From botsander at gmail.com Tue May 1 09:05:55 2018 From: botsander at gmail.com (Sander Bot) Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 10:05:55 +0200 Subject: [Syrphidae] correct name of Chrysogaster c(o)emiteriorum Message-ID: Dear all, Does anybody know why Chrysogaster c(o)emiteriorum can be found under two names? It is Chrysogaster cemiteriorum in eg - Stubbs & Falk British Hoverflies - Reemer et al. Dutch Atlas It is Chrysogaster coemiteriorum in - Syrph the Net 2016 - van Veen 2004 What is the correct name of the two? With kind regards, Sander Bot -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From w.v.steenis at casema.nl Tue May 1 10:51:16 2018 From: w.v.steenis at casema.nl (w.v.steenis at casema.nl) Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 11:51:16 +0200 Subject: [Syrphidae] Re: correct name of Chrysogaster c(o)emiteriorum In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <004701d3e131$f2bb88e0$d8329aa0$@casema.nl> Dear all, I sent Sander a copy of Thompson et al 1982, Linnaean species of flower flies. There is clearly stated why the valid name is cemiteriorum. Best wishes Wouter Van: syrphidae-bounces at lists.nottingham.ac.uk Namens Sander Bot Verzonden: dinsdag 1 mei 2018 10:06 Aan: syrphidae at lists.nottingham.ac.uk Onderwerp: [Syrphidae] correct name of Chrysogaster c(o)emiteriorum Dear all, Does anybody know why Chrysogaster c(o)emiteriorum can be found under two names? It is Chrysogaster cemiteriorum in eg - Stubbs & Falk British Hoverflies - Reemer et al. Dutch Atlas It is Chrysogaster coemiteriorum in - Syrph the Net 2016 - van Veen 2004 What is the correct name of the two? With kind regards, Sander Bot This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored where permitted by law. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From botsander at gmail.com Sun May 20 13:45:23 2018 From: botsander at gmail.com (Sander Bot) Date: Sun, 20 May 2018 14:45:23 +0200 Subject: [Syrphidae] correct names Message-ID: Dear all, For an upcoming publication I am interested in the correct names of the following species: Lejops vittata or Lejops vittatus? Sericomyia bombiforme or Sericomyia bombiformis? Sericomyia mussitans or Sericomyia superbiens? Thanks in advance for any help, Sander Bot -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From xmengual at gmail.com Tue May 22 09:10:18 2018 From: xmengual at gmail.com (ximo mengual sanchis) Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 10:10:18 +0200 Subject: [Syrphidae] Re: correct names In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Sander, 1- I would say Lejops vittatus, It was described as Mallota, but Lejops is masculine. 2- Sericomyia bombiformis was described as Syrphus bombiformis. Sericomyia is femenine, and formis has two terminations, -is, -is, -e. Thus, it would be Sericomyia bombiforme to match the genus gender. Regarding the change of the species epithet to match the genus gender, the ICZN says that genus and species epithet must agree in gender (article 34: http://www.iczn.org/iczn/index.jsp), except is it is a name in apposition (article 31.2). Usually the old works do not mention 'name in apposition', but the code recommends to treat the species name like this in case of doubt (article 31.2.2). Thus, following the code, it could be possible to use Sericomyia bombiformis. 3- Volucella superbiens Muller, 1776 was published before than Syrphus mussitans Fabricius, 1777. Thus, you should us Sericomyia superbiens. Cheers, Ximo ******************************************************** Dr. Ximo Mengual Head of the Diptera Section Stiftung Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig Leibniz-Institut f?r Biodiversit?t der Tiere Adenauerallee 160 D-53113 Bonn, Germany Phone: 0049 (0)228 9122 292 ZFMK web https://www.bolgermany.de/ | http://syrphidae.lifedesks.org/ 2018-05-20 14:45 GMT+02:00 Sander Bot : > Dear all, > > For an upcoming publication I am interested in the correct names of the > following species: > > Lejops vittata or Lejops vittatus? > Sericomyia bombiforme or Sericomyia bombiformis? > Sericomyia mussitans or Sericomyia superbiens? > > Thanks in advance for any help, > > Sander Bot > > > This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee > and may contain confidential information. If you have received this > message in error, please contact the sender and delete the email and > attachment. > > Any views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not > necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham. Email > communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored > where permitted by law. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Syrphidae mailing list > Syrphidae at lists.nottingham.ac.uk > http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/syrphidae > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Francis.Gilbert at nottingham.ac.uk Thu May 24 09:00:57 2018 From: Francis.Gilbert at nottingham.ac.uk (Francis Gilbert) Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 08:00:57 +0000 Subject: [Syrphidae] FW: paper request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: From: Jeroen van Steenis [mailto:jvansteenis at syrphidaeintrees.com] Sent: 24 May 2018 08:42 To: Hoverfly discussion list Subject: paper request Dear all I am looking for a PDF of the following publication. Santos Abreu, E. 1924. Monografia de los Syrphidos de las Islas Canarias. Mems R. Acad. Cienc. Artes , Barcelona. (3) 19(1): 1-148. Best wishes, Jeroen van Steenis -- Research Associate: Naturalis Biodiversity Center Leiden. Hof der Toekomst 48 3823 HX Amersfoort The Netherlands jvansteenis at syrphidaeintrees.com jvansteenis1 at gmail.com http://www.syrphidaeintrees.com/ https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jeroen_Van_Steenis -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: