[Syrphidae] Re: Chrysotoxum volaticum

André van Eck eckvana at xs4all.nl
Sun Jan 26 16:55:31 GMT 2020


Dear Jeroen,  

I'd be happy to share it with you. 
Can you send us the (re-)description and/or the distinguishing
characters of _volaticum_ vs _bicinctum_? 

cheers, André

Jeroen van Steenis schreef op 25-01-2020 19:18:

> Dear Andre and Sander 
> 
> Chrysotoxum volaticum is clearly different from C. bicinctum and I have specimens from Spain and France.  
> 
> I am preparing a paper on this so any additional material would be welcome. 
> 
> Best wishes, 
> 
> Jeroen 
> 
> Op za 25 jan. 2020 om 14:51 schreef André van Eck <eckvana at xs4all.nl>: 
> 
> Hi Sander,  
> 
> I have a female specimen which I suppose it is _volaticum_, from Portugal, collected in Portugal. However, since it does not appear in any existing key after Séguys description, and because I have not seen specimens to compare it with, I am keeping this ID as 'preliminary'. Apparently it is not known from Europe yet, and therefor lacks in European keys. Even Violovitch does not include it in his review of Palaearctic _Chrysotoxum_.  
> 
> So I am curious just as you for any clarification on its current status!
> Perhaps António Ricarte can help us out? 
> 
> cheers, André
> 
> Sander Bot schreef op 25-01-2020 11:05: 
> Hi everybody,
> 
> Does anybody have an idea of the status of Chrysotoxum volaticum Séguy, 1961?
> It is a valid species as far as I can see. Its original description is very brief, it looks very similar to Chrysotoxum bicinctum. 
> However, the species does not occur at all in Syrph the Net 2018. Does anybody know the reason for this? Because its status is dubious?
> 
> Many thanks for any help,
> 
> Sander Bot 
> 
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
> attachment. 
> 
> Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
> necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored 
> where permitted by law.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Syrphidae mailing list
> Syrphidae at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/syrphidae 
> 
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and
> attachment. 
> 
> Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not
> necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored 
> where permitted by law.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Syrphidae mailing list
> Syrphidae at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/syrphidae
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/pipermail/syrphidae/attachments/20200126/28f64def/attachment.html>


More information about the Syrphidae mailing list