is not subject to any targeted conservation action. However, taking into account the possible threats, it is recommended to conserve the habitat of this species by enforcement of environmental regulations, rules and other policies. In addition, public awareness and education are essential. Additional monitoring and research is needed to obtain more information on population size, distribution and trends, ecological requirements and threats. Some point localities are within the boundaries of the National Park de Los Picos de Europa, Natural Park de Fuentes Carrionas y Fuente and Natural Park Valles Occidentales. In Portugal, all point localities are within Natural Park Serra da Estrela. All known point localities are within the Natura 2000 network. Continuous monitoring is necessary in order to obtain more data on the population size and trend.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167830,149167820,Epistrophe cryptica,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Within the European region, this is probably a widespread rather arboreal species with its apparently most numerous and stable subpopulations in some areas in Scandinavia. It is listed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27 on the basis of this, its wide extent of occurrence, and because it is probably more widespread but overlooked between the known localities. It appears however to be very rare and/or threatened at national levels across most of its western and central European range, and may be specialized in transitional areas or open habitats in wet forests. Monitoring of subpopulations is necessary and further research is required to clarify the actual range of this species and to better understand the habitat requirements and threats.","It occurs in clearings with lush vegetation, in deciduous and mixed forests and in pastures near coasts, lakes and watercourses (Bartsch et al. 2009) and humid-non calcophilic Picea forest, up to the altitude of Pinus mugo (Speight 2018, Speight et al. 2016). The fly visits flowers of trees and bushes (Malus, Prunus spp., Salix spp., Acer platanoides, Crataegus laevigata) but also herbs (white Apiaceae, Cruciata laevipes) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Van Steenis et al. 2019). It is univoltine species with flight period of adults from April to June (Speight 2018), mid-May to early July in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009) with diapausing overwintering larvae (Mazánek et al. 2001). The predacious larva was described by Mazánek et al. (2001), from larvae reared on aphids in a laboratory from eggs laid by a wild-caught, gravid female. The larva is flattened similarly to known larvae of the Epistrophe species, which are camouflaged against green leaves, but reared larvae of this species were whitish.","

Apart from the general threats to biodiversity, such as deforestation, there are no known specific threats identified for this species in Europe. The loss of unimproved ecotonal areas between forest and grasslands or wetlands, and of open habitats with tall herbs, shrubs and trees with low economic value, is possibly the main threat for this species. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe, which could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","This species is probably widespread but there are only scattered records across most of Europe. Only in some northern areas it is relatively common, and its population here may be numerous and stable there (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, GBIF 2020). According to Speight et al. (2016) this species has been regarded as threatened and/or declining in Alpine, Atlantic and Continental regions of Europe (particularly in Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland). Conversely, recently this species appears to be expanding its range in Belgium and the Netherlands (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019). This species was recognized from these areas relatively recently and it has probably been overlooked due to its resemblance to common species of the genus Epistrophe. Thus the population trend as well as the range of this species is known insufficiently (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018).",Unknown,"

The known distribution of this species extends from Scandinavia southward to Massif Central (France), Alps (Switzerland), to Serbia and the Carpathians (Ukraine) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Prokhorov et al. 2020, Speight et al. 2018, Van Steenis et al. 2019). It is known also from European Russia (Moscow region), and through Siberia to east to the Pacific (Sachalin and Kuril Islands) and Japan (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). The real distribution area is probably much larger, due to confusion with other similar, commoner, species until recently (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Prokhorov et al. 2020).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Epistrophe cryptica is not threatened in Sweden, Finland and Germany (Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Ssymank et al. 2011). It is listed as Near Threatened (criterion B2a(i)) in the Norwegian red list (Gammelmo et al. 2015). Speight et al. (2016) listed this species as threatened in the Atlantic region, the Netherlands and in Switzerland. However the biology, population trends and full range of this species is known insufficiently, since this species was recognized relatively recently and it has been probably overlooked due to its resemblance to common species of the genus Epistrophe (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018). Monitoring of subpopulations is necessary and further research is required to clarify the full range of this species and to better understand to the habitat requirements and threats.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167843,149167838,Merodon constans,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This species is assessed as Least Concern on the regional level due to its relatively restricted (172 km2) area of occupancy (AOO), but large (290,363 km2) extent of occurrence (EOO), and due to the number of locations which is above the threshold (20-25). The number of locations is based on infrastructure development.

On the EU 27 level, it is assessed as Vulnerable due to the restricted (52 km2) area of occupancy (AOO), and because the number of locations is just within the threshold (10). In addition, infrastructure development and, to some extent, overgrazing by livestock and fires are causing a continuous habitat destruction and threaten this species.","This species has been collected in Mediterranean habitats, including poly-dominant deciduous forest, open thermophilous Quercus forest, evergreen oak (Q. ilex) and Mediterranean pine forest, along streams. Based on the available data, the flight period is from early July to early October (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown.","This species is threatened by habitat destruction, mostly from infrastructure development (due to tourism). Additional threats in some parts of the range include overgrazing by livestock and fires (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","There is no information about the population trend. 249 specimens have been collected so far (Vujić et al. 2020). The majority of specimens have been collected in Montenegro (from 1956 to 2019), with one from Bosnia and Herzegovina (in 1911), one from Serbia (in 2018) and eight from North Macedonia, most (seven) from the 1960s. The majority of records from Croatia (22 specimens) are also from the 1960s. Most of the records from Italy (10 specimens) are from the 1950s, with only two recent (2010 and 2013). In Greece, 10 specimens have been recorded, one in 1983 and the rest in 2018.",Unknown,"This European endemic species is distributed in Italy, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and northern mainland Greece (Vujić et al. 2020). Occurrence in Albania is possible but not yet confirmed. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be 290,363 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 172 km2. In the EU 27, the extent of occurrence of the species is estimated to be 187,029 km2, and the area of occupancy is 52 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions targeting this species. Some of the point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. Increasingly, infrastructure developments can disturb its habitats, so continuous management and protection of sites in protected areas are needed. Research on population and habitat trends as well as about possible threats is needed. Monitoring of habitat and population size is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149167852,149167842,Brachypalpus chrysites,Vulnerable,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2019-09-14 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Brachypalpus chrysites is found in mountainous parts of central and southeastern Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is around 1.7 million km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 706 km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is around 1.6 million km2 and the AOO is around 464 km2. Although the current estimates of EOO for Europe and the EU 27 are large, the small AOO's indicate this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a very fragmented distribution as is shown on the map. Based on the small AOO’s for Europe and EU 27, and taking in consideration it has a very fragmented distribution, and the expected decline in suitable habitat in the future the species is listed as Vulnerable under Criterion B for Europe, and Endangered for EU27.

Conservation action for this species should be mainly focused on the preservation of its habitat, but there are currently no direct measures in place. Further research on the population, ecology, threats, and monitoring of population and habitat trends.","

The preferred environment of this species is in mountainous areas with conifer forest; open Abies/Picea forest with overmature trees, from the upper limit of Fagus, up to the Larix/Pinus mugo zone. There is a projected future decline in the quality of the habitat of this species, due to anthropogenic activities and climate change.

The adults of this species fly around shrubs like Salix and Sorbus aucuparia in flower, but also settles on cut tree trunks of Larix and Picea and on low-growing vegetation, around the edges of clearings in forest. It is apparently a rather slow-flying, low-flying mimic of Bombus (Hymenoptera, Apidae) - or perhaps Laphria flava (Diptera, Asilidae) (Moertelmaier pers. comm. 2019). 

The species has been known to visit the flowers of Centaurea, Crataegus, Crocus, Eriophorum vaginatum, Helleborus niger, Petasites albus, Ranunculus, Salix, Sorbus aucuparia, Tussilago. 

The flight period of this species is from April to June, plus July at higher altitudes.

The larva are described and figured by Schmid and Moertelmaier (2007), from larvae reared to last instar in a mixture of damp rotten wood of Acer, Alnus and Picea, into which a captive female laid eggs.

","

The threats to this species are the usual anthropogenic threats like the use of forests for wood, cattle or human settlement. There might be additional threats which are not so easy to quantify such as climate change. However, there is no evidence to support an immediate threat of climate change yet in the species range.

","This species is not easy to collect but it is still possible to be found in good habitats in mountainous areas throughout Europe. Despite less impacts of forestry management higher in the mountains, the species still seems to be decreasing in its range. Therefore, in Europe, the population trend of this species is considered to be in decline. In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"This species is found in mountainous parts of central Europe south to the Pyrenees, including Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Ukraine (Carpathian region), Schwarzwald, through the Alps (France, Germany, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Austria) and eastwards into the former Yugoslavia, Romania, Turkey and Caucasian parts of Russia (Speight 2020). In Poland, this species is found in the Tatra Mountains (Zoralski pers. comm. 2020). It is mainly restricted to Europe.
The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is around 1.7 million km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 692 km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is around 1.6 million km2 and the AOO is around 448 km2.",This species is not utilized.,Terrestrial,"This species is considered to be threatened in several national Red Lists. In the Red Lists of Germany (Ssymank and Doczkal 1998), of Bavaria (Dunk et al. 2003) and of Baden-Württemberg (Doczkal et al. 2001), this hoverfly is categorized as endangered (Category 3). On the German Red List it is listed as Vulnerable as well (Ssymank et al. 2011). This species is also considered Vulnerable in the Czech Republic (Farkac et al. 2005), and as Endangered in the French Alsace Department (Treiber 2015).

Conservation action for this species should be mainly focused on the preservation of its habitat, but there are currently no direct measures in place, as there is no imminent direct threat for this species at the moment. This species is also known to occur in protected areas across its range. Further research on the population, ecology, threats, and monitoring of population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167871,149167860,Merodon clavipes,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC). 

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC).

The area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are above thresholds for threatened categories. A possible decline in the quality of the habitat due to logging, agriculture and tourism is considered as the main threats. This species is distributed across Central and Southern Europe and the Mediterranean basin. However, a lot of further research on this species is needed, especially on its biology and ecology, population size and trend.

","This species prefers open ground, sparsely-vegetated semi-arid, unimproved stony pasturage and open grassy areas within thermophilous Quercus forests, as well as Mediterranean oak dehesa, with Quercus rotundifolia and Quercus pyrenaica as the dominant tree species (Ricarte et al. 2018). The adults are known to visit the flowers of Apiaceae (Ferula), Euphorbia, Leontodon and Solidago (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is from March to August. The developmental stages and host plant are unknown (Speight 2020).","

Possible threats are those that are likely to happen due to anthropogenic interference (for example logging and agriculture). In the Mediterranean area, tourism can also be a threat.

",The population trend is unknown. There are many subpopulations across central and southern Europe and in the Mediterranean area.,Unknown,"This species is distributed in central and southern Europe: from northern France to the Mediterranean (including Corsica, Sardinia, Sicily and Crete) and North Africa, from Portugal and Spain through central and southern Europe to Greece, Romania, Ukraine and Turkey (Speight 2020). It is also present in Russia. In Europe and the EU27, the area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are above thresholds for the threatened categories.


",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. Some point localities are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network. Some examples are the National Parks Olympus and Pindos in Greece, National Park Durmitor in Montenegro, and National Parks Grazalema and Sierra Nevada in Spain. Further research about its population size, threats and ecology is needed. More monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required. Due to the possible threats (logging, agriculture, tourism) to its habitats, continuous management of sites in protected areas is needed.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167879,149167868,Doros profuges,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Although Doros profuges is considered threatened in the national Red Lists of some central European countries, it assessed as Least Concern in Europe and for the EU27 Member States due to its Extent of Occurrence and the large number of countries and localities where it has been recorded. Although it has a low estimated area of occupancy it is likely that this is a sampling artefact.","Doros profuges inhabits deciduous forests, Quercus/Fraxinus (both mature and scrub) and Corylus scrub, on well-drained sites which have been forested for a long time; and in well-drained, ancient, unimproved pasturage invaded by scrub. It might be an arboreal species that can also be found in open habitats, flying along the edge of scrub. Adults visit flowers of umbellifers, Chrysanthemum leucanthemum, Filipendula, and Rubus. These hoverflies fly at the end of May/June, and on into July at higher elevations. Larval biology is unknown but the larva is believed to be an ant commensal, probably with Lasius fuliginosus.","There are no specific threats reported for this species, however declines have been reported including some at higher elevations.","There are no population size estimates for this species in Europe, where it is widespread. Aartsen (1994) indicates that the abundance of D. profuges can fluctuate over time and Steenis (1998) suggested it became more common in the Netherlands during the period 1988-1998. In countries such as Denmark and Belgium, this species has been recorded in much lower numbers after 1900 (Steenis 1998), while in Spain the species has not been recorded since Gil Collado (1930). In Hungary, the most recent record of D. profuges dates from 1994 (Tóth 2011).",Unknown,"This species is found from southern Norway and southern Finland south to central Spain, and from Ireland east through most of central and southern Europe to European Russia (Speight 2020).

The range extends eastwards out of the European region through Eurasia to Japan and China (Speight 2018).",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions for this species, which is believed to be unthreatened at the European level despite what appears to be a locally declining population. However, alpine populations appear to be experiencing a heavier decline. In countries such as Germany and Denmark it is regarded as 'Threatened' (Speight et al. 2016). An accurate knowledge on larval biology is crucial to understand the actual requirements of D. profuges in nature and then, to propose effective conservation actions.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167892,149167887,Merodon chalybeatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe because while it has a relatively restricted area of occupancy (AOO) (216 km2 on regional level and 68 km2 in the EU27 countries), but its extent of occurrence (EOO) is large (268,968 km2), and its number of locations are above the threshold (16-17 on regional level and 11-12 in the EU27 countries). The number of locations is based on infrastructure development as the major threat. Infrastructure development, fires, logging, overgrazing are causing habitat destruction and threatening this species.","

This species can be found alongside seasonal river beds in rocky, dry, unimproved grasslands. It also occurs in grassy open areas in Abies forest, thermophilous Quercus forest and mixed deciduous forest (Syringo-Carpinetum orientalis forest) (Vujic et al. 2020). The adults fly fast and low within tall ground vegetation, and settle on stones in the sun when it is hot. They are known to visit yellow composites (Taraxacum spp.) (A.Vujic, pers. comm. 2020), Euphorbia, Ranunculus (Vujić et al. 2011), Cichorium intybus, Crepis capillaris (Ssymank 2012), and Mentha (Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is in April and in August and September. The developmental stages and host plant are unknown (Speight 2020).

","There is an ongoing decline in the quality of habitat due to infrastructure development (mostly due to urbanisation and tourism). Additionally, fires, logging and overgrazing by livestock are threatening the habitat of this species (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data on the population trend. In total, 52 specimens have been collected from 1901 to 2014 across the range in Europe. The majority of the records are recent.",Unknown,"

This species is distributed in Croatia, Cyprus, North Macedonia, Greece, Montenegro, Romania, Serbia and Slovenia. Outside of Europe it is found in Turkey (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2018). In Europe, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 268,968 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 216 km2. In the EU 27, the extent of occurrence is estimated to be 268,968 km2, and area of occupancy to be 68 km2.

",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions targeting this species. Vujic et al. (2001) suggest that this species should be regarded as threatened in Europe. It is protected by law in Serbia. Additional research about its ecology, population trend and possible threats is needed. Areas where this species occur should be protected. Monitoring of the habitat and population size is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167900,149167890,Didea intermedia,Least Concern,,2021,2020-09-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Didea intermedia has numerous subpopulations in forests across almost the whole of Europe and can tolerate a degree of habitat modification. It is listed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27, but is thought to be subject to declines in at least parts of its range as a result of intensive forest management and land use change. 

","

Didea intermedia occurs in connection with coniferous forests (Pinus mugo, P. uncinata and humid P. sylvestris), including plantations and conifers planted on sand dunes (Speight 2018, Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009) but also on dry sandy soils, in meadows and pastures as well as on beaches, bogs and in gardens in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults are mobile and at least partly migratory (Aubert et al. 2016). They visit many different flowers in clearings, among others white Apiaceae, yellow Asteraceae, Calluna vulgaris, Crataegus, Cirsium, Ligustrum, Narthecium ossifragum, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus, Rosa spp., Sambucus ebulus, Rubus plicatus, Hypochoeris radicata, Sorbus aucuparia and Succisa pratensis (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight et al. 2018). The flight period lasts from the end May to the end of September (August) (Ball et al. 2011, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2018). The larva is known as predacious on aphids Schizolachnus pineti on Pinus nigra tree (Rojo et al. 2003, Evenhuis 1978).

","

This species is inferred to be subject to a continuing decline in the extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species, due to human activities and settlements. It inhabits also well preserved pine plantations, but it is presumably adversely affected by intensive plantation management and by the loss of suitable forests. Jansen et al. (2016) listed many types of forests inhabited by this species as declining in Europe. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe, which could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This invasive ladybird is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991). Intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

This species is widespread and common in forested north Europe (eg. Sweden, Denmark and Finland) (Bartsch et al. 2009). It has also numerous populations in some forested, especially in mountainous regions in the rest of Europe (Ball et al. 2011, Čepelák et al. 1986), however towards to south it becomes rare and local. Speight et al. (2016) reported declines of this species in the Netherlands, Denmark, Switzerland and partly in Belgium. According to Reemer et al. (2009) there had been no apparent change in population of this species in the Netherlands.

 

",Unknown,"This hoverfly is widespread in almost all parts of Europe (except the extreme north, Iceland, Ireland and Mediterranean areas) and east through Siberia to the Pacific Ocean, as well as in Kamchatka and Japan (Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Speight 2018).",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,Didea intermedia is not considered a threatened species in any area in Europe (Speight et al. 2016) and its biology is relatively well-known. It has been referred as Vulnerable in the Thüringen region in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011).,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167914,149167908,Merodon avidus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC). 

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC).

In Europe and the EU27, this species is distributed in the Mediterranean zone of Europe, from Southern France to Italy, and to the Balkan Peninsula and Romania, Ukraine, Belarus (and probably further south around the Mediterranean basin) (Speight 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are above thresholds for threatened categories. There is a possible decline in the quality of the habitat due to tourism, urbanisation and fires in the Mediterranean zone, where this species is widely distributed.

A lot of further research on its population size and trend is needed. 

","

This species prefers open ground in forests, and the sides of tracks in thermophilous Quercus (Quercus pubescens, Quercus frainetto and Q. cerris) forests and  evergreen oak (Quercus ilex, Q. suber) forests. It also occurs in Salzmann’s pine (Pinus nigra salzmannii) forest and Pinus halapensis forest (including planted Pinus halapensis), as well as in old olive orchards.

The adults are known to visit flowers of Euphorbia (Speight 2020) as well as flowers of Ornithogalum, Foeniculum vulgare, Smyrnium perfoliatum and Ferula (Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is from April to September (Vujić et al. 2020). The larva is described by Andrić et al. (2014), who collected it from bulbs of Ornithogalum umbellatum. A description from puparia associated with Ornithogalum umbellatum is provided by Preradović et al. (2018).

",Urbanisation and expansion of tourism infrastructure can be possible threats to this species. Fires can also negatively affect the population.,"

There are numerous subpopulations of this species in the Mediterranean. There is no information about its population size and trend, but it seems stable.

",Stable,"In Europe and the EU27, the area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are above the thresholds for threatened categories. This species is distributed in the Mediterranean zone of Europe, from southern France to Italy, the Balkan Peninsula, Romania, Ukraine, Belarus (and probably further south around the Mediterranean basin) (Speight 2020).

It is also present in the Eastern Mediterranean, in Cyprus, Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Israel. 

Previously recorded populations from Spain belong to the related species, Merodon ibericus.


",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

Some point localities of this species are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network. Some examples are National Parks Dadia, Pindus and Olympus in Greece, National Park Etna in Italy, Nation Park Durmitor in Montenegro, National Park Mavrovo in North Macedonia, National Parks Fruška gora and Đerdap, and Natural Park Vršačke planine in Serbia. Increasing tourism, roads and fires can degrade the quality of its habitats, so continuous management of sites in protected areas is needed. More research and monitoring on possible threats,population and habitat trend are required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167922,149167911,Didea alneti,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species occurs widely throughout Europe and is consequently listed as Least Concern in both the EU27 and Europe regionally, although it is surely declining across most of its range in Western and Central Europe (with some evidence of recovery in the Netherlands following changes in forest management, but it remains rare here). It is a highly mobile, conspicuous species and is collected occasionally across a wide range of habitats, including anthropogenic ones, but it does not seem to be tolerant of intensive land management and may become more threatened in this region in future and research is warranted to estimate rates of decline. The extent of occurrence and area of occupancy of the European taxon are probably larger than they are known at present, and it is considered Least Concern both for Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","

It is an arboreal species associated with conifer forests and deciduous forests, including some cultural forests (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009) and plantations, with a preference for areas where there are wetlands that are close to forests (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). Adults are highly mobile, vagrant and even migratory (Speight et al. 2016, Maibach et al. 1992), eg. Aubert et al. (1976) reported 817 captured migrating adults in the Alps in Switzerland. Adults fly usually at the edges of clearings, along tracks, beside streams etc. in or near forests and visit various flowering plants, bushes and trees, with records including white Apiaceae, yellow Asteracea (Crepis spp, Hieracium spp. Leontodon autumnalis, Hypochaeris radicata), Cirsium, Centaurea jacea, Valeriana spp., Plantago major,  Hypericum maculatum, Potentilla anserina, Stellaria holostea, Armeria maritime, Rosa canina, Dasiphora (syn. Potentilla) fruticosa, Sambucus ebulus, Rubus idaeus, Crataegus spp., Viburnum opulus, Salix spp., Acer spp., Malus domestica (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Males hover at 3-4 m beside trees, or between their branches. Flight period of adults is from mid May to early September (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). The larva is arboreal and having been found feeding on several genera of aphids (Cinara, Lachnus, Pterocomma, Pterochloroides) on both coniferous (Pinus cembra, Larix, Abies) and deciduous trees (Prunus, Salix, Quercus) including fruit trees (Rojo et al. 2003, Speight et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020).

","

This species has been observed in association with conifer plantations, but it is apparently not fully tolerant of intensive forestry and agriculture and is less common in intensively used landscapes. This species is probably affected by over-intensive management of landscapes and the loss of open patches and ecotones with tall herbs, flowers and shrubs structure in connection with high forests and wetlands. Generally, it is estimated that there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species, due to human activities and settlements (e.g. deforestation). Jansen et al. (2016) listed many types of forests inhabited by this species as threatened in the Europe.

The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe, which could be important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This invasive ladybird is a predator preferentially of arboreal aphids, including genera known as prey of D. alneti (Chapin and Brou 1991). Intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and the larvae of D. alneti could be detrimental for this species, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015). It is however unclear whether D. alneti is likely to be sensitive to competition with this ladybird as it occurs also in East Palearctic, where the harlequin ladybird is native.

","

Didea alneti is widespread in almost the whole of Europe, but it is regarded as declining or threatened across the most of its range in west and central Europe (Speight et al. 2016, Ssymank et al. 2011). There are only historical records from Ireland (1934) and from several areas in Great Britain: in the 1890s; around the turn of century; in the 1930s; and two records from one locality in 1989 (Ball et al. 2011). Speight et al. (2016) reported this species as declining in Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Switzerland and also (in part) in France. These authors regard the decline in numbers of migrants in Switzerland as particularly alarming, as it implies threats impacting source subpopulations across a wide area. Declines have been recorded also in the Czech Republic, where it was evaluated as Vulnerable species (Farkač et al. 2005), and in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). It had been rare but increasing in the Netherlands according to Reemer et al. (2009), but Speight et al. (2016) refer it as a threatened species in this country. It is widespread and less common in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009), and quite rare in Finland (Haarto and Kerppola 2007).

",Decreasing,"

This species is known from almost all regions of Europe except some parts of the Mediterranean and the extreme north (Bartsch et al. 2019, Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Vockeroth 1992). The historical occurrence of this species in Great Britain and Ireland is discussed by Ball et al. (2011), where it is suggested that it is an occasional migrant or vagrant that sometimes established temporary populations in Great Britain.

Didea alneti is conspicuous hoverfly that is widely distributed in most of the forested boreal and temperate Holarctic region.

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

The species has been listed as Endangered in Great Britain and threatened in Ireland, where there have been no extant records for more than 30 years (Speight et al. 2016, Ball et al. 2011, Speight and Gittings 2020), although it is not clear that it was ever an established native in these countries. Ball and Morris (2014) excluded this species from the list of threatened species in Great Britain, because they believe that this to be a vagrant, which may be prone to irruptions form northern boreal areas where it was common. It has been considered as threatened in Germany (and at regional levels as Vulnerable or Endangered Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt and Thüringen) and it has been listed as Near Threatened (""Vorwarnliste”) in the Red List to Syrphidae of Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). It has been listed as a Vulnerable species in the List of Threatened Species in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005). In Finland, Sweden and Norway it is listed as Least Concern (Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Gammelmo et al. 2015).

There are no known conservation measures currently in place. Further research on the the species' biology (including competition with invasive species), population and threats are required. In addition, monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167935,149167932,Merodon aurifer,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC).  

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC). 

In Europe and the EU 27, this species is distributed through the coastline of the Mediterranean Sea. Although the area of occurrence (AOO) is below the thresholds for threatened categories, a high number of locations (35) and large extent of occurrence (EOO) were recorded. The number of locations is based on tourism and fires as the most plausible threats. A decline of the quality of habitat due to tourism, fire and overgrazing by livestock has been observed. A lot of further research on this species is needed, especially on its biology and ecology.Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe.






","This species prefers hedgehog heath, herb-rich, semi-arid, open, unimproved grasslands, humid tracksides and meadows (Standfuss and Claussen 2007) as well as open, riparian Fraxinus angustifolia forests (Ricarte and Marcos García 2008). The adults are known to visit the flowers of  Foeniculum and Ferula (Standfuss and Claussen 2007, Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is from April to June and from August to October. The developmental stages and the host plant are not known (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020).","The main threats are the intensification of tourism, overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020) and fires.",The population trend is unknown. It has been recorded since 1925 from different point localities in the Mediterranean coastal zone.,Unknown,"This Mediterranean species is distributed in Spain, the Mediterranean zone of France, Italy, the coastal parts of the Balkan Peninsula, Greece, and Turkey (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020). In Europe and the EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is 1,412,443 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 228 km2.

It is also recorded in Armenia and Azerbaijan. 


",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"Some of the point localities of this Mediterranean species belong to the Cabañeros National Park in Central Spain and also to the Natura 2000 network (half of the localities). Although the areas are protected, grazing by livestock is still intense (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). The species would benefit from restrictions of this activity. Additional research and monitoring on its biology and ecology, possible threats, as well as the habitat trend and population size and trend are required. Establishing the exact host plant for the development of the larvae is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167946,149167943,Dasysyrphus postclaviger,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Dasysyrphus postclaviger is rare but widespread in most of Europe. The extent of occurrence and area of occupancy of this species are probably larger in Europe than they are known at present, because this species has been probably overlooked due to similarity with common species. It prefers natural and semi-natural conifer forests at high elevations and intensive forestry could be threatening this species. The extent of occurrence and area of occupancy of the European taxon are probably larger than they are known at present, and it is considered Least Concern both for Europe and for the EU27 Member States.","

Dasysyrphus postclaviger inhabits natural or semi-natural conifer forests at the upper elevational limit of spruce (Picea) and on through Larix/Pinus cembra and P. uncinata forest up to its limit (2,200 m in the Alps) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults are observed mostly in open areas near the tree line from the end of May to the beginning of July (Speight 2018), or mainly in July in northernmost range (Bartsch et al. 2009). Males hover at 1.5-5 m above ground and often settle on the trunks in the sun. Flower visitation records exist for Veronica, Ranunculus, Rubus idaeus Crataegus and Apiaceae (Speight 2018, Krpač et al. 2009). Developmental stages are unknown, but the larva is likely to be camouflaged against bark and it is suspected to be predatory on small tree invertebrates as in other related Dasysyrphus species.

","

Any current threats to this species are not documented. Nevertheless, it is estimated that there is a continuing decline of the extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species due to human activities and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016). Especially intensive forestry activities in West Europe could be threatening the species. In Eastern Europe, it is more widespread in mountains where the forestry is less intensive. Climate change may also threaten this species as it can be found in higher elevation habitat (Barredo et al. 2020).

","

Dasysyrphus postclaviger is apparently very rare but probably a widespread species in Europe (D. Doczskal pers. comm. 2020). In some areas it is relatively frequently recorded (northern Finland, North Macedonia, European Russia) (Bartsch et al. 2009, Krpač 2009, A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020). It is assumed that this species has likely been overlooked due to similarity with the common species Dasysyrphus friuliensis, D. venustus and D. hilaris (Krpač 2009).

",Unknown,"

Dasysyrphus postclaviger is a rare and local, but probably widely distributed species, in northern Europe and local in mountains of temperate Europe, south to the Pyrenees (France) and to Pelister National Park (North Macedonia) in the Balkan Peninsula (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Krpač 2009, Speight et al. 2018). According to Barkalov and Mutin (2018) this species is also known from most parts of European Russia, Siberia; the occurrence of this species in the Russian Far East is unclear. The true distribution of this species is unclear, because a lot of records had been based on the similar species Dasysyrphus friuliensis (especially in East Europe) and this species is still regarded as a synonym of D. friuliensis in some regions.

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Further survey work is needed to determine the distribution of this species as well as its biology, and to clarify its relationships with similar species. Dasysyrphus postclaviger is listed as Data Deficient species in the Red List of Syrphidae of Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) and by Haarto and Kerppola (2007) in Finland.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167960,149167955,Merodon andriotes,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii),2021,2019-11-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is endemic to Andros Island in the Greek Aegean. It is a Mediterranean species and its habitats are largely under threat by overgrazing, fire and tourism. We propose the monitoring of the population and habitat trend. Further research about the life history and ecology of this species is needed.

Based on the small geographic range of the species (the area of occupancy and the extent of occurrence are 12 km2, with only one location (based on overgrazing by livestock), and because of the continuing decline of its habitat quality due to intensive overgrazing by livestock, it is assessed as Critically Endangered (B1ab(iii)).

","

This species prefers Mediterranean maquis (Vujić et al. 2020). Similar to the other species of the Merodon luteomaculatus complex, it occurs in maquis and open areas in Mediterranean evergreen forests (Radenković et al. 2018). The adults of the species complex appear mainly in late summer or autumn (from August to October), visiting the flowers of Senecio, Inula, and Echinops ritro (Radenković et al. 2018). Adults of this species appear in October, and have been recorded visiting Dittrichia viscosa (L.) Greuter (Vujić et al. 2020). The larval host plant is unknown.

","Overgrazing by livestock is the most plausible threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Fire, tourism and road construction can also affect negatively the population.",The population trend is unknown.,Unknown,"This European endemic species is restricted to eastern parts of the Aegean island of Andros in Greece (Radenković et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020). It is known from five localities, and all records are from 2012. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is measured at 9.5 km2 (but increased to 12 km2 to equal the AOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 12 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"The range of this endemic Aegean species belongs to a Mediterranean hotspot. It is found only on Andros island, which is one of the most important areas in Greece for seabirds and marine mammals. One locality is within a Natura 2000 protected area.

The increasing overgrazing by livestock, tourism, urbanization and frequent fires during hot and dry summers constantly increase the disturbance of its habitats (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). The species would benefit from restrictions of these activities and protection of site and habitat. Introducing it into the national lists of protected species, as well as increasing awareness about this endemic species are very important. Further research about possible threats, and about the biology of this phytophagous species is needed, especially to reveal the host plant species necessary for larval development. Additional monitoring of population and habitat trends is also needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149167968,149167957,Dasysyrphus pinastri,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread arboreal species that inhabits a range of natural forests and also conifer plantations, in which it is often abundant. There are no documented threats to this species, and no conservation action is required at present, except research into any impacts of the invasive harlequin ladybird. The extent of occurrence and area of occupancy of the European taxon are probably larger than they are known at present, and it is considered Least Concern both for Europe and for the EU27 Member States.","Dasysyrphus pinastri is a largely arboreal species of conifer forest (Abies, Picea and Pinus) and conifer plantation, plus mountainous Betula woods (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults are usually found near trees along woodland rides and edges and around mature hedgerows usually within a few metres of the ground but also high up in the crowns of trees (Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults are vagrant (Aubert et al. 1976) and males were also observed in hilltop situations (Barkalov 2007). The flight period of adults is usually from the end of April to June, but from July to beginning of August at higher altitudes or more northerly latitudes (Speight 2018). Adults visit a wide range of flowering plant, bushes and trees: Acer platanoides, Angelica spp., Anthriscus sylvestris, Argentina anserine, Barbarea vulgaris, Caltha, Cardaminopsis arenosa, Crataegus laevigata, Cirsium, Crataegus, Crepis paludosa, Euphorbia, Fragaria, Frangula alnus, Galium, Heracleum, Hieracium, Lonicera xylosteum, Malus domestus, Pink canina, Potentilla spp., Prunus spp., Ranunculus, Rosa rugosa, Salix repens, Saxifraga granulata, Saxifraga spinulosa, Sorbus aucuparia. Spiraea spp., Stellariae and others (Speight 2018, Barkalov 2007 and Bartsch et al. 2009). The predacious larva is camouflaged against bark (Rotheray 1987). It mainly feeds on aphids that develop on conifer trees (Bartsch et al. 2009) and it has been recorded as overwintering among leaf litter on the floor of spruce (Picea) forest (Kula 1980). Larvae have also been found in colonies of the aphids Drepanosiphum platanoides on Acer pseudoplatanus (Bartsch et al. 2009, Rotheray 1987). The larva has been found in association with Betula shrubs in Iceland and Greenland (Bartsch et al. 2009 and Böcher et al. 2015).","

There are no documented major threats to this species. This species is widespread and common in both natural forest and conifer plantations. Documented declines of this species in some parts of Western Europe could be influenced by changes in forestry management. The also invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe, which could be an important threat to the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of Dasysyrphus pinastri could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

This species is the most frequent and abundant species of the genus Dasysyrphus in most types of conifer and mixed forests in Europe including conifer plantations (Ball et al. 2011, Kula 1980, 2001). Recently this species has decreased in some areas of western Europe (e.g. Great Britain, Belgium and the Netherlands - Ball et al. 2011, Speight et al. 2016, Reemer et al. 2009). This may be linked to changes in forest management in these countries, where there has been a shift away from conifer plantations. Ball et al. (2011) suggested, alternatively, that at least in the UK the decreasing population trend may be an artefact of changes in recorder effort.

",Stable,"

Dasysyrphus pinastri is widespread in subarctic and boreal Europe (including Iceland) and mountainous regions of temperate Europe south to the Pyrenees, and northern Italy.

Within Europe the species is known from Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Russia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, the Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom.

Out of the European region it is also present in Turkey and the rest of northern Palaearctic region in Russia (Siberia, Far East) and in Transcaucasia (Bartsch et al. 2009, Saribiyik 2014, Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Vujić et al. 2020), and also in Mongolia, Tibet and probably also in Japan (Bartsch et al. 2009). The occurrence of this species in Nearctic region is surprisingly restricted to Greenland (Locke and Skevington 2013).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Dasysyrphus pinastri is not considered as threatened in Europe but this species is apparently declining in some western regions (Ball et al. 2013, Speight et al. 2016, Reemer et al. 2009). This species is considered vulnerable in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). The biology of this species is relatively well-known, however, the larval biology is known inadequately to estimate possible impacts of invasive ladybirds on this species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167981,149167977,Dasysyrphus pauxillus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-06-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The application of this name to European populations and the distribution of this species are uncertain at present, but as currently understood this species is widespread in Fenoscandinavia and in forested submontane and mountain regions in temperate Europe; it has been suggested that this is an ongoing range expansion for a species originally native to North America. The extent of occurrence and area of occupancy of the European taxon are probably larger than they are known at present, and it is considered Least Concern both for Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","This largely arboreal species mainly occurs in open fields in conjunction with coniferous and mixed forests, acidophilous Picea forests, Abies/Picea forests and upwards into the Larix/Pinus mugo zone (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Males were observed as hovering one to a few metres high in coniferous forest (Reemer et al. 2009). Adults visit mainly flowering bushes and trees: Acer platanoides, Rubus chamaemorus, Ribes alpinum, Crataegus spp., Prunus padus, Prunus spinosa, and Salix spp. They have however also been recorded visiting flowering herbs: white Apiaceae (Aegopodium podagraria, Anthriscus sylvestris), yellow Asteraceae (Barbarea vulgaris), Carex, Ranunculus acris, Anemone nemorosa, and Caltha palustris (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Nielsen 1998, Bygebjerg 2004, Torp 1994). The flight period of adults is from end of April to the middle of June, or to July in northernmost parts of the range (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009), in Baden Württemberg and the Netherlands it is from mid of April to mid (end) of May (Doczkal 1996, Reemer et al. 2009). Developmental stages are unknown, but the larva is likely to be camouflaged against bark and it is likely to feed mainly on aphids that live on conifers similarly as larvae of other related Dasysyrphus species (Bartsch et al. 2009).","

Specific threats to this species are unknown, since there is little relevant information on the biology of this species. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe, this could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This ladybird is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

This species is widespread in northern Europe and locally is quite common in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009). There are rather rare and local records in temperate Europe. Bartsch (2009) suggests that this may reflect confusion between this species and small Dasysyrphus pinastri in temperate areas where the latter occurs. This species is regularly recorded among specimens of this similar, common species. In Denmark all records are from 1979 onwards (Torp 1994), and it is likely that the species was introduced unintentionally in connection with planting spruce (Bartsch et al. 2009). It has been recorded in 2010 from two sites in the East Anglia, and according to Ball et al. (2011) it is probably a recent arrival in the UK. These authors regarded this as a North American species that has been spreading west across Europe and considered its arrival in the UK an expected natural range extension. Reemer et al. (2009) noted that this species was less common before 1950 in the Netherlands.

",Stable,"

The species D. pauxillus as understood by European authors (Bičík and Láska 1995, Doczkal 1996) is regarded as being widespread in Fenoscandinavia and in forested submontane and montane regions in temperate Europe, south to the Pyrenees (Spain), Alps and to Rhodopi and North Pindus (Greece) on the Balkan Peninsula, west to the Netherlands, Belgium and the United Kingdom (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Burgio et al. 2015, Vujić et al. 2019, Krpač 2009, Nedeljković 2011). This species has been referred as occurred also in European Russia, Siberia (Barkalov 2007, Barkalov and Mutin 2018) and North America, but it is doubtful that Eurasian and North American records are conspecific (in which case the name should be restricted to North American records).

European records are known from Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine and the United Kingdom.

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Further survey work is needed to determine the taxonomy, distribution and population status of this species as well as its biology. Dasysyrphus pauxillus is a protected species in Serbia (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149167987,149167976,Merodon antonioi,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-21 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"The Iberian Peninsula is the only known area that this species exists. It is an endemic Mediterranean species, and its habitats are largely under destruction by overgrazing (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Cork extraction and tourism also can negatively affect the quality of its habitat.

We propose the monitoring of the population, as well as the habitat trend. Further research on life history and ecology of this species is needed. Based on the small (16 km2) area of occupancy (AOO), with only four locations (based on overgrazing by livestock), and because of the continuing decline of the habitat quality due to intensive overgrazing, this species is assessed as Endangered (EN).

","This species prefers forests with open ground and freshwater habitat. It occurs in open areas in riparian Fraxinus angustifolia forests along seasonal rivers (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007), and in open areas in Pinus pinea forests (Van Eck 2016). Adults have been collected resting on the rocks of a dry river bed (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007). In Portugal, the adults visited flowers of Dianthus broteri (Van Eck 2016). The flight period is during September and October. The developmental stages are not described (Speight 2020). The host plant is unknown.",

The most plausible threat is overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Cork extraction and tourism can also affect negatively the habitat where the species occurs.

,"The population trend is unknown. Until now, four subpopulations in Spain and Portugal have been recorded.",Unknown,"This European endemic species is known from southern Portugal and central and southwestern Spain (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Van Eck 2016, Speight 2020). The Spanish records are from 2004 and 2016, while the Portuguese record is from 2016. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 9083 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 16 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"All point localities in Spain and Portugal belong to the Natura 2000 network, and one point locality is situated in the Cabañeros National Park in central Spain. Although these areas are protected, grazing by livestock is intense (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). This species would benefit from restriction of this activity, as well as stopping land conversion in its habitats. Additional research on its biology, ecology and possible threats is required, as well as the monitoring of the habitat trend, and population size and trend. Establishing the exact host plant for the development of the larvae is important. Introducing this species into the National list of protected species, as well as increasing awareness about this endemic species are also very important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149168000,149167997,Dasysyrphus hilaris,Least Concern,,2021,2020-06-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Dasysyrphus hilaris sensu Doczkal is probably rather common and widely distributed in most humid forests in Europe, including commercial plantations. Subpopulations of this species are numerous, there are no documented threats to this species and no conservation action is required at present except research on taxonomy and larval biology, and on the possible impacts of the harlequin ladybird.

","Dasysyrphus hilaris sensu Doczkal occurs in or near humid mature conifer, deciduous and mixed forests (up to c. 1,000 m above sea level in the Alps) including Pinus plantations (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Kula 2004). Adults fly from the beginning of May to the mid of June (to mid of July in Sweden) usually round the foliage of conifers, but descend to visit flowers and settle on foliage of large-leaved trees, e.g. Acer (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Flower visit records mentioned by Speight (2018) are from Lonicera xylosteum, Ranunculus, Sorbus aucuparia, Taraxacum, Vaccinium myrtilus, and those from Sweden mentioned by Bartsch et al. (2009) from Aegopodium podagraria, Alisma plantago-aquatica, Anthriscus sylvestris, Barbarea vulgaris, Berberis vulgaris, Cirsium palustre, Crataegus laevigata, Galium boreale, Hypericum spp., Laserpitium latifolium, Ranunculus acris, Rosa canina, Viburnum opulus, Vaccinium myrtillus. Developmental stages are not described, but the larva is apparently camouflaged against bark and it is aphidophagous, similarly to the larvae of other species of the genus.","

Apart from general threats to biodiversity, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe. This species is not significantly affected by commercial forestry.

The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axiridis in Europe could be an important threat to native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is also preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of Dasysyrphus hilaris could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

Dasysyrphus hilaris is probably a widespread arboreal species with numerous subpopulations in most forested areas in Europe that are assumed to be stable (D. Doczkal pers. comm. 2020). Its real population as well as population trends are unclear due to confusion with other similar species of Dasysyrphus (Speight 2018, Speight et al. 2016, Bartsch et. al. 2009).

",Stable,"The European range of this species is uncertain due to considerable confusion with related species until recently, but Dasysyrphus hilaris sensu Doczkal (pers. comm. 2020) is probably widespread in almost all humid boreal and temperate areas in Europe and also in Asia (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Barkalov 2007, D. Doczkal pers. comm. 2020).

Following this concept, this species is considered to occur in Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, European Russia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine and the United Kingdom.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation actions for this species, this species is not considered as threatened in any area in Europe (Speight et al. 2016). Further survey work is needed to resolve the taxonomy of this and related species and to determine the real distribution and ecological requirements of this species. However, the larval biology is known inadequately to estimate possible impact of invasive ladybirds on this species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168010,149168008,Merodon armipes,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

In Europe and the EU27, the area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are above thresholds for threatened categories, and many locations are recognized. The continuing decline in the quality of habitat due to unsustainable forest management, agricultural intensification, unsustainable farming and infrastructure development are the main threats, However, it is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and for the EU27 Member States. Further research on this species is needed, especially about its biology and ecology, population size and trend.

","This species prefers open ground and forest. It occurs in thermophilous oak (Quercus) forests, thermophilous forest fringes, as well as in open areas within dry scrub and dry, semi-arid, closed, unimproved grasslands. The adults are known to visit flowers of Ornithogalum umbellatum, and Ranunculus and Euphorbia in Turkey (Vujić et al. 2011). The flight period is between the end of April and end of June. The immature stages are unknown, but this species is apparently associated with the Tassel Hyacinth, Muscari (Liliaceae) in southern Germany (D. Doczkal pers. comm. 2020). Ornithogalum is also almost certainly an alternative host (Speight 2020).","The habitat of this species can be threatened by unsustainable forest management, agricultural intensification and increasing tourism.","The population trend is unknown. There are many subpopulations across central and southern Europe, and further to the east, in Crimea, Iran, Israel, as well as in North Africa. The most abundant subpopulations are present on the Balkan and Apennine peninsulas, from the coasts to the high mountains (Vujić et al. 2012).",Unknown,"This species is one of the most widely distributed species of the ruficornis group. Within Europe, it is present from France and Germany in the west to southwestern Romania southern and northeastern mainland Greece. It occurs in northeast France (Rhine valley in Alsace and the Alps) and in the adjacent parts of Germany, through central Europe (Switzerland, Slovenia to Hungary) and the mountainous parts of northern Italy towards the western Balkans, Albania and on to Romania, Bulgaria, Greece and Crimea. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are above the thresholds for the threatened categories in Europe and the EU 27. Outside of Europe, the range extends east to the Caucasus, Iran, Turkey (Anatolia) and south to Israel, and it is present in North Africa (Vujić et al. 2012, Speight 2020).

",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. Some point localities are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network, such as the Parnassus National Park in Greece, National Park Durmitor in Montenegro, National Parks Fruška gora, Đerdap, Kopaonik and Šar planina in Serbia. Further research about the population size, threats and ecology of this species is needed. More monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required. The increasing tourism, logging and agriculture can disturb its habitats, so continuous management of sites in protected areas is needed.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168022,149168018,Dasysyrphus friuliensis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This arboreal species is widespread in all areas with conifer (preferably Picea) forests, it has a wide distribution and it inhabits also conifer plantations, in which it is sometimes abundant, but this species is disappearing from some parts of western Europe where spruce plantations are being replaced. There are no documented threats to this species, and no conservation action is required at present, except research on the impacts of invasive harlequin ladybirds on this species.","

Dasysyrphus friuliensis is an arboreal species of Picea forests and plantations upwards to the Larix zone (Speight 2018). In Europe it is considered to be associated with spruce (Picea) forests and plantations (Ball et al. 2011).  Adults are observed from the end of May to beginning of August in trackside, clearings etc. in the vicinity of conifer forests, from which adults descend to visit flowers (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults are vagrant (Aubert et al. 1976) and males have also been observed in hilltop situations (Barkalov 2007). Flower visitation records include white Apiaceae, Ranunculus acris, Caltha palustris, Geranium sylvaticum , Sambucus ebulus, Sorbus aucuparia, Ribes rubrum, Potentila sp., Epilobium angustifolium,  and Taraxacum. (Speight 2018, Barkalov 2007, Bartsch et al. 2009). The predatory larva develops on spruce trees, where it is camouflaged against the bark (Goeldlin, 1974). It is probably an ambush predator that feeds on bark aphids (probably species of the genus Cinara) (Bartsch et al. 2009) and likely opportunistically on other soft-bodied insects, and overwinters in leaf litter on the floor of spruce forest (Kula 1982).

","

There are no documented major threats to this species. This species is widespread also in conifer plantations and it seems that presence of this species is strongly influenced by forestry management especially in the areas without suitable natural or semi-natural spruce forests. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axiridis in Europe could be an important threat to the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of Dasysyrphus friuliensis could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

This species is frequent in conifer forests in Europe and sometimes abundant also in conifer plantations (Kula 2001). Recently this species has disappeared from some areas of western Europe e.g. the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). This may be related to changes in forest management in this country, characterized by a shift away from coniferous plantations. Across the European range as a whole, the population is thought to be generally stable.

",Stable,"

Dasysyrphus friuliensis is widespread in boreal Europe and mountainous regions of temperate Europe south to the Pyrenees. European records are known from Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, Russia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Netherlands (from which it has not recently been recorded - Reemer et al. 2009), North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Ball et al. (2011) mentioned that there may be problems with identification with some records of this species from Great Britain.

Out of the European region, the range of the species extends to the rest of the northern Palaearctic region in Russia (Siberia, Far East) and Mongolia (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Vujić et al. 2020).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Dasysyrphus friuliensis is not considered to be threatened in any area in Europe and its biology is relatively well known. However, the larval biology is known inadequately to estimate possible impact of invasive ladybirds on this species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168031,149168021,Merodon arundanus,Critically Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"The Grazalema Natural Park, in the mountainous area in the southern part of the Iberian Peninsula is the only known area of this European endemic species. The habitat of this endemic species is being increasingly destructed by fires. We propose the monitoring of the population, as well as the habitat trend. Further research on the life history and ecology of this species is needed.

This species is assessed as Critically Endangered, based on the small geographic range of the species (area of occupancy 4 km2) with only one location and continuing decline of the habitat quality due to fires and intensive overgrazing by livestock.

","This endemic species prefers open ground in forest. It occurs in open areas at the upper altitudinal limit of Abies pinsapo forest (c. 1,350 m), an Endangered plant. The flight period is during April. The developmental stages are not described (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Speight 2020). The host plant is unknown.","The species prefers open areas in the forest of Endangered Spanish Fir, Abies pinsapo (Arista et al. 2011), which is mainly threatened by fires. The other major threats are overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020) and tourism, which can also affect the quality of the habitat.",The population trend is unknown.,Unknown,"This European endemic species has only been found at one locality in Grazalema Natural Park, in the mountainous area of southern Spain (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Speight 2020). The record dates from 2002. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 4 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"The point locality of this endemic species belongs to the Natura 2000 network, the Sierra de Grazalema Natural Park - a UNESCO Biosphere reserve. Although this area is protected, grazing is still intensive (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). The species would benefit from restricting this activity.

Additional research on its biology and ecology, as well as the habitat trend, population size and trend, and possible threats is required. Establishing the exact host plant for the development of the larvae is necessary and monitoring the population and habitat trends is also important. Introducing Merodon arundanus to the National list of protected species, as well as increasing awareness about this endemic species is very important. Increasing the protection levels of the endangered Spanish fir is also crucial.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149168042,149168039,Dasysyrphus eggeri,Endangered,"B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv)",2021,2020-03-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This is an extremely rare species with a relictual and fragmented distribution in Europe. The only recent records are from mainland Spain and Cyprus, and it has not been recorded from most of Europe for more than 30 years, and it is considered possibly extinct in all other parts of its European range. This is thought likely to represent a genuine decline in this highly conspicuous species and it is considered possibly extinct for most European countries. The estimated extent of occurrence has shrunk to a quarter in the last 40 years. Based on recent records, the estimated extent of occurrence 1,060,000 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) 20 km2. Recent subpopulations are known only from the Sierra Nevada and Sierra de Baza in southern Spain, and probably also in Pyrenees near Huesca in Spain, and from Cyprus. It is necessary to protect these, which are thought likely to be the last subpopulations of this species in Europe. The species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv)) as a result of its restricted AOO and continuing decline in the EOO, AOO, area and quality of habitat; (iv) number of locations or subpopulations, and in the number of locations or subpopulations.

","Speight (2018) mentioned Dasysyrphus eggeri as exhibiting a preference for forest environments in the Larix decidua/Pinus mugo forest zone in the Alps. One record from Spain (Sierra de Baza) is from schist scree with thorn cushion vegetation and single Crataegus monogyna bushes at 1,890 m above sea level (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). There are no relevant data about adult habitat and habits for most European countries, due to the rarity of the species and because this species has not been recorded for several decades in most countries in Europe. Adults were photographed on flowering white Apiaceae and violet Lamiaceae and on sunlit stones in Spain (Lacouture 2013, Rodriques 2014 and 2018). Although its ecology is largely unknown this species' rarity and apparently patchy distribution suggests that it may be associated with very rare and specific microhabitats and adults could be vagrant, as in other aphidophagous species. Developmental stages are unknown, but larva is apparently arboreal predacious as other larvae of Dasysyrphus species. Flight period of adults is from mid-June to beginning of September.
Bradescu (1991) reported that old records in the Romanian Carpathians were taken at 700 m above sea level. In the Pyrenees and Sierra Nevada, it was captured at 1,050 m and 1,800 m asl. respectively  (van der Goot 1958, Torp Pedersen 1971). The only record from Sweden (from 1980) is from Tovetorp research centre about 50 m above sea level (Bičík and Láska 1983). The record from Cyprus is from near 1,500 m above sea level (Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The sole Greek record, from 1965, is from 2,100 m above sea level near Mt. Olympus (Vujić et al. 2020).","

It seems that this very rare species has disappeared from most range of Europe over the last decades. The estimated extent of occurrence has shrunk to a quarter in the last 40 years. Although documented threats to this species are unknown, since there is no information on the biology of this species and microhabitat requirements, it is suspected that this reflects a reliance on specific microhabitats which are themselves in decline (L. Mazánek pers. comm. 2021). It is not known why this species is extremely rare and why this species has not been collected outside the isolated subpopulations in Mediterranean area (Spain and Cyprus) for several decades. Nevertheless, due to human activities and settlements in the area of occurrence of this species it is likely that there is continuing decline of extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species.

","This is a highly conspicuous species, and most evidence of surviving subpopulations is based on photographs taken by non-specialists (L. Mazánek pers. comm. 2021). As such it is considered unlikely that it is underrecorded. It is therefore thought that it is genuinely rare, present only as a vagrant, or has been lost from most of its historical European range (L. Mazánek pers. comm. 2021). Recent records of this rare species are known only from Spain (several recent records and photos from Sierra Nevada, one record from 2003 from Sierra de Baza close to Sierra Nevada and one photo from 2013 from Pyrenees near Huesca) (GBIF 2020, Lacouture 2013, Rodriques 2014 and 2018, Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). There is also one recent record for Cyprus from 2011 (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).  Although it was sometimes mentioned in literature, this was a incorrect translation by Peck (1988) and the species has never collected in Poland and also likely it has been never collected in Belgium and  Luxemburg. This species could survive in the Romanian Carpathians, where it was collected several times in the past and recent hoverfly surveys have been limited (Bradescu 1991, Stănescu and Părvu 2005). Referred records of this species from all regions in Europe (except Spain and Cyprus) are more than 30 years old (often much more) (Vujić et al. 2020, Bradescu 1991, Ségui 1961, Peck 1988, Goeldlin 1974, Bartsch et al. 2009, Maibach et al. 1992, van der Goot 1958, Heimburg 2018, Sommagio pers. comm. 2020). This species could be extinct for all territories in Europe out of Spain and Cyprus, as this is a conspicuous species which is unlikely to have been systematically overlooked in surveys in the Alps and most of the Pyrenees. The estimated extent of occurrence has shrunk from about 4,200,000 km2 to 1,060,000 km2 and area of occupancy based on known records from 72 km2 to 20 km2 during at least the last four decades. This species was relatively recently recorded from Iran (Gharali and Gilasian 2002). Only 4 locations are estimated based on the confirmed extant subpopulations in Europe.",Decreasing,"

Dasysyrphus eggeri is one of the most conspicuous species of the genus, and was known in Europe from southern Sweden, Pyrenees, Sierra Nevada and Sierra de Baza (Spain, France, Andorra), the Alps (Switzerland, Austria, northern Italy, France), Corsica, Balkan (Greece), Cyprus and the Carpathian Mountains (Romania) (Speight 2018, Peck 1988, Ricarde and Marcos García 2017, Vujić et al. 2020, Burgio et al. 2015, Speight et al. 2018, Stănescu and Părvu 2005, Heimburg 2018, A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020, Ssymank pers. comm. 2020).

Peck (1988) and some others also listed Poland, Belgium and Luxembourg, but D. eggeri is not listed in any regional literature and recent checklists for these countries (Mielczarek 2009, Bańkowska 1963, Verlinden 1991, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences 2020, Carrières 2001). Except for Spain (Sierra Nevada, Sierra de Baza, and probably also Pyrenees) (GBIF 2020, Lacouture 2013, Rodriques 2014 and 2018, Ssymank pers. comm. 2020) and Cyprus (Vujić pers. comm. 2020) the occurrence of this species in the European countries is based only on unique or scattered old records (Bartsch et al. 2009, Vujić et al. 2020, Bradescu 1991, Séguy 1961, Goeldlin de Tiefenau 1974, Torp Pedersen 1971, Maibach et al. 1992, Sommagio pers. comm. 2020, van der Goot 1958, Becker et al. 1910).

All records except those from Cyprus and Spain are old and the species is considered possibly extinct in all other parts of it European range.

Outside Europe it occurs in the Caucasus and southwest and middle Asia (Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Iran, Mongolia and the Tuva Republic in Russia) (Speight 2018, Peck 1988, Vujić et al. 2020, Dousti and Hayat 2006).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Conservation actions regarding to this species are unknown. Dasysyrphus eggeri is not listed in any national Red Lists. It has been recorded from countries that have not conducted national Red Lists and this species is listed as Not Applicable in the Swedish Red List (2015). Further survey work is needed to determine the recent distribution of this species in Europe. It is necessary to study this species' biology and larval and adult habitat requirements in Spain and Cyprus to make appropriate conservation action regarding to protection of the known, apparently isolated subpopulations of this species in Europe. Further information is needed to obtain evidence of and determine the reasons for suspected declines in order to determine whether habitat or site protection is likely to be effective.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168052,149168050,Merodon auripes,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC). 

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC).

In Europe and the EU27, the area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are above the thresholds for threatened categories. Possible decline of the quality of the habitat due to logging, urbanization, tourism, agriculture can threaten this species, so a continuous management of sites in protected areas is needed. This species is mainly distributed on the low mountains of the Apennine and Balkan Peninsulas, and in some parts of Central Europe. Further towards the east, this species also occurs in Ukraine and Turkey. A lot of further research on this species is needed, especially on its biology and ecology, population size and trend.

",The flight period is in April and May. The immature stages and the host plant are unknown (Speight 2020). The species prefers mesophilous and thermophilous deciduous forests and unimproved grasslands with scrub. The adults are known to visit Ranunculus flowers (Vujić et al. 2020).,"

The quality of the habitat of this species can decline due to unsustainable forest management (logging), tourism, and infrastructure development.

","The population trend is unknown. The species has been recorded from several point localities on the Apenine and Balkan peninsulas, as well as in Austria, Switzerland, Turkey and Ukraine.",Unknown,"This species has a mostly continental distribution. It is recorded from the Balkan and Apennine peninsulas, and in Central Europe. There are also records from Ukraine and Turkey. Its populations occur mostly on low mountains up to an altitude of 800 metres (Vujić et al. 2012, Speight 2020).
In Europe and the EU27, the area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are above the thresholds for threatened categories.


",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions targeting this species so far. Some point localities are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network. Some examples are the Pindus National Park in Greece, National Park Durmitor in Montenegro, National Parks Fruška Gora and Kopaonik and Natural Park Vršačke Planine in Serbia. Possible declines in the quality of the habitat due to logging, urbanization, tourism, roads network can be a threat, so continuous management of sites in protected areas is needed. Research about the population size, threats and ecology of this species is needed. More monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168064,149168062,Chrysotoxum volaticum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-11-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Chrysotoxum volaticum is assessed as Least Concern (LC) due to its fairly wide range across the Iberian Peninsula and southwest France, although it is absent from other parts of Europe. In the EU27 it is also assessed as Least Concern (LC), as its European range lies entirely within the European Union.","In Spain, this species has been collected from grassy vegetation at high elevations (van Steenis et al. 2020, Claussen and Hausser 1990). In the Sierra de Alcaraz, it was collected near a brook in a mountain valley (van Steenis et al. 2020). Elsewhere in Spain it has been collected from Pyrenean oak (Quercus pyrenaica) forest; at one locality this species was associated with a peat bog and seasonal stream (van Steenis et al. 2020). Adults have been observed on Thapsia villosa in full flower (van Steenis et al. 2020), where these authors observed ""many individuals"" alongside other hoverflies, but also on other flowers (Marcos-García 1986).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,"

There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe. Most specimens known from Europe have been recorded from Spain, while 21 specimens have been reported from France and only one from Portugal (van Steenis et al. 2020).

",Unknown,"In Europe, this species is known from mainland parts of northern Portugal, Spain, southern France and (van Steenis et al. 2020).

Outside Europe this species occurs in Algeria and Morocco (Séguy 1961, Sahib et al. 2020).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"This species is not included at any red lists and it is not a target of conservation measures. Further research into this species' life history - including studies of larval biology - is needed to propose effective conservation actions, and taxonomic research is recommended. It has only very recently been reported from Europe and research is needed to clarify its distribution and population status.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168075,149168072,Merodon cabanerensis,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR).

In Europe, this species is known only in one point locality in the Cabañeros National Park (Montes de Toledo) in Central Spain. The habitat of this species is largely under destruction by overgrazing by livestock that is the most plausible threat. There is no rescue effect of subpopulations from outside of the assessment region. We propose the monitoring of population, as well as the habitat trend. Further research on the life history and ecology of this species is needed.

Both the area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are 4 km2. Based on the small geographic range of the species with only one location based on the intensive overgrazing by livestock as the main threat, and because of the continuing decline of the habitat quality, it is assessed as Critically Endangered in Europe and the EU27 countries.




","This species prefers open ground areas in thermophilous Quercus faginea and Fraxinus angustifolia forests. The adults were caught resting or flying near to the ground. The flight period is in March (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007, Speight 2020). The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown.","The species is threatened by habitat degradation mainly due to overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). In addition, cork extraction and tourism can negatively influence the species.",The population trend is unknown. Only one subpopulation is known in the Cabañeros National Park (Montes de Toledo) in central Spain.,Unknown,"This species is distributed in central Spain (one point locality in Cabañeros National Park, where the record dates from 2004) and in Morocco (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007, Vujić et al. 2018, Speight 2020).

In Europe and the EU27, both the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are 4 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"The point locality of this species is in the Cabañeros National Park in Central Spain, and also to the Natura 2000 network. Although this area is protected, grazing by livestock is still intense (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). The species would benefit from restricting this activity. Additional research on possible threats, about its biology and ecology, as well as about the habitat trend and population size and trend is required. Establishing the exact host plant for the development of the larvae of the species is important. Introducing this species into the National list of protected species, as well as increasing the awareness about this species is crucial.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168084,149168074,Chrysotoxum vernale,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species does not meet the criteria for a threatened category in Europe or in the EU27 Member States. It is a widespread species, present in many habitats. There are no specific threats identified for this species; although it is regarded as Endangered in the UK, it has a marginal distribution in this country.

This species is in need of a taxonomic revision and in Iberia several similar species are known, and it has been confused with the recently described Chrysotoxum montanum.

","Chrysotoxum vernale occurs in forest (Betula, Fagus). It can also be recorded in Genista florida/Quercus pyrenaica maquis and unimproved grassland, including montane and alpine grassland (Speight 2018). Adults fly from May to June (August at high elevations) visiting flowers of white umbellifers; Caltha, Crataegus, Euphorbia, Helianthemum, Sorbus, Valeriana. The larva is undescribed (Speight 2018).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,

There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe.

,Unknown,"Chrysotoxum vernale occurs almost in all European countries from the south part of England eastwards through most of Europe into Asia, where it ranges almost to the Pacific (Speight 2018).

In Europe it has been recorded from Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Russia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation actions for this species.

Nonetheless, it is regarded as Near Threatened in the Belgian Province Flanders (https://www.inbo.be/en/search-flanders-red-lists) and the German region Bayern (Dunk et al. 2003), and as Endangered in the UK (Ball and Morris 2014). In Germany it is a widespread species (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). Further research into this species' life history - including studies of larval biology - is needed to propose effective conservation actions. Research is needed to fully resolve the taxonomy and distribution of this species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168097,149168092,Merodon calcaratus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN).


In Europe and the EU27, this species is distributed in Portugal (Van Eck 2016) and in Spain (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). In Portugal, the species prefers semi-arid, sandy calcareous grasslands with scattered Pinus pinea (Van Eck 2016). The adults visit flowers of Drimia maritima (Van Eck 2016).

Based on the small (16 km2) area of occupancy (AOO), with only three locations based on intensive tourism, overgrazing by livestock and fires as main threats, and a continuing decline of the habitat quality, this species is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU27 countries.

There is no rescue effect of subpopulations from outside of the assessment region. However, a lot of further research on this species is needed, especially on its biology and ecology.

 


","In Portugal, the species prefers semi-arid, sandy calcareous grasslands with scattered Pinus pinea (Van Eck 2016). The adults have been seen visiting flowers of Drimia maritima (Van Eck 2016). The flight period is at the end of September and October on the Iberian Peninsula, and in March and April in Algeria. The developmental stages are not described, but Van Eck (2016) provides circumstantial evidence suggesting that the larval host plant could be Scilla autumnalis (Speight 2020).","The intensification of tourism and overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020), as well as frequent threats from fires during hot and dry summers constantly increase the disturbance of the habitats.","The population trend is unknown. Besides North Africa, the species has been recorded from only four point localities in Western Europe (in Portugal and Spain).",Unknown,"In Europe and the EU27, this species is distributed in Portugal (Van Eck 2016) and in Spain (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

Outside of Europe, it also occurs in North Africa (in Algeria, Libya, Morocco, and Tunisia) (Radenković et al. 2011, Speight 2020).",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

Two point localities of this Mediterranean species belong to the Natura 2000 network because they are in the Sierra de Grazalema Natural Park and UNESCO Biosphere reserve. Although this area is protected, grazing by livestock is still intensive (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). The species would benefit from restricting this activity. Additional research on threats, taxonomy, biology, ecology, population size and trend, as well as the habitat trend, is required. In addition, the habitat and population trends should be monitored. Establishing the exact host plant for the development of the larvae is important. Introducing this species into the National list of protected species, as well as increasing the awareness about it is crucial.


",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168105,149168095,Chrysotoxum parmense,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Chyrsotoxum parmense is assessed as Endangered (EN) at European level (where its distribution is entirely within the EU27) due to relatively small AOO (20 km2), very low number of locations (4), severe fragmentation and continuing decline of the habitat quality is due to intensive and inadequate management of grasslands. The distribution of species is very disjunct and, where found, it seems to occur in low numbers. In addition, the species appears to be suffering a population decline at parts of its range, because the hoverfly fauna of certain locations has been surveyed intensively during the last years but C. parmense has only been found once.","Chrysotoxum parmense occurs in open areas in forests, also in unimproved grassland/grazed Mediterranean heath. In Spain this species occurs in open areas inside Quercus ilex forest and matorral/maquis woodland (M. Garcia pers. comm. 2020). Adults fly from May to July visiting flowers of umbellifers, Calamentha, Cistus, Euphorbia, Potentilla, Quercus ilex, Thymus. The larva is undescribed (Speight 2018).",Overgrazing may threaten C. parmense populations living in unimproved grasslands. The Spanish subpopulation is threatened by the encroachment of grassy clearings by scrub.,"There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe. The population is considered severely fragmented. Only seven specimens have been recorded so far in the Spanish Province Alicante (locality Font Roja) (Ricarte and Marcos Garcia 2017). The most recent specimens of C. parmense from Font Roja, Alicante were found in 1993/1994, even though hoverfly collecting has taken place after that. Only one specimen was recorded in Turkey (Vujić et al. 2017). In Italy and Greece only a few specimens of Chrysotoxum parmense have been recorded so far (Burgio, Sommagio and Birtele 2015, Vujić et al. 2017).",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from some mainly Mediterranean countries across a wide area: Italy (near Parma, type locality; Peck 1988), Spain (Alicante Province - most recent record from 1994), France (Midi-Pyrénées), and Crete (Greece) (Speight 2016). The Italian and French records are historical data and the most recent records are from Crete (Greece) and Spain. The species is quite conspicuous and easily recognizable and should appear in records if present, so it may genuinely have a highly disjunct range. The European area of occupancy, based on available locality records, is 20 km2.

The range of the species extends out of the European region to Anatolia (Turkey; Speight 2016), Lebanon and Israel, Iran and North Africa (Egypt), and has also been recorded from the Transcaucasus (Speight 2018).","This species is not treated or exploited commercially. Even though it has a potential use in pest control of its larval prey insects (which are unknown, but in related species include aphids) and crop pollination, the rarity of this species makes commercial exploitation difficult.",Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions for this species. In Spain C. parmense has been recorded in protected areas such as Font Roja natural park, in Alicante province, and further habitat protection is recommended. Further research into this species' life history - including studies of larval biology - is needed to propose effective conservation actions. Additional monitoring is needed to better understand population trends and impacts of threats.


",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168118,149168113,Brachypalpus valgus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Brachypalpus valgus
 is a European endemic species found across Europe, where it is rare in Poland, the Czech Republic and the Netherlands, but the most common species of the genus in southern Europe and Ukraine. It is localised and decreasing, due to the removal of old and over-mature trees. However, it is not considered to be threatened in Europe, and so is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27. To support this species, it is important to conserve the habitat of old Fagus and Quercus woods with overmature trees. There would also be the need to conserve old orchards and old trees in urban parks.","

The preferred environment of this species are old Fagus and Quercus forests with overmature trees; and according to Doczkal (pers. comm. 2020), it is also found in old cherry (Prunus) orchards with overmature trees in southern Germany. This hoverfly requires old trees, and so it is also found in parkland where those trees can be found.

Adults are, to a significant extent, arboreal, but also visits tree trunks and fallen trees in the sun in glades, etc., flying fast and very close to the surface of the timber, and settling on fallen trunks and stumps, or the trunks of living trees, in the sun; the female may be found investigating the trunk-base of old trees and the cut ends of felled timber. When visiting low-growing forest flowers (while the branches of the tree canopy are still bare of leaves), the males may settle on dead leaves in the sun. The male closely resembles a large, fast flying hive bee (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Apis mellifera). So the species could be more widespread than usually thought.

Flowers visited by this species include umbellifers, Anemone nemorosa, Crataegus spp., Euphorbia spp., Prunus mahaleb, P. spinosa, Ranunculus spp., male Salix spp., Scilla bifolia, Sorbus spp. and Tussilago spp.; the fly most frequently visits flowers at some height above the ground. The flight period of this species is from the beginning of April to the beginning of June. 

The larvae are described and figured by Dusek and Laska (1988), from larvae collected from a wet fissure in the trunk of Alnus glutinosa.  This species has also been reared from a trunk cavity if Quercus suber (J.-P. Sarthou pers. comm. 2020).

",This species is fairly adaptable and manages to use orchards and urban parks where there are old and over mature trees. Threats will therefore be forest management and the removal of old trees from orchards and urban parks.,"This hoverfly is the most rare species of Brachypalpus in the Czech Republic (Farkac et al. 2005), and it is also likely to be rare in Poland (Zoralski pers. comm. 2020) and possibly it occurs in the Netherlands and Belgium because it occurs just over the border in Germany and France (Bot and van de Meutter 2019). However, it is the most common Brachypalpus species in southern Europe and Ukraine. It is localised and it is considered to have a decreasing population trend, but the extent of this is unknown, as the species seems to be adaptable to human intrusions, having been found in town parks and orchards. Although the species can be difficult to identify, as it is a mainly arboreal bee mimic, it is not too difficult to find as it is known to visit flowers of certain tree species.",Decreasing,"

This species is endemic to Europe, where it is known from southern Norway and Sweden, although it is not recorded in Denmark. It is also found south to the Pyrenees and central Spain; northern France eastwards through central Europe, and in Ukraine to European parts of Russia (Speight 2020).

This species is mostly found in the lowlands. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 7.7 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2.6 million km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is around 4.3 million km2 and the AOO is around 1.2 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"To support this species, it is important to conserve the habitat of old Fagus and Quercus woods with overmature trees. There would also be the need to conserve old orchards and old trees in urban parks. However, there are no current conservation activities ongoing for the species. Research should be done on the biology, ecology and threats that influence subpopulations of the species. This species has been assessed as Vulnerable in the Czech Republic (Farkac et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168126,149168114,Merodon clunipes,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT). 

EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT). 

In Europe, the species is distributed in the Mediterranean, with more registered subpopulations in the eastern, and less in the western parts. Based on the small area of occupancy  (232 km2, below the thresholds) with about 13 locations (based on habitat degradation due to tourism, overgrazing by livestock and fires as the most plausible threats), and a continuing decline of the habitat quality, it is assessed as Near Threatened in Europe and the EU27, close to qualifying for Vulnerable. There is no rescue effect of subpopulations from outside of the assessment region. However, a lot of further research is needed on this species, especially about its biology, ecology, population size and trend.


","This species prefers coniferous and deciduous forests, such as Pinus forest, open areas in mesophilous Fagus and Eastern thermophilous oak forest, and Castanea forest (Vujić pers.comm. 2020, Speight 2020). The adults are known to visit Euphorbia spp. (Vujić et al. 2011) as well as flowers of Foeniculum vulgare, Smyrnium perfoliatum, and Ferula (Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is from May to September (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown (Speight 2020).","The intensification of tourism, overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020), as well as frequent threats from fires during hot and dry summers constantly increase the disturbance of the habitats.",The population trend is unknown. There are more subpopulations in the eastern Mediterranean than in the western parts.,Unknown,"This Mediterranean species is distributed in Spain, southern France, Italy (and Sicily), parts of the Balkans, Greece, Bulgaria, and Cyprus. In Europe and the EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 1,688,051 km2 , and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 232 km2.

This species also occurs in Turkey, Lebanon, Israel and Iran (Speight 2020, A. Vujić pers.comm. 2020).



",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

Some point localities of this species are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network, such as the Regional Park Sierra de Gredos in Spain, and the National Parks of Tzoumerka, Peristeri, Arachthos Gorge and Acheloos Valley and Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli Forest in Greece. Point localities in Peloponnesus and some point localities on the islands Chios, Samos and Lesvos belong to the Natura 2000 network.

The intensification of tourism, overgrazing by livestock, as well as frequent threats from fires during hot and dry summer constantly increase the disturbance of its habitats (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Taking this into consideration, continuous management of sites in protected areas is needed. Further research about possible threats, and on the biology and ecology of this species is needed. More monitoring of population and habitat trends is required, together with increasing awareness about this species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168139,149168135,Chrysotoxum octomaculatum,Near Threatened,,2021,2021-07-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

The area of occupancy of this species is below 500 km2 (448 km2) in Europe and 308 kmin the EU, but it has been recorded from a wide range of European countries. The fact that this species is catalogued under some threatened categories in parts of Europe suggests that different ongoing threats are affecting this otherwise widespread species, but details on specific threatening processes are not recorded. In the Iberian Peninsula, C. octomaculatum might be confused with similar species of uncertain taxonomic status, and the area of occupancy in this region might be overestimated (A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2021). The species does not appear to be common in south-eastern Europe (e.g. Serbia) (Z. Nedeljković pers. comm. 2021). The species does not qualify for a threatened category but it might do it in the future, so it is here regarded as Near Threatened (NT).","Chrysotoxum octomaculatum occurs in forests (both deciduous and coniferous) and in open areas (including dune scrub). Adults fly from May to September visiting flowers of white umbellifers and Erica. The larva of C. octomaculatum is unknown (Speight 2018), but is expected to be entomophagous in common with those of congeneric species.

",

Climate change and tourism may affect this species. Fires and logging may threaten C. octomaculatum subpopulations living in forests.

,"

There is no widespread information about population size and trend for this species in Europe.

Local population sizes for Chrysotoxum octomaculatum appears to be uneven within its European range. In southern Europe it appears to be abundant, while in northern Europe (Finland, Belgium, UK) it is rare (Hyvarinen et al. 2019, www.inbo.be/en/search-flanders-red-lists, Ball and Morris 2014). In Germany there are only old records for the states of Schleswig-Holstein (SH), Lower Saxony (NI), Brandenburg (BB), Bavaria (BY) and Baden-Württemberg (BW) and this species is considered to have become extinct in this region since the 1960s at the latest or possibly much earlier; it is likely to be still present in Hesse (HE) (last recorded in 1980) and in Berlin (BE), from which it has been recently recorded (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"In the European region, this species occurs from Britain (southern part of England) and the Netherlands south to the Mediterranean. It has an estimated area of occupancy of 436 km2 in Europe, and 308 km2 in the European Union.

In Europe it has been recorded from Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, Russia, Finland, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Montenegro, the Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and Ukraine.

Globally it is also present eastwards through central and southern Europe into southern parts of Russia as far as Armenia and Kazakhstan (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation actions for this species. However, it is regarded as critically endangered in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al 2005), regionally extinct in the Flanders Region in Belgium (https://www.inbo.be/en/search-flanders-red-lists), and Finland (Hyvarinen et al. 2019), endangered in the German region Bayern (Dunk et al 2003) and endangered in the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014). Further research into this species' life history - including studies of larval biology - is needed to propose effective conservation actions.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168147,149168137,Merodon crassifemoris,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT).

EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU).

The only known areas of this species are France, the Balkan Peninsula and Crimea (Ukraine). It is a forest species, whose habitats are largely under anthropogenic destruction. There is no rescue effect of subpopulations from outside of the assessment region. We propose the monitoring of population, as well as the habitat trend. Further research about the life history and ecology of this species is needed.

Based on the small area of occupancy (AOO), which is 68 km2, with about 13 locations based on habitat degradation (due to tourism, urbanisation and agriculture), and because of the continuing decline of the habitat quality, it is assessed as Near Threatened close to Vulnerable in Europe.

Based on the small area of occupancy (AOO), which is 40 km2, 10 locations, and a continuing decline of the habitat quality, this species is assessed as Vulnerable in the EU27 regional assessment.","The species prefers riparian forest vegetation of Populus and Salix, and also occurs within thermophilous oak scrub (Quercus iberica) and a more steppe vegetation of Tamarix (Hauser 1998, Speight 2020). The adults are known to visit flowers of Mentha and Ferula (Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period of adults is in June-July to August. The developmental stages and host plant have not been described (Speight 2020).","Possible threats are those that are likely to happen due to anthropogenic interference, such as agriculture, and urbanisation. In the Mediterranean area, increasing tourism is also a threat. Additionally, anthropogenic effects have threatened many of Crimea’s ecosystems. Primary habitats comprise only two to three percent of the territory of Crimea, including remnant forest and mountain meadows.","The population trend is unknown. The species has been recorded from one point locality in France, one in Crimea (Ukraine) and several on the Balkan Peninsula.",Unknown,"This species is distributed in southern France, parts of the Balkan Peninsula, Bulgaria, Romania, Greece, Turkey, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Georgia (Speight 2020, Mengual et al. 2020, A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 1,185,210 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 68 km2. In  EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 652,232 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 40 km2.


",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions targeting this species so far. In Serbia Merodon crassifemoris has been listed as strictly protected species. It is protected by national law Code of Regulations on the Declaration and Protection of Strictly Protected and Protected Wild Species of Plants, Animals and Fungi (Official Gazette of RS, No. 5/2010, 47/2011, 32/2016 and 98/2016). It has been also listed in the Red Book of Ukraine as an Endangered species (Акімова 2009).

Some point localities are near protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network, such as between the Prespa and Ohrid lakes in North Macedonia, which are close to the National Parks Galičica and Prespa. The point locality in France is in the Regional Park Monts d'Ardèche, while the point locality in Romania as well as some in Greece are within the Natura 2000 network. In addition, one point locality in Crimea is designated as a centre of floristic diversity by IUCN. Further research about population size, threats and ecology of this species is needed. More monitoring of population and habitat trends is required, as well as increasing awareness about this species. The growing levels of urbanisation, agriculture and tourism cause disturbance of its habitats, so continuous management of sites in protected areas is needed.


",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168159,149168155,Chrysotoxum montanum,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-01-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Near Threatened for Europe due to its relatively restricted area of occupancy (AOO) of 156 km2, the low number of locations (12), and a continuing decline in habitat quality. At the EU 27 Member States level, it is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) due to relatively restricted AOO (12 km2), and very low number of locations (only three known locations). Infrastructure development and, to some extent, overgrazing and fires are causing habitat destruction and threatening this species.

",This species has been found with other Chrysotoxum species in the grassy edges of conifer forests at high elevations. It flies from early May to late August. There are no data on flowers visited by adults. The larval biology is unknown (Nedeljković et al. 2015).,"Loss of habitat quality caused by climate change, intense overgrazing and other anthropocentric activities (e.g. agriculture, change of land use particularly from infrastructure development) are potential threats to this species. There is however no published scientific information to document whether these processes are presently affecting the species.","The population seems to be stable on the Balkan Peninsula (there are a lot of specimens collected in the periods 1984-1986 and 2012-2016). Data from Austria and Italy are scarce, possibly because of sporadic collecting.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from records on high mountains in central and south Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, mainland Greece, the Alpine part of Italy and Austria (Nedeljković et al. 2015). Records of this species from the western Alps in eastern France (Champagny-en-Vanoise, Tinée and haut Verdon; Cavaillès 2020) require confirmation based on examination of specimens. Its confirmed area of occupancy is estimated at 156 km2.

Out of the European region, the species has been recorded from Anatolia, Turkey (Vujić et al. 2017).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in pest control of the larval prey insects (which are unknown, but related species feed on aphids) and in crop pollination due to its larval trophic habits and behaviour of adults, respectively.",Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions for this species. Chrysotoxum montanum occurs in many protected areas in Serbia including National Parks (Kopaonik NP), Landscapes of Exceptional Features (Vlasina) and Nature Reserves (Golija). In Montenegro, this species is also present in Durmitor National Park. Its mapped range in Italy, Austria, and Greece overlaps Natura 2000 sites, however occurrence within these requires confirmation. However, it would be necessary to monitor human activities in these protected areas in order to avoid damage in the habitats of this species, which appears to depend at some extent on conifer forest at high altitudes.

Further research into this species' life history - including studies of larval biology - is needed to propose effective conservation actions. Additional monitoring is needed to better understand the population trends and impacts of threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168167,149168157,Merodon chalybeus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC).  

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC). 

The range of Merodon chalybeus occupied only Spain, Portugal and North Africa (J. Ačanski pers. comm. 2021). Previous research suggested that this species is distributed in Portugal, Spain, South France, Mediterranean region of the Balkans and Greece, as well as Corsica and Morocco (Speight 2020).

Although the area of occupancy (AOO) is below the thresholds for threatened categories (128 km2), a high number of locations (20) and large extent of occurrence (EOO) were recorded.  The number of locations is based on habitat degradation (due to tourism, overgrazing by livestock and fires) as the most plausible threat. A continuous decline in the quality of habitat due to tourism, overgrazing and fire has been observed. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe. However, a lot further research about this species is needed, especially on its biology and ecology.


","

The species prefers open ground in forest, as well as open areas in evergreen oak maquis and more open, almost bare ground in semi-arid conditions. It also inhabits Mediterranean oak dehesa, with Quercus rotundifolia and Quercus pyrenaica as the dominant tree species (Ricarte et al. 2018). The adults fly from April to September. The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Speight 2020). 

","The potential threats are intensive tourism, overgrazing by livestock and fires (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).",The population trend is unknown. The species has been recorded from six point localities in Portugal and from more than 20 in the whole of Spain except the eastern part.,Unknown,"

The confirmed range of Merodon chalybeus occupies only Spain, Portugal and North Africa (J. Ačanski pers. comm. 2021). 

Previous research suggested that this species was distributed in Portugal, Spain, South France, Mediterranean region of the Balkans and Greece, as well as Corsica and Morocco (Speight 2020). It appeared in much of the older literature under the name Merodon spicatus Becker 1907, designated a junior synonym of Merodon chalybeus by Marcos-García et al. (2007). The range of Merodon minutus Strobl, 1893 (Corsica, Mediterranean region of the Balkans, Greece, Morocco) overlaps with M. chalybeus, although this requires additional checks (Speight 2020). The two species are morphologically very similar and can be easily mistaken.

",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"About 80% of the point localities of this species occur within the Natura 2000 network, and some from the Natural Parks Grazalema and Del Estrecho in Spain, and Natural Park Vale Do Guadiana in Portugal. Although these areas are protected, grazing by livestock and tourist pressures are still intense (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Therefore, the species would benefit from restrictions of these activities. Additional research about the possible threats, biology and ecology, population size and trend, as well as the habitat trend, is required. Establishing the exact host plant for the development of the larvae is important, as is monitoring the population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168182,149168177,Chrysotoxum intermedium,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species as we understand at present is listed as Least Concern (LC) in Pan-Europe and EU27, but taxonomic research is needed to establish the number of taxa within this species complex and their associated distributions.","C. intermedium sensu lato is found in open areas inside Fagus forests, but also in evergreen oak forest (Quercus coccifera, Quercus ilex and Q. suber), maquis and garrigue in the Mediterranean zone. Additionally it occurs in open habitats and olive orchards (Speight 2018). The larva is undescribed.",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,"Animals referred to under this name are found in high numbers during its flight period in different countries, but the population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"The geographic range of C. intermedium is uncertain because there is still an unresolved complex of species under this species name (Speight 2018, Nedeljković et al. in prep.). Nonetheless, the name C. intermedium has been used in many countries of Europe and Africa to refer to Chrysotoxum hoverflies with a specific morphology (Van Veen 2004, Speight et al. 2016), suggesting that the name may apply to a genuinely widespread species.

European records provisionally accepted here are known from Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czechia, Russia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Malta, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Switzerland and Gibraltar.","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,There are no conservation actions for Chrysotoxum intermedium in Europe. To define conservation actions for a taxonomically-unresolved species is not feasible. Taxonomic research is needed to establish the number of taxa within this species complex and their associated distributions.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168190,149168179,Merodon atratus,Near Threatened,"B2ab(i,iii)",2021,2020-04-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This species is endemic to Europe, where its distribution is restricted to the Alps. It is a high montane species, and its habitats are threatened by urbanisation (spreading settlements), traffic (road networks), tourism, unsustainable farming and agriculture and climate change. We propose the monitoring of the population, as well as the habitat trend. Further research on the life history and ecology of this species is needed.

Based on the small area of occupancy (124 km2, which is below the threshold for threatened categories) with about 14 locations (based on climate change as the main threat) and a continuing decline of the habitat quality due to climate change and anthropogenic interference, it is assessed as Near Threatened, close to Vulnerable.","This high mountain species prefers unimproved montane and subalpine, non-calcareous grasslands up to around 3,000 m altitude. Adults are known to visit flowers of yellow Asteraceae, Achillea, Potentilla and Senecio (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The flight period is between mid-June and mid-August. The immature stages and the host plant are unknown (Speight 2020).","

Habitat loss and fragmentation are the major threats to alpine biodiversity. Urbanisation (spreading settlements), traffic (road networks), tourism, unsustainable farming and unsustainable agriculture are the most plausible threats. In addition, climate change also threatens the species, because its range would be greatly reduced (up to 99.66%) by 2070 under the RCP 8.5 emission scenario using species distribution modelling (Milić et al. 2019).

",The population size and trend is unknown. There are several known subpopulations in the Alps.,Unknown,"The range of this European endemic species is restricted to the Alps in France, Switzerland, Austria and Italy (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 77,015 km2, and the known area of occupancy (AOO) is 124 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions targeting this species so far. Some localities in the Alps are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and Natura 2000 network, such as the Hohe Tauern National Park in Austria, National Parks Ecrins and Vanoise in France, and Val Müstair Nature Park in Switzerland. Increasing awareness about this species is important. Further research about its population size, threats and ecology is needed. More monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required. Because of the vulnerability of Alpine ecosystems, sites and habitats of this species outside the protected areas should also be protected.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168205,149168198,Chrysotoxum festivum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) at the regional/EU27 level due to its large extent of occurrence and its large number of locations. It is a widespread species, present in many habitats. There are no major specific threats identified for this species.

","Chrysotoxum festivum occurs in grassland with scrub, in forest, and in open ground (Speight 2018). Flight period from May to September. Adults visit flowers of white umbellifers, Calluna, Chaerophyllum, Cirsium arvense, Euphorbia, Galium, Hieracium, Hypochoeris, Narthecium, Origanum, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus, Rosa rugosa, Rubus idaeus, Sambucus nigra, Senecio, Solidago canadensis, and S. virgaurea. The larva is apparently associated with Lasius niger ants in Corylus/Prunus shrubs (Speight 1976).","

Apart from habitat destruction, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

",

There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe.

,Unknown,"Within the European region, this species occurs from Scandinavia to the Iberian Peninsula on the south, and from Ireland eastwards through much of Europe into Turkey and European part of Russia. Outside Europe, this species occurs in Siberia and Pacific Coast, India and Japan (Speight 2018).

European records are known from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Russia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine and the United Kingdom.","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.

",Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation actions for this species. Chrysotoxum festivum is listed as Vulnerable in Belgium (https://www.inbo.be/en/search-flanders-red-lists). 

Chrysotoxum festivum occurs in many protected areas, and no particular conservation measures are needed either in Europe as a whole or the EU. Research is needed to clarify this species' distribution following recent work clarifying its identity.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168213,149168203,Merodon analis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This European endemic species is distributed in the continental part of Central Europe and on the Balkan Peninsula. It is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU27 Member States because while the area of occupancy (AOO) is small (308 km2), the extent of occurrence (EOO) (767,702 km2) and the locations (60) are above the thresholds for the threatened categories. The number of locations is based on the possible degradation of its habitat due to logging, tourism and agriculture, which can be a threat for this endemic species. Further research on this species is needed, especially on its biology and ecology, population size and trend.

","The habitats cited by Speight (2020) for Merodon constans are also suitable for Merodon analis, because the continental populations of Merodon constans have been recently recognized as a separate species under the name of Merodon analis. The adults prefer forest and open ground, open grassy areas in, or adjacent to alluvial hardwood forests, or Quercus and Carpinus forests, as well as grassy open areas within humid Fagus or Abies forests. The adults visit flowers of white Apiaceae, Eryngium and Scabiosa. The immature stages are not described and the host plant is unknown. The flight period is from June to early September (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020).","The possible threats are likely caused by anthropogenic interference, for instance tourism, logging and agriculture.","The population trend is unknown. In Europe and the EU 27, this endemic species has been recorded in the continental parts of several countries in central Europe, including northern Italy and most of the Balkan Peninsula. There are several point localities in Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy and Slovenia, and about 20 point localities in Serbia (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020)",Unknown,"This European endemic species occurs from western to central Europe, including eastern and southeastern France, northern Italy, southern Germany, Austria, southern Czechia, and most of the Balkan Peninsula (Vujić et al. 2020). The southern-most record is in Serbia on the border with North Macedonia, and presence in North Macedonia is possible. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is 767,702 km2 and the known area of occupancy (AOO) is 308 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

Some point localities of this species are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network, such as the Plitvice Lakes National Park in Croatia, Podyji National Park in the Czech Republic, and National Parks Fruška gora and Kopaonik in Serbia. Increasing tourism, logging and agriculture constantly degrade forests and grasslands, and disturb the habitats. Increasing awareness about this species is very important. Further research is needed about its biology and ecology, as well as possible threats. Further monitoring of population and habitat trends is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168224,149168221,Chrysotoxum elegans,Near Threatened,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2020-02-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This species is Near Threatened due to relatively restricted area of occupancy (816 km2) and reports of local decline and extinctions over most of its European range (Speight 2018). The species may however be more widespread and abundant than presently known, and the scarcity of records from much of mainland Europe may be due to historical confusion with other species.

On the EU27, the assessment for C. elegans is similar, with low AOO (208 km2) and a significant retraction of its population and habitat, mainly in the northern part of Europe (Denmark, Belgium, Germany, Ireland).

","Chrysotoxum elegans inhabits deciduous forest/open ground, mesophilous/thermophilous deciduous forest and dry, unimproved grassland with scrub, on well-drained sites. This species can also be found in some types of heathland (Speight 2018). It flies from May to August, with occasional specimens found in September. Adults visit flowers of white umbellifers, Origanum, and Ranunculus (Speight 2018). The larva is suspectd to be aphidophagous (Dušek and Láska 1962, Speight 2018).","

Chrysotoxum elegans seems to be disappearing rapidly from much of its European range, along with its primary habitat: ancient, unimproved pasture with patches of scrub woodland (Speight 2018). Land use change may impact the species, particularly if grazing by livestock becomes either too intensive or absent.

","

There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe. However, in England it is regarded as ""Nationally Scarce"" (Ball and Morris 2013). In the Balkans and Iberian Peninsula this species appear to have a stable population (Nedeljković et al. 2013).

",Stable,"Chrysotoxum elegans occurs from Sweden to Spain, but it is absent from Norway and Finland. It is also present through central and southern Europe into European parts of Russia (Speight 2018). In the UK, C. elegans is reported from southern England and south Wales (Ball et al. 2011). The estimated area of occupancy based on confirmed records is 816 km2 (208 km2 in the EU), but is likely to be an underestimate.

The mainland European range of this species is unclear due to its morphological similarity to, and subsequent confusion with, Chrysotoxum festivum (Nedeljković et al. 2013); records treated as confirmed here are known from Sweden, the United Kingdom, France, Belgium, Spain, Andorra, Portugal, Germany, Austria, Czechia, Hungary, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Bulgaria, Greece, Albania, Italy, Ukraine and European Russia.

Out of the European region, the species range extends as far as the Caucasus Mountains and into Turkey (Speight 2018). Its extralimital range, if any, is unknown, as the species with which it has been confused ranges widely in the Palearctic: Nedeljković et al. (2013) studied only European records, and the species is regarded as being endemic to Europe and the immediately adjacent Mediterranean for the purposes of this assessment.","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its preys, which are aphids.

",Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions in place for C. elegans. It is listed in England as ""Nationally Scarce"" (Ball and Morris 2013), as Critically Endangered in the National Red List of the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005), Regionally Extinct in the Belgian Region Flanders (https://www.inbo.be/en/search-flanders-red-lists), and very endangered with extinction in the German provinces of Baden-Wurtemberg (Doczkal et al. 2001) and Bayern (Dunk et al. 2003). In Greece, this species is found within Pindos National Park (Likov 2018). Additional monitoring is needed to better understand the population trends and impacts of threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168233,149168223,Merodon balkanicus,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

This species is endemic to Europe, where it is known from two locations in the Balkan Mountains in Serbia and from one location in the Rila-Rhodope Massif in Bulgaria. It is a high mountain species, and its habitats are largely under threat by intensive tourism development and climate change. We propose monitoring of population, as well as the habitat trend. Further research on the life history and ecology of this species is needed.

The area of occupancy (AOO) is 12 km2 in Europe and 4 km2 in the EU27 countries, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 191 km2 in Europe and not estimated for the EU27 countries (as it is known form just two point localities in this region). Both of them are below the thresholds for threatened categories. Based on the small geographic range of the species, with only two-three locations (one in the EU27 countries) based on the intensive tourism and climate change, it is assessed as Endangered (EN B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii)) in Europe and Critically Endangered (CR B2ab(iii)) in the EU27 regional assessment.

","The species is known from montane and subalpine unimproved grasslands, from 1,400 to 2,000 m altitude. The flight period is during July. The developmental stages are not described (Šašić et al. 2016, Speight 2020). The host plant is unknown.","This species is threatened by habitat degradation, primary due to intensive tourism (ski centres), but also because of overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020), fires and mini-hydropower plants (on the mountain in Stara Planina in Serbia). There is also intensive tourism at the Belmeken High Mountain Sports Complex, between Rhodope Mountain and Rila Mountain, close to Rila National Park and Belmeken Dam in Bulgaria. According to species distribution modelling, Merodon balkanicus is likely to become extinct by 2070 (under the RCP 8.5 emission scenario) or will only remain in small patches in the Alps (under the RCP 4.5 emission scenario) (Milić et al. 2019).",The population trend is unknown. There are three known subpopulations on two mountains in Serbia and Bulgaria.,Unknown,"This European species is endemic to the Stara Planina (two localities in the Serbian part of the Balkan mountain range) and to the Rila-Rhodope Massif (one point locality in Bulgaria) (Šašić et al. 2016, Speight 2020). The records are from 1912 (in Bulgaria), and from 2011 and 2013 (in Serbia). Although the record from Bulgaria is old, it is expected that the species is extant there. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 191 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 12 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"The locality in Bulgaria belongs to the Rila National Park and Natura 2000 network, while the two localities from mountain Stara Planina in Serbia belong to a Nature Park. For Bulgaria, species-specific surveys would be needed to determine if the species is still present. For Serbia, monitoring the population and habitat trend is required. Measures to mitigate the impact of expanding the ski centre are also needed. Introducing this species into the National lists of protected species is very important, as well as increasing the awareness about the importance of this endemic species. Further investigation of the biology and ecology of this species is also needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168252,149168241,Chrysotoxum cisalpinum,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-01-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This species is regarded as Vulnerable due to area of occupancy below 500 km(68), number of locations where is recorded (9), and an estimated decline of the habitat quality. The low number of records for this species (only 30 specimens known in entomological collections from all its range) and apparent threats for its populations in the Mediterranean lead to the consideration of this species as Vulnerable, despite the very large extent of occurrence. In the assessment for the EU27 this species also qualifies for Vulnerable, since all known locations in Europe belong to the EU27.

","The preferred habitats of C. cisalpinum are dry montane grassland in the mesophilous Fagus zone of southern European mountain ranges; open, grassy areas along seasonal streams and rivers in karstic, thermophilous Quercus forest; and thermophilous forest fringes. Adults fly from May to October, visiting flowers of Euphorbia and yellow composites (Speight 2018). The larva is undescribed, but suspected to be entomophagous.","

Apart from the general threats to biodiversity, infrastructure (e.g., housing and roads) development in touristic locations may threaten subpopulations of C. cisalpinum in Corsica, Sardinia and Sicily. Another threat is the encroachment of scrublands in Mediterranean ecosystems that may contribute to the disappearance of grassy clearings and grassland patches where this species lives, for example in Spain.

","For this species, there are around 30 specimens known in collections. Most specimens are reported from Greece (from 1976 to 2017) and Spain (from 1930 to 2018), four from Corsica (in 2017), and two from Sardinia (in 2017). In Greece, C. cisalpinum was recorded from Peloponnese in 1976, 1984, 2016, and 2019, and from Epyrus in 1994 and 1995. Records from Corsica and Sardinia are relatively recent (2016 and 2017) (FSUNS database). The European subpopulations of this species are restricted to the Mediterranean region, where it appears to occur in low numbers. There is no information about population trends in Europe.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species has been recorded from ten localities (representing 9 locations) in central  and southeastern (van Steenis et al. 2020) Spain, mainland Italy, Sicily, Sardinia, mainland France, Corsica (Durand et al. 2004), and Greece (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Ricarte et al. 2018). It has an estimated area of occupancy of 68 km2.

Out of the European region, the species has been recorded from Transcaucasia, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan (Peck 1988, Mengual 2020).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,

There are no specific conservation actions for this species. Further research into this species' life history - including studies of larval biology - is needed to propose effective conservation actions.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168262,149168258,Merodon bessarabicus,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This species is assessed as Near Threatened on European and EU27 level because while it has a relatively restricted area of occurrence (AOO) (96 km2 on regional level and 72 km2 in the EU27), its extent of occurrence (EOO) is large (337,300 km2 on regional level and 337,300 km2 in the EU27), and its relatively small number of locations are just above the threshold for threatened categories (18 on regional level and 13 in the EU27 countries). The number of locations is based on logging as the major threat. Besides logging, overgrazing by livestock and infrastructure development are causing habitat destruction and threatening this species. There is no rescue effect from subpopulations outside of the assessment region.","

This species prefers conifer forests, grassy areas in Abies forests (Vujić et al. 2011), glades in eastern thermophilous Quercus forests, and mesophilous Fagus and Quercus frainetto forests (Vujić et al. 2020.). The adults fly fast and low over ground vegetation in sun-lit glades within the forests, settling on the ground or on low-growing vegetation in the sun. Around the middle of the day, they visit stream margins to drink, alighting under concealing vegetation or jumbles of interlacing fallen branches or twigs. The females investigate white hand-nets and can be collected easily while doing so (Speight 2020). They are known to visit flowers of Euphorbia spp (Vujić et al. 2011), yellow Asteraceae and Polygonum (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is in September (Speight 2020). The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown.

","Logging can be considered as the major threat to the habitat of this species. Other threats include overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020) and infrastructure development (tourism, urbanization and road infrastructure).","There is no information about the population trend. A total of 187 specimens have been collected throughout the entire species range. The oldest record is from Croatia in 1955, and that is the only specimen collected in that country. The majority of records from other countries are recent.",Unknown,"This species is distributed on the Balkan peninsula, in Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, North Macedonia, Serbia and Slovenia (Speight 2020).

Outside of Europe it is found in Turkey (Speight 2020).

In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be 337,300 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 96 km2. In the EU 27, extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be 337300 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 72 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions known targeting this species. Some of the point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. All three point localities in Serbia are within protected areas. Additional research on its ecology and population trend, as well as on possible threats is needed. Since the record from Croatia is old, finding new specimens should be attempted. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required. Awareness should be raised about the importance of this species, and areas where this species occur should be managed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168273,149168270,Chrysotoxum cautum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Although C. cautum is possibly extinct (or recorded in error) in Ireland (Speight 2008), decreasing in England (Ball and Morris 2014) and Regionally Extinct in Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), these areas represent the northern edge of its range and its extent of occurrence is high both Europe and the EU27 (5,465,881/5,431,256 kmrespectively). Although as presently understood the area of occupancy is below 2,000 km2, it is thought that it may be undersampled in part of its range and a high number of locations has been recorded for this species. For example, in France, it occurs in most departments (Speight et al. 2020) and, in Spain, it is present in the north, centre and south-east (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017). Thus, this species is listed as Least Concern (LC) for both Pan Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","Chrysotoxum cautum occurs in deciduous forest and scrub; unimproved grassland and slightly-grazed grassland which has not been subject to ploughing or tillage (Speight 2018). Adults fly from May to July, and also April in southern Europe. They visit flowers of white umbellifers, yellow composites, Allium ursinum, Caltha, Cornus, Crataegus, Euonymus, Euphorbia, Frangula alnus, Geranium, Plantago, Ranunculus, Rhamnus catharticus, Rubus, and  Sorbus aucuparia. The larva is undescribed (Speight 2018), but expected to be entomophagous.","Overgrazing and inappropriate mowing (too intensive mowing or neglected mowing) can threaten C. cautum subpopulations living in unimproved grasslands. Any other threats negatively influencing the habitats of C. cautum in countries where it is very rare (e.g, Ireland) should also be identified and regarded as relevant to the status of this species in Europe, however its scarcity in these areas may simply reflect natural rarity at its northern range limits.
","

The population size and trend for this species are not well understood in Europe. Local population sizes for Chrysotoxum cautum appears to be uneven within its European range. For example, in the Czech Republic, northern Spain and Serbia, it appears to be abundant (Nedeljković 2011, Ricarte et al. 2014, Jiří Hadrava in litt.), while in Ireland and Finland it is extremely rare and may be extinct (Speight and Nash 1993, Speight 2008, Hyvärinen et al. 2019). In the UK, the southern English subpopulation appears to be declining (Ball and Morris 2014). It might just be that C. cautum is rare in the northern edge of its range (Great Britain, Scandinavia, etc).

",Unknown,"In the European region, this species occurs from Finland west and south to Great Britain (Wales and the southern half of England), the Pyrenees and Spain, and east across European Russia (Speight 2018).

In Europe it has been recorded from Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, Denmark, Russia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine and the United Kingdom. In Ireland, the species is either possibly extinct or was recorded in error. In Finland it is considered Regionally Extinct.

The range extends eastwards out of the European region through Asian Russia as far as Mongolia (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its preys, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions for this species. However, the species is regarded as Regionally Extinct in the Red List of Finnish species (Hyvärinen et al. 2019). Further research into this species' life history - including studies of larval biology - is needed to propose effective conservation actions. The use of inappropriate land management practices in unimproved grassland should be discouraged in order to benefit this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168283,149168281,Merodon caerulescens,Vulnerable,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"The species is endemic to Rhodes in the Eastern Aegean, Greece. The habitats of this Mediterranean species are largely under destruction by overgrazing by livestock, which is the main plausible threat. We propose the monitoring of population, as well as the habitat trend. Further research on life history and ecology of this species is needed.

Based on the small geographic range of the species (the area of occupancy is 60 km2 and the extent of occurrence is 914 km2, both of them are below the thresholds for threatened categories) with nine locations (based on the threat of overgrazing), and the continuing decline of the habitat quality, it is assessed as Vulnerable.

","The species prefers open grassy areas in pine forests or Mediterranean scrub. The adults appear during March and April. The adults are known to visit flowers of Anthemis chia L. The developmental stages have not been described (Šašić Zorić et al. 2018, Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020).","The main threat is overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). In addition, tourism, fire and soil erosion can also negatively affect the species.","The population trend is unknown. Until now, ten subpopulations have been recorded throughout the island of Rhodes in Greece.",Unknown,"This speceis is endemic to Europe, with the only confirmed records from the Greek Aegean island of Rhodes (Vujić et al. 2020). Records from Crete belong to a new species Merodon atricapillatus Šašić, Ačanski et Vujić (Šašić Zorić et al. 2018). The record from Speight (2020) for southern Bulgaria is not confirmed. The confirmed records date from 1968 to 2012.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 914 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 60 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"Most of the recorded subpopulations occur in the Natura 2000 network. Although this area is protected, grazing by livestock is still intensive (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). The species would benefit from restrictions of this activity. Additional research on its biology, ecology, population size and trend, as well as the habitat trend, is required, and the population and habitat trends should be monitored. Establishing the exact host plant for the development of the larvae of the species is important. Introducing this species into the National list of protected species, as well as increasing the awareness about this endemic species is crucial.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149168295,149168292,Baccha elongata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in either Europe or the EU27. It is a widespread species, present in many habitats, and with large populations in most countries where recorded. There are no specific threats identified for this species. Therefore, this species is regarded as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27.

","Baccha elongata occurs in forests, both coniferous and deciduous, both young and old; also in scrub woodland, hedgerows and suburban gardens. Adults fly from April to June and from July to September/October, visiting flowers of different species of Compositae, Rosaceae, Umbelliferae, Hedera, etc (Speight 2018). The larva is aphidophagous (Rotheray 1994).","

Apart from general threats to biodiversity, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.


",

There is no information about population trends for this species.

,Unknown,"This species is widespread in Europe, occurring from Scandinavia to the Mediterranean. It is present from central Spain eastwards to Greece and from Ireland eastwards into European parts of Russia. This species is also known to occur in the Azores (Speight 2018). The species is known from Andorra, Austria, Belgium; Russia, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania; Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

Outside Europe, its distribution ranges into North America.","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey, which include aphids (Rojo et al. 2003).",Terrestrial,There are no specific conservation actions for this species. Research is required into the taxonomy of Baccha species.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168315,149168313,Xylota tarda,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Xylota tarda
is a widespread species, found across Europe. It has a large area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO). The current population trend is considered to be stable, and although this species may be impacted by anthropogenic activities locally, overall there are no major threats impacting the European population. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. There are no conservation measures required at the moment, but further research on the population, habitat and ecology of this species is recommended.","

This species is found deciduous forest, Quercus forests (including thermophilous Quercus forest of Q. pubescens), alluvial forest with overmature Populus, brook-floodplain forest and other riparian forests with Populus tremula and Populus plantations (Speight 2017, 2020).

Adults are usually seen in scrub woodland, or open forest with patches of dense scrub, but nearly always on old forest sites; running on foliage of bushes, Rubus etc. at tracksides and edges of clearings and on bare ground. They fly through scrub vegetation at one to three meters from the ground (Speight 2017, 2020).

Flowers visited by this hoverfly include Calluna vulgaris, Leontodon, Potentilla, Ranunculus, Sambucus, Ranunculus acer (Zimina 1957) and Chamaenerion angustifolium (Pestov 2007).

The flight period is from May to August, with a peak at the beginning of July. 

The larvae are described and figured by Rotheray (1991), from larvae collected from a sap run at the base of the trunk of Populus tremula. Rotheray (1994) illustrates the larva in colour. Krivosheina (2001) records rearing of this species from larvae collected in rotting wood of Fagus.

","Although this species may be impacted locally by agriculture, deforestation, urbanisation and logging, this is a widespread species throughout its range and it is not under any direct pressure.","This is a widespread species, comparable with a big part of the distribution on European mainland of Xylota segnis (which it resembles) but this species is less conspicuous. There is no direct information about the European population size but the population trend is considered to be stable in both Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"

This species is known from northern Fennoscandia, south to Spain, from northern Italy (Apennines) and Slovenia, from Ireland eastwards through central Europe into European parts of Russia, the Caucasus and through Asia to the Pacific coast (Kuril islands) (Speight 2020). It is not found on the islands of the Mediterranean or the Canary Islands.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 9 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 3.6 million km2

For the EU 27 countries the estimated EOO is around 5.7 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 1.8 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are now known conservation actions in place for this species, but it is not considered to be needed at the moment. The species is widespread and probably also occurs in National Parks and nature reserves. More research needed on habitat, population trends and species biology/ecology. In the Czech Republic the species was assessed as Vulnerable (VU) (Farkac et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168326,149168323,Merodon cinereus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This European endemic high mountain species is distributed in the Alps (in France, Austria, Switzerland, Italy, Liechtenstein, and Slovenia). It prefers open ground, from the Picea zone up to 2,500 metres, in unimproved calcareous and non-calcareous montane and alpine grasslands. The adults visit flowers of white Apiaceae; Asteraceae, Euphrasia and Thymus.

The area of occupancy (AOO) is below the threshold (484 km2) for the Endangered category, however, numerous locations were estimated, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is above the threshold for threatened categories, and it is assessed as Least Concern both globally and for the EU Member States. For this Alpine species, the continuing decline in the quality of the habitat due to anthropogenic interference (deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanisation, tourism) can be the main threat.

Further research on this species is needed, especially on its biology and ecology, population size and trend.

","This species prefers open ground, from the Picea zone up to 2,500 metres, in unimproved calcareous and non-calcareous montane and alpine grasslands. The adults are known to visit flowers of white Apiaceae, and also Asteraceae, Euphrasia and Thymus. The flight period is from June to August. The developmental stages are not described, but they are very probably associated with spring-flowering Crocus (Speight 2020).","Habitat loss and fragmentation are the major threats to Alpine biodiversity. The most plausible threats are urbanisation (spreading settlements), traffic (road networks), tourism, unsustainable farming and agriculture.",The population trend is unknown. There are many subpopulations across the Alps.,Unknown,"This European endemic high-mountain species is distributed in the Alps (in France, Austria, Switzerland, Italy, Liechtenstein and Slovenia). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 186,148 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 484 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions targeting this species so far. Some point localities in the Alps are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network. These are, in France, Natural Regional Parks of Queyras, Préalpes d'Azur and Baronnies provençales, National Park Mercantour, Vanoise and Ecrins; in Italy, National Park Gran Paradiso and Val Grande, Nature Park Rieserferner-Ahrn; in Switzerland, Val Müstair Nature Park with two UNESCO awards and Nature Park Ela; in Austria, Biosphere Reserve Nockberge; in Slovenia, National Park Triglav. Further research about the population size, threats and ecology of this species is needed. More monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required. Because of the vulnerability of Alpine ecosystems, sites and habitats of this species outside protected areas should also be protected.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168337,149168334,Xylota segnis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The Orange-belted Hoverfly (Xylota segnis) is a widespread, common species found across Europe, with the exception of the very high north. The current population trend is considered to be increasing, and the species is adaptable, having been found in man made environments. There are no major threats to this hoverfly across its European range as a whole. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. Although no conservation measures are required at present, further research on the population, habitat and potential threats to this species is recommended.","

This species is found in most types of coniferous and deciduous forest. It is an anthropophilic species, also found away from woodland in hedgerows and suburban gardens. Adults have been seen running on foliage of bushes and shrubs; on ground beside logs and tree stumps, on felled or fallen trunks and on stumps of both deciduous and coniferous trees (Speight 2017, 2020).

The hoverfly is known to visit the flowers of umbellifers, Corylus, Crataegus, Hedera, Heracleum, Solidago virgaurea, Sorbus aucuparia, Tilia, Viburnum opulusAchillea millefolium, Anethum graveolens, Chamaenerion angustifolium, Geranium sylvaticum, Hieracium umbellatum, Ranunculus repens, Rosa acicularis, Rumex acetosella, Lonicera, Dactylorhiza fuchsii (Pestov 2007), Ribes rubrum (Bagachanova 1987) and Tilia cordata (Zimina 1957). De Buck (1985) has established that the species collects appreciable quantities of pollen from the surfaces of leaves and may also ingest pollen grains from the faeces of other syrphids. The detailed observations made by Rotheray (2019), of the actions of specimens whilst on the flowers of a Ranunculus species, indicated that the insect was collecting pollen grains from the surface of the petals, but not from the stamens, and that the nectaries were ignored. 

The flight period of this species is from May to September, with a peak in June, and occasionally in April (March/April in southern Europe) and may persist to November. 

The larvae are described and figured by Hartley (1961), and they may be found under bark of rotten stumps, trunks and logs of both deciduous trees and conifers, in damp rot-holes and sap-runs on living trees and in various rotting plant debris, for example, wet, decomposing silage, wet, rotting sawdust, rotting potatoes. It would appear that the larvae can also, on occasion, make use of the remains of rotting mammalian cadavers as food (Moffat 2013). Rotheray (1994) illustrates the larva in colour. A coloured photo of the puparium is given in Dussaix (2013), who confirms that the larva overwinters and reports 20 days as the duration of the puparial phase.

",There are no major threats to this species impacting the European population as a whole.,"This is an extremely widespread species throughout Europe, and the current population trend is considered to be increasing.",Increasing,"

This species is found throughout Europe, apart from in the extreme north. It is also found in North Africa, the Caucasus, through Eurasia to the Pacific coast and Japan, and in eastern parts of North America (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 20 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 8 million km2.

For the EU27 countries the estimated EOO is around 13 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 3 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation measures required for this species at the moment. However, further research and monitoring of population trends, threats and the habitat would be beneficial.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168347,149168345,Merodon confusus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This is a western Mediterranean endemic species. Its habitats are largely under destruction by overgrazing, tourism, cork extraction and fires. Based on the small area of occupancy (AOO), which is 60 km2, with ten locations, based on the threat of overgrazing by livestock, and a continuing decline of the habitat quality, it is assessed as Vulnerable.

We propose the monitoring of the population, as well as the habitat trend. Further research on the life history and ecology of this species is needed.","The species prefers forests. It occurs in open areas along seasonal streams with a riparian forest of Fraxinus angustifolia, within Quercus pyrenaica forest, and in open patches in Mediterranean shrub formations (Marcos-García et al. 2011). It is also present in open Quercus suber and Phillyrea maquis, open grassy or herb-rich areas along rivers, streams and seasonal water-courses in karstic Quercus pubescens savanna and Pinus nigra salzmannii forest (such rivers and seasonal rivers are usually lined by a riparian forest of Fraxinus or Populus). The adults fly fast and low (with a flight more rapid than that of the closely related Merodon equestris) over the bare ground of paths, settling on bare ground or stones in the sun. It visits flowers in the morning, this activity starting with the arrival of the sun and stopping later in the morning. The adults are known to visit flowers of Potentilla and Cistus. The flight period is during March to June, with a peak in May. The developmental stages have not been described (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2011, Speight 2020).","Overgrazing by livestock is the main threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020), but cork extraction, tourism (and road construction), and fires can also negatively influence the quality of habitat.","The population trend is unknown. The species is recorded from 14 point localities in western European Mediterranean countries. The species was first described in 2011, and the records date from 1966 to 2015.",Unknown,"This European endemic species is distributed in Portugal, Spain and southern France (Marcos Garcia et al. 2011, Van Eck 2016, Speight 2020). The species was first described in 2011, and the records date from 1966 to 2015. The older records are from Spain.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be 488,519 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 60 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"Five point localities in Spain and one in France occur within Natura 2000 sites. Although parts of the range occurs within protected areas, grazing by livestock is still intensive and impacts negatively the habitat quality and the species (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Therefore, it would benefit from restriction of this activity.

Additional research on its biology, ecology, population size and trend, as well as the habitat trend, is required. Establishing the exact host plant for the development of the larvae is important. Introducing it into the National list of protected species, as well as increasing the awareness about this endemic species is very important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168357,149168355,Xylota jakutorum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Xylota jakutorum is a widespread species found across Europe. It has a large area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO). Although it may be impacted by localised habitat declines in quality and quantity, the current population trend is considered to be stable. In addition, it is an adaptable species that has been found in some man-made environments, in commercial conifer plantations. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. No conservation measures are required at present.","

This species is found in conifer forest, with mature and overmature trees. It is partially anthropophilic, extending its range into commercial conifer plantations in parts of Europe previously covered in deciduous woodland, and found with Abies, Picea and Pinus (Speight 2017, 2020). In southeast Europe, the species also occurs in montane deciduous forest (A. Vujic pers. comm. 2019). Adults have been recorded running on the foliage of bushes and shrubs at tracksides and edges of clearings, in the sun on fallen or felled timber and tree stumps or on the ground in the vicinity of old trees (Speight 2017, 2020).

Flowers visited by this species include umbellifers, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus, Rosa rugosa, Rubus idaeus and Sorbus aucuparia.

The flight period is from May to August, with peak in June and July and occasional specimens into September.

Rotheray (1994) established that the larva of this species (under the name X. coeruleiventris) occurs in sap runs on Abies, caused by the weevil Hylobius abietus (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). The larva is described and figured (as the larva of X. caeruleiventris) by Rotheray and Stuke (1998), from larvae collected from sap-filled borings of Hylobius beneath the bark of Pinus sylvestris stumps.

","The main threats are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat, due to deforestation and other land management like agriculture, habitat destruction and change in land use. This will certainly have an effect on the species, and it will surely be a negative effect, but the actual impacts are unknown and likely to only be localised, as the species is adaptable and also found in man made habitats.","This is a widespread species throughout Europe, although not as common as X. segnis. The population size is unknown, but overall the current population trend is considered to be stable for both Europe and the EU 27. In Sweden, there have been more than 1,000 recent sightings.",Stable,"

This species is found from Fennoscandia, south to the Pyrenees and northern Italy. It is known from Ireland eastwards through central Europe to European parts of Russia and on into Asia through much of Siberia (Speight 2020). It is not found in the Mediterranean region, as it is not present in Portugal, Spain, southern Italy or on the Mediterranean Islands. In Greece, it is only found only in the north of the country (Rhodope mountains) (Vujic et al. 2020). Records from Bulgaria (specimens) are known (L.J. van der Ent unpublished data, pers. comm 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 9.3 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2.8 million km2. For the EU27 countries the estimated EOO is around 5.6 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 1.7 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"The species is not subject to any targeted conservation action, and this does not seem to be required at the moment. However, further research on biology, ecology, population trends and habitat criteria for the species should be done. This species has been assessed as Least Concern in Finland in 2010 and 2019 (FinBif 2020), Norway (Artsobservasjoner 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168367,149168365,Merodon desuturinus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

This species is assessed as Vulnerable due to its area of occupancy (AOO), which is 68 km2, the number of locations (8), and the continuing decline of its habitat quality caused primarily by overgrazing, but also by tourism development, recreational activities and urbanization. The number of locations is based on overgrazing by livestock that could cause the fragmentation and loss of the species habitat.

In the EU 27 Member States, the species is restricted to Croatia, and is assessed as Critically Endangered based on its area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO), both of which are 8 km2, with one location primarily based on overgrazing by livestock as the main threat. The continuing decline of the species habitat quality is expected due to ongoing threats. It is not known whether there are additional subpopulations across the Dinaric Mountains that could potentially connect to subpopulations outside the EU. If subpopulations occur close enough, they could provide rescue effect, but this is unknown.

","This species prefers open ground in forests. It occurs in open, dry, grassy areas within humid Fagus, Picea and Abies forest (Speight 2020). Although it is a high-mountain species, it prefers warm and dry locations on open ground, pasture and grassy woodland clearings and open areas covered with meadow vegetation on serpentine rock (Vujić et al. 1995). It can be found on dry slopes with species-rich grassland, often in close proximity to streams in valleys (Van Steenis et al. 2015).
This species settles on vegetation in the sun. It is known to visit Ranunculus (Vujić et al. 1995), Ornithogalum and Scilla flowers (Radenković et al. 2018). The developmental stages have not been described, but according to field observations and unpublished data, they most probably develop in plants of the Hyacinthaceae (Radenković et al. 2018). The flight period is between May and June (Vujić et al. 1995, 2018; Van Steenis et al. 2015; Speight 2020).
Like others in the genus, this species is territorial with strong ecological adaptations to specific species of host plant, which means it typically does not move much.","In all locations, grazing by livestock represents the main threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Tourism development, recreational activities and urbanization also lead to habitat fragmentation and loss, especially at point localities in mountain areas (Mts Kopaonik and Durmitor, because of their large ski resorts) and those near coastlines.","

Based on all known findings, the number of recorded specimens are the following: 8 specimens in 1986, more than 65 in 1993, 2 in 1994, 9 in 1998, 17 in 2009, 1 in 2011, 3 in 2012, 14 in 2015, 9 in 2016, 2 in 2017 and 4 in 2018 (Vujić et al. 1995, 2018). The largest subpopulation on Mt. Kopaonik seems to be stable, but the trends of the remaining subpopulations are unknown.

",Unknown,"This European endemic species is present on the high mountains of the Balkan Peninsula, with records from Serbia, Montenegro and Croatia. There are no available records from Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is a typical high-mountain species, occurring between 730 and 1,540 m. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 65,347 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 68 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

Vujić et al. (2001) listed this species under ""threatened species on the Balkan Peninsula, not present in other parts of Europe; degree of threat: decreasing"", following the classification of Speight and Castella (2001). In Serbia it is listed as a ""strictly protected species"" and protected by national law Code of Regulations on the Declaration and Protection of Strictly Protected and Protected Wild Species of Plants, Animals and Fungi (Official Gazette of RS, No. 5/2010, 47/2011, 32/2016 and 98/2016).

However, additional data must be obtained primarily on population size and trends and other potential threats. Therefore, regular monitoring is required on these issues.

Considering the fact that overgrazing by livestock is the main threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020), conservation actions should be directed mainly towards habitat protection (restricting grazing). Some point localities are within the boundaries of National Parks Kopaonik (Serbia) and Durmitor (Montenegro), one is within the Nature Park Stara Planina (Eastern Serbia), and one is within the Landscape of outstanding qualities in Kamena Gora (western Serbia). Increasing pressure from expanding tourism infrastructure requires better planning and mitigation. Education and raising public awareness about the importance of this species are very important. 


",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168379,149168376,Brachypalpoides lentus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-12-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Brachypalpoides lentus
 is a widespread species across Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 10.1 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 3.7 million km2. There is no specific information regarding the potential threats (besides the usual ones in forests in Europe) affecting this species, and although there will be a decline in parts of its range overall it is not severely under pressure. The current overall population trend for both Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be stable. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both regional assessments.","

The preferred environment of this species is forest with overmature trees; especially Fagus, Picea and Quercus and including evergreen oak forest (Speight 2020). Adult have been seen on foliage of bushes, such as Rubus fruticosus, at the edge of forest clearings and on the ground near fallen and felled trees. A teneral specimen, not capable yet of flying, was observed on a Populus-trunk (Reemer et al. 2009). Flowers visited include umbellifers, Crataegus spp., Galium spp., Rubus idaeus, Sorbus aucuparia. The flight period of this species is from April to June, and July at higher altitudes.

The larvae are undescribed, but the species has been bred from damp, fungus-riddled rotten wood within the trunk base of an old, living Fagus and is included in the keys provided by Rotheray (1994), where it is distinguished from larvae of related genera and its fore body is figured. Larvae have also been found beneath the bark of Picea, by Kassebeer (1993).

","The main threats are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat, specifically overmature trees decline. Anthropogenic activities in natural areas for logging and to create industrial areas or for agriculture and tourism reduce the natural habitats for this species. However, there is no specific information regarding the potential threats affecting this species, it is widespread through Europe and although there will be a decline in parts of its range overall it is not under pressure.","This is a widespread species, found throughout Europe (Speight 2020). Although not much information is known about this hoverfly, it is expected to have a stable population trend throughout its range.",Stable,"

This species is found from Scandinavia to the Pyrenees and central Spain; Ireland through central Europe into European parts of Russia; southern Europe eastwards to the former Yugoslavia and Greece and into Asia Minor (Ssymank et al. 1999, Burgio et al. 2000, Reemer 2000, Birtele and Hardersen 2012, Radenkovic et al. 2013, Mortelmans et al. 2014, Ssymank and Lair 2014, Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 10.1 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 3.7 million km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is around 6.6 million km2 and the AOO is 2.3 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are currently no conservation actions in place for the species. Focus should be on the research of the biology and ecology of the species, and the monitoring of habitat and population trends. It is known to occur in National Parks throughout Europe. In Finland, this species has been nationally assessed as Vulnerable (VU) (FinBif 2018).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168389,149168387,Merodon dobrogensis,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic species is currently known from Greece and Romania. In Greece, the species prefers forest habitat, where it occurs in small open areas maintained by grazing of goats, located in coastal, evergreen oak mattoral of Quercus coccifera on limestone (Vujić et al. 2020). In Romania, the species was found in small, narrow valleys with steppe vegetation, as well as in the lower parts of the valley (not in forested areas, but rather in the remaining steppe patches of the valleys). The species can tolerate moderate levels of grazing by livestock.

The species is assessed as Endangered based on the area of occupancy (AOO), which is 20 km2, the extent of occurrence (EOO), which is 1,418 km2, and due to the fact that it occurs in only two locations in two countries (Greece and Romania). The number of locations is based on overgrazing by livestock as the primary threat. Furthermore, due to the threats to the habitat of this species, a continuing decline in the habitat quality is observed. Further research is required, especially to confirm its restricted distribution.

","In Greece, the species prefers forests. It occurs in small open areas maintained by the grazing of goats, in coastal, evergreen oak mattoral of Quercus coccifera on limestone (Vujić et al. 2020). It flies very low over short ground vegetation (Speight 2020), and is known to visit flowers of Scilla autumnale. Its larvae may be associated with this plant species or with a closely related subspecies. The flight period is from August to October (Vujić et al. 2020).

In Romania, the species was found in small, narrow valleys with steppe vegetation, as well as down in the lower parts of the valley (not in forested areas, but rather in the remaining steppe patches). The species can tolerate moderate levels of grazing by livestock.","Overgrazing by livestock in some point localities represents the main threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Tourism development and urbanisation in coastal areas also causes habitat loss and fragmentation. In the Mediterranean region, fires of anthropogenic origin - particularly in fragmented ranges - can cause considerable impacts on the landscape, resulting in the destruction of large areas of vegetation. In addition, droughts and temperature extremes could also pose a threat, as an increase in the temperature could disrupt temporal synchrony of its plant interactions.","

There are no data about the population size or trends of this species. In Greece, two specimens were recorded in 1977, and six in 2011. In Romania, 21 specimens were recorded in 2014.

",Unknown,"This European endemic species is known from north-eastern Greece and south-eastern Romania. The known point localities in both countries are very near to each other; there are a total of six point localities, four in Romania and two in Greece. In Greece, Merodon dobrogensis is recorded as a rare species from the coastal region of the northeast (from the Ismaros hills) (Vujić et al. 2020), whereas previous continental records from central, southern and western Greece (Radenković et al. 2011) now refer to M. rojoi Radenković and Vujić, 2020 (Šašić Zorić et al. 2020). Confirmation of the distribution of the species, especially occurrence of the species in Bulgaria between the known localities, requires confirmation.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 1418 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 20 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

The species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. However, conservation of the habitat is recommended, and in areas where grazing by livestock occurs, this needs to be maintained at levels tolerated by the species. Enforcement of environmental regulations, rules and other policies is needed. In addition, education and raising public awareness about this endemic species may be effective. Additional research is needed on general abundance, population size, habitat, ecological requirements, threats and trends. In order to obtain more data on population size and trends, regular monitoring has to be conducted. The point localities in Romania are within the Natura 2000 network.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168400,149168397,Xylota florum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Xylota florum is a widespread species found across Europe. The area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) for both Europe and the EU 27 are large. Although the species may be impacted by threats locally, overall the current population trend is stable and the species seems to be reasonably adaptive. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. No conservation measures are required for this species at present.","

The preferred environment of this species is deciduous, alluvial hardwood forest with over-mature trees (especially Populus) and brook floodplain forest (Speight 2017, 2020). Adults have been found on trunks and stumps of fallen and felled trees in the sun, in clearings and at tracksides, as well as on streamside and trackside vegetation in the sun, within woodland. 

Flowers visited by this species incldue white umbellifers, Rubus fruticosus, Rosa acicularis, Saxifraga punctata, Cicuta virosa, Anemone sylvestris, Caltha arctica, Caltha palustris, Ranunculus affinis, Valeriana officinalis (Bagachanova 1990), Achillea millefolium, Ranunculus acer, Anethum graveolens and Rumex acetosa (Pestov 2007).

The flight period is from the end of May to the end of July, with most records from June. 

Dusek and Laska (1960) described the larvae from hole-holes in Populus. Their description has been validated as relating to this species by Rotheray (2004), who re-describes the developmental stages. Assuming that early records do relate to this species, it has been reared more than once from trunk cavities in Populus nigra. Krivosheina (2001) reports rearing this species from a fallen trunk of Picea.

","The main threats are probably focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat due to human activities, like most of the forest dwelling species. However, there is no specific information regarding the potential threats affecting the population. It is widespread and probably will be threatened in parts of its range, but overall it seems reasonably adaptive and does not seem to be in direct danger.","This is a widespread species, although it is not as common as some other species of the genus, for example Xylota segnis. The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be stable.",Stable,"This species is found from Scandinavia, south to central France, and from Ireland eastwards into European parts of Russia, the Caucasus and on as far as eastern Siberia (Speight 2020).The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 9 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 3 million km2. For the EU 27 countries the estimated EOO is around 5.5 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 1.6 million km2.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"The species is not subject to any targeted conservation action. At the moment, it is not considered to be necessary for this species. Research should be done on the population dynamics and the life history, biology and ecology of the species. It has been assessed on the national Red List of Finland as Least Concern (LC) in 2000, 2010 and 2019 (FinBif 2020). In Sweden it is assessed as LC in 2010, 2015 and 2020 with over 400 recent sightings (Artdatabanken 2020). In Norway the species is assessed as LC in 2019 (Artsobservasjoner 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168414,149168408,Merodon eques,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is listed as Endangered in Europe and the EU27, considering the fact that the number of locations is four (based on overgrazing by livestock as the main threat), and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 20 km2. In addition, in Europe, the distribution of this species is restricted to the Iberian Peninsula. Due to the ongoing threats (primarily overgrazing by livestock), an ongoing habitat fragmentation and loss is inferred.

Continuing monitoring is recommended, as well as additional research on population trend, species ecology and biology. This species is also distributed in Turkey and North Africa (Morocco, Tunisia and Algeria), but these subpopulations are separated by geographical barriers, and it is unlikely that these subpopulations would provide rescue effect.","The preferred environment of this species is rocky, sub-xeric, calcareous grassland in mattoral of Olea europea, Osyris quadripartita, Rhamnus alaternus, Pistacia lentiscus and Pistacia terebinthus (Ebejer and Bensusan 2010), as well as ruderal vegetation along the margins of seasonal rivers (Speight 2020). The adults rest on the bare ground in the sun. It has been recorded visiting flowers of Apiaceae (Foeniculum), Asteraceae (Dittrichia viscosa) and has a particular preference for Urginea (Hyacinthaceae) (Ebejer and Bensusan, 2010).  Hurkmans and De Goffau (1995) reared M. eques in the Netherlands from a batch of infested Narcissus tazzeta and from a bulb of Rhodophiala sp., all imported from Israel (Van Eck, 2016). The flight period is in September and October. The developmental stages have not been described, but it has been reared from Narcissus by Hurkmans and De Goffau (1995) and Pehlivan and Akbulut (1991) imported from Israel.","The main threat to this species is habitat fragmentation and loss due to changes in land use, mainly because of overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Tourism development might be a potential threat to the habitat of this species as well.","There is insufficient information about the population trend. However, the subpopulations found in Grazalema and Bolonia (both in Spain) are considered to be stable, since about 50 specimens were collected in 2016. In Portugal six specimens were recorded in 2011 (Van Eck 2016), and in Gibraltar 10 were recorded in 2008 and 2010 (Ebejer and Bensusan 2010).",Unknown,"In Europe, this species is distributed in Spain, Portugal, and Gibraltar.

Outside of Europe it is also present in Turkey and North Africa (in Morocco, Tunisia and Algeria).

In Europe and the EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be 190,091 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 20 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action so far. Although the range of this species is within the boundaries of the Sierra de Grazalema Natural Park (Spain), the Natural Park de Sintra-Cascais (Portugal) and the Nature Reserve Rock of Gibraltar (Gibraltar), implementing and enforcing some regulations related to grazing should be considered. All point localities are within the Natura 2000 network. Additional research on its population trend, biology and ecology is highly recommended. Increasing awareness about this species is very important. Monitoring the population size and habitat trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168422,149168411,Xylota caeruleiventris,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Xylota caeruleiventris
 is regionally widespread in Northern Europe. Although it is rare in some countries, like Ukraine, it is possible that the species is more common in some areas than previously thought. The current population trend is considered to be unknown. The species is potentially at risk from climate change, but further research is required. It is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.","

The preferred environment of this species is taiga/humid Pinus sylvestris forest (including western taiga) and mixed boreal forest; relict sub-boreal transition mire with Pinus sylvestris or P. uncinata and bog with Pinus sylvestris in central Europe. 

Males sit on the trunks of freshly-fallen (leaves still green) Pinus within/at the edge of bog/transition mire.

Flowers visited by the hoverfly include umbellifers, Rhododendron tomentosum (Bartsch et al. 2009), Rubus sp., Barbarea sp., Stellaria holostea and Ranunculus acer (Pestov 2007).

The flight period is from the end of May to mid July in central Europe, and from mid June to the second half of August in northern Europe.

The larvae are not described, but probably found under the bark of water-logged, fallen trunks of recently-fallen Pinus in, or at the edge of, bog and transition mire.

The species therefore is dependent on wood, as the larvae are dependent on the bark.

","The main threats to this species are probably the loss of quality and quantity of habitat, due to the usual human activities like urbanisation, logging and forestry management. However, there is no specific information regarding the potential threats affecting this species. The species is presumably at risk from the reduction of specific habitats caused by the changing climate.","There is not much information about the European population of this species, but after the confusion with other species was solved, it was found more commonly in Scandinavia. In the Czech Republic, it has been found in two mountainous localities. It is rare in Ukraine. There is one record from Poland in 2015, but currently it is not rare in Poland. According to Speight (2020) on status, threats and degree of endemism for the European syrphid species in the StN database this species is threatened to some extent on a European level. However, the species is potentially under-recorded, and it is likely more common than previously known. For now the population trend is considered to be unknown throughout Europe.",Unknown,"This species has a regionally broad range in northern Europe. It is found in northern and central Fennoscandia (Norway, Sweden and Finland) and through Siberia to the Pacific coast. Based on the Norway Red List (Artsobservasjoner 2020) the species occurs in Oslo and Akershus. It is known from Germany (Doczkal 2004) and the Czech Republic (Dolezal and Romig 2004) in central Europe, plus Slovenia (Groot and Govedič 2008). Literature references to the occurrence of this species prior to 2002 cannot be relied upon, due to confusion with X. jakutorum (females look alike and can be confounded) (Speight 2020) (Bartsch et al. 2002).

There is confirmation of a new record in Ukraine (Kyiv) found in 2015-2016, but all other records from Ukraine have not been checked (Zoralski pers. comm. 2019). The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 7.3 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2 million km2. For the EU27 countries the estimated EOO is around 2.9 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 684,000 km2.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation measures in place for this species. Further studies are needed into the population size, trends, abundance, biology, ecology and eventually threats to this species.

However it might well be that the species is a bit under recorded and more common than previously thought. This species was assessed as Least Concern in Finland in 2010 and 2019 (FinBif 2020) and Sweden in 2015 (Artdatabanken 2020), and as Endangered in Norway in 2010 but down-listed to Vulnerable in 2015 (Artsobservasjoner 2020). In Germany the species was assessed as Critically Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168435,149168430,Merodon equestris,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species prefers open grounds in deciduous forests. It occurs in open areas in humid deciduous forests and at higher altitudes, up into the subalpine zone. It is significantly anthropophilic, occurring also in suburban gardens and on horticultural land.

This species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and EU 27 primarily due to its wide distribution from Scandinavia south to Iberia and the Mediterranean, and from Ireland eastwards through much of Europe into European parts of Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are too big for threatened categories. Habitat fragmentation and loss is the main threat. Additional research and monitoring is needed on population and habitat trend.

","This species prefers open ground in deciduous forests. It occurs in open areas in humid deciduous forests and at higher altitudes, up into the subalpine zone. It is significantly anthropophilic, occurring also in suburban gardens and on horticultural land.

The adults fly low, with a rapid zig-zag flight, among ground vegetation beside tracks, in clearings, or over flower beds, and they frequently settle on the bare ground. It is known to visit Apiaceae and many other flowers, such as Ajuga, Aster, Cirsium, Crepis, Eschscholzia californica, Hieracium, Knautia arvensis, Meconopsis cambrica, Papaver, Ranunculus, Rubus idaeus, Senecio and Thymus (Speight 2020).

The flight period is from May to July (plus April in southern Europe and August at higher altitudes or more northerly latitudes). The larva has been described and figured by Hodson (1932) and Heiss (1938), and illustrated in colour by Rotheray (1993). It occurs in the underground storage organs of many geophyte species from different plant families (especially those of commercial importance to horticulture), but mostly from Amaryllidaceae (also in some Asparagaceae, Iridaceae and Liliaceae) (Speight 2020). For further detail on host plants, see Ricarte et al. (2017).","This species is widely distributed (it is now Holarctic), but since its preferred environment is open ground in deciduous forests, as well as suburban gardens and horticultural land, a possible threat could be habitat fragmentation and loss due to land conversion because of urbanisation, fires, and grazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","

There is not much information about the population size and trend, but it seems stable.

",Stable,"This is a widely distributed species. In Europe and the EU27, it is present from Scandinavia south to Iberia and the Mediterranean, including North Africa, and from Ireland eastwards through most of Europe into the European parts of Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are too large for threatened categories.

Within Europe its range has almost certainly been expanded due to human activity. For instance, it is doubtful that this species could have reached either Great Britain (where there are significant numbers of records across the British Isles; NBN 2021) or Ireland unaided by man (Speight 2020).

Outside of Europe, it also occurs in Japan and in North America, where it is present from British Colombia south to California.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. Although this is a widely distributed species, conservation of its habitat is recommended. Taking into account the possible threats, it is recommended to conserve the habitat by enforcement of environmental regulations, rules and other policies. Raising public awareness and education about the importance of this species are important. Additional research and continuous monitoring is needed about its population and habitat trend, species ecology and additional possible threats.

A number of point localities are within the boundaries of protected areas. Some of them are the National Park Stara Planina (Serbia), National Park Durmitor (Montenegro), National Park Mavrovo (North Macedonia); National Park des Pyrenees, National Park des Ecrins, Nantional Park de la Vanoise, Regional Natural Park des Pyrenees Catalanes (France); Natural Park de Fuentes Carrionas y Fluente (Spain).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168443,149168433,Xylota triangularis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Xylota triangularis is known in Europe from the Alps, Scandinavia, and a few other localities, including European Russia. The species has a reasonably large EOO, but probably a much lower AOO. As a forest dwelling species, it is impacted by threats such as deforestation, logging, urbanisation and climate change, particularly in the Alps and Scandinavia. The current population trend is considered to be decreasing. The AOO for this species in the EU27 is considered being around 323,000 km2, but in reality that might be much smaller as it appears localised in the Alps and the Scandinavian countries. There is a suspected decline in suitable habitat due to human activity and climate change, which will continue in the future. However, the estimated AOO for now does not place it in a threatened category for now, but that might change soon in the future. So for Europe it is assessed LC, the species is reasonably widespread in European Russia and is connected to the main distribution area of the species in the eastern part of the Palearctic. For EU 27 it is also assessed as LC for the moment.","

The preferred environment of this species is overmature conifer forest with old trees, from the upper limits of Picea into old Larix/Pinus cembra/Pinus mugo forest (in the Alps, Pinus/Betula swamp forest and western taiga (Speight 2017, 2020).

Adults fly in the dappled sunlight of small glades along streams within forest, among tall ground vegetation, on which it settles; also rests on fallen trunks of Pinus (C. Claussen, A. Haarto, T. Moertelmaier and L. Verlinden pers. comm. 2019); also along streams in the more open forest occurring towards the tree line.

Flowers visited by the hoverfly include Rhododendron tomentosum (Bartsch et al. 2009), Ledum palustre, Rubus chamaemorus, StellariaSpiraea media, Rosa acicularis, Anemone sylvestris, Ranunculus repens, Barbarea sp., Aster aplinus (Bagatchanova 1990), and Heracleum sibiricum (Pestov 2007).

The flight period is from May/June and July/August in more northerly latitudes/higher altitudes. The developmental stages are unknown.

","There are the usual threats that all forest dwelling species are subjected to like agriculture, deforestation, urbanisation and logging. However, in this case the species is also under pressure by climate change. It occurs on altitude in the Alps and in the north of Europe, so the habitat will disappear fast when global warming continues.","Not much information is known about the European populations of this species, but it is probably very rare. In Finland, this species is definitely declining, as a result of an uplisting in the National Red List (FinBif 2020). Elsewhere, it is considered that the overall current population trend in both Europe and the EU 27 is decreasing, due to the human threats as well as by the effects of climate change, so suitable habitat for the species is disappearing. In Sweden, there are only nine recent sightings (Artdatabanken 2020), and very few recent sightings in Norway (Artsobservasjoner 2020).",Decreasing,"

This species is found in Lapland south to southern Norway and Sweden. the Alps (France, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Austria, Slovenia), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018) and on into Asia throughout Siberia. It is also known from Mongolia (Pennards pers. obs. 2017). The species does not occur in Germany (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2019). The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is estimated to be around 7.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1 million km2. For the EU 27, the estimated EOO is around 3.5 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 323,000 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"The focus of conservation action for this species should be on the conservation of the habitat, because in Europe it is only found in the Alps and in the Scandinavian countries, with a few scattered records from elsewhere. These habitats are not only under direct threat of anthropogenic activities, but are also very susceptible for the effects of climate change.

In Finland, the species went from Vulnerable (VU) in 2010 to Endangered (EN) in 2019 (FinBif 2020), and the species is considered a threatened species in Finland (Nature Conservation Decree 14.2.1997/160, Appendix 4 19.6.2013/471). In Sweden, it is Least Concern (LC) (Artdatabanken 2020), and in Norway it is Not Evaluated (Artsobservasjoner 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168457,149168452,Merodon flavus,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-05-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This European endemic species prefers unimproved montane grasslands. It is assessed as Near Threatened primarily due to its small area of occupancy (AOO) (96 km2) and the continuous decline in habitat quality and extent. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is large. However, due to ongoing threats (primarily overgrazing by livestock, tourism development, and, especially in the Alps, fires), the quality of habitat of this species is in decline.  Furthermore, the presence of this species is uncertain in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Bulgaria. Monitoring of the population is required, as well as more research on population trend, ecology and biology of this species.

","

The species prefers open ground and unimproved montane grasslands with stands of wild Narcissus (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007). The adults fly low (up to 0.5 metre) through and just above ground vegetation, with a rapid zig-zagging pattern, closely resembling that of M. equestris. The flight period is between the end of May and the end of July. The developmental stages have not been described, but they are probably associated with Narcissus (Speight 2020).

","

Poorly managed grazing by livestock is the main threat, which causes habitat fragmentation and loss (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Urbanisation and tourism development are also important threats for the habitat of this species, especially in the Alps. Fires are other possible threat to habitat quality.

",

More data are needed about the population trend. Most specimens were collected in the Iberian Peninsula.

,Unknown,"

This European endemic species is known from central Portugal, central and northern Spain, and southern France (the Causses in the Massif Central), and throughout the Alps (France, Switzerland, and Italy). Speight (2020) also mentions the Czech Republic, Hungary and Bulgaria, but its presence remains uncertain in these countries (A. Vujic pers. comm. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is 547,423 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 96 km2.

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"The species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action so far. A number of point localities are within the boundaries of protected areas, National and Natural Parks and within the Natura 2000 network. Monitoring and research on population and habitat trends are needed, as well as research on its biology, ecology and other possible threats. Raising awareness about this species would be beneficial.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168470,149168454,Temnostoma vespiformis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Temnostoma vespiformis is widespread across Europe, despite some confusion over its true distribution due to confusion with other species of the genus. Anthropogenic activities in natural areas to create industrial areas, for agriculture or for tourism reduce the natural habitats for this species, and so there may be localised declines, but overall the current population trend is considered to be stable. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.","

The preferred environment of this species is deciduous forest containing over-mature and fallen trees, especially riverine alluvial gallery forest (Speight 2017, 2020).

Adults are found in open forest, especially near brooks and rivers. Males hover at 3 meters and higher, and both sexes frequently visit flowers (often visiting pastures and meadows for the purpose) and settle on shrub foliage. In flight, the hoverfly is an exact mimic of Vespula (Hymenoptera, Vespidae); when settled this insect carries its black fore tarsi as though they were antennae, resembling exactly black Vespula antennae and vibrates them as Vespula does its antennae.

Flowers visited by this species include umbellifers, Clematis, Cornus, Crataegus, Lonicera xylosteum, Papaver nudicaule, Ranunculus, Rubus idaeus, Sambucus, Senecio, Sorbus. Also on Tripleurospermum perforatum, Filipendula ulmaria, Achillea millefolium, Pimpinella saxifraga, Heracleum sibiricum (Pestov 2007), Ranunculus acer, Filipendula hexapetala, Potentilla erecta, Anthriscus and Aegopodium podagraria (Zimina 1957, Stackelberg 1958).

The flight period is from May to June and on into July and August at higher altitudes/more northerly latitudes.

The larvae are wood-boring, in solid wood within part-rotted stumps and logs. According to Drees (1999) larval development takes two years. The larvae are described and figured by Stammer (1933) and Krivosheina and Mamayev (1962); illustrated in colour by Rotheray (1994); distinctions from the larva of T. apiforme (Fab.) are detailed in Heqvist (1957). Krivosheina and Mamayev (1962) provide a key distinguishing T. vespiforme larvae from those of the other European Temnostoma species known at that time. This species has been bred from Acer, Alnus, Betula, Fagus, Populus tremula, Quercus, Salix and Tilia.

","The main threats are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat. Anthropogenic activities in natural areas to create industrial areas, for agriculture, for logging or for tourism reduce the natural habitats for this species. However, there is no specific information regarding the potential threats affecting this species, it is widespread through Europe and although there will be a decline in parts of its range, overall it is not under pressure.","This is a widespread species, found throughout Europe. Although not much information is known, it is expected to have a stable population trend throughout most of its range. There have been several hundred recent sightings in Sweden alone.",Stable,"

The full distribution of this species requires reassessment, due to confusion with both T. meridionale and T. sericomyiaeforme, but it is probably known from central Sweden south to northern Spain, from northern France (Brittany) eastwards through most of Europe and on through Asiatic parts of Russia to the Pacific coast and Japan, and the Caucasus. Now, the species is rather localised over much of its European range (Speight 2020). A record from Bulgaria (specimen) was provided by L.J. van der Ent (pers. comm. 2020, unpublished data).

It was recorded also in the Nearctic from Alaska south to New Mexico and east to Quebec, but Skevington et al. (2019) state that Temnostoma vespiformis is restricted to the Palearctic region.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 10 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 4 million km2.

For the EU27 countries the estimated EOO is around 5.1 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 2.2 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"This species also occurs in National Parks throughout Europe. There is always the need to learn more on the biology and ecology of the species, as well as studying the habitat it lives in. In Finland, this species is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) in 2000, but in 2010 and 2019 it is assessed as LC (FinBif 2020) It is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Sweden in 2010 and 2019 (Artdatabanken 2020) and Norway (Artsobservasjoner 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168491,149168486,Merodon geniculatus,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-05-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This European endemic species is listed as Near Threatened, close to qualifying under Criterion B, primarily due to the small area of occupancy (AOO) (116 km2 in Europe, 112 km2 in the EU27 Member States) with continuing decline in the quality and extent of habitat. In addition, the number of locations is estimated to be 20 based on primarily overgrazing by livestock, as the main threat, as well as fires and tourism. Although a number of point localities are within the boundaries of protected areas, grazing is still intensive (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020), and it should be controlled and managed adequately.","

This species prefers open ground in forests. It occurs in unimproved montane grassland in southern Europe, and open areas in mesophilous Fagus and Quercus ilex forests. The adults fly rapidly and extremely close to the ground, settling on small patches of bare surface among low-growing vegetation. It is known to visit flowers such as Calluna vulgaris, Hedera and Rosmarinus officinalis.

The flight period is from April to October. The puparium is described and figured by Ricarte et al. (2017), who reared a series of specimens from bulbs of various species of Narcissus: N. dubius, N. rupicola, N. tazetta and N. triandrus ssp. pallidulus, all of which were collected from the field. Circumstantial evidence suggests one potential plant host for the larva is the yellow Autumn Crocus Sternbergia lutea (Speight 2020).

","

Overgrazing by livestock is the main threat, which causes habitat fragmentation and loss (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Habitats have been increasingly fragmented, especially in the Iberian Peninsula, and processes of intensification and expansion have provoked changes. Another possible threat to the habitat quality are fires. Ongoing urbanisation and tourism development in attractive locations, especially those near to the coastline, could cause declines in habitat quality, finally leading to loss. Since some point localities are within the boundaries of Grazalema Natural Park, cork extraction from the cork oak poses a threat to this species.

",

There are insufficient data about the population trend. Most specimens were collected in the Iberian Peninsula.

,Unknown,"This European endemic species is known from mainland parts of Portugal, Spain, and France, and from Gibraltar, Corsica (France) and Sardinia and Sicily (Italy). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1,224,836 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) is 116 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

The species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. Although a number of point localities are within the boundaries of protected areas, National and Natural Parks and the Natura 2000 network, grazing by livestock (the main threat to the habitat of this species) is still intensive, and should be controlled and managed adequately. Monitoring and research about population and habitat trends are needed, as well as research on biology, ecology and other possible threats. Raising awareness is important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168499,149168488,Temnostoma sericomyiaeforme,Vulnerable,A3c,2021,2020-02-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

Although Temnostoma sericomyiaeforme has the bulk of its European distribution in Scandinavia; it is also found further east and south, but in these countries the numbers recorded are very low. The current population trend is assumed to be declining in a strong and continuous pace. The subpopulations are very small and the species is under threat from forestry activities, including deforestation, agriculture and human activities, so this decline will not be less in the future. This decline is and has been in the order of nearly 30%, so the current range could be a lot smaller than recorded on the map. The species is expected to lose a big part of its suitable habitat in a short time. Therefore, this species is assessed as Vulnerable, but it may well become even more at risk in the future, and so careful monitoring of the population and habitat trends and threats to the species is required.","

The preferred environment of this species is deciduous forest, Alnus swamp forest with Salix, Populus tremula and Betula (S. Kerppola pers. comm. 2019) and with overmature and fallen trees; Alnus forest with Betula, Prunus padus and Populus tremula (T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2019). Flowers visited by this species include umbellifers, Rubus idaeus (Bartsch et al. 2009), Pimpinella saxifraga, Achillea millefolium and Tripleurospermum perforatum (Pestov 2007). The species was also detected at the edge of a mixed forest, on flowering Crataegus monogyna (Lutovinas and Kinduris 2013). There is considered to be a decline in the quality and extent of the habitat.

The flight period is from mid June to July.

The developmental stages are not described, but stated to develop in partly-rotten stumps and logs of Betula in wet situations (Bartsch et al. 2009).

","The main threats are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat, from deforestation and forest management, agriculture, drainage, removal of old trees (found in big fallen timber), and the removal of rotten wood from natural habitats close to water.","The bulk of the European distribution seems to be in Scandinavia. In the other countries, the numbers of recorded individuals are very low. There are 21 recent localities in Finland (FinBif 2020), 21 recent localities in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020) and two in Norway (Artsobservasjoner 2020). In other parts of the EU 27 countries there are less than five records, and the species is possibly extant in Ukraine. From Russia there were a good number of records, but these are likely to be confused with T. vespiformis (Barkalov pers. comm. 2020). So probably the number of sightings here is also low. In total, there are around 45 localities in the EU 27, and around 60 in Europe. According to Speight (2020), this species is decreasing in Europe. The species is certainly declining in a rapid pace in comparison with earlier decades due to the continuing anthropogenic activities in southern Europe, and it is estimated it will be just over 30% or more given the threats for its habitat.",Decreasing,"This is an European endemic species. The true distribution of this species is uncertain, due to confusion with T. vespiformis until recently, but it is confirmed from Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark (FinBif 2020, Artdatabanken 2020) and Ukraine (although there are no specimens, G. Popov pers. comm. 2019). The species is also known from Belarus, Estonia, Lithuania and Poland (Lutovinovas and Kinduris 2013, Zoralski and Mielczarek 2018, Speight 2020). The occurrence in European Russia was considered doubtful according to Barkalov and Mutin (2018), but there are confirmed sightings from Kirov among others (Barkalov pers. comm. 2019). Sometimes there are only very few sightings, for example in Poland there is only one published record.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) for Europe is estimated to be around 4 million km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 240 km2. For the EU 27, the estimated EOO is around 1.1 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 180 km2.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no direct conservation measures currently in place for this species. Further studies are needed into the taxonomy, abundance, trends, biology, ecology and eventually threats to this species. It is not known if the species occurs in any protected areas. The species is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) in Finland in 2010 and 2019 (FinBif 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020), but as Vulnerable (VU) in Norway (Artsobservasjoner 2020). In Denmark the species is listed as Data Deficient (Bygebjerg 2019).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168511,149168507,Merodon hamifer,Vulnerable,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)    

This species is distributed in Greece and Turkey. In Europe and the EU27, it is assessed as Vulnerable, based on the extent of occurrence (EOO) (6558 km2) and area of occupancy (AOO) (60 km2), and on the number of locations (six), which is based on the main threats to the habitat of this species (overgrazing by livestock and fires), as well as because of the observed continuing decline in the habitat quality.    

","

This species prefers deciduous forests of Quercus (Vujić et al. 2011) and Castanea, herb-rich meadows and bushes, and edge of tracks with tall herbs and bushes (Ricarte et al. 2012). The developmental stages have not been described and the host plant is unknown. Flowers recorded as visited by this species are white and yellow Apiaceae such as Foeniculum vulgare, Ferula (Vujić et al. 2011, 2020) and Ridolfia segetum (Ricarte et al. 2012). The flight period is from May to July (Speight 2018).

","Overgrazing by livestock is the main threat, but fires also pose a threat. Grazing activities, especially on Greek islands (for example on Lesbos) have resulted in a drastic degradation of the landscape, and therefore, the quality of habitat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Additionally, urbanisation and tourism development on the islands lead to habitat fragmentation and loss.","

There are not enough data about the population trend. In Greece, only one specimen was collected in each of the years 1932, 1999, 2001, 2005 and 2017; seven were collected in 2004 and in 2012, and eight in 2009, while more than 30 were collected in 2010. More research and monitoring is needed in order to obtain more complete information on the population size of this species. 

    

",Unknown,"

This species is distributed in Greece and Turkey (Hurkmans 1993, Vujić et al. 2011, Speight 2020). In Greece, it is known from the Eastern Aegean Islands of Chios, Lesbos and Samos (Vujić et al. 2020). It is more abundant in Turkey than in Greece.

In Europe and the EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 6558 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 60 km2.

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Until now, the species has not been the subject of any targeted conservation action. Conservation actions should be directed towards the protection of the habitat and host plants. Some point localities are within the Natura 2000 network. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required, as well as increasing the awareness about this species. Research about its threats, ecology, abundance and population trend is also important.


",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168519,149168509,Temnostoma angustistriatum,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2019-09-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

Temnostoma angustistriatum is currently rare in Europe, although it is widespread. Most of the records are found in Finland, but the species shows signs of recent expansion over the Carpathians in different countries. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 2.8 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 436 km2. For the EU 27, the estimated EOO is around 743,000 km2, and the estimated AOO is around 336 km2. Although the current estimates of EOO for Europe and the EU 27 are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a very fragmented distribution. The species is dependent on a habitat that is rare in economically exploited woodlands making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. This species is therefore assessed as Endangered for both Europe and the EU 27.

","

The preferred environment of this species is mixed forest and deciduous forest; taiga forest with Betula (S. Kerppola pers. comm. 2019), alluvial hardwood forest and Quercus/Carpinus/Ulmus forest. In Ukraine, it is found in deciduous forests in the base of one Acer platanoides tree. The species occurs in pristine habitats, some of which are protected. 

Flowers visited by this species include Anthriscus sylvestris (S. Kerppola pers. comm. 2019) and Leucanthemum vulgare (Pestov 2007).

The flight period is from the end of April to August (Krivosheina 2002).

The larvae described and figured by Krivosheina (2003), who also provides distinctions from the larvae of T. bombylans. The larva occurs in wood of Alnus, Betula, Fraxinus, Populus tremula, Prunus avium, Quercus, Tilia and Ulmus (M. Krivosheina pers. comm. 2019). Larvae are found in dead wood.

","The main threats are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat. The major threats affecting this species are land use change due to deforestation for wood, agricultural activities and urbanization.","This species is rare throughout Europe, and the current population trend is unknown but it is assumed to be in decline. It may be more widespread than currently known, as there are several recent records from different countries. In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"This species is known from Finland, Poland (one locality from Carpathians in Bieszczady Mts., one locality from Białowieża Forest) (Mielczarek 2014), European Russia (Karelia (Polevoi 2008), Moscow region, Ural) (Krivosheina and Stahls 2003) and Siberia to the Pacific coast region (Speight 2020). There are recent records from Austria in 2014 and 2016 (Steiermark, BZ Liezen, Admont, National Park Gesäuse) (Heimburg 2018), one record from Denmark (Viborg), two records from Belarus. In Ukraine, the species only occurs in the Carpathian mountains (Popov pers. comm. 2019), on the western slope, it does not occur at higher altitudes. The species shows signs of spreading over the range of the Carpathians. There is also one locality from Norway (listed CR) but it is probably old.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 2.8 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 436 km2. For the EU 27, the estimated EOO is around 743,000 km2, and the estimated AOO is around 336 km2. Not all exact localities from countries mentioned in the occurrence section are included in the distribution map.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"

The species is known to occur in Protected Areas. The threat status of this species in Finland improved from Vulnerable (VU) in 2010 to Near Threatened (NT) in 2019 because the number of species recorded increased (FinBif 2020). However, in Norway, the species is assessed as Critically Endangered (CR) (Artsobservasjoner 2020).

More research on taxonomy, biology, ecology, life cycle, population trends and distribution is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168532,149168528,Temnostoma bombylans,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Temnostoma bombylans
 is a widespread species throughout Europe with a large extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO). Although the species is not common in the southern parts of its range, it is very widespread in central and Eastern Europe. It may be impacted by anthropogenic activities, including agriculture, logging and urbanisation, but the overall current population trend is considered to be stable. This species is therefore assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.

Further studies are needed into the taxonomy, abundance, trends, ecology and threats to this species.","

This species is found in Fagus forest with over-mature trees, up to its upper altitudinal limits; Quercus/Carpinus/Ulmus forest and old alluvial hardwood forest (Speight 2017, 2020).

Adults are found in clearings and tracksides, flying 1 to 2 metres from the ground and settling on low-growing vegetation.

Flowers visited include umbellifers, species from the genera of Cornus, Hypericum, Ranunculus and Rubus, Sambucus nigra, Sorbus aucuparia and Viburnum opulus. 

The flight period is from May to June and July at higher altitudes.

The larvae are described and figured by Krivosheina and Mamayev (1962); wood-boring, in solid wood within part-rotted stumps and logs; reared from stumps and logs of Acer, Fagus, Quercus, Salix and Tilia; N.P. Krivosheina (Krivosheina 2002) has also reared this species from stumps and fallen timber of Alnus and Betula. Derksen (1941) indicates metamorphosis takes two years and the larvae inhabit stumps of trees felled 7 or 8 years previously. The larvae described and figured, with puparium, by Heiss (1938) and Metcalf (1933) were probably those of T. balyras (Walker). Krivosheina and Mamayev (1962) provide a key distinguishing T. bombylans larvae from those of the other European Temnostoma species.

","The main threats to this species in Europe are deforestation, agriculture, urbanisation and logging. This will certainly have a negative effect on the species, but the actual impact is unknown.","This is a species with a wide European range. Overall, the population trend is considered to be stable for the moment, even with the usual anthropogenic activities in Europe. It is relatively common in the southern parts (Mediterranean region), but it is very widespread in central and eastern Europe and a bit more localised. It is probably the most frequently met species in the genus, and in the right habitat it is not too difficult to find. In Scandinavia, the species is only found in the southern parts. The hoverfly is also widespread to the eastern parts of the Palearctic.",Stable,"

The distribution of this species requires review due to confusion with T. angustistriatum, but it is probably known from southern Sweden and Denmark, south to the Pyrenees and North Africa and the former Yugoslavian countries. It is known eastwards from northern France through northern and central Europe (Whitemore et al. 2008) into Asiatic parts of Russia, as far as the Pacific coast, Japan and Korea. In Europe, it is probably the most frequently met Temnostoma species, but nonetheless very local (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 7.2 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 3.3 million km2. For the EU 27 countries, the estimated EOO is around 3.7 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 1.8 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no direct conservation measures in place. Further studies are needed into the taxonomy, abundance, trends, biology, ecology and threats to this species. The species occurs in at least some protected areas. In the Czech Republic, the species was assessed as Vulnerable (VU) (Farkac et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168536,149168527,Merodon ibericus,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

In Europe, this species is only known from the Iberian Peninsula. It is listed as Near Threatened in Europe and the EU27 primarily due to its relatively small AOO (136 km2) and 16 locations estimated based on overgrazing by livestock as the main threat. Because of the ongoing threats (changes in land use, overgrazing, fires and tourism), the quality of habitat of this species is declining. Although a number of point localities are within the boundaries of protected areas, grazing by livestock is intensive, and it should be controlled and managed adequately.

","

The preferred habitat of this species is open ground in forests. In particular, it is present in Quercus pyrenaica, Quercus rotundifolia dehesa (Ricarte et al. 2018), humid Fagus and Picea forest, dry pasture, and old almond, cherry and olive orchards (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007). It is known to visit flowers of Apiaceae, Achillea, Euphorbia, Muscari (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007) and Thapsia villosa (Carles-Tolrá 2010). The flight period is from May to July. The developmental stages have not been described.

","

Overgrazing by livestock is considered to be the main threat causing habitat loss (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). The habitats have been increasingly fragmented on the Iberian Peninsula, and processes of intensification and expansion have provoked changes (Pulido-Fernández et al. 2018). Fires in these point localities also represent a potential threat to habitat quality, contributing to its fragmentation and loss. Furthermore, ongoing urbanisation and tourism development in attractive point locations, especially those near to the coastline, could cause a decline in habitat quality, finally leading to loss. Since some point localities are within the boundaries of Grazalema Natural Park, cork extraction from the cork oak poses a threat to the habitat of this species.

","There are insufficient data about the population trend. Specimens were collected from 1920 to 2018 from different point localities on the Iberian Peninsula. Most records are from Spain (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007, Carles-Tolrá 2010, Ricarte et al. 2018), and only a few from Portugal (Van Eck 2016).",Unknown,"In Europe, this species is known only from the Iberian Peninsula (from Portugal and Spain), but it is also present in North Africa (Morocco) (Speight 2020). In Europe and EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 369,959 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 136 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. However, considering the fact that in Europe this species is endemic to the Iberian Peninsula, it should be incorporated into National lists of protected species. Although a number of point localities are within the boundaries of protected areas, National and Natural Parks and the Natura 2000 network, grazing (the main threat to the habitat of this species) is still intense (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020), and should be controlled and managed adequately. Monitoring and research on population and habitat trend is needed, as well as research on its biology and ecology and other possible threats. It would be crucially import to know the host plant for larval development. Raising awareness about this endemic species is also very important.   

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168552,149168548,Syritta vittata,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-02-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Syritta vittata is only known in Europe from southern European Russia. There is very little information known about the population trend and threats of this species, and further research is needed to confirm the distribution, trends, habitat and threats of this species. Therefore, this species is assessed as Data Deficient in Europe.

This species is not found within the EU 27 and therefore is Not Applicable.",

There is very little data about the habitat and ecology of this species. It has been recorded on the flower of Ferula sp. (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020). The flight period is from April to June. The developmental stages are not described.

,"The threats to this species are unknown, although it may be impacted by anthropogenic activities such as logging, agriculture and urbanisation.",There is no information about the population trend in European Russia.,Unknown,"

Within the European region, this species is only known from southern parts of European Russia (Speight 2020). According to Barkalov and Mutin (2018), it also occurs in southern Europe, but no records are found.

Elsewhere, this species is known from central Asiatic Russia (Wolgograd), Iran (Beluchistan, Ahwaz), Kazakhstan, Pakistan and Turkmenistan (Speight 2020) (Lyneborg and Barkemeyer 2005).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Further research is needed about the biology, life cycle, threats, habitat, population and distribution of this species in order to be able to make an assumption about any necessary conservation actions. Until now it has not been found in EU 27, and in Europe it only seems to occur in the southeastern part of European Russia.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168560,149168550,Merodon loewi,Near Threatened,B2b(iii),2021,2020-04-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This species is listed as Near Threatened both in Europe and EU 27, primarily due to its area of occupancy (AOO), which is 352 km2 despite its wide distribution range from the Apennine Peninsula to the Caucasus and Russian steppes. Furthermore, threats (land conversion, primarily overgrazing by livestock, but urbanisation as well) provoke decline in the habitat quality, causing its fragmentation and loss. Finally, additional research is needed on population and habitat trend, species biology and ecology. Monitoring is also recommended.

","

The preferred environment of this species is forests: polydominant deciduous forest (Vujić, pers.comm. 2020), open thermophilous Quercus (Quercus cerris/Q.frainetto) forests, evergreen oak (Q.ilex) and Mediterranean pine (Pinus halepensis, P.pallasiana) forests subject to periodic burning and/or clearance of ground vegetation (especially woody shrubs) to avoid burning, as well as garrigue (Speight 2020).

The males exhibit territorial behaviour, flying close to the ground to patrol the boundaries of their territories. They emit an audible buzz in their rapid zig-zag flight. They settle both on the ground and on vegetation (Hurkmans 1988). The females settle low on the upright stems of plants such as Gladiolus, and on dead leaves on the ground. The visited flowers that have been recorded are Aphylanthes monspeliensis, Muscari and Ornithogalum. The developmental stages have not been described, but are probably associated with geophytes such as Ornithogalum (Hurkmans 1988,  Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is from March to the beginning of June (Vujić et al. 2020, Speight 2020). 

","

The main threats are habitat loss due to changes in land use and overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020), as well as urbanisation (for example, in Greece, one of the point localities is in the region of the Mainalo ski center).

","

This species was first described under the name of Merodon graecus by Loew (1862) based on an unspecified number of specimens from Greece and Bulgaria (Varna). Further specimens have been collected up until 2017. According to the known data, the subpopulations seem to be stable, especially in Serbia, North Macedonia and Greece.

",Stable,"This species has a relatively wide range, from the Apennines mountains and the Balkan Peninsula through Turkey to the Caucasus and Russian steppes (Vujić et al. 2020). Most of the subpopulations are concentrated in the area from the eastern Balkans through Turkey to the Caucasus mountains (Vujić et al. 2012). In Europe and the EU27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1,114,489 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 352 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

In Serbia Merodon loewi is protected by national law Code of Regulations on the Declaration and Protection of Strictly Protected and Protected Wild Species of Plants, Animals and Fungi (Official Gazette of RS, No. 5/2010). It is recommended to protect the habitat of this species. Additional research is needed on its population and habitat trend, ecology and biology. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required. Raising awareness is very important. A number of point localities are within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network and in protected areas, for example in the National Park Đerdap (Serbia), National Park of Tzoumerka, Peristeri and Arachthos Gorge (Greece) and Karadag Nature Reserve (Crimea).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168574,149168570,Spilomyia saltuum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Spilomyia saltuum is a widespread species in Europe, but it is rare and not easy to find. There is a clear decline in some parts of its range, such as Spain and Italy, but in the southern parts of the range, the decline is not as apparent. The species has been impacted by the decrease in ancient forest. At the moment, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27, but further declines in the future may push this species closer towards a threatened Category.","

The preferred environment of this species is thermophilous (Q.pubescens) and evergreen Quercus forest with over-mature trees, but primarily with Q.ilex/Q.suber (Speight 2017, 2020). The species has also been found in a Populus plantation flying from tree to tree and sometimes settling on the trees or foliage (van Steenis 2000).

Adults are largely arboreal, but descend to flowers to feed (during the earlier part of the morning) and also to drink at the margins of forest brooks, where these are in direct sunlight; males can be found engaged in shorts bursts of hovering at 1 to 3 m, interspersed with very fast direct flight, at the edge of large open areas within forest, where patches of shorter ground vegetation are intermixed with scrub and regenerating forest trees.

Flowers visited by this species include umbellifers, Eryngium spp., Sambucus ebulus, Scabiosa spp. and Solidago spp.

The flight period is from June to September, with the peak in August and some records on into October.

The developmental stages are not described.

","

As with the other Spilomyia species known in Europe, the decrease in ancient forest has impacted this species. The usual threats for this species include human intrusions like deforestation, logging, urbanisation and agriculture. 

","The species is widespread, but rare and not easy to find. The records north of the Alps are nearly all old and the species may be regarded as extinct there, but the species is hard to find and collect, so it is uncertain. Further south, the species occurs frequently. However in Spain, it is very rare and the Italian records are mostly old, and in both countries, there seems to be a decrease in numbers (van Steenis 2000). The current population trend for this species in both Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be decreasing.",Decreasing,"This species is known from central France, and found south to the Mediterranean, from Spain to the former Yugoslavia, Turkey and the Caucasus. It is found through central Europe from southern Germany, Switzerland and Austria to Hungary, Romania and southern parts of Russia. Records from more northerly parts of Europe are apparently nearly all erroneous, due to confusion with Spilomyia manicata (Rondani), and there are very few recent records from north of the Alps (Speight 2020). Records from Spain and Italy are usually old, less recent records from the species. It is also recorded from Afghanistan (Wachkoo et al. 2019).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be around 6.3 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.6 million km2. For the EU 27 countries the estimated EOO is around 3.8 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 627,000 km2.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There is no information on any conservation actions currently in place for this species. As in other forest dwelling species emphasis should be put on protecting the habitat. Furthermore research should be done on the biology, ecology and trends in population and distribution. It sometimes occurs in National Parks (Bulgaria, Nature Park Zlatni Piassatzi) (Beuk 2004).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168582,149168569,Merodon obscuritarsis,Least Concern,,2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and EU 27 because it is widespread in Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The species is distributed mainly in the Mediterranean region in Europe, from the Canary Islands on the west, throughout Southern Europe to Ukraine and Transcaucasia on the east. The data for Austria, Switzerland (in Speight et al. 2016) and Slovenia are not checked.

Habitat loss (both quality and quantity) is the main threat due to change in land use, overgrazing by livestock and fires through the distribution range. Further research of the population trend and ecology and biology of the species is needed.

","

This species prefers evergreen oak (Quercus ilex) forests and montane, dry Pinus forests (Marcos-García et al. 2007) and Mediterranean riparian ash forests (Ricarte et al. 2008). It has been recorded in shrubland and forests of Fraxinus angustifolia, Quercus faginea and Quercus pyrenaica  in Spain (Ricarte and Marcos García 2008), and in Mediterranean oak dehesa (with Quercus rotundifolia and Quercus pyrenaica as dominant tree species) (Ricarte et al. 2018), as well as in mesophilous Fagus forest (Vujić et al. 2020). The adults fly fast and low over patchily vegetated ground in open areas within dry forests, settling on bare ground, from April to September (Marcos-García et al. 2007, Vujić et al. 2020, Speight 2020). They are known to visit flowers of Apiaceae, Caralluma burchardii, Euphorbia, Genista, OrnithogalumOpuntia and Thapsia. The larva has not been described (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020).

","Since the species is distributed mostly in southern and southeastern Europe, the main threat is probably overgrazing by livestock and fire in the Mediterranean areas (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020), as well as habitat loss due to change in land use across the whole distribution range.","Based on all known data, there are numerous subpopulations across south and southeastern Europe. It has been collected between 1888 (Italy) and 2019. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species is distributed mainly in the Mediterranean region in Europe, from the Canary Islands in the west, throughout southern Europe to Ukraine and Transcaucasia in the east. Data for Austria, Switzerland (in Speight et al. 2016), Russia and Slovenia have not been checked. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe the species is present in North Africa (Algeria, Morocco and Tunis), Georgia and Turkey.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. Its conservation needs are mainly related to the conservation of suitable habitats. The distribution of the species is partially within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network, and within various protected areas: the Pyrenees National Park (France), Ecrins National Park (France), Mercantour National Park (France), Cabañeros National Park (Spain), Durmitor National Park (Montenegro), Kopaonik National Park (Serbia), Stara planina Natural Park (Serbia), and Tara National Park (Serbia). Additional research is needed into its population trend, ecology and biology. The impact of overgrazing by livestock in the Mediterranean part of the range also needs further investigation. Monitoring the population and habitat trends, as well as raising awareness about this species are also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168596,149168592,Blera nitens,Data Deficient,,2021,2019-12-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Blera nitens
 is thought to be present in European Russia, but there is no information about localities, size of subpopulations or population trend. No threats are known, although it probably faces the same problems as other species from this genus that result in habitat loss. Therefore, this species is assessed as Data Deficient for Europe. Further research on the European population is required.

This species is not found within the EU 27 Member States and therefore it is Not Applicable for the EU Member States.","

The preferred environment of this species is Pinus sibiricus taiga (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2019). Flowers known to have been visited by this species include Rubus sachalinensis (Barkalov and Mutin 1991), white umbellifers and Rosa spp. (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020). The flight period is from July to August (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2019).

","No threats are known, although it probably faces the same problems as other species from this genus, so mainly the loss of quality and quantity of habitat.",There is no population information known for this species.,Unknown,"

This species is found in parts of European Russia, extending eastwards out of the European region through Siberia to the Pacific, to Korea and China (Barkalov and Cheng 2011, Speight 2020). This species is not found within the EU 27.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Conservation actions for this species must focus on the preservation of the suitable habitat, which seems to be Pinus sibericus taiga (Speight 2020). Research has to be done on the biology and ecology of the species, and population and habitat trends have to be monitored.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168604,149168591,Merodon puniceus,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-21 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27 countries because it is found only on the island of Lesbos, and it has a very restricted range (the area of occupancy is 12 km2 and the extent of occurrence is 55 km2) with only three locations (based on overgrazing). Habitat loss is the main threat due to overgrazing by livestock on Lesbos island, resulting in the drastic degradation of the landscape and habitats. The habitat preferred by this species is also threatened by fires. In addition, tourism, and the associated infrastructural development also pose a certain threat to the habitats of the species, particularly in Polichnitos. Additional research on species ecology and population trends is needed. The rescue effect is unlikely to happen, since the European subpopulation is restricted to one island and subpopulations outside of Europe occur far away from the European range.","

This species prefers maquis, a scrubland vegetation characteristic for the Mediterranean region. It is composed primarily of leathery, broad-leaved evergreen shrubs or small trees (Radenković et al. 2011). The preferred habitats also include herb-rich open areas in thermophilous Quercus forests and phrygana (Vujić et al. 2020), as well as small open areas in Castanea and evergreen Quercus and Pinus forests (Šašić Zorić et al. 2020). The adults are known to visit the flowers of Prospero autumnale, Foeniculum vulgare (Šašić Zorić et al. 2020) and Dittrichia viscosa (Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is in August and October (Speight 2020). The developmental stages and host plant are not known (Speight 2020).

","Habitat loss is the main threat due to overgrazing by livestock on Lesvos, resulting in the drastic degradation of the landscape and habitats (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). The Mediterranean region is prone to fires in general, but in the light of climate change, they are becoming more frequent and intensive. Fires started by shepherds for pasture improvement contribute to habitat degradation. Tourism and associated infrastructural development also pose a threat, particularly to the Polichnitos site.",There is no information about the population size or trend. Only eight specimens are known from three localities on Lesvos.,Unknown,"

This species is known from the island of Lesvos in Greece (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020), from just three point localities (Radenković et al. 2011, Šašić Zorić et al. 2020).

In addition, it is present in Turkey, near Bozdag, in the western part of the Anatolian Peninsula (Šašić Zorić et al. 2020). In Europe and the EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 55 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 12 km2.

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species so far. One point locality occurs within the Natura 2000 network (Kolpos Geras, Elos Ntipi Kai Oros Olympos). Additional research on its ecology, population trends and threats is needed. Conserving its habitat by controlling fires and grazing by livestock is likely to contribute to its maintenance on the island. Monitoring population and habitat trends, as well as raising awareness about this species is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168615,149168612,Spilomyia manicata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Spilomyia manicata is a widespread, but rare species found all over Europe. In Scandinavia, there are stable subpopulations, although with a reduced number of specimens caught in recent years. However, further south, there are more recent records of this species. Overall, the current population trend is considered to be stable, and although there are some threats that might impact the species, such as deforestation and other human activity, this species does not seem to be threatened across Europe. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. 

If conservation measures were to be implemented for this species, they should focus on the preservation of the habitat.

","

The preferred environment of this species is deciduous forest, in particular Fagus forest with over-mature trees. 

Adults are apparently largely arboreal, but descend to visit flowers or drink. In flight, the hoverfly is a disconcertingly exact mimic of Polistes wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae), and descends to drink from stream margins around the middle of the day. Flowers visited by this species include umbellifers, Filipendula spp., Succisa spp., and pink Allium spp. 

The flight period is from mid June to September, with a peak in July and August. 

Ahnlund (pers. comm. 2020) has collected females of this species from a small trap attached close to rot-holes on the trunk of live Populus tremula. This species has also been hatched from a puparium found in a rot-hole in Acer (van Steenis 2000).

","

The threats for this species are the usual ones for a forest dwelling species, including deforestation, anthropogenic activities like farming, building and recreation which lead to disappearance and decline of suitable habitat.

","

This is a widespread, but rare, species all over Europe. It is not easy to catch. In Scandinavia, the number of subpopulations has not changed over the years, only the number of specimens caught seems to have decreased (van Steenis 2000). The records from the Netherlands are regard­ed as migrants (Barendregt et al. 2000), and this may be the same situation for the Bel­gium record. Speight (pers. comm. 2020), however, does not share this opinion, and states that Spilomyia will fly at most a few kilometres. In that case the species will be extinct in the Netherlands and Belgium. In the more southern parts of the range, there are more recent records. The current population trend is considered to be stable overall.

",Stable,"This species is known from Norway, Sweden, Denmark and northern France, and found south to central Spain and eastwards through central Europe to European parts of Russia. It is found through mountainous parts of southern Europe (and Corsica) to the former Yugoslavia and Greece, Romania and the Caucasus (Speight 2020). The species is also found in India, Afghanistan (Wachkoo et al. 2019) and in Pakistan (Subhan 2016). The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 5.9 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.8 million km2. The EOO for the EU 27 is around 4.7 million km2 and the AOO is around 954,280 km2.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Conservation action for this species should especially focus on the preservation of suitable habitat. Further research is needed on the population, distribution, biology, ecology and life cycle of the species. In Germany the species is assessed as critically endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Denmark the species is listed as regionally extinct (Bygebjerg 2019). In the Czech republic the species is listed as Critically endangered (Farkac et al. 2005). In Poland the species is listed as Vulnerable (Palaczyk et al. 2002).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168636,149168633,Spilomyia diophthalma,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Spilomyia diophthalma is the most common and widespread species of the genus in Europe. It seems to be under threat in the lowland parts of its range, and possibly undergoing local declines. However, in more elevated parts of Europe, and in Scandinavia, the species is more abundant and stable. The main threats are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of forest habitat, but as the species is still widespread, it is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.","

The preferred environment of this species is conifer and deciduous forest, Tilia/Quercus/Fraxinus forest and Abies/Picea forest, with over-mature trees, up to the upper limit of Picea

Adults settle on foliage and tree trunks. Males exhibit territorial behaviour when visiting flowers, even chasing away Vespula species (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Females have been caught in traps on dead Populus tremula (all data from van Steenis 2000).

Flowers visited include umbellifers; Cirsium, Crataegus, Euonymus, Knautia and Solidago virgaurea. It has also been found on Achillea millefolium, Angelica sylvestris, Heracleum sosnowskyi, Heracleum sibiricumLeucanthemum vulgare, Rosa, Epilobium, Veronica, Angelica (Stackelberg 1958, Skufyin 1964) and Ptarmica cartilaginea (Bagachanova 1990).

The flight period is from the end of June to the end of August.

The developmental stages are undescribed, but probably found in rot holes in Populus tremula (Bartsch et al. 2009).

","The main threats are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of forest habitat. There is extensive commercial forestry activity in Fennoscandia and the Baltic states, but the species is still widespread.","This species is probably the most common and widespread species of the genus in Europe. It is a reasonably widespread species in the Palearctic region, but almost no recent records are available from lowlands of central Europe, and it may be that the hoverfly is strongly threatened, if not extinct in parts of this area. In the Scandinavian countries, the species is not uncommon and seemingly not directly threatened. In Norway, is was recently found in 38 localities (Artsobservasjoner 2020), in Finland, more than 100 recent localities (FinBif 2020) and in Sweden, more than 200 recent sightings (Artdatabanken 2020). In alpine areas in Italy, Switzerland and Austria, the species is probably rare (van Steenis 2000). Due to the extensive commercial forestry activity in Fennoscandia and the Baltic states, the species is uncommon there but widespread. The overall current population trend of this species is considered to be stable.",Stable,"This species is found in southern Norway, Sweden, Finland, Germany (Bavaria), the Czech Republic, France (but possibly extinct), Switzerland, northern Italy, European parts of Russia, Poland, Turkey and the Caucasus and on through Siberia to Sakhalin. The occurrence in France is mention­ed by Seguy (1961), but neither Speight (1993) nor van Steenis (2000) have found specimens from France. It was caught in 2013 in Kasimov, Oblast Rjazan, Russia (130 m Asl), in 2014 in lowland Poland (Osiecznica, 167 m asl) and in large numbers in Mongolia in 2017 (G. Pennards pers. comm. 2019).The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 10 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 3.6 million km2. The EOO and AOO for the EU 27 are 6.2 million km2 and 1.7 million km2, respectively.",This species is used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions in place for this species. Any conservation measures implemented in the future should mainly focus on habitat protection. Research should be done on the population dynamics of the species and trends.
In Norway (Artsobservasjoner 2020), Finland (FinBif 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020), this species has been assessed as Least Concern (LC). In the Czech Republic the species is Critically Endangered (CR) (Farkac et al. 2005). In Germany, the species is also assessed as CR (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168657,149168654,Spilomyia digitata,Vulnerable,A3c,2021,2019-09-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

Spilomyia digitata is now largely found in the Mediterranean basin. It is reasonably abundant in Spain, but with a localised distribution in France. It has apparently disappeared from areas in central Europe like Austria, Germany and Switzerland, and the current population trend is considered to be in decline. It is impacted by threats affecting forests in the Mediterranean, such as fire, and overall it is at risk of disappearing in a big part of its range, even given its abundance in the southern parts of its range. The species is likely at risk of declining at least for 30% or more from its current habitat in the future. Although the current estimates of extent of occurrence (EOO) for Europe and the EU 27 are relatively large, the strongly expected decline of the AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the map range would suggest, and it has a very fragmented distribution. The species is dependent on a habitat that is rare in economically exploited woodlands making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. Based on the declining AOO’s for at least 30% or more in Europe and EU27 over the last ten years, and taking in consideration it has a very fragmented distribution as seen on the map, and taken in account the expected decline in suitable habitat will go on in the future the species is listed as Vulnerable under criterion A3c.

Further research on the population, habitat and threats to this species is recommended.","

The preferred environment of this species is deciduous forest, thermophilous Quercus forest (Q.pyrenaica) and evergreen Q.ilex forest, containing overmature and senescent trees; Mediterranean riparian ash forest (Ricarte and Marcos Garcia 2008) and dehesa (Grković et al. 2019).

Flowers visited by this species include umbellifers, Hypericum sp. and Thapsia sp.. 

The flight period is from mid-June to September. 

The larvae are described and figured by Rotheray et al. (2006), from larvae collected from rot-holes at the roots of live Fraxinus angustifolius, Quercus faginea and Q. pyrenaica. Sánchez-Galván et al. (2014) provide information suggesting that a prerequisite for development of larvae in a trunk cavity may be the presence there of the faeces of saproxylic beetle larvae. Their work on the relationships between trunk-cavity inhabiting syrphids and saproxylic beetles was focused on the Iberian chafer Cetonia aurataeformis (Coleoptera, Cetoniidae), whose larval faeces are known to be rich in accessible nutrients (Micó et al. 2011).

","

Any threat to forest habitats within the western Mediterranean region, such as urbanisation, logging, agriculture and wildfires, will be a main threat to this species. Additionally, conversion of old-growth forests will impact the species.

","

This is a very rare species and confined mostly to the western part of the Mediterranean area. There are only old records about its distribution further north. Van Steenis (2000) stated that in the main part of its European range, there are many new records which does not suggest a decline. But already since 2000 there seems to be a strong decline for this species, and this decline is considered having been 30% or more since 2010. Therefore, the current population trend is considered to be decreasing.

",Decreasing,"This species is known from parts of central Europe (but possibly extinct in southern Germany, Austria and Switzerland) and the Mediterranean basin, from Spain round to Italy. Literature records from eastern parts of Europe probably refer to other species (van Steenis 2000) (Speight 2020). It is present in Portugal (Serra da Estrela), multiple provinces for Spain (Almeria, Soria, Tarragona, Zamora, Castellon), three regions in France and also found in Italy (Apennines), the Baleares, Corsica and Sicily (van Steenis 2000). It is apparently not in mainland Greece or Crete (A. Vujic pers. comm. 2019).

Old records previous to 2000 were likely confused with other species in the same genus, therefore they are unreliable. It is a potentially Mediterranean species, although some northern records have been validated. The species is distributed also in the Caucasus and central Asia.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in both Europe and the EU 27 is estimated to be around 1.1 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 261,000 km2.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are currently no known conservation measures in place for this species. More research is needed on the taxonomy, biology, ecology, habitat and population trends of this species. The habitat trends and population trends for this species should be monitored.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168680,149168677,Sericomyia tolli,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Sericomyia tolli
 is in Europe only known from European Russia. There is very little information available on the population, and the trend is unknown. Although this species may be impacted by human activities, it occurs in the high north, in remote and understudied areas. However, it may be impacted in the future by climate change. Based on how little is known about this species in Europe, it is assessed as Data Deficient (DD).

This species does not occur within the EU 27 and is therefore Not Applicable.","

This species is found in open ground, wetlands and tundra/bog. Flowers visited by this species include Pachypleurum alpinuma and Valeriana capitata (Barkalov 2012). The flight period is July. Features of the larva and puparium are illustrated and described by Kuznetzov and Kuznetzova (1995), from material collected from a peat bog hummock.

","The threats to this species are mostly unknown, but it will be impacted by deforestation, logging, drainage, agriculture, urbanisation and others. The environment where it lives (high north) will probably provide some protection from anthropogenic activities, but climate change will be a serious factor in the future.","Not much is known about the population of the species. In is presumed to occur in European Russia (Speight 2020) but Barkalov and Mutin (2018) do not list it as such. It probably does occur here, but it's rare and not easy to find. More detailed research would probably discover the species again in these parts. Adults have been collected near tundra wetlands, bogs and moist meadows, but it is rare and lives in areas that are not very well investigated. The current population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"

This species is from Siberia, including, supposedly, northern parts of European Russia (Speight 2020), but not listed for European Russia by Barkalov and Mutin (2018). It is also found in the Nearctic (Alaska, Yukon, North West Territories and Nunavut) (Skevington and Thompson 2012).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Further research is needed about biology, life cycle, population size and distribution in order to make an assumption about any necessary conservation actions.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168702,149168699,Sericomyia silentis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC).
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Sericomyia silentis 
is a widespread species throughout Europe, with large area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO). It is very widespread in central and northern Europe, and the current population trend is considered to be stable for both Europe and the EU 27. Although this species may be impacted locally by human activities, it is not overall impacted by any major threats. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.

No conservation action is required for this species at the moment, but it would benefit from further research on the biology and life history.
","

This information is taken from Speight (2017, 2020). The preferred environment of this species is wetland/forest, wet moorland, valley bog, fen and Alnus/Salix carr. The hoverfly is found along streams in humid coniferous and deciduous forest and palsa mire (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013).

Adults fly within 3 m of the ground, tracksides and along streams in woodland, and in moorland or heath it may be found far from water. They often settle on foliage of low-growing plants or bushes, and on the ground in the vicinity of water. 

While extremely wasp-like behaviour when foraging on flowers, this species adopts jerky zig-zag flight when alarmed, so it may adapt its flight behaviour to appear more wasp-like only when directly threatened (Golding et al. 2005).

Flowers visited by this species include yellow composites and white umbellifers, such as Calluna, Filipendula, Knautia, Ligustrum, Polygonum cuspidatum, Ranunculus, Rubus fruticosus agg., Salix repens, Sorbus aucuparia and Succisa. The species favoured Rubus fruticosus and Cardueae species (Lucas et al. 2018).

The flight period is from the end of May to the beginning of October. It is especially abundant in August and early September (Golding et al. 2005).

The larvae are not described, but has been found in old, wet bark and wood fragments and saw-dust on an old forest sawmill site and from humus-rich mud in an acid fen flush. Also found by Bloomfield (1897) in the bottom of a water-filled ditch draining an exploited peat bog. The morphology of the chorion of the egg is figured by Kuznetzov (1988).

","Although this species may be impacted locally by the usual anthropogenic activities in Europe, such as urbanisation, logging, drainage and agriculture, there are no major threats impacting this species as a whole.","This is a widespread species throughout Europe. It is more common in the Mediterranean region than S. lappona. In central Europe, it is found at somewhat higher elevations, locally in the Alps. But it is very widespread in central and northern Europe, and the current population trend for Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be stable.",Stable,"

This species is known from Fennoscandia, south through mountainous regions to the Pyrenees, from Ireland eastwards through northern Europe and mountainous parts of central Europe (this species is very local in the Alps) into Russia (and the Caucasus) and on to the Pacific coast and Japan (Speight 2020). Also in Iran (Mazandaran) (Gilasian and Vujic 2004). It was recorded as new to the Slovenian fauna in 2013 (van Steenis et al. 2013), and it was found in Portugal for the first time in 2019 (Alto Minho) (A. van Eck pers. comm. 2019).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 10.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 4.7 million km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is around 6.8 million km2 and the AOO is around 2.5 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"In light of the current distribution and population size, conservation action for this species is not required at the moment. More research can be done on the biology and life cycle of the species, combined with area management to preserve the wetland habitats. The species is not included in any national red lists.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168715,149168711,Sericomyia nigra,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The Polar Pond Fly (Sericomyia nigra) only occurs in Europe in the Scandinavian countries and in European Russia. The species is rare in parts of Sweden, but has been found nearly everywhere in Finland. The current population trend is stable for both Europe and the EU 27, and although the species might be locally impacted by human activity, overall there are no major threats to the hoverfly. Therefore, it is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27.

There are no conservation measures required for this species at the moment, but it would benefit from further research into the biology and life history.
","

The following information is taken from Speight (2017, 2020). The preferred environment of this species is forest/wetland/ tundra, humid, open areas within boreal coniferous and deciduous forest, plus western taiga, humid, seasonally-flooded grassland (H. Bartsch and T.R. Nielsen pers. comm. 2019).

Adults are found in clearings and along tracks in woodland, settling on low-growing vegetation and the foliage of shrubs and small trees, at up to 3 m from the ground (H. Bartsch pers. comm. 2019).

Flowers visited by this species include umbellifers, such as Achillea, Malus, Pyrus, Rosa, Rubus idaeus, Taraxacum, Tilia, Valeriana sambucifolia (H.Bartsch and T.R.Nielsen pers.comm. 2019), Crataegus, Prunus padus, Vaccinium (Nilsson et al. 2012), and Spiraea (Skevington et al. 2019).

The flight period is from the beginning of June to mid August.

From Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020): Sericomyia nigra adults occur on open, moist soils adjacent to forests, in Norway also on occasionally flooded grasslands. The fly usually stays near the ground in glades and brows, but can also fly a few meters up. It visits flowers of Achillea millefolium, Aegopodium podagraria, Angelica archangelica, Berberis vulgaris, Lathyrus japonicusMalus domestica, rose pink canina, Rubus idaeus, Sorbus aucuparia, Valeriana sambucifoliaViburnum opulus. The flight time lasts from the end of May to the first half of August. The larva, as in the other Sericomyia species, is considered to be of the rat-tailed larva and to live in overgrown soil and puddles.

","This species may be locally impacted by the usual anthropogenic activities in Europe that consists of urbanisation, logging, drainage and agriculture, overall, there are no major threats to it.","This species is quite rare in the coniferous forest belt in Sweden, and even more rare in the southern part of the country. There are no records from Skåne, Blekinge, Öland and Gotland as well as from scattered landscapes further north. In Norway, there are scattered records from the areas around Oslo and north in the valleys and from Kristiansand, Bergen, Trondheim, Narvik and Pasvikdalen in northeast Finnmark. It is possible that the species occurs along the entire west coast. In Finland, the species is found all over the country (records are missing from a few provinces). The current population trend in Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be stable.

In Finland there have been around 100 recent sightings, in Sweden around 200 recent sightings, and in Norway around 84 recent sightings (FinBif 2020, Artdatabanken 2020, Artsobservasjoner 2020).
",Stable,"

This species is found from northern Norway, south to southern parts of Norway, Sweden and Finland, and in northern parts of European Russia and on into Siberia. It is also known from Canada (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 3.7 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.4 million km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is around 1 million km2 and the AOO is around 423,796 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"In light of the current distribution and population size in the northern countries, no urgent conservation action is required at the moment. More research can be done on the biology and life cycle of the species and the population trend, combined with area management to preserve the wetland habitats.

This species has been assessed as Least Concern in Finland (FinBif 2000, 2010, 2020), Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020) and Norway (Artsobservasjoner 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168736,149168731,Sericomyia hispanica,Near Threatened,A3c,2021,2019-09-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Sericomyia hispanica is only known from Spain, France and Portugal. Given that more frequent severe droughts are increasingly likely and the species having only one generation per year, under climate change, the species could actually disappear very rapidly. It is suspected there will be a continuous decline in the EOO and AOO of the species due to human interference and climatic changes. This decline in size and quality of the habitat will cause a strong decrease in the population of the species estimated to be just over 30% over the next ten years. Therefore the species is assessed as Near Threatened as it is close to qualifying for a threatened Category under Criterion A.","

This species is found in deciduous forest, in open areas with streams and flushes in humid Fagus forest and Pinus sylvestris forest in northern Spain (S. Rojo pers. comm. 2019).

It has been recorded visiting the flowers of Ranunculus sp. and the flight period is from March to July. Larvae will be aquatic in standing surface water (Nielsen 1997). There is one generation per year.

","There is no specific information regarding the potential threats affecting this species. However, the species is presumably threatened by the reduction of specific habitats due to human activities and climate change. Because larvae are aquatic in standing surface water, drought and fire will be a threat, just as the disappearance of water bodies. The species is susceptible to climatic oscillations due to one generation per year. Fire is a major threat, especially because the habitat in southwestern Europe seems to be drier over the last few years and the numbers of fires have increased in the region.","In Spain, this species is rare, present only in central and northern Spain. It is also rare in northern Portugal and southwestern France. The current population trend is considered to be decreasing, due to human interference and climatic changes. The Iberian peninsula gets drier and hotter, and this will have an influence on the species.",Decreasing,"This species is known from Spain, France and Portugal. In Spain, it is found in Segovia, Madrid, Leon, Oviedo and Salamanca (Peris 1962), with a total of 11 specimens in the northern localities. Only the Madrid records are from the last two to three years, all other records are from the last century. In France, it is known from the Pyrénées-Atlantiques department (Speight 2007). In Portugal, it is found in the north in Vila Real and Montalegre (Van Eck pers. comm. 2019). This species is endemic to the EU 27.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be around 196,000km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 68,000 km2. But the actual AOO will be smaller than this, as the given AOO is an estimation from the regions it was recorded from and there seems to be a significant decline in the size and quality of the habitat.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Research is recommended on locating the larvae and learn about distribution, biology and ecology of the species. It is also important to confirm current distribution and re-survey known localities for the species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168757,149168752,Sericomyia arctica,Vulnerable,A3c,2021,2020-02-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

The Arctic pond fly (Sericomyia arctica) does not have a large distribution area in Europe, due to its habitat preferences. It is only known from the high northern parts of Scandinavia and European Russia, with the bulk of sightings in Finland. The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be strongly decreasing. The species is dependent on a wetland habitat that is strongly economically exploited making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. The decline in suitable habitat in the future is estimated to be at least 30% over ten years and so the species is listed as Vulnerable.

More research is needed about biology, life cycle, threats, population trends and distribution of this species to be able to make a more detailed assumption about necessary conservation actions.","

The preferred environment of this species is forest and wetland. The hoverfly has been found beside pools in humid Pinus sylvestris forest/taiga and forested bog and in tundra (Speight 2017, 2020). Flowers visited by the species include Achillea millefolium and Rubus chamaemorus (T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2019).

The flight period of the species is from the end of June to July, and in the Nearctic from mid June to mid August (Skevington et al. 2019).

The developmental stages are undescribed, but probably associated with small pools.

","The threats to this species are unknown, but the species will surely be affected by the usual anthropogenic activities going on in Europe like deforestation, logging, drainage, agriculture, urbanisation and others. The environment where it lives (high north) will probably provide some protection from anthropogenic activities, but climate change will be a serious factor in the future.","Adults have been collected near tundra wetlands, prairie sloughs and sedge meadows, but it is rare and lives in not very well investigated areas. The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is strongly decreasing the last decennia (van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). There is an expected strong decline in suitable habitat in the future of around 30% over the next ten years (van Steenis pers. comm. 2020).",Decreasing,"This is a circumpolar species from northern parts of Fennoscandia, European Russia (Karelia, Leningrad), Siberia and North America (Yukon) (Speight 2020). From Karelia, there is only one recent sighting of the species, 50 km north of Petrozavodsk in 2013 (G. Stahls pers. comm. 2019). In Norway, it is only known from the Pasvik valley in the northeast, in Finland only from Lapland and neighbouring provinces. The actual distribution of the species is expected to be much smaller that these numbers indicate. The worldwide distribution is circumpolar and extends via northern parts of European Russia, Siberia to the Pacific and on to North America (Artdatabanken 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) for this species in Europe is estimated to be around 2 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 680,700 km2. The EOO for the EU 27 is around 612,000 km2 and the AOO is around 180,000 km2.
",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"More research is needed about biology, life cycle, threats, population trends and distribution of this species to be able to make a more detailed assumption about necessary conservation actions. In Finland, the species was assessed as Least Concern (LC) (FinBif 2020) and in Sweden it was Not Evaluated until 2015, but in 2020 as is considered LC, although there are no recent sightings (Artdatabanken 2020) and so this is probably an underestimation.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168779,149168776,Pocota personata,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Pocota personata is a widespread species with a broad distribution. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.4 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.8 million km2. For the EU 27 countries, the EOO is estimated around 3.5 million km2, and the AOO is estimated around 906,000 km2. It can be rare, especially in some countries such as France and the Czech Republic, but it is an arboreal species that is difficult to find, and therefore may be more widespread that originally thought. The species may be declining in the natural forests where it occurs, but it is also known to occur in urban parks. This seems to be a very important lifeline for its survival, and as a result the overall current population trend is considered to be stable. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. It would benefit from the protection of original habitat in natural forests, and appropriate management of urban parks.","

The preferred environment of this species is Fagus and Quercus/Carpinus/Ulmus forest, containing overmature and senescent trees. 

Adults are largely arboreal, descending only to visit flowers of understorey trees and shrubs. Males sit on the trunks of trees near the entrance to rot-holes, quite high up the trunk – presumably awaiting the emergence of females. Mating has been observed on the trunk of beech trees. In Spain the species seems to be related with Fagus sylvatica. The hoverfly seems to also occur in Poplar species in urban parks but it is not known how sustainable these habitats are. It may be becoming increasingly rare in natural forest habitat due to anthropogenic activities, although forest management seems to adopt a more natural management in many areas. In urban forest parks with Poplar the species is known to be found as well, and so may be changing headquarters for the species.

Flowers visited by this species include Crataegus sp., Prunus sp. and Sorbus aucuparia. The flight period is from mid April to the beginning of July.

The larvae are described and figured by Rotheray (1991), from larvae collected from rot-holes in live Fagus. This species has also been reared from larvae collected in a standing-water rot-hole in Populus, by Becher (1882), and from a rot-hole in Populus tremula (Ahnlund pers. comm. 2019). Alexander (2005) concludes that there may be some dependence of the larvae of this species upon white-rot-fungi, suggesting that the presence of such fungi in a rot-hole may be of more significance to Pocota personata than whether or not the rot-hole contains standing water. He also substantiates suggestions that this species uses trunk rot-holes one meter or more above the ground. Larvae of this species may be distinguished from larvae of related genera by the keys in Rotheray (1994), who also provides a coloured illustration of the larva, apparently from a preserved specimen. The species overwinters as a larva.

","The threats for this species in natural forests include urbanisation, agriculture and deforestation, but there is a lifeline in the urban parks. The loss of old trees in natural forests, through the replacement of old deciduous trees by conifers, will also impact this species. In addition, revitalisation of suburban parks (cutting old trees) and cleaning of fallen trees from city parks may have a negative impact.","This is a widespread species, with a broad range but it can be rare, probably because it is mainly arboreal. Likely has been in decline over the last few years but this is not known for certain, at the moment the population trend is considered being stable. It was likely to be more common historically, but it is still being collected - not sure if declines impact the entire European population. The species is rarely collected and may be well overlooked, but it might be more widespread than generally assumed. In the Netherlands, there are several records every year often from parks, and the species does not seem to be connected to pristine environments (Reemer et al. 2009). The Belgian records are mostly from old-growth forest, but also include old orchards and city parks (van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020).

The species is only known from a few localities in European Russia, two or three localities from the Czech Republic, with one subpopulation with many individuals, and three localities in Ukraine, in city parks, with 40 to 50 males found in one locality in one year (Popov pers. comm. 2019). There is one record from the centre of Paris, but it is extremely rare in France, and one locality is in a protected forest (Speight pers. comm. 2019). It was recorded once in the north of Spain in a National Park (Alexander 2005).",Stable,"

This species is found from southern Sweden, south to the Pyrenees, from Britain eastwards through central and southern Europe (Switzerland, Italy, Croatia, Serbia, Greece) and into European parts of Russia and on to the Caucasus and Ukraine (Speight 2020). 

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.8 million km2. For the EU 27 countries, the EOO is estimated around 3.5 million km2, and the AOO is estimated around 906,000 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are currently no specific conservation measures in place for this species, but it requires protection of original habitat in natural forests, and appropriate management of urban parks with old trees for the species. In the Czech Republic, it is considered as Endangered (EN) on the national red list (Farkač et al. 2005). In Germany the species is assessed as Critically Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Denmark the species is listed as Endangered (Bygebjerg 2019). In Poland it is listed as Vulnerable (Palaczyk et al. 2002).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168808,149168804,Pelecocera pruinosomaculata,Near Threatened,A3c,2021,2020-02-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European Regional Assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 Regional Assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

Pelecocera pruinosomaculata
has an uncertain distribution, but is known to occur across parts of Southern Europe. There is an ongoing decline in the quality and the extent of the habitat, and in addition, the current population trend in Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be declining fast. This is due to anthropogenic impacts combined with natural regression of the coastline, impacting dune habitats. Human activity also impacts other habitats where this species is found. This decline is and has been in the order of nearly 30% over a ten year period so the current range could be a lot smaller than recorded on the map. This decline is likely to go on in this special type of habitat, so the species is expected to lose a big part of its suitable habitat in a short time. Therefore, this species is assessed as Near Threatened, as it is close to qualifying for a threatened Category under Criterion A3c.","

The preferred environment of this species is open ground and forest, Mediterranean coastal dunes and heath with scrub Pinus, Pinus salzmanni forest, open Quercus pubescens forest on limestone karst plateau (at 730 m Asl), with Buxus shrub layer and sparse, unimproved dry grassland and phrygana (east Mediterranean version of garigue). 

Lair et al. (2019) recorded that the species seems more eurytopic than the other Pelecocera species, as it has been found on Mediterranean sand dunes, scrublands with Buxus and Thymus on limestone or metamorphic schist at 500 m Asl, calcareous grasslands with Juniperus at 700 to 800 m Asl, heathlands with Erica arborea or Pinus and Cistus laurifolius, heathlands at 600 m ssl. Depending on the locality, the species is found in spring (April to May) or in the Autumn (September to October). Autumn populations may be numerous and are polymorphic, while spring data are usually of single individuals.

Adults apparently are only in flight early in the morning (before 08.30am) to judge from Malaise trap catches (Malaise trap emptied after dark and visited again early in the morning). In Cyprus, one male was collected on Polygonum equisetiforme flowers in partly shaded conditions close to several Hedera pastuchovii subsp. cypria plants standing on either side of a small stream (van Steenis et al. 2019). One additional male of Pelecocera pruinosomaculata was collected in a Malaise trap in an abandoned vineyard.

Flowers visited by this species include yellow Cruciferae, Erica manipuliflora (Standfuss and Claussen 2007) and Polygonum equisetiforme (van Steenis et al. 2019)

","Forest habitats with open, heathy areas and coastal dunes have disappeared, not only due to human activities but also because of climate change (storms, flooding) and pollution (disappearance of heath and open spaces). In the other habitats where the species occurs, there might be an additional threat by fire and droughts next to the usual threats like overgrazing, urbanisation, roads and railroads and natural succession of the vegetation.

Threats for the dune system in Europe (Coastalwiki 2020) include a combination of natural effect which affects the dune landscape as well as the anthropogenic activities like agriculture, husbandry and the deliberate use of fire. In recent decades, tourism has caused important damages on coastal landscapes with the urbanization of the coast, the increase of summer visitors, and the introduction of invasive or exotic species. The pedestrian and motorised pathways all over dunes lead to vegetation destruction and therefore enhanced weathering and erosion. The potential for dune recovery is dependent on the sediment supply in each area and on the intensity of human impact. Dune plants are especially sensitive to disturbance and are heavily affected by humans. Without dune plants, the integrity and preservation of a stable dune complex cannot exist. Anthropogenic impacts combined with the natural regression process of the coastline induce the acceleration of the destruction of the dune vegetation ultimately leading to to dune destruction.","There is no information on the European population size. The species is certainly declining in a rapid pace in comparison with earlier decades due to the continuing anthropogenic activities in southern Europe, and it is estimated it will be nearly 30% or more in a ten year period given the threats to its habitat.",Decreasing,"

The full distribution of this species is uncertain due to confusion with related species from the same genus, but it is known from Spain, southern France, southern Italy, Greece, Turkey (Saribiyik 2014) and Cyprus (van Steenis et al. 2019).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 1.7 million km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 102,000 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions for the species known, but there are efforts to restore the coastal dune habitats in general (Coastalwiki 2020). The species will probably benefit from any protection of the coastal habitat, but it is unclear to what extent that will be.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168831,149168825,Triglyphus escalerai,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Trichopsomyia escalerai was considered threatened on the Balkan Peninsula (Vujić 2001). At present, it is known to occur only at a limited number of locations (14) which are severely fragmented on a European scale. Stable subpopulations occur mainly in moist forests with Laurel nobilis trees and natural Mediterranean oak forests. In the Mediterranean, both forest types have become rare and highly fragmented, and often occur in small patches. These remaining patches can be easily be affected by human activities. Because of the severe fragmentation of suitable habitats, the recolonisation of locally extinct subpopulations is not likely to occur. On the other hand, it has also been discovered in suburban gardens and parks, but in low numbers. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 56 km2 in Europe, and 40 km2 in the EU27 countries. Based on this, the current severely fragmented distribution and the declining habitat, the current European Red List status of this species is Endangered.","

In general, this species is found in evergreen humid or thermophilous oak forests (Vujić et al. 2020), but also in suburban environments such as city parks and even gardens with planted trees (Van Eck 2011, Van Eck et al. 2020, Jentzsch and Claussen 2014, Devalez 2016). It is most abundant in dense and humid patches of Laurel nobilis forests and in undisturbed Mediterranean oak forests. 

The adults settle on the leaves of bushes and shrubs (Van Eck et al. 2020, Vujić 1994), while females have been observed flying low through wet and partly shaded vegetation close to springs, and sometimes visiting flowers (van Steenis et al. 2015). The larval stages are unknown.

It has been reported to visit flowers of Apiaceae and Ranunculus species (Vujić 1994, van Steenis et al. 2015), and one female was collected on Foeniculum sp. (M.P. van Zuijen, pers. comm. 2021).

It is most abundant in spring from mid-April to mid-June, but two specimens were also collected in early September, which indicates a weak second generation.

","

In the past, Laurel nobilis forest (where this species has been found to be most abundant) was a lot more widespread in the Mediterranean area, and Vujić (1994) stated that many sections of the natural Mediterranean oak forest and maquis along the Adriatic coast of Croatia and Montenegro have been significantly degraded due to human activities. This may have resulted in severe fragmentation of the current population of Triglyphus escalerai. There are several threats to the remaining patches of natural laurel and Mediterranean oak forests where this species is still present. For example, the subpopulation in Morinj is strongly affected by various human activities (van Steenis et al. 2015) and the patch of laurel forest in the city park of Penedo da Saudade (Coimbra) is rather small and surrounded by unsuitable urban environment. This makes subpopulations vulnerable to local extinction (Van Eck et al. 2020). Recently, there have been large fires in central Portugal which may have destroyed suitable habitat patches.

","

At most sites, only one or a few specimens have been collected, while at the sites in Slano (Croatia), Morinj (Montenegro) and in Coimbra (Portugal), more than 10 specimens were observed at the same time. The population of Morinj was revisited over several years and found to be stable (Vujić et al. 2001). The overall population is supposed to be stable, however the European subpopulations are considered to be severely fragmented.

",Stable,"

This species has an exclusively Mediterranean distribution. It was originally described from one female collected in 1929 near Tangier (Morocco) and has not been found again until the 1980s. It is currently known from six sites in north and central Portugal, and on the Balkan peninsula from Croatia (Dubrovnic (Slano), Montenegro (Morinj) and six sites in Greece (Van Eck 2011, 2016; Van Eck et al. 2020, Gil Collado 1929, Jentzsch and Claussen 2014, van Steenis et al. 2015, Vujić 1994, Vujić et al. 2020). In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1,031,206 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 56 km2. In the EU27, the AOO is 40 km2.

Outside Europe, besides the type specimen from Tangier, it has only been recorded from Turkey (Vujić et al. 2020). 

The Balkan subpopulations may belong to a different species, currently under investigation (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,"There is an area in Montenegro where this species occurs which has been proposed for protection, but this has not yet been realised (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). More research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better. Habitat protection and restoration are strongly advised to protect it. Raising awareness would be also beneficial.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168852,149168847,Triglyphus primus,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a Palaearctic species which is widely distributed in Europe. It is listed as Near Threatened on the Red List of Norway and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). Its preferred habitats are typically anthropogenic wastelands and roadsides where the widespread Common Mugwort is present (Artemisia vulgaris). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

The reduction of wasteland patches caused by the use of wastelands for other human purposes may locally or even on a larger scale have a strong negative effect on the occurrence of Triglyphus primus. Therefore, the current European Red List status in Europe is considered to be Least Concern, but may become Near Threatened in the near future.

","

Triglyphus primus is usually found in ruderal habitats with patches of bare ground, such as roadside verges, railway embankments, quarries, dikes and also thermophilous forest fringes and gardens or parks where recent digging activities have taken place (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

Adult males fly erratically low above ground or visit flowering plants: they resemble small bees and are difficult to detect. Both sexes are often observed visiting white flowers (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009) of umbellifers such as Aegopodium podagraria, Heracleum sphondylium and Daucus carotus, and also Alliaria petiolata, Euphorbia spp., Ligustrum ovalifolium, Prunus spp., Solidago spp. and Sorbus aucuparia (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020).

Larvae have been collected and reared from galls induced by the aphid Cryptosiphum artemisiae on Artemisia vulgaris, and they might also occur in aphid galls on Artemisia absinthium and Melilotus albus (Reemer et al. 2009).

This species is bivoltine with a flight period from late April until June and July, or to September with the main peak in August (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020, Stubbs and Falk 2002).

","

Because it lives in ruderal habitats, this species is vulnerable to disturbance by human activities, such as building houses or commercial premises. In many parts of its range, ruderal habitats (such as roadside verges and leftover corners in agricultural land or in industrial areas) are becoming scarce. In addition, paving of sandy roads diminishes suitable roadside habitat conditions. Mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris), on which the larvae are found is considered to be an allergenic plant to humans and hence has been eradicated in some areas.

","

Usually, only one or a few specimens have been encountered at one site. In Germany and the Netherlands, this species shows a stable population trend on the long and short term (Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011). In Great Britain, the population trend was found to be stable over the past four decades (S.G. Ball pers. comm. 2021), and the overall population trend is also considered to be stable.

",Stable,"

This is a Palaearctic species which is widely distributed in Europe. It occurs from England east to European Russia, Ukraine and Romania, and from the southern tip of Finland, south Sweden and the extreme southeastern tip of Norway, south to southern France, Andorra, adjacent provinces of Spain and south to central Italy. It is also distributed on the Balkan peninsula south to the northern parts of Greece and south-west Bulgaria (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Delmastro and Sommaggio 2003, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Heimburg 2018, Kuznetzov 1993, Ricarte and Nedeljković 2020, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Torp 1994; Tóth 2011, 2014; Vujić et al. 2020, A.V. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, L. Mazanek pers. comm. 2019, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020, R. Żóralski pers. comm. 2020).

Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside Europe, Triglyphus primus has been recorded from Siberia, southern parts of the Russian Far East (including Sakhalin), Korea and Israel (Barkalov and Mutin, 2018, Speight 2020).

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,There is no information available about conservation measures specific to this species. More research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better. Habitat protection and restoration are strongly advised to protect it. Raising awareness would be also beneficial.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168875,149168870,Trichopsomyia lucida,Vulnerable,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv,v)",2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)


This is a European endemic widely distributed mainly in central Europe. It has been found so far at only 100 different sites, but this is considered to be under-reported due to its elusive nature. Because of this, the suspected area of occupancy (AOO) is 1,200-2,000 km² in Europe and 600-1,000 km2 in the EU27 countries. It is considered to be threatened on the Balkan peninsula and also in the rest of Europe because of a noticeable decrease in the numbers of subpopulations and/or range during the 20th century (Vujić et al. 2001). In the Netherlands, it has been declining in some provinces over the past two decades.

Due to its distribution being severely fragmented, the decline in the area and quality of its preferred habitats, and reports of its decline, the current European Red List status of Trichopsomyia lucida is considered to be Vulnerable in Europe, also true for the EU27 countries. More research is  strongly needed to reveal the reasons for its decline in relation to the threats to its preferred habitat.

","

This species is found in open places, in and around moist deciduous or alluvial forests (Quercus, Populus, Ulmus) on nutrient-rich soils at forest edges with tall-herb vegetation and a high groundwater level (Reemer et al. 2009 ,Bot and van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020). The adults are observed flying low through tall herbal vegetation or just above ground on adjacent paths, sitting on leaves of shrubs or visiting flowers such as Anthriscus sylvestris, Heracleum spondylium, Rubus spp. Verbascum spp., and Potentilla erecta (Bot and van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020).


The larval stages are unknown, and the flight period is from late April until August (Bot and van de Meutter 2019).

","

There is no detailed information about the threats to the preferred habitat type of this species. Locally, the habitat may be threatened by water abstraction or by manipulation of natural flooding processes. Another threat may be habitat management such as machinery mowing of vegetation where all the vegetation is removed at once.

","Usually, only one or two specimens have been collected at each site. In the Netherlands, the population trend was found to be stable after 1950 (Reemer et al. 2009), but a recent decline of  57% was found in the province North Brabant (Zollinger et al. 2018). In Germany, a moderate long-term and undeclared short-term population decline has been observed (Ssymank et al. 2011). The overall population trend is declining. At least 50% of its population is located in isolated small subpopulations in which only one or two individuals have been found, indicating its rarity: therefore the distribution is considered to be severely fragmented.",Decreasing,"

This is a European endemic. It has a widespread but scattered distribution, mainly in central Europe, and it is often rare at its locations. So far, it has been recorded from England (London), the Netherlands (central and southern parts), Belgium (north and eastern border), Germany (seven states), Czechia (Bohemia), Switzerland (four cantons), France (nine departments), Spain (three provinces), Serbia (Vojvodina), Ukraine (the Donetsk Region) and Latvia (Kuznetsov 1993, Vujić et al. 2001, Speight 2006, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Speight et al. 2018, van Steenis et al. 2018, Bot and van de Meutter 2019, Speight et al. 2020, L. Fisler pers. comm. 2020, L. Mazánek pers. comm. 2019, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020, A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). 


Its exact distribution is not precisely known, and so the map indicates the regions where it is known to exist rather than the exact distribution. With 100 known localities, the minimum area of occupancy (AOO) is 400 km2 in Europe. As it is rare and difficult to find in the field, it is more likely that the number of localities will be around 300-500, making an AOO of 1,200-2,000 km2 possible. Its distribution in Europe is about twice as large compared to that of the EU27, and thus, the AOO for EU27 is estimated to be around 600-1,000 km2.

Records of Trichopsomyia lucida from Turkey most likely refer to a different species, Trichopsomyia ochrozona (van Steenis et al. 2018).

",There is no information about uses and trade.,Terrestrial,"

Trichopsomyia lucida is a strictly protected species in Serbia (Vujić et al. 2001). In Czechia, it is listed as Threatened (Mazánek and Barták, 2005), and in Germany as Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011). Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better, and habitat protection and restoration are needed to protect it. Raising awareness would be also beneficial.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168894,149168891,Trichopsomyia flavitarsis,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widely distributed in Europe in all kinds of wetland habitats, especially in fens, bogs and wet, nutrient-poor grassland and heath. It is a protected species in Serbia (Miličić et al. 2018). It is listed as Vulnerable on the National Red List of Czechia (Mazánek and Barták 2005) and Near Threatened in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), partly due to the loss of suitable habitat types. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, the current European Red List status is considered to be Least Concern, but this should be evaluated regularly because its preferred habitat types may be under pressure from the enrichment of nutrients and periods of extreme drought as a result of climate change.

","

This species is found in all kinds of wet and often nutrient-poor habitat types, such as wet heath- and grasslands, along fens, streams, and peat bogs, which are often situated at the edges of wet forests or above the treeline (Stubbs and Falk 2002, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The adults fly low through dense vegetation and are difficult to detect except when visiting flowers (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020). Males hover at a height of one or two metres, often near bushes, or sit on leaves (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019). The larvae are found in the galls of a gall-making psyllid Livia juncorum (Homoptera) and on stems of Juncus articulatus (Rotheray 1997). 

Adults visit the flowers of Aegopodium podagraria, Berteroa incana, Caltha palustris, Chaerophyllum temulum, Frangula alnus, Narthecium ossifragum, Potentilla erecta and Ranunculus repens (Bartsch et al. 2009, Steenis et al. 2018).

The flight period is from the end of April until late August, but late specimens also appear until September (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Stubbs and Falk 2002).

","

Because of its dependency on wet habitat types, this species is vulnerable to climatological drought periods. Miličić et al. (2018) calculated a 75% loss in its current distribution range in Serbia as a result of climate change. Furthermore, the species is vulnerable to human activities such as water abstraction and habitat destruction in general, and to nutrient enrichment of its habitats through air pollution or cattle manure.

","

This species is usually encountered in low numbers. However, sometimes up to a dozen specimens can be found at the same time. In the Netherlands and Germany, it has stable long and short-term population trends (Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011). In Great Britain, a significant decline was observed over the past four decades, especially after 1990 (S.G Ball pers. comm. 2021). Miličić et al. (2018) calculated a 75% loss in its current distribution range in Serbia as a result of climate change. The overall population trend is also considered to be declining.

",Decreasing,"

This is a Palaearctic species with a widespread distribution in Europe. It occurs from Ireland east to European Russia (northwest, central and east Federal Districts), Ukraine (Donetsk region) and Romania, and from central Fennoscandia with some local occurrences in the more northern parts, south to north-east Spain (Teruel) and central Italy (Lazio). It also occurs from the Balkan peninsula south to Greece (Chios) and south-west Bulgaria (Bartsch et al. 2009, Dirickx 1994, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Heimburg 2018, Kuznetzov 1993, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Speight 2008, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Vujić et al. 2020; A.V. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020, L. Mazanek pers. comm. 2019, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020, A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019, R. Żóralski pers. comm. 2020). 

Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.
 
Outside Europe, it has been recorded from Turkey, Siberia, southern parts of the Russian Far East, Iran, Kazakhstan, and Mongolia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Saribiyik 2014, van Steenis et al. 2018).

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. Habitat protection and, where possible, restoration are strongly advised, together with research and monitoring of the threats, ecology and population and habitat trends. Raising awareness would be also beneficial.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149168914,149168912,Trichopsomyia joratensis,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a European endemic. Its current distribution is not well known because it is elusive. It has been recorded from approximately 200 different sites, but is likely to be under-recorded because of its elusive nature. Therefore, its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are considered to be higher than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. There is no information about declines or severe threats to its subpopulations, or to the preferred habitat types in Europe. Therefore, the current status is considered to be Least Concern, cemented by the fact that the population trend seems to be stable and no large-scale threats to the preferred habitat are known.

","

This species is found in open, herb-rich places, and in moist deciduous or conifer (often Abies spp.) forests. It often appears on nutrient-poor, preferably acid soils and near streams or other wet places (Reemer et al. 2009, van Steenis et al. 2018, Speight 2020).


The adults fly low through vegetation, visit flowering plants and have been observed drinking water from moist sandy soils along trails (Bot and van de Meutter 2019, L.J. van der Ent pers. comm. 2020). Males are encountered a lot less frequently than females, which might be because they spend most of the time high up in the canopy (van Steenis  et al. 2018). The larvae are expected to feed on gall-forming aphids on coniferous trees, because a puparium was found on the main stem of Picea abies (van Steenis  et al. 2018).


The recorded visited flowers are Anthriscus sylvestris, Chaerophyllum temelum, Crataegus spp., Prunus serotina, Ranunculus repens and Rubus spp. (Bartsch et al. 2009, van Steenis  et al. 2018). The flight period is from May until early August (Bot and van de Meutter 2019).

","

Not enough is known about the natural history of Trichopsomyia joratensis to determine any threats. Its preferred habitat is not generally threatened, except from drought or decreasing groundwater levels caused by climate change. Local forestry management in which spruce forest is replaced by other types of forests may also negatively affect the subpopulations.

","

In general, only one or sometimes two specimens (mostly females) are encountered at collecting sites. In Germany and the Netherlands, it has a stable population trend (Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011). The overall population trend is also considered to be stable.

",Stable,"

This is a European endemic. It is predominantly central European, occurring in hilly areas and mountain ranges. It is distributed from the Netherlands, Belgium and the eastern part of France, east to Poland and Romania (northern part). It has scattered records on the southern tips of Sweden and Finland, with one isolated location in central Sweden. It also occurs from the eastern parts of Denmark south into the Alps (France, Italy, Switzerland, Austria, Slovenia), and on the Balkan peninsula, where it is recorded from Bulgaria (an old record), Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia (Kula 1985, Dirickx 1994, Torp 1994, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Bartsch et al. 2009, van Steenis et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2018 ,Bot and van de Meutter 2019, Speight et al. 2020, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, M. De Groot pers. comm. 2021, A. Vujić, pers. comm. 2019). Peck (1988) also recorded Trichopsomyia joratensis from Norway, but this was not reconfirmed on the 2017 country lists (Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017). Although widespread in Europe, it is elusive and consequently difficult to find. So far it has been collected at approximately 200 different sites. However, the number of localities is likely to be under-recorded and will probably be much higher because of its elusive nature. The males fly high in the canopy of coniferous trees - a habitat still widespread in Europe. Therefore, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are considered to be higher than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

 

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. It is listed as Vulnerable on the national Red List of Denmark. Habitat protection and, where possible, restoration are strongly advised, together with research and monitoring of the threats, ecology and population and habitat trends. Raising awareness would be also beneficial.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168924,149168922,Pipizella zloti,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The European endemic species is extant in Slovenia, Greece, Serbia, and Montenegro. The species prefers deciduous forest, open areas within thermophilous Quercus and Fagus forest and in montane, calcareous grasslands. It is assessed as Vulnerable because of its small area of occupancy (AOO) of  about 70 km2, the fact that it occurs at six to seven locations, and because there is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to deforestation, agriculture, intense urbanization, coastal tourism development, and habitat loss due to agriculture development. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is estimated to be about 150,000 km2.

In the EU 27, the species is assessed as Endangered because of its small area of occupancy (AOO) of 12 km2, the fact that it occurs at three locations, and because there is a continuing decline in the quality of habitat due to deforestation, agriculture, intense urbanization, coastal tourism development, and habitat loss due to agriculture development. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in the EU 27 is estimated to be about 7,200 km2.

Research on the species' population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats is required.

","

This species prefers deciduous forest, open areas within thermophilous Quercus and Fagus forest, montane, and calcareous grasslands (Speight 2018). The larvae are assumed to feed on aphids occurring on trees, in galls or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants (van Steenis and Lucas 2011), but the developmental stages are undescribed.

","The main threats to this species are deforestation, intense urbanization, coastal tourism development, and habitat loss due to agricultural development (A. Vujić pers. comm. 20202).","

There is no information about the population trend for this species. There are only a few records so far, and it is considered very rare in Europe and the EU 27 (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

",Unknown,"This European endemic species is known from Montenegro, Serbia, Slovenia and Greece (mainland and the islet of Donousa, near Naxos island) (Speight 2018). In Europe, it occurs at six to seven locations, and has an area of occupancy (AOO) of about 70 km2 and an extent of occurrence (EOO) estimated to be about 150,000 km2. In the EU 27, it occurs at only three locations, with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 12 km2 and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 7,200 km2. It is found at altitudes up to 1,400 metres above sea level.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions in place for this species. It is strictly protected under Serbian legislation (Code on declaration and protection of strictly protected and protected wild species of plants, animals and fungi, “Official Gazette of RS”, no. 5/2010). Site and and habitat protection are required to further its preservation. Research is required on its population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats. It occurs in two overlapping Natura 2000 sites called Snežnik - Pivka and Javorniki - Snežnik in Slovenia and in Ethnikos Drymos Prespon – Evryteri Periochi in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020). It also occurs in the Durmitor National Park in Montengro.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168934,149168932,Sphegina elegans,Least Concern,,2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread European species with a slightly patchy distribution. Although its habitats seem to be threatened and are declining, the area of occupancy (AOO) as well as the number of locations are still likely to be large. In addition, there is no sign of severe fragmentation. This qualifies the species to be Least Concern.","

This species occurs in humid broadleaved forests with streams. It is a lowland species found up to 1,000 metres asl. The adults fly in shady conditions close to streams, and visit a wide range of flowers, for instance white umbellifers such as Chaerophyllum temulum, Crataegus, Ranunculus, Sanicula, Stachys, Valeriana and Viburnum opulus (Verlinden 1991, Torp 1994, Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, van Steenis et al. 2013, van Steenis et al. 2015, Speight 2020). Larvae have been found in tree trunks partly submerged in streams, having sappy decay under the bark of deciduous trees such as Alnus, Fagus and Populus (Torp 1994, Reemer et al. 2009, van Eck 2016, Krivosheina 2018).

","The main threats are to its habitat, which consists of deciduous forests with streams and old tree trunks partly submerged in the water. This lowland habitat is severely threatened by human agriculture due to logging and drainage, and is under pressure due to the use of fertilisers and pesticides. Other threats are forest management including drainage, logging and clearing of old and dead trees.","Nothing is known about the population size of this species. It is often found in rather high densities and in many consecutive years at the same locality (Popov 1994, Tóth 2011, 2014, Borodin and Borodina 2014).",Unknown,"This is a widespread central European species, occurring from the southern parts of Norway, Sweden and Finland south to northern Portugal, and from Ireland to European Russia in the east and Samos Island in the south-east (van der Goot 1981, Thompson and Torp 1986, Vujić 1990, Brădescu 1991, Maibach et al. 1992, Speight and Lucas 1992, Kuznetsov 1993, Dirickx 1994, Vujić et al. 1997, Nielsen 1999, Stănescu and Pârvu, 2005, de Groot and Govedić 2008, Ball et al. 2011, Krpač et al. 2011, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Heimburg 2018, Speight et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020). The records of this species in east Turkey and the Caucasus are most likely all to belong to Sphegina alaoglui Hayat, 1997 (see Hayat 1997 and Mengual et al. 2020). Sphegina elegans is, therefore, probably a European endemic. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.",Not used or traded for any human purposes.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place for this species. It has several common names (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and van de Meutter 2019, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Röder 1990, Torp 1994, Tóth 2017) which could help to engage with the public and in taking conservation actions on a national level. Monitoring the population would be also important. On the national Red List of Germany it is listed as Least Concern (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168944,149168942,Pipizella speighti,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

The species prefers open forest ground, grassy clearings in montane Fagus and Abies/Picea forest up into alpine scrub of Pinus mugo and Alnus viridis. The species is European endemic, found in the Alps in France, Switzerland, and Italy and in the Balkan Mountains in Serbia and Montenegro. In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be between 116 and 120 kmand the extent of occurrence (EOO) is about 490,000 km2. In Europe, the species is assessed as Least Concern since it occurs at 15-18 locations. However, there are concerns that the species will fall into one of the threatened categories in the future as the quality of the species' habitat quality is declining due to human pressure on alpine and montane ecosystems. For this reason, it is recommended to monitor the population trends of the species and research its threats.

Nonetheless, in the EU 27, the species is assessed as Vulnerable since it has a restricted geographic range with an area of occupancy (AOO) of less than 50 km2, the fact it occurs in 10-12 locations, and because it has a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to the abandonment of alpine pastures, reoccurring wildfires, and tourism development. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in the EU 27 is estimated to be about 51,500 km2. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from Serbia and Montenegro subpopulations. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends is needed. Monitoring of the population trends is also recommended. Resource and habitat protection is required to conserve the species.

","This species prefers open forest ground, grassy clearings in montane Fagus and Abies/Picea forest (A. Vujić and S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020 in Speight 2020), up into alpine scrub of Pinus mugo and Alnus viridis. The undescribed larva is assumed to feed on aphids occurring on trees, in galls, or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants.","Pine scrublands are often cut and burned in order to enlarge pastures, causing wildfires, one of the main threats to alpine ecosystems. On the other hand, the abandonment of alpine grasslands cause afforestation and the loss of the biodiversity of open areas. Mountain tourism is also a threat to the habitat of this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data about the population trend of this species. It is not common, usually with fewer than ten specimens found per location (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"This species is an European endemic, where it is known from the Alps in France, Switzerland and Italy, in the Balkan Mountains in Serbia and Montenegro (van Steenis and Lucas 2011, A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020), and from the Pyrenees (Andorra and France, presence in adjacent parts of Spain not recorded). In Europe, it occurs at 15-18 locations, with an area of occupancy (AOO) estimated to be between 116 and 120 km2, and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 490,000 km2. In the EU 27, it occurs in 10-12 locations, with an area of occupancy (AOO) of less than 50 km2, and an extent of occurrence (EEO) estimated to be about 51,500 km2.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are currently no conservation measures in place for this species. Research is needed on the population size, distribution and distributional trends, as well as threats. The monitoring of population trends is also recommended. Resource and habitat protection is required for its conservation. It is found in some Natura 2000 sites, such as at Vallée du Tarn (de Brousse jusqu'aux gorges), Massif du Puigmal, Gervanne et rebord occidental du Vercors, and Steppique Durancien et Queyrassin in France, and Ambienti Glaciali del Monte Bianco in Italy (European Environment Agency 2020). It is also found in the Šar-Planina and Kopaonik in Serbia National Parks and Durmitor National Park in Montenegro.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168966,149168962,Pipizella pennina,Least Concern,,2021,2019-11-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is an European endemic species with a broad overall range from northern Spain east to western Romania. The species is assessed as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution. In Europe and the EU 27, the species occurs at 19-20 locations, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be about 200 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is about 1,930,000 km2. The species is listed as Critically Endangered in Germany. The species is protected under the Serbian legislation. Further research on the species' population size, distribution, and trends and threats as well the monitoring of the population trends are required. Resource and habitat protection are needed to preserve the species. If research shows that the population is severely fragmented, it is possible that the species may qualify for a threatened category.

","

This species prefers forest open ground, clearings in Fagus and Picea forests in the Montane zone, and on up to the upper limits of Picea forest in the Alps (Speight 2018). It also flies along forest edges, in open spaces in the forest, and around bushes up to a metre high. The larvae are assumed to feed on aphids occurring on trees, in galls, or under the ground such as on the roots of plants (van Steenis and Lucas 2011), but the developmental stages have not been described yet (Speight 2018).

","

Habitat loss and fragmentation are the major threats to Alpine biodiversity. Spreading settlements, unsustainable farming and road construction significantly endanger alpine ecosystems, but one of the most devastating human activities in the region is ski tourism. A further threat, global warming, affects weather patterns, and causes pathogen invasions and upward migration of alpine plants (WWF 2005).

","

There is no information about the population trend for this species. It is scattered in the Alps and Pyrenees mountains, and is considered to be even rarer outside this region in the rest of its distribution (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

",Unknown,"This species is an European endemic, where it is known from the Netherlands, Belgium, France, northern Spain, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Serbia, Romania (Speight 2018), Hungary (Tóth 2011) and Italy (Lucas 1976). It occurs in the Alps and Pyrenees mountains, where there are more records than in other parts of its range, where the species is much more sporadic due to habitat loss. It occurs in 19 locations, and also in one locality in Serbia (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). In Europe and the EU 27, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be about 200 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) about 1,930,000 km2. It is found at altitudes between 60 and 2,600 metres above sea level.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. It is listed as Critically Endangered (CR) in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), and is protected under the Serbian legislation (Code on declaration and protection of strictly protected and protected wild species of plants, animals and fungi, “Official Gazette of RS”, no. 5/2010). It occurs at several Natura 2000 sites such as at Montaña Central de León, Los Valles, Sierra de Chía - Congosto de Seira, Posets - Maladeta, and Capçaleres del Ter i del Freser in Spain; Capcir, Carlit et Campcardos, Val d'Argens, Le Mercantour, Dormillouse - Lavercq, Steppique Durancien et Queyrassin, Val Ferret and Ubacs du Charmant Som et gorges du Guiers Mort in France; Monte Soro e Biviere di Cesarò in Sicily, Sila Grande and Val Ferret in Italy; Karwendel and Bisamberg (Wiener Teil) in Austria; Északi-Bakony and Mátra in Hungary; Mittelrheintal, Muschelkalkkuppen close to Embken, Muldenau, and Ahrgebirge in Germany; La Gileppe in Belgium; Sint Pietersberg and Jekerdal in the Netherlands and Porțile de Fier in Romania (European Environment Agency 2020). It is also found in the Kopaonik National Park in Serbia. Its mapped distribution overlaps the areas of >400 protected areas (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2021).

Resource and habitat protection is needed as a conservation action for its preservation. Further research is required on the population size, distribution, trends and threats, as well the monitoring of population trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168975,149168965,Sphegina cornifera,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 Regional Assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This is a European alpine endemic with a wide range of occurrence. On the national Red List of Germany, it is listed as Least Concern (Ssymank et al. 2011). Its specific habitat is highly threatened by human activities, such as the canalisation of streams and rivers, and drainage of grasslands for cattle grazing. Furthermore, dam building and ski slopes pose a threat. As it has very specific habitat requirements and a narrow altitudinal range from 1,000 to 2,000 metres, it is suspected that the distribution could become severely fragmented. The inferred area of occupancy (AOO) is between 1,000 (EU27) to 3,000 km2 (Europe). In addition, its habitat quality is declining, and it is possibly severely fragmented or could become severely fragmented soon. Therefore, this species is classified as Near Threatened in Europe. The exact extent of occurrence (EOO) and AOO will need to be clarified in the near future, and regular monitoring is strongly advised as the species could become threatened very soon.","

This species inhabits alpine coniferous forests with streams and other wet situations up to alpine grassland at 2000 metres. The adults fly in shaded conditions along streams. In alpine grasslands, these streams also need to be shaded by trees. The larval habitat is not known but assumed to be water-logged tree trunks with wet sappy decay. The specific habitat needs of this species and its altitudinal range (streams in coniferous forest from 1,000 metres to 2,000 metres) (Thompson and Torp 1986, Speight and Lucas 1992, Speight 2020) mean that the habitat of this species is quite fragmented.

","

This species is threatened by many human activities which are causing a decline of wet forested areas. The threats mostly come from the agricultural practice of draining grasslands for cattle grazing. Dam building has reduced the amount of suitable habitats in the past, and is likely to continue in the future too. Land use for human leisure and especially winter sports (for instance skiing) will further decrease the amount of suitable habitat. Climate change may also cause decline of habitat quality, because it could shift upwards too quickly in the mountains.

","

This is a rare species, of which only a few specimens have been collected at the same locality. It is unknown if the subpopulations are stable through time (Thompson and Torp 1986, Speight and Lucas 1992, Maibach et al. 1992).

",Unknown,"

This species is only known from Europe and is considered an Alpine endemic (Heimburg 2018, Speight et al. 2018). There is one stray record from Romania (Stănescu and Pârvu 2005) which needs verification (J. van Steenis pers. comm 2021). As it is not verified, this record has not been taken into account in this assessment. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 347,205 km2, but the true EOO will possibly be smaller due to the specific habitat requirements of alpine coniferous forests with small streams at an elevation between 1,000 and 2,000 metres. The area of occupancy (AOO) is inferred to be around 3,000 km2 for Europe and slightly smaller for EU27.

",This species is not traded or utilised otherwise.,Terrestrial,No conservation actions are in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends. Raising awareness about this species is also important.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149168987,149168983,Pipizella obscura,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU°)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU°)

In Europe, the species is known from Finland and Sweden. It is a lowland species collected in different habitats like Boreal forests and wet meadows along the seashore close to Alnus glutinosa forests. The species was assessed as Endangered since it has a restricted geographic range in Europe and in the EU 27, with an area of occupancy (AOO) of about 12 km2, is found in only three locations, and has a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to eutrophication and pesticide use. However, considering the potential influence from subpopulations from eastern Russia, the Red List Category is downgraded to Vulnerable (VU). The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is about 36,000 km2. Further research on the species' population size, distribution, and trends and threats as well as the monitoring of the population trends is recommended. Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection is required to conserve this species.

","This is a lowland species collected in various habitats, such as Boreal forests and wet meadows along the seashore close to Alnus glutinosa forests. In Finland, it also occurs in wet meadows in turf areas with mixed coniferous and deciduous forest. Another record is from a very small ski-slope in a mixed urban forest with wet marshy meadows and a river close by (J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020). The larvae are assumed to feed on aphids occurring on trees, in galls, or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants (van Steenis and Lucas 2011). The developmental stages have not been described yet (Speight 2018).","This species is found in meadows, and thus pesticide use and the excessive growth of plant and algae known as eutrophication are the main threats (J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020).","

There is no information about any population trends. There are very few records so far, and it is considered to be rare (van Steenis and Lucas 2011).

",Unknown,"Within the European region, this recently described species is known from a small number of records in Finland and Sweden (van Steenis and Lucas 2011, Speight 2018). Presence in European Russia is not yet known but presence there is possible (J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2021). In Europe and the EU 27, it occurs at three known locations, with an area of occupancy (AOO) of about 12 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be about 36,000 km2. It was found at altitudes of up to 400 m above the sea level.

Outside Europe, it is possibly widely distributed in eastern parts of Russia, and influx from these populations may occur (J. van Steenis  pers. comm. 2020).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. It occurs in the Natura 2000 Granlandet site in Sweden (European Environment Agency 2020). Further research is recommended on its population size, distribution and distributional trends, and threats, as well as the monitoring of population trends. Conservation actions such as site/area as well as resource and habitat protection are needed to preserve this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169007,149169004,Sphegina atrolutea,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is an EU27 endemic, with scattered records from the Pyrenees and the Cantabrian mountains. Only four localities are known, in which it has only been recorded in low numbers - mostly single specimens. The habitat preferences are not well known, but it is probably forested areas with streams, as inferred from other species of this genus. The habitat is threatened by agricultural and recreational pressures, and it is found in only four locations, based on threats of logging, tourism development, and the impacts of dam building. The area of occupancy (AOO) is between 16 and 64 km2, and the species is classified as Endangered.","

Adults have been observed flying along small streams in mid-elevational beech (Fagus spp.) forests and visiting white umbellifers. They have also been recorded visiting hawthorn (Crataegus spp.). They are found along the same small streams outside the forest, indicating that they could be dispersing along streams to other suitable habitats (Thompson and Torp 1986).


The larval habitat is inferred from the other species within this genus, and is probably decaying or dead trees with accumulations of sap under the bark or sap-runs on live trees. The dead logs need to be in humid places, notably in or along streams in dense deciduous, mixed or coniferous forests (Speight 2020).

","The larval habitat is most vulnerable to threats caused by extensive logging, resulting in clear-cut areas. Other threats are the increased tourism leading to building roads, hotels and ski facilities, possibly decreasing the area of occupancy (AOO). Changes in hydrology due to dams or increased stream drainage will influence the quality of the habitat, posing a threat to the size of each subpopulations. Climate change may have a similar negative impact on hydrology.","The description is based on two males and one female collected in July 1972, and one additional record from France (Thompson and Torp 1986, Speight et al. 2018). Other exact record data were not available, but a department-level distribution map of France recorded it from two departments, namely Pyrenees-Orientales and Hautes-Pyrenees (Speight et al. 2018). Based on this information, the species has been found in four localities, three of which are along the northern part of the Pyrenees and the fourth in the Cantabrian mountains. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"

This species is endemic to Europe. It was described from the Cantabrian mountains in Spain (Thompson and Torp 1986), and has also been found in the French Pyrenees (Speight et al. 2018). It is also recorded from Romania (Stănescu and Pârvu 2005), but this record needs confirmation as it lies far from the other known range. For now, it is assumed to be a misidentification (J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020), and is therefore not taken into account in this assessment. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 9,570 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) ranges between 16 and 64 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place for this species. Research, surveying, and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and current population, as well as the potential threats. Some conservation actions are proposed, such as land and water protection and creating restoration plans. In addition, raising awareness about this species would be also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169015,149169003,Pipizella lyneborgi,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This European endemic species is known from Portugal and Spain. The species exists in thermophilous oak forest. The species is assessed as Endangered since it has a restricted geographic range with an area of occupancy (AOO) between 23 and 40 km2,  has a severely fragmented population, and has a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to logging, urbanization, overgrazing, and tourism development. The species' extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and in the EU 27 is about 72,000 km2. The species occurs at only six to seven locations. Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection are conservation actions that are needed for the species. Research on the species' population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, and threats are recommended as well as the monitoring of the population trends is required.

","This species prefers thermophilous Quercus forest (Speight 2018). The larvae are assumed to feed on aphids occurring on trees, in galls or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants (van Steenis and Lucas 2011). The developmental stages have not been described (Speight 2018).","

The main threats to this species are logging, urbanization (such as in the vicinity of Madrid), overgrazing and tourism development in coastal areas (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

","

There is no information about the population trends of this species. It is rare, with only a few specimens per locality being found (van Steenis and Lucas 2011). The population is considered to be severely fragmented, since subpopulations are extremely small and isolated.

",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is known from central Portugal and central and southern Spain (Speight 2018). The first Portuguese records for this species were from 2011. It is considered to occur in six to seven locations, with an area of occupancy (AOO) estimated to be between 32 and 40 km2, and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 72,000 km2. It is found at altitudes between 600 and 1,700 m above sea level.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species; however, site/area as well as resource and habitat protection are needed. Research is recommended on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats: the monitoring of population trends is required. In Spain, it occurs within the Sierra Nevada and Cuenca del río Manzanares Sites, and in Portugal its range overlaps the Serra da Estrela Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)/Parque Natural, which are part of the Natura 2000 network (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149169028,149169023,Sphegina varifacies,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This is an EU27 endemic with a small area of occupancy (AOO), ranging between 24 and 96 km2, and only a few widespread locations (five or six, based on forestry degradation as the main threat). Its area of occupancy and quality of the habitat is declining due to ongoing threats such as intensified forestry and water management. Its distribution is severely fragmented as most of its individuals are found in small and relatively isolated subpopulations. Therefore, the species is assessed as Endangered.","

This species was found near springs and streams in broadleaved Fagus forest at an altitude of 1,200 to 2,000 metres. The adults fly in shady conditions along streams and springs, and feed on yellow Ranunculaceae such as Caltha and Ranunculus (Kassebeer 2001, Speight 2020).

","

Forestry (especially cutting timber) and pollution will have a considerable negative impact on this species, together with human recreational activities and agricultural use of pesticides. Climate change will give rise to warmer and drier summers, and thus will lead to degradation of humid streamside forests on the Iberian Peninsula. Furthermore, extension and intensification of agriculture will have a negative impact on the quality and also on the area of suitable habitat.

",This species is found in good numbers at each of its collecting sites. Nothing is known about whether it has been found at the same localities over consecutive years. The species is considered to be severely fragmented as most of its individuals are found in small and relatively isolated subpopulations.,Unknown,"This species is only known from a few localities in France (in the Massif Central) and Spain (in the Pyrenees) (Kassebeer 1991, Speight et al. 2018). There is also possibly one record from the Cantabrian mountains (J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2021) listed as Sphegina latifrons in Ricarte and Marcos-García (2017): this record needs to be clarified. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 75,850 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) ranges between 24 and 96 km2.",The species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place for this species, but managing agricultural pollution and habitat protection and restoration are recommended. Research and monitoring are needed to understand the potential threats, and its ecology, population and habitat trends. Raising awareness is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169036,149169024,Pipizella divicoi,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-21 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is found most of western and Central Europe. The species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States in view of its wide distribution and because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. However, the species is affected by habitat loss due to irrigation of dry grasslands. The species prefers open well-drained, dry, unimproved grassland with scrub and montane, unimproved grassland and tall-herb open areas within warm-dry Oak forest. Further research on the population size, distribution, and trends and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends is recommended. Resource and habitat protection is needed to further preserve the species.

","This species prefers open well-drained, dry, unimproved grassland with scrub and montane, unimproved grassland with Castanea (Ricarte et al. 2014). It also occurs in tall-herb open areas within thermophilous forest of Quercus cerris and Quercus frainetto, unimproved, dry montane pasture, and garrigue, as well as sheep-grazed, unimproved, dry grassland with low, scattered, grazed scrub of Prunus spinosa, Crataegus or Rosa spp. (Speight 2020). It can also be found in avalanche corridors with high flower abundance (Ivenz and Krenn 2017). It occurs up to 2,300 metres in the Alps (Verlinden 1999). The undescribed larva is assumed to feed on aphids occurring on trees, in galls, or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants.","The species is threatened by the introduction of irrigation to its dry grassland habitat (Speight 2020).","There are no data on population size, but there is evidence that the population trend is declining (Speight 2020). It is not common in Europe and the EU 27.",Decreasing,"Within the European region, this species is found from the Netherlands south to the Mediterranean coast of Spain, and from Belgium and northern France in the Rhine valley eastwards through central and southern Europe to Italy and the Balkan countries. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. It is found at elevations up to 2,300 metres above sea level.

Outside Europe, it is found in Turkey, Mongolia, and through Siberia to the Pacific coast (Speight 2020).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions in place for this species.  Further research is recommended on the population size, distribution, trends and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends. Resource and habitat protection is needed to further preserve the species. It occurs at several Natura 2000 sites in Europe, such as at Julijske Alpe, Snežnik - Pivka and Grintovci in Slovenia; Gorski kotar i sjeverna Lika in Croatia and Ethnikos Drymos Vikou - Aoou, Koryfes Orous Smolikas, Periochi Metsovou (Anilio - Katara) and Oros Olympos in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020). It also occurs in the Durmitor National Park in Montengro and National Parks Šar Planina and Kopaonik in Serbia.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169047,149169044,Sphegina sublatifrons,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

This species is a very rare Balkan endemic, with only one large population on a mountain area of about 40 km2. It has a specific habitat, and very narrow altitudinal range, making it very vulnerable to any threats to its habitat. Its inferred area of occupancy (AOO) is below 500 km2, and it is declining continuously together with the extent and quality of its habitat. There is also a possible decline in its subpopulations, especially on Mount Kopaonic. Its abundance in the other areas is not well known but is seemingly very low, especially in Serbia where several surveys have been conducted, and only on Mount Kopaonic was the species found on all occasions. As there are six rather widely scattered localities where it has been found, and only one of those has a seemingly stable population, it is classified as severely fragmented. The AOO is estimated to be between 80 and 400 km2. Therefore, the species is assessed as Endangered in Europe.

In the EU27, it is only known from two localities making an AOO of 8 km2, the distribution is severely fragmented and its habitat is deteriorating. It is very unlikely that the EU27 will have an influx of specimens from other European countries, as the subpopulations are far apart with little suitable habitat in between. Therefore, the species is classified as Critically Endangered in the EU27 countries.","

This species is found in humid alpine coniferous forests with streams and old-growth trees, at an altitude of 1,200 to 1,800 metres. The adults fly close to streams in shaded conditions, mainly feeding on Caltha palustris growing in the streams or close to springs (Vujić 1990, van Steenis et al. 2015). The larval stages are unknown, but it is presumed that they live in submerged logs with sappy decay.

","The main threat is human leisure activities, particularly winter sports. The building of ski-slopes are causing forest loss, drainage of springs and streams, and pollution from ski-wax and other human waste. The type locality is now lost because of such infrastructure development and tourism. In addition, other kinds of pollution caused by human activities and climate change also pose a threat to this species.","

On Mount Kopaonic, this species is found in great numbers together with Sphegina latifrons, and can be found over many consecutive years. Some of its former localities have now been destroyed by the building of ski slopes, which probably caused a decline in its subpopulations. The other records are mostly a few to only single specimens in each locality not repeated in subsequent years (Krpač et al. 2011). It seems that Mount Kopaonic is its main area (Vujić 1990, van Steenis et al. 2015).

",Decreasing,"

This is a very rare European endemic. It is only known from six localities in Greece, North Macedonia, Romania and Serbia (Dirickx 1994, Stănescu and Pârvu 2005). The only site with large subpopulations is on Mount Kopaonic (Vujić 1990, van Steenis et al. 2015, Vujić et al. 2020). In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is larger than the threshold for the threatened categories, and the area of occupancy (AOO) ranges between 80 and 400 km2. In the EU27, the species potentially has a highly restricted EOO, but with only two georeferenced locality records, it can not be estimated. The AOO is considered to be 8 km2.

",This species is not traded or used in any other way.,Terrestrial,"This species is strictly protected in Serbia (Vujić et al. 2001). Area and habitat protection, management and restoration are recommended as well as raising awareness about this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand the potential threats, ecology, and population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169056,149169046,Pipizella certa,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-21 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

Within the European region, the species is found in southern Sweden and southern Finland. The species is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) for Europe and the EU27 Member States under Criterion B since it has a restricted geographic range in Europe and the EU 27, with an area of occupancy (AOO) between 68 and 80 km2, it occurs at 11–15 locations in Europe and in the EU 27, and has a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to the excessive growth of plants and algae caused by the mismanagement of habitat. In Europe and the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is about 137,000 km2. The species prefers humid, grassy, open areas in calciphile deciduous forest with Lime Trees. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends as well as the monitoring of the population trends are required for this species. Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection is also recommended to preserve the species.

","This species prefers humid, grassy, open areas in calciphile deciduous forest with Tilia spp. (A. Haarto pers. comm. 2020 in Speight 2020), and tall herb vegetation bordering Larix and Taxus forest (van Steenis 2011). The undescribed larva is assumed to feed on aphids occurring on trees, in galls, or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants.","The gradual overgrowing of the habitat due to the absence of grazing and mowing, the clearing of land for cultivation, afforestation, water construction, dredging, and the excessive growth of plant and algae known as eutrophication are the major threats to wet grasslands and woodlands in northern Europe (Finnish Environment Institute 2018).","There are no data about the population trends of this species. It is usually found in low numbers, fewer than 10 specimens per locality, and it is considered a rare species in Europe and the EU 27 (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The population is considered to be severely fragmented.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is found in southern Sweden (including Gotland) and southern Finland (including the Åland Islands) (van Steenis and Lucas 2011, Speight 2020). Occurrence in adjacent parts of European Russia is likely. In Europe and the EU 27, it occurs at 11-15 locations with an area of occupancy (AOO) estimated to be between 68 and 80 km2, and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 137,000 km2.

Outside Europe, it can be found in the Novosibirsk region in Russia.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions in place for this species. In Sweden, it is assessed as Near Threatened (Artdatabanken 2020) whilst in Finland it is considered Least Concern (Suomen Lajitietokeskus 2021). Research is required on the population size, distribution and distributional trends, as well as the monitoring of population trends. Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection is also recommended for its preservation. It occurs at a few Natura 2000 sites in Europe, such as at Marsviken-Marsäng and Hejnum hällar in Sweden and Karkali, Suuriniemi ja Mailan alueet and Lohjanjärven alueet in Finland (European Environment Agency 2020), and the mapped distribution overlaps that of a large number of protected areas (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2021).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169067,149169064,Sphegina spheginea,Vulnerable,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT°)
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT°)

This boreo-alpine species has a wide but severely fragmented distribution. Furthermore, it seems to have a small area of occupancy (AOO), ranging between 500 and 2,000 km2 in Europe and between 500 and 1,300 km2 in the EU27 countries, and there is a continuing decline in the area of occupancy and quality of habitats. Based on these observations, the species is classified as Vulnerable both in Europe and in the EU27 countries. However, there is considered to be significant potential for a rescue effect from subpopulations out of the European region, hence, the assessment for the both the EU27 Member States and for Europe is revised to Near Threatened (NT°).

","

This is a boreo-alpine species, found in coniferous taiga forests and also in humid Fagus forests with streams, pools and bogs. The adults are found in shady conditions along streams and humid vegetation, feeding on a wide variety of flowers such as Caltha, Potentilla erecta and Rubus chamaemorus (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

","The forest habitat of this species is threatened by the intensification of forestry and agriculture, and is negatively influenced by logging, drainage and pollution by pesticides and eutrophication. Other human impacts are extension of leisure activities such as building ski-slopes and dams. Furthermore, agricultural pollution and climate change will have a negative impact on its future survival.","In Europe, this species is mostly found in very low numbers, and it is not known if it can be found over several years at the same locality (Maibach et al. 1992, Pestov and Dolgin 2006). The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"

This is a boreo-alpine species with a scattered distribution in central Europe, and a more even distribution in the northern parts of Sweden, Finland and European Russia. It also spreads eastwards into Russia, Mongolia and the Russian Far East (Thompson and Torp 1986, Brădescu 1991, Dirickx 1994, Nielsen 1999, Stănescu and Pârvu 2005, Heimburg 2018, Speight et al. 2018). The species is possibly extinct in some parts of Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). It has a large extent of occurrence (EOO), but based on the inferred number of locations and its restricted habitat preferences, the area of occupancy (AOO) would be between 800 and 2,000 km2. The AOO for EU27 is estimated to be two-thirds of the European AOO, with a range of 500-1,300 km2.

",The species is not used by humans.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"No conservation actions are in place for this species, but urgent habitat protection and restoration are needed, as well as the de-intensification of agriculture. It has several common names (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Röder 1990), which could help in engaging with the public and taking conservation actions on a national level. Research and monitoring are needed to understand the potential threats, ecology, population and habitat trends. It is classified as Endangered on the national Red List of Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169077,149169075,Pipizella cantabrica,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This European endemic species is known from northern Spain and northern Italy. The species prefers open ground and dry unimproved grasslands. The species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) for since it has a restricted geographic range, with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 60 km2, is found at seven locations and is severely fragmented, and has a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to land conversion and the poor management of habitats, such as improper grassland management causing overgrazing or grassland conversion to forest. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is estimated to be 52,000 km2. Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection are conservation actions required to preserve the species. Further research on the population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats of the species are recommended. Monitoring of the population trends is also required.

","This species prefers open ground and dry unimproved grasslands (Speight 2018). The larvae is assumed to feed on aphids occurring on trees, in galls, or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants (van Steenis and Lucas 2011). The developmental stages have not been described yet (Speight 2018).","

The main threats to this species are land conversion and the poor management of habitats, such as improper grassland management causing overgrazing or grassland conversion to forest (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

","There is no information about the population trend of this species. Fewer than 20 specimens per locality are usually found, and it is considered a rare species in Europe and the EU 27 (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The population is probably severely fragmented since subpopulations are small and isolated.",Unknown,"This species is an European endemic species, where it is restricted to northern Spain (Ricarte et al. 2014) and northern Italy in the Piemonte and Val Pellice regions (Speight 2018). It occurs at seven locations, with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 60 km2, and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 52,000 km2. It is found at altitudes up to 1,700 metres above sea level.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions in place for this species. It occurs at five point localities found in Natura 2000 Sites, all in Spain: Ancares - Courel, Valgrande, Montaña Central de León, Liébana, and Aizkorri-Aratz (European Environment Agency 2020). Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection are the conservation actions required for its preservation. Further research is recommended on population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats. Monitoring of population trends is also required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169087,149169085,Sphegina platychira,Near Threatened,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This European-endemic species is an Alpine specialist with a restricted habitat preference, and thus it could qualify for one of the threatened categories. As there are many records from widespread localities, the area of occupancy (AOO) and number of locations are large. Nothing is known about its population size. Based on the distributional pattern and its altitudinal preference, it can be argued this species close to become severely fragmented in the near future, and its AOO and habitat quality are continuously declining. The criteria for the AOO could be met if its narrow habitat preference is taken into account (which in this case is inferred to be between 2,000 and 3,000 km2 in Europe and 2,000 km2 in the EU27 countries). Based on this information, the species is classified as Near Threatened at European and EU27 level, but is very close to the Vulnerable category. More monitoring and research is strongly advised to see if it becomes threatened in the very near future.","

The habitat consists of humid coniferous forests with streams (Thompson and Torp 1986). The adults are found in humid alpine meadows, visiting flowers of Caltha palustris and Sorbus aucuparia (Speight 2020). The larval habitat is unknown, but is probably tree trunks with sappy decay, partly submerged in streams and pools (Speight 2020).

","The main threats to this species are agricultural intensification and forestry. These cause drainage of alpine meadows and forest streams, and an increased eutrophication and pesticide use. Forestry also causes a decrease in senescent trees and dead wood, and also affects forest streams negatively. Building of dams can destroy the entire habitat, and building of ski-slopes or other human leisure facilities can also negatively affect the species. Climate change will also have a negative impact.","This species is most often found in low numbers, and it is not known if it can be found at the same locality several years in a row (Brădescu 1991). The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"

This is a mountain species of central and eastern Europe, found in the Vosges and Massif Central (France), Schwarzwald and Allgauer Alps (Germany) and throughout the Alps (Switzerland, Austria and Italy). It is also present in Slovenia, Romania and Ukraine (Maibach et al. 1992, Dirickx 1994, Stănescu and Pârvu 2005, Heimburg 2018, Speight et al. 2018). It is widespread, but has a restricted habitat and altitudinal preferences. Based on the number of localities where it has been collected, the area of occupancy (AOO) will be between 2,000 and 3,000 km2 in Europe, and around 2,000 km2 in the EU27 countries.

",The species is not traded or used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"No conservation actions are in place for this species, but habitat protection and restoration are recommended. It has a common name (Röder 1990), which could help to engage with the public and taking conservation actions on a national level. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its potential threats, ecology, population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169099,149169097,Paragus testaceus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment:  Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is mainly distributed in the northern and central part of Europe. It prefers sparsely-vegetated grassland. Although the species is Regionally Extinct in Belgium and possibly extinct in the Netherlands, it is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States since it has a relatively large range. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Deforestation and intense grazing may cause a noticeable decline in the quality of the species' habitat. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends and life history and ecology as well as the monitoring of the population trends are recommended. Resource and habitat protection is required.

","This species prefers open ground, and dry unimproved and sparsely-vegetated grassland (Speight 2018). Its flight period is in the summer months (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The developmental stages are unknown, but the larvae must be predators, probably of soft-bodied Homoptera.",Deforestation and intense grazing may cause a decline in the quality of the habitat of this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).,"There is no information about the population size of this species, but the population trend is presumably stable (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is found from southern Sweden and Denmark to northern France, eastwards through central Europe to the Balkan Peninsula. It is Regionally Extinct in Belgium, where it has not been observed for over 100 years (Baugnee 2004). It is also believed to be possibly extinct in the Netherlands because it was last recorded there in 1979 (Reemer et al. 2009). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. It is found between 0 and 2,200 metres above sea level.

Outside Europe, it is known from the Anatolia region of Turkey.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far; however, resource and habitat protection is required. Research is recommended on the population size, distribution, trends, life history and ecology, as well as the monitoring of population trends. In Serbia, it occurs in the Special Natural reserve Pašnjaci velike droplje and the Đerdap National Park, and in Montenegro, in the Durmitor and Skadarsko jezero National Parks. It is found in several Natura 2000 sites, such as at Škocjanski zatok in Slovenia, Koryfes Orous Smolikas, Notioanatolicos Parnassos – Ethnikos Drymos Parnassous – Dasos Tithoreas, Spilaiovarathro in Greece, and Horsianska dolina in Slovakia (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169121,149169117,Paragus hyalopteri,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

Within Europe, the species is found in Spain, Italy, Serbia, Greece and Ukraine. The species is assessed as Vulnerable under Criterion B because of its restricted area of occupancy (AOO) of 60 km2 in Europe and 52 km2 in the EU 27, its eight to 10 locations in Europe and six to eight locations in the EU 27, and a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat. The species' wetlands, a typical habitat for this species, are in continuing decline due to due to pollution coming from agricultural activities, drainage of these areas, and climate change, where droughts cause habitat alteration. Besides residing in its natural habitat, the species can also be found in orchards. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is around 108,2471 km2 and 685,450 km2 in the EU 27. As the species is not endemic to Europe and is found in Asia, there might be some rescue effect from subpopulations there. Resource and habitat protection and education and awareness are required conservation actions to preserve the species. Future research on the population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats is needed. Further monitoring on the species' populations and habitat trends is also required.

","The preferred environment for this species is wetlands, marshes or ditches with Arundo or Phragmites, but it is better known in association with orchards of fruit trees such as almond, apricot, peach and plum. There are no data regarding the habitat and habits of adults, as almost all known specimens derived from rearing of larvae. There is also no information about the flowers that this species visits. The flight period is from the end of May until October, with a peak in July (Speight 2018). The larval stage has been studied and described by Marcos-Garcia and Rojo (1994) and Rojo and Marcos-Garcia (1998); it feeds on aphids that live on plum trees, Arundo and Phragmites.","The main threat to this species is loss of natural habitat. Wetlands are in general decline across the world, due to pollution from agricultural activities, drainage and climate change where droughts cause habitat alteration (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).",There is no known information about the population size and trends of the species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).,Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from mainland Spain, northern peninsula Italy (Sommaggio and Corazza 2006), Serbia, north-eastern mainland Greece and from Ukraine on the Crimean Peninsula. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 60 km2 in Europe and 52 km2 for the EU 27. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is around 108,2471 km2 in Europe, and 685,450 km2 in the EU 27. It can be found between one and 913 metres above sea level, in eight to 10 locations in Europe and six to eight locations in the EU 27.

Outside Europe, it is recorded further east in Asia in Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no current conservation actions in place for this species; however, resource and habitat protection as well as education and awareness are required conservation actions for its preservation. Future research is needed on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats. Further monitoring on population and habitat trends is also required. It has been recorded in some Natura 2000 sites, such as at Serres de Mariola i el Carrascal de la Font Roja in Spain and Notio Dasiko Symplegma Evrou in Greece.


",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169129,149169119,Sphegina latifrons,Least Concern,,2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is a widespread central European mountain endemic, occurring in most of the unspoiled forest streams throughout its range. It is found in great numbers at the same locality throughout many consecutive years. Although its habitat seems to be declining, the range and the relative large subpopulation sizes are unlikely to fall within any of the threatened categories. It is, therefore, classified (as in Germany; Ssymank et al. 2011), as Least Concern.","

This species occurs in humid deciduous and coniferous forests with streams, and also along streams in grassland with tree corridors along the stream. The adults fly in the shade and visit a wide variety of flowers, such as white umbellifers (e.g. Chaerophyllum) and Caltha palustris (Speight 2020). The larvae live in partly submerged tree logs with sappy decay under the bark, and in the bast of trunks of deciduous trees (Krivosheina 2018). The males are often found patrolling these logs (van Steenis et al. 2013).

","

The main threats to this species are forestry activities, agricultural intensification and increased pressure from human leisure activities. The forest activities and agricultural intensification will lead to drainage of streams and grasslands, logging and clearing of old trees, eutrophication and to an increased use of pesticides as well. These will mostly have an impact on the larval habitat, decreasing the absolute number of suitable fallen logs and probably their quality too.

","Nothing is known about the population size of this species. However, it is often found in great numbers together over periods of several years, and it is assumed that it forms stable subpopulations over time (Brădescu 1991, Vujić et al. 1997, Tóth, 2011, 2014).",Stable,"

This is a central European species of the mountains. It is distributed from Poland in the north to Italy in the south, and from the French Alps in the west to Moldova in the east (Thompson and Torp 1986, Vujić 1990, Maibach et al. 1992, Dirickx 1994, Stănescu and Pârvu 2005, de Groot and Govedić 2008, Heimburg 2018, Speight et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020). In addition, this species has been recorded from the Cantabrian mountains in Spain (Ricarte and Macros-García 2017), but it is possible that this record is of the similar Sphegina varifacies (Jeroen van Steenis pers. comm. 2021). Exact locality data are not always available, so calculating the area of occupancy (AOO) was difficult. The AOO and also the extent of occurrence (EOO) were considered to be large enough for this species not to be threatened. This species is endemic to Europe.


",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place for this species. It has several common names (Röder 1990, Tóth, 2017), which could help in engaging with the public and taking conservation actions on a national level. Monitoring the population and habitat trends would be also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169143,149169137,Paragus haemorrhous,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is found across the European region, including European parts of Russia and Turkey. The species can be found in a wide variety of habitats such as in forests, open ground, wetland, and unimproved grasslands to name a few. It has been assessed as Least Concern (LC) because it is the most common species of the genus Paragus in Europe and its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Clearance of heathland for agriculture, intensive forestry and loss of plant diversity because of different human activities may cause a decline in the quality of its habitat in the future. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required to better understand the species and its habitat. Resource and habitat protection is also needed for the species.

","This species can be found in a variety of habitat such as in forests, open ground, wetland, unimproved grassland (calcareous and non-calcareous), heathland, including montane/subalpine heath, garrigue, dune grassland, open areas and path sides in forest up to the larch and pine zones, and in fen meadows. The adults are known to visit the following flowering plants: heather, Jasione montana, Matricaria, Origanum, Polygonum, Potentilla anserina, Potentilla erecta, Potentilla fruticosa, Solidago and Stellaria. The flight period of the adults is from May to September, with peaks in June and August (Speight 2018). The larvae were described by Goeldlin (1974), originally collected on Knautia flowers. Dussaix (2013) reported that the pupal stage lasts for ten days. Mizuno et al. (1997) stated that the larvae specialise on aphids protected by Black Garden Ants (Lasius niger).","The species can be impacted by the clearance of heathland for agriculture and intensive forestry. Loss of plant diversity due to a variety of human activities such as the introduction of invasive alien species, over-harvesting of biodiversity resources, and homogenization of species in agriculture may cause decline in quality of habitat (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","This is a common species with a stable population trend (Riddiford and Ebejer 2006, T. Tot pers. comm. 2020).",Stable,"Within the European region, this species has a vast world range and occurs over most of the Europe region, from northern Norway south to the Iberian Peninsula and the Mediterranean, from Ireland eastwards through central and southern Europe into European parts of Russia and Turkey. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside Europe, it exists in North Africa, Israel, Turkey, in the Afrotropical region, and in the Americas from the Yukon southwards to Costa Rica (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation actions in place for this species; however, resource and habitat protection is required. It occurs in a number of Natura 2000 sites across Europe. Although the most common species of the genus Paragus in Europe, research is required on the population size, distribution, trends and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends, to understand the species and its habitat better.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169151,149169140,Arctosyrphus willingii,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-01-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Arctosyrphus willingii is a circumpolar species, found only in European Russia in the European region. It is seemingly not threatened in its whole range, although it is rare. However, this is probably also due to the fact it occurs in areas that have not been investigated comprehensively. There is uncertainty around the exact distribution, and it therefore may be more or less widespread than currently known. Nothing is known about the population trend or size of this species in Europe, and there is no data on specific localities in European Russia. Therefore, this species is assessed as Data Deficient for Europe.

The main threats to this species are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat, and so protection and management of the habitat is recommended. In addition, given the lack of information about this species, further research on the population size and trends, distribution, threats and the life history of the species is required.

This species not found within the EU 27, and therefore it is Not Applicable for the EU Member States.","

The preferred environment of this species is tundra, and it is found beside shallow, freshwater pools enriched with organic material and in swampy ground with hummocks (Bagachanova 1990). The species has been recorded visiting the flowers of Taraxacum (Skevington et al. 2019). The flight period of this species in Europe is from May to July, although in the nearctic it is from late May to mid-August.

The larva is described by Bagachanova (1990), who observed that female oviposits into the ground among grass roots and established that larval development occurs in the spring, in shallow water enriched with organic material and in swamp hummocks.  Pupariation occurs under natural conditions in May/June, the species remaining in the puparium for nine to ten days.

","The main threats to this species are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat. These include drainage and abstraction projects of water from wetlands, changing rainfall patterns and drought due to the climatic change. Distributional changes are to be expected towards higher altitudes with climate change (to colder and wetter areas). In addition, intensified vegetation management to adapt natural areas to increasing tourism, reducing the existing vegetation or its features, may negatively impact the species.","Nothing is known about the population trend or size of this species in Europe, and there is no data on specific localities in European Russia. Adults have been collected near tundra wetlands, prairie sloughs and sedge meadows, but it is rare, difficult to find and lives in areas that are not very well investigated.",Unknown,"

This species has a Holarctic distribution, found in the northern parts of European Russia (Arkhangel region and Kola Peninsula) (BeiBienko and Steyskal 1969, Speight 2017, 2020; Barkalov and Mutin 2018). Outside of Europe, this species is found through Siberia to the Pacific, and in the Nearctic region through northern Canada and south into the United States (North Dakota). The species is not found within the EU 27.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 1.1 million km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 580,141 km2. However, due to uncertainty of the exact distribution, the EOO and AOO values may be somewhat inaccurate.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"There are currently no conservation actions in place for this species. However, protection and management of the habitat is recommended, as well as monitoring of the habitat trends. In addition, further research on the population size and trends, threats and the life history of the species is required. It is assumed, but not known if this species occurs in any protected areas.",Australasian|Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169164,149169162,Rohdendorfia alpina,Vulnerable,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This is a high alpine species. In Europe, it is only known from the high parts of the Alps, usually at altitudes between 2,500-3,150 metres, where it lives in small populations on rocky south-facing slopes or on mountain tops with scarce vegetation. So far it has been recorded from at least 30 localities, but it is likely to have a more widespread and dense distribution because it has been found at several nearby localities during specific surveys searching for it. Climate change is expected to shift populations upwards in altitude, which leads to more fragmented populations and local extinctions in lower mountain ranges. Many places where it has been found are now considered too small to support a viable population, and also the distances between these patches seem to have increased, making recolonisation problematic, so the distribution is treated as severely fragmented. Furthermore, enhanced human activities in high mountain areas of the Alps may locally disturb the fragile populations.

Taking the precautionary approach, due to the severe fragmentation, the continuous decline in the area of occupancy (AOO), and in the quality of habitat, as well as due to the small AOO (which is very likely to be under 2,000 km2 but above 500 km2 both in Europe and in the EU27 countries), the current European Red List status is considered to be Vulnerable, which is also true for the EU27 countries.","This species is usually found on open ground. It occurs on alpine rocky moraine and scree slopes, often close to running water, glaciers or persistent patches of snow, and also on steep sun-exposed rocky slopes and mountain tops with scarce vegetation (C. Claussen and P. Goeldlin pers. comm. in Speight 2020, F. van de Meutter pers. comm 2020, L.J. van der Ent pers. comm. 2020).
The adults fly fast and low with a darting flight and settle on rocks as soon as the sun is obscured by clouds. They also frequently disappear into rock crevices (C. Claussen and P. Goeldlin pers. comm. in Speight 2020). Females have been seen to lay eggs underneath rocks in wet conditions (C. Claussen, pers. comm. in Speight 2020, F. Van de Meutter, pers. comm. 2020). The adults can be found in large numbers ""hilltopping"" on mountain tops (F. Van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020). The larval stages are unknown. 

The adults are known to visit Cerastium spp.Leucanthemopsis alpina, Sedum spp. (C. Claussen pers. comm. in Speight 2020) and Ranunculus glacialis (L.J. van der Ent pers. comms. 2020). The flight period is from end of June to mid-August (Speight 2020).","The species of the genus Rohdendorfia are typical high-alpine species from rocky environments, often found in the vicinity of glaciers or snowfields (Speight 2020). These habitats are characterised by being covered in snow for long periods. However, due to climate change, these kinds of habitat conditions may become less common, which will negatively affect the populations of Rohdendorfia species in general (Mengual and Barkalov 2019). Climate change results in the retreat of glaciers and disappearance of semi-permanent patches of snow, which will force the subpopulations of Rohdendorfia alpina to move up in altitude in search for more suitable habitat patches. In the past, it was usually encountered around 2500 metres altitude, but in recent years it has been more often encountered at higher altitudes up to 3150 metres. This shifting upwards will result in more fragmented populations and in higher probability of local extinction events. Mengual and Barkalov (2019) also mention the influence of human activity on Asian species of Rohdendorfia, such as overgrazing by livestock, but this is not expected to occur in the scarcely vegetated high-alpine habitats in the Alps. In addition, local subpopulations can may be disturbed by enhanced hiking activities and other recreational activities in the Alps.","Several males and/or females have usually been found at each location at the same time, sometimes up to 50 specimens (J. van Steenis and F. van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020). No information is available about the population trend, but it has been found to occur at a few sites (e.g. Stelvio Pass and Saarbrückener Hütte) for at least 30 years. In several places it was found on the barren stony hilltop of very small and rather low mountains, and these places are severely threatened by cattle grazing and even more so by climate change. Both of these threat have generated an upwards shift of the flora and subsequently a decrease in suitable breeding habitat for this species. Many places where it has been found on are now too small to support a viable population, and the distances between the patches seems to have increased, making recolonisation problematic. Therefore, the species is considered to be severely fragmented (J. van Steenis pers.comm. 2021).",Unknown,"Rohdendorfia alpina occurs in Europe in the central high-mountain (above 3000 metres) range of the Alps. It has been recorded from France (Hautes Alpes) and adjacent Italy (Piëmond-Cuneo and also from Sondrio and Bolzano), Switzerland (Valais, near Saas Fee), the border area of Switzerland (Graubunden), Austria (Voralberg, Tirol) and East Tirol (Heimburg 2018, Sack 1938, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, F. Van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020, J. van Steenis pers comm. 2019, L.J. van der Ent, pers. comm. 2019). In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 58,023 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) 6016 km2, calculated for altitudes between 1950-3200 metres. However, because the species only occurs on rocky slopes facing south and mountain tops with scarce vegetation, the amount of suitable habitat will be less than 2000 km2. At least half of the records are from the EU27 countries, so the AOO is also above 500 km2, while the EOO is 55,586 km2.

Outside Europe, it is known from the Caucasus (Georgian and Russian parts), and further east in Russia from the Altai and Tuva mountains (Barkalov and Nielsen 2010, Mengual and Barkalov 2019).

",No information about the use and trade.,Terrestrial,"There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. Besides habitat protection and possible restoration, more research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better, and thus to plan conservation actions to protect it in the future. Raising awareness about this alpine species would be also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169172,149169160,Paragus finitimus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is distributed from southern Scandinavia southwards to France and through southern central Europe towards Eastern Europe. The species occurs in calcareous grasslands that can be found in subalpine, lowland, and dune habitats. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 3,850,451 km2 and in the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 3,337,615 km2. It has been assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27 since its area of occupancy (AOO) is not larger than 500 km2 in both Europe and the EU 27, the population is severely fragmented, and there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to extensive grazing and fires. Research on life history and ecology and threats as well as the monitoring of the population trends are required. Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection is recommended to conserve this species.

","The species can be found in montane and subalpine grassland. It specifically thrives in unimproved, usually calcareous grassland that is lightly-grazed by cows and sheep. It can also be found in dry, unimproved, lightly-grazed, calcareous and lowland pasture. At the northern edge of its range it occurs at sea level in more-or-less calcareous and fixed-dune grasslands (Speight 2018). The developmental stages of this species are poorly known (Speight 2018) but the larvae are known to hunt and feed on invertebrates such as soft-bodied true bugs of the suborder Homoptera.","

The main threats to this species are overgrazing by livestock, artificial fires, and habitat loss due to poor management practices and land conversion for agricultural activities. All these threats have negative affects on subalpine grasslands (García-González 2008).

","

There is no information about the overall population size and trend of this species. It is widely distributed across its range, but in most countries the population does not occur in large numbers. Within its range in Europe, only Germany and Hungary have a  high number of records. There is no Red List for Belgium, but this species is definitely one of the rarest and most threatened species there (F. van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020). The range is severely fragmented. 

",Unknown,"

This species is distributed from southern Scandinavia southwards to France and through southern central Europe towards Eastern Europe. Reemer and Rennema (2004) removed this species from the Dutch hoverfly checklist because they considered that the records belong to the species Paragus bicolor. In Belgium, there had been no confirmed records for this species for 60 years, but in 2018 Paragus finitimus was rediscovered (F. van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020). Outside of Europe, it can be found in Russia, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan and Mongolia (Speight 2018). In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 3,850,451 kmand the area of occupancy (AOO) is 444 km2. In the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 3,337,615 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 392 km2.

",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no current conservation actions in place for this species. It would benefit from the proper management of grasslands. It is threatened in Germany, but the degree of threat is unknown (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). In the Czech Republic it has been assessed as Vulnerable (VU) (Farkač et al. 2005). It has not yet been assessed on a national level for Belgium, but it is considered to be one of the rarest and most threatened hoverfly species there (F. van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020). Research is needed on life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population trends. Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection is recommended for its conservation. The species occurs in some Natura 2000 sites in Europe, such as at Valdonnez, Vallée de l'Eyrieux et ses affluents, Roc d'Enfer and Boucles de Moisson, and de Guernes et de Rosny in France; Monte Pastello in Italy; Rhein and Hardtebene between Lichtenau and Iffezheim, Albtal with side valley's, Oberwald and Alb in Karlsruhe, Albtrauf between Mössingen and Gönningen, Schönbuch, Bocksbach and upper Pfinz, Bruch close to Bühl and Baden-Baden, Gerolsteiner Kalkeifel, Ahrgebirge, Drei Gleichen, Kyffhäuser - Badraer Schweiz - Solwiesen, and Drawehn in Germany; Podyjí in the Czech Republic; Fertő tó, Hanság, Répce mente, Gerecse, Érd-tétényi plató, Turjánvidék, Balaton, Fülöpházi homokbuckák, Hevesi-sík, Hór-völgy, Déli-Bükk, Aggteleki-karszt és peremterületei, and Gemenc in Hungary; Minijos upės slėnis, Vakarinė Aukštaitijos nacionalinio parko dalis, Anykščių šilelis, and Smalvelės upė ir šlapžemės in Lithuania and Sreden Pirin - Alibotush in Bulgaria (European Environment Agency 2020). It is also found in the Durmitor National Park in Montenegro.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169185,149169180,Riponnensia longicornis,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2020-08-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species has a declining area of occupancy (AOO) of 88 km2 in Europe, and 68 km2 in the EU27 countries. It is only known from approximately 25 localities, mostly very far apart and very localised, causing the subpopulations to be severely fragmented. The distribution is smaller than it used to be. For example, it has become extinct in France. Furthermore, the habitat is in continuous decline due to climate change and human activities. Therefore, this species is assessed as Endangered for both the European Union and for Pan-Europe, since most of the European records are from within the EU.","

Speight (2020) describes the habitat as the outflow area of streams and winter-flooded torrents just above the beach (beyond the splash zone), where the torrent bed has become flat and sandy. In Lesbos, the species is restricted to places close to the coast with fresh surface water (almost) all year round, such as small rivers or drainage ditches with lots of Mentha and Nasturtium (Devalez and Meekel 2017). At the same time, records in Sicily range as high up as 1080 meters asl. (D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020).

In the Asian part of Turkey, the species is found in forest of Liquidamber orientalis with small streams, marshy grasslands, and fields with large, flowering Euphorbia species (Reemer and Smit 2007).

The species visits Asteraceae, Crithmum, Foeniculum, Mentha, Nasturtium and Tamarix (Speight 2020, J. Devalez pers. comm. 2020). The larvae will live in fresh running water close to the shore with rotting organic material or living water plants and roots.

","The habitat quality declines due to climate change, as small Mediterranean streams will become more and more seasonal due to longer dry periods and higher temperatures. The destruction of aquatic habitats due to urban and recreational development can also impact this species, just as can nutrient and pesticides input through agricultural land use close to its habitats.","The population size and population trend of this species are unknown. However, when it is found, the number of individuals is low (mostly only one specimen). The population is severely fragmented. Only in Lesbos are there several locations close to each other.",Unknown,"

This species is distributed in Portugal, Spain, Gibraltar, France (where it is Extinct), Sardinia, Sicily, North Macedonia, Greece, Romania and Bulgaria. Outside Europe, it is present in the Asian part of Turkey, Israel, and North Africa (Algeria, Morocco) (Bankowska 1967, Burgio et al. 2015, Dirickx 1994, Krpač 2011, Ricarte and Marcos-Garcia 2017, Speight et al. 2018, Speight 2020, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Van Eck 2011, Vujić et al. 2020).

Although Speight (2020) also mentions Corsica, Speight et al. (2018) do not list the species there, but Becker et al. (1910) does mention its presence there, together with Riponnensia longicornis and R. splendens. However, probably one or more of these records could refer to R. daccordii. In addition, Vujić et al. (2020) do not give records from Rhodes, so the Rhodes record of Dirickx (1994) has not been included in this assessment. Dirickx (1994) also mentions the species from Cyprus, but this might be Riponnensia morini, since R. morini was only described 5 years later and is recorded from Cyprus (van Steenis et al. 2019). Therefore, Cyprus is also excluded from this assessment.

Exact localities have not been found for Romania ('Muntenia, August' in Stanecsu and Parvu 2005) and Gibraltar.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is above the threshold for threatened categories in both Europe and the EU27 countries. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 88 km2 in Europe and 68 km2 in the EU27 countries.


",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),

No conservation actions are in place and research is needed to establish what would be the best actions to preserve this species. Protection of important sites and reducing the impact of habitat destruction would benefit its conservation fortunes. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand its ecology and population trends better.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169193,149169183,Paragus compeditus,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

In Europe, the species is only confirmed from Cyprus. The species is assessed as Endangered since it has a restricted geographic range in Europe and the EU 27 with an extent of occurrence (EOO) of 3,299 km2, an area of occupancy (AOO) of 32 km2, is found at five to seven locations, and is experiencing a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat. Using a precautionary approach, the assessors assessed this species as Endangered at present given its small distribution on a single island. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from outside subpopulations. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends is recommended. Site/area protection as well as resource and habitat protection is recommended. Conservation of crucial sites for this species and its coastal dune habitat is required.

","This species prefers open ground in arid habitats, including dune slacks in coastal dune systems and at the edge of marshes (Speight 2018). Most of the European species of Paragus produce multiple broods a year and the larvae feed on aphids (Marcos-García and Rojo 1994). The developmental stages of this species have not been described yet (Speight 2018).","The major threats to the biodiversity of Cyprus are similar to those faced by many other Mediterranean countries. They include the direct loss and destruction of habitat as a result of urbanisation and tourism, largely along the coast. Grazing by livestock and the abandonment of rural areas all have an impact. Land use changes and the expansion of infrastructure and housing cause a major impact on all habitats and to all species on the island. Fires as a result of climate change are also a potential threat to the species (CEPF 2010).",

There is no information about the population trend for this species. It is considered to be rare both in Europe and the EU 27. It was last observed in 2017. Akrotiri marsh was the locality in Cyprus with the most recorded specimens (27 specimen - 23 males and 4 females) (van Steenis et al. 2019).

,Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is restricted to Cyprus. Historical records from central and southern Italy (Bezzi 1926) and from the Giglio Isle (as Paragus aegyptius) are considered invalid; no specimens can be found in Bezzi's main collection in Milan (D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2020). There is also a record (also as Paragus aegyptius) from Ukraine, but this specimen was also misidentified (G. Popov pers. comm. 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 32 km2 in Europe and the EU 27, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is about 3,299 km2. The species occurs at from five to seven locations, at 450 m above sea level.

Outside of Europe, the species occurs in Turkey, North Africa and the Afrotropical region, including the Mascarene islands, Russia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and China (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no current conservation actions in place for this species. Two point localities occur within the Natura 2000 Network on Cyprus: Koilada Diarizou and Alykes Larnakas (European Environment Agency 2020). Research is recommended on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends. Site/area protection and resource and habitat protection is recommended. Conservation of crucial sites for this species and its coastal dune habitat is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169206,149169201,Riponnensia insignis,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Europe regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

The species is only known from one locality in Italy within Europe and the European Union, and has probably not been seen for a long period. Since there is only one known location, both the extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) are 4 km2, which would make the species Critically Endangered in both Europe and in the European Union. However, it is also possible that the species is Extinct in Europe. Since there is so little information on its true occurrence in Europe, exact historic localities and habitat needs, it makes it challenging to survey and to know its true situation. Thus the species is assessed as Data Deficient in Europe and the EU 27.","There is no information available about the European habitats or ecology of this species. In the Asian part of Turkey, information is available from one location with various habitats, including marshy grasslands, a forest of Liquidamber orientalis with small streams, and fields with large flowering Euphorbia (Reemer and Smit 2007). The larvae probably live in freshwater.","Since there is no ecological information from Europe, it is difficult to describe possible threats. However, if the species still occurs in Europe, it is likely to be highly threatened because there are so few and obsolete records. The habitat will be under threat by decreasing water tables caused by water abstraction and climate change.","Nothing is known about the populations in Europe. In Turkey, 40 specimens were collected in six days over a 14-day period, so at these localities the species is probably rather abundant.",Unknown,"This species was probably described from central Europe, but the type locality is unknown. It is now only included in the Italian checklist of Syrphidae (Burgio et al. 2015), but the source of this record could not be traced. Becker et al. (1910) gives a record from Corsica, together with Riponnensia longicornis and R. splendens. However, one or more of these records could be R. daccordii, but this should be checked and clarified. Both the extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) are 4 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is recorded from the Asian part of Turkey (Reemer and Smit 2007).",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

 The most important action would be to find out if the species occurs somewhere in Europe. Monitoring and research on its ecology, habitat preferences, population and habitat trend is needed, as well as on the potential threats. This would be important to establish the necessary conservation actions.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169214,149169204,Paragus bradescui,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is found across the Mediterranean region and can be found in oak woodlands and dry sparsely-vegetated, and unimproved grassland. It has been assessed as Endangered (EN) in both Europe and the EU 27 because it has an area of occupancy (AOO) of 184 km2 in Europe and 152 km2 in the EU 27, the population is severely fragmented, and due to human exploitation of the oak forests and grazing by livestock, the species' habitat has experienced a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat. There is no potential rescue effect from locations outside of the region. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is 3,577,261 km2 and in the EU 27 it is estimated to be around 2,667,606 km2. Resource and habitat protection is recommended. Research on the population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends is also needed.

","This species prefers open areas and forest fringes in thermophilous oak forests. It also has a preference for stony, dry, sparsely-vegetated and unimproved grassland. The adult flight period occurs from May to September with peaks in May, July and September. The developmental stages are not yet known (Speight 2018), but the larvae are predators and mostly feed on soft-bodied true bugs of the suborder Homoptera.







",The human-driven exploitation of Oak forests (Frank 2008) and grazing by livestock have caused a noticeable decline in the quality of the habitat of this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).,"There is no information about the population size of this species, and the population trend is unknown. It is considered to be rare, both in Europe and in the EU 27, with a low number of individuals having been recorded (Vujić et al. 1999). The population is considered to be severely fragmented due to small and isolated subpopulations.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species can be mostly found on Mediterranean islands and within the zone of the Mediterranean and Black Sea, with a few continental records (Vujić et al. 1999). The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is 3,577,261 km2 and in the EU 27 it is estimated to be around 2,667,606 km2. The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 184 kmin Europe and around 152 km2 in the EU 27. It is found between one and 1,920 metres above sea level.

Outside of Europe, it has also been recorded in Turkey, Israel, Asiatic Russia, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are current conservation actions in place for this species. Resource and habitat protection is recommended. Research is also needed on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends. Some localities occur within Natura 2000 sites, such as at Massif de Madres-Coronat, Massif de la Sainte-Baume, Marguareis - La Brigue - Fontan - Saorge and Haute vallée d'Asco, forêt de Tartagine et aiguilles de Popolasca and Massif du Rotondo in Corsica in France; Monti del Gennargentu in Sardinia; Monti Nebrodi and Fascia altomontana dell'Etna in Sicily in Italy; Zaleđe Trogira in Croatia; Mlaștina Satchinez and Vedea - Dunăre in Romania and Notiodytiki Chersonisos, Apolithomeno Dasos Lesvou, Voreia Lesvos, and Lesvos Paraktioi Ygroopoi Kai Kolpos Kallonis in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169226,149169222,Rhingia campestris,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a Palaearctic species widely distributed in Europe. It occurs in many habitat types from the sea level up to 2600 metres altitude. The species is not considered as vulnerable or threatened on most regional Red Lists. Severe drought may have a big impact on the local subpopulations, and it takes them years to recover from it. However, the species is still common in the central part of its range. In addition, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, the current European Red List status is considered to be Least Concern, also the case in the EU27 countries.

","

This species can be found in many moist habitat types, such as wetlands, open forest areas and alluvial forests along streams and rivers, but also in cultivated areas such as herb-rich meadows, hedgerows, parks and gardens (Bartsch et al. 2009, Stubbs and Falk 2002, Speight 2020).

The adults are often observed sitting on sunlit leaves and on flowers with concealed nectar sources, which they can reach with their elongated mouthparts (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020). The larvae are subaquatic, living as saprophages in moist cow dung and probably in dung of other animals, and expected to be able to live in accumulated rotten foliage (Speight 2020).

The adults visit many species of herbs and shrubs, with or without concealed nectar such as Geum rivale, Aegopodium podagraria, Ajuga reptans, Anchusa officinalis, Anthriscus sylvestris, Berberis vulgaris, Calluna vulgaris, Caltha palustris, Cardamine pratensis, Crataegus spp., Crepis spp. Dactylorrhiza spp,. Echium vulgare, Frangula alnus, Geranium sylvaticum, Iris pseudacorus, Lamium spp., Mentha aquatica, Prunus spinosa, Rubus arcticus, Rubus idaeus, Salis caprea and Sorbus aucuparia (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009).

The flight period is usually from April until October, with peaks in May-June and August (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020).

","

The subpopulations are known to undergo substantial crashes due to periods of severe drought (Stubbs and Falk 2002). Diminishing of cow grazing is expected to affect negatively the populations as less dung becomes available for larval development. Habitat management such as machine mowing without leaving standing vegetation also has a negative impact. The use of veterinary medicines which end up in the cowdung is expected to cause harm, but this relationship has yet to be researched in detail.

","

This species can be found in large numbers in suitable habitats in the centre of its distribution. In Germany and the Netherlands, the population trend was found to be stable (Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011). In Great Britain, Rhingia campestris was found to decline significantly over the past four decades, especially after 2000 (S.G. Ball pers. comm. 2021). The overall population trend is still stable, but it is possible that with more information, it would become decreasing.

",Stable,"

This is a Palaearctic species with a widespread distribution in Europe. It occurs from Ireland and Great Britain, east to European Russia (north, northwest, central and east European Russia), Ukraine and Romania, and from north Fennoscandia and the Baltic States, south to northern Spain and central Italy. It also occurs on the Balkan peninsula, and south to northern Greece and southwest Bulgaria (Bartsch et al. 2009, Dirickx 1994, Glumac 1968, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Kuznetzov 1993, Langhoffer 1918, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, Stanescu and Parvu 2005 Tóth 2011, Tóth 2014, Vujić et al. 2020; A.V. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020). 

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.
 
Outside Europe, it has been recorded from Transcaucasia (Georgia), Turkey, west and east Siberia, the Russian Far East and Mongolia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Mengual et al. 2020, Tóth 2013, Speight 2020).

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,"There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. Even if it is listed as Least Concern, the strong decline reported in Great Britain after 2000 is reason for great concern. Therefore, extended measures are needed to establish conservation and research actions. Some suggestions are site management and protection, and research into threats, population size and trends, as well as monitoring the habitat and population trends. Raising awareness about this species would be also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169249,149169243,Psarus abdominalis,Vulnerable,"B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv)",2021,2020-11-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

In recent years, this species has rarely been collected. It seems to have vanished from northwestern Europe and to be declining sharply in central Europe. It is probably more widely distributed in eastern Europe. However, only scarce and occasional records have been reported from probably small and very isolated subpopulations (Mengual and Ssymank 2015). Vujić et al. (2001) list the species as ‘generally endangered in Europe, not threatened in the Balkans’, but the small number of recent records from the Balkans suggests decline there as well. The situation in Russia is unclear: if it is comparable with Ukraine (Popov 2009), then there is a huge decline in numbers there as well.

In parts of western Europe the species is extinct (Sweden, Belgium, The Netherlands, Switzerland) or has almost disappeared (France, Germany). Its status in western Europe would be Critically Endangered. In the eastern and southeastern countries of the EU, the situation is a bit less severe, but it is also extinct in Slovenia and Slovakia, and maybe in Romania too. It still occurs in a few localities in Greece, Bulgaria, and probably in Latvia and Lithuania.

In the EU27, its status is Endangered because the area of occupancy (AOO) is 200 km2, the population is severely fragmented, and there is a sharp decline in its extent of occurrence, area of occupancy, quality of habitat, as well as in the number of locations and subpopulations. With better insight into the decline of locations and population size, the species could be also assessed as Endangered under Criterion A (population decline), due to these reductions possibly being greater than 50% in the last 10 years. However, more data are needed to confirm this.

At the European level, the species is Vulnerable, because the area of occupancy (AOO) is 800 km2 and there is also a sharp decline in habitats and subpopulations as well. Although in Ukraine it has disappeared from almost the whole country, it is expected that there will be more subpopulations remaining in Russia.

","

This species is most often found in well-drained, dry thermophilous Quercus forests with mature or overmature trees and a diverse herbaceous flora, including Eastern thermophilous oak forests of Quercus frainetto and Q.cerris. Other habitats are ancient olive groves with Quercus coccifera maquis as undergrowth, and Pinus pinaster forests mixed with Quercus. In northwestern Europe, most records are from oak coppice forests (Quercus petraea and probably also Q. robur) with abundant flowering forest edges or in meadows close by (Dussaix 2013, Mengual and Ssymank 2015, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020, Standfuss and Claussen 2007, Stuke 2000). Ssymank (pers. comm. 2020) suggests a relationship with pockets of ancient oak forests, which are more and more under threat by changing forest management.

The adults are usually visiting flowers when observed. In western Europe they mainly visit Geranium sanguineum, but in Ukraine, Cotinus coggygria is frequently visited. Other visited flowers include Malva sylvestris, Eryngium campestre, Convolvulus arvensis, Anthriscus sylvestris, Berteroa, Dianthus, Potentilla and Veronica (Mengual and Ssymank 2015).

The adults fly fast from flower to flower similar to Eumerus species, and it is difficult to distinguish this species if numerous Eumerus ornatus are visiting the same Geranium sanguineum. The males sometimes sit on branches or leaves and return to the same spot repeatedly (Mengual and Ssymank 2015, W. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020, J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020).

The larvae are unknown. Several authors suggest a relationship with Geranium sanguineum, but a relationship with old Quercus trees seems more likely (Mengual and Ssymank 2015).

","The heavy decline of this species clearly shows that it is severely threatened. Without understanding the larval habits, the threats to the adult habitat should be taken into account. Its preferred thermophilous oak forests are threatened by nitrogen deposition and acid rain. Changes in forest management including stopping coppice traditions (resulting in more shade-rich forests with fewer warm microclimates and less space for dominant old oaks), and cutting and replanting large areas (leading to fewer old oaks and more shade-tolerant tree species such as beech) can also negatively impact the species. Flower-rich herbaceous forest edges and meadows are also under threat from intensification of use and nitrogen deposition. In addition, the insects themselves might well suffer from pesticides.","

This species is very restricted, and its subpopulations are far apart. However, in healthy habitats, it can be found with more specimens together, up to 10 at a time (Mengual and Ssymank 2015, W. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020). The site in Alsace (France) has been visited several times in the period of 1991-2016, and the species has been found there most days during the flight period. However, it has become extinct or almost extinct in large areas of its former distribution, so the overall population trend is decreasing.

",Decreasing,"

The former distribution of this species stretched from south Sweden and western France through Poland, the Baltic States, Belarus and central Europe to eastern European Russia, and from northern Greece into the Asian part of Turkey. However, it has become extinct or almost extinct in large areas of its former range, such as in Sweden, most of France, Belgium, The Netherlands, most of Germany, large parts of Poland, Switzerland, Italy, Slovenia, Slovakia, parts of Hungary, North Macedonia, most of Ukraine, and probably most of European Russia. In recent times only very rare records have been made from central and eastern France (departments Sarte and the Rhine River Valley) through southern Germany, Poland, Hungary, Montenegro, Serbia, Bulgaria to Russia (Ryazan and Mordovia regions), northern Greece and northeastern Ukraine. The recent distribution in Romania, Latvia, Lithuania, Czechia, most of European Russia and the Asian part of Turkey is unclear due to lack of recent information.

The Belarus record is a new country record: Borodin and Borodina (2014) did not mention the species in Belarus in their country checklist of Syrphidae. This specimen was collected in Ambrosovichi, Vitebsk District (deposited in the Zoological Museum of St Petersburg, Russia, recorded by J. van Steenis in 2019). The species is not present in Austria, because the old record from this country is actually from Slovenia (Mengual and Ssymank 2015). The new records in Heimburg (2018) need confirmation.

In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 3,893,247 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 800 km2, based on an estimated 200 localities. In the EU27 the AOO is 200 km2, based on an estimation of only 50 remaining localities.

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,"

It is clear that this species is the victim of forest clearance and poor forest management throughout western Europe. The fact that it is the only species of its genus (and tribe), and that it is mostly only present in Europe, make its status of greater significance (Speight 2020). Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology, conservation needs and population trends better. At the same time, it is important to protect the remaining sites, to manage these sites in a suitable way and to raise awareness of the species and the importance of ancient oak woods for threatened species in general. It would be also important to incorporate ancient forest species in payment systems for nature management.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169257,149169246,Paragus albifrons,Endangered,"B2ab(iii,iv)",2021,2020-03-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is widely distributed in the European region but it is known from relatively scattered localities and is considered to be severely fragmented. The species is assessed as Endangered (EN) for Europe and the EU27 Member States since its area of occupancy (AOO) is not larger than 500 km2 in both Europe and the EU 27, and there is a continuing decline in habitat due to intensive logging. Protection of sites and habitat of this species is recommended. Site/area and resource and habitat protection is recommended for the species. The preferred habitat of the species is warm and dry oak forest, dry pine forest, dry dune scrub, and ancient unimproved dry grassland. Further research on the population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required for this species.

","This species prefers warm and dry oak forest, dry pine forest, dry dune scrub, and ancient unimproved dry grassland. It is usually found close to damper spots and stream margins, flying early in the morning and late in the evening, under warm conditions. It flies within stands of taller grasses along the edges of paths and in small, open areas within forest or dune scrub. It has a preference for the following flowers: Eryngium, Euphorbia, Ranunculus, Sambucus ebulus and Veronica. The adult flight period is from June to October, with a peak in September. The larva was described by Goeldlin (1974) who collected it on Cirsium arvense (Speight 2018). The larvae are predators, mostly of soft-bodied true bugs of the suborder Homoptera.",This species is threatened by unsustainable forestry practices such as intensive logging (EEA 2016). This causes a decline in the quality and availability of  habitat.,"The population size and trend is poorly understood for this species. It is relatively widespread in Europe, but in many of its localities it is very rare, with very few records. The population is considered to be severely fragmented due to small and isolated subpopulations.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is distributed from southern Sweden, south to the Mediterranean, including Malta, and from the south of the United Kingdom eastwards through central and southern Europe and into European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is 6,835,216 km2 and in the EU 27 it is estimated to be around 4,899,708 km2. In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 464-500 km2 and 392-400 km2 for the EU 27.

Outside of Europe, the species is also recorded in the Caucasus Mountains, Iran, Afghanistan, and Mongolia (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions currently in place for this species. It has been listed as Near Threatened (NT) in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), as Least Concern (LC) in Sweden (Artsdatabanken 2010) and Vulnerable (VU) in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005). In the United Kingdom, the species is listed as Critically Endangered (CR), because it is only known from a very few small localities in the Thames Estuary, which are very fragmented. In its subpopulation in the United Kingdom it has undergone a very significant decline in its range, and if one of only three recent localities is lost, this will continue (Ball and Morris 2014). Site/area and resource and habitat protection is recommended. Further research is required on the population size, distribution, trends, life history and ecology, as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends.

Some localities of the species occur within Natura 2000 sites, such as at Ria de Aveiro in Portugal; Sierra y Cañones de Guara, Serra de Collserola, and Les Gavarres in Spain; Forêts picardes: massif des trois forêts et bois du Roi, Forêts picardes: Compiègne, Laigue, Ourscamps in France; Vallée de la Meuse de Dinant à Yvoir in Belgium; River Avon, Stour and Orwell Estuaries and Thames Estuary and Marshes in Great Britain; Kaiserstuhl, Bruch close to Bühl and Baden-Baden, Wälder and Wiesen close to Malsch, Bienwaldschwemmfächer, Tiefental, Schmiechtal, Donau between Munderkingen and Ulm, northern Iller and Bocksbach, and Pfinz in Germany; Dolina Vipave in Slovenia; Bernstein - Lockenhaus - Rechnitz in Austria; Répce mente, Köröshegyi erdők, Mogyorós-hegy, Felső-kiskunsági szikes puszta, Csévharaszti homokvidék, and Alpár-bokrosi tisza-ártéri öblözet in Hungary; Frumoasa, Delta Dunării and Podișul Nord Dobrogean in Romania; Reka Yantra and Burgasko ezero in Bulgaria; Koryfes Orous Smolikas, Ori Voreiou Vourinou Kai Mellia, Oros Pilio Kai Paraktia Thalassia Zoni- Spilaia Malaki Kai Skeponi, Oros Falakro, and Koilada Filiouri in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169270,149169265,Orthonevra tristis,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-11-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This European endemic occurs in wet alpine meadows close to springs, a habitat threatened both within and outside the EU by many human activities. Within the mountain ranges, it is quite widespread and abundant. Based on the small (1.600 km2 in Europe and 1,200 km2 in the EU27 countries) area of occupancy (AOO) and the estimated decline of the habitat, the species is classified as Near Threatened in the EU27 and in Europe as a whole. Although very challenging to judge, its distribution is not considered to be severely fragmented at the moment, but with more data this could easily change in the near future. Between the mountain ranges, its distribution can indeed be severely fragmented, but within the ranges, the subpopulations could be very well connected. The only subpopulations outside the EU 27 occur in Switzerland.","

This species prefers wet unimproved montane or alpine grasslands close to springs and streams. It visits flowers such as Ranunculus (Speight 2020).


The larvae have been described by Maibach and Goeldlin (1994), found among plant roots beside seepages in unimproved alpine grasslands (Speight 2020).

","The alpine wetlands where this species occurs are quite vulnerable to habitat destruction (ski resorts, ski runs, water use for electricity production, intensification of farming, regulation of rivers and brooks, mining and use of pebbles for building purposes among others). Within the habitat, the inputs of nutrients and/or pesticides probably have a negative impact on the subpopulations. Climate change will also alter the habitat, but the negative impact of climate change on the species itself is not confirmed.","Orthonevra tristis is quite abundant in healthy habitats. In mountain areas, it inhabits a rather large altitudinal range. Between mountain ranges the subpopulations are severely fragmented as they cannot interact, but within a mountain range, the subpopulations could be well-connected.",Decreasing,"This European endemic occurs in the Massif Central in France, throughout the Alps (Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Austria, and Italy), the Pyrenees (France, and Spain), the Cantabrian Mountains (Northern Spain) and in the Sierra de Gredos (Central Spain) (Speight 2020). It is also recorded from Romania, Hungary and southern and central Italy, but these records could refer either to Orthonevra montana or to O. tristis. The Hungarian and Italian records (outside the Alps) need confirmation of the identification (W. van Steenis pers. comm. 2021). The Romanian records probably refer to Orthonevra montana (W. van Steenis pers. comm. 2021), and so those records are not included in this assessment. In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is 1,600 km2 and in the EU27, it is estimated to be around 1,200 km2.",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends. Protection of important sites and reducing the impact of habitat destruction would benefit its conservation fortunes.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169278,149169268,Eumerus azabense,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii),2021,2019-03-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

The species is found in typical dehesa in western Spain. It is assessed as Critically Endangered due to its small area of occupancy (AOO) of 4 km2 and because the species only occurs in one location, which is threatened by pasture intensification, droughts caused by climate change, trees dying off and the lack or shortage of regeneration of the tree layer. This is thus causing a continuing decline in the quality of the species' habitat. Less than 20 records exist for the species. Further research is required on its population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, and threats. Habitat protection is recommended to preserve this species.

","The species is found in the Biological Reserve of ‘Campanarios de Azaba’, a typical dehesa (a multifunctional agrosylvopastoral system and cultural landscape) of Salamanca, western Spain. This reserve extends to 522 ha. The dominant trees are Holm Oak (Quercus rotundifolia) and Pyrenean Oak (Quercus pyrenaica), and the overall tree density is 39 trees/ha (Ricarte et al. 2018).","Threats to Oak dehesa are pasture intensification, droughts caused by climate change and trees dying off. The lack or shortage of regeneration of the tree layer is also recognised as one of the major threats for Oak dehesa in Spain (Olea and San Miguel-Ayanz 2006). The specific threat at the known locality is habitat loss due to land conversion with poor management of habitats, such as overgrazing (A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2019).","There is no information about the population trend for this species. It is a quite large and noticeable species (Ricarte et al. 2018), and yet only a few specimens have been recorded since 2010, in a single locality: it is therefore considered extremely rare.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is known from a single locality, the Reserva Biologica Campanarios de Azaba in western Spain, despite the area being well explored (Ricarte et al. 2018). The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 4 km2. It is found at 800 metres above sea level.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"The area where the species is found is included in the Natura 2000 Network (ES0000202 Campo de Azaba, an Special Protection Area (SPA) under the Birds Directive and a Site of Community Importance (SCI) under the Habitats Directive), catalogued as 'Reserva Entomológica' (Entomological Reserve) by the Asociación Española de Entomología (European Environment Agency 2020). Further research is required about its population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, and threats. Monitoring is required for population trends as well. Habitat protection is recommended to preserve this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149169288,149169286,Orthonevra stackelbergi,Least Concern,,2021,2020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is Red Listed on the western border of its distribution: it is Critically Endangered in Germany, and Vulnerable in Norway (Henriksen and Hilmo 2015, Ssymank et al. 2011). However, in most parts of its distribution, it is considered as Least Concern (ArtDatabanken 2020, Hyvärinen et al. 2019), even thought the habitat is clearly threatened. In addition, its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Overall, the species is considered to be Least Concern in Europe and in the European Union, mostly due to the many connected subpopulations and small decline.","In Sweden and Finland, this species occurs in meadows and glades in damp deciduous or mixed forests, often near temporarily flooded areas (Bartsch et al. 2009). In Belgium, it appears in the lagg zone between forests and raised bogs (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019). It visits white umbellifers, Aruncus asiaticus, Caltha, Crataegus, Crepis, Frangula alnus, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus, Rosa canina, Sambucus nigra and Viburnum opulus (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020).

The larva is unknown, but probably lives in freshwater near the adult habitat.","This species is threatened by decreasing water levels, intensive forest management, and habitat shifts caused by climate change. In parts of the range, habitat alteration caused by nitrogen deposition will also pose a threat.",Nothing is known about population size or trends.,Unknown,"This species occurs in Fennoscandia (southern Norway, along the Baltic Sea in Sweden and most of Finland) and Denmark, Belgium, the Baltic States, Poland and Ukraine. It is also present in the European parts of Russia and onwards through Siberia to the Pacific Ocean (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020). It is rare and highly localised in Sweden and Finland (Bartsch et al. 2009). The species is listed for Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), but without any locality. The Ukrainian records were published as Orthonevra intermedia by Lezhenina in 1991 and Anikina in 1966 (G. Popov pers. comm. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169298,149169296,Eumerus uncipes,Least Concern,,2021,2019-11-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The European endemic species is listed as Least Concern because of its relatively large distribution. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. However, the species is considered to be Extinct in Germany and its presence is uncertain in Spain and in the Eastern part of its area. Habitat fragmentation as a consequence of deforestation, unsustainable logging, and changes in land use are the main threats to the species. In Italy, afforestation of grasslands is likely to be the main threat. Research into its life history and ecology and threats is needed. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends are required in order to elucidate the exact distribution of the species. If research shows that subpopulations are rare in other countries of occurrence, the species may qualify for a threatened status.

","The species prefers broad-leaf forests, thermophilous Quercus forests and scrub (Speight 2018). In Italy, it is usually found in calcareous grassland (D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2019). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.","Deforestation, unsustainable logging, and changes in land use present threats to European warm-dry forests and shrubland species. Mediterranean regions are likely to experience higher rates of tree mortality and forest fires, as temperatures and the frequency of droughts increase due to climate change (EEA 2016). Habitat fragmentation as a consequence of all the above is one of the main threats. In Italy, afforestation of grasslands is likely to be the main threat (D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2019).","There is no information about the population trend of this species. There may be many specimens in some suitable habitats, but it is assumed that the population is highly fragmented as a result of a fragmented habitat (D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2019).",Unknown,"

Endemic to Europe, this species is found in mainland France, peninsular Italy, Switzerland, Montenegro and Greece (on Corfu and Mount Chelmos) (Speight 2020). Its presence in Spain, Romania and Bulgaria is uncertain (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). In northern Italy it is only found in dry conditions, but it is more widespread in southern Italy (D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2019). It is considered to be Extinct in Germany (Syymank et al. 2011). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of the species in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

This species is assessed as Extinct in Germany according to their national Red List (Ssymank et al. 2011). It is found in the Natural and Culturo-Historical Region of Kotor in Montenegro. Resource and habitat protection is recommended. Research into its life history, ecology and threats is needed. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required in order to elucidate its exact distribution.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169308,149169306,Orthonevra intermedia,Least Concern,,2021,2020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

In the western part of its distribution, there is some decrease in the subpopulations of the species. For instance, it is considered to be Vulnerable in Germany and Norway. However, its distribution in the Netherlands showed some increase from 1990 to 2009 (Henriksen and Hilmo 2015, Nielsen and Gammelno 2017, Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011). In Sweden and Finland, it seems to be stable (Haarto and Kerppola 2007, G. Ståhls pers. comm. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, even though this species suffers from habitat changes caused by climate change, it is assessed as Least Concern both in Europe and the EU27 countries.","

This species prefers marshy, calcareous or neutral habitats, such as springs and flushes, lagg edges of raised bogs, young peat bogs, fens, and unimproved wet grasslands. It also occurs close to standing or slow-moving water (streams, slow-moving river branches), in open areas such as young reed beds and seasonally flooded grasslands, and in forest edges and forest glades in Alnus or Betula forests (Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020, A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). Males fly low and fast over Sphagnum bog vegetation and settle regularly (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019).

This species visits umbellifers, Crataegus, Euphorbia palustris, Frangula alnus, Knautia, Potentilla, Prunus, Ranunculus, Rosa rugosa, Sorbus aucuparia, Spiraea and Viburnum opulus, and it can very often be found on Iris pseudacorus as well (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The larvae are unknown (Speight 2020), but they probably live in open freshwater (large or small bodies), close to the adult habitat. They possibly feed on nutrient-rich decaying plant material.

","The habitat of this species is under threat from abstraction of ground and surface water, habitat alteration due to climate change, and by the eutrophication of the habitat by nitrogen input - both ammonia (NH3) input from agriculture, and nitrogen oxides (NOx) from industry and traffic - in parts of its range.","The subpopulations are far apart, but in healthy habitats the species can be abundant. The overall population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"

This species is distributed from southern Norway and the coast of the Baltic Sea, through Denmark to the Netherlands and Belgium, and from northeastern England eastwards through northern and central Europe (northern Germany, Finland, Poland, Switzerland, Hungary) to the European parts of Russia. Outside Europe, it is also present from Siberia to the Pacific Ocean (Kamchatka, Sakhalin) (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169318,149169316,Eumerus truncatus,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is found in Portugal, Spain, in the Aegean Islands in Greece, in Sicily in Italy, and in Corsica in France. The species is assessed as Endangered for Europe and the EU27 Member States based on a severely fragmented population as many subpopulations are small and isolated, a restricted extent of occurrence (EOO) of 1,919 km2 and a small area of occupancy (AOO) of only 84 km2 in Europe and the EU 27. The species is very rare in Europe and its Mediterranean habitats are threatened, so it deserves attention. Frequent fires as a consequence of climate change and tourism development in the Mediterranean Basin threaten the species.

There is a continuing decline in the quality of the species' habitat. Resource and habitat protection, research on threats to the species and monitoring of its population trends are recommended.

","The species prefers scrub and open ground, patches of thermophilous Quercus scrub or garrigue in dry and sparsely vegetated ground in Mediterranean ecosystems (Vujić et al. 2020). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.","The Mediterranean Basin is one of the most fire-prone regions in the world and due to climate change, fires and droughts are expected to become more frequent and have a higher impact on Mediterranean ecosystems. Other main threats that this species faces are overgrazing and the development of the tourism industry, which has exposed areas of coastline to intense pressure from land-use change (CEPF 2010).","There are no data about the population trend, because there are not many records of this species (Vujić et al. 2020). It is presumably very rare in Europe. Recent publications verify that it exists in Spain and Portugal, but the records from Spain are from the last century (van Steenis et al. 2017). The range is considered to be severely fragmented because many subpopulations are small and isolated, with no exchange of individuals possible among them.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from southern Portugal, central and southern Spain, Corsica in France, Sicily in Italy, and from Greece (Crete and from some Aegean Islands and islands associated with mainland Greece). In Europe and the EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1,919 kmand area of occupancy (AOO) is 84 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is known from Morocco and Tunisia in North Africa (van Steenis et al. 2017, Vujić et al. 2020).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. Resource and habitat protection, and research on threats and monitoring of population trends are recommended. It occurs at several protected sites, such as at the Vale do Guadiana Birds Directive Site in Portugal, the Sierra de Gredos, Soto de Viñuelas, and Cabo de Gata-Níjar Habitats Directive Sites in Spain, the Massif montagneux du Cinto Habitats Directive Site in Sardinia, the Monte Pelato in Sicily in Italy, and at several Natura 2000 Sites in Crete, Serifos, and Lesvos in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169341,149169338,Eumerus tricolor,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is known from the Netherlands southwards to the Mediterranean Basin, and from Belgium eastwards to central Europe and to the European parts of Russia. The species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States in view of its wide distribution across Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. However, the species deserves attention as it is decreasing over most of Europe. Land conversion due to agriculture, grazing, and urbanization pose a threat to this species in parts of its range. Habitat protection, research on threats and monitoring of the population trends is required for this species.

","The species prefers scrub, hedgerows, dry unimproved and permanent pasture, including montane grassland from within the Fagus and Picea zone up to the Abies and Picea belt (Speight 2018). The larva and puparium were described by Arzone (1972). It has been reared from Tragopogon (Loiselle 1914, Arzone 1973) and is considered to be a pest for crops of Tragopogon porrifolius (Arzone 1972).","Land conversion due to agriculture, grazing and urbanization pose a threat to this species in Europe (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data about the population size of this species. It is widely distributed, but presumably decreasing over most of Europe (Speight 2020).",Decreasing,"Within the European region, this species is known from widespread but scattered records. These are from the southern Netherlands and northern France, southwards to the Mediterranean Basin, and from Belgium eastwards to central Europe and European Russia. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is known from Siberia eastwards to the Pacific coast, including the Sakhalin Peninsula and Japan (Speight 2020).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"Resource and habitat protection is recommended for this species. Additionally, research on threats and monitoring of the population trends is required.

It occurs in several Natura 2000 sites such as at Alto Sir, Oteros-Campos, Valle de San Emiliano, Monte de El Pardo, Serres de Mariola i el Carrascal de la Font Roja (ZEPA), and Los Valles in Spain, Massif du Petit Luberon, Coteaux, bois et marais calcaires de la Champagne Berrichonne, Vallées de la Loire et de l'Allier entre Cher et Nièvre, Corridor de la Meuse, Milieux forestiers, prairies et pelouses de la vallée du Suzon, Vallées de la Loue et du Lison, and Les Caps et Marais Regional National Park in France, Geuldal and Kunderberg in the Netherlands, Dörnberg, Immelburg und Helfenstein, Hainich, Ohrdrufer Muschelkalkplatte, and Apfelstädtaue in Germany, Javorniki - Snežnik in Slovenia, Őrség,Nyugat-Dráva-sík, Kab-hegy, Felső-Nyirádi-erdő és Meggyes-erdő, Balatonfüredi-erdő, Ablánc patak völgye, Határ-menti erdők, Fertő tó, Hanság, Vértes, Gödöllői-dombság, Mátra, Hortobágy, and Zempléni-hegység a Szerencsi-dombsággal és a Hernád-völggyel in Hungary and Koryfes Orous Smolikas, Oros Lakmos, Oros Parnassos, Oros Chelmos Kai Ydata Stygos, Ymittos, and Oros Taygetos in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020). It also occurs in the Durmitor National Park in Montenegro and Fruška Gora National Park in Serbia.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169352,149169349,Orthonevra geniculata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-11-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Although threatened in some parts of its distribution (in France the population trend is decreasing and it is considered to be threatened, and it is Vulnerable in Germany and Czechia), this species is not declining in most of its range (for instance in the Netherlands, United Kingdom, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland) (ArtDatabanken 2020, Ball and Morris 2014, Bygebjerg 2019, Henriksen and Hilmo 2015, Hyvärinen et al. 2019, Mazánek and Barták 2004, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight et al. 2020, Ssymank et al. 2011). In addition, its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, the Red List status of the species is Least Concern in Europe and the EU27.","

The adults are found in mildly acid boggy areas, peatbogs and mires, and in wet woodlands of Alnus/ Salix and Alnus/Salix carrs. They also appear on heathlands with alkaline soil (Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020). They fly low above the ground and settle on bare patches, foliage and flowers, including dead Phragmites stalks. Furthermore, they also settle on trunks or twigs in the sun. The males hover between tussocks of vegetation (Ball et al. 2011, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

They visit white umbellifers, Anemone nemorosa, Bellis, Caltha, Cardamine, Crataegus, Iris pseudacorus, Malus sylvestris, Menyanthes, Prunus padus, P. spinosa, Ranunculus, and male flowers of Salix species, including S.repens (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020)

There is an observation of a female laying 1-5 eggs on twigs and grass leaves sticking out of mud, and underneath Lemna leaves. The larvae are almost certainly associated with springs and wet flushes (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

","This species is threatened by the drainage of its habitats due to the human use of water, or by drought caused by climate change. It is also threatened by eutrophication of the habitat caused by nutrient input. Furthermore, pesticides also have a negative impact in parts of its range.","In healthy habitats, the subpopulations can be quite numerous, with up to 100 individuals at one site. The overall population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"

This species occurs from northern Norway south to central France, and from Ireland eastwards through northern and central Europe (plus parts of northern Italy and northern Greece) into Russia and further into eastern Siberia and Mongolia (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020). Exact locality data are not always available, so calculating the area of occupancy (AOO) was difficult. But both the AOO and extent of occurrence (EOO) are considered to be large enough for this species not to be threatened.

",This species is not used.,Terrestrial,

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169362,149169360,Eumerus torsicus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This European endemic species is assessed as Endangered (EN) because it is only known from the islands of Chios (Greece) and Cyprus, has an extent of occurrence (EOO) of approximately 11,000 km2 and an area of occupancy (AOO) of 28 km2, and is only been found in four locations. Fire is considered to be the main threat. Intensive human activities, such as agriculture and tourism, also cause degradation and a continuing decline in the quality of the species' habitat. In order to preserve the species, there is a need for the protection of its habitat and area as well as educational awareness and communication. Gaining further knowledge about the population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, and threats of the species is also required.

","The species prefers areas along river streams, most often with Platanus orientalis and Alnus orientalis. It has been found flying around Colchicum (van Steenis et al. 2019). Adults fly from September to November (Speight 2020). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.","The most severe threats to this species are frequent forest fires and droughts caused by global warming, as well as the destruction of habitat due to agricultural (overgrazing) and tourist activities (an increased frequency of tourist arrivals on the islands together with the development of tourist infrastructure) (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).","There is no information on the population size, and the current population trend is unknown. In total, 32 specimens of this species have been found so far in 2011 and 2012. Three specimens are from Greece (the island of Chios), while the other specimens are from Cyprus (Grković et al. 2016).",Unknown,"This species is found only on the Greek island of Chios and in Cyprus (Speight 2020). It is found between 27 and 1,922 m above sea level. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 10,178 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) of 28 km2, based on the known localities.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. All of the known localities where the species is found are within the Natura 2000 network. In order to preserve this species, there is a need for conservation of its habitat and area, as well as educational awareness and communication. Gaining further knowledge about the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats will be important. Monitoring of both habitat and population trends is also required (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149169373,149169370,Orthonevra frontalis,Near Threatened,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2020-08-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

Although the range in Europe is quite widespread, this is still a rare species, and the distribution map, largely based on administrative boundaries, exaggerates its distribution. In major parts of its range (France, Hungary) it shows clear declines or is even already possibly extinct (Germany, Italy) (Mazánek and Barták 2004, Speight 2020, Ssymank et al. 2011; D. Birtele pers. comm. 2021, D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2021). The habitat is also declining and is threatened by human alterations and climate change. Although it is currently not the case, the population will probably become severely fragmented in the near future. The estimated area of occupancy (AOO) is already below the threshold for threatened categories (800 km2 in Europe and 500 km2 in the EU27 countries). Therefore, the Red List status of this species is Near Threatened, both in Europe and in the EU27, and it is very close to being Vulnerable.","

This species occurs in flushes and spring-fed brooks on the floodplains of major rivers, and in brooks in thermophilous Quercus and Q. ilex forests. The adults fly in the forests, forest edges and in wet meadows nearby, visiting Crataegus, Euphorbia and Ranunculus (Speight 2020).

The larvae are not described. They will probably live in freshwater with nutrient-rich organic material, close to submerged plants or roots of emergent plants.

","This species will suffer from deterioration of the habitat because of human developments, extracting ground and surface water, and by habitat change due to climate change. It will also suffer from pesticides used in agricultural areas but spreading out to natural areas.","Information on the population of this species is very limited. The number of localities is quite small, and the number of collected specimens per location is also very small.",Unknown,"

The former distribution of this species ranged from Poland south to Spain and the Mediterranean, and from France eastwards through central and southern Europe (Italy, western Balkans, northern Greece), into the European parts of Russia. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 4,691,118 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 800 km2. In the EU27, the EOO is 3,146,816 km2 and the AOO is estimated to be around 500 km2.

It is possibly extinct in many European countries, including Italy (D. Birtele pers. comm. 2021, D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2021), Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) and Switzerland (Maibach et al. 1992).

Outside of Europe, it occurs in Turkey and Iran, and from Siberia to the Pacific (Kamchatka) and also in Mongolia (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020).

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better. It would benefit from better protection of its sites against urban or recreational development. Maintaining the water tables (both groundwater and surface water) in its habitat and avoiding spread of agricultural pesticides into its habitat are also recommended.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169386,149169381,Eumerus tauricus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

The species is assessed as Endangered in Europe because of its very restricted and fragmented area of occupancy (AOO) of 32 kmand because it is found in only seven locations, four of which are on the Crimean Peninsula in Ukraine. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is approximately 452,000 km2. There is only one record in each of the following countries: Serbia, Romania, and the European part of Russia. There is a possibility that the species became extinct in Serbia. There is also a continuing decline in the quality of its Eurasian steppe habitat due to human activities, such as agriculture, urbanization, overgrazing, and afforestation. Since there is only one location in the EU 27, which is in Romania, and the known area of occupancy (AOO) is only 4 km2, the species is assessed as Critically Endangered in the EU 27. Habitat protection is necessary to preserve this species. Research on the population size, distribution and trends is required as well as the monitoring of the population trends in all known locations. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from subpopulations outside the assessment region.

","This species prefers open Eurasian steppe habitats (Barkalov and Popov 2000). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species, and no data about flowers visited by adults.","Eurasian steppes are facing numerous threats, such as agricultural expansion, urbanization, overgrazing and afforestation. These threats have resulted in a critical reduction of steppe‐like grasslands in Eastern Europe and in an enormous loss of biodiversity in the area (Cremene et al. 2005).","There is no information about population size, and very few records exist, all of them from before 2000 (Vujić and Šimić 1999, Bradescu 1991, Barkalov and Popov 2000). The population trend is unknown. The species is not common, but outside the Crimean Peninsula it is extremely rare.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species has been found in Ukraine (southern Crimea), a single locality in Romania, Serbia, and in the Kursk region (European Russia). The species was described in 1952 from the Crimean Peninsula, and five localities have been found there after its description. In Serbia, one specimen was found at a single locality in 1954 (Vujić and Šimić 1999), and it is possible that the species became extinct in this country. In total, it is found at seven localities in Europe. In the EU 27, there is a single location in the region of Sibiu in Romania from the last century (Bradescu 1991). In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is approximately 452,000 kmand its area of occupancy (AOO) is 32 km2, occurring at seven locations. In the EU 27, the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 4 km2 since it occurs only at one location.

Outside of Europe, the species is known from the Saur Mountains of Kazakhstan and from the Novosibirsk region in the Asian part of Russia.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"The species is strictly protected under the Serbian legislation (Code on declaration and protection of strictly protected and protected wild species of plants, animals and fungi, “Official Gazette of RS”, no. 5/2010). The site where the species was found in Serbia is a protected Special Nature Reserve called Deliblatska peščara, but despite later research, it has not been recorded there again. In Ukraine, where most records are known the mapped range of the species overlaps a number of protected areas, including the Krymskyi (Crimean) Nature Zapovednik (Nature Reserve).
 Resource and habitat protection is necessary to preserve this species. Research on population size, distribution, trends, life history and ecology is required, as well as the monitoring of population trends in all known locations.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169394,149169383,Orthonevra erythrogona,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Orthonevra erythtogona is a rare but widespread species in the northern parts of Europe. It is clearly declining in the southern parts of its range, and is probably extinct in Germany, southern Sweden and Denmark (Barkemeyer 1994, Bygebjerg 2019, Bartsch et al. 2009): it is endangered in Norway (Henriksen and Hilmo 2015). In the northern parts of the range, it does not seem to be threatened. In northern Sweden and Finland, the population seems to be stable (G. Ståhls, pers. comm. 2021).

Although with a limited distribution that is probably close to becoming severely fragmented, the species is still assessed as Least Concern, based on the large extent of occurrence and the good situation in Finland. However, in northeastern Europe it will also face habitat alterations, so a regular monitoring is recommended.","

This species occurs in wetlands both in lowland and mountain areas. The adults fly low above the ground through vegetation. They visit Caltha, Leontodon, Ranunculus acris, R. repens and Taraxacum (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The larvae are not described, but they have been found in wet mud with a high proportion of organic material, and in dungs (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020).","In the northern parts of its range, there will be no other threats other than habitat alteration due to climate change. In the southern parts, decreasing water tables, urban development, and pollution because of human activities will also play a negative role.","The population size of this species is not known. It is found in low numbers at most sites. It is obviously decreasing in parts of its distribution, and is possibly extinct in Germany, Denmark and southern Sweden. However, in Finland the population trend seems stable (G. Ståhls pers. comm. 2020). Since this is the centre of its European distribution, the population trend is estimated as stable.",Stable,"

In Europe, this species occurs in northern Europe, European Russia and Ukraine. It clearly declines in the southern parts of its range. It is probably extinct in Germany (the last record is from 1986), southern Sweden and Denmark (last recorded in 1956) (Barkemeyer 1994, Bygebjerg 2019, Bartsch et al. 2009), and is Endangered in Norway (Henriksen and Hilmo 2015). In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 4,186,737 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 2,000 km2. In the EU27, the EOO is 1,135,353 km2 and the AOO is 1,000 km2.

Outside of Europe, it occurs from Siberia to Kamchatka, and in Mongolia. (Barkemeyer 1994, Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

",This species is not used.,Terrestrial,

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand better its ecology and population trends.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169407,149169402,Eumerus sulcitibius,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is found in southern Europe from Portugal around the Mediterranean Basin to Italy and Montenegro, including the islands of Corsica, Sardinia, Sicily, and Crete. The species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States in view of its wide distribution and its presumed large and stable overall population. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of the species in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The species prefers open ground, semi-arid and unimproved grassland and open woodland of Quercus pyrenaica but also can be found in small open areas beside rivers in Quercus ilex forests. Tourism development, overgrazing and frequent fires can pose a threat to the species in parts of its range, but no conservation actions are currently required. Further research into the species' threats and the monitoring of its population trends.

","This species prefers open ground, semi-arid and unimproved grassland and open woodland of Quercus pyrenaica (Marcos-Garcia 1985). It is also found in small open areas beside rivers in Quercus ilex forests (Speight 2018). Adults are known to visit Thapsia (Marcos-Garcia 1985), Sambucus spp. and Euphorbia spp. (Krpač et al. 2011).","There are no major threats to this species, but habitat loss due to tourism development, overgrazing, agriculture and more frequent fires due to climate change can pose a threat to this species in the coastal regions of its area (EEA 2016).","There is no information about the population size, but a large number of findings indicate that the population trend is currently stable (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is found in southern Europe from Portugal all around the Mediterranean Basin to the western Balkans and Greece, including the islands of Corsica, Sardinia, Sicily and Crete, though apparently not recorded from mainland France. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, the species is found in Anatolia in Turkey and Azerbaijan (Speight 2018, van Steenis 2017).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation measures are in place for the species currently.  No conservation actions are currently needed. Further research is needed into the threats and to monitor population trends. It occurs in many protected areas: some of the Natura 2000 sites where the species occurs are Voreia Lesvos, Notiodytiki Chersonisos, Lesvos Kolpos Geras, Lesvos Paraktioi Ygrotopoi Kai Kolpos Kolpos Kallonis on Lesvos island, Kentriko Kai Notio Tmima on Andros, Oros Kerkis on Samos, Voreia Karpathos Kai Saria Kai Paraktia Thalassia Zoni on Karpathos, Dikti on Crete, Ori Gidovouni, and Taygetos on Pelloponese in Greece and Fondali marini di Punta Campanella e Capri in Italy (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169408,149169403,Orthonevra elegans,Vulnerable,"B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv)",2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is dependent on grasslands around springs, so with their disappearance caused by drainage and declining water tables, Orthonevra elegans will probably disappear as well. It has been assessed as extinct in the national Red Lists of Belgium, Finland, western Poland, France and Italy, and between Endangered and Critically Endangered in Germany, Denmark, Czechia and Sweden (Ssymank et al. 2011, Bygebjerg 2019, Mazánek and Barták 2004, ArtDatabanken 2020).

In the European Union, the number of recent locations is very low, probably only five, based on water abstraction and pollution (nutrient loads) as main threats. The decline of suitable habitats in the European Union might be over 80%, but the timeframe is unknown, and it may be longer than 10 years. The species is a bit less threatened in the eastern parts of Europe, although it seems to be very rare everywhere. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 302 km2. In addition, there is a decline in the extent of occurrence (EOO), area of occupancy (AOO), quality of habitat, number of locations and subpopulations (the species has become extinct in the countries listed above). Therefore, it is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv) in the EU27.

In Europe, it has been assessed as Vulnerable (VU B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv)), as the AOO is 600 km2 and the same arguments as for the EU27 countries are true for the whole continent as well.

","

This species occurs in springs in grasslands and wet nutrient-poor grasslands with seepage water running over the surface, bordered by forest (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020, J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020). It seems to be one of the most critical os all the syrphids of base-rich nutrient-poor wet grasslands in Europe. It visits white umbellifers, Filipendula ulmaria, Saxifraga hirculus and Viburnum opulus (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The larva is not described (Speight 2020), but will probably live in fresh surface water, probably small springs in nutrient-poor grasslands.

","This is one of the most threatened species of Syrphidae in Europe. The habitat is very vulnerable to water abstraction, intensification of grassland management, agricultural pollution and climate change. Probably the species itself is also vulnerable to pesticides.","The populations of this species are widely scattered. While recent records are fewer than in previous centuries, at some healthy sites it still flies in fair numbers. The population trend is decreasing due to habitat deterioration. At the same time, in Denmark, sites with good quality habitats still hold healthy subpopulations (J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2021).",Decreasing,"

The former range of Orthonevra elegans was from southern Finland (where it became extinct before 1950) and Sweden (extinct since 1955), south through Denmark and Belgium (extinct since 1960) to northern France (around Paris) (where the only records were from 19th century, so it is also considered extinct), and from northern Germany eastwards through central Europe to Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine and European parts of Russia, and on through to Siberia, Mongolia and China. There are also some very old records from Italy (19th century) (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Heimburg 2018, Holinka and Mazanek 1997, Karpa 2008, Pakalniškis et al. 2000, Sommaggio 2007, Speight 2020, Speight et al. 2018, Stanescu and Parvu 2005; Tóth 2011, 2014; Verlinden 1991, Verlinden and Decleer 1987).

The records from this century are from Denmark, southern Germany, northeastern Poland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Ukraine, and European Russia (Pestov 2007; Tóth 2011, 2014; J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020, G. Popov, pers. comm. 2021, A. Ssymank, pers. comm. 2020, Ł Mielczarek pers. comm. 2021).

In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is calculated to be 4,067,498 km2. The area of occupancy (AOO) of 600 km2 is a rough estimation of 150 recent localities for the species, based on the few literature records and personal comments (see above). In the EU27, the AOO is 302 km2.

It is also recorded from outside Europe: there is a record from this century from Mongolia (G. Pennards pers. comm. 2020).

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),

No conservation actions are in place for this species. Reducing pollution and more sustainable grassland management is recommended. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand its ecology and population trends better.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169428,149169423,Orthonevra brevicornis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-08-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is threatened by habitat alteration due to climate change and by the abstraction of groundwater. In the southern parts of its distribution (notably in France), it shows a clear decline (Speight et al. 2020), and is listed as Vulnerable on the national Red List of Czechia (Mazánek and Barták 2004). In Germany, it is classified as Near Threatened (Ssymank et al. 2011). However, in the northwestern parts of its range it is not declining, nor is it on any Red Lists (SLU Artdatabanken, Ball et al. 2011, Ball and Morris 2014, Bygebjerg 2019, Reemer et al. 2009). The situation in eastern Europe is less clear, but is probably comparable with the western parts. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Based on its wide distribution and relatively small declines, this species is assessed as Least Concern, both at European and EU27 level.","

The adults are found in marshes and fens, in forest edges and glades in moist forest such as acidophilous Quercus forests, humid Pinus sylvestris forests and wet Salix woodlands. Sometimes they can be found further away from forests, in hedgerows or near springs in heathlands or unimproved grasslands. They visit flowers or settle on foliage or bare ground in dappled sunlight. They visit flowers of white umbellifers, Caltha palustris, Cornus, Crataegus, Malus, Prunus padus, P. spinosa, Pyrus communis, Ranunculus, Rorippa and Salix. (Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020).

Orthonevra brevicornis and Orthonevra plumbago can be found together in the field (Speight 2020).

The larvae live in banks of brooks and pools rich in organic material. Nötzold (2000 as cited in Reemer et al. 2009) records the collection of an individual of this species from an emergence trap installed in a reed bed (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020). The larva is aquatic, living in accumulations of decaying vegetation, especially in mesotrophic or base-rich seepages in fens, meadows and occasionally woods (Ball et al. 2011).

","The larval habitat is threatened by decreasing water levels, urban and recreational development, and pesticides. The adult habitat is threatened by forest management, nitrogen deposition and pesticides.","This species is rather widespread but scattered. In most cases, only a few specimens have been found each time at one site. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"

This species occurs from southern Sweden and Denmark south to Spain and Italy, and from Great Britain (Scotland) southeast through central and southeastern Europe into the European parts of Russia. Even though listed in Speight (2020), it has not been found in Finland (Bartsch et al. 2009, Haarto and Kerppola 2014). The first records are from Sweden from 1984, and since then, records have been scattered (Bartsch et al. 2009). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is also present in the Caucasus, western Siberia and Mongolia.

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

There is no conservation plan in place for this species. The most important conservation action is protection of the habitat, both inside and outside protected areas. The negative impact of modern agriculture on its habitat is immense. These effects include the lowering of water tables, eutrophication of ditches and other small water-bodies by ammonium deposition and nutrient run off, deterioration of species-rich meadows and watersides due to fertiliser use and nutrient run-off, and the risks of pesticides spreading into natural areas. It is therefore clear that it would benefit strongly from a Europe-wide agriculture that allows space for nature within agricultural areas and does not have negative effects on the local and regional environment. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand its ecology and population trends better.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169436,149169426,Eumerus subornatus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

In Europe, the species is known from a small number of localities in Portugal, southern France, and in Spain. The species prefers small open areas in Pyrenean Oak forests, thermophilous forests of Quercus faginea, evergreen forests of Quercus suber, and Mediterranean scrub land. Based on the species' small area of occupancy (AOO) of 48 km2 in Europe and the EU 27, the fact that it is only found in four locations, and a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat, the species is assessed as Endangered (EN) in Europe and the EU 27. Threats to this species are related to human activities, such as intensive agriculture and grazing as well as the development of the tourism industry. It is unlikely that there is any rescue effect from populations outside of the assessment region.

","The species prefers small open areas in Pyrenean Oak forests, thermophilous forests of Quercus faginea, evergreen forests of Quercus suber, and Mediterranean scrub land (M.A. Marcos-García and A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2019). Adults fly very close to the ground (M.A. Marcos-García and A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2019.) and come to drink at the edge of springs in hot conditions. Adults are known to visit yellow composites and Urginea maritima (M.A. Marcos-García and A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2019). The flight period is from May to October in the Mediterranean zone of Europe. Like congeneric species, the larvae presumably feed on plants, developing in bulbs or other infested underground organs.","The destruction of habitat due to different human activities, such as increased number of tourists and the construction of tourism infrastructure, agriculture (direct destruction of habitats due to usage of the machinery and monocultural plantations), and grazing are the main threats (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).","There is no information about the population size or trend. In Spain, around 300 specimens were found in the Cabaneros National Park during 2004 in more than 10 localities (Ricarte and Marcos-Garcia 2008); around 200 of these specimens were collected using a Malaise trap. There are very few records from the rest of the range.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species occurs in southern Portugal (van Eck 2011), central Spain (Ricarte 2008), and from southern France in the Pyrenees close to the border with Spain (Speight and Ricarte 2012). It is found between 233 and 808 m above sea level. It is considered to occur in four locations. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is estimated to be around 33,511 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) about 48 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is found in Morocco (Claussen 1989).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions for this species. Site and habitat protection are necessary in order to preserve suitable areas. Further research is needed on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of habitat trends. It is present in protected areas such as in the Cabaneros National Park in Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-Garcia 2008). Some of the point localities where this species is found are part of the Natura 2000 network.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169449,149169444,Neoascia podagrica,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a Palaearctic species, widely distributed in Europe, and occurring in many wet or moist habitat types. These habitat types are vulnerable to water substraction, severe drought as a result of climate change and land reclamation for human activities. At present, it is common and widespread, and not listed as vulnerable or threatened on any regional Red Lists. In addition, its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, the current European Red List status of this species is considered to be Least Concern, also the case for the EU27 countries, but this has to be evaluated regularly due to the ongoing threats to its habitat.

","

This species can be found in all kinds of moist habitats, such as wetlands and meadows, even under brackish conditions. It also appears along ponds, ditches, and in open herb-rich areas in moist forests types, along hedgerows and even in gardens (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020, Stubbs and Falk 2002).

The adults fly through the vegetation, and often visit flowers. The males show territorial behaviour, including hovering and feinting. They visit all kinds of available flowering herbs and also shrubs (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020, Bartsch et al. 2009). The larvae of Neoascia podagrica are reported to live in cow dung and compost, but also sub-aquatically in mud and nutrient-rich water (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The flight period is from April until October (Bot and van de Meutter 2019), but in the Mediterranean areas also in March (Speight 2020).

","

This species is restricted to all kind of moist habitat types, which are threatened by dehydration because of decreasing ground and surface water levels, especially in forest areas. This may also be caused by severe drought as a result of climate change. In addition, patches of suitable habitat are reclaimed by intensification of land use for agriculture, industry or housing developments, which could finally lead to local disappearance of this species.

","

This species is encountered in small to medium numbers, up to a few dozen specimens. In the Netherlands, it was found to have a negative population trend after 1950 (Reemer et al. 2009). In Germany, the long and short term population trend was found to be stable (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Great Britain, a gradual decline was observed for Neoascia podagrica over the past four decades (S.G. Ball pers. comm. 2021). The overall population trend is considered to be decreasing.

",Decreasing,"

This is a Palaearctic species. In Europe, the species is recorded in most countries except Iceland; it is absent from the inland parts of northern Fennoscandia and from the extreme northern parts of European Russia. It is also found on the Mediterranean islands of Cyprus, Crete, Sicily and Corsica, and on the Macaronesian island of Madeira (Bartsch et al. 2009, Haarto and Kerppola 2009, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Smit et al. 2004, Speight et al. 2020, Vujić 1990). 

Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside Europe, the species has been recorded from Turkey, Transcaucasia (Georgia), and Siberia, east to Cis-Baikal and south to the Altai and the Sayan mountain regions. It is also present in Israel (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Peck 1988, Gudjabidze 2002, Saribiyik 2014, Speight 2020).

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,"There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. Protection of the habitat and research into its distribution and population trends, as well as into potential threats are needed to ensure that it remains Least Concern in Europe and the EU27 countries.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169457,149169447,Eumerus sogdianus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-11-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States in view of its wide distribution throughout Europe and its presumed large and stable overall population. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The species prefers unimproved pastures, montane grasslands, and sandy alluvial floodplains. It is also found on farmland, particularly in potato and cereal fields. There are no major threats to the species in Europe, but urbanization and land conversion due to agriculture and other human activities pose a minor threat to the species. No conservation actions are required to protect this species but monitoring of its population trends is recommended.

","The species occurs in open ground, dry, unimproved pasture and montane grassland. It is also found on farmland, particularly in potato and cereal fields, and in sandy soils, especially coastal dune systems. It lives in fixed dune grassland and sandy alluvial floodplains, plus humid and unimproved grassland, and the adults are known to visit white umbellifers and Sedum acre. The larvae have been reared from Allium spp., Daucus carota and Solanum tuberosum (Speight 2018).","There are no major threats to the species in Europe, but urbanization and land conversion due to agriculture and other human activities pose a minor threat (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There is no information about population size, but an important number of findings indicate that the population trend is stable (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Stable,"This species occurs across much of the European region. It is found from Denmark to southern Spain and the Peloponnese in Greece, and from southern England to Belgium and further eastwards through central and southern Europe and into parts of European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of the species in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is found in central Asia in Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Mongolia and China (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation measures are in place for this species currently. No conservation actions are required to protect this species, but monitoring of its population trends is recommended. It occurs in many protected areas, amongst others in the Durmitor National Park in Montenegro, Fruška Gora National Park in Serbia, and Podyjí Natura2000 Site and National Park in the Czech Republic (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). It is also found in Delta Evrou and Limnes Kai Limnothalasses Tis Thrakis - Evryteri Periochi Kai Paraktia Zoni Natura2000 Sites in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169470,149169465,Neoascia meticulosa,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widely distributed in Europe in all kind of wetland habitats and can be common locally. It is not listed on any national Red List as being threatened, but it has been reported to be in decline in Great Britain (Ball and Morris 2014). Its preferred habitat types may be locally threatened, but not on a large scale. Furthermore, its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, the current European Red List status of the species is considered to be Least Concern, and also the case for the EU27 countries.

","

This species occurs in all kinds of wetlands, mostly with open shallows and peaty vegetation, and also in rich marshes and adjacent grasslands and ditches along ponds. It is also regularly found in wet places in forest areas, and recorded in highland bogs as well (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The adults fly low through vegetation, rest on leaves of herbs and shrubs or are encountered on flowers (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009). The larvae have been found to live on aquatic plants, on the outer leaves of rotting stems of Typha spp. In the last larval instar, they move above the water where they also pupate (Maibach and Goeldlin De Tiefenau 1993).

Adults visit many species of herbs, such as Allium ursinum, Anemone nemorosa, Caltha palustris, Cardamine spp., Ficaria verna, Ranunculus acris, Galium spp., Taraxacum spp., and white Apiaceae such as Pimpinella saxifraga; and also shrubs, including Berberis vulgaris, Crateagus laevigata, Prunus padus, Prunus spinosa, Rosa canina, Salix spp. and Sorbus aucuparia (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The flight period is from April until October, with a peak in spring. Sometimes it has an evident second, but much weaker generation in the autumn (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020, Stubbs and Falk 2002).

","

Taking into account that this species is restricted to wetland habitat types, it can be locally endangered by the reclamation of these areas. In addition, water pollution and large-scale mechanical mowing of wetland vegetation may have a negative effect on its populations. Severe drought and the decrease of groundwater levels in wet forests with small ponds on sandy soils may also have a negative impact.

","

This species is usually found in small, but sometimes also in large numbers. In Germany as well the Netherlands, the population trend of this species is reported to be stable (Ssymank et al. 2011, Reemer et al. 2009). In Great Britain, the population trend has been stable over the past four decades (S.G. Ball pers. comm. 2021). The overall population trend is also stable.

",Stable,"

This is a Palaearctic species with a widespread distribution in Europe. It occurs from Ireland and Great Britain, east to European Russia (northwestern, central and the Volga Federal District), Ukraine (Kyiv and Donetsk regions) and Romania; and from most parts of Scandinavia, south to central Spain and northern Italy. It also appears on the Balkan peninsula south to Greece (in the northeastern mountainous regions) and southwest Bulgaria (Bartsch et al. 2009, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Krpač et al. 2011, Langhoffer 1918, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Nedeljkovic et al. 2009, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, Tóth 2014, Vujić 1990, Vujić et al. 2020, A.V. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020).

Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside of Europe, the species has been recorded from Turkey, Transcaucasia (Georgia), Siberia until the Cis-Baikal including the Altai, the Sayan and the Tuva mountains, Khazagstan, Kirgizia and Mongolia (Barkalov and Mutin, 2018, Gudjabidze 2002, Peck 1988, Speight 2020, Tóth 2013).




",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"There is no information about any conservation measures specific to this species. The management of the sites and habitats where it occurs is recommended, together with further research on the potential threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169478,149169468,Eumerus sicilianus,Data Deficient,,2021,2019-11-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This species is considered to be endemic to Italy, where it is known from the single type specimen collected almost 60 years ago. The species may occur in Tunisia, but this requires confirmation and at present it is considered to be endemic to Europe. The species potentially qualifies as Critically Endangered, with a small area of occupancy (AOO) of 4 km2 and because it is only known from a single location with an inferred continuing decline in the quality of the species' habitat due to tourism, urbanization, and intensive agriculture. However, the species was last recorded around 60 years ago, and nothing is known of its current distribution, population size and population trend. Further research is needed to confirm its current distribution, and to obtain information about the ecology and specific threats endangering this species. The species is assessed as Data Deficient.

","The species prefers the vicinity of springs and streams in very dry, non-calcareous, open ground (van der Goot 1964). It flies during August. As only one specimen was recorded more than 50 years ago, and no further information exists, all aspects of its biology and ecology remain unknown.","Because the species has not been found in recent years, there is no information about its specific threats. It is believed that the habitat quality is constantly declining due to intensive man-made activities in the area, such as tourism, urbanization and intensive agriculture (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).","There is no information about the population size or trends for this species. Only one specimen has been found, in 1961 in Sicily (van der Goot 1964). Some surveys were conducted in the area in 2015, but the species was not recorded.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from near Siracusa on Sicily (Italy), from where it was described, and its description is based on one specimen collected in 1961 (van der Goot 1964). Although some sampling efforts have been made in the area, the species has not been recollected since, but the sampling efforts may not have necessarily targeted this species. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 4 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is possible that the species is also present in Tunisia but this requires confirmation (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019) and at present it is considered to be endemic to Europe (Burgio et al. 2015).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species, nor is it listed in any of the National Red Lists. The known localities are entirely within the Saline di Siracusa e Fiume Ciane site (Special Protection Area (Birds Directive)). Specific surveys designed to check if the species is still present are also needed (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). Site and habitat protection as well as habitat and natural process restoration is needed. Research on taxonomy, population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends, are required for this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149169491,149169486,Neoascia geniculata,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a Palaearctic species, widely distributed but most numerous in the northern parts of Europe. In Germany, it is considered to be endangered with a moderate decline (Ssymank et al. 2011), and in decline in Ireland (Speight 2008), Great Britain (S. Ball pers. comm. 2021), Denmark (Jutland) (Bartsch et al. 2009) and in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009, Zollinger et al. 2018) where it has become rare after 2000. In the more northern part of its range, it has not been reported to be in decline or threatened. The main habitat can be locally threatened by habitat destruction, riparian vegetation management and water pollution. Climate change may also be a threat as it seems to be in retreat in a northerly direction. It is experiencing a population decline in large parts of its range due to habitat loss, although the extent of this could not be estimated. In the northern parts there is no suggestion of population decline yet, but this may change with increased monitoring and research. For now, the species is assessed as Least Concern, but it may become classified as Near Threatened or Vulnerable in the near future.

","

This species lives in all kind of wetlands such as marshes, lakes, ponds, streams and ditches with emergent vegetation, flood plains, moist herb-rich grasslands, often on clay soils or alluvial sediments and also in peatland areas along fens, raised bogs and on meadows (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The adults fly low through vegetation and near patches of mud (Reemer et al. 2009). The small, semi-aquatic larvae have been found in decaying vegetation around the margins of ponds and also along shores of peatland.

The adults visits flowers of white Apiaceae, such as Cicuta virosa and other herbs such as Ranunculus spp., Cardamine pratensis, Caltha palustris, Mentha aquatica, Iris pseudacorus, Alisma plantago-aquatica, Baldellia ranunculoides, Potentilla erecta and Senecio aquaticus (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Torp 1994).

The flight period is from late April until mid-September (Bos and Van de Meutter, 2019) or until October (Stubbs and Falk 2002), and there are probably two generations per year (Reemer et al. 2009).

","

This species prefers mesotrophic marshes, ditches and grasslands, which can be threatened by eutrophication from nearby intensively used agricultural land. Speight (2008) stated that the decline of this species in Ireland was caused by habitat loss. Locally, marshes may also be affected by increased recreation or even housing development activities, which could damage the riparian vegetation where its larvae live. In addition, mechanical maintenance of these habitats to clear watercourses has a negative impact on riparian vegetation. Climate change could also play a role, as it has been observed that it is declining in the southern parts of its range, but this claim needs to be verified.

","

Usually, this species is encountered in small numbers. In the Netherlands, its population trend was found to be decreasing after 1950 (Reemer et al. 2009) with a 71% decline in the province of Noord Brabant (Zollinger et al. 2018). In Germany, the population trend was found to show a moderate long-term decline (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Great Britain, a significant gradual decline was observed over the past four decades (S.G. Ball pers. comm. 2021). The overall population trend is also decreasing.

",Decreasing,"

This is a Palaearctic species that is most common in the northern parts of Europe, and is usually found in lowland areas. It occurs on Iceland (Nielsen et al. 1954) but this needs to be confirmed by new findings. The main range starts from Ireland and Great Britain, east to European Russia (northwestern European Russia and the Central Federal District), Ukraine (Kharkiv Region) and (north) Romania, and also from Fennoscandinavia, south to central France, south Germany, Austria and Hungary with an isolated occurrence in north Portugal (Aveiro). It is also present on the Balkan peninsula, where it is recorded in southwest Bulgaria (Bartsch et al. 2009, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Tóth 2011, Van Eck 2011, A.V. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020). 

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside Europe, the species has been recorded from Turkey, Transcaucasia (Georgia), west Siberia (including the Altai Mountains), east Siberia, the Russian Far East, Kazakhstan and Mongolia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Gudjabidze 2002, Peck 1988, Tóth 2013).

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. Protecting and restoring the habitat are urgently needed, as well as raising awareness about its decline.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169499,149169489,Eumerus santosabreui,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

The species is endemic to the Hierro, Gomera, La Palma and Gran Canaria islands of the Canary Islands, and it is undergoing a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to human-made pressure. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be less than 25,000 km2 and the EU 27 the area of occupancy (AOO) is assessed to be between 16-40 km2. The number of locations where the species is found is between four and 10 and in Europe. Therefore the species is classified as Endangered (EN). The conservation of the species should be based on resource and habitat protection. Further research about the population size, distribution, and trends and life history and ecology of the species are required. Monitoring of the population trends is also important.

","The species is found in arid and sparsely vegetated areas of the Canaries covered with succulent shrub vegetation, such as Euphorbia and the non-indigenous Opuntia. The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.","Intensive urban, tourism development and road construction are causing enormous habitat destruction, particularly for coastal and low-elevation ecosystems (WWF 2017).","There are no data about the population trend of this species, and there are no recent records. There have been no targeted studies to find more material, but unlike Eumerus purpureus and other species endemic to the Canary Islands (G. Pennards pers. comm. 2019), recent research on the islands has not provided any new specimens.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to the Canary Islands in Spain. Báez (1982) stated that it is found on Hierro, Gomera, La Palma, and Gran Canaria islands. No recent records exist. The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 16-40 km2 and extent of occurrence (EOO) is less than 25,000 km2. It is found between four and 10 locations.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures in place for this species; however, resource and habitat protection is needed. It is not known if the species is found in protected areas. Further research about the population size, distribution, trends, life history and ecology of the species is required. Monitoring of the population trends is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169510,149169507,Neoascia annexa,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Neoacsia annexa is a mainly European species that is widely distributed along forest streams in hillsides and mountain areas, primarily in central Europe. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Because of its specific habitat preference, this species is vulnerable to destruction of the small habitat patches where it does occur. However, these kinds of habitat patches are not uncommon throughout its distributional range. Therefore, the current European Red List status of the species is considered to be Least Concern which is also the same for the EU27 countries. However, it might become Near Threatened in the near future.

","

This species occurs on hillsides or in montane deciduous (usually Fagus) or mixed forests (including Picea), along small streams or near springs, often near patches of Petasites hybridus (Bartsch et al. 2009, Maibach and Goeldlin de Tiefenau 1993). The adults fly low through riparian vegetation and rest on the leaves or stems of plants, especially Petasites (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009). Larvae were found in cold wet soil on the sides of streams, close to the water, and the pupae were between moss less than one metre away from the stream (Maibach and Goeldlin de Tiefenau 1993). Adults visit umbellifers such as Anthriscus sylvestris, and other flowers such as Ajuga spp., Caltha palustris, Galium spp., Potentilla spp. and Ranunculus spp. (Bartsch et al. 2009). The flight period is from late May until August (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019) or until early September (Torp 1994). There are two generations per year, of which the second generation is weak (Reemer et al. 2009).

","The patches of Petasites hybrides along forest streams are an important feature of the habitat of this species. As a consequence, it is vulnerable to local disturbance of its microhabitat by human activities such as recreational activities or building houses. In addition, watercourse management measures for all kinds of reasons may have a negative impact, because muddy places and/or stands of Petasites hybridus may disappear or be severely altered.
","

In preferred habitat types, it can regularly be found in good numbers, up to a few dozen specimens. In Germany, the centre of its distribution, the population trend was found to be stable in the short and long term (Ssymank et al. 2011). Therefore, the overall population trend is also considered to be stable.

",Stable,"

Neoascia annexa is a Palaearctic species with its main distribution in Europe. It is a typical species for hilly countrysides and low to middle elevations in mountain regions. It occurs from the Netherlands (southeastern border), Belgium (Liège and eastern parts) and France (mostly eastern regions), east to the Baltic States, European Russia (Karelia and Komi Republic, Kirov and Lipetsk Oblast), Belarus, Ukraine (western part) and Romania (northern regions); and from the extreme southern tip of Sweden and central Denmark, south to the French Pyrenees, northwest Spain, northern Italy, and on the Balkan peninsula south to central Greece and south-west Bulgaria (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter, 2019, Glumac 1968, Langhoffer 1918, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Tóth 2014, Vujić 1990, Vujić et al. 2020, D. Birtele, pers. comm. 2020, G.V. Popov, pers. comm. 2020). 

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside Europe, the species has been recorded from Georgia (Transcaucasia) (Mengual et al. 2020) and Turkey (Saribiyik 2014), although at least some of the specimens of Neoascia annexa from north-east Turkey may belong to the very similar species Neoascia subannexa (Claussen and Haya 1997).

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. It is considered to be threatened in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), vulnerable in Denmark, potentially threatened in the German state of Sachsen (Pellmann and Scholz 1996), and has become extinct in Sachsen-Anholz (Dziock et al. 2004). On the other hand, it is not considered to be threatened overall in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) and in Czechia (Mazánek and Barták 2005). Protection and better management of the habitats where it occurs would be important, and research about its ecology and monitoring its population and habitat trends is recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169521,149169518,Eumerus sabulonum,Least Concern,,2021,2019-11-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least concern (LC)

The species is known from southern Fennoscandia to England, eastwards through central and southern Europe, and into the European parts of Russia. The species is listed as Least Concern in view of its wide distribution and presumed stable population. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. However, since the species is considered rare in the central parts of its range such as in the Czech Republic and Germany and because of a decline in suitable habitat, monitoring is required to determine the species' habitat and population trends. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from populations outside the assessment region. Research into the species taxonomy, population size, distribution and trends, and threats as well as the monitoring its population and habitat trends is required. 

","The species prefers open ground, coastal dune systems and low, rocky, coastal undercliffs at the northern edge of its range. It lives in dry, sandy areas of alluvial floodplains and dry, open, sandy areas within forest over much of continental Europe. It prefers open areas within Quercus ilex forest and maquis shrub land. In southern Europe, it is also found in unimproved montane grassland. Adults are known to visit Aegopodium podagraria, Euphorbia, Jasione montana, Potentilla erecta and Rosa pimpinellifolia. Munk (2000) apparently observed early-instar larvae of this species in cavities they had presumably made in the leaves of Jasione montana, on which he had previously observed deposition of eggs by Eumerus sabulonum. Stubbs (1997) also reported a female apparently depositing eggs on a rosette of Jasione montana.","The habitats of this species (for example improved systems) are globally impacted by human activities (such as land conversion by overgrazing, agriculture and urbanization), and as a result such activities may have an impact in parts of the range (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","

There is no information about the population size of this species, but its current population trend is assumed to be stable (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). However, although the species is widespread, it has been confirmed to be rare in some countries, such as the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005) and Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011).

",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is known from southern Fennoscandia to England, eastwards through central and southern Europe, and into parts of European Russia (Speight 2018). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, the range of this species extends to North Africa.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation measures in place for this species, and no conservations are required art this moment in time. It is assessed as Vulnerable in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005), and Endangered on the German Red List, since it is very rare in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). Because it is widely distributed, it occurs in several protected areas, including the Mercantour National Park in France (Ssymank and Lair 2014). Research into its taxonomy, population size, distribution, trends and threats, as well as the monitoring of its population and habitat, is required. 

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169532,149169529,Melanogaster nuda,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Although there is some reduction in its habitat and occurrence, for instance in the Netherlands and in France (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight et al. 2020), this species still has a large distribution in Europe and can be very abundant in a healthy habitat, and hence the European population is still very numerous. In addition, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, the species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the European Union.","

This species prefers open, moist areas such as marshes and humid grasslands, preferably on base-rich soil, and less on acidic soils (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020). It is less common in fertilised grasslands than Melanogaster hirtella (Reemer et al. 2009). The adults fly within a metre or so from the ground through and over fens and wet meadows, or around pasture vegetation in the vicinity of standing water. It is easily swept on dull days, and visits Caltha, Carex, Chaerophyllum, Crataegus, Crepis and Ranunculus (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

Larvae have been found in water or mud, close to plant roots, often in banks of ditches and streams (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Maibach et al. 1994, Speight 2020).

","Although very abundant, this species will suffer from lower groundwater tables and surface water levels, from habitat alteration, pesticides, and from habitat change and droughts due to climate change.","

This species has a large distribution in Europe and can be very abundant in a healthy habitat, so the European population will be very numerous. However, there is some reduction in the habitat and occurrence, for instance in the Netherlands and in France (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight et al. 2020), so the overall population trend is considered to be decreasing.

",Decreasing,"This species occurs from south Sweden (Skåne) and Latvia, south to northern Spain, France, Italy and Greece, and to the east in European Russia (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is also present in the Asian part of Turkey and in Syria (Speight 2020).",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

There is no conservation plan in place for this species. The most important conservation action is the protection of the habitat, both inside and outside protected areas. The negative impact of modern agriculture on its habitat is immense. These effects include the lowering water tables, eutrophication of ditches and other small waters by ammonium deposition and nutrient run off, deterioration of species-rich meadows and watersides due to fertiliser use and nutrient run-off, and the risks of pesticides spreading into natural areas. It is therefore clear that this species would benefit strongly from a Europe-wide agriculture that has space for nature within agricultural areas and does not have negative effects on the local and regional environment. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand better its ecology and population trends.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169542,149169540,Eumerus rusticus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Within Europe, this species is known from the Valea Cernei in Romania and from near Larnaka salt lake in Cyprus. The species is assessed as Endangered for Europe and the EU27 Member States since it has a restricted area of occupancy (AOO) of 8 km2 in Europe, is found in only two remote locations, and there is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due human-made pressure. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is estimated to be less than 30,000 km2. The species may have already disappeared from one of the two locations where it was found, which could lead to assess it as Critically Endangered in the near future. The species is considered to be very rare in Europe. The conservation of the species should be based on the protection of its habitat. Further research on taxonomy, population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of the population trends might also help preserve this species. There is no potential rescue effect from locations outside of the region.

","The specimens from Cyprus were collected on Polygonum equisetiforme, Colchicum and Foeniculum vulgare (van Steenis et al. 2019). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.","The location of this species in Romania has been continuously degraded by destructive and illegal logging in locations protected by the European Union's Natura 2000 legislation, including the Domogled-Valea Cernei National Park (https://www.euronatur.org/).","There are no data about the population trend of this species, but it is considered to be very rare in Europe. There is a possibility that the population is severely fragmented, given that the two known locations in Europe are far from each other (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from two localities; in Valea Cernei in Romania (Speight 2018), and recently recorded on Cyprus, near Larnaka salt lake (van Steenis et al. 2019). Its area of occupancy (AOO) is 8 km2, and extent of occurrence (EOO) is less than 30,000 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is also known from Turkmenistan (Speight 2018) and the Asian part of Turkey (Sarıbıyık 2014), although this last record is uncertain. ",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. Its habitat is partially covered by protected areas. It occurs at the Alykes Larnakas Birds and Habitats Directive Site in Cyprus and the Domogled - Valea Cernei Birds and Habitats Directive Site in Romania, which is also designated as the Domogled-Valea Cernei National Park (European Environment Agency 2020). Its conservation should be based on protection of its habitat. Further research on taxonomy, population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population trends, might also help preserve this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169552,149169550,Melanogaster hirtella,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Although this species shows some decline in numbers and is threatened by the spread of monocultural grasslands created for dairy farming, drainage and climate change, it does not seem to decline in its distribution. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, the species is assessed as Least Concern both in the EU27 countries and in Europe.","

This species occurs in wetland, fen, marsh, poorly-drained pasture and a wide range of waterside situations, such as along woodland streams or field drains, beside lakes, ponds and rivers, up to the altitude of Picea forest (Speight 2020). It also appears in all kinds of moist open or forested areas as marshes, ditch sides and humid flower-rich meadows (Barkemeyer 1994, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009).

The adults are mostly found in the vicinity of standing or running water, flying among field-layer vegetation and settling on leaves or flowers. The males hover above or between low vegetation. In spring, the species is often abundant on flowering shrubs further away from water. It is mostly seen on Ranunculus, but also visiting white umbellifers, Caltha, Crataegus, Euphorbia, Iris pseudacorus, Menyanthes, Mimulus guttatus, Potentilla erecta, Prunus avium, Pyrus communis, Sorbus aucuparia, Taraxacum and Viburnum opulus (Ball et al. 2011, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The eggs are deposited in clusters on the underside of vegetation growing above water. The aquatic larvae penetrate roots with their hind spiracles. They get oxygen from the roots of plants such as Caltha palustris, Glyceria and Typha. They live in banks of ditches and streams, rich in organic matter, close to the water surface. The pupae live attached on plants just above the water level (Ball et al. 2011, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Hartley 1961, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

","Although this species suffers from the same threats as other Melanogaster species, such as abstraction of surface and groundwater, and agro-industry grazing by livestock resulting in vast areas with no other plants than some grass species, and the total numbers show clear declines in some countries, it seems that the species is still as widespread globally as before.","In humid meadows in the Atlantic part of Europe, this is one of the most abundant species. It is often found in very large numbers. However, it is much less numerous in the eastern and southern parts of its distribution (Speight 2020). In some parts of Europe, there are some signs of a decrease in both population size and distribution (Ball et al. 2011, Reemer et al. 2009).",Decreasing,"

This is a very widespread species in western Europe. It occurs in the north in Ireland and southern Sweden, in the east in Latvia, western Poland, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria, southwards to Portugal, Spain and north Italy. Although Barkalov and Mutin (2018) record the species from European Russia, no records have been found to confirm this listing. It is also present in Bulgaria.

This is very much an Atlantic species. It is very widespread and abundant along the western seaboard of the continent from Denmark to Brittany, but otherwise rather localised and increasingly scarce into central and southern Europe (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is also recorded in the Asian part of Turkey.

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. The most important conservation measures to maintain it at its present distribution and numbers is to restore wet, species-rich meadows in all parts of Europe where there is agro-industrial dairy farming. This would ensure that it has suitable habitat throughout its area of occurrence. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand its ecology and population trends better.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169563,149169560,Eumerus richteri,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

The species is assessed as Endangered for Europe since it is very rare with five confirmed locations in Europe, with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 28 km2, and because there is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species in Europe, where it is found only in Serbia and Greece, is estimated to be 9,500 km2. In the EU 27, the species is assessed as Critically Endangered with only one recorded location, an area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) of 4 km2, and because there is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat. The majority of findings of this species are from before 2000. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from subpopulations outside the assessment region from Asian countries, where it is also considered to be rare.

The species is threatened by deforestation, agriculture, tourism, and forest fires. Further research on population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the regular monitoring of population trends are required. Resource and habitat protection is needed.

","The species is found in the low gorges of the Carpathians Mountains and in the Moesian foothills of Serbia (Vujić and Šimić 1999), where it is considered to be a relict species. It is also found in the natural mixed woodlands in Dadia in Greece. There are no data about visited flowers or developmental stages for this species. The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.","

The major threats that are most likely to affect this species are deforestation and habitat fragmentation, as well as destruction from changing land uses in the Carpathian region. In the Moesian foothills, changing land use due to agriculture is likely to threaten it. Tourism, with visitors walking around sites and nearby caves where it lives, as well as illegal logging, may be the main threat (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). In Greece, dense forests dominated by pine trees are vulnerable to large-scale fires, which can be very destructive because of higher temperatures due to climate change and drought prevailing in the summer (Catsadorakis et al. 2010).

","

The species is assumed to be extremely rare, and the population trend is unknown. There are only a few records for the species in Europe, and most of the records are older than 2000. The only reliable record from the EU 27 is the one from Dadia (northeastern Greece) collected in 2013 (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

",Unknown,"In Europe, this species is known from north-eastern mainland Greece and eastern Serbia. There are also records from Croatia and Slovenia but they are not confirmed (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020) and are not mapped here. In Europe, where it occurs at five locations, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be about 9,500 kmand the area of occupancy (AOO) about 28 km2. In the EU 27, it occurs at only one location, with an estimated area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) of 4 km2.

Outside of Europe, the species is known from Anatolia (Turkey), Azerbaijan and probably in Armenia.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"In Serbia, the species is protected under the Serbian legislation (Code on declaration and protection of strictly protected and protected wild species of plants, animals and fungi, “Official Gazette of RS”, no. 5/2010). In Greece, the species occurs in a protected area designated as the Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli Forest National Park. Resource and habitat protection are needed as conservation actions. Further research on population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the regular monitoring of the population trends, are required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169572,149169562,Melanogaster curvistylus,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This European endemic is Endangered because the area of occupancy (AOO) is 28 km2 (24 in the EU27), and the population is severely fragmented. It has only been only recorded from seven sites, five of them in EU27, all with only a very few specimens, and it is now probably extinct in Serbia (A.Vujić, pers. comm. 2021). Its habitat is under threat and is declining due to agricultural pollution, climate change and change of water management.","

The species is found close to standing or slow-flowing water bodies in humid river floodplain forests or open grasslands (Vujić and Stuke 1998, Mielczarek 2010, Tóth 2011, Heimburg 2018, Speight 2020). The adults were swept from herbaceous vegetation in Poland (Mielczarek 2010). The larvae live in small fresh water-bodies with decaying vegetation.

","

Although no threats are given in literature, this species is probably threatened due to its very small, widely scattered subpopulations in habitats that are prone to deterioration because of climate change, abstraction of ground and surface water, and pollution from agriculture.

","All records are of single specimens, which means that the few existing subpopulations are probably very small. The population trend is unknown. The species is considered to be severely fragmented because the seven specimens were registered far from each other, and it is doubtful whether the subpopulations could interact.",Unknown,"

This species is endemic to Europe. It has been recorded from Austria, Bulgaria, Germany, Hungary, Poland, Serbia (Vujić and Stuke 1998, Mielczarek 2010, Tóth 2011, 2014, Heimburg 2018, Vujić et al. 2018) and Kursk (part of the Russian Federation) (W. van Steenis, pers. comm. 2021). It is probably extinct in Serbia (Vujić et al. 2001). Its population is severely fragmented. The extent of occurrence (EOO) both in Europe and the EU27 countries is large. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 28 km2 in Europe, and 24 km2 in the EU27.

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

No conservation actions are in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand better its ecology and population trends.


It is strictly protected in Serbia (protected by national law Code of Regulations on the Declaration and Protection of Strictly Protected and Protected Wild Species of Plants, Animals and Fungi (Official Gazette of RS, No. 5/2010, 47/2011, 32/2016 and 98/2016)). In Germany, it is listed as Critically Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169588,149169580,Eumerus purpurariae,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This European endemic species is known from only two Canary Islands (Fuerteventura and Lanzarote), where it is found in arid and sparsely vegetated areas on dry and stony ground. The species is assessed as Endangered because it has a limited area of occupancy (AOO) of 16 km2, an extent of occurrence (EOO) of only 250 km2, because it is only found at two to four locations, and because it has a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to overgrazing, agriculture and tourism, which have a destructive effect on the island vegetation. Therefore, conservation of the species should be based on the protection of its habitat. Further research about population size, distribution, and trends and life history and ecology of the species are required. Monitoring of the population trends is also important.

","The species is found in arid and sparsely vegetated area on dry and stony ground (Smit et al. 2004). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.","Excessive grazing of introduced goats, combined with constant human-made pressures, mainly from agriculture and tourism development, are thought to have had devastating effects on island ecosystems (Arevalo et al. 2012). Species associated with native island plants are expected to be severely threatened by habitat loss due to the destruction of the endemic flora.","There are no data about the population size of this species, but there are very few records and hence it is presumably rare (Báez 1982, Smit et al. 2004). The current population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is found on Fuerteventura and Lanzarote in the Canary Islands (Speight 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 250 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 16 km2. The species occurs in between two to four locations.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. Its habitat is partially covered by protected areas. It is found at Salinas de Janubio in Lanzarote and Betancuria in the Fuerteventura Birds Directive Sites of the Canary Islands (European Environment Agency 2020). Its conservation should be based on the protection of its habitat. Further research about population size, distribution, trends, and life history and ecology of the species are required. Monitoring of the population trends is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169596,149169585,Lejogaster tarsata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species occurs in most European countries and is also known throughout the Palaearctic region. However, in many countries the distribution is quite erratic and shows a clear decline. It has disappeared from parts of Sweden, Denmark, probably Italy and Germany as well, and is in decline in Great Britain, the Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium) (Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998, Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011). In Czechia, Denmark and Norway it is listed as Vulnerable (Bygebjerg 2019, Henriksen and Hilmo 2015, Mazánek and Barták 2004).

Both in Europe and in the European Union, it is assessed as Least Concern due to the still large and more or less continuous distribution. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. However, especially in the EU27 countries, the decline is obvious, and the Near Threatened status could apply in the near future. It is possible that if more quantitative data were available, it might even show a decrease of 30% in population size in the last 10 years, which would classify the species as Vulnerable.

","

This species mostly appears in open marshes or peat bogs with clean water, often with calcareous or salty seepage, or in springs. In Great Britain, Sweden and Denmark, it is often found along the coast in brackish areas (Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020)

Adults are found at the margins of streams and pools, but also further away in dry habitats. They fly in a zigzagging, darting fashion among taller vegetation. They visit flowers of Iris pseuacorus, white umbellifers, Crataegus, Matricaria and Ranunculus (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020)

The larvae live in floating decaying organic material in small water-bodies such as ponds and ditches (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

","The usual threats for species living in wet bogs and grasslands apply to Lejogaster tarsata as well. These are decreasing groundwater tables, nitrogen deposition, intensification of agricultural use, urban development, climate change and possibly pesticides from agricultural lands.","

This species mostly flies in small numbers, but sometimes it can be quite numerous in wet meadows, peat bogs and brackish grasslands (Reemer et al. 2009, W. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020), especially in the central part of its distribution. In Europe, the population is declining. It has disappeared from parts of Sweden, Denmark, probably in Italy and in Germany as well. It is also decreasing in Great Britain, the Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium) (Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998, Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011). In Czechia, Denmark and Norway, it is listed as Vulnerable (Bygebjerg 2019, Henriksen and Hilmo 2015, Mazánek and Barták 2004).

",Decreasing,"This species occurs from south Norway and Sweden (Upland) to Portugal, and from Ireland to Fennoscandia, south to the Mediterranean and Mediterranean islands (Corsica, Sicily) and eastwards into the European parts of Russia, Siberia and the Russian Far East.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside Europe, it is also present in southeast Turkey, Iran, Afghanistan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kirghizistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Mongolia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Reemer and Smit 2007, Speight, 2020). In the central part of its distribution, it is rather widespread and can be abundant, while it is very scattered and in low numbers in the southern parts.",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

There is no conservation plan in place for this species. The most needed conservation action is to preserve the quality of the habitat. The relatively nutrient-poor waters and wet grasslands with many flowers should be protected from changes in their water levels and from human induced nutrient inputs (through air, water pollution or by the use of fertilisers).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169609,149169604,Eumerus pulchellus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has a broad distribution within Europe. The species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States in view of its wide distribution, because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category, and its presumably large and stable overall population. Regardless, monitoring of the population trends is recommended given that the habitat of the species is threatened by more frequent fires due to climate change and human negligence, overgrazing and urbanization. The species prefers open, well-drained ground with low vegetation, unimproved, permanent pasture and Eagle Fern covered terrain. 

","This species prefers open, well-drained ground with low vegetation, unimproved, permanent pasture and Pteridium-covered terrain. Adults are known to visit Potentilla erecta and white umbellifers (Speight 2018). The developmental stages are described and figured by Ricarte et al. (2008) from larvae found in cavities in tubers of Asphodelus aestivus and Urginea maritima. Asphodelus albus and Asphodelus ramosus have also been identified as host plants for the larvae (Speight and Garrigue 2014). ","This species is threatened by more frequent fires due to climate change and human negligence, overgrazing, and urbanization (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There are no exact data about the population size of this species, but the population trend is presumed to be stable in some parts of the range, based on the records. On the east Aegean islands the species is considered to be very common (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is found from the Canary Islands, southern Portugal, Spain (mainland and the Balearic Islands), and from the foothills of the Pyrenees on the Atlantic coast of France and in the Pyrénées-Atlantiques region in southwest France, to the Mediterranean basin in Malta, Italy (mainland, Sicily and Sardinia), Balkan Peninsula, Greece (mainland, Crete, and the eastern Aegean islands), Cyprus and Romania. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is found in Turkey and North Africa (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for the species so far and no conservation actions are needed currently. Monitoring of the population trends is recommended.
It occurs at several Natura 2000 sites in Europe such as at Estrecho, Sierra Nevada, Cimals de la Serra, Puig de na Bauçà (Palma de Majorca) and Los Valles in Spain, Rdumijiet ta' Malta: Ir-Ramla taċ-Ċirkewwa sal-Ponta ta' Bengħisa in Malta, Valle del Fiume Anapo, Cavagrande del Calcinara, Cugni di Sortino in Sicily in Italy, and Ori Kentrikis Evvoias, Paraktia Zoni Kai Nisides, Andros: Ormos Vitali Kai Kentrikos Oreinos Ogkos, Samos: Oros Kerkis, Naxos: Ori Anathematistra, Koronos, Mavrovouni, Zas, Viglatouri, Mikres Kyklades, Lefka Ori Kai Paraktia Zoni and Dikti: Oropedio Lasithiou, Katharo, Selena, Selakano, Chalasmeni Koryfi in Crete, Voreia Karpathos Kai Saria Kai Paraktia Thalassia Zoni, Anatolici Rodos, Samos: Oros Kerkis, Voreia Lesvos, Notiodytiki Chersonisos, Apolithomeno Dasos Lesvou, Oros Olympos Lesvou, Samothraki: Oros Fengari Kai Paraktia Zoni, Thasos in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020). It also occurs at the Skadarsko jezero National Park in Montenegro.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169617,149169607,Hammerschmidtia ingrica,Endangered,"B2ab(iii)c(ii,iii)",2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

In Europe, this is a scarce eastern boreal species, with only one record in the EU27 (Finland). It is a rare species, which most likely shows extreme fluctuations. The habitat is threatened and the rather small area of occupancy (AOO), which ranges between 60 and 600 km2 classifies it as Vulnerable to Endangered. The exact extent of habitat decline in Russia is not well known, but it seems to be continuous. There seem to be four scattered localities in Russia, of which one is a seemingly larger area. The 15 localities give a minimum of 60 km2 and the larger areas in Russia are estimated to be around 400 km2. All in all, the AOO is likely to be less than 500 km2 and the final category for Europe is Endangered.

For the EU27, the species should be classified as Data Deficient as the species could have been introduced (van Steenis et al. 2020). The origin of the species occurrence in the EU27 is uncertain and needs confirmation. If it has not been introduced, then it has only one location in the EU27, and the AOO is less than 10 km2, classifying the species as Critically Endangered. More research is recommended to establish the origin of the species in Finland.","

The adults are found in mixed boreal forests with over-mature deciduous trees. The larvae are found in sap accumulations under the bark of Juglans, Populus tremula and Ulmus. It has been observed visiting Cornus alba (van Steenis et al. 2020).

",Forestry with felling of trees and removal of fallen logs is the main threat to this species. The intensification of agriculture is another threat due to the use of fertilisers and pesticides (van Steenis et al. 2020).,"This species is sometimes found with several individuals at the same locality, and over several years from the same locality. It is unknown whether the populations show fluctuations, but based on the larval habitat and on the (in this respect) similar Hammerschmidtia ferruginea, it is assumed this species also shows strong fluctuations in population densities (van Steenis et al. 2020).",Unknown,"The species is widespread in European Russia and Siberia, and into the Russian Far East. It is also known from one locality in southeast Finland, collected in 2011 and whose origin is uncertain and it may be the result of introduction (van Steenis et al. 2020). In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 25,000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is between 60 and 600 km2. In the EU27, both the EOO and the AOO is 4 km2.",The species is not traded nor used.,Terrestrial,No conservation actions are in place. Habitat protection and raising awareness are possible actions to undertake for its conservation.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169630,149169625,Eumerus phaeacus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN) 

The European endemic species is found in Evergreen forest, open ground and Mediterranean macchia in Greece and Montenegro. The species is assessed as Endangered since it has an area of occurrence (AOO) of 32 km2, occurs at five locations, and has a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 54,000 km2. In the EU 27, the species is also assessed as Endangered because it has a very restricted geographic range with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 24 km2, because it only occurs at three locations, and because there is also a continuing decline in the quality of the specie's habitat due to fires as a result from climate change and human pressure on Mediterranean ecosystems, whether it be through tourism or overgrazing. In the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is about 16,000 km2. It is unknown if there is a rescue effect from the Montenegro subpopulations to Greece. If other localities are found through research and surveys, the species may require a reassessment, which could lead to down listing it to a lower threat category. For now, the assessors use a precautionary attitude to list this species as Endangered. Research about population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends of the species are required along the eastern Adriatic coast to Corfu to see if the species is extant in other localities. Resource and habitat protection is needed.","This species is found in Mediterranean Evergreen forest and open ground. It prefers Quercus coccifera (Claussen and Lucas 1988). In Montenegro, it is found in Mediterranean macchia (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.","The Mediterranean Basin is one of the most fire-prone regions in the world and due to climate change, forest fires are expected to become more frequent and have a higher impact on the habitats of this species (CEPF 2010). In addition to fires, other threats include overgrazing and the development of the tourism industry, which has exposed areas of the coastline to intense pressure from land-use change. Tourism development is the predominant threat in Corfu and Montenegro, including invasive road construction in coastal regions (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There is no information about population size for this species, but it is considered to be very rare (Chroni et al. 2018). The population trend is unknown. It is unknown whether the population is severely fragmented or not. It is a large and conspicuous species, and could be found in additional localities in the future.",Unknown,"This species is a European endemic, known from Greece (Corfu, Mount Olympus and Mount Oiti) and Montenegro (from Mount Rumija and near Skadar Lake; Chroni et al. 2018). It may occur in other localities, but there is no evidence yet. It is a large conspicuous species, but so far there is no record from any other area. In Europe, the species occurs at five locations and its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be about 57,273 kmand the area of occupancy (AOO) about 32 km2In the EU 27, the species occurs at only three locations, with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 24 km2 and extent of occurrence (EOO) about 16,000 km2.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species so far; however, resource and habitat protection is needed. It is found at the Aisthitiko Dasos Koiladas Tempon Habitat Directive Site and the Ethnikos Drymos Oitis-koilada Asopou Birds Directive Site in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020). In Montenegro, it is found close but not within the Skadar Lake National Park and in Kotor Bay at the UNESCO World Heritage Site. Research about population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends of the species are required along the eastern Adriatic coast to Corfu to see if the species is extant in other localities.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149169638,149169627,Criorhina ranunculi,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)


This is a widespread European endemic that lives in old deciduous forest and sometimes meadows with over-mature trees. The estimated extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Threats to its preferred habitat such as forest reclamation and forest management (for example replacing old trees and/or suitable tree species for larval development) occur only on a local scale. Therefore, the current European Red List status of Criorhina ranunculi is considered to be Least Concern, but the species should be evaluated regularly.




","

This species lives in old deciduous forests, and sometimes in meadows with over-mature trees.  It is most frequent in oak-hornbeam forests on rich soils, and also in Betula, Populus tremula, Fagus and Quercus forests (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).


Adults are primarily arboreal, but are often observed when they descend to visit the tops of flowering shrubs, and sometimes are found on and around wet trunk-base rots looking for the place for oviposition (females) or hovering (males). Males often behave very aggressively to other large flower-visiting insects, and do fly extremely fast with a characteristic zigzag flight between the branches of flowering shrubs and trees (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020, Stubbs and Falk 2002). Males are strong flyers that are able to cover a large area (Bartsch et al. 2009).


Larvae have been found in a stump of Fagus sylvatica, and are predicted to live in trunk-bases and in fungus-infested, wet-rot cavities of Betula spp., Fagus sylvatica, Quercus spp. and Ulmus spp. (Rotheray 1991, Speight et al. 2020), as well as of Populus tremula (Bartsch et al. 2009).


In early spring, adults can often be found on flowering male Salix spp. catkins, or on flowers of Prunus spinosa and Prunus avium. Later in the season, they occur on other flowering shrubs, such as Cornus sanguinea, Crataegus spp., Photinia spp., Prunus cerasus, Rubus spp. and Sorbus aucuparia, and have also been recorded from Cardamine pratensis (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020).


The flight period is from mid-March until June, and at higher latitudes also in July (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and van de Meuter 2019, Stubbs and Falk 2002).

","

As it is the case with other Criorhina species, deforestation and landscape management by removal of old trees will locally have a negative impact on the occurrence of this species. It is also dependent on forest edges with flowering shrubs such as Salix spp. and Prunus spinosa, which are not commonly present because transition zones are not often established in commercial and recreational forests. 



","

Generally, the species is encountered in low numbers, with one or two specimens at a time. In the Netherlands, no increasing or decreasing trend has been found after 1950 (Reemer et al. 2009), but it has become more widespread recently, possibly as a result of higher early spring temperatures. In Germany, the population trend was found to be stable in both the long and short term (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Great Britain, the population trend was found to be stable with a slight increase in the past four decades (S.G. Ball pers. comm. 2021). In general, the population trend seems to be stable.

",Stable,"

This is a European endemic with a wide distribution range. It occurs from Ireland and Great Britain, including Scotland, east to European Russia (northwest, central and eastern European Russia), Ukraine (western parts until Kyiv region) and Romania (northern and western parts), and from southwest Norway and south and east-central Sweden south to central Spain, central Portugal and central Italy. It is also present on the Balkan peninsula, where it is recorded from Croatia, Serbia, Montenegro and northern Greece (Langhoffer 1918, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Bartsch et al. 2009, van Eck 2011, Nielsen and Gammalmo 2017, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Janevic and de Groot 2018, Prokhorov et al. 2018 ,Bot and Van de Meuter 2019, Speight et al. 2020, van Eck et al. 2020, Vujić et al. 2020, G.V. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, Hoverfly Recording Scheme). 

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

The species was recorded outside Europe from Transcaucasia (Peck 1988), but this has not been confirmed in more recent faunistic reports from that area.


",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

Criorhina ranunculus is listed as a protected species in Serbia (Miličić et al. 2018). It is listed as threatened to severely threatened in some German states (Pellmann and Scholz 1996, von der Dunk et al. 2003, Dziock et al. 2004, Freundt et al. 2005), threatened in Ireland (Speight 2008), and vulnerable in Norway and Czechia (Mazánek and Barták 2005, Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre). However, in most parts of its current range there is no decreasing trend, and the species was recently downgraded on the national Red List of Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) from endangered to not threatened. In addition, the status of Criorhina ranunculi in Great Britain was changed recently from ""notable"" to ""lower risk"" (Hoverfly Recording Scheme 2010).


Protection and better management of the habitats where this species occurs would be important, and research and monitoring  its ecology, population and habitats trends is recommended.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169658,149169648,Eumerus pannonicus,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-10-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

The European endemic species is recorded only in a small area just outside the boundaries of the Special Nature Reserve Pašnjaci velike droplje in the North Banat province in Serbia. The species is a typical inhabitant of steppe areas, which are disappearing from Europe. Based upon the small known geographic range of the species with an area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) of 4 km2, found at one single location, and due to the continuing decline of the species' habitat quality because of intensive agricultural activities, the species is assessed as Critically Endangered. The species would benefit from a restriction of agricultural activities. Further conservation actions needed are in education and awareness and legislation on a national level as well as site and habitat protection. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends are needed. Additional research on population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats of this species is required. Establishing the exact host plant for the development of the larvae of the species is also significant. It is crucial to introduce this species into the National list of protected species. The species is Not Applicable for the EU 27 Member States. 

","The larva presumably feeds on plants, probably in bulbs or other infested underground organs, like other congeneric species. The specimens were caught on the white flowers of Conium maculatum, on trackside vegetation within typical Pannonian steppe (Markov et al. 2016), one of the most threatened habitats in Europe.","The typical habitat of this species, steppes, are disappearing in Europe (IUCN 2019). Intensive agriculture in the area where the species was found presents the most significant threat. Due to agricultural activities, the habitat quality is degraded and there is a continuing decline in its availability due to extensive tillage of the land. The use of herbicides and pesticides on crops is also a present threat with a direct impact on the habitat of the species since it is in the immediate proximity of cropland (A. Grković pers. obs. 2019). Fires deliberately caused in order to remove the remaining vegetation after harvest are an additional threat.","

There is no information about the population size for this species and the population trend is unknown. There are four known specimens, all found in one subpopulation in spite of repeated surveys in this area. Three specimens were found in 2014, and a fourth one in 2018 (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

",Unknown,"

Endemic to Europe, this species is only known from one locality in the North Banat province in Serbia, just outside the boundaries of the Special Nature Reserve Pašnjaci velike droplje (Markov et al. 2016), which covers a total of 6,774 ha. This nature reserve is split into three geographically separated parts, and this species is found in immediate proximity to only one of them named Jaroš. It was found at 73 m above sea level. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) of the species in Europe are estimated to be 4 km2

",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

All the four known specimens of this species came from a single point locality, in the immediate proximity of the Special Nature Reserve Pašnjaci velike droplje in Serbia (Markov et al. 2016). Although surrounding areas are protected, agriculture in this area is intensive. The species would benefit from a restriction of agricultural activities. Further conservation actions needed are in education and awareness and legislation on a national level as well as site and habitat protection. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends are needed. Additional research on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats of this species is required. Establishing the exact host plant for the development of the larvae is also significant. It is crucial to introduce the species into the National list of protected species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169671,149169666,Criorhina berberina,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has its main distribution in Europe, where it is widespread in ancient, moist deciduous but also mixed forests with over-mature trees and well-developed shrub and herb layers. The species is in decline in Great Britain (Ball and Morris 2014, Hoverfly Recording Scheme) and has been placed as threatened on a few German state Red Lists (Dziock et al. 2004, Pellmann and Scholz 1996). However, in general there are no known negative population trends and no immediate threats to the preferred habitat either. Furthermore, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species in both Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, the current European Red List status of Criorhina berberina is considered to be Least Concern, which is also true for the EU27 countries.

","

The species lives in ancient, moist, deciduous but also mixed forests with over-mature trees and a well-developed shrub and herb layer (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020), and sometimes in more open landscapes in old hedgerows and in wetlands in association with old trees (Stubbs and Falk 2002).

Adults are often seen flying through vegetation and visiting flowers. Males patrol around flowering shrubs, and females can also be found flying in the shade, investigating the trunks and roots of old trees for possible oviposition sites (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

Larvae develop in decaying wood including in tree roots. Eggs deposition was observed on and around Quercus spp. and Fagus sylvestris trees (Reemer et al. 2009). Larvae are also found in a wide array of deciduous trees, such as Acer pseudoplanatus (Speight 2008) or Fagus sylvestris, Betula spp. and Fraxinus excelsior (Rotharey 1994) but also in conifer trees such as Abies spp. and Picea spp. (Speight 2020).

All kinds of flowering plants are visited, such as white Apiaceae, Acer campestre, Allium ursinum, Cornus sanguinea, Crataegus spp., Euonymus europeus, Filipendula ulmaria, Frangula alnus, Hieracium spp., Hypericum spp., Lonicera xylosteum, Photinia spp., Ranunculus spp., Rhamnus catharticus, Rhododendron spp., Rosa spp., Rubus idaeus, Rubus fructicosus, Salix spp., Sorbus spp., Stellaria holostea, Taraxacum spp. and Viburnum opulus (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The flight period is from April until July, but also extending into September, especially at higher altitudes and at more northern latitudes (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020). It has one generation, but there is a possibility of a weak and/or facultative second generation (Reemer et al. 2009).

","The possible threats to the subpopulations of Criorhina berberina are deforestation and the dehydration of forests patches by lowering groundwater levels for agricultural or drinking water leading to the disappearance of flowering shrubs and herbs. In addition, forest management that replaces old stands of trees with new stands, and the removal of old trees in parks and hedgerows also threaten this species.","In general, this species can be found in low numbers, seldom more than five specimens at once. There is no information about the population trend, except that a stable trend was observed in the Netherlands after 1950 (Reemer et al. 2009), as well a stable long and short-term population trend in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Great Britain, a significant decline in populations was observed for Criorhina berberina during the past four decades, especially in the 1980s (S.G. Ball pers. comm. 2021).",Stable,"

Criorhina berberina is a Palaearctic species with its main distribution in Europe. It occurs from Ireland, Great Britain including Scotland and France east to European Russia (no additional distribution data available), Ukraine (Carpathians and Kyiv Region) and Romania, and from Sweden (southern tip), southeast Norway with one recent record, and Denmark south to northern Spain, central Portugal and Italy. It is also present on the Balkan Peninsula, and south to the mountain regions of northern Greece and southwest Bulgaria (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Van Eck 2011, Falck 2011, Glumac 1968, Langhoffer 1918, Ricante and Marcos-García 2017, Speight 2008, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Torp 1994; Tóth 2011, 2014; Vujić et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020, Vujic abd Milankov 1990, Vujic and Milankov 1999, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, M. de Groot pers. comm. 2021, L. Mazanek pers. comm. 2019, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020, R. Żóralski pers. comm. 2020, Hoverfly Recording Scheeme).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside of Europe, Criorhina berberina has been recorded from Turkey and from Transcaucasia in Georgia (Saribiyik 2014, Speight 2020, Mengual et al. 2020).

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,There is no information available about any conservation measures specific to this species. Protection of important sites and areas and controlling unsustainable forestry practices would benefit this species. Monitoring and research on population and habitat trend is also needed.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169679,149169669,Eumerus ovatus,Endangered,"B2ab(iii,iv,v)",2021,2019-11-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is known from Lithuania, Poland, southern Germany, Switzerland, and Austria in central Europe, to Romania, Ukraine. In southern Europe it can be found in southern France and Italy, to the Balkan countries, and Greece. The species is assessed as Endangered for Europe and the EU27 Member States because it has a restricted area of occupancy (AOO) of about 200 km2, is considered to be severely fragmented, and has a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat. The species is present throughout Europe and the EU 27, with the extent of occurrence (EOO) being estimated to be 2,578,296 km2 in Europe and about 1,750,000 kmin EU 27. The area of occupancy (AOO) for Europe is between 236 and 250 km2. Despite being widely distributed, the species is rare all over the region and its population trend is decreasing and the number of locations is considered to be declining in Europe. The species is found usually in low numbers, with approximately two to three individuals, with a maximum of 10 individuals. The species is only present in natural forests and shrubby European habitats, which are threatened by logging, air, soil and water pollution, increasing urbanization, and intensive forest management. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from Asian populations from the Caucasus Mountains. The species is Extinct in the Czech Republic and Critically Endangered in Germany. Legislation of the species and protection is needed on an international level. Resource and habitat protection is needed, as well as research on population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats to this species. Monitoring of the population trends is required all over the species' range.

","The species prefers open ground, thermophilous forest fringes and herb-rich, dry and semi-arid, open, unimproved and calcareous grassland. It is also found in scrub and garrigue (Speight 2018). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records of the larval stages of this species. The species seems to be surviving in remaining European mixed deciduous forest patches, and the host plant is said to be Tragopogon spp. (Stackelberg 1961). In Ukraine, this plant is a local species occurring in Pinus sylvestris forests and mixed forests (G. Popov pers. comm. 2019).","Invasive species, logging, increasing urbanisation as well as intensive forest management, particularly large clear cuts reforested with monocultures, are all major threats to European broadleaf and mixed forests where this species lives. The remaining forest habitats are often fragmented by divided highways and multi-track railroads, creating barriers to wildlife movement (EEA 2016). These threats directly affect this species, which relies on forests in every aspect of its life (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","

There are no precise data about population size, but the population trend is decreasing. Despite being widely distributed, the species is rare all over the region. It is usually found in low numbers, approximately two to three up to a maximum of 10 individuals (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). In Italy, it is only present in a few locations (D. Sommaggio, pers. comm. 2019). The population is considered to be severely fragmented, with many subpopulations small and isolated with no possible exchange of individuals.

",Decreasing,"Within the European region, this species is known from mostly scattered records. These include Lithuania, Poland, southern Germany, Switzerland, and Austria in central Europe, to central Romania and northern Ukraine. In southern Europe it can be found in southern France and northern  Italy, to the Balkan countries and northern mainland Greece (Speight 2018). It has also been recorded in Serbia, where it only occurs in two localities. In some of the sites the species may no longer occur, for example in Germany, where the species is Critically Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011). In the Czech Republic, the species is considered Regionally Extinct (Farkač et al. 2005). The number of locations is considered to be declining in Europe.

In Europe, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is 2,578,296 km2 and its area of occupancy (AOO) is between 236 and 250 km2. In the EU 27the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be about 1,750,000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) about 200 km2.

Outside of Europe, the species is found in the Caucasus Mountains.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

Legislation for the species and protection is needed on an international level. Resource and habitat protection is needed as well as research on its population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats. Monitoring of population trends is required all over the range.

The species is assessed as Extinct in the Czech Republic Red List (Farkač et al. 2005) and Critically Endangered on the German Red List (Ssymank et al. 2011). The species occurs in several Natura 2000 sites in Europe such as at Bredower Forst, Bruch bei Bühl und Baden-Baden, Kaiserstuhl and Nürnberger Reichswald in Germany; Coteaux, bois et marais calcaires de la Champagne Berrichonne and Le Mercantour in France; Őrség, Boronka-melléke, Mecsek, Tenkes, Közép-Dráva, Felső-kiskunsági szikes puszta, Csévharaszti homokvidék, Budai-hegység, Darányi borókás in Hungary and Porțile de Fier in Romania and Ethnikos Drymos Vikou - Aoou in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169691,149169687,Pelecocera lusitanica,Near Threatened,A3c,2021,2020-02-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European Regional Assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

Although Pelecocera lusitanica is found across Europe, it is mainly restricted to dunes and to sandy inland areas. There is a ongoing decline in the quality and the extent of the habitat, and in addition, the current population trend in Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be declining fast. This decline is and has been in the order of just over 30% so the current range could be a lot smaller than recorded on the map. This decline is likely to go on in this special type of habitat, so the species is expected to lose a big part of its suitable habitat in a short time. Therefore, this species is assessed as Near Threatened, as it is close to qualifying for a threatened Category under Criterion A3c.

The species would probably benefit from the protection of the coastal habitat.","

This species is found in coastal dune systems in western Europe, at the transition between Ammophila dunes and grey dunes/dune scrub, or where Pinus has been planted in dunes, and in sandy heathland/pine forest (Reemer et al. 2009). Johansson (2012) records the species from inland sandy localities, including sandy roadsides and sandpits, in southern Sweden. The habitat in central Europe is unknown, but may be continental dunes and sandy areas with heather. 

Adults fly low among vegetation, and appear to be in flight only early in the morning. 

Flowers visited by the fly include white umbellifers, such as Cakile maritima, Calluna vulgaris, Galium sp., Hieracium umbellatarum, Hypochoeris radicata, Pimpinella saxifraga and Salix repens. The flight period is from May/June and July/October, with a peak in September. 

The developmental stages are not described, but apparently are phytophagous. The morphology of the chorion of the egg is figured by Kuznetzov (1988). 

There is considered to be a decline in the extent and quality of the habitat in Europe.

","Forest habitats with open, heathy areas and (continental) dunes have disappeared, not only due to human activities but also because of climate change (storms, flooding) and pollution (disappearance of heath and open spaces). In the south there might be an additional threat by fire and droughts (Janssen et al. 2017).

Threats for the dune system in Europe (Coastal Wiki 2020) include anthropogenic activities like agriculture, husbandry and the deliberate use of fire. In recent decades, tourism has caused damages on coastal landscapes with the urbanization of the coast, the increase of summer visitors, and the introduction of invasive or exotic species. The pedestrian and motorized pathways all over dunes lead to vegetation destruction and therefore enhanced weathering and erosion. The potential for dune recovery is dependent on the sediment supply in each area and on the intensity of human impact. Dune plants are especially sensitive to disturbance and are heavily affected by humans. Without dune plants, the integrity and preservation of a stable dune complex cannot exist. Anthropogenic impacts combined with the natural regression process of the coastline induce the acceleration of the destruction of the dune vegetation ultimately leading to dune destruction. Inland sand dune systems with heathy areas are also under threat due to human intervention. The area is often reshaped to forest, farmland, economic centres or other.","There is not much information known about the population size, but it may be assumed there has been a substantial decline in the occurrence of the species due to the disappearance of suitable habitat. In the Scandinavian countries the species is not common: in Sweden there have been 21 recent sightings in the south, none in Norway, and nine recent localities in the southern part of Finland. Sandy areas with heather and continental dunes have been transformed to forest or agricultural used areas. In addition, the coastal dunes in western Europe are under threat although there are management actions in place to preserve them. Therefore, the population trend is considered to be declining in both Europe and the EU 27. This decline might be in such a degree that the decline will be just over 30% or more in the future.",Decreasing,"

This species is known from southern Fennoscandia, south to the Mediterranean, Portugal and Spain, east through parts of central and southern Europe into European parts of Russia (Speight 2020). The species was recorded from the Canary Islands but all of these records are now considered being Pelecocera nigricornis. It is endemic to Europe.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.3 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 774,000 km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated being around 5.5 million km2 and the AOO is estimated to be around 685,000 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions for the species known, but there are efforts to restore the coastal dune habitats in general (Coastal Wiki 2020). The species would benefit from the protection of the coastal habitat, but it is unclear to what extent that will be. The species also occurs in sandy heath areas inland. Furthermore research should be done on the biology, ecology, and distribution of the species, combined with population and habitat trends.

In Sweden, this species has been assessed as Vulnerable (VU) (Artdatabanken 2020) and in Finland as Near Threatened (NT) (FinBif 2010, 2020). In Germany the species is assessed as critically endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Denmark the species is listed as Endangered (Bygebjerg 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169700,149169690,Eumerus ornatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has a very wide range within the European region. The species is a widespread species found in deciduous forests and urban areas. It is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States because of its relatively large range and presumed stable population. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. No conservation actions are needed, but research on the population size, distribution, and trends and threats as well as the monitoring of the population trends are required.","This species prefers deciduous forest, humid and mesophilic Fagus and Quercus forest, including thermophilous Quercus pubescens forest, and is also found in mature and urban parkland. Adults are known to visit Convolvulus and Geranium robertianum (Speight 2018). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.","There are no data about major threats for this species, but the species is considered to be threatened in the Czech Republic, probably due to habitat loss (Farkač et al. 2005).","There are no precise data about the population size and trend for this species, but the population is assumed to be stable in most parts of the range, although it is not a common species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is found from southern Sweden and Norway, south to the Pyrenees mountains and northwestern Spain, and from southern England eastwards to central and Eastern Europe, including Italy and Sicily, the Balkan Peninsula and parts of European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of the species in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is found in North Africa (Sarıbıyık 2014, Speight 2018, Vujić et al. 2020). Records from Turkey (Sarıbıyık 2014) are unconfirmed.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. No conservation actions are needed, but research on the population size, distribution,  trends and threats, as well as the monitoring of population trends, are required. The species occurs at several Natura 2000 sites in its range, such as at Notranjski trikotnik and Krimsko hribovje - Menišija in Slovenia, Kvarnerski otoci in Croatia, and Koryfes Orous Smolikas in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020). The species also occurs in the Durmitor National Park in Montenegro and Fruška Gora National Park in Serbia.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169711,149169708,Pelecocera caledonica,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Pelecocera caledonica
 is an European endemic found across Europe, and is widespread in Scandinavian countries. In other parts of its European range, there is probably declines due to human activities. However, the species is fairly stable in the northern parts of Europe, and the species has been found in commercially harvested forests, so it is likely to be adaptable. Therefore, even when the population seems reasonably fragmented throughout Europe, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.","

This species is found in humid conifer forest of Pinus sylvestris and western taiga forest, coastal dune systems, in the grey dunes/fixed dune grassland, where some shelter is provided by scrub or planted conifers, and open, heathy areas in humid Pinus sylvestris forest; Pinus heldreichii/nigra forest (Vujić et al. 2018). The hoverfly can apparently persist in commercially harvested forests in Scandinavia (Speight pers. comm. 2020)

Flowers visited by this species include Calluna vulgaris, Mentha sp., Saxifraga sp. and Solidago virgaurea.

The flight period is from July and August and on to October toward the southern end of its range, at lower altitudes.

The developmental stages of this species are not described, but apparently it is phytophagous. 

","Forest habitats with open, heathy areas have often disappeared, not only due to human activities like farming and logging, but also because of climate change and pollution (disappearance of heath and open spaces). In the south, there might be an additional threat to this species by fire and droughts.","This species is widespread in Europe and although its distribution seems fairly fragmented, but there is not much information available on the population sizes. The species is certainly declining in comparison with earlier decades due to the continuing anthropogenic activities in Europe, such as in the Netherlands, but to what extent is unclear. In the northern parts of Europe, the subpopulations seem more stable. Therefore, the overall population trend for Europe and the EU 27 is unknown.",Unknown,"

This species is endemic to Europe, where it is known from northern and central Norway (Nielsen and Odegaard 2013), Sweden, northern, central and southern Finland, Latvia, Slovenia, Britain (northern Scotland), Portugal (van Eck 2016), the Pyrenees and northern Spain, France, Greece, former Yugoslavia (Vujic et al. 2018), European Russia (Karelia, St. Petersburg region) and Germany (Bavaria) (Speight 2017, 2020).

In the Netherlands there are some old records from before 1900, so it is possibly extinct here.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 7.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 807,000 km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is around 5.5 million km2 and the AOO is around 418,000 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"In Serbia, this species is strictly protected (Republic of Serbia Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning 2010). This species has been assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2019), Norway (Artsobservasjoner 2019) and Finland (FinBif 2019). In Germany the species is assessed as critically endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011). If conservation measures are implemented for this species, the focus should be on the protection of the habitat, but the species is adaptable and can be found in commercially harvested forests, and so may not require immediate conservation action.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169721,149169719,Eumerus olivaceus,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-03-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This Italian endemic species has only recently been resurrected from synonymy and is only known from the type material from Sicily. It is assessed as Data Deficient. Additional research on population size, distribution, and trends as well as threats are needed given that there are no recent records of the species. Monitoring of the population trends of the species is also required. Raising awareness on this rare species, as well as its listing in national legislation is recommended.

","The actual habitat where the type specimen was collected is not known, however, it can be assumed that this species prefers a habitat similar to that of the closely related Eumerus alpinus, which is found in well-drained, unimproved, permanent pasture from sea level to montane sites, and open areas within deciduous Fagus and thermophilous Quercus forest (Speight 2020). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records of the larval stages of this species.","Frequent fires and droughts due to climate change and human negligence, as well as overgrazing, all of which are present in Sicily, pose threats to this species (CEPF 2010).","There are no data about the population size for this species, and the population trend is unknown. It is often confused with the more widespread species Eumerus alpinus, also present on Sicily (Grković et al. 2015).",Unknown,"Endemic to Europe, this species is only found on the island of Sicily in Italy (Speight 2020), where it is only known from the type material (""Sicily"") of Loew (1848).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures in place for this rare species. We recommend raising awareness about it, as well as its listing in national legislation. There is a possibility that it occurs in a Natura 2000 site in Sicily, but its exact location is not known. Additional research on population size, distribution, trends and threats are needed, given that there are no recent records. Monitoring of population trends is also required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149169733,149169730,Milesia semiluctifera,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Milesia semiluctifera
 is a widespread species in the Mediterranean area, and also found in some parts of central Europe. It is reasonably abundant in most areas of its range, and the current population trend for both Europe and the EU27 is considered to be stable. For the EU27 countries the EOO is estimated being around 3.5 million km2, and the AOO for this area is estimated around 376,000 km2. In addition, although some areas may be impacted by threats such as fire, deforestation and climate change, they do not seem to impact the species as a whole. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU27.

While no conservation measures are urgently needed for this species, if they were to be implemented, they should be focused on the protection of forests with old and overmature trees.","

The preferred environment of this species is thermophilous and evergreen Quercus forest with overmature trees, such as Castanea forest. Adults fly strong and direct, at levels from the canopy of evergreen oak forest to close to the ground. They feed at the flowers of low-growing plants in the morning (around. 9.00 am to 10.30 am), where it bears a close resemblance to large scoliid wasps (Scolia spp. (Hymenoptera, Scoliidae) which may be found on the same flowers. The hoverfly settles on fallen timber and visits forest stream margins to drink during the afternoon, settling on mud in shaded spots adjacent to patches of sunlight (Speight 2017, 2020).

Flowers visited by this species include white umbellifers, Bupleurum spp., Eryngium spp., Euphorbia spp., Scabiosa spp., Sedum spp..

The flight period is from July to August.

","This species might be impacted in some places by deforestation, fire, anthropogenic activities and climate change, due to its wide range around the Mediterranean.","This species is widespread through the Mediterranean basin, and is not uncommon in most of its range. It is also found on several islands in the area, so presumably the hoverfly is a bit nomadic. There are no further details known about the population, but at the moment the trend seems to be stable for both Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"

This species is found in the Mediterranean basin, from central Spain through southern France to Italy (plus Sicily) (Somaggio 2017) and on to the former Yugoslavia, Greece, Bulgaria, Israel, Lebanon (Saab, 2021) and Syria. In central Europe, it is known from south-east Switzerland, Romania and the Ukraine to the Caucasus (Georgia) and on to as far as Turkmenistan in Asia (Speight 2020). Recorded from Cyprus for the first time in 2020 (van Eck pers. comm. 2020).

The species seems to have been recorded from southern parts of European Russia, but according to Barkalov and Mutin (2018) that is doubtful, and so the species is considered to be possibly extant. In the Ukraine, the species is recorded according to Speight (2020), but there are no specimens known (Popov pers. comm. 2019), and so also for the Ukraine the species is considered to be possibly extant.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 3.8 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 537,000 km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 3.5 million km2 and the AOO is around 376,000 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions currently in place for this species, although it is not considered to be at risk. If conservation measures were to be implemented, they should be focused on the preservation of habitat, especially in forests with overmature trees. Research should be done on the population and its trends, and research on threats that might occur in the future.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169744,149169741,Eumerus obliquus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-11-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Within the European region, this species occurs from the Canary Islands and along the Mediterranean coast to Greece, including some larger Mediterranean islands. The species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States
because of its relatively large range across Europe and because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. It is not known to be severely fragmented in Europe and its population is presumed to be stable. However, the scrub lands and forests where the species occurs are affected by fires, droughts, habitat conversion and urbanisation. Monitoring of and research on the population size and trends in the Mediterranean habitats is required. It is unknown if there is a rescue effect from populations outside the assessment region.","This species prefers open ground and thinly vegetated semi-arid dry grassland. It is often found along the margins of seasonal rivers, as well as in almost any Mediterranean-zone habitat where the introduced Opuntia ficus indica occurs (Speight 2018). It also occurs in rocky habitats with Euphorbia dendroides and rocky garrigue grazed by goats and sheep (Ssymank and Ebejer 2009). The larval stages have been reared from many decaying plants, including cuttings of poinsettia in water, fruits, and vegetables (De Moor 1973), including fruits of Opuntia maxima (Ricarte et al. 2008).","This species is not directly threatened, but populations of vulnerable Mediterranean scrublands and forests are threatened by changes in extreme temperatures causing fires and droughts as a result of climate change, as well as by habitat conversion for tourist infrastructure, and urbanisation (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","The population trend is not fully understood, but it is considered to be stable (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). It is common in the western part of the Mediterranean area, and rare in the eastern part (Smit et al. 2017). The main part of the range is sub-Saharan, while Europe is its northern distribution border.",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is known from the Spain (Canary Islands, mainland and the Balearic islands) France (southern mainland and Corsica), Italy (southern mainland, Sicily and Sardinia), Malta, and Greece (Corfu and Lesvos). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of the species in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, the species has been recorded in North Africa and the sub-Saharan region, including the Mascarene Islands. It is found on the island of Sokotra in Yemen (Smit et al. 2017), Madagascar, and Mauritius, and has also been recorded in Australia (Speight 2018) and Brazil, where it was introduced (Marinoni and Morales 2007).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions in place for this species so far, and no conservation measures are currently required.  Research on population size, distribution and trends as well as the monitoring of trends in Mediterranean habitats is required. The species occurs in several Natura 2000 sites in the Mediterranean, such as at Lesvos Kolpos Geras, Elos Ntipi Kai Oros Olympos – Potamos Evergetoulas in Greece and Isola di San Pietro and Litorale di Ugento in Italy (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169764,149169760,Mallota rossica,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Mallota rossica
 is only known in Europe from European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 580,000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 192,000 km2. It is found in forests, which may be impacted by human activity, but there is very little information about the population of this species in Europe. However, it is not considered to be threatened and is assessed as Least Concern.

This species is not found within the EU 27 and is therefore Not Applicable.",

This species has been recorded in conifer forest and mixed coniferous/deciduous forest (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2019). It was found in Russian Altay (Pennards pers. obs. 2013) and northern Mongolia (Pennards pers. obs. 2017) on open grass/shrub lands in the forest visiting umbellifers. The flight period is from mid May to mid August (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2019).

,"The species is likely to be impacted by human activity in forests, like deforestation, urbanisation and commercial development and agriculture. But to what extent is largely unknown.","There is very little information available about this species and the current population trend is unknown. It is not known if there are any recent search efforts to find the species in Europe, and it is not known how many sightings there have been.",Unknown,"

This species is found in central and south eastern parts of European Russia (BeiBienko and Steyskal 1969, Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Iran, Kyrgyzstan, and through Asiatic Russia to Sakhalin, Mongolia, Japan, Korea and China (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 580,000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 192,000 km2. This species is not found within the EU 27.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Further research is needed about the biology, life cycle, threats and distribution of the species, in order to make an assumption about necessary conservation actions.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169772,149169762,Eumerus niveitibia,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

The Mediterranean species is assessed as Vulnerable for Europe and the EU27 Member States because it has a restricted area of occupancy (AOO) of 52 km2, an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 223,342 km2, occurring only at eight to nine locations, and a continuing decline in the extent and quality of the species' habitat due to tourism development and increased fire frequency as a result of climate change. It is unknown if there is a rescue effect from populations outside the assessment region. It is required to monitor the population trends and research the life history and ecology of the species. It is recommended to protect the species under the international legislation.

","The species occurs in vegetation growing on naturally burnt ground, two years after forest fires. It is known to visit Ferulago sylvatica (Standfuss and Claussen 2007), and occurs in rocky quarries and herb-rich olive grove terracing (Ricarte et al. 2012). The developmental stages have not been described. The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.","The Mediterranean region is facing critical threats due to increasing urbanization, invasive species, homogenization of flora and fauna, and more intense and frequent fires due to climate change and human negligence (CEPF 2010). The main threats to this species are tourism development, particularly in insular and coastal localities, and fires. Increased fire frequency may become a problem if fires are too frequent to allow the right habitat conditions for this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There is no information about the population trend for this species. The species is very rare, but relatively widespread. It is a large and easily recognisable species. It is unknown whether the population is severely fragmented (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from the Black Sea coastal area of  Bulgaria and from various parts of Greece; from the southern mainland as well as from western Crete and the eastern Aegean islands of Samos and Lesvos. In Europe and the EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be about 223,342 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) about 52 km2It is found up to an altitude of 1,250 m above sea level.

The range of the species extends out of Europe to the Caucasus Mountains and Egypt (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far; however, it is recommended to protect the species under international legislation. It occurs in a few Habitats and Birds Directive Sites in Bulgaria (Mandra - Poda, Aytoska planina, and Emine) and in Greece (Lesvos Kolpos Geras, Elos Ntipi Kai Oros Olympos - Potamos Evergetoulas, Oros Parnassos, and Oros Taygetos) (European Environment Agency 2020). Research on its life history and ecology as well as monitoring of the population trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169784,149169780,Mallota fuciformis,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Mallota fuciformis
 has a broad range across Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.4 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.9 million km2. In the EU 27 the EOO is estimated to be around 4.6 million km2 and the AOO for this area is estimated to be around 1.1 million km2. Although it is a conspicuous species, it can be difficult to observe. However, this species used to be much scarcer, but during the last 15 years, it seems to be increasing in number across parts of its range. The causes for this are currently unknown, and it is also not known if this increase is temporary or not. However, the population trend currently seems to be stable or increasing, and therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.","

The preferred environment of this species is forest; deciduous forest (Fagus/Quercus) with over-mature trees; Quercus/Carpinus/Ulmus forest with rivers and streams; thermophilous Quercus forest (Q. pubescens) with gallery forest of Populus/Salix along rivers/in wet areas; Q. cerris/Q. frainetto forest, ancient cork oak groves. Traditional orchards can be extension of the species' habitat (old records from these areas) and these have disappeared and it's likely to be responsible for contraction in range in some regions, such as France. This species can be found in a wide range of forest types. Adults are largely arboreal, but descend to bushes and shrubs to feed, and search out rot-holes. Flowers visited by this species include Crataegus sp., Malus sp. and Prunus sp. The flight period is from mid March to the beginning of May. The developmental stages of this species are undescribed, but bred from basal rot-holes containing wet tree humus in trunks of Quercus suber (C. Lauriaut pers. comm. 2019).

","

For 15 years, this species has been increasing in Europe again but the reason behind this is unknown, so it is unclear what recent or historical threats may be. Traditional orchard loss decreases the number of suitable breeding places, but the general impact of this species is unknown.

","This species used to be very rare in the Netherlands, but a sudden rise of observations occurred (in one year 70 specimens were collected) (Pennards pers. obs. 2019). There was also a clear increase in numbers in Belgium, and in other countries as well but it is unknown why. The reason could lie in climate effects or changes in preferences. Van de Meutter (pers. comm. 2020) states it might be decrease in acid rain. The hypothesis would be that rot holes are filled with rain water and acidity may totally change the bacterial community in such holes and thus the availability of the food source. But this increase might be a temporarily phenomenon and it could fall back in its pattern from before, but it is unknown whether that will happen or not. If the increase is not temporary, the species presumably has found new options for breeding and survival, and this trend could go on. 

This species has never been found in Switzerland, but individuals have started to be found (Speight pers. comm. 2019), here it is also unknown what the causes for this increase or expansions are. It's rare in the Ukraine, only a few specimens were found (Popov pers. comm. 2019). In comparison to 20 years ago, the population has increased for unknown reasons and therefore the population trend is considered to be increasing for the moment.",Increasing,"

This species is found in Germany and Poland, south through France to Portugal and Spain; from Brittany (northwest France) eastwards through central Europe into European parts of Russia; southern western Russia, but doubtful according to Barkalov and Mutin (2018). In southern Europe, this species is known from Spain to the former Yugoslavia and on to northern Iran (Speight 2020). It is evidently much scarcer now than previously and probably threatened at European level, though not yet regarded as extinct in any European country. It has never been seen in the United Kingdom (Morris pers. comm. 2020). In Ukraine, this species is only present in Carpathian region (western Ukraine) (Popov pers. comm. 2019). 

It has a broad range and although it is a conspicuous species as it looks like bumblebee, it can be difficult to observe, probably because it is mainly arboreal. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2.1 million km2. In the EU 27 the EOO is estimated to be around 4.6 million km2 and the AOO for this area is estimated to be around 1.1 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Further research is required to establish the reasons behind the increase of this species across Europe. Conservation actions should include protection of suitable breeding places. Research on larval development is also required, the sudden increase might have to do with improved circumstances for larva survival. It is Vulnerable (VU) in the Czech Republic (Farkac et al. 2005). On the German Red List it is also regarded as VU (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169793,149169783,Eumerus nivariae,Critically Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

The European endemic species is known from a single specimen from Tenerife in the Canary Islands. The species is found in arid and sparsely vegetated areas of Los Gigantes on the island of Tenerife. The species is assessed as Critically Endangered (CR) since it has a restricted area of occurrence (AOO) of 4 km2, occurs in one location, and because there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of the species' habitat. Its habitat is under the constant pressure of urbanization and tourism development. Research on taxonomy, ecology and life history, population size, distribution, trends, and threats as well as the monitoring of the population trends are required to get more knowledge about this species. Site/area and habitat protection is recommended to preserve this species.

","There are no data about the preferred habitat for the species, but it was found in arid and sparsely vegetated areas of the island (Báez 1982). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.","The single location where the species historically occurs is under constant pressure of urbanization, the expansion of residential areas and severe habitat destruction, as well as the development of tourist resort areas (WWF 2017).",There is no data on population size or trends for this species. There is only one single male holotype collected in 1976 (Báez 1982).,Unknown,"This species is endemic to Tenerife in the Canary Islands, where it has been recorded from a single locality in Los Gigantes (Báez 1982) on the west coast. The area of occupancy (AOO) of the species is 4 km2. The species occurs in one location.",This species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures in place for this species; however, site and area protection is required to preserve it. The single record was collected in 1976 within the Teno Habitats and Birds Directive Site, however the site was not designated until October 1989 (European Environment Agency 2020). Research on taxonomy, ecology, life history, population size, distribution, trends and threats as well as the monitoring of population trends are required to get more knowledge about this species. Site/area and habitat protection is recommended to preserve it.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169804,149169801,Mallota cimbiciformis,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Mallota cimbiciformis is reasonably widespread across Europe but rare in some countries. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.6 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.0 million km2. The EOO for the EU 27 is estimated around 4.3 million km2 and the AOO for this area is estimated to be around 651,000 km2. This is an enigmatic species with a broad range but not a high population density, although this is partly due to observer's effect because the species is mainly arboreal. The current overall population trend for this species in unknown for both Europe and the EU 27. The species may be impacted locally by anthropogenic loss by forest management, but generally it is considered to be reasonably adaptable and is known to occur in urban environments.

Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27. Conservation actions should focus on the preservation of the habitats with old trees with rot holes.","

The preferred environment of this species is forest; deciduous forest of Fagus and Quercus with overmature and senescent trees, including thermophilous oak forest (Q. pubescens, Q. cerris, Q. frainetto), plus evergreen oak forest of Q. suber and Q. ilex

Adults are largely arboreal, but descend to flowering bushes and shrubs in glades and more open areas; flies between flowering bushes extremely rapidly, with a zigzag flight. Males can be found sitting on vegetation adjacent to rotholes or patches of humid trunk rot, such as at the base of the tree, apparently awaiting the appearance of females. Females may be observed prospecting rot-holes, round the entrance to which they first hover. This species can also be found in urban rot-holes, and is considered to be reasonably adaptable.

Flowers visited by this species include white umbels; Cistus, Cornus sanguineus, Crataegus, Euonymus, Euphorbia, Rosa canina, Rubus, Sambucus ebulus, Sarothamnus scoparius. Also Ligustrum sp. and Viburnum opulus (G. Pennards pers. obs. 2020).

The flight period of this species is from June to August.

The larvae are described and figured by Maibach and Goeldlin (1989), who summarise data available on larval biology. The larva is also illustrated in colour by Rotheray (1994). Dussaix (2013) provides a coloured photo of the puparium. The rat-tailed larva is saprophagous, living in standing-water tree-holes in deciduous trees, including Acer, Aesculus, Fagus, Populus, Quercus, Ulmus, usually at some meters from the ground; the species apparently shows preference for cavities with narrow entrance holes. These holes can provide entry to central trunk cavities of considerable proportions. Mallota larvae have been found in these large cavities, when they are partly filled with water, for instance by Dussaix (2005). The larva of this species overwinters. Duration of the puparial phase is approximately three weeks (Dussaix 2013).

In Ukraine, this species was found in 19th century in Q. robur forests, but is nowadays seemingly only present in the Crimea.

","There is no specific information regarding the potential threats affecting this species. However, the species is presumably threatened in parts of its range by the reduction of specific habitats in forest areas due to anthropogenic loss (agriculture, habitat destruction, change in land use) by forest management. On the other hand the species is reasonably adaptable and also occurs in human made habitats like urban parks with old and senescent trees.","In England this species is not extremely rare (Ball and Morris 2014), it is more rare in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). This species is quite frequent in the Mediterranean in southern Europe. It is abundant in Q. suber forests (Speight pers. comm 2019). In Ukraine, this species is extremely rare, only found once over the last 20 years in the Crimean peninsula (Popov pers. comm. 2020).

This is an enigmatic species with a broad range but not a high population density, although this is partly due to observer's effect because the species is mainly arboreal. The hoverfly is not incredibly rare but also not easy to find because it can be confused with another very common species Eristalis tenax (drone fly). It is relatively easily trapped in Malaise traps but many surveys done in France revealed it was not found in many occasions (Speight pers. comm. 2019).

The current overall population trend for this species in unknown for both Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,"

This species is found in southern Fennoscandia, with its distribution continuing south to the Pyrenees and central Spain and on into northern Africa. It is found in Great Britain, and east through most of Europe to central Siberia; northern Iran (Speight 2020). The record from Bulgaria in Strandzha National Park was provided by L.J. van der Ent (pers. comm. 2019, unpublished).

This species is reasonably widespread but rare. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.7 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.4 million km2. The EOO for the EU 27 is estimated around 4.3 million kmand the AOO for this area is estimated to be around 651,000 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Conservation actions should focus on the preservation of the habitats with old trees with rot holes, because these are the most important for the reproductive success of this and many other species. Habitat trends and population trends should be monitored. In the Czech Republic it is on the red list as Endangered (EN) (Farkac et al. 2005), in Sweden it is considered Vulnerable (Artdatabanken 2020). In the United Kingdom it is listed as Near Threatened (Ball and Morris 2014), and in Germany the species is listed as EN (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Denmark the species is listed as Critically Endangered (Bygebjerg 2019). There is no information on the existence of conservation actions for this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169814,149169812,Eumerus lucidus,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

The species is assessed as Near Threatened because of its small known area of occupancy (AOO) of 60 km2 and because of the fact that it only occurs in 11 to 13 locations in Europe and the EU 27. The threat of fire is causing a decline in habitat quality and the threat may become even more frequent in the future. In Europe and the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is about 286,000 km2. Even though it could be found in different ecosystems, it is a rare species and not enough is known about it. Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection are needed. Research into the species' taxonomy, population size, distribution, and trends, and life history and ecology is furthermore needed. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends of the species is also required. There is no rescue effect from populations outside the assessment region.

","

This species prefers shrubby Mediterranean habitat and also can be found on waste ground, ruderal vegetation (Ssymank 2012) and along streams in Turkish Pinus brutia forest (van Steenis et al. 2019). It was recorded flying above Hedera pastuchovii subsp. cypriavan (van Steenis et al. 2019). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies can be found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.

","The Mediterranean Basin is one of the most fire-prone regions in the world and due to climate change, fires are expected to become more frequent and have a higher impact. Other main threats are overgrazing and the development of the tourism industry, which has exposed areas of the coastline to intense pressure from land-use change and pollution (CEPF 2010).","

There are no data about the population trends, but it is obviously not a common species based on the number of records. It is generally found in low numbers, with only a few specimens per locality (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). It is unknown whether the range is severely fragmented or not.

",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is found in Greece (mainland, Karpathos, and the East Aegean) and has been recorded from Cyprus (van Steenis et al. 2019): there is a single record from southeastern Spain (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). In Europe and the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is about 286,000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) about 60 km2. It occurs in 11 to 13 locations in Europe and the EU 27.

Outside of Europe, it is found in Turkey, Yemen (Smit et al. 2017), Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan (Speight 2018).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. Site and habitat protection are needed. Research into its taxonomy, population size, distribution, trends, life history and ecology is needed. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends of the species is also required.
The species occurs in some protected areas. The single record from Spain is located within the Cuencas del Rumblar, Guadalén y Guadalmena Habitats Directive Site. In Cyprus, the species occurs at Dasos Pafou and Ethniko Dasiko Parko Troodous Habitats Directive Sites. In Greece, the species occurs at Kentriki Karpathos, Lesvos Kolpos Geras, Voreia Lesvos, and Vouna Evrou Habitats Directive Sites (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169830,149169825,Lejops vittatus,Vulnerable,A3c,2021,2019-09-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

Lejops vittatus
 has a widespread, large range across Europe but it is confined to marsh, often brackish, habitat. The main distribution of this species is outside of Europe. The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be strongly decreasing. There are occurrences, such as in Serbia where the species has disappeared from unprotected habitat. The species is dependent on a wetland habitat that is strongly economically exploited making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. Based on this, there is an expected decline in suitable habitat in the future of at least 30% or more. Therefore, the species is listed as Vulnerable.

This species requires monitoring given its wetland habitat and the threats to it.","

The preferred environment of this species is freshwater; standing and slow-running freshwater bodies supporting stands of Phragmites, Typha or Scirpus, including coastal lagoons with S. maritimus and ox-bows on functional floodplains of large rivers. Adults are known to fly amongst emergent vegetation of reeds along the edges of freshwater bodies and standing-water ditches, keeping low, and settling on reeds, Typha etc. The species visits the flowers of plants like Schoenoplectus sp. early in the morning (from 6am to 8.30am, A. van Eck pers. comm. 2019). Other flowers visited by this species include Bolboschoenus maritimus, Phragmites sp., and Typha sp.

The flight period is from mid-June to mid-August, with the peak in July. Waitzbauer (1976) records that the eggs of this species are laid on the stems and leaves of emergent plants like Typha sp., the larvae falling into the water once hatched. The larvae apparently remain more or less at the water surface, in association with floating plants such as Lemna sp., for most of their development, but the last instar larvae have moved into the submerged organic ooze/mud at the bottom of the pond or ditch in which they are living. 

In Ukraine, this species occurs in the floodplains from northern part of Ukraine to Crimea peninsula (G. Popov pers. comm. 2019). In most of its northwest European range, including the Netherlands, it occurs in coastal, mildly brackish wetlands. It appears to be an ecologically more demanding species, but not sure what factors determine abundance in localities. In the Czech Republic, it only occurs in well protected wetland nature reserves.

Anthropogenic influences are very clear in wetland habitats throughout Europe, and it is not unimaginable that at least 30% of the right habitat will disappear over the next 10 years in combination with the effects of climate change.

","This species is impacted by the common threats to wetland habitat, usually due to anthropogenic activities, like habitat loss, abstraction of water and pollution. The type of wetland habitat the species lives in is particularly threatened on a European level (Janssen et al. 2017).","There are only five records of this species in southeast Europe. The data from the Czech Republic is old, and in Slovakia, this species is known from several occurrences around the river Danube (L. Mazanek pers. comm. 2019). This species is scarce in Ukraine but known from many localities (Popov pers. comm. 2020). It is known from one old locality in European Russia (Rostov region) (BeiBienko 1969), but also a recent one in Rostov on Don (Diptera.info 2020). The species has a widespread, large range but it is confined to marsh, often brackish, habitat. The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be decreasing in the whole of its range. There are occurrences, such as in Serbia where the species has disappeared from unprotected habitat (A. Vujic pers. comm. 2019).",Decreasing,"

This species is found from Fennoscandia (Sweden and Finland, including the Åland Islands) south to central France, the Balearic Islands (Mallorca), from Britain (southern England) eastwards through central Europe (Germany, Poland, Austria, Hungary), Italy and the former Yugoslavia into Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine and southern parts of European Russia; Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kirghizia, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan into southern parts of Siberia and on to the Pacific (Speight 2020). In Finland it was first found in 2016 (Kahanpää et al. 2018). The main distribution of this species is outside of Europe.

In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be around 5.8 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2.2 million km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 3.9 million km2, and the AOO is estimated to be around 787,000 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"This species is strictly protected in Serbia (Republic of Serbia Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning 2010). In the Czech Republic, this species is assessed as Critically Endangered (Farkač et al. 2005). In Sweden, it is assessed as Least Concern (Artdatabanken 2019) and as Near Threatened in the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014). In Denmark it is on the red list as Vulnerable (Bygebjerg 2004, 2019). In Germany the species is assessed as Critically Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011). This species requires monitoring given its wetland habitat and the threats to it. This type of habitat is threatened in Europe so it is important to do research and monitoring of the species and its habitat.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169838,149169828,Eumerus longicornis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The European species is assessed as Endangered since it has a restricted area of occupancy (AOO), which is estimated to be between 28-30 km2 in Europe, the population is severely fragmented and there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of the habitat throughout Europe. In Europe, the species occurs at six locations and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 543,000 km2. In the EU 27, the species occurs at five locations, the area of occupancy (AOO) is about 25 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is about 123,000 km2Habitat loss and habitat quality decline are slow but continuous. The species is only present in natural forests and scrubby European habitats which are severely fragmented and in continuing decline due to logging, air and soil pollution, increasing urbanization, and intensive forest management. Three of the six known locations are found in Germany, where the species is Critically Endangered. Research is required to see if the species is still extant in other localities. Negative results may lead to a re-evaluation of the species at a higher risk level. Research on taxonomy, population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats for the species is required. Further monitoring of the population and habitat trends is also needed. Site and habitat protection as well as legislation both at a national and international level is needed.

","The species prefers deciduous forest and open ground, such as forest fringes of Fagus forest, and unimproved dry grassland within open deciduous forest. It also lives in xeric, open, unimproved, calcareous and non-calcareous grassland. The adult has been recorded feeding on Asparagus officinalis (Speight 2018). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records of the larval stages of this species, and so its host plant is unknown.","Logging, air and soil pollution, increasing urbanization, and intensive forest management, particularly large clear cuts reforested with monocultures, are major threats to European forests where this species lives. The remaining forest habitats are often fragmented by divided highways and multi-track railroads, creating barriers to wildlife movement (EEA 2016). These threats directly affect this species, which is related to forests in every aspect of its life.","Very few records of this species are known so far, and the population trend is unknown. Many of the records are older than 20 years. There are three German localities according to recent data, and five localities in total (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). The species is assumed to be very rare and the population is severely fragmented because localities are very small, isolated and far from each other. There are not many records for the species overall, so subpopulations may be small and are already considered threatened in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is known from three localities in southern and central Germany (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020), one record each in western Slovakia and western Hungary, and from one record in eastern Ukraine (Donetsk region) (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). It potentially occurs in one locality in the Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009). Most records are older than 20 years. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 543,000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 28-30 km2. In the EU 27, the area of occupancy (AOO) is about 25 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) about 123,000 km2. It has been found at six locations in Europe, and at five locations in the EU 27, between 200 and 600 m above sea level.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"This species is listed as Critically Endangered on the German Red List (Ssymank et al. 2011). Site and habitat protection as well as legislation both on a national and international level is needed. Research on taxonomy, population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats is required. Further monitoring of the population and habitat trends is also needed. The species occurs at a few Natura 2000 sites such as at Waldreservat Obereimer, Weihersberg bei Kiedrich, and Kyffhäuser - Badraer Schweiz - Solwiesen in Germany, Homolske Karpaty in Slovakia, and Kab-hegy in Hungary (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169851,149169846,Chrysosyrphus nasutus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Although Chrysosyrphus nasutus does not have a very large distribution area in Europe due to its habitat preferences, this species doesn't seem to be directly threatened in its range. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is estimated to be around 1.6 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 341,000 km2. In the EU 27, the AOO is around 234,000 km2, and the EOO is around 706,000 km2. In Europe, the hoverfly is only found in the high northern parts of Scandinavia and in European Russia (Speight 2020). Although it may be impacted by some human activity, and climate change in the future, it does not seem to be in any eminent danger. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. Further research is needed on the biology, life cycle, threats and distribution of this species.","

The preferred environment of this species is wetland/forest; aapa mire within boreal Pinus sylvestris/Betula forest (H. Bartsch and T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2019), northwards to taiga wetlands (Nielsen 1998) and palsa mire (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). 

The species has been recorded on the flowers of Caltha membranacea, Dryas octopetala, Ledum palustre, Rhododendron tomentosum and Rubus chamaemorus.  The flight period is from mid June to mid July. Van Steenis and Zuidhoff (2013) record observing oviposition in wet moss at the water edge, in a palsa mire.

","The threats to this species are unknown, but similar to Chrysosyrphus nigra, the species will likely be affected by the usual anthropogenic activities going on in Europe, such as deforestation, logging, drainage, agriculture and urbanisation. The environment where it lives (high north) will probably provide some protection from these activities, but climate change will be a serious decline factor in the future.","The species is not commonly encountered because it is difficult to find and is found in areas that have not been well investigated. In the mountains of Finland, it is probably more common than the few finds indicate, and it is also rare nearer the coast. The current population trend is unknown for both Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,"This species is found in northern parts of Norway and Sweden, Finland and European Russia (Narjan Mar, Vorkuta) (Barkalov and Mutin 2018). It is also recorded further through northern Siberia to the Pacific and the Nearctic (Speight 2020). It is known from the mountain ranges in Finland, from Lapland south to the Lake district and Jämtland (Haarto and Kerppola 2014, FinBif 2020). In Norway, it is known from several premises in Nordland, Troms and Finnmark (Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017), but records very old. In Sweden, it is known from the boreal zone (van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013) – records from Laivadalen.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is estimated to be around 1.6 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 341,000 km2. In the EU 27, the AOO is around 234,000 km2, and the EOO is around 706,000 km2.
",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"More research is needed about the biology, life cycle, threats and distribution of this species, in order to make a more detailed assumption about necessary conservation actions. In both Finland and Sweden this species has been assessed as Least Concern (LC) (2019) (FinBif 2020, Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169859,149169849,Eumerus latitarsis,Vulnerable,"B1ab(ii,iii)+2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2019-10-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This European endemic species is restricted to five western islands of the Canaries: Gomera, Gran Canaria, Hierro, La Palma, and Tenerife. It is assessed as Vulnerable since it is only known from eight to 12 locations, it has an extent of occurrence (EOO) of 19,064 km2 and an area of occupancy (AOO) of 108 km2, and has a continuing decline in its area of occupancy (AOO) and the quality of its habitat. Tourism development may cause continuing habitat decline and degradation, although a suitable habitat still exists, and the host plant of the species Canary Island Spurge, which is found on the narrow coastal belt, is assessed as Least Concern. For some islands, records appear to be too old so further research into occurrences is required. Raising awareness of rare and important species on the island and communication and protection of species at the national level are recommended. The assessors use precaution to assess this species as Vulnerable at the moment, although if more than 10 locations are documented, the species would have to be assessed as Near Threatened.

","

The developmental stages of this hoverfly were found in decomposing parts of the stems of Euphorbia canariensis (Báez 1977); this native succulent plant grows in the arid and humid environments of the narrow coastal belt, and is one of the most abundant plants on sea-cliffs. Adults were found on Euphorbia lamarckii (Burt and Mengual 2018).

","A variety of factors can be identified as causing habitat loss, and directly or indirectly threatening local species. With the tourism industry booming during the last few years, the development of tourist resorts and illegal buildings continue to destroy the habitats. Many local and foreign enterprises have overdeveloped on different areas of the islands, causing enormous habitat destruction. Significant additional threats come from the illegal construction of houses inside protected areas, plantations, increasing fires due to climate change and uncontrolled dumping. Of these, tourism development is likely the most important threat, because this is primarily found in the coastal areas where the species and its host plant occur (WWF 2017).",There is no information about the population trends. Most of the records are older than the 1980s. Four specimens were recorded during research at La Palma during 2000 and 2017 (Trevor and Mengual 2018). Another 20 specimens were collected during 2011 from two localities on Tenerife (G. Pennards pers. comm. 2019).,Unknown,"This species is endemic to five western islands of the Canary islands: Gomera, Gran Canaria, Hierro, La Palma, and Tenerife (Speight 2020). It is only known from eight to 12 locations. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is 19,064 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 108 km2. It is found up to 1,050 m above sea level.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for the species so far; however, resource and habitat protection, habitat and natural process resource restoration, raising awareness and communicating about the species and the protection of the species on a national level are recommended. Its habitat is partially covered by protected areas, and all mapped localities overlap that of protected areas (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN 2021). Euphorbia canariensis, the only known host plant, is protected by legislation along with other endemic species of Euphorbia, and is listed under Appendix II of CITES. Currently, the plant is assessed as Least Concern by the IUCN Red List (Beech 2017). Further research on taxonomy, population size, distribution, trends, life history and ecology might also help preserve this species. The species occurs at several Natura 2000 sites of the Canary Isles in Spain, such as at El Hierro, Barrancos del Cedro y Liria, Barranco de las Angustias, Teno, and Anaga (natura2000.eea.europa.eu).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149169872,149169867,Chalcosyrphus piger,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The Short-haired leafwalker (Chalcosyrphus piger) is widespread across Europe, and although was previously declining, it has returned across much of central and western Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be 9.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 4.4 million km2. For the EU 27 the EOO is around 4.8 million km2 and the AOO is around 1.4 million km2. In some parts of its range, the population trend seems to be increasing in Europe, in countries such as the Netherlands and Belgium. In parts of this species range, there will probably be local declines due to anthropogenic actions, but in its wide range this is not a significant problem for the species. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. More research is needed to figure out why this species has increased in recent years in Europe, including to discover any potential links with forest management.","

The preferred environment of this species is forest; Picea or Pinus forest with overmature trees, in the Pyrenees up to and including the P. uncinata zone. 

The adults of this species have been found to sit on cut trunks and fallen trees in small patches of sunlight, within forest and on the lower leaves of large-leaved, low-growing plants growing beneath shrubs (for example, Salix sp.) in partial sunlight, at the edge of small open areas within forest or at forest edge. The species visits the margins of streams or small rivers in the sun, to drink under hot conditions, choosing locations where the margin is sandy or muddy, rather than with gravel or stones.

Flowers visited by this species include umbellifers; yellow composites; Calluna sp.Crataegus sp., Prunus serotina, Ranunculus sp., Seseli sp. (Baugnée 1998); Potentilla erecta (Bartsch et al. (2009), Verbascum sp., Solidago canadensePadus serotina, Calumma vulgaris.

The flight period is from May/June, to July/August at higher altitude. In the Belgium (lowlands), this species is clearly bivoltine (two generations a year) (van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020)

The larva and puparium have been described by Heiss (1938), from sappy hollows beneath bark of Pinus. Both larva and puparium of this species are figured in colour by Bartsch et al. (2009). Perris (1870) records finding the larvae under bark on the trunk of Pinus pinaster, in wet tree humus formed from the frass of Ips sp. (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and Acanthocinus sp. (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). The female has been observed ovipositing in weeping hollows in bark, caused by woodpecker activity, on the lower trunk of moribund Pinus uncinata. Krivosheina (2001) reports rearing this species from under the bark of Larix and ""Siberian cedar"". Bagachanova (1990) similarly reports rearing C. piger from larvae collected from the bark of stumps and trunks of Larix and Pinus, in this instance the trunks being of young trees that had fallen and were lying partly in water. Bagachanova (l.c.) adds that the larvae overwinter under the bark and that the species remains in the puparium for approximately two weeks.

","In parts of this species range, there will probably be local declines due to anthropogenic actions, but due to its wide range this is not a problem for the species. Therefore, there are no major threats to this species.","This species has a broad range. It has been recorded in a lot of countries over the last years and is not considered uncommon. Previously, this was considered a particularly enigmatic species, potentially threatened at the European level and approaching extinction in western Europe (Speight 2017). However since 2000, the species seems to be expanding its range (Speight 2020). In some parts of its range, the population trend seems to be increasing in Europe, in countries such as the Netherlands and Belgium (van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020). Outside of Europe, this species is widespread in the Nearctic, and seems to also be increasing here (Skevington et al. 2019).",Increasing,"This species is distributed from Scandinavia south to the Pyrenees, found in areas that are increasingly montane southwards. It is found eastwards from northern France through central Europe into Asiatic parts of Russia, and also in the Nearctic (Speight 2020)

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be 9.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 4.4 million km2. For the EU 27 the EOO is around 4.8 million km2 and the AOO is around 1.4 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"More research is needed to figure out why this species has increased in recent years in Europe, including to discover any potential links with forest management, and whether this species may be associated with tree stumps as well as full trees. There are probably other factors for the revival of this species which are not identified yet. Also, it is unclear whether it is only a temporary rise or not. This species is likely to occur in a number of protected areas in Europe. This species is strictly protected in Serbia (Republic of Serbia Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning 2010). In Germany the species is assessed as endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011).

In Finland, this species was assessed as Vulnerable (VU) (FinBif 2010, 2018). In the Czech Republic the species is assessed as Critically Endangered (Farkac et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169880,149169870,Cheilosia subpictipennis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Cheilosia subpictipennis is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) because of its restricted area of occupancy (in Europe 240 km2 and in EU27 180 km2), severely fragmented population and a continuing decline in the quality of habitat due to tourism and unsustainable grazing. Taking into account that C. subpictipennis is generally a high-alpine species, never found at lower elevations, climate change also represents a threat. Further research into its ecology and population size, and monitoring of habitat trends is needed.","This species is found in open areas, either grassy or with tall herb vegetation, within the Abies/Picea zone and along streams down into the Fagus zone. It also occurs in unimproved, non-calcareous montane grassland up to 1,500 m; and up to 2,000 m in unimproved, non-calcareous subalpine grassland in southern parts of the Alps and in the Pyrenees. Adults fly low among clumps of taller ground vegetation and settle on low-growing plants or on the ground; males hover at 2-3 m beside shrubs. They visit flowers of Crataegus, Ribes uva-crispa, Salix, Sorbus aucuparia, Vaccinium myrtillus (C. Claussen, pers. comm. 2020) and Cotoneaster jurana. The flight period is from the end of April to mid-July (Speight 2018). Stuke (2000) had three larvae from Meum athamanticum identified as ""cf. subpictipennis"" which he scored for many morphological characters in his phylogenetic study. The species is almost certainly associated with Meum athamanticum, on which D. Doczkal has observed oviposition (Claussen 1998).","The expansion of winter tourism and unsustainable grazing on mountain grasslands represent major threats for this species. Additionally climate change is a threat, as high-alpine species are considered to be at high risk.","The population size and trends of this species are unknown. In the Alps the population trend is stable, but in alpine habitats communication between subpopulations is disabled, which causes a severely fragmented population.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is distributed in the Vosges, Schwarzwald, the Massif Central, the Jura, the Alps (France, Germany, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Austria, and Italy), the Pyrenees (France), Hungary, and the Balkans (northern Greece, Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, and North Macedonia) (Speight 2018, Vujić 1996). It is mostly found in high mountains, but records from mid-elevation mountains are also known: it is never found in lowlands. The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is 240 km2, while in the EU27 it is 180 km2.

Out of the European region, the range if this species extends to and in western Siberia (Vujić 1996, Speight 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"This species is found within the boundaries of some protected areas within the Natura 2000 network and in Durmitor National Park in Montenegro. Further monitoring of the habitat trends, and additional research into its population size and ecology is needed. Management of grazing is recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169893,149169888,Chalcosyrphus pannonicus,Endangered,"B2ab(i,ii,iii)",2021,2019-09-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

Chalcosyphus pannonicus
is found in Poland, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Romania and Greece, with continued presence in Ukraine requiring confirmation. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is estimated to be around 246,000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 68 km2. The EOO for the EU 27 is estimated to be around 129,000 km2, and the AOO is estimated to be around 48 km2. Although the current estimates of EOO for Europe and the EU 27 are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a severely fragmented distribution. The species is dependent on a habitat that is rare in economically exploited woodlands making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. The current population trend is considered to be declining, so the species is listed as Endangered under Criterion B for Europe and for the EU27.","

The preferred environment of this species is 'swamp' (Drensky 1934), flushes and beside streams in mesophilous Picea /Abies forest (Ssymank 2012). The species is found in areas of bogs with fallen trees. In Greece, the species is known from the Dadia forest, found in threatened Picea forest. Riparian gallery forest with which the species may be associated is not protected and has many threats acting on it, especially from agriculture conversion threats. Disappearance of coppice forest may be an issue, due to replacement to conifers to commercial forestry. In Georgia, the males were rather abundant at forest edge of a large deciduous forest (with no coniferous trees to be seen near) all feeding on Geranium sanguineum (van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020). Flowers visited by this species include Cirsium sp. (Mielczarek 2014), Verbascum sp. (Ssymank 2012), and Geranium sanguineum (van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020). The flight period is June and July. The developmental stages of this species have not been described.

","

The threats to this species include anthropogenic activities like deforestation, drainage, logging and other human activity. The 'swamps' habitats are especially vulnerable for human intrusion and alteration (Janssen et al. 2017). In Europe, a lot of this habitat is already lost.

","This species is likely declining in both Europe and the EU 27, as the habitat (swamp) is disappearing over time. There are very few records of this species over most of its range, and it is not frequent in Europe. It was reported as very rare in Romania in 1991 (Brădescu 1991), but there are some records from 1999 (Römig pers. comm. 2020). The species occurs in two localities in Slovakia and Poland (Mielczarek 2014), close to each other, the Picea forest in Greece (three localities from three mires) (Ssymank 2012). Furthermore there are old records from Bulgaria (Drensky 1934) and Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020). In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"Within the European region, this species is found in Poland, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Romania (where it is rare; Brădescu 1991) and mainland Greece (Ssymank 2012). The most recent records of this species from Ukraine are from the first half of 20th century, but there is no exact locality data for the map.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is estimated to be 246,000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 68 km2. In the EU 27, the species has an estimated EOO of around 129,000 km2, and the AOO is estimated being around 48 km2.

Outside of Europe this species is known from Turkey (Anatolia; Sarıbıyık 2021), Georgia and the Transcaucasus (Mengual et al. 2020).",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. The species is dependent on wetlands and forest, so conservation actions should focus on the preservation of this type of habitat. Research should be done on the population and its threats, and the population and habitat trend should be monitored. This species is included on on the Polish Red List (Palaczyk et al. 2002).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169901,149169891,Cheilosia schnabli,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) in Europe and the EU27 Member States due to its small area of occupancy (100 km2 in Europe and 28 km2 in EU 27), severely fragmented population and a continuing destruction of forests caused by inappropriate forest management, logging and afforestation with inappropriate tree species. Further research on its ecology, population size, distribution, threats and habitat trends is needed.","The preferred environments of this species are forest and open areas in thermophilous Quercus forest. In open, grassy areas within forest it settles on vegetation and flowers; the males hover at 1-3 m. It is known to visit flowers of Euphorbia and Ranunculus. The flight period is from mid-May to the beginning of July. The developmental stages are undescribed (Vujić 1996). The host plant is unknown.","Poor forest management, logging and afforestation with inappropriate tree species represent the main threats to this species, and is particularly pronounced in the lowlands where it occurs. Grazing management may also affect it.","There is no information about the population size or trends of this species. There are between 50 and 100 records. In Serbia it is a rare species, found only in isolated spots. It is likely dependent on a particular host plant, as there are similar habitats where it is not found. The population is considered severely fragmented as a result of forest loss between known subpopulations.",Unknown,"In Europe, this species is recorded from Hungary, Romania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Greece, European Turkey and Crimea (Ukraine) (Popov 1998, Tóth 2013, Stahls and Barkalov 2017, Speight 2018). It is found in low mountains. It has an estimated area of occupancy in Europe of 100 km2, and in the EU27 of 28km2.

outside Europe it occurs in southeastern parts of Russia (the Caucasus) and Kazakhstan (Popov 1998, Tóth 2013, Stahls and Barkalov 2017, Speight 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"In Serbia Cheilosia schnabli was declared strictly protected by law. Poor forest management is increasing the disturbance to its habitat. Further research into its ecology, population size and threats is needed, as well as the monitoring of habitat trends. Grazing management is recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169914,149169909,Chalcosyrphus nitidus,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-01-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Chalcosyphus nitidus
 is known from European Russia and possibly Ukraine, but it is rare and localised. There is very little information known about the population, threats or life history of this species and so further research is required. Therefore, this species is assessed as Data Deficient for Europe. 

The species is not found within the EU 27 and therefore is Not Applicable.","

This species is found in deciduous forest of Quercus/Carpinus/Ulmus with overmature trees (Speight 2017, 2020; M. Krivosheina pers. comm. 2019). Flowers visited include Trollius riederanus (Gritskevich 1998), Poa pratensis, Festuca rubra and Agropyrum repens (Mutin 1983). The flight period of this hoverfly is from May to July.

The larvae are figured and included in the key provided by Krivosheina (2001), who found it always in the galleries of other insects (for example, Temnostoma spp.) in fallen, rotten wood of Alnus, Tilia and Ulmus. By contrast, Bagachanova (1990) reports rearing this species from larvae found in the bark (phloem) of Pinus and Larix trunks.

","The species is likely to be affected by the usual anthropogenic activities going on in the forests of Europe, such as deforestation, logging, agriculture and urbanisation, but the extent to which it impacts the species is unknown.","There is no information about the population trend of this species. There is no information about the number of subpopulations or specimens from European Russia, also no information is available about search efforts for this species.",Unknown,"

This species is known from the forest zone of European Russia, but it is rare and localized. It is also known from Ukraine and from Siberia to as far as Sakhalin; also northern China (Speight 2020). According to Speight (2017, 2020) the species is recorded for Ukraine, but there are no known specimens (Popov pers. comm. 2019). Based on the possible localities, the maximum extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 29 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is around 1 million km2. However, given the uncertainty around this species, it is highly likely that this is inaccurate in reality.

This species does not occur within the EU 27.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Further research is needed about the occurrence of the species in the European range, after that research should be done on the biology, life cycle and distribution of this species, in order to identify necessary conservation actions. For that the habitat trend should be monitored.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169922,149169912,Cheilosia rufimana,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern because of its large extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO). It is considered that the entire European and EU 27 population is still stable. Potential threats include degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to poor management practices of European forests, agricultural intensification and infrastructure development. Further research into its ecology, threats and population trend is needed.

","Cheilosia rufimana prefers deciduous forest. It can be found in humid Fagus forest and in the vicinity of springs and flushes in more open country. Males hover at 2-6 m and settle on low growing vegetation on the ground. Adults visit flowers of white umbelifers, Anemone nemorosa, Bunias orientalis, Caltha, Crataegus, Euphorbia, Ficaria verna, Geranium sylvaticum, Iris pseudacorus, Prunus padus and P.spinosa, Ranunculus, Salix, Stellaria and Taraxacum. The flight period is from the end of April to mid June. The developmental stages are unknown but Bothe (1986) observed a female ovipositing on Polygonum bistorta (Speight 2018).","There are several threats to the habitat of this species: unsustainable forest management, transformation of habitat into arable land and infrastructure development.","There is no information about population size, but it is considered stable across most of its the range.",Stable,"This species is distributed from Finland, Denmark and Belgium eastwards through mountainous parts of central Europe to Bulgaria and Ukraine. Outside Europe it is found in Kazakhstan and Asiatic Russia (Speight 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,There are no ongoing conservation actions known for this species. It is protected by law in Serbia. Additional research on its population size and trend and on its ecology is needed. Monitoring is required.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169935,149169930,Chalcosyrphus nigripes,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2019-09-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

Chalcosyrphus nigripes is found in Sweden and northern Finland. There are no records from European Russia although it is highly likely to also occur there. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 1.7 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 44 km2. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in EU 27 is estimated to be around 174,000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 24 km2. There are very few recent records of this species, and the existing records are more than 40 years old. The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be decreasing, and there is a continuing decline in extent and quality of habitat. Although the current estimates of extent of occurrence (EOO) for Europe (and also the EU 27) are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a very fragmented distribution. The species is dependent on a habitat that is rare in economically exploited woodlands making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. Therefore, this species is assessed as Endangered for both Europe and the EU 27. However, given the fact that the youngest records are older than 40 years, the species might go quickly to Critically Endangered or even Regionally Extinct.
","

There preferred environment of this species is forest; arctic-alpine Betula forest and western taiga (H. Bartsch pers. comm. 2020). There is no data on the adult habits, and of flowers visited. However, the flight period of this species is from the end of May to the beginning of July. There is a continuing decline in extent and quality of habitat.

The developmental stages of the species are not described, but the species was reared by Bagatshanova (1990), from larvae collected from under the bark of Larix stumps and logs. The species appears to overwinter as a larva.

","The main threats of this species are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat. This includes logging and other anthropological activities like work, agriculture and other activities. It is also threatened by changing rainfall patterns and drought due to climatic change. Distributional changes are to be expected towards higher altitudes with climate change (to colder and wetter areas).","This species is very rare. In Sweden, there have been only six recent sightings from three different provinces, and the species has an estimated occurrence in five different provinces (Artdatabanken 2019). In Finland, there are only very old observations from 1926 (FinBif 2019). However, it is likely to be under-recorded as it is highly likely that it occurs in European Russia, but there are no known records at present. From the available data it seems the last sighting was in 1978 in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2019). The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be decreasing. The species is considered to be severely fragmented as the subpopulations are small and isolated and may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"This species is found in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2019), northern Finland, Siberia and into eastern Russia (Speight 2020). The records from Finland are old, from the 1920's (FinBif 2019). There are no available records from European Russia although it is likely to also occur there. All records are old, the youngest from 1978, so the species is likely to be very rare in the whole range of northern Europe and European Russia.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 1.7 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 44 km2. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in EU 27 is estimated to be around 174,000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 24 km2. Not all citations from literature as listed in the countries of occurrence could be found as exact localities for making the distribution map.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"This species is listed as Vulnerable (VU) in Sweden in 2010, 2015 and 2020 with a total of around 10 Swedish sightings (Artdatabanken 2020), and was listed as Data Deficient (DD) in 2019 in Finland (FinBif 2019). It seems the last sightings are more than 40 years ago, so research is needed on the population size, distribution and trends of this species, and of the main threats for it.",Palearctic,1978,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169943,149169933,Merodon ruficornis,Least Concern,,2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and in the EU 27, because it is widespread in Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The main threat is habitat loss (both quality and quantity), which is mostly due to changes in land use, and overgrazing by livestock and fires through all the Mediterranean (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Further research is needed into the population trend, and ecology and biology of the species.

","

This species prefers thermophilous Quercus, mesophilous Quercus and Fagus, as well as alluvial hardwood forests. The adults are active from the end of April to July. The species occurs in small, open areas with dense ground vegetation within forests, flying fast and low over and among ground vegetation, settling on low-growing plants in the sun, and visiting flowers such as Allium ursinum and Ranunculus. The larva has not been described (Speight 2020).

","Since this species is distributed in most of Europe, the main threat is probably habitat loss due to changes in land use across the Europe, and overgrazing by livestock and fires in the Mediterranean areas (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","Based on all known data, there are numerous subpopulations across Europe. Specimens have been collected in the period of 1857 (in Italy) to 2019. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species is predominantly distributed in the central parts of Europe, as well as on the Apennine and Balkan peninsulas in southern Europe (Vujić et al. 2012). The data for Belgium (Speight et al. 2016), Latvia (Karpa 2008), North Macedonia (Speight et al. 2016), Poland (Mielczarek and Żóralski, 2009), and the European part of Russia (Speight et al. 2016) have not been checked. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is present in Turkey and North Africa.
",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Merodon ruficornis is on the Red List of Baden-Württembergs (Germany), Red List of Germany, Red List of Belgium (regionally Near Threatened), and on the Red List of Czech Republic (Regionally Extinct). Its distribution lies partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network, and in protected areas such as the Natural Reserve Combe Lavaux (France), Regional Nature Park Vexin (France), Nature Park Vitosha (Bulgaria), Prespa National Park (Greece), Pindos National Park (Greece), Rodopi National Park (Greece), Bükki National Park (Hungary), Fertő-Hanság National Park (Hungary), Pollino National Park (Italy), Durmitor National Park (Montenegro), Domogled Nature Reserve (Romania), Stara planina Natural Park (Serbia) and Fruška Gora National Park (Serbia).

The conservation needs of this species are mainly related to the conservation of suitable habitats. Additional research is needed into the population trend, and its ecology and biology. The impacts of overgrazing by livestock in the Mediterranean part of its range also need further investigation. Monitoring the population and habitat trends, as well as raising awareness about this species are also required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169954,149169951,Chalcosyrphus nemorum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The Duskey-banded leafwalker (Chalcosyrphus nemorum) is a widespread species across Europe, common almost everywhere in its range. It has a very large EOO, around 10.2 million km2 in Europe and 7.5 million km2 in the EU 27 and also a large area of occupancy (AOO) of around 4.8 million km2 in Europe and 2.9 million km2 in the EU 27. The current population trend is considered to be stable. In addition, although there may be localised impacts from human activities, there are no major threats to this species. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. No conservation measures are needed for this species at present.","

This species is found in forest and wetland, in particular Alnus/Salix carr, poorly drained deciduous forest and woodland, alluvial gallery forest, beside ponds and along streams in deciduous forest and woodland and along streams and rivers in mesophilous and thermophilous deciduous forest. 

Adults have been found on sunlit foliage of bushes, overhanging the water along streams in woodland, and on trunks of fallen and felled trees beside water. Adults also settle on bare, damp mud and sand at the water's edge, to drink. 

Flowers visited by this species include white umbellifers, such as Aegopodium podagrariaAnemone nemorosa, Anemone sylvestris, Caltha palustris, Euphorbia amygdaloides, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus repens, Rubus idaeus, Sorbus aucuparia, Spiraea media and Taraxacum sp. 

The flight period is from the beginning of May to the end of September.

The larvae are described and figured by Hartley (1961). They have been found to occur beneath bark of water-sodden deciduous timber, stumps and in damp tree rot-holes in deciduous trees, such as Betula, Fagus, Populus, Quercus, Salix and Ulmus. They have also been recorded from under the bark of stumps of Larix and Pinus and from a water-sodden Larix trunk lying partly in the water (Bagachanova 1990). Jukes (A. Jukes pers. comm. 2019) has observed oviposition on Salix and Betula logs, in a log-jam of partially submerged timber across a small river in riverine gallery forest. The larva overwinters and the puparial phase lasts 10 days (Dussaix 2013).

","The species might suffer from the usual anthropogenic activities in certain parts of Europe, but it seemingly has no effect on the population.","This is a widespread species with large subpopulations everywhere. In the Mediterranean, the hoverfly is less common compared with the northern part of Europe, and may even by scarce in this region (Vujic et al. 2019). The current population trend is considered to be stable for both Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"

This species is found in Fennoscandia and south to the Pyrenees, in Ireland and eastwards through much of northern, central and southern Europe (to southern Italy) into Russia and on to the Pacific coast (Sakhalin, Japan). In North America, this species is known from Alaska to Nova Scotia and south to California (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) of this species in both Europe and the EU 27 are very large and exceed the thresholds for any threatened Category.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are known to be in place for this species, but at the moment conservation action is not necessary and the species occurs in protected areas throughout its range. In Finland, this species has been nationally assessed as Least Concern (FinBif 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169965,149169962,Merodon segetum,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

In Europe, this species is distributed in Spain and Gibraltar. It prefers open rocky areas of sub-xeric calcareous grassland in the matorral of Olea europea, Osyris quadripartita, Rhamnus alaternus, Pistacia lentiscus and Pistacia terebinthus (Ebejer and Bensusan 2010).

It is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU27, based on the small area of occupancy (AOO) (20 km2) and extent of occurrence (EOO) (345 km2), the number of locations (three) which is based on overgrazing by livestock and expansion of tourism infrastructure as major threats, and the ongoing decline of quality of habitats. We propose additional research concerning the population trends, as well as the monitoring and conservation of the species habitat. The rescue effect from the subpopulations outside of Europe is unlikely to happen.","This species prefers open rocky areas of sub-xeric calcareous grassland in the matorral of Olea europea, Osyris quadripartita, Rhamnus alaternus, Pistacia lentiscus and Pistacia terebinthus (Ebejer and Bensusan 2010). The adults settle on bare ground of paths and on low-growing vegetation. Their flight is rapid and noisy (Ebejer and Bensusan 2010). The flight period is between March and beginning of May. The developmental stages and host plant are unknown (Speight 2020).","Overgrazing by livestock is considered to be a major threat to this species (in Grazalema) (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Infrastructure development due to tourism also pose a certain threat, particularly in Gibraltar.","There is no information about the population trend. About 30 specimens have been collected so far, some from the 1920s. The most recent records date from 2019.",Unknown,"

This species occurs in Spain and Gibraltar, and outside Europe, it is also present in North Africa (Marcos-Garcia et al. 2007, Ebejer and Bensusan, 2010, Speight 2020). In Europe and EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 345 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 20 km2

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions targeting this species. Two point localities are within the Sierra de Grazalema Natural Park. Controlling grazing by livestock is crucial to the preservation of its habitat. Research on its population trend and threats is needed. Monitoring the population and habitat trends, as well as raising awareness about this species is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169976,149169973,Chalcosyrphus femoratus,Vulnerable,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2019-09-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

Chalcosyrphus femoratus
 is found across Europe, on dead wood within deciduous forest. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is large, estimated to be around 5.5 million km2. The the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be much smaller, around 732 km2. For the EU 27 the picture is the same, the EOO is large, estimated around 2.4 million km2, but the AOO is small, estimated around 660 km2. It is considered that the overall population trend is decreasing in both Europe and the EU 27, as there are very few records now within Europe compared to the past. The species is disappearing across Europe and the EU 27 and that is a trend which is likely to be continuing. Although the current estimates of extent of occurrence (EOO) for Europe and the EU 27 are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a very fragmented distribution. The species is dependent on a habitat that is rare in economically exploited woodlands making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. This species is therefore assessed as Vulnerable for both Europe and the EU 27.

Riparian gallery forest and large deciduous or mixed forests with which the species may be associated are not always protected and have many threats acting on it, especially from agriculture conversion threats. Disappearance of coppice forest may be an issue to this species, due to replacement to conifers to commercial forestry. Research into its distribution and why it does not just follow the distribution of certain tree species is required.","

The preferred environment of this species in Europe is deciduous forest; Quercus robur forest with over-mature trees, but it may be associated with Populus alba within these forests. 

Adult are found running on the foliage of bushes and shrubs in the sun, where it resembles, in both appearance and movements, a large ophionid Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera); it settles on freshly cut trunks. Flowers visited by this species include Ranunculus repens, Heracleum sibiricum and Euphorbia spp.The flight period of is from the end of May to the end of July. 

The larvae are undescribed, but found by Krivosheina (2001) in ""wood dust"" in Betula and in rotten wood of Betula. This species has been associated with stands of Populus alba and P. canescens (a naturally occurring, fertile hybrid between P. alba and P. tremula) along rivers and in wet areas within Quercus robur forest, suggesting that this species may also develop in the rotten wood of these poplar species. Populus canescens has both a growth form and bark very similar to Betula sp., making fallen, dead trees of these species difficult to distinguish from one another. This species potentially has a commensal relationship with another saproxylic organism - it should be much more frequent if there was just a specific tree association. For example, an added nutrient source apart from wood, meaning that the species cannot be reared on dead wood alone.

Outside of Europe, this species may be found in other habitats, such as birch forests, but this does not seem to be the case in Europe. 

There's a decline in riparian forest of 80% over the last 200 years (Naiman et al. 1993). There is a decline in the extent of habitat.

","

The threats to this species includes certain forest management as the species requires dead trees in situ. Riparian gallery forest and large deciduous or mixed forests with which the species may be associated are not always protected and have many threats acting on it, especially from agriculture conversion threats. Disappearance of coppice forest may be an issue to this species, due to replacement to conifers to commercial forestry.

This species is found in fallen timber with the bark on, so is likely to be buffered from the impacts of climatic change.

","This is currently a very localised species in much of Europe, but was clearly more frequent in the past. There seems to be a decrease in the subpopulations of this species. However, not much information is available to confirm this, but it is considered that the overall population trend is decreasing in both Europe and the EU 27, as there are very few records now within Europe compared to the past. The species is disappearing across Europe and we infer a decline of at least 20% over the past ten years, a trend which is likely to be continuing. This species is widely distributed in Ukraine but rare (Popov pers. comm. 2020). In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"This species is found from Poland south to northern and central France, Belgium and east through central Europe into parts of European Russia (Sku'f'in 1964, Speight 2020). Globally, this species is found all the way to eastern Russia, Mongolia and through Siberia, almost to the Pacific coast. There are no records of this species from the Scandinavian countries despite extensive research in the countries.

In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be around 5.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 732 km2. For the EU 27 the EOO is estimated around 2.4 million km2, and the AOO is estimated around 660 km2. Not all citations from literature as listed in the countries of occurrence could be found as exact localities for making the distribution map.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no current conservation measures in place for this species. In National Red Lists, this species is assessed as vulnerable in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), and as Near Threatened (NT) in Poland: Red List of Endangered and Endangered Animals in Poland (Głowaciński et al. 2002, Palaczyk et al. 2002). In the Czech Republic, the species is listed as Endangered (Farkac et al. 2005). Research into its distribution and why it does not just follow the distribution of certain tree species is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169988,149169984,Merodon spinitarsis,Near Threatened,B2b(iii),2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

The species is assessed as Near Threatened based on small area of occupancy (AOO) (272 km2 both in Europe and in the EU27) and continuing decline in the habitat. Habitat loss (both quality and quantity) is the main threat due to overgrazing by livestock and fires through all the Mediterranean (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020), and intensification of tourism, urbanization, expansion of agricultural land and extensive cutting of wooded land strips in the Dobrogea region in Romania (Sârbu et al. 2006). Further research is needed on the population trend, and ecology and biology of the species.

","

This species prefers open areas in Pinus forests, and in thermophilous deciduous forests (Castanea) (Vujić et al. 2011, Ricarte et al. 2012, Speight 2020). The adult flies in the period from March to July, and in September. It has been recorded visiting the flowers of Anthemis, Euphorbia and white Apiaceae. The larva has not been described (Speight 2020).

","The main threat to this species is habitat loss due to fires and overgrazing by livestock throughout the Mediterranean region (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). In addition, the Dobrogea region in Romania is exposed to growing human impacts caused by the intensification of tourism, urbanization, expansion of agricultural land and extensive cutting of  wooded land strips (Sârbu et al. 2006).","Based on all known data, there are numerous subpopulations on the Greek islands of Lesvos, Samos, Chios, Kos, Rhodos and Thaso, and several specimens come from Bulgaria and Romania. The earliest finding of the species in Europe was in 1907, in Bulgaria. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species is distributed in southeast Europe. The area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 is 272 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 300,684 km2.

Outside of Europe, it is present in Turkey, Israel and Russia.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation actions. Its conservation needs are mainly related to the conservation of suitable habitat. The range is partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network, and partly within the Olympus National Park (Greece) and Dadia National Park (Greece). Additional research is needed on its population trend, ecology and biology. The impacts of overgrazing in the Mediterranean part of its distribution also need further investigation. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required, and raising awareness about this species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149169996,149169986,Callicera macquarti,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2019-09-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

Callicera macquarti is considered an endemic of Europe for the purposes of this assessment, due to an uncertain range as a result of previous confusion with C. fagesii and C. rufa. As in other species of the genus, adults are not easily observed, and therefore there is some uncertainty regarding the true distribution and population size of this species. The estimated extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 4.7 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 356 km2. The EOO for the EU 27 is estimated to be around 3.7 million km2, but the AOO is only around 300 km2. Although the current estimates of EOO for Europe and the EU 27 are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a severely fragmented distribution. The species is dependent on a habitat that is rare in economically exploited woodlands making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. The current population trend is considered to be declining, so the species is listed as Endangered under Criterion B for Europe and EU27.

The species might be synonymised in the future with C. fagesii due to recent results from DNA analysis.","

The preferred environment of this species is deciduous forest; ancient Fagus forest with overmature and senescent trees. 

Adults are primarily arboreal, descending occasionally to feed at flowers or to visit streams to drink; descends to drink in bright sunlight, at spots where woodland streams provide flat patches in the sun at the water's edge and clear flight paths up to the canopy; occasionally females can occur at great distance from forest. Males may sit in the sun on the end of dead branches of trackside trees, at 3 m or more from the ground, returning to particular branches repeatedly (M. Hauser pers. comm. 2019).

Flowers visited by this species include pink flowered, autumnal Allium spp., Calluna vulgaris, Hedera spp., Solidago canadensis. 

The flight period is from September to October. 

The larvae are not described, but reared from rot-holes in overmature Quercus rotundifolia by Ricarte et al. (2008).

","The main threats are the usual anthropogenic ones focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat. This would include land use change due to deforestation for wood, industrial areas, agricultural purposes or tourism. For example through changing forestry practices to faster rotation schemes with younger tree forests the habitat would severely degrade. Furthermore the climate change might be of influence (fires), but that is not clear yet.","There is no known information about the population size or trend of this species. This is a European endemic which is, according to Speight on status and degree of endemism for the European syrphid species in the StN database (Speight 2020), decreasing in its range. However, this species is, as others in the genus, probably mainly arboreal and it is not easy to find and/or collect. The species rarely visits flowers which makes detection difficult, but males hover low and which makes them more easy to detect (for a Callicera). There seems to be a clear and continuing decline of the species in Europe. In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"

Due to previous confusion with C. fagesii and C. rufa, the range information for this species can only be stated provisionally. The species is thought to occur in central and southern France (including the Pyrenees), southwest Germany (Rhine valley), Portugal (van Eck pers. comm. 2020), southern Spain (Barcelona), central and southern Italy, Croatia (van Eck database), Greece, Turkey and Cyprus (Speight 2020). It was first recorded from Switzerland in August 2020 (M. Plichta via picture on Facebook pers. comm. 2020).

If C. rohdendorfi is a synonym of C. macquarti, then this species also occurs in the Crimea and Caucasus and probably Azerbaijan, so it would not be an European endemic in that case (Speight 2020). But for this assessment we consider it to be a European endemic, but not an EU 27 endemic.

The estimated extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 4.7 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 356 km2. The EOO for the EU 27 is estimated to be around 3.7 million km2, but the AOO is only around 300 km2. Not all citations from literature as seen in the occurrence could be found as exact localities for making the distribution map.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions currently known for this species. In the first place the focus should be on the taxonomy of this species, if it is a valid species or not. Furthermore research should be done on population, distribution, ecology and biology of the species. A monitoring scheme would be necessary to see population and habitat trends. In the German Red List for Baden-Württemberg it is listed as Data Deficient (Doczkal et al. 2001) and in Germany generally it is considered as Critically Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149170018,149170004,Merodon telmateia,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU27 based on the small area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO), both of which are 12 km2, the number of locations (three) which is based on overgrazing as the major threat, and the continuous decline in the quality of habitats. It is unknown if there is a rescue effect from subpopulations from outside the assessment region. We propose additional research concerning the population trends, as well as monitoring and conservation of the species habitat.","

This species prefers open ground in proximity to freshwater, and montane or subalpine grasslands with seasonal flushes or wet areas (Hurkmans 1988). However, from the information provided by Vujić et al. (2015), it seems likely Hurkmans' observations were based on both Merodon kopensis and Merodon telmateia (Speight 2020). The females fly very close (ca. 10 cm) to the ground (Hurkmans 1988), the males somewhat higher (Speight 2020). It is known to visit flowers of Euphorbia and Ornithogalum (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is from March to August. The developmental stages and host plant are unknown (Speight 2020).

",Overgrazing by livestock presents the major threat to the habitat of this species (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Fires and infrastructural development also cause some disturbance.,"There is no information about the population (size, trend, dynamics) of this species. The majority of specimens collected so far are from Turkey. From Europe a total of 11 specimens have been collected from Samos (Greece), 10 in 2010 and one in 2012.",Unknown,"

The range of this species includes Greece (only the island of Samos), Israel, Russia, Turkey and Pakistan (Speight 2020). Vujić et al. (2015) noted its discontinuous range, occurring in two regions with different climate characteristics. One is in the Aegean and Mediterranean regions, and the other in eastern Anatolia, with a gap in the central Anatolian region. Kočiš Tubić et al. (2018) confirmed this structuring of geographically isolated populations in eastern and western Anatolia, and also on Samos, designating them as three distinct subspecies. In Europe and the EU27, both the extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) are estimated to be 12 km2.

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions targeting this species. Two point localities occur within a Natura 2000 site (Oros Ampelos (Karvounis) on Samos). The prevention of overgrazing by livestock is of the utmost importance for preserving its habitat. Research on its threats, ecology and population trend is needed. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required. Raising awareness about this species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170026,149170015,Caliprobola speciosa,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Caliprobola speciosa
 is a widespread species, found both within and outside of Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 7.8 million km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 3.2 million km2. For the EU 27 the EOO is estimated around 4.1 million km2, and the AOO is estimated around 1.3 million km2. Throughout its range, it is locally found in good habitat, despite being reasonably rare. In Europe, the species does not seem greatly at risk, although the overall current population trend is considered to be decreasing. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27.

There are no direct conservation measures in place for this species, as it is not considered greatly at risk at present, although threats may include anthropogenic effects. Further studies are needed into the taxonomy, abundance, trends, ecology and threats to this species.","

The preferred environment of this species is deciduous forest (Castanea spp., Fagus spp., Quercus pedunculata, Q. pubescens) and evergreen oak forest (especially Q. suber forest maintained for cork production) with overmature and senescent trees. 

Males fly around, hover between and settle close to, the roots of senescent Castanea, Fagus or Quercus in the sun, settling on bare ground, on the sawdust of cut stumps, or on vegetation (for example Pteridium) in the vicinity. It can be found away from forests, feeding at flowers growing on exposed riverbed gravels or in adjacent fields, along large rivers with galley forest, in situations with either alluvial softwood, such as Salix alba or Populus, or with hardwood such as Fraxinus/Carpinus/Quercus. The species appears to use these riverine biotopes as corridors to move between forests. An alternative explanation would be that one or more of these trees provides an alternative host for the larvae but there is so far no evidence for this and the adults cannot be found investigating trunk bases of these trees as they do Castanea and Fagus. The species visits the damp mud of drying stream beds or drying puddles on tracks, usually in the shade, on hot afternoons, to drink.

Both sexes visit the flowers of small trees and low-growing plants. Flowers visited include white umbellifers, such as Caltha spp., Crataegus spp., Rorippa spp., Rubus spp., Sorbus aucuparia, Tamarix spp., Cornus sanguinea, and Frangula alnus (Dussaix 2013). The species is also known to visit Heracleum spp., Chaerophyllum spp., Syringia spp., Berberis spp. and Filipendula spp. (Skufin 1967, Violovich 1983)

The flight period of this hoverfly is from May to mid July, with the peak at the beginning of June. The larvae are described and figured by Rotheray (1991) and illustrated in colour by Rotheray (1994), from larvae collected from wet, decaying roots of Fagus stumps. It has also been reared from larvae collected from Fagus and Quercus pedunculata stumps/roots/rot-holes by other authors. For instance, Dussaix (2005) reared the species from material in a moist, trunk-base cavity in Quercus. Distinguished from larvae of related genera in the keys provided by Rotheray (1994). A coloured photo of the puparium is provided by Dussaix (2013) who also confirms that overwintering of this species occurs as a larva.

","The threats to this species target the habitat in old beech or oak forests. This includes human (anthropogenic) activities like logging, deforestation (for commercial use and tourism) as well as climate effects.","There is no information on the population size or number of subpopulations of this species. However, throughout its range, it is locally found in good habitat, despite being reasonably rare. In Europe, the species does not seem greatly at risk, although the current population trend is considered to be decreasing. There have likely been declines in the past as it was previously more commonly found in collections, and it might be closer to threatened in the future. However, in Flanders (Belgium) a slow but steady increase in range has been observed which can probably be linked to forest ageing and changes in forestry practices (van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020).",Decreasing,"

This species is found in Europe, from Denmark and Poland south to the Pyrenees and northern Spain, from Britain (southern England) east through central Europe (plus northern Italy and northern parts of the former Yugoslavia) into Turkey and European parts of Russia. Outside of Europe, its range stretches into Asia as far as eastern Siberia (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 7.8 million km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 3.3 million km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is estimated around 4.1 million km2, and the AOO is estimated around 1.3 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no direct conservation measures in place for this species, as it is not considered greatly at risk at present. Further studies are needed into the taxonomy, abundance, trends, ecology and threats to this species. It is known to be found in protected areas across its range.

This species is listed as Endangered in Czech Republic but has likely increased or spread again in recent years (L. Mazanek pers. comm. 2020, Farkac et al. 2005). However, it will be included in the next issue of the Red Data Book of Ukraine, as Vulnerable (Popov personal comm. 2020). This species is regarded as endangered in Spain (Marcos-Garcia 2006) where it is only found in two provinces. In Denmark the species is listed as Endangered (Bygebjerg 2019). In the Poland the species was assessed VU (Palaczyk et al. 2002).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170039,149170034,Merodon toscanus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic species is assessed as Endangered based on the small area of occupancy (AOO) of 16 km2 and the number of locations (four), which is based on grazing by livestock and its mismanagement, as the main threat. This species is endemic to Italy and is currently known from four localities, and due to ongoing threats to the habitat of this species such as overgrazing by livestock, tourism development and intensive urbanisation, a continuing decline in the habitat quality is inferred.","The species inhabits Mediterranean maquis. The developmental stages have not been described, and the host plant is unknown. The flight period is from May to August.","In the Mediterranean Basin, around 80% of the land area is marginal and is frequently mixed with different land uses (Pardini 2004). The main causes of the decline of the maquis in the Mediterranean are the destruction of the natural vegetation to make way for pasture, grazing by livestock (which hinders or slows down the succession of the vegetation) (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020), fires, replacement of the natural vegetation by crops, reforestation with species that do not give rise to maquis, and human settlement in varying densities, all in places formerly covered by vegetation (Tomaselli 1977). Tourism development and intensive urbanisation, especially in localities near the coast, represent a threat to its habitat.","

There are insufficient data about the population trend of this species. 13 specimens were collected in 1959, and single specimens in 1986, 1987 and 2012. Continuous monitoring, as well as additional research on the population trend are needed in order to obtain more data.

",Unknown,"This species is endemic to peninsular Italy, where it has been recorded from four point localities in the central and southern parts of the country. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 32,450 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 16 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. One point locality is within the Natura 2000 network. Taking into account the possible threats (especially destruction of the natural vegetation to make way for pasture), it is recommended to conserve the habitat of this species by enforcement of environmental regulations, rules and other policies. Public awareness and education are essential.

Additional research is needed on its abundance, habitat, ecological requirements, threats and trends. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is recommended.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149170048,149170036,Brachypalpus laphriformis,Least Concern,,2021,2019-12-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Brachypalpus laphriformis 
is a European endemic and reasonably widespread species in western, central and eastern Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is estimated to be around 7.1 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 3.2 million km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 5.2 million km2 and the AOO is around 1.9 million km2. Although generally not considered to be rare, the current population trend is considered to be declining due to declining forest areas from anthropogenic activities. However, it is likely to be found in multiple protected areas across its range, and therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. It is very important to focus on the importance of old woodland and wood pasture with over-mature and veteran trees for the preservation of this (and other) species.","

The preferred environment of this species is deciduous forest; over-mature Fagus and Quercus forest with senescent trees and fallen, rotting timber. Adult males engage in rapid, zigzag flight along the trunks of fallen and felled deciduous trees, in clearings, not infrequently settling on the bark, in the sun; in flight they emit a characteristic, high-pitched buzz; they also settle on the trunks of standing, live trees, in the sun. The female can be found investigating fallen trees, but does not settle on them in the sun - on occasion can be found on the cut end of a felled tree or walking around the periphery of a tree hole, or settled on the foliage of trees at upwards of 2 m from the ground; both sexes visit the flowers of certain trees (Speight 2017, 2020). De Groot et al. (2010) found “a female hovering inside a hole in a logged tree in which ants were nesting. The immediate surroundings of the log consisted of mature Fagus forests"". The species is adaptable, it can sometimes be found in rural areas and urban parks when there are suitable trees (Stuke 1998, Trzciński et al. 2014). Flowers visited by this species include umbellifers; Berberis, Crataegus, Photinia, Prunus serotina, Sorbus. The flight period is from the end of May to the end of June, with a few records for early July.

Larvae are described and figured by Rotheray (1991) and illustrated in colour (apparently from a preserved larva) by Rotheray (1994), from a larva collected from exudates of a rot-hole in the trunk of Taxus and another from sappy water in a sub-bark cavity on the trunk of a live Quercus.  From the habits of the adults, it is likely that the larvae of Brachypalpus laphriformis might also be found in association with Acer, Castanea and Prunus. According to Bartsch et al. (2009), this species may be associated with Pinus in Sweden (Speight 2017, 2020).

","The threats to this forest dwelling species are the usual anthropogenic activities throughout Europe which include deforestation, agriculture, urbanisation and logging.","This is a reasonably widespread species in western, central and eastern Europe. In Scandinavia, it is only found in the southern parts (Andersson 1988). This species is not currently considered to be very rare throughout its range, although the population trend is considered to be in decline, like most of the forest dwelling species in Europe. The species is a bee mimic, but is not too difficult to find throughout its range.",Decreasing,"

The range of this species is from southern Fennoscandia, south to the Pyrenees, and from Ireland east through much of central Europe (and northern Italy) to the former Yugoslavia and European parts of Russia (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is estimated to be around 7.9 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 3.4 million km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 6 million km2 and the AOO is around 3.4 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"For this species, the focus of conservation measures should be on the protection of forests with old and senescent trees. In addition, research should be done on the ecology and biology of the species, for example how adaptable the hoverfly is to a manmade environment. Monitoring the population trends and habitat trends are also important. This hoverfly also occurs in all kinds of protected areas across its range, for example Italy (Birtele et al. 2003). It is very important to focus on the importance of old woodland and wood pasture with over-mature and veteran trees for the preservation of this (and other) species. In Finland, this species has been assessed as Vulnerable (VU) (FinBif 2019), previously Endangered (EN) (Rassi et al. 2010). It is now also a threatened species under strict protection in Finland (Nature Conservation Decree 14.2.1997/160, Appendix 4 19.6.2013/471). It is treated as a Vulnerable species in the Czech Republic (Mazánek and Barták 2005). In Denmark the species is listed as near threatened (Bygebjerg 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149170061,149170057,Blera fallax,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Blera fallax
 is a widespread species in Europe, found from central and southern Norway, to the Pyrenees and northern Scotland, eastwards through central Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 8.2 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 3.9 million km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 4.7 million km2 and the AOO is estimated to be around 1.9 million km2. The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is unknown, and it is localised in some parts of its distribution. The main threats of this species are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat, but due to the wide distribution, this species is not considered to be threatened in Europe and the EU 27 as a whole. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both regional assessments.

Conservation actions for this species must focus on the preservation of the suitable habitat. Further research on the population size and trends, the threats and the life history of this species is required. In addition, monitoring of the population and habitat trends.","

The preferred environment of this species is humid, ancient coniferous forest containing over-mature and dead trees. It is found in association with Picea or Pinus, up to, and including, subalpine P. uncinata forest. It is generally found at higher altitudes where pine forests remain. In some areas, it may be found in planted forest as long as microhabitat is right. Adults are known to rest in the sun on the cut ends of the stumps of conifers and on the ground adjacent to felled or fallen trees. Males fly fast and low through the vegetation of forest clearings, particularly in the vicinity of clumps of plants such as Rubus idaeus in flower. The species is also known to visit the flowers of Berberis spp., Parnassia spp., Prunus spp., Rosa canina, Rubus idaeus, Valeriana spp., Fragaria spp., Potentilla spp., Spiraea spp., Heracleum spp., Plantago spp., Pleurospermum uralense and Barbaea spp.. The flight period of this species is from May to July.

The larvae and puparium have been described and figured by Rotheray and Stuke (1998) from material found in wet, heart-rot trunk cavities in cut stumps of Pinus sylvestris. These cavities can evidently persist in stumps for a number of years, in a condition usable by this species (Rotheray and MacGowan 2000). Rotheray (2013) observed that as water in a rot-hole reaches a temperature at which it freezes, the larvae emerges from the water and remains on the side of the rot-hole, or on the water surface. Rotheray (2013) also presents evidence that resource partitioning between larvae of B. fallax, Callicera rufa, Myathropa florea and Sphegina clunipes reduces the likelihood of competition between them, when they occur in the same rot-hole. Under favourable conditions, Rotheray (2013) found that larvae can complete development within one year, reaching maturity by the onset of winter and then leaving the rot-hole, apparently passing the winter in diapause, to pupate the following spring. Maximum rates of development were found when pine sawdust was added to rot-hole content. This would imply that, under natural conditions, water-filled tree-holes into which comminuted wood fragments are raining down from above, e.g. as a consequence of the activities of the larvae of saproxylic Coleoptera, would provide better conditions for larvae than rot-holes in stumps remaining from tree-felling activities. Rotheray et al. (2016) show that food resource availability within the tree holes is limiting to larval growth, but that, even when food supply is not limiting, approximately 20% of larvae take 2 years to develop. Larvae of two North American Blera species are described and figured by Greene (1923), who also found them (in frass) in rotting stumps. The larva has also been found in a water-filled tree-hole by Dusek and Laska (1961). Occurrence of this species in Picea forest from which Pinus is absent, in central Europe, indicates that this syrphid can develop in rot-holes in Picea, as well as rot-holes in Pinus. According to van de Meutter (Bot and van de Meutter 2019) the species thrives in monocultures of spruce in Belgium, suggesting it is depending completely here on Picea, not Pinus.

","The main threats of this species are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat. However, there is no specific information regarding the potential threats affecting this species in Europe, besides the loss of suitable habitat due to deforestation and other land management like agriculture, habitat destruction, fire and change in land use. This will certainly have an effect on the sub populations of this species, and it will surely be a negative effect, but the actual changes are unknown.

In the United Kingdom, a decline since the early 1900s is considered to be mainly due to loss of habitat and changes in forestry management (Rotheray and MacGowan 2000).","There is very little information on the population trend or size, with only information on the subpopulation in Scotland. Therefore the current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is unknown. It is localised in other parts of the distribution. For example, in the Carpathians, it also occurs in the lowlands (G. Popov pers. comm. 2020).

In the United Kingdom, in 1999, there was an extensive 12-year survey, which indicated a decline from eight to two subpopulations since the early 1900s, mainly due to loss of habitat and changes in forestry management (Rotheray and MacGowan 2000). Rotheray (2012) describes the ecology and conservation of endangered saproxylic hoverflies (including Blera fallax) (Diptera, Syrphidae) in Scotland. This species is arguably Britain’s rarest resident insect. However, the species is not uncommon in northern and central Europe in Pinus forests, it is regularly recorded and photographed elsewhere in Europe.",Unknown,"

This species is found from central and southern Norway, to the Pyrenees and northern Scotland, eastwards through central Europe and Siberia to the Pacific coast (Sakhalin and Japan). It is found only in the northern parts of Scotland, in the United Kingdom, where pine forests remain, and only in northern parts of Italy. Generally, this species is found at higher altitudes where pine and spruce forests remain (Speight 2020).

The relative biogeographic isolation of the relict subpopulation of this species in northern Scotland is apparently reflected in its lower levels of genetic diversity, as compared with Scandinavian subpopulations (Rotheray et al. 2013).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 8.2 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 3.9 million km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 4.7 million km2 and the AOO is estimated to be around 1.9 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Conservation actions for this species must focus on the preservation of the suitable habitat. The species relies on ancient woodland for its large gnarled trees and rot holes that can be found in them. It also relies on a naturally diverse, mosaic woodland that has open areas, where the flies can bask in the sun, and broadleaved trees – like rowan (Sorbus aucuparia) – where the flies can feed as adults. Besides Scotland the species is not subject to any targeted conservation action in other countries, although this type of habitat is getting more and more threatened. Further research on the population size and trends, the threats and the life history of this species is required. In addition, monitoring of the population and habitat trends.

In the United Kingdom, the species is threatened, listed in the UK Red Data Book as category 1 (endangered) and it is a UK Biodiversity Action Plan priority species (Rotheray 2012). In 2007, this species was included in the Species Action Framework (SAF), a Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) initiative (Scottish Natural Heritage 2007), which focuses on funding projects to improve the status of species deemed significant to overall Scottish biodiversity. In Finland, this species has been assessed as Least Concern in 2000, 2010 and 2019 (FinBif 2020). The species is Near Threatened on the Danish Red List of 2019 (Bygebjerg 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170064,149170056,Merodon virgatus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is endemic to Europe, where it is restricted to the Balkan Peninsula. It is a high mountain species and its habitats are largely under destruction by overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Based on the small area of occupancy (AOO) (120 km2) with as few as nine locations and a continuing decline of the habitat quality due to the intensive overgrazing by livestock, the species is assessed as Vulnerable on European level. The number of locations is based on overgrazing by livestock that could cause the fragmentation and loss of habitat of this species.

In the EU27, it is assessed as Endangered, based on the small geographic range of the species (the area of occupancy is just 12 km2 and the extent of occurrence is 1,717 km2, both of them are below thresholds), only two locations(a single locality in each of Croatia and northern Greece), and a continuing decline of the habitat quality due to the intensive overgrazing by livestock.

Population and habitat trend monitoring is recommended, and further research on life history and ecology of this species is needed.","This is a high mountain species, preferring open ground, and unimproved, calcareous and non-calcareous montane and alpine grassland (Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is from June to September (Šašić et al. 2016). The adults are known to visit flowers of Thymus and Thymbra (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages have not been described (Šašić et al. 2016, Speight 2020).","The main threat is habitat destruction, mainly due to overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Tourism (ski resorts), fires and logging are also additional threats for this species.","The population trend is unknown. There are about 30 subpopulations recorded to date. The older records date from 1910 from Croatia, but recent records are also available from 2011 to 2017.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to the Balkan Peninsula in Europe, with records from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, North Macedonia, Serbia, Montenegro and Greece (Šašić et al. 2016, Spieght 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 57,790 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 120 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"The point localities in Croatia and Greece belong to the Natura 2000 network, while some point localities in Montenegro belong to National Parks. In Greece, the species occurs on Mt Olympus, which is also protected. Although these areas are protected, grazing by livestock is still intensive and the species would benefit from restrictions of this activity. Additional research on its threats, biology and ecology, as well as the habitat and population size trends is required, as well as monitoring the population and habitat trends. Establishing the exact host plant for the development of the larvae is crucial. Introducing it into the National list of protected species, as well as increasing awareness about this endemic species is very important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149170090,149170077,Cheilosia ahenea,Data Deficient,,2021,2021-04-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Data deficient (DD)
EU27 regional assessment: Data deficient (DD)

This European endemic occurs in a large part of central Europe such as the United Kingdom, Ireland, Spain, France, Germany, Czech Republic, Poland, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Austria and Slovenia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU27 is very large. Its current population trend is unknown for both Europe and the EU27 but it is not considered common. It can be found in open ground, permanent, and unimproved grassland. There are no current conservation actions in place, but  conservation actions needed are site/area and resource and habitat protection.

It has an estimated area of occupancy (AOO) of 244 km2 in Europe and 228 km2 in the EU 27. It has a continuing decline projected in the area of occupancy (AOO), and also for the quality of habitat as a result of unimproved grassland through intensification of agriculture, intensified land-use due to increased urbanization, and habitat degradation as a result of climate change. However, the species might be under-recorded due to taxonomic confusion with morphologically similar species (Cheilosia grisella and Cheilosia pubera). Due to the potentially unclear distributional data resulting from taxonomic uncertainty in present data, the species is assessed as Data Deficient.

Research into its population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, and threats are required.

","This species can be found in open ground, permanent, unimproved grassland from lowlands throughout the montane zone up to nearly 2,000 m and in both calcareous and non-calcareous subalpine pasture in central Europe. Adults fly close to the ground and can be seen settling on bare ground or stones in the sun, and the males hover at 1-5 m. At the extreme western edge of its range in Ireland, it occurs on the coast at sea level and in calcareous Machair grassland. The flight period is between May and July. Flowers visited include Antennaria, Dryas, Hieracium, Ranunculus, and Taraxacum (Speight 2018). Potential plant hosts are discussed by Speight and Claussen (1987), but actual host plant and immature stages remain unknown.","

The species could be negatively impacted by locally occurring man-made activities in Europe, such as loss of unimproved grassland through intensification of agriculture or intensified land-use due to increased urbanization, which could lead to habitat loss. The localities in the sub-alpine grasslands could be under threat of habitat degradation, due both to man-made activities but also climate change.

","The population trend for this species is unknown for both Europe and the EU27 as not enough information exists. It is not commonly encountered but the population is considered to be severely fragmented.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, and has its main distributional range in central Europe. It is found in Ireland, on the small island of Islay off the west coast of Scotland, Northern Ireland, the Vosges and Alps mountain ranges in France, the Pyrenees mountains (Speight 2018), the Cantabrian mountains of northern Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Poland (Mielzcarek 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2019), Liechtenstein, Austria (Heimburg 2018) and Slovenia (S. Bot pers. comm. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU27 is very large. The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is estimated to be 244 km2 and 228 km2 in the EU 27 based on known records. It is found up to 1,900 m asl.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"This species was classified as Vulnerable (D1) on the German National Red List (Ssymank et al. 2011) as well as the National Red List of Great Britain (Ball and Morris 2014). For both National Red Lists, the number of mature individuals was estimated to be less than 1,000 and the distribution localized and in a low number of locations in the respective country. There are no current conservation actions in place for this species; however, conservation actions needed are site/area and resource and habitat protection. Research into its population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, and threats are required.
",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149170111,149170101,Cheilosia fasciata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-11-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in most parts of Europe except the north and the Mediterranean. Although certainly subjected to anthropogenic activities in Europe, including intensified land-use due to increased urbanization, forest management including clearing, and wetland drainage, the species overall has a stable population throughout its range. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27, it is therefore assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27. Research and monitoring of the population would be beneficial.","This species is associated with humid deciduous forest, including alluvial hardwood forest (usually close to water) and unimproved subalpine grassland. Adults are normally found flying low among vegetation in the immediate vicinity of the larval food-plant, at the edge of clearings, etc.; males hover low over stands of Allium ursinum and both sexes rest on the leaves of this plant. According to Hövemeyer (1992), the adult female shelters from bad weather within the soil litter layer. Flower visitation records are known from Allium ursinum, Chrysosplenium alternifolium, Ranunculus, Salix and Tussilago. The flight period is from the end of March to May, when associated with Allium ursinum, but June when associated with A. victorialis. The larva mines the leaves of Allium ursinum and A. victorialis. The final-instar larva may move from one leaf to another if its food supply becomes exhausted. The larva was figured by Dušek and Láska (1962), illustrated in colour by Schmid (1996), and the larval biology was described by Nielsen (1979). Detailed biological information on the development of this species is provided by Hövemeyer (1992). The egg and larval stages together take 8 weeks to develop, after which pupariation takes place in the soil in the vicinity of the host plant. It overwinters as a puparium. It is more easily recorded as a larva than as an adult, since the larval mines are very distinctive and obvious when the larvae are maturing in A. ursinum leaves in May. Schmid and Grossmann (1998) contrast the life-history details of subpopulations associated with A. ursinum (low altitude) and A. victorialis (high altitude) in central Europe. De Groot and Kogoj (2015) observed that, within the elevational range of A. ursinum, the highest densities of C. fasciata occurred at the highest elevations (Speight 2020).","

Although certain to be subjected to anthropogenic activities in Europe, such as intensified land-use from increased urbanization, forest management including clearings, and wetland drainage or regulations of river flows, the species is considered overall to have a stable population throughout its range.

","The population trends for this species are unknown, but the population is presumed to be generally stable as no evidence of decline exists in Europe or the EU 27.",Stable,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is distributed in southern Norway (Nielsen 1979) seperated from the main range, which extends from Denmark (Bruun and Bygebjerg 2016) south to north-east France, Belgium and Netherlands (Speight 2020); the Alps (Austria: Heimburg 2018) and and the Balkan peninsula (Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Serbia and North Macedonia: Vujić 1996), Czechia and Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Hungary (Tóth 2014), Bulgaria and Romania (Bradescu 1991).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,There are no known conservation actions known or required for this species. Research and monitoring of the population would be beneficial.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149170133,149170122,Cheilosia flavipes,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 

This species is listed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and EU 27 because it is common and widespread and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. However, habitat loss (both in quality and quantity) is expected due to change in land use and deforestation throughout the whole of Europe. Monitoring and further research is required to establish the habitat and ecological requirements and to understand the existing threats better.

","

The preferred habitats are small open areas in humid Fagus forests upwards through the Picea zone and into the subalpine zone. In central and southern Europe it occurs mainly in mountain regions. Adults settle on low-growing vegetation and fly from April to June, July at higher altitudes. Adults visits Caltha, Euphorbia, Ranunculus, Salix, Sorbus aucuparia and Taraxacum. The larva is not described, but the adult female has been observed (Stuke 1996) ovipositing on Cirsium arvense and Taraxacum officinale. The morphology of the chorion of the egg is figured by Kuznetzov (1988) (Speight 2020).

","The main threat is habitat loss, due to changes in land-use and inappropriate forest management both in the Alps and in Europe more broadly (Bebi et al. 2017, Strandberg and Kjellström 2019).",This species is widely distributed across Europe with numerous subpopulations. The population trend is unknown. The species is fairly common in the southern parts of all countries in Fennoscandia as well as in western Siberia.,Unknown,"This species is widely distributed across the whole of Europe, from Spain in the west east through the entire continent to western Siberia (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"

Cheilosia flavipes is noted as moderately common in the Red List of hoverflies of Baden-Württemberg and the Red List of hoverflies of Germany, and classified as Vulnerable in the Red List of hoverflies of Denmark. Its distributional range is partly within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network and in Podyjí National Park (Czech Republic), Ceahlău National Park (Romania), Bucegi Natural Park (Romania), Mercantour National Park (France), the Regional Park of the Catalan Pyrenees (France), Haut-Jura Natural Park (France), and Yttre Hvaler National Park (Norway). Any conservation action should be focused on preserving its habitat due to high rate of deforestation of European forests. Monitoring and further research is required to establish the habitat and ecological requirements and to understand the existing threats better.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170155,149170144,Cheilosia grossa,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widely distributed in Europe but there few records of it. The species is perhaps under-recorded everywhere due to its early flight period. The host plants, thistles, are omnipresent in the countryside and the preferred habitat type is commonly available, but the species may locally be threatened due to forest management or other human activities leading to habitat destruction. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27 and this species is therefore assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27.

","This species is known from clearings and track sides in woodland and scrub, and poorly drained pasture. Adult males hover at 2-10 m, usually beside bushes or hedges in sheltered situations; females fly fast and low over ground vegetation in clearings and along tracks. Both sexes visit flowers of low-growing plants and trees, usually towards the middle of the day. The larva was described and figured by Rotheray (1988, 1994). It is a miner in stems of Cirsium spp. (Rotheray 1994) and Carduus spp. (Dušek and Láska 1962); detailed information about larval biology is provided by Rizza et al. (1988).

Although the known food plants of the larva of this species are plants occurring in pastures and roadsides, most records of the adult insect are from sheltered woodland sites, not open country. The early season at which C. grossa is in flight may dictate that this species occurs only where woodland and pasture are closely connected, the larvae requiring the pasture for appropriate host plants, the adults requiring the woodland for its early flowers. Flowers visited include Anemone nemorosa, Corylus, Prunus spinosa, Ranunculus spp., male Salix, Taraxacum and Tussilago. The flight period is in March-April, and May at higher altitudes (Speight 2020).","

The species is subject to anthropogenic activities in Europe, including intensified land-use due to increased urbanization, and intensive forest management including clearing.

",There is no information on population trends for this species in Europe and the EU 27. The records of this species are quite limited and it is believed to be under-recorded.,Unknown,"This species is distributed in Fennoscandia (Bartsch 2009, Haarto and Kerppola 2007), and from Ireland eastwards through northern, central and southern Europe (Doczkal et al. 2001, Heimburg 2008, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020), the Balkans (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, Macedonia, Serbia, Bulgaria and Greece) (Vujić 1996), European parts of Russia and extending into Siberia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Ukraine and Crimea (G. Popov pers. comm. 2019) and Georgia (Mengual et al. 2020). It has also been recorded from the Oriental region (Uttah Pradesh in northern India) and North Africa (Morocco) (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,

There are no known conservation actions for this species. Further research and monitoring is needed to better understand the population trend of this species.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170178,149170170,Cheilosia latifrons,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Cheilosia latifrons is assessed as Least Concern because of its relatively large range, whose extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. It is considered unthreatened across Europe. Potential threats are degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to human activities such as overgrazing and agriculture. Further research into its threats and population trend is needed.

","The preferred habitat for this species is open ground; unimproved, non-calcareous grassland, usually on poorly drained sites, as well as coastal dune systems. Adult are low-flying, at the level of grasses etc., among which it settles. It visits flowers of yellow Asteraceae, especially Senecio and Taraxacum, and also Origanum, Ranunculus, and anemophilous flowers such as Luzula and Plantago. The flight period is from April (March in southern Europe) to September, with peaks in June/July and September. The larva is phytophagous, and was described by Stuke and Carstensen (2002) from larvae found in the tap root of Leontodon hispidus. Schmid and Grossmann (1996) present evidence of egg-laying by C. latifrons on Scorzoneroides autumnalis, suggesting this may be another larval host plant. Reemer et al. (2009) also cite L. hispidus as a larval foodplant of this fly. In all probability this insect uses a range of different plant species as larval food-plants (Speight et al. 2018).","

This species is affected by the loss of habitat quality in some parts of its range due to overgrazing and agriculture, but these threats do not influence the overall population trend (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

","

There is no known information about population size, but presumably the population is large and stable.

",Stable,"This species ranges from Fennoscandia south to Iberia and from Ireland eastwards through central and southern Europe to Turkey, from there into European parts of Russia and western Siberia (Speight 2018). Outside of Europe, it is also found in North Africa (Kassebeer 1998).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation activities for this species, which occurs in protected areas. It is considered unthreatened across Europe (Speight et al. 2015). Future monitoring is needed, as well as research into its population and impacts of potential threats.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170205,149170198,Eumerus hungaricus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) for both Europe and the EU27 Member States since it is considered have a severely fragmented population in Europe, has a small known area of occupancy (AOO) of only 132 kmin Europe and less than 110 km2 in the EU 27, and has a continuing decline of its quality of habitat. Habitat loss due to monoculture plantations, extensive agriculture, and increasing urbanization is a major threat to this species. Problematic pest species and fires and droughts as a consequence of climate change, are other major threats to this species which prefers Oak scrubland, open grounds, and unimproved grasslands. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is estimated to be about 2,200,000 km2.


The species, which prefers scrub and open ground and patches of dry Oak scrub, or dry, sparsely-vegetated ground of open and unimproved grassland is very rare throughout Europe. Research on population size, distribution, and trends and the monitoring of the population trends is required to gain more knowledge for this species. Site/area and habitat protection is recommended to preserve this species. There is no rescue effect outside of the region.

","This species prefers scrub and open ground, patches of dry scrub Quercus cerris and Quercus pubescens and dry, sparsely-vegetated ground of open and unimproved grassland. The puparium was described by Ricarte et al(2017) from specimens reared on bulbs of Narcissus confusus in Spain. According to this study, the larva overwinters in bulbs of the host plant. In France, adults have repeatedly been collected from localities where no species of  Narcissus is present anywhere in the vicinity, suggesting it can also use some other plants as a larval host (Speight 2018).","Habitat loss due to monoculture plantations, extensive agriculture and increasing urbanization is a major threat. Problematic pest species, and fires and droughts as a consequence of climate change, are other major threats to this species, which prefers Oak scrubland, open grounds, and unimproved grasslands (Frank 2008, A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data about the population trends of this species, but it is presumably rare in most of its range (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The population is considered to be severely fragmented since subpopulations are small and isolated.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is extant from southern Spain and Gibraltar to north and central France and to the central Mediterranean region. In northern Greece, it has been recorded on two mountains in the continental region (Vujić et al. 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is about 132 km2, occurring at 20 to 30 locations. The area of occupancy (AOO) in the EU 27 is less than 110 km2 at 20 to 33 locations. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is estimated to be 2,200,000 km2.

Outside of the European region, the species has been found in the Anatolian region of Turkey and in North Africa as far as Morocco.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures in place for this species. Research on population size, distribution, and the monitoring of population trends is required to gain more knowledge. Site or area measures, as well as resource and habitat protection, are recommended to preserve this species. It occurs at several Natura 2000 sites in Europe, such as at Serres de Mariola i el Carrascal de la Font Roja and L'Albufera in Spain; Massif du Puigmal and Combeynot - Lautaret - Ecrins in France; Colli Berici, Laghi di Suviana e Brasimone and Massif Montagneux du Cinto in Italy; Wachau - Jauerling in Austria and Koryfes Orous Vora and Vouna Evrou- Potamos Lyras- Spilaia Didymoteichou Kai Kefalovounou in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020). The species is also found in Prespa National Park in North Macedonia and Durmitor National Park in Montenegro.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170226,149170224,Eumerus montanum,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-10-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

The species is European endemic, found on Durmitor Mountain in Montenegro and on Smolikas Mountain in Greece. The species is assessed as Endangered since it has a restricted geographic range and it only occurs in four locations. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1,585 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 16 km2. There is also a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its subalpine and alpine habitat due to human activities. Since the species only occurs at one location in the EU 27, it is assessed as Critically Endangered with an area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) of 4 km2. There is also a continuing decline in the quality of the species' habitat due to the development of tourism, which is seen as the most important threat. It is unknown if there is a rescue effect from subpopulations outside of the EU 27 assessment area. In addition, the species is considered to suffer from severe fragmentation. Conservation actions should be based on new policy regulations, national legislations, habitat and area protection, and education and awareness. Further research on population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats might also help preserve this species. Monitoring of the habitat trends for this species is also recommended.

","

The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species. It is mainly found in mountainous grassland bordered with shrubs at higher altitudes, and in seasonally mown grasslands, for example in hay meadows (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

","Tourism development in both the Greece and Montenegro localities, as well as overgrazing, are considered the most important threats to this species. Mt. Durmitor, a very important tourist destination, is heavily exposed to negative direct and indirect human impacts. The main threats to this region are illegal construction, land degradation, illegal deforestation and the drying of forests. Human impact is also high in the Pindus mountain range, where another site, Mt. Smolikas, is located. Mountain tourism, ski facilities, illegal logging, overgrazing and road construction are strongly degrading the large mountain forest ecosystems (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","

There is no information about population trends. The species occurs in four locations in Europe, and only one in the EU 27 (two records from Greece, both from 1994). All findings from Montenegro are from 2014 and later (Grković et al. 2017). The species is considered to suffer from severe fragmentation.

",Unknown,"This species is an European endemic, recorded from three localities in northern Montenegro and from northern continental Greece (Ethniko Parko Pindou National Park) (Grković et al. 2017). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1,585 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 16 km2In the EU 27, it occurs at one location, with an area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) of 4 km2. It is found at altitudes between 900 and 1,500 m above sea level. A recent record (Mutin and Barkalov 2018) of this species from Omsk (Siberia) refers to another species, with genetic confirmation (A .Grković pers. comm. 2021)",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. Its habitat is partially covered by protected areas, for example the Durmitor National Park and Parko Pindou. Conservation actions should be based on new policy regulations, national legislations, habitat and area protection, and education and awareness. Further research on population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats might also help preserve this species. Monitoring of the habitat trends is recommended.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149170247,149170245,Eumerus niehuisi,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-10-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

The species, which is endemic to the island of Corsica, is assessed as Endangered (EN) since it has a known area of occupancy (AOO) of 12 km2, an extent of occurrence (EOO) of around 1,274 km2, is found at two to three locations, and is experiencing a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to tourism development and fires. The species can be found in small, tall-herb open areas in warm-dry Hungarian Oak and Austrian Oak forest. Conservation actions such as area and habitat protection, education and awareness, and legislation on a national level are needed. Further research on taxonomy, population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats of the species is needed, and monitoring of the habitat trends is required. Habitats and areas where the species can be found should be preserved.

","This species can be found in small, tall-herb open areas in Balkanic thermophilous Quercus frainetto and Quercus cerris forest in coastal areas. Adults fly low and quite slowly over sparsely vegetated ground, and settle on the ground or on dead leaves in the sun. They are known to visit flowers of Euphorbia. Their flight period is between April and the beginning of June (Speight 2018). Early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records of the larval stages of this species.","The biggest threat to this species is the development of tourism on the island of Corsica, primarily in the coastal zones of the island. Increased fires happening on the island (Vaiciulyte et al. 2019) as a result of climate change also represent an important threat, because they destroy suitable habitat. Intensive grazing by pigs on the island is a further threat (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).","There is no information about population size, and any trends remain unknown (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). In total, 17 specimens were found between 1991 and 1994. During later surveys in Corsica, the species was not detected (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).",Unknown,"This species is endemic to the island of Corsica in France (Doczkal 1996). There are currently only three known localities. Some sources state that the species occurs in Greece (Chios, Lesvos, Samos; Chroni et al. 2018, Speight 2018), but these are possibly records of the similar species Eumerus crassusIts extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be about 1,274 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) about 12 km2. It is found up to an altitude of 20 metres above sea level.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. Conservation actions such as area and habitat protection, education and awareness, and legislation on a national level are needed. The taxonomic status of the species needs to be established and it needs to be separated from the similar species found in Greece. Further research on taxonomy, population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats is needed, and monitoring of habitat trends is required. Habitats and areas where this species can be found should be preserved. The species has been recorded within the boundaries of Natura 2000 sites such as Cap rossu, Scandola, Pointe de la Reveletta, and Canyon de Calvi in the northwest part of the island of Corsica.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149170269,149170267,Eumerus nudus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 Member States because it has a relatively large distribution across Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The species' habitat is however affected by fires, which are more frequent due to climate change, urbanization, and overgrazing. Further research about population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats of this species is needed. Monitoring of the population trends is also required.

","This species prefers open dry-forest ground, open areas in Mediterranean shrubland, and sparsely vegetated grassland (Speight 2018). The larva and puparium are described by Ricarte et al(2017) from larvae collected from “swollen roots of Asphodelus cerasiferus”. It has also been reared by Speight and Garrigue (2014) from larvae found in tubers of Asphodelus ramosus. The two authors also provide a photo of the puparium. The larva apparently overwinters within decaying tubers. The duration of the puparial phase is approximately six weeks (Speight and Garrigue 2014). More than one larva is often found in occupied tubers, usually together with larvae of Eumerus olivaceus and Eumerus pulchellus (Speight and Garrigue 2014).","Habitat loss due to frequent fires as a result of climate change, urbanization and overgrazing pose a threat to this Mediterranean species (CEPF 2010).","There are no data about the population trend for this species. It is more common in the western part of the Mediterranean, while in the eastern part its presence is rare and sometimes questionable (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from Spain and Gibraltar, and around the Mediterranean coast, through southern France, to Italy including Sicily (Speight 2018). There are also records from Croatia and Romania, however these are from the beginning of the 20th century, so it is questionable whether the species still exists in these countries. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

Outside of Europe, it is found in Anatolia in Turkey and from North Africa (Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia; Speight 2018), but the records from Turkey (Sarıbıyık 2014) are unconfirmed.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. It is not known if the species occurs in protected areas. There are no conservation actions needed currently. Further research about population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats of this species is needed. Monitoring of the population trends is also required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170290,149170288,Eumerus pauper,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

The European endemic species is known from a few localities in Spain, one locality in Greece, and from southern parts of European Russia. All records are from the mid-20th century or before, with some of them possibly being misidentified. Because of the small amount of data available, the species is classified as Data Deficient (DD). There is not enough information to classify the species in a threatened category. Additional research and monitoring are needed to determine if the species is still present in the localities from where it was recorded.

","According to Stackelberg (1961), this species was found beside rivers. The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.",There are no data about possible threats to this species.,"There are no data about the population size of this species, and its population trend is unknown. Research is required to establish whether it still exists in the known localities (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). All records are from the mid-20th century or before.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where is is known from a few localities in central and southern mainland Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), in one locality in Greece (van de Weyer and Dils 1999), and in southern parts of European Russia (Stackelberg 1961). There is also one record from the European part of Russia in the Ural Mountains (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2019). Records are possibly misidentified in some of these locations. Some uncertainties regarding its taxonomy are still present, and hence the range is not clearly known. Based on all available data, the area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is estimated to be 24 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is about 3,200,000 km2. In the EU 27, the area of occupancy (AOO) is 20 km2 while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is less than 500,000 km2. The species is found at six locations in Europe, while in the EU 27 there are five locations.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures in place for this species. It is unknown if the species occurs in any protected areas. Further research about taxonomy, population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends are required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149170311,149170309,Eumerus purpureus,Vulnerable,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This species is endemic to Europe, where it is restricted to the Canary Islands of Gran Canaria, Tenerife, La Palma, and Gomera. The most recent records of the species are from 2011. Intensive urban and tourism development and road construction, which specifically impact coastal areas, are causing a continuing decline and degradation of the species' habitat. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 8,521 km2, the area of occupancy (AOO) is 88 km2, and the species occurs in 10 to 12 locations. The species is therefore assessed as Vulnerable. The assessors use precaution to assess this species as Vulnerable at the moment, although if more than 10 locations are documented, the species will be assessed as Near Threatened.

Conservation of the species should be based on the protection of its habitat. Further research on population size, distribution, and trends and life history and ecology as well as the monitoring of the population trends might also help to preserve the species.

","This species is found in arid coastal areas on dry and stony ground covered with succulent shrub vegetation such as Euphorbia and the non indigenous Opuntia (G. Pennards pers. comm. 2019). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.","Intensive urban and tourism development and road construction are causing enormous habitat destruction, particularly for coastal and low-elevation ecosystems (WWF 2017).","There are no data about the population size of this species, and the population trend is unknown. Most of the records are from the last century, but there are a few records from 2011 collected on Tenerife (G. Pennards pers. comm. 2019).",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Gran Canaria, Tenerife, La Palma, and Gomera in the Canary Islands (Speight 2018). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 8,521 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) to be 88 km2. It occurs in 10 to 12 locations.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. Its habitat exists in some protected areas. Conservation should be based on the protection of its habitat. Further research on population size, distribution, trends, and life history and ecology as well as the monitoring of the population trends might also help to preserve the species.

It is found at the Anaga, Montes y cumbre, and Teno Birds Directive Sites in Tenerife, the Monteverde de Breña Alta in La Palma Habitats Directive Site, the Garajonay Habitat Directive Site in La Gomera, Tamadaba, and the Los Tilos de Moya Habitat Directive Sites in Las Palmas (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149170332,149170330,Eumerus ruficornis,Endangered,"B2ab(i,ii,iii)",2021,2020-04-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species has faced a drastic decline in Europe in recent decades because of the abandonment of traditional agricultural practices, such as hay cutting and grazing by livestock in autumn, which was strongly favoured by its presumed host plant. While the species used to be widespread in Europe, it has only been found at five to eight locations in Sweden, Romania, Bulgaria, and Italy in the last few decades. For this reason, and because of its restricted area of occupancy (AOO), which in Europe and the EU 27 is assessed to be 50-100 km2, the species is assessed as Endangered. In Europe and the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is about 1,150,000 km2. Outside of Europe, the species has been recorded in North Africa. The conservation of the species should be based on resource and habitat protection. Further research on the population size, distribution, and trends as well as threats might also help preserve this species. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required.

","The species prefers humid and unimproved lowland grassland at the edge of floodplains. It can be found beside flushes and seepages, and along river banks where Scorzonera humilis is present, in humid, unimproved, lightly-grazed, and seasonally-flooded grasslands. Adults are known to visit flowers of Potentilla erecta and Ranunculus (Speight 2020). Johansson (2011) provides evidence indicating that a larval host plant of the species is Scorzonera humilis.","Field studies suggest that this species is associated with Viper's-grass (Scorzonera humilis), still a fairly common plant on riverside pastures in the relevant area (Johansson 2011). However, the presumed host-plant is strongly threatened by the abandonment of old farming practices, such as cutting and extensive grazing in the late season. This relationship could help explain why the hoverfly has disappeared from most of Western Europe.","The population is assumed to be declining due to the fact that the species has not been recorded from most of its range for decades. There are only a few records from the 20th century. There has likely been a dramatic population decline due to the disappearance of its host plant, the Viper's-grass (Scorzonera humilis), in Western Europe (Johansson 2011). The remaining population is considered to be severely fragmented (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Decreasing,"Within the European region, this species is extant in Sweden, where it has recently been rediscovered (Johansson 2011), and it is also considered to be persist in northern Italy, eastern Bulgaria and in Romania. Its presence is uncertain in most parts of Europe despite the fact that it was once widespread across northern Europe, from France to parts of European Russia, and also in some west Mediterranean countries (Speight 2020). It is extinct in Denmark and the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005) and possibly extinct in Germany (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). Records from northern and central France are not reliable, given from how long ago they are. It was never recorded in central Europe (Speight 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is estimated to be between 50 and 100 km2. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is about 1,150,000 km2.

Outside of Europe, it has been recorded in North Africa.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"The species is listed as Extinct on the Czech Red List (Farkač et al. 2005), assessed as Critically Endangered in the German Red List (Ssymank et al. 2011), and as Endangered in Sweden (Gärdenfors et al. 2005, Artdatabanken 2020). It occurs at the Colli Berici Natura 2000 site in Italy and Dorohoi - Șaua Bucecei Natura 2000 site in Romania and Bosna in Bulgaria (European Environment Agency 2020). Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required. Conservation of this species should be based on resource and habitat protection. Further research on the population size, distribution and trends as well as threats might also help to preserve the species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170354,149170352,Paragus kopdagensis,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Within the European region, this subalpine grasslands and meadows species is only recorded from Serbia. It is assessed under Criterion B under Endangered due to its small extent of occurrence (EOO) of 70 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) of 8 km2 in Europe, the fact that it is only found in two locations, and because of a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat. The species habitat is threatened by overgrazing and by climate change, causing suitable habitat shifting. Resource and habitat protection is needed to preserve this species. Research on the species' population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of its population and habitat trends is needed. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from the subpopulations outside of Europe. As the species is not extant in the EU 27, it is assessed as Not Applicable (NA).

","The preferred environments of this species are humid, grazed, and subalpine grasslands and meadows. There are no data about the habitat and habits of adults, nor flowers visited. The flight period is from the end of June until August. The larva is zoophagous, hunting other invertebrates. The developmental stages have not been described yet (Speight 2018).","The typical habitat for this species is subalpine grasslands that are moderately grazed, but it is threatened by the destruction of this habitat by overgrazing (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). Considering that it is a mountain and subalpine species, climate change also posses a threat, causing the shifting of its suitable habitat.",There is no information about the population size or trends of this species. Most of the European records are more than 30 years old. One recent record is from Vlasina in Serbia from 2018 (T. Tot pers. comm. 2019).,Unknown,"In Europe, this species has only been recorded from two localities in eastern Serbia, close to the border with Bulgaria. In Europe, its area of occupancy is 8 km2, and extent of occurrence (EOO) about 70 km2, from just two locations. It is not present in the EU 27. It has been found between 610 and 1,695 metres above sea level.

Outside Europe, it has been found in Turkey (Hayat and Claussen 1997) and in the Caucasus Mountains in Russia.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no current conservation actions in place for this species. Resource and habitat protection are needed for its preservation. Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends. It is found in the Special Nature Reserve Stara planina and on Vlasina Landscape of Outstanding Features.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170376,149170366,Paragus oltenicus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

The species is known from a small number of records from southern France, northern Italy, north-eastern Greece, Romania, and Ukraine. The species is assessed as Vulnerable since it has a restricted geographic range in Europe with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 44 km2, is found at 10-12 locations, and has a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to deforestation and the loss of grassland. In the EU 27, the species occurs between eight and nine locations, has an area of occupancy (AOO) estimated to be around 36 km2 and has a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to deforestation and the loss of grassland. The extent of occurrence (EOO) for Europe is about 700,000 kmand for the EU 27 it is estimated to be about 350,000 km2. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from subpopulations outside of Europe. Further research on population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of the population trends are required.

","This species prefers inland and estuarine sand dunes (Stănescu 1992), tall-herb areas in open Quercus pubescens forest, and unimproved open grassland with scattered thickets of scrub Quercus pubescens (Speight 2018). In Italy, the species is also found in olive groves (D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2020). The larvae are predators, mostly of soft-bodied Homoptera. The developmental stages have not been described yet (Speight 2018).","Since this species appears to be associated with grassland patches inside forests, it is affected by a loss of grassland and deforestation (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

","

There is no information about the population size and trends for this species. It is recorded in low numbers in the places where it has been collected. The latest records in Europe are from 2000 in Greece and from 2006 in France, from the habitat types of macchia and ruderal vegetation. Records outside Europe, for example in Turkey, are more recent, from 2014 and 2016 (T. Tot pers. comm. 2020). 

",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species has a scattered known distribution. It is recorded from southern France, Italy (three localities from Tuscany, two of those in olive orchards; D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2020), north-eastern Greece, south-western Romania, and the Crimean Peninsula in Ukraine (Speight 2020). In Europe, it occurs at 10-12 locations with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 44 km2 and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 700,000 km2. In the EU 27, it occurs at 8-9 locations with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 36 km2 and an extent of occurrence (EOO) of about 350,000 km2. It has been found between 0 and 600 metres above sea level.

Outside Europe, it is found in Turkey, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and China (Speight 2020).",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. Site/area as well as resource and habitat protection are required for its preservation. Further research is required on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population trends. It occurs in a few Natura 2000 sites in Europe, such as at La plaine et le massif des Maures, Étang de Thau et lido de Sète à Agde, and Montagne de Lure in France and Limnes Kai Limnothalasses Tis Thrakis - Evryteri Periochi Kai Paraktia Zoni, and Koilada Filiouri in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170396,149170386,Paragus punctulatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The endemic European species is assessed as Least Concern because of its relatively large range across Europe and because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The preferred environment for this species is open ground, montane and Juniperus/Rhododendron/Vaccinium heath between 1,200 and 2,500 m in the Alps, Calluna/Vaccinium heath and unimproved montane grassland in northern Europe. The species is considered unthreatened across Europe; however, it can be threatened by the degradation of habitat quality in part of its range due to human activities such as tourism, infrastructure development and agriculture. The overall population is considered to be stable. Research on life history and ecology and threats as well as the monitoring of the population trends is required for the species.

","The preferred environment for this species is open ground, montane and Juniperus/Rhododendron/Vaccinium heath between 1,200 and 2,500 metres in the Alps, and Calluna/Vaccinium heath and unimproved montane grassland in Norway (T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2019). It flies extremely low and quite rapidly over the ground and among sparse vegetation. It is known to visit flowers of Calluna, Potentilla crantzi, Rhododendron, Saxifraga, and Vaccinium. Its flight period is from mid-June/July into August at higher altitudes and more northerly latitudes. The larvae are zoophagous, feeding on other invertebrates. The developmental stages have not been described yet, but they are quite possibly associated with dwarf shrubs, to judge by the habits of the adults (Speight 2018).","

This species is affected by the loss of habitat quality in some parts of its range due to tourism, infrastructure development and agriculture, but these threats do not influence the entire population, which remains stable as a result (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). 

","There is no information on the population size of this species, but the population seems to be stable, based on observations in the field (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). It is not very abundant in the places where it occurs, but it is widely distributed and recorded in many surveys across Europe (T. Tot pers. comm. 2019). It is easily distinguished from other Paragus species.",Stable,"

This species is endemic to Europe, distributed in Fennoscandia, southern Italy (Birtele et al. 2003), in the Alps in France, Germany, Switzerland, Italy, and Austria, in the Pyrenees Mountains in France and Spain, in the northern mountainous parts of Montenegro, in the Carpathians Mountains in Romania (Speight 2018), and in Hungary (Toth 2011). Speight et al. (2015) also list this species as found in Serbia, but the named locality administratively belongs to Montenegro. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.

",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species. It is considered unthreatened across Europe (Speight et al. 2015), although certain threats influence some of its subpopulations. It occurs in several protected areas, such as in the Durmitor National Park in Montenegro. Research is needed on the life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population trends. For now, no specific conservation actions are needed.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149170418,149170408,Pipizella bispina,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is European endemic, found in Spain, France, Italy, Austria, the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Hungary, Serbia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Romania. The species is an European endemic and occurs at higher altitudes. It is assessed as Endangered in Europe and the EU 27 since its area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be between 116 and 160 km2 in Europe and less than 100 km2 in the EU 27, its population is considered to be severely fragmented, and there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to land conversion and the improper management of grasslands and forests. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be about 1,035,300 km2 and in the EU 27 it is estimated to be less than 700,000 km2. Resource and habitat protection as well as research on the population size, distribution, trends and the monitoring of the population trends is recommended.

","This species prefers open forest ground, unimproved grasslands, open areas and heath within the upper levels of Spruce (Piceaforest (Speight 2020). It occurs at higher altitudes. Adults are known to visit white umbellifers (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020 in Speight 2020). The undescribed larva is assumed to feed on aphids occurring on trees, in galls, or under the ground, such as on the roots of plants.","The major threats to this species are habitat loss and fragmentation, due to land conversion for agriculture and the improper management of grasslands and forests (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data on the population trend of this species, but it is usually found in low numbers (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). It is not common and the population is considered to be severely fragmented.",Unknown,"This species is a European endemic, known from north-eastern Spain, south-eastern France, northern Italy, Austria, the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Hungary, Serbia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Romania (van Steenis and Lucas 2011, Speight 2020). In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be between 116 and 160 km2, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) about 1,035,300 km2. In the EU 27, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be less than 100 km2, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) less than 700,000 km2. It can be found at altitudes between 300 and 1,850 metres above sea level.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far; however, in Serbia the species is protected by law (Code on declaration and protection of strictly protected and protected wild species of plants, animals and fungi, “Official Gazette of RS”, no. 5/2010). It occurs in some Natura 2000 sites in Europe, such as at Le Mercantour and Sites à Spéléomantes de Roquebillière in France; Kokrháč - Hasištejn in the Czech Republic; Laghi di Suviana e Brasimone in Italy; Obere Drau in Austria; Kamniško - Savinjske Alpe in Slovenia; Zempléni-hegység a Szerencsi-dombsággal és a Hernád-völggyel in Hungary and Piemontul Făgăraș in Romania (European Environment Agency 2020). It is also found in the Durmitor National Park in Montenegro and National Parks Tara and Kopaonik in Serbia.

Resource and habitat protection as well as research on the population size, distribution, trends and the monitoring of the population trends is recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149170438,149170436,Eumerus karyates,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-14 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

The distributional range of the species is limited to the Peloponnese Peninsula and the species is considered to be endemic to Greece. Considering that the species is found in only two locations, that its area of occupancy (AOO) is 8 kmand extent of occurrence (EOO) is around 20 km2, and because of a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to overgrazing, the species is assessed as Endangered. Monitoring of the species' population and habitat trends is also required. Site and habitat protection are required, as well as protection legislation at a national level.

","The larvae presumably feed on plants, developing in bulbs or on other infested underground organs, like other species of the genus (Speight et al. 2020). It is found in typical Mediterranean shrubland, flying during May (Speight 2020). No further information about its ecology is known.",The main threat to the species is the destruction of its habitat from overgrazing (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).,"There is no information about the population size and trend. Only 10 records exist (Chroni et al. 2018), all of them from two localities in the Peloponnese region. In spite of many field investigations in this area, it has not been recorded again after its discovery in 2016, which implies it is rare.",Unknown,"This recently described species is only known from two point localities in the Peloponnese region in Greece, and it is considered endemic to this area (Chroni et al. 2018). The localities are about 20 km from each other. It may occur in other localities of the Peloponnese, but the chances are low since the species is quite large and conspicuous. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 20 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) at 8 km2. It was found between 900 and 1,200 m above sea level.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"Neither of the known localities occur within protected areas. There is still a very small amount of information about this recently described species. It is primarily threatened due to the destruction of its habitat as a consequence of overgrazing, and so in order to be able to plan future conservation measures, research about its population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats is needed (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is also required. Site and habitat protection are required, as well as protection legislation at a national level.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149170469,149170459,Eumerus hispidus,Vulnerable,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic species is restricted to the Madeira Archipelago, where it is known from two islands. It is found in open, dry, stony, and thinly-vegetated Madeiran landscapes up to the lower altitudes of the Laurisilva forest. The species is assessed since it has an extent of occurrence (EOO) of around 1,800 km2 and a small AOO (area of occupancy) of 128 km2, is only known between 10 and 15 locations, and has a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat. Expansion of invasive alien species and more frequent forest fires due to climate change as well as the construction of new roads are degrading its habitat. Further research is needed to determine whether this species should be included in a higher threat category. Further research is required to gain more knowledge about taxonomy, population size, distribution, trends, and threats affecting this species. Monitoring of the habitat trends is also needed. Raising awareness of rare and important species on the island and communication and protection of species at the national level are recommended conservation measures.","This species prefers open ground and open, dry, stony, thinly-vegetated Madeiran landscapes up to the lower altitudes of the Laurisilva forest (J.T. Smit pers. comm. in Speight 2018). It also has a preference for field margins and Eucalyptus plantation forest (Barkemeyer 1999). Adults are usually found on stones, rocks, branches or leaves and in direct sunlight. Very often they are found in large numbers around and on Euphorbia bushes (J.T. Smit pers. comm. in Speight 2018). Adults have been recorded visiting Crithmum maritimum (Gomez and Báez 1990) and Euphorbia (J.T. Smit pers. comm. in Speight 2018). The developmental stages have not been described yet, but the larvae must feed on plants, as do other similar species, possibly in Euphorbia (Speight 2018).","Expansion of invasive alien species and forest fires, which are more frequent due to climate change, as well as the construction of new roads, represent the major threats to the habitat (IUCN 1999).","There are no data about the population trends of this species. Based on a relatively large number of records, the assessors assume that it is not rare on the islands of Madeira and Porto Santo (Smit et al. 2004).",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Madeira and Porto Santo in the Madeira Archipelago in Portugal (Speight 2018). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be about 1,800 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) about 128 km2. It is known from 10 to 15 locations.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures in place for this species. Most of the population is distributed in the southern part of the island of Madeira, outside of Natura 2000 sites. Research is required to gain more knowledge about its taxonomy, population size, distribution, trends and threats. Monitoring of the habitat trends is also needed. Raising awareness of rare and important species on the island, and communication and protection of species at the national level, are the recommended conservation measures. There are only two records of the species inside the Natura 2000 sites, one in Maciço Montanhoso Central da Ilha da Madeira, and one in Ponta de S. Lourenço Habitats Directive Sites of Funchal on Madeira (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149170491,149170481,Eumerus hispanicus,Vulnerable,B1ab(iii),2021,2020-03-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

The species is endemic to the Iberian Peninsula and is classified as Vulnerable (VU) because it only occurs in fewer than ten locations, extending from Teruel to Alicante in mountainous Evergreen Oak forests and scrubland, which is severely affected by droughts and pathogens as well as logging, overgrazing, and fires. The species' habitat is thus experiencing a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is less than 20,000 km2. Research on the species' population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats is required to get more knowledge about this species. Further monitoring of the population trends is also required.

","This species can be found in forest and scrubland. In particular, it is found in Quercus ilex and Quercus rotundifolia forest, and maquis shrubland (Marcos-Garcia pers. comm. in Speight 2018).","Severe periods of droughts due to climate change and the reoccurrence of pathogens induce Evergreen Oak (Quercus ilex) decline. Mediterranean forests dominated by the Holm Oak (Quercus rotundifolia) have been strongly influenced by human activities during the last millennia by means of wood exploitation, species mixture modifications or substitution (such as with Aleppo Pine, Pinus halepensis), livestock grazing and fires (which have become more frequent due to climate change). All these disturbances have led to degradation, and in many cases Evergreen Oak forests have been completely replaced by agriculture and urban settlements (de Rigo and Caudullo 2016).","There are no data about the population trends for this species, but it may be locally common (A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"This species is endemic to eastern Spain, where it occurs in mountainous habitats from Teruel to Alicante (A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is expected to be less than 20,000 km2. The area of occupancy (AOO) is unknown. It is found in <10 locations",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"The species occurs within several Natura 2000 sites, such as at Sierra de Javalambre II and Serres de Mariola i el Carrascal de la Font Roja, Maigmó i Serres de la Foia de Castalla Aitana, and Serrella i Puigcampana (A. Ricarte pers. comm. 2020). There are no specific conservation measures in place for this species. Research on its population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats is required. Further monitoring of population trends is also required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149170512,149170510,Cheilosia thessala,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Based on the small area of occupancy (48 km2), a continuing decline in the quality of habitat due to degradation of Mediterranean forests, its typical habitat, and the fact that the population is severely fragmented due to habitat destruction, this species is assessed as Endangered. Protection of its areas and habitats is needed, as well as further research on its ecology, population trends and threats.

","This species prefers Mediterranean pine forests of Pinus pinaster and P. halepensis (Claussen and Ståhls 2007) and P. pinea/P. halepensis (Standfuss and Claussen 2007). It flies along forest edges and tracks within pine forest (Claussen and Ståhls 2007). Adults fly during September/October (Claussen and Ståhls 2007). The developmental stages have not been described, but the larva is probably associated with the large basidiomycetes Amanita caesarea and Suillus granulatus (Standfuss and Claussen 2007).","

The main threat to this species is destruction and degradation of Mediterranean forests. It is found mainly in Pinus forests; it survives in maquis, but not in garrigue. Wildfires represent a threat, and also people collecting fungi may affect the availability of the habitat of the larvae, but this requires confirmation (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

","

There is no information about population size for this species. More than 50 specimens have been collected so far. The population is considered to be severely fragmented, with many subpopulations small and isolated with no possible exchange of individuals (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). The most recent records are from 2017 (Croatia and Cyprus) and 2019 (Lesvos and Samos in Greece). 

",Unknown,"

This species is endemic to Europe. It was originally described based on specimens from the Thessaly region in Greece, but later was also found on some Greek islands (Lesvos, Samos, and Crete) and in the Peloponnese, as well as in Croatia and on Cyprus (Speight 2020). Surveys have been conducted in Montenegro, but no records were found there. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is around 482,474 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) around 48 km2. The species is found between 1 m and 1,345 m above sea level.

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species. Protection of areas and habitats is needed, as well as further research on its ecology, population trends and threats. Some of the point localities where it has been found are a part of the Natura 2000 network. Inclusion of this species in national legislation is needed, as well as the provision of enough undisturbed habitat (specifically the host fungi).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149170534,149170531,Cheilosia soror,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Cheilosia soror is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and for the EU27 Member States because it is widespread in both Europe and the EU 27. There is an ongoing decline in quality of habitat due to the human activities. Further research on its population and habitat trends is needed, as well as on its biology and ecology.","This species occurs in deciduous forest/evergreen broadleaved forest, often mature/overmature Fagus and Quercus forest, but including cork oak (Q. suber) forest and alluvial softwood forest of Salix/Populus. Adults are active in clearings, tracksides and hedgerows, usually in partial shade. They visits flowers of white umbellifers, Cirsium and Taraxacum. The flight period is from May to September with a peak in June/July. The larva is undescribed but reported as having been found in basidiomycetes, notably truffles (Speight 2018).","Possible local threats exist due to human impact such as logging, agriculture, urbanization, tourism and infrastructure development. Inappropriate forest management is also contributing to forest destruction within its range.","There is no information on population size or trends for this species. A lot of specimens (nearly 1,000) are known.",Unknown,"This species is distributed from Scandinavia south to North Africa, and from Britain (southern England) eastwards throughout most of Europe including Turkey, into Siberia and on to the Pacific coast, including Japan (Speight 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"Some localities of this species are within protected areas of the Natura 2000 network, but it is also found in Durmitor National Park in Montenegro and in several protected areas in Serbia (Fruska gora National Park, Djerdap National Park, Sar planina National Park, Tara National Park, and Deliblatska pescara Special Nature Reserve). Although these areas are protected, forest loss is ongoing within some of them due to inappropriate management. Further research on the population and habitat trends is needed, as well on its ecology.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170554,149170552,Cheilosia sootryeni,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Cheilosia sootryeni is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27 because its extent of occurrence and area of occupancy are above the thresholds for any threatened category, and it occurs in numerous locations. There is an observed decline in the quality of its habitat due to industrial development and poor forest management. Although assessed as Least Concern, its population outside Fennoscandia is severely fragmented and it should be considered as threatened in that part of range. Protection of its habitat is needed, as well as additional research on its ecology, population size and trends and habitat trends.","The preferred habitats of this species are forests: open areas in boreal Betula and Picea forest (Nielsen 1970) and western taiga (Nielsen 1998). Adults are known to visit the flowers of Anemone nemorosa, Ranunculus ficaria (Nielsen 1970), Caltha and Taraxacum (Bartsch et al. 2009). The flight period is mid-May to mid-June (Nielsen 1970). The developmental stages are undescribed.","The main threats to the habitat of this species are associated with industrial development (logging, oil and gas exploration) and poor forest management. Human-mediated disturbances have increased in boreal forests during recent years, resulting in extensive loss of forest in some regions, whereas other regions face heavy forest fragmentation or threat of exploitation (Bradshaw et al. 2009). The boreal region is warming twice as fast as the other parts of the world, and is already experiencing severe impacts from climate change (Burton et al. 2010; Park et al. 2014).",There is no information about population size or trends. There are more than 400 known specimens.,Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is distributed in Norway (Gammelmo and Nielsen 2008), Finland (Haarto and Kerppola 2014), Sweden, Latvia (Karpa 2008), Ukraine (G. Popov pers. comm. 2020) and northern parts of European Russia (Barkalov 2007).

Its range extends out of the European region to Asiatic Russia (Speight 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial," Cheilosia sootryeni is rated as Least Concern in Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019). There are no known conservation actions. Additional research on its ecology and population trends is needed, as well as monitoring habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170575,149170573,Cheilosia semifasciata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Cheilosia semifasciata is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27 due to its large extent of occurrence and large number of locations. There is a continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to poor forest management. Further research on its population and habitat trends is required.,"This species occurs in open ground/forest; stabilized scree slopes, cliffs and rock outcrops in sheltered locations up to 2,000 m, or within woodland at altitudes up to and including those of Alnus viridis scrub; drystone walls; and poorly-drained deciduous forest (Speight 2018). It can also occur in urban situations (Barkemeyer 1997). Schmid (2004) noted the frequent occurrence of C. semifasciata in suburban gardens in southwest Germany, using Sedum telephium as larval host. This author observed that the larvae could even be found in Sedum on traffic islands in the roads, and in seedlings on sale in garden supply shops. He concluded that it had sustainable subpopulations in the urban environment there. Adults fly low over ground vegetation and rock, settling on foliage or rock in the sun; the males hover up to 3 m in woodland glades or sheltered hollows in rocky terrain. The males seldom occur far from stands of the larval foodplant, and are often no more than a few metres from it. Adults visit flowers of Alliaria petiolata, Allium ursinum, Anemone nemorosa, Prunus spinosa, Ranunculus, male Salix, Taraxacum and Vaccinium myrtillus. The flight period is from the end March to the end May (Speight 2018). The larva was described and figured by Rotheray (1988), and illustrated in colour by Rotheray (1994). It is a miner in the leaves of Saxifraga, Sedum and Umbilicus (Hering 1957), and is shown within a leaf mine on Umbilicus by Ball and Morris (2013). It overwinters as a puparium (Speight 2018).",The main threat for this species is poor management across forests in Europe.,There is no information on population size or trends of this species. A lot of specimens and subpopulations are known.,Unknown,"This species is distributed from northern Norway and Finland south to the Pyrenees, and from Ireland eastwards through the mountainous parts of central Europe to Romania and Bulgaria (Speight 2018).",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"Cheilosia semifasciata is found in some protected areas that lie within the Natura 2000 network. It is also found in Durmitor National Park in Montenegro and Djerdap National Park, Fruska gora National Park, Kopaonik National Park and Tara National Park in Serbia. Further research is required, especially on its population and habitat trends and threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149170596,149170593,Cheilosia scutellata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a very widespread species, listed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27. A continuing decline in the quality of its habitat due to anthropogenic disturbance is likely. Further research on this species is needed, especially its biology and ecology, population size and trend.

","

This species is found in a wide range of types of forest, from northern European conifer forest to Mediterranean maquis, but not apparently associated with Betula, Fraxinus or Picea. Adults are frequently found on low-growing vegetation and bushes within woodland, in the dappled sunlight of small glades etc.; also along tracks and at the edges of clearings (Speight 2020). Flower visitation records are known from white umbellifers, Calluna, Chaerophyllum, Cirsium, Cistus, Crataegus, Galium, Hedera, Hieracium, Ranunculus and Sorbus. Adults are active from May until September and from April till October (or even November) in southern Europe. The larva is described and figured by Rotheray (1990), and is well-known for tunneling the tissues of various large woodland basidiomycete fungi, especially Leccinum, Boletus and Suillus.

","

Localized threats may exist due to general anthropogenic disturbance to forest habitats in Europe (deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanization).

",The population trend of this species is unknown. There are many known subpopulations across Europe.,Unknown,"

This species has a very wide distributional range, occupying the greater part of the Palaearctic. It is occurs from Fennoscandia south to the Iberian peninsula and around the Mediterranean to Greece, Turkey and North Africa, and from Ireland eastwards through Eurasia to the Pacific coast (Vujić 1996, Speight 2020).

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

Some localities are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and the Natura 2000 network: in Spain Grazalema National Park and Somiedo Natural Park; in Czechia Podyji National Park, in Greece in Olympus and Pindus National Parks, in Montenegro in Durmitor National Park, in North Macedonia National Park and in Serbia Fruška gora, Tara and Kopaoni National Parks and in special reserves. Anthropogenic disturbance can affect its habitats, so continuous management of sites is recommended. Further investigation of its population size, threats and ecology is needed. More monitoring of population and habitat trends is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170616,149170614,Cheilosia sahlbergi,Data Deficient,,2021,2021-06-20 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

This species occurs in northern Europe, the UK and part of eastern Europe. Taxonomic uncertainty makes its true distribution uncertain. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 272 km2 in Europe and 152 km2 in the EU27, which could bring this species close to being assessed as threatened, especially as a decline in quality of habitat can be projected.

However, it is particularly difficult to separate this species from C. grisella Becker, C. pubera (Zett.) and C. vangaveri (Timon-David), creating uncertainty evident for subpopulations in central Europe. More research is needed on its taxonomy, ecology, population trends and microhabitat requirements. The available data are inadequate to determine the degree of threat, and therefore the species is assessed as Data Deficient in Europe and the EU 27.

Research is needed regarding the taxonomy, population trends, ecology and threats of this species. Monitoring of the population and habitat are also needed.","This species occurs near streams and base-rich flushes in moorland/montane heath, or unimproved, thinly vegetated, non-calcareous subalpine grassland. Adults fly low and rather rapidly over ground vegetation, emerging immediately following snow-melt. They settle on rocks, stones and flowers in sheltered spots. Flower visitation records are known from Caltha palustris, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus spp., Saxifraga spp. (Speight 2020); Rhodiola rosea, and Geum montanum (X. Lair pers. comm. 2020). The flight period is April and May at lower elevations and June/beginning July in the alpine zone (Speight 2020). The larva is undescribed, but according to Stubbs and Falk (2002) has been observed by Rotheray to feed externally on the rootstock of Polygonum viviparum L.","Potentially, climate change has profound implications for hoverfly habitats especially in the northern parts of Europe, and it can be expected to lead to significant changes in the coming century. In northern Fennoscandia the predictions are for much wetter environments, which could be unfavourable for many of the hoverflies that occur there today. The species occurring in the northernmost parts of the continent cannot to move elsewhere. It remains unclear how serious this potential threat is to this particular species, and the timeframe over which this is likely to occur.",There is no population information for this species in Europe or the EU 27.,Unknown,"This species has a boreo-alpine distribution in Europe, distributed in the northernmost parts of Fennoscandia and north-west Russia, central European mountain regions, Bulgarian mountain regions, together with a few records from northern UK. Records from Baltic countries Latvia and Lithuania (Kuznetzov 1993, Karpa 2008) need to be confirmed. Outside of Europe this species exists in Russia.

Taxonomic uncertainty makes the true distribution of this species uncertain. The currently understood area of occupancy (AOO) is 272 km2 in Europe and 152 km2 in the EU27. The extent of occurrence is large in both regions.",This species is not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. Research is needed regarding the taxonomy, population trends, ecology and threats of this species. Monitoring of the population and habitat are also needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170636,149170634,Pipiza festiva,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27 because it is widespread and known from many localities. Climate change may affect a significant minority of its range over the next three decades. Further research is needed, especially into its biology and ecology.

","

This species prefers forest, alluvial forest and orchards. Adults are active from April/June to August/October, and are fast-flying, up to 3-4 m from the ground, around trees and shrubs; they are know to visit flowers of Hedera. The larvae have been described from some found feeding on gall-making aphids of the genus Pemphigus on Populus (Speight 2018). Dussaix (2013) records duration of the puparial phase as 2-3 weeks.

","

According to the CCSM4 climate model, this species may lose up to 44% of current its distributional area by 2050, mostly in central and eastern Europe (Milić et al. 2019).

","There is no information about population size for this species. In the places where it occurs, there seem to be relatively well-established subpopulations.",Unknown,"

Within the European region, this species is distributed from Belgium and the Netherlands south to the Mediterranean, and from France eastwards through southern and central Europe to European Russia (Vujić et al. 2013, Speight 2018).

The range extends out of the European region to the Caucasus and on through Russia to as far as the Pacific (Vujić et al. 2013, Speight 2018).

",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"

Approximately 50% of point localities lie within protected areas in the Natura 2000 network. The locality in Montenegro lies within Durmitor National Park and in Serbia it has been recorded from Fruska gora National Park, as well as one point locality within Vrsacke planine Natural Park. Increasing urbanization continues to cause forest degradation and disturbance of its habitats, so continuous management of sites is recommended. Further research on its population size, threats and ecology is needed. More monitoring of population and habitat trends is required.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170659,149170654,Pipiza notata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27 because it is widespread, known from many localities and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. A continuing decline in the quality of its habitat, and conversion of forest area is likely at local scales, Although distributed throughout Europe, further research is needed, especially into its biology and ecology.

","

This species prefers track-sides and tall herb open areas in acidophilous Quercus forest. Adults fly around and through forest margin vegetation of shrubs and bushes, settling on foliage at 1-3 m. Adults are active in May and June and have been recorded visiting Ranunculus flowers (Speight 2018). The developmental stages are undescribed, but Dussaix (2005) reports rearing what may be this species from larvae collected on Prunus avium feeding on a leaf-rolling aphid.

","

The most plausible threat is a decline in the quality of the habitat of this species due to anthropogenic interference (deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanisation, tourism). A loss of up to 25% of its distribution was predicted under BCC_CSM1.1, HadGEM2-ES and CCSM4 climate models by 2070 using species distribution models (Milić et al. 2019).

","

There is no information about population size and trend for this species. In the places where it occurs, there seem to be relatively well-established populations. Records from 1905 to the present have been used.

",Unknown,"This species is distributed throughout Europe, except for the Iberian peninsula and southern Europe. It is endemic to Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.",There is no known use of or trade in this species.,Terrestrial,"More than 50% of known localities are within protected areas categorized by the IUCN and Natura 2000 network. In Montenegro it is known from sites within Durmitor National Park. In Serbia some subpopulations are within national parks and natural parks. Anthropogenic factors can disturb its habitats, so continuous management of sites is recommended. Further investigation of its population size, threats and ecology is needed. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149170682,149170675,Eumerus argyropus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-14 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is assessed as Least Concern since it has a large range and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. The species prefers forest and open ground. While the species usually occurs in natural unimproved ecosystems, frequent fires caused by human negligence and climate change as well as overgrazing in grasslands pose a threat to its habitat. Further research into its life history and ecology and threats as well as monitoring of the population trends is needed.

","The species prefers forest and open ground. It is found in dry Pinus matorral shrubland and semi-arid, stony, unimproved grassland. It is also found in hedgehog heath and field margins (Speight 2018). Van Steenis et al. (2019) stated that the species could be ""...most abundantly found along the Appides stream in the Troodos Mountains on Cyprus flying through the vegetation, sometimes close to Naked Ladies (Colchicum) flowers"".",Frequent fires caused by human negligence and climate change as well as overgrazing in montane grasslands pose a threat to this species (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). No immediate conservation actions are required.,"There are no data on the population trends of this species, but the species is assumed to be stable in the EU 27 and in Europe. It is observed to be common in Mediterranean habitats (Grković et al. 2015).",Stable,"The species is found in central and southern Spain (including the Balearic Islands), Mediterranean and sub-Mediterranean parts of France, the Rhone valley in Switzerland, mainland Italy and Sardinia, the Balkan states, Greece (mainland, Crete and the eastern Aegean), Cyprus, Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine and the European part of Turkey.

Outside of Europe, it is also found in the Caucasus Mountains (Speight 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of the species in the EU 27 and in Europe are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"The species is protected under the Serbian legislation (Code on declaration and protection of strictly protected and protected wild species of plants, animals and fungi, “Official Gazette of RS”, no. 5/2010). There are no other known conservation actions and no immediate conservation actions are required. Further research about its life history, ecology and threats, as well as monitoring of population trends are required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170702,149170698,Eumerus armatus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-14 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

The species is a Mediterranean species that in the European region is found on the eastern Mediterranean islands including Cyprus. The species prefers rocky and sparsely vegetated ground. It is assessed as Vulnerable for Europe and for the EU 27 Member States since it has a very restricted geographic range in Europe and EU 27 with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 48 km² and it only occurs in six locations. There is also a continuing decline in the quality of the species' habitat due to human pressure on Mediterranean ecosystems and because of the impact of fire, which is increased due to climate change. It is unknown whether there is a rescue effect from subpopulations outside the assessment region.","The species prefers rocky and poorly vegetated ground, and can be found in old quarries or on roadside vegetation (Ricarte et al. 2012). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies occur in fleshy parts of bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages of this species.","The Mediterranean Basin is one of the most fire-prone regions in the world and due to climate change, forest fires are expected to become more frequent and have a higher impact on the subpopulations. Other main threats are overgrazing and the development of the tourism industry, which has exposed areas of the coastline to intense pressure from land-use change (CEPF 2010).","There is no information about the population size of the species and the current population trend in Europe. In the places where it occurs, there seems to be relatively well-established subpopulations (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is restricted to Cyprus and the eastern Aegean islands (Rhodes, Lesvos and Samos) of Greece close to Turkey (Ricarte et al. 2012, Grković et al. 2015). In Europe and in the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 80,132 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) around 48 km2. It is found in six locations.

Its range extends out of Europe to 
southwest Anatolia in Turkey (Ricarte et al. 2012, Grković et al. 2015). It is found between 0 m and 520 m above sea level.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far but site and resource protection are recommended. The species occurs in some point localities within Greek Natura 2000 sites such as on the island of Lesvos in Voreia, Kolpos Geras, and Eli Ntipi Kai Charamida sites and on the island of Samos in Oros Kerketefs - Mikro Kai Megalo Seitani - Dasos Kastanias Kai Lekkas, Akr. Katavasis - Limenas sites (European Environment Agency 2020).

Site and area protection as well as resource and habitat protection are the conservation actions needed for this species. Further research about taxonomy, population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, and threats is needed. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170730,149170720,Eumerus aurofinis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-10-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is a Mediterranean species that in the European region is found on three eastern Aegean Greek islands. It is assessed as Endangered (EN) because it has a very restricted geographic range in Europe with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 68 km2, and is found in five locations, all located on fragile Mediterranean island ecosystems. There is also a continuing decline in the quality of the species' habitat due to forest fires as a result of climate change, overgrazing, and the development of the tourism industry, which has exposed areas of coastline to intense pressure from land-use change, such as vineyards expansion (CEPF 2010). There are less than 50 findings of this species so far, all recorded after 2010. Area, resource and habitat protection and habitat and natural process restoration are conservation actions needed. Targeted research is necessary to assess the population size and gather more information about this species' taxonomy, population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats. It is unknown if there is a rescue effect from populations outside the assessment area.

","

The species is generally found in clearings in forests, but has also been found near the edges of vineyards (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The host plant is unknown, but is probably restricted in its distribution. The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies occur in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records for the larval stages for this species. 

","

The Mediterranean Basin is one of the most fire-prone regions in the world and due due to climate change, forest fires are expected to become more frequent and have a higher impact. Other main threats are overgrazing and the development of the tourism industry, which has exposed areas of coastline to intense pressure from land-use change, such as vineyards expansion (CEPF 2010). 

","

There is no information about population size for this species, since all findings are from 2010 and later, but it is considered rare based on fewer than 50 findings in total, despite regular monitoring (Grković et al. 2015, Vujić et al. 2020).

",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is found on the eastern Mediterranean islands of Lesvos, Samos, and Rhodes in Greece. In Europe and the EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 6,634 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) around 68 km2. It is estimated to occur in only five locations. It is found from sea level up to 700 m above sea level.

Outside of Europe, the species is found in the Muğla and Bozdağ Mountains in southwestern Anatloia in Turkey (Grković et al. 2015). It is a recently described species and may be found in other areas, but it is typically eastern Mediterranean. It is a relatively large and conspicuous species which has been regularly monitored since 2010.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. It occurs at Natura 2000 sites on Lesvos (Paraktioi Ygrotopoi Kai Kolpos) and Samos (Oros Ampelos (Karvounis), Oros Kerkis, and Oros Kerketefs ) (European Environment Agency 2020). Area, resource and habitat protection, and habitat and natural process restoration, are the conservation actions needed. Further research about taxonomy, population size, distribution, trends, life history and ecology, and threats of this species is needed.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170752,149170739,Eumerus barbarus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Within the European region, the species is found in the Mediterranean Basin around Portugal, Spain, France, Italy, and Malta. It species prefers forest habitats along seasonal rivers and streams. It is assessed as Least Concern because of its relatively large range and presumably stable population. The species usually occurs in natural unimproved ecosystems and is probably affected by habitat loss. Further research into the species' taxonomy, population, distribution and trends and threats is needed.

","The species prefers forest habitats along seasonal rivers and streams in open maquis of Cistus florida and Quercus pyrenaica, a scrubland vegetation of the Mediterranean region, and lentisc scrub. It is also found around the edge of wetlands such as marshes, and in open ground of sparsely-vegetated, unimproved dry grasslands. In forests, it is found in Olea europaea maquis with thickets of Opuntia ficus indica. Adults fly low over ground vegetation. They settle on bare ground, visit umbellifers (Speight 2018) and other plants such as Chrysanthemum (Ebejer 1988), Hedera and Thapsia (Marcos-Garcia 1985). Early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records of the larval stages of this species.","This Mediterranean species is affected by land degradation due to overgrazing, urban tourism development, and frequent fires caused by human negligence and climate change (CEPF 2010).","There are no data about population trends for this species, but its population is presumably stable for now, based on observations (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is known from southern mainland Portugal, Spain (mainland and the Balearic Islands), the Mediterranean coast of France and peninsular Italy, and the Mediterranean islands of Corsica, Sardinia, Sicily, and Malta.

Outside of Europe, it is found in North Africa, from Morocco to Egypt, as well as in Lebanon (van Steenis et al. 2017, Speight 2018). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and in the EU 27 are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions have been implemented for this species so far. Further research into its taxonomy, population, distribution and trends, and threats is needed. Monitoring of the population trends is also required. Currently, no conservation measures are needed to preserve this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170773,149170761,Eumerus grandis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species prefers dry pine forests and large grassland area. It is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and EU 27 Member States in view of its wide distribution, but it is very rare and may be Endangered in some parts of its range, so populations need to be monitored and species' habitats should be protected. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species in Europe and EU 27 is significantly greater than the value for the application of a threatened category. The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and EU 27 is unknown. Further research into the population size, distribution, trends and threats to this species is needed. The species is considered to be Regionally Extinct in Germany and Endangered in Sweden.

","This species prefers dry Pinus salzmanni forest, herb-rich open areas in Abies and Fagus forests, and Pinus and Fagus forests, up into the Pinus uncinata zone in the Pyrenees (Speight 2018). Adults have been recorded visiting Sedum album (Bartsch et al. 2009) and Peucedanum cervaria (Ssymank and Lair 2014). In Slovenia, it is found in large grassland areas with flower-rich calcareous meadow with some scrub encroachment, with Fagus sylvaticus and Picea abies forests in the vicinity (van Steenis et al. 2013). The female has been observed ovipositing on the basal leaves of withered plants of Laserpitium latifolium (Sjöberg 2015). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records of larval stages of this species.","The species could be threatened in some parts of its range, for example in southern Germany where it is considered to be Regionally Extinct. It is under threat from habitat loss due to urbanization, inadequate forest management, and frequent droughts as a consequence of climate change (EEA 2016).","There are no data about the population trends for this species. It is rare, but may be locally common (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"This species is known from southern Finland eastwards through central Europe, Switzerland, Austria, Italy, Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Montenegro, and Romania. In France it is known from the Alps, the Cevennes, the Pyrenees, and also from the mountainous parts of northern Spain (Speight 2018). In Greece it is known only from Mount Olympus (Vujić et al. 2020). It was found in southern Germany, but is considered to be extinct there now (Ssymank et al. 2011). Outside of Europe, the species is recorded from the Transcaucasia region in Armenia, and supposedly in Mongolia and China. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe and EU 27 is significantly greater than the value for the application of a threatened category. The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is unknown.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures in place for this species; however, site and area protection is needed. It is listed as extinct according to the German Red List (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Sweden, the species is assessed as Endangered (Artdatabanken 2020). Further research into its population size, distribution, trends and threats is needed. Monitoring of the population trends is also required. Some of the locations where the species occurs are included in the Natura 2000 network, such as at Julijci and Krimsko hribovje - Menišija in Slovenia, Domogled - Valea Cernei and Porțile de Fier in Romania and Koryfes Orous Vora and Oros Olympos in Greece (European Environment Agency 2020). It is also found in the Kopaonik National Park in Serbia and in at least two national parks in Montenegro - Prokletije and Durmitor.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170908,149170905,Blera eoa,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

Blera eoa is only known in Europe from three different localities, one in Sweden, one in Finland and one from European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 311,000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 8 km2 in EU 27 and 12 km2 in Europe.

There are only three records available of the species. The species is very restricted, and based on habitat loss from agriculture and land use change, it is considered to occur at three locations (two in EU 27), with influx from other subpopulations not expected. In addition, although the population trend is unknown, but there is considered to be a decline in the quality and extent of its forest habitats. Therefore, this species is assessed as Endangered for both Europe and the EU 27.

The species may be under-recorded in European Russia, and there is potential for influx from larger subpopulations in the east of Russia, but this is not currently known. The species would benefit from further research and habitat protection.","

The preferred environment of this species is forest, specifically humid pine forest (Pinus sylvestris) (Peterrsson and Bartsch 2001) with overmature trees, and taiga. The male of this species has been collected from resting on the trunk of an old, living Salix caprea (Kerppola and Raekunnas 2012). The only place where this species was found in the Nordic countries, was a multi-hundred-year-old pine forest where window traps were placed in a very warm, south-facing and sandy areas. In Siberia, the species is found mainly in mountain forests of Pinus cembra (Swiss pine) at an altitude of about 1,600 m asl, along with Blera fallax and some other Blera spp. There, the fly visits flowers of Rosa acicularis, the herb Potentilla fragariodides and the Gingeral maple Acer tataricum subsp. ginnala. It is also known to visit the flowers of Rhododendron aureum (Gritskevich 1998), Rhododendron dauricum (Barsukova 2012), Rosa acicularis, Potentilla fragarioides, and Acer tataricum (Bartsch et al. 2009). The flight period of this species is June and July. The developmental stages are currently not described, although it is most likely that the larvae develop in wet cavities in stumps and roots of coarse, blown pine.

Due to agriculture and land use change, there is considered to be a decline in the quality and extent of the habitat.

","There is not much information on the threats regarding this species, due to the fact there are very few sightings of it in Europe. Likely threats are loss of habitat, breeding sites and big trees through agriculture, habitat destruction, and change in land use. Also climate change might trigger a shift in the habitat, forcing the species to move.","This is mainly an eastern Palearctic species, and so there are only three records in Europe, one from Sweden, one from Finland and one from Karelia in European Russia. The current population trend of this species in Europe is unknown in both Europe and the EU 27. The species is rare, but probably under-recorded in the eastern part of European Russia.

",Unknown,"

This species is found in Europe in northern Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020), northern Finland and European Russia (Ichige Barkalov 2017). The only finding of this species in Sweden is a female from the Paskatieva nature reserve in Norrbotten. A survey of the distribution of the species could be done by systematically searching for larvae and pupae in hollow stumps, in the same way that they were looking for B. fallax in Scotland (Rotheray 2012). In Finnish collections of the genus Cheilosia, a female from Russian Karelia was found, so originally misidentified.

Outside of Europe, this species is known from northern Asia from the Novosibirsk region to Kamchatka and Sakhalin, and it is found in Japan in Hokkaido and Honshu (Speight 2020). In Finland, this species has been only found once in a place called Liikasenvaara, in Kuusamo, close to the Russian border in 2011 (FinBif 2018).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 311,000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 12 kmfor Europe. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 8 km2 and the AOO is estimated to be around 8 km2. Based on loss of habitat through the threats of agriculture, and change in land use, this species is considered to occur at three locations.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are currently known to be in place, although in Sweden the species does occur in a protected area. Actions should be focusing on the protection of the habitat and research on the population dynamics, biology and ecology of the species. In Sweden, this species was assessed as Endangered (EN) (Artdatabanken 2020), and was Not Evaluated (NE) in Finland (FinBif 2018).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170919,149170916,Callicera aenea,Vulnerable,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2019-09-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

Callicera aenea has a patchy distribution across Europe, which is not fully understood due to historical confusion with C. aurata. The estimation for the extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is around 6 million km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 848 km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 3.4 million km2, and the AOO is estimated to be around 720 km2. Although the current estimates of EOO for Europe and the EU 27 are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a very fragmented distribution. The species is dependent on a habitat that is rare in economically exploited woodlands making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. The current population trend is considered to be declining, so the species is listed as Vulnerable under Criterion B for Europe and EU27.

Older records need to be clarified (verify old collections, look into genetics) to verify taxonomy. The taxonomic problems are probably solved for the western and northern parts of its range, but more clarity is needed in the central and eastern parts of its range. More research should be done, for example starting with examination of all old material in musea from this part of Europe.

","

The preferred environment of this species is forest, specifically ancient Fagus/Picea forest with overmature and senescent trees, toward the upper altitudinal limit of Fagus, plus Fraxinus forest in Scandinavia (Bartsch pers. comm. 2019). In Ukraine, this species is found in mixed forests with Scottish Pine and oak (Quercus robur) and also deciduous Q. robus and maples (Acer campestris and Acer platanoides). Acer is a very good rot hole tree, it easily develops rot holes with nice structure and content. Other trees especially oak take much more time to develop rot holes (van de Meutter pers. comm. 2019). Adults are primarily arboreal, but males are known to hover at 2 to 3 m from the ground, in clearings and at woodland edge. Some males will hilltop. 

Flowers visited by this species include white umbellifers; Crataegus sp., Rhododendron aureum, Rosa canina.

The flight period is from May to September, with the peak during May and June (June and July in Scandinavia), plus April in central Europe.

The developmental stages have not been described, but this species has been seen emerging from a small tree hole in Acer campestre (G. Popov pers. comm. 2019).

In western Europe, this species seems to be found in low altitude mountainous regions, possibly because this coalesces with forest distributions (van de Meutter pers. comm. 2019) and in eastern parts also in the lowlands. In the Czech Republic and Ukraine, this species is found in low altitude mountains (up to 1,000 m) and lowlands.

","Threats to this species include the usual anthropogenic influences in forests (logging, cattle grounds, human settlement) which causes loss of habitat and reduce suitable breeding sites. Acer is readily used by larvae but is not a commercial tree and so it has only a patchy distribution because it is not featured in any forestry management. This restricts the available habitat for this hoverfly species.","Like all species in the genus Callicera, this hoverfly is not easy to find and is rare throughout its range, probably because the adult insect is mainly arboreal and descends only to drink or visit flowers. The species rarely visits flowers which makes detection difficult, but males hover low and which makes them more easy to detect (for a Callicera). There seems to be a clear and continuing decline of the species in Europe. It was only recently recorded in western Europe. In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"

This known distribution of this species is patchy due to confusion with C. aurata until recently; but the species can be confirmed from Norway, Sweden, Poland, the Czech Republic, France (Vosges, Alps - Isere, Massif Central) and various parts of Germany through central Europe into the Jura, the Alps (Switzerland, Austria) and on into Ukraine (except Crimea) (Zimina 1986, Prokhorov and Popov 2018) and east into Siberia and on to the Pacific (Sakhalin) (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 868 km2. The species could be more widespread than thought because it is not easily observed. Not all citations from literature could be found as exact localities for making the distribution map.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No specific conservation measures are currently in place for this species. However, as the species is associated with trees that occur in unprotected managed forests, it would benefit from a number of protected sites within these areas to ensure protection of this hoverfly. Only one site is known to be protected Ukraine, in a National Park close to Kiev (Popov pers. comm. 2019).Monitoring should be done on habitat and population trends. Research on the taxonomic status is necessary, as well as the ecology and biology of the species.

Older records need to be clarified (verify old collections, look into genetics) to verify taxonomy. The taxonomic problems are probably solved for the western and northern parts of its range, but more clarity is needed in the central and eastern parts of its range. More research should be done, for example starting with examination of all old material in museums from this part of Europe.

This species is considered Endangered in some regional assessment, such as Baden-Württemberg (Doczkal et al. 2001) and Niedersachsen (Stuke et al. 1998) in Germany, and on the German red list it is listed as vulnerable (Ssymank et al. 2011). But one may argue the basis on which they are assessed (van de Meutter pers. comm. 2019). It also is included in the list of threatened species of Sweden (Cederberg et al. 2010), and Czech Republic (Farkac et al. 2005). It is also on the Polish Red List as Near Threatened (Palaczyk et al. 2002).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170951,149170927,Callicera aurata,Vulnerable,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2020-01-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

Callicera aurata
 is a widespread species found in many European countries, but is not found regularly. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.3 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2,016 km2. The EOO for the EU 27 is around 4.6 million km2, but the AOO is just 752 km2. Although the current estimates of EOO for Europe and the EU 27 are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a very fragmented distribution. The species is dependent on a habitat that is rare in economically exploited woodlands making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. The current population trend is considered to be declining, so the species is listed as Vulnerable under Criterion B for Europe and EU27. But conversely it may be more widespread than thought because it is difficult to detect, as is the case for all the species in this genus, and there is some uncertainty around the true distribution, due to historical confusion with C. aenea. Further studies are needed into the taxonomy, abundance, trends, ecology and threats to this species, in particular to verify older records.","

The preferred environment of this hoverfly is deciduous forest; ancient Fagus/Quercus forest with over mature and senescent trees, including thermophilous Quercus forest. 

Adult are primarily arboreal, descending rarely to feed at flowers or to visit streams to drink; descends to drink in dappled sunlight at the margin of streams within the canopy of old forest; occasionally females can be found at great distance from forest (Speight 2017, 2020). 

Flowers visited by this species include Calluna, Dipsacus fullonum, Filipendula, Hedera, Rosa (including Rosa canina - D. Levy pers. comm. 2019), Succisa; Crataegus (Bygebjerg 2002); Hypericum, Rubus fruticosus and Verbascum (Ssymank 2012).

Its flight period is from the end of May to mid October, with most records in July and September.

The larvae are described and figured by Rotheray (1991), from larvae collected from a rot-hole high (18 m above ground) in an old Fagus in ancient forest. The general appearance of the larva and puparium is shown in the coloured photos provided by Dussaix (2013). Dussaix (2005) reared the species from small, water-filled cavities in Fagus and Quercus. Reared from rot-holes in Fraxinus angustifolia by Ricarte (2008) and Betula (Perry 1997). Distinguished from larvae of some related species in the key provided by Rotheray and Perry (1994). Dussaix (2013) records that the puparial phase lasts nearly three weeks and confirms that overwintering occurs as a larva.

","Although widespread throughout its distribution, this species might be impacted by all kinds of possible threats due to continuous anthropogenic interference, major threats such as deforestation (especially the loss of overmature and veteran trees), logging, agriculture, urbanisation and future threats like climate changes (fire).","The adults are mainly arboreal and are usually only found when they come down to drink or visit flowers, and so the hoverfly is easiest to find when it is a larva. The population trend is therefore difficult to estimate, but in general for the moment the species seems to be in decline, and it may be affected by anthropogenic activities in bigger parts of its range. In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"

The distribution of this species can only be stated provisionally, due to confusion with Callicera aenea. The species is thought to be widespread, occurring from southern Norway, Sweden, Denmark (Bygebjerg 2002) and Britain south to the Mediterranean and central Spain, including most of France; east through central and southern Europe with records from Germany, Switzerland (Petremand et al. 2017), Italy, the former Yugoslavia, Greece and Turkey. According to Zimina (1986) (as Callicera zhelochovtsevi), this species is also from Albania Ukraine (the Crimea), and southern parts of European Russia.

The species extends out of the European region to and Caucasus and on to Azerbaijan (Zimina 1986, Speight 2020). 

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.3 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2,016 km2. The EOO for the EU 27 is around 4.6 million km2, but the AOO is just 752 km2. Not all citations from the literature as seen in the occurrence could be found as exact localities for making the distribution map.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no direct conservation measures known. Further studies are needed into the taxonomy, abundance, trends, ecology and threats to this species, in particular to verify older records. As this species is also associated with trees that occur in unprotected managed forests, a number of protected sites within these areas are recommended to ensure protection of this hoverfly. In Denmark, the species is on the Red List as Data Deficient (Bygebjerg 2004, 2019). In Norway it is assessed as VU (Artsobservasjoner 2020), and as Near Threatened in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). In the United Kingdom, this species is considered Nationally Scarce (Ball and Morris 2014). In Germany it is assessed as Critically Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170961,149170959,Callicera fagesii,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2020-01-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

Callicera fagesii
 has a large EOO throughout western and southern Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in both Europe and the EU 27 is estimated to be around 3.7 million km2. The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is estimated to be around 516 km2, and around 508 km2 in the EU 27. However, adults are not easily observed, and therefore there is some uncertainty regarding the true distribution and population size of this species. Although the current estimates of EOO for Europe and the EU 27 are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a severely fragmented distribution. The species is dependent on a habitat that is rare in economically exploited woodlands making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. The current population trend is considered to be declining, so the species is listed as Endangered under Criterion B for Europe and EU 27.

The species would benefit from protected sites that have especially overmature and old trees to ensure its protection.","

The preferred environment for this species is deciduous forest, particularly ancient Fagus/Quercus forest with overmature and senescent trees and alluvial hardwood forest; also along ravines of seasonal streams where Fraxinus and old Acer are present, within drier types of forest, for example Salzmann pine forest (Speight 2017, 2020). The hoverfly can be abundant in Quercus pubescens forest where old Acer are frequent. Findings in Germany and western France indicated that this species was associated with waterside trees like Alnus, Fraxinus or Populus (Dziock 1999). There was also a finding in a private garden, feeding on Hedera sp. (M. do Carmo pers. comm in Van Eck 2016)

Adult are primarily arboreal, descending to feed at flowers of sub-canopy trees and to visit edges of streams in the afternoon or evening - or even the wet mud of a drying stream bed or rain puddle in a track, to drink. During the spring, adults may sometimes be found sunbathing on the foliage of large-leaved plants, including tall herbs like Heracleum

Flowers visited by this species include Hedera, Quercus ilex, Sorbus aria, and Anthriscus sylvestris. It has also been found on Prunus dulcis and Pyrus spinose (Vujić 2019).

The flight period is from the beginning of April to the end of June, with females continuing to mid July. 

The larvae are unknown, but possibly associated with waterside trees like Alnus, Fraxinus, Populus or Salix. The female of this species has been seen ovipositing on the trunk of a large Populus showing lesions on its trunk (W. Renema pers. comm. 2019) and in small, water-containing rot-holes in the trunk of an old, live, river-edge Fraxinus ornus (M. de C. Williams pers. comm. 2019).

","This species may be impacted in some areas of its range by deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanisation and supposedly climate changes (droughts and fire), but there are currently no major direct threats at the moment. That is besides the usual threats that forest dwelling species in Europe always have to face since forests in Europe have been in decline for already several hundred years.","Information on the subpopulations of this species is difficult to obtain, as the hoverfly is not easy to observe or catch. The adults are mainly arboreal and are usually only found when they come down to drink or visit flowers. As is the case for other species in the genus, it is probably easier to find as a larva. This species is likely to be affected by the usual human impact in European forests, and there is a steady decline in the population trend for both Europe and the EU 27. In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"

This is a widespread species throughout mainly western and southern Europe. This species has been confirmed from the Netherlands, Belgium, northwestern France (south to the Mediterranean, including the Pyrenees), Germany, Portugal, Spain (Cadiz), Italy (including Sardinia and Sicily), Greece, Cyprus (van Eck pers. comm. 2020), the former Yugoslavia, and Turkey (Zimina 1986, Speight 2020).

The range extends out of Europe to Türkmenistan (Zimina 1986, Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in both Europe and the EU 27 is estimated to be around 3.7 million km2. The area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe is estimated to be around 516 km2, and around 508 km2 in the EU 27. Not all citations from the literature as seen in the occurrence could be found as exact localities for making the distribution map.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are currently no direct conservation measures in place for this species. Conservation actions needed are protection of suitable habitat locations and awareness for establishing protection. Further research is needed into the taxonomy, abundance, trends, ecology and threats to this species. The species would benefit from protected sites that have especially overmature and old trees to ensure its protection. In Germany, the species is on the Red List as Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170972,149170970,Callicera rufa,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-01-14 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

Callicera rufa
 has a large range throughout western and southern Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 4.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 688 km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 3.5 million km2 and the AOO is estimated to be around 444 kmAlthough it was previously considered to be very rare, this is now not considered to be the case, and it is known that the species is actually just difficult to observe, particularly as an adult. But even so the population is still considered to be strongly fragmented. Although the current estimates of EOO for Europe and the EU 27 are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a very fragmented distribution even when it is seen more nowadays, see the distribution map. The species is dependent on a habitat that is rare in economically exploited woodlands making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. The current population trend is considered to be declining, so the species is listed as Vulnerable for Europe and Endangered for the EU 27.

Further studies are needed into the taxonomy, abundance, trends, ecology and threats to this species. Because this species is also associated with trees that occur in unprotected managed forests, it would benefit from a number of protected sites within these areas.","

This species is found in conifer forest, particularly ancient Pinus sylvestris forest with overmature and senescent trees (Speight 2017, 2020). It has also been collected in P. pinaster and Abies alba forest (J-P.Sarthou pers. comm. 2019). In Scotland, records are widely dispersed in the Scottish Highlands, within native pinewoods and plantations (Rotheray and MacGowan 2000).

Adults are primarily arboreal, but females descend to visit the freshly cut stumps of old pine trees in the sun in small forest clearings, or to visit rot-holes. Males have been observed resting on the trunks and branches of more-or-less isolated pines in the sun, at heights of from 2.5 m to 15 m above the ground (N. Jones pers. comm. 2019). The species has been known to visit the flowers of Ranunculus repens (Kormann 1993). The flight period of this species is from mid May to August.

The larvae are described and figured by Coe (1938); puparium described by Coe (1939), from larvae collected from deep, standing-water tree-holes in old, living Pinus sylvestris. Rotheray (2013) observed that as water in a rot-hole reaches a temperature at which it freezes, the larva emerges from the water and remains on the side of the rot-hole. or on the water surface. The larva is illustrated in colour by Rotheray (1994). Development can apparently take one to three years. MacGowan (1994) also reports rearing this species from a standing-water rot-hole in a mature Larix, and shows that cutting artificial rot-holes in living P. sylvestris can provide sites in which the hoverfly can develop successfully. Rotheray and McGowan (2000) add that they have found larvae in the wet, decaying heartwood of a Picea stump and provide further detail on the larval microhabitat. MacGowan and Rotheray (2007) record use by the hoverfly of plastic tubs containing pine sawdust and chips, as sites for larval development sites, when these tubs are placed in localities where the species occurs. They also note that rot-holes with a capacity of less than one litre are noticeably susceptible to drying out resulting in death of the developmental stages, and that rot-holes found to contain larvae in the autumn may be without larvae the following spring, so that finding larvae in a rot-hole in the autumn is not necessarily evidence that development can be completed in that rot hole. Rotheray (2013) observed that the larvae characteristically occur around the mid-depth of a rot-hole’s volume and, because they lack an extendable respiratory tube, require to visit the water surface two to three times each hour for respiratory purposes. When the water in a rot-hole begins to freeze, larvae have been observed to come to the water surface, to rest on the ice, rather than remaining in the frozen water (Rotheray 2013). The larvae are distinguished from larvae of some related species in the key provided by Rotheray and Perry (1994).

","While this species may be affected by human impacts such as deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanisation and climate changes (droughts and fire) in certain areas of its distribution, there are no major direct threats for this species at the moment.

In Scotland, the threats are the clearance of native pine woodland, old pine plantations and removal of old trees. Where there gaps in the age structure of trees at a site, the loss of rot holes for a period of time could lead to local extinction of the fly. It is unlikely that extensive commercial plantations with younger age classes of trees could support this species.","This species used to be considered as very rare. However, adults are mainly arboreal, usually only found when they come down to drink or visit tree stumps or flowers. The species is easier to find as a larvae (see MacGowan 1994), and therefore after successful larvae searches, it was determined that this hoverfly is not as rare as originally thought. The population trend is difficult to estimate, but in general it seems to be in continuous decline like it is for most of the species in the genus when the usual anthropogenic activities are taken in account. In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"

This species is known from Scotland, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, Hungary, the Balearic Islands, Portugal, Pyrenees, Corsica, Italy, Greece (Lesbos) and Romania but not, apparently, from Scandinavia or European Russia. There are no records from more eastern parts of the Palaearctic. The species is also known from North Africa (Morocco and Algeria) (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 4.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 688 km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 3.5 million km2 and the AOO is estimated to be around 444 km2.

Not all citations from the literature as seen in the occurrence could be found as exact localities for making the distribution map.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"In Scotland (Malloch Society 1988-2019), this species was the subject of early groundbreaking management trials for the conservation of saproxylic Diptera. In order to boost and stabilise subpopulations, artificial rot holes were first created in pine trees at Beinn Eighe in northwest Scotland in 1990. Holes were cut in the cleft of a twin-stemmed tree by use of a chain saw. The results surpassed the expectations - larvae were recorded in the holes within a few months and they produced adult insects within two years of their creation. When the site was revisited in summer 2006, the holes were still being used by larvae and puparia were also present. Conservation measures in Scotland include maintaining and encouraging the presence of old pines, especially those that are well branched or have twin trunks, and ensuring the age structure of trees at a site is suited to the continued presence of rot holes. Artificially created rot holes made by cutting into trees may help overcome this to some extent. Epiphytic growth of saplings and shrubs in rot holes can lead to their drying out and render them unsuitable for this hoverfly, therefore this threat should be carefully watched for and acted against where appropriate.

Further studies are needed into the taxonomy, abundance, trends, ecology and threats to this species. Because this species is also associated with trees that occur in unprotected managed forests, it would benefit from a number of protected sites within these areas.

On the German Red List the species is Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011). For Denmark the species is Not Evaluated (Bygjeberg 2004), and in the United Kingdom the species is Nationally Scarce (Ball and Morris 2014).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170982,149170980,Callicera spinolae,Vulnerable,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2020-01-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

The Ivy Hoverfly (Callicera spinolae) is found throughout western and southern Europe. The estimation for the extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is around 3.9 million km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) for Europe is estimated to be around 700 km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is around 3.7 million km2, but the AOO is 596 km2. Although the current estimates of EOO for Europe and the EU 27 are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a very fragmented distribution. The species is dependent on a habitat that is rare in economically exploited woodlands making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. The current population trend is considered to be declining, so the species is listed as Vulnerable under Criterion B for Europe and EU 27. However, the threats to this species may increase in the future, so the species will maybe go to a higher threatened category. So an increased protection of ancient Fagus/Quercus forest with overmature and senescent trees would be beneficial. In addition, further research into the taxonomy, abundance, trends, ecology and threats to this species is recommended.","

The preferred environment of this species is deciduous forest, particularly ancient Fagus/Quercus forest with overmature and senescent trees. Adults are primarily arboreal, but descends occasionally to feed at flowers or to visit streams to drink. They visit streams in bright sunlight, choosing spots where direct sunlight falls on flat patches at the water's edge and there is direct flight path up to the canopy. The hoverfly has been recorded visiting the flowers of Angelica, Hedera, and Solidago sp. The flight period is from September to October.

Larvae of this species have been reared from rot-holes in living Populus (Zimina 1986) and Fagus (Rotheray 1994, Dussaix 1996). It has also been reared from rot-holes in ancient, living Fraxinus angustifolia and Quercus faginea, by Ricarte et al. (2008). Dussaix (2005) also reports rearing this species from a small trunk cavity in live Betula. Ball et al. (2011) cite Acer campestre and Aesculus as host trees. Further, this species has been reared from a larva collected from a cavity in the trunk of an ancient, live tree of Quercus suber (Dussaix pers. comm. 2019). The larvae usually require more than one year in which to complete development and are known to inhabit the heart-rot of the trunk of living trees, so that they may be located deep within the tree. The larva is described and figured by Rotheray and Perry (1994), who also provide a key distinguishing Callicera spinolae larvae from larvae of some related species. The general appearance of the puparium is shown in the coloured photo provided by Dussaix (2013), who also confirms that the larva overwinters (Speight 2017, 2020).

","There are all kinds of possible threats throughout the wide range of this species in Europe, such as deforestation, logging, agriculture, urbanisation and possibly in future climate changes (droughts and fire). However, currently there are no major direct threats. But that could change in future where especially this kind of old forest habitat is under threat.","The adults fly somewhat later in the year and are mainly arboreal, so are usually only found when they come down to drink, especially on Ivy (Hedera sp.). This makes recording individuals difficult, and it would probably be easier to find as a larva (see MacGowan 1994). Like all species in the genus Callicera, this hoverfly is not easy to find and is rare throughout its range. The species rarely visits flowers which makes detection difficult, but males hover low and which makes them more easy to detect (for a Callicera). There seems to be a clear and continuing decline of the species in Europe. In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"

This is a widespread species throughout mainly central and southern parts of Europe. This species is found in Britain (eastern England) (Damant 2005) and northern France south to the Pyrenees, Portugal, central Spain and the Mediterranean (also on Crete and Sicily), Germany (last record in Rheinland Pfalz was 2019), Italy, Romania and Tajikistan (Speight 2020). It is not known from European Russia and further east in the Palearctic, but the record from Tajikistan suggests it may be more widespread to the east than thought. 

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 3.9 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 700 km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 3.7 million km2 and the AOO is estimated to be around 596 km2.

Not all citations from the literature as seen in the occurrence could be found as exact localities for making the distribution map.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known direct conservation measures currently in place for this species. Further research into the taxonomy, abundance, trends, ecology and threats to this species is recommended. Increased protection of ancient Fagus/Quercus forest with overmature and senescent trees would benefit this species, but it is also important to leave trees with rotholes in these forest so the species has enough breeding sites available. A number of protected sites within these areas would help ensure the protection of this hoverfly. In Germany the species is considered to be Critically Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011), and in the United Kingdom the species is Vulnerable (Ball and Morris 2014).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149170993,149170990,Chalcosyrphus eunotus,Vulnerable,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2019-09-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

The Logjammer hoverfly (Chalcosyrphus eunotus) is widespread across Europe and so it has a large extent of occurrence (EOO) estimated to be around 3.4 million km2, but the the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated much smaller being around 1,044 km2. For the EU 27 the EOO is estimated to be around 2.2 million km2 and the AOO is estimated to be around 756 km2. The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is unknown. However, given habitat decline due to severe weather events, in conjunction with intensification of agricultural practices and water management, a reduction in habitat/population size of this species can be projected. Although the current estimates of EOO for Europe and the EU 27 are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a very fragmented distribution. The species is dependent on a habitat that is rare in economically exploited woodlands making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. Therefore, this species is assessed as Vulnerable for both Europe and the EU 27.

Research is needed on the impact of severe climatic events on this species, since this may lead to a need to reassess to an increased extinction risk.","

The preferred environment is forest/freshwater; streamside in deciduous (Carpinus, Fagus, Quercus) or mixed forest, including Fraxinus woodland, alluvial hardwood forest and brook floodplain forest; up to 1,000 m in the Alps. Although found more often in association with permanently running water, this species can be found along the bed of seasonal forest streams, where these contain fallen timber. Where beavers are present, this species is known to increase (G. Popov pers. comm. 2020). This is a secretive species, rarely seen as an adult in most countries. Most specimens have been found closely associated with running water, usually small or very small streams, where they occur on fallen logs and branches resting partly in the water, or on stones projecting from the water, or on the foliage of large-leaved, water-side plants, either over or beside the water, at up to 1.5 m above the water, or on moist stream-edge sand. Males are territorial here and females fly from log to log looking for oviposition sites. There are three different forest types this species can occur in (M. Speight pers comm. 2020). It needs streams in forests, if all the trees are cut away from the stream this may be problematic. It does not have any major specific habitat requirement besides the necessity of logs in water so it can possibly utilise different habitats.

During hot weather the species appears to visit stream edges to drink. The males patrol along streams, stopping at one appropriate resting place after another and visiting the same resting places repeatedly (Schmid and Levy pers. comm. 2020). Mating has been observed by Jukes (A. Jukes pers.comm. 2020). It is apparently initiated by a male launching itself into the air at a passing female, from some vantage point. Mating couples have been found repeatedly mostly at some distance from the water, they probably often venture to some quiet place to not be disturbed. A video of some mating and oviposition site prospecting behaviour can be found in the bibliography of this species, taken in Belgium (Margaux 2017).

The puparium has been described and figured by Maibach and Goeldlin (1992), from a larva reared from a container of artificial medium (wet sawdust) placed beside a stream in Fraxinus woodland. Jukes (A. Jukes pers. comm. 2020, Jukes 2010) has observed oviposition on (and in cracks and crannies of) the bark of small Alnus and Betula logs (around 5 cm diameter and less than 1 m long) in dappled sunlight, partially submerged in water, on the margin of a small stream within riverine gallery woodland. The eggs apparently took two to four weeks to hatch. On hatching, the larvae were observed to make their way into the wood of the log, rather than remaining just under the bark, and there they made tunnels in the wood. The wood of the water-sodden Betula logs concerned was fibrous and white. Two or three larvae were found aggregated within the same tunnel. No larvae were found in wood submerged in water. Bastiaan Wakkie also reared this species from eggs collected in Brussels (Van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020).

There is no data on which flowers this species visits. The flight period is from April to July.

","The threats to this species include loss of habitat, from water management, agriculture, forestry, and other human activities. This species is likely to be extremely susceptible to the severe weather events which could be causing declines in recent years, but there is no evidence yet for this. In some cases, extreme weather events may provide good habitat by windfall of trees near rivulets and springs, although in bigger systems it may flush good fallen timber. In addition, long spells of drought may slow down or stop water flow, reducing the important high oxygen levels needed for larvae of this species (Van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020).

Dredging and cleaning streams is detrimental, and conversion of deciduous or coniferous forest is also a threat to this species. In Belgium, cleaning streams for flood prevention and maintaining good drainage prevents habitat from developing (Van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020).","

Due to its very specific habitat, this species is not often seen. However, it is very easily found when searching logs lying in or over small streams in the right surroundings. Most Belgian researchers are familiar with these habits and the species is therefore very often reported in this country (Van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020). There are only four department records for this species in France, despite a lot of surveys in recent years, based on latest data. In Belgium, there has been strong recent increase in the occurrence of this species, which seems to coincide with water quality improvement and less intense cleaning and dredging of small water courses (Van de Meutter pers. comm. 2020).

No comprehensive information on population dynamics is known, and therefore the current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is not totally clear. However, given habitat decline due to severe weather events, in conjunction with intensification of agricultural practice etc. and water management, a reduction in habitat/population size of this species can be inferred, by a least 20% over the next ten years. It may disappear from the lowland within the next twenty years. So we consider the population trend being in decline. In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.

",Decreasing,"This species is widespread across Europe. It is known from Britain, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Germany, the Czech Republic, Switzerland, Hungary, Poland, and Romania; in southern Europe from northern Spain, southern France, northern parts of the former Yugoslavia, Armenia, the Caucasus and Turkey (Speight 2020). However, it does not occur in the Scandinavian countries.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 3.4 million km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1,044 km2. For the EU 27 the EOO is estimated to be around 2.2 million km2 and the AOO is estimated to be around 756 km2.

Not all citations from literature listed in the countries of occurrence could be found as exact localities for making the distribution map.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Research is needed on the impact of severe climatic events on this species, since this may lead to a need to reassess to an increased extinction risk. The species is depending on a certain kind of habitat which is severely under threat, therefore more research is needed on population, areas where the species occurs and actions to protect these habitats.

In the United Kingdom, this species is graded as Nationally Scarce (Ball and Morris 2014, JNCC Species Status No. 9). In Germany (Bavaria), this species was assessed as endangered (Dunk et al. 2003), in Saxony Anhalt as critically endangered (Jentzsch et al. 2016), in Baden-Württemberg endangered (Doczkal et al. 2001), and in 2011 the status of this species in Germany in general was Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Poland it is listed as Critically Endangered (Palaczyk et al. 2002). In the Czech Republic, the species is listed as Endangered (Farkac et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171004,149171001,Chalcosyrphus jacobsoni,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2019-09-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

Chalcosyphus jacobsoni
 is known for certain from northern Norway, northern Sweden, northern Finland and northern parts of European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is estimated to be around 2.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 72 km2. The EOO for the EU 27 is estimated to be around 160,000 km2, and the AOO is estimated to be around 52 km2. Although the current estimates of EOO for Europe and the EU 27 are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a very fragmented distribution. The current population trend is considered to be declining, so the species is listed as Endangered under Criterion B for Europe and EU27.","

The preferred environments of this species are forests and wetlands; a mosaic of boreal Picea/Pinus/Betula forest and mires with overmature and senescent trees and plentiful fallen timber in waterlogged conditions (H. Bartsch pers. comm. 2020). Northwards, this species is found into the taiga. Flowers visited by this species included Salix sp. (Pestov 2010) and Caltha sp. (Bagatshanova 1990). The flight period is June and July. There is no data on the developmental stages of this species.

","Like most of the wood dwelling species, forest management is the main threat for this species. There is a continuing decline of habitat, and also the growing threats from climate change will play an important role in this. Distributional changes are to be expected towards higher altitudes with climate change (to colder and wetter areas). Connected with this might be the huge forest fires recently in Sweden (Wikipedia 2018) and Norway (The Local 2019) that are likely a big threat. Climate warming is much faster in these areas making habitat change may be drastic as well.","There are very few records from the distribution of this species in northern Europe, although it is widespread. This species is, in general, an extremely rare species to find, which is also due to its habitat. However, the search effort in its distribution is very low. The latest finds in Sweden are Tavelån in Västerbotten (2016) and from Kallkällsmyren in Lule lappmark (1982). In addition, there are only two older Swedish finds: one from the Dalarna mountains found in the early 1900s and one from Lycksele Lapland taken in the mid-1800s. In Norway, a female was found in western Finnmark in 1977, and in Finland there is a find from Kittilä and a few specimens from Pudasjärvi and Kuusamo. In the rest of Europe, the species is only known from northeastern Russia and Ukraine (but long ago) (Artdatabanken 2020). The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be decreasing. In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.

From Sweden, there are four sightings, in Norway two old records from the high north, and in Finland 10 recent sightings. So probably around 16 locations in the Nordic countries mainly from Sweden and Finland. The species is not even mentioned in the modern online list for Norway, so may be possibly extinct here. From European Russia a record from Komi in 1974 (Pestov 2010), so here it is also probably very rare.
",Decreasing,"

This species is found in northern Norway, northern Sweden, northern Finland, northern parts of European Russia, on to eastern Siberia, and Ukraine (the Carpathians). The range in the Carpathians is likely to be a relict part of the distribution and the record from Ukraine is from the 1960s. It is therefore an old record and there are no recent records, so this species is possibly extinct here (G. Popov pers. comm. 2020). There are very limited recent records in Sweden and Norway. Worldwide coverage also includes Siberia to the Pacific, including Sakhalin and probably also the Altaj area with several countries in the region. 

In Norway, it is not on the online database (Artsobservasjoner 2020), but according to van de Meutter (pers. comm. 2020), the species was reported from Norway by Nielsen and Svendsen in 2014.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is estimated to be around 2.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 72 km2. The EOO for the EU 27 is estimated to be around 160,000 km2, and the AOO is estimated to be around 52 km2. Not all citations from literature as seen in the countries of occurrence could be found as exact localities for making the distribution map.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"This species will benefit from forest management to leave wood and old trees. In addition, monitoring of the population to determine trends, threats and ecology is required.

This species was considered to be Near Threatened (NT) in Norway 2010 but in 2019 there was not considered to be enough information for a true assessment (Kålås et al. 2010, Artsobservasjoner 2019). Speight states that the species is strongly threatened at the European level (Speight 2020). In Finland, the species is assessed as Least Concern (FinBif 2010, 2018). In Sweden, it is Vulnerable (Artdatabanken 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171015,149171012,Chalcosyrphus obscurus,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-01-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Chalcosyrphus obscurus
 is known in Europe from European Russia and Ukraine. However, very little other information about the species is available, and the current population trend and threats are unknown. Therefore, this species is assessed as Data Deficient in Europe. Further research on the species is required to determine the full distribution and to highlight if any conservation actions are required.

This species is not found within the EU 27 and therefore is Not Applicable.","

The species has been recorded visiting the flowers of Trollius riederanus (Gritskevich 1998), and the flight period is June. However, there is no other information known about the habitat.

","The threats to this species are unknown, but it will likely be affected by the usual anthropogenic activities going on in Europe such as deforestation, logging, agriculture and urbanisation.","There is very little information about this species, so the current population trend in Europe is unknown. There is no information about search efforts to find the species recently.",Unknown,"

This species is found in parts of European Russia (Karelia, Sverdlovsk district), Ukraine (Barkalov and Mutin 2018) and eastwards through most of Siberia (Speight 2020). It is not found within the EU 27.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Further research is needed to understand more about the biology, life cycle, threats and distribution of this species, in order to make an better assumption about the necessary conservation actions.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171027,149171024,Lejota korsakovi,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-02-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Lejota korsakovi is only known in Europe from European Russia. There is very little information on this species, and the current population trend is unknown. It is therefore assessed as Data Deficient for Europe. Although the threats to the species are unknown, it is likely to be affected by human activity, but further research is required to establish if any conservation measures are required.

This species does not occur within the EU 27 and therefore is Not Applicable.","

Adults have been recorded from Tumnin River Basin (Russia far east), sitting and flying around a large dead pine log (Mutin et al. 2016). The hoverfly has been recorded visiting the flowers of Trollius riederanus and Wiegela middendorffiana (Gritskevich 1998), and its flight period is considered to be June.

","The threats to this species are unknown, but it is likely to be impacted by the usual anthropogenic activities going on in Europe such as deforestation, logging, agriculture and urbanisation.",There is very little known about this species and about recorded specimens in Europe. The current population trend in Europe is unknown. It is also unknown if there have been any search efforts to find the species in recent times.,Unknown,"

This species is known from parts of European Russia (Sverdlovsk district; Barkalov and Mutin 2018) and eastern Siberia (Speight 2017, 2020). There are no recent records of the species so the occurrence here is seen as possibly extant. Based on the possible localities, the maximum extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 753,000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is around 536,000 km2. However, given the uncertainty around this species, it is highly likely that this is inaccurate in reality.

It has also been recorded from Ukraine, but it is not considered to occur here (Popov pers. comm. 2019). It is not found within the EU 27.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Further research is needed about the population size, distribution and trends of this species in order to see what the threats for the species will be. After that an assumption can be made about necessary conservation actions.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171038,149171035,Lejota ruficornis,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Lejota ruficornis is reasonably widespread and relatively frequent in the northern areas of its range. It is more restricted in central Europe, to mountainous areas. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.4 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2.3 million km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is estimated being around 3.0 million km2, and the AOO is estimated as around 918,000 km2.

The population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is currently unknown, and although it is likely to be impacted by threats to forests and wetlands, such as forest management and water regulation, there are currently no direct major threats to it. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27. More research is needed for this species on taxonomy, at the genetic level, as well as on developmental stages, population trends and microhabitat requirements.","

The preferred environment of this species is forest/freshwater; boggy stream-sides and pool edges in open forest from the Picea forest zone upwards into alpine grassland; flushes with streamlets (slope mires) in Alnus viridis scrub. In Sweden, this species appears to be associated with open, overmature and senescent mire forest of Betula sp. and Populus tremula, including areas where forest fires have resulted in the presence of large quantities of dead wood (H. Bartsch pers. comm. 2020).

Adults have been found usually close to water, settling on low-growing vegetation and on rotten logs, and their flight reminiscent of Chrysogaster species (T. Moertelmaier pers. comm. 2020). On flowers, they move about like a muscid (Diptera, Muscidae) or a tachinid (Diptera, Tachinidae), or Xylota spp. Indeed, given its general body shape and colour, this species is easily mistaken for a tachinid when feeding at a flower. This species has been known to visit flowers of Caltha palustris, Prunus avium, Ranunculus sp., Pimpinella saxifraga, Filipendula, Sambucus, Sorbus, Spiraea (Violovich 1980), and Ledum palustre (Stackelberg 1958). The flight period of this species is from the end of May to the end of June and July at higher altitudes.

The larva of a north American Lejota species was found by Metcalf (1913), under the bark of a rotten log. From the available data there is a high probability that the larvae of this species are associated with fallen timber (including small branches) of deciduous trees, partially-submerged in shallow water, and with wet wood partially rotted by Polyporaceae. Bartsch et al. (2009) suggest that, in Scandinavia, the larvae develop in rotting wood of Populus tremula.

Some parts of its range it's primarily confined to mountainous regions and standing water bodies.

","As with other species dependent on forest and wetlands, this species faces the same threats that occur from anthropogenic activities like forest management and the regulation of water bodies, including water abstraction and drainage of water. Also climate change might have an effect in future, distributional changes are to be expected towards higher altitudes (to colder and wetter areas) (Romig 2008). However, there are no clearly defined threats that have a direct impact on this species throughout its range.","This species is reasonably widespread in Fennoscandia, throughout Russia and eastern Siberia, and is relatively frequent in the northern areas of its range. It is more restricted in central Europe, to mountainous areas. The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is currently unknown.",Unknown,"

This species is found in Norway, Sweden, Finland, Lithuania, Poland, southern Germany (Alps), France (Alps), the Czech Republic, Switzerland (Jura, Alps), Austria (Alps), northern Italy (Bolzano (Birtele pers. comm. 2020), Dolomites), Montenegro (Durmitor) and through Russia into eastern Siberia (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.4 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2.3 million km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is estimated being around 3.0 million km2, and the AOO is estimated as around 918,000 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"More research is needed for this species on taxonomy, at the genetic level, as well as on developmental stages, population trends and microhabitat requirements.

In National Red Lists, this species has been assessed as Vulnerable (VU) in Finland (FinBif 2010, 2019), Least Concern (LC) in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2019) and as Not Evaluated (NE) in Norway (Artsobservasjoner 2019), where it is found only in the south. Threatened species in Finland (Nature Conservation Decree 14.2.1997/160, Appendix 4 19.6.2013/471). In Germany the species is assessed as Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171048,149171046,Mallota dusmeti,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Mallota dusmeti
 is found within Europe in southern France and the Iberian peninsula. It is also known from Tunisia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe, and therefore also the EU 27, is estimated to be around 614,180 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 124,874 km2. The bulk of records come from Spain, where it is relatively common, and the current population trend for this species in Europe is considered to be stable. The situation might change under pressure of anthropogenic activities and climate change (droughts, fires), but that is not the case yet. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.","

The preferred environment of this species is forest and open ground; arborescent matorral of evergreen oak (Quercus rotundifolia) forest (M.-A. Marcos-Garcia pers. comm. 2020); Quercus suber forest (Claussen and Hauser 1990). This species has been found in dehesa, a landscape in southern Portugal and Spain. In Spain, this species has also been found in areas with Quercus faginea and Fraxinus angustifolia. Flowers visited by this species include Cistus ladanifer (Marcos-García 1985), Foeniculum sp. (Carles-Tolrá 2006) and Euphorbia sp. The flight period is from March to July. Larvae have been reared (Marcos-Garcia 2006) from rot-holes in Fraxinus angustifolia and Quercus faginea; Micó et al. (2010) added Q. pyrenaica and Q. rotundifolia to the list of trees hosting larvae, adding that rot-holes containing larvae were at heights of 1 to 2.5 m from the ground. Lauriaut and Lair (2018) provide an account of rearing M. dusmeti from a deep, water-containing rot-hole in the trunk of an ancient, living Quercus suber. Larval and puparial features are described and figured by Ricarte et al. (2007).

The species is more adaptable than previously thought because it also occurs in human-impacted areas.

","

One of the main threats to this species is fire. Around Madrid in the area where specimens have been collected there was a big fire in 2019. Increases in the frequency of forest fires due to droughts, will strongly reduce old-growth forests which would be very detrimental for the species. This species is also at risk from the loss of cork trees being cut down because of increased use of plastic corks and no regeneration. So deforestation and logging are also important threats for this species.

","

There are several records of this species from Portugal, but it may be more common than currently known (van Eck pers. comm. 2020). In Spain, it occurs locally in a number of provinces, including Barcelona and Andalucia (Cadiz and Grazalema) (Marcos Garcia 2006). Larvae were collected from Cabaneros National Park (Ricarte 2008). The bulk of records come from Spain, where it is relatively common. There are two French records, one from north Pyrenees and another one from Provence (Mediterranean area) (Lauriat and Lair 2018). The current population trend of this species in Europe, and therefore also the EU 27, is stable for the moment.

",Stable,"

Within the European region, this species is known from Portugal, southern France and Spain (Claussen and Hauser 1990, Speight 2020). It is therefore not an European endemic. In Spain, records are known from the provinces of Alicante, Burgos, Caceres, Ciudad real, Madrid and Salamanca (Marcos Garcia 2006). In southern France, it is known from the Pyrenees Orientale and Var (Lauriat and Lair 2018), and in Portugal, from Vilar Formoso and Alvito (Beja) (van Eck pers. comm. 2020).

The range extends out of the European region to northern Africa (Tunisia).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe, and therefore also the EU 27, is estimated to be around 614,180 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 124,874 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions in place right now, and the species population trend seems to be stable at the moment. For this species it is further research on taxonomy (there are similar looking species) and the biology/ ecology of the species is recommended. It is also important is to monitor the population trend combined with the habitat trend to ensure the conservation of this species.

However, there might be more changes in the future (droughts, fires) so the situation could change in several years. It is listed on the Spanish Red List as “vulnerable” (Marcos-Garcia 2006). Since the national assessment, there have been more records found. It is common in some protected areas, including the Cabaneros National Park.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171058,149171056,Mallota eurasiatica,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Mallota eurasiatica
 is known in Europe to occur in Ukraine and European Russia. Although very little information about the species is known, it can occur in suburban parks, where there are old trees. Therefore, this suggests it is an adaptable species, despite possible impact from human activity. Therefore, for Europe, this species is assessed as Least Concern. However, further research on the biology, population and threats is required.

This species is not found within the EU 27 and therefore is Not Applicable.","

The preferred environments of this species are deciduous forest with overmature trees, Betula forest, suburban parks with overmature deciduous trees (Populus, Ulmus, Quercus) (G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2019) and eastern thermophilous Quercus (Q.cerris/Q.frainetto) forest.

Both males and females rest on trunks of deciduous trees, by tree holes, sap-runs and patches of humid, rotting wood, especially toward the trunk base, and can also be found hovering around trees with trunk cavities or sap-runs (G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2019). In Russian Altay (2013) one specimen was caught in the middle of a town alongside a parking lot surrounded by trees (G.W.A Pennards pers. obs. 2013)

Flowers visited by this species include umbellifers; Berberis, Euphorbia virgata, Filipendula vulgaris, Rosa, Spirea crenata (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2019), Acer ginnala (Mutin 1983) and Crataegus. The flight period is from April to July. 

Features of the larva and puparium are described by Kuznetzov and Kuznetzova (1995), based on puparia collected from rot-holes in Betula. Svivova and Mutin (2000) also found the larva of this species among wet material in a rot-hole on a young birch (Betula platyphylla). Svivova et al. (1999) both describe and figure features of the larva and briefly describe the puparium, having reared the species from wet, sappy material under the bark of old, live Ulmus pumila. They state the species overwinters as a larva and that the insect remains in the puparium for 12 to 14 days. Features of the larva and puparium are again described and figured by Krivosheina (2002), from larvae collected in saprun and wet rot-hole material on the trunk of a living tree of Ulmus propinqua Koidz.

","The threats to this species are the ones likely to be caused by human activity, such as deforestation, logging, agriculture and urbanisation, although it can occur in suburban parks with old trees. But it is unknown how adaptable the species actually is.","There is very little information about this species and the population trend in Europe is unknown. It is not known if there are any recent search efforts to find the species in Europe, and it is not known how many sightings there have been. Because the species seems to be able to use the man made environment like parks and suburban areas, the population trend might be stable, but that is speculation for the moment.",Unknown,"

This species is known from Ukraine (Popov et al. 2002), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018) and eastwards through much of Siberia to Kunashir (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 1.2 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 789,000 km2. This species does not occur within the EU 27.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"More research is needed about the taxonomy, biology, ecology, threats and distribution in order to make an assumption about necessary conservation actions.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171069,149171066,Mallota megilliformis,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Mallota megilliformis
 is found across Europe, but the main part of its distribution range is in central and eastern Russia. In the EU 27, the species is mostly found in Scandinavia, especially Finland, with a few scattered records elsewhere. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.1 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2.4 million km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 2.6 million km2 and the AOO to be around 750,000 km2. It was originally potentially threatened at European level, but the overall population in Europe and the EU 27 now seems stable overall.

In Finland, there is a stable population with sightings every year, it is not very fragmented in the south of Finland and since 2010 it seems to have clearly increased in numbers. In Finland, the species went from Near Threatened to LC in 10 years. Therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27. However, it probably was previously more widespread in Europe. Declines in some parts of the European range of this species may be due to this loss of floodplain forest, and these should be protected in especially Finland where the stronghold of the species is present for EU 27 countries. If the habitat decline continues, the status of the species might rapidly change over the coming years.","

The preferred environment of this species is deciduous forest; Falck (1996) has found this species in alluvial hardwood forest (Fraxinus/Acer) with overmature trees. The species has also been found in Quercus/Carpinus forest adjacent to seasonally flooded ground, but in forest which itself is apparently only rarely (if ever) flooded (M. Reemer pers. comm. 2020). Alluvial forests are one of the most threatened types of forest in Europe. In Ukraine, this species occurs in deciduous forests (except on the Crimean peninsula), generally scarce in Ukraine but present in higher abundance in an area with Populus and Ulmus urban parks on trees damaged by lepidopterans Cossus cossus and C. tenebrioides. Declines of the species are due to the decline of the habitat, floodplain forest, which is affected strongly by human interference (Janssen et al. 2017). 

Adults are largely arboreal, descending to visit the upper flowering branches of small trees like Crataegus and Salix, where it is difficult to distinguish from the accompanying Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera, Apidae) (H. Bartsch pers. comm. 2019). Males may patrol trackside Rubus thickets, at 1 to 2 m, settling on the foliage (M. Reemer pers. comm. 2020).

Flowers known to have been visited by this species include Crataegus sp. (Falck 1996), Anthriscus sylvestris, Salix sp., Spiraea salicifolia (H. Bartsch pers. comm. 2019), Sorbus sp. (G. Pennards pers. obs. 2013). In addition, Chamaenerion angustifolium, Lonicera, Euphorbia, Viburnum, Berberis, Sorbus aucuparia, Spiraea media, (Stackelberg 1958, Skufin and Kuznetsova 1979, Violovich 1983, Bagachanova 1987). The flight period of this species is from the end of May to July.

Developmental stages are not described, but this species is closely associated with old trees old Populus and Ulmus damaged by Cossus sp. (G. Popov pers. comm. 2019).

","Declines in some parts of the European range of this species may be due to loss of floodplain forest. This is caused by the usual anthropogenic activities like logging, agriculture, water management and industrial development.","In Finland, where the major part of the species' range in Europe occurs, there has been a recent increase in the abundance of the species (FinBif 2018). It was originally regarded as threatened at European level, but the overall population in Europe and the EU 27 now seems stable overall. This species is generally scarce in Ukraine but present in higher abundance in an area with Populus and Ulmus urban parks on trees damaged by Cossidae (Lepidoptera) (Popov pers. comm. 2019). There are only old records from Norway (Artsobservasjoner 2019), and one record in Poland and one in the Czech Republic (Mazanek pers. comm. 2019).",Stable,"This species is found in southern parts of Fennoscandia, south to Germany (although it is possibly extinct there); from Poland eastwards (including the Czech Republic and Slovakia) into eastern Russia and Ukraine and on into Siberia to Khabarovsk (Speight 2020). The main part of its distribution range is in central and eastern Russia. In the EU 27, the species is mostly found in Scandinavia, especially Finland (FinBif 2018), with a few scattered records elsewhere.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.1 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2.4 million km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 2.6 million kmand the AOO to be around 750,000 km2.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are known for this species currently. According to the Finnish Red List, the species was Near Threatened in Finland in 2010 (FinBif 2020) and Vulnerable in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2010, 2015). But in 2019 it was downgraded to Least Concern in Finland. The reasons for category change was a genuine recent increase. The Finnish website shows around 50 recent localities where the species was found (FinBif 2020). The species was on the Nordic Red List as Endangered (EN) in 2006 (Kålås et al. 2006), but it is not mentioned on the recent list (Artsobservasjoner 2020). On the Czech Red List it was listed as EN (Farkac et al. 2005). In Germany, the species is assessed as possibly extinct (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171079,149171077,Mallota tricolor,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

Mallota tricolor
 has a small range in Europe although it is likely not uncommon in the eastern part of Europe. It has a small range in the EU 27, with probably only five or less recent localities in eastern Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 4.4 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.2 million km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is around 759,000 km2, and the AOO is around 20 km2. As the species is not uncommon in Europe, due to most of the European population in the east, this species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe. However, in the EU 27, the habitat is declining, and as a result it is considered to occur at 5 or less locations. Therefore, in the EU 27, this species is assessed as Endangered.","

The preferred environment of this species is steppic grassland with scattered deciduous scrub (G. Popov pers. comm. 2019); steppic grassland with clumps of scrub Populus tremula (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2019); deciduous forest; overmature alluvial hardwood forest (Quercus, with Populus and Salix intermixed) with frequent dead trees and fallen timber (Reemer 2000). Since then, records are also collected from steppe zone in floodplain conditions. 

Adult males can be found flying round dead, standing oaks at 2 to 4 m, close to the trunk (Reemer 2000), potentially searching for freshly-emerged females.

Flowers visited by this species include Euphorbia sp. and the flight period is from the end of April to the beginning of June.

","All records seem to be associated with steppe environments which is a threatened habitat in the EU (Janssen et al. 2017). The species probably suffers from human intrusion on its habitat with commercial and industrial areas, and the steppe is used as grazing grounds for human livestock. Climate change has certainly an effect on the steppe habitat, it will shift higher north when it gets warmer and drier.","Europe is on the western margin of the range of this species, with only some scattered records from Poland (Mielczarek pers. comm. 2019), Belarus (Reemer 2000) and Ukraine (Popov pers. comm 2019). More records are known from European Russia (Pestov 2010, Barkalov pers. comm. 2019). There may be recolonisation from the main subpopulations outside Europe to western Europe, but this is not confirmed. It is not really known how migratory the species might be. The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is unknown. Older records are from forest habitats, but more recently also records from steppe habitat (Popov pers. comm. 2019).

There are two records from two different localities in the south of Finland, but only one is recent (FinBif 2018, Haarto and Kerppola 2014). There is one record in eastern Poland (Carpathians) (Mielczarek pers. comm. 2020) and it seems to be known from Latvia. There is one very old record from Germany (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2019) from the steppic area, but it is not considered to be native to Germany. In Romania, it is only known from the north (Bucovina) (Stanescu and Parvu 2005).",Unknown,"

This is a central-eastern Palearctic species. This species is known from Lithuania, Poland, Belarus, European parts of Russia (Moscow, Rostov on Don, not uncommon) and on into Asia through Siberia to Kamchatka (Speight 2020).

There are two records from two different locations in the south of Finland, but only one is recent (FinBif 2018, Haarto and Kerppola 2014). There is one record in eastern Poland (Carpathians) (Mielczarek pers. comm. 2020). Latvia, Belarus (Reemer 2000). In Ukraine, this species is present (except steppe zone and Crimean peninsula), but rare (Popov pers. comm. 2019). There is one very old record from Germany (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2019) from the steppic area, but it's considered not native in Germany. In Romania, it is only known from the north (Bucovina) (Stanescu and Parvu 2005). In European Russia, there are records from Leningrad and Moscow region and more records cited from other parts (Pestov et al. 2010, Barkalov pers. comm. 2019).

The species has a small range in Europe although it is likely not uncommon in the eastern part of Europe, but there is a low sampling effort in eastern Europe. It has a smaller range in the EU 27, with probably only five or less recent localities in the eastern part of western Europe.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 4.4 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.2 million km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is around 759,000 km2, and the AOO is around 20 km2. The exact localities are currently not all known, however, within the EU 27, it is considered to occur at 5 or less locations due to the threat of habitat loss.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Focus of conservation measures for this species should be on protection of the habitat, but more research is needed to confirm habitat criteria. This species was assessed as Data Deficient (DD) on the Finnish Red List (FinBif 2018), with only one recent observation from 2016. It was assessed as Vulnerable (VU) in Poland in 2015, from only one locality (around Lodz) but several specimens observed (Mielczarek pers. comm. 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171090,149171087,Milesia crabroniformis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Milesia crabroniformis
 is a widespread species, particularly in the Mediterranean area. Although it is localised in some parts of its range, and may be declining in the most northern parts, the species is overall not at risk, with no major threats and the overall population trend in Europe is considered to be stable. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. If conservation measures were introduced, they should focus on the preservation of habitat, in particular the conservation of forests with old, overmature and veteran trees.","

The following information is taken from Speight (2017, 2020):

The preferred environment of this species is evergreen oak (Quercus ilex/Quercus suber) and deciduous forest (mesophilous Fagus, acidophilous Quercus, thermophilous Quercus) with over-mature trees. Within the forest, the adults tend to fly high among trees, descending only to feed, drink or oviposit. Flowers visited are usually tall herbs, for example, Sambucus ebulus is particularly frequented. The adult fly is as often met within the vicinity of streams as elsewhere. It settles in patches of sun at the stream edge to drink, towards the middle of the day and in the early afternoon. It is not restricted to forests with permanent streams, but can occur where standing or running water are almost entirely absent (except after rain) during the adult flight period. Visually a very convincing mimic of the hornet, Vespa crabro (Hymenoptera, Vespidae), the hoverfly also flies in a manner very reminiscent of this large wasp, and the buzzing sound it emits in flight is very close to that made by the hornet. Both of these insects are on the wing at the same time of the year, and in the same forest biotopes. This species exhibits a distinct tendency to follow streams away from the forest biotope, so that the fly can be found feeding at streamside flowers in open country, some kilometers from the nearest potential larval habitat. 

Flowers visited by this fly include white umbellifers, Cirsium spp., Fallopia japonica, Hedera, Lythrum salicaria, Mentha aquatica, Sambucus ebulus and Scabiosa spp.. 

The flight period is from July to October, with the peak at the end August and beginning of September. 

Matile and Leclercq (1992) described what they believed to be the puparium of this species, collected from debris in an old Fagus. However, Maibach (pers. comm. 2019) has pointed out that the puparium they figure appears to be that of a species of Eristalini.  Indeed, it resembles the puparium of Mallota cimbiciformis. Certainly, its characteristics do not conform to those of the larva of another Milesia species, Milesia virginiensis, as figured in colour by Rotheray (1994). Also Vujic et al. (2019) agree that the larva is unknown. The female has been seen ovipositing in the bark at the base of an old, living Quercus that was largely hollow and filled with a meter of tree humus.

","The species may be locally impacted by deforestation, fire, anthropogenic activities and climate change, but it is not under a direct threat.","This is a widespread species, particularly over the Mediterranean, and seems to be a nomadic species. It is now very localised in parts of its range and apparently retreating at the northern edge of its range, but overall it is not threatened in its range and the current population trend appears to be stable.",Stable,"

This species is found in northern France (Brittany) and central Switzerland, south to central Spain and round the Mediterranean, including Italy (Somaggio 2017) and the islands, to the former Yugoslavia, Albania, Greece and Turkey. It is also found in northern Africa (Speight 2020). This species is apparently known from Russia in the northern Caucasus (Barkalov and Mutin 2018).

There are indications that recently it may have become established in Britain, with sightings of the species in southwest England in 2006 and 2007 (Gainey 2008, Tremewan 2008). Given the large size and unmistakable appearance of this hoverfly, it would be surprising if those sightings were erroneous. But until a specimen has been more securely recorded, it would be premature to cite Britain as part of the range of this species (Speight 2020).

In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be around 6.8 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.2 million km2. In the EU 27, the AOO is around 1 million km2 and the EOO is around 7 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions for this species are known. If there would be actions, they should be focused on preservation of habitat, in particular the conservation of forests with old, over mature and veteran trees. It is known to also occur in protected areas.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171111,149171108,Palumbia bellierii,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-09-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Palumbia bellierii is a very rare species, only known from four records in three localities in Greece and Italy. At present, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be around 127,708 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be between 12 and 16 km2. In addition, the current population trend is considered to be decreasing, and the population is considered to be severely fragmented. The species is considered to occur at three or four locations, based on the threat of increased drought as a result of climate change in southern Europe, which is causing a decline in the habitat of the aquatic larvae. Therefore, this species is assessed as Endangered under Criterion B.

The species is morphologically similar to Palumbia eristaloides, and further research is needed to determine whether they may be the same taxon, which if synonymised, would greatly increase the range of the species. Further research is also needed to determine more information on the population and threats to this species.","

There is little information about the habitat of this species, although the larvae are considered to be aquatic. The flight period is considered to be June. The species was photographed in Parco delle Madonie (Pizzo Sant'Angelo, 800 m, asl June 2008) on Sicily, visiting Foeniculum sp. (Natura mediterraneo 2008). It is presumed that the quality and extent of the habitat has and will continue to decline, given the impacts of climate change on aquatic habitats in southern Europe.

","The threats to this species are largely unknown, but it is likely to be impacted by increasing droughts as a result of climate change, due to the presumed aquatic larvae.","Not much information is available about the subpopulations of this species in Sicily. In Greece, one specimen was caught in the Pindos Mountains in 2004 (G. Pennards pers. comm. 2019). There is also a specimen from Peloponnesos (Greek atlas, Vujic et al. 2020). The species is considered to be severely fragmented as the three localities are very far apart, and so may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation. The species is also extremely rare so the subpopulations are likely to be localized and at risk. The current population trend is considered to be decreasing as a result of the decline in the aquatic habitat of the larvae.",Decreasing,"This species is only known from Sicily and Greece. Over the last 150 years, it has only been found in two localities from Sicily (one in 1860 and more recently in 2008, from a picture on the internet), and one from northern Greece (Vikos Gorge) and one from the Peloponnesos. It is morphologically similar to Palumbia eristaloides (Portschinsky 1887) but genetic research is needed to determine whether they may be the same taxon. If it turns out to be the same taxon as P. eristaloides (which is known from Turkey and Central  and West Asia) the range of the species would expand a lot, but this is not yet confirmed.

At present, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be around 127,708 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be between 12 and 16 km2.  The species is considered to occur at three or four locations, and based on the threat of the decline in larval (aquatic) habitat there will be a decline in the number of locations were the species occurs. Aquatic habitats are considered to be a threatened habitat, especially in Southern Europe (Janssen et al. 2016).",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Surveys in the three known localities are recommended, and also on Sicily around the known locality in May/June are suggested to determine if it still exists there. Further research on the taxonomy, biology and ecology is required, as well as on the threats to this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171122,149171119,Pelecocera nigricornis,Endangered,"B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv)",2021,2020-02-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Pelecocera nigricornis is an hoverfly that is endemic to the Canary Islands, where it is known from around 22 localities. The estimated extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is around 15,000 kmand the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 88 km2. The species can be abundant in some localities. Although the current population trend of this species is unknown, there is a decline in the extent and quality of the habitat, mostly as a result of increasing urbanisation and tourism, although the rates of deforestation have declined in some places, with protected areas in place. In addition, the species is considered to be severely fragmented. Therefore, this species is assessed as Endangered (B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv)).","

This species is found in Pinus forest and Laurisilva forest (Baez 1977). Adults have been found on sunny spots (Santos Abreu 1924), and recorded visiting the flowers of Cistus monspeliensis, Cistus berthelotianus (=symphytifolius) (Santos Abreu 1924), Foeniculum vulgare (Burt and Mengual 2018) and Ageratina riparia (Observation 2020).

The flight period of this species is from August to February, and January to November on La Palma (Burt and Mengual 2018). There is a decline in the extent and quality of the habitat, mostly as a result of increasing urbanisation and tourism, although the rates of deforestation have declined in some places, with protected areas in place.

","A lot of the forests have been cut in the last decennia for timber and tar, but in the 20th century, the deforestation declined in Tenerife and reforestation programs were developed (Navascues Melero 2005). Now, tourism is one of the more important threatening factors because illegal houses and buildings are constructed, destroying local habitats. This will be of greater influence in the future because tourism is still increasing on the islands. Another threat to the species is uncontrolled garbage dump sites (World Wildlife Fund 2020).","This species is not very rare in the right place in the right time, as it was found locally to be very abundant during the central hour of the day on Foeniculum vulgare in La Palma (Burt and Mengual 2018). The current population trend is unknown, but the species is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated, due to being found on separate islands, and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Unknown,"

This species is endemic to the Canary Isles (La Palma (type location), El Hierro, and Tenerife) (Marcos Garcia et al. 1998). On Tenerife, the species is known from eight localities, on La Palma there are around 12 places were the species has been found, and on El Hierro there are two. Therefore, a total of around known 22 localities across the three islands. This hoverfly has been found within an altitudinal range of 1,000 m to 2,450 m asl. 

The known estimated extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is just under 15,000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 88 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"The Canary Islands have a lot of protected areas were the species is found (for example in La Palma, Caldera de Taburiente and Roque de los Muchachos). Conservation of this species should be based on conservation and protection of habitat. More protected habitats have been established the last decades which automatically protects the species as well. Further research of population and distributional trends is also recommended. The species was assessed as 'Nativo Seguro' (García-Ramírez and Martín-González 2003).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171133,149171130,Hammerschmidtia ferruginea,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

On the Red Lists of the Nordic countries, the species is listed as Least Concern. It is threatened in Czechia, Germany and Great Britain (from Endangered to Critically Endangered). Due to its large area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO), this species does not seem to fall in any threat category. Therefore, the final category for this species is Least Concern in Europe and the EU27 countries.","

The adult habitat consists of pine and birch taiga and mixed forests with large stands of Populus tremula. The larval habitat consists of sap accumulations in fallen logs of Populus tremula or sap-runs on the same tree. The larvae live in recently fallen logs with sappy decay, lasting for two to three years. The adults visit flowers of a wide range of Apiaceae, and also shrubs and trees such as Crataegus spp., Prunus padus, Pyrus communis, Rosa spp., Rubus fruticosus, Salix spp. and Sorbus aucuparia (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","In Europe, the habitat of this species falls within the European Nature Information System (EUNIS) category G1.4. (broadleaved swamp woodland not on acid peat), which is considered “Vulnerable” (Janssen et al. 2016). Forestry with felling of trees and removal of fallen logs is the main threat to this species. The intensification of agriculture is another threat due to the use of fertilisers and pesticides. Furthermore, most agricultural activities need drainage systems, causing the dehydration of the forests, which has a negative impact on tree growth and on the renewal rate of old-growth trees that provide suitable larval habitat (van Steenis et al. 2020).","In the Scottish Highlands one suitable dead log produced almost 1,000 hatched specimens collected in one emergence trap. These logs tend to be suitable for only a few years, and the supply of dead logs is not stable over time. Based on its larval biology, it is highly likely this species shows fluctuations over its entire distributional range. On the regional Red Lists of Baden-Würrtemberg and Saxony-Anhalt, it has been assessed as extinct. In addition, in the whole of Germany, Scotland and the Czech Republic, the species is registered as Endangered to Critically Endangered, while in the Nordic countries, it is regarded as Least Concern (van Steenis et al. 2020). The overall population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This is a widespread species found from northern Norway south to the Pyrenees, and from central France east through the Alps, the Balkan peninsula and Poland towards European Russia. It is also known from Scotland. The record in northwestern France is an odd one, as it lies far away from the nearest other localities, and it does not seem to be in the right habitat: its presence here needs verification. It was previously recognized to be Holarctic, but DNA evidence showed that the Nearctic specimens belong to another species (Skevington et al. 2019).

Outside of Europe, it is present in Georgia and further east in the Russian Far East (van Steenis et al. 2020).
",The species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"In Scotland, this species is included in the UK Biodiversity Action Plan (Rotheray et al. 2009) and it is to be expected that these actions will have a positive impact on its occurrence. Research and monitoring are needed to understand better the ecology of this species and its population trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171144,149171142,Ischyroptera bipilosa,Critically Endangered,"B1ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v)+2ab(i,ii,iii,iv,v)",2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)
EU27 regional assessment: Extinct (EX)

Ischyroptera bipilosa is an extremely rare European endemic. In total, six specimens have been encountered at four widely separated localities in the Alps. Only one record is recent (from 2008 in Switzerland), while the other records come from over 50 years ago (1887, 1941, 1963). Revisiting these sites did not reveal new specimens. Increasing tourism in the Alps and climate change may threaten or have threatened the subpopulations of the species.

As there is only one recent record, both the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are 4 km2. In addition, there is a continuing decline observed in the extent of occurrence, area of occupancy and quality of habitat, as well as in the number of locations. Because of its extreme rarity, with only one recent sighting and the existence of possible threats, the current European Red List status is considered to be Critically Endangered. Despite various efforts to find it, the species has not been seen in the last 60 years in any of the other countries where it has been previously recorded. Therefore, it is considered to be Extinct in the EU27.","

This species occurs in high alpine habitats, mostly on bare, rocky and calcareous ground or talus slopes with sparse vegetation (Speight 2020) during summer. In spring, it is also found in montane or subalpine, unimproved calcareous grasslands (G. Van de Weyer pers. comm. 2008 in Speight 2020).


The adults fly when the snow melt has progressed far enough for patches of bare ground to be exposed. The males hover 2-3 metres up and settle on rocks (P. Goeldlin, pers. comm. 1976 in Speight 2020). The larval stages are unknown.


It has been recorded visiting the flowers of Potentilla spp. (G. Van de Weyer, pers. comm. 2008 in Speight 2020).


The flight period is during spring (end of May) at lower altitudes (1,600 metres) and in mid-summer (mid-July) at higher altitudes (ca 2,000-2,500 metres).

","The only recent location of this species can possibly become threatened by infrastructure development in the near future. Increasing tourism may have had an impact on this species by disturbing the preferred habitat at two of the other three locations. Moreover, due to climate change, the high altitude summer subpopulations of this species may have become extinct as there are no snow patches left.","At each locality only one or two specimens were collected. Multiple surveys have been conducted on these localities, especially where the most recent record was obtained, but they did not manage to find any new specimens.",Decreasing,"

This is a European endemic restricted to the Alps. It is an extremely rare species recorded from only four different localities throughout the Alps (France, Switzerland, Austria and Italy), but with only one recent record, from Switzerland in 2008 (Aubert et al. 1976, Lindner 1941, Pokorny 1887, Van de Weyer pers. comm. in Speight 2020). The older records are from 1887, 1941 and 1963. As there is only one recent record, both the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are 4 km2.

",It is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"Research and monitoring are needed to understand better the ecology and population trends of this species and its potential threats. Protection and better management of the area where this species occurs would be very important to ensure its survival, including controlling infrastructure developments and tourism in the area. Raising awareness about this extremely rare species is also recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171155,149171152,Lejogaster metallina,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species occurs in most European countries and is also known throughout the Palaearctic region. Many records are known all over the range of occurrence.

The intensification of agriculture and especially the use of pesticides will pose a severe threat. In addition, climate change and lower groundwater tables will be very harmful. However, these effects are not studied, and the species is widespread and occurs in many wet grassland habitats. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, the species is regarded as Least Concern for both the EU27 and Europe. A possible influx of specimens from outside of Europe is doubtful.

The species is listed in several Red Lists: it is Vulnerable in the Czech Republic, decreasing in Great Britain and the Netherlands, somewhat decreasing in France, and Near Threatened in Germany (Mazánek and Barták 2004, Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011, Ball and Morris 2014, Speight et al. 2020). In Italy, it is much rarer than it used to be (D. Sommaggio pers. comm. 2020). Therefore, regular monitoring is strongly recommended as it is possible that with more data, the species will become threatened in the near future.

","This species is found in wetlands with fresh water: mires, fen, marsh, pool, lake edge, along brooks and water-filled ditches in open situations, mostly in basic or moderately acid environments. It also occurs in brackish environments. In Sweden, it often lives near temporarily flooded areas. It can be very abundant in wet meadows. In southern Europe it is also present along brooks in Quercus ilex forests (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Kabos 1951, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The adults are observed to rest on leaves and flowers, and males are seen hovering close to females. They visit mainly the flowers of Ranunculus but also other Ranunculaceae, white umbellifers and Cochlearia, Convolvulus, Leontodon, Polygonum, Symphoricarpos and Valeriana (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020)

The larvae are aquatic in water-rich organic material, such as ditches, brooks, and ponds. They have been found in a floating mat of rotting material of mostly Bulboschoenus maritimus and in leaf sheaths of Typhus (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

","This species is threatened by many factors that have a negative impact on its habitats: more intensive farming of grasslands, drainage of marshes, longer dry periods, use of pesticides, nitrogen deposition, and human development (recreational and housing) in southern Europe.","

Even though this species can be very abundant in meadows in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) and in other wet habitats in the central part of its distribution, the overall population shows a decreasing trend.

",Decreasing,"

This species occurs from northern Finland, Norway and the Faroes (Jensen 2001) south to Spain, Portugal, northern Italy, Montenegro, Bulgaria and Ukraine, and from Ireland eastwards to Siberia. It is also present in North Africa (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Jensen 2001, Speight 2020). In the central and northern part of the distribution, the species is widespread and populations are well-connected. In the southern part of its distribution, populations are scattered, and are really rare and widely separated. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

The occurrence in Japan needs confirmation as this species has been misidentified in the past.



",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. The most urgent conservation actions are protection and restoration of nutrient-poor species-rich wet meadows and small water-bodies with good water quality and natural watersides close by. It has several common names (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Röder 1990, Torp 1994, Tóth 2017), which could help to raise public awareness and taking conservation actions on a national level. Research and monitoring are also needed to better understand its ecology and population trends.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171166,149171163,Melanogaster parumplicata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-08-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is classified as Vulnerable in Czechia and as Endangered in Germany (Mazánek and Barták 2004, Ssymank et al. 2011). In the Balkan Peninsula (both Bosnia-Herzegovina and Montenegro) it is considered to be threatened (Vujić et al. 2001). It has a rather restricted range in Europe. Although threats are not known, it is likely that climate change and intensification of land use will have a negative impact now and in the future. However, it still likely to have a much larger area of occupancy (AOO) than 2,000 km2 and a population decline of 20% in the next 10 years seems unlikely. Therefore, the species is classified as Least Concern both for Europe and for the European Union.","

Melanogaster parumplicata lives in wetland habitats mostly in calcareous areas, close to water bodies in river-floodplain grasslands or meadows, and also close to alluvial forests (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020). The adults visit umbellifers, Bunias, Caltha, Crataegus, Prunus spinosa, Ranunculus, Rhamnus cathartica and Taraxacum (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020).


The larvae are unknown. However, they are very likely to live in freshwater, close to the shore, in vegetation or roots of plants.","There are no specific direct threats known for this species. However, the negative impact of modern agriculture on the habitat of the species is immense, so this could be having an impact on the species, but further research is required. Climate change could also potentially have an impact.",There is no information about the population size or trend.,Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe. It is recorded from Norway, Sweden, southern Finland (Åland), Denmark, Poland, Germany, Belgium, the French Jura, the Alps (France), Czechia, Slovakia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Romania (Torp 1994, Vujić 1999, Holinka and Mazanek 1997, Stănecu and Părvu 2005, Bartsch et al. 2009, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Bot and van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020). Although Speight (2020) places the species in Switzerland as well, no Swiss records have been found, and hence this is not taken into account in this assessment. The range size parameters in both Europe and the EU27 are likely to be greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

There is no conservation plan in place for this species. The most important conservation action is protection of the habitat, both inside and outside protected areas. The negative impact of modern agriculture on the habitat of the species is immense. These effects include the lowering of water tables, eutrophication of ditches and other small waters by ammonium deposition and nutrient run off, deterioration of species-rich meadows and watersides due to fertiliser use and nutrient run-off, and the risks of pesticides spreading into natural areas. It is therefore clear that this species would benefit strongly from a Europe-wide agriculture that has space for nature within agricultural areas and does not have negative effects on the local and regional environment. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand better its ecology and population trends.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171177,149171174,Melanogaster tumescens,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-08-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

The species is described from Saratov (Russia) and recorded from Transcaucasia (Peck 1988), but its taxonomic status is unclear (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Mengual et al. 2020). Since it is not even clear whether it is a good species, nor where the material that the description was based on originated, it is classified as Data Deficient. Further research is needed to establish its status and ecology.","There is no information about the habitat preferences of this species. The specimens referred by Kassebeer (1999) as Melanogaster tumescens were borrowed from the Zoological Museum of the University of Tel Aviv through Dr. Ä. Freidberg, and nothing is known about their origin.",The threats to this species are unknown.,Nothing is known about the population size or trend.,Unknown,"The species was described from Saratov (South European Russia) and recorded from Transcaucasia (Peck 1988), but its taxonomic status is unclear (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Mengual et al. 2020), resulting in uncertainty over its distribution.",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Since nothing is known about this species, it is not possible to establish its conservation needs. Further research is needed to establish its status and ecology.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171187,149171185,Neoascia balearensis,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is endemic to the EU27 and lives only on the Balearic Islands of Mallorca and Menorca. It occurs in wetland areas, and along river beds and water pools. The population in Park Natural de s' Albufera de Mallorca is relatively large and considered to be stable, but may become affected by intensification of land and water use around the Park. Other subpopulations elsewhere live in small habitat patches, which are vulnerable to water substraction for irrigation or drinking water. Furthermore, larval stages may be affected by water pollution, and also to heavy rainfall or extreme drought, which may be a result of climate change. This could reduce the number of subpopulations. The area of occupancy (AOO) of the species is 40 km2, and it is projected to decline both in its extent and quality due to these threats. Therefore, the current European Red List status is considered to be Endangered.","

On Mallorca, in the Park Natural de s' Albufera de Mallorca, the species occurs in wetland vegetation with Phragmites and Tamarix and is most often encountered in areas with mud and flowering plants around (Riddiford and Ebejer 2006). Outside Park Natural de s' Albufera de Mallorca, it was found in patches of water in dried-up river beds, most often near the sea, and around small water reservoirs (Kassebeer 2002). The larval stages are unknown, but they are expected to live in wet mud. Adults visit the flowering plants of Euphorbia spp. and Ranunculus spp. (Riddiford and Ebejer 2006).

The flight period is from March until June (spring generation) and October (autumn generation) (Kassebeer 2002, Riddiford and Ebejer 2006).

","Like other Neoascia species, Neoascia balearensis is restricted to all kinds of wetlands or moist habitats. The intensification of water use for irrigation for agricultural purposes or for human consumption (tourism) may dry out suitable but often small habitat patches, such as river beds, especially at the end of the dry season (during autumn). Water pollution as a result of the use of pesticides or fertilisers in agriculture may also threaten the habitat. Due to climate change, more severe weather conditions are expected to occur in the near future including extreme rainfall or severe dryness, which will have a negative impact on the subpopulations of this species in river beds. Waste water and high pressure on water resources from increasing tourism and intensive farming nearby are also regarded as a threat to the wetlands of Park Natural de s' Albufera de Mallorca (Riddiford et al. 2014).","In Park Natural de s' Albufera de Mallorca, the species was found to be common during spring (Riddiford and Ebejer 2006). The trend of this population is unknown. At the other collecting sites only one or two specimens have been collected during the autumn (Kassebeer 2002).",Unknown,"

Neoascia balearensis is a European endemic that occurs on the Balearic Islands of Mallorca and Menorca (Kassebeer 2002). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1,292 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 40 km2.

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,Neoascia balearenis is listed by the Government of the Baleares on the list of protected species as an endemic invertebrate (Pons 2015). Research and monitoring are needed to better understand its ecology and population trends. Better management and protection of the areas where this species occurs would be also important for its survival.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149171198,149171195,Neoascia interrupta,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a Palaearctic species with a wide distribution in the central parts of Europe, especially in lowland areas in nutrient-rich wet habitat types with standing water. In Great Britain, a significant decline has been observed over the past four decades (S. Ball pers. comm. 2021). In other countries, such as the Netherlands and Hungary, it is not rare and does not seem to be threatened at the moment. Local threats may be habitat destruction by land reclamation, recreational activities, mechanical clearing of watercourses and water pollution, and many lowland nutrient-rich habitat types are fragmented and locally under pressure in large parts of its range. However, due to the lack of data, it is not possible to give the rate of habitat quality reduction, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, the species is assessed as Least Concern both in Europe and the EU27 countries, with a note that more monitoring and research is needed because with more data this species could easily be reclassified as threatened in the very near future.

","

This species prefers nutrient-rich marshes including marsh forests (Salix spp., Alnus glutinosa), along nutrient-rich ponds, lakes, ditches and channels with high emergent vegetation (Phragmites australis, Schoenoplectus lacustris, Typha spp.). It often appears in river areas in floodplains or around dune lakes, and in its northern range it is more often seen in lagoons or ditches in semi-brackish environments (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemers et al. 2009, Speight 2020, Stubbs and Falk 2002). It is typically abundant in nutrient-rich habitats with standing water, and with high emergent riparian vegetation or marsh forest.

The adults fly low through and around tall vegetation and above water, and are often found resting on leaves or branches of shrubs or small trees (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020). The larvae probably live in decaying plant matter (Bartsch et al. 2009).

The visited flowers are Schoenoplectus lacustris, Carex spp., Caltha palustris, Crataegus laevigata, Ranunculis acris, Stellaris holostea, Myosotis palustris, Apiaceae such as Apium spp., Alisma plantago-aquatica, Rubus spp., Stachys spp. and Taraxacum spp. (Bartsch et al. 2009)

The flight period is from April until September, with a peak in spring (May-June) (Bot and van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009, Stubbs and Falk 2002).

","

The preferred habitat of this species may be threatened by habitat destruction and water pollution from nearby intensive farming. In addition, increasing recreational use of watercourses in the areas may have a negative impact on the riparian vegetation where the larvae live, as the mechanical management of riparian vegetation along watercourses will destroy suitable patches for larval development. The occurrence in swamp forests may be threatened by draining and amelioration of these forest types to make them more accessible for human activities.

","

This species is usually found in rather large numbers. In the Netherlands, the population trend was found to be stable after 1950 (Reemer et al. 2009). In Germany, a moderate long-term population decline was observed (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Great Britain, a significant gradual decline has been observed over the past four decades (S.G. Ball pers. comm. 2021). The overall population trend is unknown.

",Unknown,"

This is a Palaearctic species usually found in lowland areas. It occurs from England, east to European Russia (northwestern, central and the Volga Federal District), Ukraine (including Crimea) and Romania (Moldava, Marramures and Satu Mara); from south Sweden, south Finland, and south Norway, south to central France and north Italy (Po river delta). It also has isolated occurrences in north and central Portugal. On the Balkan peninsula, it is recorded from Serbia (mostly Vojvodina), Montenegro and Bulgaria (Bartsch et al. 2009, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Nedeljkovic et al. 2009, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Tóth 2014, Van Eck 2011, Vujić 1990; A.V. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020).

Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside of Europe, the species has been recorded from Turkey, Transcaucasia (Armenia and Georgia) and West Siberia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Gudjabidze 2002, Saribiyik 2014).

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There is no information about conservation measures specific to this species. On the national Red Lists of Norway and Czechia, the species has a threatened status (Mazánek and Barták 2005, Nielsen 1999). In Germany, the species is considered to be near threatened and undergoing a moderate decline (Ssymank, et al. 2011), and is listed as threatened in some German states. In Denmark, Neoascia interrupta is regarded as vulnerable (Bygebjerg and Bloss Carstensen 2019). Monitoring and research on its population and habitat trends is needed, as well as research on its biology and ecology and other potential threats. Protection of important sites and reducing the impact of habitat destruction would benefit its conservation fortunes.
",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171208,149171206,Neoascia obliqua,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This Palearctic species is widely distributed in Central Europe. It is found to be relatively rare in many countries, but could be under-recorded because of its resemblance to the more common Neoascia podagica. Because of its rarity, it is considered to be threatened in Ireland (Speight 2008). The preferred habitats are small streams, ponds and other small water bodies with the larval host plant Petasites hybridus in their vicinity. This type of habitat occurs commonly in Central Europe and has no large-scale threats. In addition, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, its current European Red List status of is considered to be Least Concern, which is also true for the EU27 countries.

","

This species occurs in all kinds of wetland habitats, including ditches and ponds, with high herbal vegetation, often in forests or at forest edges, and usually in the vicinity of its presumed larval host plant Petasites hybridus (Bot and van de Meutter 2019, Reemer et al. 2009). It also appears in beech (Fagus) forest areas, usually along streams, and at higher altitudes or latitudes also in Picea forests (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020). The adults fly low through dense vegetation and often settle on leaves of Petasites or Phragmites (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020). The larval stages are not described but have been reported from the stems of Petasites hybrides in tunnels made by Cheilosia himantopa or Cheilosia canicularis (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009).

Adults are usually only found on flowering herbs such as Caltha palustris, Anthriscus sylvestris, Aegopodium podagraria, Cardamine pratensis, Allium ursinum, Petasites hybridus, Leontodon autumnalis, Myosotis spp., Potentilla erecta, Sium latifolium, Stellaria holostea, Galium spp, Taraxacum spp., and on small shrubs such as Rubus spp.

The flight period is from April until September (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), but it is also recorded in October (Stubbs and Falk 2002, Torp 1994), presumably having two generations a year.

","Patches of the larval host plant, Petasites hybridus, can be threatened by all kind of disturbances, such as mechanical mowing along watercourses or changes in watercourse management that can result in unsuitable habitat conditions for the plants. 
","

This species is often encountered in dozens of specimens, usually around its larval host plant Petasites hybridus. In the Netherlands, the species has had a positive trend after 1950 (Reemer et al. 2009), and in Germany, the population trend was considered to be stable in the long and short term (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Great Britain, a significant gradual decline has been observed over the past four decades (S.G. Ball pers. comm. 2021). Still, the overall population trend is considered to be stable.

",Stable,"

This is a Palaearctic species with its main distribution in Europe. It occurs from western Ireland, England, southern and central Scotland, and northern and central France, east to European Russia (no further distribution data available), Ukraine (Transcarpathian region and Crimea) and Romania (Muntenia and Moldova); and from the southern tip of Finland and south Sweden, south to central France and central Italy (including Sardinia). It is also present on the Balkan peninsula south to Greece (Pindos mountains) and southwest Bulgaria (Bartsch et al. 2009, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Speight 2008, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, Tóth 2014, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Vujić 1990, Vujić et al. 2020, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, L. Mazanek pers. comm. 2019, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020, A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020, R. Zoralski pers. comm 2020.). 

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside Europe, this species has been recorded in Transcaucasia (Armenia and Georgia) (Gudjabidze 2002, Peck 1988) and Turkey (Stackelberg and Richter 1968).

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. Site and area protection and some basic research on the population distribution and trends is advised.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171218,149171216,Neoascia subchalybea,Near Threatened,"B2b(ii,iii)",2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This is a northern Palaearctic and Nearctic species with a restricted occurrence in Europe. It is mainly present in northeastern Fennoscandia and adjacent European Russia. The main habitat, taiga wetland, is restricted in occurrence and may be affected by climate change. Its current European Red List status is considered to be Near Threatened due to the rather low number of localities and the threats (human intrusion and climate change) to the habitat. It has a small area of occupancy (AOO), ranging between 800 and 1,920 km2 in Europe and between 600 and 1,440 km2 in the EU27 countries, and there is a decline in the quality and extent of suitable habitats, which might accelerate in the future due to climate change.

More data should be gathered about its occurrence in Europe, especially in north European Russia, to find out if this species occurs commonly in suitable habitats, and to see if there are any obvious threats to the preferred habitats.

","

This species is found in taiga moors and wetlands with Caltha palustris (Bartsch et al. 2009). There are few data on adult behaviour, but the larvae are likely to live in nutrient-rich water and mud (Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults visit Caltha palustris and Stachys sylvatica (Bartsch et al. 2009). The flight period is from mid-May to early July (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

","

There is little information on the threats to the preferred habitat of this species. The recent unusually high spring and summer temperatures in the region where it lives, likely caused by climate change, may have a negative impact on its preferred habitat and on the species itself, but this has to be determined. Locally, the taiga marshes and wetland areas can be affected by land reclamation or other kinds of human activities.

","

The species is usually found in small numbers. The subpopulations in Finland were found to be stable (Kahanpää 2019).

",Stable,"

This is a northern Palaearctic and Nearctic species. It occurs in Finland, Sweden (central and northern parts), Norway (Finnmark), and European Russia (Kola Peninsula) (Bartsch et al. 2009, Haarto and Kerppola 2014, Peck 1988, SLU Artdatabanken, Kahanpää 2019). It also occurs in the polar regions.

Within its range, it has been recorded so far from somewhere between 50 and 60 localities, so the minimum area of occupancy (AOO) is between 200 and 240 km2. However, it is presumed that it is more widespread and the number of localities could be fourfold higher, making an AOO of 800-1920 km2 in Europe more realistic. Since most of the records are from the EU27, the AOO is estimated to be between 600 and 1,440 km2 here.

Outside of Europe, it has been recorded from Siberia (including Sverdlovsk Oblast), the Russian Far East, and in the northern parts of North America (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Peck 1988, Skevington et al. 2019).

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,"There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. Habitat protection and research into its population trends and threats are recommended. In Finland, where most records of this species in Europe have been obtained, no recent decline in distribution has been observed, and the species is listed as Least Concern (Kahanpää 2019). In Sweden, it is rare but also has the status of Least Concern. In Norway, the species was listed as Near Threatened and is only recorded from Finnmark (Artsdatabanken).",Nearctic|Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171229,149171226,Neoascia tenur,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widely distributed in Europe, occurring in many types of wetland areas from sea level up to 2300 metres altitude. It can be locally common. There are no reports of declines and it is not listed as vulnerable or threatened on regional Red Lists. However, it may be locally threatened, especially by mechanical mowing of vegetation. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, the current European Red List status of the species is considered to be Least Concern, and also the case in the EU27 countries.

","

This species can be found in all kinds of open wetland habitats including marshes, wet nutrient- and flower-rich grasslands, bogs, fens, ponds, lake margins, streamsides and ditches (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The adults are often seen on flowering herbs, and less commonly visiting flowering shrubs and flying low through vegetation (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020). The males are observed to hover low above the ground (Reemer et al. 2009). The larvae have been found living in the stem sheaths of rotting Typha spp. and Carex rostrata, at the water surface (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020), and females have been seen ovipositing in decaying seaweed on the high shore (Rotheray and Britton 2014).

They visit all kinds of flowering herbs available in the habitats, such as Alliaria petiolata, Caltha palustris, Cardamine pratensis, Carex rostrata, Cicuta virosa, Filipendula ulmaria, Geum rivale, Hypericum spp. Menyanthes trifoliata, Nuphar lutea, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus spp., and also flowering shrubs such as Salix repens, Prunus padus, Crataegus laevigata (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).

The flight period is from mid-April until mid–September, with a weak second generation (Reemer et al. 2009).

","

The subpopulations can be affected by large-scale mechanical mowing of moist grasslands, which lowers the availability of food plants, and of riparian vegetation along watercourses where the larvae live. Intensive grazing by livestock may result in lower availability of food plants and plants for larval development.

","

This species is usually found in medium to large numbers, up to several dozens of specimens. The population trend is found to be stable in the Netherlands and in Germany (Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011). In Great Britain, the population trend was also found to be stable over the past four decades (S.G. Ball pers. comm. 2021). The overall population trend is also stable.

",Stable,"

This is a Palaearctic and Nearctic species, widely distributed in northern and central Europe, but scarce in southern Europe. It occurs in Iceland, the Faroe Islands, and Ireland west to European Russia (northwest European Russia and the Volga Federal District) and Ukraine; and from north Fennoscandia, south to north Portugal (Villarreal), north Spain, north Italy (south to Emilia-Romagna). It is also present on the Balkan peninsula, and is recorded from Serbia, Montenegro, Greece (northern parts and Samos island), and southwestern Bulgaria (Bartsch et al. 2009, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Jensen 2001, Nedeljković et al. 2009, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Šimić and Glumac 1987, Speight et al. 2020, Tóth 2014, vVn Eck 2011, Vujić 1990, Vujić et al. 2020, A.V. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020). 

Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside Europe, it has been recorded from Turkey and Transcaucasia (Georgia), and it is widely distributed from Siberia east to the Russian Far East, Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan), Mongolia, China and Japan (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Mengual et al. 2020, Peck 1988, Saribiyic 2014). It is also widely distributed in the western parts of North America (Skevington et al. 2019).

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial,"There is no information available on conservation measures specific to this species. Protection of the habitat and research into distribution, population trends and threats is recommended.",Nearctic|Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171239,149171237,Orthonevra auritarsis,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"There is only one male known from Romania (Speight 2020). Based on the comparison of the description of Orthonevra auritarsis with material of O. gemmula from Hungary, this male might belong to Orthonevra gemmula, a very rare steppe species only known from a few specimens from the Russian steppe near the Altai Mountains, and from Serbia and Hungary (W. van Steenis pers. comm. 2021). There is no other information about Orthonevra auritarsis. Thus the species is classified as Data Deficient.","There is no information about the specific habitat and ecology of this species, except from the type locality, which is at 200-300 metres altitude in Oaş Depression, Negreşti-Oaş, part of the Pannonian Steppe. However, the locality is not precise enough to establish the type of habitat.",The threats are unknown due to the lack of information about this species.,Only one male is known. The holotype was collected in 1986 by C. Pârvu (Brădescu 1992).,Unknown,"

This species have been registered in Romania in Negreşti-Oaş (Oaş Country, Satu Mare County, Maramureş province), which is part of the Pannonian Steppe (Brădescu 1992). Since the species is only known from the type locality, the known extent of occurrence (EOO) and the known area of occupancy (AOO) are 4 km2.

",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

There is no conservation plan in place. Research and monitoring are needed to better understand the habitat and ecology of this species, its population trends and the type locality.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171250,149171247,Orthonevra nobilis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-08-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread species. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Although its habitat is somewhat threatened, it is considered not to be threatened and stable in all assessed countries of Europe. Therefore, the species is assessed as Least Concern in the EU27 and Pan-Europe.","

This species prefers springs and flushes in fen, raised bog, riparian gallery forest and humid Fagus. It also occurs in humid grassland near springs, and it is often collected by sweeping lush vegetation. It visits white umbellifers, Achillea, Caltha palustris, Crataegus, Fragaria, Galium, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus, and Viburnum opulus (Ball et al. 2011, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020). While the adults prefer dry flower-rich grasslands such as calcareous meadows, the larvae are aquatic (Reemer et al. 2009), living in springs, brooks and flushes, where they feed in wet organically-enriched mud (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020).

","The threats to this species are decreasing ground-water levels, habitat deterioration from aerial nutrient inputs (both agricultural and industrial nitrogen deposition), decreasing surface water levels (mainly due to agricultural use), climate change, and probably pesticides as well in parts of its range.",There is no information available about the population size or trends. The species mostly flies in low numbers.,Unknown,"

This species is distributed from central Sweden and Finland south to the Pyrenees, Portugal and central Spain, and from Ireland eastwards through northern and central Europe into European parts of Russia. It is also present in the mountainous parts of Italy, western Balkans, and Greece. Outside Europe, it occurs in Anatolia (Turkey), the Caucasus, and from Siberia to the Far East and China (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020).

Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

",This species is not used.,Terrestrial,

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171261,149171258,Orthonevra plumbago,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-11-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This European endemic is very rare but rather widely distributed. It is very closely related to Orthonevra incisa and O. brevicornis. Speight and Castella (2011) give characters to separate O. brevicornis and O. plumbago. Some authors suggest that O. incisa might be a synonym of O. plumbago, but this synonymy has never been established.

The possible threats are not known, but probably the species suffers from threats to its habitats, such as drainage, nitrogen deposition and habitat changes due to climate change, just like several other species of Orthonevra. In Finland, it may be Extinct, and in France it is clearly threatened (Hyvärinen et al. 2019, Speight et al. 2020). This species is assessed as Endangered in Europe as it has a small area of occupancy (AOO), which is probably smaller than 40 km2, it is considered to be severely fragmented, and throughout its distributional range, a continuous decline has been observed in the quality of habitats.

","The only habitat information is in Speight (2020). According to this, the species prefers springs and flushes in seasonally-flooded, oligotrophic or mesotrophic, herb-rich, harvested Phragmites marsh. In addition, it also occurs on freely-draining sandy soil, and small open areas with flushes in Alnus incana forest. The larvae are not known, but they probably live in freshwater close to the adult habitat, as in other species of the genus. Although the precise habitat and habitat demands are not known, the species has specific habitat requirements, and it needs a combination of terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Throughout its distribution range, a continuing decline of suitable habitats for other species of Orthonevra is observed, so probably this is true for this species as well.","The biology of this species is hardly known, so it is not possible to state clearly the threats. However, it probably suffers from threats to its habitats, such as drainage, nitrogen deposition and habitat changes due to climate change, just like several other species of Orthonevra.","Nothing is known about the population size or trend. The subpopulations are very small and very widely separated and their viability is questionable, so the species is considered to be severely fragmented. All assumed 10 localities might be so small that they are at the risk of immediate extinction.",Unknown,"

This endemic species has been recorded in southeastern Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, France (the Alps), Czechia, Switzerland, Slovakia, Italy, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, Moldova, Ukraine and European Russia. (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2020, Ł. Mielczarek pers. comm. 2020, G. Popov pers. comm. 2020). The species is possibly extinct in Italy, Finland and Ukraine (W. van Steenis pers. comm. 2021). The German records in Speight (2020) refer to Orthonevra incisa (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). Exact locality data are not always available for this species, so calculating the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) was difficult.

",This species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends better.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171271,149171269,Orthonevra shusteri,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-08-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is only known from one locality in Romania. It was collected along a small creek on Ranunculus sp. As in all marsh habitats, the habitat will most probably suffer from habitat alteration by climate change, nitrogen deposition and use of ground or surface water.

Considering that it has not been collected since 1970 and is only known from the type locality, it might be an aberrant specimen of another species. Since its taxonomic status is unclear, this species is assessed as Data Deficient. After establishing its taxonomic status, more research and monitoring will be needed to understand its ecology and population trends.","The specimen was collected along a small creek on a species of Ranunculus (Brădescu 1993). The larva is not known, but will surely live in freshwater close to adult habitat, as in other Orthonevra species.","The possible threats are unknown, but as for all marsh habitats, the habitat will probably suffer from habitat alteration by climate change, nitrogen deposition and use of ground or surface water",This species is only known from one male specimen (Brădescu 1993).,Unknown,"This species is only known from the type specimen, a single male from the province of Muntenia in Romania (district of de Giurgiu, Commune Comana, at 80-90 metres asl.), collected in 1970. It was collected along a small creek on Ranunculus sp. This area is a small nature reserve in the Danube valley, 20 km south of Bucharest.

Since the species has not been collected since 1970 and is only known from the type locality, it might be an aberrant specimen of another species. However, as long as the holotype is not studied in a broader study of Orthonevra, it is treated here as a good species.",This species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. The first step should be to determine its taxonomic status. If it is a good species, then research and monitoring are needed to understand its ecology and population trends.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171282,149171280,Sphegina montana,Least Concern,,2021,2019-11-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread boreo-montane species with many records throughout its range. It is known from many countries in the EU, as well as throughout Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Its occurrence outside Europe will possibly ensure a continuous influx of specimens, ensuring stable populations in Europe. Although the boreo-alpine forests are threatened, as in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) this species is regarded as Least Concern in Europe.","

This is a boreo-montane species, found in mixed deciduous-coniferous humid forests with streams. It is also found in coniferous peat forests and boreal pine forests, where it has been seen visiting flowers of yellow composites, white umbellifers, Fragaria, Ranunculus and Swida alba (Thompson and Torp 1986, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, van Steenis et al. 2013, Mutin et al. 2016, Speight 2020). The larval habitat consists of sappy decay under barks, or in the bast of tree trunks of larch (Krivosheina 2018).

","The boreo-alpine mixed forests and peat-bog forests are under pressure from human activities, such as drainage for agriculture and forestry. In addition, the intensified logging and use of fertilisers and pesticides will decrease the quality of the habitat.","Nothing is known about population size or trend of this species. It is found in rather low numbers at each collecting site, and can be collected over several years at the same sites (Speight and Lucas 1992, Tóth 2011, Mutin et al. 2016).",Unknown,"This is a boreo-montane species with a wide distribution from Belgium to European Russia, and from northern Norway to Italy (Thompson and Torp 1986, Vujić 1990, Brădescu 1991, Maibach et al. 1992, Dirickx 1994, Stănescu and Pârvu 2005, de Groot and Govedić 2008, Heimburg 2018, Speight et al. 2018, Vujić et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Outside Europe, it is also known from the east Palaearctic region in the Altai, Siberia and Russian Far East, and also Japan.",The species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its taxonomy and ecology and population trends. The species has several common names (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Röder 1990), which could help in engaging with the public and taking conservation actions on a national level.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171292,149171290,Chrysogaster mediterraneus,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2020-08-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

In Europe, the species is only known from six localities (one Possibly Extinct) and five widely separated locations (based on water abstraction and urban development as the main threats). The type locality in Montenegro has been destroyed. Within the European Union, the species only had five localities of which four remain, and four locations of which three remain and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 16 km2. At all European localities, it has only been collected once and always in very small numbers, mostly one specimen at a time. The population is considered to be severely fragmented. There is not enough information available about the habitat to establish clearly that it is threatened. However, similar to related species, the habitat suffers from human disturbance (housing and recreational development, climate change, pesticides and so on), which leads to a decline in the habitat quality and the loss of the type locality indicates a decline of the area of occupancy. Thus the species is classified as Endangered both in the EU27 countries and in Europe. The species also occurs outside of Europe, but it is unlikely there will be a significant immigration from outside, and thus the rescue effect is unlikely.","There is only little information available about the habitats of this species in Europe. It is found in and around streams and small marshy areas in thermophilous oak (Quercus pubescens) forests (A. Vujic pers. com. in Speight 2020). It has also been collected on a small open abandoned field with Foeniculum vulgare in a Platanus woodland and with olive grooves close to a small river (unpublished record by Jeroen van Steenis from Samos 2019) (J. van Steenis, pers. comm. 2020). In Europe, the species has been seen visiting Smyrnium perfoliatum, Ferulago sylvatica, and Tordylium apulum (Standfuss and Claußen 2007, Vujić et al. 2020).

In the Asian part of Turkey, the species is collected in deciduous forests (mainly Platanus) with springs and small streams. It also occurs in an area with mixed habitats, such as a Liquidamber orientalis forest with small streams and marshy grasslands and fields with large, flowering Euphorbia species (Reemer and Smit 2007). ","Speight et al. (2020) state that there is not enough data about the species to decide whether it is threatened in Europe. However, the small pools this species relies on will be threatened by drought, agriculture (use of pesticides and draining of the water bodies), land use change, urbanisation and climate change.

The type locality of the species in Montenegro (Boka Kotorska, Morinj) was proposed to be protected as Nature Reserve because of its highly diverse syrphid fauna (c.130 species in 4 km2) and due to the fact that two species were described from this small patch of remaining natural habitat. It was one of the richest areas within the Mediterranean. The Institute for Nature Conservation prepared a protection proposal, but this was never considered in any legal procedure (A. Vujić, pers. comm. 2020). The population at the type locality (Morinj, Montenegro) is now lost to urban development (Van Steenis et al. 2015, 2019).

","Nothing is known about population size of Chrysogaster mediterraneus. The number of collected specimens is very small, so probably the population size is also small over the whole range as well.",Unknown,"The species is known from Greece (from southeast Thessaly, central regions of the mainland, and the eastern Aegean island of Samos), North Macedonia, Montenegro and the Asian part of Turkey (Reemer and Smith 2007, Vujić 1999, Vujić et al. 2020). In addition, there is an unpublished record from Samos (one female, from Valeondades, south of Agios Konstantinos, at 110 metre asl., foraging on Foeniculum vulgare found by J. van Steenis) (J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020).

The type locality of the species in Montenegro (Boka Kotorska, Morinj) was proposed to be protected as a Nature Reserve due to the highly diverse syrphid fauna (c.130 species in 4 km2) and the fact that two species were described from this small patch of remaining natural habitat. It was one of the richest areas within the Mediterranean. The Institute for Nature Conservation prepared a protection proposal. This was never considered in any legal procedure. The type locality now is a developed housing area, and the species has disappeared (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).

In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 142,133 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 20 km2. In the EU27, the EOO is 85,029 km2 and the AOO is 16 km2.

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

No conservation action plans are in place. The most urgent conservation actions for the species are protection and restoration of the nutrient poor, species-rich sites in the Mediterranean area, namely small natural waters with good water quality, and natural watersides. Research and monitoring are also needed to better understand the ecology of this species and its population trends.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171302,149171300,Brachyopa vernalis,Endangered,"B1ab(ii,iii)+2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This species is endemic to Crete and its habitat is threatened in several ways. The few known localities suggest that the species is highly threatened. The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 12-20 km2, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1,750 km2, it has three locations (based on the threats of overgrazing, forest fires and logging) and its habitat quality is declining. Therefore, this species is classified as Endangered, but very close to Critically Endangered.

",The species has been found in Mediterranean deciduous forests visiting flowers of Crataegus (van Steenis et al. 2020).,"As in many Mediterranean areas, this habitat is under threat due to overgrazing by livestock, forest fires and other threats such as forestry management (logging and burning). It is also threatened by climate change causing drought (van Steenis et al. 2020).","This species has been found at three localities, mostly in very low numbers. At one locality, several males were collected. Although Crete has been visited many times by syrphidologists, only a few specimens have been collected, indicating that the species is very rare and shows possible extreme fluctuations in its population (van Steenis et al. 2020). The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"The species is only known from the Greek Island of Crete and is considered to be endemic to this island (van Steenis et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1,750 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is between 8 and 20 km2.",The species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,No conservation actions are in place. More research is needed to establish the habitat preferences and the need for conservation actions such as area and habitat protection and management. Raising awareness will also benefit this species.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149171313,149171310,Brachyopa testacea,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is listed as “Least Concern” on all Regional Red Lists, and its habitats also do not seem to be threatened. The habitat is heavily managed and will produce a constant amount of suitable larval habitat due to regular tree falling. In addition, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Due to its wide distribution and possible extension of the range in the west and southwards, this species is listed as Least Concern both in Europe and the EU27.

","

The adult habitat consists of pine forests or pine-dominated mixed forests, but it can sometimes be observed visiting flowers in broadleaf-dominated mixed forests. The immature stages are known: the larvae are found under the bark of Picea stumps. The adults are often found near damaged coniferous trees and especially stumps of Picea abies, but also in mixed forests, foraging on flowering herbs and shrubs. They visit flowers of several Apiaceae and others such as Acer pseudoplatanus, Anemone nemorosa, Cardaminopsis arenosa, Crataegus spp., Malus spp., Meum spp., Myrrhis odorata, Prunus padus and P. spinosa, Ribes alpinum, Salix spp., Saxifraga granulataSorbus aucuparia, Stellaria holostea, Taraxacum spp., Valeriana spp. and Viburnum opulus (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","The habitat of this species is heavily managed and will produce a constant amount of suitable larval habitat due to regular tree felling. This is favourable for the species, but the use of pesticides in modern forestry could pose a threat to larval and adult survival (van Steenis et al. 2020).","This species is dependent on pine forests, where the larvae develop in rather freshly cut stumps. It seems not to show strong population fluctuations. In many occasions, several specimens have been found together visiting flowers or flying around suitable larval habitat (van Steenis et al. 2020). The population trend is stable.",Stable,"This is a widespread boreo-alpine species found from northern Norway south to the Pyrenees and Bulgaria, and from Belgium east through the Alps and the Baltic States into European Russia (van Steenis et al. 2020). It is also widely distributed in the boreal zone of the Palaearctic region over to the Russian Far East. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the values for the application of a threatened category.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,No conservation actions are in place. More research is needed to understand the potential threats to this species. Research and monitoring are needed to have a better understanding of its population trends as well. Raising awareness about this species is also important.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171323,149171321,Brachyopa grunewaldensis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment Endangered (EN)

This species has a very scattered distribution and a range of habitats, of which several are Red Listed. The population dynamics are not well known. The small area of occupancy (AOO) and the scattered distribution makes this species vulnerable to habitat destruction. The AOO of 140-420 km2, the severely fragmented population, and the decline in habitat quality due to tourism infrastructure development and commercial forestry activities all put this species in the Endangered category in Europe.

In the EU27 countries, the same conditions apply and there are fewer locations, making the area of occupancy (AOO) even smaller. The estimated AOO is between 128 and 384 km2, classifying the species as Endangered in the EU27 as well.","

The adults are found in a wide variety of forest types from Mediterranean, mixed thermophilous, alluvial and riparian forest. The use of emergence traps to collect adults suggest that the larvae live in rot-holes of deciduous trees (Fraxinus and Quercus). The adults visit flowers of several tree species, such as Acer, Crataegus and Sorbus, or fly close to sap runs on a wide variety of deciduous trees (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","The habitat of this species, in particular alluvial and Quercus forests, are threatened by tourism infrastructure development and commercial forestry activities. Commercial forestry does not support oak forest and favours beech forest which can be particularly problematic (van Steenis et al. 2020).","This species is most often found in very low numbers, and it is not recorded repeatedly over the years from the same localities. It is seemingly a rare and very scattered species with very low population densities and possibly also with large fluctuations (van Steenis et al. 2020). The population trend is unknown. The species is considered to be severely fragmented as mostly one or max two specimens have been recorded in each locality, which indicates that is has very small subpopulations over its range, which do not seem to support viable subpopulations. In addition, these subpopulations are widely separated.",Unknown,"This is a very rare but widespread species in Europe. It is not known from outside Europe and is considered to be a European endemic. It is found from Spain to mainland Greece in the south, and through France and Serbia into Belgium and Poland in the north (van Steenis et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is above the thresholds for threatened categories in both Europe and the EU27 countries. In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) ranges between 140 and 420 km2, and between 128 and 384 km2 in the EU27 countries.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,There are no conservation plans in action. More research is needed to establish the habitat preferences and thus the need to establish conservation actions. Increased monitoring is required to understand the population trend of this species better. Several of the habitats in which this species has been recorded are Red Listed.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171333,149171331,Sphaerophoria rueppelli,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread throughout Europe and major parts of the Palaearctic region. While some of its primary habitats in large river valleys have been significantly reduced, other natural habitats such as salt grassland still exist. It can also live in many ruderal habitats and - provided enough herbaceous plants are present - even live among crops. Despite losses in the area and quality of suitable habitat, it is still present throughout its natural range and can quickly recolonize suitable areas if aphid colonies build up and there are some flowering herbaceaous plants in the vicinity. This is due to its short generation time of a few weeks, several generations per year and migratory behaviour following its larval food sources (aphid colonies). Despite population reductions, this species is not threatened because it can live in various anthropogenic habitats. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, and the species is therefore assessed as Least Concern in both regions.","This species occurs in a wide variety of open habitats, often with high nutrient levels such as saltmarshes, river banks of lowland rivers, irrigation ditches, dry river beds and in a number of crops (Sinapis, Brassica, Zea mays etc.), both in central Europe and in the Mediterranean. Adults visit a wide range of flowers of herbaceous plants in crops or along field margins, such as Asteraceae (Matricaria, Aster, Taraxacum), Chenopodiaceae (Chenopodium album), Brassicaceae, Polygonaceae (Polygonum aviculare, P. persicaria), but also halophytic plants such as Salsola kali (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020, Speight et al. 2018). The larvae was described by Bhatia (1939), and feeds on aphids of herbaceous plants such as Chenopodium, Brassica, Nicotiana or Sonchus (Bhatia 1939, Dusek and Laska 1974, Marcos-Garcia 1981). The generation time under laboratory conditions from egg to adult is only two weeks (Amorós-Jiménez et al. 2012) and in the field it has several generations per year.","The main threats to this species are the extreme reductions in herbaceous wild plants (weeds) on agricultural land, and the abundant use of herbicides and pesticides. Fragmentation of habitats by very large monocultures and the loss of undisturbed ruderal vegetation is also a threat.","This is a widely distributed species with large fluctuations in its population, and quick local establishment of new subpopulations at suitable sites with abundant aphid populations. Some decline of its population can be assumed in the past and still ongoing because this is a species that can use many arable weeds, both as adults for flower visits and as larvae if aphids are present. Modern agriculture has almost completely eliminated herbaceous plants from crops by herbicide use, and hence the total suitable habitat area has declined and with it also its population size. However, it is still present along field margins and in rural places, and its current range is not reduced. Overall, its population is considered to be declining in Europe and the EU 27.",Decreasing,"This species is widespread throughout Europe, from Norway south to the Canary Isles. It is known form a single locality in eastern Ireland (Speight 2008). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, but these cannot be calculated accurately because the distribution is largely based on country checklists rather than exact locality data.

Outside Europe it occurs in North Africa and eastwards to Turkey, Asia, Russia, Afghanistan to China, Korea and the Russian Far East (Speight 2018). It is also present in the eastern parts of the Afrotropical region (Dirickx 1998, Ssymank et al. 2020).","The species is an important pollinator species in Mediterranean glasshouse cultures, and at the same time is used as biocontrol for aphid pests.",Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species other than sites that are partially protected. However these sites are often without specific restrictions on intensive agriculture, the main factor causing declines and fluctuations in its numbers. Protection should be more effective and its habitat should be preserved. It is not considered threatened in Europe (Speight 2020), and in many countries it has been assessed as Least Concern or Near Threatened, such as Denmark (2019), Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), Finland (2019), Norway (2015) and Sweden (2020). Additional research should be carried out on its distribution, population size and biology. Monitoring is recommended for population and habitat trends.",Afrotropical|Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171343,149171341,Sphaerophoria boreoalpina,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has a boreoalpine distribution in the northern part of Fennoscandia and the Alps. It is listed as Least Concern in most of the country lists in northern Europe, and is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020). As the population is still largely stable and both the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are well above the thresholds to be considered threatened, this species is assessed as Least Concern. Further monitoring of the population is needed, especially in the Alps.","In the Alps and Altai this species occurs in sparsely-vegetated acidic high-mountain moraine soils and screes in the subalpine to alpine zone. In northern Europe, it can be found on montane tundra, sub-alpine Betula forest and scrub and on palsa mire (Speight 2018, Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). Adults have been recorded visiting the flowers of Polygonum, Rubus chamaemorus (van Steenis (1998b), Ranunculus nivalis, Trifolium (Goeldlin in Speight 2018), Bistorta vivipara (Bartsch et al. (2009a), Sanguisorba and Tanacetum (Barkalov 2012). The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","There are no major threats known to be currently affecting this species, but research is needed, especially for the alpine subpopulations. A potential future threat to this Nordic and high-mountain species in the Alps could be climate change, especially in the alpine subpopulations, with a risk of major reduction both in extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO). Its habitats have been assessed in the European Red List of Habitats as follows: subarctic dwarf Salix scrub (F2.1), boreal mountain Betula woodland (G1.9a), acidic moraine soils and high mountain siliceous screes (H2.3) are all assessed as Least Concern (Janssen et al. 2017). Only a small proportion of its habitats (such as palsa mire D3.1) are highly threatened and assessed as Critically Endangered.","This species occurs regularly in suitable habitats, and there is no evidence of a population decline. Precise information on its population size is needed, particularly for the isolated alpine subpopulations because they are not well known and have only a few records. Overall the population is considered stable in Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"This species has a boreal alpine distribution in the northern part of Fennoscandia, the Alps and, out of the European region, the Altai Mountains (Speight 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures known or needed for this species. It is not considered as threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), and is assessed in northern Europe as Least Concern for Sweden (2010), Finland (2019) and Norway (2015). The regional situation in high-mountain populations in the Alps has not been assessed. Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, especially in the Alps, as well as on its life history (larvae), ecology and threats. Monitoring is recommended on the population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171353,149171351,Platycheirus subordinatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a northern Arctic and high-mountain species not considered at risk in Europe (Speight 2016). It lives in a range of mostly widespread habitats in northern Europe that are not threatened, such as taiga, sub-alpine Betula forest and dwarf-scrub tundra. Only additional bog and mire habitats such as palsa mire are threatened. Considering its wide habitat use, no evidence of significant population decline and large extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO), this species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe. The AOO is small in the EU 27 at around 1900 km2, but the habitat is not significantly declining and the population is not severely fragmented, and so it is assessed as Least Concern (LC) for the time being. Research on its population and monitoring of its population and habitat trends are needed.","This species is found in taiga, sub-alpine Betula forest and dwarf scrub tundra (Bartsch and Nielsen in Speight 2018) and palsa mire (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). Adults fly low through dwarf scrub and ground vegetation, or rest in the sun on foliage (Speight 2018). The adults have been recorded visiting flowers such as Cerastium alpinum, Parnassia palustris, Potentilla crantzii, Ranunculus, Salix, Caltha palustris, Rubus chamaemorus and Viola biflora (Nielsen in Speight 2018, Van Steenis and Zuidhoff, 2013). The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","There are currently no threats known to this species, but in future climate change could possibly lead to habitat changes, especially the palsa mire habitat. The shrub tundra (F1.1) boreal mountain Betula and Populus tremula woodland (G1.9a) and Pinus sylvestris taiga woodland (G3,B) are assessed as Least Concern in the European Red List of Habitats. Picea taiga woodland (G3.A) is assessed as Near Threatened. Palsa mire (D3.1) has suffered a decline and is assessed as Critically Endangered (Janssen et al. 2017) but this represents only a small proportion of the habitat of this species.","The population is largely stable across its European range and within the EU27, based on the information available, and it occurs in widespread northern habitats.",Stable,"This is a northern Arctic and high-mountain species found in Fennoscandia to European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far beyond the thresholds to be considered threatened in Europe, but in the EU 27 the EOO is large and the AOO is relatively small at an estimated 1,900 km2.

Outside Europe, the species occurs from Siberia to the Russian Far East (Mutin and Barkalov 1999, Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures known for this species, but research on its population is needed, and monitoring of the population and habitat trends is also needed. In the Finnish Red List, it is assessed as Least Concern (Kahanpää 2010).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171363,149171361,Platycheirus parmatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread across Scandinavia and is scattered throughout much of Europe. Its coniferous forest habitats are not considered vulnerable, and the population trend is considered to be stable in Europe and the EU 27. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) is large in both Europe and the EU 27 and it is considered very likely to be far more widespread than the currently available data suggest, thus it is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and the EU 27.

Monitoring of its population and habitat trends, as well as research on its habitat range, ecology, biology (particularly of the larvae) and threats is required.","This species exists in Fagus and Abies forest up to the upper limits of Picea and on into the Picea mugo zone (Speight 2018, Skevington et al. 2019).

The adults are in flight between April and June, or July at higher altitudes (Bartsch et al. 2009, Tóth 2011, Speight 2018), and have been recorded visiting the flowers of Alliaria petiolata, Allium ursinum, Anemone nemorosa, Ranunculus, Salix, Stellaria, Vaccinium (Speight 2020) and Caltha palustris (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). The larvae were described by Goeldlin (1974, as ovalis), having been reared on aphids from eggs laid by gravid females.","The habitat of this species can be threatened by logging and industrial wood harvesting, but there has been very little research on this. Climate change is increasing the risk of drought which can threaten coniferous forest habitat.",The population trend of this species is considered to be stable in Europe and the EU 27. It is widely distributed with a continuous supply of records from across its range.,Stable,"This species is present in Norway (Nielsen 1999), Sweden and Finland (Bartsch et al. 2009) southwards to the Ardennes and the Vosges in Belgium, the Netherlands and France (Sarthou 1996, Reemer et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), through the Alps in central Europe (Tóth 2011) to Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Serbia (van Steenis et al. 2015) and the European parts of Russia.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in both Europe and the EU 27. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 3,568,057 km2 in Europe and 15,340 km2 in the EU 27. It is likely that the species is more widespread than is currently understood.

 Outside Europe, it occurs in Siberia and the Russian Far East (Mutin and Barkalov 1999), Alaska and northern Canada (Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019). It has been extending its range westwards for the last 20 or more years (Speight 2020).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions known to be taking place for this species. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends, as well as research on its habitat range, ecology, biology (particularly of the larvae) and threats is required. Conservation of the forest habitat is needed by mitigating the impacts of wood harvesting. In Norway (Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020), Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020) and Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), this species is listed as Least Concern on the national Red Lists.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171374,149171371,Platycheirus latimanus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

Within the European region, this species occurs in Scandinavia, northern European Russia and Bulgaria, and overall its population is considered to be in decline because of the decline in its habitat. It occurs in boreal Betula forests northwards through sub-arctic Betula forests and into taiga and dwarf Betula/Salix scrub tundra. Its habitat is likely to be predominantly threatened by climate change and commercial forestry practices. The extent of occurrence (EOO) for Europe and the EU 27 is quite large.

The area of occupancy (AOO) is large in Europe (229,779 km2), but smaller in the EU 27 (2,612 km2). Considering the fairly large AOO in Europe, this species is assessed as Least Concern (LC). However, due to the smaller AOO in the EU27 and the decline of its habitat but the lack of severe fragmentation, it is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) in the EU 27.","This species exists in boreal Betula forests (Nielsen 1981) northwards through sub-arctic Betula forests and into taiga and dwarf Betula/Salix scrub tundra (Speight 2020). The adults are in flight from the end of June to mid-August, and are known to visit Geranium sylvaticum (Nielsen 1981). The larval and pupal stages are unknown, but the larva is presumed to be aphidophagous.","This species is possibly threatened by the impacts of climate change on its habitat. Commercial forestry is more of an immediate threat in Scandinavia. In Bulgaria, its habitat is primarily affected by the building of infrastructure (urbanisation) and climate change.","In Finland this species is in decline due to habitat loss, and this is likely also to be the case for most of the central and southern European subpopulations. It was recorded in Bulgaria in 2015 in the high mountains which are at risk from climate change, which implies at least a projected decline. The Finnish and Bulgarian subpopulations are considered to be severely fragmented, but not those of Sweden and Norway. Overall it is likely to be declining in Europe and the EU 27.",Decreasing,"Within the European region, this species is found in northern Norway (Nielsen 1981, Harto and Kerppola 2014), northern Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009), at one locality in northern Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014) and into northern Russia (Nielsen and Barkalov 2017).

It has previously been misidentified, confused with four or five similar species, but the currently understood range is fairly clear. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is very large for Europe and the EU 27, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is calculated as 229,779 km2 for Europe, and 2,612 km2 for the EU27.

Outside Europe, it occurs through Siberia to the Russian Far East, Japan (Hokkaido) and Mongolia (Mutin and Barkalov 1999, Yokohama and Haga 2003, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Speight 2020).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions known for this species, and more research on suitable conservation actions would be beneficial. Monitoring of its population and habitats is needed. Research on its distribution, ecology and developmental stages is required. In Finland, it has been assessed as Near Threatened (NT) (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), and in Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020) and Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020) it is assessed as Least Concern.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171384,149171382,Platycheirus laskai,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This is an European endemic species that is found in forest habitats within northern and central Europe. It is a rare species that has a severely fragmented population in central Europe, but not throughout its distribution. There is a projected decline in the area of occupancy (AOO) and the extent and quality of its habitat due to the threats posed by logging activities and climate change. The AOO for Europe is estimated to be only 156 km2, and 120 km2 for the EU 27, although its full distribution needs further investigation. Based on currently available knowledge, this species is assessed as Near Threatened, close to qualifying under Criterion B2 in Europe and the EU 27.","This species occurs in forests, woodland edges and in open areas in deciduous forest of Betula/Salix (T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2020), and in the northern part of its distribution on dry slopes in flowering vegetation (Nielsen 1999). Its habitat in the Alps needs to be better understood, such as in Germany where it occurs in the western part of the Alps.

The adults can be seen between mid-June and the end of July (Speight 2020) visiting flowers such as Crepis (Bartsch et al. 2009) and Geranium sylvaticum (Nielsen 1999). The larval stages are unknown but should be aphidophagous.","This species may be impacted by logging and wood harvesting, and in the future it may be impacted by climate change.","Overall, this species is considered very rare in Europe and the EU 27, although it is more common in the northern boreal part of Europe: it is likely to be a relict species from the glacial period. In Germany it is considered extremely rare (Ssymank et al. 2011). It was last recorded in 2016 from Sweden. The population is considered severely fragmented, and the population trend is likely to be decreasing, although this is currently unknown in Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,"This European endemic has previously been confused with Platycheirus sticticus, and so its true range is uncertain but is not expected to be much more widespread than is currently understood. It is confirmed to occur in Norway, Sweden, Finland (Nielsen 1999, Barstch et al. 2009, Haarto and Kerppola 2014, Speight 2020), Germany (Black forest) (Ssymank et al. 2011), Czechia (Nielsen 1999), northern Italy and Austria (Heimburg 2018). The data in GBIF (2019) correspond to those of Bartsch et al. (2009). The uncertain occurrence (see map) of this species in Scandinavia comes from Bartsch et al. (2009).

The area of occupancy (AOO) is 156 km2 in Europe and 120 km2 in the EU27. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is very large (2,139,837 km2 in Europe and 1,577,700 km2 in the EU 27).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions currently known for this species. Monitoring of its population and habitat is recommended. Research on its distribution, biology (particularly the larval stage), ecology, life history and threats is needed.

This species is assessed as Least Concern in the national Red Lists of Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020) and Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171394,149171392,Platycheirus goeldlini,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-01-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

This alpine species has been found in three localities in Scandinavia and a small number of localities in the Alps. It relies on alpine grasslands, which can be threatened by climate change, tourism infrastructure development and intensive grazing by livestock. Many of the records are quite old and it is considered to be under-recorded. It has been assessed as Data Deficient (DD) in the Red Lists of Sweden and Finland.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large for both Europe and the EU 27. The area of occupancy is 36 km2 for Europe and 24 km2 for the EU 27. Many of the data are old and the species is considered to be under-recorded, so whilst the AOOs are small for Europe and the EU 27, these are considered to be under-estimates. This species is therefore assessed as Data Deficient in Europe and the EU 27. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends, as well as research on its biology and distribution range are required to understand its situation better.",This species was described in 2004 by Nielsen. It is known to occur in the open ground of unimproved calcareous montane and alpine grasslands up to 2400 metres above sea level (Speight 2018). It has been recorded feeding on Salix flowers as an adult during its flight period in July/August (Nielsen 2004). Its larval and pupal stages are currently unknown.,"Although the direct threats to this species are not well understood, the main threats to its habitats - alpine grassland - are unsustainable grazing practices, the construction of tourism infrastructure (mainly ski resorts), and perturbations caused by changes in land use and climate change. These habitats tolerate moderate grazing, but overgrazing and overstocking can destroy the vegetation and lead to soil erosion (García-González 2008).","The population trend of this species is not known in Europe or the EU 27. In Finland, its presence is uncertain because it has not been observed there for over 100 years. It does not have many records, whilst other species are regularly recorded in the Scandinavian countries where this species is theoretically present. Females are unknown.",Unknown,"This species has been found in Finland (although this is considered uncertain due to it being an old record) (Bartsch et al. 2009), eastern Sweden (GBIF 2019) and the Alps in eastern France, Switzerland, northern Italy (Nielsen 2004, 2014; Speight et al. 2018).

Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is large for both Europe and the EU 27. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 36 km2 for Europe and 24 km2 for the EU 27. Some of the records are old, and it is considered to be under-recorded, so whilst the AOOs are small for Europe and the EU 27, these are considered to be under-estimates.

Outside Europe, it occurs in the central Asian parts of Russia (Barkalov and Nielsen 2009) and the Altai mountains of south-eastern Siberia (Barkalov and Nielsen 2008).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are currently known for this species. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends, as well as study of its biology and distributional range are required. Preventing grazing practices can help to preserve its habitat types. New ski resorts should not be built in areas where the alpine vegetation has high conservation value (García-González 2008). In the Red Lists of Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020) and Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), this species is assessed as Data Deficient.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171410,149171402,Platycheirus fimbriatus,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-01-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional expert questions: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional expert questions: Data Deficient (DD)

There is only one record of this species in Europe and the EU 27, from one locality in Hungary in 2008. It is considered to be very under-recorded and hence its distribution, population trend and size is unknown. Its habitat and ecology are poorly understood because much of the available information comes from outside Europe, although it is known to occur in Fagus forests. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are currently estimated to be only 4 km2, based on the currently known single locality. Due to lack of data and knowledge we have on this species, it is assessed as Data Deficient (DD) in Europe and the EU 27. Extensive research on its full distribution, habitat, biology and ecology, threats and conservation actions needs to be undertaken. Furthermore, monitoring of the population and habitat trends is needed.","This species is found in open Fagus forest (Nielsen 2014, Speight 2020). In Hungary it is known to feed on Salix spp. as an adult (Nielsen 2014) and the flight period is in April, and May/June outside of Europe (Tóth 2011, Nielsen 2014). The developmental stages are unknown (Speight 2018). Further research is needed to understand its habitat and ecology in Europe.",The threats to this species are unknown because there are not enough data on its habitat and biology.,"There are no data on population trend or size for this species because it has been recorded only once, in 2008 in Hungary. It is believed to be very under-recorded because there have been insufficient surveys for hoverflies where this species was previously found.",Unknown,"The distribution of this species is known only from Hungary in Europe (Tóth 2011). The area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are 4 km2, because it is only found in one locality in Europe and the EU 27.

Outside Europe, it is found in central and eastern Russia and Mongolia, according to Nielsen (2014), who studied data from museum collections.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions currently being taken for this species. Extensive research on its full distribution, habitat, biology and ecology, threats and conservation actions needs to be undertaken. Furthermore, monitoring of the population and habitat trends is needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171422,149171419,Melanostoma scalare,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States because it is widespread and abundant in many habitat types and many countries, and is not subject to major threats.","Melanostoma scalare occurs in both coniferous and deciduous forests (mainly humid and mesophilus). It is largely anthropophilic species, occurring in gardens, parks and along hedges. Adults fly from march to September visiting flowers of: Graminae, umbellifers, Allium ursinum, Arbutus unedo, Caltha, Cosmos, Euphorbia, Ilex, Leontodon, Plantago, Prunus spinosa, Ranunculus, Rosa, Salix repens, Taraxacum, Verbascum, and Veronica (Speight 2018). The larva is described and figured by Dušek and Láska (1959).",

This is one of the commonest hoverfly species in Europe and seems to be subject to no threats.

,There is no estimate of the population size for this species because it is very abundant and widespread in Europe and other continents.,Unknown,"Melanostoma scalare is widespread in Europe. It occurs from Iceland and Scandinavia to the Iberian peninsula, in the Mediterranean Basin. It also ranges from Ireland eastwards through most of Europe into European parts of Russia.

Besides Europe this species occurs in Siberia (from the Urals to the Pacific coast (Kuril Isles), in North Africa and eastern parts of the Afrotropical region south to Zimbabwe; and throughout the Oriental region to New Guinea (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphid crop pests (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,"

Melanostoma scalare is not subject to any targeted conservation action because it is widely distributed. However, the apparent preference of this species for forest (Hadrava in litt.) makes desirable the monitoring of its populations to understand the effects of changes in forest management on this species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171433,149171430,Melanostoma mellinum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is listed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27 Member States because it is widespread and abundant in many habitat types and occurs in many countries, and appears not to be subject to major threats.

","Melanostoma mellinum occurs in many types of habitats such as open country, grassland and heathland, plus grassy clearings and tracksides in woodland. It also occurs in most types of farmland, including arable crops and ""improved"" pasture, in suburban gardens and parks and along firebreaks and tracks in conifer plantations (Speight 2018). The larva is described and figured by Dušek and Laska (1960), and is aphid-feeding.",

This is one of the commonest hoverfly species in Europe and seems not to be subject to major threats.

,

There is no estimate of the population size for this species because it is very abundant and widespread in Europe and other continents. This species' population could be affected by changes in agricultural practices (e.g. intensity of mowing/grazing and/or use of pesticides and fertilizers) due to the tendency of this species to occur in croplands.

,Unknown,"This is a widespread species that occurs in Europe from Iceland and Scandinavia to the Iberian Peninsula and the Mediterranean, and from Ireland eastwards through most of Europe into European parts of Russia (Speight 2018).

Besides Europe Melanostoma mellinum occurs in Siberia (from the Urals to the Pacific coast), North Africa and North America (from Alaska to Quebec and south to Washington) (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphid crop pests (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,

There are no threats identified for this species and conservation actions are unnecessary at this point.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171444,149171441,Melanostoma mellarium,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment:  Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern globally due to having a wide range across northern Europe and because no major threats have been identified, although it is relatively rare. In the EU27, this species is also Least Concern due to having a wide range across northern Europe although it is relatively rare.","Melanostoma mellarium occurs in forests (Fagus/Picea, Abies, Picea and Larix forests) and montane and unimproved grasslands. Adults fly from June to July visiting flowers of Euphorbia and Ranunculus. The larva is undescribed (Speight 2018).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species.

,There is no information about the population size and trends for this species in Europe. although it appears to be relatively rare. The majority of specimens were collected in Finland.,Unknown,"The geographic range of this species is uncertain due to confusion with other species until recently, but it presently appears to be endemic to Europe. Confirmed records are from Norway, Sweden, Finland, southern France, Luxembourg (Speight 2018), and Spain (Ricarte and Marcos Garcia 2017). There are unpublished records from various parts of the Alps (not mapped), the Pyrenees and Ireland (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,

There are no conservation actions known for this species. Research to confirm the distribution of the species and understand the population trend and life history is needed.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171454,149171452,Melanostoma incompletum,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is restricted to three islands (Tenerife, La Palma and Gomera) in the Canary Islands, Spain. It is listed as Endangered because the area of occupancy (AOO) is 104 km2, the extent of occurrence is low (6,043 km2), the number of locations is 4-7 and it is estimated that there is a continuing decline in the quality and extent of its habitat. Further research is needed into the population size and trends and its ecological requirements, and to understand better the threats affecting the species. This assessment takes a precautionary approach and presumes the species is considered to occur at five or fewer locations defined by threats from fire, tourist development and overgrazing by goats, and consequently lists this species as Endangered.","There is very little information about the habitat and ecology of this species. The climate is subtropical and the species has been found on flowers of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), on road verges and in gorges. The flight season is January to December. This species is suspected to be zoophagous (Burt and Mengual 2018).","

This species is threatened by habitat destruction. Infrastructure development (mostly due to tourism) can be regarded as the major threat to the habitat of the species. Additional threats in some parts of the species range could include overgrazing by feral goats, tourism related activities, and increasing fire risk as a result of climate change.

","There is no information about population size and trends. There have been around 200 specimens collected so far. The majority of specimens were collected in Tenerife island (from 1913 to 1974), followed by La Palma and Gomera (from the latter of which only 4 specimens were collected in 1974). Most records are historic; recent records are represented only by a specimen from Tenerife in 2013 and new material collected from La Palma in 2017. Even though Báez (1977) studied the hoverflies of all the Canary Islands, M. incompletum was not found in the eastern islands. New surveys are needed to confirm the absence of this species from the eastern islands.",Unknown,"Melanostoma incompletum is endemic to the Canary Islands, Spain, where it occurs on Tenerife, La Palma and Gomera islands (Báez 1977, Leclercq 1975, Ricarte and Marcos García 2017, Burt and Mengual 2018). Based on known records its area of occupancy has been estimated at 104 km2.","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. The species has been recorded from fennel and so may have a potential role in crop pollination, but the rarity of this species makes its commercial exploitation difficult.",Terrestrial,"Melanostoma incompletum is not subject to any protection or conservation action. Known localities on all three islands occur within Natura 2000 sites and it is considered a 'Safe Native' species (Canary Islands Biodiversity Data Bank). Additional monitoring is needed to better understand the habitat requirements, population trends and impacts of threats, and research is needed to clarify its ecology and identify suitable sites and resources that should be protected to benefit this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171464,149171462,Melanostoma certum,Least Concern,,2021,2021-07-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is so far restricted in Europe to Scandinavia, where it is catalogued as Least Concern in both the Finnish and Swedish National Red Lists. The taxonomic status of this species was clarified recently (Haarto and Ståhls 2014) and its area of occupancy at the European/EU27 (currently estimated at 180/156 km2) may warrant revision following further research. Although it is known from a fairly low number of locations (15 in Europe/10 in the EU27) defined by exposure to declines in habitat quality due to overgrazing and climate change, M. certum might be present in a much higher number of locations in Scandinavia and present even in nearby European states. Thus, following the Scandinavian national Red Lists, M. certum is regarded as Least Concern (LC) in the present assessment. More research is needed to clearly define the taxonomy of the species.","Melanostoma certum occurs in open ground: unimproved, humid montane and alpine grassland and moor (palsa mire) (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). Adults flight from June to July, and August at higher elevations. It has been recorded visiting the flowers of the following plants: Carex spp., Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus. The larva is not described (Speight 2018).",The main threat to this species is habitat loss (both in quantity and quality) due to overgrazing. Climate change may also pose a threat to this species mainly found in Scandinavia.,There is no information on the population size and trend for this species. Only ten specimens were collected in Finland.,Unknown,This European endemic species is so far known only from Scandinavia. According to Haarto and Ståhls (2014) this species occurs in northern Europe north of 68 °N.,"This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"

Melanostoma certum is not subject to any targeted conservation action. In the 2019 Finland National Red List the species is considered Least Concern (LC). In Sweden and Norway this species it is also regarded as Least Concern and additional monitoring is needed to better understand the population trends and distribution, ecology, and impacts of potential threats. Research is needed to clearly define the taxonomy of the species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171475,149171472,Melangyna triangulifera,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

In Europe, this species is Least Concern due to having a wide range across north and central Europe, relatively large known area of occupancy and number of locations (55-60) which is above the threshold for a threatened category, and because no major threats have been identified.

On the EU27, this species is also Least Concern due to having a wide range across north and central Europe and no identified threats.

","Melangyna triangulifera occurs in forest (humid deciduous forest, including alluvial hardwood forest, and alluvial gallery forest). This species has also been recorded in parks and gardens. Adults fly from April to August visiting flowers of white umbellifers, Acer platanoides, Anemone nemorosa, Bunias orientalis, Galium, Ligustrum, Lonicera, Prunus, Ranunculus, Ribes, Salix, Tilia cordata (Speight 2018). The larva is described and figured in colour by Rotheray (1994).",

There are not specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,"There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe. The majority of the specimens were collected in Norway, Sweden, Netherlands and UK. Only six specimens were collected in Serbia (mainly from the north part: Vojvodina Province).",Unknown,"Melangyna triangulifera occurs from Scandinavia to the central France. It is also present from Britain east through northern and central parts of Eurasia to the Pacific (Speight 2018).

Elsewhere, this species occurs in North America (from the Yukon to Minnesota, Massachusetts and New York) (Speight 2018).","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphid crop pests (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,

There are not specific conservation actions for this species. Additional monitoring is needed to better understand the population trends.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171486,149171483,Melangyna quadrimaculata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern on the regional and EU27 levels due to its extensive range and because no threats have been identified.,"Melangyna quadrimaculata occurs in old deciduous forest (humid Fagus and Quercus). It can also occur in extensive urban/suburban parks in which overmature or mature trees have been retained. Adults fly from February to April visiting flowers of Alnus, Anemone nemorosa, Carpinus, Chrysosplenium oppositifolium, Corylus, Hamamelis mollis, Lonicera xylosteum, Populus tremula, Salix, Sambucus (Speight 2018). The larva is described and figured by Rotheray (1988) from larvae collected on Abies alba. The larva is figured in colour by Rotheray (1994).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,"There is no information about population trends. Most specimens have been collected in Norway, Sweden, Netherlands and the UK. There is just one record of this species in Serbia, only two specimens from Poland.",Unknown,"Melangyna quadrimaculata occurs from southern Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark to Belgium. It is also present from Ireland eastwards through central Europe into European parts of Russia.

Outside Europe it ranges through Siberia to the Pacific coast (Sakhalin) (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphid crop pests (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,

There are no conservation actions known for this species. Research on population trends is needed. Monitoring is recommended.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171496,149171494,Melangyna pavlovskyi,Not Applicable,,2021,2020-03-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Melangyna pavlovskyi has recently colonized Europe and the EU27 from the Russian Far East (Bygebjerg 2011, Van de Meutter et al. 2015). Bygebjerg (2011) thinks that it has been introduced in parts of Europe, meaning that it has not arrived in Europe by natural expansion from its original area of distribution. It is consequently regarded as introduced for the purposes of this assessment, and it is Not Applicable for either Europe or the European Union.","Melangyna pavlovskyi seems to prefer forest: humid Pinus/Betula forest/acidophilous Picea forest, and mixed coniferous and deciduous forest. Adults fly from end of March to the beginning of May, visiting flowers of Prunus and Salix (Bygebjerg 2011). The larva is unknown, but expected to be entomophagous, like other species of this genus (Speight 2018).","

Apparently there are no specific threats for this species in Europe, since it appears to be flourishing in this region following its arrival from the Russian Far East.

","Van de Meutter et al. (2015) state that this species is rapidly expanding its range in western Europe and that it can be very abundant locally. Apart from this, little is known on the population size and trend of this species in Europe.",Unknown,"In the European region, Melangyna pavlovskyi is recorded from Denmark (Bygebjerg 2011), France (Langlois and Speight 2020), Belgium, the Netherlands and Poland. This species has recently colonized Europe, supposedly, from the Russian Far East (Van de Meutter et al. 2015), from where it was described. Bygebjerg (2011) states that M. pavlovskyi was introduced in Denmark, but whether the arrival and expansion in Europe of this species is natural or human-mediated it is unclear at present. It is also present in Japan (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"

There are no conservation actions for this species and it is not a candidate for conservation actions because it appears to be here introduced in Europe from the Russian Far East.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171506,149171504,Melangyna lucifera,Least Concern,,2021,2021-07-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is mainly distributed in Scandinavia, where it is catalogued as Least Concern in Sweden and in Norway. Although M. lucifera is a forest species and changes in the quality and extent of this habitat may threaten it, there is no evidence of specific impacts and it has a wide extent of occurrence. It is consequently listed as Least Concern at both the European and EU27 levels.","Melangyna lucifera occurs in forest (Betula/Pinus/Salix and boreal pine forests). Adults fly from beginning of March to May, visiting flowers of Acer platanoides, Crocus vernus, and male Salix. The larval biology of this species is unknown (Speight 2018), but it is assumed to be predatory on aphids.","

Reduction in forest quality and cover may affect subpopulations of this species in Europe, but there is no confirmed evidence of specific impacts on this species.

","The population of M. lucifera seems to be larger in northern Europe than in the south. Most records of this species are from Scandinavia, where it appears to be common. In southern countries there are few records of M. lucifera, for example two collected specimens in Serbia (Juhor and Fruška Gora mountains). The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"In the European region, Melangyna lucifera has been recorded from Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, the Netherlands, Germany, the Czech Republic, northern Italy, and Ukraine.

Besides Europe, this species is also found in Siberia (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation actions for this species. This species is regarded as Least Concern in Sweden (https://artfakta.se) and Norway (https://www.biodiversity.no). Research into the life history of species is essential for proposing effective conservation actions, but the larval biology of this species is unknown (Speight 2018).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171517,149171514,Melangyna lasiophthalma,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-17 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Melangyna lasiophthalma qualifies for the category Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States due to its widespread distribution in Europe/EU27 and large number of locations where found. It appears to be a generalist species inhabiting different forest types but also scrub, urban gardens, etc. Adults feed on a wide range of flowers and larvae on insects of different taxa (Rojo et al. 2003).

","Melangyna lasiophthalma occurs in forest (acidiophilous Quercus forest; Fraxinus/Salix gallery woods along rivers; wet forest of Alnus/Salix; Betula/Salix forest; coniferous forest of Abies/Picea and plantations). Besides forest, this species occurs in scrub, gardens and orchards. Adults fly from March to June, visiting flowers of a large list of plant species: Acer pseudoplatanus, Alnus glutinosa, Anemone nemorosa, Anthriscus, Caltha, Chrysosplenium oppositifolium, Corylus avellana, Euphorbia, Ilex, Lonicera xylosteum, Narcissus, Oxalis, Prunus laurocerasus, P. spinosa, Ranunculus, Salix, Sambucus, Sorbus aucuparia, Taraxacum, Tussilago, and Ulex. The larva is known and belongs to the aphidophagous guild of species (Speight 2018).",There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.,"There is not an accurate picture of the population size and trend of M. lasiophthalma in Europe. However, its wide distribution and apparently high local abundance (in Serbia, there are records of 269 collected specimens from different protected areas: Fruška Gora, Stara planina, and Kopaonik National Parks) suggest this species' population is large and stable.",Unknown,"Melangyna lasiophthalma is widely distributed in Europe. It occurs from Iceland and Scandinavia south to the Pyrenees and mountainous parts of Spain. It is also present from Ireland eastwards through northern Europe and mountainous parts of central Europe into European parts of Russia.

In Asia, it is distributed through much of Siberia. Besides Europe and Asia, this species is found in the Nearctic, from Alaska to Colorado and Maryland (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphid crop pests (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,

There are no conservation actions for this species in Europe.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171528,149171525,Leucozona laternaria,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

It is a widespread and locally relatively frequent species in humid well wooded landscapes still, but decreasing in some areas of temperate Europe. It inhabits mainly damp open ground habitats with tall herbs along streams and tracks in or close to humid deciduous and coniferous forests. This species is likely affected by the loss of these unimproved open ground ecotone habitats in cultural landscapes. No conservation action is required at present, except research on the population trends and on the larval biology, and to understand the causes of decline in some areas and estimate possible impact of Harmonia axiridis on this species.

The species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.","It inhabits mainly damp open ground habitats with dense and tall herbs along woodland streams and tracks in or near humid coniferous and deciduous forests (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Ball et al. 2011), up to 2,000 m in the Alps (Maibach et al. 1992). Adults are usually seen visiting flowers, especially white Apiaceae, such as Heracleum spondylium and Angelica spp. Anthriscus sylvestris, Laserpitium latifolium, Aegopodium podagraria, but it visits also Filipendula ulmaria, Myrrhis odorata and Viburnum opulus (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Álvarez et al. 2018). The flight period of adults is from June to August, with occasional specimens in September (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019). It is a univoltine species with diapausing and overwintering larvae (Speight et al. 2016, Dušek and Láska 1962). The larva feeds on aphids on Apiaceae eg. Angelica sylvestris (Rotheray 1988, Rojo et al. 2003, Bartsch et al. 2009).","Apart from the general threats for biodiversity, there are no specific threats documented for this species in Europe. Nevertheless, it is presumed there is a continuing decline of extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species due to human activities (forestry in temperate Europe) and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016). The loss of unimproved ecotones and humid open ground habitats with tall herbs and shrubs along forests, streams and tracks is likely to be the main threat for this species, since its larva is probably associated on tall herbs within these species-rich habitats. The invasion of the ladybird Harmonia axiridis in Europe could be important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). The intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).","This species is widespread and has numerous, perhaps stable, subpopulations in well-wooded lowlands in Fennoscandia, Denmark and Great Britain (Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009). It is also widespread but less common and local in humid mountainous Central Europe. There has been a non-significant decline in occurrence over the past 30 years in Britain (Ball et al. 2011). This species is decreasing in the Netherlands and especially in Germany (Speight et al. 2016, Ssymank et al. (2011).",Stable,"This species is widespread in well-wooded regions of the boreal to temperate Palearctic. Its European range is from the Arctic Circle south to Pyrenees and Cantabrian Mountains (Spain), Alps (Italy) and to Balkan Mountains (Bulgaria) and Kopaonik (Serbia) on the Balkan Peninsula and from Ireland eastwards through northern and mountainous Europe into Turkey, Caucasia and European parts of Russia (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Mengual et al. 2020, Burgio et al. 2015, Álvarez et al. 2018, Nedeljković 2011; Barkalov pers. comm. 2020).

Elsewhere, it ranges throughout Siberia and Mongolia to northern China and the Russian Far East (including Kamchatka Peninsula, Sakhalin, Kuril islands) to Korea and Japan (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009).","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,"There are not specific conservation actions for this species in Europe at present. Leucozona laternaria is not threatened in Norway, Sweden, Finland and Denmark (Gammelmo et al. 2015, Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Bygebjerg 2019). It is considered as Near Threatened in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), since it is decreasing in Germany but locally rather frequent still. The biology of this species, especially the larval biology, is known inadequately to fully understand to its habitat requirements, to explain the decline of this species in some areas and to estimate possible impact of invasive ladybird Harmonia axiridis on this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171538,149171536,Leucozona inopinata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has been recognized relatively recently and the real distribution as well as population of this species is unknown. However, it seems that this species is broadly widespread in Europe and it has numerous, perhaps stable, subpopulations at least in Germany and the Netherlands. The loss of unimproved ecotones and humid open ground habitats with tall herbs and shrubs along forests, streams and tracks is probably the main threat for this species. No conservation action is required at present, except research on population and larval biology that is known inadequately to estimate possible impact of the invasive ladybird Harmonia axiridis to this species.

The species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.","It inhabits open places with a rich, tall herbs and long grasses, preferably within sandy Pinus sylvestris forests upwards into humid Fagus forests (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018) but also in suburban gardens (Prokhorov and Popov 2016). Adults visit flowering Apiaceae (Angelica sylvestris), Cirsium arvense, and Mentha sp.. There are also reports of a strong preference for visiting the flowers of Rubus ideus (Doczkal 2000, Bartch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Prokhorov and Popov 2016). Flight period of adults is from beginning of May to beginning of July (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018) with exceptional records in August and April (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019). The larva is unknown but apparently feeds on aphids on tall herbs and/or trees similarly as related species.","

Apart from the general threats for biodiversity and deforestation, there are no specific threats documented for this species in Europe, since there is no adequate information on the distribution and biology of this species. Nevertheless, the loss of unimproved ecotones and humid open ground habitats with tall herbs and shrubs along forests, streams and tracks is likely to be the main threat for this species, since its larva is probably associated on tall herbs within these species-rich habitats. The invasion of the ladybird Harmonia axiridis in Europe could be important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). The intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","The full distribution as well as population status of Leucozona inopinata is not known adequately, but this species is probably broadly widespread in Europe and it has numerous and perhaps stable populations at least in some places in Germany (where it may be more common locally than L. lucorum) and in the Netherlands (Bartsch et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011, Reemer et al. 2009). According to Speight et al. (2016) this species is decreasing in Denmark and France.",Stable,"The distribution of Leucozona inopinata is uncertain, because of confusion with a commoner species prior to the publications of Doczkal (1998, 2000). Nevertheless, it seems that this species is widely distributed in Northern and Central Europe. Up to now, it has been confirmed from Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Switzerland, Austria, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Serbia, Ukraine, European Russia (Russian Karelia, Saint Petersburg and Moscow regions), and outside Europe from Japan (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Doczkal 1998, 2000, de Groot and Govedič 2008, Mazánek 2006, Mazánek and Bičík 2001, Nedeljković 2011, Prokhorov and Popov 2016, Speight 2018, Speight et al. 2018, Żóralski et al. 2017; A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020). Barkalov and Mutin (2018) report the occurrence of this species also from Siberia, Russian Far East and Middle Asia. There are also records from Romania in the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (2020).","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions for this species in Europe at present. Leucozona inopinata is not threatened in Scandinavia, the Netherlands and Germany (Gammelmo et al. 2015, Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011). The biology of this species, especially larval biology, is practically unknown. Further research is required to establish the habitat and ecological requirements and to better understand the existing threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171549,149171546,Leucozona glaucia,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread and locally rather common species, but declining in some areas of temperate Europe. It inhabits mainly humid open ground habitats with tall herbs along streams and tracks in or close to coniferous and mixed forests, and also in humid deciduous forests. This species is probably affected by the loss of these unimproved open ground habitats in cultural landscapes. No conservation action is required at present, except research on population trends and larval biology and to understand the causes of observed declines. The species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.","This species inhabits mainly humid open ground habitats with tall herbs along streams and tracks in or close to coniferous and mixed forests and also in humid deciduous forests (acidophilus Quercus, humid Fagus and riverine gallery forest of Fraxinus/Salix) in Central Europe (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Ball et al. 2011), up to 1,300 m in the Alps (Maibach et al. 1992). Adults often rest on the vegetation in moist, herbaceous places where visit flowers of tall herbs especially Apiaceae (e.g. Heracleum spondylium, Angelica sylvestris), but also Sambucus nigra, Senecio, Achillea millefolium, Butomus umbellatus, Filipendula ulmaria, Rosa canina, Sonchus arvensis, Tripleurospermum perforatum (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018). The flight period of adults is from May or June to September with peak in July/August (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019). It is probably a univoltine species with diapausing and overwintering larvae (Speight et al. 2016, Dušek and Láska 1962). Larva feeds on aphids on Apiaceae (Rojo et al. 2003, Bartsch et al. 2009).","Apart from general threats to biodiversity, there are no specific threats documented for this species in Europe. There is an inferred continuing decline in the extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species, due to human activities (forestry in temperate Europe) and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016). It is expected that the loss of unimproved ecotones and humid open ground habitats with tall herbs and shrubs along forests, streams and tracks will be the main threat for this species, since its larva is probably associated with tall herbs in these species-rich habitats. The is also invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axiridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). The intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).","This species is broadly widespread and has numerous subpopulations in well-wooded lowlands at least in Fennoscandia and Great Britain (Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009, Röder 1990). There have been substantial declines in occurrence over the past 30 years in Britain and the Netherlands (Ball et al. 2011, Reemer et al. 2009). According to Speight et al. (2016) this species is decreasing in The Netherlands, Germany and Denmark. Declines in Germany are reported also by Ssymank et al. (2011).",Decreasing,"This species is widespread in most forested boreal to temperate regions of the Palearctic. Its European range extends from the Arctic Circle south to the Pyrenees (Spain), Alps (Italy) and Pirin Mountains (Bulgaria) on Balkan Peninsula, from Ireland eastwards through northern and mountainous Europe into Turkey and European parts of Russia (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Burgio et al. 2015, Álvarez 2018, Tóth 2014).

Outside Europe it occurs throughout Siberia and Mongolia to the Russian Far East (Kamchatka peninsula, Sakhalin, Kuril islands), Korea and to Japan (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009).","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions for this species in Europe at present. Leucozona glaucia is not threatened in Norway, Sweden and Finland (Gammelmo et al. 2015, Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020). It is considered Near Threatened in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), since it is apparently decreasing in Germany, but still locally rather common. Reemer et al. (2009) listed this species as Vulnerable for the Netherlands and Bygebjerg (2019) as Near Threatened in Denmark. The biology of this species, especially larval biology, is known inadequately to know its precise habitat requirements and both the causes of observed local declines and the possible impact of the invasive ladybird Harmonia axiridis on this species are unclear.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171560,149171557,Eupeodes vockerothi,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-02-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Listed as Data Deficient on the basis that this species has only recently been detected on Svalbard, and it has a highly restricted known distribution in the archipelago. Should any threats be identified it may therefore be at significant risk in the archipelago, however its origin and range in Svalbard are unclear and it may represent either a recent natural colonist or an introduction.","This species is known from Arctic and alpine tundra, dwarf-shrub tundra and taiga of the Nearctic region. The larva is unknown but apparently predacious, in common with larvae of other related Eupeodes species (Böcher et al. 2015).",Any threats to this species are unknown.,"This species was first recorded on Svalbard, 18-21 July 2013 (malaise trap) (Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017). The population of this species is apparently stable - or could be increasing if this is genuinely a recent colonization.  This species could however be a newly introduced species to Svalbard (T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2021). According to Coulson (2015) there is a likelihood that additional alien species will be able to establish on Svalbard with projected climate change, both those naturally dispersing to the archipelago and those imported accidently by humans.",Stable,"This species has only recently been recorded in Europe, from Svalbard in 2013 (Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017). This species was previously confused with E. luniger, and its distribution data need revision. It is possible the species represents an introduction or vagrant to Europe from Greenland (T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2021).

Eupeodes vockerothi is widely distributed in the northern Nearctic region including Greenland (Bocher et al. 2015).","

This species is not traded or exploited.

",Terrestrial,"Further survey work is needed to determine the origin and recent distribution, ecology and population trends of this species in Svalbard. There are many protected areas on Svalbard.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171571,149171568,Eupeodes vandergooti,Endangered,"B1ab(iii,iv)+2ab(iii,iv)",2021,2020-03-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"The confirmed distribution area of Eupeodes vandergooti is restricted to Corsica, and for the purposes of this assessment records elsewhere are considered to represent misidentifications pending further research. The species was relatively frequent last century, but in recent surveys at historical sites the species has been found to be rare and the population of this species seems to have declined. It is associated with Corsican Pinus nigra laricio forests, a habitat which is geographically restricted and subject to a continuing decline in extent and quality due to various threats, especially feral pigs. The calculated extend of occurrence and area of occupancy are considered to be small (EOO=867 km2, AOO=44 km2). The number of locations is no greater than six, and for the purposes of this assessment it is considered likely to be three based on the number of pigs. As such the species is listed as Endangered in both Europe and the EU27 (to which it is endemic).","

Eupeodes vandergooti is known from black pine forest of Pinus laricio about 1,400 m above sea level on Corsica (Speight 2018). Dušek and Láska (1973) listed specimens collected usually at higher altitudes (between 800 to 2,000 m above sea level) in July, but also one female from Sand Florent near the sea from 10 May. Flower visitation has only been recorded from Sedum album (Van der Goot 1961). The developmental stages are unknown, but larvae are presumably predacious on soft bodied insects preferably aphids as larvae of other Eupeodes species.

","The main habitat reported for this species by Speight (2018) is Pinus nigra laricio forests, and Zaghi (2008) reported that, besides unsuitable forestry management and fires the overgrazing (by feral pigs), poses a threat particularly in Pinus nigra forests on Corsica. Leys et al. (2014) note that Pinus nigra laricio is an endemic subspecies that is currently threatened. Subpopulations of this taxon are geographically restricted (~16,000 ha), and their ranges are apparently decreasing, possibly because of disturbance, fire and logging. It is considered that there is a continuing decline of extent and quality of suitable habitat for this species due to human activities (tourism) and settlements in Europe (Janssen et al. 2016).","Dušek and Láska (1973) mentioned a series of 36 males and females regularly collected from 1961 to 1967 on Corsica by Van der Goot and Lambeck. The species was probably relatively frequent on Corsica at that time. The recent population status of this species on Corsica is not known precisely. During the last 5 years survey, only one specimen has been found there (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020), so it is assumed that population of this species has declined.",Decreasing,"

Dušek and Láska (1973) described Eupeodes vandergooti from a series of males and females collected from 1961 to 1967 in several localities (around the rivers Asco, Monte Cinto, Col de Vizzavone and Sant Florent) on Corsica. Some later records of this species were published from areas outside Corsica (the French mainland, Sardinia and from Italy) by other authors (Burgio et al. 2015, Speight et al. 2018), but the species is difficult to distinguish from related species (such as E. lucasi, whose male was unknown until 2000; Marcos García et al. 2000) and has not reliably been confirmed from outside Corsica. The species is probably endemic to Corsica, and reports from elsewhere are excluded from this assessment pending further research.

","

This species is not traded or exploited.

",Terrestrial,"Five of the six collection localities are within the Massif du Rotondo Site of Community Importance area. Further monitoring is needed to establish the population trends of this species and the impact of threats, as well as research on biology to determine larval ecology and on its possible distribution outside Corsica.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149171582,149171579,Sericomyia lappona,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern. (LC)

Sericomyia lappona
 is a widespread species found throughout Europe, with a large area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO). It is less common in the southern parts of its range, such as the Mediterranean region, but it is more common in central and northern Europe. The current population trend is considered to be stable, and although the species might be impacted locally by human activity, overall there are no major threats. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.

There are no conservation measures required for this species at the moment, but it would benefit from further research into the biology and life history.
","

This species is found in wetland and forest, in fen, bog and boggy stream margins within acidophilous Quercus forest, Salix carr, swamp Betula/Pinus forest and moor (Speight 2017, 2020). Adults have been seen in clearings, tracksides and streamside, at up to 3 m from the ground. 

In the Pyrenees, the species was found in a Pinus uncinata forest with an understorey of dwarf shrubs of Rhododendron ferrugineum and Vaccinium myrtillus, but with extensive open areas where oligotrophic flushes carpeted in Carex and grasses joined up to produce peaty slopes mires, with patches of Eriophorum sp. and frequent Parnassia palustris, at that time in flower (Sarthou and Speight 2002). 

Flowers visited by this species include Caltha, Cardamine, Cirsium, Crataegus, Ligustrum, Ranunculus, Rubus fruticosus, Sorbus aucuparia, Taraxacum and Vaccinium myrtillus. (Speight 2020).

The flight period is from May to September, with peak in May and June (June/July at higher altitudes/more northerly latitudes). 

The larvae are aquatic, and are described and figured by Hartley (1961) and illustrated in colour (from a preserved specimen) by Rotheray (1994).

","Although this species might be impacted by anthropogenic activities in some part of its European range, such as urbanisation, logging, drainage and agriculture, overall it is not impacted by any major threats.","This is a widespread species throughout Europe. It is not common in the very southern parts (Mediterranean region), where it is found at somewhat higher elevations. However, it is very widespread in central and northern Europe, even in Iceland and further north. The current population trend of this species is considered to be stable in both Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"

This species is known from Iceland, Fennoscandia and the Faroes (Jensen 2001) south to the Pyrenees, from Ireland eastwards through northern, central and southern Europe (northern Italy, the former Yugoslavia) into European parts of Russia, and through Siberia to the Pacific coast (Sakhalin Is.) (Speight 2020).

The species is probably new to Greece, with a picture placed on Facebook in June 2020 (Pennards pers. obs. 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is estimated to be around 12.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 4.2 million km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is around 6.6 million km2, and the AOO is around 2.2 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"In light of the current distribution and population size, conservation action for this species is not required at the moment. More research can be done on the biology and life cycle of the species, combined with area management to preserve the wetland habitats. In Germany, the species is assessed as vulnerable (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171593,149171590,Pelecocera scaevoides,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Pelecocera scaevoides is found across Europe. It is widespread in Scandinavia, but in other parts of the European range, it may be declining due to human impacts, climate change and pollution. However, overall, the population is still large and stable, and the species is considered to be quite adaptable to different types of pine forest. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.

Although no conservation measures are urgently needed, if they were to be implemented, they should be focused on the preservation of the habitats where this species is found.","

This species is found in coniferous forest, especially Pinus. The fly can persist in various sorts of pine forest in Scandinavia and central Europe (M. Speight pers. comm. 2020). Adults are low-flying among ground vegetation in open woodland and clearings, and have been recorded visiting the flowers of Cerastium sp., Myosotis sp. and Potentilla erecta. The flight period of this species is from June to September. The developmental stages are undescribed, but apparently phytophagous.

","Forest habitats with open areas have disappeared, not only due to human activities like deforestation, agriculture, industrial areas and other activities but also because of climate change and pollution (disappearance of open spaces). In the south there might be an additional threat by fire and droughts.","This is a widespread species, although there is not much information on the population size in Europe. The species is certainly declining in comparison with earlier decades due to the continuing anthropogenic activities in Europe, but to what extent is unclear. In the northern parts of Europe, the species seems stable, and the overall population size is considered to be stable over its complete range.",Stable,"This species is known from northern Norway and Sweden, Finland, Britain (Scottish highlands), Belgium (Possibly Extinct), France (Aude, Hautes Alpes), Germany, Poland, the Czech Republic, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Italy, parts of European Russia (Karelia) and the Caucasus Mountains (Speight 2020). It was recently found as a new record for Ukraine, in the Carpathians, Ivano-Frankivsk Region at 1,000 m asl (V. Shparyk; G. Popov pers. comm. 2019).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.7 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.9 million km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 4.8 million km2, and the AOO is estimated to be around 1.4 million km2.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions currently in place for this species. Although it is not threatened, if conservation actions were to be implemented, the focus should be on the protection of the habitat, but the species is quite adaptable.

This species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2019), Norway (Artsobservasjoner 2019) and Finland (Finbif 2020). In the UK it is seen as nationally scarce (Ball and Morris 2014). In Germany the species is considered to be Endangered (EN) (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171606,149171603,Sericomyia bombiformis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-14 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Sericomyia bombiformis
 is a widespread species across the hilly and mountainous areas of Europe. Although it might be under pressure in some localised parts of its range, it is not overall experiencing any major threats. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27.

The species may in the future be impacted by climate change, and any conservation action implemented should be focused on the preservation of its forest habitats.","

This species is found in forest, close to freshwater streams (including temporary streams) or flushes in Fagus/Picea forest and upwards into subalpine grassland (Speight 2017, 2020). Adults have been found in clearings, tracks and streamsides. Flowers visited by this species include yellow composites and umbellifers; Carduus, Cirsium, Echium vulgare, Knautia, Succisa, Trifolium, Verbascum. The flight period is from May to August (June to July at high altitudes). A female has been observed egg-laying in moss at the margin of a forest stream (Van Steenis et al. 2013).

","This species may be impacted by localised threats such as deforestation, fire, building and logging. However due to its wide range in Europe it not under a major threat overall, although due to high altitudes it may be impacted by climate change.","This as a widespread species through the elevated parts of Europe and in Scandinavia. This include hilly areas, for example in Poland, up to 1,200 m asl (G. Pennards pers. obs.) until up to the alpine zones in the mountains. In these areas it is quite common and it is regularly encountered. The current population trend for this species in Europe and the EU 27 is not exactly known but presumed being stable for the moment.",Stable,"This species is found in Scandinavia, and the mountainous parts of much of Europe, including the Pyrenees, the Alps, Apennines, the Balkans and various mountain ranges in Spain. It is also known from Crete, Turkey, Ukraine (Skolivs'kyi) and European Russia (Speight 2020, Barkalov and Mutin 2018).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 8.2 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2 million km2. The EOO for the EU 27 is around 4.9 million km2 and the AOO is around 1.4 million km2.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions present. These actions should focus on the preservation of the habitat and research on the population and threats of this species. In Norway the species was considered being Endangered (Kålås et al. 2010), but it is now listed as Vulnerable (VU) (Artsobservasjoner 2020). In the Czech Republic the species was assessed VU (Farkac et al. 2005). In Sweden the species was assessed Critically Endangered (CR) in 2010 (Gärdenfors et al. 2010) and also CR in 2020 (Artdatabanken 2020). In Germany the species is assessed as near threatened (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Denmark the species is listed as Endangered (Bygebjerg 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171617,149171614,Sericomyia bequaerti,Critically Endangered,"B2ab(i,ii,iii)",2021,2019-09-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

Sericomyia bequaerti is a large, obvious species with a restricted range, found in the subalpine zones of Europe. The only recent records in Europe are from Serbia from a single locality. There is considered to be a decline in the population trend for both Europe and the EU 27 and the quality and the extent of the habitat is also declining. The species is under threat from anthropogenic factors, such as deforestation, and climate change, and so the species is considered to occur at a single location in Europe. Therefore, this species is assessed as Critically Endangered.

However, the assessment at the EU 27 level is Data Deficient, as the species is possibly extant in Greece and there are very old records from Bulgaria and Romania, so the species is possibly extinct here, but further research is needed to establish this.","

This species is found on open ground, in the subalpine zone, at the margin of high-altitude Betula/Picea forest (Vujic et al. 2016). 

In the Pirin and Rila mountains in Bulgaria the species was found in mesophyllic and xeromesophyllic oak-hornbeam forests between 600 to 1,000 m Asl, and in beech forests from 900 to 1,600 m Asl (Hubenov 2017).

The flight period is June (Hervé-Bazin 1913), to August (Zimina 1960) or October (Vujic et al. 2016).

","The species lives in the subalpine zone, and faces a number of threats including fire, deforestation, climate change, grazing of cattle and sheep. The pressure on these kind of habitats will grow, and so the species is probably under continuous decline.","This species is not very common, and only found in subalpine zones. The species might be overlooked, even though it is big and conspicuous, due to its habitat. However, as only old records are known from some countries, it seems to be in decline over the last years, and it might be expected that its habitat is declining at a continuous rate.",Decreasing,"

This species is has been recorded from Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina (Dirickx 1994), Greece (Vujic 2016), Bulgaria (very old records from Pirin and Rila mountains (Hubenov 2017) but definitely known from here at one point), Romania (very old records from Parc Natural Bucegi and Parc Natural Cindrel (Stanescu 1976, Speight 2020) and was confirmed in Serbia in 2015 (Vujic et al. 2016). It is also known from Armenia, Georgia and Turkey, but not found in European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018). Although listed as occurring in Ukraine (Speight 2017), this is not thought to be correct (Popov pers. comm. 2019).

The records from Bulgaria and Romania are old to very old, so the species is considered being possibly extinct there. The records from Bosnia Herzegovina, Albania and Greece need to be confirmed, there are no recent records known. The species is considered possibly extant in these countries. Looking at recent records only from Serbia, there has been a decline in the presence of the species. It might be restricted to only this one locality in Serbia.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are both estimated to be around 4 km2. For the EU 27, the EOO and AOO are unknown.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions in place for the species, but it does occur in some protected areas, such as in Romania. More research is needed for the biology and ecology of the species and its habitat. Monitoring the species population and its habitat would be necessary.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171628,149171625,Sericomyia jakutica,Vulnerable,A3c,2021,2020-01-14 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

The Arctic pond fly (Sericomyia jakutica) does not have a large distribution area in Europe, due to its habitat preferences. It is only known from the high northern parts of Scandinavia and European Russia, with the bulk of sightings in Sweden and Finland. Although in Sweden and Finland it is listed nationally as Least Concern, it is probably an underestimation. The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be strongly decreasing. 
The species is dependent on a wetland habitat that is strongly economically exploited making it rare by definition over large parts of its range. There is an expected strong decline in suitable habitat in the future of at least 30% over the next 10 years. Therefore, the species is assessed as Vulnerable.

More research is needed about biology, life cycle, threats, population trends and distribution of this species to be able to make a more detailed assumption about necessary conservation actions.","

This species is found in tundra and palsa mire (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). Adults occur in open, moist pine forests (Artdatabanken 2020). The flight period is June and July, but in the Nearctic it is from early June to early August. The larva is not described, but is likely to develop (as in the other species of the genus) in smaller water collections and marshes.

","Specific threats to this species are unknown, but it will be affected by anthropogenic activities going on in Europe, such as deforestation, logging, drainage, agriculture and urbanisation. The environment where it lives (high north) will probably provide some protection from anthropogenic activities, but climate change will be a serious factor in the future.","Adults are rare in Lapland, in Norrbotten and Västerbotten. Findings have subsequently been made in Norrbotten as well as in Lycksele and Torne. In Norway there is only a 19th century find from northernmost Finnmark (north of 70° N). In Finland, there are at least two finds from Lapland. The actual distribution may be somewhat larger, and seems to roughly coincide with the range of the related S. arctica. The current population trend of this species is considered being strongly in decline for both Europe and the EU 27 (van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). There is an expected strong decline in suitable habitat in the future of at least 30% over the next 10 years (van Steenis pers. comm. 2020).",Decreasing,"

This species is known from Norway, Sweden, northern Finland and European Russia. Nielsen reported the species as new to Scandinavia in 1996. Ringdahl's specimen from Abisko in 1922, which was reported to be a male of Sericomyia arctica, turned out to actually belong to this species.

Outside of Europe, it is found in Siberia, Alaska and Canada in the Nearctic (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 1.4 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 909,000 km2

The EOO for the EU 27 countries is estimated to be around around 336,000 km2 and the AOO is around 183,000 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"More information is needed about biology, life cycle, threats, population trend and distribution of this species in order to make a more detailed assumption about necessary conservation actions. In Finland and Sweden, it has been assessed as Least Concern (LC) (FinBif 2019, Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171639,149171636,Sericomyia superbiens,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Sericomyia superbiens is a widespread species, found throughout Europe and has a large extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO). It is particularly widespread in Central Europe, and the current population trend is considered to be stable for both Europe and the EU 27. In addition, although this species might be impacted locally by human activities, there are no major threats to this species overall. Therefore, it is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. No conservation action is required at the moment, but further research on the biology and life history of the species would be beneficial.","

The following information is taken from Speight (2017, 2020) and van Steenis et al. (2013). The preferred environment of this species is wetland/forest, found near springs, wet flushes and streams and palsa bogs, usually in poorly-drained deciduous (Alnus/Salix/Quercus or Salix/Betula) or coniferous (Picea) woodland, such as Alnus/Salix woods along streams, but can be found by wet flushes and along streams in subalpine grassland. 

Adults fly at all heights between tree canopy and ground level, settling on the foliage of trees and bushes, often at some meters from the ground, and visits low-growing flowers beside woodland paths and alongside streams etc., but rarely in open ground; it shows some preference for pink flowers. 

Flowers visited by this species include white umbellifers and yellow composites, such as Centaurea, Cirsium vulgare, Mentha aquatica, Ranunculus, Rubus, Scabiosa, Succisa pratensis and Sonchus. Lucas et al (2018) did research on  flower visiting and pollen collecting by species of Sericomyia, and the results showed that both S. silentis and S. superbiens sequences of pollen came predominantly from Rubus fruticosus agg. pollen. However, S. silentis also favoured Cardueae and, to a lesser extent, Apiaceae, whilst S. superbiens had smaller amounts of both Calluna vulgaris and Succisa pratensis.

The flight period is from the end of July to October with peak in August; essentially a late summer/autumn insect. 

The larvae are undescribed, but almost certainly aquatic/subaquatic among organic debris in semi-liquid mud close to streams and springs. Stubbs and Falk (1983) report that ""...a female was seen ovipositing in deep, water-filled hoof prints along a shaded muddy path by a stream"".

","Although this species may be locally impacted by the usual anthropogenic activities in Europe, such as urbanisation, logging, drainage and agriculture, it overall is not impacted by any major threats.","This is a widespread species throughout western and central Europe. In northern Europe, it is only in the most southern part of Sweden. In southern Europe, the hoverfly is not uncommon but more confined to mountainous regions. The current population trend of this species is considered to be stable for both Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"

This species is found from southern Scandinavia, south to the Pyrenees, from Ireland east through central and southern Europe (northern Italy) into European parts of Russia and from the south of northern France largely confined to mountain ranges. It is not found in southern European lowland. A rapid decline of this species has been noted since 1950 in Belgium (Verlinden and Decleer 1987) and Denmark (Torp 1984) (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 8.6 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 3.3 million km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is around 5.1 million km2 and the AOO is around 1.5 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"In light of the current distribution and population size, no conservation actions are required at the moment. More research can be done on the biology and life cycle of the species, combined with area management to preserve the wetland habitats. In Sweden, this species was assessed as Least Concern (Artdatabanken 2020) with 70 recent sightings in the south (Skane, Halland). In the Czech Republic the species is considered Vulnerable (Farkac et al. 2005). In Germany the species is assessed as vulnerable (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Denmark the species is listed as Endangered (Bygebjerg 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171651,149171648,Sphecomyia vespiformis,Near Threatened,A3c,2021,2020-02-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

Sphecomyia vespiformis is known in Europe from Scandinavia, Belarus, the Baltic states and European Russia. The majority of the European records are from Finland. There is a decline in the current population trend of the species for both Europe and the EU 27, and a decline in the extent of the habitat. There is a clear decline in the occurrence of the species in the main area in Scandinavia, and in the other European countries it is very rare with few recent sightings. It is predicted that this will continue with more loss of habitat, populations and extent of occurrence, to an extent where the decline in the EU 27 is nearly 30%.

Therefore, this species is assessed as Near Threatened for the EU 27, as it is close to meeting the threshold for a threatened Category under Criterion A3c. In European Russia, it is probably more abundant, and the estimation here is that it is Least Concern for the moment.
","

The preferred environment of this species forests with freshwater; along rivers/streams in Betula/Pinus forest (T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2019). Copulation has been observed on the trunk of Populus tremula. Flowers visited by this species include Berberis vulgaris, Hesperis matronalis, Rubus idaeus and Sorbus aucuparia (Bartsch et al. 1998); Pimpinella saxifraga, Spirea salicifolia (Bartsch et al. 2009). Also Viburnum opulus, Spiraea sp., Lonicera, Berberis and Crataegus. (Stackelberg 1958, Violovich 1986). Forest and freshwater habitats are in decline in Europe, and also for this species the suitable habitats are declining due to human activities.

The flight period of this species is June and July. 

The developmental stage are not described, but according to Bartsch (1997) probably associated with sap-runs/lesions in the trunk of Populus tremula.

","The threats to this species are mostly unknown, but it will likely be affected by the usual anthropogenic activities going on in Europe, such as deforestation, logging, drainage, agriculture, urbanisation and others. That is especially the case in Scandinavia, where it has its headquarters in Europe. The environment where it lives is under threat and climate change will be a serious factor in the future.","In Finland, there seems to be a clear decline in the subpopulations of this species, with about 15 recent localities (FinBif 2020). In Norway, the only recent sightings are from Nordland (Artsobservasjoner 2020). In Sweden, there are about 13 recent sightings from 12 localities in central Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). In other countries, it is very rare, with only two localities known from Poland in a National Park (three old specimens and seven recent) (Zoralski et al. 2017). In European Russia, it is 'not frequent', and it is very rare in Belarus and the Baltic states. The overall current population trend is considered to be decreasing in both Europe and the EU 27. There is expected to be a decline of just over 30% over the next ten years in the EU 27.",Decreasing,"

This species is found from southern Norway to northern Sweden, Finland and Russian Karelia (also Moscow region), the Baltic states, Poland and on into Siberia (Speight 2020). The main distribution of this species is the central and east Palearctic region. It was thought that the species also occurred in the Nearctic region, but Moran and Skevington (2019) showed the species does not occur there. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 4.4 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.5 million km2. For the EU 27, the EOO is around 716,000 km2, and the estimated AOO is around 194,000 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Focus of conservation action for this species should be on preservation of the right habitat. In Poland not protected by law but it occurs in National Parks (Wigierski Park Narodowy in the Augustowska Forest and Biebrzański National Park), and so it benefits from strict protection ( Soszyński 2004). It is a threatened species in Finland (Nature Conservation Decree 14.2.1997/160, Appendix 4 19.6.2013/471), it has been previously assessed as Near Threatened (NT) in 2000 and Vulnerable (VU) in 2010, but is now considered Endangered (EN) (FinBif 2020). In Norway, it is also EN (Artsobservasjoner 2020) and in Sweden, it is VU (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171661,149171659,Spilomyia graciosa,Endangered,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2020-02-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

Spilomyia graciosa is a very rare species which was only known from six localities in Greece. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 78,684 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) of this species in Europe is 24 km2. Although the current estimates of extent of occurrence (EOO) for Europe are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a very fragmented distribution. Due to human activities (logging, urbanisation, agriculture) some of the known localities are already expected to have been lost. There is also the continuing decline in size and quality of habitat. Therefore, this species is Endangered for both Europe and the EU 27.","

The preferred environment of this species is ancient Balkanic thermophilous Quercus forest of Q.pubescens/Q.cerris/ Q.frainetto (M. de C. Williams pers. comm. 2010).

Adults are in flight through the middle of the day, at the hottest time of the year (M. de C. Williams pers. comm. 2010), visiting the stony edges of streams to drink, after landing walking under overhanging, low-growing vegetation before drinking. The species was found in Greece in a pasture feeding on Mentha sp. (G. Pennards. pers. obs. 2004).

Flowers visited by this species include Mentha sp., yellow composites, Scabiosa (M.de C. Williams pers. comm. 2010), Sambucus ebulus and Plumbago europaea.

The flight period is from July to the beginning of September.

As with the other Spilomyia species known in Europe, the decrease in ancient forest has probably taken a toll on this species, but there is not much information available.

","The main threats are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of forest habitat. In Greece there are a lot of human activities like deforestation, logging, urbanisation and others that will be a threat to the species. Also the climate change and the increased fires in the region will be a threat.","There is no information on the population size, but from some localities more than one individual was found. The current population trend in Europe is uncertain, but the expectation is that the population is in decline due to human activities like urbanisation, logging, agriculture and others. In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"This species is only known in Europe from Greece, from six localities - Fokida (Skaloula-Doris), Arkadia (Tripolis), Evros (Dadia, Esimi, Lefkimi) from Greek published records (Vujic et al. 2019) and Zakoria (Gliki, Acheron river, G. Pennards pers. comm. 2019).

Outside of Europe, it is found in Turkey (in the very southeast part of Anatolia, Hakkari and Sirnak province), Iran (Gharali and Steenis 2008) and Iraq.

The area of occupancy (AOO) of this species in Europe is 24 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 78,684 km2. Due to anthropogenic activities, this species is considered to occur at five or fewer locations.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known to be in place for this species, but part of the range lies in National Parks, for example in Dadia-Lefkimi-Soufli National Park in Greece. Actions should focus on the preservation of the right habitat for the species, combined with the research on the population, biology and ecology of the species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171671,149171669,Spilomyia maxima,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-02-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Spilomyia maxima is only known in Europe from European Russia, and it is also possibly found in Belarus. The species reaches the western border of its range and is found in some parts of European Russia, but it has its main distribution to the eastern Palearctic. So there will probably some scattered subpopulations in European with maybe some influx from the east. The assumption is that although it is scarce in this area, there is no evidence the species would be under threat due to the big population to the east. But also there are no solid records from European Russia except for some mentions in literature and one record from Moscow region in 2018, so this species is assessed as Data Deficient for Europe.

This species does not occur within the EU 27 and therefore it is Not Applicable.","

The preferred environment of this species is coniferous and deciduous forest (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2019), and Larix sibirica/Pinus sibirica forest with Betula (A. van Eck and G.W.A. Pennards pers. comm. 2020). Flowers visited by this species include umbellifers, Spirea spp. (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2019) and Succisa pratensis (Prokhorov 2018). The flight period of this species is from mid June to the beginning of September (A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2019). The developmental stages are not described.

","The threats to this species are not fully understood, but it is a forest species, so it will probably face the same threats as other forest dwelling species such as deforestation, anthropogenic activities and farming.","There is no information about the population of this species. There are no records from the EU 27, only some records from European Russia and literature mentions from Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014). The species reaches the edge of its distribution in European Russia, and there are records from around Moscow and from Leningrad. The main distribution area for this species is the eastern part of the Palearctic, so probably there will be some scattered populations in European Russia with possibly some influx from the east. The most recent record was from the Moscow region in 2018 (Prokhorov 2018).",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from northern parts of European Russia (Moscow region, Kirov region, Oblast Leningrad) (Pestov and Egorov 2018, Pestov 2014).  It is possibly extant in Belarus, but there are no specimens or data (Borodin and Borodina 2014).

The global range extends eastwards through Siberia to the Pacific (Speight 2020), and it is found in Mongolia and Japan.

The European extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be around 1.4 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 506,442 km2. This species does not occur within the EU 27.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are known to be in place for this species. However, it would benefit from site protection and further research on population and life history.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171681,149171679,Spilomyia triangulata,Vulnerable,"B2ab(i,ii,iii,iv)",2021,2020-02-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

Spilomyia triangulata has a very scattered distribution in Europe, of which several known localities are very old. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to > 800,000 km(c.450,000 to 500,000 km2 for the EU27) and the AOO is likely to be < 500 km2 for both Europe and the EU Member States. Threats such as logging, farming, tourism and urbanisation means there is currently considered to be around 10 locations, as some previously known localities are likely to already be extinct. There is an ongoing continuous decline in the extent and quality of the habitat. So for both the EU27 and Pan Europe the species is assessed as Vulnerable.","

The preferred environment of this species is conifer forest of Abies/Picea (France).

Adults visit flower-rich grassland to feed and settles on low-growing vegetation. In France, the hoverfly was observed on sunny, flower-rich alpine meadows with small springs, in coniferous forest, and settled on leaves near ground level. In Turkey, this species was caught on flower-rich meadows and pastures at an altitude of 1,700 to 1,800 m asl (van Steenis 2000). The species has been recorded as visiting the flowers of umbellifers (Vujić et al. 2019).

The flight period is from the beginning of June to the end of August.

The developmental stages are not described.

","Human intrusion like logging, farming, tourism, urbanisation and other influences (like climate change) insure a continuing decline of habitat suitable for this species.","There is not much information about the European populations of this species. The species is not often encountered or caught and is considered being rare, even though it is a very conspicuous species. However, it very strongly resembles a wasp, so it is probably under recorded in the field. Latest records are from Greece in 2014 (Vujic pers. comm. 2020). Nonetheless, the expectation is that the species is strongly decreasing throughout the range, as some of the records are old or might have been confused with other species. It is expected there is a strong decline in the number of localities where the species has been found, and that it will continue in the future because the reasons for decline (human activities) have not changed.",Decreasing,"Within the European region, this species is known from the Alps in France, and from mountain ranges in North Macedonia and Greece (Speight 2020). Records of Spilomyia digitata from Croatia and Romania are probably Spilomyia triangulata because of the allopatric distribution of the two species. So we treat them as possibly extant here. It is also known from Sicily (Mason et al. 2006).

Out of the European region, the species occurs in the Russian Federation (Gelendzjik (Krasnodar Krai); van Steenis 2000), eastern Anatolia (Turkey), and the species has also been recorded from northern Iran (Kazerani et al. 2012).

Van Steenis (2000) discusses the similarity of this species with Spilomyia digitata and Spilomyia maroccana. He states they have an allopatric distribution. S. digitata occurs in the western European part of the Mediterranean area, while S. triangulata occurs in the east European part and S. maroccana in the African part. There is however one specimen of S. triangulata known from France.

In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be >800,000 km2 (c.450,000 to 500,000 km2 for the EU27), whilst the AOO is likely to be < 500 km2 for both Europe and the EU Member States, the exact value is not known.

Human intrusion like logging, farming, tourism, urbanisation and other influences insure a continuing decline of habitat suitable for this species, and based on this, there is currently considered to be around 10 locations, as some localities are likely to already be extinct.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"It is not known if there are any conservation actions for this species implemented at present. Conservation measures should focus on the conservation of the suitable habitat. Furthermore research should be done on the biology, ecology and population trends of the species. It is not known whether the species occurs in protected areas.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171691,149171689,Syritta flaviventris,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The Peg-legged Compost Fly (Syritta flaviventris) is a very widespread species found all over the world. In Europe, it is mostly found in the Mediterranean, where it occurs in large subpopulations. There are no known threats to the species at the moment, and the current population trend is considered to be increasing. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.","

The preferred environment of this species is freshwater/wetland/open ground; seasonal rivers, coastal lagoons, dune slacks and temporary pools in marsh.

Adults fly low among sparse vegetation beside water (or over dried pools), settling on stones or dried mud.

Flowers visited include yellow composites. 

The flight period is from April to October with peaks in May and September.

The larvae are described and figured by Perez-Banon and Marcos-Garcia (2000), from material collected in the field from decaying vegetable matter - Opuntia platyclades. Larvae were found in decaying platyclades both on the ground and still attached to the cactus. Pupation occurred within the tissues of the platyclades.

",There are no threats known at the moment.,This species is widespread throughout the Mediterranean region and it has large subpopulations across its European range. The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU 27 is considered to be increasing.,Increasing,"

Within the European region, this species is known from Portugal, Spain and around the Mediterranean from the southern coast of France to Turkey. It is also known from various Mediterranean islands - Corsica, Sardinia, Sicily, and Crete

The range extends out of the European region to North Africa and Iran. It is found in eastern parts of the Afrotropical region to the southern tip of Africa and in Madagascar and the Mascarene islands, plus Cape Verde. It is also cited from Argentina, Brazil and Chile in the Neotropical region, Mexico and Texas (USA) in the Nearctic and Easter Island in Oceania (to which it has supposedly been introduced) (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 3.4 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 586,000 km2. For the EU27 countries the estimated EOO is around 3.4 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 248,000 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions known for the species, and probably not needed at the moment. However, research must be done on the developments in the population and ongoing trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171701,149171699,Temnostoma carens,Near Threatened,"B2ab(ii,iii,iv)",2021,2019-09-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European Regional Assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

Temnostoma carens was originally thought to be highly localised in Sweden and Finland, but it is also now known from Lithuania, northwestern European and Poland. In general, this species is widely distributed but rare across the range. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 1.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be between 2,000 and 3,000 km2. In the EU 27, the AOO is estimated to be around 76 km2. The number of mature individuals, AOO, and habitat area/quality of this species is considered to be undergoing continuing decline for both Europe and the EU 27. Although the current estimates of EOO for Europe and the EU 27 are large, the small AOO indicates this species is much scarcer than the range would indicate, and it has a severely fragmented distribution as is shown on the map. The species is listed as Near Threatened for Europe, and Endangered for the EU 27.","

The preferred environment of this species is deciduous forest; Alnus forest with flushes (this habitat information is based on data kindly provided by T. Järveläinen, relating to a specimen collected by him. Since only one specimen is involved rearing data or more substantial habitat association data are required before a relationship between this rarely-seen species and Alnus forest can be confirmed). Zoralski and Mielczarek (2018) recorded the species from old Quercus/Carpinus/Tilia forest with Pinus and Populus tremula in Poland.

The female flies low among vegetation (T. Järveläinen pers. comm. 2019).

Flowers visited by this species include white umbellifers and Crataegus spp.

The flight period is from mid June to the end of July.

The developmental stages are not described, but larvae of the genus are found in rotten wood.

Due to deforestation and forest management, there is considered to be a decline in the extent and quality of the habitat.

","The threats to this species include deforestation and forest management, agriculture, drainage, removal of old trees (found in big fallen timber) and removal of rotten wood from natural habitats close to water.","This species was thought to be very restricted, but it is now known to occur in Poland and Lithuania, so either this species has increased its range or it is more widely distributed than originally thought. Even so, it is probably not common anywhere and the expectation is it is declining in its range. There are two recent localities from Lithuania from 2015, and seven localities in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). In Finland, there are nine localities known (FinBif 2020), and in Poland, two localities known from 2018. The current population trend of this species is expected to be in decline for both Europe and the EU 27. In addition, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are small and isolated and therefore may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"This species was originally localised in northern Sweden and Finland, but it has also found in Lithuania (Lutovinovas 2015) and Poland (Zoralski and Mielczarek 2018) (Speight 2020). It is also known in northern European Russia (Karelia and Murmansk). The presence of this species is not confirmed in Ukraine - one female found but needs confirmation (Popov pers. comm. 2019).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 1.5 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is not known for certain, but is estimated to be between 2,000 and 3,000 km also based on its presence in Russia. However, for the EU 27, there is one locality in Poland and two in Lithuania. Furthermore there are records from Sweden and Finland. For Sweden there are around seven localities (Artdatabanken 2020) and from Finland, around nine recent sightings (FinBif 2020). Therefore, the AOO is estimated to be around 76 km2.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"This species has been assessed as Near Threatened (NT) in the Swedish National Red List (Artdatabanken 2020) and in Finland (FinBif 2020). More research is needed on the biology/ecology of this species, and on habitat, threats and population.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171712,149171709,Temnostoma apiforme,Near Threatened,A3c,2021,2019-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

Although Temnostoma apiforme has a wide geographic range it has a relictual distribution pattern over much of its European range. The current population trend is assumed to be declining in a strong and continuous pace. The distribution map is considered to be a rough reflection of the real distribution. This decline is and has been in the order of nearly 30%. The subpopulations are small and the species is under threat from forestry activities, including deforestation, agriculture and human activities, so this decline will not reduce in the future. This decline is likely to go on, so the species is expected to lose a big part of its suitable habitat in a short time. Therefore, this species is assessed as Near Threatened for both Europe and the EU27 Member States, as it is close to qualifying for a threatened Category under Criterion A3c.","

This species is found in forest, in areas subject to temporary flooding in humid deciduous forest, from northern Betula forest to the upper levels of Fagus/Picea forest and down to the alluvial hardwood forest of major rivers.

Adults have been found in clearings, tracksides and meadows adjacent to forest. Although it is a forest insect, it can be found flying close to the ground and visiting the flowers of low-growing plants. Flowers visited by this species include white umbellifers, Crataegus, Geum, Matricaria inodora, Potentilla, Ranunculus, Rubus idaeus, Sorbus aucuparia, Trientalis. Also Rosa canina, Ranunculus acer, Conium maculatum, Potentilla erecta, Veronica (Zimina 1957, Stackelberg 1958), Ledum palustre, Spiraea media, Plantago media (Bagachanova, 1990). Pimpinella saxifraga, Heracleum sosnowskyi, Heracleum sibiricum, Leucanthemum vulgare and Achillea millefolium (Pestov 2007)

The flight period is from June to the end of July, and on into August at higher altitudes/more northerly latitudes. 

The larvae are wood-boring, in solid wood within part-rotted stumps and logs; described and figured by Heqvist (1957), based on larvae collected from a rotten Betula stump. According to Bartsch et al. (2009), this species shows a preference for birch logs “in very humid situations, especially logs that periodically become partly submerged”. Krivosheina and Mamayev (1962) also figure and describe the larva of this species, from material collected from stumps of Tilia. These latter authors provide a key distinguishing T. apiforme larvae from those of the other European Temnostoma species.

","

The threats for this species are the usual ones for a forest insect, including deforestation, logging, agriculture, human intrusion and water management. In addition drainage or general drying of forests may be detrimental as this species requires wet situations.

","This species is widespread in Europe but the subpopulations are probably small with a relatively low number of adults. It is a species that resembles a wasp, so it is not so easy to find and collect. The current population trend of this species is expected to be in decline, because it is assumed that the real number of localities of the species will be a lot less than thought because of this relictual distribution pattern. There is an expected strong decline in suitable habitat in the future of nearly 30% over the next ten years. The population is probably severely fragmented, as the subpopulations are smaller and isolated and may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation.",Decreasing,"

The distribution of this species requires reassessment, due to confusion with T. carens, but it is probably found from Lapland south to northern France (Ardennes, Vosges), and from eastern Belgium through northern and central Europe into European parts of Russia and on through Siberia to the Pacific coast and Japan. Although this species has a wide geographic range it has a relictual distribution pattern over much of its European range (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species is estimated to be around 8 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 3.4 million km2. The EOO and AOO for the EU 27 are estimated to be around 3.7 million kmand 1.6 million km2, respectively.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions currently in place for this species, but it does occur in protected areas (for example in Belarus and Poland). More research is needed on its biology/ecology, habitat, population trends and threats. In Finland, this species has been assessed as Least Concern (LC) in 2000, 2010 and 2019 (FinBif 2020). In Germany the species is listed as Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Denmark the species is listed as Endangered (Bygebjerg 2019). In the Czech Republic the species is listed as Endangered (Farkac et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171722,149171720,Temnostoma meridionale,Near Threatened,A3c,2021,2020-02-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

EU 27 Regional Assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

Although Temnostoma meridionale is found across Europe, with its distribution concentrated in the central belt from west to east, it has a relictual distribution pattern over much of its European range, like T. apiforme. It is estimated this is the species in the genus that has declined the most in recent times in the number of locations, the area of occupancy and the quality of habitat. The current population trend is assumed to be declining in a strong and continuous pace. The subpopulations are small and the species is under threat from forestry activities, including deforestation, agriculture and human activities, so this decline will not be less in the future. This decline is and has been in the order of nearly 30% over a ten-year period. This decline is likely to go on in this special type of habitat, so the species is expected to lose a big part of its suitable habitat in a short time. Therefore, this species is assessed as Near Threatened, as it is close to qualifying for a threatened Category under Criterion A3c.","

This species is found in Fagus and thermophilous Quercus (Q.pubescens) forest containing overmature and fallen trees (Speight 2017, 2020).

Adults have been found in sunlit forest, where the species flies between the trees, the males hovering at 3 meters or higher and settling on low-growing vegetation. Males have been seen hovering in small groups, close to the trunk of large trees at the edge of a track. In these circumstances they not only hover but also fly rapidly both up and down and from side to side, within a space of 2 to 3 m diameter, buzzing noisily. Their resemblance to a cloud of hornets disturbed at the entrance to their nest hole is alarming (Speight 2017, 2020).

Flowers visited by this species include Cornus sanguinea and Photinia spp.

The flight period is from the beginning of May to the beginning of July. 

The larvae are wood-boring, in solid wood within part-rotted stumps and logs; described and figured by Krivosheina and Mamayev (1962), from larvae collected from a Fagus log. These authors also provide a key distinguishing larvae from those of the other European Temnostoma species.

","The main threats in Europe are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat due to deforestation, agriculture, urbanisation and logging. This will certainly have an negative effect on the populations of this species, but the actual changes are unknown. It seems this species suffers more from loss of quantity and quality of habitat than other forest dwelling species in Europe according to Speight (2020).","This is a species with a wide central European range. Overall the population trend is estimated to be strongly declining over its range (Speight 2017). It is thought that especially this species in the genus Temnostoma suffers a lot from the human activities like logging, agriculture and drainage. The species itself resembles a wasp and might be under-recorded, but it is also big and reasonably conspicuous in its habitat. It would have been recorded more in recent times if the population would have been stable. Although the AOO looks reasonably big at the moment, it is assumed the occurrence in Europe is declining in a rapid pace, and it will soon reach a threatened status when this goes on. In Sweden, there have been 59 recent sightings in the southernmost part (Skane (54), Halland (4), Blekinge (1)) (Artdatabanken 2020). It is not very rare in Poland (Zoralski pers. comm. 2019), and also in Ukraine is is found regularly and is sometimes common in some places (Popov pers. comm. 2020).",Decreasing,"

This species is known from Belgium, the southern part of Sweden, Estonia, Latvia, Denmark, Germany, Luxembourg, central and southwest France (including the Pyrenees), the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Serbia, Slovakia, Croatia, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Romania, Ukraine (forest zone, common in some places (Popov pers. comm. 2020)), European parts of Russia and the Caucasus (Speight 2020, Bot and van de Meutter 2019). The species is mostly found in the central belt of Europe from west to east, it seemingly does occur in the French Pyrenees but not in the more elevated part of the Alps.

For Europe the estimated extent of occurrence (EOO) is around 4.9 million km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 1.4 million km2. For the EU 27, the estimated EOO is around 2.5 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 789,000 km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no direct conservation measures for this species currently in place. Further studies are needed into the abundance, population trends, biology, ecology and threats to this species. The species occurs in protected areas, for example in Poland. In Sweden, this species was assessed as Near Threatened (NT) (Artdatabanken 2020). In the Czech Republic the species was assessed Vulnerable (Farkac et al. 2005), and in Germany the species is listed as Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Denmark the species is also listed as Endangered (Bygebjerg 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171733,149171730,Xylota sylvarum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Xylota sylvarum is a widespread and fairly common species, found across most European countries. The current population trend is considered to be stable, and although it may be impacted by forestry activities locally, there are no major threats to the European population as a whole. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.","

The preferred environment of this species is most types of humid deciduous and coniferous forest with mature and over-mature trees and along streams in broad-leaved evergreen oak forest (Quercus ilex) (Speight 2017, 2020). Adults are found at tracksides and edges of clearings, running on foliage of bushes, Pteridium and low-growing vegetation, and sometimes on tree stumps. 

Flowers visited by this species include Ranunculus, Rubus idaeus and Heracleum sosnowskyi (Pestov 2007). De Buck (1985) established that the species can obtain much or all of its pollen intake from ingestion of the pollen grains it finds on the surface of leaves, and may augment this with pollen taken from the faeces of other syrphids. 

The flight period is from the end of May until September, with a peak in July. 

The larvae are described and figured by Hartley (1961) and illustrated in colour by Rotheray (1994), who also re-describes the larva in a more recent publication (Rotheray 2004). Larvae have been found in damp, fungus-ridden decaying wood of Abies, Fagus and Quercus trunks and stumps, usually beneath the bark. Rotheray (1990) suggests decaying tree roots are probably a major larval habitat for this species and Rotheray (1994) mentions both Abies and Fagus roots as locations where larvae have been found. Krivosheina (2001) adds Pinus to the list of tree genera from which the larvae of this species have been reared, commenting that the larvae occur under the same circumstances as those of Myathropa florea. Rotheray (2004) extends the list of trees from which this species has been reared to include Fraxinus, Picea, Populus tremula and Pseudotsuga. Dussaix (2013) provides a coloured photo of the puparium, indicates that the larva overwinters and records that the puparial phase lasts for 4 weeks.

","There are the usual threats that all forest dwelling species are subjected to, but this is a very widespread adaptable species throughout its range, and so there are no major threats currently impacting the European population. The threats that are likely to affect this species are agriculture and forestry.",This is a widespread Palearctic species with a seemingly stable population trend for now.,Stable,"

This species is found from Fennoscandia south to Iberia, from Ireland eastwards through much of northern and central Eurasia to the Pacific coast, and is known in southern Europe from Italy (also Sardinia, Mason et al. 2006), the former Yugoslavia, Greece and Turkey (Speight 2020). 

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 11 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 4.4 million km2. For the EU 27 countries the estimated EOO is around 7.8 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 2.4 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"No information on conservation actions for the species, probably no need for that at the moment. For research the population trends should be looked at, and protection of suitable habitat should be undertaken. In Finland, this species has been assessed on the National Red List as Least Concern (LC) in 2010 and 2019 (FinBif 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171743,149171741,Xylota abiens,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Xylota abiens is found across Europe, particularly in central areas. It is not found in northern Scandinavia or the Mediterranean. Although the species may be under pressure in some parts of its range from anthropogenic activities in natural areas, to create industrial areas, for agriculture or for tourism, overall the current population trend is considered to be stable in both Europe and the EU 27. It has also been found in some man-made environments, so may be an adaptable species. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.","

The preferred environment of this species is overmature deciduous forest of humid Quercus and Carpinus/Quercus/ Ulmus, also alluvial hardwood forest. This species seems to frequent sites where seasonal fluctuations in water levels occur, such that during the winter months water levels are either at, or slightly above, the ground surface (Speight 2017, 2020).

Adults run about and sunbathe on felled and fallen trunks and on stumps in the sun, in glades, small clearings and beside tracks and on foliage of bushes and shrubs in similar situations, at up to 1.5 m from the ground. This species can also be found on stumps in partial shade/dappled sunlight.

Flowers visited by this species include umbellifers, Ilex, Ranunculus, Rubus idaeus, Sambucus, Rosa acicularis, Hieracium pilosella L. and Ranunculus acer.

The flight period is from mid June to July.

The larvae are described and figured by Rotheray (2004), from larvae collected from decaying sap under the bark of moribund pines (Pinus sylvestris) sinking into a mire of man-made origin. Under more natural conditions the larva has been found in wet, decaying roots of Fagus stumps.

","The main threats to this species are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat. Anthropogenic activities in natural areas to create industrial areas, for agriculture, for logging or for tourism reduce the natural habitats for this species. However this species seems adaptable and can also survive in regions where there is no undisturbed habitat (for example a man made mire). However, here is no specific information regarding the potential threats affecting this species, it is widespread through Europe and although there will be a decline in parts of its range overall it is not under pressure and the population trend seems stable.",This is a widespread western/central European species with a seemingly stable population trend for now.,Stable,"

This species is not really a northern species, in Scandinavia it is only in the south of Norway and Sweden and from Denmark south to the Pyrenees. It is found from Ireland eastwards through central Europe (and northern Italy and northern parts of the former Yugoslavia) into European Russia (Speight 2020). It is not present in the Mediterranean region, not known from Portugal, Spain, southern part of Italy, Greece and Turkey.

The range of this species extends out of the European region on as far as the Pacific coast (Sakhalin) in Russia, to the Caucasus, the Korean Peninsula, Japan, northeast China and Russia (from Urals to Sakhalin) (Jeong and Han 2019).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 8.6 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2.7 million km2. For the EU27 countries the estimated EOO is around 4.2 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 1.3 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation measures in place for this species, but as it is widespread and stable, this is not urgently needed. The species also occurs in National Parks throughout Europe. There is always the need to learn more on the biology, ecology and population trends of the species, as well as studying the habitat it lives in. In Denmark the species is listed as Vulnerable (VU, Bygebjerg 2019). In the Czech Republic the species was also assessed VU (Farkac et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171754,149171751,Xylota ignava,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Xylota ignava is a widespread species found throughout Europe. It has a large area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO). Although this species may be impacted by localised threats causing declines in the habitat in some parts of its range, the overall current population trend is considered to be stable. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. No conservation measures are required at the moment.","

This species is found in the conifer forest of Picea, down to the altitude of mixed Fagus/Picea forest (Speight 2017, 2020). Adults have been found on logs and fallen trunks in the sun, or on ground beside them, often in abundance at Picea debarking stations. The hoverfly is known to visit the flowers of Aegopodium, Crataegus, Galium, Ranunculus polyanthemos, Rosa canina and Sambucus (Speight 2020). The flight period is from the end of May to July and August at higher altitudes. The developmental stages are not described.

","The main threats are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat, due to deforestation and other land management like agriculture, habitat destruction and change in land use. This will certainly have an effect on the species, and it will surely be a negative effect, but the actual changes are unknown and are likely to be localised.","This is a widespread species through Europe, although it is not as common as some other species of the genus, for example X. segnis. The population size is unknown, but the current population trend is considered to be stable. In Sweden, there have been around 190 recent sightings. In Norway, the species is found in the southeastern point of the country and at a few central localities.",Stable,"

This species is found from Fennoscandia, south to central Spain. It is known from the Netherlands (although probably extinct) and the Ardennes (Belgium) through central Europe to European Russia. In southern Europe, it is found to parts of the former Yugoslavia, Greece and Turkey, through Asiatic Russia to the Pacific, Mongolia, China, Korea (Jeong and Han 2019) and Japan (Speight 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 9.6 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2.8 million km2.

For the EU 27 countries the estimated EOO is around 5.7 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 1.3 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"The species is not subject to any targeted conservation action, and this does not seem to be required at the moment. However, further research on taxonomy, biology, ecology and the right habitat criteria should be done.

This species has been assessed as Least Concern in Finland in 2000, 2010 and 2019 (FinBif 2020), and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). In Norway, the species has been assessed as Near Threatened (Artsobservasjoner 2020). In the Czech republic the species was assessed VU (Farkac et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171793,149171762,Xylota meigeniana,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Xylota meigeniana is a widespread species throughout Central and Northern Europe. The area of occupancy (AOO) and the extent of occurrence (EOO) are large for both Europe and the EU 27. The species may be impacted by localised threats from anthropogenic activities in forests and wetlands, but the overall current population trend is considered to be stable. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.","

The preferred environment of this species is forest/freshwater; along streams in deciduous forest with overmature trees, Carpinus/Quercus/ Ulmus forest, alluvial hardwood forest and brook floodplain forest with Populus tremula (Speight 2017, 2020).

Adults in Sweden are “typically found sitting in sunlit patches on one to two year-old windfalls of aspen in part-shaded deciduous or mixed forest glades” (Bartsch et al. 2009).

The species has been recorded as visiting the flowers of umbellifers (Bartsch et al. 2009). 

The flight period is from the beginning of June to September. 

The developmental stages have not been described, but this species has been collected in an emergence trap installed on a groundwater seepage system (helocren) with a mosaic of fen vegetation and small species of Salix, e.g. S. capraea (E. Carrières pers. comm. 2019). Krivosheina (2001) reports rearing this species from larvae found in rotten wood under the bark of humid, fallen trunks of Populus tremula, together with Hammerschmidtia. (Speight 2020).

","The main threats are focused on the loss of quality and quantity of habitat, due to deforestation and other land management like agriculture, drainage, habitat destruction, urbanisation and change in land use. This will certainly have an effect on the species, and it will surely be a negative effect, but the actual impact is unknown and is likely to be localised.","This is a widespread species through central and northern Europe. The population size is unknown, but the current population trend is considered to be stable for both Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"

This species is found from southern Sweden and Finland, south to northern France (Paris basin), from Belgium eastwards through northern and parts of central Europe (Romania) into European parts of Russia and the Ukraine and on through Siberia to the Pacific and Japan (Speight 2020).

It seems to be a central and northern European lowland species, that is not found in the Mediterranean region, the Pyrenees or the Alps. The area of occupancy (AOO) and the extent of occurrence (EOO) are large for both Europe and the EU 27, above the thresholds for a threatened Category.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The species is not subject to any targeted conservation action, and it is not considered to be required at the moment. However, further research on biology, ecology and habitat criteria for the species should be done. The species has been assessed as Least Concern in Finland in 2000, 2010 and 2019 (FinBif 2020), in Norway (Artsobservasjoner 2020) and in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). In Germany the species has been assessed as Endangered (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Denmark the species is listed as Vulnerable (Bygebjerg 2019). In the Czech Republic the species is listed as Endangered (Farkac et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171803,149171801,Xylota xanthocnema,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Xylota xanthocnema is a widespread species throughout Central Europe and European Russia. It is not found in northern Scandinavia or in the Mediterranean. It has a large extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO). The current population trend is considered to be stable for both Europe and the EU 27, and although there may be localised threats in certain parts of its range, overall this species is not impacted by any major threats. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. Although no conservation measures are required at present, further research on the population, habitat and ecology of this species is recommended.","

This species is found in well-drained deciduous forest, from the lower levels of Fagus/Picea forest down to alluvial hardwood forest still subject to seasonal flooding, on sites with a well-drained soil (Speight 2017, 2020). Adults have been found in tracksides and clearings, usually found running on foliage of bushes, such as Rubus, and shrubs, or on large-leaved lower-growing plants, such as Petasites in the sun. They have also been found on trunks of standing trees and on logs in clearings (Speight 2017, 2020).

There are no records of flower visiting by this species. It is likely it obtains its pollen and sugar intake in the same fashion as X. sylvarum, from the surface of leaves.

The flight period is from the end of May to September, with a peak in July. 

The larva are described and its posterior spiracular processes figured by Hartley (1961), who stated he had only found larvae ""in the exudate and rot-holes of yews"" (Taxus). Krivosheina (2001) records rearing this species from larvae in a standing-water rot-hole in Abies and Rotheray (2004) also records the larva from a rot-hole in Quercus.

","Although this species may be impacted locally by agriculture, deforestation, urbanisation and logging, the European population is not under direct pressure as a whole.","This is a widespread species throughout the European region. There is no information about the population size, but the current population trend is considered to be stable for both Europe and the EU 27.",Stable,"

In Scandinavia, this species is only found in the southern parts of Norway, Sweden and Finland, and from Denmark. It is also found further south to the Pyrenees, from Britain (England) eastwards through central Europe, plus Italy and the former Yugoslavia in southern Europe, into European parts of Russia and on into the Caucasus Mountains and Georgia (Speight 2020, Mengual et al. 2020).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) of this species in Europe is estimated to be around 6.8 million km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 2.3 million km2. For the EU 27 countries the estimated EOO is around 4.2 million km2, and the estimated AOO is around 1.1 million km2.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions in place for this species, but this is not considered to be needed at the moment, and it is likely to occur in National Parks and nature reserves. More research is needed on the population, habitat and species biology/ecology. In Germany the species is listed as Vulnerable (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Denmark the species is listed as Vulnerable (Bygebjerg 2019). In the Czech Republic the species is listed as Endangered (Farkac et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171814,149171811,Chrysotoxum arcuatum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in Europe/EU27. It is a widespread species, present in many habitats. There are no specific threats identified for this species, although Alpine subpopulations might be under higher pressure than those in lowlands. Therefore, Chrysotoxum arcuatum is here regarded as Least Concern in Europe and in the EU27 Member States.","The preferred habitats of C. arcuatum are wetlands/forests, fen carr, and edges of raised bogs. It can also occur along stream edges and in poorly-drained clearings in humid/wet forests (both conifer and deciduous) and conifer plantations. In the montane/subalpine zone of the Alps and Pyrenees, C. arcuatum is found in unimproved, non-calcareous grasslands and heaths (Speight 2018). Adults visit flowers of yellow composites, white umbellifers, and specifically those of Calluna, Frangula alnus, Hypochoeris, Leontodon, Leucojum aestivum, Ligustrum, Luzula sylvatica, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus, Rubus fruticosus, R. idaeus, Salix repens, Sorbus aucuparia. The flight period is May to September. The larva of C. arcuatum is unknown (Speight 2018), but expected to be entomophagous in common with those of of other congeneric species.","Reduction of habitat quality at Alpine locations - resulting from commercial and tourist development, grazing and climate change - may threaten subpopulations of C. arcuatum in Europe.",There is no information about population trends for this species.,Unknown,"Within the European region, this species ranges from Scandinavia south to northern Spain, east through Europe to European Russia (Speight 2018).

In Europe the species occurs from Scandinavia south to the Pyrenees and northern parts of Spain. It is also present from Ireland eastwards through northern and mountainous parts of central and southern Europe into European parts of Russia. It is known from Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Russia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.

Its range extends through Siberia as far as Kamchatka and Japan (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However it has a potential use in population control of its prey, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation actions for this species. However, Alpine subpopulations of C. arcuatum in Europe may require a specific monitoring programme to detect possible negative trends and then propose conservation actions accordingly. Further research is needed into this species' taxonomy, and life history research - including studies of larval biology - is needed to propose effective conservation actions.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171825,149171822,Chrysotoxum bicinctum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Chrysotoxum bicinctum does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in Europe/EU27. It is a widespread species, present in different habitats (forest and grassland), and with apparently large populations in most countries where recorded. There are no specific threats identified for this species. Therefore, C. bicinctum is regarded as Least Concern in Europe and in the EU27 Member States.

","Chrysotoxum bicinctum occurs near streams and fen vegetation in both deciduous and coniferous forests, and is also present in lowland humid and improved grassland. Adults visit flowers of white umbellifers, Achillea ptarmica, Alisma plantago-aquatica, Carduus, Crataegus, Hypochoeris, Potentilla erecta, Ranunculus, and Rubus, from late May to September (Speight 2018). The larva is undescribed, but has been reared on a diet of aphids in lab conditions (Rotheray and Gilbert 1989).","

Apart from the general threats to biodiversity, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

",

There is no information about population trends for this species.

,Unknown,"This species is widespread throughout Europe (Speight 2018). This species is possibly rare in the Iberian Peninsula, and in Spain, records of C. bicinctum are confirmed just from three northern provinces (van Steenis et al. in prep.).

In Europe it is known from Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Kosovo, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine; Russia, and the United Kingdom.

The species ranges eastwards through Asiatic Russia as far as central Siberia (Speight 2018).","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey aphids.

",Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions for this species. However, many localities where C. bicinctum is found lie within protected areas. Life history research - including studies of larval biology - is needed to propose effective conservation actions. Further taxonomic research is needed to clarify the genetic distinctiveness of this species from C. volaticum.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171836,149171833,Chrysotoxum fasciolatum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This European endemic species is assessed as Least Concern both globally and for the EU27 Member States due to wide distribution. Potential threats to this species may lead to a reduction in its population size in the near future. The species should be monitored regularly as it could become threatened in a short period of time.

,"Chrysotoxum fasciolatum is found in herb-rich open areas within humid Fagus/Picea forest and upwards through the Abies/Picea zone into unimproved alpine grassland. It flies from May to July, visiting flowers of Ranunculus, Rubus idaeus, and Taraxacum (Speight 2018). The larva is undescribed, but expected to be entomophagous, as are those of other congeneric species.

","

Apart from the general threats to biodiversity, there are no specific threats identified for this species. Nonetheless, changes in the management of grasslands and forests, where this species sometimes occurs, may have a negative influence on its conservation. Subopulations of C. fasciolatum at high elevations may also be influenced by global warming.

","There is no information on the population size and trend for this species. In Serbia, just three specimens have been recorded so far, in 1986, 1992 and 2012. In Greece, just two specimens are known, collected in 1994 and 2008. Some southern records of this species (for example, in Portugal) are old and unconfirmed. It was generally common in Czechia 10 years ago but there has been very limited monitoring recently.",Unknown,"Chrysotoxum fasciolatum is endemic to Europe, where it occurs from Scandinavia to France, with a record from northern Portugal old and requiring confirmation. It is also present in northeastern Europe (Baltic States, European part of Russia), northern Italy, and the Balkan Peninsula (Speight 2018, GBIF 2020).","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.

",Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions for this species. Further research into this species' life history - including studies of larval biology - is needed to propose effective conservation actions. The use of inappropriate land management practices in unimproved grassland should be discouraged in order to benefit this species. Listed as Vulnerable in the German Red List (Ssymank et al. 2011) and Least Concern in the 2015 Swedish Red List. Given its wide distribution, occurrence within Natura 2000 sites is presumed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171846,149171844,Chrysotoxum gracile,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

The species is assessed as Endangered in Europe due to its relatively restricted area of occupancy (120 km2), a severely fragmented population and an expected continuing decline in habitat quality. There is a large gap in the distribution of this species between the western and the eastern records. Despite extensive surveys in these areas for many years and in recent times (Z. Nedeljković pers. comm. 2021). Thus, this appears to be an actual gap in the range of this species in Europe, or the species is scarce in these regions. Inappropriate forest management and wildfire induced by global warming may result in a reduction in the quality of this species' main habitats, which are forests.

","The preferred habitats of C. gracile are forests (e.g. Quercus pubescens and Quercus petrea forests), but it is also found in Q. pubescens savannas. Streams are often present at sites where C. gracile has been recorded. Adults of this species have been found visiting flowers of Anthriscus silvestris, Euphorbia sp., Pastinaca sativa and Potentilla. Larval biology is completely unknown, but larvae are expected to be predatory on aphids, as in other Chrysotoxum species (Speight 2018).","

Reduction of habitat quality as a result of land use changes may threaten subpopulations of C. gracile in Europe. Inappropriate forest management and wildfire induced by global warming may result in a reduction in the quality of this species main habitats, which are forests.

","Published records of this species refer to a low number of specimens at each surveyed locality (e.g. Speight et al. 2013). Thus, the abundance of this species in Europe is either low or under-estimated. The population is considered severely fragmented.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from central and north-eastern Spain (Gil-Collado 1930) and the Pyrenees (Leclercq 1971), Mediterranean and sub-Mediterranean parts of southern France (Speight et al. 2013), and North Macedonia (Glumac 1968) . The area of occupancy is estimated to be 120 km2, and extensive surveys between the eastern and western parts of the distribution suggests that the species is genuinely scarce or absent from this area (Z. Nedeljković pers. comm. 2021).

Out of the European region, the species is recorded from the Anatolia region of Turkey (Erzurum province) (Vujić et al. 2017).","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.

",Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions for this species, which is absent from regional red lists. Speight et al. (2016) regard this species as 'Data Deficient'. Further research into this species' life history - including studies of larval biology - is needed to propose effective conservation actions. Additional monitoring is needed to better understand the population trends and impacts of threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171857,149171854,Chrysotoxum lineare,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This species is assessed as Endangered at the European regional level due to relatively restricted area of occupancy (224 km2), severely fragmented population, and an inferred decline in the extent and quality of its habitat. There is also potentially a continuing decline in the number of mature individuals and area of occupancy, although the causes of this remain unclear. It is unlikely that there will be a rescue effect from outside populations. Our poor understanding of this species' habitat requirements makes it difficult the define threats and propose conservation actions.

At the EU 27 level, it is assessed also as endangered due to relatively restricted area of occupancy (92 km2), severely fragmented population, and an inferred decline in the in the extent and quality of its habitat, and potentially in the number of mature individuals and area of occupancy (although the causes of this remain unclear). It is unlikely that there will be a rescue effect from outside populations.

","The preferred habitats of C. lineare are open areas of seasonally flooded, humid, unimproved, mesotrophic grassland, in the vicinity of standing-water bodies (Speight 2018), although it has also been recorded in cropland and coal mining areas. Adults fly from May to August visiting flowers of umbellifers. The larva is undescribed (Speight 2018).","Threats to this species are difficult to define as its biology and habitat requirements are poorly known, although the species is rare and may be at least local decline. A decline in the extent and quality of its habitat is inferred from tourism and infrastructure developments, although some of its fragmentary subpopulations in Europe are found in modified to heavily modified environments. For example, in the Czech Republic, this species is found in coal mining areas (Jiří Hadrava in litt.), while in Serbia it is found in crop and track verges.","There is no estimate of population size of C. lineare in Europe, but in western Europe this species exhibits a relictual distribution pattern (Speight 2018) with apparently small subpopulations. It is one of the scarcest members of the genus in Europe (A. Ricarte and Z. Nedeljković pers. comm. 2021). It is likely the population is severely fragmented. The majority of known specimens from eastern Europe belong to a series of 10 recorded in northern Serbia from 1988 to 2014. In 1988, only six specimens were recorded in Alibunar (Vujić et al. 1998) and Filić (unpublished), in Vojvodina (northern Serbia). Four further specimens were recorded in other Vojvodina locality, the Special Natural Reserves Slano Kopovo and Pašnjaci velike droplje (Markov et al. 2016). Although monitored after 1988, C. lineare has not been found again in Alibunar, suggesting that there might be a population decline of this species, at least locally, and possibly a reduction in the area of occupancy.",Unknown,"In Europe Chrysotoxum lineare is known from central France, Germany, Poland, Czech Republic (record from 2003), Slovakia, Romania, northern Serbia (records from 2014), Austria, Bulgaria, Hungary (records from 2006) and European parts of Russia (Speight 2018, Speight et al. 2016, Doczkal et al. 2001, Vujić et al. 2018, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Hubenov 2018, Toth 2001). It has an area of occupancy in Europe estimated at 220 km2, and as 92 km2 in the European Union.

The species is considered regionally extinct in Sweden. Most records that are not annotated are relatively old records (up to 100 years old).

Out of the European region, the species is also present in the Western-Siberian part of Russia and Kazakhstan (Barkalov and Mutin 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. Even though it has a potential use in pest control of their larval prey (which is unknown but likely to be insects, particularly aphids) and in crop pollination, the rarity of this species makes it a difficult prospect for commercial exploitation.",Terrestrial,

There are no specific conservation actions for this species.

This species is Strictly protected under Serbian legislation. Chrysotoxum lineare is included in the Red list of the German Province Baden-Württembergs as 'Gefährdung anzunehmen' (Dunk et al. 2003) and in the Red list of Czech Republic as 'CR' (Farkač et al. 2005). Further research into this species' life history - including studies of larval biology - is needed to propose effective conservation actions. This species is listed as Critically Endangered in the German Red List.

Additional monitoring is needed to better understand the population trends and impacts of threats.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171867,149171865,Chrysotoxum orthostylum,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Chrysotoxum orthostylum is assessed as Vulnerable on the regional level due to relatively restricted area of occupancy (60 km2), the low number of locations (9) and continuing decline in the habitat quality due to inadequate management of grassland and forest habitats, and projected habitat shifting due to climate change. The fact that other species of the C. vernale group have been surveyed an found in different habitats and regions of Europe, while C. orthostylum has mainly been found in protected areas (Nedeljković at al. 2015 and unpublished data) suggests that this species may be becoming limited to protected areas as a result of human activities and declining outside them.


","Chrysotoxum orthostylum has been found flying with other Chrysotoxum species in the grassy edges of conifer forests at high elevations in Serbia and Montenegro. In North Macedonia, C. orthostylum has been found resting on Lapsana and Chrysanthemum leaves in wet meadows (Nedeljković et al. 2015). Adults fly from mid-May to mid August. The larva is undescribed (Nedeljković et al. 2015).","Overgrazing may threaten C. orthostylum populations living in grasslands. This species has been found in the grassy edges of conifer forests at high elevations, thus conifer logging and wood harvesting, as well as habitat changes induced by climate change may also threaten this species. However, there is no published scientific information or specific observations to support these suggestions.","There is no information about the population size and trend for this species in Europe. Twelve specimens have been recorded in North Macedonia so far (in 1956, 1960, 1972, 1988 and 1994). Only one specimen has been reported from Montenegro (Durmitor National Park) and one from Serbia (Kopaonik National Park) (Nedeljković et al. 2015). However, there are 14 additional specimens of C. orthostylum collected in Kopaonik and Zlatar (Serbia), and a second specimen found in Durmitor (Montenegro) (unpublished data).",Unknown,"Chrysotoxum orthostulym occurs only in the Balkan Peninsula. European records of this species are restricted to Montenegro, North Macedonia and Serbia.

Out of the European region the species occurs in Anatolia (Turkey), Georgia (Mengual et al. 2020) and Kyrgyzstan (Nedeljković at al. 2015).","This species in not traded or exploited commercially. Even though it has a potential use in pest control of the presumed larval prey insects or in crop pollination, the rarity of this species makes commercial exploitation difficult.",Terrestrial,"Chrysotoxum orthostylum is not subject to any targeted conservation action.  Nonetheless, it occurs in protected areas such as Kopaonik National Park (Serbia), Durmitor National Park (Montenegro), Pelister National Park and Mavrovo National Park (North Macedonia). Further research into this species' life history - including studies of larval biology - is needed to propose effective conservation actions. Additional monitoring is needed to better understand the population trends and impacts of threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171877,149171875,Chrysotoxum tomentosum,Least Concern,,2021,2021-07-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This European endemic species is found in 16 locations in Europe and is assessed as Least Concern due to fact that identified threats (e.g., overgrazing, climate change in mountains and continuing decline of habitat quality) are mostly focused on the Alps and the species occurs mainly in Serbia and Montenegro. In addition, the distribution of this species is unclear due to morphological similarity with C. festivum.

It is assessed as Endangered for the EU27 Member States level due to a very small area of occupancy (24 km2), low number of locations (5) and continuing decline in the habitat quality. These five locations are all at high elevations in the French, Italian and Austrian Alps, which are all distant from one another and the species may be experiencing different specific threats at each location due to changes in its habitats and vegetation. It is unlikely that the EU27 subpopulations will experience a rescue effect from the pan-European subpopulation.

","This species occurs in open areas within Fagus/Picea forest; and open ground; unimproved, montane, and subalpine grassland. Adults fly from late May to late August. There are no data on flowers visited by this hoverfly. The larva is unknown but suspected to be aphidophagous as in congeneric species (Speight 2018).","

Reduction of habitat quality due to tourist development for snow sports, overgrazing and climate change in mountainous regions may threaten subpopulations of C. tomentosum.

","There is no information about the population size and trend for this species. There are over 200 specimens collected so far. The majority (78) were collected in Montenegro, followed by Serbia (76 specimens). Only two specimens have been collected in Italy so far (Nedeljković et al. 2013).",Unknown,"Chrysotoxum tomentosum is only known from records in the high mountains of Serbia, Montenegro, Austria, Italy (Alps) and France (Alps) (Nedeljković et al 2013; Speight 2018). It has an area of occupancy estimated at 224 km2 globally, and 24 km2 in the European Union.","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"

There are not specific conservation actions for this species. However, alpine subpopulations of C. tomentosum may require specific monitoring to detect possible negative trends and then propose conservation actions accordingly. Further research required to better understand the larval biology, distribution and threats to this species. 

This species occurs in protected areas (e.g. Kopaonik National Park, Šar planina National Park in Serbia, and Durmitor National Park in Montenegro), and its range overlaps Natura 2000 sites in France, Italy and Austria.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171887,149171885,Chrysotoxum verralli,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern both in Europe and the EU27 on the basis that it is widespread and no threats have been identified.

,"The preferred habitats of Chrysotoxum verralli are deciduous forests (including alluvial hardwood forest) and open areas, scrub and field hedges (Speight 2018). Adults fly from June to October, visiting flowers of white umbellifers, Caltha, Galium boreale, and Ligustrum. The larva is supposedly associated with nests of the ant Lasius niger (Speight 2018).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,

There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe.

,Unknown,"Chrysotoxum verralli occurs from Denmark and southern parts of Sweden to the central parts of France and southeast to north-eastern Greece. It is also present from southern parts of Britain eastwards through central Europe into European parts of Russia, the Caucasus and eastern Siberia (Speight 2018).

European records have been reported from Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czechia, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Montenegro, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, the Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine and the United Kingdom.","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphids (Rojo et al. 2003).",Terrestrial,Chrysotoxum verralli is not subject to any conservation measures and it is not included in any red list.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171897,149171895,Dasysyrphus neovenustus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Dasysyrphus neovenustus is uncommon, but apparently a widespread species across almost whole of north and temperate Europe. It has been often been overlooked due to nomenclatural problems. Its population has increased in Poland markedly (Soszyński et al. 2013). The species is likely to be more widespread than presently known, and is listed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27.

","

Dasysyrphus neovenustus is present in or near various conifer forests, preferably with Pinus sylvestris trees, including plantations and heathlands invaded by Pinus sylvestris scrub (Speight 2018). Adults have been observed on yellow-flowered Asteraceae, white-flowered Apiaceae, on flowering Sorbus aucuparia and Cerasus avium from mid April to end of June (Speight 2018). Developmental stages are unknown, but the larva is apparently camouflaged against bark and it is likely to feed as an ambush predator mainly on aphids that live on trees and bushes, in common with the larvae of other related Dasysyrphus species.

","

Apart from general threats to biodiversity, there are no specific threats identified to this species in Europe. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat to native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is also preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of Dasysyrphus neovenustus could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","Dasysyrphus neovenustus is an uncommon but apparently widespread species in most parts of forested Europe (D. Doczkal pers. comm. 2020). It has been often overlooked due to nomenclatural problems (Speight 2018). According to Soszyński et al. (2013) D. neovenustus probably appeared in Poland in the 1970s and the number of specimens collected in Poland increased markedly before 2013 (Soszyński et al. 2013), suggesting a genuine range expansion. ",Stable,"

Dasysyrphus neovenustus was described recently (Soszyński et al. 2013) and its range is still uncertain due to confusion with similar species. It has been confirmed from Ireland, Britain, France, the Netherlands, Belgium, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Switzerland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Germany and parts of European Russia (Speight 2018, Soszyński et al. 2013, Ssymank and Doczkal 2017, Láska and Bičík 1996, Maibach et al. 1998, Edelsjö 2018, Speight and Vanappelghem 2018, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Global Biodiversity Information Facility 2020). This species is probably widely distributed in boreal and temperate Europe.

Out of the European region the species is known from Asian Russia (Baikal) (Soszyński 2013, Barkalov and Mutin 2018).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Further survey work is needed to resolve the taxonomy of this and related species and determine the distribution of this species as well as its biology, especially larval biology.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171908,149171905,Dasysyrphus albostriatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC),
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread arboreal species in almost the whole of Europe and in the EU 27, it has a wide distribution and it is also widespread in conifer plantations and in suburban habitats. It is also likely that there is population exchange between European and adjacent non-European parts of the range. There are no major threats to this species and no conservation action is required at present, except research on the impacts of invasive harlequin ladybirds on this species.

","

Dasysyrphus albostriatus inhabits most types of coniferous and deciduous forests including conifer plantations, up to the lower limits of the alpine zone (Speight 2018). It is frequent also in parks and gardens with trees (Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkemeyer 1994). Adults are partly migratory (Aubert et al. 1976) and they fly from the end of April (early April in southern Europe) to September (October). There are two generation with peaks in May and August in the temperate Europe (Reemer et al. 2009, Ball et al. 2013, Kula 2001). Adult flies occur preferably in trackside, clearings etc. often near trees within 2-3 m of the ground. They frequently settle on foliage of trees and bushes to bask (Speight 2018). Adults visit various flowering plants, bushes and trees. For example Speight (2018) lists yellow Asteraceae, white Apiaceae, Acer pseudoplatanus, Calluna, Crataegus, Euphorbia, Lonicera xylosteum, Papaver, Ranunculus, Rubus, Salix, Sorbus, Stellaria, Succisa pratensis, Viburnum opulus. Adults were also observed eating honeydew from aphids on maple Acer platanoides (Bartsch et al. 2009). The larva is predacious in the crowns of trees and bushes (Kula 1982), mostly on aphids but apparently on a wide range of soft-bodied insects that it catches opportunistically as a well-camouflaged ambush predator (Goeldlin 1974, Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009).

","There are no documented major threats to this species. This species is widespread also in agricultural and anthropogenic landscapes. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axiridis in Europe, that could be important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This ladybird is also preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991). Intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of Dasysyrphus tricinctus could be detrimental for this hoverfly as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

This species is widely distributed and frequent but rarely abundant in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009) as well as in other parts of Europe. It is frequent also in suburban habitats with trees, parks and gardens (Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkemeyer 1994). Its European population is numerous and not fragmented, and seems to be stable in Europe, but with a downward trend in the Netherlands and Great Britain (Reemer et al. 2009, Ball et al. 2011).

",Stable,"

Dasysyrphus albostriatus is one of the most widespread species of the genus Dasysyrphus in Europe as well as in the Palaearctic region. It is present in almost all regions of Europe except the forestless north (Swalbard, Faroes, Iceland and the extreme north of European mainland) (Nielsen 1999, Bartsch et al. 2009, Jensen 2001). It is probably also absent from Malta (Ssymank and Ebejer 2009) and the European Macaronesian islands (Smit 2008, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017). This species has not been documented also from several poorly investigated countries (Moldova, Albania, Kosovo) in European mainland, but the presence of this migratory species is probable there.

Outside Europe it is present in almost all parts of Palaearctic region, including North Africa and Japan (Kazerani et al. 2012, Saribiyik 2014, Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Vujić et al. 2020).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Dasysyrphus albostriatus is not considered threatened in any area in Europe (Speight et al. 2016) and its biology is relatively well-known. However, the larval biology is known inadequately to estimate possible impact of the invasive ladybird Harmonia axiridis on this species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171918,149171916,Dasysyrphus lenensis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Although the distribution and validity of this species in Europe requires further clarification, the concept applied here is of a widespread species that is endemic to the European Red List region, that is found in woodlands in Central Europe and both the extent of occurrence and area of occupancy of this species are probably larger than it is known at present. It assessed as Least Concern both globally and for the EU27 Member States.","This arboreal species is present in conifer or mixed temperate forests, preferably submontane to montane Abies/Picea forest to its upper elevational limit (Speight 2018). Adults visit flowering Alnus viridis, Caltha palustris, Ribes, Cerasus avium, Crataegus, Salix spp. (Speight 2018, Doczkal 1996, L. Mazánek pers. comm. 2020). Flight period is from end of April to the beginning of June, or to July (females at higher elevations) (Speight 2018, Doczkal 1996). Developmental stages are unknown, but larvae are apparently predatory in common with larvae of other related Dasysyrphus species.","

There are no documented threats to this species. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat to native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is also preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of Dasysyrphus lenensis could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

This species is rather rare and local, but it is regularly recorded along with similar Dasysyrphus specimens in forested Central Europe during early spring, and in some suitable forested localities can be relatively abundant (Doczkal 1996).

",Stable,"As defined by European authors, the concept followed here, Dasysyrphus lenensis is known from Central Europe and some sub-Mediterranean mountains. The real range of this species is uncertain due to confusion with other similar species of Dasysyrphus.

Confirmed records are known from the Netherlands, Belgium, France (Vosges, Alps, Pyrenees), Germany, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Austria, Poland, Czech Republic, Northern Italy and Serbia (Kopaonik National Park) (Doczkal 1996, Weyer 2003, Mazánek 2009, Nedeljković 2011, Burgio et al. 2015, van Steenis et al. 2015, Speight 2018, Speight et al. 2018).

The occurrence of this species in European Russia as well as in Asia is questionable at present (Barkalov 2007, Barkalov and Mutin 2018), and the species is treated here as being endemic to Europe.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,The primary requirement is for taxonomic studies to understand the taxonomic identity and therefore the distribution of this species.

Further survey work is needed to clarify the current distribution and population status of this species as well as its biology and taxonomy. Dasysyrphus lenensis is regarded as a threatened species in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) and it is a protected species in Serbia (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149171929,149171926,Dasysyrphus nigricornis,Near Threatened,"B2b(ii,iii)",2021,2020-03-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

The known confirmed European distribution area of this species is restricted to northern Europe (Bartsch et al. 2009). The real distribution of this species in Europe is still uncertain due to much confusion that has existed over the use of the name and confusion with other similar species. The area of occupancy (AOO) for this species is 328 km2 in Europe, and it is even smaller in the EU27, where it is only present in Finland, which seems to be its distribution centre in Europe. It is a rare and local species with referred extreme fluctuation in the number of mature individuals in Norway, where it is listed as Vulnerable. In addition, it is presumed that there is a continuing decline of extent and quality of suitable habitats, due to human activities and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016), and the quality of suitable habitat for this species could be also declining due to global warming (Barredo et al. 2020). It is consequently listed as Near Threatened both in Europe and the EU27.

","

This species is present mainly in arctic dwarf-shrub tundra and taiga environments (Speight 2018). In Northern Sweden it is occurred in open northern pine forests from 200 to 500 m above sea level (Bartsch et al. 2009). The flight period of adults is during June and July in Europe. Published flowers visitation records in Europe are known from Caltha palustris, Ranunculus acris, Taraxacum, Salix, Rhododendron tomentosum (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Nielsen 1998, Locke and Skevington 2013). The larval stage is unknown (Speight 2018) but is presumably predatory, in common with larvae of other related Dasysyrphus species, probably on soft bodied insects that live on Pinus spp. or Betula sp. trees (Bartsch et al. 2009).

","

Any current direct threats to this species are unknown, since there is little information on the biology of this species. It is projected that there is a continuing decline of extent and quality of suitable habitats due to human activities and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016). The quality of suitable habitat for this species could be also declining due to global warming (Barredo et al. 2020).

","

Dasysyrphus nigricornis is rare and local in northern Scandinavia. An extreme fluctuation in the number of specimens is referred to in the recent Red List to Norwegian species (Gammelmo et al. 2015). The subpopulations in northern Sweden and Finland, where there are recent records of this species and no documented decline, could be stable. Overall, there are 60 records for this species in northern Europe, although 25% of those reported on GBIF (2019) are more than 30 years old.

",Unknown,"

The range of this species is uncertain, as much confusion has existed over the use of the name and those of similar species (Speight 2018, Bičík and Láska 1995). Recent records under the name Dasysyrphus nigricornis from Latvia and Romania (Karpa 2008, Stanescu and Parvu 2005) cannot be accepted as reliable.

With the recognition of D. lenensis as a distinct species, D. nigricornis is treated here as being confirmed in Europe only from northern Fennoscandia (Norway, Sweden, Finland, North Karelia and the Kola Peninsula in European Russia) (Bičík and Láska 1995, Speight  2018, Gammelmo et al. 2015, Bartsch et al. 2009; Barkalov pers. comm. 2019). The status of the species elsewhere in European Russia is unclear.

Outside Europe it is present in Siberia to the Far East, Altai, Mongolia, Greenland; Alaska (USA) and Northern Canada (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Barkalov 2011, Locke and Skevington 2013). Dasysyrphus nigricornis is a northern Holarctic species apparently with a circumpolar distribution north of the Arctic Circle (Bartsch et al. 2009, Locke and Skevington 2013).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Further monitoring is needed to determine the current distribution and population status of this species as well as its biology. 

Dasysyrphus nigricornis is listed in the Norwegian Red List to species Vulnerable under Criterion B2a (which equates to NT under the IUCN Categories and Criteria) (Gammelmo et al. 2015). In the Swedish Red Lists in 2015 and 2020 it is listed as Least Concern (ArtDatabanken 2015, 2020) as well as in the Finnish Red List (Hyvärinen 2019).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171940,149171937,Dasysyrphus tricinctus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This arboreal species is widespread in almost the whole Europe except parts of the Mediterranean, it has a wide distribution and it is also widespread in conifer plantations and in some suburban woodlands and parks. There are no documented major threats to this species, and no conservation action is required at present except research on the possible impacts of threats from the invasive harlequin ladybird. The extent of occurrence and area of occupancy of the European taxon are probably larger than they are known at present, and it is considered Least Concern both for Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","

Dasysyrphus tricinctus inhabits a wide range of coniferous and deciduous woodlands, in particular Picea plantations and areas of scrub Betula in sheltered locations (e.g. associated with stands of mature coniferous or deciduous trees). It is also present in suburban parks and conifer plantations. The species is present also in Iceland in connection with birch forest (Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults are vagrant (Aubert et al. 1976) but predominantly arboreal, often flying within a few metres of the ground but also high up in the canopy of trees, but descends to visit flowers of low-growing plants in tracksides, clearings and other open habitats adjacent to forests.  Adults visit various flowering plants bushes and trees. Bartsch et al. (2009) mentioned that of some thirty species of plants are visited by this species in Sweden. Adults fly from mid-April to beginning of October. There are two generation per year with peaks in first half of May and the second half of August in the most of temperate Europe (Reemer et al. 2009, Ball et al. 2013, Kula 2001, Speight 2018); two generation per year are likely also in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009). Predacious larvae are camouflaged against bark (Gäbler 1938). It has been observed predating sawfly larvae on spruce Picea abies and lepidopterous larvae on deciduous trees (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). In Scotland it is also regularly seen in connection with the aphid Drepanosiphum platanoides, which lives on the Acer pseudoplatanus (Bartsch et al. 2009).

","There are no documented major threats to this species. This species is widespread and common also in conifer plantations. Declines in some part of Western Europe could be related to changes in forestry management. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This ladybird is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of Dasysyrphus tricinctus could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).","This species is widespread and often abundant species in most woodland areas (Bartsch et al. 2009, Ball et al. 2011, Reemer et al. 2009). Subpopulations in Europe seems to be numerous and stable, but it is considered to be in decline in Switzerland, Netherlands and Great Britain (Speight et al. 2016, Reemer et al. 2009, Ball et al. 2011).",Stable,"Dasysyrphus tricinctus is widespread in the whole of subarctic and boreal Europe (present also in Iceland) and forested submontane and mountainous areas of temperate Europe south to the Pyrenees, Apennines and Turkey (Speight 2018, Sommagio 2010, Saribiyik 2014, Burgio et al. 2015, Bartsch et al. 2009, Vujić et al. 2020).

It is also present in most of the rest of Palearctic region through the Caucasus, Iran, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Siberia, Mongolia and Korea to the Pacific coast and Japan (Kazerani et al. 2012, Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009).",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"Dasysyrphus tricinctus is not considered threatened in any region of Europe at present and the biology of this species is relatively well-known. However, the larval biology is known inadequately to estimate the possible impact of the invasive harlequin ladybird.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171951,149171948,Dasysyrphus venustus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Dasysyrphus venustus sensu Doczkal seems to be common and widely distributed species in almost all humid European forests, including commercial plantations. Subpopulations of this species are numerous in Europe and there are no documented threats to this species. Some parts of range mapped to whole countries/sub-country units with detailed distribution data unavailable. No conservation action is required at present, except research into possible impacts from invasive ladybirds. Taxonomic research is required. The extent of occurrence and area of occupancy of the European taxon are probably larger than they are known at present, and it is considered Least Concern both for Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","

Adults of this species are found in or near various humid coniferous and deciduous forests, including conifer plantations, of various elevations from mid of April to June and July at higher altitudes/more northerly latitudes (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults are observed as sitting to sun itself on leaves or as flying in clearings, tracksides and open areas in forests etc. They visit white-flowered Apiaceae, flowering Acer platanoides, A. pseudoplatanus, Allium ursinum, Berberis, Caltha palustris, Crataegus, Endymion, Euphorbia, Frangula alnus, Ilex, Lonicera xylosteum, Potentilla erecta, Cerasus avium, Prunus spinosa, Ranunculus spp., Rubus idaeus, Salix spp., Sambucus, Sorbus aucuparia, Stellaria, Taraxacum (Speight 2018). The larva is camouflaged resting on bark (Dušek and Láska 1962, Rotheray 1987, 1994) on small branches on trees and shrubs, e.g. Acer pseudoplatanus, by day and it feeds on aphids and other soft-bodied insects.

","

Apart from general threats to biodiversity, there are no threats identified for this species in Europe.  This species probably tolerates commercial forestry.

The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe, which could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of Dasysyrphus venustus could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

This is an apparently common arboreal species with numerous subpopulations in almost the whole of forested Europe. But its real population as well as population trends are unclear due to confusion with other similar, undescribed species of Dasysyrphus (Speight 2018, Locke and Skevington 2013, D. Doczkal pers. comm. 2020).

",Stable,"

Dasysyrphus venustus is widely distributed in almost the whole boreal and temperate Holarctic region, and is absent in Europe only form Iceland, some northern parts of European Russia, and Mediterranean parts of Europe. Nevertheless the real range of this species is uncertain because the present concept of this species in confused and its treatment here has to be regarded as provisional (Speight 2018, Locke and Skevington 2013, D. Doczkal pers. comm. 2020).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,

There are no specific conservation actions for this species; which is not considered threatened in any area in Europe (Speight et al. 2016). Further survey work is needed to resolve the taxonomy of this and related species and determine the real distribution of this species and the larval biology is known inadequately to estimate the possible impact of invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis on this species.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171961,149171959,Didea fasciata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-09-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Didea fasciata
has numerous subpopulations in forests across almost the whole of Europe, despite evidence of some local decline. It inhabits well-preserved conifer plantations, but its occurrence is presumably declining in areas of intensive forest management and by the clearance of suitable forests. The extent of occurrence and area of occupancy of the European taxon are probably larger than they are known at present, and it is considered Least Concern both for Europe and for the EU27 Member States.","

Flies occur close to forests, both coniferous and deciduous, and can also be found in conifer plantations mostly with well developed understorey (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight et al. 2018, Reemer et al. 2009). Adults are mobile and migratory (Speight et al. 2016, Aubert et al. 2016). The flight period lasts from May to the end of September and appears to consist of two generation in most Europe (see Ball et al. 2011, Reemer et al. 2009, Barkemeyer 1994, Tóth 2011). Adults are not selective in their choice of flowers and visit various flowering plants (see Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018). The larvae have been found as preying on aphids only on trees (Larix, Abies, Pinus, Salix) (Rojo et al. 2003, Láska and Starý 1980). Starý (1976) supposed that D. fasciata is the main and most important predator of the aphid Cinara piceae, because its larvae were present in a greater or lesser numbers in most of colonies of this aphid.

","Although the species is often observed in plantations, it is probably not fully tolerant to intensive forestry (Stubbs 1982). A continuing decline in extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species is inferred due to human activities and settlements. Jansen et al. (2016) listed many types of forests inhabited by this species as decreasing in Europe.

The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This invasive ladybird is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids, including the genus Cinara, although probably not this fly's apparent preferred larval prey species Cinara piceae (Chapin and Brou 1991). Intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

This species is widespread and relatively common in forested northern Europe (eg. Sweden, Denmark and Finland) (Bartsch et al. 2009). It has also numerous subpopulations in most forested, especially mountainous, regions in the rest of Europe (eg. Ball et al. 2011, Barkemeyer 1994, Čepelák et al. 1986), becoming less frequent and more localized towards the south. There has been a significant decline in occurrence records from most parts of Britain over the past 35 years (Ball et al. 2011).

",Unknown,"The species' distribution area covers virtually all of Europe (except marginal North, Iceland and warm Mediterranean. From there it continues east through Siberia, parts of China and northern India to the Pacific Ocean, Japan and Taiwan (Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkalov and Mutin 2018). This species has been also often reported for North America (eg. Speight 2018). As another, similar species occurs there according to Vockeroth (1992), it is possible this is a misidentification.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Didea fasciata is not considered threatened at a national scale anywhere in Europe (Speight et al. 2016), although it has been listed as threatened in some regions in Germany (Thuringen, Sachsen and Sachsen Anhalt) (Ssymank et al. 2011).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171972,149171969,Epistrophe annulitarsis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT°)

This is an uncommon species in Europe, however, it is widespread across eastern parts of the region, particularly in European Russia, and it is assessed as Least Concern for the Pan Europe region.

In the EU 27 Member States it is known only from about ten collecting sites in the northeast of the EU region with a known area of occupancy in the EU of 40 km2 and occurs in 9-11 localities, which is precautionarily assumed to each be a discrete location based on threats from forestry and urbanisation. The qualifies as Vulnerable (B2ab(iii)) for the EU 27, but there is probable immigration from Russia into EU 27, so the species is downgraded on category to Near Threatened (NT°) for the EU 27.

Further survey work is needed to determine recent population trends of this species in Europe as well as its biology.

","E. annulitarsis occurs in deciduous and mixed forests (Bartsch et al. 2009) and in taiga (Barkalov pers. comm. in Speight 2018), Pestov and Dolgin (2006) referred to its occurrence south and mid parts of  taiga in northeast European Russia. The flight period of adults is in July and August (Barsch et al. 2009), mid-May to end of August (Speight 2018). The larva is undescribed, but probably feeds on aphids in trees, like the larvae of other Epistrophe species (Bartsch et al. 2009).","

In the EU 27, it is inferred that there is a continuing decline of extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species, due to human activities (forestry) and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016). In European Russia, the species is likely widespread, but although it may be rare it is unlikely to be subject to major threats. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This ladybird is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of Epistrophe annulitarsis could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).  E. anulitarsis is however more widespread in east Palearctic, where this ladybird is native, than in Europe so it may not be at substantial risk.

","E. annulitarsis is a very rare species, known only from several collecting sites in the northeast EU 27 (Bartsch et al. 2009, Hyvärinen et al. 2019, GBIF 2020). The species is widely-distributed and probably more frequent in European Russia and North East Asia (Barttsch et al. 2009, Barkalov pers. comm. 2019). Based on the criteria applied in the Finnish Red List (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) the population, area of occupancy and number of locations or subpopulations in this country experience extreme fluctuations, but the basis for this is not described.",Unknown,"

Within the European region, this species is known from southern Finland (five localities; LAJI.FI 2021), Latvia (3-5 localities), Lithuania (probably only one locality is known), Estonia (one locality is known), and northern parts of European Russia (St. Petersburg region, Moscow region, Kirov region, Northeast European Russia) (Speight 2018, Pakalniškis 2006, Karpa 2008, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Bartsch et al. 2009, Pestov and Dolgin 2006, GBIF 2020, A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2019).

Out of the European region, the range of the species eastwards through Siberia to the Pacific coast, Korea and Japan (Speight 2018; A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2019).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Further survey work is needed to determine recent population trends of this species as well as its larval biology. E. annulitarsis is listed as Near Threatened (B2ac(i,ii,iii)) in the 2019 Red List of Finnish Species (Hyvärinen et al. 2019).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171984,149171981,Epistrophe diaphana,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a rare and local but widespread species associated with unimproved ecotones and open habitats along streams with deciduous trees, bushes and tall herbs. It has been regarded as slightly declining in Continental region of Europe and declining and/or threatened in Switzerland, the Netherlands, Denmark (Regionally extinct) and Belgium (Speight et al. 2016, Bygebjerg 2019). This species is probably affected by deforestation and by intensive landscape management that induced loss of unimproved ecotones and open habitats in wet forests. It is listed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27 due to its wide range and is regarded as unthreatened in most range states which have included it on national Red Lists, but further research on its population status, ecology and threats is recommended.

","

It occurs in connection with deciduous open woodland preferably in wetlands, beach forests, in moist meadows and in pasture and unimproved grasslands, but also in dry habitats near water (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Stuke and Schulz 2001). Adults are relatively mobile and occasionally can be recorded far from breeding places. The fly visits flowers of white Apiaceae (Aegopodium podagraria, Anthriscus sylvestris, Cicuta virosa, Laserpitium latifolium, Foeniculum), Valeriana speculum and Senecio spp. (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). It is a bivoltine species in temperate Europe with flight period of adults from mid of May to end of August (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Mazánek et al. 2001), into September in southern Europe (Speight 2018) and from the beginning of June to the middle of August in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009). The larva was described as being predaceous on aphids Uroleucon cichorii and Cichorium intybus (Mazánek et al. 2001), and there was also an observation of female as laying eggs on aphids Cavariella sp. on Heracleum spondilum (Dobson 1997, Rojo et al. 2003).

","Apart from general threats to biodiversity, including deforestation, there are no known specific threats identified for this species in Europe. The loss of unimproved ecotones and open habitats along streams with deciduous trees, bushes and tall herbs is possibly the main threat for this species, because this species is associated with these habitats (Ball et al. 2011). The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).","

This species is rather rare and local across whole its distribution area in Europe (Röder 1990, Maibach et al. 1992, Reemer et al. 2009, GBIF 2020). It is more frequent and probably has numerous subpopulations only in some areas of submontane central Europe (Stuke and Schulz 2001, Ssymank et al. 2011, Tóth 2011, L. Mazánek pers. comm. 2020) and in southern England, where its frequency of occurrence has been very variable but with a slight upwards trend and range expansion (Ball et al. 2011, Ball and Morris 2014). It has been slightly declining in Continental regions of Europe and is thought to be declining and/or threatened in Switzerland, the Netherlands, Denmark (Regionally Extinct) and Belgium (Speight et al. 2016, Bygebjerg 2019).

",Stable,"

Within the European region, this species is widespread from southern Sweden, Finland and Norway south to the Pyrenees and Cordillera Cantabria (southern Spain), northern Apennines (Italy) and to the central mountains of the Balkan Peninsula (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Burgio et al. 2015, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Nedeljković 2011), and from southern England eastwards through sub-mountainous central and mountainous southern Europe into European Russia (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009).

Out of the European region, the species' range extends through Asia: southern Siberia, Transcaucasia, Middle Asia to the Russia Far East (Amurskaya Province) (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"Epistrophe diaphana is not threatened in Great Britain (Ball and Morris 2014), in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005) or in Germany generally (Ssymank et al. 2011), but it was referred as Regionally Extinct in Sachsen (Pellmann and Scholz 1996) and as Vulnerable in Sachsen-Anhalt (Dziock et al. 2004). This species was regarded as threatened in the Netherlands, Denmark and Belgium by Speight et al. (2016). This species is listed as Regionally Extinct for Denmark (Bygebjerg 2019). In Finland ans Sweden it is listed as Least Concern (Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020). Monitoring of subpopulations is necessary and further research is required to clarify the full range of this species and to better understand the habitat requirements and the existing threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149171996,149171993,Epistrophe eligans,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is widespread, rather arboreal species with numerous subpopulations in most parts of Europe including the EU 27, and is also widespread in suburban habitats. There are no major threats to this species and no conservation action is required at present, except research into potential impacts from the harlequin ladybird. It is listed as Least Concern both in Europe and the EU 27.

","Epistrophe eligans inhabits most types of deciduous forests and scrubs including suburban parks and gardens with well-established trees (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkemeyer 1994, Ball et al. 2011). Adult flies occur in trackside, clearings etc. often near trees foliage. Adults visit various flowering trees (Acer pseudoplatanus, Malus spp.), bushes (Crataegus laevigata, Prunus spinosa, Ribes spp., Euonymus europaeus, Ilex aquifolium, Sambucus nigra, Crataegus, Viburnum opulus) and herbs (white Apiaceae, Taraxacum spp., Cistus, Endymion Hyacinthoides, Euphorbia, Stellaria) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). It is a univoltine species, adults fly from April (March in southern Europe) to June (beginning of July at Mountains and on the North) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009). The larva is aphid-feeding and largely arboreal, on trees (Malus domestica, Prunus spp. Cerasus, Acer platanoides, Tilia cordata, Quercus, Fraxinus, Pyrrus communis), on shrubs (Euonymus, Sambucus, Rubus fruticosus, Ribes, Spirea, Viburnum, Crataegus) but can occur also on herbaceous plants (Arundo, Urtica, Agrostis, Aster, Silene) including some crops (Beta vulgaris, Vicia faba, Foeniculum (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Rojo et al. 2003).","Apart from the general threats for biodiversity, including deforestation, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This ladybird is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).","

This species is the most common species of the genus Epistrophe in most of its range (e.g. Reemer et al. 2009, Ball et al. 2011). It is frequent also in suburban habitats, parks and gardens with well established trees (Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkemeyer 1994, Reemer et al. 2009, Ball et al. 2011). Its European population is numerous, not fragmented and seems to be stable or increasing (Ball et al. 2011).

",Stable,"

Epistrophe eligans is widespread in all parts of Europe south from southern Fenoscandinavia (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Burgio et al. 2015, Vujić et al. 2020). It is probably absent only from some islands in the Mediterranean (Cyprus, Malta) (Ssymank and Ebejer 2009) and in Macaronesia (Smit 2008). This species has not been recorded from several poorly-surveyed countries (Moldova, Albania), but its presence is probable there.

The distribution further east is restricted to southern parts of European Russia, Transcaucasia and Turkey (Speight 2018, Mengual et al. 2020, Barkalov pers. comm. 2019), although it is possible that it extends as far as Kazakhstan and neighbouring countries in the south (Bartsch et al. 2009).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

There are not specific conservation actions for this species. Epistrophe eligans is not considered threatened in any area in Europe and its biology is relatively well known. However, the larval biology is known inadequately to estimate possible impact of the invasive ladybird Harmonia axiridis on this species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172008,149172005,Epistrophe melanostoma,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in the European region with numerous and probably stable subpopulations in several areas in Europe, and so is listed Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27. Nevertheless, this species is probably affected by deforestation and by intensive landscape management that results in the loss of unimproved ecotones and open habitats in wet forests with a sufficient proportion of tall herbs, bushes and trees of little economic value. Monitoring of subpopulations is necessary in some areas and further research is required to understand to the real distribution and the habitat requirements and the existing threats.","It occurs in connection with deciduous forests (Fagus and Quercus), alluvial softwood and alluvial hardwood forests (Speight 2018), but according to Bartsch et al. (2009) it prefers landscapes with coniferous forest where it is found in areas with mixed forest and deciduous groves near coasts, lakes and watercourses. The adults reside in clearings and open habitats with tall herbs, shrubs and trees with low economic value and they have been observed on flowering trees and bushes (Acer platanoides, Prunus padus, Crataegus laevigata, Lonicera xylosteum, Euonymus europaea, Spirea spp., Ribes alpinum, Prunus spinosus) and also flowering plants (Caltha palustris, Chelidonium, Euphorbia) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). The flight period of adults is from mid April to June, from May to July at higher altitudes and on the north (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019). It is a univoltine species with diapausing and overwintering larvae that are flattened and green, adapted to camouflage while resting on leaves (Mazánek et al. 2001). Larvae have been found as predator on aphids colonies on bushes (Eonymus europaea and Sambucus nigra) and also on the herb Carduus personata (Mazánek et al. 2001). Dussaix (2013) reports observing oviposition of this species on the foliage of an apple tree.","Apart from the general threats to biodiversity, including deforestation, there are no known specific threats identified for this species in Europe. The loss of unimproved ecotones and open habitats with tall herbs, shrubs and trees with low economic value could be the main threat for this species. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).","This species is widespread and with probably numerous and stable subpopulations in many regions in Europe (e.g. Ssymank et al. 2011), but in some regions it is quite rare e.g. in Denmark (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight et al. 2016). This species is common also in Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020). This species has been decreasing and/or is threatened in Belgium, Denmark and the Netherlands according to Speight et. al. (2016). Reemer et al. (2009) reported this species as being fairly common in the Netherlands, with evidence of an increase since 1942. The distribution patterns of records within its area suggests that there are probably problems resulting from confusion with similar species (Bartsch et al. 2009, Mengual et al. 2020), which makes determining its true population status difficult.",Stable,"Epistrophe melanostoma is widespread in Europe from Scandinavia south to Pyrenees and Cordillera Cantabria (southern Spain), Alps (Italy) and to Serbia and Bulgaria on Balkan Peninsula (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Burgio et al. 2015, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Tóth 2014, Nedeljković 2011) and from Britain (southern England) through Central Europe, Ukraine into European parts of Russia (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009).

Outside Europe, the species ranges further through Siberia to the South Russian Far East and Japan (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). However, there is still uncertainty about its range because this species was confused with similar species until recently (Doczkal and Schmid 1994, Bartsch et al. 2009, Mengual et al. 2020, Speight 2018). This species is probably present also in North America (Speight 2018).",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Epistrophe melanostoma is not threatened in Norway, Sweden, Finland and in Central Europe (Gammelmo et al. 2015, Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Ssymank et al. 2011, Farkač et al. 2006). Speight et al. (2016) listed this species as threatened in the Netherlands, Denmark and Belgium. This species is listed as Data Deficient in Denmark (Bygebjerg 2019). Monitoring of subpopulations in some areas is necessary and further research is required to better understand the habitat requirements and threats.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172020,149172016,Epistrophe obscuripes,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

In temperate Europe this species seems to be declining and the occurrence of this species in continental Europe is based only on scattered records that are often older than 30 years (although the species was only recognized in 1994). This species is probably affected by the loss of humid unimproved open habitats in forests and of ecotones with tall herbs, bushes and deciduous trees with low economic value along forests, meadows and streams. Nevertheless it remains widespread and is presently regarded as Least Concern in Scandinavia, and is listed here as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27.

","

E. obscuripes is recorded as occurring in mountainous conifer forest of Picea (Speight 2018), or in mainly deciduous or mixed forest near lakes or streams (Bartsch et al. 2009). Van Steenis et al. (2015) observed this species in a wet meadow (Calthion) with clumps of Scirpus sylvaticus reed beds on a brookside not far from the forest margin in Serbia. Adults are largely arboreal, but descend to understorey trees and shrubs in flower, especially flowering Crataegus, Sorbus aucuparia, Bunias orientalis, Salix spp., Rosa canina and Apiaceae (Anthriscus sylvestris, Laserpitium latifolium) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Males were observed hovering about 2 metres above ground near flowering willow. The flight period of adults is from the second half of May to the end of June (July) (Speight 2018). The larva is unknown, but probably feeds on aphids on deciduous trees and shrubs like the larvae of other Epistrophe species (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018).

","

Apart from the general threats for biodiversity, including deforestation, any current threats to this species are not documented. A continuing decline in the extent and quality of suitable habitat for this species is inferred due to human activities (forestry in temperate Europe) and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016). The loss of unimproved open habitats in forests and of ecotones with tall herbs, bushes and deciduous trees with low economic value is possibly the main threat for this species, because this species is probably associated with these species-rich habitats. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

Both the full distribution and population trend of E. obscuripes in Europe are inadequately known (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). It seems that this species is widely distributed in Scandinavia and locally it has more or less numerous subpopulations there (Bartsch et al. 2009, GBIF 2020). The occurrence of this species elsewhere in continental Europe is based only on scattered records that are often older than 30 years (Speight et al. 2018, Tóth 2011, Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011, van Steenis et al. 2015, Holinka et al. 1997, GBIF 2020, Carrieres 2001, Żóralski et al. 2017, de Groot and Govenić 2008, Doczkal and Schmid 1994). According to Speight et al. (2016) this species has been declining in Germany and the Netherlands. There are no recent records of this species form the Netherlands, Hungary, Austria and Slovenia (Reemer et al. 2009, Tóth 2011, Doczkal and Schmid 1994, Heimburg 2018, de Groot pers. comm. 2020). From the temporal distribution of records it appears that this species has declined in both numbers of specimens and in its area of occupancy in Europe.

",Decreasing,"

The range of this species is inadequately known since the species was recognized relatively recently (Speight 2018, Doczkal and Schmid 1994). So far it has been recorded from North Europe: Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Russian Karelia, Moscow region and forested temperate European Russia: the Netherlands (Limburg), Belgium (Ardennes), France (Vosges), Luxembourg, Germany (Niedersachsen/Bremen, Baden-Württemberg, Bayern), Austria (Steiermark), Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary (Szakonyfalu), Slovenia, and Serbia (Kopaonik National Park). Nevertheless only old records are known from some areas of continental Europe (Speight 2018, Speight et al. 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Tóth 2011, Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011, van Steenis et al. 2015, Holinka et al. 1997, GBIF 2020, Carrieres 2001, Żóralski et al. 2017, de Groot and Govenić 2008, de Groot pers. comm. 2020, Doczkal and Schmid 1994, Prokhorov et al. 2020, A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020).

This species is known outside Europe from Siberia, South Far East of Russia and west China (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkalov and Mutin 2018).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"The existing ride structures should be retained or enhanced to provide transitional structure between grasslands, stream and high forests, with provision of sunny open flower-rich glades. Rideside shrub clearance should endeavour to avoid removing of all trees and shrubs on any single ride management cycle. That all is recommended for similarly threatened related species of Syphidae by Ball and Morris (2014). Epistrophe obscuripes is listed as a Data Deficient species in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Finland, Sweden and Norway it is Least Concern (Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Gammelmo et al. 2015). Further survey work is needed to determine distribution and to estimate recent population trends of this species, especially in temperate Europe, as well as its biology.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172031,149172029,Epistrophe olgae,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The true distribution as well as the population status of this species in Europe is unknown at present, since it has been overlooked or confused up to now due to great similarity with the common Epistrophe nitidicollis. Nevertheless, E. olgae is probably a relatively frequent species with numerous subpopulations in Boreal Europe and in some biotopes may be more common than E. nitidicollis in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009). It is evaluated as Least Concern for Europe and EU 27, and there will be probably many more records of this species in future.","E. olgae occurs in the clearings in deciduous and mixed forests, gallery Salix/Populus forests along edges of lakes and pools, alluvial softwood and hardwood forests and Salix/Alnus swamp forest (Speight 2018). Males often hover close to Prunus in flower and other bushes and trees (Bartsch et al. 2009). Flower visitation records exist from Crataegus, Prunus padus, P. spinosa, Taraxacum, Salix alba (Speight 2018). The flight period of adults is from the end of April to late June (Speight 2018). The larva is undescribed, but has been reported from Sambucus sp. (Speight 2018). Bartsch et al. (2009) noted that larvae feed on aphids, probably on deciduous trees and bushes of Prunus spp. and Sambucus sp.","

Apart from the general threats for biodiversity, including deforestation, there are no specific threats identified for this species, since there is no adequate information on the distribution and biology of this species. Nevertheless, it is presumed that a continuing decline in the extent and quality of suitable habitat for this species is underway due to human activities (forestry in temperate Europe) and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016). The loss of unimproved ecotones and open habitats with tall herbs, shrubs and trees with low economic value is nevertheless possibly the main threat for this species.

The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

The true distribution as well as population of E. olgae is unknown at present, since this species has been overlooked up to now due to great similarity with common species Epistrophe nitidicollis (Speight 2018). Material of this latter from many European countries is under review or has to be reviewed. At the moment there is not enough published data about E. olgae subpopulations in many European countries (Bygebjerg 2019, Ssymank et al. 2011, L. Mazánek pers. data, Ł. Mielczarek pers. comm.), but E. olgae is probably a relatively frequent species with numerous subpopulations in Boreal Europe, and in some biotopes may be more common than E. nitidicollis in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009).

",Unknown,"

The distribution of Epistrophe olgae in Europe is uncertain, due to confusion with the common species Epistrophe nitidicollis (Speight 2018). E. olgae has been reported from Norway, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, the Netherlands, France (Rhine valley in Alsace), Switzerland, Ukraine and European Russia (Russian Karelia) (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2019, Prokhorov et al. 2018, GBIF 2020). The species is probably more widespread in boreal and Central Europe (Bartsch et al. 2009). Ssymank et al. (2011) presume the presence of this species in Germany. It is expeected to occur in Denmark, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland (Bygebjerg 2019, L.Mazánek pers. data,  Ł. Mielczarek pers. comm. 2020).

Outside Europe it has been recorded from Eastern Siberia and the Far East, including the Kuril Islands and Japan (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Further survey work is needed to determine distribution and recent population of this species in Europe as well as its biology. E. olgae is listed as Data Deficient in the Red Lists to Syrphidae of Germany and Denmark (Ssymank et al. 2011, Bygebjerg 2019), as Near Threatened species applying criterion B2ab(i,iii) in the recent Norwegian Red List for species (Gammelmo et al. 2015) and as Not Applicable in the recent Swedish Red List (Artdatabanken 2020). This species is not listed as threatened in Finland (Haarto et al. 2019).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172043,149172040,Epistrophella coronata,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

This European endemic species is regarded as Endangered (B2ab(iii)) due to the restricted known area of occupancy (AOO) of 28 km2, low number of locations (5, excluding the Italian locality), and apparent occurrence as a severely fragmented population (a), and a projected continuing decline in the extent and quality of habitat.

Within the EU, the species has a known AOO of 8 km2 in two locations in Greece. The Italian record is very old (the type specimen from 1857) and it is uncertain whether the species still occurs there. Taking in consideration that the habitats of E. coronota in the EU are also expected to experience a reduction in extension and/or quality and severe fragmentation, a precautionary attitude has been taken and we exclude the Italian record, making this species Critically Endangered in the EU27. No rescue effect expected from pan-European sub-populations to EU27.","The preferred habitat of this species seems to be relict Tertiary polydominant forest communities (Doczkal and Vujić, 1998), and Balkanic thermophilous Quercus forest (M. de C.Williams, pers. comm. 2020). Adults fly from March to May. There are no data about the flowers visited (Speight 2018). The larval biology of this species is unknown.",Reduction of habitat quality due to changes in traditional forest management and reduction of forest cover because of land use changes could threaten this species' population.,"There is no detailed information about the population size and trend for this species, which is so far known from only seven specimens. The recent checklist of Italian hoverflies does not include this species, probably due to the fact that it has not been collected again in Italy after its original description in 1857. In Serbia, two males were found in Malinik and Deli-Jovan in 1989 and 1996, respectively (Doczkal and Vujić, 1998). These localities were visited in 2008 by two experienced collectors (Ante Vujić and Dieter Doczkal) to search for E. coronata and it was not found. In 2016 and 2017, the nearby locality of Dubasnica was systematically surveyed for hoverflies and E. coronata was absent from the catches (Zorica Nedeljković pers. comm. 2021). In Greece, the only specimens (3) found were collected in 2007 and 2014 (de Courcy Williams et al. 2011; Vujić et al. 2020). The most recent finding of this species is that by van Steenis et al. (2019) in Serbia from 2019. In spite of the sampling effort put into catching hoverflies in countries such as Greece and Serbia over several decades (Vujić et al. 2018, 2020), E. coronata has proven to be a very rarely collected species.

The population also appears to be severely fragmented, given its apparent occurrence at low densities in widely separated areas.",Unknown,"This European endemic species was described from the Parma region, northern Italy (historical record, considered presence uncertain). It has since been recorded in three localities of Serbia (Doczkal and Vujić 1998, van Steenis et al. 2019) and two localities in Greece (Peloponnese and east mainland) (de Courcy Williams et al. 2011, Vujić et al. 2020).","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially. Even though it has a potential use in pest control of insect prey and crop pollination, the species appears to be rare and nothing is known of either its host plants or larval prey.

",Terrestrial,"

There are not specific conservation actions for this species. However, E. coronata may require monitoring to better understand its population status. Research is needed into the species' life history in order to propose effective conservation actions. The larval biology of this species is unknown. This species is strictly protected in Serbia and occurs in some protected areas in both Serbia and Greece. Vujić et al. (2001) and Speight et al. (2016) regarded this species as 'threatened' at the European level.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149172054,149172051,Eriozona syrphoides,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe due to being fairly widespread across Central and Northern Europe. In the EU27 Member States, the assessment for E. syrphoides is similar, as most of its European range lies within the EU. There is however some contraction of its population and habitat, mainly in the northern part of Europe (Denmark, Belgium, Germany).

","The preferred habitat of Eriozona syrphoiodes is mature Picea/Abies forest. Adults fly from May to October visiting flowers of umbellifers, Centaurea, Cirsium, Crataegus, Epilobium, Hypericum, Ranunculus, Sambucus nigra, Sorbus aucuparia, Succisa, Valeriana. The larva is arboreal and has been found feeding on aphids in forests (Kula 1983; Speight 2018). It was described and figured in colour by Rotheray (1994).",

Reduction of habitat quality due to changes in traditional forest management and reduction of forest cover because of land use changes may particularly threaten this species.

,"

There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe.

In Serbia only three specimens of this species has been recorded so far (from Kopaonik National Park) (Nedeljković 2011). In some areas, such as Sweden and Czechia, it is more widespread but relatively rare (Bartsch et al. 2009).",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species occurs from the southern part of Scandinavia (Norway, Sweden and Finland) to France (Vosges, Alps, Pyrenees), and ranges from the Republic of Ireland eastwards through central Europe (and the northern part of Italy), the Balkan Peninsula into European parts of Russia.

Its range extends out of the European region to Siberia and Pacific coast (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphids.",Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation actions for this species.

Eriozona syrphoides is considered Vulnerable (VU) in Denmark (https://bios.au.dk/raadgivning/natur/redlistframe), regionally extinct in Flanders (Belgium) (https://www.inbo.be/en/search-flanders-red-lists), Near Threatened (NT) in Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001) and Least Concern in Sweden (https://artfakta.se/artbestamning). Some of the point localities occur within National Parks as in Serbia (Kopaonik NP), and it may benefit from further habitat protection.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172064,149172062,Eupeodes biciki,Critically Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR) 
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR) 

This European endemic species has a very restricted range and it is an extremely rare species that is known only from two specimens from two localities in the northern Scandinavian peninsula (Nielsen 2003, Haarto and Kerppola 2007). It is listed as Critically Endangered (CR B2ab(iii)) in Europe and in the EU 27 since only a single record not older 50 years is known. The known localities are not far from each other and are considered to occur in one location based on climate change as a plausible ongoing threat, with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 8 km2 (4 km2 for EU 27). It is estimated that the quality and area of suitable habitat is declining due to climate change and human activities and settlements in the area. Although this species was described recently, no specimens of this species have been collected since 1982 (Nielsen 2003, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Speight 2018) despite recent surveys and it is relatively easy to separate this species from other related species of Eupeodes using external morphology.","The type specimen was found in the low alpine zone in the nearly 700 m-high Fløyfjell Mountain (Nielsen 2003). The developmental stages of this extremely rare arctic species are unknown (Speight 2018), but the larva is apparently predacious in common with related Eupeodes species.","Current threats to this species are unknown, since there is no information on the biology of this species and it has not been seen for nearly 40 years. It is not known why this species is extremely rare and why this species has not been collected for several decades. Recent surveys of extensive areas of alpine birch shrub near the Norwegian locality and also near the Finland locality have only recorded other members of the genus (T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2021, GBIF 2020).

Members of this genus tend to be ecological generalists whose distribution is influenced by the presence or absence of commoner, superior competitors (L. Mazánek pers. comm. 2021). The presence of related species in this arctic area may be an indication of competitive displacement that is induced in arctic and alpine habitats by recent global changes (A. Vujić and D. Doczkal 2020 pers. comm., T. Nielsen 2021 pers. comm.). Nevertheless, due to human activities in the area of occurrence of this species it is suspected there may have been a continuing decline of extent and quality of suitable habitat for this species. The quality of suitable habitat for this species may have declined due to global warming, as far as can be estimated from distribution data on this species (Barredo et al. 2020).","Only two specimens of this species are known: male (dated 1.7.1982, leg. A Fjellberg; Nielsen 2003) and female (date not given, leg. R. Frey probably around 1929, this specimen is wrongly referred as male by Bartsch et al. (2009) and Haarto and Kerppola (2007). No specimens of this species have been collected since 1982, despite Scandinavian hoverflies being well-surveyed (Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Bartsch et al. 2009, Nielsen and Swendsen 2014).",Unknown,"This European endemic species is known only from two close localities, Fløyfjell Mountain near Tromsø city in Norway and Kilpisjärvi in Finland in northern Scandinavia (Nielsen 2003, Haarto and Kerppola 2007). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is only 400 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 8 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"Further survey work is needed to determine the current distribution and population status of this recently-described species as well as to conduct more research on its biology (particularly larval biology) and habitat requirements.

Eupeodes biciki is listed in the Finnish Red Lists (2010, 2019) as Data Deficient (Kahanpää 2010, Haarto 2019). The species was also assessed for Norway as Data Deficient in the 2006 Norwegian Red List (Gammelmo et al. 2006), but has since been listed as Vulnerable applying criterion D2 in the 2010 Norwegian Red List (Kålås 2010) and as Vulnerable in 2015 under criterion B2ab(i,iii) (Gammelmo et al. 2015).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149172076,149172073,Eupeodes borealis,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-02-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

This European endemic species is assess as Data Deficient on the basis that this species is known from two specimens collected at an unknown date prior to 1970, and nothing is known of any threats and recent occurrence of this species. It does not occur within the European Union.","The species was described from tundra and dwarf scrub tundra on Kola Peninsula (Russia). The larva is unknown but presumably predacious, in common with other larvae of the genus Eupeodes (Dušek and Láska 1973, Speight 2018).","Current threats to this species are unknown, since there is no information on the biology of this species. Nevertheless, the quality of suitable habitat for this species could be influenced by global warming (Barredo et al. 2020).
","There are no recent data on this species, and the only two known specimens were collected on the Kola Peninsula on unknown dates before 1970 (Dušek and Láska 1973). The Kola Peninsula is a very poorly sampled area of Europe.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to the Kola Peninsula in European Russia, where it is only known from two specimens from two localities (Ponoj, Kusomen) c.200 km apart (Dušek and Láska 1973), and it has not been recorded since it was described.",This species is not traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,Further survey work is needed to resolve the taxonomy of this species and determine recent distribution and population of this species as well as its biology.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149172086,149172084,Eupeodes duseki,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC°)

This relatively recently recognized species is relatively rare but probably frequent in northern Fenoscandinavia, although the distribution area of this species is not known precisely up to now. The population seems to be stable. This species is listed as Least Concern in all recent national Red Lists of all European countries with its occurrence (Norway, Finland, Sweden) (Gammelmo et al. 2015, Haarto et al. 2019, Artdatabanken 2020). This species could be assessed as Near Threatened  EU 27 as it has a small area of occupancy based on known records (only 108 km2) and relatively small number of locations (less than 20), but there is high probability of immigration of specimens from Norway and it is presumably under-recorded, so it is necessary to downgrade category for the EU 27 assessment, also to Least Concern.","Eupeodes duseki is present mainly in dwarf scrub tundra habitats (Speight 2018). In Sweden, it is referred from open, mountainous coniferous and mixed forests including mountain birch forests (Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults fly during mid-June to July and to mid August in Sweden and they were observed as visiting flowering Apiaceae (Angelica archangelica), Caltha palustris and Potentilla crantzi (Mazánek et al. 1999, Bartsch et al. 2009). The larval stage is unknown, but apparently predacious as larvae of other Eupeodes species (Bartsch et al. 2009).","Current threats to this species are unknown since the biology of the species is poorly known. Nevertheless, it is estimated that there is a continuing decline of extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species, due to human activities and settlements (Janssen 2016). The quality of suitable habitat for this species could be also strongly influenced by global warming (Barredo et al. 2020).","This species has a relatively restricted range in northern Europe but it is locally frequent (Bartsch et al. 2009) and it is regularly recorded in northern Fenoscandinavia, including recent records (GBIF 2020).",Stable,"The distribution range of this recently recognized European endemic species is still uncertain due to confusion with related species. It has been confirmed from Fennoscandia (Norway, Sweden, Finland) (Mazánek et al. 1999, Speight 2018).

Specimens of this species reported from the Russian Far East (Madagan) have been reviewed but the results are not yet published and this species is not listed in the recent checklist of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018); pending the results of this work this species is treated as an European endemic. Its occurrence in northern European Russia has not been documented up to now (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), but it seems to be possible.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species was listed as Data Deficient in the Red Lists to Norwegian and Finnish species previously (Kalas et al. 2006). In the recent Red List to Norwegian species is listed as Least Concern: the reason for change was noted as new information in distribution of this species (Gammelmo et al. 2015). Haarto and Kerppola (2007) listed this species as Near Threatened in Finland. In the recent national Red Lists of Finland (Haarto et al. 2019) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020) it is listed as Least Concern.

Further research on biology, population and threats to this species is needed, along with monitoring on population and habitat trends.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149172096,149172094,Eupeodes goeldlini,Least Concern,,2021,2020-09-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This rare species was recognized relatively recently and so far, there are only scattered records and data about this species. It has been occasionally and locally recorded from large boreal and temperate forests in western Europe, and also in suburban situations (parks). Speight et al. (2016) report that this species as decreasing in Alpine, Atlantic and Continental regions, particularly in Great Britain, Germany, Ireland and Switzerland. The species is reported occasionally mostly from the Finland and Netherlands at present (Van de Meutter 2009, Reemer and van Steenis 2006, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, GBIF 2020). In the Netherlands, nearly half of the specimens of E. bucculatus s.l. that have been checked turned out to be E. goeldlini (Reemer and van Steenis 2006). There are no documented threats to this species, and no specific conservation action other than general research, and it is listed Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27

","

So far, there is no clear definition either of the habitat preferences of E. goeldlini nor whether these may differ from those of E. bucculatus (Van de Meutter 2009, Ball et al. 2011). Speight et al. (2007) and Speight (2018) reported E. goeldlini from a tall-herb open area in alluvial softwood forest, Alnus incana alluvial hardwood forest and other types of humid forest where stands of Salix scrub and where adults visit yellow composites (Leontodon and Taraxacum). Reemer et al. (2009) suggested a preference for more moist conditions than E. bucculatus. It has been recorded from suburban areas. In Sweden it occurs in open terrain in the archipelago and in connection with coasts and lakes (Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults have been reported from beginning of May (June in Sweden) to beginning of September (July in Sweden) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009). The larva is unknown but is presumed to be aphidophagous on trees or tall herbs like other related Eupeodes species (Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009).

","

Current threats to this species are unknown, since there is inadequate information on the biology of this species and its microhabitat requirements. It seems that this species can occur also in suburban landscapes (Reemer et al. 2009, L. Mazánek pers. comm. 2021). Adults are probably highly mobile like other related species that are in generally a woodland edge species. These species are likely to be affected by over-intensive management and loss of open patches and ecotones with tall herbs and shrubs structure in connection with high woodlands (Ball and Morris 2014). The invasion of the ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). On its type locality in the Czech Republic specimens of this species has not been recorded since 1970 despite targeted searches by L. Mazánek, but the harlequin ladybird was found on this locality on the same bushes, where larvae of more Eupeodes species were collected previously, although it is likely that the hoverfly disappeared from this site prior to the invasion (L. Mazánek pers. comm. 2021).

","

This species seems to be broadly distributed in Europe, but according to Ball et al. (2011), Bartsch et al. (2009), Van de Meutter 2009, and Reemer et al. (2009) there is no trend information available, because records are scattered records and past confusion with similar species. In the Netherlands, nearly half of the specimens of E. bucculatus sensu lato that have been checked turned out to be E. goeldlini (Reemer and van Steenis 2006). Nevertheless Speight et al. (2016) regard this species as decreasing in alpine, Atlantic and Continental regions, particularly in Great Britain, Germany, Ireland and Switzerland. In Sweden the records are spread all over the country (Bartsch et al. 2009) and the large spread of record from the archipelago in Uppland (Runmarö) indicate the species is a good migrant (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight et al. 2016). The species is reported occasionally mostly from Finland and Netherlands at present (Van de Meutter 2009, Reemer and van Steenis 2006, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, GBIF 2020). The range of this species should be reviewed, as a lot of records of this species are based on females that Mazánek et al. (1999) did not distinguish from those of Eupeodes bucculatus due to great similarity and variability.

",Decreasing,"

The range of Eupeodes goeldlini is uncertain due to confusion with similar species like E. bucculatus until recently (Speight 2018, Mazánek et al. 1999). It has been occasionally and locally recorded from boreal and temperate western Europe (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Russian Karelia, Denmark, The Netherlands, Belgium, Ireland, Britain, France (also Pyrenees), Germany, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Serbia and Montenegro (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Van de Meutter 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Mazánek et al. 1999, Nedeljković 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009, Ball et al. 2011, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight et al. 2018, Naturbasen 2020, Speight and Gittings 2020, GBIF 2020, Speight et al. 2007, Reemer and van Steenis 2006, A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020).

Outside Europe the species is known also from Georgia and the Russian Far East (Mengual et al. 2020, Mazánek et al. 1999, Barkalov and Mutin 2018) so it is apparently present across Siberia.

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This rare species was recognized relatively recently, and so far there are only scattered records of and knowledge about this species. It is listed as Data Deficient in some regional Red Lists, e.g. in Norway (Gammelmo 2015) and Germany (Ssymank 2011) and is absent from others (e.g. Great Britain, Denmark - Ball and Morris 2014, DanBIF 2020). Eupeodes goeldlini is listed as threatened in Ireland by Speight et al. (2016) and as Least Concern in Sweden and Finland (Artdatabanken 2020, Haarto et al. 2019). It is necessary to obtain further information about this species' distribution, biology and habitats requirements of this species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172108,149172104,Eupeodes lambecki,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-02-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Listed as Data Deficient on the basis that this species is known from only one specimens collected prior to 1970, and nothing is known of any threats and recent occurrence of this species. The status of the species is also unclear, because there are no other specimens of this species. It could be rare and threatened species endemic to Corsica, or an extremely dark aberrant specimen of some related Eupeodes species.","Nothing is known of this species' ecology. The larva is presumably aphidophagous, in common with the larvae of other related species of Eupeodes (Dušek and Láska 1973).","Any threats to this species are unknown, since there is no information on the biology and distribution of this species.","The only known specimen was collected in 1963 (Dušek and Láska 1973, Speight 2018).",Unknown,"This species is apparently known only from the type specimen, collected in Bonifacio, southern Corsica (Dušek and Láska 1973, Speight 2018), France.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,Further survey work is needed to resolve taxonomy of this and related species and determine distribution of this species as well as its biology.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 149172119,149172116,Eupeodes lundbecki,Least Concern,,2021,2020-09-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a common species in forested Northern Europe that also inhabits conifer plantations. It appears not to be undergoing any decline in its resident European range and is listed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27. It is a strongly migratory species and its rare occurrence in most temperate Europe is based on migratory specimens far from breeding area.

,"

This species inhabit grassy open areas in Betula/Pinus forest in western taiga, Picea forest and in conifer plantations (Abies/Picea/Pinus). The flight period of adults is from mid-May to mid-October, with a peak in August/September. The fly visits various flowering herbs (Apiaceae, Asteraceae, Caltha palustris, Cakile maritime, Oreganum vulgare, Ranunculus acris, Reseda lutea, Saxifraga granulate, Hylotelephium telephium, Parnassia palustris) bushes (Berberis vulgaris, Calluna vulgaris, Prunus padus) and trees (Acer platanoides, Tilia cordata) (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Specimens of this species were obtained from the aphid colonies collected on Tanacetum and Prunus (Bagatshanova 1990). Large-scale movements of this species apparently occur out of Scandinavia in August/September (Speight 2018, Torp 1994).

","

Any current threats to this species are unknown, and it occurs in conifer plantations as well as natural forest. Nevertheless, it is presumed that there is some continuing decline in the extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species, due to human activities and settlements in Europe (Janssen et al. 2016). Intensive chemical treatments in conifer plantations, could negatively affect some populations of this species.

","

It is common in almost the entire Nordic region except mountains and Iceland (Bartsch et al. 2009). Its population is apparently stable here, with no documented decline. Towards the south it becomes rare and its occasional records in late summer and in autumn are based on migratory specimens (Ball and Morris 2014, Reemer et al. 2009), because the fly probably migrates in mass to south after hatching in autumn (Bartsch et al. 2009, Torp 1994, Speight 2018). Speight et al. (2016) reported that this species is in decline in the Netherlands and partly in the Atlantic region.

",Stable,"

Eupeodes lundbecki is widely distributed in the northern Palaearctic from Iceland, Scandinavia and Denmark to European Russia in Europe.

Outside Europe it is known from Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, through Siberia to the Pacific Ocean, including the island of Sakhalin and the Kuril archipelago (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkalov and Mutin 2018) as far as Alaska (Fluke 1949). It is a strongly migratory species (Speight et al. 2016) and its rare occurrence in Great Britain, central Europe (as far as North Italy) and Ukraine is probably based on migratory specimens from further north (Ball et al. 2011, Ball and Morris 2014, Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2019).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Eupeodes lundbecki is not considered a threatened species in Northern Europe (Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Gammelmo et al. 2015). Speight et al. (2016) reported that this species is declining in the Netherlands and partly in the Atlantic region, but its occurrence in these areas is apparently based on migratory specimens. Nevertheless the larval biology of this species is not adequately known.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172130,149172127,Eupeodes nielseni,Least Concern,,2021,2020-06-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This largely arboreal species is present in all humid regions of Europe with conifer (preferably Pinus) forests. It is abundant in Fennoscandia and inhabits pine plantations. It is consequently listed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27, although the species is apparently in decline in some parts of west Europe. There are no documented threats to this species, and no conservation action is required at present, except research on taxonomy and possible impacts of invasive beetles.","

This hoverfly occurs primarily in Pinus forests from humid Pinus sylvestris forest including P. mugo, P. uncinata and in taiga, and in in P. sylvestris plantations (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). In the Netherlands it is mainly found in heathlands (Reemer et al. 2009). Adults reside in the tree canopy and on the vegetation in clearings. They visit flowers of various trees and bushes (Acer platanoides, Calluna vulgaris, Prunus spinosa, Ribes alpinum, Rubus spp., Rhododendron tomentosum, Rubus chamaemorus, Salix repens, Sorbus aucuparia), white Apiaceae (Angelica spp.) and other herbs (Achillea millefolium, Anemone nemorosa, Caltha palustris, Ranunculus acris, Crepis spp., Fragaria vesca, Geranium sylvaticum, Galium sp., Helianthemum nummulinum, Leucanthemum vulgare, Plantago major, Potentilla erecta, Taraxacum spp.). The flight period of adults is from the beginning of May to the end of August (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009), in the Netherlands from April to the beginning of September (Reemer et al. 2009). The larva is apparently a specialist predator of aphids on coniferous trees, and has been observed on the trees of Pinus sylvestris and Larix decidua (Rotheray 1988, Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Rojo et al. 2003).

","There are no documented threats to this species in Europe. This species is present in conifer (Pinus sylvestris) plantations. Subpopulations of this species are apparently influenced by changing of forestry practices in Europe where coniferous woodland is replanted with hardwoods (Ball and Morris 2014), especially outside of Fennoscandia. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015). The non-specific chemical treatments against other insect conifer pest, can also affected population level of this predator species.","This species has numerous and stable subpopulations in Sweden, Finland and Norway (Bartsch et al. 2009). It is rather rare and local in the other parts of Europe and it becomes extremely rare towards to South especially in lowlands (Dušek and Láska 1976, Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkemeyer 1994, Röder 1990, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight et al. 2018, Nedeljković 2011, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017). Its frequency of occurrence in Great Britain is very variable, but there is evidence of a decline (Ball et al. 2011). According to Bartsch et al. (2009) the presence of this hoverfly is dependent on the availability of pine forests or pine plantations.",Stable,"

Eupeodes nielseni occurs in the most parts of Europe from Fennoscandia to south to Pyrenees (Spain), Alps (North Italy), Dinaric Alps and Rhodope Mountains (Greece). The species is also known form European Russia (Rusian Karelia, Zhigulevky Nature Reserve), and outside Europe from North Siberia and Far East (Khabarovsk and Madagan region) (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Burgio et al. 2015, Ssymank 2012; A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

Eupeodes nielseni is not threatened in Fennoscandia (Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Gammelmo et al. 2015). Speight et al. (2016) listed this species as threatened in Belgium, Great Britain and the Netherlands. Ball and Morris (2014) listed E. nielseni as a Nationally Scarce species in Great Britain and Pellmann and Scholz (1996) listed this species as endangered in their Red List of Sachsen in Germany. The biology of this species is relatively well known, however larval biology is known inadequately to estimate possible impacts of the invasive ladybird Harmonia axyridis and impacts of non-specific chemical treatments against insect pest. Studies of the taxonomy of this species is necessary, because it is probably a complex of two species (Dušek and Láska 1976).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172141,149172138,Eupeodes nitens,Least Concern,,2021,2020-06-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This largely arboreal species is present in all forested areas of Europe. It is frequent in Fennoscandia, but in the rest of Europe seems to be rather rare and local. Its pan-European population seems to be large and stable, and as such it is listed as Least Concern both in Europe and the EU27, but this species is apparently declining in some parts of western Europe. There are no documented threats to this species, and no specific conservation action is required at present, except for research on population trends, on larval biology and the impacts of possible threats from invasive species.","

Eupeodes nitens is present in mature deciduous forest (Fagus) and also in unimproved, non-calcareous alpine grassland, from 1,700 m to 2,000 m (Speight 2018). In the Nordic region it occurs in both coniferous and deciduous forests (Bartsch et al. 2009) and in the Netherlands it has been found mainly in heathlands (Reemer et al. 2009). Adults are probably at least partly vagrant (Aubert et al. 1976). Adults reside in tree canopy and descend to the vegetation in clearings, along paths etc. They visit flowers of various trees, bushes and herbs. The flight period of adults is mostly from the beginning of May to September (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). This species has been frequently reported as being reared from larvae predaceous on aphids on various trees (both coniferous and deciduous), bushes and herbs including fruit trees and arable crops (Rojo et al. 2003) but a lot of these reports (especially older ones) are not reliable due to difficulties in identifying Eupeodes species (Ball and Morris 2014).

","

This seems to be a woodland edge species that is most likely to be affected by over-intensive ride management and loss of ecotone scrub structure in connection with high woodlands. In some locations, declining ride management may also be an issue as it may lead to closing of the canopy over the rides (Ball and Morris 2014). The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be an important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids (Chapin and Brou 1991) and intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015), although E. nitens is present also in the East Palearctic, where the invasive ladybird is native.

 

","

This species is broadly widespread in Europe, but usually quite uncommon. It is more common in some parts of Sweden and Finland and European Russia (Leningrad region) south to the Arctic Circle (Bartsch et al. 2009, A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020). It is rather rare to very rare in the southern parts of its range in Europe, especially in lowlands (Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Speight et al. 2018, Nedeljković 2011). Pan-European subpopulations seems to be stable; there are, however, indications that this species has undergone a significant decline over the several last decades in Great Britain (Ball and Morris 2014) and also in Belgium (Speight et al. 2016).

",Stable,"Eupeodes nitens is present in Europe from Fennoscandia to the north slopes of the Pyrenees (France), Apenines (North Italy), Olympus and North Pindos Mountains (Greece). The species is also known form most parts of European Russia.
Outside Europe it ranges through Siberia to the Pacific coast and also further south in Turkey, Kazakhstan, Georgia, Middle Asia, Afghanistan and Mongolia to Korea and Japan (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Mengual et al. 2020, Bartsch et al. 2009, Vujić et al. 2020; A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020).",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"Eupeodes nitens is not threatened in Fennoscandia (Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Gammelmo et al. 2015). Speight et al. (2016) listed this species as threatened in Belgium and the Netherlands. Ball and Morris (2014) listed E. nitens as a Nationally Scarce species in Great Britain, Reemer et al. (2009) listed this species as Vulnerable in the Netherlands and Pellmann and Scholz (1996) listed this species as Vulnerable in the Red List of Sachsen (Germany). There is a relatively large amount of information about larval biology of this species, but it is necessary to critically review this as it is not certain whether all this data genuinely relates to this species, and research is needed into potential impacts of invasive ladybirds.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172152,149172149,Eupeodes rufipunctatus,Endangered,"B2ab(i,iii)",2021,2020-04-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Factual threats to this species are not documented. The population on Iceland is out of main distribution area of this species, where its population status is unknown but may be declining. The population of this species on Iceland is greatly isolated and only about five collecting sites have been listed in literature, each regarded here as a separate location. It is not known from any other northern Palaearctic areas. The extent of occurrence (19,750 km2) as well as area of occupancy (20 km2) of this species is small at European level. Its actual distribution and population dynamics on Iceland are not known precisely, but presumably it is threatened there by sheep grazing. The species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(i,iii)) for Europe, but is Not Applicable for the EU27 Member States.","

This species is known from arctic and alpine tundra of northern Nearctic region (Vockeroth 1992) and from several vegetation-poor mountain habitats in Iceland (Bartsch et al. 2009). The flight period of adults is from end of June to beginning August in northern Nearctic (Vockeroth 1992, Speight 2018). Developmental stages are not described, but has been collected as predacious on Salix, on which both aphids and coccids were present (Speight 2018, Vockeroth 1992, Bocher et al. 2015, Bartsch et al. 2009).

","Any current threats to this species are not documented. Nevertheless, the quality of suitable habitat for this species is declining due to climate change (Barredo et al. 2020) and may be the cause for the possible decline in its population in Greenland. The larva is apparently associated with its prey living on low bushes vegetation (shrubs of Salix) of Arctic mountainous habitats, that is strongly affected by grazing of sheep especially in highlands of Iceland (Marteinsdóttir et al. 2017, Austrheim et al. 2008). Ross et al. (2016) directly list decline of Salix shrubs in highlands as a trend induced by the sheep grazing in Iceland. Volcanic activity could potentially impact the species in Iceland.","

There is no relevant data about population dynamics of this species in Iceland. Bartsch et al. (2009) reported only five collection sites of this species.

E. rufipunctatus seems to be rare across all of its range of distribution (Vockeroth 1992). This species was more frequently collected only form Greenland (Bocher et al. 2015, Vockeroth 1992). From the revision of all Eupeodes specimens from Greenland for Bocher et al. (2015) it is obvious, that this species has declined in Greenland. Surprisingly this species was recorded only occasionally (only one male) during intensive survey of Greenland entomofauna in 2002-2003, although 37 specimens of this species were collected from 24 localities in Greenland before this survey. The remaining two Eupeodes species extant on Greenland were collected during surveys in 2002-2003 more frequently. For example, 26 specimens of E. vockerothi were collected during survey 2002-2003 (up to this survey 37 specimens were collected from Greenland) and 40 specimens of E. punctifer were collected during survey 2002-2003 (before this survey 80 specimens were collected from Greenland).

",Decreasing,"

In Europe, this species is known very locally and rarely only from Iceland (Bocher et al. 2015, Vockeroth 1992, Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Torp 1989), with an EOO of <20,000 km2, and AOO of 20 km2 in five locations.

Eupeodes rufipunctatus
is widely distributed in Arctic and alpine tundra in the northern Nearctic region (including Greenland).

","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,Further survey work is needed to determine recent distribution and population trends of this species in Iceland. Research needed to determine larval ecology and potential threats from overgrazing.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172163,149172160,Leucozona lucorum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-13 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread and it has numerous more or less stable subpopulations in most well-wooded countryside in humid boreal and temperate Europe. There are no specific threats documented for this species in Europe, although the loss of unimproved ecotones and humid open ground habitats with tall herbs and shrubs along forests, streams and tracks will be probably the main threat for this species. No conservation action is required at present, except research on larval biology that is known inadequately to estimate possible impacts of invasive ladybirds to this species.

The species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.","It inhabits open ground adjacent to deciduous forest and shrubbery normally in relatively humid regions. Adults resides in moist places with lush herbaceous vegetation in clearings, on meadows, along roadsides, streams and in gardens where it flies in or just over the vegetation (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Ball et al. 2011), up to 2,000 m in the Alps (Maibach et al. 1992). Adults especially visit flowering Apiaceae, but also a lot of other flowering herbs, bushes and trees. The flight period of adults is normally from beginning May to July with occasional records to September (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018) or even in April (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019). It is a univoltine species with some evidence of a partial second generation and with probably diapausing and overwintering larvae (Speight et al. 2016, Dušek and Láska 1986, Ball et al. 2011). The larva feeds on aphids on herbs (Brassica, Rumex, Silene dioica) including mustard crops (Rojo et al. 2003, Bartsch et al. 2009) and also on shrubs and trees (Rotheray 1993, Bartsch et al. 2009).","

Apart from the general threats for biodiversity, including deforestation and non-selective chemical pest control methods, there are no specific threats documented for this species in Europe. Nevertheless, the loss of unimproved ecotones and humid open ground habitats with tall herbs and shrubs along forests, streams and tracks is likely to be the main threat for this species, since its larva is probably associated on tall herbs within these species-rich habitats. The invasion of the ladybird Harmonia axiridis in Europe could be important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). The intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","This species is widespread and it has numerous more or less stable subpopulations in most well-wooded countryside in humid boreal and temperate Europe (Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011, Maibach et al. 1992). According to Speight et al. (2016) this species is decreasing in the Netherlands.",Stable,"This species is widespread in Europe except the extreme north (including Iceland) and dry, forestless southern Europe (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Álvarez 2018).

Outside Europe, its range extends through Siberia, the Caucasus, Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia to the Russian Far East (including Kamchatka, Sakhalin, Kuril islands), Korea and Japan (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). In addition, it ranges in North America from Alaska through Canada south to Oregon, Colorado and New York in United States (Vockeroth 1992).","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,"

There are not specific conservation actions for this species in Europe at present. It is not threatened in Scandinavia, Germany, Great Britain and others regions (Gammelmo et al. 2015, Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Ssymank et al. 2011, Ball et al. 2011, Ball and Morris 2014). The biology of this species, especially larval biology, is known inadequately to estimate possible impacts of threats e.g. of the invasive ladybird Harmonia axiridis on this species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172174,149172171,Melangyna cincta,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in Europe or the EU27. It is a widespread species, present in many habitats, and with large subpopulations in most countries where recorded. There are no specific threats identified for this species. The species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","The preferred habitat of Melangyna cincta is deciduous forest (Quercus and Fagus forests). Adults fly from April to June visiting flowers of white umbellifers, Acer pseudoplatanus, Crataegus, Ligustrum, Malus sylvestris, Prunus spinosa, Rubus idaeus, Salix, Sambucus nigra, Sorbus aucupariae, Urtica dioica, Viburnus opulus (Speight 2018). The larva is aphidophagous, it is described and figured by Dušek and Láska (1962).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe. This species seems abundant in almost every European country.,Unknown,"Melangyna cincta occurs from Scandinavia to Iberia, and from Ireland eastwards through much of Europe into Ukraine (Crimea) and European parts of Russia.

Its global range extends out of Europe to the Anatolian region of Turkey (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphid pest species in cultivated plants (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,

There are not specific conservation actions for this species.


,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172189,149172186,Melangyna cingulata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This European endemic species is assessed as Least Concern globally due to large extent of occurrence and number of locations which are above the threshold (21) for a threatened listing, and because no threats have been identified. On the EU27 level, it is assessed as Least Concern on the regional level due to large extent of occurrence and number of locations which are above the threshold (19) for a threatened listing, and because no threats have been identified.","The preferred habitat of Melangyna cingulata are forests (Abies/Picea forest). Adults fly from May to June/July visiting flowers of Crataegus, Genista, Photinia, Ranunculus, Sorbus aucuparia, Ulex, Viburnum opulus. The larva is undescribed (Speight 2018).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,"

There is no information about the population size and trend. Only nine specimens were collected in Serbia (Kopaonik National Park). Only three specimens were collected in Montenegro (Durmitor National Parks), and two in Slovenia. Sixteen specimens were collected in Greece from 1987 to 2017.

",Unknown,"This European endemic species occurs from northern France, Poland and Czech Republic through the Alps (Switzerland, Austria) into the Balkans. It is also present in Portugal and in central and southern Spain (Speight 2018) though the locality in Portugal is uncertain and not mapped.","This species is not used or treated commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"

There are not specific conservation actions for this species. In Spain it is listed as ""Rare"" (Verdu et al. 2006) and ""Data Deficient"" in the German Province of Bayern (von der Dunk et al. 2003).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149172200,149172197,Melangyna guttata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Although this Holarctic species is regarded as threatened or near threatened in one European country (Denmark) and one region (Flanders), it is widespread and qualifies for Least Concern across its European and EU27 ranges as a whole, as it is widespread and no major threats have been identified.","Melangyna guttata occurs in forests (humid deciduous forest; field hedges with mature Fraxinus; mature Salix/Alnus forest; alluvial hardwood forest) (Speight 2018). Adults fly from June to August, visiting flowers of white umbellifers, Epilobium angustifolium, Euonymus, Filipendula, Frangula alnus, Galium, and Solidago. The larva is entomophagous on Acer pseudoplatanus (Speight 2018).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,"There is no information about population sizes and trends. However, it appears to be locally scarce: for example 11 specimens have been collected in Serbia so far, where hoverfly fauna has been extensively surveyed over several decades.",Unknown,"Melangyna guttata occurs from Scandinavia to the Pyrenees. It also ranges from Ireland eastwards through much of northern and central Europe into Russia (Speight 2018).

Besides Europe, this species ranges through Siberia to the Pacific coast in Asia, and in North America from Alaska to Arizona (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphid pests in cultivated plants (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions in place or needed for this species. In Denmark, it is cataloged as Near Threatened (https://www.allearter-databasen.dk/) and in the Belgian Region of Flanders is regionally endangered (https://www.inbo.be/en/search-flanders-red-lists).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172213,149172209,Melangyna umbellatarum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

In both Europe and the EU27, this species is Least Concern due to having a wide range across all Europe and being subject to no major threats.

","The preferred habitats of Melangyna umbellatarum are forest streams with Salix, Salix carr, beside streams and rivers fringed by Salix. Adults fly from May to September visiting the flowers of white umbellifers, Foeniculum, Euphorbia, Filipendula, Ulmaria, and Sorbus (Speight 2018). The larva is aphidophagous and was described and figured by Dušek and Láska (1967).",

There are no threats identified for this species and conservation actions are unnecessary at this point.

,"There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe. Only five specimens have been collected in Serbia (Fruška Gora National Park, Kopaonik National Park, Vlasina).",Unknown,"Melangyna umbellatarum is widely distributed in Europe. It occurs from Scandinavia to the Iberia. It also ranges from Ireland eastwards through northern, central and southern Europe into European parts of Russia.

Besides Europe this species also occurs in Asia (from Siberia to Kamchatka) and in North America (from Alaska to Arizona) (Speight 2018).","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphid crop pests (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,

There are no conservation actions known or required for this species. Research on population trends is recommended.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172224,149172222,Melanostoma wollastoni,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This species is endemic to Madeira, Portugal. It is assessed as Endangered in Europe because the area of occupancy (AOO) based on known records is 56 km2, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is low (412 km2), it is considered to occur in 3-5 locations based on tourism related activities and increased risk of fires, and there is an estimated continuing decline in habitat extent and quality and potentially in the area of occupancy.

","Melanostoma wollastoni occurs in endemic to laurisilva and Erica forest (and to a lesser degree Acacia/Eucalyptus plantation forests), and cloud heath-forest (Vaccinio - Sibthorpietum association) (Wakeham-Dawson et al. 2004; J.T. Smit pers. comm. to M. Speight in Speight 2018). The flight period is from March to November. Adults visit flowers of Ranunculus and species from the families Asteraceae and Apiaceae (Wakeham-Dawson et al. 2004). The larva is not described (Speight 2018).",This species is threatened by habitat destruction. Infrastructure development (mostly due to tourism) can be regarded as the major threats to the habitat of the species. Tourism-related activities and increasing fire risk as a result of climate change may also pose a threat to the species.,

There is no information about population trends. This species is known from a total of 84 specimens collected over more than 160 years (from 1855 to 2002).

,Unknown,"This species is endemic to Madeira Island in Portugal (Wakeham-Dawson et al. 2004, Speight 2018). The area of occupancy (AOO) based on known records is 56 km2 and the extent of occurrence is 412 km2.","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. It has a potential use in pest control of the presumed larval prey insects and in crop pollination due to its larval trophic habits and behaviour of adults, respectively, but its scarcity makes commercial exploitation difficult.",Terrestrial,"

There are no conservation actions in place for this species. Additional monitoring is needed to better understand the population trends and impacts of threats, and to identify suitable protection measures.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149172236,149172232,Parasyrphus annulatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread arboreal species with numerous populations also in conifer plantations. The decline of this species in some areas of Western Europe is probably linked to deforestation combined with changes in forest management in these countries, where there is a shift away from coniferous plantations. The species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

No conservation action is required at present, except research on larval biology that is known inadequately to estimate possible impact of invasive ladybird Harmonia axiridis to this species.","

It is an arboreal species that occurs along open habitats in woodlands with tall herbs, shrubs and trees with low economic value; and in clearings in or close to various coniferous and mixed forests, including conifer plantations. It is often recorded within a few metres of the ground but also high in the treetops (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Kula 2001). Adults visit flowerings trees and bushes (Sorbus aucuparia, Prunus spinosa, Pyrus communis, Crataegus, Ligustrum, Sambucus nigra, Rosa canina, Viburnum opulus, Rubus idaeus) and descent to visit also various flowering herbaceous plants (white Apiaceae, Allium, Caltha, Achillea, Bunias orientalis, Cardamine, Taraxacum, Barbarea vulgaris, Euphorbia, Galium, Crepis spp., Inula, Helianthemum oelandicum, Ranunculus spp., Leucanthemum vulgare, Tanacetum vulgare, Lathyrus japonicus) within or close to forests (Speight 2018, Barstch et al. 2009, Barkemeyer 1994). Adults are probably partly migratory (Aubert et al. 1976). The flight period of adults lasts from mid-May to the beginning of August, with peak in May/June and occasional specimens on into September/ October (Kula 2004, Speight 2018). The larva is unknown but apparently feeds on aphids that live on spruce needles (Speight 2018, Barstch et al. 2009). Its larvae have been recorded as dominant among overwintering Syrphidae larvae in the leaf litter of spruce (Picea) forest (Kula 1980).

","

Apart from general threats for biodiversity and deforestation, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe. This species is widespread and common also in conifer plantations (Reemer et al. 2009, Kula 2001). Reported declines of this species in Western Europe could be partly explained by high rates of deforestation and changes in forest management in these countries, specifically a shift away from coniferous plantations. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axiridis in Europe, that could be important threat for the native aphid predators (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). This species is also preferentially a predator of arboreal aphids, but probably not on Picea (Chapin and Brou 1991). Intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of this species could be detrimental for this hoverfly, as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015).

","

This species has numerous and stable populations in almost all humid areas with coniferous forests. It is very common in conifer plantations (Kula 2004). It is common in Fennoscandia and Central Europe (Bartsch et al. 2009, Kula 2001, Röder 1990), but it is considered quite rare and decreasing in Denmark (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight et al. 2016) and as declining in Ireland, Belgium and the Netherlands (Speight et al. 2016). Conversely Reemer et al. (2009) reported that this species had been increasing in the Netherlands. The occurrence of this species in Great Britain has declined substantially in the past 25 years according to Ball et al. (2011).

",Stable,"

Parasyrphus annulatus is widespread across the whole forested boreal and temperate Palearctic from northern Fennoscandia south to the Maritime Alps and north Pyrenees (southern France), northern Apennines (Italy) and Pindos and Rhodopi (Greece), and from Ireland eastwards through northern and mountainous Europe into European parts of Russia and on to the Caucasus in Europe (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Vujić et al. 2020, Sommaggio 2010, Burgio et al. 2015).

In Asia it is present through Siberia to the Pacific coast (Kuril Isles, Korea, Japan) south to Mongolia (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009).

","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,"

Parasyrphus annulatus is considered threatened in Ireland and the Netherlands by Speight et al. (2016). The biology of this species seems to be relatively well known, however larval biology is known inadequately to estimate possible impact of the invasive ladybird Harmonia axiridis on this species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172248,149172244,Parasyrphus groenlandicus,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-04-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

The full distribution and population of status of this species in Europe is not known precisely. The species is very rare; there are only scattered, mostly older, records from Scandinavia according to Bartsch et al. (2009) and one known older occurrence in European Russia (Pestov and Dolgin 2006). Although suspected to be more widespread across the Arctic tundra by some authors, it could be a threatened species in Europe - there are fewer than 20 known occurrences from northern Scandinavia including four in Finland and two in Sweden (EU27). It is expected to be more widespread than presently known, and the species is not considered threatened in any national Red List. Nevertheless, the Arctic and subarctic Scandinavian areas have been the most well surveyed areas in Europe for Syrphidae, and this assessment adopts a precautionary approach as it is a scarce species estimated to occur in only 12 locations across Europe defined by multiple threats, it has an estimated area of occupancy of 124 km2 based on known records, and there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat. It is consequently listed Near Threatened for Europe, as it is close to but does not qualify for a threatened listing applying Criterion B2.

The habitat upon which this species probably relies, dwarf Arctic Salix scrub, is listed as Near Threatened in the European Union (Janssen et al. 2016). The hoverfly is listed as Vulnerable for the EU27 based its small known area of occupancy (96 km2), occurrence in seven locations defined by threats, and a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat.

","

Parasyrphus groenlandicus inhabits Arctic and alpine communities in tundra and montane coniferous taiga (Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults have been observed visiting flowering Dryas octopetala, Rubus chamaemorus and Salix lapponum (Bartsch et al. 2009, Böcher et al. 2015, Speight 2018). The flight period is during June to July. The larva is unknown, but it probably feeds on aphids on e.g. Salix spp. (Bartsch et al. 2009).

","Any current threats to this species are not documented. Nevertheless, it is estimated that there is a continuing decline of the extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species, due to human activities and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016). Overgrazing by livestock (such as sheep and reindeer) could be also threats for the species. Sheep grazing has been found to cause declines of Salix shrubs in Arctic/subartic habitats (Austrheim et al. 2008, Ross et al. 2016). This may represent a particular threat since it is assumed that the larva lives as a predator on Salix shrubs (Bartsch et al. 2009). The quality and extent of suitable habitat for this high-latitude species could be also declining due to global warming (Barredo et al. 2020).","It is a rare species with only scattered mostly older records from Northern Europe (Bartsch et al. 2009, Pestov and Dolgin 2006). According to Bartsch et al. (2009) the species is probably overlooked. P. groenlandicus is very similar to the much commoner species P. tarsatus and females of both species are practically indistinguishable according to Vockeroth (1992).",Unknown,"This is a species with a circumpolar distribution that in Europe is known from northern and alpine Norway, Finland, Sweden, and the most northern parts of European Russia (Bartsch et al. 2009, Mutin 1990, Pestov and Dolgin 2006). The distribution is unclear due both to the potential for confusion with more common species and uncertainty surrounding its taxonomy. Bartsch et al. (2009) believe that species is more widespread than it has been recorded, because the species is probably overlooked. Acknowledging the likelihood of undersampling on this basis, the species' estimated area of occupancy based on known records is 124 km2 in Europe as a whole, and 96 km2 in the EU27.

Elsewhere it occurs in northwest and northeast Siberia, the Arctic Far East (Vrangel Island), Arctic Alaska and Canada and Greenland (Bartsch et al. 2009, Mutin 1990, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Vockeroth 1992, Böcher et al. 2015). Bartsch et al. (2009) noted its possible presence on Svalbard, but it has not been confirmed by surveys on Svalbard (Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017).","

This species is not traded or exploited.

",Terrestrial,"Further survey work is needed to determine this species' full distribution and to estimate recent population trends as well as its biology. P. groenlandicus is listed as Data Deficient in the recent Swedish Red List (ArtDatabanken 2020). It has been listed as Least Concern species in the Red Lists for Norwegian and Finnish species (Gammelmo et al. 2015, Haarto et al. 2019). Further research is needed to establish population trends and impacts of threats. Sub-arctic Salix scrub is near threatened in the EU28 ERL assessment and Least Concern in the pan-Europe assessment (Janssen et al. 2016).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172259,149172256,Parasyrphus kirgizorum,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-04-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

This is a very rare alpine species with only scattered records, suggesting its occurrence in severely fragmented, low-density subpopulations. It has been suggested that the population in the Alps is stable; conversely it has been observed that the species has been recorded more frequently in older than recent literature, but confusion surrounding the use of the names P. kirgizorum and P. tarsatus makes it difficult to determine whether this is likely to reflect a genuine decline. Should the species prove to be declining in the Alps, it will warrant reassessment and may qualify for a threatened category due to ongoing pressures on alpine habitats from development and climate change, but there is too much uncertainty surrounding its true distribution to apply Criterion B2 and data are lacking to determine whether it meets any other Criteria. It is consequently listed as Data Deficient both in Europe and the EU27 (which encompasses every confirmed range state in Europe except Switzerland).

","Parasyrphus kirgizorum is a subalpine/Alpine species known from upper levels of Abies/Picea forest into the Larix/Pinus mugo zone and beyond up into unimproved, alpine grassland, from 1,200 to 2,400 m (Speight 2018, Maibach et al. 1992, Brădescu 1991). Males hover at 2-4 metres and rest on the bare ground of paths, and on stones and rocks, in the sun (Goeldlin pers. comm. in Speight 2018). Adults fly low over sparsely-vegetated tracksides etc. and visit flowering Ranunculus, male Salix, and Taraxacum. The flight period is from end May to June according to Speight (2018) but in July and August according to Brădescu (1991), Stanescu and Parvu (2005) and Aubert et al. (1976). The larva is unknown, but it probably feeds on aphids as larvae of other related species.","Apart from the general threats for biodiversity, there are no specific threats identified for this species. Nevertheless, there is an inferred continuing decline in the extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species, due to human activities (tourism) and settlements (Jansen et al. 2016). The quality of suitable habitat for this high-elevation species is likely to be strongly influenced by global warming (D. Doczkal pers. comm. 2020, Schwager and Berg 2019).","

The population status of this species in Europe is uncertain, but it is a very rare alpine species with only scattered records from several subpopulations that are considered severely fragmented. There are about 16 recent European records combined of specimens referred to this species and P. tarsatus. The subpopulation of P. kirgizorum in the Alps is stable according to Speight et al. (2016), however records of this species had been apparently regularly more reported in historic and old literature (Maibach et al. 1992, Aubert et al. 1976, Goeldlin 1974, Séguy 1961, Şuster 1959). For example Ssymank and Lair (2014) summarized surveys of Syrphidae in Mercantour National Park in the Western Alps (France), and despite increasing the number of recognized species from this locality from 40 to 240 (based on surveys in 2010 and 2011) the only record of this species from the national park was an older published record.

",Unknown,"

The distribution of Parasyrphus kirgizorum in Europe has been uncertain due to confusion with P. tarsatus (Mutin 1990, D. Doczkal pers. comm. 2020). The species has been recorded from the Alps (France, Switzerland, north Italy, Austria), the Jura (Switzerland) in Europe (Mutin 1990, Speight 2018, Burgio et al. 2015, Heimburg 2018). Within Europe, it probably occurs also in Carpathian Mountains (Romania), Krkonoše Mountains (Czech Republic) and Rila Mountains (Bulgaria), where P. tarsatus has been recorded (Stănescu and Parvu 2005, Brădescu 1991, M. Barták pers. comm. 2009, Van der Ent pers. comm. 2020). According to Mutin (1990) (who reports that the ranges of both species overlap only in Sayan and the Altai Mountains) and D. Doczkal (pers. comm. 2020) P. tarsatus is not present in the mountains in the Central Europe. P. kirgizorum has been reported repeatedly from Poland recently, but all these records were based on confusion with Syphus nitidifrons (Mielczarek and Klasa 2017).

Outside Europe this species occurs in the Tien Shan (Kyrgyzstan), Sayan and Altai Mountains (Russia, Mongolia), Lower Amur mountains region (southern part of Russian Far East) and the Himalayas (West Nepal) in Asia (Mutin 1990, Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Claussen and Weipert 2003).

","

This species is not traded or exploited.

",Terrestrial,"

Further survey work is needed to determine distribution and monitor the population trend of this species. Research on the biology and life history of, and threats to, this species is necessary.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172272,149172268,Parasyrphus macularis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-09-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread arboreal species with rather numerous and stable subpopulations in boreal Europe and coniferous mountainous forests in Central Europe, although it is apparently influenced by forestry management in Europe outside boreal Europe. Parasyrphus macularis is considered threatened in the Netherlands and in Belgium (Speight et al. 2006), and the species was also referred as Critically Endangered in Sachsen in Germany (Pellmann et al. 1996).

The species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","

This is an arboreal species that inhabits open conifer (Picea/Abies) forests up to the tree line (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults fly around trees in open habitats and clearings with tall herbs and shrubs in spruce forests from 2-3 metres upwards above ground, the fly visit flowers of Sorbus aucuparia, Acer platanoides, Malus domestica, Prunus spinosus, Salix spp., and also descend to visit flowering bushes (Crataegus, Ribes alpinum, Rosa canina, Viburnum opulus, Sambucus nigra, Vaccinium myrtillus) and flowering herbs (Anemone nemorosa, Anthriscus sylvestris, Caltha palustris, Cardaminopsis, Carex spp., Oxalis acetosella, Ficaria, Meum, Petasites albus, Adoxa moschatellina, Taraxacum) (Speight 2018, Barstch et al. 2009, Bakemeyer 1994). The flight time lasts from the end of April to the middle of August with a peak in May/June (Speight 2018, Barstch et al. 2009). The larva is unknown but probably feeds on aphids that live on spruce needles (Bartsch et al. 2009).

","

Apart from the general threats to biodiversity and deforestation, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe. Subpopulations of this species are apparently influenced by forestry management in Europe, especially outside boreal Europe.

","Parasyrphus macularis has rather stable, numerous subpopulations especially in boreal forested areas in Europe. It is quite common in Sweden and Finland up to the tree line (Bartsch et al. 2009) and it is also numerous in mountains with coniferous forests in Central Europe (Röder 1990, Čepelák et al. 1986). It is decreasing and/or threatened in Belgium and the Netherlands (Speight et al. 2016, Reemer et al. 2009).",Stable,"Parasyrphus macularis is widespread in the forested boreal and mountainous temperate Holarctic. It is present from Fennoscandia south to Pyrenees (Spain), Northern Apennines (Italy) and Northern Pindos (Greece) and through Northern parts of European Russia (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Vujić et al. 2020, Sommaggio 2010, Burgio et al. 2015;  Barkalov pers. comm. 2020). Ricarte and Marcos-García (2017) reported this species as being extant on Balearic Islands on the base of a very old record, but according to Kassebeer (2002) this species certainly does not occur in the Balearic Islands. There is a single recorded specimen from 1992 from the Great Britain (Goring Heath, det. T. Nielsen, GBIF 2020), but this record is not included in any recent literature for this island (eg. Ball et al. 2011, Ball and Morris 2014). Parasyrphus macularis has been sometimes overlooked, especially in areas where the extremely similar P. punctulatus is more common (Speight 2018).

Outside Europe it ranges through south-western and south-eastern Siberia to the Pacific Ocean including the Kamchatka Peninsula. It also occurs from Alaska along the Rocky Mountains south to Oregon (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Vockeroth 1992).","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,

There are no specific conservation actions for this species in Europe at present. Parasyrphus macularis is considered threatened in the Netherlands and in Belgium (Speight et al. 2006). This species was also listed as Critically Endangered in Sachsen in Germany (Pellmann et al. 1996). The biology of this species particularly larval biology is not adequately known.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172286,149172282,Parasyrphus nigritarsis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread rather arboreal species with perhaps numerous and stable subpopulations in wetland forested countryside in Northern Europe. This species is rare, declining and threatened across most of Atlantic, Alpine and Continental Europe. This species is apparently affected by deforestation and by intensive landscape management that results in the loss of unimproved ecotones and open habitats in wet forests with a large enough proportion of trees of little economic value (Salix, Alnus, Populus tremula), because this species is associated with them. The biology of this species is relatively well known. Monitoring of subpopulations is necessary and further research is required to better understand the habitat requirements and the existing threats.

The species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.","

This is a generally arboreal species that occurs in connection with wetlands and moist deciduous and mixed forest with a large element of Alnus/Salix/Populus tremula woods (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009) both in brackish areas in Poland (Kaczorowska 2006) and in the mountains with Alnus viridis shrubs up to 2,000 m in the Alps (Speight 2018). In Great Britain records exist also from wet conifer plantations where there are fringes of deciduous scrub with Salix and Alnus (Ball and Morris 2014). Adults of this species are probably highly mobile and vagrant (see Aubert et al. 1976) and occasionally solitary adults have been recorded almost everywhere even in urban parks (Wien, Hamburk) (Heimburg 2018, Röder 1990). Adults reside in rides and clearings in forests usually close to water, often several metres of the ground and also high up in the treetops and visit flowering trees (Salix spp., Prunus spp, Malus domestica) and descent to visit flowers on bushes (Crataegus laevigata, Rubus spp., Rhododendron aureum, Ribes alpinum, Rosa canina) and herbs (Anthriscus sylvestris, Anemone nemorosa, Ranunculus, Potentilla erecta, Taraxacum, Argentina anserina, Caltha palustris, Bunias orientalis (Speight 2018, Barstch et al. 2009). It is univoltine species with a flight period of adults from beginning of May to the end of June (Reemer et al. 2009), the second half of May to the middle of August in Northern Europe (Bartsch et al. 2009). The larva is a specialist predator of larvae of chrysomelid beetles (Phratora vitellinae and Linaeidea aenea) found on Salix, Populus and Alnus trees and shrubs (Köpf et al. 1997).

","Apart from general threats for biodiversity and deforestation, the loss of unimproved ecotones and open habitats has been noted as possibly the main threat for this species by Ball and Morris (2014). This species is likely to be found along woodland edges and it is associated with trees of little economic value of wetlands (Salix, Alnus, Populus tremula). As a consequence of over-intensification of ride management and woodland edges may be detrimental to the survival of this species. In some locations, declining ride management may also be an issue as it may lead to closing of the canopy over the ride to the detriment of low-growing ride side vegetation of eg. Salix.","

This species is widespread but rare and local across most of Europe, only having been recorded with some regularity from some northern areas (Bartsch et al. 2009, Maibach et al. 1992, Nedeljković 2011, Reemer et al. 2009, Röder 1990, Pestov and Dolgin 2006, GBIF 2020). It may have numerous and stable subpopulations in these areas. According to Speight et al. (2016) this species is declining in Alpine, Atlantic and Continental regions of Europe and it is threatened and/or decreasing in Belgium, Britain, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands and Switzerland. According to Reemer et al. (2009) it is declining and strongly threatened in the Netherlands. This species had previously been regarded as Endangered in the Great Britain; following recent records from this country its status has been revised to Nationally Scarce although data are insufficient to determine a population trend in this country (Ball and Morris 2014, Ball et al. 2011). In some countries it is so rare that it has been listed Data Deficient in some Red Lists, e.g. in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). Possibly this species has been overlooked due to its resemblance to common species Syrphus or Epistrophe (Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018).

",Decreasing,"

This is a Holarctic species, which is widespread in Northern Europe and occurs in most of Europe south to Pyrenees and Cordillera Cantabria (northern Spain), Alps (Italy) and to Kopaonik (Serbia), Vitoša and Pirin (Bulgaria) on the Balkan Peninsula (Speight 2018, Speight et al. 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Burgio et al. 2015, Ricarte et al. 2017, Tóth 2014, Nedeljković 2011). It also occurs from Ireland eastwards through northern and mountainous Europe into northern European parts of Russia (Speight 2018, Barkalov pers. comm. 2020).

Outside Europe it occurs through Siberia to the Russia Far East including Kuril islands and Japan. It is also found in the Caucasus, Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia, and in North America from Alaska and Canada and south along the Rocky Mountains to the Colorado (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Vockeroth 1992).

","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,"

According to Ball end Morris (2014) the existing ride structures should be retained or enhanced to provide transitional structure between grasslands and high forest, with provision of sunny open flower-rich glades. Rideside shrub clearance should endeavour to avoid removal of all sallow and alder on any single ride management cycle. This species is referred as threatened in most of Atlantic countries in Europe, Belgium, Britain, Denmark, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands (Speight et al. 2016). It is considered strongly threatened in the Netherlands by Reemer et al. (2009) and as Nationally Scarce in Great Britain by Ball and Morris (2014). It is a protected species in Serbia (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). It is listed as a Vulnerable species in the Red Lists of the Czech Republic and Poland (Farkač et al. 2005, Palaczyk et al. 2002) and as Data Deficient in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Finland, Sweden and Norway it is listed Least Concern (Haarto et al. 2019, ArtDatabanken 2020, Gammelmo et al. 2015). The biology of this species is relatively well known. Monitoring of subpopulations is necessary and further research is required to better understand the habitat requirements and the existing threats.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172298,149172295,Parasyrphus punctulatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-09-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread arboreal species with numerous and stable subpopulations in both natural forest and conifer plantations in Europe. Apart from the general threats for biodiversity, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe. It is not decreasing or considered threatened in any European state (Speight et al. 2006) and the biology of this species is relatively well known. It is consequently listed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.","

This is an arboreal species that inhabits conifer forests, including plantations (Picea, Larix), but also mixed and deciduous forests (Quercus/Fraxinus and Betula/Salix/Alnus, thermophilous Quercus), as well as suburban gardens and orchards with mature trees (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Kula 2001). Adults fly around conifers and deciduous trees, frequently settling on the foliage, and visit various flowering trees and bushes (Acer pseudoplatanus, Crataegus, Ilex, Ligustrum, Prunus spp., male Salix, Sambucus racemosa, Sorbus aucuparia, Ulex, Viburnum opulus, Juniperus communis) and herbs (white umbellifers, AlliariaAnemone nemorosa, Caltha, Cardamine, Euphorbia, Oxalis, Ranunculus, Stellaria holostea, Saxifraga granulata, Taraxacum, Tussilago) (Speight 2018, Barstch et al. 2009, van Eck et al. 2020). It is rather an early spring species with the flight period of adults usually from mid-April to mid-June (Speight 2018, Ball et al. 2011, Reemer et al. 2009, Kula 2001).

The larva has been reported as feeding on aphids on conifers (Abies, Picea, Pinus), but also on deciduous woody plants (Acer pseudoplatanus, Rosa, Fagus sylvatica) (Ball et al. 2011, Bartsch et al. 2009, Speight 2018, Rojo et al. 2003). The larvae overwinter among leaf litter under trees (Kula 1999, Barkemeyer 1994, Rotheray 1987).

","

Apart from general threats for biodiversity (e.g. using of non selective pesticides against homopteran pest in conifer plantations), including deforestation, there are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe, and this species is not an obligate of natural forest.

","

Parasyrphus punctulatus has often numerous and stable subpopulations in many humid and forested areas in Europe. It is not uncommon in parts of Fennoscandia and Germany (Bartsch et al. 2009, Röder 1990) and is common in Central Europe and Great Britain (Ball et al. 2011, Kula 2001, Čepelák et al. 1986).

",Stable,"

Parasyrphus punctulatus is widespread in forested boreal and temperate Palaearctic, from central Fennoscandia south to Pyrenees, Cordillera Cantábrica (Spain, Portugal), northern Apennines (Italy) and Pindos (Greece) in Europe and into European parts of Russia (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Barkalov pers. comm. 2020, Vujić et al. 2020, Sommaggio 2010, Burgio et al. 2015, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017).

Elsewhere it occus in the Caucasus and on through Siberia to the Pacific coast (Sakhalin, Japan) and south to Himalayas (Nepal) in Asia (Speight 2048, Bartsch et al. 2009, Claussen and Weipert 2003, Barkalov and Mutin 2018).

","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,Parasyrphus punctulatus is not considered threatened in any European territory (Speight et al. 2016) and the biology of this species is relatively well known.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172310,149172306,Parasyrphus tarsatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widely-distributed and rather common species in the whole of Arctic and subarctic Europe, and is consequently listed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27. It is one of the dominant syrphid species on some Arctic areas. Further survey work is needed to solve distribution of this species in Europe and to obtain data about larval biology.","This species preferentially inhabits dwarf Betula/Salix scrub in arctic tundra and subalpine Betula/Pinus forest, but frequently descends to coniferous and deciduous boreal forests at lower elevations (Speight 2018). Males hover at 1-2 m height and settle on bare ground, stones or rocks in the sun; both sexes often bask on foliage of Betula in the morning (Böcher et al. 2015). The flies visit flowering Caltha palustris and Salix spp. in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009). In Norway they also visit white Apiaceae, Barbarea spp., Saxifraga aizoides, Taraxacum spp., Papaver nudicaule, Potentilla cranzti, Ranunculus acris, Rhododendron tomentosum, Rubus chamaemorum (Nielsen 1998, Böcher et al. 2015). In Greenland it is pollinator of Ranunculus nivalis, Drias integrifolia and Silene acaulis (Philipp et al. 1990 in Böcher et al. 2015). The flight period is normally from late May to mid-August (Speight 2018). The larva is unknown, but it probably feeds on aphids on e.g. Salix spp. (Bartsch et al. 2009).","Apart from general threats to biodiversity, there are no specific threats identified for this species. Nevertheless, it is presumed that there is a continuing decline in the extent and quality of suitable habitats for this species due to human activities and settlements (Janssen et al. 2016). The quality of suitable habitat for this species could be also affected by climate change, die to its Arctic distribution (Barredo et al. 2020).","

It is a widely distributed and abundant species in circumpolar Arctic habitats (Vockeroth 1992, Böcher et al. 2015). It is a local but rather common species in North Scandinavia (Bartsch et al. 2009) and it is one of the dominant syrphid species on some areas in North Norway (Nielsen 1998, Nielsen and Swendsen 2014). It is quite rare in Finland (Haarto and Kerppola 2007) as well as in North European Russia (Pestov and Dolgin 2006).

",Stable,"

Parasyrphus tarsatus is a widely distributed species in the northern Holarctic, with complete circumpolar Arctic to boreal range, including Svalbard, Iceland and Greenland (Speight 2018, Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009, Böcher et al. 2015, Vockeroth 1992, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017).

This species has been reported repeatedly from the Alps (France, Switzerland, North Italy) (Speight 2018, Speight et al. 2018, Ssymank and Lair 2014, Maibach et al. 1992, Aubert et al. 1976, Goeldlin 1974, Séguy 1961, Burgio et al. 2015) and Carpathians (Romania) (Stănescu and Parvu 2005, Brădescu 1991), but the presence of this species in the mountains of Central Europe is uncertain due to confusion with P. kirgizorum. According to Mutin (1990) and D. Doczkal (pers. comm. 2020) P. tarsatus is not present in the mountains in the Central Europe and it is replaced there by P. kirgizorum. Peck (1988), followed by some subsequent authors, reported that this species is present in Poland, but this was an error based on misinterpretation of Bankowska (1963). This species was also repeatedly reported as extant in Slovakia (Čepelák et al. 1986 and aithors citing this source e.g. Mazánek 2009), but these records originate from habitats that are quite different from that inhabited by either P. tarsatus or P. kirgizorum, so these records are expected to represent misidentifications.

","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,

There are no specific conservation actions for this species. Further survey work is needed to clarify the distribution of this species in Europe and to obtain data about larval biology.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172321,149172318,Scaeva albomaculata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a locally abundant and migratory species widespread in the Mediterranean area which inhabits anthropogenic suburban habitats as well as natural grassland. It is listed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27.

,"

This species prefers open ground and rather arid grasslands in the warmest areas of Europe. It occurs in anthropogenic suburban habitats in the Mediterranean. The flight period of adults is from April to September in most parts of its range but could be throughout the year in the southern parts of its range (Canary Islands, Portugal, southern Spain). Adults visit flowering Quercus coccifera (Ssymank 2012), Cytisus, Senecio, and Thapsia (Speight 2018). It is a strongly migratory species (Speight et al. 2016): adults apparently migrate every year outside the Mediterranean basin, but they often do not establish permanent populations there because of unsuccessful overwintering of fertilized females (Dušek and Láska 1986, Ball and Morris 2014). Developmental stages were recently described by Láska et al. (2006). The larvae are predatory on aphids on various herbaceous plants, including crop species of Beta and Vicia (see Rojo et al. 2003).

","

Any current threats to this species are unknown, but it is widespread and abundant and adapts to suburban habitats in the Mediterranean area where preying on some species of aphids pest of crops being vulnerable to non-specific chemical treatments.

","It is a widespread and rather locally abundant species in most of the Mediterranean area. It is exceptionally recorded outside the Mediterranean, but these appear to be mostly migratory specimens and cannot be regarded as indicative of the presence or status of resident permanent populations (Speight 2018).",Stable,"Scaeva albomaculata is widely distributed in the southern Palaearctic region and with a rather Mediterranean distribution in Europe. It is present from the Iberian Peninsula, Morocco and Canary Islands (Ricarte and Marcos García, 2017). Mediterranean basin to European Turkey, Greece, and the southern part of European Russia.

From there it ranges to the Caucasus, southern Siberia, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Mongolia and northern China (Speight 2018, Dušek and Láska 1985, Barkalov and Mutin 2018). This species is highly migratory and occasionally reaches as far north as southern Britain, from which there are two records (Ball et al. 2011). These, and records from most of central Europe, cannot be regarded as indicative of the presence of permanent populations (Speight 2018, Ball and Morris 2014).","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,

Scaeva albomaculata is not considered threatened in the Mediterranean area. Speight et al. (2016) reported that this species as threatened in the continental region in Europe.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172333,149172329,Scaeva dignota,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

It is a widespread and relatively abundant species in Mediterranean area that inhabits both natural and anthropogenic suburban habitats, and its range may be expanding as a result of climate change. It is consequently listed Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27.","S. dignota inhabits various forests (Pinus forest, up to the elevation of P. uncinata in the Pyrenees, thermopilous Quercus, garrigue and mesophilous Fagus forest (Speight 2018). It is often present also in suburban woody gardens and parks especially in northern parts of range (Dušek and Láska, 1985, Reemer et al. 2009). Adults fly fast at 1-3 m above ground in open areas and along tracks in forest and garrigue. Males hover at up to 5 m above ground in the sun and settle on low-growing plants in the evening, to bask. Adults visit white Apiaceae and yellow Asteraceae, Euphorbia, Prunus padus (Speight 2018). The flight period of adults is from May to July and the beginning August/September in southern Europe and from March to the end of October in Turkey (Speight 2018, Dušek and Láska 1985). It is a migratory species: adults apparently migrate every year to the north and into mountains during summer but they often do not established permanent subpopulations there, because of unsuccessful overwintering of fertilized females (Dušek and Láska 1986). Larvae are predatory probably on a wide range of aphids on fruit trees, shrubs and plants, and have been found on aphid colonies on Prunus domestica, Pyrus communis, Vicia faba, Sambucus nigra, Lupinus polyphyllus (Láska et al. 2006, Rojo et al. 2003).","Any current threats to this species are unknown, but it is widespread and abundant and adapts to suburban habitats. The presence of the larva of this species on fruit trees of commercial interest means that non-selective chemical treatments against aphid pest could negatively affect the populations of this predatory species.","It is widespread and rather abundant species in most of the Mediterranean area. It is becoming rare towards the northern border of its range. Subpopulations are not probably permanent there and its occurrence depends mostly on migrants there (Dušek and Láska 1985, Bartsch et al. 2009, Maibach et al. 1992).",Stable,"Scaeva dignota is a widespread and rather abundant species of the warmer parts of Palaearctic region, particularly the Mediterranean area where it seems to replace the similar species S. selenitica, with which it was previously confused (Dušek and Láska 1985). It is present from Iberia (Spain and Portugal) including North Africa (Algeria) through Mediterranean and Submediterranean Europe, Turkey, Israel to Transcaucasia (Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan) and Iran (Speight 2018, Dousti and Hayat 2006, Peck 1988, Mengual et al. 2020).

The distribution of this species in some areas is not reliably reported yet, because of the historical confusion with Scaeva selenitica (Dušek and Láska 1985): for instance when Scaeva selenitica specimens from Balkan were revised by Radenković et al. (1995) about half of them were identified as S. dignota. Moreover the northern border the range of S. dignota is unclear in Europe because S. dignota is a migratory species that can be occasionally recorded far outside its normal breeding range. In some or all of Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Denmark and even south Sweden it probably does not maintain permanent breeding subpopulations (Speight et al. 2016, Maibach et al. 1992, Bartsch et al. 2009, Reemer et al. 2009, Dušek and Láska 1985). Its range may be expanding northwards with climate change, which is likely to increase the successful overwintering of females.","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially.

",Terrestrial,"Scaeva dignota is not considered threatened in any Mediterranean area. Speight (2016) listed this species as threatened in Switzerland and Denmark. While these countries are probably at the natural northern edge of the species' range, records probably include migratory specimens (Maibach et al. 1992, Reemer et al. 2009, Bartsch et al. 2009, Dušek and Láska 1985).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172344,149172341,Scaeva pyrastri,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in Europe and EU 27, it has a wide distribution and it is abundant also in agricultural landscapes. There are no known major threats to this species, and no conservation action is required at present. It is consequently listed Least Concern in both Europe and the EU.","According to Speight (2018) it is not possible to define preferences for this abundant and highly mobile species: it seems to exploit concentrations of aphids wherever it finds them rather than being tied to any particular habitat structure. The flight period of adults is from February to November in most of continental Europe. Females are known to overwinter in central Europe, but annual occurrence of this species in northern Europe is probably highly dependent upon annual immigration from southern parts, and records of the adults are restricted to late May to September there (Dušek and Láska 1974, Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). Adults were observed on various flowers and according to Röder 1990 they have a preference for blue or purple flowers. The aphidophagous larva of this species was described and figured by various authors (Láska et al 2006). Larvae feed on various aphids and some other soft bodied insects, including those in arable crops, hedgerows, orchards, gardens and conifer plantations (see Rojo et al. 2003). They have an important role in the biocontrol of aphid pests in different areas of the world (Láska et al. 2006).","There are no major known threats to this species. This species inhabits a wide range of anthropogenic habitats and it seems to be partly anthropophilic. The invasion of the harlequin ladybird Harmonia axyridis in Europe could be important threat for the native aphid predators in Europe (Adriaens et al. 2003, Roy et al. 2006, Roy et al. 2016). Intraguild interactions between the invasive ladybird and larvae of Scaeva pyrastri could be detrimental for this hoverfly as has been observed for native ladybirds and Episyrphus balteatus (Adriaens et al. 2008, Almohamad et al. 2010, Ingels et al. 2015). However this aphidophagous species occurs also in Asia, where is H. axyridis is native, and seems not to be specialized on any particular group of aphids.","

This species is common and often the dominant hoverfly species in various habitats in most parts of Europe (Speight 2018, Bartsch et al. 2009). It is a strongly migratory species that does not have permanent subpopulation in most of its northern range and therefore its frequency of occurrence varies greatly from year to year, eg. in Great Britain (Speight 2018, Ball et al. 2011). Its population has decreased in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009).

",Stable,"

Scaeva pyrastri is one of the most widespread hoverfly species in Europe. It is present in all part of Europe except the extreme north (Swalbard) and Azores (Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Rojo et al. 1997, Bartsch et al. 2009). Occasional records from offshore islands of northern Europe, such as the Faroes are almost certainly derived from seasonal immigration (Jensen 2001, Speight 2018).

More broadly it is present in almost the whole Holarctic region, and also in the whole Mediterranean area including the Canary Islands and North Africa, in boreal and temperate Asia, marginal parts of the Oriental region (India, China) and exceptionally the Australian region (Dušek and Láska 1985, Speight 2018, Dousti and Hayat 2006, Saribiyik 2014, Vujić et al. 2020). In North America it is present from Alaska south to Arizona and Arkansas (Vockeroth 1992). According to Speight (2018) this is an extremely migratory species.

","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential to be used in biocontrol of aphids on various crops and also in greenhouses (Xiong and Dong 1991).

",Terrestrial,"

The occurrence of this species is supported for biological control of aphids in some agroecosystems. Scaeva pyrastri is not considered threatened in any area in Europe and its biology is relatively well known. However, impacts of the invasive harlequin ladybird are in need of study.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172354,149172352,Syrphus admirandus,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-02-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) globally and in the EU 27 Member States following the Scandinavian national Red Lists, although its range is uncertain range as a result of current confusion with other Syrphus species.

","Syrphus admirandus occurs in coniferous forest and western taiga (P. Goeldlin pers. comm. 2020). Adults fly from May to August visiting flowers of umbellifers, Campanula cervicaria, Crataegus laevigata, and Taraxacum (Bartsch et al. 2009). The larva is undescribed (Speight 2018).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species.

,"There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe. Only 14 specimens, including the type, have been collected in Sweden. In the Czech Republic, only one female has been collected in the Sovinecko Natural Park (Král 2018).",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it occurs in Scandinavia (Sweden, Finland and Norway) (Speight 2018), and it has been recently recorded from the Czech Republic (Král 2018). This species has an uncertain range due to current confusion with other Syrphus species (Speight 2018). Presence in European Russia is possible but not yet confirmed.","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation actions for this species. This species is regarded as Least Concern in Finland, Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020) and Norway (Artsdatabanken 2015).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149172366,149172363,Syrphus attenuatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Syrphus attenuatus
is assessed as Least Concern (LC) both in Europe and the EU27 due to fairly wide range across Northern Europe, although it is rarer in Central Europe and absent from Southern Europe. The main threat for this species is climate change, which may significantly impact its habitat.","Syrphus attenuatus occurs in forests (sub alpine Betula forest and dwarf-shrub tundra (T. Nielsen, pers. comm. 2020). Adults visit the flowers of the following plants: umbellifers; Papaver sibiricum, Salix, Taraxacum (T. Nielsen, pers. comm. 2020), and Carex. The flight period is from June to August (T. Nielsen pers. comm. 2020). The larva is not described (Speight 2018).","This species is threatened by habitat destruction. Extreme temperature changes as a result of climate change might be major ongoing or future threat on this species because its natural habitat is the tundra, but there is no information on any impacts.","There is no information about population trends. The majority of the specimens were collected in Finland: 47 from 2001-2013. There are only two specimens collected in the European part of Russia. In Poland there are only 3 specimens, from 1956.",Unknown,"Syrphus attenuatus occurs in the northern part of Europe in Scandinavia (Norway, Sweden and Finland) and in Russia (Saint Petersburg and Moscow) (Speight 2018; A. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020).

Besides Europe this species also occurs in the Nearctic from Alaska south to Wisconsin, Colorado and Pennsylvania (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids.",Terrestrial,"

There are no conservation actions known for this species. Research on population trends and larval ecology is needed. Additional monitoring is needed to better understand the population trends and impacts of possible threats from climate change. It is listed as Least Concern on the 2015 Swedish national Red List (https://artfakta.se) and in the Norwegian national Red List (https://artsdatabanken.no).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172377,149172374,Syrphus ribesii,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in Europe/EU27. It is a widespread species, present in many habitats and it has a high migrant ability. There are no specific threats identified for this species. Therefore, the species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.","Syrphus ribesii is a highly anthrophophilic species occurring in gardens, farmland, orchards, parks and all types of deciduous and coniferous forests (Speight 2018). Adults visit flowers of the wide range of plants including umbellifers, composites and threes and shrubs. The flight period is from April to mid-November (Speight 2018). The larva is described and figured by Dušek and Láska (1964).",

This is one of the commonest hoverfly species in Europe and seems not to be subject to any threats.

,There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe. There are many specimens collected from different parts of Europe so far.,Unknown,"Syrphus ribesii is widely distributed species in Europe. It occurs from Iceland and Scandinavia south to the Iberian peninsula and the Mediterranean, and the Canary Islands. It is also present from Ireland eastwards through most of Europe into European parts of Russia.

Outside Europe this species occurs in Asia - from the Urals to the Pacific coast (Kuril Islands), and in Afghanistan and Japan; and in North America (from Alaska south to central parts of the USA). This species is highly migratory (Speight 2018).","

This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphids (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,

There are no specific conservation actions for this species.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172388,149172386,Syrphus stackelbergi,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-02-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Syrphus stackelbergi is assessed as Data Deficient (DD) both globally and in Europe because it is known only from its type locality (St. Petersburg region). Only two specimens, both collected in 1915, have been recorded so far. It is not known from the European Union.",There are no data about the habitat and ecology of this species (Speight 2018).,"

Its ecology is unknown, and so it is not possible to identify any threats..

","There is no information about population trends. There are only two specimens known, from a single locality.",Unknown,"This species is known from a single locality in the northern part of European Russia, in the St. Petersburg region (N. Bronnaya, Petergof; Kuznezov 1990, Speight 2018).",This species is not traded or used commercially.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. Research needed to clarify the validity of this species and, if valid, determine its distribution, population status, ecology or any threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149172399,149172397,Syrphus torvus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in Europe and the EU27. It is a widespread species, present in many habitats including anthropogenic ones. There are no specific threats identified for this species. Therefore, S. torvus is here regarded as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27.","Syrphus torvus occurs in different kind of forests-humid conifer forest (Abies, Picea and humid Pinus), deciduous forest (Betula, Fagus and acidophilous Quercus) and dwarf-shrub tundra. This species is also anthropophilic, occurring in suburban gardens with mature trees and in urban parks (Speight 2018). Adults fly from March to October visiting flowers of umbellifers, Allium ursinum, Aster, Bellis perennis, Brassica rapa, Buxus, Caltha, Cirsium arvense, Crataegus, Euphorbia, Frangula alnus, Glaux maritima, Hedera, Hieracium, Oxalis, Prunus spinosa, Ranunculus, Rosa, Rubus fruticosus, R.idaeus, Salix, Senecio jacobaea, Sorbus, Taraxacum, Tussilago. The larva is aphidopgagous; it was described by Dušek and Láska (1964).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,

There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe.

,Unknown,"Syrphus torvus is a widely distributed species. It occurs from Greenland, Iceland, the Faroes and Scandinavia to Iberian Peninsula and the Mediterranean. It ranges through most of Europe into European parts of Russia.

Besides Europe this species occurs also in Asia (from the Urals through Siberia to the Pacific coast (Kuril Islands); Japan; Taiwan; northern India, Nepal, Thailand) and in North America, from Alaska south to New Mexico (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphids crop pests (Rojo et al. 2003).

",Terrestrial,There are no specific conservation actions in place for this species.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172411,149172407,Xanthandrus babyssa,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is restricted to Madeira island. It is assessed as as Endangered based on the restricted area of occupancy (AOO) of 88 km2 and extent of occurrence (EOO) of 535 km2, its occurrence in five locations defined by tourism-related activities and increased risk of fires as a result of climate change, and a projected continuing decline in the quality of habitat.","This species mainly occurs in Madeira-endemic laurisilva forest but less frequently, also in Acacia/ Eucalyptus plantation forests (Smit et al. 2004; Speight 2018). Adults visit the flowers of the following plants: Apiaceae, Asteraceae and Euphorbiaceae (J.T. Smit pers. comm. 2020). The flight period is from March to October (J.T. Smit pers. comm. 2020). The larva is not described, but it is probably entomophagous on Lepidoptera and Symphyta larvae (Speight 2018).",This species is threatened by habitat destruction. Infrastructure development (mostly due to tourism) and forestry activities can be regarded as the major threat to the habitat of the species. Tourism related activities and increasing fire risk as a result of climate change may also pose a threat to the species.,There is no information about population trends. There have been 145 specimens collected so far in 21 localities in Madeira island (Smith et al. 2004).,Unknown,"This species is endemic to Madeira island, Portugal (Smith et al. 2004, Speight 2018), where it is known from records across most of the island.","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to include caterpillars (Speight 2018). The rarity of this species makes commercial exploitation difficult.",Terrestrial,

There are no conservation actions known for this species. Numerous known localities occur within protected areas. Research on population trends and the species' biology is needed. Additional monitoring is needed to better-understand the population trends and impacts of threats. Taxonomic research is needed to clarify the validity of this species.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149172422,149172419,Xanthogramma citrofasciatum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread species present in many habitats and countries, and no specific threats have been identified. Therefore, The species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and for the EU27 Member States.

","Xanthogramma citrofasciatum occurs in open ground, usually in well-drained, unimproved, calcareous/mesophilous grassland. Adults fly from May to June visiting flowers of Convolvulus, Euphorbia, Scabiosa, and Taraxacum. Larvae live in the nests of Lasius ants, where they predate on ant-attended aphids (Speight 2018).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,

There is no information about population size and trends for this species in Europe.

,Unknown,"Xanthogramma citrofasciatum occurs from southern Norway to the Iberian peninsula. It is also present from Ireland eastwards through central and southern Europe into European Russia (Speight 2018).

Outside the focal region, the species ranges into the Caucasus and western Siberia (Speight 2018).","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which include aphids (Rojo et al. 2003).",Terrestrial,

There are no conservation actions known for this species. Monitoring is required to better understand population size and trends in Europe.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172432,149172430,Xanthogramma stackelbergi,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-12 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species does not meet the criteria for threatened categories in Europe/EU27. It is a widespread species, and present in many habitats. There are no specific threats identified for this species. Therefore, X. stackelbergi is regarded as Least Concern in Europe/EU27.","Xanthogramma stackelbergi occurs in forests (mesophilous Fagus forest, thermophilous forests of Q. pubescens, forest of Alnus incana and evergreen oak forest of Quercus suber). Besides forests Xanthogramma stackelbergi occurs in unimproved grasslands and scrub. In central Europe, the species occurs mostly in thermophilous grasslands (A. Ssymank, pers. comm. 2020). The flight period is from mid May to mid August. Adults visit flowers of the following plants: Sambucus ebulus; Stellaria (Bartsch et al. 2009); white umbellifers; and tall Euphorbia. The larva is not described (Speight 2018).",

There are no specific threats identified for this species in Europe.

,"There is no information about population sizes and trends for this species. Possibly, it is more common in central and northern Europe than in southern Europe. Only one specimen has ever been collected in Spain (Van Eck 2010). However, it is rare but probably widespread in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009). In Czechia and Germany, Xanthogramma stackelbergi appears to be rarer than X. dives and X. pedissequum.",Unknown,"The geographic range of Xanthogramma stackelbergi is uncertain due to the confusion with X. dives and X. pedissequum (Nedeljković et al. 2018, Speight 2018). It is known from Norway, Sweden, Finland, parts of European Russia and Ukraine (Crimea), the United Kingdom, Denmark, The Netherlands, southern Germany (several localities), Switzerland, France, Italy (Speight 2018), Spain (van Eck 2010), Czechia (Hadrava et al. 2018), Serbia, Greece and Montenegro (Nedeljković et al. 2018).

It is likely a genuinely widely distributed species that ranges beyond Europe although the entire range is unknown, and is considered to be non-endemic to the European region here.","This species is not traded or exploited commercially. However, it has a potential use in population control of its prey insects, which are suspected to be aphids (Rojo et al. 2003).",Terrestrial,

There are no conservation actions known for this species. Research into its distribution and population trend is needed. Monitoring is required. It is not included in any national Red Lists.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172443,149172440,Microdon analis,Near Threatened,A2c+4c,2021,2020-02-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This species prefers open places in different woodland and forest habitats, where its larval prey (ants) is abundant and ant nests are frequent. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered for a threatened category, but considering its observed decline in several countries and its population reduction of 10-20% during the past 10 to 15 years, still continuing (inferred from reductions in both area and quality of suitable habitats according to the European Red List of habitats), it is assessed as Near Threatened in Europe and the EU 27, approaching the threshold for VU under criterion A4.","This species prefers open places in different woodland and forest habitats, where its larval prey (ants) is abundant and ant nests are frequent. It is found mainly in deciduous forests in all altitudinal zones of Fagus and mixed Fagus-Picea-Abies forest, but also in Quercus and Betula-forests and Pinus sylvestris forests. The main habitats used according to the European Red List of habitats (Janssen et al. 2016) are G1.8 (acidophilous Quercus woodland) and a number of other forest types (G1.6a, G1.6b Fagus forests, G1.9a Betula & Populus tremula forests and G1Aa mixed mesic Quercus/ Carpinus forests, provided the canopy is not too closed and suitable ant nests are present (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). Adults can be found in clearings, along tracksides or forest margins, flying low above the ground or sitting on dead wood, on leaves or on the ground close to ant nests. Their visits to flowers are rarely observed but they do feed from flowers as adults e.g. Heracleum sphondylium (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). Their larval habitat is ant nests of the genus Lasius, possibly only Lasius platythorax, in rotten wood often under bark (Speight 2018, Schmid 2004). It is a very localised species that does not fly very far because they use chemical mimicry to communicate with the host ants.","The habitat of this species is partially declining (especially habitat G1.8 acidophilous Quercus woodland, assessed as Vulnerable (VU) for Europe (Janssen et al. 2017). The threats it faces are changing practices in forestry which lead to a more dense canopy, or natural succession in secondary oak woodland towards closed canopy dense beech forest stands. Pesticide applications in forestry, for example to combat tortricid moth infestations on pine shoots or defoliation by the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar), can also be a regionally important threat.","The population trend of this species is thought to be decreasing due to decreased extent and quality of the habitat. Generally it is found in very low numbers, often as singletons only, even in quite intense surveys. In museum material it is better represented than in recent data. It no longer exists at some historic localities in several countries such as Belgium, Czechia, Denmark, Ireland and several of the German Federal States, where its decreasing trend led to a threatened status in regional Red Lists (see Red list Rationale).

A population reduction of 10-20% over the past 10 to 15 years inferred from reductions in both the area and quality of suitable habitats, based on the European Red List of habitats (Janssen et al. 2016), a decline that is continuing.",Decreasing,"The range of this species within Europe is likely to be from Scandinavia to the Mediterranean, and from Ireland in the west to European Russia. Based on larval identification, its presence is confirmed from Ireland, Great Britain, France, Germany, Austria and Spain (Speight 2018, 2020) - with a low number of larval records available. As no records exist in parts of northern Scandinavia for this species complex, the map of (Bartsch et al. 2009) was used to exclude these parts of Scandinavia.

Outside of Europe, it ranges eastwards to the Pacific coast of Russia and Mongolia (which needs confirmation due to confusion with Microdon major), and extending to northern Africa (Speight 2018). Microdon analis can only safely be identified from larvae or pupae. It is the most frequent species of this genus.

Due to taxonomic difficulties and the impossibility of identifying adult specimens, the map is based on country checklists, where countries with safe identification based on larvae or pupae are classified as ""extant"", others as possibly extant.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"The larvae of this species develop in ant nests and therefore need healthy ant populations in the vicinity of their natal nests (due to the extremely local chemical mimicry, reproductive success drops very quickly with distance from the natal nest). Conservation must therefore aim at maintaining stable ant populations large enough to be suitable for Microdon larvae. Better forestry management is needed to maintain coarse wood debris, dead wood and old trees.

This species is listed in several national Red Lists; it is Critically Endangered (CR) in Belgium (Meerhaege and Grootaert 1998), Vulnerable (VU) in Denmark and Czechia (Bygebjerg 2004, Farkač et al. 2005), threatened in Ireland (Speight 2008) and nationally scarce in the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2015). In the National Red List of Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) it is still considered as Least Concern, but with historical losses. However, it is considered threatened in some of the regional lists within Germany, such as Berlin (Saure 2018), Saxony (Pellmann and Scholz 1996) and Saxony-Anhalte (Dziock et al. 2004). Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends and threats. Monitoring of population trends is necessary.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172454,149172451,Microdon devius,Near Threatened,A2c+4c,2021,2020-02-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This species is closely linked to threatened dry grassland habitats where its host ants live. Its main habitats in central Europe are threatened and near-threatened. It has a higher degree of threat in northwestern Europe, but in eastern and southern Europe it appears to be less threatened.

Based on a population decline suspected from habitat loss both in extent and quality where the species occurs (according to the European Red List of Habitats), it can be suspected that this species has undergone a decline of around 10-20% over the last 10 years, and this is projected to continue. It is therefore assessed as Near Threatened in both Europe and the EU27.","This species is mainly found in dry sun-exposed unimproved semi-natural to natural grassland, calcareous semi-dry grasslands, steppic grasslands and sandy dry grasslands of river floodplains. Adults fly low in the vegetation, or sit on the ground or on leaves often close to ant nests (Speight 2018). Adults visit flowers only occasionally, observed on Prunus spinosa (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). The larval habitat is ant nests of Lasius flavus (Rotheray 1994). The larvae use chemical mimicry to infiltrate the nests of the host ants, and therefore this species has locally restricted and fragmented subpopulations.","This species is closely linked to threatened dry grassland habitats, where its host ants live (Janssen et al. 2017): the main habitats in central Europe are E1.2b (semi-dry perennial calcareous grassland), classified as Vulnerable (VU), and E1.2b (continental dry steppe), classified as Near Threatened (NT) with a more southeastern distribution. In northwestern Europe, dry sandy grassland on inland dunes (habitats E1.9a & E1.9b) also are used, both assessed as Endangered (EN). The main threats come from non-adapted dry grassland management in agriculture, intensification of land-use or habitat loss due to complete abandonment of management and subsequent shrub and forest encroachment. Additional threats include pesticides used mainly in agriculture and sometimes in forestry as well. Its main habitat is classified under code ""6210"" as Annex I Habitat in the EU Habitats Directive, and 2019 reports still show declining trends; even inside EU protected Natura 2000 sites habitat losses still occur and degradation is ongoing, partially because of missing resources for adequate habitat management and subsequent complete scrub encroachment. Outside Natura 2000 protected sites, many of the smaller habitat patches have been lost during the past 10-15 years.","With a distinct historical and to some extent still ongoing decline of its specific habitats in Europe, a population decline of around 10-20% over the last 10 years is suspected, and this is projected to continue. Data from existing national Red Lists and trends from several countries confirm this, but there are no concrete data available for the overall population trend and size of this species across its European and EU27 range. It is not very rare, but it is localised. Parts of its range are very fragmented based on habitat availability. There cannot be much interchange among subpopulations.

In the northwestern and central parts of its range, this species is at risk, but it is doing better in the southern parts of its range.",Decreasing,"Within the European region, this species occurs from Fennoscandia to Spain, and in the west from southern England to the European part of Russia (Speight 2018). There are no detailed data for most countries, and it is likely to be under-recorded. It is linked to dry grasslands and is therefore likely to be more frequent in southern Europe. It is considered extinct in Denmark

The distribution map is based on country checklists, with an adaptation in Scandinavia to exclude unsuitable regions according to the distribution map of Bartsch et al. (2009). For Greece, Vujic et al. (2020), for The Netherlands, Reemer et al. (2009), for France, Speight et al. (2018), for the UK, Ball and Morris (2015), and for Spain, Ricarte and Marcos-Garcia (2017) have been used. For Germany, a specific habitat map was used and for the Czech Republic point data were used. The species inhabits specific dry habitats with its host ants, and has a scattered distribution throughout its range. Therefore for other countries where no detailed data were available, a habitat modelling approach was used based on the map of the natural vegetation of Europe (Bohn et al. 2000) with the vegetation units group L, G, F3, F4.1 and F6.

Its global range extends out of the European region to Siberia and the Russian Far East.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"The larvae of this species develop in ant nests and therefore need healthy ant populations in the vicinity of their natal nests (due to their extremely local chemical mimicry, reproductive success drops quickly with distance to the natal ant nest). Grassland management can be either extensive pasturing or mowing regimes, but cutting the grass too short should be avoided because this destroys ant nests.

It has a higher degree of threat in northwestern Europe, being extinct in Flanders (Belgium) (Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998), Regionally Extinct in Denmark (Bygebjerg 2004), threatened in the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2015) and with an observed decline in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). In central Europe, it is on the German Red list (Ssymank et al. 2011) assessed as Near Threatened (""Vorwarnstufe"") with a negative long-term trend. Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends and threats. Monitoring of population and habitat trends are necessary.

In both eastern and southern Europe, it appears to be less threatened, and in the Mediterranean its habitat is considered to be Least Concern but it seems to be rare in this region: there is, for example, only one locality known from the mountains in Greece (Vujic et al. 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172465,149172462,Microdon myrmicae,Vulnerable,A4c,2021,2020-02-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This European endemic species is closely linked to bog and mire habitats and wet heath. All these habitats have undergone severe declines, and many have been assessed as threatened in the European Red List of Habitats. Despite protection legislation being in place, there has been a significant loss in the extent and quality habitats due to climate change, intensive agriculture and pollution from pesticides and nitrogen, amongst others. Because of these declines in its habitats, it is reliant more specifically on the even more marginalised transition zone niches within these threatened habitats, and hence its population is suspected to be declining and this decline is expected to continue in both Europe and the EU27.

This species is therefore assessed as Vulnerable in Europe and the EU27 based on the continuous decline in extent and quality of its habitat: it has probably undergone a population decline and will continue to decline at a rate of around 30% over a period of 10 years.

It would benefit from the preservation of ecotones between wet grassland or heathland to bog, and fen vegetation need to be preserved, especially the hydrology and flooding regime. Research is needed on its population size, threats, distribution and trends. This is likely to indicate that the populations in the west and south of Europe are under greater threat than in the east of Europe, and may need specific conservation measures to combat the impacts of habitat destruction and climate change. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is also necessary.","This species can be found in wetland habitats, especially the ecotones between bogs and fens to humid grassland or heaths, or adjacent to wet shrub and Betula/Pinus swamp or bog forest (Speight 2018). Adults can be found hovering low over the ground or sitting on soils or vegetation close to ant nests. The larvae live in ant nests - during larval stages L2 and L3, they are predatory of ant brood and during the L1 larval stage they live in the debris of the ant nests (Wolton 2011). The species is particularly associated with the nests of the ant species Myrmica scabrinodis (Schönrogge et al. 2002) which can be found in Carex, Juncus or Molinia tussocks and in Sphagnum mosses. They can also be found in nests of Myrmica vandeli (Elmes et al. 2003), Myrmica gallienii and Myrmica rubra (Stankiewicz 2003) as well as Myrmica ruginodis (Wolton 2011).","This species is dependent on ant nests in bogs, mires and wet heathland. Its major threats are declines in the quality and extent of its habitat and the use of pesticides. Its habitats are threatened by changes in hydrology, climate change, succession and loss of quality and area due to aerial nitrogen input from agriculture and combustion, and also sometimes by land use change due to infrastructure development (road constructions and buildings). Furthermore, water soluble pesticides from adjacent agricultural areas, such as neonicotinoids within seed coatings, threaten both the larvae and its host ants.

Various of its habitats have been assessed in the European Red List of Habitats and are considered threatened or near threatened in Europe: calcareous spring mire has been assessed as Endangered; non-calcareous quaking mire, calcareous quaking mire and wet heath have all been assessed as Vulnerable; and both blanket bogs and intermediate fen and soft-water spring mires have been assessed as Near Threatened (Janssen et al. 2017).","Although direct information on the population trend of this species is incomplete, it is considered to be declining in Europe (Speight 2016) as its habitat is clearly in decline. Because it often only uses transition zones of bogs as habitat, the rate of decline of the habitat is difficult to assess, however, the species has probably undergone a population decline and will continue to decline at a rate of around 30% over a period of 10 years.",Decreasing,"The full range of this European endemic is uncertain due to its taxonomic confusion with Microdon mutabilis (a cryptic species). It is currently confirmed to exist from Norway south to Spain and eastwards to Karelia and Ukraine (Speight 2018). Based on larval and puparial characteristics confirmed from specimens, it is known to occur in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, parts of European Russia (Karelia), Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland and Ukraine (Speight 2018). It has a very large extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and the EU 27.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"Currently, this species receives partial protection under the EU Natura 2000 network because it can co-occur with a protected species (Maculinea) in the same ant nests. It also benefits from the protection of calcareous fen habitat by the Natura 2000 network and Annex I of the Habitats Directive.

It would benefit from the preservation of ecotones between wet grassland or heathland to bog: fen vegetation need to be preserved, especially the hydrology and flooding regime. Research is needed on population size, threats, distribution and trends. This is likely to indicate that the populations in the west and south of Europe are under greater threat than in the east of Europe, and may need specific conservation measures to combat the impacts of habitat destruction and climate change. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is also necessary.

This species is classified as Vulnerable in the Danish Red List (Bygebjerg 2004), and Endangered in Ireland (Speight 2008), but it is still absent from most of the available Red Lists due to previous confusion with closely related species. In Germany it was considered Data Deficient (Ssymank et al. 2011), but new regional lists such as Berlin consider it as Critically Endangered (Saure 2018). In the United Kingdom it is assessed as Least Concern (Ball and Morris 2015), probably due to the fact that there are large blanket bogs in this country.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149172475,149172473,Platycheirus aeratus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

With a subarctic boreal distribution in northern Europe, this species has a relatively small area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO), but still well above the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories. The population is considered stable in Europe and the EU 27, and in the Red Lists of  Finland and Norway, it is assessed as LC. The species is therefore assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27. As it has a small AOO of 2,300 km2 in the EU27, potential future pressure on the habitat from climate change could push it into the Vulnerable category.","This species relies on dwarf scrub tundra (Nielsen 1974), and open ground or sparsely vegetated northern habitats (Speight 2018). The adult visit flowers of sedges (Carex) and Eriophorum (van Steenis 1998b). The larvae are not well studied, but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","There are no currently known threats to this species. Because it is a northern species, climate change may be a serious future threat with the loss of suitable habitat and habitat quality (for example by shrub encroachment).","Based on the widespread availability of its habitat in northern Europe, this species is currently assumed to have a stable population trend in Europe and the EU27. More detailed data is needed on the population size itself.",Stable,"Within the European region, this species can be found from Norway throughout northern Europe to the Karelian region of European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are above the thresholds to be considered in a threatened category for Europe. The EOO for the EU 27 is greater than the threshold for the threatened category and the AOO is 2,300 km2.

Outside Europe, it can be found across Russia to eastern Siberia (Speight 2018), and in North America from Alaska south to California (Young et al. 2016).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions needed or in place for this species. Research is needed on its population size, trends and potential threats as well as on its life history and ecology. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is required.

It is assessed as Least Concern in Finland (Hyvänen et al. 2019) and Norway (Gammelmo et al. 2015), and has not yet been evaluated in Sweden.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172486,149172483,Platycheirus albimanus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread species, found in a broad range of habitats. It is considered to have a stable population in Europe and the EU 27, and is not considered to have any current threats. Its extent of occurrence and area of occupancy are far above the thresholds to be considered for a threatened category. It is therefore assessed as Least Concern in Europe and in the EU 27. The ecology of the adults and larvae is well understood, but monitoring would be beneficial.","This species can be found at the edges of woodland and scrub, as well as in hedgerows and gardens. The larvae feed on aphids and were described by Dixon (1960); the adult flight period is between April and October, depending on latitude. The adults have been found feeding on the flowers of more than 130 plant species (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020, De Buck 1990).",This species is not currently believed to be experiencing any threats.,"This species is found in relatively high numbers, and has a stable population across its range in Europe and the EU27 (Ball and Morris 2013, Speight 2018, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019).",Stable,"This is a widespread and common species across much of Europe, ranging from the United Kingdom across to Hungary and from Scandinavia to the Mediterranean (Röder 1990, Maibach 1993, Torp 1994, Nielsen 1999, Jensen 2001, Bartsch et al. 2009, Tóth 2011, Ball and Morris 2013, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019). It is also found in European Russia, but the specific localities are unknown (Mutin and Barkalov 1999).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.

Outside Europe, it is found across Russia through Siberia to the Pacific coast, the Philippines, Alaska, western Canada and the United States (Mutin and Barkalov 1999, Young et al. 2016, Speight 2018, Skevington and Locke 2019).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are currently needed for this species. Monitoring is needed in order to follow its  population trend, but this species is fairly well understood.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172497,149172494,Platycheirus angustatus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This wetland species is widely distributed across Europe and is considered to have a stable population across both Europe and the EU 27. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far beyond the thresholds to be considered for the threatened categories in both Europe and the EU 27. Therefore, this species is considered Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27. Monitoring is needed in order to judge any habitat loss that may occur due to climate change and how this may affect on the population size.","The preferred habitat of this species is wetlands, fens, rich fens and marshes and humid, unimproved grasslands subject to seasonal flooding. Adults fly among dense, tall vegetation of fenland in May to September. Males hover within two metres of the ground, over paths and open areas (Speight 2018). The adults are known to visit the flowers of Cyperaceae, Aegopodium, Leontodon, Lycopus europaeus, Polygonum cuspidatum, Ranunculus, Rubus fruticosus (Speight 2020), Poaceae (e.g. Poa trivialis, Alopecurus pratensis) and Juncaceae (e.g. Juncus effusus) (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). The aphidophagous larva was described and figured by Rotheray (1988), collected from aphids on Heracleum.","There is currently no direct threats observed to be affecting this species, but its wetland habitats may be threatened by drought caused by climate change and the drainage of habitat for agricultural water management.",This is a widespread species with stable population in Europe and the EU27 according to the available data from observation and sampling records (Speight 2020).,Stable,"This species is widely distributed with many records across Europe, from Fennoscandia south to northern Spain, and from Ireland eastwards through northern and central Europe (Sweden, Norway [Torp 1994, Bartsch et al. 2009], Germany [Doczkal et al. 2001], Serbia [Nedeljković et al. 2009], Hungary [Tóth 2011], Great Britain [Ball and Morris 2013], Bulgaria [Tóth 2014], Belgium and the Netherlands [Reemer et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019], Lithuanian, Estonia and Latvia [Kuznetsov 1993, Pakalniškis 2006, Karpa 2008]) into European parts of Russia (Speight 2018, 2020).
The map is based on the GBIF (2019) dataset and records in the literature (see references). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far beyond the thresholds to be considered for the threatened categories in both Europe and the EU 27.

Outside Europe, it is found through Siberia from the Urals to the Russian Far East and the Pacific coast (Sakhalin Is.) (Mutin and Barkalov 1999), and in North America from Alaska to Quebec and south to Washington (Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are known to exist for this species, but its wetland habitats need to be maintained and preserved. Monitoring and research are needed in order to understand better its threats, distribution and population and habitat trends. In the national red list of Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020), Denmark (Danish Biodiversity Information Facility (DanBIF) 2020) and Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) this species is Least Concern (LC).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172508,149172506,Platycheirus aurolateralis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The complete range of this species is uncertain at present due to previous taxonomic uncertainties, but it is considered to be fairly widespread across Europe and the EU 27, and is likely to be found in more localities than currently known. The population is stable, it occurs in a wide range of habitat types that are not currently vulnerable and it has been assessed as Least Concern in several Northern countries. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are greater than the threshold required to be assessed in a threatened category, and so this species has been assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU 27.","The preferred habitats of this species are deciduous forests and scrubs up to alpine Corylus and Alnus viridis vegetation, and also mature urban parks and gardens (Speight et al. 2004, Speight 2018). The adults visit a wide range of flowers including Anthriscus, Cardamine asarifolia (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020), Euphorbia amygdaloides, Myosotis, Saxifraga x urbium, Thesium bavaricum and Viburnum (Speight 2018). The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous.",There are no known threats to this species.,"This population of this species is not yet fully understood due to taxonomic confusion with other species in the scutatus group (Speight 2020). Nevertheless, its population seems to be stable in Europe and the EU 27. In the Netherlands, there has been no definitive decline in its population but it is considered very rare.",Stable,"The complete range of this species is uncertain at present due to confusion with other members of the Platycheirus scutatus group, but it is believed to have a larger distribution than is currently understood. It is currently known to occur from Ireland eastwards through Germany to the Alps and on to Slovenia and Turkey, and northwards to Scandinavia (Stubbs and Falk 2002, Speight et al. 2004, Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019, Speight 2020). Its presence in Czechia is uncertain, but according to its occurrence in Germany it may occur near to the border.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are greater than the threshold required to be assessed in a threatened category. The AOO for Europe is 72,814 km2, and for the EU27 67,482 km², while the EOO is 4,069,145 km2 and 3,236,009 km2, respectively.

Outside Europe, it is known to exist in non-European parts of Russia (Prokhorov 2018).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no known specific conservation actions being taken for this species. Research on its taxonomy, habitats and larval development are required, as well as monitoring of its population and habitat. It has been assessed as Least Concern in the Red Lists of Sweden, Norway and Finland (SLU Artdatabanken 2020, The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020, Hyvärinen et al. 2019). In contrast, in Denmark it has been assessed as Data Deficient (Danish Biodiversity Information Facility (DanBIF) 2020). In the Netherlands it is very rare and considered threatened (Reemer et al. 2009).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172520,149172517,Platycheirus brunnifrons,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Despite low local subpopulation sizes and fragmentation in high-mountain areas, there is no indication that this species is in decline in Europe or the EU 27, but this is not yet fully understood. Speight (2016) does not consider it to be threatened in Europe, and it is not listed as threatened in any national Red Lists of Europe, although considered Data Deficient in some. It has a fairly large extent of occurrence (EOO), and its area of occupancy (AOO) is large enough not to be considered in any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27. Therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern (LC) in both Europe and the EU 27. Because this is a high-mountain species, there is a risk that climate change might change this situation in the future, and monitoring of its habitat and population is crucial.","This species is found in humid mountain Fagus forest, mixed Fagus/Picea/Abies forest, subalpine Picea-forest, Larix/ Pinus cembra forest and alpine acidic grassland and humid Pinus sylvestris forest (Speight 2018). In Spain it is also found in Quercus pyreanica forest (Nielsen 2004, 2014). Adults have been recorded visiting the flowers of Calluna vulgaris (Hellqvist 2009) and Tripleurospermum hookeri (Barkalov 2012). The larvae are not yet known, but are presumably aphidophagous.","This species is a typical high mountain species, inhabiting a wide range of montane habitats including acidophilous alpine grassland and diverse high-mountain forests. These habitats are currently assessed  mostly as Least Concern or Near Threatened according to the European Red List of Habitats (Janssen et al. 2017), but they are at risk from intensification of agriculture and modification of high-mountain acidophilous grassland, as well as intensive forestry practices. Climate change may also reduce the suitable area and quality of the habitat, but more research is needed on threats.","This species is fairly scarce, possibly because of its unknown larval microhabitat requirements. While present in a number of high mountain areas in a wide range of countries, its local subpopulations are fragmented and seem to be quite small, because the number of collected specimens has always low, with mostly individual hoverflies being found. The population trend is currently unknown for Europe and the EU 27, but there is no suggestion that the population is in decline based on the frequency of records over the years.",Unknown,"This species is found in northern Europe at low altitudes, and in southern and central European in high mountain ranges from around 800 to 2,600 m above sea level.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.

Outside Europe it can be found eastwards to Yakutia and Magadan, and is also found in the Nearctic (Young et al. 2016, Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are currently no specific conservation actions known for this species. The intensive management of high-mountain and alpine grasslands as well as intensive forestry at high altitudes should be avoided. It was considered Data Deficient for Sweden in 2020 (ArtDatenbanken 2020) and also in Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019). Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends and threats as well as on its life history and ecology. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is necessary.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172530,149172528,Platycheirus clausseni,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-01-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment Endangered (EN)

This montane species is found in the high Alps of Austria, Switzerland, Italy and France. It occurs in high-mountain grassland habitats which are threatened by the building of infrastructure for ski tourism, climate change, and unsustainable grazing regimes. Hence the extent and quality of the habitat is projected to be in decline. The population is severely fragmented and the subpopulations are considered to to be very small, with just a few specimens being found at any one time. Finally, the area of occupancy (AOO) is 24 km2 for the European region and 16 km2 for the EU27. Therefore, this species categorized as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) in Europe and in the EU 27.","The preferred habitats of this species are open grounds in calcareous and non-calcareous unimproved subalpine grasslands (Nielsen 2004, Speight 2018). The adults can be found in flight in July and August,  close to streams with tall-herb vegetation (Adenostyles), and are known to visit flowers of Silene rupestris (Nielsen 2004). Currently the larval and puparial stages are unknown (Speight 2018).","The subalpine grassland communities in which this species lives are relatively stable, but very sensitive to disturbance. When the vegetative cover is altered or there is significant loss of soil, it is almost impossible to restore the original habitat. The main threats to these grassland communities are inappropriate grazing practices, the construction of infrastructure for tourism (mainly ski resorts), perturbations caused by changes in land use and climate change. They tolerate moderate grazing, but overgrazing and overstocking can destroy the vegetation and lead to soil erosion (García-González 2008). New ski resorts are one of the main threats to alpine calcareous grasslands, because the construction and maintenance of ski trails lead to the deterioration of alpine habitat (García-González 2008).","The European population of this species is considered to be very small, with just a few specimens being found at any one time, and severely fragmented because restricted to medium elevation mountains (1,800 - 2,100 m asl), and hence distributed at great distances which are highly unlikely to interact with one another. Its population trend is unknown. According to the GBIF database, the last record was in 2014 in France. Earlier data are from the 20th century (1949-1989).",Unknown,"This species is found in the high Alps of Austria (with known records from 1,800 to 2,100 m above sea level), Switzerland, Italy (Nielsen 2004) and France (Speight et al. 2018). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is 29,994 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) is 24 km2, and the AOO for the EU27 is 16 km2 and the EOO 29,982 km2.

Outside Europe it is found in the Russian Altai mountains (Barkalov and Nielsen 2008) and North America (Young et al. 2016).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are known to be currently taking place for this species. New ski resorts should not be built in areas where the alpine vegetation has high conservation value (García-González 2008). Additionally, sustainable management of grazing practices can help to conserve its habitat. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends, and research on its distribution, population size and biology (particularly of the larvae) is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172543,149172539,Platycheirus clypeatus,Least Concern,,2021,2019-09-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a very widely distributed species in Europe, occurring in a variety of wetland and anthropogenic aquatic habitats. It is well recorded and surveyed, and the data indicate that the population is stable. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the threshold to be considered in the threatened categories. The species is therefore assessed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and the EU 27. Some of its wetland habitats can experience pressure from climate change and agricultural activities such as drainage. These should be closely monitored along with the population trends.","This species exists in open habitats of wetlands, humid grasslands and fens, margins of ponds, streams, bogs and lakes. It is to some extent synanthropic, also occurring along wet ditches and canals. The adults fly among the dense tall vegetation of fens, fen meadows and waterside habitats, and can be seen in flight between April and September. The adults have been recorded visiting the flowers of plants such as Cyperaceae, Poaceae (e.g. Holcus mollis), Juncus, white Apiaceae, Caltha, Luzula, Plantago, Polygonum cuspidatum, Ranunculus, Salix, Senecio jacobaea and Vaccinium myrtillus (Speight 2018): it has been observed on the flowers of more than 65 plant species altogether, with a preference for anemophiles (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020).

The larva feeds on aphids, as other species in this genus, and was described by Dixon (1960). According to Dziock (2002), development from egg-laying to hatching of the adult under laboratory conditions can take as little as 5-6 weeks.","There have been no direct threats to the species observed, but their wetland habitats experience more general threats such as the impacts of drought caused by climate change, and modern land-use practices such as drainage for agriculture, peat harvesting and soil acidification.","This species is well recorded and surveyed, and the data indicate that the population is stable (GBIF 2019).",Stable,"This is a very widely distributed species in Europe. Its range expands from Iceland and the Faroe Islands (Jensen 2001), across Fennoscandia (Torp 1994, Nielsen 1999, Bartsch et al. 2009), south to Iberia and the Mediterranean, and from Ireland (Ball and Morris 2013) eastwards through most of western and central Europe including Germany (Röder 1990), Belgium (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), Hungary (Tóth 2011) and European parts of Russia.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the threshold to be considered in the threatened categories. Exact locality information is not available for its full distribution and so full countries have been represented on the map in these cases. Where exact locality information is available, it has been used.

Outside Europe it can be found in Turkey and from the Urals to central Siberia (Mutin and Barkalov 1999, Speight 2018). It is also present in North America from Alaska to Ontario and south to California (Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions taking place for this species, but its wetland habitats might be vulnerable, and therefore monitoring of the habitat and the population is useful in order to ensure action is taken if the population begins to decline.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172553,149172551,Platycheirus discimanus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-01-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has a wide distributional range across northern, western and central Europe, but is infrequently recorded. It is uncertain whether this indicates rarity or whether it is because it is difficult to survey. Its preferred environments are forests, deciduous forests and scrubs, and scrub-invaded grasslands. Changes to woodland management practices that affect the stand types or ride-side vegetation are the most likely changes that will affect it. In Europe, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 4,142,381 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) around 23,523 km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 3,060,958 km2 and AOO around 19,883 km2.

Further research is needed on its life history and the population trend.
","

The preferred environments of the species are forests, deciduous forests and scrubs, and scrub-invaded grasslands (Speight 2018). According to Speight (2018), adults occur in the immediate vicinity of scrubs, where they fly at about two metres or higher, among the branches of shrubs such as Prunus spinosa. They descend to rest on low-growing plants, for example, tussocks of dead Molinia. They also visit flowers of taller shrubs and small trees (Speight 2018), and flowers of, for example, Prunus spinosa, SalixSalix glabra, Salix caprea, Taraxacum spp. and Potentilla spp. (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020).

The flight period is mid-April to around the end of May.  It is not easy to find because it is active very early in the season, and often flies higher than recorders can reach (a very long net handle being necessary at many localities, according to Ball and Morris 2000).

The developmental stages have been described only very briefly (Fielding 1953); a puparium was found under larch bark (Schremmer 1959).

","

According to Ball and Morris (2014), changes to woodland management practices that affect stand types or ride-side vegetation are the most likely changes that will affect this species. In conifer plantations, removal of stands of larch may be a possible factor in the long-term survival of particular subpopulations.

","

The range of this species is large in Europe, but it has not been recorded anywhere frequently. In the United Kingdom, there has been a decline in its population over the past 25 years, and in particular there have been no records from southern England south of a line between the Thames and the Severn since 1990 (Ball and Morris 2014). However, this is not an easy species to find because it is active very early in the season, and often flies higher than recorders can reach. It is therefore unclear whether the apparent decline in the south is genuine or related to recorder behaviour, especially as recent work in Northamptonshire has revealed a number of new localities.  In Ireland there are just a few records (Speight 2008), and in the Netherlands it is rare and shows a decreasing tendency in its population since 1950 (Reemer et al. 2009). 

The current population trend in Europe and the EU 27 is unknown.

",Unknown,"

The distributional range of this species includes southern Scandinavia (Nielsen 1972, Torp 1994, Bartsch et al. 2009) south to Belgium (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019) and France (the Alps), and Ireland (Speight 2008) eastwards through central Europe (Röder 1990, Stubbs and Falk 2002, Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011, Tóth 2011, Ball and Morris 2014, Speight et al. 2018) into Russia.

In Europe, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 4,142,381 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) around 23,523 km2. In the EU 27, the EOO is estimated to be around 3,060,958 km2 and the AOO around 19,883 km2.

Outside Europe, it is known throughout Russia to Siberia and the Russian Far East to the Pacific coast (Sakhalin), as well as Afghanistan, Mongolia and China (Mutin and Barkalov 1999). It is also known from North America (Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"

According to Ball and Morris (2014), subpopulations can be supported by conserving existing ride structures, or by providing suitable areas for this species to transition between grasslands and high forest, including sunny open flower-rich glades. Ride-side shrub clearance should avoid removal or cutting of all flowering sallows on any one ride management cycle. Where stands of larch are felled, replanting with the same species and maintaining a small number of mature trees might be considered (Ball and Morris 2014).

In Sweden, Finland and Norway it has been assessed as Least Concern (LC), and in Denmark as Near Threatened. It has the status 'Nationally Scarce' in the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014), and in the Netherlands is assessed as Vulnerable (Reemer et al. 2009). Further research is needed on its life history and population trend.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172567,149172563,Platycheirus hyperboreus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

Within the European region, this species can be found within Fennoscandia and northern Europe into European Russia. It is relatively frequent in its specific bog, mire and wet grassland habitats, but these habitats are declining in extent and quality due to water abstraction activities and climate change. Therefore the population is considered to be declining in Europe and the EU 27. In Europe, it has an extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) that are far greater than the thresholds required to be considered in any threatened category and so the species is assessed as Least Concern (LC).

In the EU 27  the AOO is between 2,000 km2 and 8,000 km2, the habitat is declining in extent and quality which is also resulting in a projected decline in AOO. The population is not considered to be severely fragmented and the number of locations is greater than 10. Taking the precautionary figure for the AOO, this species is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) in the EU 27.

Restoration of the hydrology of disturbed bog systems and wetlands is needed, and possibly reduction of grazing intensity in some wetlands. Research is required on its population size and trends, as well as on its biology. Monitoring is required on its population and habitat trends.","This species can be found in wetlands, marsh (Vockeroth 1992) and palsa mire (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013), and it also uses a series of moist or wet mostly oligotrophic to mesotrophic nordic grasslands. The adults have been recorded visiting flowers of Apiaceae (Speight 2018), Ranunculus (Nielsen 1998), Carex (Van Steenis 1998b) and Parnassia palustris (Van Steenis and Zuidhoff 2013). The larva was described by Fluke (1929), who collected larvae feeding on alfalfa and pea aphids (Ohio and Wisconsin, USA), but this connection is unlikely for Europe (Speight 2020).","As this species is linked to northern wetlands and bogs, the main threats are changes in the hydrology of these habitats due to water abstraction and climate change. All of its main bog and wetland habitats are declining, with losses of both extent and quality. In the European Red List of Habitats, Palsa mire is assessed as Critically Endangered, small-sedge base-rich fen and calcareous spring mire are assessed as Endangered and arctic-alpine base-rich fen is assessed as Vulnerable. It also uses a series of moist or wet mostly oligotrophic to mesotrophic grasslands, which are all assessed as Endangered (Janssen et al. 2017).","This is a relatively frequent species in its specific bog, mire and wet grassland habitats in northern Europe. There are very few historical records, so it is difficult to compare to recent records to establish the population trend in Europe and the EU 27. However a certain population loss can be suspected in the past and still ongoing from the loss of its habitats both in extent and quality. Precise population information is not available, but there have been more than 150 records since 1980 in Scandinavia with no indication that it has been lost from any localities.",Decreasing,"This species can be found within Fennoscandia and northern Europe into European Russia.

The European extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. In the EU 27, the AOO is estimated to be between 2,000 km2 and 8,000 km2 based on the known localities and available habitat.

Outside Europe, it occurs throughout Russia to the Far East, and in Greenland, Alaska, Canada, and in the United States of  America down to Colorado and California (Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation actions currently known for this species. Currently it is not listed as threatened in the national Red Lists of any of the European countries. It is assessed as Least Concern in Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), Norway (Gammelmo et al. 2015) and Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020). However, all of its main bog and wetland habitats are declining with losses of both extent and quality. Restoration of the hydrology in disturbed bog systems and wetlands is needed, possibly together with reduction of grazing intensity in some wetlands. Research is required on its population size and trends, as well as on its biology. Monitoring is required on its population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172579,149172576,Platycheirus immarginatus,Near Threatened,"B2ab(i,ii,iii)",2021,2019-09-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

The distribution of this species is uncertain due to taxonomic confusion with other species, but it has a northern and central European distribution. It occurs in wetlands such as freshwater coastal marshes, fens and flush systems in blanket bogs, cut-over raised bogs and taiga wetlands. Its habitat is threatened by the intensification of management of coastal wetlands, eutrophication of coastal wetlands and further canalisation of tidal river fringes. Its population is somewhat fragmented in northern Europe, and the trend is unknown in Europe and the EU 27. In Europe the area of occupancy (AOO) is considered to be only 1,352 km2 , while in the EU 27 it is only 592 km2. In both regions, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is very large.

The AOO is <2,000 km2 in both Europe and the EU 27, but the population is severely fragmented only outside the United Kingdom. A decline in the AOO and EOO, and deterioration in the quality of its habitat are expected through the intensification of coastal wetlands. Thus this species is assessed as Near Threatened (NT) in Europe and the EU 27.","This species occurs in wetlands and in the Atlantic parts of Europe, particularly associated with freshwater coastal marshes, fens and flush systems in blanket bogs, cut-over raised bogs and taiga wetlands (Speight 2018). The flight period of the adults is between end of May and the beginning of September (Speight 2018) and they have been recorded visiting flowers of Hottonia palustris (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). The larval and pupal stages are unknown.","The habitat of this species is threatened by the intensification of management of coastal wetlands, eutrophication of coastal wetlands and further canalisation of tidal river fringes. Some subpopulations may be vulnerable to realignment of flood defences in response to sea level rise, but it must be anticipated that in the long run this is a species that may benefit from those realignments that create greater areas of brackish fringes (Ball and Morris 2014).","The population of this species is somewhat fragmented in northern Europe. In the UK, it is considered to have a stable population. Overall, the population trend is unknown in Europe and the EU 27.",Unknown,"The distribution of this species is uncertain due to taxonomic confusion with other species such as P. perpallidus and P. ramsarensis, and so data on its European distribution should be treated with caution (Speight 2008). However, in Britain it is present from the Scottish Highlands to the south coast of England (Ball and Morris 2014), and from various coastal sites in Ireland and Northern Ireland. It is also known to occur in Sweden, Denmark  (Torp 1994, Nielsen 1999, Bartsch et al. 2009), Belgium and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter 2019), Germany (Röder 1990, Ssymank et al. 2011), Hungary (Tóth 2011) and the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005). Its presence is uncertain in France and central Europe (including Austria, Czechia and Hungary) and needs confirmation.

In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) based on accepted available locality records is 1,352 km2 and in the EU 27, the AOO is 592 km2. In both regions, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is very large.

Outside Europe, it occurs in the Caucasus, Russian Far East (Mutin and Barkalov 1999), Japan and in North America from Alaska south to southern California (Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"This species would benefit from the maintenance of water levels within existing marsh grazing regimes, and hence this is a priority, together with maintenance of saline transitions of marsh ditches. Protection of the fringes of Carex along tidal rivers to avoid their loss while upgrading tidal defences is also important. Research on its biology, phenology, distribution range and monitoring of the population  trends is required.

It has been assessed as Vulnerable in the national Red List of Ireland (National Biodiversity Data Centre 2013), as Endangered in Czechia (Farkac et al. 2005) although the identity of records here require confirmation, as Least Concern in Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020) and Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), Near Threatened (NT) in Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020), and Endangered in Denmark (Danish Biodiversity Information Facility (DanBIF) 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172589,149172587,Platycheirus islandicus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-01-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

This European endemic species lives in the subarctic Betula forests of Iceland, where it is considered common and widespread (Bartsch et al. 2009), although the population trend is unknown. It may be impacted by climate change in the future, and the habitat, boreal forest, has declined in the past and is probably still is declining (J. van Steenis pers. comm. 2020). In Europe its area of occupancy (AOO) is only 1,336 km2, and its extent of occurrence (EOO) is 56,180 km2. Due to the small area of occupancy (AOO) of 1,336 km2, the projected decline in habitat and moreover due to the severely fragmented population, this species is assessed as Vulnerable (VU B2ab(iii)) in the Global and European assessment. The species is not present in the EU 27 and so it is assessed as Not Applicable (NA) in the EU 27 assessment.

Research on its biology (in particular the larval biology), ecology and habitat is needed. Monitoring of its population and habitat is also recommended.","This species can be found in the subarctic Betula forests of Iceland (Speight 2018, 2020). The adults are in flight between June and August (Bartsch et al. 2009). The larval and pupal stages are unknown.","No threats are known to affect this species at the moment. However, the quality and extent of its habitat has undergone a long period of historical decline and it is projected to be impacted by climate change in the future.","The population trend of this species is unknown, but it is considered severely fragmented due to fragmented habitat. However, according to Bartsch et al. (2009) it is apparently common and widespread within suitable habitat in Iceland.",Unknown,"This species is only known to occur in Iceland, where it is considered widespread (Bartsch et al. 2009). The map is based on the vegetation map of Iceland and J. van Steenis pers. comm. (2020). It is not present in the EU 27, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 1,336 km2, the extent of occurrence (EOO) 56,180 km2.",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions specifically known for this species, but Iceland has been restoring its native woodlands for the last century and this is ongoing, particularly aimed at combatting the impacts of climate change (Aradóttir et al. 2011). Research on its biology (in particular the larval biology), ecology and habitat is needed. Monitoring of its population and habitat is also recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149172600,149172597,Platycheirus lundbecki,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

In Europe, this species is only found in Norway, Finland and Sweden. There are very few data to indicate definitively its population size and trend in Europe and the EU 27. However, the population is considered to be severely fragmented, and its habitat is declining, and so the population is suspected to be declining. Commercial forestry activities and climate change may be driving habitat decline. Whilst the extent of occurrence (EOO) is large in both regions, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be only 116 km2 in Europe and 40 km² in the EU 27. Therefore, this species is assessed as Endangered (EN B2ab(iii)) in Europe and the EU 27.
","This forest species occurs in open ground within forests and beside lakes in taiga and in arctic-alpine tundra (Nielsen 2014). The adults are in flight between the end of June and the beginning of August, when they have been recorded visiting the flowers of Salix and Carex (Bartsch et al. 2009). The larval and pupal stages are unknown, but the larvae are presumed to be aphidophagous.","This species is threatened by habitat loss and fragmentation as a result of the impacts of climate change, but commercial forestry and logging activities are likely to be a more immediate threat because there is not very much natural forest left in Finland as it is highly managed.","There are very few data on this species to indicate definitively its population size and trend in Europe and the EU 27. However, its population is considered to be severely fragmented, and its habitat is declining, and so the population is suspected to be declining. There are no data from European Russia. The last record from Norway was in 2010 according to GBIF (2013), and the last from Finland in 2008.",Decreasing,"This species can be found in northern Europe, including Norway, Sweden and Finland (Bartsch et al. 2009, Nielsen 2014). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 5,987,033 km2 , and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 116 km2 in Europe. In the EU 27, the EOO is 39,432 km2, and the AOO is 40 km2.

Outside Europe, it is known from northern Siberia, Greenland, Alaska and northern Canada (Mutin and Barkalov 1999, Young et al. 2016, Skevington et al. 2019, Speight 2020).",This species is not known to be traded or exploited.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions currently known for this species, but more sustainable management of its forest habitat would be beneficial. Further research on conservation actions, distribution, population size, biology and life history (particularly of the developmental stages) would be beneficial. Population and habitat monitoring are required.

It was assessed as Least Concern in the national Red Lists of Finland (LC) (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) and Norway (The Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (NBIC) 2020). It has not yet been evaluated in the national Red List of Sweden (SLU Artdatabanken 2020).",Nearctic|Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172610,149172608,Platycheirus magadanensis,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

This species has very few records from a small area in northern Finland, with the last-known records in 2017, and from Sweden close to the Finnish border. It therefore has a small extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU27. However, its ecology and habitats are very poorly known, and it may be under-recorded from its habitat, sedge-beds alongside temporary water pools in the subalpine Betula forest zone. It is therefore currently assessed as Data Deficient (DD) and needs further research. Specifically, research on its population size, distribution and trends as well as on its life history and ecology is needed. Monitoring of its habitat and population is also needed. If it really is restricted to the specified habitat, it is likely to be assessed as threatened in the near future.","This species is found in Carex beds in shallow seasonal ponds in boreal marsh in the subalpine Betula forest zone (Haarto in Speight 2018). There are no data on the flowers visited by adults, nor on the larval biology and ecology, but the larvae are presumed to be aphidophagous.",Climate change may be a threat to this Nordic species.,"There are only a few records of this species known, and no data on its population size or trend.",Unknown,"Within Europe, this species occurs in northern Finland (Haarto and Kerppola 2007) and northern Sweden (Global Biodiversity Information Facility 2020) (Bartsch et al. 2009). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 101,930 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 1,210 km2 in Europe and the EU27.

Outside Europe, it is known from Magadan in the Russian Far East (LAJI.FI 2021).",The species is not utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"This species is assessed as Least Concern on both the Swedish (SLU ArtDatabanken 2021) and Finnish (LAJI.FI 2021) National Red Lists. There are no conservation actions currently being undertaken. Research on its population size, distribution and trends as well as on its life history and ecology is needed. Monitoring of its habitat and population is also needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172621,149172618,Platycheirus marokkanus,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-03-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This species has small subpopulations in southern Spain and Portugal, and it is considered very rare. In the majority of the known localities, only single specimens have been collected, and subpopulations are geographically isolated, making many of them probably not viable and the European/EU 27 population severely fragmented. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 730 km2 in Europe and the EU 27. The extent and quality of the habitat is suspected to be in continuing decline, and therefore this species is assessed as Vulnerable (VU B2ab(iii)) in both Europe and the EU 27.","There is only a little specific information on the habitats for this species. In Portugal, its habitat is open places in the central Portuguese highlands of the Serra da Estrela along streams, small rivers and pine forests (van Eck pers. comm. 2020). The suspected habitats are garrigue, open forest and Mediterranean shrublands, although more research is needed to confirm this. The adults are known to visit flowers of Saxifraga spp. (Van Eck 2016) and Thapsia villosa (van Steenis et al. 2020). Even in  Morocco, where the species is more widespread, there is little information on its habitats. The larvae are unknown, but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","The suspected potential habitats of this species (garrigue, open forest, Mediterranean shrublands) are generally threatened in the Mediterranean, and are declining in extent and quality. The threats are poorly understood, it can be assumed that pesticides and intensive agriculture may have negative impacts, as they have on its sister species Platycheirus albimanus.","According to Kassebeer (1998), this species is widespread in Morocco in the absence of the closely related Platycheirus albimanus. Within Europe it is obviously rare, with only single observations and probably very small subpopulations in southern Spain and Portugal, where it coexists with the more widespread similar species Platycheirus albimanus. There are no detailed data on its population status and trend available, but the stronghold of the known European subpopulations seems to be in the central Portuguese highlands (Van Eck et al. 2020). Specimens have generally been collected as part of generalised hoverfly surveys. In the majority of the known localities, only single specimens have been collected, and subpopulations are geographically isolated, making many of them probably not viable; this makes the European/EU 27 population severely fragmented.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species occurs in mainland Portugal (Kassebeer 1998, Van Eck 2016) and mainland Spain (van Steenis et al. 2020). In Portugal most of the records are from higher altitudes in the Serra de Estrela, from 900 -1910 metres above sea level, and exceptionally at lower altitudes (100 m asl) where it co-occurs with the more common Platycheirus albimanus (A. van Eck pers. comm. 2020). The distribution map is based on point data from all six known European localities (van Eck 2016, van Steenis et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is large, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 730 km2 in Europe and the EU 27.

It also occurs outside Europe in Morocco (where it is probably more widespread than in Europe).",This species is not traded or utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures existing for this species. Reduction of the use of pesticides would likely benefit, but further research is needed to define specific actions that would help. As the European population is suspected to be under threat, research to confirm its habitat (specifically the microhabitats) and all the threats is of utmost importance. Research is needed on its population size, distribution, trends and threats as well as on its life history and ecology. Monitoring of its population and habitat trends is necessary.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172632,149172629,Sphaerophoria interrupta,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This species is considered to be decreasing in Europe by Speight (2020), while in northern Europe it is still assessed as Least Concern; a decline in populations with loss of many local subpopulations is evident especially in western and central Europe, leading to a declining area of occupancy (AOO). A large part of its main habitats (mainly extensive grasslands and heathlands) are threatened and in decline both in extent and quality, especially in the lowlands. Based on the situation of its major habitats, and regional population declines in western and central Europe, the species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe, but Near Threatened in the EU 27, with a suspected population reduction of 20% based on loss of suitable grassland and heathland habitats.","This species inhabits a wide range of different open habitats, from coastal dunes to montane heathlands, various kinds of unimproved grasslands up to alpine grasslands, as well as clearings and openings within forests and forest margins (Speight 2018, 2020). Adults have been recorded visiting the flowers of a wide variety of different plants, such as Apiaceae (Achillea millefolium, Meum athamanticum, Pastinaca sativa), Asteraceae (Senecio jacobaea, Taraxacum officinale agg.), Dipsacaceae (Succisa pratensis), Rosaceae (Potentilla erecta), Ranunculaceae (Ranunculus repens, R. acris, R. bulbosus), Polygonaceae (Bistorta officinalis, Persicaria sp.) and Caryophyllaceae (Stellaria, Dianthus) (Speight 2018). De Buck (1990) lists 34 plant species visited, and 49 were recorded by Ssymank (A. Ssymank pers. comms. 2020). The larvae were described by Rotheray (1986, as menthastri) and are aphidophagous, living in aphid colonies of herbaceous plants, e.g. Cerastium fontanum (Stubbs 1996).","As this species mainly inhabits various extensively managed grassland types and heathlands, changes in grassland management, intensification with higher fertilizer input, airborne nitrogen input and pesticides (including seat-coatings mainly from adjacent arable fields, especially in wet grasslands) are among the main threats. For heathland habitats, in addition to nitrogen input, changes or intensification of grazing also plays an important role. Abandonment of extensive grassland or heathland management can also lead to loss of habitat via succession. Other threats of lesser importance include habitat loss (in both extent and quality) due to residential and commercial developments, changes in hydrology in wet grasslands, and in the case of dune grasslands tourism pressure and activities. More research is needed to assess how much this affects its populations in different regions of Europe. Other minor threats can be modifications in forestry management leading to less open habitats in forest areas. Moist and wet mesotrophic to eutrophic grasslands (E3.4b), grey dune grasslands of the Atlantic and Baltic coasts (B1.4a) are assessed as Endangered, and dry heath as Vulnerable in the European Red List of terrestrial habitats (Janssen et al. 2017 ). In higher mountain areas, alpine and subalpine grasslands and Nordic boreal grasslands are assessed as Least Concern. The subpopulations in openings of Fagus forest, and Picea and Abies forest at higher altitudes are also less threatened.","There is no detailed information available on the population size and trends of this species at the European level. At least in some countries its population is declining quickly, especially in western and central Europe. However it is still a widespread, moderately frequent species even with the loss of some of its local subpopulations. Locally in Germany (Wahnbachtal), there has been subpopulation declines of 75% over a 25-year period (1989-2014) (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020), and in the Netherlands 50% of the occupied grid squares (minimum loss of local subpopulations) have been lost since 1990 (Reemer et al. 2009). Overall, the population is considered to be decreasing in Europe and the EU 27.",Decreasing,"This is a widely distributed species, occurring from northern Fennoscandia to the Mediterranean, and eastwards into Russia, Caucasus, Siberia and the Russian Far East (Speight 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, but cannot be calculated accurately because some of its distribution is based on country checklists rather than exact locality data. While in some parts of its range the AOO is declining, the EOO has remained the same.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures known for this species, but it is present in several Natura 2000 sites with grassland habitats, which should continue to be protected and managed appropriately. It is considered to be decreasing in Europe by Speight (2020), and assessed as Critically Endangered in Belgium (Flanders: Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998); in the Netherlands there has been around a 50 % decline in occupied grid squares compared to before 1990 (Reemer et al. 2009). In Germany overall it is assessed as Least Concern (Ssymank et al. 2011), but local studies point at rapid regional declines, such as Berlin where it is assessed as Extinct (Saure 2018), in Wahnbachtal (North Rhine-Westphalia) where there has been a population decline of 75% (1989-2014) (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020) and in Saxony where it is considered Vulnerable (category ""3"") (Pellmann et al. 1996). In northern Europe, it is less threatened and still assessed as Least Concern in Denmark (2019), Finland (2019), Norway (2015) and Sweden (2010). Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its ecology and threats in different regions in Europe. The aggravation of its decline seems to be a recent development and needs to be monitored more in detail. Monitoring is required for both population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172642,149172640,Sphaerophoria laurae,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is found in northern Scandinavia and European high-mountain ranges (Alps, Pyrenees). It is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), and is not assessed as threatened on any national Red Lists. It has stable habitats in both northern Europe and the central European high-mountain ranges, and its population is considered stable with no major recognized threats. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27. Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially larvae), ecology (habitats and flower-visiting behaviour) and threats. Monitoring is required on its population and habitat trends.","The preferred habitats of this species are sparsely vegetated alpine calcareous and acidic alpine grasslands in the high-mountain ranges and montane arctic tundra in Scandinavia (Speight 2018). Adults have been recorded visiting flowers of Nigritella rubra, Potentilla and Ranunculus (Goeldlin and Verlinden in Speight 2018). The larvae are unknown but are presumed to be aphidophagous.","There are no major past and present threats to this species, but in the future climate change may be a potential threat both in northern Europe as well as in the high-mountain screes of central Europe with habitat alteration and possibly also loss. All major habitats of this species (coded E4.3b, F1.2, H2.1 and H2.4) have been assessed as Least Concern in the European Red List of terrestrial habitats (Janssen et al. 2017).","There is no detailed information available on the population size and trends of this species at the European and EU 27 level, but the trend overall is considered stable. It has a fragmented distribution with a more or less continuous northern boreal subpopulation, and fragmented subpopulations in central European high-mountain ranges, such as the Alps and Pyrenees. There are no available data on the genetic divergence of these subpopulations. Overall the population is assumed to be stable because its main habitats (tundra in northern Europe, and mainly screes and block fields in central European high-mountain ranges) are stable.",Stable,"Within the European region, this species is found in northern Scandinavia and European high-mountain ranges (Alps, Pyrenees).

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category for Europe and the EU 27, but these cannot be calculated accurately because the distribution is partially based on country checklists rather than exact locality data.

Outside Europe, it occurs in the Caucasus and Siberia (Altai) (Speight 2018).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures known for this species, but its habitats are well covered by the EU Habitats Directive, and subpopulations occur in several EU Natura 2000 sites. It is not considered threatened in Europe by Speight (2020), and is not listed as threatened in the Red List of any country. It is assessed as Least Concern in Denmark (Bygebjerg 2004), Finland (2019), Norway (2015) and Sweden (2010). Research is needed on its population size, trends and distribution, as well as on its life history (especially larvae), ecology (habitats and flower-visiting behaviour) and threats. Monitoring is required on its population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172655,149172651,Brachyopa vittata,Near Threatened,"B2b(iii)c(ii,iii)",2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

This is a widespread species, which is possibly extending its distribution range westwards into Europe. In Scandinavia, it is a rare and scattered species only found in singletons on many occasions, and hence is possibly at the edge of its northern distribution here, where it may show large fluctuations. In central Europe, Brachyopa vittata is a widespread and sometimes abundantly collected species. The habitat is heavily managed and will produce a constant amount of suitable larval habitat due to regular tree felling. In regional Fennoscandia Red Lists, this species has been included for Finland (Data Deficient), Norway (Endangered) and Sweden (Least Concern). These strongly contrasting assessments are based on very few recent records for each country, and thus it would make sense to rate this species as Vulnerable or even Endangered for these countries. At the same time, due to its wide distribution in Europe and possible range extension westwards, this species could be listed as Least Concern. However, it has a very narrow habitat preference, and the quality of the preferred habitats is declining. The species is possibly showing extreme fluctuations, and in Scandinavia and Germany most records are from before 2000. The total number of records is rather low, making an area of occupancy (AOO) of 3,000 km2. The EU27 has about 2/3 of the records, making a possible AOO of just above 2,000 km2. The species is thus categorised as Near Threatened in Europe and the EU27.

","

The adult habitat is old-growth pine forests or mixed swamp forests. Larvae are found in stumps and trunks of Abies spp., Picea spp. and Larix spp., in association with larvae of various Coleoptera and Diptera. Visited flowers include diverse Apiaceae and others such as Caltha palustris, Crataegus spp, Pimpinella majorPrunus spp., Salix spp., Sambucus spp., Sorbus aucuparia, Valeriana officinalis and Viburnum opulus. The adults are most often found on tree stumps and trunks of a wide range of coniferous trees (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","

The species habitat is heavily managed, which could be a threat but also produces a constant amount of suitable larval habitat due to regular tree felling. Agriculture could pose a threat to the larval and adult habitat due to the use of pesticides and eutrophication (van Steenis et al. 2020).

","This is a species dependent upon pine forests. It seems that it does not show strong population fluctuations in its central distributional range. On several occasions, many adult specimens could be found together flying around suitable larval trees (van Steenis et al. 2020), so the population trend is considered to be stable.",Stable,"This is a widespread species, found from northern Sweden south to the Pyrenees and northern Greece, and from the Netherlands east into European Russia and further to the Russian Far East (van Steenis et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are higher than the values for the application of a threatened category. The AOO is inferred to be approximately 3,000 km2 in Europe and around 2,000 km2 in the EU27. Although the larval habitat seem to be stable it is possible this species shows extreme fluctuations. In Scandinavia and also in Germany the number of records during each decade fluctuates strongly, possibly indicating extreme fluctuations.",The species is not traded or utilised.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place. Research and monitoring of its populations trends are needed, and raising awareness about this species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172679,149172676,Chrysogaster cemiteriorum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Europe regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Although the species shows a clear decline in the southern and western parts of the distribution (Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011, Ball and Morris 2014, Speight 2020, Speight et al. 2020, Henriksen and Hilmo 2015), the northern populations from Sweden eastwards seem to be stable. The area where the species shows a decline is rather large, but not large enough to justify the Near Threatened category. Considering the whole of Europe, the conservation status seems to be in better order, although we do not have much information to be sure about the trends over the whole range. In addition, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27 countries.","This species lives in wetlands, around fen and cutover valley bog (Speight 2020). It also occurs in herb-rich grasslands near small streams, forest edges close to running water, and moist deciduous forests (Reemer et al. 2009). It has also been recorded several times in dry habitats (dry grasslands, quarries, ruderal areas) (Barkemeyer 1994). It is also present in various wetland habitats and adjacent flower-rich forest edges (Bartsch et al. 2009), in marshes and brook valleys on base rich soils (chalk, loam) or with base rich seepage, sometimes in drier flower-rich habitats (such as calcareous grasslands) close by. The species often visits white umbels (Bot and Van de Meutter 2019).

The larval habitat is not known, but without doubt the larvae live in freshwater, presumably in small streams or ponds.","In the northern parts of Europe (Finland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Ireland) this species does not seem to be threatened, although climate change, change in forest management and intensification of agricultural use will have a negative impact. In Great Britain, the species shows a significant decline in most parts, except in the uplands (Ball et al. 2011). In France, Germany and Belgium, it is decreasing and is probably endangered (Speight 2020). In these countries, nitrogen deposition, alteration of water bodies and climate change will be the most important factors. In addition, pesticides (neonicotinoids and others) might also have an important negative effect in the southern parts of the distribution.",Not much is known about the population size of the species. The species can be quite abundant at healthy sites.
,Unknown,"This species occurs from southern Scandinavia, Scotland and Ireland, south to Spain, Italy and Greece (Belova et al. 2008, Borodin and Borodina 2014, Brădescu 1991, Burgio et al. 2015, De Groot and Govedić 2008, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Heimburg 2018, Karpa 2008, Mazánek 2006, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Nielsen 1999, Pakalniškis et al. 2006, Reemer et al. 2009, Röder 1990, Soszyński 1981, Speight 2008, Speight et al. 2018, Stanescu and Parvu 2005, Torp 1994; Tóth 2011, 2014, 2017; Vujić et al. 2020). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and in the EU27 are significantly greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

Its distribution spreads to the east to western Siberia and Central Asia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Belova et al. 2008, Borodin and Borodina 2014, Chursina and Ruchin 2018, Pestov 2007, Pestov and Dolgin 2006, Pestov et al. 2010). It also occurs in North Africa (Speight 2020).",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"There are no conservation plans in place. The most urgent conservation actions for the species are protection and restoration of nutrient-poor, species-rich meadows, forest edges and small natural waters with good water quality and natural watersides in the vicinity. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand the ecology of this species and its population trends better.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172692,149172689,Chrysogaster simplex,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-10-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

There is very little information available about this species. Most of the records are from within the European Union, but the only recent records are from Greece. Nothing is known about the current situation in Romania. There are only three records from Mordovia (Russia). In Europe, the distribution is considered to be severely fragmented. The habitat preferences are predicted based on the known distribution and ecology of closely related species and from records from the Asian part of Turkey (Reemer and Smit 2007). Based on this, the species prefers Mediterranean forests and forest edges with small streams, and the quality of this type of habitats is inferred to be in decline. The species is recorded from Asian Turkey, but there will not be significant immigration from here to Europe, and thus the rescue effect is unlikely. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 180 km2 in Europe and 168 km2 in the EU27. Based on this, the species is assessed to be Endangered (EN  B2ab(iii)) both in Europe and the EU27 countries.","There is no information about the habitat preferences from Europe, but in the Asian part of Turkey, the species is found in deciduous forest (mainly Platanus) with springs and small streams (Reemer and Smit 2007).

In Greece, it is recorded close to the town of Paleros near the Ionian Sea (Syrphidae database of A. Vujić). In Romania, it is recorded from the Danube delta up to the Central Romanian Plain and from more montane areas up to 850 metres. Thus the habitat seems to be Mediterranean forests and forest edges with small streams.","This species may be threatened by commercial management of Mediterranean forests. Infrastructure development, particularly on the Danube and other coastal areas, will have a negative impact, and loss of habitat for the larvae and adults by water abstraction for agricultural reasons can also have an effect. Climate change will also have a negative influence.","The records are scarce. The Greek and the Mordovian records are of few specimens (Chursina and Ruchin 2018, Vujić et al. 2020). The Romanian records do not give any numbers of specimens (Bradescu 1991). The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species has a southeastern distribution in Europe, where it is present in Romania and Greece. In Romania, it is recorded from a range of localities (Mt. Ceahlău, Plateau De Suceava, Plaine Roumaine, Dobrogea du Sud, the Danube Delta, up to 850 metres) (Bradescu 1991). In Greece, there are two records close to each other on the coastland of the Ionian Sea (Vujić et al. 2020). In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1,139,713 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 180 km2, while in the EU27 the EOO is 426,581 km2 and the AOO is 168 km2.

The species is also recorded from Mordovia in the Russian Federation by Chursina and Ruchin (2018) (three records), but it is not on the Russian species list of Barkalov and Mutin (2018).

Outside of Europe, it is also present in the Asian part of Turkey (Reemer and Smit 2007).",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),There are no conservation actions in place. The most urgent conservation actions are protection and restoration of both nutrient-poor species-rich meadows and small and larger natural waters with good water quality and natural watersides in the vicinity of the meadows. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand better its ecology and population trends.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 149172702,149172700,Chrysogaster virescens,Near Threatened,"B2b(ii,iii)",2021,2020-08-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT) 
EU27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

The species only occurs in Great Britain and in the EU27 countries. Although it does not seem to be threatened in parts of its distribution, it is listed as Threatened in the Czech Republic and Flanders (Belgium), and Vulnerable in Baden-Württemberg (Meerhaeghe and Grootaert 1998, Mazánek and Barták 2004, Ssymank et al. 2011). The species has an area of occupancy (AOO) above 2,000 km2 (3,200 km2 in Europe, and 2,380 km2 in the EU27 countries) and its distribution is not severely fragmented. However, if the current declining trends of both the AOO and the habitat quality continue, the species might classify as Vulnerable in the near future.

Over most of its range, it will suffer from a drier environment due to groundwater abstraction and climate change. The peat habitat is clearly negatively affected by the ongoing threats. In addition, forest habitat will be also negatively affected by drier circumstances, nitrogen deposition and forest management. Furthermore, pesticide contamination may affect larvae and adults negatively.

Taking all this into account, the species is assessed as Near Threatened both in Europe and in the EU27 countries.
","

The habitats of this species are forests and wetlands, occurring in fen carrs and in small open areas with flushes and streams in deciduous forests (Speight 2020). In Belgium and the Netherlands it is found in two different habitats: in marshy seepage areas in large forests and in peat bogs and moors (Bot and van de Meutter 2019).


The adults settle on foliage of bushes and trees. They visit flowers of white umbellifers, Filipendula, Ilex, Iris, Ranunculus, Rubus, Rosa rugosa, Prunus avium and Sarothamnus scoparius (Bartsch et al. 2009, Ball et al. 2011, Speight 2020). The females fly low above Sphagnum vegetation (Bot and van de Meutter 2019). The larval ecology is not known, but the larvae probably live in shallow water close to the shore, where they probably feed by filter-feeding among decaying plants, just like the larvae of Chrysogaster solstitialis.

","As with all species dependent on wet habitats, the drainage of moors, peat bogs and humid forests for domestic, agricultural or other uses poses a major threat to Chrysogaster virescens. Furthermore, the deterioration of forests and forest edges, pollution by nutrient loads or pesticides, and climate change (causing drought and habitat alteration) are also threatening the species.
","This species can be found repeatedly over time in some locations, and in satisfactory numbers, but nevertheless there is no information about the overall population size or trend.",Unknown,"This species occurs from southern Sweden, Scotland and Ireland south to Spain, Southern France, Hungary and Romania. One locality is also known in southern Finland. The record from Greece by Speight et al. (2020) is not given by Vujić et al. (2020), so in this assessment Chrysogaster virescens is considered as not present in Greece. No records have been found from Switzerland, and it is not listed in Maibach et al. (1992), nor in the recent Swiss Syrphidae checklist on the internet. Therefore, despite Speight (2020), the species is not considered to be present in Switzerland. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 4,808,316 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 3,200 km2. In the EU27, the EOO is 4,495,507 km2 and the AOO is 2,380 km2.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

There are no conservation plans in place. The most urgent conservation actions are protection and restoration of nutrient-poor species-rich wet to dry meadows and small natural waters with good water quality and natural watersides in the vicinity. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand better its ecology and population trends. The species has several common names (Röder 1990, Torp 1994, Haarto and Kerppola 2007, Bartsch et al. 2009, Tóth 2017, Bot and van de Meutter 2019), which could help to raise public awareness and taking conservation actions on a national level.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 149172717,149172712,Criorhina asilica,Least Concern,,2021,2021-02-22 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)


Criorhina asilica is a widespread European endemic which lives in old deciduous forest with over-mature trees with well-developed shrub and herb-layers. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in both Europe and in the EU27 are greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category. The species has become more widespread in the Netherlands after 1990 (Reemer et al. 2009). The population trend was found to be stable in Germany, the Netherlands and Great Britain. Besides local forest management issues and deforestation, there are no immediate threats known to the habitat of this species. Therefore, the current Red List status of Criorhina asilica is considered to be Least Concern, which is also true for the EU27 countries.


","

This species lives in old, mesophilous and humid deciduous forests (mostly Fagus or Querus/Carpinus/Ulmus and sometimes Fraxinus forests) with over-mature trees and a well-developed shrub and herb-layer on sandy or more nutrient-rich soils (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020). It is also found in ancient fenland sites with Salix spp. and Alnus spp. (Stubbs and Falk 2002), and in Fennoscandinavia in Betula and Populus tremula forests (Bartsch et al. 2009).


The adults are mainly arboreal but are often encountered on flowering shrubs and, less frequently, on flowering herbs. The males patrol around flowering shrubs and zigzag quickly through the vegetation. Sometimes they are found in groups on and around tree trunks that are suitable for egg deposition (Reemer et al. 2009, Speight 2020).


The larvae develop in decaying wood of deciduous trees, such as tree humus in a trunk cavity of Fagus sylvestrus (Schuhmacher 1968), and pupae in or near rot holes of Betula spp. and Populus tremula (Bartsch et al. 2009, Rotheray and Stuke 1998). 


The visited flowers are shrubs including Berberis vulgaris, Cornus sanguineaCrataegus spp., Euonymus europaeus, Frangula alnus, Ligustrum vulgare, Lonicera xylosteum, Rhamnus catharticus, Ribes spp., Rubus idaeus, Sorbus aucuparia, and herbs including Apiaceae, Allium ursinum, Cardamine spp. and Hieracium spp.


The flight period is from mid-April until June and at higher altitudes or more northern latitudes also to late July (Bartsch et al. 2009, Bot and Van de Meutter, 2019, Speight 2020, Stubs and Falk, 2002). There is one generation per year.


","

Possible threats are deforestation and forest management where old trees and fallen tree trunks are removed, or original forest types like oak forests are replaced by stands of other, mostly fast-growing tree species which are not suitable for larval development.




","

In general, this species is encountered in small numbers, rarely more than 10 specimens at a time. In the Netherlands, the population trend has been stable since 1950 (Reemer et al. 2009). In Germany, the population trend has also been stable in both the short and long-term (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Great Britain, the population trend was found to be stable during the past four decades (S.G. Ball pers. comm. 2021). The overall population trend is also considered to be stable.

",Stable,"

This is a European endemic with a widespread distribution. It occurs from Great Britain (but is not present in Scotland except for one record near Edinburgh) and France, east to European Russia (northwestern, central and eastern European Russia), Ukraine (western and central parts) and Romania, and from central Fennoscandinavia (with a few records in northern Norway) south to the French Pyrenees (no recent records in Spain) and central Italy. It is also present on the Balkan peninsula and south to northern Greece (Pindos mountains) and southwest Bulgaria (Langhoffer 1918, Glumac 1968, Vujić and Milankov 1990, 1999, Bartsch et al. 2009, Tóth 2014, Nielsen and Gammelmo 2017, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Speight et al. 2018, Speight et al. 2020, Vujić et al. 2020, A.V. Barkalov pers. comm. 2020, D. Birtele pers. comm. 2020, G.V. Popov pers. comm. 2020, SLU Artdatabanken, Hoverfly Recording Scheme, Laji.fi).


The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of this species both in Europe and in the EU27 are estimated to be greater than the thresholds for the application of any threatened category.

",There is no information on the use or trade of Criorhina asilica.,Terrestrial,There is no available information on conservation measures specific to this species. Protection of important sites and areas and controlling unsustainable forestry practices would benefit this species. Monitoring and research on population and habitat trend are also needed.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 151663293,149163763,Eristalis tenax,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widely distributed and abundant species across the European and EU27 regions. It is found in a wide variety of habitats and is highly tolerant of human environments. As a larva it lives in aquatic habitats, and as an adult it feeds on a wide range of flowers. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values in Europe and the EU27 are far above the thresholds for any threatened category, and therefore it is categorized as Least Concern in the EU27 and Europe. This species would benefit from monitoring and research of its population size, trends and threats. It would also be beneficial to educate and communicate about its importance as a pollinator.","

This species is highly tolerant of human environments and could even be described as ubiquitous. The developmental stages have been described many times; for example, by Pérez-Bañón et al. (2013), and compared with other species by Campoy et al. (2017). The larvae are found in a wide range of aquatic habitats with a high quantity of decaying organic matter. It is very common in human-managed environments. It hibernates as an adult, and can be seen flying around between February and November, visiting a huge range of flowers. It is also highly migratory. The adults can be found in a wide variety of natural, semi-natural and anthropogenic landscapes, close to larval habitats including grasslands. All of this information has been summarised and updated from Ball and Morris (2000), Speight (2008 and 2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).

","There are not many threats known to be currently affecting this species. Nevertheless, the indiscriminate use of plant protection products in agricultural and livestock management also contaminates water resources and may cause some negative effect to its population.","This species is cosmopolitan, highly migratory and widespread across Europe and the EU27. It is considered common in many countries, e.g. Ireland (Speight 2008), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), UK (Ball and Morris 2000), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017) and Greece (Vujić et al. 2020). It is one of the most common and most widely distributed species of all hoverflies. The population trend is stable in Europe and the EU27.",Stable,"Eristalis tenax is the most widely distributed hoverfly species in the world. In general, it is present in all the biogeographical regions except the Antarctic, and throughout Europe except in the far north. It occasionally reaches the offshore islands of northern Europe, such as the Faroes. It is highly migratory (Francuski et al 2013), found in many human-managed landscapes. All this information has been obtained and updated from Speight (2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. 

This species has been recorded from the following European countries: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Croatia (Jelicić et al. 2010), Cyprus (van Steenis 2019), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Faroe Islands (Jensen 2001), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Including Crete) (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (Including Sardinia and Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Madeira (Borges et al. 2008), Malta (Ssymank and Ebejer 2009), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Including Columbretes, Balearic and Canary Islands) (Pérez-Bañón et al. 2003; Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Turkey (Tóth 2013), Ukraine (Popov pers. com. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

","This species is a good pollinator, and is artificially reared and used in the pollination of commercial crops (Jarlan et al. 1997, Francuski et al. 2014, Campoy et al. 2019).",Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

As this species is widespread and does not appear to be experiencing any significant threats, there are no conservation actions being currently implemented or recommended.  However, it would benefit from monitoring of and research into its population size, trends and threats. It would also be beneficial to educate and communicate about its importance as a pollinator (Jarlan et al. 1997). It has been categorized as Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 151991189,149168828,Copestylum melleum,Not Applicable,,2021,2020-07-15 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,European regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

This is an introduced species to Europe and is therefore assessed as Not Applicable in both Europe and the EU27.,"The developmental stages of this species are not well known, but larvae seem to feed in decaying plant tissue. It occurs in grasslands and open areas with pine trees. Adults normally visit composites and umbellifer plants. The flight period of the adults in the Canary islands is from March to May and in October. Many adults have been collected since 1994. This information is summarized from Romig and Hauser (2004) and Burt and Mengual (2018).",This is an invasive species and its threats in Europe are therefore not studied.,

The number and geographical spread of records since 1994 suggests that this species is a firmly established in the Canary archipelago (Romig and Hauser 2004). It was cited from Las Palmas island in 2017 (Burt and Mengual 2018).

,Stable,"This is a neotropical species native in Mexico that in the European region has been introduced to the Canary Islands (Tenerife, La Palma and La Gomera) (Romig and Hauser 2004, Burt and Mengual 2018).",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281334,149166094,Eristalinus aeneus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-23 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Eristalinus aeneus is a widespread species, found across Europe and beyond. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) exceed the thresholds for a threatened Category in both Europe and the EU 27. It is a good pollinator and is artificially reared for commercial crop pollination. It is a common species, and the overall population trend is considered to be stable. Although impacted locally by loss of freshwater habitats, it is found in human-dominated environments and is therefore considered to be fairly adaptable. It is therefore assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.

Further research and monitoring of the population trend is recommended, as well as education on the role the hoverfly can play as a pollinator.","

This species is found close to bodies of water such as ponds, marshes, streams or rivers. It has also been found in coastal lagoons with high salinity and large amounts of decaying seaweed, especially in the northern regions. In southern Europe, it is highly anthropophilic, being present in areas with intense human activities such as sewage ponds, farms and irrigation ditches. The larval stage has been described several times (Dixon 1960, Hartley 1961, Pérez-Bañón et al. 2003, Zalat and Mahmout 2009), as well as the puparium (Pérez-Bañón et al. 2003) and is aquatic and saprophagous. Adults fly very fast and low, usually close to the water margin, although they can be found in a variety of inland environments. They can be found feeding on yellow composites, white umbellifers, AsterBerteroa incana, Cistus, Origanum, Salix repens, Senecio and Taraxacum. The flight period ranges between April and September, and October in southern Europe. It overwinters as an adult. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020). It has an important role as a pollination agent in both natural and agricultural ecosystems (Latif et al. 2019).

","The principle threats to this species are related to the loss of natural habitats, especially freshwater habitats, by modifications to hydrological systems or the intensification of agriculture, amongst others (Janssen et al. 2017). However, due to its synanthropic character, this species is capable of surviving and reproducing in environments with high human activities.","This is a widespread species, common where present and with a synanthropic character. All these characteristics indicate a stable population trend for both Europe and the EU 27. In the United Kingdom, it is widely distributed around the coast (Ball and Morris 2000). In Ireland, it is also frequent along coastal areas (Speight 2008). In Greece, it is considered widespread and common on the mainland and islands (Vujić et al. 2020). In Spain, it is considered widespread on the mainland and the Balearic islands (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017).",Stable,"

The general range in Europe of this species is from southern Sweden, south to North Africa and the Canary Islands, and from Ireland eastwards through central and southern Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the threshold for a threatened category in both Europe and the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Estonia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been cited in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Cyprus (van Steenis et al. 2019), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (including Crete) (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Madeira (Borges et al. 2008), Malta (Ssymank and Ebejer 2009), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (including the Balearic and Canary islands) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Turkey (Tóth 2013), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside European borders it is present from Russia and China to the Pacific, and south into the Oriental region; it also occurs on Mauritius. In North America, it is known from Minnesota and Ontario south to California and Texas, and also from Hawaii and Bermuda. It is present in Australia and the Gilbert and Ellice islands in Australasia too. In the Afrotropical regionit is found from the Sahel south to Kenya and Tanzania (Speight 2020).

","This species is a good pollinator, and is artificially reared and used in the pollination of commercial crops (Latif et al. 2019, Campoy et al. 2019).",Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The synanthropic character of this species means that conservation actions are not currently required to ensure its survival. Monitoring and research of its population size and trends is recommended, as well as education about its importance as a pollinator (Latif et al. 2019). The hoverfly is categorized as Endangered in Belgium (RBINS 2020) and Least Concern in Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). In some countries outside Europe, it is considered to be an invasive species (Thompson 2008). ",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281542,149163611,Parhelophilus frutetorum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has a wide distribution across Europe; its population is considered overall to be stable, and it has been categorised as Least Concern in a number of national Red Lists. It can be found in wetland and riparian forests, and more specifically around pools in alluvial softwood forests. Whilst its habitat may be affected by threats such as agricultural pollution, these effects are not considered currently to be impacting the extinction risk of this species. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category, in either Europe or the EU27. The species is therefore categorised as Least Concern in both the EU27 and Europe. Increased monitoring and research on the distribution and population of this species is recommended.","

This species can be found in wetland and riparian forests, and more specifically pools in alluvial softwood forests. The saprophagous larvae were described and figured by Hartley (1961) from specimens collected from organic mud in a woodland pond. Adults can normally be seen in open areas in wet woodlands, standing on water and low-growing plants and shrubs. They visit flowers such as Cornus, Crataegus, Filipendula, Frangula, Ranunculus, Rubus, Sambucus and Viburnum, and also yellow composites and white umbellifers. The flight period of the adults is between the end of May and July. All this information has been extracted and updated from Ball and Morris (2000), Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).

","The aquatic habitat of this species can be threatened by agricultural pollution (nitrates, pesticides and herbicides), drought (which is exacerbated by climate change) and unsustainable commercial forestry and water management practices (Janssen et al. 2017).",This species is widespread across Europe. It is locally abundant in south-east England (Ball and Morris 2000) and common in the Netherlands where it has been increasing since 1950 (Reemer et al. 2009). It is considered to be common in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Greece it is recorded infrequently and only in northern areas (Vujić et al. 2020). In Spain it has scarcely been recorded (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017). Its population is considered to be stable in EU27 and Europe.,Stable,"

The general range of this species is from southern Sweden south to the Mediterranean, and eastwards through central Europe and parts of southern Europe into Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category, in either Europe or the EU27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Germany) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been included in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Including Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European part of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (de Groot and Govedič 2008), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-Garcia 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside Europe, it can be found in the Caucasus and as far as eastern Siberia (Speight 2020).",This species not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions should be focused on protection of the habitat by avoiding drainage, preventing drought and halting the pollution of wetlands. Monitoring and research on the population trend, distribution and ecology is recommended, as well as education and raising awareness about this species. It has been categorized as Endangered in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005), Vulnerable in Belgium (INBO 2020) and Finland (FinBIF  2020) and Least Concern in Denmark (DanBIF 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281546,149163622,Parhelophilus crococoronatus,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic species is only known from mainland Portugal and southern France, and the population trend is currently unknown due to the low number of records. It can be found in a variety of freshwater habitats, some of which are considered threatened. Its area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 40 km2, and there is a continuing decline in the quality of the habitat due to urbanisation, pollution and drought. It is considered to occur in between five and ten locations, taking pressures on water, land abstraction for urbanisation and construction of recreational areas as the main threats. It is therefore categorized as Endangered in Europe and the EU27. Key habitats and sites for this species would benefit from conservation and protection, particularly coastal freshwater areas, to prevent the impacts of anthropogenic pressures. Research is needed into its biology, ecology and distribution, and monitoring of its population is required.","This species can be found in open areas close to a variety of freshwater bodies, such as bogs, marshes, freshwater lakes and freshwater pools that have Phragmites grasses. It can also be found in brackish lagoons and estuarine areas. The larval stage is not yet fully understood, but the larvae should be saprophagous and live in aquatic environments, as is the case with other species of the genus. The adult flight period ranges between April and June. All this information has been summarised from Speight (2020).","This species is scarce and its threats are not yet fully understood. However, anthropogenic pressures should be considered a major risk, and the impact of the resulting increases in recreational activities, urbanisation and pollution (eutrophication caused by agricultural and urban wastes) are of particular concern. In addition, climate change causing drought could threaten this species. There is a decline in the quality of freshwater bodies, its main habitat. The brackish freshwater habitat where this species can be found is categorized as Endangered (C5.4- Inland saline and brackish helophyte beds) and as Near Threatened (C1.5: Permanent inland saline and brackish waterbody) in the European Red List of Habitats (Janssen et al. 2017).","In Portugal, this species has been found in four localities. Three males were collected in 2016 at one locality, and one female in 2007 at another (van Eck 2016); in 1999 one male was found at a third locality and in 1985 a female was found in a fourth (Reemer 2000). It is very localized in France (Speight et al. 2018), found at only one locality where it was originally recorded in 1953 (male) and then rediscovered in 2015 (one male and one female), including a photographic record. The population trend is currently unknown.",Unknown,"This European endemic species is only known from mainland Portugal and southern France. Is is confirmed from four localities in Portugal (van Eck 2016, Reemer 2000) and one in France (Fos-sur-Mer, Bouches-du-Rhône department). It may occur in more localities that have not been surveyed, or where specimens may have been misidentified or are yet to be identified. It is therefore possible that this species occurs at more sites than is currently known, but if this is the case, the number of additional sites would be very limited, based on the specificity of its habitat. The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 40 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) 170,308 km2.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"This species is very localised in France (Speight et al. 2018). Very little information is known about the threats, so conservation actions are not clear. Key habitats and sites for this species would benefit from conservation and protection, particularly coastal freshwater areas, to prevent the impacts of anthropogenic pressures. Research is needed into its biology, ecology and distribution, and monitoring of its population is required.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 152281550,149163632,Parhelophilus consimilis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is present in northern, central and eastern Europe. Its population is stable and widespread in some parts and rare in other parts of its European and EU27 range. In the UK its distribution increased with more efficient surveys, which indicates it might be underestimated in other countries too. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category, in either Europe or the EU27.  Thus this species is categorized as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27. Research on its biology and population trends is recommended.","

This species is present in wetlands, normally in the transition habitat between bogs and fens. In Ireland it has been found associated with ditches installed for drainage of bogs that are used for peat extraction. The larval and pupal stages of this species are not yet well understood, but the larvae are likely to be long-tailed, aquatic and saprophagous like the other species in the genus. The adults visit white umbellifers and flowers such as Bidens, Menyanthes, Potentilla and Ranunculus. The flight period of the adults is between June and August. All this information has been summarized and updated from Ball and Morris (2014) and Speight (2008, 2020).","The main threats to this species result from reductions in the quality and extent of its habitat. In this case, drainage of its freshwater habitats and reduction in habitat quality are the main problems. It does not occur in eutrophicated waters and can be expected to disappear when small water-bodies become enriched with fertiliser residues. Nutrient enrichment in naturally nutrient-poor fens due to agricultural activity may also be an issue. Variation in the temperature ranges and hydrological patterns in the habitat due to climate change could be a feasible threat too. This information has been extracted from Speight (2008) and Ball and Morris (2014).","

This species is not considered to be very abundant in central and western Europe. However, in Ireland it is quite widespread (Speight 2008) and in the UK more abundant than before due to more efficient surveying, which indicates that it may be more widespread than previously thought (Ball and Morris 2000, 2014). In northern countries such as Sweden and Finland it is also widespread and quite common, but in the Netherlands and Germany it is considered to be rare (Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011). The population is considered stable in the EU27 and the pan-European part of its range.

",Stable,"

This species can be found from Scandinavia southwards to Belgium and north-east France, and from Ireland eastwards through Britain, Denmark, Poland and northern Europe into European Russia. It does not seem to have been recorded from the Alps, other than in Switzerland (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Germany) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been included in the following country checklists: Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and UK (Ball and Morris 2014).

It was cited for Spain (Ibiza Island) (Riddiford and Ebejer 2006) but re-examination of the material showed that it was a misidentification of Parhelophilus versicolor (Speight 2020).

Outside Europe, it can be found across Russia to eastern Siberia.

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

Conservation of this species depends on the protection and correct management of its habitat,  focusing specifically on maintaining natural water levels and limiting the nitrification of watercourses.  Monitoring and research of the population size and trends is required, and increased education and communication about this species would be beneficial. Additionally research is required to understand its biological cycle, which will also improve knowledge of its larval and pupal habitat needs.

This species has been categorized as Endangered in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005), Vulnerable in Norway (NBIC 2020), Near Threatened in Denmark (DanBIF 2020) and the UK (Ball and Morris 2014) and Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281554,149163644,Myathropa usta,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This endemic European species is restricted to the Portuguese island of Madeira, where it lives in the laurel forests. Although protected, its habitat is very sensitive to invasive species, and so there is an overall decline in the habitat. Taking into account fire as the main threat, this species is found in fewer than five locations (probably four); its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 128 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) about 24 km2. Because this species is found only on Madeira, there is a real risk to its future. Therefore this species is assessed as Endangered under Criterion B in both Europe and the EU 27.","This species is restricted to the areas of humid laurel forest (Deschampsietum argentae association) and Erica forest (Vaccinio - Sibthorpietum association) in the centre and north of the island of Madeira. Adults have been recorded from March to September, but they are likely to be present the whole year round. The developmental stages have yet to be described, but they are likely to be similar to Myathropa florea, with aquatic larvae living in standing water, rot-holes and in water-filled hollows among tree roots. All this information has been summarized and updated from Smit et al. (2004) and Speight (2020).","This species is threatened by the degradation of its habitat. Its main habitat, Macaronesian laurophyllous woodland, is considered Vulnerable in the European Red List of Habitats (Janssen et al. 2017). There are invasive species (e.g. the Australian tree Pittosporum undulatum) that affect the laurel forest, and climate change may impact the habitat in the future. Fire is a threat to this species, defining its four locations. This particular habitat may also be under pressure as a result of tourism and outdoor recreational activities.","The population trend of this species is unknown. It seems to be found in small numbers. Twelve specimens were collected in 1935, one in 1949, twenty between 1992 and 1998, and seven more in 2002 (Smit et al 2004).",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it occurs on the island of Madeira (Smit et al. 2004). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 128 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) about 24 km2.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation of this species is currently linked to the conservation of laurisilva habitat, which is already under protection and is included in the Natural Park of Madeira. Research and monitoring is needed on the biology and population trend.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 152281558,149163655,Myathropa florea,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species can be found in a variety of deciduous forests, seasonally-flooded grasslands and suburban gardens due to its synanthropic character. It is a common species, widespread across Europe and the EU27 with a stable population, and is categorized as Least Concern in some countries such as Finland and Sweden. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU27. Therefore this species is categorized as Least Concern in both the EU27 and Europe. Increased taxonomic research is recommended to understand what is probably a species complex.","This species can be found in a variety of deciduous forests, seasonally flooded grasslands and and also suburban gardens due to its synanthropic character. The aquatic larva is saproxylic, living in rot-holes with standing water, water-filled hollows among tree-roots, tree stumps and at the junction between major branches and trunks. It can be found in such rot pockets from ground level to high up in the tree. It has been found in association with various tree species: Alnus, Betula, Castanea, Fagus, Populus and Quercus and also some conifers. The larvae can also develop in wet cow dung and compost heaps.

The developmental stages were described by Hartley (1961) and Rotheray (1994), and illustrated in colour by Rotheray (1994) and Dussaix (2013). The duration of the developmental stage is very variable, between a few months or a few years; it overwinters as a larva. Sánchez-Galván et al. (2014) show that successful development of larvae of Myathropa florea in a trunk cavity can be enhanced by the presence of the faeces of saproxylic Coleoptera.

Adults can be seen near woodland tracks, hedgerows or woodland streams. Their flight period is between May and October with peaks in June and August. The flowers that this species normally visits are white umbellifers, Castanea, Convolvulus, Crataegus, Chaerophyllum, Euonymus, Filipendula, Hedera, Rhododendron, Rubus, Sambucus, Solidago, Sorbus and Viburnum. All this information has been summarized and updated from Ball and Morris (2000), Speight (2008), Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).","This species is ubiquitous and its synanthropic character means it is relatively unthreatened. However, the saprophagous aquatic larvae are sensitive to variation in their habitat caused by drought, and significant variation in temperature promoted by climate change. Because the larva overwinters, Greig (1989) suggested an important cause of mortality is the drying-up of many rot-holes toward the end of the winter. The presence of faeces from saproxylic Coleoptera favours larval development and the fitness of the resulting adults (Sánchez-Galván et al. 2014), and so their absence could negatively affect the life cycle.","

This species is very widespread and common in its European and EU27 range, and can be often be seen in anthropogenic settings such as parks and gardens. Its population is considered stable in both Europe and the EU27.

",Stable,"

This species can be found from Scandinavia south to the Iberian Peninsula and the Mediterranean, and from Ireland eastwards through to Eastern Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Estonia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been recorded from the following countries: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Croatia (Jeličić et al. 2010), Cyprus (van Steenis 2019), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Including Corsica) (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Including Crete) (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (Including Sardinia and Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2000), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Malta (Ssymank and Ebejer 2009), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Including Balearic and Canary Islands) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside Europe it is found in North Africa and through Asia to the Pacific coast (Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The synanthropic behaviour of this species makes it unnecessary to implement conservation actions to ensure its survival. Some conservation measures can be focused on monitoring of and research into  population size and trends. Education and communication about the importance of this species as a pollinator is important (Klecka et al. 2018). It is a very attractive and conspicuous species, making it a good candidate for teaching people about the role of hoverflies as pollinators. It is probably a species complex, and detailed research is needed to understand its taxonomy, and then to determine which of the species of the complex is present in each of the countries where Myathropa florea has been observed. This species has been categorized as Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). It is considered very common in Germany (Dunk et al. 2003), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Ireland (Speight 2008), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017) and the UK (Ball and Morris 2000).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281562,149163667,Mesembrius peregrinus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This wetland species is widespread in central and southern countries in Europe and the EU27, and its population is considered stable. Its primary habitat, wetlands, are largely protected in Europe through the Ramsar convention. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, both in Europe and the EU 27. Therefore, it is categorised as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27. It would benefit from increased monitoring of its population and research on its life history.","This species can be found in wetlands and other freshwater habitats such as temporary pools in humid, seasonally-flooded, unimproved grasslands and slightly brackish waters. The developmental stages have not yet been described, and are not fully understood but the larva is known to be saprophagous. Normally the adults can be seen between May and September around flowers, including umbellifers, Euphorbia, Paliurus spina-christi etc. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).","The main potential threats to this species are loss of quality and quantity of habitat caused by drainage and water abstraction projects from wetlands, and changing rainfall patterns and drought due to climate change (Janssen et al. 2017). Additionally, intensified vegetation management to adapt natural areas to tourism reduces the existing vegetation or its features. Intensification of grazing by livestock around wetlands and the nutrient enrichment of oligotrophic water bodies which results in the modification of the original physicochemical properties of the environment could also impact this species.","This species is widespread in central and southern Europe, although in Greece it is considered rare (Vujić et al. 2020). In Ukraine it is widespread in the country, and although considered rare, it can sometimes be locally common (Popov pers. comm.  2020). Pétremand et al. (2020) considers it very rare and localized in Switzerland, and affirms that it is becoming rare in Europe due to the scarcity of its habitat. Nevertheless, in Hungary it is considered well distributed and common (Tóth 2011). In Slovakia there is a relatively stable and numerous population in the Ramsar site Parižské Močiare Nature Reserve (Králiková 2004). Grim (2006) cited this species in 1994, 1996 and 1997 in food samples obtained from cuckoo nestlings in reed warbler nests in Lednice and Lužice in the south-eastern part of the Czech Republic. Taking into account all this information, we consider that the general trend of the species up to now in EU27 and Europe is stable.",Stable,"

Within the European region, this species can be found from southern Germany to the Mediterranean, through parts of central Europe (Switzerland, Austria, Hungary) and southern Europe (Italy, Bulgaria, Romania) to Israel; and from the Ukraine to European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Ukraine and Czechia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been observed in the following countries: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Krym (Popov 1998), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Including Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015),  Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European part of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Switzerland (CSCF 2020) and Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020).

Outside Europe, it can be found from the Caucasus eastwards through southern parts of the Palaearctic to the Pacific and northern China (Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The conservation of this species depends on the protection and correct management of its habitat, the wetlands. Preservation of traditional hydrological and substrate conditions and the sustainable management of human activities (fishing, livestock grazing, hunting, etc.) is important, as well as reducing habitat contamination and invasive species. Most wetlands are now protected in European countries. Increased monitoring of and research into population size and trends is needed, as well research into the life cycle and developmental stages. Education and communication about this species would also be beneficial.

This species has been found in Grande Cariçaie nature reserve, according to Pétremand et al. (2020). This finding proves the utility of the construction of temporary flooded pools linked to the seasonal fluctuations of the river, to allow and promote the establishment and survival of wetland-related species such as M. peregrinus

This species is categorized as Critically Endangered in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005), very rare in Germany (Ssymank et al.  2011) and common in Hungary (Tóth 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281566,149163679,Helophilus trivittatus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is distributed widespread across Europe and the EU27, where it is very common and ubiquitous. Its preferred habitat is wetlands such as river margins, seasonally flooded humid grasslands and salt-marshes. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU 27. Therefore it is categorized as Least Concern in EU27 and Europe. Increased research and monitoring of this species is recommended.","

The preferred habitat of this species is a variety of wetlands: river margins, seasonally flooded humid grasslands and salt-marshes. This species is synanthropic in southern Europe, where it can be found in ditches in farmlands. The developmental stages have not yet been described, despite being reared in the laboratory by Dolezil (1972) and Bagachanova (1990). Larvae have been found in liquid mud with high organic content of animal dung and rotten vegetation; from laboratory rearing, it has been concluded that this species overwinters as a larva. Adults can be seen between May and October, with the main peak in August. They are frequently found in areas where their larvae cannot develop, probably because of its migratory character. Adults normally visit flowers such as Armeria, Aster, Cakile, Centaurea, Chrysanthemum, Cirsium, Crataegus, Epilobium, Eryngium, Eupatorium, Euphorbia, Ligustrum, Lychnis, Lythrum, Mentha, Menyanthes, Origanum, Plumbago, Polygonum, Potentilla, Ranunculus, Rubus, Salix and Sorbus. All this information has been extracted and updated from Speight (2020). 

","

The principal threats to this species are related to loss of natural habitats, especially freshwater habitats due to modification of hydrological systems, intensification of agriculture or droughts and significant temperature variations caused by climate change (Janssen et al. 2017). Due to its synanthropic behaviour, it is capable of surviving and reproducing in environments with a high human activity, although this has mainly been observed in southern Europe. 

",This species is regarded as highly migratory and can frequently be found in habitats which cannot support its larvae (Speight 2020). It is considered to be very common in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) and Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Ireland it has been spreading in recent decades (Speight 2008). In Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017) and Greece (Vujić et al. 2020) it is also widely recorded. The population is considered stable in Europe and the EU27.,Stable,"The general range of this species is from Scandinavia south to the Mediterranean, and from Ireland eastwards through Europe to European Russia, although eastern part of the range in Russia is not well known. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Ukraine and Belarus) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been recorded from the following countries: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina, 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Croatia (Jelicić et al. 2010), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Malta (Ssymank and Ebejer 2009), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Including Balearic islands) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Ukraine (Popov pers. com. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside Europe, it occurs in Asia through to the Pacific, including Iran and Afghanistan (Speight 2020).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The synanthropic behaviour of this species makes it currently unnecessary to implement conservation actions to ensure its survival. Increased monitoring and research of population size and trends, ecology and life history, as well as threats, is recommended. Education and communication about the species would also be beneficial. It has been categorized as Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281570,149163690,Helophilus pendulus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is synanthropic and occurs in wetlands, mainly standing waters, garden ponds, silage seepage and shallow depressions on bogs. It is widely distributed across Europe, where it is very common and ubiquitous. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU27. Therefore this species is categorized as Least Concern in the EU27 and Europe.","This species is synanthropic (i.e. it can thrive in human-managed environments) and has become ubiquitous in some regions of Europe. It is found in wetlands, mainly in standing waters, garden ponds, silage seepage and shallow depressions on bogs. The developmental stages were described and figured by Hartley (1961). Larvae develop in the water of ponds (including garden ponds), canals, wet ditches, open tree hollows and garden water butts, and in sub-aqueous decaying vegetable matter such as cow-dung, wet compost heaps and slurry pits. Adults can be seen flying in gardens and parks, visiting flowers of Compositae, Rosaceae, Umbelliferae and other yellow and white flowers. The flight period is between April and October, and even November in southern Europe. All of this information has been summarized and updated from Ball and Morris (2000) and Speight (2008 and 2020).
","The principal threats to this species are related to loss of natural habitats, especially freshwater habitats, by modifications to hydrological systems or the intensification of agriculture, amongst other factors (Janssen et al. 2017). Due to its synanthropic behaviour, it can survive and reproduce in environments with high levels of human activity.","

This species is common and ubiquitous in most of Europe and the EU27, except the Mediterranean area, where it is more localized in humid forest (Speight 2008). In the United Kingdom it is one of the most common hoverflies (Ball and Morris 2000), and in Germany it is considered very common too (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Greece and Spain, it is more common in northern areas. The population is thought to be stable in Europe and the EU27.

",Stable,"

This species can be found from Iceland and Fennoscandia south to the Iberian peninsula, and from Ireland eastwards through central and southern Europe to European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, in either Europe or the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Ukraine and Belarus) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been recorded in the following countries: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Croatia (Jelicić et al. 2010), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Faroe Islands (Jensen 2001), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (Burgio et al.  2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), North Macedonia (Krapč et al. 2001), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Including Andorra) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. com. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside Europe, it is found through central and southern Asia to the Pacific coast (Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

The synanthropic behaviour of this species makes it unnecessary to implement conservation actions to ensure its survival. Therefore, some conservation measures can be focused on monitoring of and research into population size and trends. Education and awareness-raising about the species would also be beneficial. It has been categorized as Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281574,149163701,Helophilus lapponicus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-08 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

Helophilus lapponicus has a Holarctic distribution in the northern latitudes of the globe, and in Europe it is present across northern countries. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) values in Europe are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. Although there may be some threats causing habitat loss locally, there are no major threats impacting the European population as a whole. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe.

However, in the EU 27 its distribution is limited to Sweden and Finland, with a large EOO of 900,000 km2, but with a restricted AOO of 250 km2. There is inferred to be a continuous decline in the habitat extent and quality, and one of the habitats in which it lives is categorized as Critically Endangered in the European Red List of Habitats (Palsa mires, D 3.1). The number of locations is between 15 and 20, taking hydrological variation as the main threat, and therefore it is categorised as Near Threatened for the EU 27.","

The habitats of this species are different types of wetlands: fens in boreal forest of Picea, Pinus and Betula, taiga wetlands and palsa mires in tundra. The developmental stages are not described. The larvae should be long-tailed, aquatic and saprophagous, as the rest of the species in the genus: they probably develop in pools and ditches (Nielsen 1997). Adults can be seen between June and September, visiting flowers such as Achillea, Allium sibiricum, Caltha, Matricaria, Ranunculus, Rubus and Sorbus. All this information has been summarized and updated from van Steenis and Zuidhoff (2013) and Speight (2020). According to Janssen et al. (2017), some of the habitats of this species (fens, bogs and mires in Nordic countries) have suffered strongly in recent years with long-term declines due to peat extraction, forestry, drainage and eutrophication, amongst other factors.

","The threats to this species are related to threats to the habitat in which it lives: wetlands, tundra, taiga and palsa mires. These threats can be derived from industrial activities such as the oil, gas and mining industries, together with unsustainable forestry and water management practices; grazing and mowing activities may also affect these habitats, but with less impact than at lower latitudes. The habitats can also be threatened by variation in temperature and water distribution due to climate change, specially palsa mires (D3.1) due to permafrost melting (Janssen et al. 2017).",There is no information regarding population trends of this species for either Europe or the EU 27.,Unknown,"

The general range of this species is from Fennoscandia and northern parts of European Russia and on through Siberia to the Pacific coast, Kyrgyzstan and Greenland. In North America it occurs from Alaska south to Oregon, Colorado and New York State (Speight 2020). The Extent of Occurrence (EOO) and Area of Occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category in Europe, but in the EU 27 its distribution is limited to Sweden and Finland, with an EOO of 900 km2 and AOO of 250 km2.

This species has been listed in the following checklists: Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (Nielsen and Svendsen 2014), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018) and Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions should be directly related to conservation of the tundra, taiga and subarctic open wetlands where this species lives. Monitoring and research on population trends is a suggested conservation tool, as well as education and awareness-raising. The species has been categorized as Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281578,149163711,Helophilus hybridus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread and common across northern and central Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. Although there may be some threats causing habitat loss locally, there are no major threats impacting the European population as a whole, and it is not considered to be threatened in several National Red Lists. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both EU 27 and Europe.","

The main habitats of this species are different kinds of wetlands: freshwater pools (temporary and permanent), seasonally flooded grasslands fens, poor fens, bogs, brooks in woodlands and dune slacks. It is not common in eutrophic waters, but in some countries such as Ireland, it can occur in abundance  in association with (and has been bred from) temporarily flooded Glyceria maxima beds in constructed wetlands, introduced to farmland for treatment of livestock waste (Speight 2008). The pre-imaginal stages were described and illustrated by Hartley (1961) with material sampled from decaying rhizomes of Typha in a pond. Adults can be seen flying around between May and September, visiting flowers of various genera such as Calluna, Cirsium, Convolvulus, Crataegus, Echium, Euphorbia, Limonium, Lycopus, Mentha, Menyanthes, Narthecium, Parnassia, Plantago, Pulicaria, Rosa, Rubus, Salix, Senecio, Sorbus, Succisa, Taraxacum and Valeriana. All this information has been extracted and updated from Ball and Morris (2000) and Speight (2008 and 2020).

","Apparently, eutrophication in wetlands negatively affects the pre-imaginal stages of this species. Therefore, the main threat may be loss of water quality in the habitat where it lives. The drainage and loss of quantity of water may be a feasible threat too, together with drought, mainly related to climate change (Janssen et al. 2017).","This species is considered to be common in the Netherlands, recording a slight increase in population since the 1950s (Reemer et al. 2009). In Germany it is a common species too (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Ireland and the United Kingdom, it is a very widespread species (Ball and Morris 2000, Speight 2008).",Stable,"

The general range of this species is from Fennoscandia south to northern France, and from Ireland eastwards through much of northern and central Europe (very localized in the Alps) into Russia and on through Siberia to the Pacific coast and Mongolia. In North America it occurs from Alaska to Nova Scotia and south to Utah (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category, in either Europe or the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Ukraine and Belarus) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been listed in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania, (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation should be focused on preservation of the wetlands where this species lives, preventing pollution and drought. Monitoring and research on its population trends is also suggested as a conservation tool, as well as education and awareness-raising about the species. This species has been categorized as Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281582,149163721,Helophilus groenlandicus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Helophilus groenlandicus has a Holarctic distribution in the northern latitudes of the globe. In Europe it is widespread across northern countries such as Sweden, Norway, Finland and European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. Although there may be some threats causing habitat loss locally, there are no major threats impacting the European population as a whole, and it is not considered to be threatened in several National Red Lists. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both EU 27 and Europe.","

The habitat of this species is low-lying wetlands and bogs in taiga and tundra. The pre-imaginal stages are not described, but the larvae should be long-tailed, aquatic and saprophagous, as the rest of the species in the genus; they occur in accumulations of decaying organic matter (Böcher et al. 2015). Adults can be seen flying around flowers of various genera such as Allium, Epilobium, Matricaria, Stellaria, Tripleurospermum and Valeriana, between June and September. All this information has been summarized and updated from Ball and Morris (2000, 2014) and Speight (2020). 

","The threats to this species are related to threats to the habitat in which it lives: wet grasslands, tundra and taiga. These threats can be derived from industrial activities such as the oil, gas and mining industries, together with unsustainable forestry practices; grazing and mowing activities may also affect these habitats, but with less impact than at lower latitudes. There are also threats from the variation of temperature and water distribution caused by climate change (Janssen et al. 2017).","

There is no information about the population trends of this species in the EU27 and Europe apart from the fact that in the UK there have been only a few records restricted to the northwestern part of Scotland, and so it may just be a vagrant (Ball and Morris 2000).

",Unknown,"

The general range of this species covers the northern parts of Europe and the world: north of the United Kingdom (mainly Scotland), the Baltics (Norway, Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania), northern parts of European Russia and northern Siberia through to the Pacific, Greenland, Alaska, Canada and mountainous parts of the USA south to Colorado and New Hampshire (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, in either Europe or the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Estonia and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been included in the following checklists: Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009) and the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000 and 2014).",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions should be directly related to conservation of the tundra, taiga and subarctic open wetlands where this species lives. Monitoring of its population trends and research on its true distribution is suggested as a conservation tool, as well as education and awareness-raising. The species has been categorized as Data Deficient in the UK (Ball and Morris 2014), Vulnerable in Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) and Least Concern in Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281586,149163732,Helophilus continuus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

Helophilus continuus is found in Europe in Ukraine, European parts of Russia, Romania, Belarus. The extent of occurrence (EOO) across Europe is high and the area of occupancy (AOO) is currently unknown, due to imprecise data, but it is considered larger than the thresholds to be considered in a threatened category, therefore, it is categorised as Least Concern. However, research is needed to determine the full distribution, population trends and biological information such as the developmental stages and habitat.

In the EU 27, the distribution is restricted to the Danube Delta in eastern Romania, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) in the EU Member States is about 3,500 km2. The data are inadequate to estimate the area of occupancy (AOO), however it is likely to be very much less than 2,000 km2. The presence of the species in Romania is considered to be the western edge of its distribution. There is considered to be a decline in the wetland habitat, but the number of locations cannot be determined because there is no information about the exact localities inside the area, nor about its specific threats. Therefore, taking into account the restricted area where it is found in EU27 and the declining quality of the wetland habitat in this region, the species has been assessed as Near Threatened (B1ab(iii)) in the EU 27.","

The habitat where this species has been found outside its European range is primarily in wetlands. According to Popov (1997), adults were caught in azonal and extrazonal areas near freshwater, such as deciduous forest, coastal meadows or steppes. There is no understanding of its habitat in Europe, and its biology is not yet understood. The developmental stages are not described but larvae should be aquatic and saprophagous, as other species of the genus (Naderloo and Pashaei Rad 2014). There is considered to be a decline in the quality of the habitat (the Danube delta) in the EU 27.

","This species has been found in a variety of different habitats, always close to freshwater bodies. Although the specific threats affecting this species are not well understood, the most common threats affecting this kind of habitat are changes in hydraulic conditions of water bodies (dams, for example), pollution (caused by agricultural and urban effluents), variation in hydrological patterns caused by climate change, land reclamation for human uses (urban, agricultural and industrial expansion), among others (Janssen et al. 2017). The loss of quality and quantity of this habitat would affect directly the stability of the  subpopulations of this species.","There is no information regarding the population trends of this species for either Europe or the EU27. However, according to Popov (1997), the species is rarely found on its western and eastern limit ranges but is considered common in southern Central Asia.",Unknown,"

Within the European region this species has been recorded from eastern Romania (Danube Delta: Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Ukraine, Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014) and the European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category for Europe. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Ukraine) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise area of occupancy (AOO) for this species. The EOO is around 3,500 kmfor the EU 27, but it is not yet possible to calculate the AOO due to lack of specific data about the localities in which it occurs.

This is clearly an eastern Palaearctic species, well distributed in eastern Asia, but in Europe it is only present in Belarus, Ukraine, Romania and Russia, suggesting that the population in Romania is the furthest western place where we can find it (Popov 1997).

The global range of this species extends to the Transcaucasus region and through Asiatic Russia to the Pacific (Speight 2020, Popov 1997).

",This species is not known to be used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"For the proper conservation of this species, serious research on it is necessary first. There are some questions regarding its distribution, together with details of its habitat and biology, amongst other issues, that need to be answered before preparing any conservation plan. It is not included in any National Red Lists.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281590,149163742,Helophilus bottnicus,Regionally Extinct,,2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Regionally Extinct (RE)
EU 27 regional assessment: Regionally Extinct (RE)

Helophilus bottnicus was most recently recorded in Europe in 1980 in Poland, but this may well have been a vagrant as it was not found in its normal habitat. It has not been recorded in Poland again, despite survey efforts. It was known to occur in Sweden and Finland in the past, but has not been seen since 1930 in Finland and 1843 in Sweden. Therefore, this species is assessed as Regionally Extinct (RE) in Europe and EU27.","This species is found in open ground areas, close to forest and freshwater bodies. It has been found in seasonally-flooded alluvial grassland and taiga forest, both in Europe and outside. The larval stage is undescribed, although it should be aquatic and saprophagous, with an elongated anal segment. The flight period is in June. The record in Poland from 1980s was on a moor, possibly at a high altitude. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).",This species is considered extinct in Europe. The threats that could have caused its extinction are unknown.,"There is one old record in Finland (from 1930) (Haarto and Kerppola 2014), no recent record in Poland (last recorded in 1980) (Bankowska 1980), and it is extinct in Sweden (last recorded in 1843). It was searched for in Finland in 2019, but none were found (Stahls pers. comm. 2020). The Polish record may well have been a vagrant as the specimen was not found in its normal habitat, but instead in moorland (but the specific locality was not recorded, and the identification may need confirmation). General hoverfly surveys have taken place in Poland since 1980, but it has never been recorded since.",Unknown,"This Holarctic species was present in Europe in Sweden, Finland and possibly Poland, but it seems to be extinct now in all of these countries. All the records are very old, and the National Red Lists of Finland and Sweden categorize it as Regionally Extinct.

Outside Europe, it has been recorded from North America, in Canada and the USA (Alaska) (Speight 2020), and in far eastern Siberia (Russian Federation), where it is very common, but not in European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018).",This species is not known to be used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions should be focused on researching the distribution and monitoring to confirm that it no longer exists in Europe. Some analysis of the habitat and ecology outside of Europe may help inform understanding of the species, and help with any conservation efforts to revive the subpopulation of this species in Europe. We also need research on the threats facing this species to understand better what caused its decline and disappearance in Europe.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281594,149163752,Helophilus affinis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-07 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Helophilus affinis is widespread in most of the countries of northern Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. Although there may be some threats causing habitat loss locally, there are no major threats impacting the European population as a whole, and it is not considered to be threatened in several National Red Lists. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both EU 27 and Europe.","

The habitat of this species is wetlands: small water bodies in grasslands, fens and bogs. The pre-imaginal stages are not described, but the larvae should be long-tailed, aquatic and saprophagous, as the rest of the species in the genus. Adults can be seen flying between May and September, visiting flowers such as Aruncus, Cirsium, Parnassia, Ranunculus, Rubus, Senecio, Succisa and Valeriana. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).

","The principal threats are related to loss of natural habitats, especially freshwater habitats, by modifications  of hydrological systems, intensification of agriculture, water pollution or drought due to climate change, among others (Janssen et al. 2017).","This species apparently is extending its range southwards in Europe (Speight 2020). According to Torp (1984) large migrations occurred from southern Sweden into Denmark. Since 1980 it has been recorded first from north Germany, then from the Netherlands. It has subsequently been recorded from southwest Germany and Switzerland (Ball and Morris 2000). In Germany it is considered to be rare (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Unknown,"

The general range of this species is from Scandinavia south to the Netherlands, including Denmark, Germany, Poland and Switzerland, and through from northern Europe into Siberia and on into Asia (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, in either Europe or the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Estonia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been cited in the following checklists: Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), the Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation should be focused on the preservation of the wetlands where the species lives, preventing pollution and droughts. More research on its distribution across Europe is necessary to clarify the migration patterns and its real distribution. Some conservation measures can be focused on the education and awareness about the species.  This species has been categorized as Least Concern in Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281598,149165744,Eristalis similis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This forest-dwelling, migratory species is considered to be widespread and common in some countries across Europe. Its population is thought to be stable, increasing in some areas. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered for any threatened category. This species is therefore categorized as Least Concern in both the EU27 and Europe. More monitoring and research is needed on its population trends and threats. Education and increased communication about the species would also be beneficial.","The preferred habitat for this species is a wide variety of forests: mature deciduous Fagus and Quercus forest, Mediterranean evergreen forest, Evergreen Oak and Cork Oak (Quercus ilex/Quercus suber) forest, and conifer forests of Abies, Picea and Pinus.  In southern Europe, adults have been found commonly in surrounding vegetation of crops (for example Diplotaxis erucoides and Almond trees).  The developmental stages were described by Pérez-Bañón et al. (2013) and the larvae used for the description were found in streams rich in organic matter (waste from an olive processing factory); pupation took place near the streams above the water level. Adults can be seen flying between March and August in most of the European territory except in the south, where their flight period starts in February and ends in November. They normally visit flowers such as Angelica, Buxus, Chaerophyllum, Convolvulus, Crataegus, Euonymus, Hypericum, Mentha, Parnassia, Ranunculus, Salix, Sambucus, Sorbus and Tilia. This species has migrant characteristics. All of this information has been extracted and updated from Speight (2020). 

","The threats to this species mainly affect its larval and adult habitat: forest and aquatic habitat within forests. Deforestation caused by unsustainable forestry practices is the most feasible threat in Northern and Central Europe, and fire is more likely in southern areas of Europe, together with modifications of the quantity of water in the streams by drainage and drought - this last could be increased by climate change (Janssen et al. 2017).","

There is some data suggesting that this species is increasing in some countries like Germany (Speight 2018) and Norway (Nielsen et al. 2012). It is a common species in Netherlands, but with a fluctuating population, possibly caused by the migrant character of the species (Reemer et al. 2009). In Greece is considered common and very widespread (Vujić et al. 2020), and it is very widespread in Spain too (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017). 

",Stable,"

This species can be found in Europe from Finland in the north to the Mediterranean basin in the south (including islands), and from Britain (central England) eastwards through central Europe to European Russia and Turkey-in-Europe (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered for any of the threatened categories. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Estonia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been noted in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Croatia (Jelicić et al. 2010), Cyprus (van Steenis 2019), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Including Crete) (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Including Balearic Islands and Gibraltar) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Ukraine (Popov Pers. Comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

The global range extends to Turkey, North Africa and Asia (Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions should be focused on preservation of the adult and larval habitats to avoid decline. More monitoring and research is needed on population trends and threats. Education and increased communication about the species would also be beneficial. This species can travel great distances and in countries such as Denmark, Finland, Sweden and Norway, it is only present for short periods of the year when it migrates to the South of these countries. This species is categorized as Least Concern in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281602,149165767,Eristalis rupium,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species can be found in freshwater habitats within woodlands. It has a particular need for clean freshwater in its larval stage, and so special attention should be paid to preventing pollution of this habitat. Increased research and monitoring is needed to improve our understanding of its population trend, particularly because it can be easily confused with other related species. However it is widespread across Europe and considered common in some countries. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category, and therefore it is categorized as Least Concern in the EU27 and Europe.","

The preferred habitat of this species is forests (mainly coniferous and deciduous) with running freshwater and streams in highlands (normally about 300 metres), and it can also be found in montane grasslands. It seems to have an apparent dependence on clean water; adults are absent from lowlands except where permanent cold and clean spring-water streams are present. They can be seen flying around in stream margins and woodlands, between May and July (even in August in high altitudes), visiting flowers such as Anemone, Cardamine, Chrysanthemum, Crepis, Helianthemum, Menyanthes, Parnassia, Polygonum, Rubus, Sorbus, Taraxacum and Valeriana. The developmental stages were discovered and described by Maibach and Goeldlin in 1991: the larvae are saprophagous and aquatic. All this information has been extracted and updated from Ball and Morris (2000) and Speight (2020). 


","The quality of the water in the streams that this species uses is an important factor for the developmental stages. Therefore the main threat can be loss of water quality in the habitat where it lives, because of  pollution and contamination due to human activities. Drainage and loss of water quantity due to climate change may also be a feasible threat (Janssen et al. 2017).","

The population trend is unknown for this species: it can be easily misidentified as Eristalis nemorum or Eristalis horticola, which makes assessing population trends more challenging. In the Netherlands and UK, it is considered rare (Ball and Morris 2000, Reemer et al. 2009), but is considered to be common in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). Overall, the population trend is unknown in Europe and the EU27.

",Unknown,"

The general European range of this species is from Scandinavia south to the Pyrenees and northern Spain, and from the United Kingdom eastwards through central Europe into European Russia (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

The species has been recorded from the following countries: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020),  France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis  et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu, 2005), European part of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García, 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov Pers. Com., 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

The global range of this species extends into Turkey and Russia east to Siberia, and occurs in North America from British Columbia south to Colorado and east to New York (Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilized or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The conservation of this species should be focused on the preservation of the habitat in which it lives: freshwater areas and streams inside forests, with special attention in the quality of the water, which seems a key factor for larval development.  Some research on identification is needed to improve current taxonomic keys, because at the moment it can be confused with Eristalis horticola, Eristalis nemorum or Eristalis picea (Speight 2020). Research and monitoring are needed to better understand its population and population trend. Education and communication about the species would also be beneficial.

This species is categorized as Vulnerable in Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Near Threatened in Belgium (INBO 2020) and Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Nearctic|Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281606,149165788,Eristalis rossica,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-01 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species can be found in tundra, boreal shrubland and taiga habitat. It has a clear north-eastern distribution. More research is needed to know the exact distribution and population trends, but the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are considered to be far above the thresholds for any threatened category, and so it is categorized as Least Concern for Europe and EU27. Conservation actions should focus on conservation of tundra, boreal shrublands and sub-arctic grassland habitats.","

In Europe, the habitat in which we can find this species is in tundra, boreal shrubland and taiga of Pinus sylvestris, Pinus sibiricus and Abies sibirica. The developmental stages were first discovered and described by Kuznetzov and Kuznetzova (1994) from a specimen collected near St. Petersburg. The larvae are aquatic and saprophagous (feeding on decaying material) and live in the roots of grasses that grow in shallow waters, but not in swamps (Bagachanova 1990). In Japan, larvae have been collected in manure and effluents of manure in an experimental farm (Sasaki and Mikami 2007). Adults can be seen flying between June and August, visiting flowers of genera such as Aruncus, Heracleum, Rhododendron, Trollius and Weigela. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020). This species has been observed to have synanthropic characteristics in Japan although there is no evidence of this in Europe (Sasaki and Mikami 2007).


","This species can be threatened by damage to or loss of the habitat in which the larvae lives: wet grasslands, tundra and boreal shrubland. These threats can be derived from industrial activities such as the oil, gas and mining industries, together with unsustainable deforestation practices; livestock grazing and mowing activities may also affect these habitats at lower latitudes. The habitats can be threatened by changes in temperature and water distribution due to climate change (Janssen et al. 2017).","The population trend for this species is unknown in both Europe and the EU27. In Russia, it is found fairly regularly, but it is not common.",Unknown,"In Europe, this species is found in Eastern Europe and European Russia (Sasaki and Mikami 2007, Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. 

It has been recorded from the following countries: Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Estonia and Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006) and recently in Finland (Kerppola 2016; FinBIF 2020). Its presence in Belarus and Ukraine is expected, but not certain: more research is needed to determine the truth of the matter. 

Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Estonia and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise Area of Occupancy (AOO) for this species.

Outside of Europe, the species occurs in Siberia eastwards to Sakhalin, Mongolia, China and Japan (Sasaki and Mikami 2007, Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions for this species should focus on conservation of the tundra, boreal shrublands and sub-arctic grassland habitats on which this species relies. The extinction risk has not been assessed in individual European countries to date. Increased research and monitoring is necessary to improve our understanding of the biology, ecology, distribution and population trends of this species. Education and communication about this species would also be beneficial.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281610,149165816,Eristalis picea,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species lives in the aquatic habitats of a variety of woodlands across Europe, occurring in most of the countries of central and northern Europe. It is categorized as Least Concern in some of these countries. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category, and therefore it is categorized as Least Concern in both the EU27 and Europe. The species is here considered to be endemic the European Red List region, however, given the past confusion between this and other species, this requires confirmation through further research.","

The preferred habitat of this species is freshwater areas in forests. It can be found in deciduous forests that have seasonal pools and streams, alluvial softwood forest of Salix and Populus woodland and alluvial hardwood forest. It can be also be associated with bogs, marshes, fens and permanent springs. Its developmental stages are not yet fully understood, but the larvae should be aquatic saprophages that feed on decaying material, as the rest of the species of Eristalis; they may occur at the bottom of seasonal pools. Adults can be seen flying between April and June. They are mainly arboreal but often fly around temporary streams and visit flowers of plants such as Anemone, Brassica, Caltha, Cardamine, Crataegus, Euonymus, Myosotis, Prunus, Pyrus, Ranunculus, Rorippa, Rosa, Salix, Scilla and Sorbus. All this information has been extracted and updated from Reemer et al. (2009) and Speight (2020).

","The main threats to this species are habitat loss and damage to its habitat. Aquatic forest habitat can be negatively impacted by pollution (affecting the quality of the water), drought (which is increasing as a result of climate change) and unsustainable forestry and water management practices (Janssen et al. 2017).","There is not enough information regarding the population trend of this species. In the Netherlands it is considered to be scarce (Remeer et al. 2009), while in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) and in southern areas of Fennoscandia (Speight 2020) it is a common species.  The overall population trend of this species is considered unknown in Europe and the EU27.
",Unknown,"

This European endemic species is found from Scandinavia south to central France, and from Belgium eastwards into central Europe as far as Switzerland and Austria. It is also found in European Russia and Ukraine (Speight 2020). Due to common misidentification, it is not certain if this species is present further east than European Russia, in Siberia and Kamchatka (Bartsch 2009, Barkalov and Mutin 2018), and at present the species is considered to be endemic to the Pan Europe region. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Germany) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been recorded from the following countries: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Netherlands (Reemer et al.  2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020) and Ukraine (Prokhorov and Popov 2017).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Research is required in order to confirm the distribution of this species, including whether the species is endemic to the European Red List region. The conservation of this species should be focused on the preservation of the quantity and quality of the water of the streams and pools inside forest areas, together with preservation of the trees (upon which the adults appear to rely). More research on its distribution and population trend is needed, particularly because of the difficulties in differentiating it from other species such as Eristalis obscura (Prokhorov and Popov 2017). Education and communication would also be of benefit. This species has been categorized as Near Threatened in Belgium (INBO 2020) and as Least Concern in Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 152281614,149165838,Eristalis pertinax,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This wetland specialist species is widespread and common in the countries where it is present. In most of its European range it is tolerant of human behaviour and human-influenced habitats, but it is less tolerant in southern Europe. It would benefit from further research and monitoring of its population. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for the application of any threatened category, and therefore it is categorised as Least Concern in both the EU27 and Europe.","

This species can be found in wetlands and in forests, more specifically in fens and woodland streams and ponds. It can be found in urban and human-dominated areas over much of the European territory (mainly northern and central areas), occurring in farmlands (mainly where domestic livestock graze in fields), wastewater treatment areas, parks and gardens. The developmental stages were described and first understood by Hartley (1961), who obtained larvae from a pond containing wet manure and decaying vegetable matter. Adults can be seen flying between February and November and they visit flowers belonging to a wide range of low-growing plants, bushes, shrubs and trees. All this information has been extracted from Ball & Morris (2000), Speight (2008 and 2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).

","The threats to this species mainly arise from threats to its larval habitat. Aquatic areas in forests can be affected by pollution, drought (which can be increased by climate change), and unsustainable forestry and water management (Janssen et al.  2017). Due to its ability to thrive in areas controlled by humans, it is able to survive and reproduce in environments with high human activity.  Threats may have a higher impact in southern Europe, where the species is less tolerant of human behaviour (Speight 2020).","This species is one of the commonest species in Britain (Ball and Morris 2000), and is considered very common in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008) and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). In some southern European countries, it is often restricted to mountainous areas, such as Greece (Vujić et al. 2020). Overall, its population trend is considered stable in Europe and the EU27.",Stable,"Within the European region, this species can be found all the way from Scandinavia southwards to the Iberian peninsula and Mediterranean parts of Europe, and from Ireland in the west throughout much of Europe into the European parts of Russia and Turkey (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above threshold for the application of any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been recorded from the following countries: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Croatia (Jeličić et al. 2010), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov, pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside Europe, it is not found beyond the Ural mountains (Speight 2020) but does occur in Anatolia in Turkey.",This species is not known to be traded or utilized.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions should be focused on the preservation of its habitat, especially wetlands. These actions need to be directed mostly to southern areas where the species is more restricted and the population may not be stable. Some conservation measures can be focused also on the monitoring of and research into the population size and trends. Education and communication about this species is also beneficial. This species is categorized as Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281618,149165859,Eristalis oestracea,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-31 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread wetland hoverfly found in bog and marsh habitats. Within its European range, its distribution is restricted to the northern and central parts of Europe, and in some of these countries it is judged to be threatened. This species is considered to be scarce, and hence deeper research on its distribution and population trends is necessary. Nevertheless, with the current information and considering that the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category, it is categorized here as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27.","

This species can be found in wetland habitats on which it relies during its larval stage. It can be found in water bodies such as bogs, marshes and moors. The developmental stages are not yet fully understood but the larvae should be saprophagous (feeding on decaying matter) and aquatic, as in the other species of Eristalis.

Adults can be seen flying between May and September, beside the edges of small lakes and pools, where they visit flowers such as Caltha, Cardamine, Lythrum, Menyanthes, Prunus spinosa, Succisa and Salix. All this information has been extracted and updated from Speight (2020).

","The principal threat to this species is the loss of habitats important for its developmental stages, specifically, freshwater habitats. Modifications to hydrological systems, intensification of agriculture, water pollution or drought due to climate change can all have negative impacts (Janssen et al. 2017).


","This species is considered to be rare in the north of Germany, with a declining population (Ssymank et al. 2011); it was most recently observed in 2020 after 33 years of not being found (Plichta et al. 2020). In Denmark and Sweden, its population is declining as well (Torp 1994, Bartsch et al. 2009). Overall, this species is considered to be decreasing in Europe and the EU27.",Decreasing,"Within the European region, this species can be found from Scandinavia south to northern Germany and eastwards through Poland into European parts of Russia. It can also be found in mountainous parts of Romania (Speight, 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been observed in the following countries: Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Italy (Burgio et al.  2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European part of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Sweden (Bartsch 2009) and Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020).

Outside Europe, this species can be found in Siberia, central Asia, Kazakhstan and in parts of North America such as Ontario.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions for this species need to be focused on the preservation of the habitats where adults and larvae occur e.g. bogs and marshes. The continuous presence and quality of water are important factors to take into account.  This species would also benefit from increased monitoring and research on its distribution, ecology, population size and trends. Increased education and communication about this species would also be beneficial.

It has been categorized as Critically Endangered in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005), Denmark (DanBIF, 2020) and Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), as Vulnerable in Norway (NBIC, 2020) and as Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF, 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken, 2020).",Nearctic|Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281622,149165891,Eristalis nemorum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Eristalis nemorum is a widespread species, common in northern and central Europe. It is also present in southern parts, but more restricted to mountainous areas. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) are very large, and exceed the thresholds for any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27. Although the species can be impacted by threats to the habitat, such as pollution, drought and water management, it is generally not considered to be at immediate risk. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.

Further research and monitoring on population trends would benefit this species.","The habitat of this species is wetlands within forest: river, streams and brook margins, marshes, fens and bogs in forested areas. It can also be seen in parks in northern parts of Europe (Reemer et al. 2009). The pre-imaginal stages were described and figured by Hartley (1961); the larvae are aquatic and saprophagous, occurring mostly in streams and pools, but they have been found in cow faeces in water-logged areas. The adult flight period is between April and September: they fly around streamsides, visiting flowers of Cakile, Calluna, Caltha, Cardamine, Cirsium, Crataegus, Eupatorium, Euphorbia, Filipendula, Malus, Menyanthes, Mentha, Parnassia, Prunus, Ranunculus, Rubus, Salix, Sorbus and Succisa. All this information has been extracted and updated from Speight (2008, 2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).","The threats to this species are related to direct threats to the larval habitat. Watery areas in forests can be affected by pollution, drought (caused by climate change for example), management of water resources, deforestation or logging (forestry) (Janssen et al. 2017).","This species is considered common and widely distributed in northern and central Europe, such as in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), Ireland (Speight 2018) and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009).  However, in southern regions it is more restricted to mountains (Vujić et al. 2020). The current population trend is unknown, but likely to be stable.",Stable,"The general European range of this species is from northern Fennoscandia, south to Iberia, and from Ireland eastwards through central Europe and European Russia (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above thresholds for any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Estonia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been cited in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Ireland (Speight 2018), Italy (Including Sicily and Sardinia) (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mileczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017) and Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020).

The global range extends into Turkey, Russia and on into Asia, including most of Siberia and Japan, and to North America, where it is present from Quebec south to Colorado (Speight 2020).",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),The conservation of this species should be focused on the preservation of the quantity and quality of the water of streams and pools inside forest areas. Some conservation measures should be focused on the monitoring of and research into population size and trends. This species has been categorized as Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020) and Norway (NBIC 2020).,Nearctic|Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281626,149165912,Eristalis jugorum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Eristalis jugorum is present in many countries across Europe, and has a widespread distribution. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27.  It is a common species in central Europe, but less common in the northern area of its distribution and rare in the south of Europe. The current population trend for both Europe and the EU 27 is unknown. Overall, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.

Although the species is widespread, any conservation measures should focus on the preservation of the larval habitat. In addition, further research and monitoring of the population is recommended.","

The habitat of this species is streams (running freshwater) in Fagus and Picea forest. The pre-imaginal stages of this species are not described, but the larva should be aquatic and saprophagous, as in the rest of the genus. Adults can be seen flying between May and July, visiting flowers such as Chrysanthemum, Euphorbia, Knautia, Polygonum, Rubus, Scabiosa, Sorbus and Succisa.  All this information has been extracted and updated from Speight (2020). 

","The threats to this species are direct threats to the larval habitat. Watery areas in forests can be affected by pollution, droughts (caused by climate change for example), management of water resources, deforestation or logging (forestry) (Janssen et al.  2017).","

This species is widely distributed around Europe, although it is not very common in the northern parts (Reemer et al. 2009, Vujić et al. 2020). However, in Germany it is considered a common species (Ssymank et al. 2011) and is also common in central Europe, but less common in the northern area of its distribution and rare in the south of Europe (Vujić et al. 2020). The current population trend for both Europe and the EU 27 is unknown.


",Unknown,"

The general European range of this species is from Poland, south to the Pyrenees and northern Spain and from Belgium eastwards through central and southern Europe into European parts of Russia (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the threshold for any threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Germany and Ukraine) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been cited in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), North Macedonia (Krpač et al. 2011), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Switzerland (CSCF 2020) and Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020).

The global range of the species extends to the Caucasus, Turkey and Iran (Speight 2020).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The conservation of this species should be focused in the preservation of the quantity and quality of the water of streams and pools inside forested areas, the potential larval habitat. Monitoring and research of population size and trends are recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281630,149165933,Eristalis intricaria,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This wetland species is widespread across the European region and has been assessed as unthreatened in most of the national Red Lists from European countries. Its population seems to be stable in Europe and the EU27. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. It is therefore categorized as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and EU27. Increased monitoring and research of population size and trends is needed. Education and communication about its importance as pollinator would also be beneficial.,"This species is present in a variety of environments, such as wetlands (bogs, fens or streams), deciduous forests and shrub areas, and seasonally flooded grasslands. It has also been observed in parks and gardens. It is frequently found close to humid areas since the larval stage is aquatic and saprophagous, present in stagnant water bodies or semi-liquid environments with a high amount of decaying organic material where it filter-feeds on microorganisms. It is sometimes associated with slurry/cow dung. The larval stage was described by Hartley (1961) who identified that it had an elongated anal segment. Adults feed on pollen and nectar from trees and shrubs, and normally visit white umbellifers and yellow composites, and also flowers of genera such as Armeria, Cakile, Cirsium, Prunus, Rubus, Salix and Succisa. The adult males are territorial. The flight period is between April and October. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).


","This species can be affected by impacts to its habitat. Aquatic habitats in forests can be affected by pollution (primarily agricultural and urban effluents), drought (which can be exacerbated by climate change) and unsustainable forestry and water management practices (Janssen et al.  2017).",This species is quite abundant in northern Europe and the population trend is stable. It is less abundant in southern Europe and absent in south-eastern Europe. Its subpopulations are generally large. Overall the population trend is considered stable in Europe and the EU27.,Stable,"

The general European range of this species includes Iceland and then from Scandinavia and the Faroes south to northern Spain, but increasingly confined to mountainous regions towards the southern limit of its range and absent from much of southern Europe; from Ireland eastwards through much of northern and central Europe (though very localised in the Alps) into European Russia (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above thresholds for any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Estonia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been listed in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2011), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Faroe Islands (Jensen 2001), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (including Northern Ireland) (Speight 2008), Italy (Stoch 2003), Latvia (Karpa 2008), Lithuania (Kuznetzov 1993), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009) Switzerland (CSCF 2020), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000). The presence of this species in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and North Macedonia is not certain, but Vujić et al. (2004) cite it as present in the countries of the Balkan Peninsula.

The global range of this species extends as far as eastern Siberia (Speight 2020).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions for this species should focus on its habitat, particularly in central Europe. Increased monitoring and research of population size and trends is needed. Education and communication about its importance as pollinator would also be beneficial. This species has been categorized as Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). It is considered common in Germany (Ssymank  et al.  2011) and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281634,149165954,Eristalis hirta,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)

Eristalis hirta is a northern species, only present in the very northernmost areas of Fennoscandia and European Russia. Some of its habitats are under threat, as indicated in the European Red List of Habitats, being affected mainly by climate change: therefore these habitats are judged to be declining. The current population trend is unknown. The range of its habitats is wide compared to those of other species of the genus, which reduces the impact of the threats. In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the threshold for any threatened category. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe.

However, in the EU 27, the AOO is between 90 and 100 km2 and there is a continuous decline in the habitat due to human pressures and climate change, but the number of locations is higher than 10, taking into account the previously mentioned threats. Therefore this species is assessed as Near Threatened, as it is close for qualifying for a threatened category under Criterion B2 for the EU 27.","

The habitat of this species is wetland located in open areas, bogs, aapa mires, ditches and temporary pools in grasslands (seasonally-flooded and unimproved), tundra and sub-alpine Betula forest. The pre-imaginal stages are not described, but the larvae should be aquatic and saprophagous, as in others of the genus. Adults can be seen flying between June and September, visiting flowers of species of genera such as Achillea, Caltha, Galium, Ledum, Matricaria, Ranunculus, Salix, Taraxacum and Valeriana. All this information has been extracted and updated from Speight (2020). 

","The threats to this species are related to threats to the habitat in which adults and larvae live: wetlands, temporary flooded grasslands, tundra, aapa mires and forest. These threats can be derived from industrial activities such as oil, gas and mining industries; together with logging and deforestation. Grazing and mowing activities may affect these habitats too, but with less impact than at lower latitudes. The habitats can also be threatened by the variation in temperature and water distribution caused by climate change (Janssen et al. 2017).","This species is widespread and often dominant in northern Norway, especially in cultivated areas (Nielsen and Svendsen 2014). The current population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"

The general European range of this species is northern Norway, Sweden, Finland and European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) for Europe are far above the threshold for any threatened category. For the EU 27, the EOO is about 283,600 km2 and the AOO is between 90 and 100 km2.

It has been cited in the checklists of Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (Nielsen and Svendsen 2014), Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009) and the European part of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018).

The global range extends eastwards though Siberia, and it is also found in North America (Speight 2020, GBIF 2020).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions should be directly related to the conservation of its habitats: wetlands (bogs and mires), tundra, taiga and sub-arctic wet grasslands. Some of these habitats have been categorized as threatened by the European Red List of Habitats; temperate and boreal wet grasslands are categorized as Endangered (E 3.5) (Janssen et al. 2017). The species has been categorized as Least Concern (LC) in Norway (NBIC 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). It needs more research and monitoring of its distribution and population.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281638,149165977,Eristalis gomojunovae,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

Eristalis gomojunovae is a northern species, being only present in the very northernmost areas of Fennoscandia and European Russia. Some of the habitats where it is found are under specific threats as indicated in the European Red List of Habitats, mainly by climate change and human activity. The current population trend is unknown and there is an inferred habitat decline. However, in Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are very large, above the thresholds of any threatened category. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in Europe.

However, in the EU 27 the AOO is between 30 and 40 km2, there is considered to be a decline in the habitat and the number of locations is between 6 and 10 determined by the previously mentioned threats to the habitat. Therefore, in the EU 27, this species is assessed as Vulnerable under Criterion B.","

This species has been found in wetlands in boreal areas: the margins of lakes, tundra, taiga (Pinus sylvestris) and palsa mires. The pre-imaginal stages are not described, but larvae should be aquatic and saprophagous, as the rest of the species in the genus. Adults can be seen flying around between June and July close to the water surface, and visiting flowers such as Caltha, Ranunculus, Salix and Rubus. All this information has been summarized and updated from Bartsch et al. (2009) and Speight (2020). 

","The threats to this species are related to the habitats of the adult and larvae, i.e. wetlands, tundra, taiga and palsa mires. Some derive from industrial activities carried out by the oil, gas and mining industries, together with logging, deforestation, drainage and water abstraction. Grazing and mowing activities may also affect these habitats, but with less impact than at lower latitudes. These habitats are also threatened by the variations of temperature and water distribution caused by climate change, especially palsa mires due to permafrost melting (Janssen et al. 2017).",This species is not considered to be common in any of the countries in which is present. There is no information on its  population size or trend.,Unknown,"The general European range of this species is northern Norway, northern Sweden and Finland, plus northern parts of European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values for Europe are far above threshold for a threatened category. However, for the EU 27 the EOO is estimated to be about 28550 km2 and the AOO is between 30 and 40 km2.

It has been cited in the following checklists: Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (Nielsen and Svendsen 2014, NBIC 2020), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009).

The global range of the species extends eastwards through Siberia and in the Nearctic, it occurs in Alaska and northern Canada (Speight 2020, GBIF 2020).",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions should be directly related to the conservation of the tundra, taiga and palsa-mire habitats in which this species lives. Some of these habitats have been categorized as threatened by the European Red List of Habitats, for example palsa mires are categorized as Critically Endangered (D3.1) (Janssen et al. 2017).  This species has been categorized as Vulnerable (VU) in Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020), and as Data Deficient (DD) in Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019), which indicates that more research and monitoring of the distribution and population trends of this species are needed. Other conservation measures can be focused on education and awareness about the species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281642,149165997,Eristalis cryptarum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species occurs in wetland habitats, which are declining in most  European and EU27 countries (EEA10). The low number of records makes it difficult to follow the population trends. Further studies on its populations are therefore needed. It is threatened in some countries in central Europe, but is considered stable in northern Europe where the majority of the subpopulations occur. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the threshold for threatened categories. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU27.","This species is present in valley mires grazed by cattle, peat bogs, marshes and in acidic water bodies with low or medium levels of nutrients (oligotophic and mesotrophic water bodies). It also occurs in palsa mires, taiga and tundra wetlands, mostly at northern latitudes. These wetland habitats are declining in most European countries. The unknown larval stage is certainly saprophagous, using its 'tail' (elongated anal segment) to breathe when submerged under the water surface. The adults feed on pollen and nectar. The flight period lasts between May and September. In Siberia, this species occurs on flowers of Caltha species.  This information has been summarized from Ball and Morris (2014) and Speight (2020).","The threats are related to the habitat where this species lives: wetlands, tundra, taiga and palsa mires. These threats derive from industrial (oil, gas, mining) as well as logging, deforestation and hydrological (drainage, abstraction) activities. Grazing and mowing may also affect these habitats, but with less impact than at lower latitudes. Its habitats can also be threatened by the variations of temperature and water distribution due to climate change, and especially palsa mires due to permafrost melting (Janssen et al. 2017).

Particularly in the United Kingdom, the inadequate management of water resources may be harmful to the species; for instance, drainage or lack of drainage can generate desiccation and scrub invasion in either case. Furthermore, the intensified vegetation management needed to adapt natural areas to tourism reduces the existing vegetation or its features. Nutrient enrichment of oligotrophic water bodies that modifies the original physicochemical properties of the environment can also be considered a feasible threat (Ball and Morris 2014).


","This species is very localised in some of the countries where it occurs in Europe and the EU27. It has a mostly northern distribution, and it is widespread in Finland and Sweden. It is common in Russia. In the United Kingdom it was considered abundant between 1900 and 1930, but since then there has been a clear and continuous decline of its population there, and now seems to be found mainly in Dartmoor National Park (Ball and Morris 2014; Castle and Falk 2012). In Spain it is only known from the Pyrenees. Overall, subpopulations of this species are common in some areas and declining in others, and there is currently no clear picture about the overall population trend in Europe or the EU27. Further research is needed to clarify this.",Unknown,"

The general European range of this species is from northern Scandinavia south to the Pyrenees, and from Ireland through central Europe into European Russia. Despite its wide distribution, this species is very localised throughout its range, including in Europe and the EU27 (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for threatened categories. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Estonia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been observed in the following countries: Austria (Heimburg 2008), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Karpa 2008), Lithuania (Kuznetzov 1993), Norway (Nielsen and Svendsen 2014), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănesku and Părvu 2005), European part of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014). It is considered extinct in Ireland (Speight 2008) and in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009).

It is known to occur in several countries, but there is very little information available about the localities and precise distribution. In Czechia, the last record is from more than 50 years ago, and is therefore highly likely to be regionally extinct in this area (Farkač et al. 2005). In Slovakia and Romania the records are very scarce.

The global range of the species extends east from the European region to central Siberia, and it occurs in Mongolia and North America.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions for this species should be focused on the preservation of its habitats, and on research into its populations to determine the real distribution and risks. This would be particularly important for the countries where it is considered to be threatened. Education and communication about its importance as a pollinator is also recommended.

This species has been categorized as extinct in Belgium (INBO 2020), Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005), Ireland (Speight 2008) and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). It is Critically Endangered in the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014), and Endangered in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). However, it has been categorized as Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).

The main population of the UK is situated in the Dartmoor National Park. It acts as a meta-population, and it is very dependent on small populations surrounding the suitable habitats (Ball and Morris 2014). Managed grazing in some areas may be beneficial, to avoid willow and birch growth which can encroach on its habitat. Further research would be needed on the biology and ecology of the species, as well as on the habitat of the larvae.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281646,149166052,Eristalinus taeniops,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Eristalinus taeniops is a widespread species found across the Mediterranean Basin. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for a threatened Category in both Europe and the EU 27. Although the current population trend is unknown, the species is common in some countries, such as Greece and Spain. Although it may be impacted locally by declines in suitable habitat, particularly freshwater environments, it has been found in anthropogenic habitats and it is therefore considered to be an adaptable species. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27.

No conservation measures are required at the moment, but the species would benefit from additional research and monitoring on its population size and trend.","This species can be found in open ground and evergreen forest, scrubs and maquis, usually close to freshwater bodies such as seasonal rivers, temporary pools and coastal lagoons and marshes. The larval and pupal stages were described by Pérez-Bañón et al. (2003) and Zalat and Mahmoud (2009). The larval stage is aquatic, saprophagous and filter-feeding. The described larvae were found in standing water containing decaying plant material (pine needles) or rotting animal carcasses, and also in running water contaminated by pig manure. Dutto and Maistrello (2017) report the recovery of larvae from various forms of organic waste produced as by-products on urban industrial premises. Therefore, taking into account this larval information, this species is considered to have a synanthropic character. Adults have been found feeding on umbellifers, Calluna vulgaris, Cistus, Solidago, Senecio, Daphne, Eryngium, Rubus, Euphorbia, Mentha and Hedera, amongst others (Marcos-García 1985). The flight period takes from April to September, extending to October in southern Europe. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).","The main threats to this species are habitat loss and drought provoked by human activities. The loss of natural habitats especially freshwater habitats, by modification of hydrological systems or the intensification of agriculture, and climate change, amongst other factors, will have a negative impact (Janssen et al. 2017). However, it is capable of surviving and reproducing in environments with a high human activity.","This species is widespread throughout the Mediterranean Basin. In Greece, it is a very common species (Vujić et al. 2020), and in Spain it is also considered a frequent species (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017).",Stable,"

The general European range of this species is across the entire Mediterranean region. This information has been obtained from Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for a threatened category in both Europe and the EU 27.

This species has been cited in the following checklists: Cyprus (van Steenis et al. 2019), France (including Corsica) (Speight et al. 2018), Greece (including Crete) (Vujić et al. 2020), Italy (including Sardinia and Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Malta (Ssymank and Ebejer 2009), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Spain (including Balearic and Canary Islands) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Portugal (van Eck 2016).

Out of the European region, the range of this species extends to the Afrotropical and Oriental regions: Lebanon, Israel, North Africa (Syria, Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and Morocco), Transcaucasus, eastern part of Afrotropical region, South Africa and in Nepal and parts of Pakistan and northern India. Due to human activity, this species has been expanding its distribution through South America (e.g. recently in Argentina: Lillo et al. in prep.).",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

As this species is found in anthropogenic environments, it is considered to be adaptable and so no conservation measures are required at present. However, monitoring of and research into population size and trends would be beneficial. Education and awareness related to this species and its situation can be also a useful conservation tool. There is no information regarding the assessment of this species in any national Red Lists.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281650,149166081,Eristalinus megacephalus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Eristalinus megacephalus is a widespread species, found mainly in the Mediterranean Basin in Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for a threatened Category in both Europe and the EU 27. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27. Further research on the population size and trends is recommended.","This species is commonly found in open-ground areas close to freshwater bodies, coastal lagoons, canals and riverside situations. Adults are fast flyers, frequently around tall waterside vegetation. They can be found on flowers such as Anthemis, Dittrichia viscosa, Picris, Solidago, Erygium and Mentha, among others. The larval and pupal stages were described by Pérez-Bañón et al. (2003) and Zalat and Mahmoud (2009) from larvae were found in running water with pig manure and sewage settlement lagoons. The larvae are aquatic and saprophagous. The flight period of the adults is from March to October. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).","The main threats to this species are related to loss of natural habitats, especially freshwater habitats, by modifications to hydrological systems, the intensification of agriculture, pollution and climate change, amongst other factors (Janssen et al. 2017).","This species is mainly found in the Mediterranean Basin, where it is widespread and stable. In Greece, it is widespread and common on the islands and along the continental coast (Vujić et al. 2020).",Stable,"

The general European range of this species is from southern Spain, the Rhone Delta in France and coastal parts of Italy round the Mediterranean basin (including the islands of Corsica, Malta, Sicily and Crete) to European parts of Turkey (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for a threatened Category in both Europe and the EU 27.

This species has been cited in the following checklists: Cyprus (van Steenis et al. 2019), France (including Corsica) (Speight et al. 2018), Greece (including Crete) (Vujić et al. 2020), Italy (including Sardinia and Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Macedonia (Krpač et al. 2001), Malta (Ssymank and Ebejer 2009), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018) and Spain (including Balearic Islands) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017).  

Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Turkey) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise Area of Occupancy (AOO) for this species.

The range of this species extends through Anatolia in Turkey and on into Egypt and North Africa, and also southwards through the Afrotropical region to South Africa (Speight 2020).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation measures to preserve the quality of freshwater bodies may benefit this species. In general, such actions have been implemented over past decades in most of Europe due to the impact of the Urban Waste Treatment and Nitrates Directives, amongst others (ETC/BD et al. 2015). Further research into the population size and trends is recommended. There is no information about the categorization of this species in national Red Lists.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281654,149166124,Anasimyia transfuga,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread and locally abundant in wetlands. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for threatened categories. Although there have been some declines, the local declines do not impact the extinction risk and therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU27. The main threats to this species are the loss of habitat extent and quality due to unsustainable land management. Monitoring and research on its distribution and population trends are recommended.","This species is present in wetlands, shallow standing water bodies surrounded by woodland, and riparian vegetation such as Scirpus, Sparganium and Phragmites. The places they are found are usually hidden and shaded, with moderately nutrient-rich water. The larvae are aquatic and of the ""long-tailed"" type typical for the genus; they feed on microorganisms among rotting plant debris.

Adults fly among the vegetation and males are territorial. Adults feed on the pollen and nectar of flowers. The flight period ranges between early May/June to August/September. All of this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).",The main potential threats to this species are the loss of quality and extent of habitat. This can be caused by drainage and water-abstraction projects in wetlands. Intensified vegetation management to adapt natural areas to tourism has also resulted in reducing existing vegetation or its features. Nutrient enrichment of naturally low-nutrient water bodies can also damage the quality of the habitat (Janssen et al. 2017). Changing rainfall patterns and drought due to climatic change may also impact this species in the future.,This species is widespread and locally abundant in wetland habitats. It is highly likely to have a stable population trend. It is less common in south-eastern Europe.,Stable,"

This species can be found from southern Sweden to northern France; from Ireland eastwards through mountainous parts of central and southern Europe into European Russia (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above threshold for threatened categories. Specific locality data are not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO.

It is cited in the following national checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Krym ( Popov 1998), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Hungary (Tóth 2001), Ireland (including Northern Ireland) (Speight 2008), Italy (Stoch 2003), Latvia (Karpa 2008), Lithuania (Kuznetzov 1993), Montenegro (van Steenis  et al. 2005), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).",This species is not known to be traded or utilized.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions for this species should be focused on conserving their wetland habitats. Additionally, monitoring and research on its distribution and population trends are also recommended. Education and awareness-raising about this species and its situation is also a useful conservation tool. Most wetlands are now protected in European countries.

This species is categorized as Endangered in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011); as Vulnerable in Belgium (INBO 2020), the  Czech Republic (Farkač et al 2005) and Norway (NBIC 2020); and as Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). It is considered to be common in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) and suggested to be threatened in Ireland (Speight 2008).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281658,149166147,Eurimyia lineata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has been assessed as not threatened in most of the national Red Lists within Europe. It occurs in wetlands and relies on the flora found in this habitat for feeding as an adult.  Its populations seem to be stable with no major threats, although its wetland habitat is experiencing some pressures. It has a large EOO and AOO, and therefore is categorised as Least Concern (LC) in both Europe and the EU 27.","This species can be found in wetland habitats. In particular, it can be found around stagnant and slow-flowing, nutrient-rich water bodies such as fens, marshes, ponds or oxbow lakes. It occurs less frequently in bogs. Described by Hartley (1961) and illustrated by Rotheray (1994), the larval stage is aquatic and feeds by filtering microorganisms under the water surface - usually in areas with rotting plant debris. It has an elongated anal segment which acts as a breathing tube. The adults feed on pollen and nectar from flowers that occur near the wetlands, often on Ranunculus, Anthriscus, Caltha, Cardamine, Crataegus, Lythrum and Nymphaea. The adults can typically be seen flying from between May and August/September. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).","Loss and disturbance of habitat are the main threats to this species. Drainage of wetlands, changing rainfall patterns and drought due to climatic change all impact the wetland habitats necessary for the larval stage. Intensification of vegetation management for tourism and development purposes can result in loss of important food sources for this species. Pollution can result in the nutrient enrichment of its wetland habitat, which can also impact this species (Janssen et al. 2017).","The population of this species is stable in the EU 27 and the European region. It is quite common in northern and central Europe, but it is scarcer in southern Europe. In Greece it is a rare species, being only present in the northern part of mainland Greece (Vujić et al. 2020).  It can be locally common where there is appropriate habitat.",Stable,"

This is a widespread species, found from southern Scandinavia to the northern edge of the Pyrenees, and from Ireland to the European parts of Russia. Outside Europe, it occurs across Siberia to the Pacific coast (Speight 2020).  It is now considered to be restricted to the Palaearctic, whilst records from the Nearctic are now (after taxonomic revision) considered to be E. stipata (Skevington et al. 2019). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are significantly greater than the values for the application of a threatened category. Specific locality data are not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

The species has been cited by the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2019), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2019), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2001), Ireland (including Northern Ireland; Speight 2008), Italy (including Sicily; Stoch 2003), Latvia (Karpa 2008), Lithuania (Kuznetzov 1993), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2019), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2019), European Turkey (Tóth 2013) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

",This species is not known to be used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation efforts should focus on protecting the habitat. Most wetlands are now protected in European countries, and therefore this species is known to occur within protected areas. Additional research is required to understand the ecology of this species and its population trends better. Social education and awareness-raising related to this species and its situation could also be a useful conservation tool.

It is categorized as Near Threatened in Belgium (INBO 2019), Vulnerable in the Czech Republic (Frakač et al. 2005), and Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2019) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2019); it considered common in Germany (Dunk et al. 2003) and Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281662,149166171,Anasimyia contracta,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Anasimyia contracta is a widely distributed species in Europe and in the EU 27 and is known to exist in wetlands that are usually surrounded by shrubs or forests. The habitat quality and extent is known to be in decline. Despite this species being threatened in some European countries such as Germany, Belgium and Czech Republic - where habitat loss is the main threat - it is quite abundant and widespread in Northern countries and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in a threatened category. Therefore, its is categorised as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU 27. The conservation of this species depends on the protection and correct management of its habitat, the wetlands. Monitoring and research of the population and distribution of this species is also necessary.","This species is present in wetlands that are usually surrounded by shrubs or forests. It has a specific association with ponds, ditches and fens where Typha is growing. It can also be found in water treatment wetlands (known from man-made habitats). The larval stage remains poorly understood, but it is known to be saprophagous and presents an elongated anal segment transformed into a breathing tube. Larvae can be found among debris of dead Typha stalks beneath the water surface in moderately nutrient-rich water where they filter microorganisms. Adults are usually close to the margins of the water source, flying low over the vegetation or settled in the sun, and frequently on the foliage of large-leaved emergent vegetation such as Menyanthes. They feed on pollen and nectar as adults and males are territorial. The flight period of this species ranges between May/June to August/September. All this information has been obtained from Speight (2020).","The main threats to this species are the loss of quality and quantity of habitat. This can be caused by drainage and abstraction projects of water from wetlands, and as a result of changing rainfall patterns and drought due to climate change (Janssen et al. 2017). Intensified vegetation management of natural environments for tourism and intensification of grazing around wetlands can also threaten the species because it reduces the existing vegetation or wetland features. Nutrient enrichment of oligotrophic water bodies can also modify the original physicochemical properties of the environment. Although there are several threats to this species and its habitat which can be an issue in some specific localities, it is a very adaptable species and is broadly not at risk across Europe.","This species is not equally common across all its range. It is more commonly present in the Atlantic seaboard countries, but more localised in central and southern countries of Europe (Speight 2018). For example, in the UK, it is considered widespread (Ball and Morris 2000) and in Netherlands it is quite common in coastal areas (Reemer et al.  2009). It is likely to have a stable population trend in Europe and the EU27.",Stable,"This species is widely distributed in the European region and can be found from Scandinavia southwards to the Mediterranean basin and from Ireland eastwards through central Europe to European parts of Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in a threatened category, in either Europe or the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species are not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise area of occupancy (AOO) for this species.

This species has featured in the following national checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Hungary (Tóth 2001), Ireland (including Northern Ireland) (Speight 2008), Italy (including Sardinia) (Stoch 2003), Latvia (Karpa 2008), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Netherlands (Reemer et al.2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European part of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), European part of Turkey (Tóth 2013), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2019) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

The global range of the species extends out of the European region to Georgia (Mengual et al. 2020), ASian Russia (Western Siberia, Khabarovsk Krai; Barkalov and Mutin 2018), and Turkmenistan (http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Diptera/Syrphidae.htm).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The conservation of this species depends on the protection and correct management of its habitat, the wetlands. In particular, it is important that the hydrological and substrate conditions upon which it relies are conserved. Minimising threats such as uncontrolled human activities (fishing, grazing, hunting, etc.), habitat contamination and invasive alien species are important for its conservation,  and reinstatement of local communities of flora and fauna will also help. This species requires correct management of surrounding vegetation, particularly Typha populations, due to its connection with this plant.

Most wetlands are now protected in European countries, and this species is known to occur in Protected Areas. There is a lack of information regarding its population trends and biology, which are important for the ongoing assessment and understanding of the conservation measures that are needed; Therefore, monitoring and research of its population and distribution is necessary. Education and awareness about this species and its situation can be also a useful conservation tool.

The species is categorized as Endangered in Belgium (INBO 2020), Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) and in Norway (NBIC 2020), as Vulnerable in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005) and as Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281666,149168620,Eristalis tecta,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)
EU27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

This species is currently known from two records in North Macedonia, where it has been found on Kožuf Mountain, making it endemic to Europe. It is not known to occur in the EU27 region. It has a preference for beech woodlands that have freshwater habitats, but more research is needed on its biology and ecology. There is a continuous decline in the quality of the habitat; the number of locations is limited to one, based on the main threat of development and human activities; the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 10 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 8 km2. Therefore, it is categorised as Critically Endangered for Europe and as Not Applicable for the EU27, though its absence from adjacent parts of Greece requires confirmation through further studies. Even though only two specimens have been recorded, it is considered highly likely that this species is only found on the one mountain and is endemic to this area. However, lots of further research and monitoring is needed to understand the distribution, habitat and threats to this species better.","This species is present in Fagus forests of a moderate climate that also have freshwater, such as streams and rivers. One individual was recorded at a relatively high elevation, and the other was lower down. The developmental stages are unknown, but it is presumed that the larva is an aquatic saprophage (feeding on decaying material), as the other species belonging to this genus. The adults fly between April and June. This information has been summarized from Vujić et al. (2004).",This species is threatened by recreational human activity near the river and streams around the mountain. A new ski centre was recently built on the mountain that increases this disturbance.,"Only two individuals of this species have ever been found (in 1956 and 1957), found about 10 km apart. It is difficult to identify, as there are many similar species. Because of the paucity of records, the population trend is also unknown.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe (Speight 2020), where it is only known from Kožuf Mountain in southern North Macedonia (Vujić et al. 2004). Based on the available information, it is endemic specifically to this mountain and is unlikely to be found elsewhere (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019); although the mountain range forms the border with Greece, Greece is well-studies, and it has not been recorded there as yet. It has been found twice (two males) on the same mountain in two different years (1956, 1957). There have been no systematic surveys recently to establish its presence, but it is considered likely to still be present. The area of occupancy (AOO) is calculated to be about 8 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be approximately 10 km2.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"There are no conservation measures currently in place for this species. It may benefit from protection of natural water areas close the known localities, but further research is needed to establish the specific habitat requirements and threats to this species. In addition, research into the population trends and monitoring is required. Education and communication about the importance of this species as a pollinator would be beneficial. Kožuf Mountain on which this species is known from is a natural reserve.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 152281670,149168644,Eristalis obscura,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This wetland species is most commonly found in the north of Europe where it is abundant and widespread. Its distribution in other parts of Europe needs to be confirmed with further research and monitoring. In recent national Red Lists it has been assessed as Least Concern. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered for any of the threatened categories. It is therefore categorized as Least Concern for both the EU27 and Europe regions. It is important that more research is conducted on its distribution across Europe due to previous misidentification over past decades, and monitoring and research of its ecology and population trends are needed.","

This species is primarily found in wetland habitats such as freshwater bodies, fens, reed beds and watery areas in forests and forest edges.

The developmental stages were first understood and described by Kuznetzov and Kuznetzova (1994) under the name Eristalis vitripennisEristalis vitripennis was recognized by Hippa et al. (2001) as a synonym of Eristalis rupium before being considered as Eristalis obscura (Hippa et al. 2009). Because of this, the original specimens examined in 1994 need to be reviewed, to determine definitively to which species the larvae belong.The larvae are saprophagous (feeding on decaying matter) and aquatic, as in the other species of Eristalis. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).

Adults can be seen flying between May and June, as well as in July in the northern part of its European range. The adults visit flowers such as Achillea, Caltha, Jasione, Crataegus, Ranunculus, Rosa, Rubus, Saxifraga, Taraxacum and Valeriana.


","The larval habitat of this species faces great threats because aquatic forest habitats can be negatively impacted by pollution, drought (likely to be increased by climate change), management of water resources and unsustainable forestry practices (Janssen et al. 2017).","Particularly in the northern parts of its range (Sweden, Finland and Norway), the population of this species is stable, and is considered relatively common. It is thought to be stable overall in Europe and the EU27.",Stable,"

This species can be found from northern Norway, Sweden and Finland, south to the Netherlands and across to central Germany and European parts of Russia. Because of being often confused with other species, its presence in countries south of Scandinavia need to be verified. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds of any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Estonia and Ukraine) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species. Outside of Europe, it occurs in most of Siberia and is also present in North America.

This species has been observed in the following countries: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Sweden (Bartsch 2009) and Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020).

",This species not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions for this species should be focused on the preservation of the wetlands where its larvae live, by preventing pollution and drainage. It is also important that more research is conducted on its distribution across Europe due to previous misidentification. Monitoring and research on the ecology and population trends of this species are also important.

It has been categorized as Least Concern in Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281674,149168665,Eristalis horticola,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Eristalis horticola has a widespread distribution. It is present and abundant in many countries across Europe, and hence the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are very large for both Europe and the EU 27 and exceed the thresholds for any threatened category. The current population trend is unknown, and the species may be impacted by changes to watery areas in forests, through pollution, climate change, management of water resources and deforestation. However, the species is adaptable and also found in gardens and parks in northern Europe. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.","The habitat of this species is wetland inside forest: river, streams and brook margins, fens and bogs in forestry areas (both deciduous and coniferous). It can also be found in parks and gardens in northern Europe and has been sampled from farms in Dartmoor in the United Kingdom (Castle and Falk 2012). These data seem to indicate that it is capable of adapting to a wide range of habitats. The aquatic and saprophagous larval stages were described by Dolezil (1972). Adults can be seen flying between May and September, and even in April in southern Europe, and normally visit flowers of genera such as Calluna, Cardamine, Cirsium, Crataegus, Eupatorium, Galium, Jasione, Pyrus, Ranunculus, Rubus, Sambucus, Sorbus, Stellaria, Succisa and Viburnum. Adults have been seen laying eggs in soakaways of acidic peatlands in the United Kingdom (Castle and Falk 2012)This information has been summarized from Ball and Morris (2000) and Speight (2008 and 2020).


","The threats to this species are related to direct threats to its habitat. Watery areas in the forest can be affected by pollution, drought (caused by climate change for example), management of water resources, deforestation and logging (forestry) (Janssen et al.  2017). However, it seems to have the ability to adapt to different habitats.","This is considered a common species in forestry areas of Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), and is a widespread and common species in the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000), Ireland (Speight 2008) and Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). It is an Atlantic-zone insect, being more restricted in central and southern Europe; for example, in Greece, it is only present in the mountainous areas of the northern part of the country (Vujić et al. 2020).",Stable,"

The general European range of this species is from Fennoscandia, south to Mediterranean parts of the European region, and from Ireland eastwards through much of Europe into European Russia (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values for both Europe and the EU 27 are very large and far above the threshold for any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Estonia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been cited in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Krym (Popov 1998), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2000), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

The global range extends south to North Africa and eastwards through Siberia to the Pacific coast (Sakhalin) and India (Speight 2020).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The conservation of this species should be focused on the preservation of the quantity and quality of the water of streams and pools inside forested areas. In addition, monitoring and research of the population size and trends is recognised as important. The species has been categorized as Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020) and Norway (NBIC 2020). ",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281678,149168688,Eristalis fratercula,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-11 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

Eristalis fratercula is clearly a northern species, being only present in the very northernmost areas of Fennoscandia and European Russia. Some of the habitats where it lives are under threat, affected mainly by climate change. Although the current population in Europe is unknown, it has a very large area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO), which are above the thresholds for a threatened category. Therefore in Europe it is assessed as Least Concern. However, in the EU 27 the AOO is between 40 and 50 km2, and there is considered to be a decline in the habitat due to climate change. In addition, the species is found at between six and 10 locations (assuming habitat shifts due to climate change are the main threat), and therefore it is categorized as Vulnerable under Criterion B.

Conservation measures should focus on the protection of the habitat where this species is found, and further research and monitoring of the population, distribution and threats is recommended.","

This species can be found in seasonally-flooded grasslands with standing water, in tundra and taiga beside rivers. The pre-imaginal stages of this aquatic and saprophagous species were described by Campoy et al. (2017) with material obtained from gravid females collected in north Norway. Females laid eggs in a medium of cow manure, soil and water, where the larvae developed. Adults can be seen flying in June and July at the edge of pools, and visiting flowers of Caltha, Matricaria, Ranunculus and Salix. All this information has been summarized and updated from Campoy et al. (2017) and Speight (2020).

In both, Europe and EU 27, there is inferred to be a decline in the quality and extent of the habitat.

","The threats to this species are related to threats to the larval and adult habitat in which they live: wet grasslands, tundra and taiga. These threats come from industrial activities such as the oil, gas and mining industries, together with logging and deforestation. Grazing and mowing activities may affect these habitats too, but with less impact than at lower latitudes. The habitats can also be threatened by the variations of temperature and water distribution caused by climate change (Janssen et al. 2017).","This species occurs locally in the northern parts of Fennoscandia, but there is no information on population trends.",Unknown,"The general European range of this species is northern Norway, northern Sweden, Finland, northern parts of European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values for Europe are far above threshold for any of the threatened categories. In the EU 27, the EOO is around 40450 km2 and the AOO is between 40 and 50 km2.

It has been cited in the following checklists: Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (Nielsen and Svendsen 2014, NBIC 2020), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009).

The global range extends through Siberia to the Pacific coast, and it is also found in Greenland, Alaska and North America (Speight 2020, GBIF 2020).",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions should be directly related to conservation of the tundra, taiga and sub-arctic wet grasslands, as these are the habitats in which this species lives. Some of these habitats have been categorized as threatened by the European Red List of Habitats, for example Temperate and boreal wet grasslands are categorized as Endangered (E 3.5) (Janssen et al. 2017). The species has been categorized as Least Concern in Norway (NBIC 2020) and as Data Deficient in Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020), which indicates that more research on and monitoring of the distribution and population trends of this species are needed, as well as further research on the threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281682,149168710,Eristalis arbustorum,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in Europe and the EU 27. It has a wide distribution and is abundant with large subpopulations. It occurs in farmlands, urban parks and gardens, as well as in a wide range of wetlands and softwood forests.

There are no major threats to this species, but further research on the effects of insecticides is recommended. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for threatened categories. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27.","

This species is tolerant of human-managed landscapes and it is ubiquitous in farmlands, urban parks and gardens. It also occurs in a wide range of wetlands and softwood forests. The adults fly two to three metres from the ground, settling on low-growing vegetation. They visit the flowers of a wide range of low-growing plants and shrubs. Their flight period is between April and October, starting in March in southern Europe. This species is migratory. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).

","The principal threats are related to the loss of natural habitats - especially freshwater habitats mostly by modifications to hydrological systems, intensification of agriculture or droughts and temperature changes caused by climate change, amongst other factors (Janssen et al. 2017). Due to its tolerance of human landscapes, it is capable of surviving and reproducing in environments with high human activity. Nevertheless, the indiscriminate use of insecticides (ivermectins and systemic helminthicides) in agricultural and livestock management also contaminates water resources and may cause some effect on the population (Speight 2020). ","The population of this species is stable in Europe and the EU27. In Western Europe, there has been a noticeable decrease in its abundance during the 1990s, perhaps due to the widespread use of medicines used to treat cattle for parasites (ivermectins and similar helminthicides). These compounds render cow-dung toxic to a range of dung-feeding insects, but their level of toxicity to this species remains to be established.",Stable,"

This is a very widespread species, covering most of the Palaearctic region. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for threatened categories. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Estonia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been observed in the following countries: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2019), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Croatia (Jeličić et al. 2010), Czechia (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2019), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Faroe Islands (Jensen 2001), Finland (FinBIF 2019), France (including Corsica) (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (including Crete) (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2001), Ireland (including Northern Ireland) (Speight 2008), Italy (including Sicilia and Sardinia) (Stoch 2003), Latvia (Karpa 2008), Lithuania (Kuznetzov 1993), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Malta (Ssymank and Ebejer, 2009), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin, 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2019), the European part of Turkey (Tóth 2013), Ukraine (Popov 2010) and the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside of Europe, this species occurs in North Africa and North America, where it occurs from Wisconsin to Labrador south to Kansas and South Carolina. It also reaches the Oriental region in northern India (Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Because of its tolerance of human-managed landscapes, there are no conservation actions needed to ensure the survival of this species.  Conservation measures can be focused on the monitoring and research of its population size and trends. Research regarding the impact of insecticides on this species is recommended due to the observed decline in Western Europe. Education and communication about its importance as a pollinator is also beneficial. It has been categorized as Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). It has also been considered as very common in Germany (Saure 2018) and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281686,149168733,Eristalis anthophorina,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This wetland species is relatively widespread.  However, the apparent declining trend in its population needs to be thoroughly analysed to see if it is continuing and occurring across the range. The scarcity of new data hinders the study of these trends. For example in Germany, it has been recorded four times since 1991. Nevertheless, the species seems to be stable in the northern parts of Europe, which is reflected in the Least Concern categorization of some countries. Both the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are considered far above the thresholds for threatened categories. Therefore, with the information available now, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both Europe and the EU27.","The larvae are saprophagous, feeding on dead or decaying organic matter. The developmental stages were described and illustrated by Kuznetzov and Kuznetzova (1994), and also four years before by Bagachanova (1990). These authors have associated the species with swampy ground and swamp hummocks. It therefore occurs in wetlands, specifically in fens, woodland flushes, watery areas in coastal dune systems and taiga wetlands. Adults normally visit flowers such as Bellis, Caltha, Cardamine, Cirsium, Crataegus, Lycopus, Menyanthes, Prunus, Ranunculus, Rubus, Salix, Solidago, Taraxacum and Valeriana. Adults can be seen flying between mid-April and the end of August. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).","The threats to this species are related to the direct threats to its habitat. Watery areas in forests can be affected by pollution (agricultural and urban effluents mainly), droughts (caused by climate change for example), management of water resources and unsustainable forestry practices (Janssen et al. 2017). These threats seem to be occurring mainly in central Europe.","This species is widespread in Finland and Sweden, but it is increasingly less common further south in Europe. It is stable in northern Europe, but its populations are declining in the southern parts of its range and it is considered possibly extinct in Czechia.

In Western Europe, its range seems to have shrunk during the previous and present century, leaving the remaining population isolated in France, Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium (Speight 2020). Overall it is considered to be decreasing in Europe and the EU27.",Decreasing,"

The general range of this species is from Scandinavia southwards to eastern France; from Denmark and the Netherlands eastwards through central Europe into the European parts of Russia and through Siberia to the Pacific coast and Japan. It is also present in Mongolia. Specific locality data are not available for some countries and so it is not possible at this time to calculate an accurate area of occupancy (AOO). However, both the extent of occurrence (EOO) and AOO are considered far above the thresholds to be considered for threatened categories.

This species has been observed in the following countries: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2019), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), Latvia (Karpa 2008), Lithuania (Kuznetzov 1993), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielesen and Svendsen 2014), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018) and Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020).

Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Estonia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise Area of Occupancy (AOO) for this species.

The global range of this species extends to North America from Alaska southwards through the mountainous parts of the USA to California and New Mexico (Speight 2020). It is a typically northern species.

",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation measures for this species need to focus on the preservation of its habitat, and can also focus on monitoring of and research into its population size and trends, as well as on education and awareness-raising about its importance as a pollinator. The population trend seems to be decreasing in the southern part of its range since 1950. It has been categorized as Critically Endangered in Czechia (Farkač et al. 2005) and it is possible that it is already extinct there (Mazanek pers. comm. 2019). It is also considered to be extremely rare in Germany, even possibly extinct in the Berlin area (Saure 2018), and scarce in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). However, in Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020), it is categorized as Least Concern.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281690,149168754,Eristalis alpina,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is found in freshwater habitats within forests. It is believed to be extinct in some European countries, and its presence is uncertain in others. However, it is widespread in European Russia. Thorough research on the species is recommended to be able to determine its risk of extinction and improve understanding of distribution within certain countries. With the current information available, the categorization in Europe and EU27 is Least Concern. However, while it is a widespread species in the EU27, there is a documented decline in its population in the EU Member States. Currently, the extent of the decline is unknown. Therefore, after acquiring more information, this species may be uplisted to a threatened category.","The main habitats of this species are streams and rivers located in forests. Its developmental stages have not been described. Nevertheless, it is known that the larvae feed on dead or decaying organic matter. Adults visit umbellifer plants of genera such as Aruncus, Crataegus, Heracleum, Prunus, Sambucus or Trollius. Its flight period is from mid-May to the end of August, and June and July at higher altitudes. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020). Haarto and Kerppola (2004) suggest that there is a possibility that this species could migrate.","The threats of this species are related to the direct threats to its habitat. Watery areas in forests can be affected by pollution, droughts (caused by climate change for example), unsustainable management of water resources and unsustainable forestry (Janssen et al. 2017). These threats seem to be occurring mainly in central Europe.","This is a widespread species, common in European Russia but not in some of the EU27 countries. It is very localized in south-eastern Europe, and in Serbia is considered a rare species from six different mountains. It is widespread in Czechia, being relatively frequent in humid forest landscapes (Mazánek pers. comm. 2021). In Spain it has only been observed near the eastern parts of the Pyrenees. It is present in one province in France, but the number of localities is unknown. In Italy it is known from three different areas: in northern Italy it has been collected in the Piedmont Alps and the Travisio area, and in southern Italy it has been found in Sila National Park in Calabria; the southern findings need to be reviewed and confirmed taxonomically. In Ukraine it is considered to be rare, only common in some very local areas in the Carpathian mountains (Popov pers. comm. 2020). Its population trend is decreasing in western, northern and central Europe, experiencing a steep decline during the last 50 years. It is more stable in European Russia and the southern parts of Finland. Overall, its population is considered to be decreasing in Europe and the EU27.",Decreasing,"

The general range of this species is from Denmark, the Netherlands and Belgium eastwards through the mountainous parts of central and southern Europe (Italy, Balkans, Caucasus) into the European parts of Russia and Turkey, and on through Siberia and Mongolia to the Pacific coast (Speight 2020).  North of this range, there are some records in the southern parts of Finland (FinBIF 2020). Specific locality data are not available for some countries and so it is not possible at this time to calculate an accurate area of occupancy (AOO), but the extent of occurrence (EOO) and AOO are far above the thresholds to be considered for a threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Poland) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

There is one record from north-eastern Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017). It is also present in one province in south-eastern France (Speight et al. 2018) and in the northern and southern parts of mainland Italy (Burgio et al. 2015).

This species has been observed in the following countries: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Czechia (Mazánek 2009), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Hungary (Tóth 2011),  Luxembourg (van Steenis et al. 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Switzerland (CSCF 2020) and Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020). The presence of this species in Croatia, Norway and European parts of Turkey is uncertain. It seems to be extinct in Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) and Belgium (INBO 2020).

",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions for this species should focus on the preservation of its habitats, and on researching and monitoring its populations to determine the real distribution and risks. This is particularly relevant for countries where it is considered to be threatened.  Education and awareness-raising about its importance as a pollinator are also important. Its population is decreasing and is threatened in some parts of Europe. In Belgium (INBO 2019) and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), as well as in Denmark (DanBIF 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020), it is categorized as Regionally Extinct. It is categorized as Vulnerable in Czechia (Farkač et al. 2005) and as Near Threatened in Finland (Hyvärinen et al. 2019). It is considered to be a rare species in Germany (Saure 2018).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281694,149168773,Eristalis abusiva,Least Concern,,2021,2020-10-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread in northern Europe and also occurs in central Europe. It lives in aquatic environments, such as marshes, fens, bogs and seasonally flooded grassland. Despite threats to its habitat, Eristalis abusiva is an abundant and widespread species with only one record of threat categorization in Europe (Czech Republic). Therefore, it is categorized as Least Concern for Europe and the EU27 at this time. Monitoring and research on its distribution and population trend are suggested, as well as education and raising awareness about its situation.","The developmental stages of this species were described and illustrated by Hartley (1961) from a specimen collected in a moorland pond. The larvae develop in aquatic environments such as marshes, fens, bogs and seasonally flooded grassland. They filter-feed on bacteria in an environment filled with decaying vegetation. They can also be found in constructed wetlands on farmland for treating livestock waste, although not very commonly since Eristalis abusiva is not synanthropic. Adults normally are present in places with dense vegetation within marshes, visiting the yellow and white flowers of plants such as Calluna, Caltha, Cirsium, Erica, Potentilla, Ranunculus, Rubus, Salix, Stellaria or Spartina. The flight period is from May to mid-October. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).","The threats to this species are related to direct threats to its habitat. Aquatic habitats can be affected by pollution, drought (caused by climate change for example), unsustainable management of water resources and unsustainable commercial forestry practices (Janssen et al. 2017). These threats seems to mainly occur in Central Europe.","This species is widespread in northern Europe, particularly in Finland and the southern part of Sweden. It is extremely scarce in most of central Europe. It has been cited in older studies, but has not been observed in recent years. It is very common in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), as well as in European Russia and in the UK. Its population may be declining in the UK and in central Europe, but it is stable in northern Europe. There are only a few records from Romania. It is considered common in the Berlin area of Germany (Saure 2018).",Stable,"

The general range of this species is from Scandinavia and the Faroes south to northern France (Yonne); and from Ireland eastwards through northern and central Europe into European Russia. The area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are far above thresholds required for a threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Ukraine and Poland) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been observed in the following countries: Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Krym (Popov 1998), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Faroe Islands (Jensen 2001), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Saure 2018), Hungary (Tóth 2001), Ireland (including Northern Ireland) (Speight 2008), Latvia (Karpa 2008) , Lithuania (Kuznetzov 1993), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Ukraine (Popov 2010) and the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014). The presence of this species in Belarus is not certain. It is clearly a northern species.

Outside of Europe, this species occurs eastwards through Siberia to the Pacific coast (Speight 2020).",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The conservation of this species should be focused on the conservation of its habitat, particularly in central Europe. Monitoring and research on its distribution and population trend are suggested, as well as education and awareness-raising about its situation. It has been categorized as Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020), and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020), and as Vulnerable in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281698,149168803,Eristalinus sepulchralis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Eristalinus sepulchralis
 is a widespread species found across Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for a threatened Category for both Europe and the EU 27. Although this species may be impacted locally by threats to its habitat, particularly freshwater environments, it is considered to be adaptable because it is found in anthropogenic habitats, and the current population trend is considered to be stable. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern for both Europe and the EU 27.

Further research and monitoring on the population is recommended, but no conservation measures are required at present.","

This species can be found in wetlands such as fens, rivers and pond margins. It is highly anthropophilic, occurring close to seawage farms, manure heaps, polluted ditches and irrigation channels. Adults can be found flying low over the ground vegetation and mud, and also feeding on flowers such as white umbellifers, Achillea millefolium, Bellis perennis, CalthaRanunculus, Rosa, Salix, Senecio jacobaea, Solidago virgaurea, Taraxacum, Tussilago and Valeriana dioica, amongst others. Pre-imaginal stages were described by Hartley (1961) and Pérez-Bañón et al. (2003); the larvae develop in water with decaying organic matter. Adults can be seen flying between April and September, even October. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).

","The main threats to this species are related to loss of the natural habitats of the larvae, particularly in freshwater, by modifications of the hydrological systems, the intensification of agriculture, and climate change, amongst other factors (Janssen et al. 2017). Due to its synanthropic nature, the hoverfly is capable of surviving and reproducing in environments with high human activities. However, the species seems to have become less frequent recently in some parts of Europe, which may be due to changes in farming practices associated with animal waste storage and disposal – farmyard manure heaps have all but disappeared from the countryside due to progressive enforcement of EU regulations (Speight 2008).","This is a widespread species likely to have a stable population trend in both Europe and the EU 27. In the United Kingdom, it is widely distributed, although more abundant in southern areas and more restricted in the north (Ball and Morris 2000). In Ireland, the hoverfly is common and widely distributed (Speight 2008) although recently it may be less frequently recorded, and it is also common in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) and Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). It is considered a widespread species in Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017) and Greece (Vujić et al. 2020).",Stable,"The general European range of this species is from Fennoscandia, south to the Iberian Peninsula and the European Mediterranean region, and from Ireland through most of Europe into Turkey and the European parts of Russia (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for a threatened category for both Europe and the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Estonia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been cited in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodina and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), the Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (including Corsica) (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (including Sardinia and Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2000), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (including Balearic Islands) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Turkey (Tóth 2013), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Out of the European region the range of the species extends south to North Africa and east through Siberia to the Pacific coast, Japan, China and India (Speight 2020).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

As this species seems to be adaptable to human-dominated environments, it is not necessary to implement conservation actions at present. However, further research is recommended, including the monitoring of population size and trends. Education and awareness relating to this species and its situation can be also a useful conservation tool.

This species has been categorized as Near Threatened in Belgium (INBO 2020) and Least Concern in Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281702,149168849,Anasimyia lunulata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species can be found in wetland habitats across northern Europe and potentially parts of Central Europe. It is fairly widespread in northern Europe, and its population seems to be stable in this part of its European range where the population is better understood. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) for both the European and the EU27 regions are far above the threshold for the application of a threatened category, and therefore this species is categorised as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27.

This species and its population is not fully understood. In some countries, it has been assessed as threatened or decreasing, which suggests it needs to be closely monitored in Europe and the EU27.  There is a lack of information regarding its biology, populations and trends, and so further research is recommended.","This species occurs in wetlands, and in particular it has a preference for more acidic water bodies, which sets it apart from the rest of the species in this genus. It has been found in valley bogs and bogs that are being restored using the 'cut-over' method, transition mires and pools with vegetation. This habitat is common in the northern part of Europe.

The larval stage of this species is thought to have been described by Hartley (1961), although it is unclear if this description should actually belong to Anasimyia interpuncta. The larva is aquatic with an elongated tail which acts as a breathing tube. It feeds on microorganisms that are usually filtered from rotting plant debris under the water surface.

The adults feed on the pollen and nectar of flowers. Their flying period is usually between mid-May and August/September. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).","The following potential threats to this species mainly affect the loss of quality and quantity of its habitat, which has been negatively impacted by the drainage and removal of water from wetlands, and changing rainfall and drought patterns due to climate change. Furthermore, intensified vegetation management to adapt land for tourism and recreation can negatively impact its habitat. Nutrient enrichment of oligotrophic water bodies, modifying the original physicochemical properties of the environment (Janssen et al. 2017), is also probably a threat. These possible threats are based on the fact that this species is found in similar habitats to others of the genus.","The population trend of this species is unknown in Europe and the EU27 because of previous taxonomic confusion. It is unknown how common it is, and in the countries where it is known to exist, the data regarding locality are imprecise. 

Data from the UK, Netherlands, Finland, Denmark and Sweden are more precise, and it is considered common in Finland (FinBIF 2019) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2019). In the Netherlands, it is very threatened with only two subpopulations known to exist (Reemer et al. 2009); in the UK it is considered Nationally Scarce (Ball and Morris 2014) and as Endangered in Denmark (DanBIF 2019).

Overall it seems to be more widespread in northern European countries and scarcer in southern countries.",Unknown,"

This species can be found from Scandinavia southwards to northeastern France, west to Britain and Ireland, and east to European Russia. Its range elsewhere requires reconfirmation due to previous confusion with Anasimyia interpuncta (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU27 regions are far above the threshold for the application of a threatened category. Specific locality data for this species are not available for some countries (for example: Estonia and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise area of occupancy (AOO).

This species has been cited in the following checklists: Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009) Denmark (DanBIF 2019), Estonia (Kutnetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al 2018), Ireland (including Northern Ireland) (Speight 2008), Netherlands (Reemer et al 2009), Norway (Nielsen and Svendsen 2014), Latvia (Karpa 2008), Lithuania (Kutnetzov 1993), European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin, 2018), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2019) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014).

Its presence in the following countries requires confirmation: Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Germany, Hungary, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Serbia and Switzerland. Although it occurs in the Czechia and Slovakia national checklists, it has since been confirmed that the specimens were misidentified (L. Mazaneck pers. comm. 2019).

It is not limited to the European territory, being also present in the northern regions of the United States, central Russia and Japan.

",The species is not utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions for this species should be focused on the protection of the habitat in which they live. Monitoring and research on the distribution should also be prioritised, to clarify its full distribution. This species would also benefit from increased awareness-raising efforts.

Most wetland habitats are now protected in European countries. This species has been categorized as extinct in Belgium (INBO 2020) but due to previous misidentification its presence needs to be further investigated. It has been categorised as Endangered in Denmark (DanBIF 2020) and in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) (although its presence in the country is now uncertain), as Vulnerable in Czechia (Farkač et al. 2005) and as Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020), Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020) and Norway (NBIC 2020). It is considered nationally scarce in United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014) and very rare in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009).",Nearctic|Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281706,149168869,Anasimyia interpuncta,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Whilst the general outlook of this species indicates that its populations are moderately decreasing in some of the assessed countries, it is not significant and it has a large extent of occurrence and area of occupancy and stable populations in other occurrence countries. It is widespread throughout Europe and so this species has been categorized as Least Concern (LC) for Europe and the EU27 regional assessment.","This is a wetland species. It has been found at the edges of emergent vegetation covered by slow-moving water in fens, marshes and rivers in association with grasslands. During its aquatic larval stage it feeds on decaying material, making use of its elongated anal segment. It is frequently found beneath the water surface among rotting plant debris, filtering microorganisms, their main food resource. Adults are active between May and July, when they feed on pollen and nectar.

The larval stage was apparently first described by Hartley (1961), although it is uncertain if this description definitely refers to A. interpuncta. It is closely associated with Glyceria maxima. This information is summarized in Speight (2020).","The main possible threats are loss of quality and quantity of habitat. Drainage and water abstraction projects in wetlands, and changing rainfall patterns and drought due to the climate change (Janssen et al. 2017), may threaten this species.

Intensified vegetation management to adapt natural areas for tourism and intensified grazing of wetlands may also threaten this species. Nutrient enrichment of naturally low-nutrient water bodies is also a threat because it alters the natural physicochemical properties of the environment; such enrichment can be caused by a variety of human activities, such as agriculture, industry and domestic activities.","This species is widespread and abundant across most of its range, in the EU27 and Europe, except in the Mediterranean basin. In some countries a moderate decline has been observed, including in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). However, its general trend appears to be stable and it is common across both assessment regions.",Stable,"This species is quite widespread and occurs from Scandinavia to northern France, and from Britain eastwards through Central Europe into the European parts of Russia: it is endemic to Europe (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for it to be considered in a threatened category, in either Europe or the EU 27.
 
This species is cited from the following national checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al, 2001), Hungary (Tóth, 2001), Latvia (Karpa, 2008), Lithuania (Kuznetzov 1993), Netherlands (Reemer et al, 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Păarvu 2005), European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2019) and the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014).

In Estonia, the presence of this species is not certain: it has also been cited from the Balearic Islands (Ebejer et al. 2007) and European Turkey (Tóth 2013), but these occurrences need to be reviewed. Specific locality data for this species are not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise area of occupancy (AOO).

The range of this species extends out of the European region to Asian Russia (Siberia; http://szmn.eco.nsc.ru/Diptera/Syrphidae.htm) and Kazakhstan (Barkalov and Mutin 2018).",This species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The conservation actions for this species should be focused on the conservation of the habitat in which it lives. There are a lot of wetlands that are currently protected in the EU 27 and other European countries, many of them listed within the Ramsar Convention.

Monitoring and research on distribution and population of the species is recommended, and education and awareness-raising would also be beneficial.

This species is considered to be nationally scarce in the United Kingdom, suggesting that the current subpopulations are stable but very localized (Ball and Morris 2014). It is considered to be Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020), common in Germany (Dunk et al. 2003) and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), and Vulnerable in the Czech Republic (Frkač et al. 2005) and Norway (NBIC 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281710,149168902,Anasimyia femorata,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

This species is known from Montenegro on Lake Skadar (Vujić et al. 2001, van Steenis et al. 2015), where it was described, and it is also known to exist at Prespa Lake in Greece (Vujić et al., 2020). The larvae exist in wetlands where they feed on decaying material, and the adults feed on pollen and nectar from flowering plants associated with marshlands. Habitat loss is the main threat to this species and conservation action should prioritize this. research is required to confirm its distribution, and occurrence in other countries adjacent to these two lakes is possible.

The occurrence range of this species is extremely small in Europe, where it is known only from Montenegro and Greece. In the EU27, the species is only present in Greece. The estimated area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) in Europe is 10 km2 and 8,000 km2 respectively. It occurs in two locations based on the threat of tourism development. Given the small AOO and EOO, the small number of locations and continuing decline in habitat extent and quality, this species is assessed as Endangered in Europe. In the EU27, the AOO is 4 km2 and the EOO around 80 km2, it is found at one location because it is only known from one locality in Prespa Lake, and the habitat extent and quality is declining. Therefore, the species is assessed as Critically Endangered in the EU27, and there is a high likelihood of this subpopulation going extinct due to the presence of the identified threats.","The larval stage of this species remains undescribed, but is probably saprophagous (feeds on decomposing material). Larvae are probably to be found in water with decaying vegetable material in wetlands, more specifically in shallow pools. Adults have been found in marshland bordering lakes with submerged and emergent vegetation of Nuphar and Nymphaea, from whose flowers they must feed on pollen and nectar. This species has actually been observed feeding on Nuphar lutea. This information is from Speight (2020), Vujić et al. (2001) and van Steenis et al. (2015).","There is a continuing decline in the extent and the quality of the habitat, due to development of infrastructure and tourism activity in the areas. There is development in the areas for tourism which might be contributing to pollution in the lakes, and moreover a large resort is currently (2020) being planned on Lake Skadar. Hydropower is also projected to be a future threat to the lake ecosystem. Habitat decline can also be impacted in a less rapid and perceptible way by the effects of climate change, such as by drought, modification of the flora due to variation in temperatures, and speeding up other damaging processes such as eutrophication and the appearance of alien species (Janssen et al. 2017).","

The population trend of this species is currently not known. The main subpopulation of this species occurs in the same marsh in which it was originally discovered in Montenegro. 27 individuals were collected during a survey in Montenegro in 2009 (van Steenis et al. 2015) and these authors indicated that a large subpopulation was established in the area. This is not considered enough information to determine its population trend. Although it might appear to be stable in that locality, it is not known where else this species is present, nor what its situation might be in those areas. There have been general hoverfly surveys in Greece, but this species has not been found elsewhere, indicating that it is not abundant. Nevertheless, as it has been described on quite recently, much more research is needed to determine the distribution and population trend.

",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe (Speight 2020), where it is restricted to Lake Skadar in Montenegro (Vujić et al. 2001, van Steenis et al. 2015) and Prespa Lake in Greece (Vujić et al. 2020); presence in Albania and in North Macedonia in the Lake Prespa region is possible.

In Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 10 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) around 8,000 km2. In the EU 27, the AOO is estimated to be 4 kmand the EOO around 80 km2. The number of locations in Europe is highly likely to be fewer than five, and in the EU 27 is reduced to only one location because it is only known from one point in the small Prespa lake. There is an inferred continuing decline in the extent and the quality of the habitat, due to development of infrastructure and tourism activity in the areas.

It is possible that this species was previously more widespread and may be a relict species.",This species is not utilized.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Both localities where the species is present are protected within a National Park, which means that threats to the habitat are supposed to be controlled by the National Parks conservation measures, although the extent of the protection is not fully known. Conservation actions should be focused on protecting the habitat. Lake Skadar is protected as a National Park and it is protected as a Ramsar wetland, Important Bird Area (IBA), Important Plant Area (IPA) and it is part of the Emerald Network. The Greek locality (Prespa Lake) is also found within a National Park, is listed as a Natura 2000 site and a Ramsar wetland site. 

This species is not listed in any National Red List, but nevertheless in the recently published Atlas of the Hoverflies of Greece (Vujic et al. 2020) it is suggested that it should be considered threatened.

Population monitoring is needed, as well as research into its ecology to identify the micro-habitat and behaviour of the larval stage. Education and awareness-raising related to this species and its situation could also be a useful conservation tool.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 152281714,149169327,Neocnemodon vitripennis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This forest species is widespread across Europe and the EU27, and present in many countries. Its current population trend is unknown, but in some countries it is considered common. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. Therefore it is categorized as Least Concern for both the EU27 and Europe. Increased research and monitoring on the distribution, population trends and threats are required.","

The preferred habitat of this species is conifer forest, deciduous forest (Quercus, Carpinus and Ulmus) and suburban parks and gardens. The developmental stages were first described by Delucchi et al. (1957) from larvae collected on Abies, feeding on adelgids. The larvae predate upon a variety of insects including coccids on Populus and aphids on Malus (Evenhuis 1959). The adults are highly arboreal, flying up to three metres high; the flight period is between May and September. They visit flowers such as Euphorbia, Potentilla, Prunus, Rosa, Rubus and Salix. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).

","The main threats to this species are related to how its habitat is managed and affected by human activities such as forestry-related logging, deforestation and fires. Variation in temperature ranges and hydrological patterns caused by climate change can be considered as a feasible threat to the species as well.","

In the UK, this species is considered to be the least scarce species of Neocnemodon hoverflies, although it is still quite scarce with records being concentrated in the south-east of the country (Ball and Morris 2000). In the Netherlands it is considered a common species (Reemer et al. 2009) and very common in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). In northern countries such as Finland or Sweden, it is widespread and shows stable population trends (Artdatabanken 2020, FinBIF 2020). The population trend of this species is overall considered stable in EU27 and Europe.

",Stable,"

This species can be found from southern Sweden southwards to central France, and from Ireland eastwards through northern and central Europe into European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Polonia and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been included in the following country checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2011), Krym (Popov 1998), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov et al. 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight, et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (Including Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov et al. 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside Europe it occurs through Russia and on to Siberia and the Pacific coast (Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"

Conservation efforts should be focused on habitat preservation and empathetic management of sites for the species. Monitoring and research of its distribution, threats and population trends are needed, together with education and awareness-raising. It has been categorized as Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281718,149170078,Neocnemodon larusi,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This European endemic is present in Sweden, Finland, Norway, Montenegro, Italy and Serbia. Due to the taxonomic issues attached to this species, the full distribution of this species and its population trend is not clear, nor is its biological cycle is fully understood or the threats that may affect it. Nevertheless, considering its current distribution, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened categories. Thus the species has been categorised as Least Concern in the Global, European and EU27 assessment. Extensive research on its taxonomy, threats, distribution and population are needed to understand this species better.","

This species is found in forest habitats, alongside streams in open, montane Picea/Abies/Fagus forest, up to 1,800 m (Vujic 1999). The developmental stages have not been described, but as for other species of the genus, the larvae should be predators upon hemipteran insects (generally gall formers and flocculent wax secretors) and therefore have a range limited to the availability of these prey. The adult flight period is between May and July, visiting flowers such as Caltha, Ranunculus and Prunus. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).

","This species is threatened by direct threats to its habitat. Human activities related to forestry in mountainous areas, such as unsustainable deforestation and forest fires, are a particular threat.","The population trend of this species is unknown in both Europe and the EU27. In Sweden it is considered to be widespread but not common (Artdatabanken 2020), while in Norway it has a more localised distribution (NBIC 2020); in Finland it is also widespread and apparently more common (FinBIF 2020).",Unknown,"This European endemic species is currently known from Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), northern Italy and Serbia (Vujić 1999). Certainly, it seems odd that this species has been recorded for the Balkans and Scandinavia, but not, apparently, from any points in between. Due to identification difficulties, it is recommended that Central European Neocnemodon pubescens specimens should be re-examined to determine whether this species exists in other parts of Europe. Nevertheless, considering its current distribution, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"

Conservation actions for this species should be focused on the preservation and appropriate management of its habitat. Increased monitoring and research of the taxonomy, biological cycle, distribution and population trends are needed, together with education and communication about the species. It has been categorised as Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). 

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 152281722,149170098,Neocnemodon verrucula,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This woodland species is present in northern and central Europe to European Russia. Its population trends are unknown in Europe and the EU27, but its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. Thus it is categorized as Least Concern for both EU27 and Europe. It would benefit from increased research on its biology and distribution, as well as the monitoring of its population.

","The preferred habitat of this species is Pinus sylvestris and Quercus, Carpinus and Ulmus humid forests. The developmental stages have not been described, but as with other species of the genus, the larva should prey upon hemipteran insects (generally gall formers and flocculent wax secretors) and therefore have a range limited to the availability of these prey. The adult flight period is between April and June, when they visit flowers such as Acer, Potentilla and Salix. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).

","

The main threats to this species are related to the management of its habitat. Forestry activities such as logging, deforestation and fire can impact it. It is likely to be a woodland-edge species that could be affected by over-intensive ride management and loss of scrub structure at the interface with high woodland (Ball and Morris 2014). Variation in temperature ranges and hydrological patterns caused by climate change can be considered as a feasible threat to the species as well.

","

In the UK the records of this species are scattered, but it is widely distributed up to Scottish Highlands (Ball and Morris 2014). In the Netherlands and Germany, it is considered a very rare species (Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011). Its general population trend in the EU27 and Europe is uncertain.

",Unknown,"

This species can be found from Scandinavia south to Netherlands and Germany, and eastwards into European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Latvia and Germany) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been included in the following country checklists: Belgium (RBINS 2020), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2011), Latvia (Kuznetzov et al. 1993), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Sweden (Bartsch 2009) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000, 2014).

Outside Europe it occurs through Siberia to the Pacific coast and Mongolia (Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"

Conservation actions should focus on the conservation of its habitat. Existing ride structures should be retained or enhanced to provide transitional structure between grasslands and high forest, with provision of sunny open flower-rich glades (Ball and Morris 2014). Further monitoring of and research on the distribution, population size and trends, as well as the biology of the developmental stages, are needed. Increased education and communication to the public and relevant sectors about the species would be beneficial. It is categorised as Near Threatened in Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Data Deficient in the UK (Ball and Morris 2014) and Norway (NBIC 2020), and Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). 

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281726,149170119,Neocnemodon pubescens,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This widespread species is present in many countries across Europe and the EU27. Its population trend is currently unknown in both regions, but it is considered Least Concern in several national Red Lists. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. It is therefore categorised as Least Concern for both EU27 and Europe. However, some taxonomic research should be done to solve separation issues with Neocnemodon larusi. Additionally, increased research on its population and threats, and monitoring of the population, is required. ","The preferred habitat of this species is deciduous and coniferous forest, including forests of Quercus and Carpinus, Fagus and Picea, and Abies and Picea. The developmental stages have not been described, but as in other species of the genus, the larvae should prey upon hemipteran insects (generally gall formers and flocculent wax secretors) and therefore have a range limited to the availability of these prey. Kula (1980) recorded a larva overwintering on the forest floor in Picea forest. Adults are largely arboreal, flying between April and July, and visiting flowers such as Anemone, Bellis, Caltha, Mercurialis, Prunus, Ranunculus, Ribes, Stellaria, Taraxacum and Veronica. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).

","

Forestry activities such as deforestation, removal of dead trees and the creation of forests with even-aged stands possibly threaten this species. Additionally, forest fires and hydrological modifications may affect it (Janssen et al. 2017). This is a woodland-edge species most likely to be affected by over-intensive ride management and loss of scrub structure at the interface with high woodland (Ball and Morris 2014). Variation in temperature ranges and hydrological patterns caused by climate change can be considered as a feasible threat to the species as well.

","

This species is considered to be scarce in the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014) and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), but common in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). Apart from that, the population trend of the species in EU27 and Europe is unknown. 

",Unknown,"This species can be found from Scandinavia southwards to the Alps, and from Britain eastwards through central Europe into European parts of Russia (Speight 2020). Outside of Europe, this species can be found in the Russian Far East and in North America (Barkalov and Mutin 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Estonia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been included in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov et al. 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight, et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov et al. 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek, 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu, 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin, 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"

Conservation actions for this species should be focused on the preservation of its habitat. Research is needed on the taxonomy, biological cycle, threats and distribution of the species, and monitoring is required on the population trends. Education and communication about this species is also recommended. Existing ride structures should be retained or enhanced to provide transitional structures between grasslands and high forest, with the provision of sunny open flower-rich glades (Ball and Morris 2014). The species has been categorized as Nationally Scarce in the UK (Ball and Morris, 2014), Vulnerable in Belgium (INBO 2020), and Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). 

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281730,149170141,Neocnemodon latitarsis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This woodland species has a widespread European distribution, although it is considered to be more common in south-eastern Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above any thresholds to be considered as threatened in either Europe or the EU27. Therefore it is categorized as Least Concern in both the EU27 and Europe. Its habitat is somewhat threatened, and efforts should be made to conserve it, along with increased monitoring and research on the population and distribution.","

This is a woodland species, found in mixed coniferous Abies forest, deciduous (acidophilus and thermophilus) Quercus forest and evergreen Quercus ilex forest. The developmental stages were first described by Dusek and Laska (1960). As in other species of the genus, the larvae prey upon hemipteran insects (generally gall formers) and therefore have a range limited to the availability of these prey. Larvae have been reported feeding on Dreyfusia (Adelgidae), Eriosoma, Pemphigus and Schizolachnus (Aphididae), and Pullus implexus (Coleoptera); they have also been found in Paranthrene tabaniformis galleries (Lepidoptera) (Rojo et al. 2003). As an adult, the species is largely arboreal but it can be seen flying around low-growing shrubs, visiting flowers such as Campanula, Origanum, Prunus, Rosa, Rubus and Vaccinium. The adult flight period is between June and September. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).

","Acidophilous Quercus woodland (G1.8), a key habitat for this species, has been categorised as Vulnerable in the European Red List of Habitats. Unsustainable deforestation practices and forest fires are particular threats to its habitat (Janssen et al. 2017). Variation in temperature ranges and hydrological patterns caused by climate change can be considered a feasible threat as well.","

This species is widely distributed in Europe but not common in at least part of its range, such as southern England (Ball and Morris 2014) and Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). It is considered scarce in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). In Greece it is recorded widely in the mountainous areas of the mainland (Vujić et al. 2020). Its population trend is unknown in Europe and the EU27, but it is more common in south-eastern Europe.

",Unknown,"This species can be found from southern Finland south to the Pyrenees, and from Britain eastwards through central and southern Europe into European parts of Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above any thresholds to be considered as threatened, either in Europe or the EU27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Polonia and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been included in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Including Sardinia) (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov et al. 1993), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside Europe, it is found as far as the Caucasus mountains and has been introduced into North America (Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"

Conservation efforts for this species should focus on protection of its habitat and the sites where this species occurs. Monitoring and research on its distribution and population trends are required, together with education and communication about the species. It has been categorized as Nationally Scarce in the UK (Ball and Morris 2014), Vulnerable in Belgium (INBO 2020), Near Threatened in Finland (FinBIF 2020) and Least Concern in Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). 


",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281750,149170163,Neocnemodon fulvimanus,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-04-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

The distribution of this forest-dwelling species is uncertain, due to persistent misidentification with Neocnemodon pubescens and Neocnemodon vitripennis. It is currently confirmed to occur in Norway, Sweden, Finland and the Alps (Austria, Italy), but its presence is uncertain in much of its range. Its population trend is also unknown. Increased monitoring and research of the habitat, distribution and population trends, and research on the developmental stages, are required. Due to taxonomic uncertainty and associated lack of data, this species is categorised as Data Deficient for both EU27 and Europe.","

The preferred habitat of this species is forest, found in conifer forest of Abies and Picea at high altitudes (1300-1800 m) in the Alps, taiga forest and subalpine Betula forest. The developmental stages have not been described yet, but as other species of the genus, the larvae should prey upon hemipteran insects (generally gall formers and flocculent wax secretors) and therefore have a range limited to the availability of these prey. The adult flight period is between May and August, in open areas at the edges of forest, visiting flowers of Taraxacum. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).

","The main threats to this species are related to the management of its habitat. Unsustainable forestry activities in montane forests can impact this species, this includes deforestation and fires. Variation in habitat condition due to shifting temperature and hydrological patterns caused by climate change is a feasible threat to the species as well.","The population trend of this species is unknown across the EU27 and Europe. In Finland it is not considered rare: 24 adults were sampled between 2003 and 2018 (FinBIF 2020). In Sweden only four adults have been found across 2002, 2011 and 2020.",Unknown,"

The general range of this species is uncertain, due to persistent misidentification with Neocnemodon pubescens and Neocnemodon vitripennis, but it is confirmed from Norway, Sweden, Finland and the Alps (Austria, Italy), with occurrence in European Russia and some other parts of Europe uncertain. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above any thresholds to be considered threatened.

The species is included in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Sweden (Bartsch 2009) and Switzerland (CSCF 2020).

Outside Europe, it may occur through Siberia to the Pacific, as indicated in Peck (1988), but this requires confirmation (Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"Conservation actions for this species should be focused on the preservation of its habitat. Increased monitoring of and research on the habitat, distribution and population trends, and research on the developmental stages, are required. It is categorized as Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020), and as Data Deficient in Norway (NBIC 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281755,149170186,Neocnemodon brevidens,Least Concern,,2021,2020-04-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 Regional Assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This widespread species is present in many countries across Europe, particularly in central and southern Europe, although its population trend is unknown. Its preferred habitat is primarily softwood forest with  Populus and small water bodies fringed with Populus and Salix in forests. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered as threatened, and therefore it is categorised as Least Concern for both EU27 and Europe. However, more research on the distribution and population is recommended to determine more accurately its situation.","

This species has a close relationship with Populus and Salix, at least in United Kingdom, and its preferred habitat is primarily softwood (conifer) forest with Populus and small water bodies fringed with Populus and Salix in forests. The developmental stages of this species have not yet been described. As other species of the genus, the larvae probably prey upon hemipteran insects (generally gall formers and flocculent wax secretors) and therefore have a range limited to the availability of these prey. Adults are mainly arboreal, but often visit flowers such as Caltha, Nasturtium or Rubus. The flight period of adults is between mid-May and the beginning of September. All this information has been summarised and updated from Ball and Morris (2000; 2014) and Speight (2020).

","

The forest and aquatic habitats on which this species relies experience a number of threats. These habitats can be affected by pollution, drought (which can be affected by climate change), management of water resources and deforestation associated with commercial forestry, the latter being the biggest threat (Janssen et al.  2017). Clearance of poplars and willows is a significant threat to this species in the UK (Ball and Morris 2014).

","This species is considered Nationally Scarce in the UK, but it is likely to be more widely distributed than current data suggest because it is a difficult species to find (Ball and Morris 2014). It is considered rare in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2005) and in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). The overall population trend for this species is unknown.",Unknown,"

This species can be found from the Netherlands southwards to France, and from the United Kingdom eastwards through central Europe to Romania and the European parts of Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above any thresholds to be considered threatened. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Latvia and Czechia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been included in the following checklists: Belgium (RBINS 2020), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside Europe, it occurs across Siberia towards the Pacific (Speight 2020).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"The conservation of this species should be focused on the conservation of its habitat and important sites. Increased education and communication about this species would also be beneficial. Increased monitoring of and research on the distribution, population size and trends, as well as biology of the developmental stages, is required. It is categorised as Near Threatened in Belgium (INBO 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281759,149170214,Sphiximorpha petronillae,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This saproxylic species is found in a very specific habitat within certain oak woodlands, and is known to live in the same habitat as the European velvety ant (Liometopum microcephalum). The area of occupancy (AOO) is about 32 km2 in the European region, and although the population trend is unknown, there is continuing decline in the extent and quality of habitat. It exists in six locations, at most, with fire and tree felling as the main threats (the loss of a single tree in Novi Sad would eliminate the entire Serbian subpopulation). Taking all of these into account, the species has been categorized as Vulnerable (VU) in Europe.

In the EU27 this species has an AOO of 24 km2 and exists in one to four locations, using tree felling and fire as the main threats. The habitat is in decline in Italy but it is considered stable at the locality in Greece. This species is therefore considered to be Endangered in the EU27.

This species requires urgent action to protect its key sites and restore its habitat across its European range. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand the species, its ecology and population better.","

This species has a saproxylic larva: although the larvae have not yet been studied, female adults have been observed laying eggs in the bark of old living Quercus cerris trees inhabited by colonies of a saproxylic ant, the European velvety tree ant (Liometopum microcephalum). The presence of this ant indicates that the trunk is hollow and hence that there may be suitable habitat for larvae to grow. In Serbia, the specimen was found in a tree in a garden in Novi Sad, and the ant was also present in this tree. It is suspected that without the ant, the hoverfly is unlikely to be found. It is important to highlight that the ant Liometopum microcephalum is also associated with aphid colonies. Polistes dominulus and the European ant hunter (Tracheliodes curvitarsus) could also be used to identify possible localities for this species (van Steenis et al. 2019). The wasp Tracheliodes curvitarsus is known to predate on the European velvety tree ant, and they are found at several European localities where this ant still remains. The ant is thought at one stage to have existed as far west as Germany.

The habitat of this species is very specific, in veteran thermophilous Quercus cerris forest, Quercus frainetto and Quercus cerris forest and humid Castanea, Quercus and Laurus forest. In the regions in which it is known to exist, this habitat is considered to be declining.

Adults fly between April and May, and have been observed visiting flowers of Euphorbia, Pyracantha coccinea and Smyrnium.

All this information has been summarized from van Steenis et al. (2016), van Steenis et al. (2019) and Speight (2020).

","The main threats to this species are related to habitat decline. The larvae are reliant on veteran/mature trees, which are in decline due to deforestation, unsustainable forest management and forest fires. Human management of the habitat is not currently permitting trees to age long enough to ensure that appropriate habitat will occur in the future. The cutting of trees for preparing recreational areas for tourism can be also a potential threat, together with decline due to variation in temperature range and hydrological patterns caused by climate change.","

Only four specimens (females) of Sphiximorpha petronillae have been recorded during the last 150 years from localities in Italy and Montenegro; it is one of the rarest of all European hoverflies (Speight 2020). There are only three specimens known from Italy and the subpopulation there is not well understood since it has so rarely been seen (only once since it has been described). The habitat of the localities in Italy and Montenegro are suspected to be lost or degraded in such a way that the continued existence of the species is doubtful (van Steenis et al. 2015).

It has been found recently in north-eastern Greece (Dadia National Park), and this subpopulation is considered to be thriving . However, it has so far been found in only three localities where there is suitable habitat. The specific conditions it needs have apparently been found in other parts of the park, but this species has not been found there.

In Serbia it was found in a natural patch inside a urban area, and therefore it is very likely to disappear in 20-30 years or sooner if the trees it relies upon are cut down during urban maintenance of the park. 

Overall, together with Epistrophella coronata, it is one of the rarest of all European species (van Steenis et al. 2016, Vujić et al. 2020, Speight 2020), and its population trend is currently unknown in Europe and the EU27. Despite increased interest in photography of hoverflies as a means of identification, a photo of this species is yet to be submitted, which further indicates its scarcity.

",Unknown,"

This species is considered to be endemic in Europe, where it is known from three localities in peninsula Italy (most recently from 2003), Montenegro (one record from 2005) and north-eastern Greece (collected several times in Dadia National Park within the last two decades). It has recently been found (2019) around an old tree in a garden in Novi Sad, Serbia (van Steenis et al. 2019). For Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is 32 km2, but the extent of occurrence (EOO) is large (around 355,000 km2). In the EU27, the AOO is only 24 km2 and the EOO is around 208,950 km2. In Dadia National Park (Greece), there is around 50 hectares of suitable habitat, and there have been extensive attempts to find more suitable habitat but this has not been successful.

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"This species requires urgent action to protect the key sites where it exists, and restore its habitat across its European range.

When considering its conservation needs, it is important to consider the requirements of the associated ant Liometopum microcephalum, because the presence of the hoverfly appears to be dependent on its presence. Surveys to look for the ant in the last known localities of the hoverfly could be carried out, as it is often easier to find the ant than the hoverfly, and this would help to identify possible additional localities for the hoverfly. Research to establish if there is a decline in the ant population may mean that we can infer a decline in the population of the hoverfly. Research on the biology and population of this species is required to understand further the relationship between the ant and the hoverfly. The population and habitat trends of this species also require monitoring, and description of the larvae is required.

The Greek locality for this species exists in the Natura 2000 site, Dadia National Park. However, the park would benefit from more resources being made available for management, and research to ensure the protection of this species. The national park authority should be informed of the whereabouts of this species and the vulnerability of the largest subpopulation.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 152281763,149170234,Sphiximorpha euprosopa,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This saproxylic forest species is found on the Greek island of Lesvos and Dadia National Park on mainland Greece. Its area of occupancy (AOO) is between 14 and 20 km2 and its extent of occurrence (EOO) is 3950 km2. Based on fire as the major threat, it is judged to occur at no more than five locations, more likely to be between two and five. There is continuous decline of habitat quality in both Lesvos and mainland Greece due primarily to forest fires and road construction, and restoration is limited because of overgrazing of the regenerating forest by livestock. The subpopulations are known to be declining in Lesvos, but may also be declining in mainland Greece. Due to all this information, the species is categorised as Endangered in both Europe and EU27. Habitat protection and better habitat management are recommended, as well as research and monitoring to improve our understanding of the species and its population.","

This is a species with a close ecological relationship with veteran trees. The developmental stages are not yet understood, but the larva should be saproxylic. In mainland Greece, the adults can be found in thermophilous oak forest of Quercus frainetto and Quercus cerrris. In the Lesvos islands, the species has been found in Quercus coccifera forest. Adults fly from March to April. After rain on hot days, individuals have been observed drinking at puddles on forest tracks. Adults often visit flowers of Crataegus and Pyrus amygdaliformis plants. All this information has been summarised and updated from van Steenis et al. 2016, Vujić et al. (2020) and Speight (2020).

","

The main threat to this species is habitat degradation, and in particular, the disappearance of old and veteran trees, primarily due to deforestation and forest fires. In Lesvos, a new road has been constructed recently which has resulted in the loss of veteran trees. Sporadic illegal firewood felling also causes habitat destruction. In mainland Greece, roads are being built for access to windfarms, which may pose some risk on these subpopulations, although it is not currently possible to confirm whether this is a significant threat. Overgrazing in Lesvos could be a threat too, as it prevents the regeneration of the forests. On mainland Greece, the species is found in a National Park where there has been no increase in habitat quality but it is unknown whether the habitat is actually declining. Anthropogenic pressure caused by tourism on both island and mainland territory could be considered as a potential threat too, together with variation in temperature ranges and hydrological conditions caused mainly by climate change. 

","The largest subpopulation of this species is on mainland Greece. There are three subpopulations in mainland Greece where it is likely to be stable, but roads are being built for access to wind farms which may pose some risk to these subpopulations although it is not currently possible to confirm whether this is a significant threat. Therefore the current population trend in mainland Greece is unknown. The subpopulation on Lesvos island has significantly reduced due to the habitat impact of road development in the area there, and the population is considered to be decreasing overall.

This is a rarely observed species only found at a small number of localities, and it is therefore difficult to confirm its overall population trend. It was described 150 years ago, and the only known European records are fairly recent, from Lesvos island in 2001 and 2004.",Decreasing,"

Within the European region, this species is known from north-eastern Greece (Dadia National Park and surrounding areas) and Lesvos island (Sikaminea and Mystegna) (Vujić et al. 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) is calculated to be between 14 and 20 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 3,950 km2.

Outside of the European region, this species occurs in Turkey at one locality very close to Lesvos island.

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"This species requires urgent action to protect its habitat. There is habitat protection and management required in Lesvos, to reduce overgrazing and the development of infrastructure, including roads and trails (used for agriculture). In mainland Greece, this species is found in a National Park, but the park would benefit from more resources being made available for management, and research to ensure that this species is effectively protected and enabled to thrive.

More research is needed on the biology, distribution and population of this species, both on Lesvos and in Dadia National Park. Research is specifically needed to understand if this species is associated with other tree species or not - or if it is only associated with old Quercus coccifera because this would imply greater rarity. Monitoring can confirm if there is a continuing decline across the whole population in Europe.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281767,149170256,Ischiodon aegyptius,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is present as a resident in the Canary Islands (Ricarte and Marcos-García, 2017), where it is common and abundant. It is also present in the Madeira islands, and has been recorded in southern Spain, Italy and Cyprus in southern continental Europe. It lives amongst low-growing plants in shrubby areas, open areas along tracks and in plantations of cotton, maize and squashes  The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are greater than the thresholds required to be considered in any threatened category, and is well distributed in the Canary Islands. Therefore it is categorized as Least Concern for both the EU27 and Europe. Increased monitoring and research on its ecology, population and threats are recommended.","

The habitat of this species is low-growing plants in shrubby areas, open areas along tracks and also in plantations of cotton, maize and squashes. The developmental stages were described by Tawfik et al. (1974). Láska et al. (2006) provided a key for separation of the last-instar larvae and puparia of Ischiodon aegyptius and Ischiodon scutellaris, and also describe the features which define this species. Larvae are predatory and feed on aphids. Adults normally fly low through sparse ground vegetation and settle on flowers of low-growing herbs. The flight period of adults is from June to October in Madeira, during August in southern Spain and throughout the year in the Canary Islands. The fact that adults have been observed in southern Europe only during the summer suggests this species may not be resident there, establishing temporary populations in favourable seasons. It was collected from Euphorbia obtusifolia in the Canary Islands. All this information has been obtained and updated from Speight (2020).

","In Europe and the EU27, there are no known direct threats to this species, the main feasible threats being related to the habitat in which it lives. Its habitat could be affected by variations in temperature and hydrological cycles related to climate change. As it is associated with crops, the use of pesticides may negatively affect this species.","The population trend of this species in Europe and the EU27 is unknown. It is very widespread and common in Africa and the Canary Islands (Ebejer and Bensusan 2010), from where it migrates to southern Europe. It does not seem to be resident in southern Europe (apart from in the Canary Islands), establishing temporary populations during favourable seasons (Speight 2020).",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is present in southern Spain (Alicante, Almeria, Cádiz and Gibraltar), southern and central Italy and Sicily (Burgio et al. 2015), and on Cyprus (van Steenis 2019), the Balearic, the Canary Islands and on Madeira (Borges et al. 2008) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values exceed the thresholds to be considered for any threatened category.

Outside Europe, it is present throughout the Afrotropical region and into North Africa to the Mediterranean coast and Yemen.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"Conservation actions for this species should be focused on sustainable management of the crops in which this species can be found. Increased research and monitoring of its population trends, distribution, threats and ecology are needed. Education and communication about this species would also be beneficial.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281771,149170278,Psilota innupta,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-02-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

Psilota innupta is found in the central and southern regions of Europe, as well as outside of Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is very large but there is not enough locality information to calculate the area of occupancy (AOO), and so this is unknown. The current population trend in Europe is considered to be declining, and its threats include forestry activities such as deforestation, the removal of dead trees, or the creation of even-aged stands. The information on this species is currently not robust enough to determine a threatened category. It is therefore assessed as Data Deficient in both Europe and the EU 27, due to the lack of information in most of the countries where it is found.

The conservation of this species is closely connected with the conservation of over-mature trees and forests, because this is its main habitat. Research on its distribution, population trends and the developmental stages is needed.","

This is a saproxylic species that is arboreal and present in Fagus forest, balkanic thermophilous Quercus forest, evergreen oak maquis and mixed forest with Quercus robur and Pinus sylvestris. The species is associated with mature and veteran oak trees in thermophilous oak forest - it lays its eggs on the trunks of Quercus cerris. It may also be associated with dry pine forest (Speight 2020). It has been found on flowering Salix in Mongolia. Its habitat is clearly very rare (Ssymank pers. comm. 2019)

The larval and pupal stages, the developmental stages and the biological cycle are not yet understood. The flight period ranges between the end of April and August.

","Unsustainable forestry activities such as deforestation, removal of dead trees, or the creation of even-aged stands are possible threats, as well as forest fires and hydrological modifications (Janssen et al. 2017). The timber hygiene programmes in woodland and parkland sometimes remove trees damaged by wind and diseases, or with sap runs, because such trees are believed to be dangerous. The wood and pulp plantations remove natural forest, diminishing the natural host species. In addition, the loss of connectivity between suitable habitats remains a matter of concern. It is unclear whether isolated hedgerow trees may contribute to a suitable habitat. Variation in temperature ranges and hydrological patterns caused by climate change can be considered as a feasible threat to the species as well. Forest destruction for housing and urbanization could constitute a direct threat to the species due to habitat loss.","

In continental Europe, many of the subpopulations are decreasing, especially in Germany. It is extinct in Sweden - it was confirmed to be there in 2008, but has never been common in the country. It is very rare in the Czech Republic and in Slovakia. The current population trend of this species in Europe and the EU27 is therefore decreasing.

",Decreasing,"

This species can be found in the central and southern regions of Europe. Specific locality data are not available and so it is not possible at this time to calculate an area of occurrence (AOO) for this species. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is very large. 

This species has been recorded in the following countries: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014),  Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (only the north-east) (Vujić et al 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), northern Italy (Stoch 2003), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Serbia (a few localities) (Vujić et al 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (as regionally extinct) (Bartsch et al. 2009) and Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2019). There is a study that places it in a few localities in Poland and Russia (Zóralski 2018). In Germany, four localities were recorded in 2011 (Speight 2020), and the Spanish records are not recent (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017). The most recent records are for Germany, Poland and Ukraine (Flügel 2001; Zóralski 2018).

This species is not found in France, where most of the habitat in which the species might occur has been eradicated (Speight pers. comm. 2019). There have been no new records from Serbia and Croatia in the last few decades (Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

Outside Europe it also occurs in North Africa, and eastwards into Siberia, Sakhalin, Japan and South Korea (Vujić et al. 2020).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The conservation of this species is closely connected with the conservation of mature trees and forests, its main habitat. 

This species is categorized as Endangered in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005), Extinct in Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009) and extremely rare in Germany (Ssymank pers. comm. 2019). Research regarding its distribution, the population trends, habitat trends and the developmental stages is needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281775,149170298,Psilota atra,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This arboreal forest species has been previously confused with Psilota exilistyla and Psilota anthracina, and further research is required to determine its true distribution. However, based on currently available knowledge, this species is considered to be widespread in Europe and the EU27. There are early indications that it may be decreasing, but further research and monitoring are required to determine the extent of this reduction. Because the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far greater than the values to be considered for any threatened category, this species is categorised as Least Concern in Europe and EU27. Research is needed to understand better its taxonomy, population trend and ecology.

","This species is largely arboreal and lives in forests of Pinus sp., thermophilous Quercus (Quercus pubescens, Quercus cerris and Quercus frainetto) forests and Quercus and Carpinus forest. The saprophagous larva and the pupal stage were first studied by Kassebeer et al. (1998); larvae can been found feeding on yeasts and bacteria in decaying sap runs under bark and in crevices, hollows or rot-holes in trees. Adults visit flowers of Crataegus, Acer campestris and occasionally Anthriscus sylvestris.  The flight period ranges between April and June. All this information has been summarized and updated from Smit and Zeegers (2005) and Speight (2020).","Deforestation and unsustainable forestry practices such as removal of dead trees and the creation of forests with even-aged stands could threaten this species. Forest management plans that are designed to reduce disease in productive woodlands and parkland result in the loss of important microhabitats by the removal of trees that have been damaged by wind and fungal development, or have sap runs. These trees are removed because they believed to be dangerous. Wood and pulp plantations tend to eliminate naturally occurring tree species, which diminishes the availability of trees upon which this species naturally relies. Additionally, loss of connectivity between suitable areas of habitat remains a matter of concern. The degree to which isolated hedgerow trees can contribute to the availability of suitable habitat is unclear. Additionally, forest fires and hydrological modifications (water abstraction in forest areas or drought due to climate change) could impact this species (Janssen et al. 2017).","

It is considered to be rare in some countries, such as the Netherlands (Reemer et al 2009), Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020) and Norway (NBIC 2020). It is well distributed across Poland (Zóralski 2018) and France (Speight et al 2018). The general trend of its population in Europe and EU27 is unknown.

",Unknown,"The distribution of this species requires re-examining due to its previous confusion with Psilota anthracina and Psilota exilistyla, but it is confirmed to occur in Norway, Sweden, Denmark, low-lying continental parts of the Atlantic zone (e.g. Netherlands), France, Spain, the Mediterranean region, central Europe, Italy and on to Montenegro, Greece (including Crete), Romania and Cyprus. Due to taxonomic uncertainties, its occurrence in Austria, the Czech Republic, Portugal, Ukraine and Slovakia is considered uncertain. Some research has also placed this species in Belgium (Van de Meutter and Reemer 2012), Poland (Zóralski 2018), Germany and Montenegro (Smit and Vujić 2007). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far greater than the values to be considered for any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Poland and Germany) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been included in the following country checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Czech Republic (Mazánek, 2009), Denmark (DanBIF, 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Greece (including Crete) (Vujić et al. 2020), Netherlands (Reemer et al.  2009), Norway (Nielsen and Svendsen, 2014), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017) and Ukraine (Prokhorov et al. 2018).

Outside Europe it is found in North Africa (Morocco) (Speight 2020).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"Conservation actions should be focused on the preservation of the habitat. Some conservation measures can be focused on monitoring as well as education about the species. It is considered to be Vulnerable in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020) and Endangered in Norway (NBIC 2020). Additional research is needed to understand better the taxonomy, population trend and ecology of this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281779,149170320,Pseudodoros nigricollis,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

In Europe and the EU27, this species has only been recorded from two localities, both in Cyprus, where it survives in wetland habitats. The population trends are currently unknown, and therefore monitoring is needed. The areas of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are 8 km2 and 15 km2 respectively; there are two locations, taking into account loss of habitat due to infrastructure development as the main threat, and there is a continuous decline in the habitat. This species is therefore categorised as Endangered (B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii)) in both the EU27 and Europe. Increased protection of its sites and habitats is needed, as well as research on its distribution, population, ecology and threats. It is present in more countries outside European borders, mainly to the south where it is more widespread and common. This leads experts to think that Cyprus is the northern limit of its distribution.","

The habitat of this species is wetlands with Phragmites or Arundo plants. It was collected in Cyprus from reed beds of Phragmites. The developmental stages are not yet fully understood, but larvae have been reared feeding on the aphid Hyalopterus pruni. This aphid usually alternates between Phragmites reeds and Prunus fruit trees, and this hoverfly varies its habitat in the same way. Adults have been discovered in the leaves of Phragmites australis. In Cyprus, adults have been found in October and November, but in localities outside Europe adults have been found flying between April and September. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020), van Eck and Makris (2016) and van Steenis et al. (2019).

","One of the areas (Akrotiri lake) in which this species is found is under threat of habitat loss and fragmentation as a result of infrastructure development for tourism, roads and renewable energy. The most recent threat for this site is the development of a casino and golf resort in the north-east part of the peninsula (Birdlife Cyprus 2018).","There are two localities from which this species has been collected. One is in the north-west of Cyprus, in the town of Polis Chrysochou, where seven individuals were collected in November 2014 and 15 more collected in November 2015 (van Eck and Makris 2016). The second locality is in the south in Akrotiri Salt Lake, where a further 15 individuals were collected in October 2017 (van Steenis et al. 2019). There is no information about its population trend on the island.",Unknown,"

Within Europe, this species has only been found in two localities, both in Cyprus (van Eck and Makris 2016, van Steenis 2019). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is about 15 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is calculated to be around 8 km2.

 Outside Europe, it is also present in Israel, Palestine, Egypt, the Arabian peninsula and the Afrotropical region (Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"The protection of important sites and habitats, as well as reduction of damaging activities, is crucial for the survival of this species in Europe. Research is needed to understand better its current distribution and population, as well as its ecological relationship with aphids. Research is also needed to understand better the conservation actions that would benefit its habitat.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281783,149170341,Platynochaetus setosus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is widespread and considered stable on the Iberian Peninsula. It is considered locally abundant in Spain and can be found in evergreen oak forest and maquis. However, outside of Spain, this species is more at risk and therefore requires additional research and protection. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. With the information currently available, this species is categorised as Least Concern in Europe and EU27.

The habitat, ecology and threats of this species are poorly understood and would benefit from increased monitoring and research.","The developmental stages of the genus are unknown, and hence it is currently unknown how the larva of this species feeds, but it is expected to be phytophagous. Adults are found in open areas in evergreen oak forest and macquis of Quercus ilex, where they have been observed visiting flowers of Viburnum tinus. They can also be found in suburban areas. The adult flight period is from March to April, with males flying extremely rapidly in a zig-zag manner through shrubby vegetation, and hovering at heights of up to three metres. All of this information has been summarised and updated from Speight et al. 2020.","The threats to this species are currently unknown, because its biology and ecology and its host plant are currently poorly understood.","The population trend of this species is considered to be stable. It is a locally abundant species found in many provinces of Spain (Alicante, Albacete, Almeria, Balearic islands Barcelona, Cádiz, Castellón, Ciudad Real, Córdoba, Girona, Granada, Guadalajara, Jaén, Huelva, Lérida, Madrid, Málaga, Murcia, Salamanca, Sevilla Tarragona, Valencia, Zaragoza) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Biodiversidad Virtual 2019). It has been recorded more than 200 times photographically, which indicates its abundance.",Stable,"Within Europe, this species is present in Portugal (van Eck 2016), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), the Mediterranean zone of France (Speight et al. 2018) and Corsica. In Portugal it has been recorded from the Algarve, Santiago do Cacém, Lisbon and Santarém areas. It is not certain that it occurs on Sicily, because it has been recorded but the material needs to be checked to confirm its identification (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category.

Outside Europe, it can be found in North Africa (Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"Further research is needed to understand better the threats, ecology and biology of this species and the genus. This species would also benefit from continued monitoring in Spain, and increased monitoring in other parts of its range. Its habitat could benefit from protection, particularly in localities outside of Spain. Within Spain, it is found in both National and Natural Parks, but also in suburban areas.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281787,149170363,Myolepta vara,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This saproxylic forest species can be found across the European region and is widespread. It is an elusive species, and so is considered to be somewhat scarce where it does exist, although the population trend is currently unknown. The habitat in which it lives is partially threatened, and the species is considered Endangered in Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium. Nevertheless, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU 27. Thus it is categorised as Least Concern in both Europe and EU27. Habitat protection and increased research and monitoring are recommended.","The saproxylic larvae of this species can be found in water-filled rot-holes in mature/veteran trees such as Ulmus pumila (Sivova et al. 1999) or Quercus (Dussaix 1997) and also in decaying dead wood. It is present in acidophilous and thermophilous deciduous forests of Quercus with mature trees. The adults are elusive, but can be found feeding on flowers of small trees and shrubs, or settled in patches of sunlight. The adult flight period ranges between April and June. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).","Some of the habitats in which this species is found has been categorised as Vulnerable by the European Red List of Habitats (e.g. G1.8 Acidophilous Quercus woodland). Human activities related to forestry such as deforestation, removal of dead trees and the creation of forest with even-aged stands can possibly threaten this species, as well as forest fires and hydrological modifications (Janssen et al. 2017). The loss of continuity of ageing trees is potentially a matter of concern in part of the range.","The general trend of the population in Europe and the EU27 is unknown. It is a widespread species across the European territory, but is considered scarce in the countries where it is present (Speight 2020). In Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) it is considered rare. However, in Hungary Toth (2011) states that it is a common.",Unknown,"The known general range of this species is from the Netherlands south through Belgium and France to the Mediterranean and central Spain; and through central and southern Europe to Switzerland, Austria and Romania and on to the Balkans. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in a threatened category, in either Europe or the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Poland and Czechia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been included in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2019), Hungary (Tóth 2001), Italy (Stoch 2003), the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European part of Russian Federation (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017) and Switzerland (CSCF 2020).

Outside Europe it occurs in the Caucasus (Azerbaijan) and Far Eastern Russia (Speight 2020).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"This species is considered as Endangered in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). Conservation efforts should be focused on the preservation of its habitat to avoid its decline, paying special attention to the conservation of old trees. Increased research on the biology, ecology and population is required, as well as monitoring of population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281791,149170384,Myolepta nigritarsis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species can be found from southern Europe to southern parts of European Russia. Its habitat is forest, mainly mature and senescent deciduous oak forest. Its population trend is unknown, but in Greece it is considered to be widespread (Vujić et al, 2020). The habitat in which it lives has some level of threat, and this should be monitored along with increased monitoring of the population. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU 27. Therefore, taking into account the geographical distribution, it is categorized as Least Concern in both Europe and EU27.","The developmental stages of this species are not described, but like the rest of the genus, the larva should be saproxylic; females have been observed flying around and ovipositing in sap runs of Quercus species. Its habitat is forest, mainly mature and senescent deciduous oak forest of Quercus ilex and Quercus suber. It has also has been recorded in Liquidambar forest. The flight period of the adults is from May to mid-July, and the flowers that it normally visits are Cistus, Crataegus, Euphorbia and Orlaya. It has been recorded together with Myolepta dubia, Myolepta mada (outside Europe), Myolepta obscura, Myolepta potens, Myolepta trojana and Myolepta vara. All this information has been summarised and updated from Reemer et al. (2004) and Speight (2020).","Some of the habitats where this species is found are categorised as Vulnerable by the European Red List of Habitats (e.g. G1.8 Acidophilous Quercus woodland). Human activities related to forestry activities such as deforestation, removal of dead trees and the creation of forests with even-aged stands can threaten this species. Additionally, forest fires and hydrological modifications (Janssen et al. 2017) can pose a threat.  Special attention needs to be paid to the conservation of mature/veteran and senescent trees. The loss of continuity of mature trees is potentially a matter of concern in some localities.","The overall population trend of this species is unknown in Europe and the EU27. In Greece it is considered widespread (Vujić et al, 2020), while in Hungary it is considered rare (Toth 2011).",Unknown,"

The distribution of this species is concentrated in the northern part of the Mediterranean, where it is more common in the Balkan Peninsula. Spain is considered to be its western limit, and in this country it has been found in two different areas of the northern part of the country (Reemer et al. 2004). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Bulgaria and Ukraine) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been included in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), France (Speight et al. 2018), Greece (including Crete) (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2001), Italy (Stoch 2003), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and the southern part of European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018).

Outside Europe, it can be found in Turkey, Azerbaijan and Armenia.

",This species is not known to be utilised.,Terrestrial,"Conservation actions for this species should be focused on conservation of its habitat by ensuring continuity of forest diversity, particularly the presence of mature and senescent trees. Research on the biology, ecology and population of this species is needed, as well as monitoring of its population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281795,149170406,Ferdinandea fumipennis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Ferdinandea fumipennis is restricted to a small area of Europe, but it is abundant in some parts of its Iberian range. It is considered the second most abundant species of the genus. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. Although there may be some threats causing habitat loss locally, there are no major threats impacting the European population as a whole. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both EU27 and Europe.","

The larval morphology of this saproxylic species was described by Ricarte et al. (2007) from a specimen found in sap-runs of Quercus pyrenaica in Cabañeros National Park; there is also a report of a female laying eggs in a sap-run of Quercus pyrenaica. Its habitat is forest, mainly deciduous acidophilus forest with Q. pyrenaica and riparian forest of Fraxinus angustifolia. The flight period is from February to November, but it varies depending on location; it is normally seen flying with individuals of Ferdinandea cuprea. The flowers that they normally visit are Hypericum and Merendera. Only found along rivers, the potential range of this fly is reduced because the associated trees are not known to occur over very large areas. All this information has been summarized and updated from Ricarte et al. (2007, 2010) and Speight (2020).

","The main threats to this species are related to the habitat. Some of the habitats where this species is found are categorized as Vulnerable by the European Red List of Habitats. Human activities related to forestry can be possible threats, such as deforestation, removal of dead trees, the creation of even-aged stands, and also fire and hydrology modifications (Janssen et al. 2017).","This species is quite abundant in the areas where it is found. The subpopulations are small but stable. There are three subpopulations in France, two of which are sustainable; the third was an individual tree in a rubbish dump. This species has been found in Spain through photographs shared online, which indicates its abundance.

In the Iberian Peninsula, it seems to be the second most abundant species of the genus, after F. aurea. Despite being restricted to the Iberian Peninsula and some small subpopulations at the periphery, it is not considered to be at risk of extinction (Ricarte et al. 2010).",Stable,"This species is considered as an Ibero-Maghreb endemic. In the European region, it is known from Portugal, Spain (including the Balearic Islands) and from two localities in the southeastern area of France (no more than 20 km from the Mediterranean coast) (Biodiversidad Virtual 2019, GBIF 2019, Ramírez-Hernández et al. 2015, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2007, Ricarte et al. 2010, Speight et al. 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category.

It is also known from Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

Conservation actions should be focused in the conservation of the habitat where it lives. For example, in Spain this species has been recorded in one National Park, two Natural Parks and Biological Reserve and also in one Natural Park in Portugal. However, not all the subpopulations studied are found in protected areas. Attempts have been made to protect one of the French sites, as it has exceptional saproxylic beetle subpopulations - but this is more of an understanding than official protection status. Monitoring and research on the distribution and population trends of the species are needed. 

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281799,149170426,Ferdinandea aurea,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Ferdinandea aurea is considered to be widespread across its range. It is endemic to southern Europe, found across the Mediterranean. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. The species is not considered to be threatened at the national level in any national Red Lists, and although some subpopulations may be decreasing, there is no direct threat which may reduce significantly the overall population. Therefore this species has been categorized as Least Concern for both Europe and EU27.","

Its habitat is forest, mainly overmature thermophilus forest of Quercus pubescens and Quercus pyrenaica and evergreen forest of Quercus ilex and Quercus suber. It can also be present in Fagus forest (mesophilous). Adults can be seen in the sun, settled on trunks, among dead leaves on the ground, on stones and the bare ground of forest paths and on flowers of Dianthus, Hedera or Scabiosa. They normally have a flight period between July and October, with a mass emergence in mid-September. The saproxylic larva is not yet described, but there is evidence from Spain and France that it has a close relationship with the damage of longhorn beetles (Cerambycidae) in the trees. Dependence upon other Mediterranean saproxylic insects may explain its restriction to the Mediterranean zone, and its trait of having an almost entirely autumnal flight. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).

Ricarte et al. (2010) recorded collecting this species in emergence traps covering basal tree cavities (“root-holes”) and other trunk tree-holes, in Quercus faginea and Q. pyrenaica. Now that the larval microhabitat is known, it should be possible to establish whether other saproxylic species are involved in making appropriate larval microhabitat available for F. aurea.

","The main threats to this species are related to the habitat. Some of the habitats where this species is found are categorized as Vulnerable by the European Red List of Habitats (e.g. G1.8. Acidophilous Quercus Woodland). Human activities related to forestry, such as deforestation, removal of dead Quercus trees and the creation of even-aged Quercus stands can be possible threats, along with fire and hydrology modifications (Janssen et al. 2017). The relationship with longhorn beetles should be taken into account when analysing the possible threats to the species.","The species seems to be widespread across its distribution. Some subpopulations across Europe seem to be decreasing, but in Spain it shows a high abundance, even being the most abundant saproxylic hoverfly in Cabañeros National Park (Ricarte et al. 2009). Therefore, the overall current population trend is unknown.
",Unknown,"

This species is clearly a southern species, with a range in Europe from Portugal to Greece, around the Mediterranean (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category.  Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Albania and Cyprus) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It is listed on the following checklists: Cyprus (van Steenis et al. 2019), France (Speight et al. 2018), Greece (including Crete) (Vujić et al. 2020), Italy (including Sardinia and Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Portugal (van Eck 2016) and Spain (including the Balearic Islands) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017).

Outside of the European territory this species has been recorded in Transcaucasia (Mengual et al. 2020) and Israel (Dirickx 1994).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation should be focused on the habitat, promoting the protection of over-mature and senescent Quercus trees. Some conservation measures can be focused on the monitoring of and research into  population size and trends. A deep analysis of the relationship of this species with other saproxylic insects is needed, together with the biology of the pre-imaginal stages. There is no information about national Red List categorization of this species across European countries.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281803,149170457,Ceriana glaebosa,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species seems to be restricted to Cyprus and is considered endemic to the EU27, but increased surveying on other islands is needed for confirmation. The population in Cyprus seems to be declining in distribution. In the 1950's lots of specimens were found, but recent surveys have suggested it to be less common now, indicating a decline in the number of individuals but more surveys on the island are needed in order to determine the significance of this decline. The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 25 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) around 1,365 km2. The number of locations is estimated to be five with human disturbance (housing development and tourism activities) as the main threat, and hence this species is categorized as Endangered under Criterion B in Europe and the EU 27. Increased monitoring of this species and its habitat is needed, as well as research on its ecology and developmental biology, and the threats it faces.","

This is a saproxylic species, but its developmental stages are not yet understood. The larvae of congeneric species develop in tree sap, and this could be the case for this species. There is some evidence to suggest that its developmental stages may be associated with old storm-damaged Cupressus sempervirens trees.

Adults have been collected in herb-rich, open land with patches of scrub and scattered Cypress and Eucalyptus plantations, and they have been seen feeding on white umbellifers such as Ammi majus. Adults fly from early April to mid June and from mid August to early October. This species appears to be restricted to areas with lower altitudes between 500 and 600 metres, because apparently it does not occur in the mountains. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).

","The most important threats to this species are those related to modification of the quality and quantity of habitat in which it lives. Deforestation and tourism/recreational activities are most feasible threats. There are three localities where it is found very close to the city and therefore urbanization may also have an impact. Habitat pressure due to livestock farming may also impact this species. Fire are a potential threat too, although fires in Cyprus are normally restricted to the mountains and so may not be a direct current threat.","Many specimens of this species were collected at a small number of localities more than 50 years ago. In Limasol, 14 males and 18 females were collected between 1934 and 1958, one female in Episkopi in 1937, one male in Lania in 1961, eight females and four males in Yermasogia between 1950 and 1956 (van Steenis et al. 2016), one female in Paphos in 2017 (van Steenis et al. 2019) and one more collection point in Lapithos in 2018 (van Eck in prep.). The lack of more recent records suggests it may now be very scarce, but more surveys on the island are needed in order to determine the significance of this decline.",Decreasing,"This species is endemic to Europe, and is considered to be endemic to Cyprus, although confirmation of its absence on other islands where the very similar species, Ceriana vespiformis, has been recorded, may be required (van Steenis et al. 2016, Speight 2020). Its area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and the EU 27 is 24 km2, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1,365 km2.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"

As this species was recognized taxonomically only recently (2016), continued surveys are needed in order to confirm that this species is limited to Cyprus. Additionally, monitoring of the currently known population and research on its ecology, developmental biology and habitat is necessary to understand the specific threats affecting it, and to develop a proper conservation strategy.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 152281807,149170478,Volucella zonaria,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is found in forests, parks and gardens, and relies upon wasp/hornet nests for part of its life cycle. It is considered common and widespread across central and southern Europe and the EU27. Its population trend is considered to be increasing in both regions, and its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered for any threatened category. It is therefore categorised as Least Concern in both the EU27 and Europe.","

This species lives in forests (mesophilous Fagus and thermophilous Quercus forest), open ground, scrub, suburban gardens and parks.

Its developmental stages in wasp and hornet nests were studied and described by Rotheray (1999). The larva is detritivorous/ predatory, living and feeding for most of the time in the midden underneath the nest proper. It is mainly associated with Vespa crabro and Vespula species.

Adults can normally be seen between mid-June and November flying in open areas, gardens and parks. They also occur in a wide range of different situations whilst migrating, including resting on ships e.g. on cross-channel ferries between France and Britain. Adults normally visit a wide range of flowers, such as Achillea, Allium, Buddleja, Carduus, Centaurea, Cirsium, Clematis, Eryngium, Eupatorium, Hedera, Hydrangea, Knautia, Ligustrum, Mentha, Ranunculus, Rosa, Rubus, Sambucus, Scabiosa, Sedum, Solidago, Succisa and Thymus. All of this information has been summarised and updated from Ball and Morris (2000), Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).

","The threats affecting this species may be directly related to habitat loss and fragmentation primarily through deforestation and fire. Threats affecting wasp and hornet populations would also impact this species due to its reliance on them for part of its life cycle. The decline of the habitat due to variation in temperature range and hydrological patterns caused by climate change could be a feasible threat too. Due to its synanthropic nature, this species is able to survive and reproduce in environments with high human activity.","This species is widespread across central and southern Europe. In the UK it is very common and is normally present in urban areas, where its population has been increasing since the 1940s (Ball and Morris 2000). This is also the case in the Netherlands, where records have been increasing in number since 1950, and the species is clearly reproducing successfully (Reemer et al. 2009). In Greece it is a very well distributed species (Vujić et al. 2020) and in Spain it is also very common (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017). In Germany, it is considered a common species (Ssymnak et al. 2011). Overall the population of this species is considered to be stable in Europe and the EU27.",Stable,"This species can be found from the United Kingdom (southern England) southwards to the Mediterranean (including islands) and eastwards through central and southern Europe into European Turkey and European parts of Russia. It is strongly migratory (Speight 2020). Outside this range there is only one record in southern Finland, probably a vagrant (FinBIF 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered for any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Germany) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been included in the following country checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Croatia (Jelicić et al. 2010), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Including Sardinia and Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Including Balearic islands and Gibraltar) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside Europe, it occurs in North Africa and through Siberia to the Pacific, Iran and Mongolia.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"The conservation of this species should be focused on conservation efforts to protect its habitat and the wasp/hornet nests in which the larvae feed. Monitoring and research on its distribution and population trends, together with education and communication about the species are also needed. It is categorized as Vulnerable in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281811,149170499,Volucella inanis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This forest species relies on social wasps for the larval stage of its life cycle. It is found in a variety of habitats including suburban parks and gardens. Its population is considered stable in the EU27 and Europe and it is categorised as threatened in only one country. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered for any threatened category. It is therefore categorized as Least Concern for both EU27 and Europe. It would benefit from increased research and monitoring of its population.,"

This is an arboreal species found in forest habitats, primarily in deciduous forests. It can be found in open areas in woodland and scrub, and also in suburban areas such as parks and gardens. The developmental stages were described and illustrated by Rupp (1989) and Rotheray (1999). The larvae are obligate ectoparasites of wasp grubs (Vespidae: Rupp 1989), living in above-ground wasp nests of Vespula germanica and Vespula vulgaris. It seems to prefer wasp nests at some height above ground, for example in the attics of houses. (Speight 2020). Adults can be seen between the beginning of July and the end of September, visiting flowers of Achillea, Allium, Buddleja, Cirsium, Epilobium, Eupatorium, Hedera, Knautia, Mentha, Sambucus, Scabiosa, Solidago, Succisa, Thymus and Valeriana. It has a strongly migratory character. All of this information has been summarized from Ball and Morris (2000), Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020). 

","This species may be threatened by deforestation and fire impacting its habitat. It has a close relationship with social wasp nests, and therefore is at risk as a result of any threats affecting wasp populations. The decline of its habitat due to variation in temperature range and hydrological patterns caused by climate change could be a feasible threat too. The synanthropic character of this species diminishes the potential impacts these threats have on its extinction risk.","This species is widespread in Europe and the EU27, and is considered locally abundant in the southern UK (Ball and Morris 2000) and Germany (Ssymnak et al. 2011), while in Greece it is considered to be widespread in mountainous areas (Vujić et al. 2020) and in Spain it is widespread also (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017). In contrast, it is considered rare in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). Overall, the population of this species is considered stable in Europe and the EU27.",Stable,"This species can be found from southern Scandinavia south to Spain and the Mediterranean (including the islands), and from Britain (southern England) eastwards through central and southern Europe into European Turkey and European parts of Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered for any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Germany) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species is included in the following country checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Including Crete) (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Including Sardinia and Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Including Andorra) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside Europe, it can be found in North Africa, Syria, and on through Siberia to the Pacific, Afghanistan, Mongolia and China (Speight 2020).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"Conservation actions for this species should be targeted at the conservation of the habitat and the wasp populations on which larvae rely. Monitoring and research of its distribution and population trends, together with education and communication about the species are also recommended as conservation tools. It has been categorized as Vulnerable in Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Near Threatened in Belgium (INBO 2020), and Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020),  Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281815,149170520,Volucella bombylans,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a very widespread species found right across Europe and the EU27, primarily in forest habitats. It is considered common or abundant in some of the countries in central and western Europe, and overall it has a stable population in both regions. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered threatened. It is therefore considered to be Least Concern for both the EU27 and Europe. As this species is reliant upon bumblebees for part of it life cycle, its future depends somewhat on the future of bumblebees. This species would benefit from habitat protection, and increased research and monitoring.","

This species is primarily found in forest habitats, most types of deciduous forests, humid Pinus forest and evergreen oak forest of Quercus ilex. The developmental stages of this species were described and figured by Rotheray (1999). The larvae are detritivores/predators in nests of bumblebees (Bombus): Barkemeyer (1994) lists the Bombus species with which this species has been found associated. The adults are bumblebee mimics and can be found in mature woodland and humid grasslands visiting a wide range of flowers, including many different composites, umbellifers and trees in bloom. The adult flight period is between May and August and even in September at higher altitudes. All this information has been summarized and updated from Ball and Morris (2000); Speight (2008 and 2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).

","This species has a close relationship with bumblebee nests, and some bumblebee species are in decline or threatened, which may be problematic for this species (Nieto et al. 2014). This is particularly evident in Ireland where the consequences of intensification of farming activities and drainage of wetlands is affecting bumblebee populations and therefore constitutes a threat to the survival of this species. However, Volucella bombylans is tolerant of human environments in some European countries, and is likely to survive as long as bumblebees do not decline further (Speight 2008). The use of pesticides can also be a threat because of its direct effect on populations of bumblebees. The decline of the habitat due to variations in temperature range and hydrological patterns caused by climate change could be a feasible threat too.","

This species is widespread across Europe, although less frequent in the south. In Ireland, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Germany it is common and widely distributed (Speight 2008, Ball and Morris 2000, Reemer et al. 2009, Ssymank et al. 2011). In Spain it is not widely distributed (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017). The population is considered to be stable in Europe and the EU27.

",Stable,"This is a very widespread species found right across Europe and the EU27. More specifically, it can be found from northern Scandinavia south to the Iberian peninsula, and from Ireland eastwards through central and southern Europe and into Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are considered far above the threshold to be considered in any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Germany) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

The species has been included in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu, 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Including Andorra) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside Europe, it occurs in the Caucasus and through to the Pacific coast and Japan (Speight 2020).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"Habitat conservation should be the focus of conservation efforts for this species, together with conservation of the bumblebee populations upon which it relies. Monitoring and research of its ecology, distribution and population trends, together with education and communication about the species are also recommended as a conservation tools. It has been categorized as Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Nearctic|Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281819,149170542,Myolepta trojana,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

In Europe, this species is only known from the Greek island of Lesvos. Although the current population trend of this species is stable, the deciduous thermophilous forest habitat where this species is found is showing a continuing decline in extent and quality. In addition, the area of occupancy (AOO) is calculated to be around 16 km2 and extent of occurrence (EOO)  approximately 30 km2. Finally, based on the main threat of forest fires, it is considered to occur at two or three locations. Therefore this species is assessed as Endangered under Criterion B in both Europe and the EU27. Increased habitat protection, research on the distribution and monitoring of the population are recommended for this species.","

The developmental stages of this species are not yet fully understood, but the larva should be saproxylic like the other species in the genus. It is found in deciduous thermophilous forest of Quercus and Fagus trees. The adult flight period starts in the middle of April and ends in June. This information has been summarized from Reemer et al. (2004) and Ricarte et al. (2012).

","The main threats facing this species are the destruction of its habitat as a result of unsustainable deforestation practices and fire. Based on these main threats, this species is considered to occur at two or three locations. Due to these threats, its habitat (mature/veteran trees) is declining in quality and extent on Lesvos. The construction of roads and residential development for housing and tourism also threaten its habitat (Vujić pers. comm. 2019). Variation in the condition of the habitat due to shifting temperature and hydrological patterns as a result of climate change is a feasible threat to the species as well.","The species has only been recorded in four localities on Lesvos (Greece), some of which are close together - altogether no more than 10 km apart. It was recorded at these localities over several years, and so the population trend is considered to be stable here. It was collected for the last time in 2010, when four specimens were sampled during systematic research on the island.",Stable,"This species is only found on the Greek island of Lesvos, where it has been recorded in four localities. Outside Europe, it can be found in Azerbaijan and Iran (Reemer et al. 2004, Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) is calculated to be around 16 km2 and extent of occurrence (EOO) is approximately 30 km2.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"Conservation actions for this species should be focused on the preservation of its habitat, with particular efforts made to conserve mature/veteran trees. Research on its biology and ecology is needed, as well as monitoring and research of population and habitat trends.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281823,149170563,Primocerioides regale,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This saproxylic species is considered to be endemic to the Balkan Peninsula and is found in thermophilous oak forests. The area of occupancy (AOO) is calculated to be around 24 km2 for Europe and around 20 km2 for EU 27. There are several threats causing a decline in AOO and habitat extent and quality. Taking unsustainable forestry practices as the main threat, the number of locations is considered to be fewer than five. Taking all this into account, this species is assessed as endangered in Europe and EU27. Confirmation that this species is found only in a few localities may push the species to Critically Endangered: it is very unlikely that it occurs elsewhere in Europe. Habitat management and protection, and research and monitoring are all needed for this species. Habitat protection and habitat creation are needed to ensure the continuity of veteran trees. Further research and monitoring is also recommended, as well as confirmation of the records from Cyprus.","

This is known to be a saproxylic species, although the larval and pupal stages are not yet fully understood. The adults are active from late February to late June, and can be found on streams along thermophilous oak forests of Carpinus and QuercusQuercus frainetto and Quercus pubescens and olive orchards - although only one record comes from olive orchards. It is normally found at low elevations (around 300 m in mainland Greece). This information has been summarized from Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).

","Some of the habitats on which this species relies are categorised as Vulnerable in the European Red List of Habitats (e.g. G1.8 Acidophilous Quercus woodland). Unsustainable forestry practices such as deforestation, removal of dead wood and the creation of even-aged monocultures can threaten this species. Forest fires and hydrological modifications within forests also pose a risk. Variation in temperature ranges and hydrological patterns caused by climate change can be considered as a feasible threat to the species as well (Janssen et al. 2017). Forest destruction for housing and urbanization could constitute a direct threat due to loss of habitat.","In Belgrade, an adult was found on an old tree (Quercus sp.) when first discovered (1985) and again later in 2019 in the same locality. In Lesvos, it was found on the flowers of olive trees, although it was originally identified as Sphiximorpha hiemalis in 2006 (Ricarte et al 2013, van Steenis et al 2016). It has frequently been discovered in north-eastern Greece in Dadia National Park, where numerous individuals have been found in four localities (de Courcy Williams pers. comm 2019). On Cyprus, it is only known to occur in one locality in the southern part of the island, but this is from a very old record and therefore it may be extinct there (van Eck pers. comm. 2019). To sum up, it is only considered frequent in the Dadia National Park in northeastern Greece, while rare in the rest of its localities.",Unknown,"

This species is considered to be endemic to the Balkan Peninsula in Europe. It is known from three countries: Serbia, in the city of Belgrade, where it was first described and recently rediscovered in the same locality (van Steenis et al. 2019); in northeastern Greece, where it is known from four localities in Dadia National Park and from one locality on Lesvos Island (Vujić et al. 2020); and finally, it was found in the south of Cyprus (Speight 2020), although its continued presence here is uncertain as it is known from a single very old record. The European area of occupancy (AOO) is calculated to be around 24 km2, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 51,900 km2. In the EU 27, the AOO is calculated to be around 20 km2, and the EOO about 48,950 km2.

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The main subpopulation of this species is found in Dadia National Park where it seems to be abundant and quite stable, but the other localities are not in protected areas and in them this species has been found infrequently on just one or a few trees. Conservation actions should be focused on the protection of veteran and maturing trees, as well as replanting of new trees around existing old trees. Legislation is required to protect these important micro-habitats for this species. Further research is needed to confirm the distribution, and monitoring of the population and habitat trends is also recommended. Additional research is required on the threats, conservation actions needed and ecology of this species. Finally, the species would benefit from the creation of a conservation management plan.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 152281827,149170583,Psilota exilistyla,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-02-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

The distribution of this species requires re-examining due to previous taxonomic confusion with Psilota anthracina and Psilota atra. Although there are plenty of records from across Europe, most of these records are now uncertain and specimens need to be checked for correct identification, and therefore the distribution is unknown. Because of this, the population trend is also unknown. Furthermore, the habitat, ecology and threats to this species require research. This species is therefore categorised as Data Deficient in Europe and the EU27.","

This species is mainly arboreal, present in deciduous humid Fagus forest. The saprophagous larval and the pupal stages and biological cycle are not yet fully understood, and further research is required. The flight period ranges from the end of April to mid-July, and adults normally can be seen visiting white flowers such as Acer or Anthriscus. All this information has been summarized from Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).

","Because the habitat needs of the larvae are not currently well understood, the threats facing this species are also not well understood. However, given its relationship with temperate forest, it is likely that threats such as deforestation, forest fires and other anthropogenic pressures may affect this species. Variation in temperature ranges and hydrological modifications due to climate change could be a feasible threat for this species as well.","

There are very few data available for this species, with only one or two specimens from each locality. Until recently, it was taxonomically confused with Psilota atra, so it is likely that it is more common than previously thought. Until 2008, it had only been recorded in Greece and France. Since then it has been confirmed in the following countries: Poland (one locality in 2019), Belgium (one locality in 2015), Austria (one locality in 2017), France (three localities), the Netherlands (two localities in 2015) and Greece (four localities). It is likely to be found in Switzerland. Most of the specimens have not been re-examined following its separation from Psilota atra, and therefore new records may appear in the near future. Although present in Greece, the Netherlands, France, Belgium, Poland and Austria, at present there is population information only from France, where it is considered to be decreasing and threatened (Speight pers. comm. 2019). Overall, the population trend of this species is unknown in Europe and EU27.

",Unknown,"

The distribution of this European endemic species requires re-examination due to previous taxonomic confusion with Psilota anthracina and Psilota atra. There is very little reliable information about its distribution, but it is confirmed to occur in the Netherlands, Belgium, France (Jura and Pyrenees) and Greece (Speight 2020). The known area of occupancy (AOO) is about 50 km2, and the known extent of occurrence (EOO) about 1,923,245 km2, taking into account only the countries where the species is known for certain. 

This species has been previously cited as occurring in the following countries: Austria (Heimburg 2018), France (Speight et al. 2018), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020) and the Netherlands (Smit et al. 2015). Some studies also suggest it exists in Belgium (Van de Meutter and Reemer 2012) and Poland (Zóralski 2018).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"There is little information about this species, and so currently it is difficult to recommend conservation actions. The subpopulation in France is considered to be threatened. Research is needed to confirm its true distribution following the resolution of former taxonomic confusion with other species. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand its population trend, habitat and ecology, and the threats and actions needed.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 152281831,149170604,Psilota nana,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This European endemic occurs in thermophilous deciduous and broad-leaved evergreen forests from only six localities, and is likely to have become extinct in one (Montenegro). The threats are very localised, giving only five locations for Europe, taking into account fire as the main threat, and there is a continuing decline in the habitat. Additionally, the area of occupancy (AOO) is only 24 km2 in Europe, and so this species is therefore assessed as Endangered in Europe.

In the EU27, the AOO decreases to 16 km2, the locations are reduced to two, taking fire as main threat and, as in Europe, there is a continuing decline in the habitat. Therefore the species is assessed as Endangered (EN).","

This species is arboreal and present in thermophilous deciduous and broad-leaved evergreen forests of Quercus cerris and Quercus frainetto, Castanea sativa woodland with Laurus nobilis understory, Quercus ilex forest and Balkanic white-oak forest. In Montenegro, it was found in a deciduous forest on a path in the shade. The developmental stages are unknown, but the larva should be saproxylic; there is currently no information about the biological cycle. Regarding adults, males hover in the sun and females have been observed flying up and down the trunk of a large Quercus frainetto tree inhabited by the trunk-cavity ant Liometopum microcephalum, attempting oviposition on the bark. The flight period is during May. Adults visit flowers of the Apiaceae (such as Smyrnium) and Euphorbia. All this information has been summarized from Smit and Vujić (2007) and Speight (2020).

","The threats to this species are not well understood, but it shares its habitat with other similar species, and therefore the threats are likely to be similar. Unsustainable forestry activities such as deforestation, removal of dead wood and the creation of even-aged stands may threaten this species. Additionally, forest fires and anthropogenic modifications to the woodland hydrology may threaten this species (Janssen et al. 2017). Variation in temperature ranges and hydrological modifications due to climate change could be a feasible threat for this species as well. In the Serbian locality, this species is threatened by the construction of a tourism resort.","

This species is considered endemic to Europe, only known to exist in Greece, Serbia and Montenegro (Speight 2020). In Montenegro, five specimens were sampled from one locality (Morinj) between 1991 and 1995 (Smit and Vujić 2007); in 2009 there were some sampling efforts in the area but no more specimens were found; in Serbia one male was collected in 1996 in Dubasnica (Smit and Vujić 2007) and one female in Suva Planina in 2009 (van Steenis et al. 2015). Greece is where we find the main subpopulation in the Dadia National Park, where apparently it is not as scarce as in the other localities. The population trend in Europe and EU 27 is unknown.

",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is currently known from one locality in southeastern Serbia (van Steenis et al. 2015), one in western Montenegro (Smit and Vujić 2007) where it it is considered possibly extinct as recent survey work did not refind the species, and from four records in northern mainland Greece (Vujić et al. 2020). For Europe, the area of occupancy (AOO) is calculated to be around 20 km2, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) estimated at approximately 76,739 km2; and for the EU 27, the AOO is around 16 km2 and EOO approximately 5,475 km2.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"This is a protected species in Serbia. Conservation actions should be directed to the protection of its habitat. The main subpopulation is in a National Park in Greece (Dadia National Park). Research is needed on its ecology, habitat, population and threats. It will also benefit from population and habitat monitoring.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 152281835,149170624,Ischiodon scutellaris,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)
EU27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

The distribution of this species outside European borders is widespread, but in Europe and the EU27 the distribution is extremely limited, with the European subpopulations being at the western limit of its distribution.

In the EU27, it has only been recorded on one island in Greece, with an extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of 40 km2 and 16 km2 respectively. The number of locations is three, taking drought caused by climate change as the main threat, and there is a decline in the natural habitat. Therefore it would be considered as Endangered. In Europe it has also been recorded from two localities on the Crimean peninsula and in the mainland part of Ukraine, making the European extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) 52,169 km2 and 24 km2 respectively. In Europe, the number of locations increases to five (based on the threat of drought), with continuing decline in the habitat, and therefore it would also be categorized as Endangered. Nevertheless, taking into account that this species has the western edge of its distribution in Europe, and that it is widespread and common in the rest of its distribution, the categorization for both EU27 and Europe has been downgraded to Vulnerable (VU).

Habitat protection, population monitoring and research on distribution and threats are recommended for this species.","

The habitat of this species is open-ground areas close to freshwater, along the margins of water bodies and wetlands (permanent or temporary/seasonal). It is also present on agricultural land where crops such as Solanum tuberosum, Pisum sativum and Sinapis alba grow (Lal and Gupta 1953). The developmental stages were described by Lal and Gupta (1953) using larvae found on low-growing and tall herbaceous plants, including lianas. Láska et al. (2006) provide a key to help identify the larvae and puparia of Ischiodon aegyptius and Ischiodon scutellaris, and they also describe their key identifying features. The larvae are predators feeding on aphids. Adults fly low, in a manner reminiscent of Sphaerophoria, and they normally visit flowers such as Citrullus, Diplotaxis, Fagonia and Reichardia. They can be seen from January to April. All this information has been extracted and updated from Speight (2020).

","The threats affecting this species are not currently well understood. It is predominantly associated with crops and therefore the management of crops may affect it, such as the use of pesticides. It can be present also in wetlands, so the loss of water by drought due to climate change, or changes in hydrology management, could be feasible threats too. Taking drought as the main threat, there are five locations.","The European and EU27 population trend of this species is unknown; when recorded, it is found in small numbers. In Greece, it has only been recorded on Chios island, where it was found in four localities (three males and three females collected) in November 2012. In Ukraine, it has been recorded twice on the Crimean peninsula in 2007 (one female) and 2015 (one male).

It is considered a cosmopolitan species in the East Asian and Australasian regions (Speight 2020, Vujić et al. 2020).",Unknown,"

Within the European region, this species has been recorded from just three localities in the East Aegean Islands (Vujić et al. 2020) and Ukraine (Krym and the mainland; Popov pers. comm. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) for Europe are 52,169 km2 and 24 km2 respectively, and for the EU27 are 40 km2 and 16 km2.

Outside Europe, it can be found in the Caucasus, Kazakhstan, Iran, and the Arabian Peninsula, south to the Indomalayan region, China, Japan, and Taiwan, and the Australasian and Oceanic regions except Hawaii (Mengual et al. 2018). It is very common in the East Asian and Australasian regions (Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"This species has not yet been assessed on any national Red Lists. Conservation actions should be focused on the preservation of its habitat. Increased monitoring and research on the threats, population trends and distribution are needed to have a better understanding of its current situation. This species has been found in the Black Sea Biosphere Reserve (Popov pers. comm. 2020), and therefore one subpopulation is in a protected area.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281839,149170644,Sphiximorpha garibaldii,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The distribution of this species in Europe is very unclear, and more research is needed to confirm where exactly this species occurs, particularly in eastern Europe. However, the potential area of occupancy, extent of occurrence and number of locations is likely to be too large for a threatened category, and it is assessed as Least Concern in Europe. In most of the countries of the EU27 Member States where it is known (Spain, Italy, France, Hungary and Greece), it is considered to be very rare and localised. It is provisionally also assessed as Least Concern in the EU 27, because whilst the area of occupancy (AOO) is less than 2,000 km2, and there is a continuing decline in the habitat (specifically in western areas of Europe), but there are many more than 10 locations (considering fire as the main threat). However, this species requires further research to establish its distribution more comprehensively in both Europe and the EU27, and therefore the species may change to a threatened Category if more data are found.","

This species has saproxylic larvae; although their larvae have not yet been studied, females have been observed ovipositing in rot-holes of veteran Quercus trees. Adults fly from mid-April to August in thermophilous deciduous forest of Quercus pubescens and Quercus suber forest with veteran trees . They fly into oak cavities with narrow openings. In the evening, males sit on the bark of veteran trees in the sun, apparently awaiting the arrival of females. After rain, the adults visit damp mud and drying puddles to drink. All this information has been summarized and updated from van Steenis et al. (2016) and Speight (2020).

In Ukraine, this species is found in mixed forest with Quercus robur, and in Spain it is found in the Dehesa habitat which is under protection in the country.

","This species can be negatively impacted by deforestation, the removal of old trees and forest fires. Furthermore, increased use of plastic corks in bottles has resulted in a reduction in the need for the ancient cork groves where this species can be found. Management of forests for tourism and recreational activities also affects this species. The variation in temperature ranges and hydrological conditions caused mainly by climate change could be considered as a feasible threat too.","

The general population trend of this species in Europe and the EU27 is currently unknown. In the western part of Europe, where there is more available data and the population is considered scarce and very rare. It has very rarely been recorded in Spain, is only known from two regions of France, and in Italy it is considered very rare (Burgio et al 2015). In the eastern part of Europe, where information on its distribution is less specific and there is less data overall, there is one stable subpopulation in Greece, in Dadia National Park.

",Unknown,"

This European endemic species primarily occurs in southern Europe. It has been recorded very rarely (Prokhorov et al. 2020, Speight 2020, van Steenis et al. 2016 and Vujić  et al. 2020), and in Germany it is considered extinct. 

More specifically, in Spain, it has been found in Ciudad Real (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2010) and in the Pyrenees region of northern Spain (Gerard pers. comm. 2019). It is present in southern France (Speight et al. 2018) and Italy (Roma, Palermo, Parma and Viterbo) (Burgio et al. 2015), where it was originally described. It has also been included in the country checklists of Hungary (Tóth 2011), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Greece (Vujić  et al. 2020) where there is a relevant subpopulation in Dadia National Park and some isolated records in Lesvos and Aristi, Serbia (Nedeljković et al 2009) and Ukraine where one specimen was found in 2019 in Kiev (Prokhorov et al. 2020). It is considered extinct in Germany, where there has been no record of this species for 150 years (a specimen was found in an ancient entomological collection).

The data are scarce, and the available information is not specific for all the countries where it has been mentioned to be present (for example: Croatia). The taxonomic uncertainty that was present until 2016 also impedes the possibility of a proper calculation of the area of occupancy (AOO), but taking into account the distribution and the habitat, it is inferred to be less than 2,000 km2. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is very large.

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions for this species should be focused on habitat preservation, and on researching its biology. Thermophilous Quercus forest is declining in western Europe, and in particular, there is a massive decline in veteran oak trees and primary forest. The decline of this habitat is continuous because the forest is not permitted to regrow or restore, making the habitat unsustainable and intrinsically unviable. In eastern Europe, the habitat appears to be less affected by threats than in western Europe, apparently presenting a higher quality of habitat. Research is needed to confirm the exact distribution in eastern Europe. Cyprus is a potential candidate location where this species might occur. Monitoring of this species and its habitat are needed to understand better the population and habitat trends across its range, and research on specific actions to help this species would be beneficial.

This species is categorised as threatened in France (Speight et al. 2018).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 152281847,149170677,Psilota anthracina,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This is a widespread European endemic previously confused with Psilota exilistyla and Psilota atra, which has created uncertainty about its true distribution and population trend. It is an arboreal species, present in deciduous forest of Quercus, Caprinus and Ulmus and old orchards of Malus and Prunus. Unsustainable forestry practices may threaten this species, and increased research and monitoring are needed to improve our understanding of its distribution, population trend and threats. Despite some uncertainties, the known extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. This species is therefore categorised as Least Concern in Europe and the EU27.","This is an arboreal species, present in deciduous forest of Quercus,Caprinus and Ulmus and old orchards of Malus and Prunus. The saproxylic larval and pupal stages have been studied (Kassebeer et al. 1998), but because of taxonomic uncertainties it is believed that this original study may have also included data from Psilota anthracina and Psilota atra, which means further research is required. The larvae can be found feeding on yeasts and bacteria in the decaying sap of trees damaged by wind or other insects. They are believed to be mainly confined to broad-leaved trees. Adults can be found visiting flowers of Crataegus and Acer campestris, and occasionally Anthriscus sylvestris. Females can be found investigating tree trunks in the shade. The adult flight period ranges between April and June. All this information has been extracted from Smit and Zeegers (2005) and Speight (2020).","

Deforestation and unsustainable forestry practices such as removal of dead trees and the creation of forests with even-aged stands could threaten this species. Forest management plans that are designed to reduce disease in productive woodlands and parkland result in the loss of important microhabitats by the removal of trees that have been damaged by wind or fungal development, or have sap runs. These trees are removed because they believed to be dangerous. Wood and pulp plantations tend to eliminate naturally occurring tree species, which diminishes the availability of trees upon which this species naturally relies. Additionally, loss of connectivity between suitable areas of habitat remains a matter of concern. The degree to which isolated hedgerow trees may contribute to the availability of suitable habitat is unclear. Additionally, forest fire or hydrological modifications (water abstraction in forest areas or drought due to climate change) could impact this species (Janssen et al. 2017).

","

In the UK this species is considered to be rare, having undergone a significant decline in the number of records in the last 25 years. However, it is a notoriously difficult animal to find and is easily missed (Ball and Morris 2014). It is considered rare in some other countries, such as in the Netherlands (Reemer et al 2009) or Hungary (Toth 2011). The general trend of its population in Europe and EU 27 is unknown. 

",Unknown,"

The general range of this European endemic requires re-appraisal due to confusion with the species Psilota atra and Psilota exilistyla, but it is has been confirmed to occur in Albania, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, the Alps (France, Switzerland, Liechtenstein and Austria), the Pyrenees (France), Spain, Italy, Montenegro, Croatia, Hungary, Poland and Greece (Smit and Vujić 2007, Speight 2020, Zóralski 2018). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Poland and Ukraine) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been included in the following country checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001),  Italy (Stoch 2003), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020),  Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen and Svendsen 2014), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000) and Ukraine (Popov pers. com. 2019).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"Conservation actions should be focused on preserving the habitat and sites in which this species occurs. Research on its distribution is needed due the former confusion that existed between this species and Psilota atra and Psilota exilistyla (Speight 2020). Further research on the taxonomy and threats it faces, and public communication/education about it are also necessary. Additionally, monitoring of the population and habitats is required to understand better population trends in Europe and the EU27. This species is considered not at risk for Europe; however, it is considered scarce in the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000) and the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 152281851,149170700,Platynochaetus macquarti,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic is known only from the Maltese islands and the southern part of Sicily. Its population is considered stable in part of its range. The area of occupancy (AOO) is about 44 km2, the number of locations is between 8-10 taking fire as the main threat, and there is considered to be a continuing decline in the quality of the habitat. Consequently, this species is categorized as Vulnerable under Criterion B for both Europe and the EU27. Conservation efforts should be focused on the preservation of its habitat, which is declining as a result of anthropogenic pressures. Research and monitoring are needed to understand better the population trend, ecology, biology, habitat changes and threats of this species.","The main known habitats of this species are shrubs and open ground, calcicolous garrigue with patchy vegetation areas. The developmental stages of none of the species of this genus are known, and thus how the larva feeds in uncertain but is expected to be phytophagous. Adults have been collected in Malta on a steep coastal slope, garrigue with flowering Euphorbia dendroides and Asphodelus albus. In Sicily it has been observed on steep slopes with rocky debris and abundant flowering Euphorbia rigida. It has also been collected on Chrysanthemum coronarium. The flight period is from February to June, and the adults fly low over the ground surface, frequently settling on bare ground paths or rocks. All this information has been summarized and updated from Ssymank and Ebejer (2009) and Speight (2020).","The impact of the threats to this species are not currently well understood. However, it is likely that fire is a major threat to its habitat, which determines the six or eight locations that this species is estimated to occur in overall. In addition, development for tourism and urbanisation is highly likely to impact this species. The habitat is threatened and is considered to be declining in quality due to increasing tourism and the construction of roads and infrastructure. Variation in the temperature ranges and hydrological patterns, mostly caused to climate change, could be a feasible threat for the species as well.","This species is more abundant on Malta than in Sicily. In Sicily it is known from one locality within a village, surrounded by agricultural land and other anthropogenic landscapes, and in some southern localities in the south-east of the island; a total of 28 specimens have been found in four different localities, one in a volcanic scree. The subpopulation on the Maltese Islands is considered to be stable, although the area in which it is found is very small. It was last recorded in Malta in 2006 (Ssysmank and Ebejer 2009).
",Stable,"

This European endemic species is known from the Maltese islands and the eastern part of Sicily (Ssymank and Ebejer 2009, Speight 2020). It is considered endemic to these islands. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 9,487 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) around 44 km2. It is likely that fire is the major threat to this species, and therefore this species is considered to be found in between eight and ten locations.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"Conservation efforts for this species should be focused on the preservation of its habitat, which is considered to be in continuous decline as a result of anthropogenic pressures. Research and monitoring are needed to understand better the population trend, ecology, biology, habitat changes and threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 152281855,149170718,Myolepta obscura,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species can be found across central and southern Europe and into European Russia; although the population trend is unknown, it is considered rare where it does occur. It lives in forests that have mature/veteran and senescent trees of Populus and Fraxinus, and can also be found in thermophilous Quercus and alluvial forests. Some of these habitats are considered threatened. However, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category. Therefore it is categorized as Least Concern in both Europe and EU27.","The saproxylic larvae of this species was first described by Becher (1882), who found it in a tree-hole of Populus. It was re-described when discovered in a rot-hole in the trunk of a Fraxinus tree by Ricarte et al (2007). This species lives in forests that have mature/veteran and senescent trees of Populus and Fraxinus, but can also be found in thermophilous Quercus and alluvial forests. The adult flight period occurs from the end of April to the end of May, and they normally visit flowers of Sorbus but they have also been found on the invasive Photinia plants. Adults have been collected together with Myolepta dubia, Myolepta mada (outside Europe), Myolepta potens and Myolepta vara. All this information has been summarized from Reemer et al. (2004) and Speight (2020).","Some of the habitats in which this species is found are categorized as Vulnerable by the European Red List of Habitats. Human activities related to forestry, such as deforestation, removal of dead trees, and the creation of commercial forests with even-aged stands, possibly threaten this species. Additionally, forest fires and hydrological modifications can impact this species (Janssen et al. 2017). The lack of continuity of maturing trees due to increasing monocultures and decreasing variety of tree ages is potentially a matter of concern in some localities.","The population trend of this species is unknown in Europe and the EU27. In southern Europe, it is a rare species known only from northern Italy (Speight 2020), north-eastern Greece (Vujić et al. 2020) and central Spain (Ricarte et al. 2007).",Unknown,"

This species can be found across central and southern Europe and into European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Germany and Ukraine) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been included in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), France (Speight et al. 2018), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Stoch 2003), North Macedonia (Krpač et al. 2001), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov 2010) and south of European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018).

Outside Europe, it can be found in the Caucasus (Azerbaijan) (Vujić et al. 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"Conservation efforts for this species should be focused on the conservation and protection of its habitat to avoid habitat decline. It would also benefit from research on its biology, ecology and population, as well as monitoring of population and habitat trends. It has not been assessed on any national Red Lists, but is nevertheless considered rare wherever it does occur in its geographical distribution in Europe and the EU 27.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281859,149170738,Myolepta dubia,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This saproxylic species is the most widespread of the genus in Europe, found from the United Kingdom to European Russia and across southern Europe. It is categorized as threatened and possibly extinct in some countries, and the habitat in which it lives is threatened. However, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU 27. Therefore, taking into account its geographical distribution, it is categorised as Least Concern in both Europe and EU27. It would benefit from increased protection of its habitat, and research and monitoring of its population, habitat and threats.","The saproxylic larva of this species was described by Dusek & Laska (1960), and the pupa was illustrated by Dussaix (2013). They develop in wet holes in mature trees such as Populus, Fagus and Acer. They take over a year to complete their developmental cycle, overwintering as larvae (Dussaix 2013). The environments in which this species can be found are different kinds of forest: mesophilous forest with Fagus, acidophilous and thermophilous forest with Quercus, and maquis with Quercus species such as Quercus ilex and Quercus suber. Forests with mature, senescent and ancient trees are also potential habitats. Adults are normally in seen in dappled sunlight flying around low-growing plants with flowers such as Cistus, Cornus, Crataegus, Heracleum, Pastinaca, Potentilla, Prunus, Rubus and Torilis. The flight period of the adults is from May to August. It has been recorded together with Myolpeta nigritarsis, Myolepta vara and Myolepta potens. All this information has been summarized and updated from Ball and Morris (2014), Reemer et al. (2004) and Speight (2020).","Some of the habitats in which this species is found are categorised as Vulnerable by the European Red List of Habitats (e.g. G1.8 Acidophilous Quercus woodland). Unsustainable forestry activities such as deforestation, removal of dead trees and the creation of monoculture forests with even-aged stands can also threaten this species, as well as fire and modifications to hydrology (Janssen et al. 2017). The loss of old trees where the species breeds in rot-holes may be a possible threat.  Since larvae are likely also to be present in trees of urban parks, arboricultural activities may affect it as well (Ball and Morris 2014).","This species is considered the most widespread species of the genus, but its population trend is unknown in Europe and the EU27. It is considered to be rare in the UK (Ball and Morris 2014) and Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), and scarce in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009).",Unknown,"The general distribution of this species is from southern Sweden south to Spain and the Mediterranean, and from Britain (southern England) eastwards through central and southern Europe into the European parts of Russia (Speight 2020). 

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Poland and Czechia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It is included in the following national checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2017), France (Including Corsica) (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), European Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020) and the UK (Ball and Morris 2014).

Outside Europe it is found in the Transcaucasus (Gilasian et al. 2016, Barkalov and Mutin 2018).",This species is not known to be utilised.,Terrestrial,"This species requires greater conservation efforts to protect its forest habitat, taking special consideration of the conservation of mature and senescent trees. Research on and monitoring of its distribution, population, habitat and threats are also recommended.  This species is categorized as Endangered in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005), Vulnerable in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020) and Near Threatened in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281863,149170760,Ferdinandea ruficornis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern

This species has a wide distribution in many countries across Europe, but nevertheless is considered to be rare and scarce in many of these countries, and even Extinct in one. Its wide distribution gives an EOO and AOO above the threshold limits for any threatened category. Information about population trends is not abundant, but there are recent records in the last few years; for example, twenty new records in Belgium and two more in Italy during 2020. These recent records indicate hill-topping behaviour, and also that it may spend long periods flying in the high canopy of trees - hence it is easily overlooked during surveys and may be considered rarer than it really is.

Taking into account the wide distribution of the species, the consequent high EOO and AOO and the recent records found last year, this species is categorized as Least Concern for both EU27 and Europe. More research is needed on this species to determine the real state of the population, analysing the time that the species spends in the adult stage and what is the adult habitat. New information about this may lead to a different categorization in the future. It needs to take into account that its habitat is thought to be in decline, and the populations of the lepidopteran larvae with which is presumably associated are in decline too.","

The preferred habitat of this species is mainly forest, more specifically deciduous Quercus forest and alluvial hardwood forest. The saproxylic larval stages are not yet described, but nevertheless there is evidence that they develop in sap-runs and tree trunks of Quercus and Populus species. It has a close relationship with the activity of Cossus caterpillarsbut it is unlike that this is an obligate association because the hoverfly does occur at localities where the moth has not been found.  Adults are normally seen in patches of sunlight on tree trunks, but they are seldom found and may be largely arboreal; they have been found visiting Heracleum umbels. It is possible that adults are overlooked, perhaps by staying high in the canopy, and it is now considered to be a hill-topping species (van de Meutter pers. comm. 2021). The flight period is between April and September, with peaks in May and August. All his information has been summarized and updated from Ball and Morris (2000, 2014) and Speight (2020). 

In the Iberian peninsula Q. pyrenaica and Q. robur are breeding sites of the larvae, and the flight period is between mid-March and October (van Eck 2006; Ricarte et al. 2010).

","

The main threats that may affect this species are those affecting its habitats, mainly over-mature trees. Some of the habitats where this species is found are categorized as Vulnerable by the European Red List of Habitats (e.g. G1.8 Acidophilous Quercus woodland). Human activities related to forestry can be possible threats, such as deforestation, removal of dead trees, the creation of even-aged stands, and also fire and hydrology modifications (Janssen et al. 2017). If the Cossus relationship with this species determines its distribution limits, then because Cossus is currently exhibiting a marked decline in much of western Europe, this may imply a decline in the F. ruficornis population as a consequence. This information has been obtained from Ball and Morris (2014).

","

Despite being represented across many European countries, and having a wide distribution, this species is considered very scarce and rare in some countries, such as the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), Hungary (Tóth 2011), the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000), Portugal (found only in Serra da Estrela) (van Eck 2016) and Spain (found in Cabañeros National Park and in a Natural Reserve in Salamanca) (Ramírez-Hernández et al. 2015, Ricarte et al. 2010). In Ukraine it is widespread all over the country but considered rare, although it can sometimes be locally common on sapping oaks (Popov pers. comm.  2020).

It has been recently collected in Italy in Piemonte Plain (Umberto Maritano pers. comm. 2020). In Belgium it is considered widespread but occurs in low numbers - around 20 individuals were collected in 2020 in the four different high-spots of the country (van de Meutter pers. comm. 2021).

The overall population trends for both Europe and the EU27 are unknown. The general literature and experts agree that this species might be overlooked and considered scarcer than it really is. Apparently it flies in the high canopy, and hence is not so easy to sample or see in normal syrphid surveys.

",Unknown,"

The general range of this species is from Sweden south to Iberian Peninsula, and from Britain (England) eastwards through central and southern Europe into European Russia and the Caucasus and on through Siberia and Uzbekistan to the Pacific and northern China (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Poland) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species appears in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Croatia (Jelicić et al. 2010), the Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020),France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Macedonia (Krpač et al. 2011), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (NBIC 2020), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (de Groot and Govedic 2008), Spain (Ricarte et al. 2010, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions should be focused on preservation of the habitat, mainly focusing on the promotion of old woodland habitat and improvement of the connectivity between habitats. More research is needed to determine the nature of the relationship between this species and Cossus caterpillars. Some conservation measures can focus on monitoring and research into the distribution, behaviour,  population size and trends too, as well as on education and awareness about the species. The species has been categorized as Regionally Extinct in Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Endangered in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005) and Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) and Nationally Scarce in the UK (Ball and Morris 2014); it is considered Vulnerable in Norway (NBIC 2020) and Belgium (van de Meutter in prep.), and as Least Concern in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281867,149170781,Ferdinandea cuprea,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

Ferdinandea cuprea is a very widespread and common species across Europe. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. Although there may be some threats causing habitat loss locally, there are no major threats impacting the European population as a whole, and it is not considered to be threatened in several National Red Lists. Therefore, this species is assessed as Least Concern in both EU 27 and Europe.","

The habitat of this species is mainly forest, more specifically deciduous forest with mature trees: alluvial forest of Populus, Quercus, Salix and Caprinus, acidophilus and thermophilus Quercus and Betula forest. Larvae have been found in semi-aqueous material in tree wounds of Populus damaged by Cossus larvae (Lepidoptera), and in tree wounds and sap runs on the trunks of living deciduous trees of various sorts, including Acer, Aesculus, Betula, Malus, Populus, Quercus, Salix and Ulmus. Dussaix (2013) reports observing full-grown F. cuprea larvae moving down the trunk of an oak, away from the sap-run in which they developed, to pupate among the litter at the trunk base. This species overwinters as a puparium (Dussaix 2013).  For non-overwintering puparia derived from the spring generation of adults, the duration of the puparial phase is two weeks (Dussaix 2013). Adults appear on tree trunks, on the ground among leaves, on stones near tracks in the sun, and also at sap runs. Their flight period starts in April and ends between September and October. In the Iberian Peninsula the flight period starts in March (Ricarte et al. 2010). Adults visit flowers of species such as Convolvulus, Crataegus, Hieracium, Leontodon, Lonicera, Mentha, Oenothera, Prunus cerasus, Ranunculus, Rosa, Rubus, Sonchus, Taraxacum and  Ulmus. In Ireland there are records away from woodland areas, suggesting that sometimes this species can develop in rotting parts of large herbaceous plants, as well as in sap runs on the trunks of trees; and indeed, in France it has been reared from Cynara scolymus roots that were also attacked by Cheilosia vulpina larvae (Brunel and Cadou 1994). All this information has been summarized and updated from Ball and Morris (2000), Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).

","The main threats to this species are related to the habitat. Some of the habitats where this species is found are categorized as Vulnerable by the European Red List of Habitats (e.g. G1.8 Acidophilous Quercus woodland). It is impacted by human activities related to forestry, such as deforestation and fire (Janssen et al. 2017). However, it can be present in parks and anthropic areas, so it is less at risk of habitat loss driving extinction.","This syrphid occurs over most of Europe, from southern parts of Scandinavia southwards, and can be abundant where it is found. It does become more localised in southern Europe, however, where it is largely restricted to more humid situations within forests (Speight 2020). It can be regarded as marginally synanthropic, although there is a general lack of records from farmland, suburban gardens or parks and this species does not occur in association with conifers. Any records from conifer plantations are presumably due to an admixture of deciduous trees surviving with the conifer crop (Speight 2008). It is common in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands (Ball and Morris 2000, Reemer et al. 2009). In Spain, it is restricted to the northern areas of the country, where it is not locally abundant (Ricarte et al. 2010).",Stable,"

The general range of this species is from Fennoscandia south to southern Spain and North Africa (Algeria) and round the Mediterranean through southern Europe to Turkey; from Ireland eastwards through central/northern parts of Eurasia to the Pacific coast of Siberia and Japan (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds for any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Estonia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species appears on the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Croatia (Jelicić et al. 2010), the Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (including Sardinia and Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Russian Federation (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Ricarte et al. 2010, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch et al. 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Turkey (Tóth 2013), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The conservation actions should be focused on the preservation of the habitat. Some conservation measures can be focused on the monitoring and research of population size and trends too, as well as education about the species. This species has been categorised as Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). It is considered to be very common in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009) and the United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281871,149170794,Ceriana vespiformis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species typically occurs in oak woodland and is found across much of southern Europe. Despite part of its habitat being threatened, it is fairly widespread and there is currently no evidence of the population decreasing. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for threatened categories, but increased monitoring and research are recommended. This species is therefore categorized as Least Concern both in Europe and the EU27. The presence of veteran trees needs special attention because conservation efforts for preserving forests do not always guarantee the protection of older trees. Research on its general biology is also needed, as well as increased monitoring of the population and habitat.","

This species is known to exist in evergreen oak forests of Quercus suber and Quercus ilex that have veteran trees present. It also exists in Mediterranean riparian Fraxinus angustifolia forests and Mediterranean mixed Fraxinus angustifolia and Tamarix forests. Adults fly from April to September, with a peak in June. It prefers flying in open areas surrounding Mediterranean shrubland and visiting umbellifer flowers. It is a saproxylic species, and the larvae have been found in decaying roots of Fraxinus angustifolia (Rotheray et al. 2006) and in sap runs of dead Morbus alba (Shaumar and Kamal 1978). An adult was collected in an emergence trap over a tree-hole in Quercus pyrenaica (Ramirez-Hernandez et al. 2014). Nearly all of this information has been summarized from Speight (2020).

","This species may face threats in the future due to loss of quality and quantity of habitat. Part of its habitat is categorized as vulnerable in the European Red List of Habitats (Mediterranean and Macaronesian riparian woodland and Acidophilous Quercus woodland). Unsustainable forestry practices, such as deforestation, removal of dead trees and monoculture forestry may threaten this species. Forest fires (exacerbated by climate change) and hydrology modifications are also potential threats (Janssen et al. 2017).","This species is widely distributed across the Mediterranean basin, for example in Greece, where its population is known to be stable (Vujić et al. 2020). The population trend is thus considered to be stable in Europe and the EU27.",Stable,"

This species occurs predominantly in the Mediterranean basin. In Europe, it ranges from Spain, through the Mediterranean basin and Adriatic sea coast including Albania and Greece, to Romania and Turkey (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for threatened categories. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Albania and Romania) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been observed in the following countries: France (including Corsica) (Speight et al. 2018), Greece (including Crete) (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (including Sardinia and Sicily), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părcu 2005) and Spain (including Balearic islands and Gibraltar) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017).

It has only been recorded twice north of the the Alps, both from the Netherlands, in 1978 and in 1980 (Reemer et al. 2009). These two records need to be reviewed to be able to confirm that the occurrence of this species reaches further north than Mediterranean basin. They are difficult to reconcile with current knowledge of its ecology, because it has never been associated with habitats other than evergreen oak forests.

 Outside the European region, it can be found in Lebanon, Israel and in North Africa from Morocco to Egypt (Speight 2020).

",

This species is not utilised or traded.

,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions for this species should be focused on the preservation of its habitat to avoid future decline. The presence of veteran trees needs special attention as the conservation efforts for preserving forest do not always guarantee the protection of older trees. Research on its general biology is also needed, as well as increased monitoring of the population and habitat.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281875,149170806,Volucella inflata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment:Least Concern (LC)

This is a forest species which relies upon veteran trees for survival. Veteran trees are increasing in scarcity and there are very few young trees growing in habitats to replace them and ensure habitat continuity. Whilst this species is widespread in Europe and the EU7, it is becoming quite localised in parts of its range and has even has been categorized as Critically Endangered and Regionally Extinct in two countries. Its population trend is unknown, but there are countries in which it is widespread and more commonly found. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered for any threatened category. Therefore, with the information present to date, it is categorised as Least Concern for both EU27 and Europe. Careful attention should be paid to the preservation and restoration of mature trees, as well as increased research and monitoring of the population and habitat.","

This species lives in forests with veteran trees. The developmental stages of this species were described by Rotheray (1999) using material collected from debris produced by the tunnelling activity of Cossus larvae in a Quercus trunk. According to the morphology of the head, Rotheray suggests that this species is saprophagous, rather than a predator of insects (as in its congeners). There are references of this species being reared from the humus of cavities in deciduous trees. Adults are largely arboreal, descending to the ground level to visit flowers, and sap runs of tree trunks where females have been seen laying eggs. The flight period of adults is between May and July, and the flowers normally visited by adults are Cornus, Crataegus, Euonymus, Frangula, Heracleum, Ligustrum, Rubus, Sambucus and Viburnum. This information has been summarized from Ball and Morris (2000), Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).

","The habitat of this species is threatened by human activities: for example, forestry activities such as deforestation, removal of dead trees, and the creation of even-aged stands in commercial forests. Forest fires and hydrological modifications within the habitat can also threaten the species. The decline of the habitat due to variation in temperature range and hydrological patterns caused by climate change could be a feasible threat too (Janssen et al. 2017).","This species is widespread in Europe. It is considered locally frequent in southern Britain but scarce in the northern regions of the country (Ball and Morris 2000). It is considered rare in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017) and Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), and Speight (2020) indicates that it is very localized in most of the European territory. Its population trend is unknown in Europe and the EU27.",Unknown,"

This species can be found from Sweden and northern Germany southwards to the Pyrenees and northern Spain, and from Britain eastwards through central Europe and into European parts of Russia. Outside Europe, it occurs in the Caucasus (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the threshold to be considered for any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Germany) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been noted in the following country checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Including Crete) (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"Conservation actions should be focussed on habitat protection, and in particular the protection of veteran trees. In many parks and gardens there are no new young trees growing, and so with the decline of the old trees, there is no regeneration and continuity of habitat possible. Careful attention needs to be paid to the presence of veteran trees: conservation of the forest can protect the forest type but this does not guarantee the protection of old trees. Monitoring and research on the distribution, habitat and population trends, together with education and communication about this species are recommended. The species has been categorised as Critically Endangered in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281879,149170817,Parhelophilus versicolor,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-03 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species has a wide distribution across Europe, is considered to have a stable population trend in Europe and the EU27 and is categorised as Least Concern in many countries. It can be found in a variety of freshwater habitats, and although its habitat faces some threats, these are not great enough to put the species at risk currently. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU 27. Therefore this species has been categorized as Least Concern in both EU27 and Europe. Increased monitoring and research of its population is recommended.","

The habitat in which this species can be found is mainly wetlands (fens, marshes and reed beds), and also along canals and water-filled ditches and associated with pools or ponds in farmlands because it is more tolerant of nutrient-rich water than other species of the same genus. The saprophagous larvae were first described by Hartley (1961), who collected them from decaying Typha stems in water; larvae have been collected multiple times on Typha, which suggests a relationship with this plant. Adults have been observed resting on the leaves of this plant, and they also visit the flowers of other plants such as Aegopodium, Cardamine, Cistus, Crataegus, Euphorbia, Filipendula, Galium, Leontodon, Sorbus and white umbellifers. The adult flight period is between May and August in the northern parts of its range, and between April and September in southern Europe. All of this information has been summarised and updated from Ball and Morris (2000), Speight (2008 and 2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).

","The main threats to this species are related to the loss of freshwater habitat extent and quality as a result of hydrological system modifications, intensification of agriculture, agricultural pollution and climate change (Janssen et al. 2017). Since this species is present in eutrophic waters, this species is not currently considered to be severely at risk from these threats.","This species is widespread across Europe. In Ireland it is widely distributed but not abundant, while in the UK it is abundant in the south and in the Netherlands and Germany, it is considered common (Ball and Morris 2000; Reemer et al. 2009; Ssymank et al. 2011). In Greece (Vujić et al. 2020) and Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017) it is not considered a frequent species. The population is thought to be stable across Europe and EU27.",Stable,"

This species can be found from southern Scandinavia southwards to the Iberian peninsula and the Mediterranean, and from Ireland eastwards through most of Europe into Turkey and European parts of Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category, in either Europe or the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Germany) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been included in the following checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Krym (Popov 1998), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (Including Sardinia and Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2000), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European part of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (de Groot and Govedič 2008), Spain (Including Balearic islands) (Ricarte and Marcos-Garcia 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov Pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside Europe it can be found in North Africa and across Russia to Siberia (Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation actions for this species should be focused on the protection of its habitat, avoiding drainage, mitigating the impact of drought and stopping the pollution of wetlands. Increased monitoring of and research into its population size and trends is needed, as well as education and communication about the species. It has been categorized as Endangered in Belgium (INBO 2020) and the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005), Vulnerable in Norway (NBIC 2020) and Least Concern in Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281883,149170829,Tropidia fasciata,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This wetland species is found in much of central and western Europe. It has been frequently recorded in France in the last few years, throughout the country. However in other parts of Europe such as in the north, the subpopulations are considered to be decreasing and in some instances are even going extinct. Overall, its population is considered to be decreasing, but its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, in either Europe or the EU27. It is therefore categorised as Least Concern in both the EU27 and Europe. Its habitat is negatively impacted by drought and pollution, which should be managed to conserve it. More research is needed to understand better its distribution and population trends.","

This species occurs in wetlands, mainly in bog pool edges with Betula and Pinus in deciduous forest, acid fens, oligotrophic flushes and streamlets in acidophilous grasslands. The developmental stages have not been described, but the larva it is known to be saprophagous. Adults can be found very close to the streamlets and over the surface of flushes. Females have been seen ovipositing on wet mud with organic debris on the edges of a streams. Adults normally visit flowers such as Chrysanthemum, Daucus, Euphorbia, Mentha, and Ranunculus, and the flight period is between June and September. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).

","The habitat of this species can be affected by pollution, drought (increasing as a result of climate change) and unsustainable forestry and water management practices (Janssen et al. 2017).","The only part of Europe that this species has been observed regularly is in France, from the Ardennes to the Pyrenees (Speight 2020). It is considered rare in Hungary (Tóth 2011) and Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). In Finland it has been categorised as Regionally Extinct since 2010, with only four records between 1916 and 1918  registered in the country (Hyvärinen et al. 2019). Overall this species is considered to be decreasing in Europe and the EU27.",Decreasing,"

This species can be found from France through the Pyrenees and on through the Czech Republic to Slovakia, Austria and Hungary. It is apparently absent from the Alps and European Russia, but is known outside Europe in eastern Siberia (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, in either Europe or the EU27. Specific locality data are not available for some countries (for example: Germany, Poland, Czechia, Slovakia, Belgium and Estonia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It is included in the following country checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Finland (as extinct) (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015) and Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation efforts for this species should focus on conserving its habitat via better habitat management to avoid drainage of water from the habitat, prevent and reduce the impact of droughts and stop pollution of wetland habitats. More research is needed, particularly on its life cycle (to understand better its habitat needs as a larva and pupa) and its distribution and population trend. This species has not been recorded frequently in the countries in which it is present, and therefore more sampling efforts are needed to know its exact distribution. Education and communication about the species is recommended as a conservation tool. This species has been categorized as Endangered in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281887,149170839,Tropidia scita,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This saprophagous species is found in wetland habitats and is widespread across Europe. It is considered to be most frequent in the Atlantic areas and has been categorized as Least Concern in many European countries. The population is considered stable in both European and the EU27 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, in either Europe or the EU27. This species is therefore categorised as Least Concern in the EU27 and Europe. Increased research and monitoring about this species and its population is recommended.","

This species is found in wetland habitats, such as reed beds, marshes, fens, ditches and beside slow-flowing rivers. It can be also be found in freshwater marshes near coastal lagoons. The puparium of this saprophagous species was first studied by Decleer and Rotheray (1990) from a specimen collected as larvae in Typha leaves. It is likely that the saprophagous larvae develop in the debris that exists around the base of Typha plants. Nötzold (2000) collected an individual from an emergence trap installed in a reed bed.

The adult flight period is between May and early September among waterside vegetation, visiting flowers of Ranunculaceae, Apiaceae, Cardamine, Corydalis, Euphorbia, Galium, Iris, Myosotis, Potentilla, Rubus, Sorbus, Symphytum, Vaccinium and Valeriana. All this information has been summarized and updated from Ball and Morris (2000), Speight (2008 and 2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).

","The principal threats to this species are related to loss of natural habitat, especially freshwater habitats, as a result of modifications to hydrological systems and the intensification of agriculture which can result in increased pollution of freshwater habitats. The decline of the habitat due to variation in temperature range and hydrological patterns caused by climate change could be a feasible threat too (Janssen et al. 2017).","

This widespread species is considered to be abundant in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), frequent and widespread in Ireland (Speight 2008), frequent in the coastal areas of the UK (Ball and Morris 2000) and common in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). According to Speight (2008) it is very common in Atlantic areas but is less frequent in central and southern Europe. Overall, its population is considered to be stable in both the EU27 and European regions.

",Stable,"

This species can be found from Spain north to Scandinavia, and from Ireland eastwards through central Europe to European Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, in either Europe or the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been included in the following country checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Krym (Popov 1998), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen and Svendsen 2014), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Turkey (Tóth 2013), Ukraine (Popov pers. com. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014). 

Outside Europe, it occurs in the Caucasus and in Asia as far as the Pacific coast and Japan (Speight 2020, Pérez-Bañón et al. 1996, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017, Lara-Ruiz and Lara-Vicente 2013).

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"Conservation efforts should be focused on the protection of the habitat and reducing the drainage of freshwater, reducing the impact of drought and stopping the pollution of wetlands. Increased monitoring and research on the species and its population size and trends is needed, as well as education and communication about it. This species has been categorized as Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020). It is protected in Serbia (Vujić pers. comm. 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281891,149170850,Volucella elegans,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This European endemic forest species probably relies upon bumblebee and/or social wasp nests as a larvae. It only exists on the Iberian Peninsula (Spain, Portugal, Andorra) and Corsica, but is widespread and considered common. Its population is stable and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category. Therefore it is considered to be Least Concern in EU27 and Europe. Research and monitoring are recommended for this species to understand its ecology and population better.","The developmental stages of this species have not yet been studied, but like most of the species in this genus, the larvae are likely to be associated with bumblebee (Bombus) and/or social wasp (Vespula) nests. It lives predominantly in forests, including evergreen forests and maquis of Quercus ilex, Quercus rotundifolia and Quercus pyrenaica. The flight period of the adults is between May and October, and the adults visit flowers such as Carduus, Cirsium, Crataegus, Diplotaxis, Euphorbia, Hedera, Mentha, Rubus and Thapsia. All this information has been summarized and updated from Speight (2020).","This species may be threatened by deforestation and fires impacting its habitat. It may have a close relationship with bumblebee nests, and some bumblebee species are in decline or threatened. Therefore it may be at risk as a result of threats affecting bumblebee and/or wasp populations. The use of pesticides can be also a threat because of its direct effect on populations of bumblebees. The decline of the habitat due to variations in temperature range and hydrological patterns caused by climate change could be a feasible threat too.",This species is considered to be widespread and common in the countries in which it is present. Its population is also considered to be stable.,Stable,"This European endemic occurs throughout Spain and Andorra (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Portugal (van Eck 2016), and the island of Corsica (Speight et al. 2018). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered in any threatened category.",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"Conservation action should be focussed on protecting its habitat and the bumblebee and/or wasp populations on which it may rely. Monitoring and research on its distribution, population, threats and taxonomy are needed, together with clarification of its relationship with social Hymenoptera. Education and communication about this species are also recommended as a conservation tools. This species has not currently been assessed on any national Red Lists.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 152281895,149170862,Volucella pellucens,Least Concern,,2021,2020-03-10 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This species is found in certain Fagus forests and Quercus forests, and relies upon Vespula nests for part of its life cycle. Part of its habitat is considered threatened under the European Red List of Habitats and therefore conservation efforts should be focussed on habitat conservation, monitoring and research.

It is considered common and widespread across Europe and the EU27, and has been categorised as Least Concern in a few national Red Lists. Its population trend is considered stable in both regions, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered for any threatened category. It is therefore categorised as Least Concern in both the EU27 and Europe.","This species lives in deciduous, mesophilous forests with Fagus trees, acidophilous and thermophilous forests of Quercus and also in hedgerows, gardens and parks.

The developmental stages of the life cycle were studied and described by Rupp (1989) and Rotheray (1999). The larvae are detritivores/predators in the nests of social wasps (Vespula), living for most of the time in the midden below the nest proper.

Adults are normally seen between May and October in open areas, flying high and visiting flowers of a wide range of low-growing plants (for example Heracleum), bushes and trees. It can be somewhat defined as synanthropic, but it seems to depend to a large extent on the presence of deciduous woodland. All this information has been summarized from Ball and Morris (2000); Speight (2008 and 2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).","The threats affecting this species may be directly related to habitat loss and fragmentation primarily through deforestation and fire. Threats affecting wasp populations would also impact this species due to its reliance on Vespula for part of its life cycle. One of its woodland habitats, Acidophilous Quercus woodland, has been assessed as Vulnerable by the European Red List of Habitats. Human activities related to unsustainable forestry, such as deforestation, removal of dead trees and the creation of even-aged stands, forests fires and hydrology modifications can threaten this habitat. The decline of the habitat due to variation in temperature range and hydrological patterns caused by climate change could be a feasible threat too (Janssen et al. 2017).","

This species is widespread and common across Europe and the EU27, and it is more common than Volucella bombylans in southern Europe (Speight 2008). It is widespread but infrequent in Greece (Vujić et al. 2020). In Ireland, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, it is common and well distributed (Speight 2008, Ball and Morris 2000, Reemer et al. 2009). Overall, its population is considered stable in the EU17 and European regions.

",Stable,"

This species is widespread across the European and EU27 regions, found from Scandinavia south to the Iberian Peninsula, and from Ireland eastwards through Europe to Russia. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are far above the thresholds to be considered for any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Germany) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

This species has been included in the following country checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Bulgaria (Tóth 2014), Croatia (Jelicić et al. 2010), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2011), Ireland (Speight 2008), Italy (Including Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Lithuania (Pakalniškis et al. 2006), Luxembourg (van Steenis 2006), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Norway (Nielsen 1999), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European parts of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013), Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Ukraine (Popov Pers. comm. 2020) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2000).

Outside Europe, it occurs in the Caucasus and across Asia including Japan, India and Malaysia (Speight 2020).

",This species is not known to be utilised.,Terrestrial,"The conservation of this species should be focused on efforts to protect its habitat and the wasp populations in whose nests the larvae feed. Monitoring and research on its distribution and population trends, together with education and communication about the species are also needed. It has been categorised as Least Concern in Belgium (INBO 2020), Denmark (DanBIF 2020), Finland (FinBIF, 2020), Norway (NBIC 2020) and Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281899,149170873,Ceriana conopsoides,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This saproxylic woodland species is widespread across Europe with a large area of occupancy and extent of occurrence, and the population is considered to be stable. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above thresholds to be considered in a threatened category. Therefore, it is assessed as Least Concern, both in Europe and EU27. Increased research on its ecology and population trends is recommended, together with increased monitoring of its habitat, which is partially threatened.","

This is a saproxylic species with the larvae being found in exuded tree sap and tree-holes mainly of deciduous trees (eg. Poplar and Elm (Populus and Ulmus)). The habitat of adults includes different types of deciduous forest: riparian Ash and Poplar (Fraxinus and Populus) forest, Oak, Elm and Hornbeam (Quercus, Ulmus and Carpinus) forest, warm and dry oak forest (Quercus pubescens, Quercus cerris and Quercus frainetto) and evergreen oak forests (Quercus suber) managed for cork production.

Veteran trees are important for its larval habitat. Adults fly from mid-May to mid-August, with a peak in mid-May to mid-June. The flowers most commonly visited are Apiaceae, Cirsium, Dianthus, Euonymus, Euphorbia, Ligustrum, Rubus and Sorbus. All this information is summarized and updated from Speight (2020) and Vujić et al. (2020).

",Habitat loss and habitat modification are the main threats to this species. Some of the habitats where it is found are categorized as vulnerable on the European Red List of Habitats (Mediterranean and Macaronesian riparian woodland and Acidophilous Quercus woodland). Unsustainable commercial forestry activities such as deforestation or removal of dead wood also threaten this species due to the lack of age diversity and veteran trees. Forest fires (which can increase as a result of climate change) and modifications to the forest hydrology also pose a threat (Janssen et al. 2017).,"This is a widespread species with a large and stable population in Europe and the EU27. It is rare and decreasing in Western Europe and was probably present in Britain in the 19th century but has not been observed since (Speight 2020). It is considered to be scarce in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), but quite widely distributed in Greece (Vujić et al. 2020).",Stable,"

This species can be found from Finland in the north to the Mediterranean in the south; and from France in the east across to European Russia (Speight 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds to be considered in a threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been cited in the following national checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), Estonia (Kuznetzov 1993), Finland (FinBIF 2020), France (including Corsica) (Speight et al 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al 2001), Greece (including Crete) (Vujić et al 2020),  Hungary (Tóth 2011), Italy (including Sardinia and Sicily) (Burgio et al. 2015), Latvia (Karpa 2008), Lithuania (Kuznetzov 1993), Malta (Ebejer 1995), Netherlands (Reemer et al 2009), Norway (Nielsen and Svendsen 2014), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Portugal (van Eck 2016), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), European part of Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al 2013)Spain (including Balearic islands) (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), European parts of Turkey (Tóth 2013) and Ukraine (Popov 2010). Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Latvia) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise Area of Occupancy (AOO) for this species.

Outside of the European region it is present across the Asian continent to the Pacific coast (van Steenis et al. 2016), and can be also found in North Africa.

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"The conservation actions for this species should be focused on the preservation of its habitat. Monitoring and research on its ecology and population are needed. Education and awareness-raising related to this species and its conservation needs would be beneficial.

It is categorized as Endangered in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005) and in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011), as Vulnerable in Norway (NBIC 2020), as Near-Threatened in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020) and as Least Concern in Finland (FinBIF 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281903,149170884,Myolepta difformis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-02-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 Regional Assessment: Endangered (EN)

In Europe, this species can only be found in Spain and Portugal, where because of its saproxylic larva it occurs in forests with veteran trees that support rot-hole habitats. Its known area of occupancy (AOO) is 64 km2. Based on the main threat of fire, this species is present in around 10 to 12 locations, although the population is also considered severely fragmented using the precautionary approach, because the subpopulations are small and isolated and may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation. Some of the subpopulations may not be viable, and some records are older than the 1980s. Habitats where this species can be found are progressively decreasing and fragmented. Therefore this species is categorized as Endangered under Criterion B, both in Europe and the EU27. It is recommended that the habitat of this species is given greater protection, and that there is increased monitoring and research on its European populations and ecology.","The saproxylic larval stage of this species lives in water-filled rot-holes in overmature tree trunks in riparian ash (Fraxinus angustifolia) forest and thermophilous Quercus pyrenaica (deciduous) forest, alongside rivers. The developmental stages were described by Ricarte et al. (2007). According to Sánchez- Galván et al. (2014) and Micó et al. (2011), larval development in tree-holes may be conditioned by the presence of the larvae of saproxylic beetles in the cavities. Adults feed on pollen and nectar, normally from white umbellifers; they can be seen between mid-April and mid-July. All this information has been summarized from Speight (2020).","The main threats to this species are related to threats affecting its habitat. Some of habitats in which this species can be found are categorised as Vulnerable by the European Red List of Habitats (e.g. G1.8 Acidophilous Quercus woodland). Unsustainable forestry practices, such as deforestation, removal of dead trees, the creation of monoculture forests with even-aged stands can also threaten this species, together with fire and hydrology modifications. Temperature and drought caused by climate change are considered feasible threats (Janssen et al. 2017). For example, the forest habitat has been replaced by Pinus halepensis in some localities, such as Valencia. Human pressures caused by urbanization and recreation activities can also act as a threat to the habitat, and therefore to the species. Using fire as the main threat, 10-12 locations have been calculated for this species.","In each of the localities where this species has been found, several specimens have been observed, but the subpopulations are quite small and some may not be viable. Some records are from before the 1980s. The Valencian and some of the Madrid records are very old (1930s), and hence it was thought that the species might be extinct in those localities because the habitat has been quite degraded. However, photographs submitted online for identification have confirmed that this species still exists in Madrid (Biodiversidad Virtual 2019). Ten specimens were collected between 2010 and 2011 in the Entomological reserve of Campanarios de Azaba, in Spain (Ramírez-Hernandez et al. 2011). 

The population of this species is considered to be severely fragmented, and using the precautionary approach, since the subpopulations are small and isolated, they may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonisation. The habitat of this species is found across the Mediterranean.",Unknown,"This species is known form a small number of records in central and southern parts of Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017) and Portugal (van Eck 2016). A locality in eastern Spain at Valencia is considered possibly extinct because the record dates from the 1930's.

Outside Europe, it is also present in North Africa (Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia) (Reemer et al. 2004). It is considered endemic to the Iberian Peninsula and North Africa (Speight 2020).",This species is not known to be utilised.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),"This species is considered to be facing threats in Europe (Speight 2020), but it has not yet been included in the Red Data Book of Spain (Verdú et al. 2011). It occurs in areas where conservation measures are being implemented, but wild fires still threaten it since conservation measures cannot protect it from all threats. Conservation actions should be focused on conservation of the habitat, as well as research on its habitat and ecology, and monitoring of distribution and population trends. The fact that the most northerly point of distribution of this species is Spain makes conservation particularly important in that country (Ricarte et al. 2007).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 152281907,149170894,Myolepta potens,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-05 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

The general range of this species is from the United Kingdom (southern England) through France south to the Mediterranean, and in Germany (Rhine valley), Hungary, Romania, Serbia and Turkey. It is found in different types of forest: mesophilous and thermophilous forest with Fagus and Quercus species with mature/veteran and senescent trees. The habitat in which it lives is partially threatened. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU 27. Therefore, taking into account the geographical distribution, it is categorized as Least Concern in both Europe and EU27.","This species is found in different types of forest: mesophilous and thermophilous forest with Fagus and Quercus species with mature/veteran and senescent trees. The saproxylic larva was described by Rotheray (1991) from material collected in a rot-hole of a Fagus tree. The flight period of the adults is between May and July, visiting flowers of species such as Cistus, Cornus and Crataegus; both sexes have been seen flying around sap runs. There is only one generation per year. The adults have been observed with Myolepta dubia, Myolepta nigritarsis, Myolepta obscura and Myolepta vara. All this information has been summarized and updated from Reemer et al. (2004) and Speight (2020).","

Part of the habitat of this species is categorised as Vulnerable in the European Red List of Habitats (e.g. G1.8 Acidophilous Quercus woodland). Human activities related to commercial forestry such as unsustainable deforestation practices, removal of dead trees and the creation of forests with even-aged stands possibly threaten this species. Additionally, forest fire and hydrological modifications can threaten its habitat (Janssen et al. 2017). Loss of continuity of ageing trees is potentially a matter of concern in part of its range. It can be encountered in urban parks, so arboricultural practices such as cavity filling could contribute to a reduction in possible breeding opportunities (Ball and Morris 2014).

","The population trend of this species is unknown in Europe and the EU27 and requires further investigation. It is considered rare in most of the countries where its presence has been recorded; for example Hungary (Toth 2011), Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011) or the UK, where it was considered extinct until found again in 2002, 2009 and 2013 (Ball and Morris 2014).",Unknown,"

The general range of distribution of this species is from the United Kingdom (southern England) through France south to the Mediterranean, and in Germany (Rhine valley), Hungary, Romania, Serbia and Turkey. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far above the thresholds for this species to be considered in any threatened category, either in Europe or the EU 27. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Germany) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

It has been included in the following checklists: France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2001), North Macedonia (Krpač et al. 2001), Montenegro (van Steenis et al. 2015), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018) and United Kingdom (Ball and Morris 2014).

Outside of Europe the species occurs in the Transcaucasian region (Speight 2020).",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"In the UK, this species is categorized as Critically Endangered under criterion D by Ball and Morris (2014). The authors recommend increased research to understand its risk of extinction better. In the previous Red List of the country, it was considered extinct (Ball and Morris 2000). In the update of the checklist of France (Gretia, 2012), this species is categorized as threatened in France and Europe. Despite this, it is thought to be under-recorded and possibly elusive, and further research is needed to support this conclusion.

Conservation actions for this species should be focused on the preservation of its habitat, in particular the conservation of old trees and continuity of forests with a diverse age structure. A better understanding of this distribution is needed, as well as increased research on its biology and ecology, as well as monitoring of the population and habitat. It is listed by the council of Europe as a Saproxylic Indicator Species. Education and awareness related to this species and its situation can be also a useful conservation tool.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 160074946,160074944,Eumerus banaticus,Critically Endangered,"B1ab(ii,iii)+2ab(ii,iii)",2021,2019-11-18 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

The species is assessed as Critically Endangered in Europe since its area of occupancy (AOO) is 8 km2, extent of occurrence (EOO) is 35 km2 and the population is considered to be severely fragmented. There is a continuing decline in the habitat quality and in the area of occupancy of the species due to intensive agricultural activities.

The species is assessed as Critically Endangered in the EU 27 since its area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are 4 km2 and it is only found in one location. There is a continuing decline in the habitat quality and in the area of occupancy of the species due to intensive agricultural activities.

This species is a typical inhabitant of steppe areas, which have almost entirely disappeared in Europe. Monitoring of the subpopulations as well as the monitoring and protection of the species' habitat are needed. Further research on life history and ecology of the species is also needed.

","

The larva should feed on plants, presumably developing in bulbs or other infested underground organs, like other congeneric species (Speight et al. 2020). Adults have been found on trackside vegetation within typical Pannonian Steppe grassland, and also visit Conium maculatum (A. Vujić pers. obs. 2020).

","

Grassland steppe habitat, the typical habitat of the species, have almost entirely disappeared in Europe (IUCN 2019). Intensive agriculture in the area represents the most significant threat, and due to agricultural activities, the quality of the habitat is degrading. There is a continuing decline in the available habitat for this species because of extensive tillage of the land. The use of herbicides and pesticides on crops is also present as an influence on the habitat, because the species is found in the immediate proximity of cropland (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

","

There is no information about population size for this species, and thus the overall trend and the population size are unknown. In total, just 25 specimens have been found: 24 in 2012 in Romania, and one in Serbia in 2016 (Grković et al. 2019). The subpopulations are small and isolated, and may go extinct with a reduced probability of recolonization because the surrounding region is composed of areas of intensive agriculture, and so exchange of individuals is very unlikely. The population is therefore also considered to be severely fragmented. 

",Unknown,"The species is endemic to Europe, where it is found only in the Banat province, part of the Pannonian plain of northern Serbia and western Romania (Grković et al. 2019). The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 8 km2 and the extent of occurrence (EOO) around 35 km2. In the EU 27, the area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) are estimated to be around 4 km2. Furthermore, in Europe the species occurs in two locations, but only in one location in the EU 27. It is found between 72 and 90 metres above sea level.",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"

The locality where this species was found in Serbia is in the immediate proximity of the Special Nature Reserve Pašnjaci velike droplje. Although the surrounding areas are protected, agriculture in this area is intensive, as it is in the locality in Romania. In Romania, the species occurs at the Natura 2000 site called Mlaștina Satchinez. The species would benefit from a restriction of agricultural activities. It is recommend that this species is added to the National list of protected species, and that the area and habitat on which it relies is protected. Furthermore, increasing awareness and communication about this species would be beneficial. Additional research on population size, distributions and trends, life history and ecology, and threats of this species is required. Finding out the exact host plant for the development of the larvae is particularly important. Further monitoring of the population and habitat trends is also required. Appropriate conservation planning, more specifically developing an area-based management plan would further benefit the species.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 160074969,160074966,Eumerus bicornis,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-25 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

In Europe, the species is found only in one location in Greece, in high mountain pastures. Based upon the small geographic range of the species with an area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO) of 4 km2 in Europe and the EU 27, with only one location, and a continuing decline of the habitat quality due to the construction of a ski centre and overgrazing in the area, the species is assessed as Critically Endangered. It is unlikely that there is a rescue effect from outside Europe, given the relict status of the species. The main conservation actions that are needed in order to preserve the species is resource and habitat protection and raising awareness about the level of endemism of the species and the fact that if its habitat is lost, it will disappear from Europe. Further research about the population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, and threats of the species is needed (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

","

The species prefers open forest ground, open areas in Mediterranean Pinus forest and shrubland, and in Eastern Europe, more open, unimproved, semi-arid dry grassland (Vujić et al. 2020). It is connected with high mountain pastures, and has been found flying from June until September (Grković et al. 2019). The larvae presumably develop in bulbs or other infested underground organs.

","

The main threat to this species is tourism, due to the construction of a ski centre on the only known occurrence site in Europe. There is also intensive grazing in this area (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

","There is no information about the population size or trends of this species. Only 10 records exist from one single location in Europe, Chelmos Mountain on the Peloponnese Peninsula, in spite of repeated surveys across Greece (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019). These findings are from 2017. The species is presumed to be rare.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is currently known from a single small location in the Peloponnese Mountains in Greece (Grković et al. 2019). It appears to be a relict species, found on a high mountain in the Peloponnese Mountains. The species persists as a remnant of what was probably once a diverse and widespread population. In Europe and the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) are estimated to be around 4 km2It is estimated to occur in only one location, up to 1,704 m above sea level.

Outside of Europe, the species is also found in Turkey (Grković et al. 2019).",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"

The main conservation actions needed to preserve this species are resource and habitat protection, and raising awareness about the importance of the European site and the fact that if its habitat is lost, it will disappear from Europe. It occurs in the Chelmos-Vouraikos National Park in Greece, which encompasses 12 Natura 2000 sites. Specifically, it is found within the Oros Chelmos Kai Ydata Stygos site. Further research about the population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, and threats of the species is needed (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 160074986,160074983,Eumerus bifurcatus,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii),2021,2019-11-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

The species is species endemic to Spain, where it is found at only one location, in a high mountain pine forest. It is assessed as Critically Endangered since it has very a restricted extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) of 12 km2. The quality of its habitat is continuously declining due to tourism activities, soil instability, and frequent fires. There is a need for area and habitat protection, awareness and communication, and implementation of legislation at a national level. Research into the species population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, and threats is required. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is also needed. 

","

The species is found in mountainous areas with open pine-dominated forest of Pinus halepensis and Pinus nigra. It also lives in the undergrowth of Mediterranean maquis, the adults feeding on yellow and white flowering umbellifers (Grković et al. 2019).

","The main threat to this species are forest fires caused by human negligence and climate change, overly intense and inadequately managed logging operations, and overgrazing (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020). The species is also potentially affected by mountain tourism, ski facilities, and road construction, which are strongly degrading mountain forest ecosystems. Soil instability of steep mountain slopes, road construction, and clear-cutting operations have provoked serious landslides.",There are no data available on population size or trends. It has only been recorded at one location. Fewer than 10 specimens have been recorded so far (Grković et al. 2019).,Unknown,"

This European endemic hoverfly is found in the Sierra de Alcaraz and Puerto de las Crucetillas in Spain, between 1,000 and 1,500 m above sea level (Grković et al. 2019). It appears to be a relict species because it persists as a remnant of what was once probably a diverse and widespread population. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) are estimated to be around 12 km2. It appears to occur only at one location, based on the known threats.

",This species is not used or traded.,Terrestrial,"

There are no specific conservation measures in place for this species. It occurs in the Los Calares del Mundo y de la Sima Natural Park and Sierra de Alcaraz y Segura y cañones del Segura y del Mundo Natura 2000 site (natura2000.eea.europa.eu). All mapped localities are within the Sierra de Alcaraz y Segura y cañones del Segura y del Mundo Site of Community Importance (Habitats Directive)/Special Protection Area (Birds Directive).

Conservation actions needed include area and habitat protection, awareness and communication, and implementation of legislation at a national level. Research into the population size, distribution and trends, life history and ecology, and threats is required. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is also needed.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 160075009,160075007,Eumerus grallator,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-19 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"The species, which is endemic to Spain, is considered a rare species because less than 20 records exist for it. It is found in Oak dehesa. The species is assessed as Vulnerable due to its small area of occupancy (AOO) in Europe and EU 27 of 28 km2, because it is only from six known locations, and because of a continuing decline in its habitat due to poor grassland management, trees drying-off, droughts caused by climate change, pasture intensification, and land conversion. The extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be around 154,985 km2Site, resource, and habitat protection are needed. Raising awareness of this rare and important species and communication and protection of species at the national level are also recommended as conservation measures. Research into population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats as well as the monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required.","This species is found in Oak dehesa and mosaic landscapes generated after a long history of human use, where grassland, scrubland and woodland have been combined in the landscape (Ricarte et al. 2018). The early stages of Eumerus hoverflies are found in the fleshy parts of the bulbs, stems and roots of various plants, but there are no records of the larval stages of this species.

","Threats to Oak dehesa habitat where this species is found include pasture intensification and droughts caused by climate change (which impacts tree survival). The lack or shortage of regeneration of the tree layer is also recognized as one of the major threats to this habitat in Spain (Olea and San Miguel-Ayanz 2006). Habitat loss due to land conversion, and the poor management of habitats (such as overgrazing), is probably the main threat.","The population trend is unknown for this species. All the records are from after 2000, and in total there are fewer than 20 records for this recently described species (Grković et al. 2019). It is a large, and hence relatively conspicuous and easily noticeable.",Unknown,"

This species is endemic to Spain, where it is known from six locations in central and southern Spain and from Burgos in the north (Grković et al. 2019). It could be extant in more localities, but this is unlikely since the species is relatively large and conspicuous, and therefore easily noticeable. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be around 154,985 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) about 28 km2.

",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no specific conservation measures in place for this species. The Oak dehesa is a system protected by the 92/43/EEC Habitat Directive and included in the Natura 2000 network. This species would benefit from site, resource and habitat protection. Raising awareness of this rare and important species, and communication and protection of species at the national level, are also recommended as conservation measures. Research into its population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends, is required.

The species occurs in numerous protected areas, including the following Natura 2000 sites: Serres de Mariola i el Carrascal de la Font Roja, Carrizales y sotos de Aranjuez, Sabinares Sierra de Cabrejas, Carrizales y sotos de Aranjuez, Sierra de Loja, and Doñana Norte y Oeste (European Environment Agency 2020).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 160075024,160075021,Eumerus tenuitarsis,Critically Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)
EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

Based upon its small area of occupancy (AOO) of 8 km2 in Europe and the EU 27, with only two locations known, both in Greece (in the Evros region and on Lesvos island), severe fragmentation of its population, and the continuing decline of habitat quality due to fires and tourism activities, the species is assessed as Critically Endangered. In Europe and the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated at around 180 km2Conservation of the species should be focused on the protection of its habitat and area. Monitoring of the habitat trends is required. Research of this recently described species should focus on population size, distribution, and trends, life history and ecology, and threats. If future research finds the species elsewhere, its area of occupancy (AOO) could be more important. However, the species is likely to be very rare. There is little probability of rescue effect from subpopulations in Turkey.

","The larva feeds on plants, presumably developing in bulbs or other infested underground organs, like congeneric species. It is found in open areas in Castanea forest (M. Miličić pers. comm. 2019) and thermophilous Quercus forest (Vujić et al. 2020), the adults flying during the months of June and July (Speight 2020).","The main threats to this species are destruction of its habitat by fires and droughts as a result of climate change, as well as tourism activities such as resort development. These threats affect both known localities, and are especially intensive in the locality on Lesvos island (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).","There is no information about the population size of this species, and the current population trend is unknown. Only two specimens are known so far from Greece (one in 2003 and the other in 2013) (Grković et al. 2019). It was recently described (in 2019) and it is likely very rare, because it was not recorded in spite of repeated surveys across different areas in Greece. The population is severely fragmented.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is only known from Greece, where it is known form a single locality in the Evros region on the Greek mainland, and from a single locality Lesvos (Grković et al. 2019) in the Eastern Aegean. It is found between 310 and 598 metres above sea level. In Europe and the EU 27, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be around 8 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated at around 180 km2.

Outside of Europe, it has been recorded from the Anatolia region of Turkey.",The species is not utilized or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species so far. It is present in a site on Lesvos Island listed in the Habitats directive (Lesvos Kolpos Geras, Elos Ntipi Kai Oros Olympos – Potamos Evergetoulas), and is found within the boundaries of the Dadia National Park in Greece. Some of the point localities are part of the Natura 2000 network. Conservation should be focused on the protection of the habitat and area. The species would also benefit from being included in national legislation. Research on this recently described species should focus on the population size, distribution, trends, life history, ecology and threats. Monitoring of both the population and habitat trends is required (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2019).",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 162913135,162913022,Merodon longisetus,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-11-28 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

EU 27 regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)

Based on the area of occupancy (AOO), which is 8 km2, and extent of occurrence (EOO), which is 0.01 km2, as well as the number of locations (one), the species belong to the category of Critically Endangered species in Europe and the EU27. The number of locations is only one based on the threat of overgrazing by dairy sheep, as well as due to frequent fires and the impact of urbanization. In Europe, it is restricted to only one Greek island, which prevents the spread of its range and the exchange of genetic material. The only known subpopulation seem to be small and isolated (there are only four registered specimens). The subpopulations occurring in Turkey are registered on high mountains of eastern Anatolian, and they are separated from Greek subpopulations by geographical barriers in the forms of mountains and sea, and they are far from the European range, making the rescue effect more difficult. Furthermore, a recent increase in the intensity of Chios dairy sheep farming has been recorded (Gelesakis et al. 2012), as well as fires across the island, which lead to expected overgrazing by livestock and consequently, to the loss of habitat quality, in addition to the negative impacts of urbanization in this area. Further research is needed into the population size and trend, habitat and ecological requirements and to better understand the threats affecting the species.

",

This species prefers Mediterranean maquis and phrygana. The adults are known to visit flowers of Foeniculum vulgare. The flight period is from May to October (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages and host plants are unknown.

,"Habitat loss (both in quantity and quality) due to overgrazing by livestock is the main threat (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Recently, increasing intensity of Chios dairy sheep farming has been recorded (Gelasakis et al. 2012), which is expected to lead to overgrazing and therefore to loss of habitat quality. Fires can be also a major threat (fires occurred in 2012 and 2016 on the island). Additionally, all known point localities are very close to a soccer field, so urbanization may cause habitat loss as well. The distribution range of this species is restricted to only one island in Europe, and so neither range expansion nor exchange of genetic material is likely.","Due to the lack of sufficient data, the population trends are unknown. Based on all known findings, the population seems to be small and isolated (there are only four recorded specimens). In Chios, the records date from 2003 (three specimens) to 2009 (one specimen).",Unknown,"

This is an eastern Mediterranean endemic, with the type locality on the Aegean island of Chios (Greece). In Europe, it is restricted to only three localities, all on Chios. The area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 is 8 km2. The known extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is highly restricted (below 1 km2), but has been increased to 8 km2 in order to equal the area of occupancy.

It is also distributed in the southeastern part of the Anatolian Peninsula, with records on Mt Bozdağ, the Isparta plateau and on high mountains around the plateau (Likov et al. 2020).

",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action and there are no conservation measures in place. As it does not occur in protected areas, it is recommended that the areas where it occurs receive some kind of protection. Since it has been recorded only on three localities on the island of Chios in Europe, conservation actions should be focused on preservation of the habitat. Further research is required to establish its habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better the existing threats. Monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required. Introducing this endemic species into the National list of protected species, as well as increasing awareness about it is very important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 172768371,172768359,Merodon chrysotrichos,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-05-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

This species is distributed in Eastern Greece and on the Aegean islands of Samothraki and Samos (Vujić et al. 2020), as well as in Bulgaria. Outside of Europe, it is found in Turkey on mountains along the Aegean and Mediterranean coast (Vujić et al. 2020).

This species is assessed as Vulnerable in Europe due to its restricted area of occurrence (AOO) (28 km2), small number of locations (seven), and a continuing decline in the quality of the habitat. The number of locations is based on the increasing rate of urbanisation, extension of transport networks and frequent forest fires. The habitat of this species is threatened by infrastructure development, mostly due to tourism, fires and overgrazing by livestock. There is no rescue effect from subpopulations outside of the assessment region.

","This species has been collected in the following habitats: open areas and clearings by streams, in alluvial woods of Platanus orientalis, open thermophilous oak forest (Quercus frainettoQuercus pubescens and Quercus cerris) and Pinus forest, and from mid- to low-altitude hillsides (700-1200 metres above sea level) right down to the seaside. It flies around clearings, settling on vegetation, including in sunlit patches in the deep shade of Platanus woodland. The flight period is from late March to late July (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown.","Habitat loss is the main threat due to the increasing rate of urbanisation, extension of transport networks mostly because of tourism, and frequent fires. On Samothraki, the habitat is threatened by soil erosion caused by overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data about population trends. A total of 29 specimens has been collected between 1962 and 2016, of which 10 specimens were from Greece, two from Bulgaria and 17 from Turkey. The majority of records are recent (from the 2000s) (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020).",Unknown,"This species is distributed in eastern Greece and on the Aegean islands of Samothraki and Samos (Vujić et al. 2020), as well as in Bulgaria. Outside of Europe, it is found in Turkey on mountains along the Aegean and Mediterranean coasts (Vujić et al. 2020). In Europe and the EU 27, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be 72,004 km2, and the area of occupancy is estimated to be 28 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions targeting this species. Six point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. Additional research about threats, population size and trends, and ecology is needed. Monitoring of habitat and population trends is required. Areas where this species occur should be protected. Awareness should be raised of the importance of this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 172768416,172768413,Merodon confinium,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-05-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is restricted to the Peloponnese Peninsula in Greece. It is a low mountain species, and its habitats are largely under destruction by overgrazing by livestock and fires. We propose the monitoring of the population, as well as the habitat trend. Further research on the life history and ecology of this species is needed.

Based on the small geographic range of the species - the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 130 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 8 km2 , with only two locations, (based on intensive overgrazing by livestock and fires), and a continuing decline of the habitat quality, it is assessed as Endangered.",The preferred habitat is Mediterranean evergreen Pine forest. The flight period is between the end of August and early September (Vujić et al. 2020).,"

The main threats to the maintenance of the special ecological characteristics of the mountain ecosystems of Erymanthos originate from overgrazing by goats and sheep, and from road expansion and increasing tourism (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Overgrazing by goats and sheep is one of the major threats to the survival of many unique plant associations in the open steppe grasslands characterized by high diversity and a great number of endemic species. From 1961 to 1972 there was a decrease in the number of goats grazing in the mountains, but an increase in the number of sheep, and the total number of grazing animals increased. However, during the 10-year period between 1980 and 1990 this number appeared to stabilise (Natura, 2000 Data Form). Fire is an important additional threat during hot summers.

",

The population trend is unknown as there are not enough data. The only specimens are one from 1983 and one from 2012 (Vujić et al. 2020).

,Unknown,"This European endemic species is restricted to the Peloponnese Peninsula (Greece), where it is known from only two localities, Mt. Erymanthos to the north and Xirokambi in Laconia, southern Peloponnese (Vujić et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 130 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 8 km2, based on the two known locality records.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"The species has not been the subject of any targeted conservation action. One point locality is within Mt. Erymanthos Natural Park, which also belongs to the Natura 2000 network. However, it is recommended to conserve the habitats of this species. Additional research is needed on general abundance, habitat, ecological requirements, threats (for example, which levels of grazing can be tolerated) and trends. Increasing awareness about this species, as well as the monitoring of population and habitat trends, are both important too.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 172768501,172768498,Merodon nitens,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This is a local endemic species of the Italian island of Sicily. It is assessed as Endangered based on the area of occupancy (AOO 8 km2) and extent of occurrence (EOO 35 km2) and because it is considered to occur in two locations. The number of locations is defined by intensive anthropogenic activities, as tourism, urbanization and intensive agriculture. Additionally, possible volcanic activity can destroy habitats of this species. The species was registered more than 50 years ago, in 1961 and 1966. Further monitoring and research is required to establish the current status of the species throughout its range, the habitat and ecological requirements, and to better understand the existing threats.

","This species prefers open areas within mixed Mediterranean forests, high scrub, maquis, tracks and seasonal streams. Based on the known data, the flight period is from May to early August (Vujić et al. 2020)","Since this species has not been found in recent years, there is no information about its specific threats, but it is believed that the habitat quality is declining due to intensive anthropogenic activities, such as tourism, urbanisation and intensive agriculture. In addition, possible volcanic activity can destroy habitats of this species.","This species has a restricted range on Sicily, where it was recorded more than 50 years ago (27 specimens in 1961, and one more in 1966). The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This European endemic species is restricted to northwestern Sicily, Italy. The area of occupancy (AOO) is 8 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated at 35 km2, as whilst the sepcies is only known from two localities, it is considered to occur across an area of 100 m at each locality.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action, and has a relatively restricted range. For this reason, it is recommended that the areas where it occurs, as well as the suitable habitats, receive some kind of protection. Specific surveys designed to check if it is still extant are needed. Additional research is needed about the population size and trend, habitat, ecological requirements and threats. Monitoring the habitat and population trends is required, and increasing awareness about this endemic species is very important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 172768523,172768520,Merodon spineus,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-07-21 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic species is considered at present to be endemic to the island of Corfu in Greece (Vujić et al. 2020). Data on species ecology and habitat preferences is lacking, but it prefers herb-rich open areas in thermophilous oak (Quercus) forest (Vujić et al. 2020).

The species is assessed as Endangered due to its restricted area of occupancy (AOO) and extent of occurrence (EOO), both of which are 12 km2, and is considered to occur in three locations, based on tourism as the major threat. The habitat of this species is threatened by infrastructure development due to tourism and urban development, overgrazing by livestock and fires (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020), and there is a continuous decline in the habitat quality. Additional research on the species ecology, and population size and trend is needed.","Data on ecology and habitat preferences of this species are lacking, but it seems to prefer herb-rich open areas in thermophilous Quercus forest (Vujić et al. 2020). The flight period is from August to early September (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages and host plant are unknown.",The habitat of this species is threatened by infrastructure development (mostly due to tourism) and overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Fires are also considered to be a serious threat.,There are no data about the population trend. A total of 15 specimens from three point localities have been collected so far (all in 2014).,Unknown,"This species is considered to be endemic to the island of Corfu in Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), where it is known form a small number of localities in the centre of the island. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and the area of occupancy (AOO) of the species are estimated to be 12 km2.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no ongoing conservation actions targeting this species. It is recommended to conserve the suitable habitats by wildland fire management and controlling the negative anthropogenic influence of tourism growth and urban development, as well as overgrazing by livestock. Additional research on its ecology, population size and trends is needed. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required, and raising awareness about this endemic species is also very important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 172768546,172768543,Merodon triangulum,Near Threatened,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-05-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Near Threatened (NT)
EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

In Europe, this species is assessed as Near Threatened, due to its relatively restricted area of occupancy (AOO) (60 km2), a continuing decline in quality of habitat, and because the number of locations (which is based on the urbanization and infrastructure development) is only slightly above the threshold (14). In the EU27 Member States, the species is assessed as Vulnerable, because the extent of occurrence (AOO) is 36 km2 and the number of locations which is based on the urbanization and infrastructure development is eight. Infrastructure development, agricultural intensification and overgrazing by livestock are causing an ongoing habitat destruction and threatening this species.","This species has been recorded from open areas in deciduous mesophilous beech (Fagus), thermophilous oak (Quercus) and mixed forests at lower altitudes. Based on the available data, the flight period is from May to July (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages and host plant are unknown.","Many point localities are in close proximity to large cities and urban areas, and hence urbanization and infrastructure development can be considered as the major threats. In some parts of its range, there are other threats including agricultural intensification and overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data about the population trend. Records are scattered in time and space. One specimen was recorded in Austria in 1866. The 5 specimens recorded from Croatia are from 1907, 1969 and 2011. Two were collected in Hungary in 1963 and 1968, three in Montenegro in 1982, and five in North Macedonia (two in 1951, three in 2001). Five specimens were collected in Serbia (three in 1910, one in 1956, and one in 1958), and two in Slovenia in 2003 (Database of Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Serbia).",Unknown,"This European endemic species is known from northeastern Italy, northern Austria (on the border with Czechia), eastern Hungary, Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, Montenegro, and North Macedonia (Vujić 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 319,987 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 60 km2. In the EU 27, its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 144,186 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 36 km2.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. Four point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network, and one point locality in Serbia is in the Nature park ""Bosutske šume"". Threats such as overgrazing, agricultural intensification and infrastructure development can disturb its habitats, so continuous management and protection of sites in protected areas are needed. Additional research is needed on abundance, habitat, ecological requirements, threats and trends. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is recommended.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 172768737,172768719,Merodon calidus,Least Concern,,2021,2020-05-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This European endemic species is assessed as Least Concern because while it has a relatively restricted area of occupancy (AOO) (372 km2 for Europe and 220 km2 in the EU27), its extent of occurrence (EOO) is large (400,183 km2 in Europe and 300,770 km2 in the EU27), and its number of locations are above the threshold (55-60 on regional level and 35-40 in the EU27). The number of locations is based on fires as the major threat. In some parts of the range, there is a continuing decline in quality of habitat due to fires, overgrazing by livestock, infrastructure development, agricultural intensification.",The species prefers open areas within deciduous submediterranean forests (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2020) There are few data about its ecology. The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown. The flight period is from April to July (A. Vujić  pers. comm. 2020).,"There are no major threats, although in some parts of the range the habitat is threatened by fires, infrastructure development, overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020) and agricultural intensification.",There are no data on the population trend. Around 390 specimens have been collected so far. The oldest records are from Albania (1918) and the most recent from Montenegro (2019).,Unknown,"This European endemic species is distributed in the southern parts of the Balkan Peninsula: Greece, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Albania, Serbia (Vujić et al. 2020), and just reaching southwestern Romania. Vujić et al. (2020) also list Bulgaria, but its current presence cannot be confirmed because it is an old record (from 1907). In Europe, the extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be 400,183 km2, and the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 372 km2. In the EU 27, extent of occurrence (EOO) of the species is estimated to be 300,770 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 220 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions targeting this species. Some of the point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. Research about its ecology and population trends is needed, and additional research in parts of the range where older records are from would be beneficial. Areas where it occurs should be managed. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is important. Awareness should be raised about the importance of this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 178088273,176123659,Cheilosia luteicornis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-06-26 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 
EU 27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC) 

This species is listed as Least Concern (LC) in Europe and EU 27 because it is widespread and known from many localities, and the extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27. Habitat loss (leading to a decline in both quality and quantity of its conifer forest habitat) is expected due to change in land use and deforestation throughout Europe. Monitoring and further research is required to establish the habitat and ecological requirements and to understand the existing threats better.

","This species favours open areas in conifer forests of Picea and Pinus, from the Fagus/Picea zone upward. Adults usually fly beside streams and rivers, among Salix branches or visit Ranunculus. Adults are active in early spring, from April to May at high altitudes (Vujić 1992, Vujić 1996, Speight 2020). Barkemeyer (1994) provides a comprehensive review of the larval biology of this species, based on Hellrigl (1992) and Tragardh (1923). Essentially, the larva inhabits resin outflows on the trunk of Picea, caused by damage or the activities of scolytid beetles. The species apparently overwinters as a larva and pupates on the trunk, at the edge of the resin flow. Individual resin flows can evidently provide suitable larval habitat for a number of years, indicated by empty puparia trapped in the resin. The extent to which the larva is dependent upon the resin itself, or on micro-organisms associated with resins outflows, as its food source, is obscure (Speight 2020).","The main threat is habitat loss due to changes in land use and deforestation throughout Europe (Bebi et al. 2017, Strandberg and Kjellström 2019).","Based on all known data the largest subpopulations are reported from Scandinavia, Montenegro and Serbia. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"Cheilosia luteicornis is mainly distributed in northern and central Europe (mostly in the Alps and Carpathians) south to the northern part of the Balkan peninsula. Reports from Latvia (Kuznetzov 1993), Slovakia (Chvála 1997), Switzerland (http://www.cscf.ch/), Romania (Stanescu and Parvu 2005) and the European part of Russia (Speight 2020) have not been checked and are treated as uncertain here. Its range extends out of the European region to western Siberia and Mongolia in the east.

The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) are far greater than the thresholds to be considered in the threatened categories for Europe and the EU 27.
",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"Cheilosia morio is on the Red List of hoverflies of Baden-Württemberg, on the Red List of Hoverflies of Germany (rare), on the Red List of Plants and Animals of Sachsen-Anhalt (very rare), and on the List of Protected Wild Species of Plants, Animals and Fungi in Serbia. The distribution range is partly within the boundaries of Natura 2000 and in Haut-Jura Natural Park (France), Triglav National Park (Slovenia), Durmitor National Park (Montenegro) and Kopaonik National Park (Serbia). Since the species is known mainly in mountains of central and northern Europe, as well as in western Siberia, the conservation actions should be focused on the preservation of the habitat due to high rate of deforestation of European forests. Monitoring of the population and habitat and further research is required to establish the population trend, habitat and ecological requirements and to understand the existing threats better.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 179993037,175942795,Merodon kozufensis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-07-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU 27 regional assessment: Endangered (EN)

This European endemic species known only from Mount Kožuf in North Macedonia and the Pindus and Falakro mountains in northern Greece. Based on the area of occupancy (AOO) (12 km2), and number of locations (three in Europe and two in the EU27, mainly based on fires deliberate and/or accidental as the main threat) it is assessed as Endangered in both Europe and the EU27. Additionally, because of poorly managed grazing by livestock, as well as timber extraction, this species habitat could be fragmented and lost. Regular monitoring and further research is needed on population size and trend, ecology and biology of the species.

This is an endemic species known in the EU27 only from Mountains Pindus and Falakro in Greece. Based on the area of occupancy (AOO) (8 km2), extent of occurrence (EOO) (240 km2) and number of locations (two), this species is assessed as Endangered. Due to primarily deliberate and/or accidental fires, but also because of poorly managed grazing, as well as timber extraction, this species habitat could be fragmented and lost. Regular monitoring and further research is needed on population size and trend, ecology and biology of the species.

","The habitat of this species is inside, or very close to beech forests. It occurs in montane-Mediterranean Fagus moesiaca, Abies alba, Pinus peuce, Pinus heldreichii, in combination with Supra-Mediterranean oak (Quercus) forests (Radenković et al. 2020). The flight period is between August and September. The developmental stages have not been described.","The main threats are forest fires (deliberate and/or accidental), but also unsustainable timber extraction and overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Especially in Pindus National Park, extensive fires are caused by cattle breeders in order to create meadows for grazing, and because of this, large parts of the Pinus nigra and Pinus heldreichii forests are being destroyed.","In 2008, one specimen was recorded, in 2012 three, and in 2018 only two (Radenkovic et al. 2020). Further research is needed on the population trend.",Unknown,"This European endemic species has been recorded from three mountain areas in southeastern Europe: Mt. Kožuf in North Macedonia near the border with Greece, and from northern Greece (the northwestern part of Mt. Pindus (Radenković et al. 2020) and on Mt. Falakro). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 8,550 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 12 km2. In the EU27 (Greece), the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 240 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 8 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"Until now Merodon kozufensis has not been the subject of any targeted conservation action. However, since it is an endemic species known from only three mountains, with some point localities within protected areas (such as the Pindos National Park and Natura 2000 networks), conservation actions should be undertaken, such as limitations on grazing by livestock and logging. Regular monitoring and further research is needed on its population size and trend, and its ecology and biology. Raising awareness about this endemic species is also very important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 179993092,175944745,Merodon medium,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-07-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is endemic to the island of Crete in Greece. It is assessed as Endangered primarily due to the number of locations (2-3) based on fires as the main threat (but also overgrazing by livestock and potential tourism development). Furthermore, both the area of occupancy (12 km2) and extent of occurrence (118 km2) are very near to Critically Endangered thresholds. Monitoring is needed, as well as additional research on population and habitat trend, an on the biology and ecology of this species.","

This species prefers open ground in forests, open areas in dry Pinus and thermophilous Quercus forests, scrub with Pistacia lentiscus, as well as well-vegetated, unimproved grassland. The known visited flowers are Ornithogalum, Potentilla and Thymus. The flight period is May. The developmental stages have not been described (Vujić et al. 2020).

","Fires on the Greek islands represent the main threat, causing considerable impacts at the landscape scale by destroying large areas of vegetation. In the Mediterranean region in general, the season of forest and bush fires starts in May, reaches its peak in July and August and lasts until the end of October. Other threats include extensive grazing by livestock, tourism and urbanisation, which can cause declines in habitat quality, leading to fragmentation and loss (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","

All five known specimens are from 2014. Further monitoring, as well as additional research on the population trend is needed.

",Unknown,

This species is endemic to the island of Crete in Greece. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 118 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 12 km2.

,This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. However, considering the fact that it is endemic to Crete, and that it is known to occur only at three point localities, it should be incorporated into National lists of protected species. Monitoring and research on population and habitat trends are needed, as well as research on its biology, ecology and other potential threats. Two point localities are within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network. Fire management of wild lands and limiting grazing by livestock are recommended as the main conservation actions. Raising awareness about this endemic species is also very important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 179993389,175944635,Merodon olympius,Critically Endangered,B1ab(iii),2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This species is a local endemic of Olympus Mountain in Greece. It is assessed as Critically Endangered because of its highly restricted extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO), and it is considered to occur in one location. (The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1.8 km2, but this has been increased to 12 km2 to make it equal with the area of occupancy). The value of the area of occupancy (AOO) is 12 km2, which is very close to the Critically Endangered category. The number of locations is defined by tourism and overgrazing by livestock. In addition, only six specimens have been registered from 2012 to 2014. The main threats in the Olympus National Park can be the ongoing habitat loss due to human management activities and animal grazing, but also negative consequences of forest fires (Klesse et al. 2014). Further research is required to establish the current status of the species throughout its range, the habitat and ecological requirements, and to better understand the existing threats.

","This species prefers open ground in mesophilous Fagus forests. The adults fly in September, and have been recorded visiting the flowers of Achillea.",The main threat is habitat loss due to tourism and overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020). Negative consequences of human management activities and animal grazing have a proven devastating effect on some forests of Mt Olympus (Klesse et al. 2014). The Olympus National Park also faces a problem with forest fires (Filippidis and Mitsopoulos 2004).,This species has only 6 recorded specimens from Mt. Olympus in Greece in the period 2012 to 2014. The population trend is unknown.,Unknown,"Merodon olympius is endemic to Europe, where it is known from four adjacent recorded localities on Mt. Olympus in Greece (Radenković et al. 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) is 12 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1.8 km2 (increased to 12 km2 to make it equal to the area of occupancy).",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action, but it occurs in the protected area of the National Park “Mt Olympus” and the Natura 2000 network. Due to the fact that negative human activities have a proven devastating effect on the forests on Mountain Olympus, it is recommended to control the growth of tourism infrastructure and limit grazing by livestock. Further research is required to establish its current status throughout its range, its habitat and ecological requirements, and to understand the existing threats better. The monitoring of population and habitat trends, as well as raising awareness about this endemic species is very important.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 179993413,175945081,Merodon opacus,Vulnerable,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

EU 27 regional assessment: Vulnerable (VU)

In Europe, the species is only present on Lesvos island in Greece. This species prefers open grounds in forests, thermophilous and evergreen Quercus forests, Castanea forests, dry Pinus forests, unimproved grasslands and tracksides. The visited flowers are Ornithogalum spp. and Potentilla spp.

The species is assessed as Vulnerable in Europe because the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1021 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 56 km2. The number of locations is 10, defined by habitat loss due to overgrazing, but the species is present only on Lesbos island in Europe. The subpopulations generally seem to be small and isolated (only on one Greek island). Due to intense overgrazing by goats and sheep in Greece, the quality of suitable habitats for this species is expected to decline. Further research is needed about the population size and trend, habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better the threats affecting the species.","This species prefers open ground in forests, thermophilous and evergreen Quercus forests, Castanea forests, dry Pinus forests, unimproved grasslands and along the sides of tracks. The recorded visited flowers are Ornithogalum and Potentilla. The flight period is from March until September (Vujić et al. 2020). The larva is described in Vujić et al. (2020).","In Europe, this species is present on only one Greek island (Lesbos). The main threat is habitat loss due to overgrazing by goats and sheep in Greece (Arianoutsou-Faraggitaki 1985, Papanastasis 2004, Gkoltsiou 2011), which may cause the loss of habitat quality and quantity. In addition, wildfires that often occur as temperatures rise in dry summer months also threaten the species.","There is a lack of data, but based on all known findings there are several subpopulations on the island of Lesbos. The specimens were collected between 1988 and 2016. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This species has been recorded on the Greek island of Lesbos and in western Turkey (around Bozdağ and Muğla) (Vujić et al. 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) both in Europe and in the EU27 is 56 km2, while the extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1021 km2.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"The conservation needs of this species are mainly related to conservation of habitats. Limitations on grazing and fire management are recommended as the main conservation actions. Its distribution is partially within the boundaries of the Natura 2000 network. Additional research on its population trend, ecology and biology, as well as potential threats, is needed. Monitoring population and habitat trends, as well as raising awareness about this species is required. Although it is also recorded in the western part of Turkey, it is unlikely that the subpopulations from Bozdağ and Muğla can provide a rescue effect, taking into consideration that dispersal ability generally for Merodon is very low, since it is very territorial and does not migrate.


",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 179993561,175944666,Merodon orjensis,Critically Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2019-12-04 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

Global and European regional assessment: Critically Endangered (CR)
EU 27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

This species is endemic to southwest Europe, with a single known recent record in Montenegro (Mountain Orjen) from 2011. Based on the only known record, the area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 4 km2. Since the species is registered only in one locality the location number is one bused on a range of threats. Considering all known information, the species is assessed as Critically Endangered. Further research is needed into the population size and trend, habitat and ecological requirements and to understand better the threats affecting the species.

",The specimen was found in a Fagus forest on the oro-mediterranean Mt Orijen (A. Vujić pers. comm. 2021).,"

The main threat is habitat loss (both quality and quality) due to forest fires, overgrazing by livestock, fragmentation of habitats, tourism and urbanization (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).

",The only known specimen was recorded in 2011 (Radenković et al. 2020). The population trend is unknown.,Unknown,"This species is endemic to Europe, where it is known from a single locality, Mt. Orjen in Montenegro (Radenković et al. 2020). The area of occupancy (AOO) is 4 km2. The species is not present in the EU27.",This species is not traded or exploited commercially.,Terrestrial,"

This species is not the subject of any targeted conservation action. As it does not occur in protected areas, the areas where it occurs should receive some kind of protection. It is recommended to conserve its habitats using wildland fire management and controlling negative anthropogenic influences (tourism growth, urban development and overgrazing by livestock). 

Further research is required to establish the current status of the species throughout its range, its habitat and ecological requirements, and to understand better the existing threats. Raising awareness about this endemic species is important. Monitoring its population and habitat trends is also necessary.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 179993901,175922919,Merodon atricapillatus,Endangered,B1ab(iii)+2ab(iii),2021,2020-07-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This European endemic species is found in Mediterranean scrub along the coastal zone of Crete in Greece. It is assessed as Endangered due to its restricted area of occupancy (40 km2) and extent of occurrence (165 km2), small number (4-5) of locations based on overgrazing by livestock, and because of the continuing decline of the habitat quality. In addition to overgrazing, the habitat of this species is also threatened by fires. Additional research on population trend and species ecology is needed.",This species prefers Mediterranean scrub along the coastal zone (Šašić Zorić 2018). The developmental stages and the host plant are unknown.,"Degradation of habitats has been going on for centuries on Crete. Overgrazing by livestock (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020) and the setting of fires to produce fresh grassland have contributed to the transformation of large areas of mature forests to degraded shrubland. Today, at least 50% of the land surface is used for grazing for sheep and goats.","There are no data about population trends. In total, 174 specimens have been collected until now. The majority is from the 1980s, and the most recent ones are from 2014 (11 specimens).",Unknown,This European endemic species is restricted to a small number of records around Heraklion the island of Crete (Šašić Zorić et al. 2018) in Greece. Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 165 km2 and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 40 km2.,This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. Research on population size, trends, and species ecology, as well as on possible threats is needed, and monitoring of the population and habitat trends is required. Limiting grazing by livestock and wild land fire management are recommended as the main conservation actions. Localities where this species is found should be placed under some form of protection to ensure its survival. Awareness should be raised about the importance of this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 179993994,175923879,Merodon rojoi,Vulnerable,B2ab(iii),2021,2020-07-24 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This European endemic species has a restricted distribution in Greece, mostly in central Greece and on the Peloponnese Peninsula (Šašić Zorić et al. 2020). It is assessed as Vulnerable because it has a restricted area of occupancy (AOO) of 24 km2, and occurs in six locations, which is based on infrastructure development as the major threat. The extent of occurrence (EOO) is relatively large (37,096 km2), but the habitats of this species are threatened by the increasing rates of infrastructure development (mostly due to tourism), overgrazing by livestock, and fires, causing a continuous decline (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).

",This species prefers small open areas in evergreen Quercus and Pinus forests. The adults are known to visit flowers of Prospero autumnale. The developmental stages and host plant are unknown. The flight period is in September (Šašić Zorić et al. 2020).,"Habitat loss is the main threat, and it is mainly caused by increasing rates of urbanisation and the extension of transport networks (mostly due to tourism). Additionally, overgrazing by livestock and fires present a great threat to habitats throughout the Mediterranean, and the habitat of this species is no exception (S. Radenković pers. comm. 2020).","There are no data about the population trend. In total, 25 specimens have been collected from 1982 to 2012. The majority of records (20) are from 2012.",Unknown,"This species is endemic to Greece, with records from near Chalcis, Athens and on the Peloponnese Peninsula) (Šašić Zorić et al. 2020). Its extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 37,096 km2, and area of occupancy (AOO) to be 24 km2.",This species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"There are no conservation actions known for this species. Three point localities occur within the Natura 2000 network. The conservation of the habitat, fire prevention and controlling negative anthropogenic impacts, especially tourism growth, urban development and overgrazing by livestock, are crucial for maintaining this species. Additional research on the ecological preferences of the species, as well as on population trends and threats is needed. Monitoring the population and habitat trends is required. Raising awareness about this endemic species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 190418992,190418475,Chrysogaster musatovi,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-11-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU27 regional assessments: Not Applicable (NA)

Both the taxonomic status and the existence within the assessed area are uncertain. However, in recent literature (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Mengual et al. 2020), the species is listed, and the record in Ukraine could indeed be Chrysogaster musatovi, since the confirmed Teberda record is only 500 km from the Ukrainian border. More research and monitoring is needed to confirm the status of the species in Europe.",No information exists about habitat preferences.,"Since nothing is known about this species in Europe, the potential threats are also unknown.",There is no information about the population in Europe.,Unknown,"

Speight states that the species is present in Ukraine, but Popov (pers. comm. 2020) does not know of any record of Chrysogaster musatovi (or C. basalis) from this country. The listing from southern European Russia in Peck (1988) is probably based only on one of the type localities, Teberda in Karatsjaj-Tsjerkessia, in the European Caucasus (Stackelberg 1952), which is outside the scope of this European assessment. 

The species is present in Asia (Caucasus, Kazakhstan and Tajikistan) (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Mengual et al. 2020, Speight 2020) and probably also in Iran, published as Chrysogaster basalis (Khaghaninia et al. 2012, Samin et al. 2016).

",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),The first thing would be to prove the existence of this species in the assessed area and its taxonomic status as a good species.,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 190432075,190431889,Orthonevra incisa,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-11-27 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)

This species is closely related to Orthonevra plumbago and O .brevicornis, and is sometimes considered to be a synonym of O. plumbago. Thus its taxonomic status is unclear. If it is a good species, it is quite likely to be threatened at both the EU27 and the Pan-European level. However, there are not enough data to give substance to this assumption. The species is 'Threatened with extinction' in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). Further research is needed to confirm the status of this species.","No exact information is available, but this species probably lives in wet meadows and forest edges, close to freshwater. The larvae probably live in the water, just like the other species of the genus.","The possible threats to this species are unknown, but are probably comparable to the threats to the other Orthonevra species. It is probably quite threatened, at least in parts of its distribution.",There is no information available about the current population size or trend.,Unknown,"This species is distributed from Germany, Poland, Hungary, Romania to Asian Turkey. It is also present in western Siberia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Brădescu 1991, Saure 2018; Tóth 2011, 2013). In Germany, only old records exist, with the most recent from 1979 (A. Ssymank pers. comm. 2020). There are more records in Poland than shown in the distribution map (Ł. Mielczarek pers. comm. 2020), but without detailed information, it was not possible to include them. Based on the available information, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is estimated to be 437,068 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 600 km2, based on an estimated 150 localities in Europe.
",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. Research and monitoring are needed to understand its taxonomy, ecology and population trends.

",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 191167514,190514782,Melanogaster jaroslavensis,Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2021-06-30 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Global and European regional assessment: Endangered (EN)
EU27 regional assessment: Not Applicable (NA)

Melanogaster jaroslavensis is a widespread, but very rare species. It lives in wet, nutrient-poor meadows close to forest and rivers, a habitat sensitive to human alteration and therefore it is very likely that the species habitat is threatened. The subpopulations are very far apart, so the distribution is considered to be severely fragmented. There has been quite a lot of collecting in this part of Russia in the second part of the 20th century, so the very low number of records is not caused by lack of collecting effort. The area of occupancy (AOO) is estimated to be 32 km2. Therefore, the species is assessed as Endangered in Europe, while it is considered Not Applicable for EU27 Member States as it does not occur in these countries.
","

The preferred environments are alluvial forests and wet meadows in the vicinity of rivers. In the Sumy Region (Ukraine), all specimens were collected on a floodplain near the edge of an Alnus glutinosa forest. The visited flowers are Ranunculus, Caltha, and Barbarea. The adults fly in May in the southern parts of the range, and in June in the northern parts (Popov et al. 2020).


The larva is unknown (Popov et al. 2020), but probably lives in nutrient-rich or well-vegetated freshwater bodies close to the shore.

","This species is threatened by forest management, intensification of meadow use (increasing grazing by livestock and use of fertilisers) and human alterations of rivers.","There are only a few localities where the species is found. Both at the type locality and at the Ukraine locality, several specimens were collected on different days. Three males and seven females were collected at the type locality over six different days in 1907 and 1908. At the Ukrainian locality, two males and two females were collected on two different days in 2018 (Popov et al. 2020). The populations are probably far apart, but rather large at healthy sites. The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"This a European endemic, recorded from European Russia (Komi, Kirov, Perm, Leningrad, Moscow, Yaroslavl and Voronez regions) and northeastern Ukraine (Barkalov and Mutin 2018, Pestov and Dolgin 2006, Pestov et al. 2010, Popov et al. 2020; database of A. Barkalov 2019, Zoological Museum of Moscow State University collection listed by J. van Steenis). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is larger than the values for the application of a threatened category. The area of occupancy (AOO) is difficult to calculate because there are only regional listings of some Russian regions and just one record for the other regions. The minimum number of localities from Russia will be seven and there is only one known locality in Ukraine. With eight localities, the minimum AOO is 32 km2.",The species is not used.,Terrestrial|Freshwater (=Inland waters),

There are no conservation plans in place for this species. The most important conservation measure would be to protect the sites and habitats where it occurs. Research and monitoring are also needed to understand its ecology and population trends.

,Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 191489906,188456986,Cheilosia candida,Data Deficient,,2021,2021-02-02 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"This species is listed as Data Deficient both in Europe and the EU27, to which it is endemic, on the basis that it is known from a single specimen and nothing is known of any threats. Extensive research is needed of the distribution, population, habitat and ecology and the potential threats.","This species was collected in May in relict montane conifer forest of Pinus heidreichii/P. nigra pallasiana (Radenković et al. 2020). There is no information on flower visits. The larvae are undescribed, but are presumably phytophagous.",Nothing is known about any of the threats to this species.,This species was described based on one male specimen and so there is no information regarding its population trend.,Unknown,"This species is only known from its type locality, the Pindos mountains in northern mainland Greece (Radenković et al. 2020). This species is currently considered to be a an EU 27 endemic but this requires further investigation. The extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) cannot currently be accurately calculated at this time due to lack of data.",This species is not traded and not commercially utilized.,Terrestrial,"There are no known conservation actions for this species. Extensive research is needed of the distribution, population, habitat and ecology and the potential threats.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 193562621,149172664,Brachyopa zhelochovtsevi,Data Deficient,,2021,2020-10-16 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
EU 27 regional assessment: Data Deficient (DD)
In Europe, this species is only known from Finland, where it was recorded twice with a very long interval (1911 and 2008). It is not known from adjacent European Russia. It could be this species has been introduced as larvae from Siberia into Finland with logs. Another possibility is that the localities are part of relict habitats in which this species still survives. There is not enough information available in Europe, and there are only a very few records here. Therefore, this species is assessed as Data Deficient in Europe and in the EU27 Member States.","This species is found in old-growth mixed deciduous and coniferous forests with over-mature and dead trees, especially Abies, Betula, and Populus tremula (van Steenis et al. 2020).","Boreal forests are threatened due to forestry, agricultural expansion and also due to climate change. The net effect will most likely be a decline in the area of occupancy (AOO), extent of occurrence (EOO) and quality of the habitat (van Steenis et al. 2020).","In Europe, only three individuals have been found at two localities (in Finland). In the locality with one record, it has not been seen for many years and is possibly extinct here. In Siberia, it is found in very low numbers together with other Brachyopa species (van Steenis et al. 2020). The population trend is unknown.",Unknown,"Within the European region, this species is known from just two localities in Finland, and it is possibly extinct in the northernmost locality.
Out of the European region, it is known from eastwards from Siberia to the Russian Far East, but it is not known from adjacent European Russia (van Steenis et al. 2020). The extent of occurrence (EOO) is 1000 km2 and the area of occupancy (AOO) is 4 km2.",The species is not traded or used.,Terrestrial,"No conservation actions are in place. More research and monitoring is needed to establish the habitat preferences of the species and the trends of the habitats, which will help establish necessary conservation actions. Research and monitoring are also required to understand better the population trends. Raising awareness about this rare species is also important.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 194174834,194174678,Paragus thracusi,Critically Endangered,B2ab(iii),2021,2021-03-09 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"

This is an European endemic species, found only in Greece, where it is known from a single specimen collected in 2000. The species is known to inhabit open ground and dry grasslands with scrub near the wetland. It is assessed as Critically Endangered (CR B2ab(iii)) since it has a very restricted geographic range, with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 4 km2, it exists in only one location as it is only known to one locality with a range of potential threats, and it is inferred to be experiencing a continuing decline in the extent and quality of its habitat due to agricultural and urban expansion and pollution.

Research is recommended on the population size, distribution, trends, life history and ecology, as well as the monitoring of population trends. Protection legislation at a national level is required to conserve this species as well.

","This species is known to inhabit open ground, dry grasslands with scrub, near wetland. Its flight period is from April to May. It is known to visit flowers of Spurges (Euphorbia) (Vujić et al. 2020). The developmental stages are unknown, but the larvae are most likely to be predators, probably on soft-bodied Homoptera insects.","

Agricultural and urban expansion (Gerakis 1992, datazone.birdlife.org) have caused noticeable decline in the quality of the habitat of this species. The only known site for this species is threatened by water pollution from intensive agricultural, industrial and domestic sources.

","

There is no information about the population size of this species and the population trend is unknown. So far this species has only been found once (in May 2000) - a male was collected by W. van Steenis and E.S. Bakker in Porto Lagos, on a road verge with ruderal vegetation (W. van Steenis pers. comm. 2021). Further surveys are required to understand the population trends of this species.",Unknown,This species European endemic species is only known from a single male specimen collected from Porto Lagos in northeastern Greece in 2000 but not described until 2020 (Radenković et al. 2020). It is considered to occur in one locality with an area of occupancy (AOO) of 4 km2.,The species is not utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"There are no currently known conservation actions for this species. However, the locality in which this species is known to exist is protected nationally and internationally as it occurs within Nestos Delta National Park, which is also a Natura 2000 Site (European Environment Agency 2020). Porto Lagos is also included in the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (Birdlife International 1997). However, the protection in these sites is relatively weak and needs improvements to conserve this species effectively. Research is recommended to understand the population size, distribution, life history and ecology, as well as the monitoring of population trends. Legislation is needed at a national level to conserve this species.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,"Global, Europe & Mediterranean" 212646842,149170656,Sphiximorpha subsessilis,Least Concern,,2021,2020-02-06 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"European regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)
EU27 regional assessment: Least Concern (LC)

This saproxylic species is found in a variety of forests but has a particular reliance on veteran trees which are in decline. Overall it is considered stable, but there have been some declines within its range, particularly in northern Europe, with the species considered extinct in some countries including Belgium, Finland and possibly Sweden. However, the majority of its population is found in south-western Europe, where it is considered stable. Overall, the European and EU27 extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are both large enough to be above the thresholds for any threatened category, and therefore this species is assessed as Least Concern for Europe and EU27. It would benefit from increased research and monitoring.","

This is a species with a saproxylic larva that develops in sap runs and under-bark cavities on the trunks of old deciduous trees (eg. Populus, Alnus, Salix) and veteran Evergreen Oak (Quercus suber) trees. The larvae were first studied by Rotheray et al. (2006) from larvae collected from exuding sap at the base of an Abies alba tree. Adults are found from April to June in alluvial soft- and hardwood forests with Populus nigra, riverine gallery forest with Alnus and Salix, Mediterranean Fraxinus angustifolia and Quercus faginea forest, Mediterranean wet Liquidamber orientalis forest and Quercus suber, Quercus pubescens and Pinus nigra forest. They can also be found in urban parks and avenues that have old trees present, such as Populus and Aesculus hippocastanum. This information has been summarised from van Steenis et al. (2016) and Speight (2020).

","This species is potentially at risk from the negative effects of deforestation and the loss of veteran trees, and also from forest fires. The decline of the habitat due to variation in temperature range and hydrological patterns caused by climate change could be a feasible threat too.","The population of this species is considered stable in Europe and the EU27. However, the sustainability of many subpopulations are of concern as its habitat is threatened and at risk of not restoring quickly enough to replenish that which is being lost. Additionally, the subpopulations are often small and in areas that are unprotected. It is found in many localities in France, while in Spain it has been found in just a few localities spread out throughout the country. It is considered quite stable in the Mediterranean region and is particularly abundant in old cork groves. It is almost certainly under-recorded and it is therefore perceived as more scarce than it actually is.",Stable,"

This species is known to occur from the Netherlands south to Spain, the Czech Republic through central Europe to Romania and European parts of Russia, and through southern Europe from the Pyrenees to the Balkans and on into European Russia (Speight 2020, Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017). The European and EU27 extent of occurrence (EOO) and area of occupancy (AOO) values are both large enough to be above the thresholds for any threatened category. Specific locality data for this species is not available for some countries (for example: Belarus and Poland) and so it is not possible at this time to calculate a precise AOO for this species.

The species has been included in the following country checklists: Austria (Heimburg 2018), Belarus (Borodin and Borodina 2014), Belgium (RBINS 2020), Czech Republic (Mazánek 2009), France (Speight et al. 2018), Germany (Doczkal et al. 2001), Greece (Vujić et al. 2020), Hungary (Tóth 2001), Italy (Burgio et al. 2015), Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009), Poland (Mielczarek 2009), Romania (Stănescu and Părvu 2005), Russia (Barkalov and Mutin 2018), Serbia (Vujić et al. 2018), Slovakia (Mazánek 2009), Slovenia (van Steenis et al. 2013) Spain (Ricarte and Marcos-García 2017), Sweden (Bartsch 2009), Switzerland (CSCF 2020), Turkey (Tóth 2013) and Ukraine (Popov 2010). The species is considered Regionally Extinct in Finland (Hyvärinen et al 2019, Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus 2020), with records shown in FinBIF (Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus 2020) either old (dating from the 1930's) or considered misidentifications (G. Ståhls pers. comm. 2022).

 Outside Europe it occurs in the Caucasus.

",This species is not known to be utilised or traded.,Terrestrial,"The species has been categorised as Endangered in the Czech Republic (Farkač et al. 2005) and in Sweden (Artdatabanken 2020), and as Vulnerable in Germany (Ssymank et al. 2011). It is considered 'rare' in the Netherlands (Reemer et al. 2009). The species is considered Regionally Extinct in Finland (Hyvärinen et al 2019, Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus 2020).

Conservation actions for this species should be focused on the preservation of the forest where this species lives. Research is needed to understand the population, distribution and ecology of this species better. It would also benefit from continued and increased monitoring.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Europe 213756106,124924053,Xanthandrus azorensis,Near Threatened,B1b(iii)+2b(iii),2022,2018-03-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Xanthandrus azorensis is an endemic species of the Azores (Portugal), being present in historical and recent records from Faial, Pico, S. Jorge, and S. Miguel islands. It is apparently widespread through natural and man-made/disturbed habitats. This species has an extent of occurrence of 5,765 km2, although its potential area of occupancy is small (132 km2). It is possible that this species has declined in the past as a result of human activity, even if apparently adapted to artificial habitats and also associated with introduced vegetation. The present situation of this species needs to be assessed and further research is needed into its population, distribution, threats, ecology and life history. Conservation of native habitats could potentially aid this species conservation. Overall, precautionarily, this species is assessed as Near Threatened.","Although the larvae of this species are not described (Speight 2018), Xanthandrus azorensis presumably has aphidophagous larvae, like other congeneric species. It has been found visiting flowers of exotic plants (e.g. Hydrangea macrophylla) and endemic plants (e.g. Euphorbia stygiana) (Frey 1945). This species has been collected in several different habitats, including swampy meadows and deciduous forests, and also disturbed or urbanised areas. According to Rojo et al. (1997), its preferred environment is peaty wetland. The species has been found flying from June to September (Rojo et al. 1997).","The lack of information regarding the present distribution and ecology of this species, precludes a complete assessment of potential threats. Nevertheless, from the ecology of the Syrphidae family and known habitat preferences, this species has probably declined in the past due to changes in habitat size and quality, mostly due to human action. On the other hand it seems adapted to some disturbed habitats and is associated with both endemic and introduced flowering plant species; although pesticides and herbicides will most likely have an impact on this species. Based on Ferreira et al. (2016) the habitat will likely further decline as a consequence of climate change (increasing number of droughts and habitat shifting and alteration).","No current population size estimates exist for this species. Nevertheless, this species is relatively widespread through part of the Azores archipelago, in a wide variety of habitats, which might be assumed as an indicator of a stable population.",Stable,"Xanthandrus azorensis is a hoverfly species from the islands of Faial, Pico, S. Jorge and S. Miguel (Azores, Portugal) (Frey 1945), known from several distinct habitats, some degraded. Based on the old historical data and more recent records, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is ca. 5,765 km2 and the estimated area of occupancy (AOO) is ca. 132 km2.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"Historically, this species was present in areas that are currently included in the Natural Parks of Faial, Pico and S. Miguel, disturbed or otherwise. The species is not protected by regional law. It has been collected in some native vegetation areas, but also in degraded areas. From what is known of its habitat preferences, conservation of native wet or dry grasslands and other natural habitats could potentially aid this species conservation. Degraded habitats could also be restored. Additionally, a strategy needs to be developed to address the future threat by climate change. Further research is also needed into this species population, distribution, threats, ecology and life history.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe 213756777,124922581,Sphaerophoria nigra,Near Threatened,B1b(iii)+2b(iii),2022,2018-03-29 00:00:00 UTC,3.1,English,"Sphaerophora nigra is an endemic species from the Azores (Portugal), with historical and recent records in Flores, Faial, Pico, S. Jorge, Terceira and S. Miguel islands. It is apparently widespread through natural and man-made/disturbed habitats, and occurs in areas that are currently Nature Reserves. This species has an extent of occurrence  of 22,957 km2, although the area of occupancy is small (152 km2). It is possible that this species has declined in the past as a result of human activity, even if apparently adapted to artificial habitats and also associated with introduced vegetation. The present situation of this species needs to be assessed and further research is needed into its population, distribution, threats, ecology and life history; and conservation of native habitats could potentially aid this species conservation. Overall, precautionarily, this species is assessed as Near Threatened.","The ecology and traits of this species are unknown. Larvae are presumably aphidophagous and, according to the wide habitat spectrum and altitudinal range on the Azores, no specialisation is expected on one or only a few aphid species. Most adults are very active fliers and often visit flowers, feeding on nectar and pollen (McAlpine 1987), and are also important pollinators. Other species of the genus Sphaerophora are usually associated with grasslands, woodlands or marshes. Several specimens of this species were collected in shady forest areas, or in association with flowers of Euphorbia stygiana and Hydrangea macrophylla. It was also reported from higher altitude areas in Pico Mountain (Pico).","A lack of information regarding the present distribution and ecology of this species, precludes a complete assessment of potential threats. Nevertheless, from the ecology of the Syrphidae family and known habitat preferences, it is likely that this species has probably declined in the past due to changes in habitat size and quality, mostly due to human action. On the other hand it seems adapted to some disturbed habitats and is associated with both endemic and introduced flowering plant species; although pesticides and herbicides will most likely have an impact on this species. Based on Ferreira et al. (2016) the habitat will likely further decline as a consequence of climate change (increasing number of droughts and habitat shifting and alteration).","No current population size estimates exist for this species. Nevertheless, this species is relatively widespread through the archipelago, in a wide variety of habitats, which might be assumed as an indicator of a stable population. However, some fluctuations can be assumed in aphidophagous species with a wide range of suitable habitats.",Stable,"Sphaerophora nigra is a hoverfly species, described from the islands of Flores, Faial, Pico, S. Jorge, Terceira and S. Miguel (Azores, Portugal) (Frey 1945, Borges et al. 2010). It is known from several distinct habitats, some degraded, but also from areas that are Nature Reserves (Caldeira do Faial - Faial and Pico da Vara - S. Miguel). Based on the old historical data and more recent records, the extent of occurrence (EOO) is ca. 22,957 km2 and the estimated area of occupancy (AOO) is ca. 152 km2.",The species is not utilised.,Terrestrial,"Historically at least, this species was present in areas that are currently included in the Natural Parks of Flores, Faial, Terceira and S. Miguel, disturbed or otherwise.; but the species is not protected by regional law. A habitat management plan is needed and one is anticipated to be developed during the coming years. Further research is also needed into this species population, distribution, threats, ecology and life history, and degraded habitats could also be restored. Additionally, a strategy needs to be developed to address the future threat by climate change.",Palearctic,,FALSE,FALSE,Global & Europe