[Syrphidae] Re: Orthonevra

[Stefan Pruner]

Dear Babak!

I hope you get the paper soon or at least find a faster way to translate it!
Thanks for the scan. That was very kind of you. it answered my  
question, that came to my mind again, after reading your request on  
that genus.

Best wishes!

Stefan

Zitat von Babak Gharali <bgharaei at mail.com>:

> Dear Stefan
> Hi
> To me at the present time, the name isn't as important as the paper itself.
> I should identify many specimens and need the english version . Ximo  
> kindly helped me and sent Russian version. If I don?t find this  
> version I have to work on its translation that last some months.
> I think the catalogue of syrphidae may give the answer. As  
> attachment you find that papge.
> cheers
> Babak
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: syrphidae-request at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> Sent: 12/09/13 03:30 PM
> To: syrphidae at lists.nottingham.ac.uk
> Subject: Syrphidae Digest, Vol 88, Issue 3
>
> Send Syrphidae mailing list submissions to  
> syrphidae at lists.nottingham.ac.uk To subscribe or unsubscribe via the  
> World Wide Web, visit  
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/syrphidae or, via  
> email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to  
> syrphidae-request at lists.nottingham.ac.uk You can reach the person  
> managing the list at syrphidae-owner at lists.nottingham.ac.uk When  
> replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than  
> "Re: Contents of Syrphidae digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Orthonevra  
> (Stefan Pruner)  
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------  
> Message: 1 Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 10:00:23 +0100 From: Stefan Pruner  
> <Stefan.Pruner at student.uibk.ac.at> To: Hoverfly discussion list  
> <syrphidae at lists.nottingham.ac.uk>, ximo mengual sanchis  
> <xmengual at gmail.com> Subject: [Syrphidae] Orthonevra Message-ID:  
> <20131209100023.30593x5qw2berzk0 at web-mail.uibk.ac.at> Content-Type:  
> text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed"!
>   Dear All! I've been wondering several times why (and maybe when)  
> the name Orthoneura changed to Orthonevra. Was there a typing error  
> in an earlier description? One would think "Orthoneura" sounds  
> correct, wouldn't he? Maybe one of you knows the answer to this  
> puzzling question. Best regards Stefan  
> ------------------------------  
> _______________________________________________ Syrphidae mailing  
> list Syrphidae at lists.nottingham.ac.uk  
> http://lists.nottingham.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/syrphidae End of  
> Syrphidae Digest, Vol 88, Issue 3  
> **************************************** This message and any  
> attachment are intended solely for the addressee and may contain  
> confidential information. If you have received this message in  
> error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it. Please  
> do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this  
> message or in any attachment. Any views or opinions expressed by the  
> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the !
>  University of Nottingham. This message has been checked for viruses bu
> t the contents of an attachment may still contain software viruses  
> which could damage your computer system, you are advised to perform  
> your own checks. Email communications with the University of  
> Nottingham may be monitored as permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>
> Babak Gharali (Assistant Professor)
> Department of Entomology (Head)
> Research Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources
> Shahid Beheshti Blvd. No. 118,
> Ghazvin, Iran
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the  
> addressee and may contain confidential information. If you have  
> received this message in error, please send it back to me, and  
> immediately delete it.   Please do not use, copy or disclose the  
> information contained in this message or in any attachment.  Any  
> views or opinions expressed by the author of this email do not  
> necessarily reflect the views of the University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an attachment
> may still contain software viruses which could damage your computer  
> system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email  
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as  
> permitted by UK legislation.
>
>
>
>
>